Spring Sale: Get 1 Year, Save 58%

DeSantis calls Trump “missing in action” for dodging debate

Carving out time behind the mic during the second Republican presidential primary debate at the Ronald Reagan Presidential Library in Simi Valley, California, Florida Governor Ron DeSantis called out Donald Trump for being a no-show once again. Not like he ever hinted at appearing in the first place.

Piggybacking off of a President Biden diss, in which he called him “missing in action from leadership,” DeSantis pivoted to, “And you know who else is missing in action? Donald Trump is missing in action. He should be on this stage tonight.” Not knowing that elsewhere — at Drake Enterprises, an automotive parts manufacturer and supplier in Macomb County, Michigan, to be exact — Trump was projecting his own barbs right back, referring to DeSantis and the other presidential hopefuls as nothing more than “job candidates.” 

As The Hill points out in their coverage of Wednesday’s debate, “Trump, the frontrunner of the GOP presidential field, skipped the GOP’s first presidential debate in Milwaukee in August and passed on the second event . . . He’s cited his lead in the polls as a reason for not getting on the stage with his fellow White House hopefuls.”

Knowing this in advance, DeSantis persisted, saying, “He owes it to you to defend his record where they added $7.8 trillion to the debt, that set the stage for the inflation that we have now.”

 

 

 

As COVID infections rise, nursing homes are still waiting for vaccines

DALLAS CENTER, Iowa — “Covid is not pretty in a nursing home,” said Deb Wityk, a 70-year-old retired massage therapist who lives in one called Spurgeon Manor, in rural Iowa. She twice contracted the disease and is eager to get the newly approved vaccine because she has chronic lymphocytic leukemia, which weakens her immune system.

The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention approved the latest vaccine on Sept. 12, and the new shots became available to the general public within the past week or so. But many nursing homes will not begin inoculations until well into October or even November, though infections among this vulnerable population are rising steeply, to nearly 1%, or 9.7 per 1,000 residents, as of mid-September from a low of 2.2per 1,000 residents in mid-June.

“The distribution of the new covid-19 vaccine is not going well,” said Chad Worz, CEO of the American Society of Consultant Pharmacists. “Older adults in those settings are certainly the most vulnerable and should have been prioritized.”

With the end of the formal public health emergency in May, the federal government stopped purchasing and distributing covid vaccines. That has added complications for operators of nursing homes who have encountered resistance throughout the pandemic in persuading employees and residents to get the shots.

“We’re going to have to remind people more this year that covid-19 is not benign. Maybe it’s a cold for some people, but it’s not going to be a cold for the folks I care for.”

The coronavirus decimated nursing homes during the first two years of the pandemic, killing more than 200,000 residents and staffers. Elizabeth Sobczyk, project director of Moving Needles, a CDC-funded initiative to improve adult immunization rates in long-term care facilities, said without a government agreement to purchase the shots, vaccine manufacturers will make large quantities only once CDC experts have recommended approval.

“Then they need to be FDA inspected — we want safe vaccines — then there is contracting and rollout,” Sobczyk said. “So I completely understand the frustration, but also why the availability wasn’t immediate.”

Even once the shots are available, nursing homes face continuing resistance to the vaccine among nurses and aides. Without state mandates for workers to be vaccinated, most nursing homes are relying on persuasion, and that is often proving difficult.

“People want covid-19 to be in the rearview mirror,” said Leslie Eber, medical director of Orchard Park Health Care Center in Centennial, Colorado. “We’re going to have to remind people more this year that covid-19 is not benign. Maybe it’s a cold for some people, but it’s not going to be a cold for the folks I care for.”

Sixty-two percent of nursing home residents are up to date on their vaccines, meaning they received the second booster available before this month’s new shot. That’s an improvement over the 38% rate at the start of October 2022, according to the most recent federal data as of mid-September.

But only 25% of nursing home employees are up to date, which is close to last October’s rate.

In a written statement, the Department of Health and Human Services said that it will be identifying long-term care facilities with low vaccination rates and reaching out to ensure “proven infection prevention and control measures are being implemented to protect seniors.”This year, more nurses and aides will have to obtain shots at drugstores or health centers, on their personal time rather than at work. Many homes run clinics, with their long-term care pharmacies supplying the vaccine as they did before, but face extra bureaucratic hassles in billing insurers for the vaccine for both residents and employees.

On top of that, homes are rolling out a new vaccine for a dangerous respiratory virus, RSV, which will be a third shot for many residents along with vaccines for covid and the flu.

The trio of vaccines will create more administrative complexity for nursing homes since this year they must bill Medicare to be reimbursed for the shots. The covid vaccine should be charged to Medicare Part B, which covers outpatient and physicians’ services, but the RSV vaccine must be billed to Medicare Part D, the prescription drug benefit.

“The United States has been phenomenal in screwing up vaccinations,” said David Nace, chief medical officer of UPMC Senior Communities in Pittsburgh. “This idea that some are under Part B and some are under Part D and some can be billed by a pharmacy — who in God’s name came up with this?”

While Medicare will pay for vaccines for most nursing home residents, employees may face private insurance red tape and, for a small group, potential out-of-pocket costs.

“There’s very little time, given how many nursing home workers work multiple jobs.”

Leslie Frane, an executive vice president of the Service Employees International Union, which represents more than 134,000 workers in 1,465 nursing homes, said that many homes had stopped running clinics in their facilities and told workers to go to the drugstore to get vaccinated. She said this would lead to more workers skipping their shots.

“There’s very little time, given how many nursing home workers work multiple jobs,” she said.

The CDC has arranged for 25 million to 30 million people lacking health insurance or whose insurance doesn’t cover the complete cost of the vaccine to get free covid shots at select pharmacies, health centers, and medical offices listed at vaccines.gov. Frane said that program is not well known among workers, and Worz said distribution is favoring the large pharmacy chains, slowing access in rural communities. Of the nation’s 19,400 independent pharmacies, federal officials said 627, many in rural areas, are enrolled in the program and 100 are being added.

A big obstacle, though, continues to be resistance to the vaccination among nurses and aides. Like many facility owners, Avalon Health Care Group, which owns or operates more than a dozen nursing homes in Western states, is not mandating staff be vaccinated. Sabine von Preyss-Friedman, Avalon’s chief medical officer, said she tries to address the reasons with each worker and won’t abandon the push.

“We’re not going to just say, ‘OK, everyone get vaccinated’ and then forget about it,” she said.

Avalon’s homes have used modest financial incentives, such as organizing contests between different units, with the winner getting prizes like a pizza party or a drawing for a gift certificate from a department store, and those efforts will resume this year.

Jim Wright, medical director of Our Lady of Hope Health Center and two other nursing homes in Richmond, Virginia, said that rewards and respectful persuasion were not enough to sway his homes’ employees. They tend to be in their 20s and 30s and are not worried about catching covid, which many of them have already weathered.

“They most likely will not do it to protect the residents or protect themselves,” he said. “I don’t know what the answer is.”

Sheena Bumpas, a certified nursing assistant in Duncan, Oklahoma, and vice chair of the National Association of Health Care Assistants, plans on getting this season’s shot but said some of her colleagues won’t.

“Now that the public health emergency has ended, I think people are done with it,” she said.

Edenwald Senior Living, a nursing home within a retirement community in Towson, Maryland, is requiring its workers to be vaccinated unless they can justify an exemption for medical or religious reasons.

As of Sept. 10, about three-fourths of the home’s workers were up to date with their previous covid vaccines, which is triple the national rate for nursing home employees, according to federal records.

For the first time, nursing home residents will be offered a vaccine for respiratory syncytial virus, or RSV.

Edenwald is relying on the Giant supermarket pharmacy to administer the shots in the auditorium of its independent living section. Sign-up sheets have already been distributed for clinics later this month. The home is billing workers’ insurance for the shots, but facility managers said it will pay for employers without health coverage.

“This is our seventh clinic for covid,” said Meghan Curtis, Edenwald’s director of care management. “We’ve kind of got it down pat.”

Swati Gaur, medical director of three nursing homes affiliated with Northeast Georgia Health System, said leaders may offer recalcitrant employees the option to take the Novavax vaccine. It relies on more traditional virus-blocking technology than the Moderna or Pfizer shots that use messenger RNA.

“We are basically saying, ‘Why are you not taking the vaccine? Have you thought about Novavax? It’s manufactured like the flu vaccine,'” Gaur said.

For the first time, nursing home residents will be offered a vaccine for respiratory syncytial virus, or RSV. The virus causes the hospitalizations of as many as 160,000 people 65 and older each year, killing up to 10,000. Most nursing homes are coupling the flu vaccine with either the covid vaccine or the RSV vaccine, but not attempting to give all three simultaneously.

Gaur said because of the novelty of the vaccine and the relative unfamiliarity with RSV, clinicians will need to spend more time explaining the reason for the shots.

In Dallas Center, Iowa, Spurgeon Manor, an independent nonprofit home, is partnering with the pharmacy from a nearby Hy-Vee grocery store to provide the covid shot, most likely in early October, to 85 residents of the nursing home and an adjoining assisted living center as well as employees.

Alana Marean, Spurgeon’s assistant director of nursing, said workers will be encouraged to receive the shots, but she guessed that not even half would do so. “There’s a lot of stigma out there about it,” she said.

Resident Lee Giese, 95, a retired truck driver, said he’s looking forward to the latest shot after coming down with covid last winter. He suspects his earlier vaccinations helped protect him from more serious symptoms.

He expects most residents of his facility will get the shots, but a few will refuse. “Some people have a death wish,” he said.

KFF Health News is a national newsroom that produces in-depth journalism about health issues and is one of the core operating programs at KFF—an independent source of health policy research, polling, and journalism. Learn more about KFF.

Subscribe to KFF Health News’ free Morning Briefing.

Trump wedges in mention of “sex changes for children” during speech to Michigan autoworkers

While the other GOP presidential hopefuls readied themselves for Wednesday’s debate, Donald Trump spent a portion of his evening at Drake Enterprises, an automotive parts manufacturer and supplier in Macomb County, Michigan, addressing a crowd of mostly non-union workers about the dangers of electric vehicles and — apropos of nothing — “sex changes for children.” 

Trump’s comment against the trans community was sandwiched in-between blocks of Biden bashing and comments on how windmills “don’t work,” and it stood out for its pointed randomness.

To a frothed up crowd yelling encouragements, Trump let it fly, saying, “In a Trump administration, gasoline engines will be allowed.” Which registered as reasonable. But then he followed that with, “And sex changes for children will be banned. Is that okay?”

The cheers that followed indicated that many agreed it was, although it should be noted that an AP News article posted earlier this year debunks such things as being a possibility.  

“The general recommendation is for gender affirming surgeries to be done after age 18 with limited exceptions,” Dr. Michael Irwig, director of transgender medicine at Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center in Boston, wrote in an email to the outlet. “The patient should always be of an age where they have adequate maturity including the ability to understand the potential risks and benefits of any treatment.”

No age limitation, however, has been set for understanding how windmills and electric vehicles work. 

Watch here:

I watched Travis Kelce’s 2016 reality dating show so that you don’t have to. Here’s what I learned

Like many other Swifties, I’m excited about the public spectacle that is Kansas City Chiefs tight end Travis Kelce courting Taylor Swift. Unlike anyone else on the face of the planet, I am also excited because this budding union gives me an opportunity to talk about a show that has haunted me since 2016. That show is Kelce’s reality dating competition series “Catching Kelce.” As both a football fan and dating show connoisseur, I dutifully watched all seven episodes when they aired and Kelce has occupied a section of my brain ever since. Since I’m a Swiftie first and football fan second, I thought it was important to share what I learned from rewatching the series.

Kelce’s first public attempt to find love aired on E! in October 2016 when he wasn’t quite the name he is today. In the years following “Catching Kelce,” the tight end would go on to win two Super Bowls with the Chiefs, hold the record for the most consecutive 1,000+ yards seasons for his position and be selected for eight consecutive Pro Bowls. At that time, he was just another football player, desperate enough to say yes to an E! dating show, but interesting enough to warrant one. Meanwhile, Swift had just gotten into a relationship with actor Joe Alwyn, whom she recently broke up with. She was about to disappear completely from the public eye for a year, fall madly in love and begin her “reputation” era.

At that time, he was just another football player, desperate enough to say yes to an E! dating show, but interesting enough to warrant one.

Travis was in his “Lover” era though, trying his luck with reality TV dating. E! flew out 50 women — one from each state — to line the gridiron of the Coliseum with pom poms in hand to meet their potential future boyfriend. After being given literally 60 seconds with the women, Kelce swiftly cut the pool down to just 20. It was the most brutal cut I have ever seen in any dating show and I need to know why producers didn’t go with less women from the start. (Why not 32, one for each NFL team, for example?) The random association with the 50 states also resulted in Kelce mostly referring to the women by their states instead of their names. There was a lot of “You surprised me, New Jersey,” and “I could really see something with Missouri.” He also sent women home by saying, “I’m gonna have to ask you to go back to [their state].” 

This vaguely patriotic distraction aside, “Catching Kelce” had all the staples of your standard reality dating show: a born-again virgin who at one point refers to herself as a “severe Christian,” women who are there looking for their “best friend” and a delusional girl from Connecticut. There was a surprise country performance by an artist that all the contestants swear they love but there’s no way they’ve ever heard a single one of their songs, an appearance from uncle-nephew duo LMFAO and an obligatory conversation about how taking care of your athlete husband is the most important job in the world with a woman who is lucky enough to have landed one herself. At one point, Kelce and a contestant spontaneously dive into a fountain while walking home from a date. He slept with at least one of the women, but potentially three of them. 

Despite the occasional gesture toward romance or unconvincing reference to finding the one, it was clear no one was there looking for love, especially not Kelce, who slips in and out of a blaccent, by the way. He describes two different women as the kind of people he could see himself introducing to his family and settling down with and then picks neither of those women as the winner. Pretty much immediately, any illusion of true love that shows like “The Bachelor” work so hard to maintain disappeared and we’re left with an (at the time) no-name tight end and a gaggle of women who mostly seemed like they felt “meh” towards him.

“Catching Kelce” stuck with me not only because until now I felt like it was a show I had hallucinated, but because it was a dating show where literally no one even cared about dating. While Swifties are investing in Kelce’s jersey, I’m here to save you the $12.99 it costs to watch this show on Prime. Below you can find everything a Swiftie deems worthy to know about the show.

01
The winning contestant claims that Kelce cheated on her.

Maya Benberry, or “Kentucky,” was technically the winner of “Catching Kelce.” Unlike “The Bachelor,” there was no diamond ring or even a profession of love, and unlike “Love Island,” there was no cash prize. After leaving the Los Angeles mansion where the show was filmed, Kelce and Benberry dated for a few months before ending their relationship.

 

On Tuesday, following Swift’s very public attendance of a Chiefs game that weekend, the former contestant told the Daily Mail that Kelce cheated on her. His team then told TMZ that’s not true. Anyway, I told you this show wasn’t about love. Plus, Taylor Swift is famously in support of cheating for the right reasons.

02
Kelce is not afraid to pick the villain.

Benberry was not well-liked in the house. When she was given the chance to pick two women to bring on a group date with her and Kelce, she announced that she made her selection based on who she thought wasn’t a threat, calling them “basic.” Her roommate and early ally Lexie/Georgia also moved out of their room after a disagreement. Still, Kelce didn’t seem to mind the drama surrounding Benberry and stuck with his girl. In a world that has many opinions on Taylor Swift, it’s nice to know that he’s able to stand by his own.

03
Kelce has always been a bold dresser.

On the night that Swift showed up to Kelce’s game, he wore a white denim matching set that featured abstract drawings of naked women and was somehow “1989”-themed. Kelce is known for taking fashion risks to varying degrees of success, but on “Catching Kelce,” there were a lot more misses than hits. His outfits include: a bright red suit, a plaid suit, a neon Hawaiian shirt paired with white cutoff shorts and a backwards snapback, a short-sleeved sweatshirt, a bright blue suit layered over a bright salmon-colored tribal print tank, neon yellow shoes, a shirt with a studded collar, some very long tops and . . . a cardigan. 

04
He’s close with his brother Jason.

Travis is very close to his older brother and Philadelphia Eagles center Jason Kelce, so it’s not a surprise that Jason joined Travis on his journey to find not-love on E!, offering advice and serving as a coach in a two-hand touch football match. “I think Travis is ready,” he lied to the cameras about his brother signing onto a dating show. Their mother, Donna Kelce, did not make an appearance on “Catching Kelce,” but she did keep Swift company during the Chiefs-Bears game this past weekend, and Travis is very close to her too. Today, the brothers host the “New Heights” podcast, and Jason is the subject of a documentary called “Kelce.” (It’s actually very endearing.)

05
He used words like “sweetie” a lot.
Any dating show leading man is going to develop his own thing that he overdoes, like when Clayton from “The Bachelor” kept licking his lips. For Kelce, it was saying “sweetie,” “sweetheart,” or putting “miss” in front of a contestant’s name or home state. Swift already calls herself “Miss Americana,” so maybe this will work?
06
He called himself a “goober.”
Twice.
07
The women called him “daddy.”
Multiple women did. On multiple occasions. On national television. 
08
He’s good at keeping things light.

In my rewatching of “Catching Kelce,” I was most excited to see how he handled having tough conversations or dealing with conflict. I figured these would be valuable notes to share with the Swiftie community (and Swift herself, if you’re reading this). However, neither of these things really happened. When there was an outright fight happening between two women in front of Kelce on one episode, he mostly pretended he didn’t hear it. 

09
He wasn’t too interested in “pageant girls.”

One of the first contestants Kelce sent home was a pageant queen who he felt gave too perfect and polished answers. He also quickly sent home one of the “most attractive” women because he felt like she was too used to having men chase her. Overall, he wasn’t very into women who play hard to get, which is good because Swift flew to Kansas City to spend four hours sitting with his mom, cleaning up in their private suite and cheering for Kelce when he scored a touchdown.

10
He wears a size 14 shoe.
On one of the last dates on the show, he bragged to Veronica/New Jersey on a trolley ride around Kansas City that he has size 14 feet, which is “two inches longer than a foot,” he stressed. 
11
He’s comfortable in the spotlight.

While 2016 Kelce as an NFL star on the rise wasn’t quite looking for love, he didn’t come off looking like a jerk. He was able to roll with the craziness of reality TV dating well and was happiest being the center of attention. He seemed excited when the women had passions and talked about their own careers. In Swiftie-speak, I think Kelce would let Taylor bejeweled. 

 

Trump’s push for Judge Tanya Chutkan to recuse herself has been denied

A motion filed by Donald Trump‘s legal team several weeks ago asking for Judge Tanya Chutkan to recuse herself from presiding over his election interference case has been denied.

The motion had been filed on the basis that previous comments made by Chutkan led Trump to worry as to whether she would be “fair” in the case, but the judge shot those fears down in her decision on the matter.

In Wednesday’s court filing, Chutkan said that “her comments during sentencing hearings for two defendants who took part in the Capitol riot on Jan. 6, 2021 — which Trump and his lawyers cited in his attempt to remove her from the case — do not warrant recusal,” per CBS News.   

“The statements certainly do not manifest a deep-seated prejudice that would make fair judgment impossible — the standard for recusal based on statements with intrajudicial origins,” Chutkan wrote.

In earlier reporting by Salon, the comments found worrisome by Trump’s legal team were identified as such:

During one of these hearings, which took place in October 2022, Chutkan told the defendant that the people who “mobbed” the Capitol on Jan. 6 showed “blind loyalty to one person who, by the way, remains free to this day.” In another hearing, in December 2021, Chutkan told a defendant that the “people who exhorted you and encouraged you and rallied you to go and take action and to fight have not been charged.”

As AP News points out in their coverage of the denial, “There’s a high bar for recusal, and legal experts had widely considered Trump’s request to be a long shot aimed at undermining the legitimacy of the case publicly that could only sour the relationship between the judge and the defense in court.”

In a so-called post-racial NFL, Colin Kaepernick is still seemingly shut out in new NY Jets letter

Colin Kaepernick is back — well sort of. The former 49ers quarterback-turned-overnight activist despised by Middle America and just about every racist in the county for braving and quietly exercising his First Amendment right to free speech by kneeling for racial justice during “The National Anthem” in 2016, has found his way back into the spotlight.

In a newly released letter by Kaepernick’s friend rapper J.Cole on Instagram, Kaepernick asked the struggling NY Jets if he could join the team’s training session this season. So it is possible for racist white America’s least favorable athlete to find his way back to the game after six years absent from pro football and a grievance lawsuit that alleged the NFL was colluding against him that he settled?

The letter, addressed to the team’s general manager Joe Douglas said that Kaepernick would be honored to join the team that lost their quarterback, Aaron Rodgers in a season-ending injury and has had to rely on their second QB Zach Wilson. Kaepernick said that he would “lead the practice squad” with “the sole mission of getting your defense ready each week.”

Furthermore, he stated that allowing him to be a QB option would allow him “to be of great service to the team as a practice squad QB, while also giving you a low-commitment chance to assess my capabilities to help in any other capacity you may see fit.” 

The reality check for Kaepernick is that we do not live in this post-racial utopia ready to accept him again.

He stressed his commitment to the sport, ready to jump back into football again. He pled his case: “Worst case scenario, you see what I have to offer and you’re not that impressed. Best case scenario, you realize you have a real weapon at your disposal in the event you ever need to use it.”

Following the circulation of the letter, sports critics have asked why is Kaepernick asking to be a part of a league he’s called a “plantation,” a league that he shunned when he was invited to training camp in 2019, a league that effectively blacklisted him from ever playing the sport again, and opened him up to backlash from bigots who only want Black athletes to keep their head down — be respectable — shut up and keep playing?

In 2016, Kaepernick took a knee for the first time. It was also the last year that America was able to finally stop the less-than-convincing show that it was in a liberal post-racial fantasy. Prior to the culture wars, before all the alleged white-collar crime and the threat of the crumbling of democracy, we lived in a seemingly post-racial America that exalted the election of the first Black president, Barack Obamabut it was all pretend. The retaliation only led us to an insurrection, impeachments, a plethora of indictments leading to the first-ever presidential mug shot and a deeply bitterly divided public.

We should not fear retaliation for speaking truth to power.

The reality check for Kaepernick is that we do not live in this post-racial utopia ready to accept him again. Why he thought he would receive another shot at the NFL is probably linked to blind optimism that things have changed and his desire to play the game he loves again. I hate to be this cynical but I don’t believe things have gotten better. 

We need your help to stay independent

In a more equitable, fair and just world, someone like Kaepernick could sue the NFL, call the league all the names in the book and still be accepted back because we should not fear retaliation for speaking truth to power. But we don’t live in that world, and if we’ve learned any lessons from the last few years as close as we were about having authentic conversations about systemic racism in this country during the protests, businesses took it as an opportunity to begin selling the idea of diversity and inclusion as a product. And the NFL is no different. Ultimately, it is a business looking to maximize its profits off its players and deemed Kaepernick no longer sellable when he took that knee and upset the conservative business and political interests in this country.

The league is still riddled with gaping racial disparities from the lack of Black coaches following a racial discrimination lawsuit alleging discriminatory hiring practices among team owners. Other discrimination lawsuits the league is facing are a result of using “race-norming” or racially discriminatory criteria to evaluate former players with neurocognitive impairments, and a former Black reporter alleging his NFL Network contract was not renewed because he spoke out against the league’s lack of diversity.

There’s no question that Kaepernick’s mistreatment has opened the floodgates to other athletes finally speaking up about the abuse they have faced as well. My question is why would he want to subject himself to that again when nothing on its face – not to mention what’s underneath that – has changed about the league? He deserves his fair shot at playing pro football again after all the vitriol and abuse he’s been through . . . but is it worth it?

 

AOC slams Speaker Kevin McCarthy’s “boy math” with a government shutdown looming

Rep. Alexandra Ocasio-Cortez has two strong words for Speaker of the House Kevin McCarthy: boy math. In her tweet posted on Tuesday evening, AOC insinuated that the speaker is incompetent for his inability to broker a deal between House Republicans and Senate Democrats.

As the deadline to reach a budget for the fiscal year tightens, AOC memed the speaker who is struggling to reach a deal with House conservatives who want to radically cut the country’s spending and the Senate Democrats who will not pass any budget stipulated with spending cuts. 

In her tweet, AOC refers to the gender-swapped version of the girl math meme going viral on social that implies some type of illogical thinking or ineffectual action based on real-word situations. “Boy math is needing 15 attempts to count the votes correctly to become Speaker and then shutting down the government 9 months later,” she posted.

If Congress doesn’t come to a compromise, the government will shut down on Tuesday, Oct. 3. A shutdown means that government workers will have to immediately cease working, and the government will furlough thousands of employees across the country.

The partisan plan passed in the House was considered dead upon arrival in the Senate. It included spending cuts and changes to border policy and would have pushed the shutdown deadline through the next month to give negotiators more time to hammer out a larger deal for government funding in the 2024 fiscal year.

 

“The View” mocks Trump for bombshell ruling he committed fraud: “He’s a loser!”

“The View” hosts enjoyed a good laugh discussing the shocking ruling that found former President Donald Trump liable for fraud. Tuesday’s ruling, made by Judge Arthur Engoron of the Supreme Court 1st Judicial District in New York, came in response to the lawsuit by New York Attorney General Letitia James, who is seeking $250 million in damages and a ban on Trump doing business in New York.

“Wait till Melania finds out he’s [Trump’s] worth 800 bucks!” said Joy Behar during Wednesday’s episode of the show, much to the amusement of Sara Haines, Sunny Hostin and Whoopi Goldberg. Hostin added that the ruling “is pulling the curtain entirely back” on Trump and took the opportunity to praise James.

Elsewhere in the segment, co-host Alyssa Farah Griffin poked fun at Trump overvaluing his Mar-a-Lago resort and lying about the size of his three-story Trump Tower penthouse:

“This is how crazy it is. He inflated the value of Mar-A-Lago, his club down in Florida by 2,300%,” Farah Griffin said. “That would be like me saying that my two bedroom apartment is like a multi-floor penthouse and then trying to get a line of credit off of it. It’s insanity! An average person would be in jail for doing it.”

She continued, “Here’s the thing, because I do know the man decently well, he thinks that being a loser or being poor or struggling financially, those are the absolute worst things. He never learned that playground lesson we did, that winning isn’t everything.

“I honestly think potentially seeing the Trump Tower taken off of Fifth Avenue would be more devastating to him than sitting in a prison cell because it says unequivocally he is a loser in the place he always wanted to be.”

Behar added, “He’s a loser!”

Watch a the full segment below, via YouTube:

“The end of Trump’s financial empire”: Legal experts say N.Y. fraud ruling could bring him down

Donald Trump committed massive fraud in New York for years by repeatedly misrepresenting his wealth by hundreds of millions of dollars while building his real estate empire, a state Supreme Court judge ruled on Tuesday afternoon.

This startling decision came in the civil case brought by New York Attorney General Letitia James, who has argued that Trump, along his sons Donald Jr. and Eric and the entire Trump Organization, had “grossly” inflated the value of more than a dozen assets by hundreds of millions in total, and then used those fake values to defraud banks and insurers in order to obtain more favorable deals and secure loans.

James argued that Trump routinely overstated his net worth to financial institutions by between $812 million to $2.2 billion, depending on the year and the specific applications he filed, and is seeking a penalty of about $250 million in a trial scheduled to begin Oct. 2. 

New York Supreme Court Judge Arthur Engoron, who issued the summary judgment on Tuesday, ordered that some of Trump’s business licenses be rescinded as punishment and ordered that an outside “receiver” must be appointed to supervise the management of those Trump properties. The ultimate outcome could well be the end of Trump’s ability to do business in the state.

Trump and his adult sons are now “barred from doing business in New York forever” under Engoron’s ruling, said Catherine Ross, a constitutional law professor at George Washington University. “And given that New York was the home base of their business, the base of their fortune, of Trump’s reputation, his credibility, his integrity — it’s all been found lacking.” The former president “is not a good businessman,” she added. “He’s a conman.”

Tuesday’s ruling came summary judgment, a decision indicating that there is no need for a jury trial because the evidence is “so strong” for one side, Ross explained, that no reasonable jury could reach a different decision.

“Given that New York was the home base of their business, the base of their fortune, of Trump’s reputation, his credibility, his integrity — it’s all been found lacking. He is not a good businessman. He’s a conman.”

Engoron’s ruling amounts to saying “that the New York attorney general presented an ironclad, well-documented case backed up with lots of evidence,” Ross said. In fact, she added, Engoron had already “lambasted Trump’s lawyers for trying to resuscitate defense arguments and positions that he had already expressly rejected and for essentially misleading the court in a number of instances.”

This decision was viewed as a surprise by legal observers and is clearly a major victory for James, who has been investigating claims since March 2019 that Trump and other executives at his companies had manipulated the values of various properties in order to get better deals from banks and insurers. She filed a lawsuit in September 2022. 

Though the trial will determine the exact magnitude of the financial penalty inflicted on the Trumps and their business entity, Engoron has already granted one of the biggest punishments James pursued: the cancellation of business certificates that allow some of Trump’s New York properties, including the Trump Organization itself, to operate in the state. That could have major repercussions for the Trump family business.

This decision “signals the end of Trump’s financial empire,” Bennett Gershman, a former New York prosecutor and law professor at Pace University, told Salon. 

“The judge declared that Trump and his family are guilty of a massive, staggering fraud in overvaluing his properties,” Gershman said. “The only issue left to be decided is the penalty to be imposed on him.”

We need your help to stay independent

The ruling, if it survives the appeals that are sure to follow, would deprive Trump of his ability to exercise control over critical properties in the state, particularly with regard to strategic and financial decisions. This would effectively dismantle a large portion of the former president’s business empire, and could destabilize his financial standing.

“This ruling cripples [Trump’s] ability to engage in business activities anywhere, and completely terminates his ability to do business in New York state,” Gershman said, adding that Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg could now decide to reopen “his criminal investigation of Trump for falsely stating the value of his properties.” Bragg had earlier declined to prosecute Trump on those charges.

The former president has “boasted” that his personal net worth in the billions, Gershman added, although many observers have concluded that is unlikely. “The truth is that his net worth is far, far less than that,” Gershman said. “The consequences of this ruling and the upcoming trial, while not making him a pauper, will significantly reduce his net worth.”

According to Engoron’s ruling, Trump, along with his company and key executives, engaged in a pattern of false statements about their financial status in annual statements. This resulted in more favorable loan conditions and reduced insurance expenses, among other tangible benefits, the judge found. 

Furthermore, these deceptive tactics violated legal boundaries, Engoron said, despite the arguments by Trump’s lawyers that a disclaimer attached to his financial statements absolved him of liability.

“In defendants’ world: rent regulated apartments are worth the same as unregulated apartments; restricted land is worth the same as unrestricted land; restrictions can evaporate into thin air; a disclaimer by one party casting responsibility on another party exonerates the other party’s lies,” Engoron wrote in his 35-page ruling. “That is a fantasy world, not the real world.”


Want a daily wrap-up of all the news and commentary Salon has to offer? Subscribe to our morning newsletter, Crash Course.


The judge ordered that Trump and the other defendants provide the names of potential independent receivers “to manage the dissolution of the canceled LLCs,” meaning the various Trump business entities, within 10 days of the ruling.

No member of the Trump family will have control over the properties in question, and according to Ross it is “very likely” that many or most will be sold to compensate for the Trumps’ fraudulent gains, a process similar to the “liquidation” that occurs in bankruptcy proceedings. 

One notable finding in Engoron’s decision was that Trump had continuously overvalued Mar-a-Lago, his private club in Palm Beach, inflating its value on one financial statement by as much as 2,300%, The Associated Press reported. Engoron also challenged Trump’s claim about the size of his apartment in Manhattan’s Trump Tower, which the former president on at least one occasion had asserted was 30,000 square feet, nearly three times its actual size. Trump had estimated the apartment’s market value at $327 million, a patently implausible number even in the New York City real estate market.

“A discrepancy of this order of magnitude, by a real estate developer sizing up his own living space of decades, can only be considered fraud,” Engoron wrote.

Former federal prosecutor Neama Rahmani told Salon that while the former president is a “fraudster,” his supporters will continue to claim that “he’s a good businessman,” adding that Trump has “proven time and again that he can survive these sorts of stains on him and his company.”

As far as Trump’s business ventures go, Rahmani said: “He’s done doing business in New York. He’s just done.”

As far as Trump’s business ventures go, former federal prosecutor Neama Rahmani said, “He’s done doing business in New York. He’s just done.”

In their own motion for summary judgment, Trump’s legal team had asked the judge to dismiss the case, contending that there was no evidence that the public had been harmed by Trump’s actions. They also argued that many of the allegations in the lawsuit were barred by the statute of limitations.

Engoron noted that he had rejected those arguments earlier in the case, and fined Trump’s five defense lawyers $7,500 each as punishment for “engaging in repetitive, frivolous” arguments.

James’ lawsuit is just one of many legal challenges confronting Trump, who remains the frontrunner for the 2024 Republican presidential nomination. Over the past six months, the former president has faced four criminal indictments and is also facing a second defamation suit filed by writer E. Jean Carroll, who earlier won a civil verdict against Trump for sexually assaulting her in the 1990s.

“Maybe this will affect the public’s perception of him not only as an obstructer of justice, who undermined national security and sought to unlawfully undo a fair election, but also as a financial cheat,” Gershman said. 

Ross added that Trump “seems to be leveraged up to his eyeballs,” facing “enormous debts” and rapidly mounting legal bills. And this decision creates further legal jeopardy for him, she added.

“If he were to consider taking the stand in one of the many pending cases against him, whether criminal or civil,” Ross said, “this finding of fraud could be used by the other side — by the prosecution, or the other party in a civil case — to impeach his testimony. Fraud goes to the essence of whether you tell the truth.”

The GOP’s top “person of faith”: More Republicans think Trump is religious than Pence, Romney

More than half of Republicans view former President Donald Trump as a person of faith, placing him ahead of vocally religious politicians like former Vice President Mike Pence.

A new national poll conducted by HarrisX for the Deseret News showed. Registered voters were asked whether they believed a list of political figures to be people of faith with the results falling along party lines. Among Republicans, 53% deemed Trump a person of faith, a value greater than that of almost every other figure on the list; Mike Pence was given the consideration by 52% of Republican respondents. President Joe Biden topped the list for Democrats with 63%, while Sen. Mitt Romney, R-Utah, rose to the top for Independents with 42% of them considering him a person of faith.

The former president also vaulted above his other GOP primary opponents with 47% of Republicans indicating they believe that Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis is a person of faith, 31% saying the same for Sen. Tim Scott, R-S.C., 31% for former South Carolina Gov. Nikki Haley, 30% for Vivek Ramaswamy and 22% for former New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie. Twenty-three percent of Republicans, on the other hand, dubbed Biden a person of faith and 12% said the same of Vice President Kamala Harris. 

At a June Faith & Freedom gala, Trump — who rarely discusses his own faith compared to Pence, a Christian, and Biden, a Catholic — said he had bolstered policies favored by Christian voters, including appointing conservative justices to the Supreme Court, which later overturned Roe v. Wade. "No president has ever fought for Christians as hard as I have," he said during the event, adding, "I got it done, and nobody thought it was even a possibility."

The poll, which surveyed 1,002 registered voters, was conducted from Sept. 8-11 and has a margin of error of +/- 3.1 percentage points. 

Is TikTok right — will eating three carrots a day really give me a natural tan?

A beauty trend gaining popularity on TikTok, dubbed the “carrot tan”, claims eating three carrots a day will give you a natural tan.

But can this really give you a natural glow? And is it healthy?

 

Why would carrots affect your skin tone?

Carotenoids are natural pigments that give red, orange and yellow colors to fruits and vegetables. Think of them as nature’s paint.

There are many carotenoids including lutein, lycopene, alpha-carotene and beta-carotene. Beta-carotene is the carotenoid responsible for a carrot’s vibrant orange colour.

Once a beta-carotene containing food is digested, special cells in the gut break it into two molecules of retinol (also known as vitamin A). This vitamin A is then used in various critical bodily functions such as vision, reproduction, immunity and growth.

The body controls the conversion of beta-carotene into vitamin A based on what it needs. So, when the body has enough vitamin A, it slows down or stops converting beta-carotene into vitamin A.

Any extra beta-carotene is then either stored in the liver and fat tissue, excreted through poo or removed via sweat glands in the outer layer of the skin. This is when the orange skin “tan” can happen. In medicine, this is called carotenoderma.

Carotenoderma gives your skin a yellow/orange pigment that is not the same colour you’d turn from a sun tan. It is concentrated in the palms of the hands, the soles of the feet and smile lines near the nose.

Carrots are not the only food that contains beta-carotene. Dark-green leafy vegetables, some (not all) other yellow- and orange-colored vegetables and fruits also contain high amounts. Beta-carotene is also found in parsley, basil, chives, chilli powder, sun-dried tomatoes and some dietary supplements.

 

How many carrots are we talking?

A few days of high carrot intake will unlikely result in a change in skin color.

No high quality trials have been conducted to test the relationship between number of carrots eaten per day and skin color changes or other outcomes. However, there is evidence that carotenoderma appears when blood levels get higher than 250-500 µg/dL.

One published case report (where researchers talk about one patient’s case) found eating around 3 kilograms of carrots per week (about seven large carrots a day) induced skin color changes.

Other experts suggest you would need to eat at least ten carrots per day, for at least a few weeks, for color changes to occur. Most people would find this carrot intake challenging.

The amount of carrots needed to change skin color will also depend on the variety of carrot, its size and ripeness, the way the carrot is prepared (raw or cooked) and whether or not the carrot is eaten with a source of fat. A person’s weight and gastrointestinal health will also impact the amount of beta-carotene absorbed.

 

Is it dangerous to eat too much beta-carotene?

Vitamin A comes in two main forms, preformed vitamin A and provitamin A.

Preformed vitamin A is the active form of vitamin A found in animal-based foods including liver, fish liver oil, egg yolks and dairy products. When you eat these foods the preformed vitamin A is already ready to be used by the body.

Provitamin A compounds (including beta-carotene) are the precursors to vitamin A. Provitamin A compounds need to be converted into active vitamin A once inside the body.

Preformed vitamin A can be toxic if consumed in large amounts. However, provitamin A compounds don’t cause vitamin A toxicity in humans because the body tightly regulates the conversion of provitamin A compounds to vitamin A. For this reason, there are no recommended limits on how much beta-carotene a person can safely consume each day.

There is, however, some evidence that taking high-dose beta-carotene supplements (20 mg per day or more) increases lung cancer risk in people who smoke cigarettes or used to smoke. This may be due to changes to chemical signaling pathways.

The Cancer Council therefore recommends avoiding high doses of beta-carotene supplements (more than 20 mg per day), especially if you smoke. This does not relate to wholefoods though, so people who smoke should still consume fruits and vegetables that have beta-carotene.

 

Why you should aim for a variety of vegetables

You can still use food to look great without focusing on eating carrots. Incorporating various colourful vegetables, particularly those high in carotenoids, into your diet may promote a natural radiance and a gentle enhancement in skin tone.

Rather than processed foods, a high variety of fresh vegetables provide various nutrients and some may have what others lack. So it’s important to have a balanced diet that doesn’t depend on a single type of vegetable.

No matter how many carrots you eat in a day, it’s important to protect your skin with sunscreen when going outside.

Lauren Ball, Professor of Community Health and Wellbeing, The University of Queensland and Emily Burch, Dietitian, Researcher & Lecturer, Southern Cross University

This article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license. Read the original article.

Longest U.S. spaceflight record smashed thanks to space junk collision

Earth is encircled by millions of pieces of trash, called “space junk,” which orbit our planet and are the bane of astronomers’ existence. This garbage has had devastating impact on at least one American astronaut, Frank Rubio, who returned to Earth on Wednesday after space junk is suspected to have hit the International Space Station last year. As a consequence, a trip that was supposed to last only 180 days dragged on for 371 days while Rubio and his Russian colleagues waited for a replacement team.

If there is any silver lining, it is that Rubio’s inadvertently year-long stay in space earned him a record: He now has spent more time in space than any other American, beating the record held by  NASA astronaut Mark Vande Hei. That said, Rubio’s achievement is only national; internationally, Russia has the record, having stayed in space for as long as 437 days, a milestone set in the mid ’90s.

Rubio does not seem to believe that his record was worth the sacrifice. Speaking to CNN, Rubio said that he would not have gone on his space mission if he had known it would last more than twice as long as planned. Indeed, living space can be extremely dangerous, as more time off-planet equals more exposure to radiation and other hazards that can have devastating health effects.

“And that’s only because of family things that were going on this past year,” Rubio explained. “And if I had known that I would have had to miss those very important events, I just would have had to say, ‘thank you, but no thank you.'” Among the events he missed: One daughter finished her first year at the U.S. Naval Academy, while another left for West Point.

The magical, reliable allure of rice pudding

There are many pieces of iconography, if you will, that I associate with my Nana’s house. One constant that was always in her refrigerator was a gray, nondescript container of store-bought rice pudding; the containers — emptied and cleaned and used as storage vessels for various detritus — were also all throughout the apartment. I’m not certain if I even knew what rice pudding was in those days, but I knew of its existence, its presence, the fact that it was always there. I didn’t eat it then, though.

Fast-forward to my college years, when my “big brother” in my fraternity absolutely, truly cherished rice pudding. It resulted in lots of barbs and jabs from friends, lots of questioning about why a twenty-something college student would eat rice pudding — a dish often derided as being so decidedly un-hip and “old”— so often, but I thought it was a fun little quirk and so I’d pick up little containers in the dining hall for him here and there. 

But rice pudding still hadn’t captured me yet.

Sometime within the past decade, though, rice pudding has become a mainstay for me.

From individual delivery dessert containers to large, supermarket buckets, I can make my way through rice pudding with aplomb and deep satisfaction. I love the viscosity, the way the grains remain separate though the dish is a verifiable “pudding,” the smattering of ground cinnamon atop . . . it’s all terrific. It’s also a pretty top-tier comfort food for a bummer of a day, a rainy day, what have you. (I also tend to eat my rice pudding with a little container of ground cinnamon, so I can continue to add more as I make my way through the bowl). For some time there, during COVID quarantine, I’d order the rice pudding from any restaurant that had it on the menu. At some point, I had a true mountain of takeout rice pudding containers stacked atop each other in my fridge. 

A few Christmases ago, I opted to make a cardamomcoconut rice pudding pie of sorts. Truthfully, it didn’t look that great, but it tasted pretty darn terrific. Now, while my dad was the world’s biggest pudding fan, he didn’t necessarily love rice pudding or coconut (although he did love lots of coconut-filled chocolate candy bars). So I was pleasantly surprised when, over the holidays, he ate a few slices with gusto, plus some of the leftover rice pudding that I had stashed in a storage container and thrown into the fridge when it didn’t fit into the pie crust.

I was so pleased to see how much he enjoyed it — also because we were the only two people in the family to eat it whatsoever. Over the years, I made many a dish that no one else liked and forced myself to eat and then promptly discarded the leftovers. Thankfully, that wasn’t the case this time.

Again, a point for rice pudding. 

We need your help to stay independent

Much like someone might refer to a dish like congee as a comfort food, rice pudding is within that same frame of reference. Rice overall offers such a stability, a familiarity, a reliability: the toothsomeness of the grain, the way it’ll cook up and take on the flavors of whatever is added to the liquid, the fact that, at some point, it will break down from singular grains to some sort of indecipherable mush.

Rice is a treasure at large — but I wonder if rice pudding might actually be rice in its most powerful, elite form. 

Rice pudding shares lots in common with oatmeal, from flavor profiles to texture — but I’d pick rice pudding any day. Interestingly enough, though, that oatmeal is generally regarded as a breakfast item whilst rice pudding is almost singularly a dessert? 

Now, of course, oatmeal often sports nuts, seeds, dried fruits, extraneous sweeteners and what have you, but rice pudding has more of a simplicity. Maybe that’s why I’m such a fan. While some might throw in some raisins or currants or other garnishes or mix-ins, the best rice puddings need nothing more than rice, water, milk or cream, some sugar and lots and lots of cinnamon. There’s no reason for anything superfluous to gild the lily. Just those five ingredients yield something really special. 

Something else that’s so special about rice pudding is its amazing universality. It is eaten in practically every country worldwide, with different flavor profiles and ingredients to accentuate the humble dish. From Lebanon and Turkey to Bengali and Thailand to Europe and Latin America, rice pudding is a staple in nearly every single culture — and for a good reason.


Want more great food writing and recipes? Subscribe to Salon Food’s newsletter, The Bite.


As Sharon Benjamin writes in Gulf News, many countries would argue that rice pudding is “theirs.” Generally, though, it is assumed that India’s kheer, which supposedly traces its origins to 6000 BCE, might possibly be the victor of the very first rice pudding. Throughout the Middle East, rice pudding was also said to have a medicinal or digestive purpose beyond just the need for sustenance. No matter the origin or the purpose for eating it, though, the modest pudding’s legacy and importance is undisputed. 

Now, though, rice is a potentially precarious resource, as climate change has resulted in destroyed, submerged rice paddies throughout India, the primary exporter of rice internationally. It’s said that rice prices will soon skyrocket, so you might want to buy some larger bags or bucketfuls in the meantime. as reported last month by Rhea Mogul, Vedika Sud and Sonia Farooqui in CNN

No matter if you call it moghli, riz au lait, sholezard, firni, put chai ko or arroz con leche, rice pudding is a veritable comfort for all. 

So no matter if you’re purchasing rice pudding in tiny, single-serve containers from a local diner, making your own at home or purchasing it by the vat-ful from your local supermarket, make sure you have enough ground cinnamon on hand. And thanks Nana and Garrett for introducing me to this dish, which, for some twenty-something years, I pretty much completely ignored. I’m glad that I’ve changed my tune ever since. 

Decriminalizing drugs in Oregon and Washington isn’t associated with overdose increases, study finds

In 2020, Oregon voters passed Measure 110, a law decriminalizing the possession of small amounts of controlled substances like cocaine, heroin and methamphetamine. The measure, which passed with 58 percent of the vote, was praised as a “historic, paradigm-shifting win” that could serve as a model for the rest of the country, but it wasn’t long before the decriminalization was blamed for a rise in overdose deaths. The legislation has been called a “disaster” and a “botched” job with a “troubled start.”

“To judge by the catastrophe unfolding in Oregon, I’d think twice before replicating this reckless experiment elsewhere,” wrote New York Times opinion writer Bret Stephens.

Meanwhile, Oregon’s northern neighbor Washington overturned a court case in 2021 that also significantly reduced the criminalization of drug possession. The state’s Supreme Court, ruling on the so-called “Blake decision,” declared Washington’s main drug possession statute unconstitutional and “void.”

Between 2020 and 2021, overdose deaths did increase in Oregon and Washington with some apparent missteps in the rollout of decriminalization programs: An audit of Oregon’s program released in January 2023 found the legislation was vague in dictating how it would actually connect people using drugs to recovery and struggled to get grants secured for harm reduction efforts. By April 2023, more than 60% of Oregonians blamed Measure 110 for increasing homelessness and drug use. 

“There seems to be an increase in overdose death rates. But this increase in death rates is not due to the policy changes.”

Still, the audit said it was “too early to tell” the full extent of the initiative’s impacts, and a new study published today paints a different picture of how the overdose crisis in these states has played out in recent years. Writing in JAMA Psychiatry, researchers compared the rate of fatal overdoses in both states to a comparison group of matched states with similar characteristics and found no significant difference in the rate of overdoses between the two groups after decriminalization policies took effect.

“What we found is that both in Oregon and in Washington, if you’re looking at overall trends, there seems to be an increase in overdose death rates,” said study author Spruha Joshi, Ph.D., a social epidemiologist studying the overdose crisis at the University of Michigan. “But this increase in death rates is not due to the policy changes.”

Furthermore, these increases were minor to begin with, described as “not statistically significant” in the study. In nearby states that didn’t enact decriminalization policies, overdose deaths were comparable. While overdose deaths spiked 66% in Washington between 2019 and 2021, for example, overdose deaths rose 55% in Nevada between 2019 and 2020.

Measure 110, officially known as the Drug Addiction Treatment and Recovery Act, was modeled in some ways after Portugal’s decriminalization policy, enacted in 2001. People found to be in the possession of drugs are charged a $100 fine, which can be avoided if they agree to call a treatment referral hotline. In Washington, drugs were recriminalized in later legislation, though the new law reclassified most drug possession crimes from felonies to misdemeanors.

In Oregon, it was estimated that Measure 110 could prevent thousands of people from being charged with felonies, reduce racial disparities in arrests and decrease drug overdose deaths by treating substance use as a public health problem rather than something to be handled by the police. Similarly, the legislation that somewhat decriminalized drug possession in Washington was enacted to redirect people using drugs to treatment facilities rather than prisons.

Being arrested for drug crimes has been shown to increase the risk of death by an overdose, with that risk increasing with each arrest.

In one qualitative study published in 2022, researchers interviewed Oregon residents who used drugs and many reported not calling the police when a friend overdosed because they were afraid of getting arrested. Being arrested for drug crimes has been shown to increase the risk of death by an overdose, with that risk increasing with each arrest.

“I don’t say [overdose],” one study participant said about calling emergency services. “I’m saying, ‘Someone’s having a hard time breathing. Someone’s having complications.’ Because if you say ‘overdose,’ then they have to notify the police because the police are there to ‘protect’ the fire department/EMTs.”

The criminalization of drug use disproportionately impacts Black, brown and Indigenous communities who are already overpoliced, said Fernando Peña, the Operation Director at the Northwest Instituto Latino De Addicciones in Oregon.

“Black and brown communities are underserved,” Peña told Salon in a phone interview. “They are overcharged when they are being arrested and arraigned. They get more charges and they get less frequent referrals to diversion or mandated treatment services.”

In Oregon, Measure 110 uses cannabis tax revenue to fund harm reduction programs, while Washington’s new legislation requires police officers to refer people using drugs to recovery at least twice before they are arrested. In a recent study, some 650,000 Oregonians were found to be untreated for substance use disorder in 2020.

Peña said Measure 110 is expanding access to recovery services for thousands of people, and especially historically underserved communities. It has taken decades of neglect and mismanagement to get to this point in the opioid overdose crisis, and it’s unrealistic to assume that will be fixed in such a short time period, he said.


Want more health and science stories in your inbox? Subscribe to Salon’s weekly newsletter Lab Notes.


“We can just keep making it better,” Peña said. “That takes time, strategic planning, leadership and investment. Measure 110 began a process that can hopefully go on to make generational systemic change.” 

The lack of an association found in this study could be explained by the fact that the study took place before much of the funding for harm reduction programs had been dispersed.

However, some have been critical of the program, which has struggled to get off the ground. The majority of the $287 million dedicated to harm reduction programs in Oregon was delayed and not distributed until 2022, according to the JAMA Psychiatry study. In the first 15 months after the hotline intended to redirect people toward recovery services began, it received 119 calls that cost the state $7,000 each. Ultimately, the program’s manager resigned due to a lack of support.

Many critics and supporters of Measure 110 alike both thought the legislation would impact overdose deaths one way or the other, said study author Haven Wheelock, who is also Outside In’s drug users health services program supervisor. The lack of an association found in this study could be explained by the fact that the study took place before much of the funding for harm reduction programs had been dispersed, the authors noted. It also took place during the COVID-19 pandemic, which was associated with increased rates of substance use across the country.

At the same time, the West Coast is also experiencing unprecedented amounts of fentanyl in the drug supply, with overdoses from synthetic drugs like fentanyl increasing 84% between 2020 and 2021. Synthetic fentanyl, which is 50 times more potent than heroin, was responsible for two-thirds of overdose deaths nationwide in 2022. Meanwhile, stimulants are playing a greater role in overdose deaths, with some describing these shifts as a “fourth wave” of the crisis. Some blame the U.S. War on Drugs, which increased the criminalization of drug use, for these changes in the drug supply in the first place. 

“It’s really easy to want to blame something new and novel for an issue, but we are seeing these [overdoses] increase everywhere,” Wheelock told Salon in a phone interview. “People want an easy why. With all things related to poverty, all things related to addiction, it is a much more complicated issue than any one given policy or intervention.”

We need your help to stay independent

Overdose deaths aren’t the only data point that can be monitored to track the effects of decriminalization, Joshi said. One study showed decriminalization has reduced drug-related arrests in Oregon, especially among people of color. Data from the Oregon Health Authority shows marked increases in people seeking treatment, housing services and employment. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) reported a significant decrease in non-fatal overdoses between 2021 and 2022 in Oregon.

Still, earlier this month, voters submitted a ballot measure to the Secretary of State’s office that could recriminalize drug possession if it is accepted. 

“I feel like it is shortsighted, that going back to the status quo, which wasn’t working, which isn’t working in cities similar to Portland across the country, and is not going to get us to the solutions,” Wheelock said. “We really need to switch our thinking from a punitive approach to a healthcare-based approach.”

 

Judge orders top Trump administration officials answer for family separation policy

Two Trump-era administration officials have been mandated to testify as part of a lawsuit filed against the U.S. government for separating migrant children under the age of 18 from their parents at the U.S.-Mexico border. 

Federal magistrate judge Kandis Westmore of California on Monday issued a decision telling the Justice Department and attorneys for the affected families to meet in order to slot depositions for former U.S. Attorney General Jeff Sessions and former Homeland Security Secretary Kirstjen Nielsen. 

The suit, filed in 2021 by three families from El Salvador and Guatemala, alleges that the parents were separated from their children — then ages 6, 11, and 13 — and spent several weeks in detention centers before being reunited. 

Westmore in her ruling wrote that Sessions and Nielsen had “unique personal knowledge of their own intent” in enforcing such a stringent policy, adding that while the Department of Justice initially touted the zero-tolerance rule as fomented by “dozens of people,” the government ultimately conceded that the duo alone had been responsible for structuring the policy as such, a fact which the judge said left her “disappointed.” Records show that Sessions and Nielsen approved the documents that catalyzed the separations, according to the Washington Post.

“Such an injustice cannot stand,” Westmore wrote.

We need your help to stay independent

MAGA officials claimed that they instituted the separation policy as a means of prosecuting parents who crossed the border illegally; however, Trump’s administration neglected to organize a process for reuniting families that were broken up and instead deported hundreds of parents while leaving the children behind. The Washington Post noted that lawyers for the migrant families have indicated that many parents were never criminally prosecuted, including some of the parents in the lawsuit. 

Justice Department spokeswoman Dena Iverson said in a statement, “We remain committed to achieving a just resolution for the victims of this abhorrent policy.” Court records show that the agency disagreed with deposing Sessions and Nielsen on the grounds of the apex deposition doctrine, which serves to protect high-ranking officials from having to testify. 

“We’ve got to follow the rules one way or the other,” Sessions said in a statement, declining to offer further comment. 

“These officials set in motion a cruel program of ripping apart migrant families. It is only right that they provide testimony under oath in this case,” argued Victoria Petty, staff attorney at the Lawyers’ Committee for Civil Rights of the San Francisco Bay Area. “Thousands of parents and children will endure the lasting harm of this barbaric treatment for the rest of their lives.”

“We hope this order brings us one step closer to holding the United States government accountable for its officials’ misconduct that deeply traumatized asylum-seeking families,” she added.

Though President Joe Biden has routinely criticized border separations in the past, the Department of Justice continues to defend Trump-implemented immigration policies.  

“President Biden has described family separation as a ‘human tragedy,’ but his administration is fighting separated families tooth and nail in federal court,” said Bree Bernwanger of the American Civil Liberties Union.

New study shows we can create value from food waste by turning it into a highly desirable material

Food waste is a global problem with approximately 1.3 billion tons of food wasted each year throughout the food lifecycle — from the farm to food manufacturers and households.

Across the food supply chain, Australians waste around 7.6 million tons of food each year. This costs our economy approximately A$36.6 billion annually.  

In a recent study published in Bioresource Technology Reports, we have found a way to use food waste for making a versatile material known as nanocellulose. In particular, we used acid whey — a significant dairy production waste material that it usually difficult to dispose of.

 

Mixing waste with bacteria

Nanocellulose is a biopolymer, which means it’s a naturally produced long chain of sugars. It has remarkable properties — bacterial nanocellulose is strong, chemically stable and biocompatible, meaning it’s not harmful to human cells. This makes it a highly marketable product with applications in packaging, wound treatments, drug delivery or food production.

The traditional approach for making nanocellulose can be expensive, uses large amounts of energy and takes a long time. Some types of nanocellulose production also use a chemical process that produces unwanted waste byproducts.

By contrast, our new approach uses just food waste and a symbiotic culture of bacteria and yeasts (SCOBY) — something you may be familiar with as a kombucha starter. Our process is low cost, consumes little energy and produces no waste.

We used a runny waste liquid known as acid whey from a local cheese manufacturer in Melbourne, Australia. In the dairy industry, acid whey is often disposed of as wastewater in large amounts (more than 100 million litres of acid whey are produced annually in Australia alone), despite it being rich in carbohydrates and proteins. This is because it’s hard to process into other products due to a high lactic acid content.

We heat-treated the liquid and supplemented it with sugar and yeast extract before adding the key ingredient, SCOBY (obtained commercially from a Melbourne-based kombucha company).

Over four days as our mixture fermented, the bacteria worked to create nanocellulose material which floated to the top. Lovers of home-brewed kombucha may actually be familiar with the raw nanocellulose material — it forms as a floating off-white structure called a pellicle. Some people already use this kombucha by-product as vegan leather.) A similar pellicle formed on our acid whey mixture.

 

A growing market

Demand for nanocellulose is growing worldwide. The global market was valued at US$0.4 billion in 2022 (A$0.6bn) and is expected to grow to US$2 billion by 2030 (A$3.1bn). Bacterial nanocellulose produced from food waste can help to satisfy this demand.

This growth is in part due to how we can use nanocellulose instead of petroleum-based and other non-renewable materials in things like packaging. Among its desirable properties, nanocellulose is also fully biodegradable.

Manufacturers around the globe are seeking sustainable sources of raw material for producing composite materials with various properties. Nanocellulose is easily customized in this way. For example, infusing nanocellulose with a compound called glycerol enhances its flexibility and makes it more pliant. As a food-safe material, we are now investigating nanocellulose as “smart” packaging by infusing nanocellulose with indicators that signal when food is no longer safe to eat.

Additionally, using a single source of food waste (such as acid whey in our example) means we can produce highly pure nanocellulose — ideal for biomedical applications, such as wound dressings, pharmaceutical compounding and cell cultures.

 

Efficient circular economy

A circular economy attempts to minimize waste and extend the lifecycle of products for as long as possible. Our study demonstrates an efficient circular economy approach for upcycling a dairy industry waste product into sustainable nanocellulose.

Additionally, the sediment residue we produced has a high nutrient value and potentially has commercial value as a fertilizer or animal feed, while the liquid culture can be reused for the next batch.

Our study was limited to a single source of food waste within a laboratory environment. A future challenge will be taking this approach out of the lab and scaling it up for commercial use. This will involve a series of steps throughout the value chain from waste collection and transport through to commercial production.

We also hope to explore alternative mediums such as mixed food waste. More research also needs to be done on how nanocellulose can be most effectively customized for various applications, such as different types of food packaging.

Overall, our proof-of-concept study demonstrates potential for producing nanocellulose in a sustainable, environmentally sound manner — from food waste to significant value.

Alan Labas, Lecturer in Management, Federation University Australia; Benjamin Matthew Long, Senior Lecturer, Chemistry, Federation University Australia, and Dylan Liu, Lecturer in Food Science and Sustainability, Federation University Australia

This article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license. Read the original article.

Trump and sons rage after judge delivers “the corporate death penalty for the Trump Organization”

Former President Donald Trump and his sons, Eric and Donald Trump Jr., erupted on social media in response to a New York Judge's ruling Tuesday that the elder Trump committed fraud for years as he built his real estate empire, dubbing the ruling "politically motivated" and attacking the judge and the state's attorney general across a number of posts.

In the Tuesday afternoon decision, Manhattan Supreme Court Justice Arthur Engoron found that Trump and his company deceived insurers, bankers and other entities by heavily exaggerating his assets and his net worth in paperwork used when making business deals and securing financing. He also found that Trump, his company and its executives had repeatedly lied about his wealth on his annual financial statements in order to take advantage of favorable loan terms and lower insurance premiums. The judge ruled that those actions violated the law and, thus, canceled the certificates of 10 of Donald Trump's key New York businesses, including the Trump Organization, as well as any other New York entities "controlled or beneficially owned by Donald J. Trump, Donald Trump, Jr., Eric Trump, Allen Weisselberg, and Jeffrey McConney." Engoron ordered the parties to identify three independent receivers within a 10-day period to manage the entities' dissolution.

"It's essentially the equivalent of the corporate death penalty for the Trump Organization in New York state," conservative attorney George Conway said on CNN on Tuesday night.

In a lengthy statement to Truth Social (compiled from previous posts on the platform shortly after the decision), the former president took aim at New York Attorney General Letitia James, who filed the civil lawsuit, while defending his actions.

"I have been unfairly sued by the Trump Hating Democrat Attorney General of New York State, Letitia James, over the false fact that I inflated my Financial Statements in order to borrow money from Banks, etc. The Judge in this case, Arthur F. Engoron, refused to allow this case to go to the 'Commercial Division,' where it belongs because he is a Trump Hater beyond even A.G. James, who campaigned against me spewing horrible inflammatory statements which are False & Defamatory," Donald Trump began, then lamented the non-jury status of the case.

Trump went on to list what he deemed the facts of the case: that he is worth more than his valuation on his financial statements; he excluded his "MOST VALUABLE ASSET," his brand, from those statements; there were no victims in the case; the financial statements include a "STRONG 'DISCLAIMER CLAUSE'" advising reviewers against trusting the values and to do their own research; and that his company has millions in cash with very little debt.

"It is a great company that has been slandered and maligned by this politically motivated Witch Hunt. It is very unfair, and I call for help from the highest Courts in New York State, or the Federal System to intercede," he concluded. "THIS IS NOT AMERICA!"

Donald Trump echoed those sentiments in another post to the conservative platform Wednesday morning, leveling more insults at James and Engoron.

"I have a Deranged, Trump Hating Judge, who RAILROADED this FAKE CASE through a NYS Court at a speed never seen before, refusing to let it go to the Commercial Division, where it belongs, denying me everything, No Trial, No Jury. He made up this crazy 'KILL TRUMP' decision, assigning insanely low values to properties, despite overwhelming evidence. AS AN EXAMPLE, HE VALUES THE MOST SPECTACULAR PROPERTY IN PALM BEACH, FLORIDA, MAR-A-LAGO, AT $18,000,000, WHEN IT IS WORTH POSSIBLY 100 TIMES THAT AMOUNT," he began.

We need your help to stay independent

"His anger & hatred is politically motivated & unprecedented by those who watched! My actual Net Worth is MUCH GREATER than the number shown on the Financial Statements, a BIG SURPRISE to him & the Racist A.G., Letitia James, who campaigned for office on a get Trump Platform," he continued. "While murderers roam the sidewalks of New York, my banks are happy, all loans are current, or paid off in full, sometimes early, with no defaults or problems of any kind. There is also an IRONCLAD DISCLAIMER CLAUSE!"

Donald Trump Jr. and Eric Trump had also released statements across several social media posts decrying the judge's ruling and accusing Engoron and James of weaponizing the government against their father and the family.

"Today, I lost all faith in the New York legal system. Never before have I seen such hatred toward one person by a judge – a coordinated effort with the Attorney General to destroy a man's life, company and accomplishments," Eric Trump wrote in the first of a handful of posts to X, the platform formerly known as Twitter. "We have run an exceptional company – never missing a loan payment, making banks hundreds of millions of dollars, developing some of the most iconic assets in the world. Yet today, the persecution of our family continues…"

He then accused Engoron of attempting to "to destroy my father and kick him out of New York," lambasting the $18 million valuation of Mar-a-Lago that Engoron cited as the low-end of the Palm Beach County Assessor's appraisal of the property from 2011 to 2021 and calling the case "so corrupt and coordinated." 

Eric Trump went on to compare values of homes on smaller stretches of land in Palm Beach despite Mar-a-Lago, as Engoron noted in the filing, not being legally classified as a residence but a private social club with restrictions on its use and modifications. He also posted a video with spliced clips of James' attorney general campaign speeches, in which she vowed to follow Trump's money and sue him and asserted that she'd never be afraid to challenge him, statements Politifact clarified last year were taken out of context in the video. 


Want a daily wrap-up of all the news and commentary Salon has to offer? Subscribe to our morning newsletter, Crash Course.


"While everyone can see that this case is egregious, the only thing worse than weaponizing the legal system against a political opponent is unfairly going after their family. Both the Attorney General and the Judge know I had absolutely NOTHING to do with this case. Every single person has testified that my job has always been acquiring, developing and managing properties, not back office functions," he said.

"The only reason I am collateral damage is because my last name is Trump and I am unwavering in the support of my father, his accomplishments and what he has done for our country, a nation which is now rapidly in decline," he concluded.

"Anyone with even a basic understanding of the law should read the ruling and see for themselves how nonsensical and asinine the whole thing is," Donald Trump Jr. tweeted shortly after Eric Trump began his rant in response to the decision. "This is weaponized Blue State Marxist America, & another example of the sheer impossibility of a fairness & impartiality in these areas."

He, too, disputed the low-end valuation of Mar-a-Lago cited in the ruling, arguing that "legal system has been commandeered by radicals hell bent on destroying America" and even joking that if property is worth $18 million, he wants 10 of them. 

"If my father tried claiming the property was worth $18 million, he would probably then get charged with trying to underpay his real estate taxes!" Donald Trump Jr. added. "They've set the game up so it's always lose/lose in these blue states. If you don't abide by their narrative they will target you."

Engoron's decision, however, addressed many of the former president and his sons' claims, some of which resembled previously rejected arguments brought by the defendants' legal teams to the judge. 

He noted that the defense's assertion that the record lacked any evidence of default, breach or complaint of harm from the victims, while correct, was "completely irrelevant" to the case, citing the precedent set by People v. Ernst & Young. He also declared that the disclaimer written on the statements of financial condition by non-party accountants Mazars "put the onus for accuracy squarely on defendants' shoulders."

"As the SCFs did not particularize the type of fact misrepresented or undisclosed and were unquestionably based on information peculiarly within defendants' knowledge, defendants may not rely on such purported disclaimers as a defense," Engoron wrote in the filing. 

He further elaborated that the disclaimer, referred to as the "worthless clause," does not only fail to "rise to the level of an enforceable disclaimer" but does not say what the defense argued it did and can not be used to insulate fraud.  

As for the value of Mar-a-Lago, Engoron cited the Palm Beach County Assessor's appraisal of the property's market value from 2011 to 2021, which valued the club between $18 million and $27.6 million. He dismissed the expert affidavit the defense submitted to support their valuation of the club as "inadmissible because it is conclusory" and its views "apparently based to a great extent on hearsay statements from unspecified witnesses as well as upon speculations on the part of the expert."

He also broke down Donald Trump's efforts to classify Mar-a-Lago as a social club in the 90s, which saw the former president signing a 1995 deed relinquishing his right to use the property as anything other than a club and a 2002 "Deed of Development" forever extinguishing his right to develop Mar-a-Lago and limiting changes to it, including division or subdivision for any purpose like use as single-family homes.

"Exacerbating defendants' obstreperous conduct is their continued reliance on bogus arguments in papers and oral argument," Engoron wrote in the filing. "In defendants' world: rent regulated apartments are worth the same as unregulated apartments; restricted land is worth the same as unrestricted land; restrictions can evaporate into thin air; a disclaimer by one party casting responsibility on another party exonerates the other party's lies; the Attorney General of the State of New York does not have capacity to sue or standing to sue (never mind all those cases where the Attorney General has sued successfully) under a statue expressly designed to provide that right; all illegal acts are untimely if they stem from one untimely act; and square footage subjective."

"That is a fantasy world, not the real world," he added.

Writers Guild of America votes to officially end the Hollywood writers strike after 148 days

The Writers Guild of America (WGA) strike has officially come to an end, just two days after the union reached a tentative agreement on a new contract with the Alliance of Motion Picture and Television Producers (AMPTP). WGA leaders voted unanimously on Tuesday to authorize its members to return to work, thus ending the strike after an astounding 148 days.

“The WGAW Board and WGAE Council also voted to lift the restraining order and end the strike as of 12:01 am PT/3:01 am ET on Wednesday, September 27th,” the WGA wrote online. “This allows writers to return to work during the ratification process, but does not affect the membership’s right to make a final determination on contract approval.”

The 94-page contract, which will expire in May 2026, includes pay increases, better health and pension contributions for writing teams, improved terms for screenwriter employment, stricter regulations for the use of artificial intelligence by studios and other major benefits. Read the full summary of the deal terms for the 2023 MBA here.

As for what’s next, the contract will soon go to the guilds’ memberships (both on the East and West coasts) for a ratification vote. The ratification vote will be held from Oct. 2 through Oct. 9. Per Variety, the contract “is expected to be easily ratified by strike-weary members,” who will be meeting in person and on Zoom to discuss the details of the contract.

In Max’s hilarious and heartfelt “Young Love,” I saw my own life

Matthew Cherry’s “Young Love” is the Black, Blackity, Black-Black series that I didn’t know I needed. 

“Young Love,” now available on Max, is a continuation of Cherry’s Oscar-winning short animated film “Hair Love.” which tells the tale of young Black family of three, dealing with cancer and life after remission. 

The matriarch Angela (Issa Rae) is diagnosed and admitted to the hospital for an extended stay, leaving dad Stephen (Kid Cudi) to take on all of the chores alone: cooking, cleaning, providing entertainment and yes, learning to do a Black girl’s hair. Trust me, this task is not easy. I have a three-year-old, and on the days my wife is away on business or a girls’ trip, I become the “Hair Love” dad, charged with the task of whipping and twisting and styling my daughter’s massive cloud of an afro into something presentable. Sometimes I get it right, but most times I don’t. Stephen almost makes it look too easy. 

I play the same games when my wife is away, allowing my daughter to eat ice cream at 4 a.m., pizza for breakfast, and stay up for days at time while dressed like a princess, while rocking the crooked, fuzzy afro puff I created.

“Young Love” picks up after Angela is settled at home and begins working her way back into the fold of her household. Where does she fit in? This also happens when parents like myself have to travel to different places for work or other reasons; we tend to miss out on those small things like when the baby stopped liking pancakes because she discovered French toast, stopped wearing those cute Little Air Jordans because she discovered church shoes or her bedtime becomes 10:00 p.m. when it was 8:00 p.m. two weeks ago when you first left. We get the opportunity to see Angela’s frustrations and the humor it entails. While she was in the hospital, Stephen taught their daughter Zuri (Brooke Monroe Conaway) how to make grilled cheese with an iron and that you can save a lot of time by washing your dishes and your child at the same time in the same water. I play the same games when my wife is away, allowing my daughter to eat ice cream at 4 a.m., pizza for breakfast, and stay up for days at time while dressed like a princess, while rocking the crooked, fuzzy afro puff I created. Mom comes home and instantly reestablishes order. Angela attempts to do the same, and Zuri slowly complies but pushes back at the same time. We see this when she rejects her mother’s hairstyle, longing for one of her dad’s creation. 

We need your help to stay independent

Angela’s struggles also go beyond the house and drift into her job at the salon where she styles natural hair. Angela has been away healing and has lost a step. Her clients aren’t necessarily happy with their hairdos. Some show grace because of her illness, buy one feisty elderly woman puts Angela in her place, telling her that her hair looks horrible and needs to be redone ASAP. I welled up with tears, just like Angela who needed that energy to reclaim her normalcy. 

Young LoveYoung Love (Max)

The creators choose not to create some kind of fantasy. Angela and Stephen are real people, trying to figure it out.

Stephen is on his own journey as struggling music producer, trying to sell beats while maintaining his artistic integrity. Sometimes he can chip in on the rent and sometimes he can’t. The couple lives in a building owned by Angela’s penny pinching dad Russell Young (Harry Lennix). Russell has an app on his phone that tracks the temperature in their apartment. If it’s too cool in the summer­­ – he’ll bust their door letting them know that AC is for paying tenants. What’s so cool about “Young Love” is that Angela and Stephen are not married. 

The creators choose not to create some kind of fantasy. Angela and Stephen are real people, trying to figure it out. Angela wants to be an influencer but can’t monetize. Stephen is dreaming of selling beats to top acts but has yet to learn the industry; their love is as young as their business experience. It is a real show that’s so relatable, it forces us to laugh.

I don’t necessarily think this is a kids show; however, there is scene at the beginning of the second episode that displays Zuri and Angela sleep, both in their bonnets. That image caused my wife to run upstairs to get our daughter because this never happens on television.

“Look, baby. They are wearing their bonnets,” my wife said, reapplying my daughter’s bonnet that may have slipped off as she fought her sleep, “You must protect your hair.” 

The scene was also funny because Zuri was sleeping in the bed with her parents – a battle that we have been having recently. Our daughter went from sleeping in her bed all night to banging or our door in the wee hours, hungry to find a space between mom and dad. And sometimes we act like we don’t hear, but most times we let her in because our family and love is young, just like the show, and that’s why it works. 

“Young Love” is streaming on Max.

 

 

In the end, “Reservation Dogs” reminds us that every final act invites us to begin again

When they’re done well, series finales are slices of wish fulfillment. That’s why so many shows end with weddings and births, life events marking a desirable end to one life chapter with the assurance that what happens next, the part the audience usually doesn’t see, will unfold as it should. “Reservation Dogs” closes with a funeral which, if you’ve been watching this show, is entirely appropriate. One of the best episodes of the series was the second season installment called “Mabel,” named for the grandmother of Elora Danan (Devery Jacobs).

The implied co-leader of the namesake group of friends had run away but didn’t get far, coming back home in time to see off the woman who raised her. Mabel’s story was much bigger than her bond with her granddaughter, though. That episode showed viewers how one life rippled outward to touch an entire community, all of whom showed up in her final hours to eat and laugh together, bringing the spirit of her daughter and Elora’s long-departed mother with them.

Series co-creator Sterlin Harjo, who directed and co-wrote the finale “Dig” along with Chad Charlie, encircles the whole third and final season with that spirit, making this 10-episode goodbye feel substantive and the show itself feel whole and complete. That isn’t something one often says about a series that only lasts for three seasons. But “Reservation Dogs” was never the typical TV show — not quite a comedy or a drama, but more like a series of visits that often felt like short films.

Harjo, who has fingerprints on seven of the season’s 10 episodes either as a writer or director, once explained to Salon that he fell in love with movies by watching them with this father. Hence, where other auteur directors have been hailed for making movies about movies, Harjo shows us how those movies bridge generations by recreating their plots in the lives of his characters.

TV shows leave us all the time. Very few depart on their own terms.

His show’s legacy is and will be massive, having showcased emerging talents like Jacobs, who wrote another biographical episode for her character Elora this season under her birth name Kawennáhere Devery Jacobs as well as directing an episode, while giving other deserving talents their due as the rest of industry catches up. Lily Gladstone, introduced in the second season episode “Offerings” as Aunt Hokti, is already receiving award nominations buzz for her co-starring role in Martin Scorsese’s “Killers of the Flower Moon.”  Those who first noticed her work on this show, might have suspected that such honors were only a matter of time.

Season 3 pulls in several cinematic homages, from a horror episode inspired by “Suspiria” to the fifth episode, “House Made of Bongs,” an homage to “Dazed and Confused.” The second episode, “Maximus” is reminiscent of a lighthearted episode of “The X-Files.” These nods serve as a common language connecting older generations to the ones assuming the mantle of responsibility – linking Elora, Bear (D’Pharaoh Woon-A-Tai), Willie Jack (Paulina Alexis) and Cheese (Lane Factor) to the elders and peers surrounding them.

Ending with a funeral, then, is the only sensible way to close a show that was never about a group of young criminals (despite that being the original hook) or expressly about a group of kids.

Their lives were always at their funniest and most touching when their adventures butted up against the people surrounding them – mothers, fathers, uncles, aunties, and elders like Big and Bucky (Wes Studi). Funerals in this Indigenous community are celebrations, reunions where the family net covers many more people than the ones connected by blood. That means we get to hang out one last time with Bear’s mother Rita (Sarah Podemski) and the wry, gum-cracking Bev (Jana Schmieding), along with Teenie (Tamara Podemski), Big (Zahn McClarnon) and Uncle Brownie (Gary Farmer).

Reservation DogsGary Farmer as Uncle Brownie in “Reservation Dogs” (Shane Brown/FX)And if are part of the generation who saw those movies to which Harjo refers in theirs, you probably have more in common with the elders in these stories — including Ethan Hawke’s Rick, appearing in one episode as Elora’s dad — than with its young adventurers. Still, their discoveries remind us what it was like to be young and bewildered about what comes next.

We need your help to stay independent

The death bringing everyone together in “Dig” is that of the community’s traditional healer Old Man Fixico (Richard Ray Whitman), a fixture outside the health clinic offering herbal remedies and other medicine he tacitly acknowledges to his apprentice Willie Jack are soul-soothing placebos. Willie Jack visits Hotki in prison (where we first met the character in last year’s excellent “Offerings”) to break the news of Fixico’s passing and receive guidance. Since Hokti can see spirits who lend her advice and share wisdom, and the younger woman feels out of her depth in this new community role, she’s hoping her aunt can help.

“Reservation Dogs” was never the typical TV show — not quite a comedy or a drama, but more like a series of visits that often felt like short films.

What Hokti tells Willie Jack could have easily been meant for an audience that was always smaller than this show deserved, and that is going to miss it deeply. “I know it feels like Fixico is gone, and in a way he is,” Hokti tells Willie Jack. “But he’s also not gone at the same time.”

TV shows leave us all the time. Very few depart on their own terms. “Reservation Dogs” doesn’t merely complete its mission on strategy but does it in a way that completes a circle. To ensure we don’t miss that intention, the finale opens with the local radio playing a rendition of “Will the Circle Be Unbroken,” a callback to the opening scene of the series where the same DJ plays The Stooges anthem “I Wanna Be Your Dog.” The Rez Dogs were originally motivated to find their purpose after their friend Daniel died by suicide; they’re ending our time with them by stepping into responsibility, having put his spirit to rest in California.

Reservation DogsPaulina Alexis as Willie Jack and Lily Gladstone as Hotki in “Reservation Dogs” (Shane Brown/FX)Dressing a body one last time involves getting the details right. Including “Will the Circle Be Unbroken” in the show’s farewell reminds us that there’s ample pleasure in returning to previous seasons and chapters to remind us of everything that connects us to what made Okern, Oklahoma special.


Want a daily wrap-up of all the news and commentary Salon has to offer? Subscribe to our morning newsletter, Crash Course.


Many third-season episodes co-star the spirits of loved ones who have died or strange guides such as Bear’s spirit mentor William Knifeman (Dallas Goldtooth), but the subplot that carries the greatest heft involves Graham Greene’s Maximus. Through him, we understand how the people in our lives can be lost without dying, and how it’s always possible to mend those rifts even after they die.

“Even if you’re not seeing them, the quantum thread cannot be disentangled,” Bucky tells Cheese in an earlier episode, when the younger man worries he may be losing his friends, adding, “These are bonds you don’t want to break.”

But the lyrics of A.P. Carter’s funerary folk classic thematically summarize the larger moral of the third and final season’s story — a conclusion that is also the truth of humankind’s story – which is that our previous generations never entirely leave us. We learn lessons from their legacies and the wisdom they pass on, and we gain knowledge from considering their mistakes.

Bear, Elora, Cheese and Willie Jack make it to California and back, and of the four, Elora decides to step out of that circle, as does Rita, while the rest stay. “Reservation Dogs” debuted one year into the pandemic, don’t forget, and these side trips into the spirit realm touch that part of us that remains sensitive to loss and death even as we laugh at the folly of the living. But it also leaves us with the reminder to value community, sending us off “in that good way,” as Uncle Brownie says, affirming that while it’s done, it isn’t truly gone – just waiting for our next visit.

All episodes of “Reservation Dogs” are streaming on Hulu.

 

This secret McDonald’s sandwich is only available at exactly 10:35 a.m.

If you’re bummed that McDonald’s stops serving their breakfast menu after 10:30 a.m., fret not! The fast food chain has a special, albeit secret, offering for their brunch and brekkie lovers nationwide. However, there’s just one catch: it’s available only at 10:35 a.m. on the daily.

Called the McBrunch Burger, the hush-hush menu item recently took the internet by storm, thanks to a few avid foodies over on TikTok. The burger itself features two cheeseburger patties, bacon, scrambled eggs and a hash brown in a sesame seed bun. Essentially, it’s a celebration of McDonald’s breakfast staples and their lunch offerings, which makes its name pretty darn fitting.

As for how one can get their hands on the McBrunch Burger, Bailey Fink of AllRecipes said you can’t order the burger until after McDonald’s starts serving lunch. Several TikTokers added that you have about a 20 to 30-minute buffer to order the burger, so you don’t need to show up at your local McDonald’s exactly at 10:30 a.m.

While several McDonald’s employees confirmed online that the burger does indeed exist, others seemed to be unfamiliar with the menu offering at the drive-thru lines. Fink said it’s best to list out the burger’s ingredients while ordering instead of asking for it by its name. Her order was then rung up as a Double Cheeseburger with a “special request.” This isn’t McDonald’s first-ever brunch burger — a similar burger actually exists at McDonald’s restaurants in Australia. It’s called the Big Brekkie Burger and contains a double cheeseburger topped with bacon, hash brown, eggs, and barbecue sauce.

Trump family fraud exposed — but Ivanka dodges liability in N.Y. civil case

It’s been a long time coming but it finally happened. Donald Trump, several of his businesses and two of his sons have been found liable for fraud by a New York judge for massively inflating the value of their holdings and companies. Is it possible that Trump’s pathological lying and grandiose bragging finally caught up with him after all of these years?

The civil fraud case brought by New York Attorney General Letitia James appeared so unassailable to Justice Arthur Engoron that he issued a summary judgment on behalf of the state which strips control of some of Trump’s businesses from the family and could end up costing the former president as much as $250 million. Engoron found that after examining the facts and the arguments there was no need for a trial to determine that Trump had committed fraud. This ruling amounts to what lawyers call the “corporate death penalty.”

Trump’s main lawyer in the case, Alina Habba, who travels with him frequently on his campaign plane, was hired by Trump after meeting her at his golf club in Bedminster, New Jersey. She was previously general counsel for a parking lot concern and was known for her representation of former “Real Housewives” cast member Siggy Flicker in a case against Facebook, which she claimed had disabled her account for wishing Melania Trump a happy birthday.

Evidently, Habba’s defense of Donald Trump’s business empire wasn’t convincing to the judge, who indicated that Habba hadn’t presented a coherent case but instead had argued that “the documents do not say what they say; that there is no such thing as ‘objective’ value; and that essentially the Court should not believe its own eyes.” Engoron sanctioned each defense lawyer $7,500 for repeatedly using the same arguments that had been ruled invalid. “Defendants’ conduct in reiterating these frivolous arguments is egregious,” he wrote in judgment. “We are at the point of intentional and blatant disregard of controlling authority and the law of the case.” Yikes.

We need your help to stay independent

Trump ranted on Truth Social that it was all a Witch Hunt and the judge and the prosecutors are all out to get him. The usual. He insists that he never inflated the value of his company and that, in fact, his valuations are all very low because he doesn’t include the greatest value of all, his “brand” which is apparently worth gazillions. Hilariously, in his deposition, cited by the court, Trump defended himself by saying that the valuation of his properties cannot be inflated because he could find a ‘buyer from Saudi Arabia’ to pay any price he suggests. Now why would that be, I wonder?

We knew that Trump was a crook from the Trump University fraud case which Trump settled for $25 million after he won the White House to the grotesque con game his family called the “Trump Foundation,” which they used for their own benefit and which was dissolved in a previous civil case they lost. The blatant pay-to-play at the Trump hotel and his various resorts during his presidency was astonishing.

Trump has trained his followers to believe that any attempt to hold him accountable, regardless of the facts, even those they can see with their own eyes, are part of a massive conspiracy to destroy him.

That his sons are caught up in this one is particularly notable since this particular scam has been intergenerational from the start. The blockbuster New York Times exposé of Trump’s father’s various dubious ploys to shelter his earnings from taxes showed this was a family affair from the time Trump and his siblings were toddlers. This latest case nails Eric and Donald Jr. right along with Trump since they were also “executives” who are legally liable for these fraudulent practices.

Don Jr. took to Twitter to rant about “weaponized Blue State Marxist America,” which he does pretty much every day anyway.

While Eric is apparently a world-class whiner who seems to be throwing his father and brother under the bus:

While everyone can see that this case is egregious, the only thing worse than weaponizing the legal system against a political opponent is unfairly going after their family. Both the Attorney General and the Judge know I had absolutely NOTHING to do with this case. Every single person has testified that my job has always been acquiring, developing and managing properties, not back office functions. The only reason I am collateral damage is because my last name is Trump and I am unwavering in the support of my father, his accomplishments and what he has done for our country, a nation which is now rapidly in decline.

Poor Eric didn’t have anything to do with all those “back office functions” like the rest of them. He “acquires, develops and manages properties”, you know, the important stuff. I guess that’s why he took the 5th over 500 times when they deposed him.

That his sons are caught up in this one is particularly notable since this particular scam has been intergenerational from the start.

Ivanka, meanwhile, is off the hook for this particular scam because the Appellate Division of the State Supreme Court dismissed the charges against her when the attorney general missed a deadline for filing the case against her. She’s very lucky. (She was also up to her neck in the Trump pump and dump hustle in which they similarly lied about valuation of their properties to investors and customers alike.)


Want a daily wrap-up of all the news and commentary Salon has to offer? Subscribe to our morning newsletter, Crash Course.


The amount that Trump will have to pay will be decided at a trial set to begin next week, presided over by the same judge. Trump’s lawyers have already said they will appeal the ruling and they have sued the judge over a separate issue which an appeals court panel will decide this week. If none of that works (and it might, you never know) Trump will be on trial next week. Since the judge has already ruled against Trump, it shouldn’t last long.

In a healthy political culture, Donald Trump being held accountable for fraud after lying for years about his wealth would at least put a dent in his reputation as a successful businessman. Sadly, we do not have a healthy political culture so this is unlikely to change anything. Trump has trained his followers to believe that any attempt to hold him accountable, regardless of the facts, even those they can see with their own eyes, are part of a massive conspiracy to destroy him.

That argument obviously didn’t work on this judge, who is rational and able to see the facts before him, but the MAGA movement is beyond reason. The more proof that is presented of Donald Trump’s corruption and criminality, the more they respect and revere him.  But at least the rest of us know that we aren’t crazy and that’s about the best we can hope for.

Electric vehicles are a climate solution with a pollution problem: Tire particles

As gas-guzzling cars are replaced by their electric counterparts, tailpipe emissions are on the decline. But cars have other negative impacts on environmental health, beyond what comes out of their exhaust pipes.

One of the bigger, and lesser known, problems is tire pollution — or “tire and road wear particles,” in industry terminology.

Tires shed tiny particles with every rotation. Tire wear happens most dramatically during rapid acceleration, braking, and sharp turns, but even with the most conservative driving, particulate pollution is an unavoidable consequence of car use. And it’s a problem that’s poised to get worse as drivers transition to EVs.

“We’re pushing for decarbonization by going to battery electric vehicles, and in doing so we’re pushing up tire wear emissions … which is going to prove difficult to solve,” said Nick Molden, founder and CEO of Emissions Analytics, a London-based company that performs independent tests on cars’ real-world tailpipe and tire emissions. Molden pointed out that tailpipe exhaust is dramatically reduced by filters and catalytic converters, which use chemical reactions to reduce pollution. Meanwhile, tires are a fundamentally open system, so there is no viable way to capture the polluting particles that fly off of them.

Emissions Analytics found that a single car sheds almost nine pounds of tire weight per year, on average. Globally, that amounts to six million metric tons of tire pollution annually, with most of it coming from wealthier countries where personal car use is more prevalent.

Tire particulate is a toxic slurry of microplastics, volatile organic compounds, and other chemical additives that enter the air, soil, and water around trafficked areas.

The amount of tire pollution emitted per vehicle is increasing as more electric cars hit the road around the world — some 14 million of them this year, according to the International Energy Agency. EVs tend to be significantly heavier than gas-powered or hybrid cars due to their larger, heftier batteries. The average battery for an EV on the market today is roughly 1,000 pounds, with some outliers approaching 3,000 pounds — as much as an entire gasoline-powered compact car. Emissions Analytics has found that adding 1,000 pounds to a midsize vehicle increased tire wear by about 20 percent, and also that Tesla’s Model Y generated 26 percent more tire pollution than a similar Kia hybrid. EVs’ more aggressive torque, which translates into faster acceleration, is another factor that creates more tire particulate mile for mile, compared to similar internal combustion engine cars.

Tire particulate is a toxic slurry of microplastics, volatile organic compounds, and other chemical additives that enter the air, soil, and water around trafficked areas. The rubber, metals, and other compounds coming off tires settle along roads where rain washes them into waterways. Smaller bits of tire particulate linger in the air, where they can be inhaled, and the smallest of this particulate matter — known as PM 2.5, because each particle is 2.5 micrometers or less — can directly enter the bloodstream. A 2017 study estimated that tire wear is responsible for 5 to 10 percent of oceanic microplastic pollution, and 3 to 7 percent of airborne PM 2.5 pollution. 

One particularly concerning chemical in tires is 6PPD, which is added to virtually all tires to prevent rubber from cracking. But in the environment, 6PPD reacts with ozone to become 6PPD-quinone, a substance that has been linked to salmon die-offs in the Pacific Northwest. A 2022 study confirmed the compound is also lethal to rainbow trout and brook trout.

Further research has shown that the chemical is absorbed by edible plants like lettuce and has the potential to accumulate in them. A study in South China found both 6PPD and 6PPD-quinone in human urine samples. The human health effects of the chemical are not yet understood, but other chemicals found in tires have been linked to problems ranging from skin irritation to respiratory problems to brain damage.

Given the intensifying realities of climate change, phasing out gas-powered vehicles rapidly is a must. But experts say the U.S. and other wealthy countries can accomplish this while also mitigating the environmental and health problems caused by EVs’ increased tire wear — namely by curbing car use overall.

Foremost, local policymakers can take steps to make U.S. cities less cripplingly car-dependent. Although that might sound like a daunting task, there’s historical precedent: The Netherlands used to be dominated by cars and experienced a higher rate of traffic fatalities than the U.S., until activist groups like Stop de Kindermoord (“Stop Child Murder”) mobilized in the 1970s to let policymakers know that they wanted less traffic on their streets. According to Chris Bruntlett, the co-author of Building the Cycling City, policymakers created the low-traffic, bike-friendly Dutch cities we know today by instituting traffic-calming measures. “Officials started with speed-limit reductions, parking restrictions, through-traffic limitations, and lane narrowings and removals,” Bruntlett told Grist.

David Zipper, a mobility expert and a visiting fellow at the Harvard Kennedy School, says that city leaders can also remove subsidies for car ownership, such as free residential parking on public streets. “Once car subsidies are removed, fewer people in cities will choose to buy and own them,” Zipper said.

Of course, measures to reduce car use only work in tandem with investments in alternative transportation. The Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act of 2021 provided some federal funding for transit and pedestrian and bike infrastructure, but making the most of these funds will require political will from state and local lawmakers. Zipper said that policymakers in some U.S. cities have begun to take positive actions — like Boston Mayor Michelle Wu, who has committed to expanding her city’s bike lane network until 50 percent of the population lives within a three-minute walk of a bike lane.

One legislative solution to car bloat is introducing weight-based vehicle taxes, which encourage consumer interest in lighter cars and can be used to offset the cost of increased wear on roads caused by heavier vehicles.

Another way to reduce tire pollution is to trade big, heavy cars for smaller and lighter ones. Especially in the U.S., cars have grown significantly in size and weight in recent decades. Automakers began promoting SUVs in the 1980s, because a legal loophole allowed vehicles designated as “light trucks” to skirt fuel-efficiency regulations. Nine out of the 10 best-selling cars in the U.S. last year were trucks or SUVs, and the International Energy Agency has found that SUVs were the second largest cause of the global rise in CO2 emissions between 2010 and 2018.

One legislative solution to car bloat is introducing weight-based vehicle taxes, which encourage consumer interest in lighter cars and can be used to offset the cost of increased wear on roads caused by heavier vehicles. France implemented a weight-based car tax in 2021, charging consumers a penalty of 10 euros (about $10) for every kilogram above 1,800 (about 4,000 pounds) that their car weighs. This year, Norway also extended its weight-based vehicle tax to include EVs at a rate of a little more than a euro per kilogram above the first 500 kilograms (about 1,100 pounds) for EVs. Norway also taxes vehicles on their carbon dioxide and nitrogen oxides emissions. Taken together, these three taxes have the combined effect of dramatically incentivizing small electric vehicles

In the U.S., some states already prorate vehicle registration fees based on weight, and Washington, D.C. recently overhauled its registration system to more heavily penalize larger cars. In D.C., owners of cars heavier than 6,000 pounds now have to pay $500 in annual fees. New York state lawmakers also recently introduced legislation that would similarly incentivize smaller cars.  

Regulators can also take steps to minimize the harm caused by tire pollution — and in California, the process has already begun. In October, a new regulation implemented by the state’s Department of Toxic Substances Control, or DTSC, will require manufacturers of tires on the California market to research safer alternatives to 6PPD. Manufacturers that sell tires in the state are obligated to notify DTSC about products containing 6PPD by the end of November. 

Karl Palmer, deputy director of safer consumer products at DTSC, believes that making tire makers conduct an “alternatives analysis” will ultimately result in products that are safer for the environment.

“We’re using California’s market strength to say, ‘If you want to park here, you’ve got to comply with our rules,'” Palmer told Grist.

 

President Drink Bleach says what? Trump now claims he beat George W. Bush and Barack Obama

Donald Trump is skipping another GOP primary debate this week and the theories abound as to why. Some paint it as a smart strategy, setting his opponents to take each other apart while he sails into the presidential nomination. Others, including the right-wing editorial board at the Wall Street Journal, have accused Trump of being afraid to debate. But watching clips of some recent Trump speeches, I have a different theory: His team is worried Trump will start talking about how he bested Teddy Roosevelt in a bear-hunting competition, before trouncing the 26th president in the 1904 presidential election. 

To be sure, Trump was never playing with a full deck. Never forget when he recommended bleach injections for “cleaning” COVID-19 from lungs. Lately, however, his brain functioning, as impossible as it may be to believe, seems even worse. He appears to believe he’s won every presidential election in the last two decades, instead of that one electoral college-based win against Hillary Clinton in 2016. During a campaign stop in South Carolina, Trump spun out a whole story about defeating a famous military leader named “Bush.” 

“When I came here, everyone thought Bush was going to win,” he rambled, saying it was “because Bush supposedly was a military person.” Then he added, “He got us into the, uh, he got us into the Middle East. How did that work out, right?”


Want more Amanda Marcotte on politics? Subscribe to her newsletter Standing Room Only.


Trump did prevail over Gov. Jeb Bush of Florida in the 2016 GOP primary. But he appears to believe he defeated President George W. Bush, Jeb’s older brother, who is actually the guy who “got us into the Middle East,” when he invaded Iraq. 

Before bragging about besting two-term winner George W. Bush, Trump gave another speech boasting about his imaginary win against another two-termer, President Barack Obama. “With Obama, we won an election that everyone said couldn’t be won,” he prattled on in a speech in Washington, D.C. last week. In the same speech, he confused Obama with President Joe Biden, and warned that, if he didn’t win in 2024, we would enter “World War II,” which famously ended the year before Trump himself was born. 

Flat-out dumbassery or overt bigotry from Republicans is shrugged off, because of the belief that their base voters don’t care anyway. 

While Trump, who likes to call Biden “cognitively impaired,” got widely mocked on social media for this, the audience he’s speaking to doesn’t seem to notice their god is brain-farting. That’s because Trump fans, as I’ve written about before, don’t actually listen when Dear Leader is talking. Instead, they wait for him to say buzzwords they can cheer, like “lock her up,” but otherwise they tune him out. After all, MAGA is an authoritarian movement based on tribalist politics. Merit-based systems allow women and people of color to rise up, which is intolerable to the GOP base. What Trump says is not imporant. What they like about him is he’s rich, white, male and a bully.

There’s no way to know from afar what’s going on with Trump. On one hand, he’s 77 years old, and his own father died of Alzheimer’s. On the other hand, Trump’s narcissism has long fueled a willingness to lie shamelessly about his own supposed accomplishments, from making up golf scores even pros can’t achieve to pretending he had a chance with women who hated him to falsifying charitable donations to claiming his inauguration drew crowds it didn’t

But claiming to have won elections he didn’t run in would be next-level lying, even by Trump standards. Plus, it doesn’t explain really his confusing Biden with Obama, or confusing the two Bush brothers. The likelier explanation is he’s confusing his fantasies with memories. Nor does it explain how his social media presence, which was always ungrammatical and silly, has become even more unhinged and incoherent. Perhaps we’ve all become numb to it, but stepping back, it’s really remarkable that he regularly issues violent threats on Truth Social that get ignored mainly because they’re as incomprehensible as they are terrible. 

That the press understands Trump isn’t doing well is evident in the way they all politely ignore him screaming for the head of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, much like one would smile patiently at a dementia patient yelling invective about long-dead relatives. But of course, this is unbelievably unfair, because the very same press is in an endless hype cycle about “concerns” that Biden, who does not issue grammar-challenged murder threats regularly, is slowing down from age. 


Want more Amanda Marcotte on politics? Subscribe to her newsletter Standing Room Only.


“Biden is old” is swiftly turning into one of those self-perpetuating B.S. media cycles that only end up seeming to smear Democrats unfairly, such as “Hillary Clinton’s emails.” First, the press runs a million pieces on this non-story, creating the illusion of controversy where none exists. Then voters start to parrot the “concerns” back in polls, concerns they only have because they’re being told by a 24/7 news cycle to worry about this. Then those polls are used to justify even more coverage of a non-controversy, making sure a candidate is defined by something that was never a real problem. 

With Biden, the rejoinder is “but he actually is old!” But of course, so is Trump. Worse, Trump, who is only 3 years younger, is clearly feeling his age a lot more than Biden, who does not forget what elections he ran in or how many world wars there were. Crucially, Biden isn’t displaying the loss of impulse control we see with Trump, whose baseline of self-control was not good to begin with. Trump struggles to get through interviews without confessing to his crimes. Good for prosecutors, but also a reminder that a man who can’t be a passable steward of his own freedom has no business running the country. 

As Salon’s Heather “Digby” Parton pointed out on Twitter, the press actually knows they’re treating Biden and Trump very differently, even though the latter is way worse. 

Part of this is the same old bothsiderism that has cobbled Beltway journalism for decades. The press exaggerates the flaws of Democrats while minimizing the transgressions of Republicans, in order to create a false sense that the two parties are equal. They do this to seem “fair,” even though it’s the opposite of fair to handicap one party so thoroughly. They also do it for market reasons, because horse race coverage benefits from false equivalence, while giving audiences clear and accurate information would take some of the sport out of it. It gets to downright silly levels the closer elections get:

A lot of the double standard is driven by perceptions of what the two voting bases care about. Mainstream journalists believe, with good reason, that Democratic voters care about qualities like intelligence, competence, and mental fitness. They also believe, with good reason, that Republican voters don’t care if their candidates are babbling morons, so long as they a rich, white men. Indeed, being seen as “too” smart can hurt you with the GOP base, which suspiciously eyes intelligence as a gateway drug to rationality. So the Beltway press, in an attempt to be “objective,” ends up covering candidates through these perceived partisan biases. A Democrat saying something wrong or off is “news” because his own party members won’t like it, even if the mistake is inconsequential. Meanwhile, flat-out dumbassery or overt bigotry from Republicans is shrugged off, because of the belief that their base voters don’t care anyway. 

And it’s true enough that most Democratic voters care about competence and most Republican voters do not. But that doesn’t excuse the press’s wild double standard on this. For one thing, it’s basic journalistic ethics to report the truth without worrying whether their most loyal voters care. But also, it’s foolish to think that giving audiences greater context doesn’t matter. There are a lot of swing voters, independents, and people who haven’t decided if they’re going to vote yet. Those folks can actually have their opinion shaped by the information they’re taking in. If the media focuses on Biden’s age while ignoring that Trump is worse, a lot of those fairweather citizens may vote in ways they come to regret — or not vote at all. 

That’s bad news in any environment, but especially bad considering how much of a threat Trump is to our democracy and the nation’s future. He was bad enough in his first term where he, as much as the media might often forget, attempted a coup. If, as all public signs indicate, his already fragile mental state is getting more disjointed and reckless, that’s terrifying. What may be more dangerous than Trump’s idiocy is that, while he’s always been sociopathically impulsive and evil, he seems to be getting worse in his late 70s. If he gets power again, there’s little that could contain him.