Spring Sale: Get 1 Year, Save 58%

What the Georgia Senate candidates think about climate change

It may be a new year, but the 2020 election isn’t over yet. All eyes are on Georgia, where four candidates are duking it out over a pair of crucial U.S. Senate seats. The two runoff races will finish what was started on November 3, when no candidate in either of the state’s Senate races managed to win a majority of the vote. If Democrats win both those races, the Senate will be split 50-50, with Vice President-elect Kamala Harris acting as tiebreaker, which would give President-elect Joe Biden the latitude to accomplish at least some of his legislative agenda. If Republicans prevail in one or both of them, Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell will retain control of the upper chamber, dashing Democrats’ dreams of passing policy on everything from health care to climate change.

Democrat Jon Ossoff, a 33-year-old investigative journalist, is facing off against 71-year-old Republican incumbent David Perdue, former senior vice president for the shoe company Reebok. Democrat Raphael Warnock, a 51-year-old pastor, is up against 50-year-old Republican incumbent and businesswoman Kelly Loeffler.

Climate change and what these candidates aim to do (or not do) about it haven’t exactly been a focal point of these races. Only a slim majority of Georgians accept the scientific consensus that human activity is to blame for rising temperatures. Instead of yammering on about an issue Georgians aren’t fired up about, the candidates — even the ones whose platforms include climate planks — have largely trained their attention elsewhere. Perdue and Loeffler have been busy aligning themselves with President Trump — supporting his baseless claim that the presidential election was skewed by widespread voter fraud. Ossoff and Warnock have been focused on accusations that Perdue and Loeffler took part in insider trading ahead of the coronavirus pandemic. The Republican senators offloaded millions of dollars worth of stock before the stock market took a nosedive in March.

So where do these candidates stand on climate change? Only one of the candidates, Perdue, has a voting record to point to as evidence of what he’ll do on the issue in office. But two of the candidates have climate platforms, and most have spoken publicly about their views on climate change.

Ossoff may have the most ambitious climate agenda of the bunch. He hasn’t endorsed the Green New Deal, but which politician would embrace that political hot potato in a Southern swing state? Ossoff prefers a sweeping infrastructure plan that includes funding for clean energy, energy efficiency, and jobs in the renewable energy sector. He’s also a proponent of rejoining the Paris Agreement, reversing many of Trump’s environmental rollbacks, and instituting a ban on single-use plastics. At an Atlanta Press Club debate in October, Ossoff said Georgia could become “the leading producer of renewable energy in the American Southeast.”

At that same debate, Perdue dodged a question about what he planned to do about rising temperatures and instead bashed the Green New Deal. “That is the greatest threat to Medicare and Social Security that we have in America today, is this outrageous spending plan the Democrats are trying to perpetrate in this election,” he said of the progressive climate proposal. Perdue has a 3 percent lifetime score from the League of Conservation Voters, an environmental group that keeps track of how members of Congress vote on green legislation. He opposed former President Obama’s Clean Power Plan and has voted against many other climate and environmental measures during his six years in the Senate. But he also cosponsored the Great American Outdoors Act, a land conservation bill that passed with bipartisan support, and a measure to reduce the amount of plastic pollution in oceans. And after Hurricane Michael devastated Georgia in 2018, Perdue led a bipartisan effort to secure disaster relief funding for states impacted by Michael and other natural disasters.

In the other race, Warnock believes that “the Earth is the Lord’s,” according to his website, which lays out his support for a clean energy transition, environmental justice, and stewardship of the natural world. He is a proponent of rejoining the Paris Agreement, reversing Trump’s rollbacks, investing in climate resiliency projects to prepare the Georgia coastline for rising sea levels, and providing job training to help low-income and minority Georgians to take part in a green energy economy. Ebenezer Baptist, Warnock’s church, partnered with the Clinton Foundation in 2016 to become more energy efficient and implemented an educational program to teach its members about sustainability. In 2019, Warnock co-hosted an interfaith meeting on climate change and environmental justice with former Vice President Al Gore and Bishop William J. Barber, II, in Atlanta.

Loeffler, who was appointed to the Senate in December 2019 after Johnny Isakson retired, hasn’t been in office long enough to receive a score from the League of Conservation Voters and she hasn’t said much about climate change publicly. It’s probably safe to assume that her position on the issue looks a bit like Trump’s, considering that she has aligned herself with the president on many other issues. But it’s hard to know for sure what Loeffler will do if she’s elected. The energy trading company Loeffler used to work for, Intercontinental Exchange Inc., paid a lobbying firm $260,000 between 2009 and 2010 to lobby Congress for cap-and-trade legislation. Loeffler was vice president of communications and investor relations at the company when it was advocating for mandated fees on greenhouse gas emissions. Still, experience working for a company that once liked the idea of a cap-and-trade scheme is no guarantee that Loeffler will support a similar policy in office.

Yet another Trump lawsuit smacked down as judge rules he can’t overturn Georgia loss

On Tuesday, President Donald Trump lost yet another lawsuit, as a federal judge swatted away his latest attempt to overturn the election results in Georgia, where he lost by just under 12,000 votes.

In the order denying relief, Judge Mark Cohen, an Obama appointee, ruled that the president had no standing in the matter, and that his case would not survive on the merits even if he did.

The president and his associates have lost over 60 challenges to the election results in state and federal courts around the country, including cases that were before judges Trump himself appointed.

The decision comes down as voters in Georgia head to the polls for the runoff elections that will decide control of the Senate.

“Fort Trump”: President wants to rename base honoring Confederate general for himself

With a little more than two weeks left in his presidency, Donald Trump suggested at a Monday night rally in Dalton, Georgia, that when the Department of Defense, against his wishes, eventually changes the name of a Georgia military base honoring a Confederate hero, the base should be renamed after him.

“Give me a couple of names,” Trump asked the crowd, when fishing for a new name for Fort Benning. Someone volunteered “Fort Trump,” an idea that the Polish government once proposed, apparently in earnest.

“Fort Trump! Yeah, how about that? I like that. Yeah, let’s change the name. Let’s change it. Kelly [Loeffler], let’s change it,” Trump said, calling out the embattled Republican senator who had joined him onstage ahead of her critical runoff election on Tuesday. “If they name it Trump, let’s change it.”

Twitter users had considerable fun with that moment, but former senior White House adviser Sebastian Gorka, whose Twitter bio says he is a “DoD presidential appointee,” was quick to cheer for it: “Who wants there to be a ‘Fort Trump?!'”

(In some distant, technical sense, Gorka’s bio may be correct: Last July, Trump appointed him to the National Security Education Board, part of a scholarship and grant outreach program under the Office of the Under Secretary of Defense for Personnel and Readiness.)

Perhaps the “Fort Trump” idea fits this president especially well. He has spent the last four years battling his own military, has repeatedly defended Confederate heroes since his first year in office, and whose defiance of the democratic process has sparked discussion about secession among his supporters.

Fort Benning, Georgia, roughly a three-hour drive south of the site of Monday night’s rally, is one of 10 U.S. military installations that honor generals who fought for the Confederacy. Confederate Gen.Henry L. Benning was more than an armed steward of the rebel cause — he was also Georgia’s commissioner to the Virginian secession convention, and argued for war specifically on the grounds that “a separation from the North was the only thing that could prevent the abolition of her slavery.”

In a convention speech on the eve of the Civil War, Benning, apparently concerned that the Confederacy was insufficiently committed to slavery, urged the South toward violence, for fear that one day Georgia might be led by Black elected officials as a consequence of abolition.

“If things are allowed to go on as they are, it is certain that slavery is to be abolished,” Benning said. “By the time the North shall have attained the power, the black race will be in a large majority, and then we will have black governors, black legislatures, black juries, black everything. Is it to be supposed that the white race will stand for that?”

Benning went on to say that if the South lost the war, white people would be “completely exterminated” and the land would revert to “wilderness” and “become another Africa.” He would rather, he said, suffer “pestilence and famine” than see Frederick Douglass, a Black man and former slave, elected president.

Though it took more than 14 decades, Benning’s final fear came to pass with the election of Trump’s predecessor, Barack Obama, in 2008. Georgia still has not seen a Black governor, although Stacey Abrams narrowly lost to Brian Kemp in 2018 in an election marred by evident vote suppression.

Such was the vision of one of the men whose memory Trump has defended, often by name, when he pushed back this year against the overwhelmingly bipartisan movement to rechristen the country’s military installations that currently honor treasonous Rebel officers.

In June, the Republican-led Senate Armed Services Committee voted to rename the bases as part of the Pentagon’s annual defense policy bill. Trump immediately vowed the administration would veto any such effort. The move “shocked” military leaders, after Defense Secretary Mark Esper and Army Secretary Ryan McCarthy expressed openness to the idea amid the nationwide reckoning on race sparked by the deaths of George Floyd and Breonna Taylor.

“It has been suggested that we should rename as many as 10 of our Legendary Military Bases, such as Fort Bragg in North Carolina, Fort Hood in Texas, Fort Benning in Georgia, etc,” Trump tweeted at the time, employing his usual eccentric capitalization and referencing bases named for Confederate generals.

“These Monumental and very Powerful Bases have become part of a Great American Heritage, and a history of Winning, Victory, and Freedom,” the president wrote — describing military bases named for generals who fought and lost an immensely destructive war against their own country, in an effort to ensure that Black people remained enslaved.

“Therefore, my Administration will not even consider the renaming of these Magnificent and Fabled Military Installations. Our history as the Greatest Nation in the World will not be tampered with. Respect our Military!” Trump concluded. By “our Military,” the president presumably meant the U.S. Army, which won a conclusive victory over the Confederacy in the Civil War, albeit at the cost of more than 360,000 troops.

Trump’s commitment to Benning’s memory drew swift rebuke from retired Maj. Gen. Paul D. Eaton, former commanding officer at Fort Benning, who released a statement blasting Trump for standing “shoulder-to-shoulder” with “racist traitors” against the ideals of the Army.

Today, Donald Trump made it official. Rather than move this nation further away from institutionalized racism, he believes we should cling to it and its heritage, by keeping the names of racist traitors on the gates of our military bases. These bases were named long after the Civil War was over, by whites who wanted to fight back against progress towards racial equality. Donald Trump stands shoulder-to-shoulder with them, and against the ideals that the United States Army stands for.

The annual defense policy bill, officially known as the National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA), has never presented a problem for any president: The broad popularity of the military along with the sheer scope of the annual legislation has helped ensure its passage for 59 straight years. Trump dug in on this issue, however, even firing Defense Secretary Esper for working with a bipartisan group of lawmakers to draft language stripping U.S. bases of their Confederate names.

By the time the bill arrived on Trump’s desk last month, he had already lost re-election, but made good on his threat to veto the bill, daring Congress to override the veto — something that had not happened throughout his first term. 

In Trump’s veto statement on Dec. 11, he specifically singled out the base issue. “I have been clear in my opposition to politically motivated attempts like this to wash away history and to dishonor the immense progress our country has fought for in realizing our founding principles,” said the president, even as he battled to overturn the result of a democratic election.

Georgia’s two Republican senators, Kelly Loeffler and David Perdue, facing tight runoff elections and trying to walk a fine line between Trump’s whims and the need to be perceived as supporting the military in a red state, both voted to pass the NDAA, although Loeffler had previously spoken out against renaming the Confederate bases. (“I have been clear from the beginning that we do NOT need to rename our bases and I will work with [Trump] to remove this provision once and for all,” she tweeted on July 21.)

On Dec. 11, the two Peach State multimillionaires issued a joint statement explaining their vote: “This critical defense bill fully funds our military, gives our troops a significant pay raise, prioritizes our military families, and continues to improve military housing. While there were several provisions we would have changed, our main mission is to support our military.”

The Senate overrode Trump’s veto on Jan. 1, but neither Georgia senators cast a vote. Perdue was in quarantine after contact with a COVID-positive staff member. Loeffler’s absence from the Senate floor was unexplained, but three days later she was at Trump’s rally in Dalton, getting called out to help the president rename Fort Benning in his honor.

Fox News abruptly cuts off Georgia election official debunking fraud claims to interview Trump aide

Fox News made the peculiar choice to cut off Georgia official Gabriel Sterling’s press conference midway through his direct debunking of the Trump campaign’s baseless fraud claims to give a platform to one of Trump’s loudest sycophants, Jason Miller. Notably, Sterling thoroughly took apart each of Trump’s election fraud claims in a pained, lawyer-like fashion.

“There is no shredding of ballots going on,” Sterling, voting system implementation manager for the Georgia secretary of state’s office, explained. “That’s not real. That’s not happening.” The top election official added, “No one is changing parts or pieces out of Dominion voting machines[…] I don’t even know what that means. It’s not a real thing…I don’t even know how exactly to explain that.”

Trump’s leaked call with Georgia Secretary of State Brad Raffensberger, in which the president demanded that the secretary “find” enough votes to overturn the election, also featured bizzare claims that the voting systems in the Peach State had been hacked during the November election.

“It’s whack-a-mole again,” Sterling said Monday. “It’s Groundhog Day again.”

Fox News host Bill Hemmer then interjected: “I know a lot of viewers are very much in tune with the clarifications he’s trying to make. The videos that have gone viral. [Sterling] says there’s nothing amiss there,” a reference to the so-called “suitcase videos,” which Trump’s legal team claims show Georgia poll workers hiding untallied ballots in suitcases.

When asked for a reaction to Sterling’s take-down of Trump’s baseless conspiracies, Miller criticized the timing of Sterling’s press conference, arguing that it was two months too late. “The fact of the matter is, we’re here January 4,” Miller argued, “the day before the two run-off elections and Mr. Sterling was looking very nervous like someone that wasn’t very confident that things are going to go smoothly tomorrow and not confident in maintaining their job.”

Miller continued along this line by accusing Sterling of “glossing over” certain issues like signature matching, ballot curing, and out of state voting –– despite the fact that Sterling dedicated a great length of time to these very concerns. 

Hemmer, meanwhile, proved a relatively anodyne host, allowing Miller to spout his talking points without challenge. Miller, for instance, asked Hemmer, “Why wasn’t [this presser] something that was done with our lawyers a month ago or even two months ago?”

In response, Hemmer simply parroted Miller’s own question, “Why was that?” You sound like a significant doubter based on this explanation.”

Miller closed the interview with a Star Wars-infused talking point. “We have to get to the bottom of it and we can’t be glossing over it and saying we’re going to get to it at some point,” he said. “Just because Gabe Sterling got up there and said, ‘Well, I heard it and it’s not that big of a deal.’ You know, like Star Wars, ‘These are not the droids you’re looking for.'”

 

It’s not just you: The pandemic is making young adults gain weight

Perhaps you’ve heard of the “Freshman Fifteen,” the legend that freshman year of college makes one gain fifteen pounds. But what about the “Covid Nineteen?” 

If you feel like the COVID-19 pandemic has made you gain weight, you’re not alone: in fact, a new study proves it.

Co-authored by a trio of scientists from the University of Southern California’s Department of Preventive Medicine, a recent paper in Journal of Adolescent Health describes how young adults who self-reported that they ate too much in response to the pandemic gained more weight than those who did not. What is notable, though, is that both groups have gained weight since the pandemic started: Those who said they have overeaten gained an average of 5.55 pounds between the baseline period (October 2018 to October 2019) and the follow up period (May-July 2020). By contrast, those who said they have not overeaten only gained an average of 2.54 pounds, meaning that they still gained weight despite lacking the perception of overeating.

All of the participants enrolled in the study when they were in the ninth grade of one of 10 Los Angeles area high schools, and continued through the following year. The authors note that they chose the schools which participated in the study in order to achieve sociodemographic and regional diversity.

The researchers said their findings had broader implications.

“Young adults may be particularly susceptible to adverse mental health concerns related to the pandemic,” they explained. “Many young adults do not have established careers and may be particularly likely to suffer loss of employment or work. Furthermore, college students are facing educational disruptions caused by transition to remote learning modalities or concerns about exposure to the virus for universities that continue on-campus classes.”

As a result of both these factors and the fact that “young adulthood is already a development period marked by increased desire for social affiliation and risk of mental health problems,” the authors said that they anticipated many young people would experience mental health problems.

“One maladaptive way to cope with stress and negative emotions is unhealthy eating patterns, such as eating more than one usually would or eating unhealthy calorie-rich, nutrient poor foods,” they note. “In general, emotional eating is prominent among young adults and predicts weight gain.”

This is not the first study to indicate that the pandemic could be causing people to put on weight. Last month a survey commissioned by the biotechnology company Gelesis claimed to have found that 71 million Americans had gained weight throughout the pandemic. In addition, as Tom Philpott of Mother Jones recently observed, Americans consume more than half of their calories from “ultraprocessed” foods that include added sugars and fats which cause weight gain, almost 90 percent of Americans have at least one sign of metabolic dysfunction and more than 40 percent are obese… all of which put them at greater risk of suffering more serious health problems if they develop COVID-19.

With gyms closed, many more people telecommuting, and fewer incentives to leave the house, it is perhaps unsurprising that many people are gaining weight as a result. Indeed, there is anecdotal evidence that the issue of pandemic weight gain is on the minds of many. 

“I’m glad so many of us are gaining pandemic weight together, as a family,” writer Louis Peitzman opined last summer on Twitter. 

“During the pandemic I’ve lost electricity, I’ve lost water, I’ve lost work and human interaction. But I’ve also gained SO much [w]eight,” writer Wendy Liebman likewise noted

Salon spoke to members of the public who agreed with the study’s findings. Ian Brine, a 34-year-old telemarketer, told Salon by email that he had experienced pandemic weight gain.

“As soon as the initial lockdown happened back in March, my gym routine, sporadic as it was, stopped entirely,” Brine said, explaining that he’s been trying to use his newfound free time that he used to spend commuting to do something active. “I’ve not lost a ton of weight, but I am healthier, happier, and on what feels like a sustainable track to building muscle and losing weight.”

Shelli Johnson, a 49-year-old author and weight loss coach who wrote “Start Where You Are Weight Loss,” shared a similar story with Salon.

“I gained 13 pounds during the pandemic because I was looking for food to fix something, namely the trapped feeling that I had and didn’t want to sit with,” Johnson told Salon by email. “As a formerly-obese gal and a weight-loss coach, I knew better but I didn’t do better, and that’s okay. Mistakes are inevitable; defeat is optional.” Johnson said she confronted her overeating and “reframed” her worldview, and was able to lose the weight again. 

Astronomers discover a peculiar batch of stars moving fast enough to leave the galaxy forever

Astronomers estimate there are nearly 100 billion stars in the Milky Way galaxy, orbiting around our galaxy’s common center of mass that consists of a supermassive central black hole. Just as the planets closer to the sun have higher orbital velocities, the stars orbiting closer to the central point of the Milky Way are absolutely screaming through space. And on rare occasion, a star orbiting near the center of the Milky Way, known as the halo, is tugged in just the right way that it manages to pick up enough speed and escape our galaxy’s pull.

Known as high-velocity stars, many of these former members of the Milky Way’s halo break free and become intergalactic roamers, unbound by any galaxy’s gravity. This is only possible because of the extreme astrophysical processes involved.

The unusual properties of these galactic escapees has intrigued astronomers. Now, according to a new study published in The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series on Dec. 17th, there are far more of them than previously thought in the Milky Way’s halo — nearly double the total number of high-velocity stars previously believed to exist.

From 2005 until recently, multiple telescopes had discovered 550 high-velocity stars. With the new batch of 591 newly-discovered high velocity stars, over 1,000 are now known to exist. According to the study, 43 of the 591 newly discovered high-velocity stars are orbiting fast enough that they have a fifty percent probability of escaping the gravitational pull of the galaxy.

Dr. Li Yinbi, lead author of the study, told Salon via email that the new discovery was a surprise, and only increases the likelihood that astronomers will discover more.

“I think there will be more high velocity stars to be discovered in future, but we need to wait for a while,” Yinbi said.

The combination of multiple large surveys will help enable future exploration.

Yinbi and and her co-authors analyzed data from the  Large Sky Area Multi-object Fiber Spectroscopic Telescope (LAMOST). LAMOST, which is based in China, can observe about 4,000 celestial objects in one exposure. It is the telescope with the highest spectral acquisition rate in the world.

Collectively, these massive databases provided the team with an unprecedented opportunity to find never-before-discovered high-velocity stars, some of which can achieve a speed of a fraction of the speed of light. To qualify as “high-velocity stars,” they must have a relative speed of at least 220 kilometers per second. The fastest move up to 12,000 kilometers per second, or about 4 percent the speed of light.

To further our understanding of these peculiar stars, authors of the study tracked the orbits of them back in time. They found that 55 percent originated in the galactic disk, 30 percent are from outside the Milky Way galaxy, and 15 percent are from the galactic center.

Yinbi said that learning about these high-velocity stars, especially the ones that will escape our galaxy, will further our understanding of our own galaxy and of black holes. High-velocity stars are believed to be the result of a combination of extreme gravitational forces, like supermassive black holes. The ones originating from outside the Milky Way may have been ejected in a collision between two galaxies.

Indeed, understanding the formation of galaxies in the early universe and how they’ve evolved can be a challenge to researchers given the distances and time spans involved. But high-velocity stars in general, even those that don’t orbit fast enough to leave, are worth studying in depth. 

Indeed, high-velocity stars “can be used to investigate many problems,” Yinbi said. “For example, are there other mechanisms that can produce them? Do other galaxies produce high velocity stars of currently unknown types? What is the produc[tion] rate of different types of high velocity stars, and are they the same?”

“Elizabeth Is Missing” is a poignant portrait of dementia cloaked as a Masterpiece murder mystery

Over the last several years, the minds behind popular crime media — both true and scripted — have pushed the boundaries to expand what typical police procedural or murder mysteries includes in their narratives. This causes some blurring between genres in a way that is often really affecting. “Murder on Middle Beach,” a 2020 HBO docuseries, is just as much a story about the dissolution and regaining of family trust as it is about solving the murder of Barbara Beach Hamburg. The British ITV and Netflix series”Marcella,” which centers on London detective Marcella Backland, is really a story about trauma and stigma surrounding psychiatric disorders, underpinned by an investigation into a serial killer. 

“Elizabeth Is Missing,” which is a standalone feature-length episode of “Masterpiece” (as PBS’ long-running series celebrates its 50th anniversary) is a subdued, poignant addition to the list. The 87-minute television film, which is based on Emma Healey’s mystery novel of the same name, centers on Maud (Glenda Jackson, after a nearly three decade break from the screen), a spirited grandmother who lives alone despite her early-stage Alzheimer’s. 

Her daughter, Helen (Helen Behan) places scribbled reminders all over Maud’s home to remind her to complete day-to-day tasks: where to go, what to do, what to buy. At the beginning of the film, the stakes surrounding Maud’s forgetfulness are pretty low; she’ll space on a meeting or overbuy canned peaches because she forgot she already had some in the pantry. But her quality of life is such that she still has regular meetings with her best friend, Elizabeth (Maggie Steed).  

The two women spend time in Elizabeth’s garden — working, planting, complaining about how their families don’t get around to see them enough. While rooting around in the garden, Maud finds a compact that belonged (or at least looks like it belonged) to her older sister Sukey (Sophie Russell), who disappeared in 1949. Maud never heard from her again. 

Days later, Elizabeth suddenly disappears, too. 

Maud becomes obsessed with finding her, using the same memory-jogging techniques that get her through her daily tasks — scrawling observations on sticky notes and jamming bits of written information in her coat pockets — to conduct an investigation. It’s a start-stop process as Maud’s dementia progressively gets worse. She’ll forget that Elizabeth has disappeared, then jump in anew when something reminds her. 

Her interest in the case also lapses into flashbacks of her sister’s disappearance and Maud’s teenage years (in these scenes, her younger self is played by Liv Hill). The past and present meld, while she, and sometimes the viewer, are unsure of what is happening now and what already transpired — and if either of those events actually happened at all. 

Because of this, “Elizabeth Is Missing” is too muddled to be watched as a straightforward mystery; if you’re looking for “Sherlock”-level precision, where all the loose ends are neatly tied, this film will come up short. However, the narrative — and Jackson as an actress — thrive in what Maud would call “the blanks.”

“I don’t like all the blanks,” Maud tells Helen early in the film. “Elizabeth is missing. I know it!” 

But no one believes her. Instead, people pity her, and Maud’s frustration in response is palpable. However, she’s powerless in the face of her loved ones brushing her off again and again. “I want to scream but it won’t come out,” she tells her family over dinner, before tossing her head back and releasing a nearly silent scream, her mouth contorting around the forceful whisper. 

It’s a potent, heartbreaking flicker of emotion that has haunted me since I saw it. At that point, the real story of “Elizabeth Is Missing” also truly comes into clear view, even amid the uncertain mind games and memory lapses. It’s about the anguish of worsening dementia — for both the sufferer and their family. Director Aisling Walsh laser-focuses her lens on the moments that quietly encapsulate that emotion: when Helen has to lock her mother in her home so she doesn’t wander during the day, when Maud rails against a “mad woman with the umbrella,” when she eventually no longer recognizes her own daughter. 

There’s the superficial parallel in “Elizabeth is Missing” between a detective attempting to piece together what transpired in a case and Elizabeth trying to rekindle her own memories through the aid of notecards and Post-its. Both are mysteries in their own way, but viewers soon begin to recognize that Maud’s is likely destined to hit a permanent dead end. When that will happen is the question that drives much of the film, and it’s an eerily familiar feeling for anyone whose life has been touched by dementia — the idea that a countdown clock is ticking before the person you know, as you have known them, disappears. 

With equal parts sensitivity and suspense, “Elizabeth Is Missing” displays an emotional range that is sometimes uncommon in crime by interweaving it with an intensely personal drama. The result is mesmerizing. 

“Elizabeth Is Missing” is available to stream for a limited time online, on the PBS app, on Amazon Prime’s PBS Masterpiece channel, as well as on DVD. 

Hands across the water: Catherine Flowers’ quest to drain the septic swamp

Catherine Coleman Flowers, activist, author and MacArthur “genius grant”  recipient, was born in Birmingham, Alabama, and spent some of her childhood in Montgomery. But mostly, she grew up in rural Lowndes County, where, she has written, “Indoor plumbing was a luxury,” and children walked long distances to pump water from a well – water “that was so fresh and delicious” the effort seemed worth it.

Many years later, after she’d spent time in Atlanta as an intern at the Martin Luther King Jr. Center for Nonviolent Social Change, taught high school for underperforming students in Detroit and served in the Air Force, a neighbor approached her at a community event and asked her to come home to Lowndes County. There she found in her childhood community a sanitation infrastructure so broken that raw sewage emptied into backyards and septic tanks backed up against the superhydrated clay soil of the Black Belt region of Alabama: the same soil that made the South so rich growing cotton.

Worse, some of those residents were being held criminally responsible for their broken sewage systems, which they lacked both the power and wealth to fix.

In 2009, after her legs were ravaged by mosquitoes swarming around a pool of raw sewage, she broke out in an unidentifiable rash and in 2012 enlisted the help of Dr. Peter Hotez of the National School of Tropical Medicine at the Baylor College of Medicine in Houston. Five years later, Hotez and his team found, in a peer-reviewed study, that more than 30% of Lowndes County residents carried hookworm, a disease of the tropics long considered eradicated from the U.S.

Flowers’ new book “Waste: One Woman’s Fight Against America’s Dirty Secret” documents, in patient, straightforward and clarifying prose, how she came to be known as the “Erin Brockovich of sewage.” It’s a title she wholeheartedly embraces.

* * *

Judith Lewis Mernit: First, congratulations on the book. I’ve been calling it an “outward-facing memoir,” because it’s about your life and how you came to the work you do, but it’s also populated with so many figures from the civil rights and environmental justice movements, from Stokely Carmichael to Jane Fonda. It’s almost like a who’s who. It made me realize how connected these movements are across time.

Catherine Coleman Flowers: That’s one of the things I wanted people to come away with after reading the book. That kind of understanding.

It’s also great timing for the book, because we’re at this point now where we all want to do something right. For the country, for the planet – everything. So much damage has been done over the last four years, and we want to set that right. Your book shows how we can.

It’s also about why it’s important right now for us to find some common ground. I haven’t talked about [sewage] as a Democrat or a Republican; I’ve talked about it as an environmental issue that impacts all of us.

That bipartisanship comes through pretty clearly. Democratic Sens. Elizabeth Warren and Doug Jones both had trouble grasping what you were trying to tell them about rural poverty and sewage. Then-Sen. Jeff Sessions, though, the Alabama Republican, got it right away. Is breaking down that partisan split something you think about?

My bipartisanship is just based on the people that I’ve been able to connect with along the way. When I talk about rural communities, I speak the language of the rural folk, because I’m from a rural background myself. Jeff Sessions is from a rural background. We connected on that level.

Rural issues seem to transcend a lot of boundaries. You’ve talked about the issues facing people in Appalachia being similar to what people in Alabama go through.

Lowndes County is not the only community with wastewater problems. One of the persons I’ve talked to is Nina McCoy, from Martin County, Kentucky. Nina and her husband are activists on water and sanitation there. There’s a lot of commonality.

There are also just some things that people from rural communities understand that [urban] people don’t. Oftentimes when people call to ask me a question, people would ask me, “Where are you from?” And I’d say,  “Lowndes County.” And they’d say, “No, I mean what town are you from.” The assumption is that everybody’s from a town.

That’s true in Kentucky, too. When I was there reporting last winter everyone identified themselves as from Bell County or Harlan County or Breathitt County. There was always that county identification over any town or city.

That’s because in rural communities, a lot of places where people live are unincorporated. A lot of folks don’t even understand what an unincorporated area is. A lot of those people who don’t understand are making policy, and it’s one of the reasons rural people get left out.

It’s not always intentional. I think some people intentionally make bad policy, but as it relates to rural communities, there are folks who’ve made policies that unintentionally discriminate against people. These are people who simply don’t know because they have not spent the kind of time they need to in rural communities.

There’s a place in your book where Bob Woodson, who’s a Black conservative activist, said that rural Alabama’s sewage crisis is a failure of the civil rights movement. You disagreed, saying that you consider it a failure of government to address the needs of the rural poor, “another chapter in the long history of the marginalization of poor communities and rural residents.” Isn’t that sort of another civil rights movement?

When people say, “civil rights,” they aren’t necessarily talking about an economic system undergirded by inequality. People in their minds have accepted that it’s supposed to be okay for folks not to make a living wage, even when they work more than eight hours a day. People have accepted that it’s okay for people to go to work every day and have to live in a mobile home, where they can’t self-isolate if they get COVID on one of these “essential jobs” that they have to work at.

So that’s what I was referring to. I guess it’s civil rights, but it’s something else, too. At the time I didn’t understand as much as I understand it now.

COVID has amplified the disparities and inequalities that exist in this country. Lately what we’ve seen encouraged by the government is a level of selfishness that’s not only jeopardized our economy but also public health. The people that have suffered the most have been those people that have been bearing the burden of inequality for so many years.

You’re very good at connecting people to other people and getting them to visit the communities that need their help. A couple of years ago you got Jane Fonda to come to a community meeting in Allensworth, California,  about the drinking water problems there.

It’s something I do naturally. I learned from my parents growing up in Lowndes County that we don’t hoard resources, which includes friendships and networks. The more people of like minds that come together, the more able we are to bring about change.

I saw a bumper sticker on a car not long ago that said, “The most radical thing you can do is introduce people to one another.”

That’s a good one. I never really thought about it as being radical. It’s something that I’ve always done. People have told me that others are not so free spirited when it comes to connecting folks, but to me that’s what we’re supposed to do, especially for those of us who belong to the Christian tradition. That’s part of me living my faith. I don’t hoard knowledge, and I don’t hoard access.

You talk about faith a lot. On the left there’s so much suspicion around faith and religion. But in the South, faith is such a huge part of people’s motivation in political and environmental work. Your Christian faith is such an important part of what you do.

It’s an important part of who I am. My father used to say, “If you make one step God will make two.” That’s something I always remember,  and it motivates me to do what other people may not do, because they think it’s not going to lead to anything. I have faith that if I put in the work, then I’m going to get help from other places to bring about what’s necessary. Because, you know, Jesus started out with 12 disciples. And with a lot of opposition! Although if Jesus were to come here today, he probably couldn’t come across the Southern border. And if he were coming from an African country, he might be banned and not be able to come at all.

Certain people have, in a political way, propagandized what religion is so that they can make money destroying the Garden of Eden.

That does seem to be what’s happened to Christianity.

That is exactly what has happened to Christianity. They have used it inappropriately. I’m a flawed Christian. But one of the things that I hope to be able to demonstrate is that one of the greatest things we can do is love thy neighbor. And I cannot see raw sewage on the ground and not try to do something. As you can see throughout my book, whenever people came to me with adversity, instead of running from it, I have tried to help.

You also in your book talk about Karenna Gore’s work, as you put it, “studying the climate crisis through a moral lens.” When she founded the Center for Earth Ethics in 2015, she helped broaden the conversation around climate.

One of the things Karenna did at Union Theological Seminary was bring together people like myself with people like her father [former Vice President Al Gore]. She was able to convene people from the spiritual community, not just Christians. There would be people there that were Muslim, that were Jewish, that represented indigenous religions. We all found common ground in our love for Mother Earth.

We shouldn’t allow someone else to take [religion] away from us, to make us think that [the environment] is not a natural part of our worship. Water, for an example: For most of us, water is part of most of our spiritual ceremonies in some way. Water is sacred. And we should not allow people to defile and contaminate it.

Water is also at the center of so much activism, so many protest movements. Standing Rock is about water. In Northern California, the Winnemem Wintu are fighting Shasta Dam because of water. And your work, of course, is all about water.

We all have to use the bathroom. We all have waste. No matter who you are, where you are, what your race is, where you live, how much money you have, we all go to the bathroom.

Everybody poops!

Everybody poops. And if you don’t go, you’re gonna have a problem!

People don’t like to think too much about where their poop goes, though.

The way we have looked at it here in this country is that everybody has access to flushing and forgetting or has the privilege of flushing and forgetting. And the only places that don’t have that privilege we believe are the Third World or developing countries.

People need to understand that this level of inequality exists here. It shouldn’t be that way. It shouldn’t be that way here, and it shouldn’t be that way in other parts of the world.

In Trevor Noah’s autobiography, Born a Crime, he has a whole story about how when he was a little kid in the South African township, he didn’t want to poop in the outhouse because of the smell and all the flies and bugs. So he put a piece of newspaper on the kitchen floor, did his business and then wrapped it up and stuck it in the garbage. He talked about how going number two is this sacred moment where you want to be alone, with everything clean around you.

It’s interesting that you mentioned South Africa, because I’ve already been invited to speak in South Africa next year, to talk about the wastewater.

And this is the next step for me – to provide inspiration globally. I want to bring to the table engineers who are visionaries, to design and eventually deploy the type of wastewater systems that can really work and take into account climate change.

I hope that my legacy will be that I have helped to take away the shame of talking about human waste. Because once you bring these issues to the forefront, the problems can be solved.

* * *

Copyright 2020 Capital & Main

Health care policy in the Biden era

After vowing and failing to repeal or replace the Affordable Care Act, President Donald J. Trump will leave office with a mostly dismal record on health care, a point underscored by his denials and diminutions of COVID-19 in the face of a pandemic that as of today has reached more than 20 million cases and killed more than 350,000 people in the United States. Beginning Jan. 20, President-elect Joe Biden will have the opportunity to make his mark on the well funded and lobbyist-heavy health industry, a behemoth that has proven allergic to change under several administrations.

While it’s uncertain how effective a Biden-Harris health care agenda will be if it faces a divided Congress, industry leaders and experts nevertheless are preparing for a radical departure from the Trump years. Here are five ways in which the Biden administration will seek to break quickly with the policies of the past four years.

Enhancement and expansion of Obamacare

Biden, who helped guide the ACA to passage during the Obama administration, doubled down on its importance during the 2020 campaign. His platform invokes a plan to ultimately insure more than 97% of Americans by, among other things, increasing the value of tax credits to help lower the cost of premiums. Biden also will push for a Medicare-like public option, with the government negotiating prices directly with hospitals and other health care providers and thus driving down costs. Just after the November election, the Supreme Court heard arguments on what was at least the seventh challenge to the legality of the ACA to come before it. Assuming the law again survives, Biden will immediately begin trying to enhance it.

An “urgent” response to COVID-19

The Biden-Harris plan for attacking the pandemic bears almost no resemblance to Trump’s shambolic approach to a once a century phenomenon. The president-elect says he will more aggressively use the Defense Production Act to rapidly increase the supply of personal protective equipment needed by those on the health care front lines, as well as by the public at large, and will build up a U.S.-manufactured stockpile to hedge against future emergencies. Biden also said he is aiming to get 100 million COVID vaccinations distributed in his first 100 days in office, and to have “the majority” of schools open by the end of that three-plus month period. Further, Biden said his administration will ensure that “public health decisions [will be] informed by public health professionals,” which sounds self-evident until the Trump record is examined.

Lowering the Medicare age From 65 to 60

This idea, which Biden has repeatedly championed, may be the most fiercely resisted of all – but not simply because the GOP opposes it. Any move toward a lower threshold for signing up for Medicare will face massive pushback and intense lobbying by hospitals and health care facilities, who stand to lose billions in revenue. (Speaking broadly, Medicare reimbursement rates for patients admitted to hospitals are only about half of what private or employer-sponsored plans pay.) But the notion of lowering the Medicare age has overwhelming and bipartisan public support; in fact, on an allied topic, 85% of Democrats and 69% of Republicans favor allowing people between ages 50 and 64 to buy insurance through Medicare, according to 2019 polling data by the Kaiser Family Foundation.

A turn toward value-based care

Put simply, value-based care means that hospitals and doctors get paid, in part, based upon the quality of care they provide, and how efficiently they do it. Thus, providers under this model would be rewarded for things like lowering hospital readmissions and improving preventative care. This stands in stark contrast to the fee-for-service system most often used currently, in which reimbursements are made according to a preset menu of prices, and doctors and hospitals make more money by scheduling more tests and procedures. Both the Obama and Trump administrations made strides toward installing value-based care as the first option, but Biden has signaled a willingness to put that process into hyperdrive.

Reversing Trump on Medicaid

The Trump administration undercut the expansion of Medicaid by approving waiver requests by individual states that allowed them to deny coverage to those who did not work a set number of hours, or to slap premiums and extra costs on those who did use the system. The idea, for several states, was to discourage increasing enrollment in the program, which uses federal and state money to provide health coverage to poor Americans. Health care analysts have predicted that Biden will either withdraw federal approval of those “discouragement waivers” or eliminate them when they come up for renewal. They also expect him to offer financial inducements to the 12 states that haven’t yet expanded their Medicaid coverage as allowed under the ACA, part of Biden’s goal of extending health care to the millions of Americans who don’t have it.

Copyright 2021 Capital & Main

Tips for sustainable grocery shopping

Meatloaf, roast chicken, chickpea stew: What’s for dinner tonight? When you are thinking about what to make, how much does sustainability factor into your menu and recipe decisions? Here at FoodPrint, we’ve made it our mission to help you incorporate your desire to support a better food system into your grocery or farmers’ market shopping. There are many signs that shoppers are looking for food that is better for animals, people and planet. For example, organic food sales grew a record five percent in 2019, continuing an upward trend, and you can find organic products in three out of four conventional grocery stores. Even fast food chains like Just Salad and Chipotle are incorporating labels that help people track the environmental impacts of their food choices.

Two new guidebooks also indicate shoppers are looking for more guidance: Sophie Egan’s “How to Be A Conscious Eater” and Kate Bratskeir’s forthcoming “A Pocket Guide to Sustainable Food Shopping” both offer to help you navigate the grocery store, read labels and shop, all while reducing your own impact and foodprint. The ideas they put forth echo ours, and we’ve consolidated them here into six key steps.

Start small

If you are just getting started on your sustainable shopping journey, know that it’s common to get caught up in reactions like eco-anxiety, worrying that you’ll never be “perfect” while continuing to use plastic bags, eat foods with a high footprint and throw leftovers away. Bratskeir suggests starting small, with one change. Take a look at your grocery shopping list and think about forgoing a product packed in plastic, making your own version, or finding an alternative that is packaged in a reusable container.

Egan frames sustainable grocery shopping — similarly to how we talk about foodprints — around a decision-making compass of whether the food is good for you (“nutritious, wholesome, safe”), good for others (animals and people across our food systems), and good for the planet (when possible even restoring the ecosystem, as opposed to just not destroying it). “Ask yourself if you are optimizing at least one of these factors with every food choice,” she writes. In some cases, checking off one may be enough — such as a farm fresh, wholesome dinner cooked with care. In others, you may choose products that check off all three characteristics.

Learn more about getting started with our guide to sustainable shopping.

Reduce your food waste

Both Egan and Bratskeir write about the importance of reducing food waste, which starts with grocery shopping. The first step is creating a proper shopping plan and buying only what you need. When you get those groceries home, make sure to store foods properly to reduce spoilage. And finally, reframe how you think about waste. Instead of throwing out odds and ends you’d normally toss, turn bits of leftovers into a new meal. Use waste-free cooking techniques like saving onion and garlic peels to make stock; using the stems of hearty greens for smoothies; and preserving extra vegetables with freezing or dehydrating techniques. Simply cooking your own meals helps make a dent in your waste. When you cook at home, there won’t be any take-out containers, and you’re less likely to waste ingredients you have picked out by hand.

Learn more techniques for storing food properly and reducing food waste.

Eat less meat, but better meat

Although home food waste is often focused on fruits and vegetables, Egan reminds readers that because of the huge inputs required and intensive impact of meat production, red meat (beef, pork, lamb) is the most important food to not waste. More than any other food, she writes, make sure to use leftovers including red meat.

For the same reasons, cutting back on meat consumption in general is one of the best ways you can reduce your foodprint. Industrial meat production is inhumane for animals, pollutes waterways and soil and is a major contributor to global greenhouse emissions. It’s also simply not efficient. “Animal-based foods are less efficient uses of natural resources because you’re growing animal feed and relying on these creatures to convert that into food that humans eat, rather than just growing food for humans to eat directly,” explains Egan. “By just about every metric used to evaluate the environmental impact of making food, the plant kingdom beats the animal kingdom by a long shot.”

By cutting back on meat consumption just one day a week, you can reduce your personal impact by 15 percent. Some people cut back by skipping meat on Mondays; others skip meat for breakfast and lunch, eating it only at dinner. Another approach is to combine vegetables and meat — such as blended burgers — to reduce the overall quality of meat you are eating in typical meat dishes. And when do you purchase meat, look for pasture-fed, responsibly produced meat, ideally from farmers practicing regenerative farming techniques, which improve the quality of the land being used to farm, rather than diminish it.

Learn more ways to reduce your meat consumption.

Shop local and organic

Probably the most widely available certified label out there is USDA Certified Organic. When you can find and afford it, Egan suggests choosing organic. “Conventional industrial agriculture is characterized by maximizing the yield of crops above all else,” she writes, “doing so through energy-intensive farming practices and synthetic chemicals such as fertilizers, at the expense of the surrounding environment.” The USDA Organic certification, which is “arguably the most rigorously backed certification on the market,” she explains, guarantees farmers use pest and weed mitigation techniques that are less harmful to the environment, the surrounding communities and our health.

In order to be strategic about your organic purchasing, the Environmental Working Group’s Dirty Dozen and Clean Fifteen is a good way to hone in on foods that are most or least likely to have heavy pesticide loads. “[It’s] unrealistic for most of us to have the budget to buy organic everything” as Egan says. Beyond labels, when possible, shop from local farmers and producers. While producers at farmers’ markets or farm stands are less likely to have certifications, you can ask questions about production methods and issues that are important to you.

Learn more about the organic label.

Understand food labels

When you are shopping consciously, certain words on packaging might seem more wholesome than they actually are. “Don’t just close your eyes and swallow,” writes Bratskeir. “Instead look out for words and phrasing that hint at shadiness, and start following certifications that you trust.” Labels such as healthy, natural, superfruit/food, plant-based and sustainable have vague — or no — food industry guidelines, often leaving a lot up to interpretation.

Instead, it’s recommended shoppers seek out trusted certifications that guarantee foods have been produced in a way that is fair to the planet, animals and workers. So if you’re interested in animal welfare, don’t just look for the words “pasture-raised,” look for a label that is third party verified, like Animal Welfare Approved, or Humane Certified. If you’re interested in worker welfare, look for Food Justice Certified or the Fair Food Program. There are also a number of niche labels that support various conservation efforts, such as an Audubon Certification for meat that guarantees producers meet standards that overlap with USDA Organic and also requires ranchers to protect the bird-friendly, native plants on their grazing land.

Learn more about food labels with our guide.

Avoid packaging and BYO bags

Here at FoodPrint, we are passionate about helping you understand that food packaging — in addition to the food itself — has a foodprint. Although there are many reasons to cut way back on single-use plastic, Eagan gives a great one: “Plastic pollution is one of the most serious threats to the health of our ocean,” she writes, citing an estimate that suggests by 2050 the ocean will house proportionally more plastic than fish. Reducing the amount of plastic you bring into your home by choosing to grocery shop sustainably is a great way to keep it out of your house, and eventually the trash.

When you look at your shopping list, think about items that come in single-use plastic. Can you buy a larger size to reduce the packaging waste? Or, look for another brand using more sustainable packaging. When possible, choose cans over glass over plastic. Bratskeir also challenges you to ask yourself, “Do I really need this today?”, especially when it comes to produce that is unnecessarily wrapped in plastic wrap or stored in plastic containers. Can you forgo that ingredient this time?

And don’t forget to bring your own reusable grocery bags, as well as produce bags. While some cities and states have banned them, plastic bags are still used in the majority of stores nationwide. They aren’t recyclable, and clog machinery when people put them in recycling bins anyway. This is an easy win for when you grocery shop sustainably — bring a tote!

Get more ideas for using less plastic in the kitchen and take our pledge to cut out single-use plastics.

Josh Hawley claims family was terrorized by “antifa scumbags” in peaceful “vigil” at his home

Sen. Josh Hawley, R-Mo., claimed that “antifa scumbags” threatened his family at their Washington, D.C.-area home after video showed what appeared to be a peaceful protest.

A group of about 15 people held candles and signs saying “Protect Democracy” in protest of Hawley’s plan to object to the Electoral College results during a joint session of Congress on Wednesday, according to the Washington Post. But the freshman senator who has been rumored as a potential 2024 presidential candidate accused the group of “leftwing violence.”

“Tonight while I was in Missouri, Antifa scumbags came to our place in DC and threatened my wife and newborn daughter, who can’t travel,” he tweeted. “They screamed threats, vandalized, and tried to pound open our door.”

Protest organizers said there was no vandalism and the crowd did not knock on the door, though they did ring the bell when they left a copy of the Constitution on the doorstep.

“This was not threatening behavior,” Patrick Young, a ShutDownDC organizer, told the Post. “This is people engaging in democracy and engaging in civil discourse. … This was a pretty tame and peaceful visit to his house.”

The group published a 50-minute video on YouTube showing that protesters used a bullhorn to condemn Hawley’s bid to reject millions of legal votes. The video shows police officers who responded to the scene asking protesters to lower their volume before standing by as the demonstration continued. At one point, a woman who appeared to be Hawley’s wife opened the door to complain about the noise and said she has “neighbors and a baby.” Minutes later, three people not involved in the protest entered the home. A neighbor was also seen on the video complaining that the group was “disturbing” the neighborhood.

The crowd chanted “Hawley, Hawley, shame on you” and “Due diligence has been done, Biden-Harris have won.”

Young told the Post that police were present for most of the demonstration and that the group only protested at the home because the coronavirus pandemic has shuttered many lawmakers’ offices.

“If we want to talk to powerful people, we need to talk to powerful people where they are,” Young said, “and more often than not, that’s home right now.”

Young told the outlet that he “proudly identifies as an anti-fascist” but criticized Hawley’s comments.

“That’s not the level of discourse that we would want to engage in,” he said. “But if he wants to call us scumbags, then we’re happy to call him a snowflake.”

The incident was reminiscent of protests outside of the homes of Democratic mayors in Seattle, Portland, Chicago and St. Louis, as well as the homes Republican Senate leader Mitch McConnell, R-Ky., and Postmaster General Louis DeJoy. Michigan’s secretary of state said her home was surrounded by armed pro-Trump protesters last month who baselessly alleged fraud in the election.

Hawley’s tweet prompted handwringing from conservatives who claim concern over antifa violence. President Trump has repeatedly blamed the anti-fascist movement for violence surrounding the summer’s anti-police racism protests in Washington, but court documents have showed no evidence of members’ involvement. An avowed antifa supporter, Michael Reinoehl, was involved in a fatal shooting in one Portland protest, and was later shot dead under suspicious circumstances by officers deputized as U.S. marshals.

On the other hand, authorities have linked multiple shootings and terror plots this summer to the far-right “Boogaloo Bois” movement. More recently, Proud Boys leader Enrique Tarrio was arrested by Washington, D.C., police and charged with burning a Black Lives Matter banner during a pro-Trump post-election protest last month as the group terrorized multiple Black churches in the nation’s capital.

Members of the Proud Boys are expected to descend on Washington again on Wednesday as Hawley and Sen. Ted Cruz, R-Texas, lead a group of about a dozen Republican senators in objecting to the Electoral College votes, even though their scheme has no chance of overturning the election result. Tarrio bragged that his followers members will be dressed in all black, like some antifa supporters.

Young told the Post that Hawley’s efforts had also “encouraged the Trump supporters” who are expected to march in Washington, “in turn putting the city at risk of violent clashes and hurting trust in the democratic process.”

The group described the demonstration at Hawley’s home as a “vigil,” which Hawley disputed.

“Now ‘vigil’ means screaming threats through bullhorns, vandalizing property, pounding on the doors of homes and terrorizing innocent people and children,” he wrote.

Many left-wing Twitter users pointed to the recording of the demonstration to accuse Hawley of lying about the incident.

“Just as there is documented evidence that Joe Biden handily won the election, there is video evidence that Hawley is lying about a peaceful gathering,” wrote activist Matt Browner Hamlin.

“There’s footage of the protest and believe it or not, it doesn’t show a bunch of pitchfork toting antifas carrying lit torches while ready to molotov the whole house,” wrote reporter Daniel Moritz-Rabson. “What’s the overlap of lawmakers who decry cancel culture or liberal censorship and lawmakers who lose their minds when people hold a targeted protest?”

“I did not miss you!”: Meghan McCain returns to rocky reception on “The View” after maternity leave

Meghan McCain wore out her welcome on the second day back to “The View” from her maternity leave.

The conservative commentator set off a clash Monday, on her first day back, and made it through Tuesday’s first segment before interrupting co-host Joy Behar and drawing a rebuke from moderator Whoopi Goldberg.

“Let the Republicans fight amongst themselves,” Behar said. “On the one hand, you have the Republicans, on the other, you have the seditionists. In the Democrats you have the progressives versus the moderates, which is de rigeur, as they say. You know, it’s what it always is, it’s typical politics. The Republican Party is in much more trouble right now.”

That’s when McCain barged in and started yelling about Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-NY).

“Are you kidding me?” she began, as Behar protested the interruption. “You have AOC — that’s inaccurate. You have AOC fighting about whether she’ll primary Chuck Schumer, saying she has the full support of Nancy Pelosi. You have the squad, who is very angry, and Bernie Sanders saying he’s angry.”

Behar scolded her co-host.

“Excuse me,” she said. “I was speaking.”

McCain acknowledged that Behar had been speaking before she interrupted, and then joked that her co-host had missed sparring with her during her leave.

“Joy, you missed me so much when I was on maternity leave,” McCain said. “You missed fighting with me.”

Behar disagreed.

“I did not miss you,” Behar said. “I did not miss you, zero.”

McCain protested as Goldberg attempted to regain control of the discussion.

“That’s so nasty, that’s so nasty,” McCain said. “I was teasing. You said something rude. That’s so rude.”

 

Georgia runoffs reveal the total putrefaction of the GOP: Republicans are now openly anti-democratic

In a mildly healthy society, Donald Trump should have been scared to death to set foot in Georgia Monday night. Just the night before, a tape was leaked of Trump calling up the Georgia secretary of state, Brad Raffensperger, and demanding that he “find 11,780 votes” — Trump’s mob speak for cooking the books — in order to steal the state’s election from the true winner, president-elect Joe Biden. It’s literally one of the worst scandals in American history, far worse than Watergate. This is a sitting president demanding that an entire state’s election be illegally thrown out, all because he doesn’t like the outcome. 

Trump should have been afraid to face crowds of the very same people whose votes he wished to throw in the trash bin. Instead, he was greeted by an adoring mob that cheered repeatedly as Trump insulted their state for an hour, claiming it was a “rigged election” and encouraged them to boo and hiss state officials for being unwilling to risk prison time by committing election fraud for him. In fact, the audience at the Trump rally was so on board with his vitriolic attitude towards Georgians that they largely elected not to wear masks, voluntarily exposing themselves to a deadly pandemic to show their devotion to Trump. 

This display was a suitable cap to the past two months, with Republican politicians competing with each other in a grotesque competition to be the most fascistic and sociopathic, all to honor their fallen leader, Trump. (Not that they’ll admit he’s fallen.) And no where has this been more evident than in Georgia, which is holding a Senate runoff election Tuesday between two incumbent Republicans, Kelly Loeffler and David Perdue, and their Democratic opponents, Raphael Warnock and Jon Ossoff. 

Whatever the election outcome is after the polls close on Tuesday, this election has demonstrated beyond all shadow of of a doubt that the rot that has infected the Republican Party has completely overtaken the organism. Every tendril of Republican politics, from the White House to the homes of ordinary voters, has putrefied and grown toxic with loathing for their fellow Americans and for democracy itself. 


Want more Amanda Marcotte on politics? Subscribe to her newsletter Standing Room Only.


Loeffler and Perdue are definitely vibing the anti-democracy, pro-coup mentality among the voters who, ironically, they need in order to win a democratic election. Prior to Monday’s rally, both candidates came out in favor of Republicans objecting to Congress certifying Biden’s win on Wednesday. The stated reason for the objection is “concerns” about “fraud”, but of course, no one bought that lie even before Trump was caught on tape begging Raffensperger to alter vote totals in Georgia. No, it’s obvious that both candidates believe that earning the support of conservative voters means coming out against democracy. The reactions of the Trump rally crowd, which cheered for coup talk and grew bored of democracy talk, only confirms that Perdue and Loeffler are probably guessing right. 

Not that anyone is surprised. Both Perdue and Loeffler are wholly loathsome individuals, giving Trump a run for his money in the contest of who can be the worst possible person in politics. Both candidates have been soundly accused of profiting off the coronavirus pandemic, using insider knowledge gained from their roles as senators, knowledge that allowed them to understand the severity of the pandemic before most Americans and subsequently make profitable stock trades on it. And that’s just the tip of the iceberg when it comes to the sheer amount of insider trading both have been accused of engaging in. In addition, Loeffler has another layer of corruption, involving her and her husband’s involvement in setting off offshore financial exchanges that look an awful lot like an effort to dodge both taxes and financial regulations in the U.S.

The campaigns, however, has made these two villains eviler, as they desperately pander to a conservative voting base that is assumed to favor candidates who show the most contempt for common decency.

On Monday, Salon’s Roger Sollenberger exposed how Loeffler’s campaign has been running Facebook ads darkening the skin of her opponent, Warnock, who is Black. This is just the latest move in a series of grotesquely racist gestures made by the Loeffler campaign. For instance, as the Atlanta Journal-Constitution reported, Loeffler gave an interview to a “TV pundit associated with white supremacy and Nazism” and supported the newly-elected Rep. Marjorie Taylor-Greene, a QAnon devotee with a long history of racist comments. Her campaign has run ads linking Warnock to footage of burning buildings, playing on racist tropes equating civil rights activists with rioters. Her race-baiting is so out of control that WNBA players, both on the Loeffler-owned Atlanta Dream and other teams, have been protesting Loeffler for her disparagement of Black Lives Matter protesters

Perdue has gotten less attention but has been competitive in this race to the bottom, beginning with his refusal to even debate Ossoff. In recent days, his boot-licking of Trump has become almost comical. On Monday, Perdue went on Fox News to call Raffensperger “disgusting” for taping the phone call with Trump, treating as somehow self-evident that the bad guy is not the one trying to strong-arm election officials into committing crimes but the guy who blew the whistle. This makes sense, one supposes, if the prior assumption is that democracy is bad and that anyone who gets in the way of an authoritarian dictatorship is the enemy. 


Want more Amanda Marcotte on politics? Subscribe to her newsletter Standing Room Only.


That Raffensperger looks good next to these clowns shows how thoroughly corrupt the Republican Party is. Raffensperger is not, by any stretch of the imagination, a good guy. He’s as committed as any Republican official in the country to racist voter suppression and has advocated for laws to make it as hard as possible for people, especially Black people, to vote. He’s so anti-voting that, just a few days ago, he put out a press release threatening criminal penalties to anyone who tries to make it more pleasant (usually with food and water) to stand in the long lines caused by Raffensperger’s diligent voter suppression tactics. After all, boredom, hunger, and thirst are some of the weapons most valuable to Republicans like Raffensperger in their war on voting. 

But such is the state of the current GOP that Raffensperger is the least bad of them because at least he’s not interested in playing along with the lie that an election he ran was fraudulent. For that, Raffensperger is incredibly rare in his party. 

It’s tempting to see all this rot as a top-down phenomenon, the result of a few corrupt leaders, like Trump, imposing their corruption on the party. But the disturbing reality is that, while Trump is definitely leading the charge, this is only happening because everyday voting Republicans are themselves thoroughly corrupted, having turned against democracy out of a rage at having to share the franchise with people — especially people of color — they don’t see as “real” Americans. Washington Post reporter Dave Weigel has been on the ground with Republican voters, and his observation about the situation is bone-chilling: 

There’s no point in being delicate about this: The belief that Trump is the “real” winner of the election depends on believing that the votes of Black people shouldn’t count.

From the minute the polls closed in November, Trump and his allies have been targeting cities with large Black populations — such as Detroit, Atlanta, and Philadelphia — and declaring that those votes are “fraudulent” and should be thrown out. This isn’t subtle, but it is effective. Racism is the beating heart of the modern Republican Party. It’s what moves the voters and why the leaders have become so thoroughly corrupted. 

It also means that there’s no easy solution to the problem. Perdue and Loeffler are not well-liked by anyone. Even their own voters are grossed out by all the insider trading. But they may win anyway because white conservative Georgia voters simply cannot abide by the idea that candidates supported by the majority of Black voters might win. It really is as simple as that, and everything else — including the growing support for Trump’s coup — flows from that. Because Republican voters don’t want democracy if they have to share it. And the rancid smell wafting off the Georgia election is the direct result. 

 

USPS delays could disenfranchise thousands of Atlanta voters in critical Georgia runoffs

Mail delays in the Atlanta area reported by the U.S. Postal Service threaten to disenfranchise thousands of Georgia voters in the state’s Senate runoffs this week.

Despite promises by Postmaster Louis DeJoy, a top donor to President Donald Trump and the Republican Party, to improve delivery times after a nationwide mail slowdown in the second half of 2020, the USPS’s performance is still lagging well behind previous years.

The USPS said in a federal court filing that as of Dec. 21 it was processing just 76% of ballots on time in the Atlanta metro area, which is home to half of Georgia’s population, according to NBCLX. That could disenfranchise voters who sent in their ballots within three to five days of Tuesday’s election, including those who mailed them before New Year’s.

It’s unclear how many ballots could be affected. The state reported receiving more than 38,000 mail ballots this past weekend, suggesting “tens of thousands of additional ballots are still likely in transit,” according to the report. Nearly 1 million voters have already cast their ballots by mail, according to data from the US Elections Project at the University of Florida, with nearly 400,000 more requested ballots still unreturned.

The USPS experienced a nationwide slowdown that was blamed on rule changes introduced by DeJoy, which officials have claimed were aimed at cutting costs at the cash-strapped agency. Multiple federal judges blocked the rule changes ahead of November’s election, although DeJoy said he planned to implement the rules again after the election. Last month, the USPS agreed in a court settlement to fast-track mail ballot delivery in Georgia. Court filings showed that on-time ballot processing fell to just 68% in the Atlanta area, even though 93% of ballots in heavily Republican southern Georgia were processed on time.

USPS spokesman David Partenheimer told The Washington Post last month that “none of the Election Mail lawsuits are justified by the facts or supported by the applicable law” and described it as a “false narrative.”

A spokesman told NBCLX that December’s mail increase affected “scores of all products” but “Election Mail and ballots have always been prioritized and are performing well above other product lines.”

The delays have been exacerbated by worker shortages. About 2,500 of the Atlanta area’s 15,000 USPS workers were out due to positive coronavirus tests, recent exposure or child-care concerns, Stacey Sabir Brown, president of the metro Atlanta chapter of the American Postal Workers union, told the Post.

Despite widespread criticism, the USPS worked to expedite mail-in ballot delivery ahead of November’s election, likely delivering more than 99.9% of mailed ballots on time. But the agency processed more than 150,000 ballots after Election Day. Though many states accept ballots that arrive several days after the election, between 25,000 to 50,000 ballots were likely rejected nationwide because of USPS problems, according to an analysis by NBCLX. Those numbers were ultimately not enough to affect any statewide election.

More than 5,000 ballots in Georgia were rejected because they arrived after Election Day, according to the report, which noted that most “key USPS performance indicators did not improve in November, then deteriorated further as the December holidays approached.”

The presidential race in Georgia was decided by fewer than 12,000 votes, with absentee ballots from the Atlanta metro area ultimately tipping the scales for President-elect Joe Biden. The Atlanta region figures to play a big part in the runoff between Sen. David Perdue, R-Ga., and Democrat Jon Ossoff, as well as the special election runoff between Sen. Kelly Loeffler, R-Ga., and Democrat Rev. Raphael Warnock. These races will decide which party controls the Senate when Biden takes office.

The FiveThirtyEight polling average shows both Democrats leading by about 2 percentage points. Ossoff and Warnock have also massively outraised their Republican opponents, though outside groups have helped Loeffler and Perdue make up ground. Early voting data also looks promising for Democrats, boosted by higher early Black voter turnout than in the general election, but Republicans dominated in-person voting on Election Day in November. Perdue led Ossoff by nearly 90,000 votes in November, but failed to hit the 50% threshold needed to win outright. In the nonpartisan special election for the seat Loeffler now holds, Warnock led the field with 33% of the vote while Loeffler and former Rep. Doug Collins, R-Ga., split about 46% of the vote in a field of 20 candidates.

“Polling had an off year in 2020, but the reality is that polls are still our best tool for forecasting elections, and it’s really hard, if not impossible, to predict which direction any polling error will run,” wrote FiveThirtyEight’s Nathaniel Rakich. “Plus, while it’s true that polling of the 2020 election overall wasn’t very accurate, polls of Georgia were actually pretty good: FiveThirtyEight’s final polling average of the presidential race in the Peach State was just 1 point off the final margin.”

The absolute best way to make peanut butter

2020 was the year the peanut peaked.

Each American consumed, on average, 7.6 pounds of peanuts — an all-time high. This per the USDA, the U.S. Census, and, delightfully, the National Peanut Board. Of that 7.6 pounds per person, roughly 56% was ingested as peanut butter. I am willing to believe this part, as I once attempted to scoop out the Skippy from the inside of a dog’s bone.

While they may be Miss Popular in America’s Top Snack to Eat on a Domestic Flight, peanuts got their start far afield. The legumes are thought to have originated in South America some 10,000 years ago. After Spanish colonizers hefted peanuts back across the Atlantic by the bushel, they brought them to the Philippines — and meanwhile, the Portuguese brought them to Goa — spurring their proliferation to China and Indonesia. Peanuts traveled to Africa as a commodity exchanged by the Portuguese for spices and ivory, and from Africa to the United States through the slave trade. Up until the Civil War, peanuts were largely a regional staple in the American South. Circus peanutsand peanut butter both emerged commercially in the late 19th Century, and the groundnuts have since been a staple in the culinary realm and beyond, with significant credit due to George Washington Carver, who invented hundreds of products made from the little guys. Corporations like Conagra and Procter & Gamble joined the commercial butter fray soon after.

Which brings us — sort of, kind of — to 2020, the year of the peanut.

There was, accordingly, no more obvious contender for my last Absolute Best Test of the year than PB, which was convenient given our SEO strategist basically insisted upon it. Behold, the results of my day spent with so many peanuts, when the grocery store employee who checked me out asked if everything was “going okay.”

Controls & fine print

For each test, I used 2 cups of unsalted roasted peanuts, 2 scant tablespoons of peanut oil, 1 tablespoon of honey, and a heaping 1/2 teaspoon of kosher salt. A highly biased taste-tester who also identifies as my dad described this ratio as “delicious” and “just like candy.”

If you prefer to buy peanuts raw and roast them at home, simply pat yourself on the back because you’ve got your life together in a big way, then proceed to roast on a rimmed baking sheet at 350°F for 10 to 15 minutes, until they’re fragrant and golden with oil beginning to brim on their surface.

* * *

Methods & findings

High-powered blender

Method

  1. Add the peanuts and blend, covered, on medium-high for about a minute, until they’re broken into pieces the size of coarse grains of salt.
  2. Scrape down the sides with a spatula, cover, and continue to blend until the peanuts look damp and matted.
  3. Scrape down the sides, add the oil, honey, and salt, and blend on high until the desired texture is achieved, another minute or two. If needed, pause to scrape down the sides intermittently.
  4. Store covered at room temperature for up to a week.

(Note: I suspect standard blender butter would be a bit chunkier naturally—I plan to test and report back for a round two.)

Findings

Every time I use a borrowed Vitamix — I refuse to shell out — I am floored by its sheer power. There’s always a moment about 30 seconds into blending during which the motor kicks into high gear and it sounds like my kitchen might explode. It was at this precise juncture that my peanuts began to turn from plain old roasted nuts into nut pieces closer in texture to Parmesan dismantled by the finest side of the box grater. A few minutes and side-scrapings later, they morphed into something wetter, more matted, almost like crumbly biscuit dough. At that point, I added the oil, honey, and salt and “let her rip,” as they say in the Vitamix community.

The result was a peanut butter so creamy, so smooth, so glossy, it could’ve graced the cover of any magazine (or slice of toast). While it had a touch more texture than store-bought PB, it lacked the coagulated stickiness, in the best possible way. I would be pleased to drizzle blender peanut butter over any yogurt or granola bowl, turn it into sauce and pour it over rice, or incorporate it into my next round of baked tofu. Chunky butter lovers may want to reserve half of the peanuts to add along with the oil and honey, for more texture.

Food processor

Method

  1. Add the peanuts to the bowl of a food processor fitted with the S-blade. Process for a few minutes, until the peanuts are broken into pieces the size of coarse grains of salt.
  2. Scrape down the sides with a spatula, cover, and continue to process until the peanuts look damp and matted.
  3. Scrape down the sides, add the oil, honey, and salt, and process until the desired texture is achieved, another few minutes. If needed, pause to scrape down the sides intermittently.
  4. Store covered at room temperature for up to a week.

Findings

As I’ve mentioned before in Absolute Best Tests, the food processor is the most-used appliance in my kitchen. That said, it can be hit or miss in the realm of plant-based butters and milks. (This is a passive-aggressive reference to my old Cuisinart specifically, which shuddered to a full stop the last time I attempted coconut butter within its mighty plastic bowels.)

So I was surprised when the process of alchemizing roasted peanuts into silky butter with a food processor turned out to be extremely simple. The method mimicked that of the Vitamix, except with only one “blend” setting in the case of the processor, and the resultant PB was nearly indistinguishable. If pressed in, say, a Court of Peanut Butter, one might admit that food processor peanut butter is a hair grittier than blender butter, but it’s otherwise nearly identical. As with the blender method, consider adding half of your peanuts midway through if you prefer a spread with more texture.

Mortar & pestle & mixer

Method

  1. Grind the peanuts in a mortar with a pestle until you’ve achieved a homogeneous paste. (Note: If you’re going for something chunkier, stop while you’ve still got plenty of small, visible peanut shards.) For me, this took about 25 minutes for 2 cups of peanuts.
  2. Transfer the paste to a large bowl or the bowl of a stand mixer. Add the oil, honey, and salt. Mix for roughly 10 minutes on medium-high until you’ve achieved a creamy emulsion that doesn’t settle into separate layers when you stop for a few minutes.
  3. Store covered at room temperature for up to a week.

Findings

Oh my good god. This peanut butter made my mouth feel how I imagine feet feel when slipped into silk slippers. (No wonder when I realized that the method was adapted for Bon Appétit by my former Food52 colleague Joanna Sciarrino, one of my nut butter and general sauce/spread idols.) Perhaps due to my subpar pestle skills, my peanut butter retained more texture than either the blender or processor butters. This was a feature and not a bug. This method also affords more control over the exact crunchiness level of your final product, both because you can stop pounding whenever and because you can toss in more peanuts at various points for lots of textural variety, if you please. The mortar and pestle PB was also stickier and thicker than either of the motorized batches.

* * *

TL;DR

Make peanut butter any way you please, and it’ll be delicious.

For a crunchy-silky texture, call upon your mortar and pestle plus hand mixer. For the smoothest, least-gritty stuff, break out a high-powered blender. If you don’t have one, use a food processor for nearly identical PB.

House Democrats make a criminal referral to FBI over Trump’s Georgia election shakedown call

House Democrats are demanding the FBI open a criminal probe following Donald Trump’s leaked phone call with Georgia elections officials over the weekend. Reps. Ted Lieu, D-CA, and Kathleen Rice, D-NY, have asked FBI Director Wray to “open an immediate criminal investigation” against the president for possible election interference.

In a letter sent today to FBI Director Christopher Wray, Lieu and Rice call for a criminal inquiry of Trump following his leaked phone call with Georgia Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger. In the call, Trump repeatedly pressured Raffensperger for a recount of the Georgia state election, citing a mysterious chunk of 250-300,000 votes that somehow went unaccounted for. Trump alleged that ballots may have been shredded in Fulton County or that voting technology may have been tampered with. When Raffensperger denied the unfounded allegations, Trump ominously warned the Secretary, “[…] You can’t let that happen. That’s a big risk to you and to Ryan, your lawyer. And that’s a big risk.”

In their letter, Reps. Lieu and Rice condemn Trump as “[engaging] in solicitation of, or conspiracy to commit, a number of election crimes.” Sections 20511 of Title 52 of the U.S. Code on federal election fraud state the following: Anyone who “knowingly and willfully deprives” the U.S. of an “impartially conducted election process, by […] the procurement, casting, or tabulation of ballots that are known by the person to be false, fictitious, or fraudulent” should be tried as a criminal. In Section 10307 of Title 52, the law states that “no person acting under color of law shall […] willfully fail or refuse to tabulate, count, and report such person’s vote.” According to Lieu and Rice, the sole fact that Trump explicitly asked Raffensberger to “find” 11,780 votes –– just the right amount to overturn the election in his favor –– is enough evidence to open an criminal inquiry.

Raffensberger, who shared a recording of the call with the Washington Post, has declined to comment on the legal implications of Trump’s entreaties. “I’m not a lawyer,” he said in an interview with ABC News on Monday, “All I know is that we’re going to follow the law, follow the process.”

“Truth matters,” Raffensberger added. “And we’ve been fighting these rumors for the last two months.”

In their letter, Reps. Lieu and Rice claim that Trump could be held liable under state law in addition to federal law. Georgia’s state code, for example, rules it a federal offense for “a person to [commit] the commit election fraud in the first degree” when “he or she solicits…or otherwise attempts to cause the other person to engage in such conduct.” Georgia State Election board member David Worley joined the Representatives’ call for action and has sent an additional investigation request to Director Wray. If tried under Georgia state law, Trump would not be able to pardon himself.

Donald Trump’s silver lining: Will his last-ditch coup rip the Republican Party apart?

Despite the existential threat to American democracy Donald Trump is manifesting, there’s part of me that’s cheering for him to keep on doing what he’s doing. I’ll explain momentarily. Meantime, yes, he’s committing treason by exploiting the office of the presidency to forcibly overturn the certified results of the 2020 election. If he were successful, it would signify the end of our system of government. Sure, he’s much more likely to fail, but it doesn’t necessarily mitigate the damage he’s wreaking, especially to his own party.

Since the November election, Trump has not only been stress-testing our electoral system but also our judicial system and especially various state governments — not unlike the velociraptors in “Jurassic Park” testing the electrified fences as a means of escape. While he’s been hilariously unsuccessful, he’s essentially leaving a trail of breadcrumbs for the next Trump (who could literally be another Trump) to follow in his tiny footsteps. 

It appears as if the system has held, this time around, yet party operatives are fully aware by now which Republican officials to replace (watch your backs, Brian Kemp and Brad Raffensperger) and which posts are most vulnerable to authoritarian extortion. Next time, it could be much easier for Trump copycats with tyrannical aspirations to seize power, thanks to the trail he’s blazing for them as we speak.

In addition to the various Trumps who are lining up to run for office — namely Lara and Ivanka, at least — we’re now fully cognizant of which members of Congress have officially and perhaps permanently signed on to Trump’s fascist idiocracy bandwagon. Around 140 members of the House of Representatives and a dozen or so members of the U.S. Senate plan to object to the congressional certification of the electoral college results this week, indelibly carving their names on the bathroom walls of history. These members, including Josh Hawley, Ted Cruz, Ron Johnson, Marsha Blackburn and dozens of other Red Hats, are the charter members in the new breakaway Trump Party.

This brings us back to my aforementioned cheering. Provided their efforts are unsuccessful and provided we sidestep irreparable damage in the long run, the events of the past two months, if not the past four years, may permanently cleave the Republican Party into two factions, with Donald Trump holding the chainsaw.

The split began in 2016, with the NeverTrumpers and a few elected Republicans pledging to oppose Trump, but it’s been greatly accelerated in the past year and turbo-boosted since the 2020 election. 

We’ve all observed how Trump’s screechy blurts and whiny laments have become dogma for the Red Hat movement. Whatever he says is perceived as golden in the small minds of his sucker disciples. They question nothing and believe everything belched by this professional con man, including his unsubstantiated insistence that the election was stolen from him. Any Republican who disagrees is immediately targeted as an enemy of the MAGA cult. These enemies are subsequently threatened, extorted or directly accosted by the various Red Hat militias, with marching orders amplified by the Trump entertainment complex on the internet, radio and cable news.

That’s exactly what cowardly Republicans like Ted Cruz and Mitch McConnell fear the most. More than anything, they fear the wrath of the Red Hat Army and its ugly-crying generalissimo. That’s mainly why they’ve decided to enable such an obvious and proven con artist and his cockamamie strategy for remaining in power. If they oppose Trump, they’re asking to be screwed with their pants on and they know it. They certainly don’t want to be primary-challenged in 2022, and anyone running for president in ’24 will need the Red Hats on their side. The fear of being targeted for ouster is further compounded by fundraising problems and threats from cosplay-terrorists like the Proud Boys and the Boogaloo Bois. So out of pure fear and political expedience, the sedition caucus has decided to genuflect before the small-man from Mar-a-Lago and his mob family of Fifth Avenue Clampetts.

Meanwhile, Trump’s attacks against members of his own party, most recently including elected Republicans from Georgia, are going a long way toward alienating those people from the MAGA ranks. More crucially, Trump’s attacks are collectively creating a de facto enemies list. Through this process of testing democracy for weaknesses, Trump is systematically choosing who’s pure enough for the Trump Party and who’s standing in the way of his self-serving tyranny. In other words, even if someone like Brian Kemp wants to be part of Team Trump, he probably won’t be welcome. Not any more. “Join or die” would make for an appropriate slogan. “Don’t betray Dear Leader” would be a better one.

Bizarrely, this process is less about Republicans leaving the party than about Trump expelling Republicans from it.

The lure of Trump’s emerging party, much like the Dark Side of the Force, is easier and more seductive from a political standpoint. But again, this won’t attract everyone — it won’t be every single Republican. It’ll be a whole lot of them, though, and the group will only get larger as the online reach of pro-Trump conspiracy theorists and OAN fanfic grows exponentially larger, collecting new Trump Party members as it snowballs, while leaving turncoat anti-Trump Republicans in its wake. Once the teams are decided, the party that once occupied half of the political debate in this country will see its power greatly undermined by Trump’s shenanigans.

It’s difficult to forecast how exactly the two factions will be subdivided — that is, which faction will end up with the larger piece of the toxic pie — but it sure looks as though the Trump Party side will end up by far the most powerful and most populated, given that there are only a handful of remaining Republicans who oppose Trump: Mitt Romney, Ben Sasse, Adam Kinzinger and maybe Liz Cheney. There might be additional elected officials who lash themselves to the wheel of the old Republican Party, but it looks at least right now as if it’s being stripped for parts by a Trump-led movement of weirdos, racists, conspiracy theorists and nihilists.

It’s possible some of the anti-Trump Republicans will finally join the Biden coalition alongside the NeverTrumpers. It’s also possible they’ll continue to stand by the remnants of the old Republican Party, though greatly reduced in numbers and influence. It all depends on where this major party realignment ends up, but it looks as though the Red Hat side will be the larger of the two remaining halves. Conceivably the Trump Party will end up with third-party status, though I doubt it. 

Irrespective of how all this breaks down, political opposition to the Biden coalition will be more or less powerless nationally, thanks to Trump’s burning of the village: It will only be capable of achieving victories in heavily MAGA regions and ridiculously gerrymandered districts. Everywhere else, the conservative half of the American political debate could end up with permanent minority status. That would be the best-case scenario for the nation. This is the genuine upside to Trump’s massively destructive antics.

Either way, whether or not the GOP is really imploding, we’ve entered a new and harrowing phase in American political history. Debating policy in good faith has become an archaic relic of a more civil past. Now the stakes have come to this: Either the Biden coalition of mostly Democrats continues to increase both its voter registration and turnout numbers, thereby dominating elections, or the Trump faction will continue to infiltrate government at every level. As I’ve written before, American politics is no longer about left versus right. It’s now a cold civil war between the forces of truth and the forces of fiction: an adult side of the ledger — an American side that still believes in reality, democracy and political sanity — and a side entirely poisoned by Trumpian fascism and fantasy. Should the Trump side be allowed to expand its power, it’s game over for the republic. But if Trump’s endgame is the total destruction of the Republican Party, which is how it looks today, it’s possible that American democracy could actually benefit from his shotgun assault.

Texas Congresswoman Kay Granger tests positive for coronavirus

U.S. Rep. Kay Granger, R-Fort Worth, a high-ranking member of Texas’ congressional delegation, has tested positive for the coronavirus, her office announced Monday afternoon.

Granger, who was on the U.S. House floor during swearing-in proceedings in Congress on Sunday, is a ranking member of the House Appropriations Committee.

Granger tested positive for the respiratory disease after arriving in Washington, D.C. and is “asymptomatic and feeling great,” her office said in a statement. Granger said she will remain under the care of her doctor and has been quarantining.

According to WFAA, Granger received her first injection of the coronavirus vaccine in December. Experts say it takes a few weeks for the body to build immunity after being vaccinated, and that getting sick before completing a two-dose regimen should not undermine the potency of the vaccine.

Granger, 77, did not immediately release further details. It is unclear how she contracted the virus.

This is not Granger’s first brush with the virus. In July, she announced she tested negative after coming in contact with U.S. Rep. Louie Gohmert, R-Tyler, who later tested positive for the COVID-19.

Multiple state leaders have tested positive for the virus since the pandemic began. The first statewide elected official to publicly confirm a positive coronavirus test was Texas Supreme Court Justice Debra Lehrmann in May. Other state lawmakers, including Rep. Tony Tinderholt, Sen. Kel Seliger and outgoing House Speaker Dennis Bonnen have tested positive. Texas Agriculture Commissioner Sid Miller also tested positive in early December.

The Texas Tribune is a member-supported, nonpartisan newsroom informing and engaging Texans on state politics and policy. Learn more at texastribune.org.

Days before Georgia runoff, Kelly Loeffler officially became a billionaire

Jeff Sprecher, husband of unelected Sen. Kelly Loeffler, R-Ga., has become a billionaire at the end of his wife’s first year in office, according to Bloomberg. His company, Intercontinental Exchange (ICE), which owns the New York Stock Exchange, saw its stock rise more than 22% in 2020, boosting the couple’s net worth from where it stood at $800 million as recently as this summer.

While she was becoming half of a billionaire couple, Loeffler, who faces the Rev. Raphael Warnock, a Democrat, in one of two runoffs on Tuesday that will determine control of the Senate, has apparently neglected her official job. Loeffler has been marked “not voting” for 50 out of 65 votes in the U.S. Senate, or about 77%, since the Nov. 3 election, missing most of those in favor of campaign events. While a sizable portion of those votes concern appointments, the first-year senator also missed two votes on amendments to make Social Security benefits more accessible, including one to eliminate the five-month waiting period for patients with ALS, the incurable degenerative disease.

Loeffler also missed votes, for unclear reasons, to condemn weapons sales to the United Arab Emirates, as well as two confirmations for board appointees to the Tennessee Valley Authority, the U.S. corporate agency that provides power for 10 million people in the Southeast, including some in north Georgia. As Salon has reported, Loeffler has extensive ties to the energy sector after her extensive career in the financial sector, and the TVA is currently engaged in talks about creating a larger energy exchange market with the Southeast’s leading power companies, including Georgia Power, where she served on the board.

The newly-minted billionaire worked as an executive at ICE (her husband’s company) from 2002 until 2019, when Georgia Gov. Brian Kemp picked her to replace Sen. Johnny Isakson, who resigned for health reasons. Loeffler’s personal fortune has been a key focus of her campaign to hold the seat ever since. Within months, Loeffler faced a firestorm of public criticism over a series of strikingly well-timed stock trades that she and Sprecher made ahead of the coronavirus pandemic. Though a Justice Department investigation into the trades did not result in criminal charges, Loeffler has never said what came of a parallel investigation led by the Securities and Exchange Commission.

Asked about that second investigation, an ICE spokesperson referred Salon to the Loeffler campaign. A Loeffler spokesperson did not reply to Salon’s request for comment, and the ICE spokesperson also declined to say what came of the portion of that investigation that focused on Sprecher.

While at ICE, Loeffler led a cryptocurrency joint venture between her company, Microsoft and Starbucks, called Bakkt. When she joined the Senate, she was assigned to a committee that had direct oversight over the agency that regulates ICE and the NYSE, as well as Bakkt. Mother Jones recently reported that in March, that agency published a critical decision affecting cryptocurrency markets.

In September, ICE bought Ellie Mae, a software company that processes nearly half of the new residential mortgages in the country. Housing sales have soared amid the pandemic, and the purchase has proved a boon for ICE. Salon reported last week that a number of last-minute Loeffler donors are executives at major real estate and equity firms. Some did not disclose the name of their employer.

Indeed, Loeffler’s recent FEC are missing employer information for hundreds of donors, an unusually large proportion. Among them were members of the Asplundh family, owners of the eponymous multibillion-dollar infrastructure clearing corporation.

Salon also reported last month that the second-largest donor to a pro-Loeffler super PAC — hedge fund mogul Ken Griffin — had contributed $2 million one day after one of his companies announced a major acquisition. That purchase required approval by the NYSE, which Sprecher owns. (Sprecher himself was the Loeffler PAC’s largest donor.)

Loeffler has consistently told voters that her independent wealth frees her of conflicts, because she cannot be bought by corporate interests. Still, the issue has dogged her on the campaign trail. Before her appointment, Loeffler promised Kemp that she would spend as much as $20 million funding her 2020 campaign, a point that her main Republican opponent, Rep. Doug Collins, struck at repeatedly.

“Raising money — especially from small donors — is a great barometer of support and it is clear that [Collins] has a dedicated grassroots army marching with him,” a Collins spokesperson told ABC News in July. “Kelly Loeffler is mainly supported by Kelly Loeffler, her super wealthy stock-exchange-owning husband and a bunch of lobbyists. She leads a very small and lonely parade.”

Loeffler has also been criticized for owning a private jet that she and Sprecher may have bought on the taxpayer’s dime. Although she has claimed she was using the plane to save taxpayer money, a Salon investigation revealed that she has taken dozens of publicly funded flights between Atlanta and Washington. 

As an executive at ICE, months after the Great Recession brought the global economy to its knees, Loeffler helped market a new mechanism for the world’s biggest banks to keep trading in the very financial instruments that contributed to the crisis in the first place — registered in one of the world’s most notorious Cayman Islands tax shelters, where the banks could avoid U.S. taxes.

But Loeffler still appears to have a tin ear when it comes to the vast gulf between her enormous wealth and the financial circumstances of everyday Americans. One recent campaign ad proclaims that she knows what “it feels like waiting on that paycheck.” Despite the tens of millions of dollars that she boasted of having at her disposal, in November she appealed for campaign donations in the halls of the Senate — a violation of the law.

As Americans are dying by the thousands, Trump aims to short-circuit democracy

It’s a new year, but our once-in-a-century mass death event continues. In my home state of New Jersey, the COVID death toll closes in on 20,000, while our national government remains in the kind of turmoil we might associate with a nation without a long tradition of the peaceful transition of power.

A nation with the mightiest and most high-tech military in the world has been cornered by a deadly virus — and by predatory leadership that’s trying to exploit a public health crisis to perpetuate its hold on power.

As with so much during the Trump administration, what was promised in federal pandemic support to the states has failed to materialize in spectacular fashion, with the outgoing administration falling far short of its goal of vaccinating 20 million Americans by the end of 2020.

CNN reported that only 2.1 million people have gotten the vaccination, just a tenth of the goal of Trump’s “Operation Warp Speed.” This speed bump, which anyone who knows Donald Trump could have predicted, came as several states confirm cases of the newest COVID strain from Britain, which scientists say is no more lethal than the original — but far more contagious.

Dr. Anthony Fauci, the nation’s top infectious disease physician, has said that 80 to 85 percent of the nation’s population would need to be inoculated for us to achieve so-called herd immunity. That would be more than 260 million Americans.

“At the current rate, it would take the United States approximately 10 years to reach that level of inoculation,” warned Washington Post columnist Leana Wen. “That’s right — 10 years. Contrast that with the Trump administration’s rosy projections: Earlier this month, Health and Human Services Secretary Alex Azar predicted that every American will be able to get the vaccine by the second quarter of 2021 (which would be the end of June). The speed needed to do that is 3.5 million vaccinations a day.”

While the United States, the world’s wealthiest nation and sole remaining superpower, represents just 4 percent of the world’s population, it has reported almost 20 percent of the earth’s 2 million COVID-19 deaths.

Here in New Jersey, with more than 200 COVID deaths per 100,000 people, we account for 5.7 percent of the deaths but are just 2.77 percent of the nation’s population. “Put another way: if it were a country, the Garden State would have the highest COVID-19 per capita death toll in the world,” reported NJ Advance Media on Dec. 14.

From the very beginning of the pandemic, President Trump has played red states off against blue states even as he downplayed the seriousness of the virus, consistently misleading many Americans into believing that the highly contagious and deadly virus was like the flu.

Rather than coordinate the nation’s pandemic response, Trump installed political operatives in the CDC twisted its public health messaging to suit the presidential campaign calendar, undermining the critical agency’s credibility when the nation’s states were looking to it for science-based leadership.

Just as with Trump’s reckless campaigning, this added to the body count and helped accelerate the spread of the virus, which at various times people in the White House suggested was the administration’s goal, in pursuit of herd immunity.

The November election was, if anything, a referendum on this unprecedented betrayal of the public trust, whose deadly consequences will be felt by American families for generations to come. More than 81.28 million Americans voted for Joe Biden, blowing past the previous record for the most votes cast for a single presidential candidate, set in 2008 when Barack Obama garnered 69.49 million votes.

Despite the certification of the states’ returns, a sizable faction of the Republican Party, including New Jersey Rep. Jeff Van Drew, who was elected as a Democrat in 2018 before switching parties during Trump’s impeachment, want to end-run the will of the American people as and have the votes thrown out from swing states that went for Biden.

On Wednesday, well over 100 Republican members of the House of Representatives, along with about a dozen members of the U.S. Senate, are planning to protest the formal certification of Biden as president, even though all the lawsuits alleging voting fraud filed by Trump and his allies have been rejected by every court, including the nation’s highest.

Moreover, despite the Trump campaign’s post-election challenges in the contested states, Biden’s victory in those states survived the labor-intensive process of hand recounts, which also produced no evidence of voter fraud.

On Dec. 12, the U.S. Supreme Court refused to hear a lawsuit brought by Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton to throw out the certified vote tallies from Georgia, Michigan, Pennsylvania and Wisconsin, based on the claim that the mail-in ballot processes adopted by those states amid the COVID pandemic violated the law and were subject to widespread fraud.

The Texas AG was joined by the attorneys general of Missouri, Alabama, Arkansas, Florida, Indiana, Kansas, Louisiana, Mississippi, Montana, Nebraska, North Dakota, Oklahoma, South Carolina, South Dakota, Tennessee, Utah and West Virginia.

One hundred twenty-six Republican House members, including Van Drew, aligned themselves with that Texas challenge, which was unanimously rebuffed by the Supreme Court. Yet, this faction, with an eye on their own ambitions, have chosen to embrace Trump over abiding by their sworn duty to “support and defend the Constitution … against all enemies, both foreign and domestic.”

In President-elect Biden’s Dec. 14 speech, given after the certification of the election returns, he described the Texas lawsuit as an effort to wipe out the votes of more than 20 million Americans, a “position so extreme, we’ve never seen it before, a position that refused to respect the will of the people, refused to respect the rule of law and refused to honor our Constitution.”

Biden went on to proclaim that the November results meant that “faith in our institutions prevailed” and that “the integrity of our elections” remained intact while suggesting now was the “time to turn the page as we’ve done throughout our history, to unite, to heal.”

But as Trump and his junta have repeatedly demonstrated throughout the pandemic, they have no interest in uniting and healing, even in the midst of a once-in-a-century mass death event — if fostering division will help tighten their grip on power.

Their self-serving antics, pulled on a weary nation aching for a shred of normalcy in a sea of misery and uncertainty, need to be framed for posterity as the opening line of their obituaries.

7 ways 2020 exposed America

If America learns nothing else from these dark times, here are 7 lessons it should take away from 2020:

1. Workers keep America going, not billionaires.

American workers have been forced to put their lives on the line to provide essential services even as their employers failed to provide them with adequate protective gear, hazard pay, or notice of when COVID had infected their workplaces. Meanwhile, America’s 651 billionaires – whose net worth has grown by over $1 trillion since the start of the pandemic – retreated to their mansions, yachts and estates.

Amazon CEO Jeff Bezos sheltered in his 165,000-acre West Texas ranch while Amazon’s warehouse workers toiled in close proximity to each other, often without adequate masks, gloves, or sanitizers. The company offered but then soon scrapped a $2 an hour hazard pay increase for warehouse workers, even as Bezos’ wealth jumped by a staggering $70 billion since March, putting his estimated net worth at roughly $186 billion as the year came to an end.

2. Systemic racism is literally killing Black and Latino Americans.

Black and Latino Americans account for almost 40 percent of coronavirus deaths so far, despite comprising less than a quarter of the population. As they’ve borne the brunt of this pandemic, they’ve been forced to fight for their humanity in another regard — taking to the streets across the country to protest decades of unjust police killings of their community members, only to be met with more police violence. 

Among Native American communities, the coronavirus figures are even more horrifying. The Navajo Nation has had a higher per-capita infection rate than any state but can’t adequately care for the sick, thanks to years of federal underfunding and neglect of its healthcare system. 

Decades of segregated housing, pollution, lack of access to medical care, and poverty have left communities of color vulnerable to the worst of this virus, and the worst of America.

3. If we can afford to bail out corporations and Wall Street, we sure as hell can afford to help people.

Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell continues to insist we can’t “afford” $2,000 COVID survival checks for Americans. But the latest coronavirus relief legislation doled out over $220 billion to powerful business interests that could instead have been used to help struggling working families. 

Another way of looking at it: The total cost of providing those $2,000 checks ($465 billion) is less than half the amount America’s 651 billionaires added to their wealth during the pandemic ($1 trillion). 

4. Health care must be made a right in America

Even before the pandemic, an estimated 28 million Americans lacked health insurance. After it struck, an additional 15 millionlost employer-provided coverage because they lost their jobs. Without insurance, a hospital stay to treat COVID-19 cost as much as $73,000. Remember this the next time you hear pundits saying Medicare for All is too radical.

5. Our social safety nets are woefully broken.

No other advanced nation was as unprepared for the pandemic as was the United States. Our unemployment insurance system is over 80 years old, designed for a different America. We’re one of the few countries in the world that doesn’t provide all workers some form of paid sick leave. 

Other industrialized nations kept their unemployment rates low by guaranteeing paychecks during the pandemic. But Americans who filed for unemployment benefits often got nothing or received them weeks or months late. Under new legislation they get just $300 a week of extra benefits to tide them over.

6. The Electoral College must be abolished 

Biden won 7 million more popular votes than Trump. But Biden’s margin in Arizona, Georgia, and Wisconsin totaled just 45,000. Had Trump won these three states instead, he would have gained 37 more electoral votes, tying Biden in the electoral college. Under the Constitution, this would have pushed the election to the House of Representatives, with each state delegation getting just one vote. Even though Democrats have a majority in the House, more state delegations have Republican majorities. Trump would have been reelected. 

The gap between the popular and electoral college vote continues to widen. The Electoral College is an increasingly dangerous anachronism.

7. Government matters.

For decades, conservatives have told us that government is the problem and that we should let the free market run its course. Rubbish. If nothing else, 2020 has shown that the unfettered free market won’t save us. After 40 years of Reaganism, it’s never been clearer: Government is in fact necessary to protect the public.  

It’s tragic that it took a pandemic, near-record unemployment, millions of people taking to the streets, and a near-calamitous election for many to grasp how broken, racist, and backwards our system really is. Biggest lesson of all: It must be fixed.  

Changing tides in Georgia’s “Black belt” could deliver the Senate to Democrats

Shimmering fields of cotton and pecan orchards punctuate the predominantly pine and oak forests around Cairo, Georgia. The region’s lifeblood is the Flint River, which borders the fictional slave labor plantation in Gone With the Wind. In reality, the river flows from west central Georgia into the Gulf of Mexico, and its waters are clean enough to harbor bass, bluegill and bullheads.

Located amid rolling hills not far from the border with Florida, Cairo is a town with fewer than 10,000 residents that’s known locally for its vintage car show, but it has a claim to fame when it comes to the long fight for racial equality: It was the birthplace of Jackie Robinson, who went on to break baseball’s color barrier when he joined the Brooklyn Dodgers in 1947.

Barbara McDuffie, who was born in the same town less than a decade later, has through her life experiences and careers — placing children in adopted families and more recently promoting voter education and engagement — developed distinct insights into the area’s enduring challenges when it comes to race and inequality.

Barbara McDuffie, a member of Organizing for Grady County, stands in the town of Cairo where some residents say their monthly electricity bills are $350 or more.

Some of them came early. The youngest of eight children, McDuffie was the first in her family to go to college. She enrolled in Fort Valley State University, one of 10 Historically Black Colleges and Universities in Georgia. But before she could attend, the school required her to pass a physical in what would be her very first doctor’s visit. In her world, she recalls, “People didn’t go to the doctor unless they were deathly ill.”

When she entered the doctor’s office, she discovered separate waiting rooms — one for whites, the other for “colored people,” she recalls.

“Why did it have to be separate?” she remembers thinking. She went to the white side, and was told, “You can’t sit here.”

That moment, in 1972, made clear that while major civil rights legislation had passed in the 1960s, the area was far from coming to grips with its racist past.

Later on, McDuffie would spend nearly two decades in child services helping to place children that courts had removed from their families due to abuse or neglect with foster and adopted families. Such work put her face to face with the human toll of long term racial and economic disparities that continued to bedevil the region.

More recently, while working as a voter education advocate, the 66-year-old mother finally sensed changes in the political terrain beneath her feet. “We’ve been letting the powers that be know that this is not the way we are going to continue to live.”

Thomasville, with a population of 18,518, is the second largest town in southwestern Georgia.

For some Blacks of McDuffie’s generation who returned to Grady County post-graduation, their college degrees opened a pathway to middle-class jobs, home ownership and lifestyles that included private music lessons and swim teams for their kids. But McDuffie and other advocates say a lack of opportunity and obstacles built up in the past continue to trap rural Black people.

“Most available jobs are in fast food or retail and pay $7.50 or less,” she says. “That’s not just for teenagers,” she says, “but also for grownups trying to feed their families.”

That helps to explain why the per capita income in Cairo in 2019 was less than $20,000; 35% of residents struggle beneath the poverty line.

The area of town called “The Hill” was once a Black middle class neighborhood, but now some of the one-story modest mid-century houses are partially boarded up, missing roof panels and broken steps that lead to sagging porches. Long gone are the swing sets, rose bushes and vegetable gardens that graced these yards when McDuffie was growing up.

McDuffie describes Cairo as an “affordable housing desert” where many of the places for Black families are in such disrepair that it causes them major problems. Some of the housing was built near a creek that routinely floods and had to be abandoned.

******

Fifty miles due north of Cairo, in Albany, a small city that serves as a hub for the rural counties surrounding it, one in three people lives in poverty.

Part of the problem has to do with the power company. Low-income community members living in aging and dilapidated housing stock routinely receive monthly bills between $350 and $400, and advocates say they’ve heard people lament bills in excess of $800 a month because landlords never weatherized homes and apartments, even though federal funds have been set aside for such efforts.

“Their dwellings are not up to code, their doors and windows are cracked, and the people who live there are basically heating and cooling the area outside of their home,” explains Albany City Commissioner Demetrius Young.

The Imperial Hotel in Thomasville, built in 1949, was featured in the Green Book, a guidebook for African-American tourists on the hotels, restaurants, shops and music venues that would reliably serve them during the Jim Crow era.

People are under intense pressure, Young says. A constituent at a utility protest in October in Albany spoke of one such power bill and suggested it might be the last straw that could lead that person to commit suicide by jumping off a nearby bridge.

“For some folks it threatens their sanity,” Young says.

He said that the municipal electric authority, known as MEAG, signed an extremely unfavorable contract with Georgia Power that requires the local authority to buy pre-defined amounts of power, regardless of usage — and those costs are passed on to customers.

“We are locked into these extractive contracts for decades,” says Young. “It’s my challenge to figure out a way to reverse that.”

The cost of living is a problem on other fronts. Since 2014, the federal government has given states the option to increase the income threshold for Medicaid. The goal was to provide low-cost or free health care to more adults who live near or below the poverty line, but two Republican governors — Nathan Deal, elected to a second term in 2014, and Brian Kemp, elected in 2018 — chose not to expand its income levels.

“People, including children, continue to go without basic health services,” says McDuffie. “Every time I go to the doctor or dentist, I think of all those who can’t.”

* * *

McDuffie has joined a community of activists in the nonprofit Organizing for Grady County to foster civic engagement, including getting people to vote.

The group, which is open to anyone, but currently includes just one white member out of more than 200, was established after a meeting with Cliff Albright and LaTosha Brown, co-founders of Atlanta-based Black Voters Matter. They found a need for such outreach after visiting communities across Georgia and talking to people about the potential impact of the Black belt voting as a bloc.

For the last three years, after receiving instruction in organizing concepts, training and analytic tools by the nonpartisan voter registration group New Georgia Project, Organizing for Grady County has been discussing issues of concern within the community.

McDuffie recalls that their first town hall in 2017 was attended by more than 100 people. They’ve also been registering people to vote, advocating for the hiring of Black poll watchers, and soon plan to roll out a newspaper, to be called The Voice, to more effectively represent relevant issues.

Cotton fields along State Highway 111, on the outskirts of Cairo, Georgia.

They have helped to drive a jump in electoral participation in Grady County from 8,370 votes cast in 2018, to 10,707 in the recent 2020 election. That’s significant in a state where Joe Biden beat Donald Trump by about 12,000 votes, and where participation in Tuesday’s election could surpass turnout last November because the tight presidential race made the stakes so clear.

“People were energized by the slim margin statewide in the presidential race; it made them realize their vote matters,” says McDuffie. “They’re finally opening their eyes to the fact that life could be different.”

Jessica King, a community coordinator for the Southwest Georgia Project, an advocacy group that’s been active in the southwest part of the state for six decades, agrees. “Our people are returning to the polls to finish the job they started in November.”

To make sure that happens, King says that at least 50 canvassers will work six-hour shifts until the election as they wrestle with seemingly intractable challenges, from safety concerns associated with the pandemic — Albany was one of Georgia’s early COVID-19 hotspots — to coping with using high-tech tools in areas where there is no broadband Internet.

“Our folks know to pull out a clipboard and get to writing names and numbers down,” King says. “Old school.”

They also know, King makes clear, that in another close election, turnout in the Black belt could decide the election. “People have come to understand that it’s important to pay attention to the leaders we select,” she says, “because they make decisions for our health care and stimulus packages.”

 ******

Before Christmas, there were sightings of Mr. and Mrs. Santa Claus on the road on both sides of the Flint River. It was likely Commissioner Young and Sherrell Byrd, the co-chairperson of SOWEGA Rising, an Albany-based advocacy group.

Commissioner Young let his already gray beard grow longer, and the duo donned gold-embroidered Santa suits and dispensed candy canes. For added effect, elves distributed voter literature on issues rather than candidates.

Their stops, which were spent listening to community concerns and urging people to vote early, were mainly at housing projects in Black neighborhoods in Blakely and Cairo where they played Black Christmas standards like James Brown’s “Santa Claus Go Straight to the Ghetto” over a sound system.

“As we rode around we saw there are still folks living pretty much the same way they lived in the early ’60s,” Young says, referring to the time before the passage of the Voting Rights Act and the War on Poverty policies enacted under President Lyndon Johnson.

Demetrius Young and Sherell Byrd in South Albany, Georgia.

That was especially true in small towns like Donalsonville, in the southwesternmost corner of the state where “it looked like a movie set from then. Still stagnant, still in poverty with minimal health care, bad health care outcomes and really no upward mobility,” Young explains.

“They’ve been in this condition so long, and nobody pays attention to them.”

“We’re very much still living on a modernized plantation in southwest Georgia,” Byrd says. “You go to one side of town and they’ve got everything they need, but you go to the other side of town and there’s tarps still on the roofs from a hurricane that happened two years ago.” 

She sees the entrenched disparities in parts of Georgia’s Black belt as another long battle for equality. “Our job here is to give people that historical perspective and connect them to the ancestors who tilled this land, who we still feel present with us every day. But also to go that extra step and do our part in our generation to push us closer to that freedom.”

******

There is no longer a single Election Day in Georgia. By the end of 2020, more than 3 million votes — representing nearly 40% of voters — had already been cast, marking a new early-voting record.

Young says the largest turnout has been in Black rural communities despite what activists allege  are efforts to suppress the vote. On Dec. 28, the Albany Dougherty County Board of Registration and Elections rejected a petition by Commissioner BJ Fletcher that attempted to use the post office “change of address” list to effectively disenfranchise 3,000 people. The board concluded that the petition was filed “without probable cause.”

“The current power structure doesn’t want Black people to have the effect on the election that we are having,” says Young.

Speaking of the people creating obstacles, he adds, “The crushing thing is some of them look like me.”

Cliff Albright, co-founder and executive director of Black Voters Matter, says history demonstrates that social justice movements that fail to include rural communities tend to fail more broadly.

“You can’t change Georgia just off of metro Atlanta; you’ve got to have the midsized cities, the small cities, but more importantly you’ve got to have the rural areas that are everywhere in between.”

The votes may be far-flung, but they add up. Albright says that the electoral power of the Black belt in Georgia is equal to that of a midsized city.

Election signs on Martin Luther King Jr. Drive in Thomasville.

That’s significant in an election that will decide the balance of power in the Senate, and define the scale of legislative power that President Biden will have to work with. Georgia’s election is one with tremendous national stakes, especially as it will define the role of Sen. Mitch McConnell, who proved adept as Senate leader at placing obstacles in front of the Obama-Biden legislative agenda. If Sen. McConnell has a majority once again, he could do the same during a Biden presidency.

Albright interprets some of what this might mean to him: “We won’t be able to correct the damage that has been done to the federal court system because nothing will move.”

Paraphrasing “Brother Malcolm [X],” Albright offers a larger, more historic analysis: “It’s not progress when you put a knife in my back and pull it halfway out. Progress is when you pull the knife all the way out and help the wounds heal.”

Then he adds: “We can’t heal the wound if we don’t have control of the Senate.”

All photos by Jason Kerzinski

WATCH: Josh Hawley squirms as Fox News host grills him about challenging Joe Biden’s election win

Sen. Josh Hawley (R-MO) attempted to defend his efforts to reject the outcome of the 2020 presidential election on Fox News on Monday night, but anchor Bret Baier keep interjecting facts into the conversation.

“I just want to pin you down on what you’re trying to do,” Baier said. “Are you trying to say, that as of January 20th, that President Trump will still be president.”

“Well, that depends on what happens on Wednesday, this is why we have the debate,” Hawley replied.

“No it doesn’t,” Baier noted. “I mean, the states, by the Constitution, say they certify the election, they did certify it. By the Constitution, Congress doesn’t have the right to overturn the certification.”

“Don’t you have a responsibility to your constituents?” Baier asked. “Don’t you have a responsiblity to tell them it won’t be Donald Trump as of January 21st?”

Watch:

U.S. attorney in Georgia abruptly resigns following Trump’s election shakedown call: report

U.S. Attorney for the Northern District of Georgia Byung Pak resigned abruptly on Monday, according to Talking Points Memo and the Atlanta Journal-Constitution, as the state finds itself at the center of fierce debates over the 2020 election.

It’s not uncommon for U.S. attorneys to resign near the end of an outgoing administration. But Pak, a Republican who was appointed to his position by President Donald Trump in 2017, has previously indicated “he would not leave until Inauguration Day,” Talking Points Memo reported. This apparently abrupt departure, then, is likely to draw scrutiny.

It’s especially noteworthy because Trump himself suddenly became the target of intense criticism when the Washington Post published a recording of his call with Georgia Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger over the weekend. In the call, Trump insisted he won the state, relying on a series of debunked and fictitious claims about supposed fraud and misconduct in the election that he claimed tilted the result in Biden’s favor. Most egregiously, he told Raffensperger to “find” 11,780 votes, the number he believed he needed to flip the state and win its electoral votes. Trump even seemed to threaten Raffensperger when he suggested the secretary could face criminal penalties for his administration of the election.

Many observers, including top election law expert Rick Hasen, have suggested Trump could be prosecuted under federal and state law for this behavior. It is illegal to try to induce an election official to commit fraud.

There may be a mundane reason for Pak’s departure. But the proximity to Trump’s scandalous conduct suggests at least two possibilities. He may have left for reasons related to a possible investigation of the president for his behavior on the call and related actions, or he may have left because he was placed under similar pressure by the president or his proxies to find or invent allegations of wrongdoing in the Georgia election.

The more scandalous possibilities are also suggested by Trump’s recent behavior toward the Justice Department. Trump made it clear he was not happy with former Attorney General Bill Barr’s claims that federal investigators had found no evidence of fraud significant enough that it would have affected the result of the 2020 presidential election in any state. He has also reportedly been pushing for a special counsel to look into his allegations about the election. And since Barr himself abruptly left the Justice Department on Dec. 23 before Trump’s term was officially concluded, to be replaced by acting Attorney General Jeffrey Rosen, it’s unclear whether there’s anyone left who would stand up to the president’s demands.

Pak’s office would not provide any additional details about his departure, the Atlanta Journal-Constitution reported.