Spring Sale: Get 1 Year, Save 58%

Watch: “Superman” returns more colorful than ever with classic friends, enemies and dog Krypto!

When James Gunn was tapped to lead DC Studios’ “soft reboot” of the DC Extended Universe — now called the DC Universe or DCU — fans of the studio’s wealth of comic book character properties like Superman and Batman were ecstatic. Since its inception beginning with 2013’s “Man of Steel,” the live-action films in the DCU were largely derided as being unfocused and dull, lacking the narrative thrust of their competitors in the Marvel Cinematic Universe. Gunn’s arrival was intended to be DC Studios’ turning point, one that would showcase its potential with 2025’s “Superman,” resetting the Henry Cavill-starring “Man of Steel” sub-franchise for a new era.

After a bout of teasing this week, DC Studios dropped the first teaser trailer for “Superman,” which stars David Corenswet as the titular superhero and is directed and written by Gunn. Though the clip is billed as a teaser, it maintains the length of a full trailer, stretching past the two-minute mark to give fans and Superman newcomers a crash course in both the hero’s origin and his current antics while dropping in plenty of Easter eggs for diehard DC devotees.

The teaser opens with a shot of Corenswet’s Superman making a rough landing, somewhere in the Arctic that isn’t his presumably nearby Fortress of Solitude. Wheezing and gasping for air after some untold battle of great strength, he uses his remaining might to whistle for his dog, Krypto (sporting an equally handsome red cape of his own), to drag him back to safety. Interspersed with this sequence are brief shots of Superman’s alter ego Clark Kent heading to work as a reporter at The Daily Planet, the new Lois Lane (Rachel Brosnahan), and Clark on the Kent farm where he’s raised after crash-landing on Earth. Title cards follow, reading, “This summer, it begins.” 

While that’s all familiar territory for most who have a vague idea of the bits and bobs that make up Superman, less so are the quick glimpses of action that follow. There are shots of Superman’s arch nemesis Lex Luthor (Nicholas Hoult) looking like a menacing James Bond inside the private walls of his business, Luthercorp; a giant ball of light in the skies of Metropolis, where Clark Kent resides, presumed to be Solaris the Last Sun of Krypton — or, basically just an evil sun; the crystal shards of the Fortress of Solitude; and even a giant, kaiju-like, fire-breathing monster for Superman to fight.

Fans aching for the return of the colorful atmosphere of the Superman comics will be pleased that Gunn’s version seems filled with color and Superman’s signature blues. The trailer is even well-lit enough to recognize some equally heroic in-universe cameos from Hawkgirl (Isabela Merced), Mister Terrific (Edi Gathegi) and Guy Gardner (Nathan Fillion), a member of the green Lantern Corps.

There are still a good seven months to go before “Superman” hits theaters this July. But considering that this clip is only a teaser, loaded with enough Easter eggs that will keep fans busy until the next look at Gunn’s film drops, it looks as though that soft reboot of the DCU is off to a promising start.

Why it’s so hard to create a truly recyclable Keurig coffee pod

There's a Keurig machine in some 40 million households in the U.S. Single-serve coffee brewing systems — which allow consumers to make just one cup of coffee at a time by feeding a pod into a slot and pressing a button — have soared in popularity since the early 2000s. 

Inevitably, this leads to a lot of trash. 

Every cup of java brewed creates a conundrum: what to do with the coffee pod that produced it. To start, can it be recycled? The answer, in Keurig's case, is not really. The company's single-use coffee pods — also known as K-cups — are made of polypropylene plastic, a material that experts warn is not as recyclable as consumers have been led to think. Two of the country's largest recycling companies have said they do not accept K-cup pods, and one environmental group calculated that if you lined up all the K-cup pods in the world's landfills side by side, they would comfortably circle the globe 10 times

A new coffee pod company claims to have developed a solution to Keurig's plastic waste problem. Cambio Roasters, which launched in September, offers a Keurig-compatible coffee pod that's made out of aluminum — which, unlike plastic, is infinitely recyclable. Cambio is led by a team of former Keurig employees, including founder and CEO Kevin Hartley, who was previously a chief innovation officer at Keurig Green Mountain, as the company was formerly known. "This is, in our view, the most exciting innovation in coffee since the K-cup," said Hartley during a launch-day press call for Cambio.  

Experts, however, aren't sure that Cambio understands just how big of a problem K-cups pose to curbside recycling systems. 

"Really, plastic is just not a good option," said Jeremy Pare, a visiting professor of business and environment at Duke University's Nicholas School of the Environment. But even aluminum, with all its benefits, is "still going to have issues."

Part of the difficulty of creating a truly recyclable packaging option — for just about any consumer good — is the severely fragmented nature of the American recycling landscape. "There are over 10,000 recycling systems in the U.S.," said Pare, who is also a member of the Plastic Pollution Working Group at Duke's Nicholas Institute for Energy, Environment, and Sustainability. "And yet, at the same time, only a quarter of the population has access to recycling in the U.S." (Pare lives in one such community with no formal recycling program, just outside of Augusta, Maine.) In the U.S., the question of whether something is recyclable can only accurately be answered on a local level.

Another problem is the plastic composition of most K-cup pods. Sustainability concerns have followed the Keurig brand closely as it has scaled. (Once a small startup, Keurig was acquired by Green Mountain Coffee Roasters in 2006; in 2018, Keurig Green Mountain merged with Dr Pepper Snapple to become Keurig Dr Pepper.) Keurig started selling K-cups pods made of polypropylene in 2016, with the goal of making 100 percent of K-cup pods "recyclable" by 2020. But the company has run into trouble for touting recyclability. In 2018, a California resident sued Keurig for claiming that K-cup pods could be recycled after the foil lid was removed and the coffee grounds were rinsed or dumped out — which resulted in Keurig agreeing to pay $10 million in a class-action settlement. And in September of this year, the Securities and Exchange Commission charged Keurig for falsely claiming the pods "can be effectively recycled." (Keurig settled the claim by agreeing to pay a $1.5 million penalty fee.) 

Hartley, who left Keurig in 2017, knew consumers wanted a plastic-free K-cup option — and after years of prototypes and testing, he and his team settled on aluminum as an easier-to-recycle alternative. Aluminum is also impervious to oxygen, which causes coffee to lose its flavor over time. "Whenever we brew a cup of coffee, it tastes exactly as the roastmaster intended," said Hartley. 

Cambio isn't the first single-serve coffee company to opt to ditch plastic or invest in circularity. Nespresso, a popular single-serve coffee company that's owned by the Nestlé Group, has made its capsules out of aluminum for over 30 years. In 2020, Nespresso announced that its pods would be made of 80 percent recycled aluminum, and it claims its global recycling rate is 32 percent

But Nespresso pods only work in Nespresso machines. Because Cambio coffee pods are designed to work with Keurig models, Hartley hopes to give consumers what they want "without having to buy a new brewer."

Cambio also allows users to peel back the lid and dump out the grounds before recycling. Nespresso pod lids are difficult to remove, and the company instructs users to recycle their pods as is, grounds and all — but they're only approved for curbside recycling in New York City and Jersey City, where a designated recycling contractor cleans them out before reprocessing them. (Nespresso consumers can also mail used pods back to the manufacturer for recycling, or drop them off at Nespresso stores.)

Unfortunately, swapping plastic for aluminum doesn't automatically solve K-cup pods' recyclability crisis, experts say. What really prevents coffee pods, regardless of what they're made of, from having a second life is their size. 

After collection, recyclables are sorted at a facility known as a materials recovery facility, or MRF. MRFs aren't equipped to collect small items — a common rule of thumb is that they can't handle anything smaller than a credit card — and so small objects placed in recycling bins often wind up getting sent to landfills. "The K-cups are so small that they fall through" the machinery in many recycling facilities, said Pare. "So other than separating" coffee pods from the waste stream "individually, there's no good way to recycle them." 

Cambio's approach to working around this is two-pronged. First, the company says it wants consumers to stack used K-cup pods together — and then pinch them closed — to overcome many recycling facilities' size requirements. Three or more used K-cup pods should create a piece of aluminum large enough to fit through the machinery at recycling facilities, says Hartley. (These instructions don't currently appear on Cambio's packaging or website.)

Cambio says it is also developing a device that will make this stacking and pinching of used K-cups easier. "Think of this device as an easy way for consumers to bundle cups together and then toss into their recycling bin," said Hartley. He added that the company has filed for patents for second-generation Cambio pods that can be "snapped" together after use.

Jan Dell, a chemical engineer and an environmental nonprofit founder, said, "I don't think aluminum pods are a meaningful improvement," citing their small size as a barrier to being accepted and sorted via curbside recycling systems. "Think of the pods like confetti: impossible to collect back up."

Cambio disagreed with Dell's characterization of the switch to aluminum, pointing out that currently, essentially no single-use plastic pods are recycled, whereas aluminum can be endlessly recycled. "To Cambio and consumers, these two facts are meaningful." Hartley also shared that the work of ensuring Cambio's compatibility with recycling programs across the country is "ongoing." The company is planning to run tests with MRFs in specific markets "as soon as feasible."

In response to a request for comment, a spokesperson from Keurig Dr Pepper said, "We know our consumers want simplicity and less waste." They shared that the company has "been lightweighting our pods to reduce the amount of plastic used," as well as "increasing options for recycling them," including a soon-to-be-launched program in which customers will be able to mail their used pods to Keurig for recycling. The spokesperson also said the company is "continually exploring" more "sustainable packaging" options. 

Dell leads the nonprofit The Last Beach Cleanup, which is focused on fighting plastic pollution. The ultimate solution to Keurig's plastic footprint, she said, is a product that eliminates "the need to collect anything back from customers," like a fiber-based pod that can be composted along with the grounds.

Keurig is currently testing a plant-based pod format that won't have any plastic or aluminum, and the company expects it to be certified compostable, according to the Keurig Dr Pepper spokesperson. Hartley said he worked on that product for many years, calling it "an amazing innovation." 

But these coffee pucks, which are not yet available for sale, will require an entirely new machine to run. "It's going to take a long time before America is going to throw away 40 or 50 million brewers and buy 40 or 50 million new brewers," said Hartley. He added, referring to his time with Keurig, "I won't tell publicly how much money we spent to start from zero and have 50 million American households loving their Keurigs. But it's a big lift, and it takes decades." 

In an interview with the Atlantic in 2015, the inventor of the K-cup said, "I feel bad sometimes that I ever did it." As the market for single-serve coffee brewers grows, so will its impact on the environment, unless its products are somehow wildly reimagined and redesigned. Keurigs and Nespresso machines are marketed as both convenient and luxurious, a combination that is likely to keep drawing in new market segments. 

But eco-conscious coffee brewers can rest easy in the knowledge that you don't need a Keurig or Nespresso machine to brew one cup of coffee at a time; any coffee maker can be single-serve if you use only the water and coffee grounds you actually need. No pods required — maybe just a filter.  

This article originally appeared in Grist at https://grist.org/food-and-agriculture/why-its-so-hard-to-create-a-truly-recyclable-keurig-coffee-pod/.

Grist is a nonprofit, independent media organization dedicated to telling stories of climate solutions and a just future. Learn more at Grist.org

“They’ve pushed workers to the limit”: Amazon employees go on strike during the holiday rush

Workers at seven Amazon facilities went on strike Thursday morning, hoping to force negotiations for a labor contract after the delivery and retail giant ignored union requests to begin talks by a Dec. 15 deadline.

The International Brotherhood of Teamsters, the union that represents around 10,000 Amazon workers and contractors, hopes to apply maximum pressure by timing the strike during the holiday delivery rush. Amazon, which employs around 1 million hourly workers and reported $39 billion in net income for the first nine months of this year, insists that operations will continue as normal.

The strikes are taking place in facilities across the four states of California, New York, Illinois and Georgia. Police in Maspeth, Queens have already started making arrests, with Hell Gate, a local publication, posting a video of NYPD officers physically confronting workers and moving to block off their path. Another video posted half an hour later shows the NYPD setting up barricades, apparently to clear a path for non-striking Amazon contractors to break the picket line by entering and leaving the facility.

“If your package is delayed during the holidays, you can blame Amazon’s insatiable greed. We gave Amazon a clear deadline to come to the table and do right by our members. They ignored it,” Teamsters General President Sean O’Brien said in a statement posted on X. “These greedy executives had every chance to show decency and respect for the people who make their obscene profits possible. Instead, they’ve pushed workers to the limit and now they’re paying the price. This strike is on them."

Workers in other areas of the company are also ready to join the strike should Amazon refuse to bargain, according to the union announcement.

Amazon, seemingly confident that the price will be small, has shown no signs of relenting. The company claims that the delivery drivers represented by the Teamsters are not Amazon employees at all because they work through a third-party contractor; the union says that, under a National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) ruling, the workers should be considered to have joint employers — both Amazon and Delivery Service Partners — and all of the attendant rights to bargain for higher wages and benefits with the company that controls their working conditions.

Amazon and other business groups have issued legal challenges against that NLRB rule and others, as well as the watchdog's constitutionality.

We need your help to stay independent

“For more than a year now, the Teamsters have continued to intentionally mislead the public — claiming that they represent ‘thousands of Amazon employees and drivers.' They don’t, and this is another attempt to push a false narrative," Amazon spokesperson Kelly Nantel said in a statement. The Teamsters, the company claimed, "threatened, intimidated, and attempted to coerce" workers into joining the strike.

Labor advocates say that Amazon is the one using its heavy hand against union activity. The company has been the subject of several investigative reports and NLRB complaints that highlighted alleged attempts to surveil, harass and fire workers who stepped out of line. Just last month, the NLRB ruled against Amazon over forcing workers to attend "captive audience" meetings where management delivered lectures about the ills of joining a union.

Those tactics have not dissuaded the employees of several Amazon facilities from voting for union representation. The largest group at Amazon represented by the Teamsters works at JFK8, a Staten Island warehouse that employs more than 5,000 people. Although warehouse employees voted to unionize in an election in 2022, Amazon has refused to bargain with them and, alleging bias by the NLRB officials charged with overseeing the process, unsuccessfully challenged the election outcome.

Amazon has also tried to ward off union drives by sometimes offering concessions, as they did for delivery drivers in September, raising their average national pay from $20.50 to $22 an hour. At least publicly, the company maintains that is enough.

A $6M banana, $350k watch, $270 nachos: The most outrageous purchases in 2024

What’s on your holiday shopping list? I’m guessing it’s not a $3.5 million Yayoi Kusama painting or a $4.75 million David Hammons piece. But that’s what the rich were buying at Art Basel, the annual prestigious art fair that wrapped in early December in Miami Beach.

When I lived in Miami for a few years I couldn’t help but fall victim to the city’s flashy allure. Every day felt like brushing shoulders with model-like people straight out of a Hollywood movie (or reality show). So I saved for months, survived on Trader Joe’s $3 frozen meals and finally decided to splurge $3,000 on my first designer handbag. When in Rome, right?

I gingerly walked into the Hermès store in the Design District, a glossy four-story temple of luxury. Frugal me justified the choice because Hermès bags supposedly hold high resale value. Stepping out of the elevator, I spotted two sales associates — a man and a woman — talking to each other. I took a deep breath and mustered the words, “Do you have the bucket bag?”

The woman paused, exchanged a glance with her colleague, and replied, “No.” She softened slightly when I mentioned I lived in Miami. Feeling hopeful, I asked, “Could you let me know if one comes in stock?” She took my number, but when I tried to specify color choices, the man cut me off with a dry laugh and a heavy French accent: “No, no, no, no, no — don’t be greedy.” I changed my mind and left. 

The uber-rich have long since moved past pricey purses, and this year they dropped quite a bundle on some notably extravagant items. Here are a few of the wildest things that were purchased — and proposed — in 2024.

We need your help to stay independent

The $6.2 million banana

In late November, crypto entrepreneur Justin Sun placed the winning bid on a banana taped to a wall at Sotheby's contemporary art museum: $5.2 million, plus another $1 million in auction-house fees. The banana had been purchased from a fruit stand in New York City for a mere 35 cents. 

It's not the first banana-as-art that sold for a tidy sum. Previous ones netted $120,000 and $150,000 for the Italian artist Maurizio Cattelan, known for critiquing the art market’s absurdity while making a fortune from it.

Sun has been known to lighten his wallet before. He once bid $4.57 million for a dinner with Warren Buffet to try to convert him into a crypto advocate. After Donald Trump won a second term, Sun invested $30 million in World Liberty Financial, a crypto platform the president-elect helped launch this year. 

Sun followed up his banana buy with a video on X of himself eating it. “The taste is naturally different from an ordinary one," he said. 

Time is money. So are these watches.

JAY-Z, the 24-time Grammy winner and longtime watch collector, debuted his $350,000 Bugatti Chiron Tourbillon in August at Fanatics Fest in New York City. Created by Jacob & Co., the watch draws inspiration from the Bugatti supercar, boasts 578 hand-assembled parts and features a miniature engine that moves when wound. 

JAY-Z has been a client of Jacob & Co. for 25 years, a relationship that secured him a spot at the front of the line for the exclusive timepiece. It has an inclined tourbillon, a feature aimed at improving accuracy by counteracting gravity, which adds to its rarity in the watch world. It's a statement piece for collectors who can afford it. You’re essentially wearing an apartment on your wrist.

Not impressed? Former NFL great Tom Brady sold $4.6 million worth of watches at a Sotheby's auction this month. The "GOAT Collection" included a rare Rolex Daytona Paul Newman "John Player Special" watch from 1969 that went for $1.1 million. 

Virgin Galactic’s $600k tickets to space

For $600,000, Richard Branson's Virgin Galactic offers the ultimate adventure: a trip to space. Passengers experience weightlessness and see Earth from the perspective of astronauts — a blue marble floating in the void.

The journey, initially priced at $450,000, includes pre-flight training and luxury accommodations. Its website bills it as a life-changing experience. The company is facing problems posting profit and the next flight has been postponed to 2026, but Virgin Galactic has already sold over 800 tickets. Was it the price hike that held me back from buying one? Sure, let’s go with that.

Mukesh Ambani’s $100M private jet

Indian billionaire businessman Mukesh Ambani — the richest person in Asia — bought a Boeing 737 Max 9 and not just for transportation. It’s a flying palace, customized for one of the world’s wealthiest men. The $100 million jet includes a private suite, entertainment lounge and office. It also boasts noise-canceling tech, high-speed internet and automated controls. For Ambani, it’s the ultimate way to travel in style this holiday season.

But even with that price tag, it may not be the fanciest: The most luxurious private jet costs around $500 million and is owned by Saudi Arabia’s prince and businessman Al Waleed bin Talal Al Saud, according to the Times of India.

$270 nachos at the Miami Grand Prix

Finally, something less expensive — and tastier? — than banana art. At Miami’s star-studded Formula 1 Grand Prix this spring, the food menu went viral for its jaw-dropping prices. We're not talking $6 hot dogs at Yankee Stadium. This menu offered $270 nachos with black truffles and Wagyu beef, $280 lobster rolls, a $12,000 bottle of Clase Azul Ultra tequila and a $560 bottle of Tito's vodka. We're not sure how much the actual race tickets cost. 

Some fans argued the premium ingredients and exclusive setting justified the cost of the food. Plus, for an extra $400 you could add an ounce of caviar to your item of choice!

Donald Trump’s $2T "Iron Dome" 

As Trump stumped, he repeatedly proposed an "American Iron Dome" aimed at defending U.S. airspace from missiles and drones and inspired by a similar system in Israel. The plan would cost about $2.5 trillion dollars, national security analyst Joseph Cirincione estimated. That's over three times the country’s projected 2025 military budget, leaving us to wonder how many taxpayers are on board with footing the bill. 

Not to worry. Trump offers options for smaller budgets: Those who donate at least $1 million to his inauguration or raise $2 million for it can have dinner with wife Melania or J.D. Vance the night before the Jan. 20 swearing-in.

After all that, maybe I should revise my holiday wish list. To keep it simple: a banana from a New York fruit stand or nachos from Dos Toros. Decisions, decisions.

The week American journalism died

Dearly beloved, we are gathered here today to pay our respects to the dearly departed: journalism.

Journalism was dearly, and it has departed. I’ve been here for a while and I haven’t seen it move a muscle.

Journalism in America died a short time after its twin, democracy, passed. Both succumbed to self-inflicted injuries brought about by hubris, greed and a government ostensibly of, by and for the people.

Turns out that while all animals are equal, some are more equal than the rest of us.

I’d invite a few important and critically thinking people to eulogize both, but it remains questionable whether any such people exist in today’s government or media — and what few do are struggling desperately to keep above the rising tide of, autocracy, oligarchy, AI, social media, stupidity, intolerance, ignorance and all of those stupid stories about drones.

Donald Trump delivered the final death blow to journalism and democracy, but he only put both out of their misery. Some may even view it as a mercy killing. For the last 50 years, beginning with the cancer-stain of Richard Nixon, government has faltered. It began when we threatened to impeach a president over serious crimes — like bugging the DNC and lying about it, during a re-election. Our democracy held then and Nixon resigned rather than face the wrath of Democrats and even Republicans who vowed to do the right thing. But beginning with Ronald Reagan and his successful appeal to the vulgar, the ignorant and the vain, it quickly became apparent Nixon was not an anomaly among our leaders. His prosecution was. 

Since then, our government has tolerated a variety of low-browed, ridiculous and seditious men ranging from Colonel Oliver North to Michael Flynn. And while Reagan successfully convinced us he alone had ended the Cold War, the rats like Mitch McConnell snuck into the ship of state and began eating at its foundation like so many rabid termites with a head full of bad hallucinogens and a stomach full of tapeworms.

The cancer spread. Reagan kicked out the underpinnings of the free press by getting rid of the Fairness Doctrine while simultaneously allowing consolidation of the media. Large companies bought out smaller ones and closed bureaus, laid off editors and experienced reporters. They saved money by hiring neophytes and then letting them go once they got enough experience to demand a larger salary. The wealth of institutional knowledge in the veteran White House press corps began to evaporate.

For four years Biden couldn’t communicate. Millions of people think his historic infrastructure bill is about six EV stations in California. For four years, traditional reporters couldn’t get across the facts. We couldn’t communicate. It’s officially time for an autopsy because journalism has no pulse.

And all the while, the government and media continued to divide us. Cultural schizophrenia ensued. Coupled with the cancerous greed, by the time Newt Gingrich became speaker, it was apparent that American democracy and journalism were terminal patients. Fox News, MSNBC and the rise of extreme media hastened the demise. By the time we elected a man convicted of 34 felonies to office and television anchors began preaching that you shouldn’t speak to MAGA relatives, the patients were dead. 

The evidence is everywhere. On the left, members of Congress preach to us about what “political parties” are. Instead of asking the electorate “what do you need?” the left tells us why they’re better and what they will do to and for us. If you don’t agree with them then you’re an ignorant, misogynistic and probably racist atavism.

On the right, it’s about God and native-born, Bible-thumping, gun-toting men and women who voted against their own self-interest because they thought Donald Trump was “one of us.” They all would rather shoot their neighbor than talk with them.

Trump has shown how dead democracy is by nominating nearly a dozen billionaires to high posts in his incoming government who are worth more than an overwhelming majority of Americans will ever earn in a lifetime. His other nominees are former Fox News employees, friends and family members – icing on the cake for the grifter-in-chief. He’s showing us in real time the death of American journalism, because as reported in Politico, “No modern president — including Trump in his first term — has made a habit of personally suing the media while in the Oval Office.”

Technically he isn’t back in the Oval Office yet, but speaking for the first time in a news conference after his election victory to reporters on Monday, Trump promised more lawsuits against journalists and pundits he doesn’t like.

We need your help to stay independent

That came after ABC News settled a lawsuit Trump had filed against the news organization for defamation. The lawsuit stemmed from a March 10, 2024, ABC news piece in which George Stephanopoulos repeatedly said that Trump had been “found liable for rape” in the E. Jean Carroll civil case. Though Trump still denies any wrongdoing, last year a jury found that Trump sexually abused Carroll, sufficient to hold him liable for battery, though it did not find that Carroll proved he raped her.

Trump, being a public figure claimed ABC was guilty of “malice” toward Trump for saying “rape”, the judge allowed the case to proceed on that basis, which opened the network up to pre-trial discovery including emails and private correspondence — so the network settled.

Former ABC White House Correspondent Sam Donaldson said the settlement is an obvious victory for Donald Trump. “First instinct is to find the settlement abhorrent and wrong but then it is not ABC News that is doing it, it is Disney – the News Department had no choice; the Corporation like all the others are afraid to challenge DJT. So, was Iger (Bob Iger, CEO of Disney) wrong not to stand up? The Great Speaker, Sam Rayburn used an expression often to explain to recalcitrant members what they must do to have a successful time in the House ‘You've got to go along to get along’ and in the end Iger decided in this case to "go along." Let's see whether it turns out okay for him and Disney even though the news department takes it on the chin!

Trump wasted no time in showing where his thoughts are on the matter. Later that day, he followed through on his pledge: He sued the Des Moines Register and its veteran pollster, Ann Selzer, over a pre-election poll that showed Trump trailing Kamala Harris in Iowa shortly before last month’s election. Pure revenge against a pollster.

“You might as well sue the weatherman because you don’t like the weather,” a veteran First Amendment attorney told me. “These are predictions. I’ve never seen anything like it.” 

Michael Cohen, Trump’s former fixer said the onslaught of lawsuits filed against the press is just beginning. On CNN's "NewsNight" Tuesday, Cohen said that Trump does not have to win such lawsuits because the costs associated with them can have a chilling effect. He predicted that the Register will eventually settle.

“Not only does Donald Trump have money, he has money with the RNC,” Cohen said. “He has money with his super PACS and his money has money. Look at all of the tech billionaires that are around him now. There is an indefinite amount of money. And I believe wholeheartedly that The Des Moines Register, very much like ABC Disney, is going to capitulate. And I believe that Donald Trump has actually figured out a way how to change the way that media deals with issues.”

Trump’s moves are classic examples of strategic lawsuits against public participation (SLAPP). Currently, 34 states and the District of Columbia have a variety of anti-SLAPP laws to prevent these costly and time-consuming lawsuits that can intimidate and silence critics. They not only benefit the media but, more importantly, every day individuals who wish to speak out against the government.

Trump, and his minions like Elon Musk who claim they support Free Speech have actually, finally killed it, and with it – democracy.


Want a daily wrap-up of all the news and commentary Salon has to offer? Subscribe to our morning newsletter, Crash Course.


There is other evidence. A new survey of hundreds of journalists who received safety training from the International Women's Media Foundation finds 36% say they have faced or been threatened with physical violence on the job — and they have felt especially threatened at Trump campaign rallies.

"Journalists reported feeling at high risk while covering Trump rallies and 'Stop the Steal' protests, especially when some Trump supporters and protestors openly carry weapons," the report states.

But wait there’s more. Joe Biden and the Democrats are no free speech heroes either. Biden failed to take any action as president to break up the media monopolies. During the annual Christmas party for supporters this week, Biden, who has shown up in the White House Brady Briefing Room once to talk to reporters, met in the Roosevelt Room with his favorite social media influencers. Trump at least met with his fan base publicly in the Rose Garden. Sure, it was a raucous meeting where I commented that his influencers looked like a group of people eager to be demonically possessed, but Trump did it in the open.

Biden met with his influencers privately. According to a few in the room, Biden and his communication staff told them they “are the new leaders” of the media. They pumped them with thoughts of “patriotism” and said the influencers need to make sure that they let people know that Donald Trump is going to take credit for the successes of the Biden administration. “Great they want us to deliver on the message they couldn’t” one explained. Another said, “We wouldn’t have to do it if the administration had done it successfully.”

Exactly. For four years Biden couldn’t communicate. Millions of people think his historic infrastructure bill is about six EV stations in California. For four years, traditional reporters couldn’t get across the facts. We couldn’t communicate. It’s officially time for an autopsy because journalism has no pulse.

Democracy is dead and the large number of Americans who are watching from the gravesite as the bodies are buried are too busy spitting on the corpses to understand it is they who are being tossed in the grave too. Those rending their hair and gnashing their teeth on the right are screaming that their friends and neighbors who disagree with them are communists, “Karens” and anti-American roustabouts who’d rather get a free meal off the government than do an honest day’s work – while their healthcare, education and social security evaporate in a puff of smoke.

And on the left, the extremists scream “authoritarian” and “oligarchy” as they fret over their friends, relatives and neighbors turning them into the government – without once wondering why the Democrats lost the race and support in rural America.

Unless you cave to the almighty leader, your goose is cooked.

So, as we end our eulogy, let us pray with the time-honored saying left to us by Pogo “We have met the enemy and he is us. Amen brothers and sisters.”

And we will end our services with a pipe-organ rendition of “You can’t always get what you want” by the Rolling Stones.

Let it Bleed.

“Tradwives” were the hot topic online in 2024 — but offline, women are more independent than ever

I was already glad about the upcoming TikTok ban, but now I have one more reason to be happy about it: the site's minitrend of women "pranking" their husbands by saying, "I can't pay the mortgage this month." The "joke" is that the husband reacts with confusion because his wife doesn't contribute to the house payment. The goal isn't humor, though, but bragging. A woman who posts this content wants us to believe she's such a sexual dynamo she's snagged a man who is willing to pay all her bills. What's ignored is the entire history of women's financial dependence on men, which is actually about men's domination over women, not women's sexual power over men. Or the ways that women who don't have money of their own are so often trapped, abused or abandoned into poverty. 

Tradwifes are a silly online fantasy, and in many cases, overt propaganda. 

The "can't pay the mortgage" meme is just the latest in a series of social media trends that romanticize female submission to men. There are also "soft girls" and "stay-at-home girlfriends," working the same "too sexy to work" schtick. (The old term for this role, of course, is "kept woman," especially if your sugar daddy has a wife he goes home to after visiting you in his sidepiece apartment.) The biggest of all are the "tradwives": influencers who peddle idyllic images of housewifery, where women's equality is rejected in favor of obsequiousness and exaggerated domesticity. Some tradwives, like Hannah Neeleman of Ballerina Farm, avoid explicit denunciations of feminism, simply presenting their lifestyle as a "choice" among many. Others are more overtly political, putting out rants about how feminists must all be miserable cat ladies. But they all are based on the false promise that self-abasement before men is a woman's happiness. 

The ubiquity of this content, especially on TikTok, has created widespread anxiety that this is a real-life trend of everyday women rejecting feminism for "happy housewife" fantasies. In the real world, however, women are not turning their backs on decades of women's progress. The data shows the opposite. More women than ever are embracing financial independence, delaying motherhood, and choosing single life over unsatisfactory relationships. Tradwifes are a silly online fantasy, and in many cases, overt propaganda. 


Want more Amanda Marcotte on politics? Subscribe to her newsletter Standing Room Only.


A 2023 study from Pew Research shows that in 45% of marriages, the wife makes as much or more money than her husband. Women on TikTok may pretend that men handle most family finances, but in reality, women do. Most studies show around 90% of women in relationships make the most financial decisions or split that duty in half with a partner. Ironically, part of the reason women dominate family checkbooks is that paying bills is a household chore, and women still unfortunately do far more of those tasks than men. But it shows that the stereotype of the bubbleheaded housewife whose husband gives her an allowance has no relationship to most women's realities. They're far more likely to be the ones signing the mortgage check than their husband. 

About half of women are unmarried, which is a record high. Single women are more likely than single men to own their home. Single women without children have as much wealth on average as their male counterparts. Young women complete college at higher rates than young men, with 47% of women ages 25 to 34 having a bachelor's degree, compared to 37% of men that age. The birth rate has hit a record low, largely driven by the collapse in teen pregnancy rates

There's no real-world tradwife trend. It's better understood as an online fantasy, which attracts so much attention precisely because it's so foreign to people's lived experiences. A not-small amount of traffic on tradwife accounts is driven by hate-watchers or gawkers. Like most reality TV, it's closer to a freak show than an attempt to reflect the average person's experiences. It's very similar to the "big family" trend on social media, where influencers with 8, 10 or a dozen kids get large amounts of traffic because of that WTF factor. It's also not likely a coincidence that this content seems more prominent on TikTok than on other platforms. One reason the U.S. government has moved to ban TikTok is it's so tightly wound up with the Chinese government, which is strongly motivated to sow politically divisive content to American audiences. Drumming up a culture war with overwrought debates over "trad" lifestyles is certainly one way to do that. 

That most women's lives have no relationship to the "trad" fantasy propped up online doesn't mean it isn't dangerous propaganda. A lot of this content is deceptively alluring, either because it's aesthetically pleasing or sexually provocative. It taps into people's emotions to sell them on dangerous right-wing ideas. For instance, while Neeleman pretends to be apolitical on her feeds, she recently posed for the cover of Evie magazine, which is funded by far-right billionaire Peter Thiel and pumps out a constant stream of disinformation painting contraception as unnatural and dangerous. It's unlikely that women will encounter tradwife content and decide to quit their jobs to be submissive housewives. But it's unfortunately quite likely some will see false information demonizing birth control and skip taking the pill, leading to an unwanted pregnancy. 

The good news, as I reported in a deep dive earlier this year, is that growing numbers of people are pushing back against the "trad" propaganda, often in the same social media spaces that gave rise to this online trend. Some critics are feminists exposing the sexism and the dishonesty. Others are critics of Christian nationalism, pointing out how "trad" content is often interwoven with fundamentalist Christianity. Some are escapees from "trad" lifestyles, blowing the whistle on the violence and ugliness right behind the shiny, happy veneer. 

The anti-trad cause got a huge boost in 2024, when British journalist Megan Agnew published a profile in The Times of Hannah Neeleman and her husband, Jet Blue heir Daniel Neeleman. After extensive visits and interviews with the Neelemans on their farm, Agnew revealed that Hannah Neeleman's life is not at all like the bucolic fantasy she portrays online. Instead, readers met a woman who was pushed out of her ballet career, rushed into marriage, and pressured into giving birth repeatedly without even the benefit of pain relief. Even though Neeleman's husband is unbelievably wealthy, she's not even permitted a space of her own on their sprawling ranch to dance, as her studio was turned into a classroom for her eight children. 

The Neelemans have angrily denounced Agnew's article, even though she produced the audio interview that showed the painstaking accuracy of her portrayal. Their protests didn't work. The article unleashed a torrent of discourse about how there is nothing romantic about the tradwife lifestyle because it's predicated on a woman abandoning her identity and selfhood to be a prop in a male fantasy of female submission. It created an opportunity for feminists to educate young audiences on how the "happy housewife" was always a myth, and that women in the 1950s often suffered from depression and drug abuse because of the self-erasure expected of women of that era. It began to dawn on more people that the "tradwives" they see online, like Neeleman, aren't even really housewives at all. They are professional content creators who make money by selling a fantasy. In some cases, their husbands seize the money they make, which only underscores how much this is not a romantic dream, but sexualized exploitation. 

With TikTok having to find an American buyer or get banned in the U.S., the tradwife concept may have a short shelf life. The Chinese company's algorithm is famously a mystery, but it does seem to favor tradwife content more than American platforms. Even if the Chinese government doesn't have its thumb on the algorithm's scale — which is highly unlikely — there's good reason to think this content won't be as prevalent in other spaces. Even image-based platforms like Instagram aren't quite as dependent on circumventing the rational parts of the brain as the rapid scroll of TikTok. Tradwife content depends on audiences who absorb it uncritically, and without TikTok, that will be much harder to pull off. 

Trump’s infrastructure “fantasy”: Ditch mass transit for self-driving cars, private highways

While President-elect Donald Trump rarely spoke about infrastructure projects during the 2024 campaign, especially compared to the grand promises of his earlier campaigns, Trump's allies plan to revive infrastructure planning from his first administration. But this doesn't meant taking on big new projects. Instead, it's likely to mean reduced funding for public transit, increased investment in autonomous or "self-driving" vehicles and contracting out major infrastructure projects to private investors. 

During Trump’s first presidential campaign, he often spoke of ambitious plans to rebuild America's infrastructure, including highways, bridges, ports and airports. During his first term, Republicans made efforts to enact a conservative vision for infrastructure and transportation policy. Trump asked Congress at one point to defund Amtrak, and proposed increasing the role that private capital plays in major infrastructure projects like highway building

In 2020 and 2024, however, Trump effectively dropped the issue. This year's GOP platform barely mentions infrastructure, and its policy proposals mostly involve protecting computer systems from cyber attacks, rather than any large-scale infrastructure investment.

More detailed policy prescriptions can be found, however, in the Heritage Foundation’s Project 2025, which appears to serve as an unofficial agenda for the incoming administration, or perhaps a manifesto for the American conservative agenda in the age of Trump. 

In that document, economist Dianna Furchtgott-Roth, who served as an undersecretary at the Department of Transportation in the first Trump administration, lays out what may well be the incoming administration's vision for infrastructure investment, focused on private contractors and investment deals and dramatically scaled-down federal funding for capital improvements. It feels much closer to old-school, small-government Republican politics than to the more ambitious vision Trump has occasionally championed.

Project 2025 specifically mentions the push to eliminate capital investment grants under the first Trump administration. These large grants of federal dollars are used both to build new infrastructure projects and fund maintenance of existing highways, bridges and other crucial infrastructure components in major metropolitan areas. As the spectacular collapse of Baltimore's Francis Scott Key Bridge last March made clear, infrastructure maintenance can become a critical issue. (Given the current budget standoff in Washington, it's unclear whether Congress will fund rebuilding the bridge.) Eliminating these grants could slow down transportation infrastructure projects currently contemplated or underway, or kill them off completely. 

In smaller cities (with a population of 200,000 or less), capital investment grants can also be used to cover operating expenses for public transit services. Since many such cities cannot afford to subsidize bus lines or paratransit services for people with disabilities, losing these grants could shut down services entirely in some areas. 

We need your help to stay independent

Furchtgott-Roth also recommends contracting out infrastructure projects to private investors, who would fund the projects in exchange for the right to operate the infrastructure asset in question, either by collecting "fees from the users of the asset" or by receiving "periodic payment from the government" In other words, this envisions for-profit, privately operated highways and bridges, which were common in 19th-century America but virtually disappeared during the last century.

There are discernible hints of MAGA-style ideology in Furchtgott-Roth's technocratic prose, as when she advocates a “tech-neutral approach to addressing any emerging transportation technology,” which seems to mean steering policy back toward private cars and fossil-fuel consumption. The Biden administration, she writes, used “the department’s tools to get people to take transit and drive electric vehicles instead of helping people to choose the transportation options that suit them best.”

Project 2025 advocates a "tech-neutral approach to addressing any emerging transportation technology," which seems to mean steering policy back toward private cars and fossil-fuel consumption.

Indeed, Furchtgott-Roth tries to blur the definition of "public transit" to mean something entirely different, which sounds more like the pay-as-you-go private-sector options that already exist. “New micromobility solutions, ridesharing, and a possible future that includes autonomous vehicles," she writes, "mean that mobility options —particularly in urban areas — can alter the nature of public transit, making it more affordable and flexible for Americans."

She concludes: "Unfortunately, [the Department of Transportation] now defines public transit only as transit provided by municipal governments.”

In its totality, this document imagines a future in which private companies collect tolls from drivers of private cars on privately-owned highways — with many of those cars, perhaps, self-driving vehicles hired through apps like Uber and Lyft. This new system, which does not appear to be "public" in any conventional sense of the word, could potentially replace fixed-route mass transit like buses or trains, which Furchott-Roth appears to believe are no longer economically viable.


Want a daily wrap-up of all the news and commentary Salon has to offer? Subscribe to our morning newsletter, Crash Course.


Kevin DeGood, director for infrastructure at the Center for American Progress, told Salon that even if the technology to create such a system existed (which it does not), "The vision put forward of ditching public transit and pushing for mass ride-hailing is fundamentally flawed.”

Trips in cars hired through ride-hailing apps, whether a human driver is involved are not, are “more expensive" than any conceivable form of public transit, DeGood said, and "also massively inefficient."

"The issue is deadheading," he continued, which means "moving around between fares without a passenger. These empty miles add up very quickly, causing big spikes in congestion and delay. Public transit provided more than 7 billion trips in 2023. It's a vital part of our economy and the federal-local funding partnership should be strengthened, not cut."

DeGood added he expects the second Trump administration to follow the example of the first one in moving “away from projects such as public transportation and active or non-motorized transportation, including biking and walking, and toward more highway projects — especially for rural highway repair and expansion.”

Adie Tomer, a senior fellow at the Brookings Institution, said that the plans spelled out in Project 2025 were “easy to write” but will be difficult to sell to Congress or enact into law. "When you say it out loud it’s like a fantasy novel,” Tomer said.

Tomer noted that because of the bipartisan infrastructure law passed under the Biden administration, large chunks of infrastructure spending are locked in through at least 2026, meaning that the Trump administration’s ability to pursue these policies will likely be limited before the next midterm elections, when Trump's lame-duck status will be more apparent. But “the volume of this debate will increase” over the next two years, Tomer added.

When it comes to slashing funding for public transit while investing in speculative public-private partnerships for new infrastructure projects, Tomer suggested that the first Trump administration could serve as a lesson. 

Even with Republicans in control of both the House and Senate, Tomer said, “Congress has fundamentally a different approach. These members of Congress have to go back to communities and regions" to seek re-election, and in many parts of the country, "transit does extremely well at the ballot box. So what we’ve seen is support for transit investments.”

Possible private funding for infrastructure, Tomer added, is not a new talking point in the GOP lexicon, but it opens the door to all sorts of potential problems, including conflicts of interest, cost overruns and concerns around quality control.

One major issue is that private investors will clearly seek a return on their investment, which is likely to mean making the resulting infrastructure asset more expensive for users, through increased bridge and highway tolls, for example.

Another key issue, Tomer said, is that investors will only be interested in "the most profitable routes and corridors and portions of the network. Why do we have a rural broadband gap? It’s because those are the least profitable portions of our telecommunications networks. That's also why they skipped over some of our densest lower-income neighborhoods.”

“An exclamation point on global warming”: Climate scientists warn 2024 was marked by broken records

The year 2024 is on track to be the hottest in recorded history, as humanity has officially exceeded the 1.5º C threshold established by the 2015 Paris climate accord. Despite this milestone, President-elect Donald Trump is pushing environmental scientists out of the government. According to Dr. Mark Serreze and many other climate scientists who spoke with Salon, the new reality created in 2024 by unprecedented rising temperatures is the biggest news story today, despite relative lack of coverage. It raised many unanswered questions — as well as ominous prospects for the future of our species.

“While this fact is an exclamation point on global warming, it is also telling us that we have much more to learn,” Serreze, director of the National Snow and Ice Data Center (NSIDC), told Salon. Scientists like Serreze want to learn why the planet is so much warmer than even they had predicted. Dr. Peter Kalmus, a NASA climate scientist who emphasized his opinions are his own, noted that heating is accelerating “and is now substantially more rapid (0.26° C per decade) than it was a decade ago.”

Dr. Ken Caldeira, an atmospheric scientist at the Carnegie Institution for Science's Department of Global Ecology, observed that from the perspective of scientists who dedicate their careers to studying climate systems, one major question is whether the current temperature spikes occurred because the previous El Niño cycle gave humanity years of relative relief from temperature increases.

Will 2025 be another record breaking year, or will it be another hot, but not record hot, year?” Caldeira said. “Many scientists think the recent hot years were largely attributable to a super-position of El Niño variability on top of a greenhouse gas-induced warming trend, but some see the recent years as an acceleration in the underlying warming trend."

"This and other indicators show clearly that the Arctic is in a new regime that is overall hotter and wetter."

Other scientists, including Caldeira, hope that mitigation strategies like carbon restrictions will slowly push back against the warming trend.

This is not to say that scientists do not agree for sure on one important thing: Overwhelming scientific evidence indicates humans are burning fossil fuels at an unsustainable rate, releasing gases such as carbon dioxide and methane into the atmosphere. As these so-called greenhouse gases trap excess heat, they cause extreme weather events like wildfires, hurricanes and droughts, as well as rising sea levels.

As such, 2024’s distinction as the warmest year in human history “underscores the reality that the planet will continue to warm as long as we burn fossil fuels and add carbon pollution to the atmosphere,” Dr. Michael E. Mann, a climatologist from the University of Pennsylvania, told Salon. Dr. Twila Moon, the deputy lead scientist and science communication liaison at the NSIDC, also pointed out that 2024 was also the second hottest year on record in the Arctic, and that the previous nine years were the nine hottest years in a dataset that goes back to 1900.

“This and other indicators show clearly that the Arctic is in a new regime that is overall hotter and wetter,” Moon said. “Every year in the Arctic now looks dramatically different than even a couple of decades ago. Yet, this new regime is not a new normal because human-caused climate change will continue to bring rapid and ongoing change to the Arctic, and our entire globe.”


Want more health and science stories in your inbox? Subscribe to Salon's weekly newsletter Lab Notes.


These statistics are more than abstract trivia — they will have a direct impact on the lives of human beings everywhere. For example, 2024 had the deadliest hurricane season in almost two decades, after Hurricane Katrina hit in 2005.

“This underscores how hurricanes are becoming more intense and more deadly as the planet continues to warm,” Mann said. In addition to causing more than 400 deaths, the 2024 Atlantic hurricane season was accompanied by 24 climate change-exacerbated weather disasters in the United States alone that each racked up more than $1 billion in damages. These events included devastating storms like Hurricane Milton and Hurricane Helene.

“This underscores the profound impact that human-caused climate change is already having in the form of devastating extreme weather events that threaten our economy and, increasingly, our lives,” Mann said. These impacts are likely to continue worsening, with Moon pointing out that global fossil fuel emissions are set to reach a new record in 2024.

Antarctic iceAn aerial view of an iceberg while scientists conduct a research on effects of climate change during 8th National Antarctic Science Expedition organized by TUBTAK MAM Polar Research Institute as they have discovered that ice cuticles, sized as much as Turkiye, melted due to the effects of climate change in Antarctica, which is described as the coldest and driest continent of the planet on February 8, 2024. (Sebnem Coskun/Anadolu via Getty Images)“This human release of heat-trapping gasses is the primary cause of the increases in extreme weather, flood, drought, heatwaves and generally ‘weird weather’ that we are all experiencing,” Moon said. “It is well known that reducing these emissions is key to minimizing risk and damage into the future. And how to achieve these reductions is well mapped out, with the technology to do it. The pressure is now focused on social, cultural, business and political will.”

Caldeira echoed Moon’s observation about the need for America’s leaders to be serious about the threat posed by climate change.

“On the politics side, the big question is what Trump and the MAGA gang will do to Biden's legislative achievements in the climate arena,” Caldeira said, referring to President Joe Biden’s various executive and legislative reforms intended to address climate change.

We need your help to stay independent

“One view is that the drive for vengeance and destruction (and tax breaks!) is so strong that they will try to eliminate the incentives that were created in the infrastructure and inflation reduction laws,” Caldeira said. “Another view is that since, reportedly, 85% of the benefit accrues to Republican districts, this is essentially a subsidy from blue districts to red districts that the Republicans might not want to give up.”

Kalmus is cynical about the future. He pointed out that at the 2024 United Nations Climate Change Conference, more than 1,700 fossil fuel lobbyists were present to push back against efforts to curb carbon emissions.

“Everything is getting worse, fast — and instead of stopping it, the billionaire class has the pedal to the floor,” Kalmus said. “This will set the stage for reduced habitability on our planet for an extremely long time. Biodiversity could take millions of years to recover. It could lead to billions of human deaths, unimaginable suffering, and limit the possibilities for our species far into the future.”

“It’s clear who’s in charge”: House GOP scraps funding bill after Trump, Musk tirades

A proposed bill to fund the federal government beyond this Friday is dead in the water after it was objected to by President-elect Donald Trump and billionaire Elon Musk

House Majority Leader Steve Scalise, R-La., shared with CNN that the spending bill negotiated by leadership in both the House and Senate would be scrapped after Musk spent the day whipping Republican votes against it. The bill was meant to avert a government shutdown on December 21. 

"There's no new agreement right now," Scalise said, admitting that the original agreement was a no-go among House GOP hardliners. 

Some Republicans soured on the deal to fund the government until mid-March as soon as it was released. The objections grew in number as Musk went on a day-long tirade against the bill, which he called a "scam" and a "crime." The final nail in the coffin came when Trump released a statement painting the deal as a "betrayal of our country."

Scalise told CNN that "there's no new agreement right now" and admitted to working on a request to raise the debt ceiling that Trump made in his statement. 

“We’ve been having some conversations about the debt limit, as relates to the [funding bill]," he said. "Those are ongoing conversations.” 

Democratic House members expressed outrage at Musk's perceived influence on Trump and legislators.

 

"An unelected billionaire was crowned co-President by the Republican Party," Rep. Maxwell Frost, D-Fla., wrote on X, "They’ve given him the influence to make a damn post that throws a spending bill into limbo cause House Republicans are scared of him."

Rep. Pramila Jayapal, D-Wash., called Musk a "shadow president" and said Trump was "follow[ing] his lead" in a post to X.

Florida Republican Sen. Rick Scott was hopeful that a new agreement could be reached before the deadline on December 20.

"If there’s a goal of getting it done, absolutely," he shared with CNN. "I mean, everybody can move fast if they want to get something done."

Scott's optimism runs counter to Trump's marching orders, however. In a post to Truth Social, Trump said that any Republican who negotiates with Democrats to pass the stopgap funding measure "should, and will, be primaried." 

“Call their bluff”: Trump, Vance urge GOP lawmakers to vote down emergency government funding bill

President-elect Donald Trump is urging members of his party to vote down a resolution that would fund the federal government into March. 

In a joint statement with Vice President-elect JD Vance shared by Vance on social media, the incoming executives said that Republican legislators should "call [the] bluff" of congressional Democrats and push for a new resolution that doesn't include spending they see as wasteful. 

"Increasing the debt ceiling is not great but we’d rather do it on [President Joe] Biden’s watch. If Democrats won’t cooperate on the debt ceiling now, what makes anyone think they would do it in June during our administration?" they shared. "Let’s have this debate now. And we should pass a streamlined spending bill that doesn’t give Chuck Schumer and the Democrats everything they want.

The debt ceiling is an approved amount that the U.S. Treasury can borrow to pay its debts. The statement called Congressional Republicans "inept" for allowing the federal government to get to the brink of its borrowing limits. Vance and Trump also argued that the bill negotiated by congressional leaders would give too much to Trump's ever-growing list of enemies

"Congress is considering a spending bill that would give sweetheart provisions for government censors and for Liz Cheney. The bill would make it easier to hide the records of the corrupt January 6 committee—which accomplished nothing for the American people and hid security failures that happened that day," they wrote. 

The joint statement came after Trump admin figure Elon Musk spent the day Wednesday raging against the spending bill on social media. Trump and Vance said that anything less than a new resolution and a raised debt ceiling would amount to "a betrayal of our country" and encouraged Republicans to "GET SMART and TOUGH."

"THIS CHAOS WOULD NOT BE HAPPENING IF WE HAD A REAL PRESIDENT," they wrote in closing. "WE WILL IN 32 DAYS!"

“This bill is a crime”: Musk throws social media fit over stopgap government funding effort

Soon-to-be Department of Government Efficiency head Elon Musk can add another imaginary title to his resume: social media majority whip. 

The Tesla CEO and owner of X raged all day Wednesday against an omnibus bill meant to avoid a government shutdown. That continuing resolution was negotiated by leaders of the House and Senate and revealed earlier this week. It provides funds to keep the federal government operational through March 14. Without a resolution, the government would run up against a lapse in funding, as a similar resolution passed earlier this year only funded the government through December 20.

GOP hardliners have been railing against the contents of the bill, which includes approximately $100 billion in disaster aid and a pay raise for lawmakers, since it was released. 

Musk was tagged to join President-elect Donald Trump's administration alongside Vivek Ramaswamy, and the pair were given the ill-defined mandate to slash government spending. He posted more than 40 times to his social media app X on Wednesday, calling the omnibus bill a "scam" and "an outrage." He's also shared the posts of Republican members of the House who have spoken out against the bill.

"The more I learn, the more obvious it becomes that this spending bill is a crime," he wrote. "Stop the steal of your tax dollars!"

Musk's impromptu whipping of votes in opposition to the spending bill reportedly has House Speaker Mike Johnson considering a narrower resolution that would carve out much of the stopgap bill's appropriations. Politico shared that Johnson is weighing a Plan B resolution. However, abandoning the bill negotiated by congressional leaders runs the risk of heading into the holidays with the federal government shut down for lack of funding.

Why “Anora” star Mikey Madison’s comments on intimacy coordinators are receiving backlash

Intimacy coordinators have been a hot-button topic in Hollywood as norms and standards for filming intimate scenes have changed in the last several years. But what exactly are intimacy coordinators? And most importantly, what are they used for on the sets of your favorite movies and television shows?

It's simple. An intimacy coordinator is trained in many functions: as a choreographer, an advocate for actors and a middle-person between actors and production for intimate scenes that may include "nudity, hyper-exposed work, simulated sex acts, and/or intimate physical contact," explains the Intimacy Directors & Coordinators website

While the term was coined in 2006, intimacy coordinators weren't broadly used in the industry until the MeToo Movement shifted cultural norms on sets, highlighting traumatic experiences for actors while filming intimate scenes. According to The Hollywood Reporter, in 2018 HBO was the first network to commit to hiring intimacy coordinators, which has led to permanent change. Now, all of HBO's shows that include intimate scenes have an intimacy coordinator, and many networks like Netflix, Hulu, Starz and Amazon followed HBO's lead.

The first HBO show to use an intimacy coordinator was the 2017 drama "The Deuce," which details the origins of sex work and trade in New York City in the '70s and '80s. Because of its explicit scenes, one of its lead actresses, Emily Meade, went directly to HBO executives demanding change, specifically requesting an advocate on set to support her during filmed intimate scenes, Rolling Stone reported.

Since then big-name shows like "Euphoria," which is widely known for its explicit sex scenes, have used intimacy coordinators. Actors like Sydney Sweeney on "Euphoria" said the experience with her intimacy coordinator "changed my approach to everything. I love having one and I think they should be considered a necessity on every set."

However, now we are seeing that some actors like "Anora" star Mikey Madison have opted out of using intimacy coordinators, a stance that has sparked controversy and backlash.

Mikey Madison and Sean Baker's comments 

The 25-year-old actress is at the center of a buzzy award season for her role as sex worker married to the son of a Russian oligarch in Sean Baker's "Anora." Madison was paired with another awards contender, "The Last Showgirl" star Pamela Anderson for Variety's Actors on Actors in which they discussed "Anora's" sensitive subject matter. Anderson shared she had friends who work in the industry and asked Madison if they had used an intimacy coordinator during filming.

"For our film, it was a choice that I made; the filmmakers offered me, if I wanted, an intimacy coordinator," said Madison. "Mark Eydelshteyn, who plays [my husband] Ivan, and I decided it would be best to just keep it small."

She continued, "My character is a sex worker, and I had seen Sean’s films and know his dedication to authenticity. I was ready for it. As an actress, I approached it as a job."

Baker, who wrote and directed "Anora," shared a similar sentiment during a joint interview with Madison at The Hollywood Reporter. He said they opted out of using an intimacy coordinator because it was the actors' choice, however, Baker emphasized, "I think it’s very important for an actor to have that option. . . . We like to call them sex shots, not sex scenes, because they’re blocked, they’re calculated.

"But also I have directed sex themes throughout my career, so I was very comfortable doing so and also as a producer on my film, the number one priority is the safety and comfort of my actors," he said.

Madison added, “We talked at length about each scene, what it would look like. And Sean and his wife and producing partner Sammy [Samantha Quan] would even block out what it would look like [on screen].”

In a separate interview with The Associated Press, Baker said, "We were our own intimacy coordinators, actually," adding, "It is a "case by case basis, a film by film basis." 

The swift backlash  

Since the interview between Anderson and Madison came out, the clip about Madison discussing her experience on set has been viewed on X 19.2 million times.

Some people even brought up that Baker and his wife would demonstrate the sex positions to Madison and h Eydelshteyn. The post said, "I see a lot of people talking about this clip but not a lot of people talking about how insane this is for the director of a film about SEX WORKERS to have himself and his wife fill in as the intimacy coordinators instead of doing it right and having one on set."

Another person said, "Offering an actor the choice of an intimacy coordinator instead of immediately hiring one feels like a labour law violation."

One person pointed out, "I’m glad the actors were comfortable during the nudity and sex scenes but I don’t think having an intimacy coordinator should be up for negotiation; this mindset isn’t used toward dance or fight choreographers."

One person defended Madison's comments, saying, "Mikey Madison said it was her choice to have an intimacy coordinator. She didn’t trash having one and she made that absolutely clear."

A meme of the viral discourse also highlighted that even though the internet does not agree with Madison's comments and decision not to have an intimacy coordinator — she and Eydelshteyn still consented to not have one.

As Madison and Baker gear up for the rest of awards season, they both have not responded to the growing, online controversy about intimacy coordinators.

 

Bird flu hospitalizes person in Louisiana, the first severe infection in U.S.

A person has been hospitalized with bird flu in Louisiana, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), marking the first time since the outbreak began that an infection with the H5N1 virus reached such severity. Although another severe case hospitalized in a teenager in Canada last month, this is the first severe case reported in the U.S.

This case brings this outbreak's total number of human infections to 61, though many cases may be going uncounted. Most of these infections occur among farmworkers who come into contact with dairy cows and poultry, which the virus is infecting and massacring in massive numbers. This week, seven more outbreaks were reported among Californian dairy herds, bringing the total number of herds affected across the country to 860. More than 123 million poultry and more than 10,000 wild birds (with 300 million dead birds worldwide) have been affected.

The case in Louisiana — along with recent cases in Washington state and in the Canadian patient with severe illness — involves a type of the virus that has recently been detected in wild birds in the U.S. and it is different from another type that is circulating in dairy cows. 

This week, the CDC also announced another probable case of bird flu in a person in Delaware. The source of infection is being investigated, but if confirmed, this would indicate the virus is continuing to increase its geographical range. Most cases in the U.S. have occurred in California and Colorado, but it has not yet reached the Northeast. Another presumptive case was reported in Wisconsin today, a first for the state.

Public health officials have not been able to identify the source of three cases of bird flu detected in a person in Missouri, a child in California, and the teen in Canada. Although the source of infection for the person in Louisiana has not been confirmed, they did come into contact with dead birds in backyard flocks. This is the first infection known to have occurred among someone exposed like this in the U.S., although backyard flocks have been infected in places like Oregon.

Another possible means of transmission is through drinking raw milk from cows infected with the virus. After the virus was detected in raw milk sold in California last month, the U.S. Department of Agriculture ordered raw milk manufacturers to ramp up testing as well as recalling some raw milk from stores.

“Nothing nefarious”: Biden gives first statement on New Jersey drone panic

Joe Biden says East Coast residents seeing odd aircraft in the sky have nothing to worry about. 

In an early morning chat with reporters on Wednesday, the president said that there was "nothing nefarious" behind the rash of reported drone sightings. His answer followed a similar tack to several federal agencies who spoke on the drones earlier this week: providing no concrete answers while trying to strike a calming tone. 

"They’re checking it all out…there’s a lot of drones authorized up there," he said. "I think one started and… everybody wanted to get in the deal."

Biden added that his administration was "following it closely" and that there was "no sense of a danger" coming from the unmanned aircraft. 

On Monday, the Department of Homeland Security, the Federal Aviation Administration, the FBI, and the Department of Defense issued a joint statement stating that the seeming rush of drones was a conflation of disparate events and misidentifications. 

"The sightings to date include a combination of lawful commercial drones, hobbyist drones, and law enforcement drones, as well as manned fixed-wing aircraft, helicopters, and stars mistakenly reported as drones," they wrote. "We have not identified anything anomalous and do not assess the activity to date to present a national security or public safety risk over the civilian airspace in New Jersey or other states in the Northeast." 

Biden's response came two days after President-elect Donald Trump brought up the drone sightings in his first post-election press conference. He told reporters that he would avoid traveling to his New Jersey golf club until the drones were sorted out. 

"Something strange is going on," he said. "For some reason, they don’t want to tell the people." 

Facing more delays, NASA astronauts to remain in space until at least March 2025

A long trip to space is about to get even longer. NASA astronauts Suni Williams and Butch Wilmore were originally supposed to spend only about a week aboard the International Space Station, but due to issues with their spaceship, have remained stuck for months. Originally slated to return in February, the two astronauts are now going to remain onboard on the ISS until “no earlier” than late March 2025, according to a recent report.

Williams and Wilmore blasted off in June for a trip that was supposed to end eight days after they landed. When Boeing’s starliner capsule began experiencing technical problems, however, NASA sent it back empty in September so it could be repaired. The deadline has been pushed back to late March to permit more time for “complete processing” of the new SpaceX spacecraft that will be used to retrieve the stranded Americans.

“Fabrication, assembly, testing and final integration of a new spacecraft is a painstaking endeavor that requires great attention to detail,” Steve Stich, the manager at NASA’s Commercial Crew Program, said in a statement. “We appreciate the hard work by the SpaceX team to expand the Dragon fleet in support of our missions and the flexibility of the station program and expedition crews as we work together to complete the new capsule’s readiness for flight.”

The astronauts will be rescued by a team known as Crew-10, which includes NASA astronauts commander Anne McClain, and pilot Nichole Ayers; Japan Aerospace Exploration Agency mission specialist Takuya Onishi,; and Roscosmos cosmonaut Kirill Peskov. They are currently training at NASA’s Johnson Space Center in Houston.

Gaetz admits to “embarrassing” acts after Republicans join vote to release House ethics report

The former representative from Florida, Matt Gaetz, tried to get out ahead of the expected release of an ethics report on his alleged sexual misconduct and drug use, saying that he was “playing hard” in his 30s.

Multiple news outlets, including CNN and The New York Times, reported that the House Ethics Committee, which had previously voted to not release the report on its investigation into Gaetz, reversed course on Wednesday, with some Republicans joining Democrats in voting to release the highly anticipated report. The full House is now expected to vote on the matter.

Gaetz’s conduct before becoming a U.S. congressman has been highly scrutinized throughout his political career due in part to his relationship with a former Florida tax collector, Joel Greenberg, who was convicted of sex trafficking a minor in 2022.

The Ethics Committee report will be the culmination of a years-long investigation into the allegations against Gaetz, including whether he shared inappropriate images on the House floor, used illicit drugs, misused campaign funds and accepted a bribe, among other issues. House investigators heard testimony from several people who claimed to have witnessed Gaetz having sex with a minor at a drug-fueled party, a charge he denies.

While a Justice Department investigation into the matter concluded without any charges being brought against Gaetz, the House Ethics Committee investigation continued — an issue that rose to prominence once again after President-elect Donald Trump nominated Gaetz for attorney general. Gaetz has since withdrawn from consideration.

Catching wind of the news that the report would be released, Gaetz posted a statement on social media. “I was charged with nothing: FULLY EXONERATED," he said, complaining that he had "no opportunity" to rebut the report as a result of his own resignation from Congress.

“I’ve had no chance to ever confront any accusers. I’ve never been charged. I’ve never been sued,” Gaetz continued. “Instead, House Ethics will reportedly post a report online that I have no opportunity to debate or rebut as a former member of the body.”

Gaetz added: “In my single days, I often sent funds to women I dated — even some I never dated but who asked. I dated several of these women for years. I NEVER had sexual contact with someone under 18.”

“My 30’s were an era of working very hard — and playing hard too,” he continued. “It’s embarrassing, though not criminal, that I probably partied, womanized, drank and smoked more than I should have earlier in life. I live a different life now.”

Adele’s song to be pulled globally as plagiarism case continues, Brazilian judge says

One of Adele's songs will be pulled internationally because a Brazilian judge issued an injunction while a plagiarism case against the song continues.

The song "Million Years Ago," featured on the 2015 album "25," must be pulled from all platforms including streaming services, Judge Victor Torres said in an injunction filed Friday, the Agence France Presse reported. Adele is accused of plagiarizing the song because of alleged similarities to a Brazilian samba song called “Mulheres" by Martinho Da Vila. The song's composer, Toninho Geraes, sued Adele for plagiarism in 2021. She and music producer Greg Kurstin co-wrote “Million Years Ago," says the Los Angeles Times.

According to the injunction, the Brazilian counterparts to Adele's labels Sony Music Entertainment and Universal Music could be slapped with an $8,000 fine if they do not comply with the order. Torres demanded the labels to stop “immediately and globally, from using, reproducing, editing, distributing or commercializing” the song. 

Adele's representatives did not respond to the LA Times' request to comment.

Geraes’ attorney blasted Adele, calling the song a “parasitic use” of Brazilian music and saying he will work to keep the song off radio, TV, streaming services and other platforms worldwide.

Meanwhile, the British singer has just wrapped her years-long Las Vegas residency and said she would now take a hiatus from touring, music and public life.

In a show in Germany in the fall, the singer said, “I have spent the last seven years building a new life for myself and I want to live it now.”

 

Fed makes third rate cut this year, suggests fewer in 2025

The Federal Reserve on Wednesday committed to a final interest rate cut this year, as widely expected by economists and investors, but suggested fewer cuts next year. 

The Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC) lowered the rate by a quarter point to a target range of 4.25% to 4.5%, marking the third consecutive reduction of 2024. Fed policymakers also signaled two cuts in 2025, reducing earlier projections in half to adjust for market expectations. Following the news, U.S. stocks slid to one of their worst days of the year, with the Dow Jones Industrial Average losing 1,123 points and posting its first 10-day losing streak since 1974.

Despite the anticipated cut, concerns linger about the persistence of inflation and the potential impact of the Trump administration's policiesFed chair Jerome Powell, addressing reporters in Washington, D.C., struck a cautious tone in his remarks.

“Recent indicators suggest that economic activity has continued to expand at a solid pace,” he said, citing GDP of 2.8% in the third quarter and resilient consumer spending. “The slower pace of cuts for next year really reflects both the higher inflation readings we’ve had this year and the expectation inflation will be higher.”

Going into the December meeting, market expectations were nearly unanimous, with about 9 in 10 economists polled by FactSet forecasting another cut. However, the outlook for 2025 remains less certain, with some analysts scaling back their projections for future rate reductions.

Others projected a “heated debate” at the FOMC two-day meeting, given the economy is doing better than anticipated.

“The economy remains stronger than participants at the meeting thought it would be when they started cutting in September, while improvements in inflation appear to have stalled,” Diane Swonk, chief economist at accounting firm KPMG, wrote in her preview note of the Fed meeting. “Some of that may be in response to recent hurricanes and surge in replacement demand but underscores how susceptible we are to supply chain disruptions and demand shocks.”

Of note, there has been an IV fluid shortage at hospitals since late September when Hurricane Helene damaged the North Carolina plant responsible for 60% of IV fluid supply. 

The economic landscape presents a mixed picture. The services sector is booming, with the S&P Global Flash US PMI Composite Output Index rising to 56.6 in December, signaling the fastest expansion of business activity since March 2022. However, manufacturing tells a different story, with output falling sharply due to weak export demand. 

This dichotomy underscores the challenges facing the Fed as it navigates conflicting economic signals.

The risk of inflation continues to loom large. November's Consumer Price Index rose 2.7%, outpacing the Fed's 2% target. This persistent inflationary pressure, coupled with potential policy shifts under the incoming administration, has led some economists to predict a more cautious approach from the Fed in the coming year.

Even if the Fed scales back rate cuts, inflation could still roar back due to a number of economic factors and geopolitical risks, analysts say. 

“This inflation resurgence need not necessarily be tied to monetary policy, there are a number of plausible risks to the inflation outlook: escalation of any of the several ongoing geopolitical conflicts could push commodity prices higher; the imposition of higher tariff rates by the U.S. could prompt retaliatory tariffs abroad, pushing the costs of all manner of items higher,” Lawrence Nelson, principal economist, S&P Global Market Intelligence, told Salon.

“Regardless of the cause, the Fed will take much of the blame for the inflation resurgence, and inflation expectations will rise," Nelson added. "To regain its credibility, the Fed would have to impose restrictive policy even more forcefully than they did during the initial inflation battle, tipping the U.S. economy into a painful recession until inflation has returned all the way to 2%.”

With economic uncertainties on the horizon, Powell and his colleagues at the Fed face the delicate task of balancing growth stimulation against inflationary risks in the year ahead.

“The Fed can’t declare a victory over inflation until the plane has landed, the passengers have disembarked and the plane is in the hangar. We’re nowhere near that right now,” Swonk, the KPMG economist, told Salon. “And you can see that in the Fed’s forecast, it’s a very slow process.”

Maybe getting “Laid” is a matter of connecting with one’s hectic, self-involved youth

No moment encapsulates the conflicted charm and weirdness of "Laid" as aptly as when its not-quite-a-heroine Ruby (Stephanie Hsu) shows up at the funeral of a guy named Brandon who she recalls dating for “like, a second” out of curiosity.

She and her best friend AJ (Zosia Mamet) spend the scene before discussing how little Ruby knew and thought of him, which makes it especially bizarre for her to stumble into a shrine consisting of framed photos featuring her and her ex mere steps beyond the church's threshold.

Have Ruby and AJ stumbled into an alternate dimension? Of a sort. This is how Ruby discovers how much more central she was to this near stranger’s life than he was to hers. Ruby remembers Brandon as another notch on her bedpost. To him, she was so much more, to an extent that Ruby can’t quite wrap her head around, because Ruby is pathologically self-involved.

At Brandon’s service, she stands over Brandon’s casket and launches into yammering about her dreadful love life. He’s the ideal conversation partner, after all, because he can’t talk back. In another episode, Ruby attends a wedding and badgers the groom to explain why she couldn’t bring a guest, and why the two of them didn’t work.  

“This,” he tersely answers. “You’re making my wedding about you while my parents and a line of people are waiting to talk to me.” He adds, “Maybe if you weren’t like this, you would have a plus one.”

“Laid” is adapted from an Australian series, but its creators Nahnatchka Khan and Sally Bradford McKenna, who collaborated on “Don't Trust the B—— in Apartment 23” have captured a version of youthful solipsism that feels extremely American.

Here they center our focus on a woman who is simultaneously egocentric and terminally insecure, which describes many young adults who are struggling to figure themselves out.

But this premise saddles Ruby with a tangible answer to the question that’s plagued anyone who’s repeatedly struck out at dating – “Is it me?” —  along with a deadline to solve that problem. It quickly comes to Ruby’s attention that the people she’s slept with are dropping dead in the order in which they smashed – so yes, the problem is her, and a mystery Ruby and AJ are determined to unravel.

LaidZosia Mamet as AJ and Stephanie Hsu as Ruby in "Laid" (Jeff Weddell/PEACOCK)

“Laid” deserves to be commended for taking what is essentially a “Black Mirror” premise and extending it into an eight-episode kinda-sorta rom-com.

This is where I’ll admit that I’m probably not quite the audience for this for reasons that could be generational. The premise bears similarities to past shows like the awesomely named Brit TV series “Scrotal Recall” (retitled “Lovesick” for Netflix, because we can’t have nice things) and “Love Life.”  Another way to measure whether “Laid” is for you may be to ask yourself whether you enjoyed “Girls.” (Mamet’s AJ even has a slacker boyfriend Zack (Andre Hyland), who is convinced he’s more enlightened than the women in his life despite purporting to make a career out of online gaming.)

“Laid” takes what is essentially a “Black Mirror” premise and extends it into an eight-episode kinda-sorta rom-com.

The shows' tones could not be more disparate, and although Mamet has a central role in both, that's not the reason why the seminal “voice of a generation” comedy came to mind. It’s the nervous, shuddering electricity in dialogue that Hsu and Mamet deliver pitch-perfectly, capturing a strain of younger Millennial/elder Gen Z vanity you either find to be endlessly pleasing or totally exhausting.

Plenty of people loved “Girls," and I suspect that if I counted myself in that group I might not have been so impatient with Ruby’s single-minded infatuation with herself. Hsu’s charismatic effervescence, though, kept me hanging in there.

LaidZosia Mamet as AJ and Stephanie Hsu as Ruby in "Laid" (James Dittiger/PEACOCK)

Having Hsu shoulder “Laid” alongside Mamet is its saving grace, reinforcing the sentiment that she deserves more and meatier roles after proving her dramatic flexibility in “Everything Everywhere All At Once.” In playing Ruby, Hsu is by no means forging new paths in the realm of portraying supposedly unlikable women. Nor does she go out of her way to sugar her narcissism with cuteness.

We need your help to stay independent

But when I say it’s no small feat that we come around to feeling for Ruby in a real way by the third episode, I’m putting my full chest behind that. Even in her shallower moments, there are parts of Ruby to which every woman whose confidence is misunderstood as arrogance can relate.

Whatever humor the script gleans from Ruby’s myopic behavior and AJ's unnatural excitement about her best friend’s bizarre predicament is undercut by the pair’s callow reaction to the lengthening trail of dead dragging behind Ruby.

Her banter with AJ endeavors to explain this away by reminding us of her terminal superficiality. Hsu’s character doesn’t grow that much beyond her childish “why is this happening to me” wallowing until late in the season. By then you may be ready for her problems to resolve, but no. The finale optimistically sets up more chapters.


Want a daily wrap-up of all the news and commentary Salon has to offer? Subscribe to our morning newsletter, Crash Course.


Since “Laid” is a modern rom-com it follows that genre’s standard rules, including its heroine’s moon-eyed ideality of that genre’s classics, specifically Billy Crystal’s contribution to them. (An atypical choice, but it works: “I’m a Crystal-head!” she chirps.) Khan and McKenna assign every major character a pop culture obsession or quirk, which explains the barrage of TV and movie references throughout. Mamet’s AJ is all in for true crime and has a specific obsession with Amanda Knox.

LaidMichael Angarano as Richie in "Laid" (James Dittiger/PEACOCK)

For Michael Angarano’s Richie, who runs trivia night at a local bar a mastery of pointless TV and movie ephemera is his whole personality, reflective of many movie and TV references stuffed into the show.

There’s more to him and Ruby’s client and crush Isaac (Tommy Martinez) who is hopelessly unavailable, as most love interests are in this kind of story. Of the two, Isaac is mostly a pretty face, one of the least known in a string of cameos that includes Simu Liu and John Early as a heightened version of himself.  

“Maybe it seems like I’m selfish, but really, it’s like AJ says: I just have high standards for myself,” she observes. Of course, this ignores that Ruby has bumped with assorted randos of questionable quality. That doesn’t justify making their lives and deaths feel meaningless aside from their roles as ticks on a countdown clock. Then again, maybe it’s just me.

All episodes of "Laid" stream Thursday, Dec. 19 on Peacock.

Farmers’ markets are a vital but overlooked part of fixing Canada’s struggling food system

Since the onset of the pandemic, food prices have remained stubbornly high, even as grocery chains have made record profits. This has fueled public frustration with so-called "greedflation"— a term describing large corporations raising their prices during times of crisis.

In response, Canada's Competition Bureau has made the case for more grocery retail competition, recommending policies from the creation of a grocery innovation strategy to welcoming more international players and enacting consistent pricing legislation.

Absent from this policy conversation, however, is the role of local alternative food networks, like farmers' markets, in supporting more resilient food systems. We currently have an incomplete picture of food price dynamics in Canada because of a research gap.

While the federal government has just launched a grocery affordability tool to provide more transparency around pricing, little is known about food price dynamics in local food systems like farmers' markets.

Our recent study addressed this topic by exploring how food prices have changed in farmers' markets compared to mainstream grocery retail since the pandemic's onset.

Resilient food systems

Farmers' markets provide a host of benefits to both consumers and farmers. They offer a localized alternative to global supply chains, which are often susceptible to delays and shortages.

Resilience — broadly defined as the capacity of a system to withstand, recover and adapt from disruptions while maintaining essential functions — is crucial for ensuring sustained access to safe and nutritious food for communities.

However, the highly concentrated, industrial food system has demonstrated a notable lack of resilience. It has failed to maintain its core function of ensuring access to food.

One reason for this lack of resilience in the mainstream food system is the extremely high levels of corporate concentration. Diversity — the opposite of uniformity that comes from such concentration — is a cornerstone of resilience.

Local food systems tend to be more diverse than mainstream ones. While they also experienced significant challenges during the pandemic, they demonstrated nimbleness and resilience that needs to be better recognized by policymakers.

Understanding how farmers' markets fit into the current landscape is important for building more secure and resilient food systems, especially considering climate change will likely exacerbate the vulnerabilities of global, uniform food systems.

Farmers' markets shield consumers

Using pilot data and interviews with farmers' market vendors, our study provides much-needed nuance in the ongoing debate around food prices, competition and food system resilience. We interviewed 223 vendors across Canada.

Our study compared Statistics Canada's monthly average retail prices over a five-year period (2018-23). Our findings revealed that inflation rates for the majority of selected food items were higher in mainstream grocery stores than in farmers' markets. The selected food items included tomatoes, onions, eggs, salad greens, carrots, apples, strawberries, cabbage, potatoes and broccoli.

In interviews, farmers' market vendors cited rising input costs as a driver of price increases. However, unlike large retailers, they noted that their profit margins were shrinking as they absorbed costs instead of passing the full burden onto consumers.

This highlights a significant contrast between food systems: while major grocery chains have reported record profits, vendors in farmers' markets operate differently, even at the expense of their margins.

While the absorption of these costs is unsustainable for many local producers, it speaks to the increased accountability vendors feel when they are selling to the communities they themselves are embedded in.

In this sense, farmers' markets demonstrated greater resilience as they adapted to the shock of the pandemic but maintained the core function of the food system — ensuring access to food.

Calls for policy changes

As a part of our study, we asked farmers' market vendors how they and local food systems could be better supported. They frequently emphasized the need for appropriate regulations. Vendors said requiring local producers to meet the same regulations as industrial food producers was a burden to many of them.

Vendors also said that improved local food infrastructure would help local producers increase their capacities and market reach. Suggestions included providing access to commercial kitchens at low-rent costs, regional food distribution sites and food hubs.

Finally, they said incentive programs, such as farmers' market nutrition coupons that encourage consumers to shop locally, would also help both producers and consumers.

Ultimately, our study highlights the value of local food systems in the era of corporate concentration and "greedflation" in Canada's food system.

Given the federal government's supposed commitment to enhancing food self-sufficiency and sustainability, the absence of local food systems in Canada's national policy landscape is a critical oversight. Addressing this oversight could strengthen community-based food systems and create a more resilient food economy.

Vicki Madziak, community food co-ordinator, Ecology Action Centre and Justin Cantafio, executive director at Farmers' Markets of Nova Scotia, co-authored this article.The Conversation

Phoebe Stephens, Assistant Professor, Food Security and Sustainable Agriculture, Dalhousie University and Alyssa K Gerhardt, PhD Candidate, Department of Sociology and Social Anthropology, Dalhousie University

This article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license. Read the original article.

Megan Thee Stallion files restraining order, as Tory Lanez continues to “terrorize” her from prison

Megan Thee Stallion has filed a new restraining order against Tory Lanez, citing that Lanez continues to "terrorize" her from a prison cell.

The Houston-born rapper, born Megan Pete, said in a petition obtained by Rolling Stone Tuesday, that asking for a restraining order would entirely prohibit Lanez from harassing, attacking or contacting her.

Pete said in the filing that she needed the extra protection from Lanez, born Daystar Peterson, because a prior protective order expired shortly after Peterson was convicted of shooting her in a 2020 incident in Los Angeles. Since then, Pete claimed that Peterson had started a targeted harassment campaign against her by paying bloggers like Elizabeth Milagro Cooper. Pete separately sued Cooper last October for cyberstalking.

The petition stated, “Even from behind bars, Mr. Peterson continues to terrorize Ms. Pete. Due to inadequacies and loopholes in the criminal justice system, Ms. Pete is currently without any formal protection against Mr. Peterson’s attacks. Mr. Peterson’s attempts to re-traumatize and re-victimize Ms. Pete recognize no limits.”

Just one day before the release of Prime Video's documentary, "Megan Thee Stallion: In Her Words," the filing claims that Peterson "purposefully" filed his own petition challenging his conviction. Pete said that the petition falsely alleged that law enforcement officials mishandled the gun used in the case, claiming the police deprived him to test for DNA.

“While Mr. Peterson distorts and recklessly disregards the truth in his desperate attempt to appeal his conviction, his false assertions have reignited a slew of negative, harmful and defamatory comments directed to Ms. Pete,” the petition says.

Peterson's attorneys did not respond to requests to comment to Rolling Stone.

A deadline looms: Will New York invest in better food for public institutions?

As the holiday season fast approaches, a different kind of deadline looms large in New York State: The future of the Good Food NY Bill. Advocates, farmers and policymakers are calling on Governor Kathy Hochul to sign the legislation into law before a Dec. 24 deadline, a move they argue could reshape the state’s food systems and public institutions for good, while also bolstering rural economies

The Good Food NY Bill proposes sweeping changes to how public institutions — like schools, correctional facilities, hospitals and senior centers — procure food. Currently, the state’s procurement law requires these institutions to award contracts to the “lowest bidder,” or the supplier offering the lowest price, as long as they meet minimum qualifications. This is meant to ensure efficient use of funds and prevent favoritism, however, the approach often sidelines critical factors like food quality, ethical labor practices and local economic benefits. It also means that small-scale and local producers are often undercut by large out-of-state industrial suppliers. 

The bill would allow municipalities to pay up to 10% more for New York-produced food, making it easier for small and mid-sized farms to compete with out-of-state suppliers. 

Farmers, who were integral to drafting the legislation, see this as a game-changer.

"Knowing where our food comes from, nutritional content and how it was produced helps us make informed decisions about what we choose to eat," said Katie Baildon, Policy Manager at Northeast Organic Farming Association of New York, in a statement. 

Baildon continued: “NOFA-NY has strongly supported the Good Food NY bill, underscoring that its passage would enable public institutions more flexibility in exercising their buying power, for example, by buying produce from local farms. As an organization of NY-based organic and regenerative farmers and gardeners, we believe that how our food is produced matters for our health and wellbeing, our environment and our local economies and that public institutions should be allowed to account for these impacts when making procurement decisions."

This is a point echoed by Jessica Gilbert-Overland, the co-founder of the Good Food Buffalo Coalition

We need your help to stay independent

“Our public institutions should be able to prioritize spending tax dollars on food aligned with public values, rather than propping up companies that sell cheap food and are responsible for perpetuating unjust, unsustainable, and inhumane food systems,” she said. 

Supporters say the Good Food NY bill aligns with existing state initiatives, including Nourish NY and the 30% New York State Initiative, which incentivize schools to source a portion of their food locally. The bill also supports broader goals in the NY Climate Leadership and Community Protection Act by encouraging climate-smart agricultural practices such as improving soil health and reducing pesticide use.

State legislators, including Senator Michelle Hinchey and Assembly Majority Leader Crystal Peoples-Stokes, highlight the bill’s potential to make New York a national leader. 

“Our Good Food NY bill will make New York the first state in the country to lead the way with a blueprint for values-based food procurement that prioritizes healthy, locally-sourced food to feed community members across our schools, hospitals and all public institutions,” Hinchey said in a written statement. “By signing this bill into law, Governor Hochul can help us create new market opportunities for New York farmers and set the stage for a more sustainable food system that exemplifies how the decisions we make about where our food comes from can strengthen our state economy and create healthier communities.” 

Peoples-Stokes says the Good Food NY Bill succeeds in “moderniz[ing] antiquated public food procurement processes.” 

“This bill provides economic opportunities to struggling New York farms, especially those operated by historically under-represented individuals in farming,” she continued. “Access to healthy and nutritious food is critical to our communities' collective health and I call on Governor Hochul to sign this bill into law.” 

Critics of the current system argue that it prioritizes cost over everything else, often excluding smaller producers who cannot compete on price alone. The Good Food NY Bill seeks to level the playing field by introducing a values-based procurement model that factors in local economies, environmental sustainability and workforce fairness.

Farmers already participating in programs like the Good Food Purchasing Program, which centers values such as equity and accountability, are well-positioned to meet the bill’s benchmarks. Francis Yu, co-director of the Catskills Agrarian Alliance, noted that the legislation would be particularly impactful for Black, Indigenous, and other farmers of color who have historically been excluded from institutional markets.

"We cannot realize more positive health outcomes if our food system remains broken and lacks an embedded value system."

“Local producers accessing institutional markets are a vital component of a vibrant food system and regional economy,” Yu said.

Beyond economic and environmental benefits, the bill’s supporters argue that it could have far-reaching effects on public health.

“The quality of our food continues to change and not always in ways that are favorable to the public and certainly not for those who struggle with food insecurity and who reside in under-invested communities,” said Allison Dehonney, a Buffalo-based farmer and executive director of Buffalo Go Green. “Adding a value system that is more equitable, inclusive, and has a focus on nutrition is the first step in connecting the dots between the food system and health outcomes. We cannot realize more positive health outcomes if our food system remains broken and lacks an embedded value system.”

Labor advocates also see the bill as a crucial tool for ensuring fair treatment of workers throughout the food supply chain. Christina Spach, food campaigns director at the Food Chain Workers Alliance, stressed the importance of passing the legislation without diluting its provisions. “Lifting barriers to prioritize good food providers in public food contracts provides valuable tools for municipalities, workers and community partners,” she said.

With just days left before the deadline, the pressure is mounting on Governor Hochul to act. Advocates are rallying in Albany and across the state, emphasizing that the legislation represents a once-in-a-generation opportunity to align public food purchasing with New York’s values. For now, the fate of the bill — and the vision for a better food system in New York — rests in the governor’s hands.

Taco Bell will add chicken nuggets to its menu for a limited time only

Taco Bell is officially introducing a new menu item.

Starting Dec. 19, the fast food chain will be serving up Crispy Chicken Nuggets alongside three new dipping sauces for a limited time, while supplies last. The nuggets, made from all-white meat, are marinated in “jalapeño buttermilk flavor” and coated in a mixture of breadcrumbs and tortilla chips, Today reported.

“In a world dominated by chicken cravings, it was time to show the world how Taco Bell does chicken nuggets — unexpected and undeniably bold,” Taylor Montgomery, Taco Bell’s CMO, said in a press release.

The Crispy Chicken Nuggets were first tested in Minneapolis, Minnesota, last year and Houston, Texas, earlier this year.

As for the sauces, Taco Bell is introducing a Hidden Valley Fire Ranch Sauce, a blend of Fire Sauce and Hidden Valley Ranch; Bell Sauce, a “familiar, rich, creamy and tangy signature blend” with tomatoes, red chiles and garlic; and Jalapeño Honey Mustard, a blend of honey mustard with jalapeño.

From Dec. 19 through Dec. 31, customers can get a free fountain drink or freeze of any size when they order an a la carte 5-piece nugget on DoorDash, Uber Eats, Postmates or Grubhub, along with Taco Bell’s website or app. From Jan. 1 to Jan. 22, customers can get $1 regular Nacho Fries with the purchase of any a la carte 5-piece or 10-piece nugget order. On Jan. 10, customers can get a 5-piece a la carte nugget order on DoorDash, Uber Eats and Grubhub. And on Jan. 21, Taco Bell rewards members can get a $1 5-piece nugget offer that will be available at 2 p.m. PT for the first 20,000 users who redeem it in the app.

Republicans come for Liz Cheney: Trump’s allies in Congress set the stage for political prosecutions

That the incoming Trump administration will go after its political enemies, using all levers of state power to intimidate and persecute those who previously sought to hold the president-elect accountable, can no longer be portrayed as hysterical speculation, nor as something that would surely be opposed by cooler heads in a Republican-led Congress.

Donald Trump ran as the candidate of “revenge” and "retribution," filling his meandering campaign speeches with complaints about those who had investigated him over his connections with Russia and incitement of the Jan. 6 insurrection. Anyone hoping an electoral victory would spur a change in heart — as opposed to justifying, in his mind, a national campaign to repair his narcissistic injuries — was dispelled of that notion this week.

“Numerous federal laws were likely broken by Liz Cheney,” the GOP-led House Administration Subcommittee on Oversight claimed in a 128-page report on the 2021 U.S. Capitol riot. It's effectively a MAGA whitewash of that day’s events, Republican investigators finding more fault with one of their party's former leaders than with the president who told his followers to “fight like hell” and then watched them do so from the safety of the White House. Indeed, the report’s first four “top findings” all have to do with Cheney, not Trump or anyone else who opposed the peaceful transfer of power.

Cheney, after all, is a traitor: She voted for Trump in 2016 and 2020 while serving in House GOP leadership. A self-styled “constitutional conservative,” she only broke with the president-elect and his party after he tried to end American democracy, going on to serve as co-chair of the special committee that investigated the Jan. 6 attack on the U.S. Capitol. For that — the crime of disloyalty — she is being set up for punishment.

Specifically, the committee led by Rep. Barry Loudermilk, R-Ga., a Trump loyalist, charges the former Wyoming Republican with supposed “witness tampering,” accusing her of convincing Cassidy Hutchinson, a former Trump White House aide, to jettison her previous Trump-friendly testimony and tell the truth about what she heard and saw the day that her boss tried to overturn an election (like the president responding to chants of “Hang Mike Pence!” by saying that his former running mate “deserves” it). In the upside-down version of events proffered by congressional Republicans, the crime here was convincing another former MAGA ally to come clean.

“These violations should be investigated by the Federal Bureau of Investigation,” the Loudermilk report concludes.

Kash Patel, Trump’s pick to lead the FBI, has already signaled, repeatedly, that he would be willing to do so. In a 2023 interview with Steve Bannon, Patel promised that he would “go out and find the conspirators not just in government, but in the media,” who contributed to Trump’s loss in 2020; in a book published the next year, he provided an actual list of “deep state” players heaccused of criminal corruption.

Trump, who earlier this month said that Cheney and others who investigated him “should go to jail,” all but gave Patel his marching orders in a Thursday morning post on his website, Truth Social, reaffirming the fact that his November victory has not caused a fundamental change in his character or desire to punish those who crossed him.

“Liz Cheney could be in a lot of trouble based on the evidence obtained by the subcommittee,” Trump wrote, citing the report’s line about laws “likely broken” by one of his leading critics. The post came hours after Trump’s legal team filed a lawsuit against the Des Moines Register and pollster J. Ann Selzer, arguing that their November survey — which falsely suggested Vice President Kamala Harris would win Iowa — constituted “election interference,” demonstrating the president-elect’s intent to pair his campaign rhetoric with real-world legal actions (boosted by Disney and ABC News' decision to gift him $15 million rather than fight over whether "rape" and "sexual abuse" are the same thing).

Cheney, reportedly being considered for a preemptive pardon from President Joe Biden, responded with defiance in a statement on Tuesday.

“January 6th showed Donald Trump for who [he] really is — a cruel and vindictive man who allowed violent attacks to continue against the Capitol and law enforcement officers while he watched television and refused for hours to instruct his supporters to stand down and leave,” she said. As for the criminal allegations made against here: “No reputable lawyer, legislator or judge would take this seriously.”

Come next year, however, the question is: How many reputable lawyers, legislators and judges will we have left in government — and how many be willing to stand up to the president of the United States? Cheney is at least on the path to finding out.