Spring Sale: Get 1 Year, Save 58%

“Seismic impact”: Legal experts says new fake elector revelations “should worry” Trump

A Nevada grand jury on Wednesday indicted six Republicans who acted as so-called “fake electors” for former President Donald Trump following his 2020 election loss in the state, according to the Associated Press.

The six fake electors were charged with offering a false instrument for filing and uttering a forged document, which can carry between one and five years in prison, according to the report.

“We cannot allow attacks on democracy to go unchallenged,” Nevada’s Democratic Attorney General Aaron Ford said in a statement Wednesday. “Today’s indictments are the product of a long and thorough investigation, and as we pursue this prosecution, I am confident that our judicial system will see justice done.”

The six Republicans, including Nevada GOP Chairman Michael McDonald, signed certificates falsely stating that Trump won the state and submitted them to Congress and the National Archives.

Ford “played it quiet and close the vest, and now this has a seismic impact,” tweeted former U.S. Attorney Harry Litman.

Georgia State Law Prof. Anthony Michael Kreis called the indictment a “big deal.”

“Nevada was one of the states where— for a long time— it was unclear any action would be taken against the GOP slate of electors,” he wrote. “It all but guarantees that the powers at be in Arizona will pursue similar charges against the GOP electors there.”

CNN correspondent Jamie Gangel argued on Wednesday that the indictments “should worry” Trump.

"Even though he is not named in this case the way he was in Georgia, additional charges conceivably could be brought,” she said. "But I think there's another reason for him to worry: Kenneth Chesebro is a critical witness and he's been going state to state giving evidence," she added.

The Nevada case “ramped up” after prosecutors secured the cooperation of Chesebro, one of the alleged architects of the fake-elector scheme, according to CNN.

We need your help to stay independent

Chesebro also advised fake electors in Wisconsin, who on Wednesday agreed to settle a civil lawsuit and admit President Joe Biden’s victory, according to the AP.  They also agreed to withdraw their filings and not serve as presidential electors in any election where Trump is on the ballot.

The 10 fake electors also agreed to send a statement to government offices that received their certifications as “part of an attempt to improperly overturn the 2020 presidential election results.”

Former Wisconsin GOP Chairman Andrew Hitt said that he has been working with the Justice Department since May of 2022 and would not be supporting Trump in 2024.


Want a daily wrap-up of all the news and commentary Salon has to offer? Subscribe to our morning newsletter, Crash Course.


 “The Wisconsin electors were tricked and misled into participating in what became the alternate elector scheme and would have never taken any actions had we known that there were ulterior reasons beyond preserving an ongoing legal strategy,” he said.

“This appears to be Jack Smith's theory of the case and is what gets Trump-Chesebro-Giuliani in deep legal trouble,” tweeted New York University Law Prof. Ryan Goodman. “They fraudulently misled many of the false electors.”

Landmark study suggests mice can pass the mirror test, a standard for measuring self-awareness

A study in the journal Neuron revealed something surprising about mouse intelligence — specifically, that they can recognize their own reflections. That may seem insignificant, but sociologists starting with Charles H. Cooley in 1912 argue that animals which pass the so-called "mirror test" possess an advanced sense of self-awareness, which has intriguing implications for the evolution of our own intelligence. Only a handful of animals other than humans are known to be able to pass the mirror test: Primates like chimpanzees, bonobos, gorillas and orangutans, as well as bottlenose dolphins, Asian elephants, European magpies and cleaner wrasses. Now it seems mice belong on that list.

Scientists learned this by putting white ink on the foreheads of dark-furred mice, then placing them before a mirror. The mice who saw the ink splotches groomed themselves to remove it. Significantly, mice did not groom themselves when they couldn't see the ink because it was either smaller or in a color that blended with their fur. The researchers did more than experiment with ink and mirrors. They also monitored the rodents' brains to learn which parts activated as the mice literally saw themselves.

"Visual self-image may be developed through social experience and mirror habituation and stored in a subset of vCA1 neurons in mice," the authors write. They add mice may even have a "Gestalt of visual self-image," meaning they could have individualistic personalities.

Why voters aren’t more worried about Trump’s return: It sure doesn’t look like he’s running

For those understandably worried about the United States sliding towards a fascist dictatorship under Donald Trump, the current debate about the polls is an all-consuming obsession. There's Team Freak Out, who point to polls showing Trump is pulling ahead of President Joe Biden in the 2024 presidential election and start panicking and demanding that Democrats reverse course somehow. Then there's Team Chill Out, with members such as Jennifer Rubin at the Washington Post, who argue to ignore "meaningless, premature polling" when "we are a year away from the race," long before most people are paying much attention. 

These two teams are in constant argument with each other on social media, but in truth, both sides have a point.

For those folks who are mostly checked out and satisfy themselves with occasionally looking up at the TV news while getting dressed in the morning, the landscape of information is very different than that of those who are paying attention.  

Team Freak Out is right to worry that voter complacency could result in the nation sleepwalking into a Trump dictatorship. Team Chill Out, however, is right that most voters aren't paying much attention. They rarely hear Trump talk, so when they're re-exposed during the 2024 campaign, many will be reminded of the importance of keeping the fascist imbecile as far away from the White House as possible. 

Crucially, a huge number of voters, especially swing voters, simply don't believe that Trump is going to be the Republican nominee in 2024. This is a point that never-Trump pollster Sarah Longwell has hit upon repeatedly in her focus group testing of undecided voters of all ages. She and Amy Walter of the Cook Report discussed this aspect of the race on a recent podcast


Want more Amanda Marcotte on politics? Subscribe to her newsletter Standing Room Only.


"A lot of them have not grokked yet that Joe Biden and Donald Trump are likely to be the nominees," Sarah Longwell explained of her in-depth interviews with swing voters. 

"They really believe something can change," Walter agreed. "A number of them are like, 'Well, if Biden is the nominee, if Trump wins."

When pollsters call potential voters, in other words, they are often reaching people who don't take the "Trump or Biden?" question seriously. Some view it as akin to asking them whether they'd rather have dinner with John Lennon or Joseph Stalin. Once the matter shifts out of the realm of hypothetical to real, we may very well see the polls change to reflect this dawning realization that this is really happening. 

For hardcore political observers, this feels preposterous. In the Democratic primary, Biden is functionally running unopposed, faced only with a couple of fake candidates who seem more interested in attention-seeking and profit than in mounting a real bid for the presidency. In the Republican primary, there are technically candidates mounting well-funded challenges that appear to be serious efforts to win. But, unless Trump dies, their odds are infinitesimally tiny. The FiveThirtyEight poll aggregator shows Trump with nearly 60% of likely primary voters, which puts him 47 points ahead of his nearest contender, Gov. Ron DeSantis of Florida. 

So why on Earth are so many voters not getting this? The reason is what political scientist Brian Klaas deems the "Ignorance Bias," which is where "political elites assume most other people think about politics often and have a basic working knowledge of it that is rooted in facts and reality." This, as he points out, is a false assumption, as most people barely pay attention to politics. For example, more than half of Americans cannot name a single Supreme Court justice. 

Most people's understanding of the news is cursory and impressionistic, cobbled together by half-read headlines, glanced-at images on the news, and vaguely sourced assertions on social media. For those folks who are mostly checked out and satisfy themselves with occasionally looking up at the TV news while getting dressed in the morning, the landscape of information is very different than that of those who are paying attention. For one thing, the blissfully ignorant probably think former South Carolina Gov. Nikki Haley is winning the Republican primary. 

Once the matter shifts out of the realm of hypothetical to real, we may very well see the polls change to reflect this dawning realization that this is really happening. 

Just flip on cable news today and watch it on mute. Odds are you'll see lots of images of last night's Republican debate, with lots of chyrons hyping Haley for her allegedly sober-minded performance. Or, if you glance across political headlines, you'll see photos of the four debaters, which include former New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie and businessman Vivek Ramaswamy along with Haley and DeSantis. If you bother to listen or read a little, which is more than most people do, you'll see the surge in stories highlighting how big money interests are backing Haley. Most people believe money controls politics, even more than it actually does, so this may sound like she's got it in the bag. 

We need your help to stay independent

 

The face that's not really as visible? Trump's. People may know he's been charged with crimes, even if they don't understand them, but let's face it: That's only likely to increase their skepticism that he'll actually be the nominee. If anything, most Americans tend to assume some mysterious "they" — such as billionaires or a shadowy "elite" — are the real people in charge, and would never let that happen. So it will come as a bit of a shock when "they" prove once again to be powerless to stop Trump from seizing the nomination. 

It's tempting to lay the blame entirely at the feet of ordinary voters for not paying attention. And yes, there's some blame here, because people really could siphon a half-hour out of their day away from watching reality TV garbage to be a little better informed about politics. But the truth is that politics is boring and hard for most people, and most people are under enough stress as it is, so of course they tune out more than they should. 

The media has done everyone a disservice by propping up the illusion that the presidential run of either Trump or Biden is in doubt. Along with the misleading hype of the GOP faux-primary, there's been relentless coverage — the kind that pierces the bubble of ignorance — about Biden's age and the possibility that he'll step aside for some yet-unnamed Johnny Unbeatable Democrat. Just this week, there's been a flurry of headlines and cable news hits about Biden's throwaway comment at a fundraiser that, "If Trump wasn’t running, I’m not sure I’d be running." This has created opportunities for reporters to do things like ask Biden, "Would you be running for President if Trump wasn’t running?"

Stuff like this, when run through a filter of inattention, ends up sending a message that the fate of the primaries is an open question. So no wonder ordinary people see this stuff in passing and think that the Biden v. Trump rematch isn't happening. The most frustrating aspect is this: The reporter who asked that dumb question is no doubt aware that primary voting starts for Democrats in less than two months. The notion that Biden is just going to drop out and clear the way for some random person who has no campaign staff, no funding, and no name recognition is a joke. But by asking it, she legitimizes the assumption that Biden is on the verge of calling it quits and, I dunno, Michelle Obama will run or something. 

The media plays this game because the fake drama and alleged uncertainty are good for ratings. It justifies focusing horse race coverage over that which garners even less audience attention, substantive discussion of policy. It's a little less clear why the Republican National Committee is so interested in propping up this charade, even as they must know it is a giant money pit that will not move the needle away from Trump at all. 

Well, there's no way to read their minds, but it is worth noting that the main person who is benefitting from all this hype about the GOP debates and primaries is Trump. The more the press is chattering about Haley and DeSantis and whatever fool thing Ramaswamy said on stage, they less they are talking about Trump. They aren't headlining how he has called more than half the country "vermin" who he plans to "root out." They aren't giving wall-to-wall coverage of how he has threatened to repeal Obamacare or that he is using his rallies to treat the January 6 insurrectionists like heroes and martyrs. Because that stuff is "old news" to the political media, it is shifted to the back pages and light cable news coverage, making it not news to the vast majority of people who are only paying a little attention. 

That's the bad news. The good news is this: Ignorance is a much less fixed position than, say, being a MAGA diehard.

People may not recognize now that Trump is going to be the nominee again, but that will change as soon as he actually becomes the nominee. Most people already dislike Trump. So they are going to be open to arguments about voting against him, especially once that possibility moves from the mental space of "hypothetical" to reality. Getting people to pay attention may be out of the reach of the mainstream media sources already being mostly ignored. But that creates an opportunity for social media, door-to-door canvassing, advertising, and other outreach efforts to meet people where they're at. This isn't a lost cause. And there are 12 months to help people fill that knowledge gap with real information. 

The roots of Trump’s megalomania: “Public humiliation” pushed him “into a delusional state of mind”

As the pressure on Donald Trump increases from his criminal and civil trials, he is now publicly proclaiming that he is the Chosen One, selected by “god” and “Jesus Christ” to be the next President of the United States (which if Trump and his agents get their way will mean that he is the country’s first dictator and ruler for life).

During a speech in Iowa last weekend, Trump told his MAGA cultists that, “But I think if you had a real election and Jesus came down and God came down and said, ‘I’m going to be the scorekeeper here,’ I think we’d win there [in California], I think we’d win in Illinois, and I think we’d win in New York.”

This is not the first time that Donald Trump has made claims on divine power. Repeatedly throughout the last seven years, Trump has said that he has secret and all-powerful knowledge, that his followers should trust him and not the facts and reality or anyone else, claims to know things that no one else possibly can, makes bold predictions about the future as though he is a mystic or a psychic, and in total believes that he is omnipotent and above the law and any other form of accountability.

Trump is becoming even more bold and direct in his threats and promises to be a Hitler-like dictator, the leader of an American Fourth Reich, who is the champion of a campaign of revenge and retribution against his and the MAGA movement’s “enemies." Trump’s claims to be god-like are terrifying on their own but made much worse by the rapidly deteriorating democracy crisis.

In an attempt to make sense of Trump’s megalomania and God complex and what it further reveals about his mind, behavior and overall dangerousness, and what may come next in America’s democracy crisis, I asked a range of experts (including the ex-president’s biographer) for their thoughts and suggestions.

Federico Finchelstein is a professor of history at the New School for Social Research and Eugene Lang College in New York. His most recent book is "A Brief History of Fascist Lies."

Leaders like Trump present a God complex that is both a performance but also a deep narcissistic belief. This is a classic element of a cult and a key ingredient of why and how Trumpism works among his followers. In this context, the profane and the sacred are conflated in the same way as the Nazis did. Like Hitler or Mussolini, Trump mixes the divine with the most mundane acts as well as with the biggest lies in their propaganda. God becomes a mere helper of the leader.

As I say in the most forthcoming book, “The Wannabe Fascists," this conflation of God and leader can lead to sacrificial ideas and even violence. In fascism, applying the language of sacred ritual to secular politics helped create a cult of leadership that motivated followers, leading them to persecute and even exterminate others in service of the leader. For Mussolini, the “sovereignty of the people” existed only if they delegated all power to the leader, who ruled by force, not consensus. Hitler took it even further. By claiming “I am acting in accordance with the will of the Almighty Creator: by defending myself against the Jew, I am fighting for the work of the Lord,” Hitler used religious faith in his leadership to provide a rationale for Nazism. Trump follows the same playbook.

As always with fascist propaganda the leader mixes things he believes in with outrageous lies he knows are untrue. What is important is that he is able to convince fanatic followers of the sacred mission he ascribes to himself as well as to them.

Michael D'Antonio is the author of the biography, "Never Enough: Donald Trump and the Pursuit of Success."

Raised in his father’s words to be “a killer” and “a king,” Trump sees his life’s ambition — power for the sake of power – within reach.  We no longer have the option of ignoring or discounting anything he says. And all of it from internment camps for migrants to using the military against enemies, will likely come to pass if he is elected in 2024.

Right now, the playbook is the same as it has always been. Raise the stakes with every new post or speech and accuse Biden of committing the outrages that belong to Trump himself. Hence his accusation that Biden is a threat to democracy.

We need your help to stay independent

It is hard to find the words to adequately describe the danger America faces. Trump is a man the founders could not have imagined rising to such heights. This is why our constitutional system is unlikely to contain him should he be elected again. As many of his trolling supporters say online, he will be a god-emperor in his own mind and usher in a long period of increasing authoritarianism and fear.

I am certain that in his life before politics, Trump never gave a thought to God and would have believed that people who were concerned about what the Almighty expected were wasting their time and perhaps pathetic. He was, nevertheless, aware of the power evangelicals wield in elections and therefore chose Mike Pence as a running mate.

After his election in 2016, Trump often found himself in the presence of Christian Right leaders who do believe he was anointed to lead and the more he heard it, the more he liked it. Trump may still be ambivalent about the spiritual argument but thrilled to hear that others believe he is God's choice. The fact that in the end the truth is unknowable suits him just fine because it leaves people free to advocate anything they choose. Trump doesn't need to reckon with his 2020 loss because he denies it even occurred. Also, by insisting that he was cheated by his opponents, Trump aligns himself with Christians who would say the 2020 vote count was hijacked by Satan's minions including Democrats, journalists, liberals and election officials. 

Trump's genius in dealing with the God question is seen in how he echoes those who believe he has been chosen but does not do it in religious terms. In this way, he affirms them without the risk of showing his religious ignorance.

Katherine Stewart is the author of “The Power Worshippers: Inside the Dangerous Rise of Religious Nationalism."

Let’s set aside analyzing Trump. When we think about the people who are still supporting and voting for him, given everything they know, we have to conclude that the majority of them essentially want authoritarianism or fascism. They want a strongman, and all of our arguments about how lawless and unprincipled he is just reinforce their desire to support him, because they basically want the kind of punitive, identitarian, and anti-establishment leadership that he represents.

Our top priority by far should be to motivate “our” voters. The issues that seem to drive them to the polls include (but are not limited to) reproductive rights, public education, voting rights, gun violence, health care, climate issues, and the preservation of democracy. They need to be reminded that presidential elections are not just about front-runners, they are also about judicial appointments. We need a big tent, and we need to hammer home what’s at stake: It’s now or never.

If not winning the 2020 election wasn't humiliating enough, the thought of losing to Joe Biden may have been so much of a public humiliation as to push Trump over into a delusional state of mind.

What we learned from the interim elections is that you can drive up Democratic participation pretty dramatically around certain issues. The abortion issue crushed it in Ohio even though that’s a red state. In Virginia, Democrats also overperformed, and abortion and public education played central roles there too. So looking ahead to the 2024 election, the biggest variable we can play with is base motivation.

The second lesson is that there’s little point in trying to convince much of Trump’s base that there’s a danger to democracy in electing him because they love the danger. Let’s look instead for that share of Trump voters that haven’t really grappled with reality and are supporting him in the frame of traditional Left-Right politics. Those folks have been convinced of two things: (a) Democrats are truly awful, and (b) for all the noise Trump makes, voting Republican is still a sensible choice.


Want a daily wrap-up of all the news and commentary Salon has to offer? Subscribe to our morning newsletter, Crash Course.


For the soft Trump supporters, the economy might be the best angle. Many of these people have had it drilled into their heads that Republicans are fiscal conservatives and good for the economy, while liberals are fiscal big spenders and bad for the economy. We need to point out to them that Democrats have, in fact, been better for the economy and the American workforce, while the Republican Party of today, with its dependence on super-wealthy donors, is grotesquely corrupt and incompetent.

So, while the primary aim should be to get out the base, we should also attempt to peel off the Trump voters who still understand the election as a traditional liberal versus conservative choice, or those who just view this as a referendum on who is older.

Dr. Mark Goulston is a prominent psychiatrist and former FBI hostage negotiation trainer.

Let’s start with a basic definition. According to Medical News Today:

Narcissistic rage is an intense and explosive emotional reaction observable in individuals with NPD (Narcissistic Personality Disorder). It is not a distinct symptom of NPD or a particular type of rage but may refer to those with NPD reacting to certain situations due to the condition.

Unlike ordinary anger, which arises from typical triggers, narcissistic rage may occur in response to perceived threats to the narcissist’s inflated self-image and grandiose sense of self. This overwhelming anger may present suddenly and aggressively, seemingly out of proportion to the triggering event.

Narcissistic rage stems from a deep-seated fear of exposure as inadequate or not living up to an ideal self-image that the individual projects.

What is relevant about the above is that the greater the sense of humiliation, the greater the rage. And if not winning the 2020 election wasn't humiliating enough, the thought of losing to Joe Biden may have been so much of a public humiliation as to push Trump over into a delusional state of mind. If that is so, it is not enough to just claim the election was stolen, but he may now be seeking to expunge it from the record and history books. Trump's latest rants are consistent with this.

What next?

Since he has now crossed over into invoking the names of Jesus and God, it may be that what will come next is Trump saying that he has been directed by Jesus and God to do what he is doing… or that he is doing this in their name.

What can be done to counter this?

Perhaps we could reach out to his base and ask them if they can remember anyone from their high school or college days who in the face of utter public humiliation went off the deep end with destructive behavior.

I can certainly remember a few.

Rick Wilson is a co-founder of The Lincoln Project, a former leading Republican strategist, and author of two books, "Everything Trump Touches Dies" and "Running Against the Devil: A Plot to Save America from Trump – and Democrats from Themselves."

Donald Trump is flat-out telling everyone what he will do in a second term. He is surrounding himself with yes men who promise to arrest members of the media, attack political opponents, and generally do whatever crazy idea comes into his mangled brain. MAGA wants total control of every lever of power and is actively undermining the democratic institutions to crush any ability to check his power if he wins. Trump has turned the GOP into a cult of personality that embraces violence and accepts conspiracy theories at face value. In the last few weeks, Trump has started to set the stage for violence and call the election into doubt – again. He is telling his followers to protect the vote, calling his trial a political persecution, and that the only way he can lose is if he is cheated. Trump will do everything he can to win — or burn the country down trying. This election is going to be a key moment for the nation and everyone needs to decide if they want Trump back in the Oval Office with more committed and more loyal staff, or President Biden – a believer in democracy who has managed two wars and built one of the best economies in history.   

Are psychedelics a treatment for long COVID? Researchers probing this mystery don’t have answers yet

It was March 2020 and Ash was the healthiest she’d been in 15 years. She had just started an exciting new job and COVID was still a nameless “novel coronavirus” mainly appearing on cruise ships. One evening, after getting home from the gym, Ash was suddenly struck with a wave of feverish delirium. She passed out and eventually came to a couple of hours later on the kitchen floor with her dog staring down at her.

The next two weeks were a blur, but eventually Ash started to feel better. About a month after the initial illness she had pretty much recovered. And then things started getting strange. She had this feeling her teeth were rotting. A painful pressure began building in her head.

“And it just took over my nerves,” Ash explained in a conversation with Salon. “About six weeks after COVID, I started losing the use of my hands.”

Everything from opening a ziploc bag to using scissors became profoundly difficult. Multiple GPs, dentists, clinical specialists and even a Chinese acupuncturist all had no idea what was going on. By the end of 2020 Ash had stopped working altogether. Alongside the neuropathic problems all the now common neurological long COVID issues had become entrenched: Brain fog, dissociation, extreme fatigue, memory troubles.

About six weeks after COVID, I started losing the use of my hands.”

Alienated by mainstream medicine’s denial of her condition, Ash became her own guinea pig for the next couple of years. With a deep knowledge of science and a pool of friends in the entheogenic community Ash tried anything and everything to overcome her debilitating symptoms. Steroids, low-dose naltrexone, melatonin, lecithin, goldenseal, sceletium and a whole world of anti-inflammatory botanical ferments like kefir. Some helped temporarily, some didn’t help at all. Ash kept a detailed treatment diary, tracking the effects of everything she consumed.

“People were just sending me random obscure stuff. And I'm like, yep, that doesn't work. That works. That doesn't work. Oh, that doesn't work for more than three days.”

Then in early 2023, Ash tried something completely different. Something she described as a game-changer for her condition: A powerful hallucinogenic plant called iboga that originates from Africa. It's active ingredient is known as ibogaine and it's being explored for addiction treatment. It's not clear yet if it will really help — but even more questions remain about its potential for alleviating long COVID.

The serotonin hypothesis

It has been estimated that at least 65 million people have, or have had, long COVID. The illness encompasses hundreds of different symptoms and researchers are still struggling to find a way to easily define it. Some of the more universal symptoms — fatigue, post-exertional malaise, brain fog or memory loss — resemble what has previously been seen in other post-viral chronic illnesses, such as influenza or Epstein-Barr. But the sheer scale and heterogeneity of long COVID has made it challenging to study.

A number of different, compelling hypotheses have emerged to try and describe the pathology underlying long COVID. Some have suggested the condition is caused by a persistent viral reservoir of SARS-CoV-2 viruses, the microbes that cause COVID, hiding out somewhere in the body. Others argue the acute illness triggers a chain reaction of immune dysregulation, which ultimately leads to persistent chronic symptoms. It’s also been proposed that SARS-CoV-2 could alter one’s gut microbiome in ways that cause broader systemic inflammation. And then there’s all the ways COVID can impair normal functions of the brainstem and vagus nerve.

In October a study was published in the journal Cell that turned the world of long COVID research upside down. The study, led by a team from Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, presented a kind of grand-unifying hypothesis attempting to tie together all prior ideas surrounding long COVID.


Want more health and science stories in your inbox? Subscribe to Salon's weekly newsletter Lab Notes.


The researchers first reviewed metabolite profiles from several previously published long COVID studies. A pattern quickly emerged. Those patients with long-term symptoms consistently showed lower levels of circulating serotonin. In fact, the pattern was so reliable the researchers could distinguish long COVID patients from fully recovered patients just by measuring plasma serotonin levels.

Subsequent animal tests revealed SARS-CoV-2 infections did indeed reduce circulating serotonin — so the researchers then wondered how this was happening. Because the vast majority of serotonin in our body is produced in the gastrointestinal tract, all attention turned to the gut.

Across a series of impressive animal and organoid experiments the researchers discovered SARS-CoV-2 infections induced a kind of inflammatory response that disrupted the gut’s ability to absorb the amino acid tryptophan. Without an effective source of tryptophan the GI tract is unable to effectively produce serotonin, and this is potentially how serotonin depletion could be a defining trait of long COVID.

The masterstroke in the new research was its exploration into how serotonin interacts with vagal nerve neurons.

The final piece of the puzzle was understanding how this viral-induced serotonin depletion could lead to the neurocognitive problems commonly seen in long COVID. After all, serotonin produced in the gut does not cross the blood-brain barrier. While circulating serotonin levels looked to be directly depleted by viral inflammation, levels of serotonin in the brain remained unaffected.

Here the researchers turned to the vagus nerve — a crucial communication superhighway that travels from the brainstem to the gut. It was discovered serotonin depletion in the gut dampened vagal nerve signalling to the brain, specifically the hippocampus. When vagal nerve activity was reduced, hippocampal neuron activity declined, and this led to cognitive impairments such as memory problems.

The masterstroke in the new research was its exploration into how serotonin interacts with vagal nerve neurons. Elaborate animal and cell tests revealed serotonin signalling via 5HT3 receptors on vagal nerve neurons was responsible for this whole chain reaction. And, perhaps most significantly, when 5HT3 receptors on the vagal nerve were artificially stimulated with a drug, animals suffering long COVID-like impairments showed notable cognitive improvements.

What psychedelic compound is known to stimulate 5HT3 receptors? Ibogaine.

No magic bullet

Ash was fastidious about maintaining a treatment diary. “Start low, go slow”, she’d say in reference to bringing any new compound into her larger regime. In the merry-go-round of self-experiments she looked to a homegrown iboga tincture. Maybe, in low doses, it could help give her the motivation to exercise, she thought.

“Some people are extremely responsive to iboga,” Ash said. “It has adverse effects when I take a drop of the homemade tincture without diluting it down.”

These minidoses of iboga did help Ash start exercising regularly again. They weren’t traditional microdoses but something closer to a psychedelic dose. The psychological boost from this motivational bounce sent positive ripples throughout the rest of his life, but the iboga was no panacea. The brain fog and sense of disconnectedness was still devastating. Ash would regularly spend hours just staring into space.

Some time passed and a colleague offered Ash a magic mushroom extract. It was an unpleasant-tasting homemade concoction but being the psychonaut scientist she is, Ash gave it a shot. She took a minidose of the extract. The result was a deep healing sleep and Ash was excited. She took another small dose the very next day but it frustratingly did nothing.

She called her colleague with the news about the inconsistent results. “No, no, no,” the colleague said. “You can only take this once or twice a week.”

"The gut microbial system, at the interface between the individual and the environment, is important for healthy homeostasis."

“So I eyeballed a dose twice a week,” Ash said. “And the mental clarity started to come back. And they kind of feed off each other. So if you've got enough physical energy to do something, then you can exercise, you can go outside, you can have a shower, wash your clothes, you can hang them up. And you can do that best if you've had a deep night's sleep, which I hadn't had for a long time.”

The magic mushroom extract helped Ash regain a substantial volume of mental clarity and connectedness. Like any chronic disease, improvements were gradual with frequent relapses. Two steps forward, one step back, as they say.

“[But there] was still a feeling of derealization, depersonalization,” Ash said. “Things aren't connected to each other, like being hungry and having food in the house are two completely separate issues. [And] it can take you an hour to connect.”

So Ash began experimenting with DMT. Just once or twice a month in a smokable blend commonly known as changa. Much like Ash’s prior psychedelic experiments, the DMT was imbibed in low doses.

“I wasn't out to discover the meaning of life. I just wanted to get far enough in that I could access reality on a step by step basis. You can't afford to be that far gone if you're not processing things properly. If you can't remember how to put a meal together, the last thing you want to be is crawling around the floor.”

The psilocybiome

“The gut microbial system, at the interface between the individual and the environment, is important for healthy homeostasis,” explained John Kelly, a psychiatrist and neuroscientist from Trinity College Dublin. “Gut microbes communicate with the brain via the gut-brain axis, including tryptophan-kynurenine, immune, hypothalamic pituitary adrenal axis, and vagus nerve pathways.”

Kelly has worked on several psychedelic therapy clinical trials, including last year’s landmark phase 2 human study exploring the effect of single psilocybin doses on treatment-resistant depression. However, one of his personal areas of interest looks to bring together two different nascent scientific fields — psychedelic medicine and the microbiome.

We need your help to stay independent

In late 2022 Kelly and colleagues published a curious paper that proposed a novel hypothesis. If the trillions of microbes in our gut are being found to play a role in everything from psychiatric disorders to autoimmune disease, then what effect do these biofeedback signals have on the therapeutic outcomes of psychedelic medicine? Here Kelly and colleagues coined the term “psilocybiome,” a combination of the words psilocybin and microbiome

“The term ‘psilocybiome’ is still somewhat conceptual at this point, but broadly refers to the interaction between psychedelics and the microbiota-gut-brain axis,” says Kelly. “In other words, the psilocybiome comprises the reciprocal host-microbiota-psychedelic interactions and serves as an example of systems interconnectivity.”

Almost all questions surrounding the effect of psychedelics on gut-brain communications remain unanswered. In fact, both worlds of psychedelic and microbiome science are filled with countless unknowns right now. So much so that most reasonable scientists are incredibly cautious when talking about these things.

“The term ‘psilocybiome’ is still somewhat conceptual at this point, but broadly refers to the interaction between psychedelics and the microbiota-gut-brain axis.”

“It is established that serotonergic psychedelics have immunomodulator and anti-inflammatory properties,” Kelly said. But the precise immune-signalling pathways and their relationship to the vagus nerve as related to potential therapeutic effects “have yet to be fully understood.”

Kelly says the serotonin hypothesis for long COVID is a commendable piece of translational research. It points to fascinating directions for future research into the effects of serotonergic psychedelics on the gut.

The traditional psychoactive brew ayahuasca, which contains the powerful psychedelic DMT, for example, is well known for its unpleasant physical effects. Nausea and vomiting are consistently reported to precede the brew’s hallucinogenic onset.

Scientists have suggested the purging associated with ayahuasca is the result of a flush of serotonin released by the gut. This serotonin release then stimulates the vagus nerve causing the acute vomiting that accompanies the experience.

Attila Szabo, from the University of Oslo, is perhaps one of the world’s top experts on the immune modulating effects of psychedelics. He says the recently published serotonin hypothesis for long COVID is “outstanding” and “exciting”, but he also warns against self-experimentation with psychedelics, even for post-acute sequelae of COVID-19, or PASC, another name for long COVID.

“I can see the beauty of a hypothesis on testing the potential therapeutic effects of e.g. microdosing classic psychedelics to tackle the pathophysiology of decreased systemic serotonin in PASC. However, we desperately need more human clinical studies, before any recommendations could be formulated here,” Szabo explained in an email to Salon.

According to Szabo, we have very little understanding of the systemic immune effects of psychedelics in humans. And in some cases psychedelics could hypothetically be harmful.

“This is something that everybody needs to understand: Until the first reliable human clinical data is getting published, self-experimenting with psychedelic substances to treat inflammation, autoimmune disorders, symptoms of PASC, etc. is clearly not advised. Since classic psychedelics can also potentially cause system-level immunosuppression (both short and long-term, depending on drug use habits and other factors), avoiding them in the chronic phase of a disease seems to be wise,” Szabo stressed.

Kelly agrees, even indicating a need for further preclinical work to better home in on the complex interactions between psychedelics, the immune system and the psilocybiome. One compelling point Kelly makes is that psychedelic medicine generally focuses on the acute effects of a small handful of big doses. Other medicines, such as antidepressants, are taken daily for months, or even years, so their effects can be more consistent. Does one big dose of psilocybin lead to persistent benefits when thinking about conditions like long COVID, or will we need to explore longer-term low-doses?

“It is important to consider the different durations of treatment between SSRIs or tryptophan supplementation and the serotonergic psychedelics,” Kelly explains. “Clinical studies typically use between 1 and 3 doses of psychedelic in the context of therapy. As such, it will be interesting to figure out the extent to which 1 – 3 doses of psychedelic would be mediated by the pathways of the microbiota-gut-brain axis in post viral conditions, such as long COVID and other immune-dysregulated conditions.”

A search for more scientific evidence

Saleena Subaiya is an assistant professor at Columbia University's Department of Psychiatry whose personal long COVID story started in early 2021. The condition forced them to quit their job as an emergency room physician in a busy New York hospital. Like many long COVID patients, they faced doctors who dismissed their condition as unrelated to COVID. They were put on numerous medical treatments, both traditional and non-traditional. Ultimately, Subaiya found their own way to live with long COVID. Diet and lifestyle changes were crucial, but to this day they still have good and bad days.

Over the last couple of years their interest in the potential for psychedelic medicines to treat long COVID led them to establish the first human clinical work directly investigating the relationship. Subaiya is currently running two human trials, one in the middle of recruitment and the other beginning in the new year. These initial trials are small pilot studies looking primarily at the effects of certain psychedelics on psychiatric and neurocognitive symptoms associated with long COVID.

Echoing Szabo and Kelly, Subaiya is well-aware of how uncharted this territory is. Long COVID is a new illness, still being fully understood. Psychedelic medicine is a nascent field, with so much yet to be learned.

“You can understand how having a novel disease with a novel mechanism that we're still trying to figure out, as well as trying to use novel therapeutics, ones that have been illegal for many years and are still illegal, presents a challenge,” Subaiya explained in an interview with Salon. “And so it's really, really important that we proceed very carefully. And we don't over promise when the data is burgeoning.”

"Having a novel disease with a novel mechanism that we're still trying to figure out, as well as trying to use novel therapeutics, ones that have been illegal for many years and are still illegal, presents a challenge."

Subaiya says the recently proposed serotonin model for long COVID is exciting, and points to a potential way some psychedelics could help some patients. But from their experience the heterogeneous nature of long COVID means this hypothesis is unlikely to encompass all presentations of the illness. They cited patients with long COVID-like symptoms from post-vaccine injury as a good example.

“So these patients present with a similar constellation of long COVID symptoms, but they don't actually have viral persistence,” they explained. “And so this could be one theory that explains a portion of the patients that have chronic fatigue, brain fog, etc. But I'm not entirely sure that this presents the entire picture.”

One of Subaiya’s biggest concerns for long COVID patients who may be experimenting with psychedelics is the possibility of their condition getting worse. Post-exertional malaise is a hallmark of long COVID for many patients. This is where cognitive, physical or emotional exertion causes a flare-up in disease symptoms.

“So we know that serotonergic hallucinogens can create a very, very intense and powerful psychological experience. When you're taxing the body, it can possibly even be detrimental to patients, if in fact, they're having a fearful experience. They're not adequately prepared. They don't have a provider to walk them through some of the bigger questions that can result after these experiences that can create ongoing stress. These are all really, really critical.”

“There is no quick fix”

“I can confidently say now I'm probably 90% back,” Ash said. “I can ride my motorcycle short distances. I'm not waking up with facial bruising in the morning. I can use scissors. I can memorize six digit strings of numbers. I still can't play guitar. I can't lift anything over my head. There’s a bunch of stuff I can't do. But looking back on where I was in May 2020 it's a much more fabulous place.”

For Ash psychedelics were crucial to her slow recovery, but they were also part of a larger therapeutic regime. A regime that included changes to diet, exercise, lifestyle. A regime that included countless experiments with other botanicals, herbs and vitamins.

Subaiya certainly believes in the potential for psychedelics to play a therapeutic role in the treatment of long COVID. However they are still struck with so many questions that they urge people to not start self-experimenting.

What specific psychedelics could benefit long COVID patients? What particular populations of long COVID should be targeted? What kinds of doses help? What kinds of doses harm? These are all questions with no good answers right now.

“We're in a mental health crisis,” Subaiya said. “We want a quick fix. And the answer is that there is none. We need a holistic model of care that takes into account the individual, their medical needs, their psychological needs, their unique cultural backgrounds, all of those things are so critical. Because of the hype around psychedelics, because there's no treatment for long COVID, we have a vulnerable population that is desperately seeking a treatment. And this concern that I have is that the data is just not there yet. And so, you know, it's really, really important to proceed cautiously.”

From Ash’s perspective she is cautious to recommend anything specific to anyone. She recognizes the privilege she had in terms of both having access to a community of scientists and plant experts, and the space to develop a personal treatment regime.

“I'm really lucky to be from that generation of Psychonauts, who considers holistic medicine to be diet, exercise, lifestyle, self reflection, documentation. Taking care with these things, you can't really separate anything out.”

And her advice to anyone with long COVID is to remove as many stresses from your life and be gentle on yourself.

“Pick one thing, start low, go slow, and monitor it. Whether it's diet, exercise, meditation, medication, or psychedelics.”

A dictator on “day one”: The time to push back on Trump is now

When Donald Trump acknowledged in a Fox News town hall on Tuesday his intent not to abuse power as retribution against anybody, “except for Day One,” he was doubling down on a tried and true strategy of 20th-century dictators. As NYU professor Ruth Ben-Ghiat, author of “Strongmen,” wrote years ago about Trump’s wild statements, he is “introducing an idea that is  reprehensible to the values of liberal democracy, framing it as an off-the-cuff remark or even as a joke.” Meanwhile, she notes, “it cannot be unheard.” 

The message is that his followers, like those in a cult, can experience power through their leader.

We’ve seen Trump retreat plenty of times when he got pushback for saying the quiet part out loud. Recall early in the Covid crisis when he said there should be less testing so public health officials reported fewer cases in an election year. When a public chorus of boos erupted, he said he was just joking.

It’s a common strategy for rising authoritarians to float “trial balloons” to see what they can get away with, as Professor Ben-Ghiat explained:

[A]nti-democratic rulers have always “tested” . . . the public and the media as they consolidate their power, saying things that “push the envelope” against democratic norms to the point of raising the idea of extralegal or irregular action.

On Tuesday, Trump’s statement about dictatorship to his ally Sean Hannity drew applause from the Fox News audience that loves him. But whether his balloon flies across America depends on pushback from the rest of us, including the media. 

We need your help to stay independent

Before coming back to that, let’s note another communications theme at play here. Trump was not only doubling down on a familiar messaging strategy; he was also tapping into a strong undercurrent in the electorate — and himself — about power and powerlessness.

First, he was appealing to the feeling shared by so many of his followers that they lack or are losing power and will regain it symbolically through him if he is elected. As Michael Bader, a Chicago psychologist who writes on the role of the American psyche in our public life, described in Salon on Sunday, Fox builds its audience by exploiting such feelings of powerlessness: 

If helplessness is prominent in people’s experience of personal and social life then the resulting anxieties become fertile ground into which right-wing media can plant its conspiracy theories.

Those feelings work the same way for Trump as they do for Fox, and he knows it. Trump’s audience likes the idea of him becoming a strongman because, like other authoritarians, he appeals to them by telling them he will be "your voice," and “your retribution.” The message is that his followers, like those in a cult, can experience power through their leader.

A social science study of Trump voters in 2016 confirmed the effectiveness of the message, at least for men who felt powerless.

Second, he was compensating for his personal, characterological feeling of powerlessness – asserting unlimited future power to convince his doubting inner self to “fake it ‘til he makes it.”

To that point, Dr. Bandy Lee, a forensic psychiatrist and president of the World Mental Health Coalition, stated in a 2021 Scientific American interview that Trump “projects grandiose omnipotence” – as he just did this week with Hannity – because he is “hungry for adulation to compensate for an inner lack of self-worth.” 

Public response can help sidetrack a man who would be king, on “day one” and beyond.

Third, he was doing everything he could to make his eventual election and political omnipotence feel inevitable to his opponents, so they feel powerless trying to stop him. As professor Ben-Ghiat told Washington Post columnist Greg Sargent on Tuesday, authoritarians like Trump “create a climate where they seem unstoppable. Creating an aura of destiny around the leader . . . mak[es] his movement seem much stronger than it actually is.” 

The aim, as Sargent elucidates, “is to hypnotize voters into forgetting the power and numbers that they possess, persuading them that politics is a hopelessly sordid and disappointing exercise. But that is not the story of the Trump years.”


Want a daily wrap-up of all the news and commentary Salon has to offer? Subscribe to our morning newsletter, Crash Course.


Nor is it the story of today — so long as people use their voices and we have the rule of law. 

As one example, on Wednesday, news broke that in the settlement of a civil lawsuit brought by two of President Joe Biden’s 2020 electors in Wisconsin, 10 Trump “fake electors” confessed in public that the Big Lie in which they participated is, in fact, a lie. They acknowledged that Biden won the election and that they were not true electors. 

The two citizens who brought that suit felt neither hopeless nor powerless in the face of Trump and his MAGA enablers' assault on the truth. 

The criminal justice system, meanwhile, appears equipped to remedy Republicans’ attempted assault on democracy. On Wednesday, Nevada became the third state – joining Michigan and Georgia – to bring charges against fake pro-Trump electors, including the state’s GOP chair.

Crucially, hopelessness and powerlessness needn’t be the story of tomorrow either. As Timothy Snyder wrote in the very first chapter of his salutary 2018 handbook, On Tyranny: 

Most of the power of authoritarianism is freely given. . . . A citizen who adapts [by offering himself without being asked] is teaching power what it can do.

Those who believe in a constitutional republic governed by the rule of law need not wait until election day to teach Trump that in America, dictatorship is not what power can do. Public response can help sidetrack a man who would be king, on “day one” and beyond.

“Full swing”: New analysis shows three respiratory viruses (including COVID) on the rise in the U.S.

It may sound a little gross, but analyzing wastewater for traces of diseases is one of the best ways to understand how populations are handling illness. It can be a gold mine of information regarding the prevalence of respiratory viruses like influenza, respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) and SARS-CoV-2 (which causes COVID-19). The latest results from Biobot Analytics, an American biotechnology company that has been monitoring wastewater throughout the United States, indicate that all of these viruses are spiking across America.

"The respiratory illness season is now in full swing across the US," the report states. It shows active and increased co-circulation of all three viruses. In the case of influenza, the surge is fueled by influenza A (although influenza B is still prevalent) and includes all regions of the Unites States. The highest concentration of RSV cases are in the Northeast, followed by increases in the Midwest and South. As for COVID-19, the wastewater data confirms what hospitalization data has previously shown us: It is "on the rise again, especially in the Midwest and Northeast." The scientists concluded that respiratory illness season "has not yet peaked," and urged people to take precautionary steps like getting vaccinated and staying home if they are sick.

This is not the only recent study to examine wastewater for public health data. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) is also monitoring wastewater to test for diseases and also warns that COVID-19 cases are spiking. CDC data indicates COVID-19 is still killing 1,000 Americans per week and the wave is expected to increase throughout the holidays, driven in part by variants like BA.2.86 (nicknamed "Pirola"). Luckily the latest crop of vaccines seem to neutralize the virus, as does masking.

Make America fascist again: The future if Donald Trump returns to the Oval Office

On February 19, 1942, two months after the Japanese attack on Pearl Harbor, President Franklin Roosevelt issued Executive Order 9066. It initiated a Department of Defense program that resulted in the rounding up and incarceration of about 122,000 individuals of Japanese descent. They were to be placed in federal “relocation centers” that would popularly become known as “internment camps.” As it happened, they were neither. They were prisons set up to house and so violate the civil and human rights of a despised and racially different group defined as “the enemy.”

Although that executive order did not, in fact, mention a specific ethnic or racial group, it was clearly understood that the prisons were not being established for citizens or residents of German or Italian descent, the other two nations then at war with the United States. While not a single person of Japanese ancestry was found to have spied on this country or to have committed acts of sabotage against it, pro-Mussolini and pro-Hitler demonstrations, rallies, and propaganda had been commonplace. Before the war, fascist groups had been allowed to organize and spread propaganda from coast to coast. Some even had influence over and alliances with members of Congress, mainstream journalists, and well-known scholars.

Such a travesty of justice was not just being pushed by Roosevelt, one of the most liberal presidents in American history, but by notables like California judge Earl Warren (later to become a liberal Supreme Court justice) and renowned journalist Edward R. Murrow.

Although lawsuits challenging the prison camps were filed, the Supreme Court allowed them to continue to operate. More than half of those incarcerated were U.S. citizens. None had been charged with any crimes. Often under the banner (made popular again in our time) of “America First,” far-right, racist policies had been put in place and millions suffered from them.

The openly discussed basis for unity in those years was, at least in part, opposition to non-Aryans and non-Protestants, whether they were Japanese, Jewish, or African American.

In 1981, 36 years after World War II ended with the atomic bombing of two Japanese cities, a Presidential Commission on Wartime Relocation and Internment of Civilians issued a report making clear that the imprisonment of Americans of Japanese descent in such striking numbers “was not justified by military necessity, and the decisions which followed from it… were not driven by analysis of military conditions. The broad historical causes which shaped these decisions were race prejudice, war hysteria, and a failure of political leadership.”

 Trump Threatens

It’s important to keep this history in mind since Donald Trump and his MAGA associates are planning to emulate it on a grand scale in a second (and what they hope will be a never-ending) administration. Promises of new “camps,” should The Donald be elected a second time in 2024, are already pouring out of Trumpworld. These would be “huge camps” for migrants near the border with Mexico, as the New York Times reported recently, “to detain people while their cases are processed and they await deportation flights.” To ensure that Congress has no direct role in funding them, they will be built and operated with money taken directly from the military budget.

Just to be clear, Trump isn’t against all immigrants. Anything but. After all, he married two, one from the Czech Republic and the other from Slovenia, countries that most Americans would have to google to find on a map of Europe. Instead, the targets of the pending Trumpian anti-immigrant tsunami will, of course, be individuals and families from the global South. The racism embedded in such a future effort isn’t beside the point, it is the point.

Trump’s former adviser and fellow xenophobe, Stephen Miller, stated that such a new administration would build “camps” — think: prisons — that could house up to a million undocumented immigrants while preparing them for mass deportations. As he told the New York Times, “Any activists who doubt President Trump’s resolve in the slightest are making a drastic error: Trump will unleash the vast arsenal of federal powers to implement the most spectacular migration crackdown. The immigration legal activists won’t know what’s happening.”

And rest assured about one thing: the next Trump administration won’t just go after undocumented immigrants trying to enter the country. It will build an unprecedented gulag system to round up and deport millions of people of color, one that would be unimaginable if those undocumented immigrants came from Canada or Denmark. The Trump gang has stated that they will end TPS (temporary protected status), reinstate the former president’s Muslim ban, reimpose and expand health restrictions on asylum seekers, revoke visas for foreign students who participated in protests against recent Israeli actions, shut down the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) program, and deport immigrants who had been allowed into the United States for humanitarian reasons. 

Mind you, Trump proposed or tried to institute much of this while still in office, only to be thwarted by his administration’s ineptitude, Democratic resistance, grassroots organizing, and the courts. If, in the wake of the 2024 election, the GOP were to gain control over both chambers of Congress as well as the White House — a formula that would ensure the appointment of ever more Trump-friendly federal judges — success (as he defines it) will be a given for many of these efforts.  

When Trump tells his followers that “Our cruel and vindictive political class is not just coming after me — they are coming after YOU,” he means that he hates the very same people they do and will provide the retribution for all the harm supposedly done to them by immigrants (of color), Muslims, Blacks, Latinos, Asians, Native peoples, feminists, and other enemies.

The Fascist Aims of America First

While Trump is the likely GOP nominee in 2024, the election is still a year away and any number of unforeseen developments could lead to someone else being nominated. At this moment, the other potential Republican candidates are Florida Governor Ron DeSantis, former U.N. Ambassador Nikki Haley, business executive Vivek Ramaswamy, and former New Jersey Governor Chris Christie. Christie excepted, there isn’t a sliver of policy difference between any of them and Trump. And notably, Christie supported Trump for nearly all of his administration. In addition, each of them would need the former president’s far-right MAGA base to win the nomination.

Trump’s people have cloaked themselves in an “America First” aura without in any way owning that as a meme. In fact, it harks back both to the second rise of the Ku Klux Klan in the 1920s and the American fascist movement of the 1930s. By the mid-1920s, the KKK had ballooned to between three and eight million members and, as scholar Sarah Churchwell notes in her remarkable book Behold, America: A History of America First and the American Dream, it had already adopted “America First” as a motto. 

While both Democratic President Woodrow Wilson and Republican Presidents Warren Harding and Calvin Coolidge had used the term earlier to promote American isolationism, nativism, and “exceptionalism,” it was the KKK that truly embraced its white supremacist core ethos. As one example, 1,400 Klansmen chanted “America First” as they marched in a Memorial Day parade in Queens, New York, in 1927. And consider it more than ironic that, as Churchwell documents, their presence evolved into a riot that led to the arrests of five Klansmen, one bystander (by mistake), and under circumstances that remain less than clear, Fred Trump, the father of the future 45th president of the United States. 

In 1940, the America First Committee (AFC) was founded. At its height, it would have more than 800,000 members. Initially, it was seen as isolationist — that is, against American entry into the war already being waged in Europe — and even anti-imperialist. As a result, its ranks initially included liberals, progressives, and socialists, as well as conservatives, libertarians, and avowed fascists. The latter, however, would eventually come to dominate, especially after the nation’s leading anti-Semite and pro-Hitler celebrity, pilot Charles Lindbergh, became its most popular spokesperson. The fascist-loving AFC then joined other U.S.-based far-right groups in celebrating German nazism and Italian fascism, while making America First their rallying cry.

Of course, the historically challenged Donald Trump undoubtedly doesn’t know much, if anything, about this history. But give him full credit. From the beginning, with the instincts of both a fascist and a white nationalist, he intuitively grasped the mobilizing value of seemingly patriotic but xenophobic slogans. Count on one thing, though: some of his allies know all about the noxious roots of “America First” and still embrace it. Such jingoistic patriotism has, in fact, become a thinly veiled cover for a revised and expansive contemporary version of white nationalism.

The proliferation of America First groups run by former Trump staffers and supporters is daunting. The dizzying array of them includes America First Legal, America First Action, America First Policies, America First Policy Institute, America First P.A.C.T. (Protecting America’s Constitution and Traditions), America First Foundation/America First Political Action Conference, and America First 2.0, the latter a contribution from Republican presidential aspirant Vivek Ramaswamy.

America First Legal is run by Stephen Miller and promotes itself as an alternative to the American Civil Liberties Union, but its deepest focus is on defending whiteness and amplifying Miller’s white nationalist proclivities. During the 2022 midterm election cycle, it typically produced radio and television ads like this fact-free one:

“When did racism against white people become OK? Joe Biden put white people last in line for Covid relief funds. Kamala Harris said disaster aid should go to non-white citizens first. Liberal politicians block access to medicine based on skin color. Progressive corporations, airlines, universities all openly discriminate against white Americans. Racism is always wrong. The left’s anti-white bigotry must stop. We are all entitled to equal treatment under the law.”

Decrying (fake) racism against whites fits well with Trump’s hysterical, desperate accusations that Georgia’s Fulton County District Attorney Fani Willis, New York Attorney General Letitia James, and Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg are all “racists” out to prosecute him because he’s white, not because he broke the law in their jurisdictions. (So far, none of Trump’s Black supporters have echoed that call — perhaps a bridge too far even for them — but Miller and others on the far right certainly have.)

Linda McMahon, former head of the Small Business Administration under Trump, is now the president of the America First Policy Institute, which claims that its guiding principles are “liberty, free enterprise, national greatness, American military superiority, foreign-policy engagement in the American interest, and the primacy of American workers, families, and communities in all we do.” That well-funded group takes on policy and culture war issues. You undoubtedly won’t be surprised to learn that it recently held a gala at — yes! — Mar-a-Lago.

The America First P.A.C.T., led by former Arizona Republican Party chair Kelli Ward, focuses on running state candidates on a far-right MAGA agenda and prioritizes raising funds for GOP candidates. Blasted across its website is the phrase “A weak republican is more dangerous than a democrat.” Ward is under investigation in Arizona for her alleged involvement in a 2022 fake-elector plot there. 

Perhaps this country’s best-known white nationalist (and former Trump dinner guest) Nick Fuentes is the founder and president of the America First Foundation. It sponsors the annual America First Political Action Conference, an unabashed gathering of white supremacists and other far-right and extremist elements. Fuentes founded AFPAC because he thought the Conservative Political Action Conference (CPAC) was too moderate. However, the political distance between the more traditional CPAC and AFPAC has narrowed. Noted Islamophobe Michelle Malkin, for example, spoke at both in 2019, as did conservative journalist Jon Miller in 2020. Neither Malkin, who is Asian, nor Miller, who is African American, called out Fuentes and other bigots at the conferences on their racism.

The 2022 AFPAC conference featured a who’s who of contemporary American extremists, including disgraced former Arizona Sheriff Joe Arpaio, defeated Arizona election-denier Kari Lake, longtime founder and publisher of the white supremacist American Renaissance Jared Taylor, Florida-based Islamophobe and anti-immigrant warrior Laura Loomer, extremist activist Milo Yiannopoulos, and former too-toxic-for-even-the-House-Republicans Representative Steve King. Current Republican congress members who have spoken at AFPAC include (you undoubtedly won’t be surprised to learn) Representatives Marjorie Taylor Greene and Paul Gosar. 

Violence as Politics

Like fascists and racists of old, Donald Trump and the America First crowd are demonizing and dehumanizing their opponents. In October 1923, Klan leader and Imperial Wizard Hiram Evans gave a fiery anti-immigrant speech in Texas railing against the “polluting streams of pollution from abroad” that immigrants were bringing to the United States. This October, exactly 100 years later, Trump gave an interview to the far-right National Pulse in which he declared that immigrants are “poisoning the blood of our country.”

In his 2024 campaign, he’s not only planning to go after immigrants, but a broader group of liberal and progressive citizens and even Republicans who stand in the way of his fevered lust for heading a genuinely authoritarian government. If he returns to the Oval Office, he’s already declared that he’ll “root out” what he’s called “communists, Marxists, fascists and the radical left thugs that live like vermin within the confines of our country.”

“Vermin” (a classic Hitlerian word choice) and those who would “poison” the nation must be wiped out, annihilated. Responding to criticism of such language, Trump campaign spokesperson Steven Cheung called the very notion “ridiculous,” even as he reinforced the point by insisting that the former president’s critics suffered from “Trump Derangement Syndrome” and “their entire existence will be crushed when President Trump returns to the White House.”

None of what Trump and his allies plan to do is likely to be passively accepted. In fact, they’re already anticipating a massive popular revolt and preparing for it. As the Wall Street Journal noted, in 2020 Trump first contemplated invoking the Insurrection Act, which allows a president to employ the military to enforce federal laws under special circumstances, to break up protests related to the murder of George Floyd and other African Americans by the police and racists. He was talked down. Its use was then suggested by Trump ally Roger Stone and evidently considered by the president as a way to “put down” any “leftwing protests” related to the 2020 election. Again, the idea went nowhere.

The third time, however, could be the deadly charm. The Washington Post has reported that Trump is now considering invoking the Insurrection Act on his first day back in office. One thing is certain: should he somehow, despite four criminal indictments and multiple trials, return to the White House on January 20, 2025, we can’t say we weren’t warned.

“We cannot let him win”: Biden may have opted out of re-election were it not for Trump

During a campaign fundraising event outside of Boston on Tuesday, President Joe Biden revealed that he may have opted out of going after a 2024 re-election bid if it weren't for Donald Trump, telling donors that democracy is “more at risk in 2024” because the former president and his followers are out to “destroy” democratic institutions.

“We’ve got to get it done, not because of me . . . If Trump wasn’t running I’m not sure I’d be running. We cannot let him win,” Biden said, hitting the last words slowly for emphasis, as described by AP News. After saying this, Biden phrased it differently to reporters later in the day when asked if he'd still be running if Trump weren't in the picture, saying, “I expect so, but look, he is running and I have to run.”

In The Boston Herald's coverage of the campaign event at which Biden did this bit of back and forth, they provide further clarity as to where the current president's mind is at in terms of seeking to defeat Trump once again, if only to prevent him from doing further damage, quoting his response to Trump’s comments that he’s out for “retribution” if he wins, to root out the “vermin” in the country — a throwback, vibes wise, to the language used in Germany in the 1930s.

“Trump’s not even hiding the ball anymore. He’s telling us what he’s going to do,” Biden said. “He’s making no bones about it.”

Angelina Jolie developed Bell’s palsy leading up to divorce from Brad Pitt

The details of what went down leading up to Angelina Jolie filing for divorce from Brad Pitt back in 2016 are still trickling in, so many years later, as the couple have yet to finalize the legalities of their split after only two years of marriage and much of what led to it is tied up in court proceedings.

In a recent interview with The Wall Street Journal, Jolie opens up about the ways in which the stress of it all took a toll on her, both emotionally as well as physically, revealing that she developed Bell’s palsy — a condition where facial muscles become weak or paralyzed — before calling it quits with Pitt after he allegedly verbally and physically assaulted her and their son, Maddox, on a private plane.

“My body reacts very strongly to stress,” Jolie says. “My blood sugar goes up and down. I suddenly had Bell’s palsy six months before my divorce.”

During the interview, in which she discusses finding new purpose in the launch of a sustainable-fashion company called Atelier Jolie, she furthers that she and her six children have been focusing on healing and that she'd eventually like to leave Hollywood after her divorce finally goes through, saying, "I lost the ability to live and travel as freely. I will move when I can." 

 

 

“The whole story of Jan. 6”: Legal experts say Jack Smith filing hints at “very powerful evidence”

Special counsel Jack Smith is requesting that a Washington, D.C. jury be briefed on former President Donald Trump's efforts to cast false doubts on the elections of 2012 and 2016 — a strategy the special counsel's team contends laid the groundwork for a criminal effort to overturn the 2020 election after Trump's defeat to Joe Biden.

Prosecutors in Tuesday's filing said that they want to focus on highlighting Trump's “historical record” of “false claims of election fraud.” Some of these claims were made as early as November 2012, when the former president issued a public tweet falsely suggesting that voting machines had switched votes from then-candidate Mitt Romney to former President Barack Obama, according to the filing

Smith is requesting approval from U.S. District Judge Tanya Chutkan to present evidence not explicitly listed in the criminal indictment, but that may be pertinent to the jury's deliberation on the alleged crimes.

Smith is “laser-focused” on presenting a narrative of Trump as an individual who did not act in “good faith” when he made his claims about election fraud in 2020, Temidayo Aganga-Williams, white-collar partner at Selendy Gay Elsberg and former senior investigative counsel for the House Jan. 6 committee, told Salon. 

“Smith intends to prove that Trump is someone who implemented a long-term, intentional strategy of falsely blaming fraud for election results he does not like, giving aid and comfort to those who do his unlawful bidding even if through violence, and attacking those who dare to speak truth to his lies,” Aganga-Williams said. 

It is not unusual at all for prosecutors to seek to introduce evidence of other acts that go to show the defendant's plan, intent, motive, modus operandi, and preparation, Laurie Levenson, a law professor at Loyola Marymount University, told Salon.

“The prosecutors are just anticipating Trump's defense that he either didn't know, or didn't intend, for the acts of Jan. 6 to occur,” Levenson said. “This additional evidence can show the contrary.”

The introduction of this evidence will “tell the whole story of Jan. 6” and answer questions like why it happened, how the groundwork was laid, and the context for Trump's decisions and statements that day, Levenson said. “It could be very powerful evidence for the prosecution.”

This is a fairly common practice in criminal trials and the Supreme Court has upheld it, Bennett Gershman, a former New York prosecutor and law professor at Pace University, told Salon. The Federal Rules of Evidence explicitly authorize the practice, he added, referring to the Harvey Weinstein and Bill Cosby sexual assault trials, where uncharged crimes were introduced when relevant.  

“Smith must demonstrate that the proof is relevant for a specific purpose here to prove Trump’s knowledge that he is engaging in criminal behavior and has the requisite intent to commit the crime,” Gershman said. “The fact that he has engaged in similar criminal or wrongful conduct in the past is relevant because it shows that Trump has done it before and would likely do it again.”

Prosecutors also made clear that they intend to introduce other evidence, including how Trump established a “pattern” of using public statements and social media posts to subject his perceived adversaries to threats and harassment, including instances where he targeted then-Vice President Mike Pence.

“At trial, the Government will introduce evidence of this conduct—including the defendant’s public endorsement and encouragement of violence—and further will elicit testimony from witnesses about the threats and harassment they received after the defendant targeted them in relation to the 2020 election,” the filing said.

Prosecutors plan to include evidence of the former president’s vocal support for violent Jan. 6 rioters as well. For example, in response to a question during the September 29, 2020, presidential debate asking Trump to denounce the extremist group the Proud Boys, he instead spoke publicly to them and told them to “stand back and stand by,” according to the filing.  

Members of the group “embraced” his words as an endorsement and printed merchandise with them as a “rallying cry,” the filing says. When the Proud Boys and other extremist groups took part in obstructing the congressional certification on January 6, Trump “made clear that they were acting consistent with his intent and direction in doing so.”

We need your help to stay independent

Prosecutors often seek to introduce evidence of a defendant’s past crimes or wrongful acts not charged in the indictment when the evidence is relevant for a specific purpose in the trial, such as proving a defendant’s knowledge and intent, Gershman said. In this case, the prosecutor has to demonstrate that the proof is relevant and necessary. 

“The problem for the prosecutor is that such proof is always massively prejudicial, and may also confuse the jury,” he added. “The judge would have to find that the probative value of this proof (and clearly there is probative value) is not substantially outweighed by unfair prejudice, or that it might unduly confuse the jury rather than help the jury analyze and weigh the facts in the case.”

The judge will want to make sure that the evidence is being used for something other than just “Trump's propensity to violate the law and that its probative value outweighs any undue prejudice,” Levenson said, calling it a "balancing" act that judges do regularly.  


Want a daily wrap-up of all the news and commentary Salon has to offer? Subscribe to our morning newsletter, Crash Course.


“She will look at all the factors in the case, as well as how the evidence will be presented,” Levenson continued. “She has the option of allowing some of the evidence in the prosecution's case-in-chief and waiting for cross-examination or rebuttal to allow more.”

However, introducing such evidence by the special counsel's team might lead to “downsides,” including the defense arguing that the prosecution is "grasping at straws" due to a perceived lack of support in the actual evidence of the events on Jan. 6, Levenson pointed out.

The defense is likely to argue that the evidence is “terribly prejudicial” and “highly inflammatory,” Gershman said. They may argue that it will allow the jury to convict not on the basis of the charges in the indictment, but on evidence “outside the parameters” of the indictment that is "unfair, irrelevant, and confusing.”

But, this evidence could also assist the jury in determining that Trump possessed the "necessary mental culpability," which includes an awareness of wrongdoing and the intent to commit the charged crimes," he added. “The evidence would help the prosecution paint a more dramatic and colorful picture of Trump’s longstanding history and practice of trying to undermine the integrity of elections.”

TikTok made cottage cheese cool. Can it do the same for climate-friendly eating?

It couldn’t be simpler. Cherry tomatoes go into a baking dish with olive oil, salt and pepper — and at the center of it all, a full block of creamy, salty feta cheese. Into the oven it goes to get all melty and roasty and delicious. Then add garlic, fresh basil, and cooked pasta, and you’ve got dinner.

That recipe, originally by Finnish blogger Jenni Häyrinen, took off on TikTok and sparked a feta craze that has affected real-world demand and supply — so much so that the New York Times dubbed the phenomenon “the TikTok feta effect.” Stores couldn’t keep it on shelves and cheesemakers expanded production to keep up. Häyrinen wrote that feta sales went up 300 percent in Finland after she first posted the recipe in 2019.

#FetaPasta has racked up 1.4 billion views on TikTok as of this writing, with droves of users recreating the viral recipe and adding their own twists. As a casual TikTok user, I have watched the yearslong feta obsession and similar fads like the recent unlikely rise of cottage cheese, and wondered: Could the platform’s power to influence food trends help inspire a shift toward more climate-friendly eating? Could a humble vegetable — or better yet, a low-impact, vegan protein or a perennial grain — experience the TikTok feta effect?

TikTok creator Max La Manna is a low-waste, plant-based chef with about 150,000 followers on the platform. I asked him what made the feta recipe so successful and what he thinks about when trying to make his recipes take off on the platform.

“There’s a multitude of different variables that come into play to make a video successful,” La Manna said. One factor he nods to is the ability to capture a viewer’s attention quickly. On TikTok, a user might scroll from a recipe to a makeup tutorial to a montage of funny cats, all in the span of seconds. Creators are trying more and more to hook people in during the very first few seconds of a video, La Manna said. “It’s all these components. It’s the delivery, it’s what’s being filmed, it’s how it’s being filmed.” And, he adds, the personality of the host or creator also plays a big role in how people will respond to a given video.

Cooking videos are, in many ways, perfectly suited to these aspects of TikTok’s ethos. The great appeal of the TikTok cooking video is that it invites you into another person’s kitchen and shows you, in quick-moving steps, exactly how something is made. If that something is an easy, low-effort dish using ingredients you can get at the supermarket — like feta or cottage cheese — all the better. In describing the proliferation of the feta pasta, the New York Times noted that “the videos are just as likely to be made by influencers as by teenagers without large followings.”

Of course, another factor is that the dish in question has to actually be appetizing. When I asked Katie Burdett, a farmer and recipe creator with 350,000 TikTok followers, about the success of the feta pasta, she noted simply, “You know, feta baked down with herbs and tomatoes is really good.” (I’ve tried it. It is good.)

Still, it’s famously impossible to predict, or control, what trend or ingredient or single piece of content is going to go viral. “I’ve been lucky to have many viral videos, and sometimes they’re confounding to me,” Burdett said. One of her most popular formats is ASMR harvest videos. Her recipes haven’t tended to perform quite as well and she suspects part of the reason is that the algorithm likes to see her staying in one lane.

TikTok also has features that can quickly amplify momentum and lift up some surprising things. Copycats and reaction videos or “duets” can turn a minor trend into a sensation as other creators try to piggyback on something that is already working. “When one viewer, one creator sees a video doing well, then they try to spin off of that and make something,” La Manna said. “‘Oh, that cheese video did really well. I’m gonna do something similar that’s using cheese.’” It happens a lot with cooking videos, because creators can also add their own flare to a trending recipe.

In a way, the feta effect may be a combination of creator skill, luck and a volume game. More videos = more chances for one to take off. In that case, the odds of a shortage-inducing craze for a vegetable or other climate-friendly food are rising every day, thanks to the growth of plant-based creators on TikTok — a trend in and of itself.

However, both Burdett and La Manna offered that in hunting for a climate-friendly food sensation, I may be asking the wrong question altogether.

That ability of viral videos to inspire people to try new things is a positive, Burdett believes — and there’s no reason that couldn’t happen for low-impact ingredients. But, she added, as a farmer, she has concerns about the pendulum swing of food trends. Many crops take a long time to grow or produce and farmers often plan several years in advance. If and when a fad fades, it can pose problems for producers, she said. “I hope that there’s not an overcorrection on the side of a maker, then, who … makes a lot of investments in their infrastructure or livestock or all different kinds of things, and then the next year that trend’s over.”

Rather than trying to increase consumption of a particular food, climate-friendly TikTokkers may prefer to help people reduce overconsumption. “I think that I am seeing more of a trend from a lot of the food content creators leaning more in a sustainable direction,” Burdett said.

Many of her recipe videos focus on seasonal eating and how to use up the harvest. That seasonality is one thing that sets fruits and vegetables apart from ingredients like feta — some veggies do, in a sense, go viral when their moment arrives. “That’s mostly when I hear from people,” Burdett said. “‘Oh my God, I have way too much zucchini. And I don’t want it to go to waste, I put all this time and energy and money into growing this and so, like, help.’” She enjoys that back-and-forth with her followers and the opportunity to offer recipes for specific scenarios. “I think that it can be really important to use that platform to give people resources to empower them,” she said.

La Manna echoes that sentiment, and emphasizes the importance of cooking resourcefully and using up what you have — not only to avoid food waste, but also to avoid wasting money. He recently published a cookbook, You Can Cook This!, inspired by two years’ worth of asking his digital community about the ingredients they most often throw away. The book focuses on 30 of the most commonly trashed ingredients, from broccoli stems to bagged leafy greens, and offers recipes to keep them from going to waste. If one of these recipes were to “go viral,” we would never see its ingredients fly off the shelves as feta has done — that’s the opposite of the point.

All that said, if La Manna had to nominate one ingredient to be the next feta, his candidate is stale bread. From breakfast (french toast!) to dessert (bread pudding!), old bread has tons of easy and potentially viral uses that ought to keep it out of the compost bin, he said — it can thicken sauces, it can replace nuts in a pesto, it can even be the base for a hearty and thrifty soup. “Let’s make stale bread sexy.”

A parting shot

Andrée Nieuwjaer, a resident of Roubaix, France, poses in front of her pantry filled with reusable glass jars of staple foods, holding a sponge she made out of potato bags. Nieuwjaer’s household is one of 800 to participate in a program called Roubaix Zéro Déchet or “Zero-Waste Roubaix” — an educational initiative that gives residents tools to reduce their household waste. In a story published today, Nieuwjaer told Grist’s Joseph Winters that she would be eating for free all winter, with imperfect or slightly-past-its-prime produce she sourced for free and then preserved. She estimates that she saves around 3,000 euros a year from her waste-reduction efforts.

“That almost killed me”: Julianne Moore on learning Sarah Palin’s accent for a role

"May December" star Julianne Moore revealed just how challenging it was to nail Sarah Palin’s accent in preparation for playing the former governor of Alaska in the HBO film “Game Change.” 

On Monday’s episode of Andy Cohen’s “Watch What Happens Live,” the actor was asked whether it was more difficult to speak with a lisp in her new Netflix film “May December” or pick up Palin’s regional vernacular in the 2012 political drama. She shared that it was the latter:

“The thing that was really, really hard was Sarah Palin’s voice. That almost killed me,” Moore said. “I listened to nothing else for months on end. I took all the music off my phone and just listened to her voice constantly.”

Based on the 2010 book of the same name, “Game Change” centers on John McCain's 2008  presidential election campaign. Alongside Moore, the film stars Ed Harris as McCain, Woody Harrelson as Steve Schmidt, and Sarah Paulson as Nicolle Wallace.

Moore previously spoke about how she prepared for her standout role during a 2021 interview with Willie Geist on TODAY.

“I started listening to her voice and watching every recording I could and reading all the books and watching that TV show that she did,” she said. “And I literally did nothing. I didn't go out. I just spent all of my time kind of studying it.”

Watch the original trailer for HBO's "Game Change," via YouTube.

“Three times is excessive”: Ex-judges slam Trump lawyers for “petty” requests

Despite having lost most of his New York civil fraud trial before it began, lawyers for Donald Trump have resorted to trying legal maneuvers that have confounded legal experts. Last week, according to The Daily Beast, the former president's defense asked the judge for a "directed verdict," which is essentially an outright victory that brings the case to a close. In the legal world, it's a longshot request that rarely works, and in Trump's case it's even less likely to succeed — last Tuesday's ask was the third in this trial from his attorneys. 

“Three times is excessive. I think they're just taking a shot in the dark here. It just sounds like a ‘Hail Mary’ pass,” Carolyn E. Demarest, a retired state judge, told the Daily Beast. She added that she couldn't recall a single time she granted such a request in her nearly 35-year tenure. The New York Attorney General's lawsuit against Trump, which seeks to punish him for exaggerating his assets on official documents for years, began in October and is almost over, with just days to go. The former president's legal team has stunned presiding Judge Arthur Engoron in court by asking him to throw out the entire case, requests that have at times sparked muted laughter in the courtroom. 

Alan Davis Marrus, another former state judge, told the Daily Beast the request isn't "unethical or improper" on its own, but that Trump's lawyers' multiple requests make even less sense given that the judge concluded before the trial that he is liable for fraud. “It’s a show trial. He’s already found the guy liable,” Marrus said. “That a trial like this would take so long is really the shocking thing. This is petty stuff that they’re asking for a directed verdict.”

Meet the “magic” mushroom shop salesman hoping to demolish Canada’s war on drugs

In some respects, our culture seems to be experiencing a psychedelic renaissance, meaning a social and cultural upheaval fueled by mounting scientific evidence that there are some clinical benefits to the class of drugs encompassing LSD, psilocybin (i.e., “magic mushrooms") and DMT, most of which are highly illegal in most jurisdictions on the planet. While such drugs are infamous for the perceptual distortions they can cause, a growing body of research suggests that psychedelics can also be a balm for the mind, providing some relief for stubborn depression, PTSD and addiction.

Though it will likely still some time before the U.S. Food and Drug Administration officially sanctions these drug therapies, if that ever happens, reforms in Oregon, Colorado and over a dozen U.S. cities have helped erase the criminal penalties for “changing one’s mind,” as Michael Pollan put it.

Amid an apparent epidemic of mental illness epidemic coupled with the unrelenting overdose crisis, which cumulatively claim hundreds of thousands of lives yearly, many people are seeking relief. When they hear about the potential for psychedelics in these arenas of suffering, many are willing to experiment without waiting for medical and legal bureaucracy to catch up. This has created booming demand, with plenty of suppliers eager to fill the gap. Some have opened brick-and-mortar shops that resemble cannabis dispensaries or pharmacies, but this (unsurprisingly) tends to attract police attention.

On Nov. 1, three businesses in Vancouver, Canada, were raided by police for selling psychedelic drugs, including psilocybin mushrooms, LSD and DMT, the latter being the active ingredient in the Amazonian brew ayahuasca. These stores, which have been operating since 2019, reopened a few days later. Their owner, Dana Larsen, an author and activist, says he has run these shops as an act of civil disobedience — and is no stranger to law enforcement scrutiny. In 2019, one of Larsen’s unlicensed marijuana dispensaries was cleaned out by police and he has been arrested for handing out cannabis seeds.

Why does he keep opening back up if the cops keep shutting him down? Larsen says he believes the end of drug prohibition is nigh, given the overwhelming evidence that banning certain chemicals makes them more dangerous, not less. Salon spoke with Larsen about the growing opposition to drug reforms in Canada and how he runs his not-entirely-legal business.

This conversation has been edited and condensed for clarity.

Can you share your history of challenging drug policy in Canada?

I'm 52 now and I've been doing this stuff since I was a teenager — over 30 years of working to change the drug laws in Canada, one way or the other. I opened one of the first medicinal cannabis dispensaries in the city back in 2008. I was very influential in getting the cannabis dispensary movement going in Vancouver and in Canada, encouraging others to open their own shops. I think that was a necessary prerequisite to getting legalization happening: having hundreds of shops across the country openly selling cannabis before legalization.

Dana Larsen in front of a dispensary signDana Larsen in front of a dispensary sign (Photo courtesy of Larsen)

I feel now we're in a parallel situation when it comes to mushrooms and psychedelics. In the late ‘90s and early 2000s, we had a lot of court cases in Canada affirming patients right to use medicinal cannabis and a growing understanding among the public that medicinal marijuana was a valid thing. And it certainly changed people's perceptions around cannabis use. We're kind of using the same strategies now.

I opened one of the very first mushroom shops in Vancouver. There's over a dozen shops now selling mushrooms, but our shops, I think, remain unique because of the range of things that we sell. We don't just sell psilocybin mushrooms, but also LSD, DMT, kratom, coca leaf and things like that. There's no other shops in the world where you can walk in and access all those products like you can from us.

To make a purchase or come into our shop, you have to be over 19. We check their IDs and make them sign a form saying they're going to be a responsible user, they're not going to provide it to children or pets, are not going to swim or climb or drive or do anything irresponsible.

I also still run some of the very last old school unlicensed [cannabis] dispensaries. And we use the funds from our cannabis shops and from our psychedelic shops to fund a program called Get Your Drugs Tested. We started this in 2019 and we have become the world's busiest center for free street drug analysis. We're able to analyze your substance and tell you what's in it, checking for fentanyl and things like that, but also just making sure that it is what it's supposed to be. We were getting close to over 60,000 substances analyzed. I'm very proud of that service.

When you're doing this kind of civil disobedience, you're always aware that you can be raided or attacked by the police. But I wasn't really expecting those kinds of issues. The Vancouver police had been in the media before saying that they did not consider shops like ours a priority, and that they would let the city bureaucracy deal with us rather than do a raid. This was the same kind of philosophy that they had during the heyday of cannabis dispensaries in the city. At one point there were over 100 unlicensed cannabis shops in the city.

Dana Larsen being arrested on November 1Dana Larsen being arrested on Nov. 1 (Photo courtesy of Larsen)

And when people asked the VPD, “Why aren't you raiding these places?” they would say, “Look, it costs us about $40,000 to raid one of these shops, they reopen a few hours later, the prosecutors don't want to prosecute, the courts don't want to put anybody in jail. So it's not worth the time and effort on our part.”

I always felt we had a good relationship with the VPD. And then they come storming into all of our locations, seized all of our money, all of our products — a huge financial hit for us. I spent seven hours in custody, but I wasn't charged or given any conditions, which shows how ridiculous it is that they do this massive raid, but they don't bother charging anybody with any criminal charges. It seems kind of odd.

You haven't been charged with a crime? This happened like a couple of weeks ago, right?

Typically, they have up to a year or so to charge me if they want to. But usually the charges would be laid right away. It's very unusual for them to wait. I could be wrong, but I don't think I'm going to be charged. If they did [charge me], we would fight those. We have some very good lawyers and very strong constitutional arguments. I think there's a very good chance that we could win in court, if it came down to it.


Want more health and science stories in your inbox? Subscribe to Salon's weekly newsletter Lab Notes.


It didn’t take you long to reopen after the raid.

We reopened our main location the next day. It took a little while to get the other two locations reopened, mainly because we had to get stock and re-prepare it, weigh it and sort it and put it in baggies and label it and all that.

It's odd to me that we were the only one targeted. I don't want to see anybody targeted but certainly coming after me when of all the mushroom dispensaries in the city, we're the only one operating a program like Get Your Drugs Tested. I'm clearly the most idealistic of all of the dispensary operators and the one most committed to helping my community. I think it was a political raid.

A week before we got raided, there was a group called the Drug User Liberation Front. For about two years they were operating, basically, a heroin compassion club, where they would buy heroin, meth and cocaine off the dark web, get it tested at our service or a different service and then provide it to their customers. They were supplying things to about 40-odd people, a tiny fraction compared to the number of drug users in British Columbia. But it got in the news in a negative way and some of the opposition politicians here in British Columbia were making hay out of it.

So suddenly, this program loses their funding. Their funding wasn't to buy drugs, it was to operate a space to do other things. Actually, we were their biggest donors when it comes to money to make [drug] purchases. We supplied them probably $7,000 or $8,000.

But they got on the news, they got raided and they got conditions placed on them, so they had to shut down. And then a week later, we got raided. I don't feel that's a coincidence. I feel this is a political decision and not one made by the police here in Vancouver themselves. I think that they were put under pressure by provincial politicians.

I think the provincial NDP [the center-right New Democratic Party] are feeling embarrassed by us and by DULF, and told the police to shut us down. That's why we got targeted and none of the other mushroom shops in the city had been raided.

What is your motivation in doing all of this? It could be argued that you're just trying to make money.

We do have business licenses for two of our three mushroom dispensary locations. But there's no category for psychedelics in the business license system, so we applied as a retail outlet. Actually, we have a hearing on Dec. 6 to try to take away our license at one location.

We need your help to stay independent

Yes, we do make money. You need to make a profit to run a business and we use our profits for programs like Get Your Drugs Tested and also activism and community change. People could question my motives. But the reality is, I've been doing this for over 30 years and I could be a millionaire if I wanted to. We've spent well over $1.5 million on Get Your Drugs Tested. I'm very idealistic. I don't really need to have huge amounts of money for myself. I want to see political change happen. I've devoted my life to trying to end the war on drugs.

I recognized at a young age that this was a very bad social policy that was causing lots of harm. And I've only seen that decision of mine fully vindicated over the years. Now we're in this massive death crisis caused by drug poisonings, I've certainly lost friends to this as well, and many other people have, too. So, you know, when I'm old and looking back on my life, if I have a big stack of money that's not really what I'm looking for. I'm looking to be able to say, “Hey, I helped end the war on drugs in Canada.”

Joy out of context: Why we loved food-themed clothing in 2023

​​I've unintentionally made a professional uniform out of a black crewneck sweatshirt emblazoned with STEAK DIANE in yellow heat-pressed letters, arranged slightly askew. In the past two months alone, I appeared on a taped podcast interview while wearing it; attended a small media dinner at a buzzy new restaurant in Portland, Oregon; and sat for a profile interview with a Northwestern University graduate student. 

I have zero personal connection to the dish steak Diane, which consists of pan-fried steak served in a piquant sauce made from pan drippings, cream, Cognac, shallots and Worcestershire or Dijon mustard. Purportedly named for Diana, the goddess of the hunt, it might have originated in 1930s London, where it was flambéed tableside in a most theatrical display. These sorts of anecdotes come in handy whenever I wear this shirt, by the way, because everyone I come into contact with assumes I’m an expert on steak Diane and peppers me with questions. 

But how come this out-of-context assemblage of food-related words appeals to me?

“I feel like food is just a really easy and positive way to connect with people,” said Katie Kimmel, the California-based artist who made the shirt. “The thing is, what I’ve noticed from wearing my own shirts is people just say it out loud at you.”

Kimmel didn’t set out to become known for food-themed shirts, either. Her usual artistic medium is ceramics, which she shapes into whimsical, googly-eyed animal vases and trinket plates. Then about six years ago, her best friend gave her a heat press, and she and her husband thought it would be fun to spell out their favorite foods on a couple of t-shirts. She posted an Instagram story of one emblazoned with “linguine and clams,” and almost immediately people started asking if they could order one. 

“It’s so funny that this is what I’m associated with because it’s so, like, straightforward,” she said. “I always get a kick out of things that are so literal and that’s kind of what this is.” 

Culinary motifs have appeared in clothing design for almost a century; in 1937 Italian designer Elsa Schiaparelli created a lobster dress with Spanish artist Salvador Dalí in the midst of the Surrealist art movement. But food as fashion has soared to new heights over the past five years, thanks mostly to social media. A statement puffer coat printed with bowtie pasta by designer Rachel Antonoff went viral last winter. Dutch designer Rommy de Bommy creates startlingly convincing burnt toast and birthday cake handbags. California designer Lisa Says Gah peddles an entirely tapas-themed collection with dresses, shirts and pants patterned with prawns, cheese, wine and olives. (In fact, last year I waited four months to receive one of their t-shirts, which features a strategically placed pair of clams.) Most of these can be purchased with a few clicks, straight from Instagram.

We need your help to stay independent

Perhaps it’s a little on the nose that I’m a food writer whose wardrobe consists of a few too many food-themed pieces, like a crossing guard getting really into wearing variations on the mesh safety vest. But I find food clothing to be a little shot of whimsy to the arm. It feels good to leave the house in a shirt that says “hot sandwich” because you know it will make at least one person smile when they see it. Food writer Naomi Tomky wrote in a piece for the "Huffington Post" that publicly wearing a hot-pink playsuit with bananas all over it also helped liberate her from a lifetime of self-consciousness about her weight. 

“Where I expected raised eyebrows and silent judgment, I instead saw spontaneous smiles,” Tomky wrote. “When [people] got close enough to see the bananas, it instantly brought them happiness ― and me compliments. Far fewer reactions than I feared ― none, in fact ― seemed tinged with the fatphobia for which I’d long honed a sensitive radar.”

Kimmel’s favorite part of the process is coming across a fun food phrase or reminding herself of something delicious to put on a shirt, like mozzarella sticks or lava cake. She finds inspiration in all kinds of places: at restaurants, bookstores and estate sales, the latter of which she scours for Kiwanis club and church cookbooks. Sometimes in the middle of the night an appealing dish will come to her and she’ll add it to the notes app on her phone. She recently read a few out loud to me that sounded like a gloriously mundane piece of postmodern poetry: “lettuce wraps,” “scrambled egg,” “bloody Mary,” “puff pastry,” “hard candy,” “light beer.” 

Reciting them aloud is essential to the process, because the words have to roll off the tongue for maximum effect — all the better if they contain therein a double entendre. “I feel like if it’s a tongue-twister, you’re going to be there all day while the guy at the meat counter is trying to work out what’s on your shirt,” she said.

Indeed, beyond the delight that comes with taking a sartorial stance in favor of steak Diane, food-themed clothing makes for far more evocative and personal small talk than the “14 million, perfectly fine” conversations one might have about the weather, as Kimmel pointed out.  

“I made a one-off lasagna shirt and wore it to the grocery store, and the cashier told me she makes lasagna with cottage cheese, which is another divisive food that’s having a moment right now,” Kimmel said. “But the second I got in my car I had to call a friend and tell her about it. I think about that woman and her crazy lasagna all the time.”

McCarthy resigns after humiliating ouster and shrinks GOP majority — after declaring “I never quit”

Former House Speaker Kevin McCarthy, R-Calif., who earlier this year declared "I never quit," announced Wednesday that he will be resigning from the House of Representatives at the end of the year in an op-ed for the Wall Street Journal. The California Republican, who was ousted from the speakership in October following a concerted effort by the lower chamber's far-right flank to give him the boot, began his written announcement by recounting his record as a representative and speaker, including getting more "Republican women, veterans and minorities elected to Congress at one time" than before, leading Republicans to a House majority twice, and keeping "our government operating and our troops paid while wars broke out around the world."

"It is in this spirit that I have decided to depart the House at the end of this year to serve America in new ways," McCarthy wrote. "I know my work is only getting started." The former speaker indicated that his future work will see him recruiting others to run for elected office and assisting the Republican Party's expansion by lending experience to support the "next generation of leaders." He also reflected on how "it often seems that the more Washington does, the worse America gets," writing that the nation's challenges are more likely to find solutions in innovation than legislation and pointing to "the goodness of the American people" as what will uphold the country's values. "I never could have imagined the journey when I first threw my hat into the ring. I go knowing I left it all on the field—as always, with a smile on my face," he added. "And looking back, I wouldn’t have had it any other way." McCarthy echoed the sentiments of his op-ed in an announcement video shared to X, formerly Twitter, Wednesday.

“Housewives” LuAnn de Lesepps and Sonja Morgan team up for a Christmastime Uber Eats partnership

Can you believe it, girls? Cabaret sensation Countess LuAnn de Lesseps, of "Real Housewives of New York" fame — as well as the upcoming "The Real Housewives Ultimate Girls Trip: RHONY Legacy" — paired up with her long-time castmate Sonja Morgan for a new Uber Eats ad. The glitzy, glam-filled video, which is chockfull of fake snow, deep greens and tons of "Housewives" references, also features a spin on de LeSepps's iconic 2010 smash hit "Money Can't Buy You Class (Elegance is Learned)." In this Uber Eats partnership, though, the title is now "Money Can Buy You Class."

The song incorporates lyrics such as "Scented candle? That's cool! Empty-handed? Uncool," referencing a much-discussed moment (and eventual catch phrase) from a season 7 RHONY episode.  "Sonja and I always have a great time!" de Lesseps tells Billboard. “When I started discussing the remake and music video with Uber, we knew we wanted her to make a cameo. And I’m so glad she was able to join us. We had a blast on set, as we always do when she pops into my Countess Cabaret!” Uber Eats even now lists some "countess-approved" idea and gift lifts on their app.

Uber Eats even now lists some "countess-approved" idea and gift lifts on their app. When asked by Billboard what she'd give to former co-star Bethenny Frankel for Christmas via Uber Eats delivery, de Lesseps told Billboard "A bag of coal . . . she's already got the gift of gab." As the countess herself would say, "Chic C'est la Vie!"  You can watch the video here.

Get creative with these food preservation methods

It could be argued that the world’s cuisines owe a lot to the long history of food preservation — the ingenious and unexpected ways to prolong the lifespan of food that have allowed humans not only to feed themselves year-round, but also to experiment with recipes, expand their palates and find new flavors.

With the dawn of home appliances and shelf-stable packaged goods, some of these millennia-old methods have lost their urgency. Still, preserving can be a crucial tool to help prevent food waste, prolonging ingredients’ lifespan beyond what simple refrigeration will allow while saving the bounty of a CSA, a backyard tree or a garden haul for future meals — or giving new life to scraps like rinds and stems. A preservation project can also be about more than just the food: a way to spend time in the kitchen, to intentionally incorporate sustainable cooking into your lifestyle or to pass down generational knowledge. That there are so many ways to do it is icing on the cake.

We’ve got a rundown of the most common at-home food preservation methods — whether you’ve got two hours or two days, for lovers of involved recipes and kitchen gadgets or cooks who just want to keep it simple. Keep reading for all the preservation inspiration you need.

 

Candying

This is the method for when you want to preserve to impress. While candying can be quite time-consuming (some recipes will require several days, though of course you won’t actually be working for the majority of those hours) the high-effort, high-reward technique produces luminous confections that make any cheese platter or holiday pastry shine.

What is it? This ancient food preservation method prevents spoilage by replacing an ingredient’s water contents with sugar — a process that can also transform scraps and discards, like citrus rinds, wrinkled ginger or bruised fruit, into something quite special.

How should I use it? Popular candying candidates include cherriespineapplepapayafigs and citron (or other citrus), but feel free to get creative. Some confectioners infuse their candying syrup with botanicals, like bay leaves, rosemary or peppercorns, for added intrigue. Candied items can be stored in syrup or thoroughly dried and kept in an airtight container.

 

Canning

It’s not just cottagecore: “Putting up” produce is a time-honored food preservation method to keep fruits and vegetables shelf-stable. There are two main canning methods: pressure canning, which requires specialized equipment, and water bath canning, which can be done with a standard stockpot and a Mason jar. The latter approach, also known as “hot water canning,” is the more accessible option for many home cooks.

What is it? The name “water bath canning” refers to a crucial part of the process: submerging lidded jars in a bath of boiling water. The heat will neutralize the enzymes in the food that relate to decay, kill many bacteria and other microorganisms and create a vacuum that further prevents growth. 

How should I use it? A crucial detail: Certain foods, including meat, dairy, grains and certain types of vegetables, should not be canned with a water bath. Water bath canning is used exclusively for acidic foods, which create an environment that is inhospitable to Clostridium botulinum (the cause of botulism). Common foods include pickles, jams, whole fruits and tomatoes or tomato sauce, always with added acid. It’s important to follow recipes exactly: Boiling times are carefully calculated to ensure thorough heating and pH levels must remain below a certain threshold to be safe.

 

Dehydrating

Drying food once looked like leaving it out in the sun or wind. Thanks to modern technology, you can achieve much the same effect without building a backyard drying rack: An oven or specialized countertop machine can generally dehydrate food in less than 12 hours and all you have to do is slice your ingredient evenly, spread it all out in a single layer and press a button.

What is it? Dehydrators remove water by exposing ingredients to low heat while keeping air circulating throughout, much like a convection oven but at a temperature that doesn’t actually cook them. You can also use a standard oven on the lowest possible setting and crack the door for better airflow. Without moisture, bacteria cannot grow (though exposure to humid air can reintroduce water over time).

How should I use it? Beginners can start with sliced fruits, great for snacking and baking, or vegetables (for stews and braises) and bunches of herbs (for the spice cabinet). Level up with more involved recipes like flavored jerkies or fruit leathers. The dehydrator is your oyster — though dehydrated oysters might not be ideal.

 

Fermenting

You know it when you taste it: funky, sour, salty, savory. Humans have been fermenting since at least the Neolithic age, harnessing the power of microorganisms (sometimes introduced, but often naturally occurring in or on our food) to make it last longer and change both texture and flavor. These microorganisms aren’t harmful — on the contrary, they’re often quite good for us.

What is it? Fermenting encompasses a range of processes through which microorganisms — yeasts, molds, bacteria — break down compounds in food to create alcohols, acids or alkalis, which in turn prevent the growth of harmful pathogens. With produce, it’s often lacto-fermentation afoot: Salt is added to kill the bacteria we don’t want, and Lactobacillus survives to convert the sugars present into lactic acid.

How should I use it? Ferments are among the most famous of all preserved preparations: kimchi, sauerkraut, miso, vinegars, fish sauces. But you can apply the method to all sorts of odds and ends, making kraut from kale scraps or hot sauce from overripe chiles. Fermented foods will last longer than fresh, but should be stored in the refrigerator.

 

Freezing

Yes, freezing counts! It’s one of the simplest preservation methods we have, but that doesn’t mean you can’t be thoughtful about it. How you freeze — and what you freeze and how you prep it — will make a noticeable difference in how frozen food will act once it emerges from the cold.

What is it? Cold temperatures halt decay by slowing enzymes and preventing the movement and growth of microorganisms. Cold temperatures also cause water to crystallize — and those crystals, which can puncture cell walls, cause emulsions to separate or wreak other molecular havoc, are the reason so many foods seem a little different after defrosting. Learning how to minimize the damage can be useful.

How should I use it? With the right preparation and packaging, you can freeze almost anything, though some ingredients are notably more successful than others. Read our guide to learn what foods freeze best, and how you can freeze strategically to minimize common woes, like freezer burn — plus a few recipe ideas for using your freezer creatively, like onion “shaved ice” and one-ingredient banana ice cream.

 

Jam-making

Jams, jellies and marmalades are a classic way to preserve summer fruits or turn a bounty of sour winter citrus into something sweet. Professionals and passionate cooks will often do this in large batches, carefully measuring and canning to ensure everything is shelf-stable. So-called refrigerator jams, on the other hand, require a little less finesse; they’re generally made in small batches to be eaten within a few weeks, making them a great place for novices to start.

What is it? When making jam, fruit is preserved by cooking it with sugar, which slows microbial growth, as does the acid that’s often naturally present. The process also activates pectin, an acidic polysaccharide present in many fruits that sets the jam into a spreadable gel. If you’re not canning, refrigeration is necessary. 

How should I use it? Refrigerator jams typically skip added pectin — many recipes call for just fruit and sugar, and sometimes an acid like lemon juice — so they’re best for fruits that are already rich with it, such as applespearsblackberries or cranberries.

 

Pickling

Pickled cucumbers are so popular in the U.S. that we know them simply as “pickles.” But there’s almost no end to the pickling options. Just like with jams, some people will put up dozens of jars at a time using a precise recipe and careful canning  — and just like with jams, you don’t always need to do all that. Refrigerator pickles (also known as “quick pickles”) can come together in half an hour and last around a month. 

What is it? As is the case with some lacto-fermented preparations, pickles are preserved with acid — in this case, acetic acid from vinegar. The brine is usually an even-ish ratio of vinegar and water, plus varying amounts of sugar, salt and flavorings. Many recipes will have you boil the brine first, which draws out the flavor of added spices and helps the produce absorb it more quickly.

How should I use it? This method works best with vegetables that are very fresh so you maintain that classic crunch. Pickled onionspeppers and cucumbers (of course) are typical on burgers and sandwiches; julienned carrots and daikon are a must for banh mi, and thinly sliced radishes or cabbage can add crunch to tacos. Larger veggies, like blanched green beans or cauliflower florets, make for a great pickle-y snack. Fruits can pickle, too!

 

And more…

There are plenty of other ways to expand your food preservation toolkit. Try hanging up herbs to dry or making a chile ristra or garlic braid. Many animal proteins are traditionally preserved by smoking or curing in sugar, salt or both (usually the case for bacon or gravlax). Something you’ll see somewhat less in the U.S. is curing with lye, the method behind lutefisk and century eggs. Ever heard of duck confit? This technique, which comes from the French word for “preserved,” involves cooking and storing an ingredient in fat to keep oxygen out; it was historically used for meat, but also works great with vegetables.

Check out the National Center for Home Food Preservation for safety guidelines and more ideas.

“Just factually wrong”: Jewish Dem calls out GOP resolution declaring “anti-Zionism is antisemitism”

More than 100 House Democrats on Tuesday declined to vote for a resolution condemning antisemitism over language that equates it with anti-Zionism.

The final vote was 311-14, with 13 Democrats and one Republican voting against the resolution and 92 Democrats voting "present" on it, amounting to 105 Democrats ultimately deciding not to support it, Business Insider reports

Ahead of the vote this week, progressive and Jewish groups condemned the resolution, which draws on the International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance's controversial working definition of antisemitism.

On Monday, Democratic Rep. Jerry Nadler, N.Y., the senior Jewish member of the chamber, spoke out against the resolution in a floor speech. He later encouraged his colleagues to vote "present."

"The resolution… states that all anti-Zionism is antisemitism," Nadler said. "That's either intellectually disingenuous or just factually wrong."

While many view anti-Zionism as a form of antisemitism, they are two distinct ideologies. Antisemitism refers to both historical and contemporary prejudice and discrimination against Jewish people, while anti-Zionism is opposition to the state of Israel's existence. 

The Anti-Defamation League, a Jewish civil rights organization that is staunchly pro-Israel, argues that anti-Zionism is antisemitic because it "renders Jews less worthy of sovereignty and nationhood than other peoples and states."

Nadler, however, noted that many of his former constituents in Brooklyn, including Orthodox Jewish communities, have long held anti-Zionist views, believing that the modern, secular state of Israel butts up against religious prophesies about the return of Jews to the Land of Israel.

"While most anti-Zionism is indeed antisemitic, the authors, if they were at all familiar with Jewish history and culture, should know about Jewish anti-Zionism that was, and is, expressly NOT antisemitic," Nadler said, according to a transcript of his floor speech. "This resolution ignores the fact that even today, certain orthodox Hasidic Jewish communities—the Satmars in New York and others—as well as adherents of the pre-state Jewish labor movement have held views that are at odds with the modern Zionist conception."

These ultra-orthodox Hasidic Jews believe that only the messiah can bring about the true Israel, Nadler added, citing the Jewish Encyclopedia and emphasizing that the Satmars are not antisemitic. 

"I should also note that there are those who try to smear even progressive pro-Israel supporters with the inappropriate label of 'Israel hater' or 'anti-Zionist,'" Nadler said. "Under this resolution, those who love Israel deeply but criticize some of its policy approaches could be considered anti-Zionist. That could make every Democratic Jewish member of this body—because they all criticized the recent Israeli judicial reform package—de facto antisemites. Might that be the authors’ intention?"

Many progressive Jews, including the group Jewish Voice for Peace, also describe themselves as anti-Zionist.

"Again, let me be unequivocally clear: most anti-Zionism, particularly in this moment, has a real antisemitism problem," Nadler continued. "But we cannot fairly say that one equals the other."

Nadler on Monday introduced his own resolution on antisemitism, arguing that it better addresses the problem than the Republican-proposed resolution. Tuesday's resolution was sponsored by Rep. David Kustoff of Tennessee, one of two Jewish Republicans in the House of Representatives. 

Rep. Mark Pocan, D-Wis., a leading House progressive, told Business Insider earlier Tuesday that he was unsure how he would vote on the resolution and expressed frustration with the breadth of pro-Israel resolutions that have come to the floor in recent months.

"I have to admit, I'm kind of over the weekly stuff that they're putting out there that means nothing," Pocan said, adding he was unsure whether to "start doing 'present' votes on stupid things, or just vote 'no' on stupid things, or just say 'yes' because they're stupid things."

Last week, the House voted on a resolution affirming Israel's right to exist. Rep. Thomas Massie, R-Ky., voted against it and Rep. Rashida Tlaib, D-Mich., voted "present."

Massie was also the only Republican member of Congress to vote against Tuesday's resolution before which he posted a Drake meme that prompted one White House spokesman to accuse him of "virulent antisemitism."

Ninety-five Democrats voted for the resolution anyway, including Ohio Rep. Greg Landsman, one of more than two dozen Jewish representatives.

"It is of course fine to criticize any government, including Israel's," Landsman told Business Insider. "But I do believe that denying Jews a state is antisemitic, so I plan to vote for the bill. There are misunderstandings about antisemitism and a lack of appreciation for its rise. I hope my explanation helps folks better navigate all of this."

We need your help to stay independent

The 13 Democrats who voted against the resolution are Reps. Tlaib; Jamaal Bowman, N.Y.; Cori Bush, Mo.; Gerry Connolly, Va.; Jesús "Chuy" García, Ill.; Raul Grijalva, Ariz.; Pramila Jayapal, Wash.; Summer Lee, Pa.; Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, N.Y.; Ilhan Omar, Minn.; Ayanna Pressley, Mass.; Delia Ramirez, Ill.; and Bonnie Watson Coleman, N.J.

"This extreme and cynical Republican resolution does nothing to combat antisemitism, relies on a definition that conflates criticism of the Israeli government with antisemitism, paints critics of the Israeli government as antisemites, and falsely states that anti-Zionism is antisemitism," Omar said in a statement about her vote, per Common Dreams. "We must stand against any attempt to define legitimate criticism of this war and the government perpetrating it as antisemitism."

After the vote, Bowman said that, while he "strongly condemn[s] antisemitism and hate in all of its forms," he voted against Tuesday's resolution because "it fuels division and violence, conflates criticism of the Israeli government with antisemitism, and ignores one of the greatest threats to the Jewish community, white nationalism."

Rep. Bush echoed Nadler's remarks during his floor speech in a post to X, formerly Twitter, explaining her reasoning for voting against the resolution.

".@RepJerryNadler is right," she wrote. "H.Res.894 doesn’t protect our Jewish neighbors facing alarming rises in antisemitism. I opposed it because it dangerously conflates criticism of the far-right Israeli government with antisemitism. We need genuine action, not political games."

Bowman and Omar are among the House progressives facing legitimate primary challenges in the next election cycle, in part because of their criticism of the Israeli government and its bombardment of Gaza, which has killed almost 16,000 Palestinians in less than two months, according to the Hamas-run Gaza Health Ministry.

They joined Bush, Lee, Massie, Ocasio-Cortez, Ramirez, Tlaib and Reps. André Carson, D-Ind., and Al Green, D-Texas, in opposing a bipartisan resolution in October, which asserted the House unconditionally "stands with Israel as it defends itself against the barbaric war launched by Hamas and other terrorists" and did not mention the suffering of Palestinians.


Want a daily wrap-up of all the news and commentary Salon has to offer? Subscribe to our morning newsletter, Crash Course.


J Street, a progressive pro-Israel organization, vehemently condemned the rise in antisemitism but criticized the resolution's conflation of all anti-Zionism with antisemitism in a Tuesday statement.

"While we will never waver in calling out antisemitism from any corner, we have been equally clear that not all beliefs, statements and actions that are anti-Zionist are also antisemitic," the organization wrote.

"Unfortunately, while the Kustoff-Miller resolution (H.Res.894) rightly denounces antisemitism, supports the Jewish community, and rejects terror, the resolution states 'clearly and firmly' that 'anti-Zionism is antisemitism' – a blanket, inaccurate and ultimately counterproductive statement with no recognition of the complexities of the Jewish people or the definition of Zionism and anti-Zionism itself," J Street continued.

The organization pointed to Jewish communities who do not support the Zionist movement and the way efforts to codify definitions of antisemitism would "legally define some Constitutionally protected speech on Israel and its policies as antisemitic" as reasons why it opposed Tuesday's resolution and will oppose any future provisions attempting to legislate a single definition of antisemitism. Instead, J Street voiced strong support for Nadler's resolution.

It also condemned the "concurrent rise in bigotry and deadly violence" against Palestinian-Americans and others of Palestinian heritage in the U.S, referencing "the brutal murder" of a 6-year-old Palestinian-American boy in October and the recent shooting of three Palestinian college students late last month. 

"Just like the human security of Israelis and Palestinians is inextricably intertwined in Israel and Palestine, so too is the safety of Jewish and Palestinian communities here in the United States in no small part bound together," J Street wrote. "None of us are truly safe until all of us – all Americans and others who call our country home — need not live in fear of bigotry."

Taylor Swift is TIME’s person of the year

In unsurprising news, Taylor Swift has been named TIME’s person of the year. The singer and newly minted billionaire beat out contenders like the Hollywood strikers, Vladimir Putin and Barbie for the title.

TIME’s profile highlights Swift’s economic impact—her Eras Tour sold 2 million tickets in just one day and 4.1 million tickets for 2023 in total, and even caused Ticketmaster to crash, fans to sue and Congress to launch an investigation. Each stop of her tour brought its own “mini economic boom,” driving out of town fans to spend money on transportation, hotels, food and friendship bracelet materials.

For Swift, this economic success has implications beyond her bank account. She calls the frenzy surrounding her tour, Beyoncé’s Renaissance Tour and “Barbie” “a three-part summer of feminine extravaganza” that proves that female art is lucrative, hopefully meaning more of it will get made. “It’s extremely heartening,” she said. She also slammed those who put her in competition with Beyoncé, a performer she has been publicly praising all summer. “Clearly it’s very lucrative for the media and stan culture to pit two women against each other, even when those two artists in question refuse to participate in that discussion,” she said.

While this moment in her life is the “proudest and happiest” she’s ever felt, Swift acknowledged to TIME that it all started with hardship. She discusses how “getting canceled within an inch of [her] life and sanity” after her feud with Kanye West and having her masters purchased by Scooter Braun were the catalysts for her next-level fame.

#TradWives are not real housewives. “Fargo” shows us the heroic difference between the two

Internet-based subcultures that bleed into the mainstream are inevitably misinterpreted or incorrectly defined. Take the whole “tradwife” trend, for instance. As my Salon colleague Amanda Marcotte describes in her recent article on this weird phenomenon, so-called tradwifes are a strain of white, Christian TikTok influencers extolling the virtues of submissive marriage while dressing like pin-up fantasies.

Central to their schtick is exhibiting happiness at the thought of pleasing their husband and bending to his will in all matters.

“Fargo” provides an example of that dynamic in Jon Hamm’s Roy Tillman, a supposed “constitutional” sheriff who rules his North Dakota town more than running it. Tillman keeps his constituents in line by supposedly living by Biblical law, his interpretation of which is squishy at best; the New Testament doesn’t say anything about, say, misappropriating weapons to arm a local militia.

But the verse Tillman gets off on the most refers to a husband’s supremacy over his wife. “Jesus was a man, not some bearded lady. And just as water flows downhill, her husband is head of his household. Under him, the woman abides,” Roy riffs in the second episode, later adding, “He only raises his hand when she forgets her place and acts the man. And then, only for instruction. Never taking any pleasure or satisfaction from the task.”

What type of marriage does that produce? Episode 3 provides some hints when it more fully introduces us to Karen Tillman (Rebecca Liddiard), Roy’s latest wife and mother to two daughters. Karen’s father is a white supremacist leader of an anti-government battalion Roy is secretly supporting which informs how Karen was probably molded – which is to say, into #TradWife material. White supremacy and patriarchy go hand in hand, after all.

FargoJon Hamm as Roy Tillman in "Fargo" (Michelle Faye/FX)Following a visitation by Karen’s father, she joins Roy at bedtime, where he silently stares at the ceiling while smoking a joint.

“Alone at last!” she says, strolling to the large wooden chest at the foot of their bed and opening it to reveal a softly lit trove of sexual fantasy. “What do you want tonight, Daddy? You want 'helpless hitchhiker'? How about 'angry feminist'?” she says, saucily swinging handcuffs from her finger.

Frances McDormand’s Marge Gunderson is the first of many "Fargo" mothers, daughters, wives and sisters who get things done because they must, despite men who underestimate their fortitude.

Then she removes her robe and slides into bed with him, stroking and kissing his chest. “How about that mean old governor? Hmm?” Karen purrs, stopping curtly when Roy gently lifts his hand. “Sorry,” she says abruptly, rolling over to her side of the bed with her back to him, her face arranging itself into a look suspended between fear and nothingness.

Roy is no hero. He’s hunting his ex-wife Dorothy Lyon (Juno Temple), who has been hiding out in a new life and a happy, stable marriage to gentle Wayne (David Rysdahl), a guy Roy would likely denigrate in emasculating terms. 

Like Karen, Dot is a stay-at-home mother whose main jobs are keeping house, caring for her daughter Scotty (Sienna King), and assisting with PTA functions – a rare situation in 2019, when the fifth season takes place. She loves making Bisquick pancakes and knits while watching daytime TV. 

Write off Dot as another kind of tradwife to your peril, however. She’s also an expert on improvising field dressings for bullet wounds and setting deadly booby traps to defend whatever place in which she's cornered, be it her home or a convenience store under siege.

In the season premiere, she dispatches her kidnappers by knocking them out – one by using bags of ice, another with a shovel. Both men were armed with guns, and they couldn’t overpower her. Minnesota state trooper Witt Farr (Lamorne Morris) took a bullet from one of them, and he would have bled out if not for Dorothy rigging a makeshift tourniquet out of bandages, an ice scraper and duct tape.

“Where’d you learn to do all this?” he asks her.

 “It’s not my first getaway,” Dot quietly replies.

Women have been central to every “Fargo” tale since the 1996 movie, when Frances McDormand’s Marge Gunderson unravels a grisly series of crimes in Brainerd, Minn., while being seven months pregnant and barely calling attention to that state. 

She’s the first of many "Fargo" mothers, daughters, wives and sisters who get things done because they must, despite obstacles placed in their way by men who underestimate their fortitude.

FargoDavid Rysdahl as Wayne Lyon, Juno Temple as Dorothy "Dot" Lyon and Sienna King as Scotty Lyon in "Fargo" (Michelle Faye/FX)In most of the previous seasons such women have been cops or criminals; some were and are kingpins. Dot, who’s called a “tiger” by a formidable foe, is a tiny woman with a cheerful smile and a reassuring voice who favors buttercup yellow and thrift store fashion. She likes to do crafts with her daughter. She does not appreciate being threatened.

Write off Dot as another kind of tradwife to your peril.

Resourcefulness is the hallmark of the housewife, according to any 1950s home economics film. Typically that refers to stretching a dollar or getting creative with leftovers. Dot interprets that doctrine to ensure she can keep the life she wants on her terms instead of letting Roy recapture her.

When Wayne balks at getting a security system, and the local gun shop is hamstrung by federal background check laws and week-long cool-down periods, Dot rigs a Rube Goldberg-style home protection grid using items she has around the house or that she can purchase at the hardware store.

Light bulbs balanced between doorknobs and frames double as a warning system. A sledgehammer suspended by a cord awaits any who would breach her front door. Lacking a gun, she hammers nails into a baseball bat. Lacking an automated connection to a monitoring service, she connects exposed wires running along jambs to a light switch. We see how effective a deterrent all of these are during an inevitable home invasion. Sadly for Dot, Wayne ends up taking the voltage when, in a panic, he dashes for a window.

But the sheer fact that Dot is battle-ready distinguishes her from women like Karen, who would claim to be helpless without Roy. The tradwife or the "female," as Roy refers to women and livestock – is under her husband’s protection. Defending territory is a man’s duty. By that logic, a woman who can take care of herself, women like Dot, would be “acting the man,” not being self-sufficient or capable.

We need your help to stay independent

The relative mainstreaming of tradwife lunacy is concerning for a lot reasons, one being an escalating tendency to conflate the term with that of everyday stay-at-home parents and housewives. This implies all homemakers-by-choice are somehow anti-feminist figures, a lie that's resurfaced many times in some form since the 1970s.  Such needless debates pitting housewives against working women tend to center white, college-educated women, leaving aside the reality for many Black and brown women who have no option other than to keep their household in order while maintaining a full-time job.

Besides, framing general homemaking and caretaking in such terms is denigrating to people pushed out the workforce during the pandemic, many of them leaving to take care of their kids due to our government’s sub-par to non-existent childcare subsidies.

If you spent any time around the culinary-themed Internet within the past couple of weeks, you’ve probably encountered Jessica Secrest’s “aggressive” taco tater tot casserole tutorial. The Grand Rapids, Mich. TikToker’s video went viral after it was cross-posted on Twitter, earning praise for Secrest’s loud, plainspoken, “I’ve had it with you people” presentation and frankness.

Secrest isn’t gussied up like a 1950s Betty Crocker drawing. Her hair isn’t done up specially, it’s pulled back and off her face. She’s dressed for utilitarian comfort in a long-sleeved black top and jeans. That she feels no need to smile for the camera or seduce her audience makes her all the more endearing.

“This is just a lady making a meal for her family, albeit in an aggressive way,” says culinary TikTok’s top judge Chef Reactions, with whom Secrest passes muster aside from her shocking over usage of “jarlic.”


Want a daily wrap-up of all the news and commentary Salon has to offer? Subscribe to our morning newsletter, Crash Course.


A few posts social media posts, such as this one from an X user called @SaintQ92, assigned the tradwife label to her. 

“OK A, she’s my new favorite person, and B, this is what irl tradwives are but nobody is ready for that convo. Sorry bro, she’s probably not some ethereal size 0 walking through a field of sunflowers.”

They meant that to be funny, I'm sure. To women doing the hard work of keeping house and raising the kids without hewing to some ridiculous notion of subservience, being called a #TradWife, even as a joke, might not be.

 A Detroit News profile of Secrest reveals that she earned a master’s degree in employment and labor relations in 2017 and worked as a human resources manager until 2021 when, like so many parents with young children, she quit her job to be a stay-at-home mom to her now-three- and five-year-olds. The same article reveals that her husband is her partner who moderates her live videos.

Secrest’s popular post shows her making a meal colloquially known as “hot dish,” a term that is regionally specific to the Midwest, including Michigan and Minnesota. That marks her as a sister in spirit to Dot, who also dresses sensibly and prefers homey activities, but also makes it clear she will not back down from any threat or challenge.

Like Dorothy Lyon, Secrest’s take-no-guff demeanor leads us to believe she could as MacGyver her way out of a bind if the need arose. She’s a mom and a wife making it work because if not her, then who? So she only has time for jarred garlic. So what? The corn she uses is frozen, and she opens its package with her teeth — “It’s fine,” she yells. 

Generations of adults whose mothers raised them as a full-time job, often in addition to other work, relate to her.

“I would trust her with my life,” says X user @meatsical.  

If she were in “Fargo,” she might be the only one who could save it.  

New episodes of "Fargo" air 10 p.m. Tuesdays on FX and stream the next day on Hulu.

 

Lidia Bastianch’s coziest winter recipes, either for a holiday or a frenzied weeknight

No matter if looking for recipe ideas for a snow day, Christmas itself, or some random Tuesday, Lidia Bastianich is one of the most reliable chefs, food personalities and recipe developers around. 

As the weather reaches especially low temperatures and you want to curl up with something especially comforting as the flurries start to come down, look no further than Bastianich's terrific recipes. 

This list has an assortment of ingredients and protein choices, but each one feels festive, filling and entirely delicious. 

Some of these dishes can make for an excellent center piece on Christmas Day, New Years Eve, a Hannukah evening or any other special occasion, holiday or not. 


Want more great food writing and recipes? Subscribe to Salon Food's newsletter, The Bite.


We couldn't recommend them enough. But as always, don't feel like you need to follow every single ingredient and step to a T. Especially this season, give yourself some grace and use — with common sense — what you already have on hand. No need to trek out in the cold. 

Clams oreganata is a holiday non-negotiable for my family; usually both clams oreganata and stuffed mushrooms are welcome starters on our annual Christmas spread.
 
Simple, quick and wildly flavorful, clams oreganata (or any protein made in an oreganta manner) is a terrific appetizer or hors d'oeuvres to get things going, to whet your guests' appetites, or to simply enjoy on your own, nestled on the couch while watching your favorite holiday movie. These come together in no time at all and call for only the best ingredients: clams, garlic, evoo, white wine, lemon, butter, breadcrumbs and lots of fresh herbs.
 
Also, no utensils required! 
Baked ziti is welcome any day of the year, but an especially gussied up version is really delicious on a holiday – especially one with lots and lots of crispy bits and edges. It's also a favorite crowd pleaser that happens to also feed a crowd. Don't skimp on the ricotta here, and of course, feel free to amp up the cheese all the more.
 
Have rigatoni on hand and not ziti? Have tons of zucchini but no eggplant? No worries, any swap is fine here. 
Any carnivores will be especially fond of this particularly festive centerpiece. Fatty, crisped pork shoulder — which can be shredded into a carnitas-type manner or served in chunks or thick slices — is taken to another level with each spoonful of savory, rich vegetable sauce. Roasting everything together allows all of the flavors to mingle together. The recipe calls for onions, carrots, leeks, celery, mushrooms and lots of herbs, spices and wine, but if you have other vegetables languishing on the counter, chop 'em up and throw those in, too. Why not?
 
Bonus: the sandwiches made from leftovers will blow you away. 

We need your help to stay independent

Whole fish is always a showstopper and you'll impress everyone with this picture-esque fish dish with an amazingly unassuming yet delicious tomato pesto served alongside. This can also be served on its own volition or with your favorite, go-to holiday potatoes, carbs or starch. 
 
This is an exercise in simplicity so use your discretion not to gild the lily too much! You want the flavor of the fish itself to be the starring component.
This is a quintessential Christmas dessert, from color and flavor to the heady, stellar aromas that'll waft through the house as this is in the oven.
 
Get some store-bought ice cream (or pick some up from your favorite local ice cream shoppe or parlor), throw this in the oven as you're eating dinner and then pull it out and let it cool slightly before spooning over scoops of your absolutely favorite ice cream, frozen yogurt or sorbet. 
 
This is an especially low lift but an. astonishingly satisfying end cap to your holiday meal, with flavors of roasted fruit and savory, warming spices mixing perfectly with a cool, refreshing base. 

“Immoral”: Bernie Sanders rejects $10 billion in aid for “extremist Netanyahu government”

U.S. Sen. Bernie Sanders, D-Vt., said Monday that he opposes sending billions of dollars in additional military assistance to the Israeli government as it continues to wage a catastrophic war on the Gaza Strip, an assault that the Vermont senator described as unlawful and "immoral."

"I do not believe we should be appropriating over $10 billion for the right-wing, extremist Netanyahu government to continue its current military approach," Sanders, who has faced backlash from progressives and some of his former campaign staffers for refusing to support a permanent cease-fire, said in remarks on the Senate floor.

Sanders' speech came as Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y., set the stage for a procedural vote on a $106 billion supplemental package that includes military assistance for Israel and Ukraine. The vote is expected to fail as Republicans push for the inclusion of asylum restrictions that progressive Democrats have condemned as draconian.

The Vermont senator, for his part, decried the lack of attention to domestic emergencies in the bill, from childcare to primary healthcare to housing.

"I am deeply concerned that this legislation has no investments to address the needs of working families in the United States — 60% of whom are living paycheck to paycheck," Sanders said, noting that the supplemental bill includes "tens of billions" in military spending that should be dedicated to "some of the enormous domestic crises we face."

Sanders went on to slam the proposed $10.1 billion in no-strings-attached military aid that would "allow the Netanyahu government to continue its current offensive military approach" in which the U.S. is complicit, having supplied the Israeli military with around 15,000 bombs and tens of thousands of artillery shells.

The senator said he would support "defense systems" to protect Israeli citizens from rocket attacks fired by the groups involved in the deadly October 7 attack. But "Israel's indiscriminate approach is, in my view, offensive to most Americans, it is in violation of U.S. and international law, and it undermines the prospects for lasting peace and security," said Sanders.

"Israel must dramatically change its approach to minimize civilian harm and lay out a wider political process that can secure lasting peace," he added.

That process, Sanders said, must include "a guarantee that displaced Palestinians will have the absolute right to return to their homes as Gaza rebuilds; it will include no long-term occupation or blockade of Gaza; an end to the killings of Palestinians in the West Bank and a freeze on new settlements there; and, perhaps most importantly, a commitment to broad peace talks to advance a new two-state solution in the wake of this war."

Sanders delivered his speech as Israel expanded its ground offensive to southern Gaza, threatening to worsen the territory's horrific humanitarian crisis by attacking the region to which many fled as Israel assailed the northern part of the strip. Around 80% of Gaza's population has been displaced in less than two months.

Doctors Without Borders warned Monday that hospitals in the south are "at a breaking point" due to Israel's bombardment and ongoing siege, which have prevented the delivery of critical supplies including fuel and anesthetics.

In an open letter on Monday, Doctors Without Borders executive director Avril Benoît implored U.S. President Joe Biden to "call for an immediate and sustained cease-fire in Gaza," saying his group has rarely "encountered such a catastrophic combination of escalating humanitarian and medical needs, ravaged infrastructure, and intentionally limited humanitarian access."

"Our teams throughout Gaza recount scenes of horror in the hospitals: dead bodies everywhere, people with crushed limbs rescued from collapsed buildings, and orphaned children with severe burns covering most of their tiny bodies. They describe patients screaming in pain because there's not enough anesthesia," Benoît wrote. "And every day, they go to work for their patients."

"They can't go on like this," she added. "No one in Gaza can go on like this. We need a sustained cease-fire now."