Spring Sale: Get 1 Year, Save 58%

“Joe Exotic” series starring Kate McKinnon ordered at Peacock, NBC, USA Network

The Kate McKinnon-led series about Carole Baskin and the “Tiger King” Joe Exotic has received a multi-platform series order at NBCUniversal Television, Variety has learned.

The limited series, currently titled “Joe Exotic,” is now set to air on NBC, Peacock, and USA Network. In addition, Etan Frankel has boarded the project as writer and executive producer under his overall deal with series producer Universal Content Productions (UCP). The project was first announced as being in development last November.

Read more from Variety: Roman Polanski loses bid for Academy reinstatement

Frankel’s past credits include “Friday Night Lights,” “Shameless,” “Animal Kingdom,” and the Epix series “Get Shorty.” He is also attached to write an Evel Knievel limited series starring Milo Ventimiglia. That project was originally set up at USA but is now being shopped to other outlets. 

Based on the Wondery Podcast of the same name, the show centers on Carole Baskin (McKinnon), a big cat enthusiast, who learns that fellow exotic animal lover Joe “Exotic” Schreibvogel is breeding and using his big cats for profit. She sets out to shut down his venture, inciting a quickly escalating rivalry. But Carole has a checkered past of her own and when the claws come out, Joe will stop at nothing to expose what he sees as her hypocrisy. The results prove dangerous.

Read more from Variety: Ryan Reynolds to star in and co-write “Upstate”

McKinnon will executive produce in addition to starring, with Frankel and Wondery’s Hernan Lopez, Marshall Lewy, and Aaron Hart also executive producing. UCP, part of the Universal Studio Group, will produce.

The decision to air the series across NBCU’s two main English language linear networks and the recently-launched streaming service comes as the company looks to adapt itself for the streaming wars. Amidst an industry-wide decline in linear ratings, NBCU CEO Jeff Shell recently oversaw a major reorganization of the company’s television business. That reorganization placed a clear emphasis on the company’s future streaming plans while deemphasizing the importance of certain cable networks in the NBCU portfolio in order to cut costs.

Read more from Variety: What happens when the Tony Awards go virtual?

The bizarre world of Exotic and Baskin was most famously documented in the hit Netflix docuseries “Tiger King.” The series dropped on March 20 and quickly became a media sensation. Variety exclusively reported that the series is estimated to have reached an audience of 34.3 million unique viewers in its first 10 days of availability, according to Nielsen data.

This is one of two television projects set in the “Tiger King” world. Variety exclusively reported in May that CBS Television Studios and Imagine Television are developing a series about Schreibvogel with Nicolas Cage attached to play the lead role. It is based on the Texas Monthly article “Joe Exotic: A Dark Journey Into the World of a Man Gone Wild,” by Leif Reigstad.

Police: Justin Townes Earle died from “probable drug overdose”

Justin Earles Townes likely died from a “probable drug overdose,” a spokesperson at the Metro Nashville Police Department confirmed to Rolling Stone on Tuesday. Police conducted a welfare check at the 38-year-old songwriter’s Nashville apartment on Sunday after one of Earle’s friends said they hadn’t heard from him since Thursday. MNPD spokesperson Don Aaron told Rolling Stone that the Nashville Fire Department entered the residence and found Earle dead. An autopsy is pending.

Earle had struggled with substance abuse issues since he was 12, logging several stints in rehab and then staying clean for extended periods. He attributed some of his early troubles to an unstable home environment following his father Steve Earle‘s separation from Justin’s mother, Carole Ann Hunter.

Read more from Rolling Stone: Bruce Springsteen on making “Born to Run”: “We went to extremes”

“I think I was dealing with a lot of things I didn’t know how to deal with, between my father leaving and my mother bringing in a slew of drunken bastard boyfriends to live with us for a little while … by the time I emerged from my parents’ household at 15 years old, I was a very fucked-up kid,” he told Rolling Stone in 2012. “I discovered very fast that my way of doing things was going to get me in trouble, and I kept going with it, because I believed the myth for a long time, and I believed I had to destroy myself to make great art.”

Earle had a relapse in 2010, right around the time he released his breakthrough album “Harlem River Blues” and was touring relentlessly. His increasing alcohol usage eventually exacerbated to the point of an altercation with the owner of an Indianapolis venue and an overnight stay in jail. Earle had another relapse in 2016, but started to reclaim his life with the help of cannabis. “I am a participant of the marijuana maintenance program,” he told Chris Shiflett on the Walking the Floor podcast in 2017.

Read more from Rolling Stone: How YouTube reaction videos are changing the way we listen

Even so, Earle maintained that he’d been through the worst of his addiction very early in his career. “When I started making records, I was sober,” he told Shiflett. “I got all my craziness out of the way as a coffeehouse musician and a roadie.”

Like many musicians who struggled with addiction, Earle had once believed that being high was enhancing his work. Through the prism of his thirties, he was able to see that notion as an illusion.

“I used to use my music as an excuse to get high for a long time, saying that it was my right, but it’s not, it’s nobody’s right,” he said in 2012. “Your mother did not put you on this earth to treat yourself like that.”

Read more from Rolling Stone: Lily Cornell Silver’s Eddie Vedder interview: 10 things we learned

Numerous artists and friends paid tribute to Earle on Twitter, including one-time collaborator Jason Isbell, Lucinda Williams, Margo Price, American Aquarium’s BJ Barham, Joshua Hedley, and Samantha Crain. On Monday, Earle’s father tweeted a photo of them together, with Justin lying in his dad’s lap on a couch.

A private service will be held for the musician next week, with a public memorial planned for 2021.

Additional reporting by Jonathan Bernstein and Brian Hiatt

The pandemic presents colleges and universities with a no-win situation

The coronavirus pandemic has presented American colleges with a seemingly no-win dilemma: Do they resume in-person learning — which, if done wrong, could put thousands of students at risk — or only conduct classes remotely, exacting a financial toll on said colleges and diluting the on-campus college experience many students desire?

A pair of news stories, from opposite sides of the Mississippi River, reveals just how high the stakes are.

The University of Alabama–Tuscaloosa is reported to have 566 confirmed positive cases of COVID-19 among faculty, students and staff on their Tuscaloosa campus. In a statement made on Monday morning, President Stuart Bell characterized the challenge facing the school as one of needing to “identify where does the virus thrive and where does the virus spread, and how can we work together with our students, with our faculty and with our staff to make sure that we minimize” incidents and spread. 

Perhaps in response to news reports about students socializing in seemingly unsafe environments, Bell added that “it’s not student behavior, OK. It’s how do we have protocols so that we make it to where our students can be successful, and we can minimize the impact of the virus.”

On the west coast, there is the case of the University of Southern California (USC). According to a memorandum published on Monday by Dr. Sarah Van Orman, chief health officer for USC Student Health, more than 100 students at the college are in two-week quarantines after being exposed to infected individuals. Orman clarified that all of the infected students resided in off-campus living environments.

These two colleges are hardly alone. The University of North Carolina–Chapel Hill announced last week that it was transitioning to remote classes after dorms, a fraternity and other student housing saw outbreaks of COVID-19. Syracuse University suspended 23 students for having a large gathering that, they argued, could have required the whole campus to shut down. Notre Dame University has stopped in-person instruction for two weeks after 147 students tested positive on their campus.

USC, incidentally, is providing instruction almost entirely online, while University of Alabama–Tuscaloosa is primarily giving classes in-person. Other colleges are planning variations on these two policy approaches, which are not a strict binary. According to the Chronicle of Higher Education, 27 percent of American colleges are teaching primarily online, 20 percent are teaching classes primarily in-person, 15 percent are using a hybrid approach, 6 percent are fully online and 2.5 percent are fully in-person. Thirty percent of the colleges have either not yet decided how to handle the situation or have chosen an “other” approach.

There are a number of reasons why many colleges, especially state schools, are partially or fully choosing in-person learning even if doing so puts their students at risk, as North Carolina State University historian Bret C. Devereaux wrote in The Atlantic. As universities increase the cost of education to pay for more teachers, state funds for universities drops and students pay more for various amenities that are used to entice them, many colleges depend on students being physically on campus for their business models to remain profitable.

“Now that universities face the emergency of a pandemic, they are stuck,” Devereaux writes. “Calling a halt to on-campus operations and going totally online, thereby waiving on-campus fees, was the right, moral choice. And yet it was the option that this reckless system could never take, because those inflated fees were needed to pay the fixed costs of the business model. Without sufficient state funds, universities are reliant on federal grant money, which requires students to enroll. If online courses drive away even a fraction of those students, the house of cards will collapse. For the university to do the right thing would be financial suicide.”

Many college employees have, predictably, expressed dismay with this approach. As Jay Ganz, a special education professor at Texas A&M University’s College Station flagship, told The Texas Tribune, “People are pretty upset and feeling like they’re being forced into a situation that’s really unsafe. We’re being treated as guinea pigs.”

So how have colleges that are following a hybrid approach, or which have not yet formulated a precise plan, responding to the recent news of campus COVID-19 outbreaks?

Utica College, a private university in New York, had an open-ended response.

“At Utica College we have been planning since last March for a resumption of ground classes at the start of the Fall semester — albeit modified,” a spokesperson told Salon by email. Utica College representatives plan to test students for COVID-19 often and enforce social distancing and other safety protocols.

University officials at Alabama State University told Salon that they are doing a hybrid of “face-to-face and online instruction,” and said they would “handle any developments as they arise.”

Yet given that those with coronavirus can infect others long before they show symptoms, hopefully dealing with developments “as they arise” isn’t too late.

Republicans trail Democrats in ratings race after night one of convention

President Donald Trump lost the first-night rating battle of the Republican convention. According to the Los Angeles Times, the first night of the Democratic convention scored a much better viewership than the GOP.

Night one for the GOP convention scored about 15.8 million viewers, which is a significant decline from Trump’s 2016 views. By contrast, the Democratic Party averaged about 18.7 million viewers over the major broadcast networks and leading three cable channels, CNN, MSNBC and Fox News. The Democratic National Committee reported 35 million live views of their video streams across the four-night convention.

The numbers do not count online views as those can only be self-reported by the networks themselves. For example, CNN cited “31 million unique visitors and more than 9 million video starts across its desktop, mobile and OTT devices,” the network said on the first night of the Democratic convention.

“Fox News was the most-watched channel for coverage between 10 and 11 p.m. Eastern, with an average of 7.1 million viewers, followed by CNN, (2 million), ABC (1.97 million), NBC, (1.7 million), MSNBC (1.6 million) and CBS (1.5 million),” said the report.

For Fox News, however, those numbers were the top in their history of covering political conventions. The overwhelming majority of Trump’s interviews go to the network, however, which has been incorporated into his campaign with Fox News personalities like Sean Hannity and Jeanine Pirro appearing at rallies.

“Hannity,” the Fox News show that airs at 9 p.m. EST, scored 6.8 million views, which is the second largest in the show’s history.

But the numbers are 26 percent down from Trump’s first convention at a time that the president’s poll numbers are struggling and his ratings for his response to the coronavirus pandemic have been even worse.

The first night of the Republican Convention was supposed to be “diversity night,” with the GOP’s two non-white leaders taking the stage. The remainder of the GOP convention will feature only whites.

You can read the full report from Los Angeles Times.

What’s lost when “The Righteous Gemstones” and Falwell scandals spotlight holy-rolling hypocrisy

There’s always a kind of collective schadenfreude to be experienced when someone’s seemingly holy (or “holier than thou”) persona is dismantled, revealing a pattern of inconceivable hypocrisy. Yes, we all fall short of the glory of God, but there’s something especially insidious about profanity being concealed by a sacred smokescreen — or in the case of megachurch pastors and evangelical college administrators, hidden behind the vapor of the smoke machines that augment bouncy, electric guitar-scored worship services. 

The visceral reaction such revelations inspire made for a compelling dramatic backbone for “The Righteous Gemstones,” a Danny McBride-led HBO satire series that debuted in August 2019. It’s also what makes  Liberty University President Jerry Fallwell Jr.’s current tumble from grace feel more worthy of notice  —and, honestly, more salacious — than your typical ousting of a university leader. 

The stories mirror each other in obvious ways: In the television series, Pastor Jesse Gemstone (McBride) and a few of his fellow church leaders got “dirty, dirty for sure-y” at an Atlanta prayer conference, hiring hookers and doing cocaine. This week, Reuters reported that Falwell both approved of and observed his wife’s sexual relationship with former pool attendant-turned-Miami businessman Giancarlo Granda. These encounters took place multiple times between 2012 and 2018. 

“Becki and I developed an intimate relationship, and Jerry enjoyed watching from the corner of the room,” Granda said. 

There are other superficial similarities; both the fictional Gemstones and the Falwells are families of multigenerational evangelical leaders whose legacies are built on hell, fire and brimstone — though perhaps replace “brimstone” with “clogging” for the Gemstones. Jesse and his wife, Amber, (Cassidy Freeman), are an evangelical power couple, just as many have described the Falwells. And, in both cases, video and photographic evidence (allegedly, in the case of Falwell) exists of their indiscretions. 

But on a deeper level, both of these narratives are knitted together by a series of escalating scandals that were known, or at least suspected, internally, by family or followers who helped keep the puritanical conceit alive through their silence. While this tangle of deceit, French maid costumes, and cover-ups makes for good television, it flies in the face of everything evangelicals preach about Biblical values and church discipline. It’s life imitating art, imitating life again. 

Church discipline is the practice of rebuking congregation members when they have sinned with the ultimate goal of repentance and reconciliation with God and the greater church body. There are several steps for appropriate church discipline, as outlined in the New Testament: a church leader should arrange a private meeting with the offender; if that fails, they should approach them again with witnesses; if the offender still doesn’t repent, the matter may be brought up with the entire congregation. Excommunication is typically the last resort if the person does not repent of their sin. 

“Our purpose in church discipline is positive for the individual disciplined, for other Christians as they see the real danger of sin, for the health of the church as a whole, and for the corporate witness of the church to those outside,” wrote Mark Dever, senior pastor of the Capitol Hill Baptist Church in Washington, D.C., in his book “Nine Marks of a Healthy Church.” 

He continued: “Most of all, our holiness is to reflect the holiness of God. It should mean something to be a member of the church, not for our pride’s sake but for God’s name’s sake. Biblical church discipline is a mark of a healthy church.” 

In the “Righteous Gemstones,” immediate church discipline isn’t even a consideration; if it was, there wouldn’t be enough meat for a nine-episode season. The drama is in the avoidance of being outed. 

After Jesse is blackmailed for a large sum of money by a mysterious masked man in a van who has a copy of the “Atlanta tape,” he turns to his siblings — also church leaders — for assistance. They help him and keep quiet along the way, largely because of their own hidden lives. Judy Gemstone (Edi Patterson) is “living in sin” with her fiancé, BJ (Tim Baltz), while Kelvin Gemstone (Adam Devine) has palpable sexual chemistry with his ex-Satanist “roommate,” Keefe (Tony Cavalero). 

All of them, including patriarch Eli Gemstone (John Goodman) and his brother-in-law, Uncle Baby Billy Freeman (Walton Goggins), are so blinded by their desire for more — more power, more money, more prestige — that they allow the ruse to continue. Because if one Gemstone goes down, so goes the empire they’ve constructed on a foundation of holy rolling, built with congregants’ tithes.

In the case of Jerry Falwell, Jr., we can only imagine what happened behind the scenes and what prevented concrete disciplinary action from being taken earlier — but we do know that students at his university have been expelled for far less egregious violations. The student honor code is called “The Liberty Way,” and according to it premarital sex is forbidden, as are same-sex relationships. Drinking alcohol and “obscene language” are infractions, and students are instructed to “dress modestly at all times.”

Falwell’s past scandals have been blips in the news cycle over the last year. As Politico reported in September 2019, former Trump attorney Michael Cohen helped Falwell “clean up racy ‘personal’ photographs” of his wife, Becki; at least one of these showed her dressed in a French maid costume. Allegedly, Falwell sent the image to a number of Liberty University employees. 

Additionally, Liberty employees detailed other instances of “Falwell’s behavior that they [saw] as falling short of the standard of conduct they expect from conservative Christian leaders, from partying at nightclubs, to graphically discussing his sex life with employees.” A former senior university official told Politico about a car trip with Falwell, during which “all he wanted to talk about was how he would nail his wife, how she couldn’t handle [his penis size], and stuff of that sort.”

There would have been ample opportunity for university officials or church leadership to confront Falwell, and perhaps they did behind closed doors, but it’s obvious that any requests for repentance and better behavior didn’t stick. 

On Aug. 7, photos surfaced of Falwell with his pants partially unzipped with his arm around a woman whom he later claimed was his wife’s assistant. He was holding a glass of dark liquid in the photo and joked in the caption that it was “just black water.” The photo was quickly deleted, but screenshots were widely circulated. 

Then on Aug. 23, the night before Granda’s revelations about his relationship with the couple, Falwell released a statement to the Washington Examiner claiming that his recent behavior was due to depression over his wife’s affair with Granda. 

“It was like living on a roller coaster,” he said in the statement. “While completely dedicating ourselves to Liberty, we were also suffering in silence during our personal time together, while simultaneously trying to manage and deal with this increasingly threatening behavior, which only worsened over time. We were doing our best to respectfully unravel this ‘fatal attraction’ type situation to protect our family and the university.”

There was no mention of the allegation that Falwell approved of the relationship between Granda and his wife. Instead, he claimed that Granda was trying to extort the couple for a large sum of money in exchange for keeping the affair secret; Granda denied these claims. In an interview with Reuters, he said he was seeking a buyout from a business arrangement he had with the couple. 

Typically, how and with whom couples engage in the privacy of their own bedrooms should be just that — private. But a cornerstone of Jerry Fallwell Sr.’s rise to power in the conservative cultural space was in his condemnation of acts that he declared to be sexually immoral, including same-sex relationships (he once stated, “AIDS is not just God’s punishment for homosexuals, it is God’s punishment for the society that tolerates homosexuals”) and premarital sex. 

His legacy allowed megachurch pastors and writers like Joshua Harris to preach purity culture as the ideal state for Christian relationships. Harris, who announced in 2019 that he was no longer a Christian and apologized for the harmful views he spread, was known for his books “I Kissed Dating Goodbye” and “Boy Meets Girl: Say Hello to Courtship.” 

Harris wrote both books — which emphasize the idea of courting with the intention of marriage, as opposed to casual dating — when he was in his early 20s. They both held the idea that the best way to preserve one’s purity was to stop dating altogether. “Dating was a game,” Harris wrote. “It hurt people and it was practice for divorce and a distraction from preparing for life.” 

The books also introduced some concepts, like abstaining from all physical touch before marriage and the idea of “giving one’s heart away,” that hold no real scriptural basis, but mirror the message found in “The Liberty Way.” Followers of both Harris and the Falwells may be in the world, but not of it. 

The moral duplicity that underlies evangelical leaders’ willingness to paper over scandal in effort to put on a holy face is the same that allowed them to campaign — like Falwell did — for a thrice-married man who pays off porn stars and brags about grabbing women by the pussy. 

Would Jesse Gemstone have voted for Donald Trump? I don’t know. That was one question the series left me with when I first viewed it. But I’m relatively confident that he wouldn’t have condemned Trump’s behavior because it would have led to an interrogation of his own. And when your financial stability is intrinsically tied to how righteous you are, why risk it? Judge not lest ye be judged, and all that. 

Perhaps that was the thinking at play at Liberty University, as fellow college leaders seemingly did nothing for so long in the face of Falwell’s sin. If the Falwell legacy fell, would they — and their jobs — go along with it? 

As I wrote in 2019, one of the other questions that “The Righteous Gemstones” left me with was what would the congregants of the family’s gigantic megachurch think of Jesse’s fall. “Other than brief snippets, we don’t know what the pastors preach from the pulpit,” I said. “We don’t know who their congregants are, what they want out of their relationship with God, and even how they’d feel if their pastors proved to be hypocrites.” 

I would have loved to know how they feel, and perhaps we will in a second season. I say this as someone who grew up in the church and watched as leaders skated around hard discussions and concrete action when a youth pastor was found to be involved an “emotional affair” with a 15-year-old member of the congregation, but were quick to excommunicate a congregant who came out as gay. 

Conspicuously absent from both the Falwell fallout and “The Righteous Gemstones” is an examination of the ways in which their “flocks” will be impacted by not just the indiscretions of their leaders, but by the hypocrisy. I’m not talking about shame or embarrassment. I’m talking about the inevitable deep questioning of values and self that accompanies the realization that perhaps your entire worldview has been shaped leaders engaged in willful deceit. 

Over the last 48 hours, there was a lot of back-and-forth uncertainty about Falwell’s future at Liberty. According to a report from CNN, Falwell agreed to resign and then quickly rescinded his resignation, only to resign again. If this was “The Righteous Gemstones,” this quick turn would likely signal a last-minute plot twist. Perhaps the Atlanta tape was destroyed or Walton Goggins had another trick up his sleeve. But in the case of Falwell, it likely speaks to a latent grasp at maintaining power. After all, pride goeth before a fall. 

Far-right Trump supporters in Ohio want to impeach GOP Gov. Mike DeWine over COVID-19 restrictions

Ohio Gov. Mike DeWine is among the Republican governors who has been applauded by medical experts for his response to the coronavirus pandemic and implementing social distancing measures in his state. But some Republicans in Ohio’s state legislature believe that DeWine committed an unforgivable sin by trying to slow down the spread of COVID-19 in his state and are calling for his impeachment.

Leading the anti-DeWine effort in the Ohio House of Representatives is Rep. John Becker, who has drawn up ten articles of impeachment against DeWine and created a website called “Impeach Mike DeWine” — which offers updates on efforts to impeach the conservative Republican governor. The articles, announced on August 24, slam DeWine for, among other things, issuing a stay-at-home order earlier this year and encouraging Ohio residents to wear protective face masks.

In one of his articles of impeachment, Becker even makes the claim that face masks promote the spread of COVID-19; that article states, “WHEREAS, Healthcare professionals have stated that, for the general population, wearing face coverings, people are more likely to infect themselves with COVID-19 because they will touch their face more often to adjust the covering, and that face coverings retain moisture, bacteria, and other viruses, in addition to re-breathing carbon dioxide, making them potentially dangerous for the general public to wear.”

That article also reads, “WHEREAS, Richard Michael DeWine’s face covering mandate promotes fear, turns neighbors against neighbors, and contracts the economy by making people fearful to leave their homes, to the detriment of every Ohioan.”

The Republican co-sponsors for Becker’s ten articles of impeachment, according to the Impeach Mike DeWine website, include Rep. Candice Keller, Rep. Paul Zeltwanger and Rep. A. Nino Vitale. The website lists all of the Ohio representatives who have co-sponsored the articles, and as of August 25, the vast majority of Ohio House of Representatives members had not signed on as co-sponsors.

Ohio House Speaker Bob Cupp, a Republican, has come out against impeaching DeWine. Cupp, in an official statement, declared, “Having now had time to read and consider the draft resolution to impeach the governor announced by a couple of members, it is clear to me that it is an imprudent attempt to escalate important policy disagreements with the governor into a state constitutional crisis. Even serious policy disagreements do not rise to the level of impeachment under our constitution.”

Ohio-based journalist John Conway, in an article for the conservative website The Bulwark, is vehemently critical of Becker and the Ohio House Republicans who have embraced his Impeach Mike DeWine effort — which, Conway stresses, is “likely to go nowhere.” But Conway also notes that Becker’s campaign “raises a sadly common question: how did Ohio get here, and what does this mean for the future of the Republican Party?”

“Any rational person operating outside of pure nihilistic self-interest can see that Gov. DeWine’s actions do not warrant impeachment, but rather, praise,” Conway writes. “But to be fair, these state Republicans learned it from higher-ups in their party. Many GOP elites, including Governors Ron DeSantis of Florida and Brian Kemp of Georgia, have continued to downplay the seriousness of COVID-19 to appeal to their constituencies. And beyond just the current pandemic, the last four years have shown that the GOP establishment — with rare exceptions like Mitt Romney — will let Donald Trump get away with anything and everything out of fear of electoral consequence.”

Conway laments that even if former Vice President Joe Biden, the 2020 Democratic presidential nominee, does defeat Trump in November, the GOP will still be plagued with anti-science extremists like Becker.

“A Biden victory does not automatically remedy the problems of governance that the coronavirus has exposed or the problems of political judgment that this cynical Ohio impeachment ploy exposes,” Conway writes. “Even after removing Trump from the equation, there will still be state representatives like John Becker who either have no understanding of science or are willing to ignore it for political gain…. The GOP has been exposed as rotten to its core.”

“I May Destroy You” ends with a revolutionary “ego death” because the other options would be a lie

Sometimes the only satisfaction there is to be gleaned from being horrifically wronged is to take charge of the story, name the lesson within and walk through its darkness. “I May Destroy You” completes its heroine’s journey by expressing this wisdom through multiple possibilities, all of which conclude with this singular truth.

For the entire season series creator Michaela Coel holds the viewers close as she recreates her own experience with trauma through her main character Arabella, a promising young writer on the verge of publishing her second novel when she’s drugged, sexually assaulted by a stranger, and left to piece together the memories of what happened in the wake of that violation. The finale is titled “Ego Death,” taken from the name of the chic London bar where Arabella was drugged and abducted by a man who goes on to rape her. It’s also a psychological concept explored in other literary sources, all of which are applicable to this episode and the series in general.

Over the course of “I May Destroy You” Arabella stakes out Ego Death from a place across the street, hoping that a glimpse of something or someone familiar would jog her memory. It’s a solid plan for solving a mystery; for whatever reason the perpetrator can’t help but return to the scene of his crime . . . which he does, at long last.

Arabella’s eyes fly wide open in shock when she sees him, realizing the moment she’s been waiting for is at hand.

Now what? Revenge? Compassion? Prosecution? Coel, through Arabella, chooses all and none, allowing for a new type of brilliance to light the way ahead.

“Ego Death” is the culmination of Arabella’s winding journey through the part of her story she never chose and as a result cannot easily write. Extreme imbalance colors the plot threads unspooling after Arabella’s assault, with her moods becoming more erratic as fragments of memory return.

A crucial step to understanding what transpires in the finale lurks in the penultimate episode of the season, where Arabella obtains guidance from a writing peer whom she initially believes to be the mirror image of herself. In meeting her previously unknown idol she realizes everything she presumes about the person is an illusion; I won’t spoil the surprise of that twist. Suffice it to say it serves a purpose beyond simply jolting us with surprise. It brokers a bridge, allowing Arabella to obtain what she truly needs: a framework to write a new plot.

Together they jot down notes on cards and tape them to the walls of her bedroom, building her story into something solid, a favor that memory hasn’t granted her. Her ally points out the novel Arabella intended to write was supposed to revolve around the theme of consent, like the series itself.

Neither was ever about that, as it turns out. The real moral of the story lurks in the season’s opening installment and is named in the finale. In this ambiguous ending, “I May Destroy You” becomes the story of an individual’s disintegration and rebirth.

With her thoughts organized into a structure, all that’s left is the ending – and the engine for that is right in front of her and her best friend Terry (Weruche Opia), who happens to be at her side. And, she tells Terry, she has a plan. Arabella calls their old high school friend Theo (Harriet Webb), changes into shiny, avant-garde black vinyl dress she happens to have with her and dons a white pixie wig. From there she saunters up to the man who raped her as he casually stands by the bar, and dangles herself as bait.

True to her expectations, he attempts to repeat the crime. Only now Theo is watching, Arabella knows better than to down her drink, and Terry is there as a backup, distracting the man’s accomplice.

Arabella pretends to become woozy again, and the rapist steers her into the bathroom and takes her panties. But the women are ready. Theo has pickpocketed the drug, prepared it in a liquid and placed it into a syringe. On Arabella’s signal, Theo injects the man with his own malevolent medicine. They keep him long enough for the drug to take effect, then follow him as he runs out of the bar until he collapses in the street, realizing they have to reclaim her underwear . . . which is now evidence. 

Arabella then violates him before beating him to a pulp. Afraid to leave him in public, she takes him back to her apartment and tucks his bloodied and possibly dead body under her bed with the rest of her old secrets.

Or . . .

Arabella and Terry head in Ego Death, only now they’re following Terry’s plan. Terry gets her friend massively high on stimulants to counter the date rape drug, and Arabella again puts herself in the sights of the rapist – only this time, she’s not wearing a wig or any disguise. She’s just a heightened version of herself . . . and she drinks the drink.

As the man pulls Arabella into the bathroom, Terry calls the cops, with the idea of having the officers catch him in the midst of the crime, making his guilt irrefutable. By the time they get there, though, both Arabella and her rapist are gone. She has jumped to her feet as he’s unzipping her pants, surprising him – but also terrifying him. He threatens her, but when she refuses to show fear, he collapses and even reveals that his real name is David. She takes him back to her place.

While they sit on her bed – which, again, baffles David –  Arabella listens as he unburdens himself, confessing to all manner of sexual assaults and quivering as he talks about being twisted by abuse and begs her not to leave him alone. The cops arrive anyway, and before they can take him away, Arabella embraces him.

Next we’re presented with a fantasy of consent and control, where Arabella shapes the terms of the encounter. She walks up to David, whispers something in his ear that’s never revealed, and after furiously making out in the bar’s bathroom stall, they head back to her place. Next comes a carefully constructed and splendid love scene, crafted to highlight the pleasure Arabella and David take in each other’s bodies, climaxing with her on top, penetrating him.

He’s still there when she awakens the next day, smiling lovingly at her and informing her that he’ll only go if she wants him to. Go, she tells him. At this he calmly rises out of bed and walks out of her bedroom door, entirely nude . . . followed by the version of him that crawls out from under her bed, still beaten and bloody, and follows his romanticized, vulnerable incarnation out of Arabella’s life.

Coel has fielded multiple interviews about “I May Destroy You” and the part it has played in taking her work to the next level. “Chewing Gum,” her Netflix debut as a series creator, announces her as a talent to keep in an eye on; this marks her as a creative force to the reckoned with.

The unfortunate connective tissue between “Chewing Gum” and “I May Destroy You” is a trauma she sustained while she was creating the second season of that comedy: in the midst of a marathon all-nighter, she took a break to meet a friend for a drink, was drugged, passed out, and sexually assaulted by two men.

The scenes of Arabella’s assault mimic this incident, but the experience of all that happens afterward is the well from which “I May Destroy You” draws its essentiality. But it all comes down to what that bar represents.

“Ego death” is a term also present in Joseph Campbell’s description of the hero’s journey. It describes the warp and fracture of the previous sense of self and the eventual acceptance that the only way forward is through, that the persona that was must fade away to make room for a stronger, wiser self.

For most of the season Arabella’s obsession with bringing her rapist to justice lurks behind her messy struggle to figure out her own self-concept. She lashes out at her friends, even her close mate Kwame (Paapa Essiedu), who is a rape survivor himself. 

Arabella rages against the writer’s block preventing her from completing a draft of her new book and getting it to her publisher on time. What sheen she once enjoyed as a promising writer vanishes with her contract. She becomes addicted to social media, where her extreme openness wins her empty adulation and anonymous abuse. She does what she can to press her case forward with the police until they hit a wall and cease pursuing suspects.

She comes apart at the seams in ways large and small until, at long last, she glimpses the man whose flaring nostrils and angry face have been dancing in and out of her memory.  But in the end, when she has her shot at revenge, she chooses a spiritual resolution, sitting her serene flat mate Ben (Stephen Wright) and watching his plants grow.

Time passes, Ben’s deck garden blossoms into fruit, and Arabella, after so much tribulation, self-publishes her very different and triumphant next book.

The final act of “I May Destroy You” defies the common conventions of catering to the audience’s presumed need for concrete closure. Viewers adore open-and-shut stories where the protagonist somehow obtains justice. When the law can’t help the wronged party, they might take matters into their own hands to obtain the satisfaction they’ve been stalking.

Life is not like that. The depressing statistics pointing to low conviction rates for sexual assault, and the dead end in Arabella’s case, tell us that a clean ending would be a lie. Coel’s refreshingly unreal path in the finale takes on a new kind of power when viewed in that light, and it fits with her and director/co-director Sam Miller’s presentation of Arabella’s life as a montage of fantastic visual allusions. In one example earlier in the season, an expedition out for a night of painting and wine with Kwame and Terry, friends who patiently abide her fits of anger, shows them dressed as angels with her as a winged demon in black vinyl.

A disastrous return to Italy, where her lover shuts her out of his place (understandably) and leaves her to sleep outside, leads her to wander into the ocean, unmoored, and disappear under the water – not drowned, baptized. Music choices woven throughout the series (some selected by Coel, others placed by music supervisors Ciara Elwis and Matt Biffa) add their own subliminal messaging, with a few artists appearing time and again. One whose music Coel calls upon in key turns is Janelle Monae, particularly selections from “The ArchAndroid,” Monae’s concept album that tells the story of a synthetic being who learns how to become more human.    

Two pieces from that work stand out in the finale, each narrating the weight of the choices before Arabella through swelling strings and Monae’s ethereal spoken musings, asking her and the audience to contemplate which offers the best path. The heroine chooses another way entirely, one that turns out to be profoundly heartbreaking, astonishing and gorgeous, and not at all where we suspected she would take us in the first place.

The “I May Destroy You” finale is far from the only instance of a storyteller choosing an unconventional ending. But it confidently meets the expectation the creator promises to the audience at the series’ outset. Most importantly I’m guessing it meets the pledge she made to herself. Resolution is a fine outcome, but revolution is even more fulfilling – and Coel, through her brave and open vision, gifts us with both.

All episodes of “I May Destroy You” are currently streaming on HBO Max.

A genetic study reveals which animals can contract coronavirus

Researchers at the University of California, Davis, figured out a clever way to deduce which animals are susceptible to the novel coronavirus — without putting any of our animal friends at risk by intentionally infecting them. 

According to the study, which was published in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America (PNAS), any animal that has the same enzyme which SARS-CoV-2 uses to infect human beings is also at risk of infection from the novel coronavirus. The enzyme in question, ACE2, is found in a number of different cells in the human body, including the epithelial cells (a type of surface cell) on the lungs, nose and mouth. In order to infect humans, the novel coronavirus binds itself to 25 amino acids of the ACE2 enzyme.

The scientists at the University of California, Davis, believe that animals which have the same 25 amino acids in those ACE2 enzymes have the highest risk of contracting the novel coronavirus. In addition, they found that animals with the ACE2 enzyme who do not have the same 25 amino acids are less likely to contract the virus; there is a direct correlation between the number of shared amino acids and a given animal’s likelihood of getting infected.

Prior to this study, scientists knew that certain animals could contract coronavirus based on real-life cases. Dogs, for instance, were already known to be susceptible, and there have been multiple cases of dogs around the world contracting it. Last month Buddy the German shepherd, the first American dog to test positive for COVID-19, died from the disease. Both house cats and big cats are known to be susceptible, too, although no cats are known to have died of coronavirus. A Malayan tiger and three African lions housed at the Bronx Zoo in New York City contracted the coronavirus, though all appear to have mostly recovered.

Yet the UC Davis researchers’ study had some surprises as to which animals were susceptible. Notably, their list includes several threatened species.

“Among the 103 species that scored very high, high, and medium for ACE2/SARS-CoV-2 S binding, 41 (40%) are classified in one of three ‘threatened’ categories (vulnerable, endangered, and critically endangered) on the International Union of Conservation of Nature (IUCN) Red List of Threatened Species, five are classified as near threatened, and two species are classified as extinct in the wild,” the authors write. “This represents only a small fraction of the threatened species potentially susceptible to SARS-CoV-2.”

Other animals that are believed to be able to contract coronavirus, based on this genetic study, include 12 cetaceans including dolphins, many different species of rodents, three types of deer, the Angolan colobus monkey, and giant anteaters.

While the researchers urge against overinterpreting their results, they note that these other animals could theoretically serve as new avenues for transmission. “These species represent an opportunity for spillover of SARS-CoV-2 from humans to other susceptible animals,” they write. Fortunately, so far, animals that have been observed to contract coronavirus do not seem to be particularly infectious. Indeed, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) emphasizes that there is no evidence that infected dogs or cats can transmit the illness to human beings.

“The virus that causes COVID-19 spreads mostly from person to person through respiratory droplets from coughing, sneezing, and talking,” the CDC explains. “Recent studies indicate that people who are infected but do not have symptoms likely also play a role in the spread of COVID-19. At this time, there is no evidence that companion animals, including pets, can spread COVID-19 to people or that they might be a source of infection in the United States.”

Salon spoke with Klaus-Peter Koepfli, a co-author of the study as well as a senior research scientist at the Smithsonian Conservation Biology Institute and a professor at George Mason University. He emphasized that, while we do know that human beings can pass the disease on to animals, scientists are unsure of the implications for pet owners.

“Your household pets are likely to be in your immediate vicinity, of course, at home and socially distanced from other household pets and other homes,” Koepfli told Salon. “But again, it’s not clear to me exactly whether, if somebody at home gets infected, whether they’re likely to pass that infection off to their pet cat, or which is among the species that’s likely to be the most at risk.”

He added, “There is a particular group of hamsters that we found to be in the high risk category — those are like the Chinese hamsters, but I don’t think these are the type of hamsters people have as pets commonly. It’s really hard to say exactly because we need more studies to actually see what the chance of infection from people in their households are, how often this can be transmitted to humans. Those types of studies are very hard to do in a systematic fashion.”

New “OK Boomer” book tries to heal generational rift between Millennials and Boomers

Last fall, the meme “ok Boomer” hit the internet like a bomb, due in no small part to a provocative New York Times article about the meme that was guaranteed to play on the notoriously fragile egos of the Me Generation. The dismissive turn of phrase, Taylor Lorenz wrote, is used “to reply to cringey YouTube videos, Donald Trump tweets, and basically any person over 30 who says something condescending about young people.”

The reaction was swift and whiny, thereby providing overwhelming evidence for the thesis embodied in the two-word meme, which is that Boomers take themselves way too seriously. But it wasn’t just the narcissism that frustrated younger people, but the blindness to economic and social realities that have left Boomers holding most political power and wealth in this country, while their children and grandchildren face increasingly uncertain futures. 

Journalist Jill Filipovic has decided to step into the fray with her new book “Ok Boomer, Let’s Talk: How My Generation Got Left Behind,” a sober-minded and gracious effort to explain, in painstaking detail, the way political forces converged to create a world where Boomers benefitted from American prosperity but left little in the way of wealth and opportunities for those who came after them. Filipovic isn’t here to dismiss, condescend to, or annoy Boomers, but instead have a real conversation about the world they’re leaving behind, and what it might take to fix things so the later generations aren’t left behind. 

Watch my conversation with Filipovic on “Salon Talks” to hear more about her book and how to heal this generational warfare.

This interview has been lightly edited for clarity and length.

Let’s start with the genesis of this book, which was the expression “ok Boomer,” which hit the internet like a nuclear bomb, except instead of radiation, the fallout was all whining from Boomers. What did you think about that entire controversy?

I mean, it was very silly. The book is playing on the meme to kind of go into what is now a cultural touch point. The book is not about the meme, but I do think you’re right, that Boomer response to “ok Boomer,” which I think one Boomer called the n-word of ageism, in which they all sat around and whined about, is pretty reflective of I think some of the many complaints that Millennials have about Boomer entitlement and sort of general lack of ability to take responsibility for the world they’ve left us with.

I think legitimately for a lot of Boomers it had never occurred to them that they had any kind of responsibility for, or that even that there were disparities between their generation and other generations. You write about how Boomers have hoarded a lot of wealth and opportunities for themselves, and nothing has trickled down to especially Millennials and now Generation Z. How big are the gaps really between Boomers and Millennials when it comes to education, housing, economics, that sort of thing?

The gaps are huge. Going into this book, obviously we’ve all heard that Millennials are behind. But in the process of researching and writing it, I was surprised how bad things are. Millennials are not only going to do worse than our parents, but will probably do worse than our grandparents. We’re the first generation in U.S. history that has not done better than the previous generation.

One of the more shocking statistics that I found from that Stanford Center on Wealth and Inequality is that we’re not for social welfare programs, so things like food stamps, cash welfare. Millennials would be the most impoverished generation since the Great Depression, so we’re in trouble. Something like 1 in 5 Millennials lives in poverty. Our rates of home ownership are actually going down, even though more of us are now in our 30s, and the oldest Millennials are turning 40 this year. We are tremendously in debt. We’re the most educated generation in history, but we’re also carrying with us huge student loan debt. The average Millennial has about $33,000 in student loan debt, whereas Boomers, when they were the same age, had more like $2,300 in debt. You could pay for a college education by working over the summers.

It’s just a totally different world for Millennials. I think some more progressive Boomers understand that and are sort of horrified what their generation has left us. But the more conservative Boomers who have been the ones who have had a monopoly on political power really managed in their generation to climb the ladder. They had affordable education, they had affordable housing programs and then they pulled it up behind them. Millennials have really been left struggling at the bottom. Part of what’s so frustrating is that this was totally preventable.

I’ve had this conversation and it’s been really antagonistic with some people about how Millennials are falling behind and there’s a tendency to agree that that’s true, but an unwillingness to believe that Boomers did anything that caused this problem. I guess I want to drill down into that. How is this their fault?

I mean, it’s most of the fault of Boomer politicians and Boomer-elected politicians. Boomers have been dominant in American politics and American culture for decades now. They’re still the largest age group that makes up the U.S. Congress. There’s not a single Millennial in the Senate. There’s a small handful of Millennial Congress people. It’s been true that Boomers have been dominant since Boomers came of age.

When Ronald Reagan was elected, he was the first president, kind of came in on the fumes of Boomer energy. 1980 is really where you see a huge turning point on a lot of these issues. It’s where you start to see radical underinvestment in public education and where you then start to also see rapidly rising higher education costs. You see the government investing less in grants for college, and instead offering more in loans that students then have to pay back. You also see rapidly rising healthcare costs, which have just absolutely animated Millennial life. 1980 is this turning point where we start to see American healthcare costs skyrocket, and we started to see American health outcomes decline.

The opposite trajectory happens in most of our economic peer nations in Western Europe. They start controlling costs and they start getting better health outcomes. We get the worst of both worlds. Again, really kicking off in 1980 in this year where you have a Boomer leader coming into office and things unfortunately don’t get much better even under a Democratic president. First Boomer President Bill Clinton, who is the person who basically unfettered Sallie Mae and allows them to become not just a totally out of control student lender, but also their own collection agency. I think many Millennials who have student loan debt have a particular opinion of Sallie Mae now.

For that, you can blame, I mean, not just Clinton, congressional Republicans as well, but all of these seeds were planted when Millennials, when the earliest Millennials were just being born and when many of us didn’t even exist yet. There’s this impulse now I think the point to, for example, Millennial consumer choices, the sort of stereotypical of which is avocado toast. And to say, “This is why you guys can’t afford to buy a house,” without recognizing that the cost of a new home is almost twice what it was when Boomers were young adults. The cost of rent is much higher than what it was.

Young Millennial parents pay significantly more to have babies, to insure their families, in out-of-pocket health care costs than Boomers did when they were young adults. We’re more in debt. Our day-to-day costs for every aspect of adult life are more expensive. At the same time, the way working class wages have just seen the bottom fall out. Now you have to have a college degree to make something close to what a Boomer with a high school education would make in their early ’80s. We’re also making less.

Then on top of that, we are also a much more racially diverse generation. Millennials were about 56% white. Boomers, when they were our age, were more like 80% white. America’s longstanding even before America existed, history of racial discrimination really planted the seeds for now a Millennial generation that is immensely suffering because of systematic racism and things like housing that has not allowedBblack families to build the kind of wealth that white families did. That’s naturally going down to their Millennial kids and being magnified and perpetuated forward. Racism in education and where you can live and what kinds of jobs you have access to.

Then in wage discrimination, so really across the board. I know this is a very long answer. But our history of racism and then these really explicit, specific political decisions that were made in the 1980s and ’90s have set Millennials up for generational failure.

That leads us to today, Millennials, like you said, have the oldest are turning 40 and the youngest into their 20s. They’re sort of in their prime earning years, and we just got hit with the worst economic crisis, one that’s even worse than the 2008 one, one that’s as bad, it looks, as the Great Depression. How do you anticipate that exacerbating these problems, or do you?

Amanda, we are so screwed. I know you are Gen X, but Millennials are particularly screwed. We obviously got hit by the Great Recession of 2008 when older Millennials were in our initial earning years. Many of us didn’t get jobs, were fired from our first jobs, took lower rates of pay. Researchers suggest that that will probably, just that recession, will impact our lifelong earnings.

We were already starting at a deficit, and now this spectacular financial collapse hits us. The industries that it’s hit are really overrepresented, are dominantly Millennials, so things like food service. We hear a lot about Millennials working in the gig economy and that’s true. A lot of us do have gig jobs or cobbled together a series of gigs in order to make ends meet, and those jobs have been absolutely decimated.

Again, Millennials are also racially diverse and we know that people of color have been hit, not just health-wise by coronavirus, but financially have really shouldered many more of the burdens that white people have. We know that people under 40, the majority of which as adults anyway, are Millennials, have experienced much significant economic disruption then folks over 40 have. This is really, really hurting us. I think it’s hurting Millennial women in particular. Women’s prime earning years start a little bit earlier than men’s because women have children and then some drop out of the workforce and many then experience intense discrimination for being mothers. It really is in your late 30s that for women, your earnings start to peak. For men, it comes a little bit later, which is right where Millennial women are now, right when an economic downturn is hitting. And when a pandemic is hitting, that means that you can no longer outsource things like childcare. You have to now divide your time if you have a kid between working and taking care of a child.

Many Millennial dads are doing their part, but many, many, many aren’t. I think we’re going to see a huge hit both to Millennials as a category, and then to particular sub categories, female Millennials, and Millennials of color.

Well, and to talk about the gender issue, kind of to switch gears a little, since the Millennials were teenagers, you’ve been the subject of a bunch of hand-wringing articles and cable news segments about sex, family, marriage, all these things. You’ve been accused of being too sexual, too averse to getting married and unwilling to have families. What did you find in your research was the true story about Millennials? Are they a bunch of spoiled ne’er-do-wells that  . . .

Well, true story is we are the generation that older folks think are doing it wrong no matter what we do. Millennials were in high school when we were younger and in college, there was this whole state of hand-wringing about hookup culture, which I know you’ve written about quite a bit, and this total fear of teen sex and these crazy stories about rainbow parties and girls getting their hearts broken because they’re giving it away without being committed. There’s this whole moral panic about Millennial hookup culture.

Then the study comes out by a researcher named Jean Twenge, and it finds that Millennials are actually having less sex than previous generations, which then fuels a totally separate moral panic about Millennials not having enough sex. We’re all in our bedrooms watching porn and posting on Instagram, instead of going out and meeting people and having the sex we apparently should be having. No matter what the research finds or doesn’t find, it gives folks license to freak out about what Millennials are or are not doing in the bedroom.

I also remember when I was growing up, there was a teen pregnancy panic in the ’90s, this tremendous moral panic about babies having babies and it’s high teen pregnancy rates, and that was true. Teen pregnancy rates were high. They weren’t as high in the ’90s as they were in the ’50s, the sort of height of the nuclear family, but they were high. That is now radically decreased. The average age of a first birth for an American woman is as high as it’s ever been. Now that’s its own source of hand-wringing, that Millennials aren’t having enough babies, that we’re getting married too late, that we’re not having enough children.

I mean, my conclusion essentially is that every generation has done something different than the one before it. Every generation is a subject to this “the kids are doing it wrong” narrative. Boomers certainly were, and Millennials have just followed the path that Boomers tread. So Boomers also got married later than their parents. Boomers also had fewer children than their parents. Boomers also went to college in record numbers. Boomer women entered the workplace in record numbers.

Millennials are just magnifying those existing trends, and overwhelmingly I think those sort of lack of a safety net for Millennials, the lack of a ladder is obviously a bad thing. But I think when you look at the decisions that Millennials are making in response to some pretty terrible circumstances, I’d say we’re a generation of pretty thoughtful, responsible people.

I think that’s fair. I’m a Gen Xer, I’m on the younger side of Generation X. We definitely think the Millennials are like the goody two-shoes, good kids. I do want to ask about that because Gen X is forgotten in all of this. We’re the generation between the Millennials and Boomers and mostly we’re okay with not being part of this fight, but where do you see Xers in this whole story of these generational tensions?

It’s funny. Every time I read about the book, there’s always some Gen Xer being like, “You always forget us.”

I’m fine with that. Leave us out.

I sort of think Gen Xers are the Jan Bradys of the generation wars. Millennials, Millennials, Millennials. Obviously Gen Xers got hit by the recession as well, the 2008 recession. Gen Xers actually initially got hit a lot harder than Millennials did because they were older. They were more established.

The difference though now is that, A, Gen Xers were better off by, I would have to go back and look at the numbers, but I think they were sort of average in they’re kind of early 30s, right when the 2008 recession hit. Those Gen Xers were a lot better than early 30s Millennials are now. They did have further to fall, but then they also recovered. When you look at where Gen Xers ended up compared to where Millennials ended up, Gen Xers really did make up most of their losses from the recession. Millennials didn’t. Millennials took a hit that is still hitting even 12 years later. That’s a huge difference.

One thing I talk about in the book that I think is actually kind of under-explored in these generation debates is the impact of mass incarceration and the rise of mass incarceration. That’s one place where Gen Xers really got socked. Gen Xers who are young adults in the 1980s and 1990s, and as incarceration rates rose and hit their peak in 2009. Gen Xers that were kind of that prime age for policing and incarceration, which is 20s and 30s.

At the point where we hit our incarceration peak, the generation that had the largest number of people behind bars were Gen Xers. That obviously has huge impacts on your future ability to make a living, on where you can live, on whether we can vote.

I think how Millennials got hit is that we were kids when the incarceration boom began. We really had this kind of cradle-to-adulthood relationship with incarceration. A ton of Millennials kids’ parents had a parent who went to prison, so Millennial kids experienced that trauma. Millennial adolescents were sent to juvenile facilities in larger numbers than any other generation. A lot of us were put in jail when we were kids. Then we hit adulthood as mass incarceration was peaking. Then it started to go down, but it went up like this and it’s going down like this. The decline is a lot more modest than the scale up. I think it’s going to be Millennials and Gen Xers that are really caught up in that long tail of mass incarceration. We don’t know yet in terms of generational numbers, which generation kind of got hurt the worst by this system. But I think both Millennials and Gen Xers have a pretty strong claim to that.

I mean, the Gen Xers also were kind of the canaries in the coal mine for a lot of these questions. They didn’t pay as much for their college educations as Millennials did, but they certainly paid quite a bit. They were the first generation that did start taking out pretty substantial amounts in student loans. They also obviously got hit by the housing crisis. Gen Xers were much more likely to own their homes as young adults, but many of them lost those homes or were caught up in foreclosures. I certainly don’t want to send a message that any generation including Boomers has been universally successful or privileged, and Gen Xers, I think you’re right, we do often forget them. They experience I think in a slightly smaller scale, what a lot of Millennials are now living through.

I hate to cut it short on this, but I have to ask the question of what can be done. I mean, how do we fix this?

We fix it through politics. I think there’s often a temptation to individualize solutions in the U.S. That’s not going to cut it here. These are huge systemic generational issues. The number one thing that we need to do, and that Boomers frankly needs to do, is kind of get out of the way and start to share their reins of power. Boomers have a lot to teach us. They have a lot of knowledge and a lot of learned wisdom, especially progressive Boomers who have been more or less, have been shut out of politics much more than their conservative counterparts, but we need Millennials in office. We need Millennials running organizations and companies. We need Millennials on the pages of all of our newspapers and heading up our newsrooms. We need Millennials who are now the largest American generation and are not children anymore, are well into adulthood and starting to press toward middle age, actually being given a fair share of the power and influence in our country.

Why California’s wildfires keep getting worse

OAKLAND, Calif.— In a normal year, the intensity of the existing wildfires in California would be apocalyptic on their own. Thousands of Californians have had to evacuate their homes due to fire while simultaneously staying wary of social distancing rules to avoid suffering the added respiratory distress caused by coronavirus. But this year’s wildfires aren’t just distressing for their timing, coming amid the pandemic. They are also literally and physically much worse, in terms of area burned.

On Monday, California Governor Gavin Newsom explained at a briefing that this year’s wildfire season is 25 times worse than last year’s season in terms of acreage burned. At the moment, the LNU Lightning Complex fire, which is burning north of San Francisco, and the SCU Lightning Complex, which is burning in parts of Santa Clara, Alameda, Contra Costa, San Joaquin and Stanislaus counties, have both become two of the biggest wildfires in the state’s history. The past few years have had their share of record-breaking fires: In 2018, the state experienced its deadliest wildfire, the Camp Fire, in Butte County. In 2017, the Tubbs fire became the third deadliest fire in the state.

“They are certainly getting worse over time,” Susan Kocher, a forestry advisor at the University of California-Cooperative Extension Central Sierra, told Salon. “We burned fewer acres in wildfires in 2019 than 2018, but overall, yes, the trend is progressing to burning more and more acres at high severity over time and affecting more people through evacuations and damages to homes and communities.”

Common culprits for the worsening fire season include climate change and a lack of regular burning due to human development. While both problems factor into why wildfire season is intensifying, experts in the field tell Salon it’s more complicated.

“Certainly we see that climate change has made the landscapes more ready to burn for longer times of the year, especially in Northern California, but we also have very, very dense forests due to a century of fire exclusion in many places and this has caused an overabundance of trees that just says ‘fuel’ for the fires,” Chris Dicus, professor of wildland fire and fuels management at California Polytechnic State University and President of the Association for Fire Ecology, told Salon. “Also, sometimes overabundant trees cause all the trees in the forest to be weakened because there is only so much water and nutrients to go around.”

Notably, the two largest fires in Northern California were caused by lightning strikes.

Despite being painted as “unprecedented” in various media outlets, Dicus disagreed.

“This is not unprecedented,” Dicus said. “This actually happened in 2008, and these fires are different from the fires that we”ve seen over the last five years or so.”

Michael Mann, Distinguished Professor of Atmospheric Science at Pennsylvania State University told Salon via email that the connection between climate change and the severity of California wildfires isn’t subtle.

“It’s clear—take more persistent and widespread drought and longer summer dry seasons, combine that with record heat, and you get more expansive, more intense, faster-spreading wildfires,” Mann said.

Yana Valachovic, a Forest Advisor and County Director at University of California Cooperative Extension–Humboldt and Del Norte Counties, told Salon that 100 years of fire suppression is catching up to the state as well. Valachovic said before California was settled by white pioneers around the gold rush in the 1850s, Native Americans frequently used fire as a tool —for example, to clean out an infestation of bugs in acorns. When ranchers burned, they usually could be suppressed quickly.

“Fire can be really important for stimulating biodiversity and creating more food sources,” Valachovic said. “After years of suppressing those fires, now we get an ignition, whether human-caused or lightning- caused or power lines down, and you have an accumulation of materials that have accumulated over various time periods, but the quantity of fuel is substantially greater than it was historically.”

Valachovic added: “The general population felt like these were safety measures of protecting us, but in the action of protecting us, we haven’t been developing a similar strategy to manage accumulation of dead material over time.”

In other words, the problem is three-fold, and much more complicated than President Trump’s claim that  California has got to “get rid of the leaves.”

Kocher told Salon cleaning the debris from the forest floors could help lessen the severity of the wildfires, but that “the weather under which burns occur is also a huge determinant of the severity of the wildfire.”

“However, almost all of the ecosystems in California are fire dependent and like to burn including shrub and grassland systems, so obviously forest management will not help in those areas,” Kocher said.

So, what’s California to do? Valachovic said there are opportunities for the state legislature to strategize how to make California more resilient year-round, not when there’s just smoke in the air.

“I think we have lots of room for improvement, and there’s some opportunity for the legislature this year to try and rethink how we approach defensible space,” Valachovic said. “I think we need to really strategize our alert systems and perhaps standardize them uniformly across the state so that we get information and can move quickly and get people out; I think we need to practice evacuation, and I think we need to value our open space and value our agriculture.”

Valachovic said it’s going to take a change in mindset to not try and fight the fires, but rather be better prepared to adapt to them.

“I think it’s going to take a fundamental sea change for us to begin to pivot towards thinking about resiliency,” Valachovic said.

New York AG Letitia James: “This USPS slowdown is nothing more than a voter suppression tactic”

New York’s attorney general Letitia James has filed a federal lawsuit challenging changes at the U.S. Postal Service that could impact the November election.

President Donald Trump’s new postmaster general Louis DeJoy has been grilled by lawmakers over recent changes that have resulted in delays and weakened confidence about mail-in voting, and James announced that her office was challenging those new rules, reported CNN.

“This USPS slowdown is nothing more than a voter suppression tactic,” James said in a statement. “Yet, this time, these authoritarian actions are not only jeopardizing our democracy and fundamental right to vote, but the immediate health and financial well-being of Americans across the nation.”

Two other states have challenged USPS operational changes under DeJoy that have disrupted delivery across the country before the election, when more voters than ever are expected to cast absentee or mail-in ballots due to the coronavirus.

James has also filed lawsuits as part of her investigations into the Trump Organization and its dealings.

 

“Unhinged, crazy and incredibly loud”: Ana Navarro says Kimberly Guilfoyle RNC speech scared her dog

CNN’s Ana Navarro on Tuesday said that former Fox News personality Kimberly Guilfoyle’s speech at the Republican National Convention was so loud and angry that it scared her dog.

After watching a clip of Guilfoyle’s speech, which was widely mocked online for being delivered nonstop at high decibels, Navarro suggested that Guilfoyle needed to take things down a notch unless her goal was to frighten America’s pets.

“My dog was underneath my bed because it was — you know, it came across as somewhat unhinged, crazy and incredibly loud,” Navarro explained.

She also took Guilfoyle to task for claiming that she was a first-generation daughter of immigrants, when her mother was from Puerto Rico, which makes her 100 percent American.

“I think we all know Puerto Ricans are not immigrants to America,” she said. “Puerto Ricans are American citizens from birth. She is a natural-born U.S. citizen.”

Navarro closed her analysis of Guilfoyle’s speech by saying that she needs to drink more “decaf.”

You can watch the video below via YouTube:

Trump’s FDA chief apologizes for hyping unproven treatment on eve of Republican National Convention

Dr. Stephen Hahn, commissioner of the Food and Drug Administration (FDA), apologized Monday for overstating the benefits of convalescent plasma as a coronavirus treatment during a press conference with President Donald Trump one day earlier.

“I have been criticized for remarks I made Sunday night about the benefits of convalescent plasma. The criticism is entirely justified,” Hahn said in a thread of tweets posted in the middle of the first night of the Republican National Convention. “What I should have said better is that the data show [sic] a relative risk reduction not an absolute risk reduction.”

At the Sunday press conference, Trump declared the FDA’s “historic” emergency use authorization (EUA) for convalescent plasma to be a treatment “breakthrough.” The president also claimed that plasma “had an incredible rate of success” for treating COVID-19 patients, despite the fact that his own scientists and the FDA itself had expressed more reserved assessments.

The timing of the emergency announcement — one day before the Republican National Convention, and days after Trump alluded multiple times to “deep state” conspiracy theories of intentional election sabotage by the FDA — raised questions about the approval process. It also put Hahn in the crosshairs of critics who saw him as appeasing Trump politically.

Hahn explained his walk-back in an interview with Politico, saying that “I thought it was really important for the American people and the agency, the FDA, to correct that record” about the decision to authorize the use of plasma.

“I 100% stand behind” the agency’s scientists, Hahn said. “As we get more data, if we have to change the EUA, we will change it,” he added. 

The FDA’s original announcement read in part: “Based on scientific evidence available, the FDA concluded, as outlined in its decision memorandum, this product may be effective in treating COVID-19 and that the known and potential benefits of the product outweigh the known and potential risks of the product.”

However, the “scientific evidence” section of the announcement clarified that the safety and efficacy of plasma had not been definitively demonstrated, and the treatment “does not yet represent a new standard of care.”

The EUA is not intended to replace randomized clinical trials and facilitating the enrollment of patients into any of the ongoing randomized clinical trials is critically important for the definitive demonstration of safety and efficacy of COVID-19 convalescent plasma. The FDA continues to recommend that the designs of ongoing randomized clinical trials of COVID-19 convalescent plasma and other therapeutic agents remain unaltered, as COVID-19 convalescent plasma does not yet represent a new standard of care based on the current available evidence.

The timeline raised questions of political interference or pressure. Days before the press conference, the president suggested, without offering evidence, that FDA officials might have been slow-rolling the emergency approval until after the election.

“I hear great things about it . . . That’s all I can tell you,” Trump told reporters during a White House press briefing Wednesday, referring to the plasma treatment. “It could be a political decision, because you have a lot of people over there who don’t want to rush things. Because they want to do it after Nov. 3, and you’ve heard that one before.”

Trump later thanked Hahn at the conference, saying: “The FDA really stepped up, and especially over the last few days in getting this done.”

The FDA placed a hold on emergency use status last week after health officials, including the nation’s top infectious disease specialist Dr. Anthony Fauci and Director of the National Institutes of Health Dr. Francis Collins, expressed concern about supporting data, The New York Times reported.

Amid a nationwide surge in infections and deaths, Trump began speaking and tweeting frequently about therapeutic treatments in mid- to late-July.

On Aug. 2, three weeks before the FDA authorization, White House chief of staff Mark Meadows told John Dickerson on CBS News’ “Face the Nation” that he expected an announcement about plasma soon:

What are we doing with therapeutics? We’ve got to give hope to the American people. Hopefully, we will — we will be able to not only have a vaccine, but have therapeutics for those who get this where, where it’s not a death sentence. And we’re making great progress. So we’ve already seen that with convalescent plasma. Hopefully, some good announcement in the coming days there.

During the intervening three weeks, Salon called and emailed the FDA several times with questions about a possible plasma announcement, beginning on the day after Meadows’ announcement. The agency would either not respond to questions or say it had “no information to share.”

Hours before announcing the Saturday press conference, Trump blamed the FDA “deep state” in a tweet for a politically-motivated delay to test therapeutics, which tagged Hahn.

“The deep state or whoever, over at the FDA is making it very difficult for drug companies to get people in order to test the vaccines and therapeutics. Obviously, they are hoping to delay the answer until after November 3rd. Must focus on speed, and saving lives! @SteveFDA,” Trump wrote at the time. 

Following that tweet, Salon asked the agency whether it was “part of an effort to encourage FDA to approve immune plasma therapeutic treatment.” The FDA did not respond.

A follow-up the next morning similarly received no reply. An email sent a few minutes after the Sunday press conference — asking “How many times did the White House contact the FDA about immune plasma over the last four weeks?” — received a link to the agency’s press announcement.

Speaking at that press conference, Trump claimed that blood plasma treatment had cut COVID-19 mortality by 35%. However, the truth is more narrow.

The FDA cited a Mayo Clinic study in its authorization announcement. That study found a 35% increase in the likelihood to survive another 30 days in patients younger than age 80, who were not on a respirator and who received plasma with high levels of antibodies within three days of diagnosis, as compared to patients who received plasma which had lower levels of antibodies. The study did not include a placebo group.

Immune plasma, or convalescent plasma, is a treatment which dates back at least a century and was used on patients in the 1918 flu pandemic. The therapy uses blood from recovered patients who have developed antibodies. In this use, plasma from their blood is given to COVID-19 patients in hopes of mitigating the effects of the disease.

Though scientists and medical experts are in agreement that the emergency authorization would likely make it easier for certain hospitals and clinics to access plasma, a promising treatment strategy which uses antibodies of recovered patients, many expressed alarm Sunday over Trump’s rhetoric.

“I watched this in horror,” Eric Topol, a physician and the director of the Scripps Research Translational Institute, told The Washington Post. “These are basically just exploratory analyses that don’t prove anything. It’s just extraordinary to declare this as a breakthrough . . . All this does is jeopardize ever getting the truth.”

Carlos del Rio, the executive associate dean of the Emory School of Medicine, pointed to Trump’s record with hydroxychloroquine.

“The problem is, the President, in my mind, has lost total credibility because of what he’s done with hydroxychloroquine. He’s touted so many things that don’t work,” del Rio said. “The reality is what we have today to treat COVID is extremely limited.”

Dr. Scott Gottlieb, a former adviser to then-candidate Donald Trump’s 2016 campaign, who also served as FDA Commissioner under Trump from March 2017 until Hahn took over in April 2019, told CNBC on Monday that the treatment might be “weakly beneficial.”

“I think that this could be beneficial. It might be weakly beneficial. It doesn’t look like a home run, but right now we’re looking for singles and doubles,” Gottlieb said. “There aren’t really going to be any home runs on the horizon until we can get the other therapeutic antibodies on the market and hopefully eventually vaccines and better therapeutics.”

The FDA began allowing doctors to use plasma to treat COVID-19 patients on a case-by-case basis in late March. Clinical trials “remain ongoing,” according to the press release Sunday.

In June, the FDA revoked its coronavirus emergency use authorization for anti-malarial drug hydroxychloroquine — an unproven COVID-19 treatment pushed relentlessly by the president, who at one point claimed to be taking it daily — citing increased likelihood of “serious cardiac adverse events and other serious side effects.”

According to data compiled by Johns Hopkins University, the U.S. has reported about 5.7 million cases of COVID-19, with at least 176,809 deaths.

Were Don Jr. and Kimberly “coked up”? Maybe not, but it’s all part of the fascist tradition

During the first night of the Republican National Convention, the word “cocaine” started to trend on Twitter, and not because there was any breaking news about the infamous party drug. No, it’s because many of the speakers at the convention brought a hyperactive bombast to the proceedings that was highly reminiscent of the effects of cocaine and other illegal stimulants. Watching some of the speeches, in fact, felt quite a bit like sitting through that scene in “Boogie Nights” where a menacing half-naked cocaine dealer brandishes a gun while pacing and ranting to 1980s hits like “Sister Christian” and “Jessie’s Girl.” The only thing missing was a dude in the corner setting off fireworks randomly to keep people even more on edge. 

In particular, Donald Trump Jr., the president’s eldest son, along with his girlfriend, former Fox News host and current Trump campaign factotum Kimberly Guilfoyle, delivered speeches that caused widespread speculation on social media about the use of chemical assistance. 

“Don’t let the Democrats take you for granted. Don’t let them step on you. Don’t let them destroy your families, your lives and your future. Don’t let them kill future generations because they told you and brainwashed you and fed you lies that you weren’t good enough,” Guilfoyle ranted in a speech so hyperventilating and ridiculous that Mother Jones paired it with North Korean propaganda music. 

On Tuesday, MSNBC’s “Morning Joe” played a video that intercut Guilfoyle’s speech with the famous episode of “The Office” in which Dwight Schrute unwittingly channels Benito Mussolini during a sales convention speech. 

Trump Jr. brought another variation on the cocaine aesthetic, with his hurried speech, bloodshot eyes and skin shining with sweat as he gravely declared that “the radical left” wants “to bully us into submission.”

There was even a hat-tip to the unhinged gun-waving with the presence of Mark and Patricia McCloskey, a St. Louis couple who became right-wing heroes after being photographed swinging their guns like “Scarface” characters at a bunch of Black Lives Matters protesters who passed by their home earlier this summer. A video of their bizarre meltdown was played at the RNC before a subdued but morbid living-room-style chat in which Patricia warned that “your family will not be safe in the radical Democrats’ America.”

This entire display left progressives, mainstream journalists and anyone who isn’t already in the Trump tribe befuddled. It was grotesque and overwhelming, and only served to unnerve viewers. Even the presence of speakers who took a more measured tone, like former U.N. ambassador Nikki Haley and Sen. Tim Scott of South Carolina, didn’t help matters. If anything, the rapid and dramatic tonal shifts only served to discombobulate viewers more. It was an emotional roller coaster that was, yes, reminiscent of the wild mood swings of someone who’s cranked up on hardcore stimulants. 

As gross as it all was, it would be a mistake to assume that Republicans don’t know what they’re doing. On the contrary, this coked-up aesthetic has a long and unsavory history in the annals of fascism, authoritarianism and other forms of personality cult.

Hitting audiences with a firehose of emotions is about deliberately unmooring them, spinning them so hard emotionally that they can’t tell up from down. It’s about breaking down people’s sense of self and their grip on reality, so they turn into putty at the hands of the authoritarian leader, to be rebuilt in the form that he prefers. 

The emotional overloading strategy, often openly fueled by stimulant drugs, was a famous aspect of Nazism, which was known for rallies with long and overbearing speeches and a general atmosphere designed to overwhelm participants. Fidel Castro, of course, was known for giving speeches, that often lastd hours, that would wear down listeners so they could be built back up again in his image. Cult leader Jim Jones would suck down mountains of drugs and then rant at his followers for hours through the speaker system at Jonestown, breaking them down emotionally so that resistance to his message became impossible. 

Hell, cocaine abuse and fascism are so intertwined that when David Bowie was at the height of his cocaine addiction, he convinced himself he was a fascist. 

To be clear, I’m not suggesting that anyone on Team Trump is using drugs. (And I’m not saying they’re not.) Really, that’s beside the point. The issue isn’t drugs themselves, but the aesthetics of the convention — ones that happen to be suggestive of drug abuse, but can also be induced by other forms of emotional flooding, including inflated rhetoric, loud music, paranoid fantasies, and rapid and disconcerting tonal shifts. The main thing is to keep up a sense of too-much-ness that makes it hard for people to get their bearings and start thinking more clearly. Clear thought, after all, is the biggest threat to Trumpism. 

In fact, the shouty, nutty, coked-up atmosphere of much of the televised convention on Monday night is perfectly in line with the aesthetic Donald Trump has used to dominate his audiences for years. His rallies are notorious for blasting loud music at decibel levels far beyond what is normal for campaign rallies, and they’ve only gotten louder. After enduring that for however long, the audience is then subjected to a rambling Trump speech that usually clocks in at more than an hour and veers wildly from one incoherent grievance or conspiracy theory to another. The whole process couldn’t be better designed to break down a person’s emotional defenses or remaining tendrils of rationality, and indeed, it’s wise to assume that’s exactly the purpose. 

Trump really is just building on what Fox News has been doing for years to get viewers to turn off their rational brain and swim in a sea of overstimulated emotions. The formerly “fair and balanced” network employs not just loud graphics and loud music, but also overwhelms its audience with violent and even salacious imagery. For those who aren’t conditioned to this already, it feels incredibly alienating. But it’s important to grasp that the Trump fans who this convention is geared toward have ingested a steady diet of increasingly chaotic media for years now. If it all felt coked-up, well, that was likely the intention. Because giving viewers a moment to breathe might lead them to start thinking for themselves, and that is the last thing Trump or the Republican Party want. 

RNC Day 1: Trump stokes racial division, claims he’s not racist, in night of unhinged dishonesty

The first night of the Republican National Convention featured a diverse lineup that defended President Donald Trump from charges of racism, even as other speakers sought to stoke racial fears and push conspiracy theories.

The convention, largely consisting of a mix of live and pre-taped speeches before an empty auditorium, appeared to take place in an alternate reality where Trump had successfully beaten back the coronavirus pandemic, and where the protests, violence and racial division seen during Trump’s presidency would only get worse Democratic nominee Joe Biden is elected. It was a wildly dishonest night, with the New York Times fact-checking team counting at least 30 false and misleading claims.

“This one half-night of Republican programming so far has been exponentially more dishonest than the entire four nights of the Democratic convention,” wrote CNN fact-checker Daniel Dale.

While Republicans insisted that their convention would be optimistic, and headliners like former UN ambassador Nikki Haley and Sen. Tim Scott of South Carolina delivered speeches on the promise of America that could have taken place under any other Republican president, the tone of the night was dark and the theme was racial fear-mongering.

The night kicked off with a speech by Charlie Kirk, founder of the right-wing student group Turning Point USA, who described Trump as a “bodyguard of Western civilization” — a common white nationalist dog whistle — who is defending America against a “vengeful mob that seeks to destroy our way of life, our neighborhoods, schools, churches and values.”

Rep. Jim Jordan of Ohio gave a speech riddled with falsehoods accusing Democrats of stoking “crime, violence, and mob rule.” Rep. Matt Gaetz of Florida, one of Trump’s most loyal followers in Congress, bizarrely warned that Democrats will “disarm you, empty the prisons, lock you in your home, and invite MS-13 to live next door.”

Mark and Patricia McCloskey, the St. Louis couple who threatened Black Lives Matter supporters with guns, delivered a gloomy, downbeat chat accusing “radical Democrats” of trying to destroy the suburbs.

“They are not satisfied with spreading the chaos and violence into our communities. They want to abolish the suburbs altogether by ending single-family home zoning,” Patricia McCloskey said. “This forced rezoning would bring crime, lawlessness and low-quality apartments into thriving suburban neighborhoods.

“These are the policies that are coming to a neighborhood near you,” she added. “So make no mistake: No matter where you live, your family will not be safe in the radical Democrats’ America.”

These divisive speeches were interspersed between people of color who insisted that neither Trump, the Republican Party nor the nation had a problem with racism. 

Former NFL player Herschel Walker — who once played for the New Jersey Generals, a long-gone USFL team owned by Trump — said it “hurt my soul” to hear people call Trump “racist,” noting their long friendship. Haley, speaking of her own experience as the daughter of Indian immigrants, said that “America is not a racist country” but a “work in progress.”

Scott, the night’s keynote speaker, delivered a powerful speech on the promise of America and his own experiences with racism. Scott urged viewers to “not look simply at what the candidates say” before listing a number of remarks made by Biden to suggest that he, and not Trump, would ignore minority communities. Scott repeatedly insisted that Biden wants to turn the U.S. into a “socialist utopia,” which would be news to Biden and the progressive primary challenges who repeatedly criticized him for being too conservative.

But while the headliners tried to ignore the division stoked by Trump since long before he launched his 2016 campaign, Donald Trump Jr. and his girlfriend, former Fox News personality Kimberly Guilfoyle, stole the show with stunningly dark and loud diatribes that prompted viewers to question whether cocaine was involved.

Guilfoyle, who earns $180,000 per year from the Trump campaign, shouted an amped-up speech into the empty auditorium comparing Democrats to socialists in Cuba and Venezuela. Guilfoyle, who was formerly married to California Gov. Gavin Newsom, claimed that Democrats (including her ex-husband, apparently) had turned California into a “land of discarded heroin needles in parks, riots in streets and blackouts in homes.”

“They want to control what you see and think and believe so that they can control how you live,” she warned. “They want to enslave you to the weak, dependent liberal victim ideology to the point that you will not recognize this country or yourself.”

“Biden, Harris and the rest of the socialists will fundamentally change this nation,” she continued. “They want open borders, closed schools, dangerous amnesty, and will selfishly send your jobs back to China while they get rich. They will defund, dismantle and destroy America’s law enforcement. When you are in trouble and need police, don’t count on the Democrats.”

Donald Trump Jr. gave a speech touting his father’s response to the pandemic, albeit one that was entirely detached from reality.

He claimed that the president had “acted quickly,” even though Trump spent the crucial early weeks downplaying the threat, and that the administration had delivered supplies to “hospitals that needed them most,” even though the Health and Human Services Department’s inspector general found rampant shortages of vital supplies. Six months into the pandemic, such equipment remains in short supply.

The night also featured segments in which Trump hyped hydroxychloroquine, a drug that has repeatedly been found ineffective in treating the coronavirus, and a video that touted Trump’s “rapid policy changes” in the face of the pandemic.

MSNBC broke away from the broadcast to fact-check the claims.

“To say that 170,000 souls lost in our country up to now is a success by any measure is fantasy,” Dr. Vin Gupta, a disease expert at the Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation, said during the segment. “It’s disrespectful to the families who lost loved ones, to frontline clinicians who put their lives at risk. It’s just fantasy. It’s propaganda.”

During another segment, Trump spoke with a group of Americans who had been freed from overseas prisons, including pastor Andrew Brunson, who was arrested by Turkey during President Recep Tayyip Erdogan’s purge following an unsuccessful coup attempt.

“To me, President Erdogan was very good,” Trump told the pastor, who was detained for two years.

Though all of the major news networks break away during portions of the convention for analysis and ads, Fox News host Sean Hannity warned his viewers that “the media won’t cover large parts of the RNC that we’ll be showing.”

Twitter users couldn’t help but notice that Fox News actually aired fewer segments from the convention than CNN and MSNBC. Trump’s former campaign manager, Brad Parscale, tweeted his complaints at Fox News.

“Can’t believe I have to watch the convention on @CNN,” he wrote. “Unbelievable.”

Federal prosecutors have Steve Bannon’s murky nonprofit in their sights

Near the end of a lengthy indictment detailing fraud allegations against Stephen Bannon, former Donald Trump campaign CEO and chief strategist and his associates, federal prosecutors reveal that they intend to seize the assets of a murky nonprofit organization Bannon launched in 2017 to promote “economic nationalism.”

The group is Citizens of the American Republic, a California-based nonprofit that serves as a platform for Bannon’s films and podcasts that promote Trump’s ideology. Throughout the 24-page indictment, the group appears to be referenced as “Non-Profit-1” in a scheme in which Bannon and his partners were allegedly looting a crowdsourced charity, We Build the Wall, for personal gain. The indictment never outright states that “Non-Profit-1” is Citizens of the American Republic, but it describes it as an “organization founded by [Bannon] with the stated purpose of promoting economic nationalism and American sovereignty,” which closely matches the nonprofit’s own stated aims.

The indictment alleges that “Non-Profit-1” received over $1 million through the scheme and funneled part of it to Brian Kolfage, the military veteran who raised money to build a privately funded wall to help Trump block off the southern border.

The document also sheds light on an oblique financial trail linking a loose-knit group of private businesses and nonprofit organizations politically aligned with Trump. In addition to Bannon’s nonprofit and We Build the Wall, federal investigators are moving to seize assets from four other entities, including two affiliated with Kolfage — a defunct right-wing news site called Freedom Daily that operated out of Florida and America First Medical, a medical supplies company Kolfage formed in Wyoming to sell masks in the midst of the coronavirus pandemic.

U.S. rules allowing so-called dark money groups like Bannon’s to hide the identity of their donors helps them maintain a shroud of secrecy, which is only partially pierced by a criminal indictment and the subpoena power of investigators.

“The only reason any of this is coming to light is it turns out that the money that was being collected wasn’t necessarily used for the promised purposes and instead it was used to enrich someone,” said Daniel Weiner, deputy director of the Brennan Center for Justice’s Election Reform Program. “The secrecy, at least for the people who helped design the system, is a feature not a bug.”

 

Kolfage told Reuters in 2019 that he had earned seven figures through creating and selling conservative websites like Freedom Daily.

Bannon played a critical role in helping Kolfage set up We Build the Wall Inc. after GoFundMe, the crowdfunding platform he had been using, accumulated millions in donations from supporters, the indictment charges. GoFundMe demanded that Kolfage set up a legitimate nonprofit to accept donations. The effort ultimately raised over $25 million after promising — falsely, the indictment alleges — that the donations would not benefit Kolfage.

That “removes all self-interest taint” and gives “Brian Kolfage saint hood,” stated Andrew Badolato, a longtime Bannon associate who was also indicted, in a text to Bannon that prosecutors quoted. Badolato and his lawyer did not respond to emails requesting comment.

Bannon promoted the wall effort on his podcast “War Room: Pandemic” as recently as Wednesday, when he had Kolfage on to discuss the situation at the border.

“You’ve been the leader of this, assisting President Trump in building this wall in these tough areas,” Bannon said to Kolfage.

Bannon was arrested on Thursday by federal agents in Connecticut while on board a superyacht owned by wealthy Chinese businessman Guo Wengui. Guo also allowed Bannon to use his private jet to fly around promoting Republican congressional candidates in 2018, an arrangement that experts said could run afoul of campaign finance laws banning foreign donations.

Bannon and his lawyers did not return emails from ProPublica requesting comment. He told reporters after posting bond that the indictment was a “fiasco” to “stop people who want to build the wall.” On Friday, Kolfage wrote on his Facebook page that the indictment is a “witch hunt” and the work of a “weaponized judicial system” trying to take down Trump insiders.

Kolfage did not return an email from ProPublica for comment after the indictment. On Thursday, Trump continued to distance himself from We Build the Wall, telling reporters that he thought “it was done for showboating reasons” and that he didn’t know that Bannon was linked to the group. A spokesperson for Trump told Fox News that the president did not know the other people involved with the project.

Citizens of the American Republic raised around $4.5 million in 2018, according to its tax filings, most of which came through six- and seven-figure donations from just a handful of donors, whose names are not disclosed. A single donor gave $2 million. The group’s purpose is to “educate the American people” about issues including “economic nationalism,” “social policy and respect for traditional American values” and “America First foreign policy,” among other issues, according to the filing.

The group’s first filings, for the 2017 tax year, show no donations to the nonprofit. The 2018 tax filings show transactions that occurred prior to the timeline covered in the federal indictment.

As a “social welfare” nonprofit organized under section 501(c)(4) of the Internal Revenue Code, the organization is not required to disclose its donors. The contact number listed on the group’s tax forms belongs to its accountant, Robert Watkins, who did not return a message requesting comment.

The organization made just $15,000 in grants in 2018. The filings show $250,000 in loans and payments to Bannon’s film company and $40,000 in payments to Bannon’s nephew, Sean.

Bannon is the group’s president and is described as working 80 hours a week for the group with no salary. His sister Mary E. Meredith, who is vice president, earned $20,000 for her 40 hours per week of work. Meredith did not respond to messages requesting comment. Other top officials are Dan Fleuette, a longtime Bannon associate, and lawyer Cleta Mitchell. Fleuette did not respond to a LinkedIn message requesting an interview.

Mitchell has served on the boards of several right-leaning nonprofits, including the National Rifle Association and the Committee to Unleash Prosperity, led by Trump economic adviser Stephen Moore. She declined an interview request.

The filings show more than $1.1 million flowing out of the nonprofit to various large vendors, although the nature of their work is unclear. Nearly $850,000 went toward travel, and more than $1.4 million to “conferences, conventions and meetings.” The filing says that Citizens of the American Republic funded two Bannon documentaries, about the 2016 campaign and Chinese President Xi Jinping, and paid for promoting them.

In 2018, Citizens of the American Republic paid nearly $144,000 to a company called Platinum Advertising Corporation for “websites/social media.” The address given for Platinum Advertising in the filing, 30 N. Gould St., Suite R, in Sheridan, Wyoming, is the same address as the medical supplies company Kolfage formed, America First Medical.

Wyoming has particularly lax business transparency laws, and Platinum Advertising appears to be a shell corporation. Its secretary is listed in state filings as Gerald Pitts, the founder and president of Wyoming Corporate Services, which specializes in incorporating businesses to shield assets from taxation or disclosure. A 2011 investigation by Reuters found that Pitts was listed as “a director, president or principal for at least 41 companies” registered at a single address in Wyoming.

Pitts did not respond to an email requesting comment.

A second company paid by Citizens of the American Republic, Fortress FM, received more than $191,000 in 2018 for “security, logistics, and training.” The company address listed on the 2018 filing is a post office box in Cheyenne, Wyoming, that is also used by a firm of accountants, Kercher-Jarrett LLC.

T. Gary Kercher and Wayne Jarrett, who are listed on Kercher-Jarrett LLC’s business filings, did not respond to messages requesting comment.

One of the charges Bannon is facing is that of conspiring to commit money laundering. The 2018 National Money Laundering Risk Assessment, prepared by the departments of Treasury, Justice and Homeland Security and U.S. regulatory agencies, noted the risks presented by a lax approach to shell corporations.

“The ease with which companies can be incorporated under state law, and how little information is generally required about the company’s owners or activities, raises concerns about a lack of transparency,” the report said.

Kolfage worked with Fisher Industries, a North Dakota-based construction firm, to help build the two border fences. We Build the Wall funded the construction of one stretch of border fence in New Mexico, near El Paso, Texas, and contributed 5% of funds for Fisher to build a $42 million fence along the banks of the Rio Grande south of Mission, Texas.

A ProPublica-Texas Tribune investigation found that the Rio Grande Valley project suffered from major erosion just months after it was finished. Engineers warned that could result in segments of the fence toppling into the river if not fixed. Fisher Industries’ CEO has dismissed the concerns and said that he will fix any problems.

Despite criticism of the wall-building project from the president, his administration has awarded Tommy Fisher, CEO of Fisher Industries, about $2 billion worth of federal contracts to build segments of the border wall for the government — at least two of them while a federal audit over concerns of “inappropriate influence” by the president is pending.

Fisher’s attorney told ProPublica and the Tribune that his client has not received any other money beyond the construction funding provided and has no other business with We Build the Wall.

Perla Trevizo and Kirsten Berg contributed reporting.

ProPublica is a nonprofit newsroom that investigates abuses of power. Sign up to receive our biggest stories as soon as they’re published.

This article is co-published with The Texas Tribune, a nonprofit, nonpartisan local newsroom that informs and engages with Texans. Sign up for The Brief weekly to get up to speed on their essential coverage of Texas issues.

Don’t cry for Kellyanne Conway: Like the whole corrupt Trump enterprise, she must pay

In keeping with the neck-snapping pace of the news these days, several breaking stories happened all at once Monday morning. 

Postmaster General Louis DeJoy testified before the House Oversight Committee, repeatedly declaring that he would not reverse the sabotage he imposed on the Postal Service mid-pandemic, and with a presidential election 70 days away. Donald Trump tried to disrupt the hearings by jumping into an amped-up airing of grievances during the opening proceedings of the Republican convention, splitting cable news screens into two levels of Dante’s hell. Meanwhile, a former business partner of Jerry Falwell Jr. accused the Liberty University evangelist of being a willing cuckold in a love triangle. Practically buried under everything else was word that the Trump administration will not comply with the Supreme Court’s order to resume accepting new applicants into the DACA program.

We also learned that New York’s attorney general, Letitia James, has officially launched a lawsuit against Eric Trump and the Trump Organization for an array of financial crimes including tax fraud, charges initially touched off by Michael Cohen’s 2019 congressional testimony. It’s noteworthy that James has already successfully disbanded both the Trump Foundation and Trump University, both for fraud. She’s also currently prosecuting the NRA for bilking its members out of $65 million in a span of just three years.

All this crap landed in our laps Monday morning following the announcement late Sunday that the Mouth of Sauron herself, Kellyanne Conway, would be leaving Trump’s Mordor to deal with what appears to be a serious conflict with her husband, George Conway, and their daughter.

There’s no need to elaborate upon the grisly details of the Conway family squabble because, frankly, it’s none of my business. It’s no one’s business except theirs.

That being said, the aspect of Kellyanne Conway’s life that’s entirely our business is that she has collected a government salary for three and a half years so far, while lying to the American public on a daily basis and enabling a fascist regime — a regime animated by Trump’s brittle ego and his unquenchable desire to install himself as a permanent chief executive not unlike his role model, Vladimir Putin.

Conway is almost as visible on television as Trump himself, and few members of the White House inner circle are more responsible for the hellscape we find ourselves in than she is. There’s not a blurt, not a racist policy, not an unconstitutional trespass, not a crime against humanity that Conway hasn’t managed to rationalize through her soulless, venom-spitting gift for toxic spin-doctoring. 

And yes, Kellyanne Conway is a master at what she does — she’s an expert at turning every brain-searing nightmare from the Trump firehose of destruction into something that sounds almost innocent and commonplace. Her job is to make the deeply abnormal normal. She knows exactly how to play the whataboutism game — the dictum that “if everyone’s doing [insert wrong thing], then no one is,” perpetually justifying Trump’s most horrendous actions by round-pegging her “alternative facts” into the softened, pliable skulls of Trump’s fanboys.

Even before assuming a role at the White House, Conway was one of the architects of Trump’s 2016 campaign, alongside Steve Bannon, who was recently indicted on charges of defrauding Trump’s Red Hats out of millions. In that respect alone, she’s a charter member of a small rogue’s gallery of Trumpers who facilitated the ascendancy of American idiocracy: a nation on the verge of collapse, with hundreds of thousands dead, overseas dictators on speed-dial and a recession so calamitous that it has shattered all previous records.

But then something weird happened.

After the announcement of her resignation, there were more than a few influencers and random voices alike on social media who made it a point to express sympathy for Conway. While I respect the idea of discouraging a pile-on when it comes to her family situation, neither she nor any other wayward Trump lieutenants deserve our sympathy. Not now, not ever. The only Trumpers who might get a pass on this front are the ones who did the right thing by blowing the whistle on their former boss, and even they ought to be prosecuted for any crimes uncovered, not unlike the aforementioned Michael Cohen.

In a new feature about Donald Trump Jr. in the New York Times Magazine, reporter Jason Zengerle reports: “An electoral defeat in November, Trump Jr. fears, could result in federal prosecutions of Trump, his family and his political allies.”

Junior’s fears are well-placed. 

The conspirators responsible for aiding in both the known and as yet unknown Trump crimes must be held accountable for their part in this brain-melting tangent in our political space-time continuum. 

If Trump is defeated in November, there has to be what former U.S. attorney Glenn Kirschner dubbed a Trump Crimes Commission: a bipartisan panel tasked with investigating the high crimes we know about while uncovering what we don’t, then referring it all to the post-Bill Barr Department of Justice, the IRS and beyond. Everyone from the president himself down to Mike Pence, Bill Barr, Mike Pompeo, Kellyanne Conway, Mark Meadows, Ivanka Trump, Jared Kushner and the entire regime of post-apocalyptic ghouls who participated in or were aware of malfeasance and unconstitutional conduct inside the White House must be compelled, at the very least, to testify about what happened, when it happened and who was involved. The commission can work backward from the administration’s  criminal response to the pandemic to the president’s repeated attempts to cheat in the 2016 and 2020 elections, including with Ukraine, Russia and the Postal Service, and then to the theft of taxpayer funds, the myriad myriad cases of obstruction of justice and so onward.

Beyond the crimes commission, the Justice Department under a new attorney general needs to resuscitate all the probes Barr has obstructed or canceled in aid of his puppeteer in the Oval Office.

Get ready, though. Not only will the Red Hats scream bloody murder — and they’ll scream loudly — there will also be a movement among Democrats to simply move on. To cut bait. The Van Joneses of the cable news landscape — those who’ve attempted to misuse the coveted label “presidential” to describe the exact opposite — will exploit their platforms to promote letting the nation “heal” by leaving the past in the past. 

We can’t allow those voices to prevail, or we risk the rise of the next Trump, sashaying through the gigantic Trump-sized hole in our institutions and political discourse. Already, Donald Trump Jr. is on the shortlist to run in 2024 — unless, that is, Trump decides to declare himself president for life. Without adequate recompense, it’d be remarkably easy for either Trump himself or a successor to repeat this entire shitshow. If there’s one thing we’ve painfully learned over the last several years, it’s that there’s little we can do to stop the criminals once they’re in office and hold power.

We have to make it politically suicidal for new and existing Republican leaders to follow Trump through that hole in the wall. Trumpism must be put down. For that to happen, patriotic Americans have to maintain a fierce resolve to end it through the election and then through popular support for accountability, ideally through some mechanism like Kirschner’s crimes commission.

It won’t be easy. The Trumpers will be clever with their mea culpas. Conway and others will exploit social media, reality television or cable news to humanize themselves. They’ll try to pretend they had nothing to do with anything, or they’ll flip the script to frame themselves as victims. Don’t let them. There are victims in all this, for sure, but it ain’t them. The real victims are the children who’ve been ripped from their parents for the sin of escaping death, only to be incarcerated and terrorized in “the land of the free.” The real victims are the peaceful protesters who were gassed and fired upon by Trump’s stormtroopers, all for a botched photo-op. The real victims are the 177,000 Americans and counting, none of whom have received a moment of silence from their president, along with millions of others who were infected by a deadly virus thanks to Trump’s lack of responsibility, ethics, morality and personal restraint. Heather Heyer, murdered by one of Trump’s “very fine people,” is a victim. American voters are victims. Americans who get their medications, their paychecks or their ballots by mail are victims. American taxpayers of all parties and all ideologies are victims. We could do this all day. 

Kellyanne Conway, on the other hand, is a culprit. She freely chose to take a gig in which she erased all those victims from the minds of anyone paying attention to her. She was in the room where major decisions were handed down and rather than blowing the whistle on the worst of the worst, which is what a decent and patriotic American would have done, she hastily ran outside to explain to the world why the atrocity of the hour was actually great news — our lying eyes be damned.

Letitia James has the right idea. Glenn Kirschner has the right idea. Rep. Eric Swalwell, D-Calif., who has also called for a crimes commission has the right idea. But in order for post-Trump reforms and accountability to occur, the rest of us are bound by our citizenship to fearlessly and steadfastly support the women and men who will spearhead the effort. We have no choice. There are too many wrongs that need to be made right, too many lives disrupted by Conway and her co-conspirators. And remember to tell the people who would rather we ignore it all and move on, that, yes, we will move on — after we deliver satisfactory closure to one of the most terrible chapters in our national history.

Trump is sending cheap COVID tests to nursing homes — but there’s a hitch

The Trump administration’s latest effort to use COVID-19 rapid tests — touted by one senior official as a “turning point” in arresting the coronavirus’s spread within nursing homes — is running into roadblocks likely to limit how widely they’ll be used.

Federal officials are distributing point-of-care antigen tests — which are cheaper and faster than tests that must be run by a lab — to 14,000 nursing homes to increase routine screening of residents and staff. The initial distribution targets nursing homes in hot spots and those with at least three COVID-19 cases, senior Trump administration officials said in July, hailing it as a tool that could root out asymptomatic carriers who might still infect others.

But there’s a hitch: Two manufacturers that have received Food and Drug Administration authorization and whose instruments are being delivered — Becton, Dickinson and Co., known as BD, and Quidel — say their antigen tests are intended for patients with symptoms, calling into question how valuable the tests would be for broad screening purposes. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention estimates 40% of infected people may be asymptomatic.

“It’s important always to use a diagnostic in the way that it has been designed to be used,” said Elizabeth Talbot, New Hampshire’s deputy state epidemiologist. “We simply don’t know how [the tests] will perform in persons who are asymptomatic.”

Perhaps the highest-profile example of the problem occurred in Ohio this month, when Gov. Mike DeWine had no symptoms and tested positive for COVID-19 with Quidel’s antigen test. Within hours, the Republican governor’s diagnosis was reversed after he got a PCR test.

“People should not take away from my experience that testing is not reliable or doesn’t work,” DeWine said on CNN after his false-positive diagnosis. “The antigen tests are fairly new,” he said. “We’re going to be very careful in how we use it.”

The bigger problem is false-negative results, which show someone isn’t infected when they actually are. BD’s false-negative rate — how often a test incorrectly says someone isn’t infected — is about 15%; Quidel’s is 3%.

Quidel and BD say their tests are intended to be used for people within the first five days of showing symptoms. A spokesperson for BD said its test should not be used on asymptomatic individuals. Quidel through a spokesperson deferred to FDA guidelines, which allow asymptomatic testing in certain scenarios.

“For routine surveillance, this is a great tool and these are our best tools that we have available,” said Adm. Brett Giroir, assistant secretary for health at the Department of Health and Human Services, on a July call with nursing home officials, according to a recording obtained by KHN. Seema Verma, the administrator of the federal Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, on the call referred to the effort as a “turning point” in the fight against the virus.

A month after the initial announcement, the Trump administration invoked the Defense Production Act to bump its contracts with the two companies to the front of the line and expedite shipments. BD will send roughly 11,000 devices and 3.75 million tests to nursing homes; Quidel and HHS declined to answer questions about its volume.

As states and the federal government move to mandate COVID testing inside nursing homes, whose patients are deemed highly vulnerable to infection and severe complications, several industry officials have said they hoped to use the tests on asymptomatic people. But many states restrict the use of antigen tests or still require lab-based testing because of accuracy concerns.

If a person with a negative test result has to default to getting a more accurate PCR test, “then we simply have just added time and cost,” Talbot said. “That’s a problem.”

Officials said the antigen test announcement caught them by surprise, underscoring the administration’s chaotic testing strategy. Separate from the federal effort, 10 states have banded together through the Rockefeller Foundation to secure 5 million tests from the two companies in hopes of curbing the virus’s spread this fall.

After nursing homes receive an initial batch of tests — each facility gets between 150 and 900 — they would have to buy future supplies. Medicare will cover the costs of diagnostic tests but not expenses for routine surveillance.

“I just have a lot of skepticism,” said Brendan Williams, president of the New Hampshire Health Care Association, which represents nursing homes and assisted living facilities in the state. “Basically you’re giving some lousy tests for nursing homes and you’re making them pay for them. I don’t see that as a win; I see that as a risk.”

Public health experts have become increasingly vocal that frequent rapid testing is the best tool for stopping the virus — which has killed more than 174,000 Americans including tens of thousands in nursing care — rather than relying on more accurate lab-based tests that have been plagued by delays and shortages. In a call this month with the industry, Verma estimated that half of the country’s nursing homes have experienced cases.

“I don’t see an avenue where these will not help to stop transmission chains, and I don’t see another option on the table for us,” said Dr. Michael Mina, an assistant professor of epidemiology at the Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health and a proponent of rapid tests. “It is what we need to be doing right now.”

“This is better for the folks in our buildings, without a doubt,” added Jason Belden, director of emergency preparedness and physical plant services for the California Association of Health Facilities.

In theory, antigen tests can serve dual purposes — diagnosing a person with a suspected infection or screening a group of people to more quickly identify sick individuals. The tests by Quidel and BD, under their FDA authorizations, can be used on certain asymptomatic individuals, including those suspected of having COVID-19 after exposure to an infected person. The companies would need additional FDA authorization to screen any asymptomatic person regardless of whether they’re suspected of being sick, according to agency guidelines.

The CDC has suggested antigen tests could be useful in high-risk settings if performed repeatedly. It said there was limited data to guide using them to screen asymptomatic people.

Nonetheless, HHS recommends universal screening of nursing home residents at least once and regular screening of staff regardless of symptoms, said agency spokesperson Mia Heck, citing the fact that COVID-19 viral loads are similar between patients with and without symptoms. “Only one test in the U.S. is authorized for asymptomatic individuals,” she said, referring to a PCR test from LabCorp, “yet the overwhelming majority of testing is being done on asymptomatic individuals.”

“If the world were ideal we’d say, ‘Oh, we want the more accurate test.’ But the more accurate test takes forever to get the results back,” said Peter Van Runkle, executive director of the Ohio Health Care Association, which represents the state’s nursing homes.

All targeted nursing homes will receive tests by the end of September, according to federal officials, who recently announced that facilities in states with a positivity rate of at least 5% must test staff each week.

“I don’t see this as a federal strategy so much as a stopgap method to bring a little relief to nursing homes,” said Katie Smith Sloan, president of LeadingAge, which represents nonprofit nursing homes. “It’s really tragic that we are where we are right now.”

Boosted by $71 million in federal funds for Quidel and $24.3 million for BD, Quidel plans to produce 1.8 million tests weekly by September; BD will produce similar volumes by October.

“The situation is much too urgent to wait a few months so we can put bows and lipstick on the program. So we’re going to build this plane a little bit while we’re flying it,” Giroir told nursing homes in July. “Just work with us. We want to get you what you need. And then in September, October you can get what you want.”

States take different approaches in deploying antigen tests in nursing homes; in at least seven — including California, Illinois and Maryland — officials say PCR tests should still be used to confirm results or to screen patients without symptoms. In Massachusetts, nursing homes must use PCR tests to meet surveillance requirements.

In Maryland, “our goal is to screen out staff who are positive as quickly as possible, particularly asymptomatic folks,” said Dennis Schrader, chief operating officer of the health department.

Maryland nursing homes can use antigen tests for weekly staff testing if there isn’t an outbreak. But if at least one person tests positive for the coronavirus, all staff and residents must be tested with PCR tests.>

Investigative reporter Greg Palast: Trump’s plans to steal the election go well beyond the mail

Donald Trump is interfering with the U.S. Postal Service, in an apparent attempt to steal the 2020 election. He has repeatedly and publicly confessed to this scheme. For example, Trump has said that the post office must be denied additional funding because it would help facilitate mail-in voting — which he has previously said would hurt his chances of re-election chances. Trump has also said that mail-in voting is fraudulent and must be stopped. (There is virtually no evidence of such fraud.) He has also said that mail-in ballots may not be counted for “months or years” — a gesture toward his evident desire to remain president indefinitely. 

This is one of many examples when Trump has shown himself to be an authoritarian who does not respect democracy: He has threatened not to leave office if he loses the 2020 presidential election, wants to extend the number of years he can be president and has floated the idea of delaying the date of the election if he believes that will help him “win.” During his speech on Monday before the Republican National Convention, Donald Trump said again that he wants to stay in office for 12 more years. He also said that mail-in voting is one of the biggest “scams” in human history and once again suggested that the only way Joe Biden and the Democrats can defeat him is by cheating. With such wild claims Trump is, again, creating a pretext for a “Reichstag fire” event which he will try to use to nullify the 2020 Election.  

Trump is also threatening to dispatch 50,000 “poll watchers” in a Jim Crow-style campaign to prevent “fraud” by intimidating and harassing Democratic Party voters — a large proportion of them Black or brown — in major cities like Detroit and Milwaukee. Trump is never subtle in his schemes: Last week he told Fox News’ Sean Hannity that he would only send his “law enforcement” agents to “Democratic Party” areas

Donald Trump’s efforts to steal the 2020 presidential election by interfering with mail delivery is being orchestrated by Postmaster General Louis DeJoy, a major Trump donor and Republican Party booster. DeJoy is also personally and financially invested in destroying the Postal Service because of his major investments in XPO, a competing delivery company. DeJoy has also previously invested in Amazon and UPS.

DeJoy has ordered the removal of high-volume mail sorting machines, taken away mailboxes, ended overtime for postal workers and changed other rules and regulations which in some cases have caused weeks-long delays. His changes will cause a predictable delay in the delivery of mail-in ballots, which in many states will be discarded and not counted.

During his Senate hearing last Friday, DeJoy claimed that he would pause these disruptive damaging changes to the U.S. mail, and promised that mail-in ballots would be delivered on schedule

Like other Trump officials, DeJoy was at best being evasive and at worst lying in his testimony before Congress. Whistleblowers within the USPS as well as leaked memos indicate that he has no intentions of allowing the mail to proceed as normal in these weeks leading up to Election Day. There are also suggestions that DeJoy is targeting service delays to heavily Democratic areas, which would give Trump and even larger unfair advantage.

On Monday, DeJoy testified before the House Oversight Committee, where he proved incapable of answering basic questions about the Postal Service and admitted to being in contact with the Trump 2020 campaign team through intermediaries. DeJoy also claimed that the damaging and disruptive changes to mail delivery began before he was appointed as postmaster general. When challenged with a chart which clearly showed that the delays corresponded with the beginning of his tenure, DeJoy had no sensible explanation.

In all, Donald Trump and his regime’s interference with the U.S. mail represents yet another crisis for the country and its failing democracy. Greg Palast, the investigative journalist and bestselling author who is one of the country’s foremost experts on vote rigging, vote fraud and election theft, believes that the Trump regime’s interference with the mail is largely a distraction from bigger problems with democracy and voting in America.

Palast is the author of several books, including “The Best Democracy Money Can Buy” and “Billionaires & Ballot Bandits.” His new book is “How Trump Stole 2020: The Hunt for America’s Vanished Voters.”

In our most recent conversation, Palast warned that the Trump regime and Republican Party and their agents are implementing a massive nationwide campaign to challenge the legitimacy of votes cast in support of Joe Biden. This is part of a plan that may also include intimidation and perhaps even coordinated violence and acts of terrorism by pro-Trump paramilitaries and other forces against post offices, polling stations and other election facilities. The goal is to create national chaos and a state of emergency in which millions of votes are left uncounted and the presidential election, under the 12th Amendment to the Constitution, is decided by the House of Representatives. The result of that, Palast predicts, will be the re-election of Donald Trump.

You can also listen to my conversation with Greg Palast on my podcast “The Truth Report” or through the player embedded below.

As usual, this interview has been edited for length and clarity.

What is actually happening with Donald Trump, the Postal Service, and his efforts to steal the 2020 election?

No. 1, we should thank Donald Trump and his postmaster general because he has woken people up to the fact that mail-in voting can be really dangerous. It is like playing Russian roulette with your voting ballot. Twenty-two percent of all mail-in votes never get counted. And that was under Barack Obama, when they were promoting mail-in voting. What is going to happen with Trump and the Republicans?

Mail-in voting has already been a disaster in America. One in 10 people who ask for absentee ballots do not get them. One in 10 people who do get their ballots and send them back have their ballots rejected, thrown out and not counted. Mail-in voting was a big problem before Trump decided to make it worse.

There have always been problems with the post office in its handling of mail-in ballots. But the post office is not the main problem with voter suppression and vote rigging in America. In many ways, focusing on Trump and the post office is a distraction.

There are eight states which require a person to have a witness signature. Three states require notarizing either the ballot or the request for a mail-in ballot. This was difficult before, but in a pandemic is problematic to the extreme. Very little of this has to do with the post office. The biggest reason why people don’t get their ballots is that they are not registered voters. What happened? Many of those people have been purged from the voter rolls. Seventeen million people have been purged during the last few years.

The real theft of the 2020 presidential election is not the lack of mailboxes that will stop people from mailing in their ballots or getting them. It’s not the lack of sorting machines. It is a lack of commitment to counting ballots by both parties.

The real danger of mail-in voting is that you do not get your ballot because some political functionary has decided to slow-walk your ballot to you or has removed your registration or decided they’re not going to send it because, for example, you are one of the several million people on what are called the “inactive voter” list. The post office is not responsible for that interference and trickery.

Is Trump’s sabotage of the U.S. mail an intentional distraction? Some type of sophisticated strategy?

Donald Trump and his agents are not that strategic. What they are doing with the mail is just one more thing among many that they are doing to try to keep the American people from voting in November.

Yes, if you tear apart the United States Postal Service the problems with voting are going to get worse. There is no question of that. Overtime is being eliminated by Trump’s postmaster. There are going to be 120 million mail-in ballots. How will those ballots get processed if overtime is reduced? Trump’s postmaster is also eliminating the requirement that mail comes in and goes out the same day. That is a longstanding post office rule. So yes, what is happening with Trump and the post office is very destructive and dangerous and will make it harder for people to vote. But, again, it is not the worst part of how mail-in voting, and voting more generally, in this country is being undermined. The whole system of voting in America needs to be fixed.

Why is Donald Trump being so bold as to publicly admit that he is sabotaging the mail so that he can win the 2020 election?

It is quite brilliant. But again, it is not Donald Trump being brilliant, but rather the people around him who are directing these efforts to interfere in the 2020 presidential election. Trump’s advisers are creating a situation where they will challenge the vote in November. Mail-in ballots are going to be central to the scheme. About half of all ballots cast, about 60 million, are going to be challenged. If there are 120 million mail-in votes, 26 million of them will not be counted.

My big fear is that Donald Trump is establishing the grounds for making a claim that mail-in ballots are fraudulent. Moreover, they will focus on black people as part of that strategy. This is an old lie and stereotype in America — that black people somehow vote twice. Watch the film “Birth of a Nation” and you will see that racist stereotype’s origins. Trump has repeatedly said that people of color are going to be sending in multiple ballots.

If Trump and the Republicans cannot win by challenging all those votes because Biden is too far ahead, then we will see some version of what happened in Florida in 2000 with Gore and Bush.

Then Roger Stone led $600-an-hour consultants who went crazy in the Miami-Dade County voting offices and stopped the counting of the ballots that the machines could not read. The result was that Bush became president by 537 votes. If you had counted all those votes in Miami, George W. Bush would likely not have been elected president. This time the Republicans and their operatives are going to say, “That building is filled with fraudulent ballots. That post office building has a million ballots from Bolivia or what have you that should not be counted!”

I believe there is a good chance that right-wing paramilitaries such as the Boogaloo Boys, the Proud Boys or other similar people are going to burn down the post offices. They are going to attack county offices. The riot this time will not be consultants wearing suits, like in 2000, but instead men armed with assault rifles. I also believe there are going to be large-scale protests on Election Day because of the interference with the vote. I really believe that there is a good chance that this nation will be on fire on Election Day. If Donald Trump is behind in the vote there are going to be massive attacks on polling places.

People are not going to get their mail-in ballots. They are going to have to wait in line during a pandemic. I am worried that the lines will be attacked by right-wingers trying to protect Trump and keep him in office. I am very worried that places such as Miami, Detroit, Milwaukee and Washington, D.C., will be in flames. In that scenario for example, the Florida legislature says, “There are a million mail-in ballots stuck in the post office. We believe they are fraudulent. We are getting word that there are huge numbers of questionable signatures. We cannot finish counting the votes on time and therefore we cannot certify the vote on time.”

What happens then? Florida does not certify the vote. The Republican-controlled legislature in Michigan does not certify the vote. Wisconsin does the same. Neither Biden or Trump gets 270 votes in the Electoral College as a result. Now the election is resolved under the 12th Amendment, which says it goes to the House of Representatives where Nancy Pelosi will call for a single vote from each state. Trump will win. [See correction above.] In that scenario, Donald Trump will be constitutionally elected by a right-wing riot and the burning of people’s votes.

The Republican Party, Trump and the right-wing propaganda media have spent years developing and circulating the lie that there is massive “vote theft” or “fake ballots” cast by Democrats. Of course, Republicans have actually been arrested for trying to rig elections using those means. Why don’t Republican operatives simply print up their own fake ballots, mail them in, and then claim that there is massive voter fraud? Create the “crime” that you later discover.

Exactly. That is an obvious trick, where fraudulent votes are sent in by the same right-wing operatives who then claim to “discover” them. I would not put such a plot past the likes of Roger Stone. Photocopy 1,000 ballots and mail them in and then say, “Look at all these fraudulent ballots!”

Donald Trump is threatening to use his own army of 50,000 “poll watchers” against Democratic voters. Trump has said he will deploy law enforcement agents in heavily Democratic communities as a way of ensuring that there is no “voter fraud,” but will not be sending law enforcement to Republican-controlled areas. Trump and William Barr also now have a secret police force which ran amok in Portland and elsewhere, and will certainly be used against the American people on Election Day.

The 50,000 volunteers that Trump has called for are not intimidation forces. I stood in line with the Souls to the Polls for five hours. I have stood in long lines in places such as Georgia and Milwaukee. I do not believe that a single person in those lines would be intimidated by anyone, even one of Trump’s people with an AK-47. The real issue will be that Trump’s poll watchers are going to challenge every ballot. So it’s not intimidation. The issue will be that they will go in as poll watchers and challenge every ballot.

What type of America are Donald Trump, William Barr, Stephen Miller and the Republican Party as a whole trying to create? To what end is their vote-rigging, vote suppression and other means of interference in the people’s will being directed?

There is apartheid in American voting. Let’s begin with that basic premise. The votes of nonwhite people are not being fully counted. This is because of the smart people around Donald Trump who have implemented many tactics and strategies to suppress and otherwise stop Democratic voters and their ballots from even being counted. 

According to the Elections Assistance Commission, in the 2016 election 1,913,369 ballots cast in person were rejected, thrown out. In addition, 925,973 people were forced to cast provisional ballots which were not counted. In other words, roughly 1 million provisional ballots cast and rejected, 2 million in-precinct ballots cast and rejected, and then 3 million mail-in ballots which were either never received or were rejected. That comes to nearly 5.9 million ballots cast and not counted. And that was 2016. That is what elected Donald Trump. Nothing has been done to protect the American people’s votes.

Why don’t the Democrats make it clear to Donald Trump and the Republicans, “We’re going to challenge every single one of your votes”?

What I would like the Democrats to do is to challenge the Republican Party’s challenges to the votes. In Michigan, and this is very important, Republicans challenged every Hillary Clinton vote. The Democrats did not challenge a single Trump vote.

In response to your question, we should not answer the Republican Party’s attack on American democracy with another attack on democracy. Every vote should be counted. Voters’ intent should count — whether it is for Trump or whomever. If Donald Trump has 50,000 Boogaloo Boys or other right-wingers challenging votes, then the Democrats need 50,000 patriots — and they do not even have to be Democrats, just people who believe in democracy who will go in and say, “No, you cannot challenge those ballots. No, you can’t say that that signature is wrong. You have no expertise in signatures. Count that ballot!”

I believe in a true “We the people” democracy. That having been said, in terms of realpolitik why don’t the Democratic Party’s leaders tell the Republicans, “Whatever you do to stop our voters we are going to do yours 10 times worse unless you play it straight and fair.”

I really do not like the idea of mass challenges of votes. I do not want anyone playing that game. It would be sufficient for the Democrats to have people to challenge the challenges. I want Democrats to go to court and say, “Count the ballots. We need those ballots counted.” We also know that the chance a ballot will be challenged is 900 percent higher if a voter is black than if they are white.

We also need to go to the courts and demand an end to that discrimination. The Republicans also try to stop young people from voting. That should be challenged in court as well. Let me tell you, we still do have a Voting Rights Act in America. It may be weakened, it may be gasping for life, but we have it and we need to start enforcing it and demanding it. 

I want the Democratic Party to be ready to challenge this attack on democracy. Trump and the Republicans are going to continue suppressing the votes of nonwhite people, young people, and others who support the Democratic Party. That is going to happen regardless of how much the Democrats put into the U.S. Post Office. Yes, the Postal Service should be protected, but that cannot be the main focus of stopping the theft of the 2020 election by Donald Trump.

What should people do if they are stopped or otherwise interfered with by one of Trump’s enforcers at a polling place? Would it be viable for the Democrats and other people of conscience to have their own security — a 21st-century version of the Deacons for Defense and Justice — to stop such interference and intimidation?

The American people do not need a vigilante force. We do need people who are vigilant and organized. For example, young people, who as a group are less susceptible to the pandemic, could volunteer to be poll watchers. They need to be there to challenge Trump and the Republican Party’s efforts to interfere with people’s votes. They must also know the rules. For example, 64% of all African-,American males are asked for their voter ID even in states which prohibit asking for a voter ID. If you’re a Black man, you’re going to be asked for your ID, even though it’s illegal to ask you for your ID.

Some people lose their vote because they do not have the acceptable ID. We need people at the polls to say, “No, you may not ask for that ID.” We have to know those rules and then we have to have people who will stay after the polls close for the opening of the mail-in ballots.

These trained observers would be watching for things such as when votes are disqualified because the “wrong” color ink was used. Our poll watchers must say, “No, that vote must count.”

What is the best-case scenario on Election Day in November — and what is the worst?

The best-case scenario is that the vote is so overwhelming against Trump that the Republicans and other Trumpists cannot steal the election. The voters make it such a defeat for Trump the outcome cannot be changed. The worst-case scenario is that the United States is in flames and the vote is not certified in several key states and then Trump wins through the 12th Amendment. I am very worried about massive violence and not the shutdown of the election per se, but rather using the violence as an excuse to go to the 12th Amendment.

Former Melania Trump adviser has tapes of first lady disparaging Trump, Ivanka: report

A former friend and adviser to Melania Trump reportedly has audio recordings of the first lady making “disparaging remarks” about President Trump and his adult children, according to a report Monday.

Yashar Ali, a journalist with HuffPost, reported in his newsletter Monday that Stephanie Winston Wolkoff, an event planner who remained close with Melania Trump for years, will reference the remarks in a memoir detailing the collapse of her friendship with the first lady.

Ali, citing sources familiar with the book, reports that Wolkoff will allude to tapes of the first lady deriding her husband and her stepdaughter, Ivanka Trump. Though Ali says the alleged recordings refer to multiple Trump children, he mentions only Ivanka by name:

It’s unclear what exactly Wolkoff is alleging that the first lady said about the president and his adult children but two sources familiar with the contents of her book confirmed that she reveals the details in her book including harsh comments about Ivanka Trump, the president’s eldest daughter and senior advisor.

It’s also unclear if Wolkoff reveals in the book that she was taping her conversations with the first lady but I’m told by sources that the comments published in the book are based on audiotapes.

The book, titled “Melania and Me: The Rise and Fall of My Friendship with The First Lady,” will focus in large part on Wolkoff’s role in producing Trump’s inauguration, for which she says Melania Trump made her a scapegoat amid a federal investigation into the event’s financial irregularities. 

The news of the alleged tapes comes just days after Mary Trump, the president’s niece, released audio recordings of conversations with the president’s eldest sister, retired federal judge Maryanne Trump Barry. Those recordings appear to corroborate claims that Mary Trump included in her memoir published earlier this summer, “Too Much and Never Enough,” which included embarrassing anecdotes about the president and allegations of rampant dishonesty.

In Mary Trump’s recording, Barry is heard calling the president a “cruel” liar and alleging that she helped him gain entrance to Fordham University and the University of Pennsylvania, which Barry says he accomplished thanks to a man named Joe Shapiro, who allegedly took the SAT for Trump.

“All he wants to do is appeal to his base,” Barry said on the tape. “He has no principles. None. None. And his base, I mean my God, if you were a religious person, you want to help people. Not do this.”

“It’s the phoniness of it all. It’s the phoniness and this cruelty,” Barry says at one point. “Donald is cruel.”

Wolkoff’s name has floated in and out of headlines in connection to the inaugural committee, as her inside knowledge of how the committee spent money has caught the attention of investigators. She left her unpaid East Wing position in 2018, and has bristled at speculation that she was forced out for profiteering from the inauguration.

But Wolkoff herself may have triggered those investigations when she expressed concerns about the inaugural committee to Trump’s former personal attorney and “fixer” Michael Cohen, a friend of hers, who recorded their conversation. Prosecutors found that recording on a cellphone confiscated from Cohen in a separate investigation.

To prevent “disinformation cesspool,” networks urged to run Republican convention on delay

In a letter to the presidents of major news networks Monday, a coalition of progressive groups asked that the airing of the Republican National Convention be delayed by one minute in order to “help prevent the spread of dangerous disinformation in real time.”

Members of the coalition—including UltraViolet Action, ACRONYM, BlackPAC, Color of Change PAC, NARAL Pro-Choice America, and others—warn that a number of scheduled speakers at the RNC, with speeches and prime time coverage kicking off Monday night, have actively spread disinformation about the coronavirus pandemic, police violence, and abortion.

“As our nation battles the dual crises of systemic racism and the coronavirus pandemic, relying on the media for factual, life-saving information is crucial to the health of the American people and our democracy,” the letter to the presidents of CNN, MSNBC, ABC, NBCUniversal and CBS reads.

x

The letter highlights Abby Johnson, an anti-abortion activist who has advocated against wearing masks to curb the spread of Covid-19, Mark and Patricia McCloskey, the couple made famous when a photo of the pair waving guns at Black Lives Matter protesters went viral, and Sen. Joni Ernst (R-Iowa), who has compared Covid-19 deaths to deaths from influenza while pushing the theory that the coronavirus was developed in a lab in Wuhan, China, according to the letter.

The groups called out President Donald Trump for pushing a “birther” conspiracy against former President Barack Obama and, more recently, about Democratic vice presidential nominee Kamala Harris.

“The best way to combat the spread of disinformation is to stop it at its source,” the letter reads. “By putting the Republican National Convention on a one-minute time delay, your network will be able to actively correct disinformation in real time, and prevent the American people from being lied to on your airwaves. The future of our country, our people, and our democracy are at stake.”

CNN’s Brian Stelter warned that news outlets would have to deal with “asymmetric lying” by the nation’s political parties, noting CNN fact-checks of the DNC convention last week showed the Democrats spoke mostly in “generalities or offered subjective opinions” but that factual assertions made by convention speakers “have largely been accurate.”

“We have seen throughout history how false theories and misinformation have been used to justify oppression and racism if they are not countered and debunked in real time,” said Kimberly Peeler-Allen, director of Higher Heights Political Fund. “The rhetoric that is anticipated to come from the RNC will put lives in danger whether it is misinformation about Covid-19 or language that can be used to justify attacks on Black and brown people. We strongly implore all of the major networks to institute a time delay and fact checking because it can and will save lives.”

Bridget Todd, a spokesperson for UltraViolet Action, warned the GOP gathering would be a “disinformation cesspool filled with toxic misogyny, virulent racism, and flat out lies about the coronavirus pandemic.”

Todd said that while it’s not possible to keep the networks from airing the convention, “we can ask that they do their part to correct disinformation in real time and help stop its spread.”

“CNN, MSNBC, ABC, NBC, and CBS have previously cut away or run fact-checks in real-time during coronavirus briefings, and this should be no different,” Todd added. “We’ve seen what happens when disinformation is allowed to spread unchecked, and the risks are just too great.”

Trump just teed up his “October surprise” — but it is already doomed to fail

On Sunday, Donald Trump held a press conference to announce a “therapeutic breakthrough” that was anything but. Trump said that his FDA had issued an Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) for antibody-rich plasma to treat Covid-19 patients, and claimed that he had overcome resistance from members of the “deep state” embedded at the agency to deliver it. Scientists were quick to point out that while plasma therapy has shown promise in some patients, its efficacy hasn’t been established in controlled trials and added that the authorization would have limited impact anyway given that tens of thousands of patients have already received the treatment.

On its face, this seemed like Trump trying to grab some overly credulous headlines heading into the GOP convention. Last week, it was reported that White House Trade Advisor Peter Navarro “had aggressively confronted FDA officials” during a meeting to discuss Covid-19, saying, “You are all Deep State and you need to get on Trump Time.'” According to Axios, “Navarro has been venting at the FDA for weeks at what he perceives as its slowness to approve therapeutics” to combat the pandemic.

But Peter Hotez, a pediatrician and vaccine scientist at Baylor University, suggested that there might be more to it than that. “I think the reason why the White House got involved has less to do with an EUA for plasma therapy (although maybe it’s a way they can appear to be doing something substantive) and more to do with getting the public feeling comfortable with EUAs,” he wrote on Twitter. Hotez speculated that their “ulterior motive” was to “lower the bar for EUAs in general, in order to push what they really want – an EUA for a COVID19 vaccine.” 

That’s consistent with a report in The Financial Times that “the Trump administration is considering bypassing normal US regulatory standards to fast-track an experimental coronavirus vaccine from the UK for use in America ahead of the presidential election.”

That should come as no surprise. It’s been widely reported that Trump’s campaign staff are pinning their hopes on the public health crisis at least beginning to fade and some economic recovery beginning by the election. And if they can’t have that, a rosy prediction that they’ll soon begin distributing a vaccine and a promise that we could return to some sort of normal in the near future might be good enough.

But if Team Trump is planning to pressure the FDA to authorize the use of a vaccine that hasn’t been adequately tested as an “October surprise,” it won’t work, for a couple of reasons.

First, there’s Trump’s credibility problem. A Pew poll conducted in June found that only 30 percent of respondents said that Trump and his administration “get the facts right” about the pandemic “all” or “most of the time,” while 65 percent said the regime gets it right “only some of the time” or “hardly ever.” It’s worth noting that Trump’s approval rate and support in head-to-head polls against Joe Biden are significantly higher than 30 percent, so even a lot of Republicans aren’t buying what the White House is selling about Covid-19.

As of this writing, Biden leads Trump by 9 points in FiveThirtyEight’s average, and a Yahoo News poll released today found that only 3 percent of Biden supporters say there is any chance that they will change their minds “between now and the election.”

Second, nobody will be taken by surprise given how clearly Trump is projecting that he’s likely to make this move. The media’s response to Trump’s Sunday presser suggests that they’re becoming more skeptical about Covid-related information coming out of the White House than they have been about Trump’s happy pronouncements about “historic” trade deals with China or nuclear agreements with North Korea before their chimeric nature became clear. You can’t have an October surprise if everyone sees it coming.

But even if a rushed emergency approval for a new vaccine wouldn’t help Trump politically, it could have some real negative consequences. In 1976, Gerald Ford was faced with a more modest infectious disease outbreak than what we’re experiencing today in the lead-up to his election. According to Discover Magazine“while the World Health Organization adopted a cautious ‘wait and see’ policy to monitor the virus’s pattern of disease and to track the number of emerging infections, President Gerald Ford’s administration embarked on a zealous campaign to vaccinate every American with brisk efficiency.”

With President Ford’s reelection campaign looming on the horizon, the campaign increasingly appeared politically motivated. The rationale for mass vaccination seemed to stem from only the barest of biological reasoning… those who were infected with the flu only suffered from a mild illness while the vaccine… resulted in over four-hundred and fifty people developing the paralyzing Guillain-Barré syndrome. Meanwhile, outside the United States’ borders, the flu never mushroomed into the anticipated public health disaster. It was the pandemic that never was.

Not only did hundreds of people develop debilitating illness from the vaccinations, but more significantly, Gerald Ford’s “fiasco,” as The New York Times characterized it, is believed to have contributed to the rise of the anti-vaccine movement in the 1980s and 1990s. Expect to see plenty of stories on that bit of largely forgotten history if Trump announces a game-changing vaccine breakthrough in October.

Was Donald Trump, Jr. “coked out of his mind”?: Twitter reacts to opening night of RNC 2020

Donald Trump, Jr. addressed the Republican National Committee on Monday, urging Americans to trust his father with four more years in office.

But instead of focusing on the words coming out of his mouth, many Twitter users were focused on his eyes, with many wondering if he might have been on drugs.

Here’s some of what people were saying about his speech:

New York attorney general asks court to compel Eric Trump to testify in Trump Organization probe

New York Attorney General Letitia James has taken new legal action in an ongoing civil investigation into whether President Donald Trump’s private business unlawfully manipulated the value of its assets in order to secure loans or other tax and financial benefits, asking a state court to compel the deposition one of the president’s adult sons: Eric Trump.

“For months, the Trump Organization has made baseless claims in an effort to shield evidence from a lawful investigation into its financial dealings,” James said in a press release. “They have stalled, withheld documents and instructed witnesses, including Eric Trump, to refuse to answer questions under oath.”

James’ office asked a New York judge in court documents filed Friday to order Eric Trump to respond to a subpoena after he canceled an agreed-upon deposition last month.

“Eric Trump initially agreed to appear to testify on July 22, balking less than two days before he was scheduled by agreement to give testimony,” the filing said. 

James’ office said its the probe began after Trump’s former lawyer and “fixer” Michael Cohen told Congress in February 2019 that the president had inflated his worth in financial statements. The subpoenas are part of an “ongoing confidential civil investigation into potential fraud or illegality,” and investigators have not yet made a determination of whether they believe any laws were broken.

The Trump Organization’s chief legal officer, Alan Garten, told Reuters that the company had tried to cooperate with James, a Democrat, and pointed to the approaching election as motivation for the subpoenas in the 18-month-old investigation.

“The Trump Organization has done nothing wrong,” Garten said. “The NYAG’s continued harassment of the company as we approach the election (and filing of this motion on the first day of the Republican National Convention) once again confirms that this investigation is all about politics.”

James’ office said Eric Trump was “intimately involved” in at least one of the transactions under investigation, and he would have “no plausible basis” preventing testimony.

“These questions will be answered, and the truth will be uncovered, because no one is above the law,” the attorney general said. 

State prosecutors are looking into four properties, the statement said, in particular a 212-acre property called Seven Springs Estate in northern Westchester County, an affluent suburb of Manhattan. The estate received a $21.1 million tax deduction in 2015 related to the donation of a “conservation easement” following Donald Trump’s two-decade failure to build a golf course or residential housing on the property. 

Other properties being probed include 40 Wall Street in downtown Manhattan, the Trump National Golf Club in Los Angeles and the Trump International Hotel and Tower in Chicago. The latter property, which towers a quarter-mile over the Chicago River, has been “omitted” from Donald Trump’s “Statement of Financial Condition” since 2009, according to the attorney general’s office.

Trump has endeavored to block Manhattan District Attorney Cy Vance from subpoenaing eight years of his tax returns in connection with a criminal investigation at the city level. Vance’s office agreed Monday that it would not enforce a subpoena for Trump’s financial records until after a federal appeals court rules on Trump’s request for a stay. That hearing is slated for Sept. 1.

The U.S. Supreme Court ruled last month that Trump was not be immune from Vance’s investigation.