Spring Offer: Get 1 Year, Save 58%

“Not all love has to be the same”: Lessons for “Bridgerton’s” matriarch who is “testing the waters”

Lady Violet Bridgerton stands at the foot of the main staircase in her family home, wearing a shimmering dress whose color matches her name. Poised, elegant, and bejeweled in diamonds, Violet is prepared to spend her evening doing what "Bridgerton" characters do best: Attend a ball.

Her son, however, is not. 

"She can't get a handle on Francesca."

Colin Bridgerton (Luke Newton) stands before his mother in a state of disarray. "Was it you I heard lumbering in the hallway late last night?" Violet asks. Colin is missing an overcoat, his shirt is rumpled, and he's proclaimed his "bottle-weary" state has precluded him from attending the festivities. But Violet knows better.

"It's like she knows everything before them [her children]," says Ruth Gemmell, who portrays the Dowager Viscountess and matriarch of a brood of eight on Netflix's massively popular series set in Regency era England. Colin is vexed by his romantic feelings for Penelope Featherington (Nicola Coughlan), a close family friend and, unbeknownst to the 'Ton, the woman behind the curtain: the gossip scribe, Lady Whistledown. 

"I am proud of your sensitivity," Violet tells her son. "But living to please others? I imagine it can be wearying at times. Painful, perhaps. So I do not blame you for putting on armor lately. But you must be careful that the armor does not rust and set so that you might never be able to take it off."

The "will they/won't they" tension between Colin and Penelope defines the latest season's action and conflict. For Violet, their longstanding friendship coming to intimate fruition marks another successful pairing for a Bridgerton scion — in an era wholly defined by courtship and marriage prospects, much of a society mother's duty was to ensure that their children are securely wed. Gemmell sees Violet's role as one of quiet and gentle guidance.

"She just needs to kind of move them in the direction until they wake up and realize themselves," Gemmell tells Salon.

Though "Bridgerton" often places considerable focus on the 'Ton's most eligible young men and women, this season gestures toward the possibility of a second turn at romance for Violet with the arrival of Lord Marcus Anderson (Daniel Francis). The two share immediate chemistry, much to the chagrin of his sister and Violet's close friend, Lady Agatha Danbury (Adjoa Andoh). Violet and Lord Marcus' flirtation is subtle and slow — a mature progression that both reflects their age and is a far cry from Bridgerton's explicit lovemaking scenes for the show's younger characters. It also builds upon a revelation made in "Bridgerton"'s prequel spinoff, "Queen Charlotte," that Violet's garden is in bloom, signaling a budding interest in male affection after the death of her husband more than a decade prior. 

Check out the full interview, in which Gemmell elaborates on Violet's role as a mother, matchmaker and dowager set to potentially return to the dating scene.

The following interview has been edited for length and clarity. 

I come from a large family — I'm the oldest of five siblings. My own mom was one of nine, and so I've always grown up in and around big families. Your character has eight children. I have this affection for Violet Bridgerton and what she has to go through with eight kids, having seen my mom go through it firsthand and as the oldest specifically. I wanted to start first with how she's dealing with Colin. What does she think of his engagement with Penelope?

"Whatever the Queen would say, I think [Violet] would believe."

I think she's over the moon, absolutely over the moon. In the books, she's always making her sons go and dance with the wallflower Penelope. So I think she has an inkling that one day Penelope will be part of the family, or at least that's her hankering, I think. And there's a really lovely moment — I think it was the first scene that I did with Luke, I think — and it's in one of the balls when he's asking his mother about what she hopes for Francesca [Hannah Dodd]. And of course, the answers are the same. It's love, passion and friendship. And then she realizes that the object of it is not about Francesca at all — it's about him and that the object of his desire is, in fact, Penelope.

And I think there's a moment there that she is really lovely to clock and then realize that from this moment on, she knows exactly how to navigate him. Because the way she steers all her children — it's like she knows everything before them. So she just needs to kind of move them in the direction until they wake up and realize themselves.

I'm the youngest of five. So I know how those dynamics of a large family operate.

BridgertonRuth Gemmell as Violet Bridgerton, Victor Alli as John Stirling and Hannah Dodd as Francesca Bridgerton in "Bridgerton" (Netflix)I also wanted to ask about Violet's feelings about Francesca. To me, Francesca's engagement to John Stirling (Victor Alli) seemed somewhat more subdued, even though they seem like a well-suited pair. How do you read her attitude toward that match?

I think she respects it. I think she thinks he's a lovely man. But what Violet has always wanted for her children was the something that she had, and she knows it's achievable. And she can't get a handle on Francesca. She can't understand why Francesca isn't interested in the same way. It'll be interesting to see where we go with Francesca's story, because you could say that Violet had a point. But on the other hand, Francesca is teaching her something: that not all love has to be the same, that not all love has to be a thunderbolt, that something that is a slow burn can be equally as valid and beautiful. But I think she struggles with it, definitely, because she worries that it won't be enough at some point, I think.

Do you feel that Violet understands Francesca fully? Eight kids are a lot to keep up with as they as they mature, especially, and begin to engage in intimate relationships. Francesca does seem to have kept more to herself than the others.

Yeah, she's definitely the quiet one. She's definitely the quiet one. And the way we depicted that, I guess, in these last previous two series is that she's always away — going to stay with relatives, doing things on her own, even when she is always the quiet one. And that's something that she's relished, but also kind of is unfathomable to her [Violet] because the others are all so loud.

Yeah, that's very true. Even having this conversation is just making me think of, like, the different personality types between my siblings and I. In many ways, we couldn't be more night and day from each other, even though I think we all kind of amalgamate around this same shared family identity. 

I often used to think that with me and my siblings, none of us look like each other, but we all look like our parents.

Yeah, I feel the same way. And it's so disorienting when people say, "Oh, you look like your sister," or "You look like your brother." And you never see it. But everyone else does.

While this series is sort of a fantasy version of Regency England, the Queen's (Golda Rosheuvel) interest in matchmaking and socializing does, I think, seem rather over the top. How much does Violet take into account the Queen's opinion?

I think she takes it to heart quite a lot. I think if given the period of time and where we are with this 'Ton, I think royalty is everything to them. It sort of sets the order of the day in a way. So whatever the Queen would say, I think she would believe. And unfortunately, my children seem to piss her off quite a lot (laughs). They always go one way with the Queen and then their own way. And that's another reason why she's nervous with Francesca about going to the Queen, because yet again, the Queen chose somebody for her, and she's chosen somebody else.

But yes, I think where that social standing is, I think I think the royal household is something to revere.

At the end of "Queen Charlotte," we find out that Violet's garden is in bloom. The scene is sweet and funny at the same time as Violet is sort of trying to communicate her desires to Lady Danbury without saying it outright. What was it like to shoot that scene?

A lot of fun, a lot of fun. I adore Adjoa, and we've been working together now — I think I didn't know her before I knew of her. I'd never worked with her before.  And we've been working together on this for the past five years. So we have a shorthand now and we really relish our scenes together because we get to play. So, yeah, that was a lot of fun.

BridgertonDaniel Francis as Marcus Anderson in "Bridgerton" (Netflix)We see Violet make what seems to be a few attempts at flirting already with Lord Marcus. Do you feel that Violet is ready for another relationship or is she just sort of testing the waters of what romance could feel like?

I would probably say she's testing the waters. I think she's going to be very tentative with this because I think her children mean everything to her. And I think her friendship with Lady Danbury is also everything to her. And she's already said, I think, that no man will come between them. So I think she's enjoying feeling alive again. And I think she's surprised about feeling alive again. But I think she would be quite nervous. Yeah, we'll see.

Widows and widowers, especially those who already have children, have a bit more freedom in Regency England than those who have never married. Do you think it's crossed Violet's mind to sort of take advantage of that romantically or otherwise?

"If she does, she'll be bloody secretive about it."

That's quite difficult to answer because in the book, of course, she never does. In the books, she doesn't quite deliberately because no one has ever kind of matched up to Edmund. And in fact, I think there is a conversation possibly in a later book between Francesca and her where — I can't remember, one of my daughters — they have a conversation and the daughter asks why I never took her love, and she said, "No one ever really – I just didn't, wasn't interested."

So I'm not sure about taking advantage of the situation. I think she's heard of people who do. I think she's aware of that, but I think she would be, I think she'd be nervous. I think social standing to them all is something that they all hold dear. But, you know, if she does, she'll be bloody secretive about it.

I would concur. Like the series "Queen Charlotte," how open would you be to see a prequel spinoff for Violet? We sort of started her story in "Queen Charlotte," but we didn't see much of her relationship with Edmund, actually.

No, I don't know. I think that's entirely in their hands, really. We saw a little bit of Edmund and how his loss affected her in Season 2 of "Bridgerton." So we've seen bits and pieces. There is a sort of a prequel in — I think it's the very final book that Julia Quinn wrote, which sort of documents her as a young girl when she meets Edmund and when they're first married and things like that. It's there, but I think that's in somebody else's hands.

Now that Kate (Simone Ashley) is stepping up with her Viscountess duties and there's at least one grandchild on the way, how is Violet feeling about what her role is in the future?

It's probably going to be — I think she absolutely believes in Kate. I think she in some respects relishes letting go. I think on another standard, that's all she's ever done for many, many years. And I think it's a slow process to realization that she doesn't, she can't have the same . . . But there was a very funny moment that Simone and I kept giggling about. There's a scene where Penelope faints, and we both ran out of the room calling for Mrs. Wilson [Geraldine Alexander] at the same time, trying to be the head of the house. So that was quite entertaining.

Have you ever thought about if Violet has any hobbies or interests outside of her children? After all, that is sort of her expected role in society, but I was curious to know if you thought of her outside of that.

Well she does a lot of bloody needlework. She's always sewing something, doing some kind of pattern and you should see how I butcher it. It's always really beautiful — a lovely little flower — and then I'm always on the same spot and it looks like hell by the time we finish. There's that.

I think Adjoa and I decided she drinks quite a lot (laughs.) I think there is somewhere in the books when she's exacerbated by one of them sort of drinking. Not heavily, but you know, it's more like that really. I've decided she just goes out buying diamonds. Maybe she's a shopaholic.

Who would you say tends to be the biggest jokester on set and who do you have the greatest rapport with?

Jonny [Bailey] is a real prankster and so is Eloise [Claudia Jessie]. Yeah, I love those family scenes. I think they're great. I love those kids. I probably have my most significant scenes on the whole with Adjoa. I suppose I do sometimes have very kind of poignant moments with whoever's falling in love at the time. So they're always nice to have, but yeah, we all joke around quite a lot actually, especially in those big ball scenes, they go on for days. Honestly, it can be hell and it can be heaven at the same time because it's often when we get to see each other and there's a lot of sort of messing around and I think we are the bane of the crew's life on those days. But that's probably why we're that giddy, because they go on for days.

Queen Charlotte: A Bridgerton StoryRuth Gemmell as Violet Bridgerton and Adjoa Andoh as Lady Agatha Danbury in "Queen Charlotte: A Bridgerton Story" (Nick Wall/Netflix)Freedom means different things to different women in "Bridgerton." What do you think that it means to Violet?

I think one of the reasons that she is so adamant that her children marry for love is that with love comes respect, and if there's respect in the marriage, then her daughters will be safe and happy and that whoever her sons marry will have the same respect and be safe. I think, because it's such a patriarchal society, I think that form of freedom is everything to Violet.

Yeah, and I think even in the scenes we do see of Violet and Edmund, that sort of value is reflected. Do you feel the same way?

Yeah, I think I do, yeah. She's certainly bringing up those children the way he would have wanted as well.

How would you say that you define freedom for yourself?

Well, funnily enough, probably similar: respect I think. I think equality. It's really hard to answer for yourself.

Would you say that playing Violet has influenced your definition of freedom? Or altered it?

I think the way I approach a character is to find something that I can identify with. So in the same way that freedom can — when I say respect and equality, part of that encompasses being heard, I guess.  And even for characters that are nothing like Violet, who are evil.  I mean, most of the time I used to play really s**t mothers or murderers. So it would be kind of a similar sort of thing. Someone who wants to be heard; there is a freedom in that. Now, it's not necessarily respectful, but there is a freedom in being heard.

All episodes of "Bridgerton" are streaming on Netflix.

 

“Society is ready to kill”: Director Agnieszka Holland on the refugee crisis and film “Green Border”

Agnieszka Holland’s astonishing epic “Green Border” presents the current refugee crisis from multiple points of view to illuminate the moral and emotional complexities of this hot button political issue. This film, shot in stark black and white, as if to magnify the gray morality and bleak experiences on display, is set in October 2021, in and around the forest between Belarus and Poland that separates the EU. It is the green border of the title. 

"They call me all the possible names, said I made Nazi propaganda, compared me as being Hitler, Goebbels, Stalin and Putin in one."

Holland’s absorbing drama tells several intersecting stories. A Syrian family along with an Afghanistan woman Leila (Behi Djanati Atai), arrive in Belarus to cross into Poland and the safety of the EU. But situations occur that have Polish border guards, including, Jan (Tomasz Wlosok), send them back to Belarus. Meanwhile, a handful of activists try to help the refugees stranded in the forest get food, medical attention and to safety. After the activists meet Julia (Maja Ostaszewska), a psychologist who lives near the green border, she assists in their efforts and is changed by the experience.

These various characters and their storylines are all gripping because they feel so authentic. Perhaps too real; the film struck a nerve with the Polish President Andrzej Duda as well as right-wing members of the government, including the ministers of justice, education and the interior — all of whom spoke out against “Green Border” (though it was unclear if any of them had actually seen the film).

Nevertheless, Holland speaks truth to power, railing against injustice — a theme throughout her decades-long career. She shows how poorly border guards treat refugees and the networks that are created to help the refugees. “Green Border,” which features many indelible sequences (including the heartbreaking death of one character), is a rallying cry to address this global crisis head on and with humanity. 

Holland spoke with Salon about her new film. 

How did you develop the various stories and decide to present them in the way that you did? 

It was quite special this work. I reacted to the reality in an urgent way. I tried to make the film about the events a few weeks after they became public. I contacted two colleagues who became my co-screenwriters. I asked them to join me and to make it quickly. I wanted the film to be part of the reality somehow. We started the very extended research. My cowriters had acquaintances and friends who have been involved in the medical and humanitarian activism on the border. We met with local people, activists, refugees and journalists who had been covering the issue, and a few border guards who anonymously wanted to tell their story. We saw all kinds of information or stories in the media — a photo or a video clip. After three or four weeks we had so much material the work was to eliminate it, to shape it. 

The main question was what [approach] to take? Do we [present] one story, or one place, or one character? I decided that the story of migration and the response of Europe to the migration issue is well known, but what was happening on the borders had a lot of unknown specifics. I decided it was good to give faces and voices to many points of views and many experiences in the drama — refugees, who were dehumanized by the official propaganda, who are trapped in that terrible forest between Belarus and Poland and shifted back and forth very violently by uniformed forces, and the activists who were immediately named as “Putin’s useful idiots,” and the border guards who didn’t have a choice — a bit like the refugees. They are transported to the situation by the fact that they are serving as part of the armed forces and have to obey orders. At the same time, the most intelligent knew they are breaking the constitution and international law through violent pushbacks. Very few didn’t do it, or left. Many decided to take early retirement, or they escaped as a reaction to their everyday duty. All those points of views needed to have a voice.

Green BorderGreen Border (Kino Lorber)

Your film made headlines, angering the President of Poland and his ministers. “Green Border” features a scene where the refugees are bluntly told, “The Polish government doesn’t want you!” Can you discuss the reaction in Poland to your film? 

It was rejected by the authorities at that time. It opened [in Poland] last September a few weeks before the general election, after eight years of authoritarianism and populist nationalistic party. Many people have been responsive to the film. The fact that I was attacked by the government, and the attacks have been unprecedented — they call me all the possible names, said I made Nazi propaganda, compared me as being Hitler, Goebbels, Stalin and Putin in one – it became good promotion. The film had good box office and deeply felt responses. The democratic opposition was afraid that the authoritarian regime could use the film to spread even more hate and create some nationalistic hysteria. The film helped in the victory of the democratic opposition.

Unfortunately, nine months later, the democratic opposition was very vocal against the practices at the border made by the previous regime is using the same language and is acting in a somehow worse way. They recently ordered soldiers to shoot the migrants practically with no limitations — which means, no punishment — which is shocking to me. But that reflects what Europe is today. That happened around the European elections, which trigger all kinds of nationalistic, xenophobic and populist reactions among democrats and populists. They are competing about who is more patriotic, strong and decisive. And because they are not in a position of government, it is good to show their determination on the border.

I started to receive threats and was quoted by politicians as someone who is mistaken and naïve, and who doesn’t understand the stakes — the typical voices saying all the racist and hateful remarks, “You and people like you want to let everyone in, and they are terrorists and Putin’s agents, and if you like them so much, take them under your roof.” Five percent of the population is supporting the shooting of migrants by the soldiers. Society is ready to kill. I have been expecting things would go in this direction since 2015. Politicians didn’t want to analyze the situation and look for the rational and difficult solutions. The migration issue will shape the future of Europe and America — and it will not be a nice future.

We need your help to stay independent

What details did you discover researching the activists? 

"Black and white gives you some metaphorical dimension. It becomes timeless. It becomes a reality from 1940 or 2024."

The activists are a special race of people. Many people became activists without thinking about it. They live in the place, meet a person in need, open their arms, and are forced by the situation to continue. Several are still doing it after three years, and some have had nervous breakdowns after a year or so because it’s a lot of stress and tension and despair and adrenaline and satisfaction as well and frustration. You help someone in a bad condition in the forest and leave them. They can be pushed back to Belarus, and God knows what happens to them. It is interesting and dramatic. It is a radical choice to be an activist. But some people respond to the call because it’s not a choice. Some are radicalized and do not care about laws, and they do things against national treaties and the Polish constitution. They do things that are much more anarchistic. Those groups are acting in a more ordered way and belong to the bigger organizations. They want to do things their way, which causes conflicts, as I show in the film. What are the limits of this activism? What does it mean when are you breaking the law? If the state fails, and you have to replace the state, you have to make choices that are dangerous for your life. There is so much drama in this situation and so many human destinies. 

What observations do you have about how ordinary citizens react to this topical issue? It’s easier to fear than to understand. Your film creates understanding.

I hope so. I tried not to be preachy. I wanted to show how difficult it is for everybody. I tried to find the humanity. 

Green BorderGreen Border (Kino Lorber)

Can you talk about how you approached the film visually? The black and white cinematography is effective, but so too are the panning and tracking shots through the forest, the overhead shots of the forest, and some of the urgent scenes where the characters are on the run. Your create a very visceral "You are there" feeling.

We wanted the rawness of a documentary, and black and white gives you some metaphorical dimension. It becomes timeless. It becomes a reality from 1940 or 2024. The tracking shots express what the characters are going through. They are constantly on the run. Moments of rest and quiet are rare, but because they are so rare, they are also very precious and beautiful. The challenge was how to make a film about the refugee crisis in black and white that’s two hours and 40 minutes long with three different storylines and keep audiences’ attention and not have them disconnect with the film. That was the professional and artistic challenge and I think we’ve passed it quite well. 

You have! The emotions are palpable even when the action is harrowing. There are painful scenes of guards separating the refugees, or when a character suddenly dies. What can you say about staging the chaos? 

I had fantastic cinematographer. My daughter also came and helped me for some scenes because it was difficult to control. We had very little time; we shot in 24 days. I invited two young women directors to collaborate and codirect with me. We divided into parallel units to shoot so much footage. We had, as a reference, some blurry clips made by refugees and some guards posted on the internet so we can feel the fear and speed of everything and the violence that was very palpable. You try to recreate it. When I explained what the scene should look like, and we staged it as we shot it, the actors and extras found different ways to deal with situation. We were running with the camera and capturing it like it was like reportage from a war scene. When I analyzed it, I realized what I was missing from storytelling, so we did some precise shots not to miss the point. 


Want a daily wrap-up of all the news and commentary Salon has to offer? Subscribe to our morning newsletter, Crash Course.


You have long addressed issues of injustice in your films, most recently, in “Charlatan” and “Mr. Jones.” What are your thoughts about how cinema can change minds in general and how “Green Border” can foment change? 

You need many more voices like mine to change something in a substantial way. I have questions when I showed the film in different countries. I tell them that I don’t think the film will change the world, and a young girl in France said, “Maybe your film will not change the world, but it certainly changed my world.” That is my ambition — to find enough individuals to change their vision of things. 

“Green Border” opens in New York on June 21 and Los Angeles on June 28 with national rollout to follow.

 

“The Boys” introduces Sister Sage, a Black woman who is not going to save you this time

In the bloody, raunchy, gooey and frequently oh-so-wrong world of "The Boys," Antony Starr’s Homelander is a psychotic version of Superman beloved by his human followers. Homelander is the star of a show that begins from the moment the world awakens until we all sleep. We're not even extras — we're expendable. Especially people of color. 

But like America itself and the game show host obsessed with ruling it, Homelander isn't above acknowledging marginalized folks' usefulness. Enter Susan Heyward’s character Sister Sage, created specifically for the TV show. Sage is the most intelligent sentient being on the planet. In comic book terms, she's on par with Brainiac or Lex Luthor, two supervillains who have forced DC Comics’ greatest heroes to destroy a lot of property and natural landscapes in the name of saving humankind.

But what those figures have that Sage lacks is power, money and respect. Luthor, despite bearing an overt hatred for everyone he deems to be his lesser, won the presidency three times. Sage couldn't clear a primary.

Luthor has also invented many weapons of mass destruction, mainly because he can. Sage, who was raised in working-class Detroit, also claims advanced engineering as a special skill, along with an eidetic memory, “moderate” regeneration, empathic accuracy and, like a living supercomputer, hypercognition. Since she lacks wealth or influence, none of that matters . . . until Homelander knocks on the door of her modest apartment and imperiously demands a showcase of her abilities. 

Malcolm X famously preached, “The most disrespected person in America is the Black woman. The most unprotected person in America is the Black woman. The most neglected person in America is the Black woman." Very few series, if any, bother to interrogate the way those truths affect Black women over a lifetime.

Sage, being a 30-something Black woman living in the United States is accustomed to having her intellect and abilities questioned despite being a registered super-genius. Can she fly? Stop a speeding train? No, on both counts. Even A-Train (Jesse T. Usher), the token Black man on Homelander’s top-shelf squad The Seven – down three members as the season begins – scoffs at Sage. 

But when she reads Homelander like one of her countless books, he offers her a job on the spot. Homelander is no genius, but he’s smart enough to know he needs one to think for him. For reasons that aren’t yet clear, Sage agrees to be his right hand and possibly the architect of his rise to absolute power. 

“Rome. Greece. All democracies fail, because people are . . . stupid,” Sage counsels Homelander in the fourth season’s premiere. “You don’t need an army of supermen like Nazi bae wanted. So German . . . Nah, the people will tear it apart themselves. Just gotta nudge ‘em a little. Then you get to swoop in, be the one saving it.”

“Like Caesar,” Homelander says, and Sage adds, “Statistically, it’s inevitable.”

Series creator Eric Kripke designed “The Boys” to be a commentary on America’s broken political system and the ways that its decline is hastened by corporatized popular culture. Hand in hand with that is its critique (by fun house mirror example) of Trumpism, casting Homelander as alt-America’s unstable would-be dictator with daddy issues and an unquenchable yearning to be loved.

Lex Luthor, despite bearing an overt hatred for everyone he deems to be his lesser, won the presidency three times. Sage couldn't clear a primary.

The recently debuted fourth season is as overt with these parallels as it gets, opening with the trial resulting from Homelander killing a man in public. Echoing Donald Trump’s claim that he could shoot a man in the middle of the street and still not lose voters, Homelander’s homicide in plain sight elicits cheers from his fans who view the crime as a show of strength. Unlike Trump, his trial ends with his acquittal.

The show’s title describes a CIA-backed unit of non-powered people formed by a violent nihilist named Butcher (Karl Urban) willing to do anything to stop him and other Supes, all created by way of a serum called Compound V developed by Vought, a global mega-corporation that has insinuated itself in all areas of life.

Along with Butcher’s partners Marvin Milk ( Laz Alonso), Hughie (Jack Quaid), Frenchie (Tomer Capone) and Kimiko (Karen Fukuhara), The Boys very nearly succeeded in destroying Homelander at the cost of Butcher’s life. Now that he’s dying, Butcher has ceded leadership to Marvin. But he still knows of a Supe-killing virus that can finish what they started, of which Homelander is ignorant.

Having seized control of Vought, it’s enough that he knows half the country wants to rein him in, if not see him destroyed – including the President-Elect, Robert Singer (Jim Beaver). But the other half is on board with making him a God, especially if the people they hate will suffer.

Realizing that goal rests on Singer’s vice president Victoria Neuman (Claudia Doumit), secretly a Supe who wills people’s heads to explode. Strategy is where Sage comes in – which, depending on who you are, makes a person wonder why the smartest person alive would agree to assist the most dangerous despot imaginable.

We need your help to stay independent

Maybe the pertinent word is “alive," since Homelander could end her with a hard stare.  Or it could have something to do with the “power” part. The other new member of The Seven (hired at Sage’s suggestion) is a racist, conspiracy-mongering podcaster with an otherwise mediocre power, Firecracker (Valorie Curry), who has any number of obvious real-world corollaries. 

The BoysThe Boys (Jasper Savage/Prime Video)Her “truthbomb” broadcasting style screams low-I.Q. Laura Ingraham; her unchecked lunacy channels Rep. Marjorie Taylor-Greene, R-Ga; and plunging necklines and crossbody bullet-lined bandolier recall Lauren Boebert. She’s also a useful idiot with a talent for directing her followers' rage toward Homelander's foes.

Again, to what end? Guessing whether Kripke and his writers intend Sage to be the Candace Owens or Omarosa Manigault Newman of “The Boys” is fun, sure, but that implies those women are working with more brain power than they actually possess. 

Maybe “The Boys” writers are trying to explain why select members of a marginalized group, when granted access to power, use it to sell out everyone else — other members of their community be damned. But for the likes of Rep. Byron Donalds, R-Fla., who recently made the cable news rounds by claiming Black Americans were better off during Jim Crow, his goal is obvious. Like Sen. Tim Scott. R-S.C., he wants to be named Trump's running mate. Sage has not shown herself to be that brazen or craven. 

Perhaps they’re simply extending the show’s broader philosophy to remind the viewer that nobody is immune to ego-tripping, especially those we assume to know better simply because they’re smarter. The way Heyward makes her face slacken when Homelander suggests Sage can try out her theories about human nature and power on a global scale is outright disturbing. (Only slightly less than her habit of self-lobotomizing to relax, and maybe not hate herself so much?)

But to someone unaccustomed to seeing a power fantasy of themselves included in Avengers or Justice League-ranks of these stories, Heyward’s Sage is a multifaceted curiosity. When we meet her she's exhausted enough with people not taking her seriously to be brutally honest with an insecure superman who could murder her on a whim. What happens when that woman is rewarded for her candor by being granted control of the scariest group of opportunists and sociopaths on the planet?

“The Boys” strives to make us questions our love affair with comic book heroes and our broad acceptance of all they represent, including the assumption that the strongest and wealthiest among us would automatically want the best for humanity instead of shaping it to their will alone. This also explains why comic books ignored Black women almost entirely until the 1970s.

With Sage, “The Boys” writers recognize the way Americans use and celebrate the political and social mobilizing power of Black women every election season, only to leave them high and dry when policies geared to further disempower them or actively harm them are enacted. 


Want a daily wrap-up of all the news and commentary Salon has to offer? Subscribe to our morning newsletter, Crash Course.


Influential celebrities may praise the bravery of white female politicians or activists, represented in the show by Annie January, aka Starlight (Erin Moriarty) while taking it for granted that the Sages of the world will be their foot soldiers. That’s tossed on its head when Sage starts a riot that ends up vilifying the show’s liberal protesters and gets two innocent Black men framed for a triple murder.

Comic books peddle unreasonable powerful fantasies, which is why they’re so stubbornly popular. Who wouldn’t wish to be someone like Storm, a righteous goddess who controls the elements in a world that all too soon aligns against you to prevent you from rating at the same rate as your peers? 

But to assume Sage is secretly noble and working to save us by pulling strings from the inside is naive. That’s not the world comic's creators Darick Robertson and Garth Ennis built as a warning – a place where the formerly powerless, once empowered, tend to abuse their lab-created gifts and leave carnage in their wake.

It’s already shown us to beware of those who believe themselves to be gods. But we have yet to see how much more dangerous the person enabling that rise to power can be – especially someone people are quick to label “sister” without treating them like one.

New episodes of "The Boys"  stream Thursdays on Prime Video.

How “House of the Dragon” may defy George R.R. Martin’s indictment of violence

All men must die, so the common Braavosi saying goes, but in "House of the Dragon's" second season premiere, death came not for a man, but for a 4-year-old boy. Jaehaerys Targaryen (Jude Rock) died in his bed, a knife sawing away at his throat, payment for the murder of 14-year-old Lucerys (Elliot Grihault) at the hands of his one-eyed uncle Aemond (Ewan Mitchell) above Shipbreaker Bay — a son for a son.

This manic, catastrophic escalation of violence jerks memories back to "Game of Thrones," the predecessor series that fed on the blood of innocent, beloved characters with a hunger that only grew as the seasons turned. Devotees of "Game of Thrones" kept watching the show, and keep watching "House of the Dragon," even after moments of hope-rending despair like the Red Wedding, a massacre that seemed to indicate above all else that George R.R. Martin's view of human nature was stubbornly, psychotically nihilistic.

And yet, this alleged nihilist once said in a 2013 interview, "The most important thing is that love, compassion and empathy with other human beings is still possible," as if that's what "Game of Thrones" and "House of the Dragon" is known for preaching.

Martin's reputation among the wider public and its disconnect from reality exposes, more than anything, the fault lines between "A Song of Ice and Fire" – a book series that strips away the easy, paradoxical allure of violence – and "Game of Thrones," a show that continued to indulge in it until the final season. According to the showrunners themselves, one of the takeaways from the Red Wedding could be that slaughtering thousands of people under the sacred laws of hospitality is for winners.

"I don't think Tywin is a villain," said executive producer D.B. Weiss, referring to the Lannister patriarch, played by Charles Dance, who orchestrated the massacre.

Weiss' partner, David Benioff, agreed. "He’s ruthless, for sure. But there’s an argument to be made that Westeros needs ruthlessness."

Tywin's brand of ruthlessness is the kind that justifies putting the Riverlands to the torch, using rape as a weapon and smashing the head of a 1-year-old child against a wall. When it's Tywin's turn to die in the books, his bowels loosen, and the smell of his rotting corpse mimics the rotten legacy he leaves in his wake.

Even if Tywin had hoped to use violence to end violence rather than fulfill petty grudges under the guise of realpolitik, he has failed utterly in his mission. Two books after his death, fighting and famine still ravages Westeros, driving the smallfolk to banditry, religious militancy or simple resignation to death, torture and worse.

We need your help to stay independent

The Lannisters, surrounded by vengeful enemies, must also reckon with what they have unleashed. Bands of displaced peasants and ex-soldiers roam the Riverlands, hanging any Frey or Lannister they chance to meet. Doran Martell (Alexander Siddig), brother of the slain Princess Elia, prepares to join forces with an invading Targaryen pretender. And on the snowbound road to Bolton-controlled Winterfell, Stannis Baratheon (Stephen Dillane) is aided by a force of Northerners and mountain clansmen, whose leader swears that he and his men will "die fighting for Ned's little girl."

Vengeance, an easy but destructive impulse to grasp, falls on the shoulders of the Stark children.

People may have feared Tywin while he lived, but when he is no more, out come the daggers in the dark. Ned Stark (Sean Bean), who sacrificed power for empathy and then honor for love, is also dead. But even as bones and ash, Ned inspires a kind of loyalty that the Tywins of the world can never fathom. In the Riverlands, against all hope, armed men still fly the Tully banner, perhaps remembering the time when Lord Edmure Tully (Tobias Menzies), now a prisoner, took them in as the Lannisters burned their way across the Trident.

"Who are these folk?" asked Catelyn Stark (Michelle Fairley), observing the refugees crowded in Riverrun's outer bailey.

“My people,” Edmure answered. “They were afraid.”

The reaction by the Stark and Tully vassals in the show is far more cynical. When Jon Snow (Kit Harington) attempts to rally opposition to Bolton rule, one lord tells him: "I served House Stark once . . . but House Stark is dead." Vengeance, an easy but destructive impulse to grasp, falls on the shoulders of the Stark children, who carry it out with stoic inclemency or cathartic glee. And moments shared by the show, which chooses to lean on vengeance, and the books, which do not, undergo subtle and not-so-subtle changes in meaning.

When Arya Stark (Maisie Williams) buries the blade that her half-brother Jon once gifted her, she begins to cry. "She sees herself as an instrument of revenge in many ways, in this world, and that sword is the way she's going to exact revenge on the people who wronged her family," explained Weiss in a behind-the-episode video. When Arya does eventually reclaim Needle, it's because this teenage girl is amped up to finally begin her killing spree.

This interpretation differs from Martin's description of a young, traumatized girl having to discard the last link she has to her past. "Needle was [her brothers] Robb and Bran and Rickon, her mother and her father, even [her sister] Sansa," he writes. "Needle was Winterfell's grey walls, and the laughter of its people . . . Needle was Jon Snow's smile. He used to mess my hair and call me 'little sister,' she remembered, and suddenly there were tears in her eyes."

Sansa too dwells on her scattered family. “In Sansa's dreams, her children looked just like the brothers she had lost," Martin writes. "Sometimes there was even a girl who looked like Arya.” The elder Stark sister does not begin her story as someone who is particularly aware of suffering, but when her eyes are open, it is clear that she has inherited her father's empathy, including towards those who have abused her. Far from being a weakness, Sansa's empathy has helped her cling to her humanity (which Arya is in danger of losing), and in the case of Sandor Clegane (aka The Hound played by Rory McCann), earn her a protector from King Joffrey's (Jack Gleeson) cruelty.

When Joffrey orders his Kingsguard to strip Sansa and beat her with their swords, Sandor, Joffrey's loyal hound, tries to intervene on her behalf. Lancel Lannister (in the series, Eugene Simon), on the other hand, justifies the king's command with false accusations and watches the violence take place with "neither pity nor kindness" in his eyes.

As Stannis' army assaults King's Landing late in the second book, a wounded Lancel pleads with Queen Cersei (Lena Headey) to let Joffrey join the battle and inspire the troops. Cersei responds by slamming her palm into his wound, causing the young knight to almost faint, and leaving him and Sansa in a room filled with panicking courtiers.

Sansa doesn't have to help Lancel. Arguably, she shouldn't. But then she kneels beside him, and orders the maesters to dress his wound. "Lancel was one of them, yet somehow she still could not bring herself to wish him dead. I am soft and weak and stupid, just as Joffrey says. I should be killing him, not helping him."

The last time Lancel saw Sansa kneeling, she was naked and bleeding, and he was standing above her. Now, she is kneeling above him, like the praying icon of the gentle Mother that she has so often invoked and from whom soldiers seek comfort and mercy in the shadow of pain and death. Lancel has plenty of time to reflect on the moment as he recovers from his wounds. By the time he can stand again, Lancel is still half-broken in body, but his insecure, powerless arrogance has given way to humility and gentle piety.

As Martin has shown repeatedly, the cost of vengeance is most often paid by the innocent.

"When it seemed that I might die, my father brought the High Septon to pray for me," he later tells Cersei. "He says the Mother spared me . . .” It's very unlike the Sansa (Sophie Turner) of the show, who smiles as she feeds Ramsay Bolton (Iwan Rheon) to his own starving hounds. Rather than using the scene to underscore the tragedy of a girl who has become numb to violence, however much of a monster Ramsay was, Benioff and Weiss chose to portray it as an empowering, exciting moment, where a character previously seen as "weak" or "naïve" has grown into the badass woman she should be.

This isn't the justice of Ned Stark, who passes the sentence and swings the sword. This is vengeance, and the futile, corrupting pleasure that comes from it. It's hard to imagine Sansa from the books, who describes Joffrey's death as "too terrible to watch" and thinks of her own brother Robb clawing at his throat while it happens, employing the same torturous methods of her abusers or finding it empowering in any form.

However Ramsay fares in the books, it could be said that he of all characters deserves a bloody death. But as Martin has shown repeatedly, the cost of vengeance is most often paid by the innocent, and deadly to the humanity of its perpetrators, however legitimate their grievances. How "House of the Dragon" chooses to handle the fallout over young Jaehaerys Targaryen's murder, the murder of others yet to be named or the inevitable violence against smallfolk that marches alongside armies and fire-breathing dragons at war, may be the ultimate test of whether it will repeat the worst mistakes of "Game of Thrones" or come onto its own.

Clarence Thomas defends an abuser’s right to own a gun, says ban violates “historical tradition”

The U.S. Supreme Court on Friday upheld a federal law that bans gun possession for people covered by a domestic violence court order in an 8-to-1 vote, with conservative Justice Clarence Thomas the only dissenter, Bloomberg reported

This decision, in favor of the Biden administration, bars those who are subjected to domestic violence restraining orders from owning firearms and makes it clear that the Constitution’s Second Amendment isn’t so broad as to ensure a dangerous person's right to a gun.

Thomas made his annoyance with the eight justices explicitly clear by issuing a 32-page dissent in which he argued that no such laws existed around the time of the nation's founding  and that any subsequent regulation must be “consistent with the nation’s historical tradition of firearm regulation."

“Not a single historical regulation justifies the statute at issue,” he wrote, per the Associated Press, arguing that current law “strips an individual of his ability to possess firearms and ammunition without any due process.”

However, Chief Justice John Roberts, writing for the majority, said the domestic violence restriction on gun ownership "fits comfortably within this tradition." 

“Our tradition of firearm regulation allows the government to disarm individuals who present a credible threat to the physical safety of others,” he wrote.

The majority opinion continued: “When an individual has been found by a court to pose a credible threat to the physical safety of another, that individual may be temporarily disarmed consistent with the Second Amendment. Since the Founding, the Nation’s firearm laws have included regulations to stop individuals who threaten physical harm to others from misusing firearms.”

The ruling follows the court's June 14 decision to throw out the federal ban on the bump stock accessory on semiautomatic rifles, which allows the weapon to fire at a speed comparable to a machine gun.

Gruesome hypocrisy of US foreign policy being exposed in Gaza, Ukraine

When someone shows you who they are,” Maya Angelou said, “believe them the first time."

That should apply to foreign-policy elites who show you who they are, time after time.

Officials running the Pentagon and State Department have been in overdrive for more than 250 days in support of Israel’s ongoing slaughter of Palestinian civilians in Gaza. Supposedly dedicated to defense and diplomacy, those officials have worked to implement and disguise Washington’s war policies, which have taken more lives than any other government in this century.

Among the weapons of war, cluster munitions are especially horrific. That’s why 67 Democrats and an equal number of Republicans in the House of Representatives voted last week to prevent the U.S. government from continuing to send those weapons to armies overseas.

But more than twice as many House members voted the other way. They defeated a Pentagon funding amendment that would have prohibited the transfer of cluster munitions to other countries. The lawmakers ensured that the U.S. can keep supplying those weapons to the military forces of Ukraine and Israel.

To this point, 124 nations have signed onto a treaty banning cluster munitions, which often wreck the bodies of civilians. The “bomblets” from cluster munitions “are particularly attractive to children because they resemble a bell with a loop of ribbon at the end,” the Just Security organization explains.

But no member of Congress need worry that one of their own children might pick up such a bomblet someday, perhaps mistaking it for a toy, only to be instantly killed or maimed with shrapnel.

Two years ago, the Biden administration responded with justifiable outrage to indications (later proven accurate) that Russia was using cluster munitions in Ukraine. On Feb. 28, 2022, White House spokeswoman Jen Psaki told journalists that if the reports of Russian use of those weapons turned out to be true, “it would potentially be a war crime.”

At the time, the front page of the New York Times described “internationally banned cluster munitions” as “a variety of weapons — rockets, bombs, missiles and artillery projectiles — that disperse lethal bomblets in midair over a wide area, hitting military targets and civilians alike.”

Days later, the Times reported that NATO officials “accused Russia of using cluster bombs in its invasion,” and the newspaper added that “anti-personnel cluster bombs . . . kill so indiscriminately they are banned under international law.”

But when the Ukrainian military ran low on ammunition last year, the U.S. administration decided to start supplying it with cluster munitions.

“All countries should condemn the use of these weapons under any circumstances,” Human Rights Watch has declared.

As BBC correspondent John Simpson summed it up, a quarter-century ago: “Used against human beings, cluster bombs are some of the most savage weapons of modern warfare.”

We need your help to stay independent

As the Congressional Research Service reported this spring, cluster munitions “disperse large numbers of submunitions imprecisely over an extended area.” They “frequently fail to detonate and are difficult to detect,” and “can remain explosive hazards for decades.”

The CRS report added: “Civilian casualties are primarily caused by munitions being fired into areas where soldiers and civilians are intermixed, inaccurate cluster munitions landing in populated areas, or civilians traversing areas where cluster munitions have been employed but failed to explode.”

Members of Congress who just greenlit more cluster munitions are dodging grisly realities. The basic approach of U.S. policy is that such human realities don’t matter — as long as a U.S. ally is using those weapons.

The horrible immediate effects are just the beginning. “It’s been over five decades since the U.S. dropped cluster bombs on Laos, the most bombed country in the world per capita,” Human Rights Watch points out. “The contamination from cluster munitions remnants and other unexploded ordnance is so vast that fewer than 10 percent of affected areas have been cleared. An estimated 80 million submunitions still pose a danger, especially to curious children.”

The members of Congress who just greenlit more cluster munitions are dodging grisly realities. The basic approach of U.S. policy is to proceed as though such human realities don’t matter — as long as a U.S. ally is using those weapons (or if the U.S. itself uses them, as has happened in Southeast Asia, the former Yugoslavia, Afghanistan, Iraq and Yemen).

Overall, with carnage persisting in Gaza, it's easy enough to say that Israel’s prime minister Benjamin Netanyahu has shown us who he is. But so has President Biden, and so have the most powerful Republicans and Democrats in Congress.

While the U.S. has been supplying a large majority of the weapons and ammunition imported by Israel, a similar approach from official Washington (with ineffectual grumbling) has enabled Israel to lethally constrict food going into Gaza.

During his State of the Union address in early March, Biden announced plans for the U.S. to build a port on the Gaza coast to bring in food and other vital aid. But his speech didn’t mention the Pentagon’s expectation that such a seaport could take 60 days to become operational.

At the time, a Common Dreams headline summed up the hollowness of the gambit: “Biden Aid Port Plan Rebuked as ‘Pathetic’ PR Effort as Israel Starves Gazans.” Even at full tilt, the envisioned port would not come anywhere near compensating for Israel’s methodical blockage of aid trucks — by far the best way to get food to 2.2 million people facing starvation. “We are talking about a population that is starving now,” said Ziad Issa, the head of humanitarian policy for ActionAid. “We have already seen children dying of hunger.”


Want a daily wrap-up of all the news and commentary Salon has to offer? Subscribe to our morning newsletter, Crash Course.


An official at Save the Children offered a reality check: “Children in Gaza cannot wait to eat. They are already dying from malnutrition, and saving their lives is a matter of hours or days — not weeks.” The Nation described “the tragic absurdity of Biden’s Gaza policies: the U.S. government is making elaborate plans to ameliorate a humanitarian catastrophe that would not exist without its own bombs.”

Earlier this week, more than three months after the ballyhooed drumroll about plans for a port on the Gaza coast, news broke that this entire U.S. aid project is a colossal failure even on its own terms.

“The $230 million temporary pier that the U.S. military built on short notice to rush humanitarian aid to Gaza has largely failed in its mission, aid organizations say, and will probably end operations weeks earlier than originally expected,” the New York Times reported on June 18. “In the month since it was attached to the shoreline, the pier has been in service only about 10 days. The rest of the time, it was being repaired after rough seas broke it apart, detached to avoid further damage or paused because of security concerns.” 

As Israel’s indispensable military patron, the U.S. government could insist on an end to the continual massacre of civilians in Gaza and demand a complete halt to interference with aid deliveries. Instead, Israel continues to inflict “unconscionable death and suffering” while mass starvation is closing in.

Maya Angelou’s advice certainly applies. When the president and a large bipartisan majority in Congress show us that they are willing accomplices to mass murder, we should believe them.

It’s also worth remembering that Angelou, a renowned poet and writer, gave her voice to words from Rachel Corrie, the young American activist crushed to death in 2003 while standing in front of an Israeli army bulldozer as it moved to demolish a Palestinian family’s home in Gaza.

A few years after that event, Angelou recorded a video while reading from an email Corrie had sent: “We are all born and someday we’ll all die. Most likely to some degree alone. What if our aloneness isn’t a tragedy? What if our aloneness is what allows us to speak the truth without being afraid? What if our aloneness is what allows us to adventure — to experience the world as a dynamic presence — as a changeable, interactive thing?"

Steve Bannon loses bid to delay his 4-month federal prison sentence for defying Congress

A federal appeals court panel rejected former Trump adviser Steve Bannon’s bid to delay the July 1 start to his prison sentence for defying a subpoena issued by Congress’ January 6th select committee investigating the 2021 U.S Capitol attack, CNN reported

After the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit upheld Banon’s conviction, earlier this month the U.S. District Judge Carl Nichols, nominated by Trump, granted the prosecution’s request to send Bannon to prison.

The former Trump aide’s lawyers requested the appeals court to delay his prison sentence while he tries to fight the conviction at a Supreme Court level.

“The government seeks to imprison Mr. Bannon for the four-month period leading up to the November election, when millions of Americans look to him for information on important campaign issues,” his attorneys said of their client, who hosts a conservative podcast, in the filings.

They added that if he is made to serve his sentence now, it would “also effectively bar Mr. Bannon from serving as a meaningful advisor in the ongoing national campaign,” CNN reported.

Prosecutors resisted, claiming in a filing that “Bannon’s role in political discourse is simply not a relevant factor” under the federal statute dictating when a defendant’s appeal can delay his sentence. “Bannon also cannot reconcile his claim for special treatment with the bedrock principle of equal justice under the law.” 

The panel voted 2-1 with Judge Cornelia Pillard, a nominee of former President Barack Obama, and Judge Bradley Garcia, a President Joe Biden nominee, in the majority. The panel said Bannon’s case “does not warrant a departure from the general rule” that defendants begin their sentence after being convicted, CBS reported.

Bannon is expected to report to prison at the start of next month to begin serving his four-month sentence. Without Supreme Court intervention, he will serve his sentence at a low-security prison camp in Danbury, Connecticut, CNN reported.

“After I lost the election”: Legal expert says new Trump recording could be “admissible evidence”

Donald Trump got caught forgetting his own lie — that the 2020 election was stolen from him — during an interview with journalist Ramin Setoodeh for his new book, “Apprentice in Wonderland,” according to a tape Setoodeh shared Thursday with MSNBC’s Nicole Wallace.

Setoodeh, the co-editor-in-cheif of Variety, told Wallace that he and Trump were discussing the latter's falling out with his once close friend, former Fox News personality Geraldo Rivera. As the subject came up , the presumptive GOP nominee let it slip that Rivera called him after he “lost the election,” which he then quickly corrected to say, “I won the election, but when they said we lost.”

Trump went on to belittle Rivera, who he said "called me up three or four times, and finally, I had a little time. I called him back. And he went on Fox and he started talking about, 'The president called me.' I didn't call him."

As Wallace noted, Trump, "speaking casually,"  actually "admitted" that he lost. At the same time, he publicly insists that he won, a lie fervently believed by supporters who stormed the U.S. Capitol on Jan. 6, 2021.

Setoodeh said the interview took place in August 2021. 

“He was very comfortable that day because we were actually watching clips of 'The Apprentice,' and I think part of the reason the mask slipped off was that he was remembering his life as an entertainer, he was very amused, he was excited to see himself in the boardroom,” the author said.

“This is all performance art for Donald Trump,” he added.

At least one legal expert believes Trump's remark could be used against him.

"This statement made on tape and on the record by Mr. Trump would be admissible in evidence against him on the issue of his corrupt intent in the four Smith indictments in DC that SCOTUS is inexcusably keeping on hold in United States v. Trump," Laurence Tribe, a law professor at Harvard University, posted on X.

Pickleball has declared its official food — and no, it’s not pickles

Pickleball, America’s fastest-growing sport, now has its very own official food. Contrary to what most people would’ve guessed, the food isn’t pickles — even though it’s there in the name. Instead, it’s blueberries.  

In partnership with the U.S. Highbush Blueberry Council (USHBC), the Major League Pickleball hopes to bring more awareness to the many health benefits of blueberries. “Pickleball is a hugely popular sport that inspires excitement and passion — in the same way we know many people are superfans of blueberries for their deliciousness and health benefits,” Kasey Cronquist, president of USHBC, said in a press release. She continued, saying this partnership will hopefully “motivate consumers to grab a boost of blue, whether they’re a fan of playing pickleball, watching it, or both.”

Blueberries are among the world's most powerful sources of antioxidants and as a result, may help protect against aging and cancer. They are also among the most nutrient-dense berries and are especially high in fiber, Vitamin C, Vitamin K and Manganese. Additionally, blueberries may help prevent heart disease, may lower blood pressure and can help maintain brain function and improve memory.

Ina Garten’s summer garden pasta is a must-try weeknight dinner

Nothing screams summer like homemade pasta salad filled with an assortment of fresh produce. It’s a simple yet refreshing dish that’s perfect as a colorful side, a picnic showstopper or — even better — an effortless weeknight dinner.

Ina Garten’s recipe for summer garden pasta is an absolute must-try this season. To start, combine cherry tomatoes, extra virgin olive oil, garlic, basil leaves, red pepper flakes, salt and black pepper in a large bowl. Cover the mixture and set it aside at room temperature for about four hours — or until you’re ready to serve the pasta salad. 

Cook the pasta in a large boiling pot of water with a splash of olive oil and a sprinkle of salt. Garten recommends cooking the pasta al dente (or “to the tooth”) so that it has a slight bite when enjoyed alongside the seasoned cherry tomatoes. Once the pasta is finished, add it to the bowl containing the tomato mixture. Add a generous amount of freshly grated Parmesan cheese and fresh basil leaves and toss well. Serve the finished pasta in individual bowls with extra cheese on each serving.

Garten’s summer garden pasta can be enjoyed on its own or alongside a heartier main entrée, be it barbecued chicken, blue cheese burgers or a summer skillet with clams, sausage & corn. Regardless of how you choose to enjoy the dish, it’s guaranteed to be delicious. 

The full recipe can be found here.

“Extremely rare”: Experts say report reveals colleagues’ “embarrassment” about Judge Cannon’s “bias”

The story, in a way, is that there is any story at all: On Thursday, two sources told The New York Times, in effect, that every liberal critic of Judge Aileen Cannon — every legal analyst who says she has mishandled Donald Trump’s classified documents case, displaying incompetence and prejudice — is absolutely right.

First, go back to the summer of 2022, when Cannon, 43 and appointed to the federal bench by the criminal defendant, first got involved in the case brought by special counsel Jack Smith. It was then that she first shocked the legal community by buying Trump’s argument that, perhaps, the government had no right to sift through all the classified documents it found stashed at Mar-a-Lago; perhaps, she ruled, those documents were protected by “executive privilege” and should instead be reviewed by a third party, known as a special master.

That decision delayed the case by months and was unanimously overruled by the conservative U.S. Court of Appeals for the 11th Circuit, which stated, “The law is clear” (and Judge Cannon clearly wrong).

After the embarrassment of that slap-down, Cannon lucked out: Instead of limping away, she was randomly assigned responsibility over the whole case months later. It was then, the Times reports, that two of her colleagues, including Chief Judge Cecilia M. Altonaga, implored her to step aside. Altonaga, in particular, went straight at the issue, telling Cannon it would be a bad look to take the case considering how badly she had bungled the whole “special master” issue.

It’s “extremely rare for judges to tell other judges that they ought to step aside,” The Times' Charlie Savage, who shared a byline on the story, told CNN. “So it’s not like there’s a roadmap here that makes anything about this normal.”

It is also highly unusual for any court’s dirty laundry to be aired out in the press like this. As the Times noted, the sources who shared the story “had been told about it by different federal judges in the Southern District of Florida, including Judge Altonaga.”

We need your help to stay independent

In other words, Cannon’s own colleagues are openly talking about her bias and inability now that both have been ably demonstrated in case that still has no trial date, a year after she was assigned it, largely due to the fact that she has agreed to hold hearings on just about every issue raised by the defense. On Friday, even outside right-wing attorneys will be given time in the courtroom to argue that it was actually illegal for Smith to even bring the case.

'”It's somebody literally saying to the American public: All of those concerns you hear about Judge Cannon being out of her depth, in the tank for Donald Trump — those are concerns shared by two colleagues on the bench,” noted MSNBC legal analyst Lisa Rubin.

“Both the story and the fact that it has been reported are remarkable,” conservative lawyer George Conway posted on social media. “The degree of embarrassment and chagrin Cannon’s incompetence and bias must be causing to her colleagues is unimaginable.”


Want a daily wrap-up of all the news and commentary Salon has to offer? Subscribe to our morning newsletter, Crash Course.


That is indeed the takeaway: Whatever grumblings about Cannon one hears on MSNBC or CNN — those are shared by the federal judges who know her best. It is not that complicated of a case and believing that Cannon is bungling it, possibly on purpose, is not merely a product of year-nine “Trump Derangement Syndrome.”

Ty Cobb, a former Trump White House attorney turned critic of the former president, said the reasons why the judges would speak out about Cannon — behind her back, at the very least, if not directly to the Times — can be seen in the decision she made to hold a hearing on whether Smith can bring the case at all (Trump’s defense insists, contra precedent, that the appointment of a special counsel is unconstitutional).

“The fact that Trump can get a hearing on the flimsiest arguments is shocking,” Cobb told CNN. It’s also the closest she’s come to giving Smith a sure-fire reason to ask for her removal.

“The worst thing that could happen to her is that she actually does rule for Trump on this,” Cobb said, “because that would go to the 11th Circuit and then I think this petty, partisan prima donna would be put in her place and they would remove her.”

With the Supreme Court’s help, Republicans’ plan to resurrect “zombie laws”

Anyone with a passing knowledge of the history of reproductive rights in America has heard of the antediluvian Comstock Act but I doubt most of them ever thought it would actually be back in use in the 21st century. The notorious "anti-vice" law from 1873 banned the shipment of "lewd" written materials, contraceptives and any “instrument, substance, drug, medicine, or thing” for the purpose of abortion, and had not been in force for many decades since the passage of various laws and the recognition of a constitutional right to abortion in 1973's Roe v. Wade Supreme Court decision. Nonetheless, it remained on the books. And leave it to the radicals putting together Project 2025 to exhume it the minute Samuel Alito and company give them the green light.

My Salon colleague Amanda Marcotte wrote about the Comstock Act in depth a few months ago in the wake of the 5th Circuit Court of Appeals Mifepristone ruling (access to which was thankfully affirmed (for now) by the Supreme Court this month.) The original decision relied heavily on the Comstock Act to justify the decision to ban the drug, an issue which was left unresolved by the Supreme Court when it threw out the lawsuit on the basis of standing rather than the merits. So the Comstock Act remains on the books and is now theoretically constitutional since the reversal of Roe v Wade, at least when it comes to contraception and abortion. Other aspects of the law regarding obscenity are still unenforceable as they remain protected under other precedents.

The Comstock Act is what's known as a "zombie law" which is a law that has been neutered by subsequent High Court decisions that have found a constitutional prohibition against enforcing them but remain on the books sometimes for centuries lurking around like the undead (hence the name) waiting for a chance to be reanimated by the Supreme Court overturning one of its own decisions. There are a lot of them as we just saw in several states that had draconian 19th-century laws go into effect when the Court handed down its Dobbs decision.

In Arizona, after Roe was overturned, the conservative state Supreme Court revived a near-total ban on abortion, invoking an 1864 law that only allows abortion to save the mother's life and gave prison time to doctors who perform them. The state legislature went through tremendous gyrations to finally repeal that 1864 law but the status of the state's abortion laws remains in limbo and doctors and patients remain confused and anxious about the law's requirements. A similar story has played out in all the states that had these zombie laws on the books. 

The Comstock Act is a federal law, however, and it is still in effect and is ripe for the picking by anti-abortion zealots and others who want to further restrict reproductive freedoms, including contraception. From the moment the Dobbs decision came down legal experts and activists recognized the danger it posed with this radical right-wing judiciary and they immediately started to work on repealing it. At the time a number of abortion rights groups asked them to stand down because of cases already in the pipeline that would have been affected. As Notus reported:

“There’s a lot of litigation playing out that’s specific to this that many of the reproductive rights groups are in the middle of. They’re actually wanting to, they’re not wanting to see [the Comstock Act] change in the middle of that litigation. So that was at the request of Planned Parenthood and other reproductive freedom groups that have been fighting this for a long time,” Democratic Representative Pat Ryan said.

That came as something of a surprise but the Democrats in Congress complied with the request. However, with the Mifepristone case decided they have decided to make the move. 

According to the Washington Post, Democrats are now introducing legislation to repeal the abortion provisions of the Act with the backing of those major abortion rights groups. (They will apparently leave in some of the obscenity laws on which bans on child pornography are based.) The Senate bill has 20 co-sponsors, including Sens. Tina Smith, D-Minn., Elizabeth Warren, D-Ma., and Catherine Cortez Masto, D-Nev. And Reps. Becca Balint, D-Vt. and Cori Bush, D-Mo. introduced the legislation in the House. Although they haven't spoken out, the assumption is that the Democratic leadership is supportive. 

We need your help to stay independent

The Post article suggests that there may be some reluctance by the White House but the reasons are unclear although other unnamed Democrats fear that it will somehow distract from other issues, which is typical but foolish. I hope that's not the case. The Comstock Act is a 19th-century monstrosity that should be repealed because it is grotesque and we are watching it be used to roll back Americans' basic human rights. 

Obviously, the very pious Christian Nationalist Speaker of the House Mike Johnson will not let this pass. The Comstock Act might have been written by him personally. (This is a man who participated in one of those bizarre purity balls with his daughter, after all. ) So there's no hope of passage this year. But this should be part of the debate going into the election and the Democrats must repeal it the minute they get the chance because we know the Republicans are planning to use it the minute they get theirs. 

There are a lot of zombie laws on the books that are likely to be used by conservative judicial activists in the next few years now that they've secured the right-wing Supreme Court of their dreams. For instance, there are existing, unenforced laws against adulteryatheism and sodomy which could easily be reanimated under some of the right's current crusades. Discriminatory housing covenants and outdated draconian drug laws could rise from the dead as well.

They are setting up test cases all over the country with an eye toward overturning precedents to make that happen. Just this week Louisiana passed a new law requiring that all schools display the Ten Commandments in every classroom (using a large font!) They hope to get it to the Supreme Court which has shown every inclination to destroy the separation of church and state. Any zombies from the 1950s will immediately go back into effect if they uphold this law as constitutional.

Democrats in state legislatures and at the national level would be wise to survey all the laws and repeal these dead ones wherever they can as soon as possible. If they don't, there's every chance the right's various culture crusades will end up bringing them back to life.

Louisiana’s mandatory Ten Commandments law invites the Supreme Court to impose more theocracy

Not that I usually feel reporters should be in the business of giving politicians pop quizzes, but for this, I'd make an exception. Now that Louisiana's Republican Gov. Jeff Landry has signed a clearly unconstitutional law requiring the Ten Commandments displayed in every public school and university classroom, it would be a good time to ask the law's supporters to list the commandments, in order. Most Republicans do a better job than Donald "Two Corinthians" Trump at performing Christian piety for the cameras, but still, it's a safe bet that few of the people reviving this tedious culture war flashpoint have read the actual Ten Commandments in quite a while. Many probably think "thou shalt not watch 'RuPaul's Drag Race'" is somewhere on there. 

Not that actually reciting them out loud would do Republicans any favors, either, as on any given day they're violating at least half of them. "Thou shalt have no other gods before me" is violated on an hourly basis, with the exaltation of Trump as their replacement Jesus. "Thou shalt not bear false witness" is a joke in an atmosphere where the GOP standard is to lie about everything: Why Trump got 34 felony convictions, whether or not storming a Capitol to overturn an election constitutes an insurrection, why one's house keeps manifesting January 6 flags. "Thou shalt not steal" seems like it would also cover Trump's efforts to steal a presidential election. 

Even in passing this law, Louisiana Republicans are violating the spirit of "honor thy father," as they thumb their nose at the men they love to call the Founding Fathers. The founders were quite clear in their intentions for a secular state, in no small part to avoid exactly the conflict that is being teed up here. About one-third of Americans aren't Christian,  a percentage that rises to almost 40% when looking at people under 30. Mandatory Christian iconography — and that's how this is meant, no matter how much they disingenuously toss the word "Judeo" around — sends a clear and unmistakable message: Only Christians are "real" Americans. 


Want more Amanda Marcotte on politics? Subscribe to her newsletter Standing Room Only.


Which is to say, Louisiana Republicans are signing onto an overt Christian nationalist agenda. This isn't about wanting to "respect the rule of law," as Landry claimed or he would respect the First Amendment. It certainly isn't morality from a party lined up behind Trump, who is breaking multiple commandments at any hour of the day. It really isn't about sincere religious faith, either, which is being polluted by this association with open bigotry and crass politicking. 

In a too on-the-nose symbol of how little Republicans actually care about the children they claim to champion, a little girl appeared to pass out during the bill signing, while Landry and his cohorts ignore her. 

It would be easy to shrug this off, of course. Making a stink about mandatory, taxpayer-funded displays of the 10 commandments has been a go-to political stunt for Republicans for decades. The last big fight over this was a little over a decade ago, when Oklahoma Republicans, no doubt as a psychological defense mechanism to cope with seeing a Black president, put one of these monuments up at the state capitol, only to have their own courts later rule it violated state religious liberty laws. In an age when democracy's very existence is threatened, these battles over symbols might seem like penny ante stuff. 

But this is much more serious than that, and not just because, as the Sam Alito flag controversy shows, symbols do matter. This law builds on years of the Supreme Court chipping away at both religious freedom and the separation of church and state. It's an open invitation to the court to go even further, and strike down the very premise that the U.S. government should not be telling its citizens what gods to worship or what religious strictures control their lives. This isn't just Republicans taking a petty swipe at their neighbors who believe differently than they do. It's about the ongoing threat of encroaching theocracy. 

Landry isn't hiding that fact, either. "I can’t wait to be sued," he crowed at a Republican fundraiser last week. In the same speech, notably, he denounced Trump's 34 felony convictions. The number of commandments Trump broke in the series of events that led to the conviction, by the way: At least seven, including adultery, stealing, coveting, false witness and, hilariously, breaking the Sabbath, since the golf tournament all this sinning happened it was on a Sunday. 

Louisiana Republicans clearly hope to get this case in front of the Supreme Court, which has been on quite a tear recently, and offered tortured decisions justifying the use of government power and taxpayer funds to foist conservative Christian beliefs on the non-consenting. In 2022, the court ignored decades of First Amendment precedent to rule that a high school football coach can bully his students into Christian prayer. In the same month, they also ruled — again violating decades of precedent — that the state of Maine has to pay for religious schools that not only have Bible classes but teach far-right beliefs, such as the immorality of homosexuality. In 2023, they ruled that opponents of LGBTQ rights can ignore anti-discrimination law, as long as the bigots claim religious motives. With the rise of explicitly racist rhetoric inside Christian nationalist circles, it may not be long before we see people who want to run whites-only businesses also claiming a "religious" exemption from the law. 

To underscore how this is not just about symbols, but about people's ability to live freely, we should add Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health to the pile. During oral arguments over abortion bans, Justice Sonia Sotomayor pointed out that state interest in banning abortion is nothing "but a religious view." This really is indisputable. There's no scientific reason to ban abortion. In fact, all evidence shows abortion bans are quite harmful to both individual and public health. When outside of court, and often even inside it, abortion opponents don't even bother to hide that this is about imposing their religious rules about sexuality and procreation on the majority of Americans who disagree.

When we're talking about theocracy, it's about more than having to see religious iconography in a public classroom or even being forced to play along while a teacher makes kids pray. It's the Christian right snaking its way into the most intimate parts of people's lives, using "Jesus" as an excuse to tell us who we can love, whether we can marry or divorce, and when we should have children — even as they can't or won't follow their own religious rules. As with all things MAGA, rules are forever only for other people.

Dr. Phil’s staged interview with Donald Trump is a sign of the grim political theater to come

Each day, the Age of Trump provides more evidence in support of the argument by scientists and philosophers that what we believe to be reality may actually be an elaborate simulation. I envision the entity running this simulation is having a great time finding new ways to torment the American people and the world.

Donald Trump is the first former president and now leading candidate for a major political party to be a convicted felon. Instead of being forced out of public life – and for his many other gross offenses such as attempting a coup on Jan. 6 and being a sexual assaulter as confirmed by a court of law, and more generally for his horrible behavior and “leadership” – his MAGA people and other Republican and right-wing followers and many millions of other Americans continue to cling to him.

Donald Trump is channeling Adolf Hitler, one of the worst mass murderers and evildoers in human history, as he escalates his threats of massive violence (including imprisonment and executions) against the human “vermin” who are polluting the “blood” of his country. The mainstream media, and the more American people as a whole, mostly continue along as though this is somehow normal.

As detailed in Plan 47 and Agenda 2025, Donald Trump and his agents are publicly planning to end democracy and to impose an authoritarian regime on the American people when/if he takes power in 2025. Again, this existential threat has been largely normalized by the mainstream news media and a large percentage of the American public who are either indifferent, exhausted, in denial, or outright support aspiring dictator Donald Trump.

Donald Trump continues to behave in a manner that suggests he is mentally and emotionally unwell. His memory lapses are becoming too numerous and obvious for his handlers to hide. At his rallies and in interviews Trump rants about his hatred and fear of sharks, hostility towards electric vehicles, fascination with the fictional serial killer Hannibal Lecter, and is increasingly nonsensical and full of gobbledygook as he loses the ability to speak cogently and instead makes strange noises and invents words and phrases.

In one of the most surreal and bizarre moments in what is an already amazingly bizarre and surreal era in American life, Donald Trump recently participated in an “interview” with TV personality and therapist “Dr. Phil.”

We need your help to stay independent

During this “interview”, Dr. Phil validated Donald Trump’s lies, soothed and validated his egomania and narcissism, and encouraged the corrupt ex-president and now convicted felon’s persecution complex. If a therapist is supposed to help a person better integrate their emotions so that they can be a healthier person, Dr. Phil failed on all accounts. In a particularly disturbing moment, Trump plainly told Dr. Phil about his unrepentant desires and plans for revenge.

Of course, Dr. Phil’s agenda and role was not that of truth-teller, but to be Donald Trump’s enabler and partner in an elaborate act of political theater.

In all, Donald Trump’s staged interview with Dr. Phil (there was little push-back or substantive disagreement) is a distillation of how the mainstream news media and the country’s political class continue to not fully understand the fundamental nature of the Age of Trump and the larger democracy crisis and the role of emotions and storytelling in it.

“Donald Trump” does not exist. He is a character and a symbol who is viewed as being more than a mere mortal by his MAGA cultists. In that role, Trump is permission for revenge, craven power, and permission for them to engage in the worst human behavior. Trump imagines himself in those terms: he is a professional wrestling heel, a “fighter”, a type of god and messiah, a “billionaire” and titan of business, a genius who is never wrong and has amazing genes, an action hero movie star, a virile and potent conqueror and seducer of women and an idol for men, a reality TV star, and now a warlord and aspiring dictator who is the only person who can “save” America.

In an excellent essay at the New York Times, Ramin Setoodeh explains how Donald Trump views American politics and his role as a type of TV program where he is the star, casting agent, and producer:

A traditional vice-presidential search happens discreetly, with possible picks lobbying behind the scenes and through proxies while publicly downplaying their interest. Mr. Trump’s search is playing out more like a cattle call audition.

But Mr. Trump is always governing for the cameras — his favorite constituency. Viewed through that lens, his veepstakes make much more sense. The process is playing out in public, with unvarnished careerism on view, in the familiar form of a reality show. Mr. Trump was America’s first reality-TV president, and now he’s reviving the hits: He’s turned the veepstakes into a reboot of “The Apprentice.”

It’s a mentality I came to understand intimately while interviewing him, starting in 2021 after he’d left the White House, for a book on “The Apprentice.” Mr. Trump gave me hours of his time, often extending our scheduled meetings at Trump Tower as we watched clips of the show together. I discerned that, in many ways, Mr. Trump sees his runs for president and his time in the White House as extensions of his reality show. In our conversations, he seemed engrossed by his image and the minutiae of his TV career, far more than by anything he achieved as leader of the free world.

“Dr. Phil” (Phil McGraw) is a character as well, a product of the mediated reality that is television and other forms of mass media. He rose to popularity because of his appearances on "The Oprah Winfrey Show" where he offered a “commonsense” and “masculine” “tough love” approach to therapy.

The interview between Dr. Phil and Donald Trump was an interaction between two television characters and symbols. There is no authenticity or truth to the interview-therapy session because it is a staged or “pseudo-event”, a form of propaganda, that is designed to manipulate the viewers by emotionally training and conditioning them into accepting Donald Trump and his neofascist MAGA movement’s return to the White House as both inevitable, normal, and good.

On this, David Altheide, who is an expert on media and propaganda and author of the recent book “Gonzo Governance: The Media Logic of Donald Trump," explained to me via email:

Propaganda researchers would not be surprised by the long-time TV host Phil McGraw’s (AKA Dr. Phil) commercial—following an interview format— with Donald Trump on the newly launched Main Street Media, owned by Trinity Christian Network. They gushed over one another’s media performances. It was a meme dance of two veteran entertainers performing a media-on-media advertisement for Trump and especially McGraw, who confirmed that Trump has been mistreated, attacked, unfairly prosecuted, and courageously supports the best interests of the United States.

Not once did the pop psychologist disagree with Trump’s rant that the election had been stolen and that drug-crazed, mentally ill criminal migrants were invading the U. S. McGraw agreed with Trump that world leaders respect him; that he created the best U.S. economy in history; that he was the best president for Blacks since Abraham Lincoln; and that he tried to calm down crowds chanting “lock her up” about Hilary Clinton. Instead, he asked how Trump could keep going and why people were so energized against him, since he had done such good things for America? Trump replied that he loved the country, and it was just habit for many people to support Democrats, while others were just evil people.

Altheide continues:

As Trump recited his narcissistic script, an audience may have expected a bit more from a clinical psychologist, posing as an interviewer, even though he had been unlicensed since 2008. Mr. McGraw, anointed by Oprah twenty-two years prior, became Dr. Phil and ministered pop psychology to a generation.  Trump watched his program. So did journalists who would follow-up this propaganda fest. Of course, it was all a ruse. He knew better. After all, Mr. McGraw, playing Dr. Phil, had presented a three-part series on narcissism, and concluded: “You can’t change a narcissist no matter what you do.” And “These are people that just don’t have a good prognosis.” Dr. Phil had also read descriptions of narcissism when asked about Trump on several TV shows seven years earlier. And his earlier persona would hold guests accountable to reexamine their behavior, “how’s that working for you?”. But not this time.  No correction was needed. Trump was basically fine and good, and Phil suggested that the newly minted felon should be forgiving and not be revengeful and not follow the cycle of vengeance and retribution. Similar to an earlier comment made to Sean Hannity, Trump countered that sometimes revenge is necessary. "Revenge does take time. And sometimes revenge can be justified, Phil. I have to be honest. Sometimes it can.”  More politics of fear to follow. Bingo!

This was showtime. The goal of the show was to entertain, get more attention, and promote each other. Another Trump threat of vengeance in the future. The media logic worked. Almost immediately, major news outlets and publications posted commentary about what Trump said about revenge. Dr. Phil appeared in several, stating that he hoped he could help Trump to not be revengeful. Trump and the politics of fear again ruled the news cycle. The commercial would be viewed many times and pundits would reflect on who might be subject to Trump’s revenge. More conflict, drama, and promotion for two memes and the network they rode in on. The mainline news media were willing accomplices. Again.

Beyond being a propaganda pseudo-event and spectacle, Dr. Phil’s interview with Donald Trump is important in at least two other ways as well.

Fascists and other authoritarians and demagogues do not care about the truth. All they care about is amassing and exercising corrupt power. Such figures need people in the news media and other positions of authority and trust to enable and legitimize their rise to power. In his staged interview with Donald Trump, Dr. Phil fulfilled that role.

Authoritarians and autocrats routinely threaten to put their enemies and anyone else who opposes them in mental hospitals or other types of psychiatric institutions. Donald Trump and his agents are already previewing that move with their repeated lies that Special Counsel Jack Smith, Attorney General Merrick Garland, the prosecutors and judges and other law enforcement who are trying to him accountable for his obvious law-breaking are “sick”, “deranged”, “insane”, “mentally ill”, and “the most evil people imaginable”. In addition to threats of execution and imprisonment, Donald Trump and his agents have made similar attacks on President Biden and other leading Democrats.

The mainstream news media and political class, even after eight years of experience with Trumpism and the democracy crisis (specifically as a spectacle and ongoing story) are refusing to effectively grapple with this new era because it exists outside of their frameworks (and hubris-driven assumptions) about how politics is supposed to function in America where “the institutions” and “the American people” in the end almost always get it right because they are “fundamentally decent.”


Want a daily wrap-up of all the news and commentary Salon has to offer? Subscribe to our morning newsletter, Crash Course.


Public opinion and other research show that the news media and other governing institutions are increasingly viewed with distrust and disdain by large swaths of the American people – across the political spectrum. Part of that loss of trust is a result of an unwillingness to adapt and change in a way that speaks compellingly to the realities of people’s lives, experiences, the larger society, and reality itself.

I wish that we "the Americans" could just collectively get up and walk away from the horrible experience that is the Age of Trump and all its horrors, those both already here and soon to come when/if he and his forces take power in 2025. Alternatively, if the Age of Trump was a TV show we could just turn it off or change the station. But this is the real world, and no such easy escape exists.

Heat waves have killed thousands this year​​​​​​​. Experts say the worst could be yet to come

The ongoing heat wave gripping the Northern Hemisphere hasn't just triggered triple-digit temperatures, but also a sizeable death toll. From India to Saudi Arabia to Massachusetts, many regions across the globe have buckled under extreme heat — but while such phenomena is normal during the summer months, the degree to which things are cooking is not.

Unsurprisingly, climate change is a major culprit in this unfolding crisis and experts agree that it will get worse.

"I am 100% certain that worsening heat waves across Earth are due to global heating caused primarily by burning fossil fuels."

On Tuesday, AFP reported 550 people had died from heat-related causes during Hajj, an annual Islamic pilgrimage to Mecca. By Thursday, the death toll had nearly doubled to 1,081 across at least 10 countries, with the principal reasons for death being dehydration, heat stroke, high blood pressure and other heat-related issues. One Egyptian man, according to the Associated Press, broke down in tears when learning that his mother was among the dead, and then called his travel agent in distress.

“He left her to die,” he shouted, referring to the agent, while those nearby tried to comfort him.

Meanwhile, more than 100 people have died in India from extreme heat in the last three-and-a-half months, with more than 40,000 cases of heat stroke being reported. One of India's largest hospitals in Delhi has created a first-ever heat stroke emergency room, with one doctor reporting that "in my 13 years of working here, I don’t remember signing a death certificate for heat stroke. This year, I’ve signed several."

And in the northeastern United States, more than 135 million people are under a heat advisory, with the holiday weather breaking temperature records both there and in the midwest. Europe is also under the grips of an unprecedented heat wave, with at least five people dying in Greece so far, as well as a heat dome that killed at least 61 in Mexico earlier this month.

"I am 100% certain that worsening heat waves across Earth are due to global heating caused primarily by burning fossil fuels," said Dr. Peter Kalmus, a NASA climate scientist, who emphasized his opinions are his own. "We see intensifying extreme heat in all observational datasets and model hindcasts."

Kalmus told Salon that quantified attribution studies — ones that, importantly, use models both with and without the presence of accumulated anthropogenic greenhouse gases in the atmosphere — show it is probable that the recent heat waves follow a pattern based on fossil-fueled global heating. The question becomes how much is climate change at fault and how much is part of El Niño and regular old summer?

Dr. Michael E. Mann, a climatologist at the University of Pennsylvania, told Salon "We have to be careful with the framing."

"Might there have been a heat wave like this without the effect of human-caused warming from carbon pollution? Perhaps." Mann said. Yet he added, "Would it have been as intense and persistent as this one? Almost certainly not."

"There's always a chance that we could have temporarily experienced extreme heat in this spatiotemporal pattern even without global heating, even if that chance is nearly zero," said Kalmus. "But when you look at intensifying extreme heat trends overall, it's 100% certain that this is caused by global heating at this point."


Want more health and science stories in your inbox? Subscribe to Salon's weekly newsletter Lab Notes.


"We have to be careful with the framing."

Dr. Kevin Trenberth, a distinguished scholar at the National Center for Atmospheric Research who has published more than 600 articles on climatology, said that it would be simplistic to frame the current heat waves as being caused entirely by climate change.

"Climate change does not cause heat waves as such," said Trenberth. "The heat waves and their intensity and location are related mostly to the weather patterns, that even now are dominated by natural variability. What climate change does is exacerbate certain extremes. In particular in hot summer weather human-induced climate change makes the consequences much worse."

With thousands dying across the world, one major factor determining survival rates is income. In Saudi Arabia, for example, tens of thousands of low-income Muslims who cannot afford official permits take their pilgrimage to Mecca by using irregular channels and therefore lack access to the air conditioned spaces available for the 1.8 million people who are authorized to undertake the pilgrimage. Yet even people in more affluent countries are at risk if they stay outside too long.

"Of course, we need to take all of the steps we can to minimize the public health risk from extreme heat, and that requires a mobilization of resources and collaboration between policymakers, emergency managers and other stakeholders," Mann said. "But the only way we can prevent this from getting worse is to address the problem at its source; the ongoing warming of the planet from fossil fuel burning and other activities that generate carbon pollution."

Barring major changes in human behavior, climate change is expected to only get worse. In a recent study of hundreds of climate scientists by The Guardian, nearly 80 percent of the experts foresee Earth's temperature rising at least 2.5º C (4.5º F) above pre-industrial levels; almost half believe the temperature will rise at least 3º C (5.4º F) above that level. Only 6% thought the limit of 1.5º C (2.7º F) — the one agreed upon at the Paris climate accord, and widely acknowledged as being a major threshold before global catastrophe — is even attainable.

Regardless of whether Earth can avoid the more apocalyptic scenarios, however, experts agree that increasingly severe heat waves will exist in the foreseeable future.

We need your help to stay independent

"We can expect extreme heat, including deadly heat, to continue intensifying so long as the fossil fuel industry continues to exist, as they are the primary cause of global heating," Kalmus said. Like Mann, he said that humans need to rapidly transition away from fossil fuels, humans will soon experience heat waves that kill millions within a few days.

"If we continue burning fossil fuels despite such deadly warnings from the overheating Earth system, this death toll will continue to mount — and at some point the first 10-million-death heat wave will occur," Kalmus warned. "There's no good way to prepare for such deadly heat — air conditioning can go out in a blackout, and blackouts are more likely during heat waves — so the best preparation at this point is to minimize how hot things get by doing everything you can to end the fossil fuel industry as quickly as possible."

A black hole 1 million times our Sun awakened — and astronomers caught the whole thing in real time

We typically think of black holes as monstrous entities that destroy everything. But while they do have incredibly destructive power, they really only rip apart things that get too close. Most galaxies have a supermassive black hole in their center. Ours in the Milky Way is called Sagittarius A*. But scientists caught some never before seen footage of a black hole, as described in a recent study published in the journal Astronomy & Astrophysics.

A galaxy known as SDSS1335+0728 displayed unprecedented activity in late 2019. Specifically, it began to brighten, remaining illuminated for years even though galaxies observed to light up usually do so for weeks at the most.

Using archival data and new observations from several facilities, including the X-shooter instrument on ESO’s VLT in Chile’s Atacama Desert, the scientists behind the study concluded that the galaxy has an active galactic nucleus (AGN). This means that the galaxy has an active supermassive black hole at its core, emitting bright jets and winds to illuminate the celestial feature for Earth-bound astronomers.

“These giant monsters usually are sleeping and not directly visible,” co-author Claudio Ricci from Diego Portales University in Chile said in a statement. “In the case of SDSS1335+0728, we were able to observe the awakening of the massive black hole, [which] suddenly started to feast on gas available in its surroundings, becoming very bright.”

There are other possibilities as to what this might be, including entirely new phenomena never before seen in the universe. Co-author Lorena Hernández García, from MAS and the University of Valparaíso in Chile, said that if the data from this study is correct, “this would be the first time that we see the activation of a massive black hole in real time.”

What's more, the galaxy's core is just getting brighter. While located some 300 million light-years away in the constellation Virgo, it's definitely worth keeping an eye on to see how it behaves in the future.

Galaxies that revolve around an AGN are more volatile than those with inactive black holes at their center. Blazars, for example, are galaxies where the center shoots out jets of ionized matter flying through space almost as fast as the speed of light. Quasars are even more intense, emitting matter so powerful that it can destroy baby stars. Although the origin of these phenomena remains mysterious, a 2023 study in the journal Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society hypothesized based on recent data that they may be caused by galactic collisions.

Trump hush money prosecutor flooded with racist harassment and death threats

Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg has been flooded with racist harassment and death threats after his office led a successful prosecution of former President Donald Trump.

Per the New York Daily News, hundreds of hateful messages have poured in since a New York City jury found the ex-president guilty of falsifying business records in an effort to hide hush money payments to porn actress Stormy Daniels, to influence the 2016 election.

The content of the messages ranges from racial slurs, including the N-word, to death threats, including words like “Savage […] primate, F**king […] rapist” and “GORILLA.”

Bragg, who is leading prosecutions against Harvey Weinstein and Steve Bannon, was elected as DA in 2021 and launched a case against Trump last year. After the jury verdict, Bragg told reporters that he simply “did [his] job.”

Bragg was left out of a gag order in the case, which shielded jurors as well as key witnesses, leading Trump to lash out against the prosecutor several times during his historic criminal trial. 

“It’s Alvin Bragg’s fault. Alvin Bragg does nothing. He goes after guys like Trump who did nothing wrong,” Trump said back in April, per CNN. “There are hundreds of murderers all over the city, they know who they are and they don’t pick them up. They go after Trump.”

Bragg’s office now seeks to add the prosecution to the gag order, as the Daily News reports that prosecutors handed over 89 threats of violence to the New York Police Department.

A Utah man was killed last year in a federal law enforcement search after making graphic death threats toward Bragg on Truth Social, posting that he was “waiting in the courthouse parking garage” with a firearm, in addition to a deluge of threats against President Joe Biden and others.

Arizona AG sues governor for attempt to swipe opioid funding for Department of Corrections

An Arizona judge has temporarily blocked Governor Katie Hobbs (D-AZ) from accessing the state’s share of a national opioid settlement to fill a budget gap, at the request of the state’s Democratic attorney general.

Movement of a $115 million sum, part of Arizona’s $1.14 billion portion of the settlement funds from pharmaceutical companies that exacerbated an opioid crisis across the United States, was halted by a Maricopa County judge on Thursday evening as Attorney General Kris Mayes accuses the governor of pilfering it to close a budget shortcoming.

Part of the money, which the attorney general’s office says must be used for one of 12 opioid crisis-related purposes per the state’s agreement, was earmarked by the state’s recent budget for the Department of Corrections, a move that Mayes called unlawful.

“Though I repeatedly warned them this is an unlawful use of these funds, they proceeded with moving forward anyway,” Mayes wrote in a statement on the budget. “This is an egregious grab. I will do everything in my power to protect these opioid settlement funds for all Arizonans.”

Mayes noted that the shortfall was the result of cuts and spending increases from GOP policies, including a school voucher program, which Save Our Schools Arizona Director Beth Lewis said made up much of the deficit.

“The ESA voucher program has shown in a nonpartisan report last week that it’s driving half of the budget deficit. So, you know, anything that’s driving hundreds of millions of dollars of deficit should clearly be the first thing on the table to be reined in,” Lewis told local newspaper AZ Family.

Mayes’ momentary victory in court sets up a June 27 hearing on the matter, as she vows to fight the governor’s attempts to the furthest extent she can.

“Unless this Court acts today, $75 million intended to help Arizona citizens recover and rehab from opioid addiction will instead be used to plug a routine budget hole,” Mayes wrote in an emergency motion Thursday afternoon. “In two weeks, another $40 million will similarly disappear, a total of $115 million diverted from opioid treatment to routine government expenses.”

Lawsuit alleges Disney misled employees into relocating before canceling Florida project

Disney promised 2,000 of its California employees new jobs in Florida, and asked that they move, before abruptly canceling those plans and leaving the employees jobless, a lawsuit alleges.

Two employees in the complaint, which has yet to be filed in L.A., say they sold their L.A.-area homes and purchased property in Florida after the company directed them to relocate to support the construction and staffing of a planned $1 billion campus.

But the positions they moved to take were canceled, along with all 2,000 others associated with the “Lake Nona” project after a feud between the company and Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis endangered its tax breaks.

Per the suit, Disney employees Maria De La Cruz and George Fong had to move back to California in order to keep their employment, with De La Cruz claiming that an inquiry on her job status in Florida was ignored.

“After all of this, will there be any security in our positions? My fear would be that we decide to stay in Florida, only to be laid off in the next year or so. I don’t want to be punished for being put into a situation my company put me in,” De La Cruz wrote to Disney Human Resources, per the complaint.

The two named parties seek to enter a class-action lawsuit with others who moved for the project, arguing that Disney misled the employees of the project’s future and “made it clear that employees who declined relocation would lose their jobs.”

The company previously drew criticism in 2017 for employee wages so low that many Anaheim park employees were left homeless, in a year when theme park revenue climbed 8%. California park workers made headlines earlier this year when they announced their intent to form a union, and garnered thousands of signatures to do so.

RFK Jr. heats up anti-press rhetoric and CIA conspiracies, as he fails to make debate stage

Presidential hopeful Robert F. Kennedy Jr. is peddling conspiratorial attacks on the press, decrying CIA connections as his poor performance keeps him out of the June debate.

"The new head of NPR is a CIA agent," Kennedy told supporters in April, per ABC News, adding that CEO Katherine Maher was part of a “systematic takeover of the American press, particularly the liberal media.”

Kennedy, whose support in polls of the November election hovers near 10%, has long amplified dangerous conspiracy theories, but this is a fresh batch. Ramping up to the election, he has reportedly been repeating claims that “Operation Mockingbird,” a conspiracy theory that holds that the CIA manipulates American journalists, is “alive and well” at rallies, ABC says.

Citing Q-Anon supporter and conspiracy theorist Kevin Shipp, the vaccine conspiracist alleged that swathes of publications were “compromised by the CIA.” The big-money-backed campaign slammed individual outlets for their minimal coverage, too.

Kennedy’s campaign continued attacks on CNN after failing to meet the qualifications for its June 27 presidential debate, claiming in a statement earlier this month that CNN and employees involved in the production of the televised event would violate campaign finance laws if he were left off the stage. CNN denied the claim.

Kennedy’s attacks on journalists come as a report on press freedom from Reporters Without Borders demonstrates a worrying increase in political pressure and violence against the press going into the 2024 election. 

 

“He looks like he’s about to cry me a river”: Internet awash in memes after Justin Timberlake’s DWI

Justin Timberlake in the early morning hours on Tuesday was arrested on suspicion of driving while intoxicated in a wealthy Hamptons community in Long Island, New York, sparking a deluge of backlash online, largely in the form of memes related to the singer's music or past career indiscretions. 

The police report filed by Sag Harbor Village Police Officer Michael Arkinson at the time of the arrest determined that Timberlake's eyes were "bloodshot and glassy," and that "a strong odor of an alcoholic beverage was emanating from his breath."

"He was unable to divide attention, he had slowed speech, he was unsteady afoot, and he performed poorly on all standardized field sobriety tests," the report added, per NBC. An anonymous source speaking to Page Six reportedly shared that the arresting officer was “so young that he didn’t even know who the pop star was.”

“He didn’t recognize him or his name,” the source told the outlet. 

Another Page Six source added, “Justin said under his breath, ‘This is going to ruin the tour.’ The cop replied, ‘What tour?’ Justin said, ‘The world tour.'”

After allegedly telling the officer that he'd only consumed one martini, Timberlake — who recently kicked off his "Forget Tomorrow" world tour and is slated to perform at Madison Square Garden on June 25 and 26 — was charged with driving while intoxicated and was held overnight before being taken to Sag Harbor Village Justice Court the following morning to be arraigned. The New York Times reported that he was released without bail. 

Timberlake's music career kicked off in the late '90s and early aughts — when he was a member of the hugely popular boy band, 'N SYNC — and continued after he splintered off from the group in 2002 as a solo artist. 

Social media was quick to jest about the "Sexyback" singer's arrest. “Sir I’m gonna need you to step out of the vehicle and walk in a straight line," wrote one X/Twitter user above a video of Timberlake dancing frenetically onstage. The post has been viewed more than 6 million times. 

“Now bring sexy forward, in a straight line," tweeted another user in response to the clip.

"I heard that when he asked when the trial would be he was told, 'It’s going to be May,'" wrote one Instagram user under a post of Timberlake's mugshot, alluding to 'N SYNC's hit 2000 song, "It's Gonna Be Me."

https://www.instagram.com/p/C8X7IQDumeZ/?img_index=1

"Honest to God, if Justin Timberlake had said to me 'This is going to ruin the world tour' to me, I would have asked 'The Trolls World Tour'?" one X/Twitter user wrote, referencing Timberlake's role in the film franchise by playing Branch in 2016 animated children's movie, for which he also contributed the song "Can't Stop the Feeling!" to the soundtrack.

The incident also marks the latest in a series of publicly scrutinized career missteps that have marred the pop star's image, namely, those including singers Britney Spears and Janet Jackson. Timberlake has faced criticism for his treatment of singer Britney Spears, who he dated in the early 2000s. In Spears' 2023 memoir, "The Woman In Me," she revealed that she had an abortion when she was 18 because Timberlake "wasn't ready to be a father," calling the experience "agonizing."

"Justin definitely wasn’t happy about the pregnancy,” she wrote. “He said we weren’t ready to have a baby in our lives, that we were way too young." 

“I wanna apologize for some of the things I wrote about in my book. If I offended any of the people I genuinely care about I am deeply sorry,” Spears had later posted on social media. "I also wanted to say I am in love with Justin Timberlake's new song 'Selfish' it is soo good and how come every time I see Justin and Jimmy together I laugh so hard ??? PS 'Sanctified' is wow too," she added, referring to one of Timberlake's appearances on comedian Jimmy Fallon's "The Tonight Show."

Speaking to a New York City audience in February 2024, Timberlake seemed to respond to Spears' claims mere days after she apologized. “l'd like to take this opportunity to apologize — to absolutely f***ing nobody,” Timberlake said.

Following Timberlake's remarks, Spears scrubbed her apology from the internet and wrote, “Someone told me someone was talking s**t about me on the streets!!! Do you want to bring it to the court or will you go home crying to your mom like you did last time??? I’m not sorry!!!"

Per the NYT, Timberlake jested at Spears' prior virginity during "Saturday Night Live" and separately spoke openly about their sexual relationship. Following the then-young couple's breakup, Timberlake released "Cry Me A River," a revenge track about a cheating partner ostensibly aimed at Spears. The song's music video even featured a woman who bore an uncanny resemblance to her. 

Following the recent arrest, Spears seemed to indirectly comment on her ex's legal plight when she posted an image of a cocktail on the day he was arrested, captioning the post, “It’s the little things you know!!!”

https://www.instagram.com/p/C8YOt8tPQOD/?utm_source=ig_embed&ig_rid=8e2b30af-1ceb-4d48-b59a-181e9c980376

Meanwhile, many of the memes are now pulling in Janet Jackson. This most likely is in reference to the 2004 Super Bowl Halftime Show, in which Timberlake reached across Jackson's chest and ripped off a section of her bustier to reveal her breast. The incident, known as "the wardrobe malfunction," spurred significant public outrage directed at Jackson — she subsequently lost her record label deal, movie deals, and sponsors, and was even barred from attending the Grammys. In contrast, Timberlake's career took off. 

In an Instagram post shared in 2021, Timberlake acknowledged that he owed both women an apology and could have better defended them from slander. “I am deeply sorry for the times in my life where my actions contributed to the problem, where I spoke out of turn, or did not speak up for what was right,” he wrote in the post, which is no longer available. “I specifically want to apologize to Britney Spears and Janet Jackson.”

In addition to sarcastic and humorous memes, Timberlake's DWI has also generated online discourse about his prior treatment of women. 

"Anxiously awaiting Justin Timberlake to release a statement somehow blaming Britney for his recent DUI," wrote one used on X/Twitter.

Former economics and finance editor at The Guardian, Heidi N. Moore, argued on X/Twitter that "'hating Justin Timberlake' brings so many people together."

"People who love Janet Jackson. People who love Britney Spears. Millennials who resented the bodyshaming of Jessica Simpson. Who else am I missing; what other women did he screw over?"

“Meandering and confusing”: Trump showed cognitive decline in interviews, author says

Donald Trump demonstrated “severe memory issues” and gave several alarming false recollections in interviews for a book chronicling “The Apprentice,” author Ramin Setoodeh said.

Setoodeh interviewed the former president six times in “meandering and confusing” conversations for his book “Apprentice in Wonderland,” and says that Trump didn’t remember speaking with him afterward. 

“My first sit-down interview was in May,” Setoodeh noted in an interview with CNN’s Kaitlan Collins. “We sat down again towards the end of the summer, and when I sat down, you know, there was a very blank expression on his face. So I asked, ‘Do you remember when we spoke recently,’ and he [Trump] said, ‘No, I have no memory of that.’”

Trump also appeared to forget that he was no longer in charge of foreign policy, leaving one interview early to “deal with” a conflict in Afghanistan.

“He [Trump] also seemed to think that he still had some foreign policy powers,” he noted. “There was one day where he told me he needed to go upstairs to deal with Afghanistan, even though he clearly didn’t,” he said, adding that Trump actually called the nation “the Afghanistan.”

In another instance, Trump purported that Joan Rivers — who passed away in 2014 — voted for him.

“He confidently told me, and declared, that Joan Rivers voted for him when he ran for president, and Joan Rivers died in 2014,” Setoodeh recalled. “She would not have been able to vote for Donald Trump.”

The “Apprentice in Wonderland” author said Trump was at his happiest during their conversations when discussions focused on “The Apprentice.”

“He would talk about what he did at the White House and he would become gloomy, and unhappy, and resentful.”

On conversations surrounding an alleged tape of Trump saying the N-word on the set, Trump claimed, unprovoked, that if he were to have said it, he wouldn’t have done so while mic’d, Setoodeh said.

78-year-old Trump, who has recently had a spate of public verbal flubs and mental slips, is set to debate 81-year-old Joe Biden on Jun 27.

Kendrick Lamar dunks on Drake and courts controversy with Dr. Dre at Juneteenth unity concert

Consensus has deemed Kendrick Lamar the unspoken, unofficial winner of the bitter rap feud with Drake.

The high-profile hip-hop battle between the Canadian-born rapper and the Los Angeles native amounted to numerous diss tracks like "Not Like Us," which became the No. 1 song in the country. A byproduct of the tit-for-tat war of words was how some said it perpetuated allegations of abuse and alleged parentage.

On Wednesday, a month after the battle's climax, Lamar held a Juneteenth concert at Los Angeles' Kia Forum called “The Pop Out: Ken & Friends." The night showcased unity among West Coast rappers and musicians like Lamar's special guests Dr. Dre, YG, Tyler the Creator, Roddy Rich, Schoolboy Q and Steve Lacy. “This is unity. Y’all just don’t know man,” Lamar said as the LA-born artists took a photo and said "One West," according to The Hollywood Reporter.

At the concert event, Lamar revived the beef by performing the viral diss track "Not Like Us" five times and even adding a verse to "Euphoria" stating how Lamar's influence on rap is unbeatable and adding an additional new line: “Give me Tupac’s ring back and I might give you a little respect," reports the New York Times. Variety reported that the reference was to a ring belonging to late West Coast rapper Tupac Shakur that an anonymous buyer purchased. It was later revealed last year to be Drake. The music event, which was live streamed on Amazon Music, showed Lamar performing three out of five of his Drake-centered diss tracks.

Later in the evening, the rapper covered one of Shakur's most popular songs "California Love" with rapper Dr. Dre, who produced the song. Dr. Dre helped introduce the lead-up to Lamar's final performance of "Not Like Us."

Lamar said during an encore performance, “Y’all ain’t gonna let anyone disrespect the West Coast, huh? Oh y’all ain’t gonna let nobody mock or imitate our legends, huh?” Throughout the night, the crowd had reportedly been chanting “OV-hoe,”  another line from "Not Like Us."

We need your help to stay independent

Performing his hits like "M.A.A.d City,” “Be Humble,” “DNA,” “Element.,” “Money Trees,” “Swimming Pools,” “King Kunta” and “King’s Dead, Lamar's Juneteenth commemoration was lauded as a "celebration of Los Angeles unity,” albeit one with daggers pointed towards Drake.

However, despite the praise, many took issue with one of Lamar's special guests. Some have noted that while Lamar has called out Drake for alleged abuse of minors, having Dr. Dre on stage seemed to contradict some of his previous statements. Dr. Dre has a reported history of physical abuse towards women like journalist Dee Barnes and alleged abuse of his ex-girlfriend R&B singer Michel'le’.

Rolling Stone journalist Mankaprr Conteh tweeted and shared an interview she did with Barnes last year, "No matter what Dr. Dre does or who uplifts him, many of us won’t ignore the grave accusations and witnessed acts of violence against women at his hands, including journalist Dee Barnes, who I spoke with last year."

Prominent defense attorney, Olayemi Olurin said on X, "Why did Kendrick even bother to call Drake out for being a pedophile who surrounds himself with abusers on 'Not Like Us' if he was just going to call Dr. Dre — King of the Abusers — to introduce it?"

Another person online said, "So Kendrick brought out Dr. Dre, the man who beat women to a pulp, but I thought we didn’t like abusers??? What happened to that. This why I can’t take these n****s serious."

 

“Never treated me fairly”: Trump blasts “TRASH” Fox News poll showing him losing to Biden

Donald Trump isn’t reacting well to a Wednesday Fox News poll of the presidential race, showing President Joe Biden up by 2 points for the first time since October of last year.

On Truth Social, the former president — who also fell behind in FiveThirtyEight’s national polling aggregation for the first time since they began tracking the race this week — blasted Fox in a rambling post.

“The latest Fox News poll is TRASH! They used a biased, Democrat-leaning sample of voters, polling more Biden 2020 voters than Trump 2020 voters to skew the results in favor of Crooked Joe,” he wrote on Thursday of the poll of national registered voters. “I am leading BIG in virtually every other poll.”

Biden, who’s been underperforming in polls against his predecessor for much of the race, is seeing a slight improvement in polling numbers as his administration takes victory laps on key economic issues, like slowing inflation and junk fee bans on various industries. 

At the same time, Trump’s criminal conviction and other pending legal troubles, as well as doubts over his mental and physical fitness, seem to be hurting his numbers.

Biden’s support figures have been plagued since his withdrawal from Afghanistan after two decades of U.S. occupation there, as well as his support of Israeli attacks on Gaza in response to the October 7 attacks.

The Biden campaign has made democracy a central issue in the race after Trump supporters stormed the U.S. Capitol on Jan. 6, 2021, as part of a coordinated effort to subvert the results of the 2020 race, much to the chagrin of Trump, who was named a co-conspirator in several state-level plots to overturn race results.

“The #1 issue in this country is not protecting democracy,” Trump said in the post. “It is INFLATION and IMMIGRATION!”

Trump is running on a plan to initiate mass deportation of undocumented people, which experts note would have catastrophic inflationary and humanitarian consequences. Another proposed policy to replace income taxes with tariffs would have similar price-surging consequences.