Spring Sale: Get 1 Year, Save 58%

Trump’s “shock and awe” campaign hits the wrong targets

President Donald Trump's transition team and outside allies have been signaling for weeks that they were planning to "flood the zone" in the first 100 days of the new administration. Former senior adviser and activist Steve Bannon had pushed this idea during Trump's first term, telling author and journalist Michael Lewis that "the Democrats don’t matter. The real opposition is the media. And the way to deal with them is to flood the zone with s**t.” He called it "shock and awe," which was described by historian Douglas Brinkley as "bizarre, rapid-fire presidential policy making."

"[E]very day there’s a new, radical initiative, and it doesn’t give journalists or the public a chance to get a grip on what just happened."

The new Trump administration may just have miscalculated what their "shock and awe" strategy might do.

Current senior adviser Stephen Miller has refined the idea for the second term. He recently told the New York Times that he believes that "those he regards as Mr. Trump's enemies — Democrats, the media, groups like the American Civil Liberties Union and portions of the federal bureaucracy — are depleted and only have so much bandwidth for outrage and opposition." Miller, the Times reports, "has told people that the goal is to overwhelm them with a blitz of activity."

Russell Vought, Project 2025 author of the first 180 days memorandum and Trump's pick for the Office of Management and Budget, has described the political opposition as “enemy fire that’s coming over the target,” while urging allies to be “fearless at the point of attack” and calling his policy proposals “battle plans.”

Bannon, for his part, has recently said that "shock and awe" is "so 2017." So now he's calling it "Rolling Thunder."

I think you're getting the picture from all these military terms. These guys are all cosplaying Clausewitz. It seems to make them feel very strong and manly.

In turn, Trump signed a huge pile of executive orders on day one but they're as substandard as MAGA legal work always is. Slate's Dahlia Lithwick writes, "We saw some shoddy, shoddy lawyering in some of these new executive orders":

And I want to note that the one promise, for at least the last six months, as I understand it, was that these Project 2025 jobs were going to be ready from Day 1. That the greatest minds in the conservative legal movement were beavering away for months to make sure that when all of this went into effect on Day 1, or Week 1, it would be bulletproof. And this is not bulletproof. Some of it looks like it was written by A.I. or by a first-grader using A.I. And I just want to flag that one of the reasons Donald Trump lost a whole lot in the first four years of Trumpism was because of crap lawyering by crap lawyers cutting corners and doing a bad job. It seems to me that would’ve been the one lesson they learned. 

Maybe none of that matters if the whole point of the exercise is to "flood the zone" with you-know-what and rain down shock and awe on the American people — but I have to wonder if maybe people are on to them this time.

Rather than confusing and overwhelming everyone with their flurry of sloppy executive orders, there was one specific action Trump took on Tuesday that got everyone's attention, almost to the exclusion of everything else — his shocking pardons of more than 1,500 Jan. 6 defendants and commutations of the handful who were convicted of sedition. On top of that, he completely went back on his promise that he would not interfere with the workings of the Department of Justice by ordering it to drop all pending Jan. 6 cases.

Everyone knew that Trump was planning to pardon some of the convicted prisoners but nobody expected this full sweep. Polling before and after the election has shown that, of all Trump's proposals, from the ridiculous to the bizarre, this one is the most unpopular. A Scripps-Ipsos poll before the election found that 68% of Americans disapproved of Trump's plan to pardon the J6 rioters. Likewise, a recent AP-NORC poll from this month showed that 60% disapproved.

We need your help to stay independent

Just a couple of weeks ago, Vice President JD Vance was asked about the possibility and said, "If you protested peacefully on Jan. 6 … you should be pardoned, if you committed violence on that day, obviously you shouldn’t be pardoned." Trump's nominee for attorney general, Pam Bondi, said just the other day in her confirmation hearing that if she was asked to advise the president on the pardons (as is the usual process) she would take those on a case-by-case basis but added, "Let me be very clear in speaking to you, I condemn any violence on a law enforcement officer in this country."

Trump pardoned people who were convicted of literally attempting to murder police officers that day. He was asked about it yesterday and his pathetic response was that he didn't know anything about that and would "take a look at it," as if that means anything, and went on to say that murderers get away with it all the time in cities around the country:

That officer had a heart attack from the stun and suffered a brain injury. More than 140 officers were injured that day, which was the worst single day for law enforcement since 9/11.

Trump had the chutzpah to call himself a "friend of police":

As it happens (in a proverbial leopards eating faces moment), the Fraternal Order of Police, which enthusiastically endorsed Trump last November, begged to differ, putting out this statement:

Crimes against law enforcement are not just attacks on individuals or public safety — they are attacks on society and undermine the rule of law. Allowing those convicted of these crimes to be released early diminishes accountability and devalues the sacrifices made by courageous law enforcement officers and their families.

It went on to say that, contrary to Trump's deplorable excuses, his pardons sent a dangerous message, potentially "emboldening others to commit similar acts of violence.”


Want a daily wrap-up of all the news and commentary Salon has to offer? Subscribe to our morning newsletter, Crash Course.


But then, that may be a feature, not a bug. At the same press conference, Trump virtually invited the Proud Boys and the Oath Keepers to rejoin the MAGA cause, saying that "they love our country" One of the leaders whose sentence Trump commuted, Enrique Tarrio, told Alex Jones yesterday that he wants the people who prosecuted him to "feel the heat" and be put in prison.

There is no mistaking the messages Trump sent with his sweeping pardons yesterday. He told his followers that if they commit crimes, violent or otherwise, on his behalf, he has their backs. The immunity the Supreme Court gave him is therefore conferred on anyone who does his bidding. He has also told his political opponents, and any official protection they might have, that they are not safe from political violence.

He means it. Yesterday he revoked Secret Service protection from his nemesis, former national security adviser John Bolton, who has reportedly been threatened by Iranian agents:

The new Trump administration may have miscalculated the effects of its "shock and awe" strategy. Pardoning even the violent criminals who attacked police officers has broken through the fog of war; people can see exactly what they're up to. The "law and order" president is acting exactly like someone who's been convicted of multiple crimes. After all, that's what he is. 

Elon Musk’s salute falls flat: Why far-right trolling isn’t working this time around

One thing that's easy enough to see about Elon Musk's infamous hand gesture from Donald Trump's inauguration celebration is that he acted with deliberation. As the video from the event shows, he threw his back into it, taxing himself enough that he grunted from the exertion. 

um

[image or embed]

— Aaron Rupar (@atrupar.com) January 20, 2025 at 2:58 PM

And then he turned around and repeated the gesture in the other direction, in case anyone missed it. 

Elon Musk gave two back to back Nazi salutes at the Trump inauguration parade

[image or embed]

— PatriotTakes 🇺🇸 (@patriottakes.bsky.social) January 20, 2025 at 3:07 PM

I'm not here to litigate what mainstream media outlets, always wary of defamation lawsuits and angry MAGA emails, used as descriptors of this gesture, so familiar to anyone who has ever seen a film reel from WWII. Instead, I want to flag that we've been down this road before, during the first Donald Trump administration, when white nationalists appropriated the "OK" hand gesture to troll progressives. 


Want more Amanda Marcotte on politics? Subscribe to her newsletter Standing Room Only.


To recap: Pretending it was a "joke," white nationalists, starting around 2015, started flashing the OK hand gesture as a sign of racist solidarity. This wasn't the OK sign in the casual way most people do it. They usually exaggerated for effect, sometimes flipping their hand upside down to make it look especially odd and therefore noticeable. The goal of this was twofold: First, to signal fascist sympathizers to fellow travelers. Second, to bait liberals into ugly, divisive debates over the "true" meaning of the gesture. 

The OK sign was just the most prominent version of fascist peekaboo, but there are plenty of other ways the far-right trolls progressives with coded language, only to declare innocence and feign outrage when called out on it.

The troll worked beautifully. Every time some Proud Boy or cop or local GOP official or online troll or Brett Kavanaugh aide flashed the exaggerated OK hand gesture, progressives who understood the tactic called it out as fascist signaling. In response, mainstream journalists and moderates eager to prove their resistance to hysteria were quick to scold progressives as "paranoid," insisting these people weren't "real" racists — despite their love of Trump! — but were instead pretending to be racist to get a reaction. They rarely paused to ask why someone who isn't racist would be fine with merely "pretending" to be racist, especially since acting like a racist tends to mean people see you as a racist. 

The pretzel logic phase ended a couple years in, when one of those "ironic" racists shot up a mosque in New Zealand, killing 50 people. He flashed the OK hand gesture during his arraignment. Since you can't murder people "ironically," the mainstream media had to finally admit the gesture was both a troll and a sincere symbol of white nationalist beliefs. No apologies were made to those who didn't need 50 murders to get to the obvious truth, but hey, at least the scolding stopped. 

The OK sign was just the most prominent version of fascist peekaboo, but there are plenty of other ways the far-right trolls progressives with coded language, only to declare innocence and feign outrage when called out on it. It's not just about baiting the left, though. It's a recruitment tactic. Having provoked progressives into yelling at them, authoritarians will appeal to centrists with some form of, "Don't you hate these paranoid leftists?" Once the hook is in the mouth, they draw their prey in with, "But you know, fascists did have some good ideas. Would you like to read some Curtis Yarvin about the need to get past dictator-phobia?" 

Musk spends all his time on Twitter, chatting with far-right trolls, so the odds he's unaware of how this works are approximately zero. His behavior follows the standard script. Having made the obnoxious public gesture, he's now baiting the "liberals are paranoid" hook, tweeting, "The 'everyone is Hitler' attack is sooo tired."

But what is actually tired is this exhausting "Who me?" act. The good news is much of the reaction shows that progressives have learned how to deal with peekaboo trolling. The first step is to refuse to get sucked into "debates" about the "real" meaning of a gesture. Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, D-N.Y., modeled how to do it, as she often does. After the Anti-Defamation League (ADL), which has drifted towards Trump apology, insisted Musk merely made "an awkward gesture in a moment of enthusiasm," she responded curtly on Twitter, saying, "People can officially stop listening to you as any sort of reputable source of information now."

A huge part of the peekaboo troll is provoking extensive arguments, by preying on the often misplaced faith among progressives in the power of reason and evidence. These go-nowhere debates exhaust progressive energies and make it easier for the right to paint the left as "shrill." As counterintuitive as it may seem, this "whatever dude" response can make it easier for people, especially fence-sitters, to be open to reason. Instead of feeling brow-beaten, they are invited to trust what their own eyes and ears are telling them. That's a more inviting approach to persuading people to look at evidence. 

By not wasting too much energy doing a frame-by-frame analysis to determine if something meets an exacting definition of a "Nazi" salute, progressives and smart journalists have learned to spend time on what really matters: the context and impacts.

Perhaps someone feels unconvinced that Musk meant the gesture he put so much effort into. And it's true! We can't know what Musk meant with absolute certainty, especially since nothing he says about his own thought process can be trusted. Having not wasted energy arguing about the gesture, one can point to the bigger picture. For instance, Musk backs not just MAGA in the U.S., but also the Alternative for Germany (AfD) party, a radical, far-right group whose leaders have been fined for using Nazi slogans, denounced the monuments to Holocaust victims, and declared Germans should be "proud of the achievements of the German soldiers in two world wars." Musk persists in championing AfD, even though German courts found "some AfD members favor a two-tier society in which 'ethnic' Germans are given more rights than people from immigrant backgrounds," NBC News reported

We need your help to stay independent

Some news outlets wisely sidestepped the go-nowhere debate about what Musk "meant" to focus on a more productive topic: the impact of his behavior. On this, there is no debate: Loud-and-proud Nazis were over the moon about the Musk salute.

"Right-Wing Extremists Are Abuzz Over Musk’s Straight-Arm Salute," declared the headline at Rolling Stone. Wired went with a similar headline: "Neo-Nazis Love the Nazi-Like Salutes Elon Musk Made at Trump's Inauguration."  The examples are hard to wiggle away from. Thanking Musk for the gesture, one white nationalist group tweeted, "The White Flame will rise again." Another poster, who helped create a chatbot named after Adolph Hitler, shared the clip with the caption, "Incredible things are happening already lmao." Reporting on this impact is far more helpful than digressive debates over the exact meaning of the word "fascist."

Most people, if they made this gesture innocently, would be upset about the neo-Nazis trying to claim common cause with them. As Ed Kilgore argued at New York Tuesday, "there is an easy way to clear this up, particularly for someone who owns a major social-media platform and uses it very often." All Musk needs to do is "make the gesture of denouncing fascism aggressively." He adds that explicitly rejecting fascism and white nationalism "should be worth a few dozen tweets, wouldn’t you say?"

Musk, however, saves his ire for anti-racists and seems unworried about neo-Nazis praising him. That is behavior inconsistent with an honest mistake, but it certainly echoes the model of trolling the left that we saw with white nationalists who flashed the "OK" sign. Ultimately, it doesn't matter what's in Musk's heart, but how he acts. When someone keeps casting warm smiles at racists while mocking anti-racists, they are promoting racism. At every turn, Musk's behavior is friendly and helpful to the worst people in our society. As Ocasio-Cortez said, those who refuse to see his behavior for what it is aren't worth listening to.

“We must save ourselves”: America’s crippling cynicism helps Donald Trump

It was dangerously cold outside on Monday, which necessitated that Donald Trump's inauguration ceremony be held inside the Capitol Rotunda. Four years ago on Jan. 6, 2021, Trump’s MAGA followers attacked the Capitol with the goal of keeping him in office and nullifying the results of the 2020 election. They carried the Confederate Battle Flag. During the Civil War, that symbol of white supremacy and treason never flew inside of the Capitol. Four years later, Trump would stand in the Capitol building and take his oath of office as the country’s first elected autocrat who has promised to rule as a dictator on “day one.” 

One of Trump's first official acts on Monday was to either pardon or commute the sentences of nearly all the MAGA followers (approximately 1,600 people in total) who attacked the Capitol on Jan. 6 in his name. They will likely be his most zealous foot soldiers and enforcers. At The American Prospect, Ryan Cooper summarizes: "This has two immediate effects. The first is to set loose a large number of dangerous insurrectionists who may well form the core of a Sturmabteilung-style paramilitary force. The second is a signal that federal law enforcement will almost certainly not hold anyone who commits crimes or violence on behalf of Trump accountable so long as he is president." In addition to freeing his Jan. 6 MAGA people, Trump would sign many dozens of Executive Orders as part of his shock and awe campaign to destroy President Biden's legacy (and multiracial pluralistic democracy more broadly) and then build the foundations for his autocratic rule as the country's first elected de facto dictator.   

Donald Trump and his MAGA movement and their agents are much more dangerous than they were during his first presidency. The MAGA movement and the larger right-wing and the neofascists now have a much better understanding of the weak points and other vulnerabilities in American government and democracy and civil society. Perhaps most importantly, the Supreme Court has made Trump a de facto king who is above the law.

In all, the MAGAverse and the Trumpocene are a type of never-ending horrible story and epic, one that is overwritten and contains so many plot twists and genres that if it were fiction few people would read or watch it. Unfortunately, this never-ending horrible story is the reality that the American people and the world must now navigate for (at least) the next four years.

What of the Resistance to Trump and the MAGA movement that was the focus of so much praise and discussion during his first time in the White House?

The Democrats are not acting like an opposition party. Instead, they are trying to find ways to cooperate (or more accurately collaborate) with Trump and his MAGA Republicans. The mainstream news media is preemptively surrendering to Trump as well. Civil society organizations are on the defense, afraid of how Trump’s administration and its agents will use lawfare and perhaps even go so far as to declare them supporters of terrorism or find other ways to take away their funding and tax-exempt nonprofit status as “enemies of the people.” This is in addition to how threats of violence and intimidation will create an overall chilling effect on attempts to organize in opposition to the Trump administration and the MAGA agenda and in defense of American democracy and freedom.

What about the activists, large protests, marches and other such actions? The everyday Americans who comprise the base of the Resistance are tired, exhausted and frustrated and, for now, at least, appear to have tapped out of a rematch with President Donald Trump before it has even begun. 

Ultimately, the Resistance, in whatever form it is going to take, will have to use new approaches (which will necessarily mean (re)learning lessons from successful pro-democracy movements both here and abroad, such as the Black Freedom Struggle and the civil rights movement) to confront and hopefully slow down Trumpism and American fascism’s advance.

The Resistance is quickly running out of time. President Trump’s “shock and awe” and “trauma” campaign is no longer a hypothetical. It is real, here and will gain great momentum in the days and weeks ahead.

In an attempt to gain some perspective as we navigate Trump’s return to power and the rise of MAGA America, I recently spoke with Virginia Kase Solomón, president and CEO of Common Cause, a nonpartisan government watchdog organization driving systemic change and holding power accountable through grassroots advocacy and legislative action. Since 1970, Common Cause has championed government accountability, ethics and the removal of big money from our nation’s political system. Today, the organization represents over 1.5 million members and 23 state offices. 

This is the second part of a two-part conversation.

What is democracy? Why should Americans want to protect and preserve it?

As shown by the outcome of the 2024 election, real democracy is not something that many Americans appear to embrace or are willing to defend. Cheap gas and eggs and “the border crisis” were more important than the Constitution, democracy and the rule of law for those Americans who put Trump back in power. 

This is a really great question and it’s one we discuss a lot at Common Cause. From a values standpoint, it really is about life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness, as described in the Declaration of Independence. At its core, democracy is a system of government where the public elects leaders to advocate on their behalf. In theory, it was created to empower everyday people and to prevent the consolidation of power by any one despot or monarch. Although we know that American democracy has always been flawed and has never fully met its promise, most Americans still support this system of government and we know for a fact that they will protect it when they think it’s being challenged. It is not just partisan battles we should keep a close eye on but also inaction from lame-duck legislatures that failed to codify voter protections for disenfranchised voters before leaving office. 

It’s also true that millions of Americans don’t feel our democracy can deliver for them right now. For that reason, many people are willing to take a chance on political leaders who attack democratic norms and promise a full overhaul of our system. These people have every right to be concerned and as we begin a new term in Washington, it’s on all political leaders in both parties to show Americans that our democracy is still able to address the most pressing challenges of our time.

Democracy is something we do. Part of defending democracy in this time of American autocracy and ascendant fascism will mean doing things in one’s own immediate community that on the surface do not look like “politics." This will be a very long struggle and not one measured in a few years or one election cycle.

It’s true that all politics is local, and over the next few years, I expect we’ll see a lot more young people taking action at the community level to address the issues that they feel are overlooked by our leaders in Washington. People can do amazing things when they come together.  

I can speak from firsthand experience about the impact of community organizing. When I was 22, I helped launch the Hartford Youth Peace Initiative in Connecticut, a nonprofit to provide a safety net and educational support to youth. I came out of a community with only a 56 percent high school graduation rate. We had more people living in public housing per capita than any other city in the country. This was a time — and a community — that was very economically disenfranchised and over-policed. We weren’t getting help from adults or elected leaders, so we took action and got organized. We saw that there were not enough social programs, so we fundraised and built programming to help young people improve their education. This is democracy in action, people organizing to yield power and make positive change. This work wasn’t unique. It happens to this day in communities all around the country and it requires investment. 

Is Donald Trump a populist? Is MAGA a populist movement? 

In short, yes. Trump is a populist. He has the ability to speak to broad voter anger and voters are very angry. They feel like the system doesn’t work, so they’re willing to put their trust in someone who speaks to that anger. However, grassroots organizing was created to empower everyday people, the kind of folks who don’t have a lobbyist fighting for their interests in Washington. The MAGA movement has hijacked the traditional tactics of grassroots organizing but used it to advance an agenda that serves our country’s richest citizens.

We need your help to stay independent

If we’re going to defend democracy and unite an electoral majority behind important policies in D.C. and in states across the country, we need to meet people where they are and address the issues that impact them most acutely every day. Some of the most common issues are affordability, access to healthcare, safety, freedom of expression and so much more. Too often, political leaders fall into the trap of lecturing their constituents when they should actually be on the ground, in their communities, listening to people talk about their problems.

Using the exact same strategies from the last time Trump was in power will likely not be effective given how he has expanded his base of support, has professionalized and expanded his attack on democracy, the country’s institutions and the rule of law and has the Supreme Court, almost literally, in his back pocket. 

The next four years will look a lot different than the last Trump administration. However, the president is still fundamentally the same person he was when he was elected in 2016, even if he has a more professional operation around him. We can learn a lot from the first term and shouldn’t repeat the mistakes of the past as we work through these next four years.

A few high-level lessons:

1) criticize the politician and/or the policy, but not the voters

2) don’t get so lost in fact-checking that you amplify the president-elect’s lies to a larger audience

3) focus on bringing people together around issues where we agree

4) make it plain and simple for people to understand the impact of issues on them and their lives and why they should care

The right-wing and “conservatives” and other actors spent decades building parallel organizations, institutions, media, think tanks and interest groups. What can the Resistance and others who want to help defend and renew American democracy learn from the opposition?

The GOP was much better at using non-traditional media spaces to reach voters in 2024 and politicians on both sides of the aisle have fully embraced the power of podcasts and Substack as a means of mass communication. 

In general, I think legacy media as a whole needs to do a better job of reaching people. For many voters, the intervention of Jeff Bezos in The Washington Post’s endorsement decision was deeply concerning. So many great papers and networks have shuttered, consolidated, or been bought out by billionaires. Over the next four years, I’d encourage folks to really focus on identifying independent newsrooms, responsible voices on social media and new platforms to communicate and build new coalitions.

Much media attention and that of the engaged public has been focused on Project 2025 for example. But Project 2025 is just one part of a much larger revolutionary project by the American right to remake society in their vision. What are some of the other initiatives and projects that you and your colleagues are monitoring?

While all eyes are on Trump and the imminent threats of Project 2025 and Agenda 47’s egregious policies, we must not lose sight of the democracy denialist threats playing out in state legislatures and city halls across the country. These hyper-local policies will have massive implications for our democratic processes. 

Take a look at the Allison Riggs-Jefferson Griffin race for state Supreme Court in North Carolina. Griffin, the Republican candidate and North Carolina appellate judge, lost the race to Democratic Supreme Court incumbent Allison Riggs. He lost by just over 700 votes, with over five million ballots cast. The Republican Party is demanding that 60,000 lawfully cast ballots get thrown out despite two recounts and weeks of litigation — an attempt to silence voters and interfere in North Carolina’s democratic election system. This challenge disenfranchises voters and calls the entire state’s election system into question. A Republican-controlled Supreme Court in North Carolina will now decide the winner of the race, which could create a dangerous precedent for other state legislatures. 

It is not just partisan battles we should keep a close eye on but also inaction from lame-duck legislatures that failed to codify voter protections for disenfranchised voters before leaving office. 


Want a daily wrap-up of all the news and commentary Salon has to offer? Subscribe to our morning newsletter, Crash Course.


I also think that we have to pay close attention to the role of billionaires and corporations in our government and how they are influencing policy, elections and our courts. Far too many of our elected officials, and even a few Supreme Court Justices, are — dare I say — being bought and paid for by those whose very interests are not aligned with the American people. While this is not new, this level of corruption is at an all-time high and we cannot look away. The role that money has in politics has gotten so out of control that we now have people questioning if Donald Trump is just a proxy for Elon Musk. That’s both sad and embarrassing for our country. 

What will it require for the Democrats and other mainstream political actors, including the news media, to adopt a posture of being the opposition? I have deep worries that the Democratic Party, given its present leadership, is even capable of operating in that manner. 

The country is very polarized right now. But when you remove the parties, there’s broad consensus on a lot of issues. People want the same things: they want to earn a living, have freedom over their bodies, have access to adequate health care and live free from fear or intimidation. These are universal values shared by a broad spectrum of voters. These are values that both parties should be holding sacred while looking for real solutions.

Remember, a lot of the people who voted for Bernie Sanders also voted for Donald Trump. We must hold both parties accountable and realize that we must save ourselves, no political party or politician is going to do that for us. 

What is the role of big money and moneyed interests in Trump 2.0?

Well, Trump has accepted millions and millions of dollars from CEOs and billionaires to fund his inauguration and pay off his campaign’s debts. Additionally, the new Cabinet has over 20 billionaires in it to date. It’s fascinating because the involvement of elite corporate interests has been a Republican talking point used to critique the Democratic party, but the same standard does not exist for Trump’s administration. This needs to be addressed.

There’s an expression: tell me who your friends are and I’ll tell you who you are. When Trump is surrounding himself with billionaire donors and tech leaders, he is separating himself from the American people, especially the middle and working class. When the founder of SpaceX is put in charge of regulating NASA, you have a serious conflict of interest. 

What do you want to prepare the American people for in these weeks and months ahead?

We will see injustice. We will see inequity, oppression and unjust laws. This is not new in America. However, for many, this is the first time you will have experienced this for yourself. Be reminded that far too many have experienced these things their entire lives. It is okay to feel sadness, anger and even despair, but you cannot sit in it. Use those emotions as motivation to be part of the change. Find ways to engage and be in community with others. There, you will find the inspiration you need. There, you will find joy and hope — both of which are active forms of resistance. 

A few years ago, I was arrested with the late Congresswoman Sheila Jackson Lee. We were engaging in civil disobedience with the Black Women’s Roundtable protesting at the Senate in an effort to get them to eliminate the filibuster so we could pass voting rights legislation. She was one of my cellmates. As we sat in our cell talking, she said, “Isn’t this great?” I responded, “Isn’t what great? Being in jail?” She responded, “Yes. How fortunate are we that we get the honor and the blessing of doing this work for so many people?” Perspective. Even in a jail cell, she took pleasure in doing something that just might make people’s lives better. We didn’t win that battle, but we both left that day knowing that we had done our part — with joy, to fight another day. There will always be another day and one day, we will win. 

Trump declared a “national energy emergency.” Experts say it’s a “farce”

On Monday, President Donald Trump opened his second term with an inaugural address declaring that America has a “national energy emergency.” Vowing to tap into the country’s vast oil and gas reserves, Trump dismisses the overwhelming majority of climate scientists who say burning fossil fuels releases greenhouse gases that overheat the planet.

Instead of trying to curb emissions on those gases, Trump signed executive orders withdrawing the United States from the 2015 Paris climate deal. He also announced initiatives promoting Alaskan oil and gas development and reversing outgoing President Joe Biden’s policies protecting Arctic lands and U.S. coastal waters from drilling and encouraging the adoption of electric vehicles.

Climate scientists, as well as other experts on environmental and energy policy, say that Trump's emergency doesn't actually exist. They emphasize that the president's desire to ramp up fossil fuel use is a self-destructive move, as Earth’s temperature is already 1.5 degrees Celsius above pre-industrial levels, which will hurt both the planet and the economy.

“There is no national energy emergency — and certainly no emergency as President Trump has defined it,” Julie McNamara, deputy policy director with the Climate & Energy program at the Union of Concerned Scientists, told Salon. “President Trump is simply doing the bidding of fossil fuel executives, attempting to slash critical climate and public health protections and basic project accountability to boost their bottom lines.”

"There is no national energy emergency — and certainly no emergency as President Trump has defined it."

Dr. Mark Serreze, the director of the National Snow and Ice Data Center, likewise said “there is no energy emergency in the sense of not having enough. The USA is the world's largest producer of oil and natural gas.” Serreze said we need to get off hydrocarbons and fossil fuels, and transition to solar, wind and nuclear and embrace energy conservation, but "Trump's climate policy seems to be to ignore the threat of climate change. History and humanity will not look kindly on that choice.”

Energy sector experts have confirmed that America has more than enough energy already, and point out Trump’s energy policies will have harmful economic ramifications for ordinary citizens.

John P. Holdren, a Harvard University professor of environmental science and engineering who specializes in energy technology innovation, described Trump’s claim about a national energy emergency as “absurd,” echoing Serreze in saying that “this country is producing oil and gas at the highest rates in our history — and more of each than any other country.”


Want more health and science stories in your inbox? Subscribe to Salon's weekly newsletter Lab Notes.


“The USA also produces far more nuclear energy than any other country and is producing the most renewable energy in our history,” Holdren said. “We are more than self-sufficient in energy as a whole — that is, we produce more than we consume. That has been true since 2019; the last time before that when the USA was (barely) self-sufficient was 1957.”

Even though Trump supporters bemoan rising energy costs, Holdren pointed out that gasoline was 9% cheaper in real dollars at the end of 2023 than it was in the final year of Trump’s first term, while residential electricity is 6% more expensive.

“There are challenges in the U.S. energy picture, but they are mainly about the need to expand non-fossil energy faster in order to reduce the greenhouse-gas emissions that are driving increasingly devastating climate change — a now overwhelmingly obvious problem that Trump denies,” Holdren said. “His other executive orders so far include measures that will slow down progress on the real challenges.”

Kenneth Gillingham, a Yale University professor of environmental and energy economics, explained that although Trump’s attempts to combat the non-emergency will initially be tied up in court, “oil companies are already drilling as much as they want given the price of oil.” The long-term consequence is that Trump’s environmental deregulations will lead to real-world harms to people, and that companies and investors may decide not to give money to clean energy businesses, “which could slow down progress in reducing greenhouse gas emissions.” Businesses that manufacture electric vehicles or wind energy (also targeted by Trump’s executive orders) are likely to be negatively impacted.

Gillingham added that although Trump was elected in part because Americans want him to lower prices, the president’s insistent denial of climate change will have economic ripple effects that do the opposite and exacerbate inflation. For example, the recent Los Angeles wildfires are estimated to cost more than $200 billion, and scientists say these heavy financial burdens are just the beginning.

“There is a long-running connection between climate change and inflation in that higher insurance costs and investments to make supply chains more resilient to climate shocks will increase prices in the long run,” Gillingham said. “I do think that this is a secondary factor relative to decisions by the Fed or other central banks. And in the short-run, other inflationary factors dominate.”

Dr. Kyla Bennett, the director of science policy for the Public Employees for Environmental Responsibility (PEER), told Salon that there is an inextricable link between the science of climate change and the economics of rising prices.

“Higher temperatures, floods and droughts — all symptoms of climate change — adversely impact food production, which helps drive inflation,” Bennett said. “Heat waves increase energy demand, which drives inflation. Severe weather impacts supply chains. Natural disasters (like the fires in LA) increase demand for building materials, housing, etc., which drives inflation. There are recent peer-reviewed studies on this.”

Holdren echoed these concerns, pointing out that “it should be obvious that harm from the impacts of climate change — more damages to people, property, productivity and ecosystem services from droughts, heat waves, floods, hurricanes, pest infestations, and the spread of tropical diseases — can only make everything more costly than would otherwise be the case.”

Dan Esty, a Yale University professor of environmental law and policy, pointed to current events for evidence of the kinds of phenomena that both confirm climate change and harm the economy.

We need your help to stay independent

“With fires in LA, two high-impact hurricanes this past year within a month hitting Florida, and floods in the Carolinas, we are starting to see the kinds of impacts that climate scientists have long forecast,” Esty said. “We need, in this regard, to redouble our efforts to move to a clean energy future — and to lead the world in creating a sustainable 21st century economy.”

In lieu of this transition, natural disasters caused by climate change like wildfires, floods and tropical storms will become more common.

“When disaster strikes, prices go up,” Esty said. “In recent years, we have seen an increasing number of supply chain disruptions in the wake of disasters (wind storms, floods and fires) that might well be climate change-caused. Ignoring the need to reduce greenhouse gas emissions will increase the pace and intensity of climate change — and cause further spikes in prices in the years ahead.”

McNamara bluntly argued that Trump’s policies reveal a disconnect from reality.

“The farce is in the facts,” McNamara said. “President Trump is claiming an energy emergency at the same time that the U.S. is producing record levels of fossil fuels. If President Trump were truly committed to building out a clean, affordable, resilient energy system, he’d be pulling every lever he could to support the ramp-up of clean energy solutions; instead, right from the jump he attempted to knock any new wind power offline.”

“Please try not to use it again”: Jon Stewart on Elon Musk’s “awkward” hand gesture at inauguration

It's a new year and a new presidency but Jon Stewart has the same unbridled energy to skewer President Donald Trump's inauguration and the high-profile figures in attendance. The comedian began his "Daily Show" opening monologue noticing the tone shift after the inauguration. He grimaced, "I'm your host for this historic vibe shift of a day."

Stewart noted the guests in attendance like the Supreme Court, Trump’s family, Congresspeople and former presidents.

“Also attending were all those people who warned Americans to shun this wannabe fascist dictator called Trump,” Stewart quipped.

“‘Look at me, Ma! Oh, let’s go see Hitler and get a quick selfie first! Hello! Look at us! A quick one for the ‘Gram!’ Former President Obama was there. George Bush seemed kind of there," Stewart said. "Even Mike Pence showed up, I guess to let the crowd finish the job. Only Michelle Obama seemed to have the consistent ethical stance of saying, ‘When they go low, I stay the f**k home.'"

Stewart also highlighted the heads of the tech industry, who had front-row seats to the inauguration — a signal of their close ties to Trump.

Stewart described them as a “plethora of stocky, bald billionaires who also seem to go to the same biohack life extension clinic and say, ‘Give me the Lex Luthor.'” He joked, “Shouldn’t this gathering be happening in a volcano’s lair near Zurich? Or are we just open-sourcing the Illuminati now?”

Tech billionaires like Mark Zuckerberg, Jeff Bezos, Elon Musk, Tim Cook, Shou Zi Chew and Sundar Pichai are "the six guys who maybe control 20% of the world's wealth and 100% of your nudes," Steward said.

But Stewart dropped all pretenses, "Honestly there's not a useful app of communication not controlled by at least one of these individuals and you may not be concerned that they've all ponied up a $1 million to be sitting there and are kissing the a** of a president who openly threatens non-a** kissers."

He added, “Trust me, s**t’s going to get weird.”

One of those billionaires, Musk, made headlines Monday evening after a controversial hand gesture at an event held following the inauguration. During the billionaire's appearance and speech, Musk made a salute on stage which has caught momentum online. Historians have said it is clearly a Nazi gesture.

We need your help to stay independent

"Charitably, I’m going to say that was just an awkward 'my heart goes out to you' gesture," Stewart replied after showing the clip and mimicking the hand movement. "You know, listen, it’s a f**king nerve-wracking day, you’re not normally a public speaker, it’s a one-off gesture. Please try not to use it again."

Then the show continued the clip of Musk repeating the gesture at the rally. 

“Son of a b***h! You really want to make sure that people in the back can see it. I’m just going to be generous and say maybe it was Elon’s attempt at dabbing on the haters.”

"The Daily Show" airs Monday through Thursday at 11 p.m. ET on Comedy Central and streams on Paramount+.

“No time for celebration”: Champagne sales are reportedly on the decline, new report finds

Looks like consumers, both nationwide and around the world, aren’t feeling particularly celebratory to pop bottles of champagne, CNN reported.

A new report from Comité Champagne — an organization consisting of key players in champagne production, including growers, cooperatives and merchants — found that the total number of champagne shipments from France dropped nearly 10% last year, to 271 million bottles.

The reason for the steep decline can be attributed to rising food costs, along with a general pessimistic outlook on the current state of the world. Maxime Toubart, co-president of Comité Champagne, told CNN that now is “no time for celebration, with inflation, conflicts around the world, economic uncertainty and a political wait-and-see attitude in some of Champagne’s biggest markets,” both in the U.S. and in France.

Within France, champagne sales declined 7% to 118 million bottles because the “domestic market is still suffering from the prevailing gloomy political and economic context,” according to a statement obtained by the outlet.

In 2024, several luxury brands and major champagne producers reported a steep decline in sales. French luxury goods brand LVMH reported a 15% decline in sales for the first half of the year. “Champagne is quite linked with celebration, happiness, et cetera,” LVMH Chief Financial Officer Jean-Jacques Guiony said on an earnings call, per CNN. “Maybe the current global situation, be it geopolitical or macroeconomic, does not lead people to cheer up and to open bottles of Champagne.”

French spirits group Rémy Cointreau stated in a recent financial report that it’s also expecting a decrease in sales due to more consumers growing weary of inflation-fueled food prices.

“Whitest show in America”: Tracy Morgan said he felt “culturally isolated” on early days of “SNL”

Tracy Morgan is opening up about the early, difficult days of his "Saturday Night Live" tenure. In Peacock's "SNL50: Beyond Saturday Night" documentary, the comedian and actor shared that his experience on the sketch variety show was starkly different than he had imagined because of his race. Morgan joined the show in the show's 22nd season in 1996, becoming the ninth Black person to be cast in the series.

"I wanted to show them my world, how funny it was. But the first three years, I felt like I was being culturally isolated sometimes," he said in the documentary.

Morgan admitted, "I’m coming from a world of Blacks. I’m an inner city kid. To be on the whitest show in America, I felt by myself. I felt like they weren’t getting it."

During Morgan's first "Saturday Night Live" season, he performed with cast members such as Jim Breuer, Will Ferrell, Tim Meadows, and Molly Shannon nearly 30 years ago. The comedian was on the sketch comedy series for seven years, until he was a main cast member in Tina Fey's "Saturday Night Live"-inspired comedy, "30 Rock."

Even though Morgan was one of few Black people to be the show's cast at the time, his experience shifted when he had a conversation with his producer Lorne Michaels.

"Lorne Michaels had that talk with me. He said, ‘Tracy, I hired you because you’re funny, not because you’re Black. So just do your thing.’ And that’s when I started doing my thing."

"SNL50: Beyond Saturday Night" is available to stream on Peacock now

Trump signs executive order for WHO exit

On Monday, President Donald Trump signed an executive order removing the United States from the World Health Organization, steering the country away from participation with the specialized agency of the United Nations responsible for global public health.

This isn't the first fight Trump has picked with the WHO. His administration began the removal process in July 2020 during the first year of the COVID-19 pandemic. Former President Joe Biden halted the exit in one of his first actions when he started his presidential term in 2021. The executive order cited the WHO’s “mishandling of the COVID-19 pandemic that arose out of Wuhan, China, and other global health crises, its failure to adopt urgently needed reforms, and its inability to demonstrate independence from the inappropriate political influence of WHO member states” as a reason for the withdrawal. 

The executive order also cited financial reasons for the directive. 

“The WHO continues to demand unfairly onerous payments from the United States, far out of proportion with other countries’ assessed payments,” the order stated. “China, with a population of 1.4 billion, has 300 percent of the population of the United States, yet contributes nearly 90 percent less to the WHO.”

On Tuesday, the organization released a media statement in response to the executive order stating that it hopes the U.S. will “reconsider.” 

“The United States was a founding member of WHO in 1948 and has participated in shaping and governing WHO’s work ever since, alongside 193 other Member States, including through its active participation in the World Health Assembly and Executive Board,” the statement read. “For over seven decades, WHO and the USA have saved countless lives and protected Americans and all people from health threats.” 

Over these past seven decades, WHO said, the U.S. and the organization have been able to save “countless lives.”

“Together, we ended smallpox, and together we have brought polio to the brink of eradication,” the statement said. “American institutions have contributed to and benefited from membership of WHO.”

“I submitted my resignation last week”: José Andrés responds to being fired by Donald Trump

Chef José Andrés has responded to being “fired” as a presidential appointee by President Donald Trump, who first announced the news on his social platform Truth Social.

“Our first day in the White House is not over yet! My Presidential Personnel Office is actively in the process of identifying and removing over a thousand Presidential Appointees from the previous Administration, who are not aligned with our vision to Make America Great Again,” Trump wrote.

“Jose Andres from the President’s Council on Sports, Fitness and Nutrition, Mark Milley from the National Infrastructure Advisory Council, Brian Hook from the Wilson Center for Scholars, and Keisha Lance Bottoms from the President’s Export Council — YOU’RE FIRED!”

Andrés took to X to address his recent firing, explaining that he “submitted my resignation last week . . . my 2 year term was already up.” The chef and former CEO of his eponymous restaurant group (formerly known as ThinkFoodGroup) was asked to serve as co-chair of the President’s Council on Sports, Fitness, and Nutrition under the Biden administration in 2022.

“My fellow council members — unpaid volunteers like me — were hardworking, talented people who inspired me every day,” Andrés said. “I’m proud of what we accomplished on behalf of the American people . . .like a historic partnership between the White House and every major sports league to increase access to sports and health programs for kids.”

“I hope @realdonaldtrump exercises his presidential authority so the Council can continue to advocate for fitness and good health for all Americans. These are bipartisan issues . . . nonpartisan issues."

“May God give you the wisdom, Mr. President, to put politics and name calling aside . . . and instead lift up the everyday people working to bring America together. Let’s build longer tables,” Andrés wrote.

Pete Hegseth’s former sister-in-law alleges that his ex-wife lived in fear of him

Senators on the Armed Service Committee received an affidavit Tuesday from the former sister-in-law of Pete Hegseth, who said that the would-be defense secretary's behavior caused his second wife to fear for her safety, NBC News reported.

Danielle Hegseth, the former sister-in-law who was previously married to Hegseth's brother and kept the surname, submitted the affidavit in response to a letter from Sen. Jack Reed, D-R.I., seeking “a statement attesting to your personal knowledge about Mr. Hegseth’s fitness to occupy this important position.” Hegseth has denied the allegation.

In a redacted copy of the affidavit reviewed by NBC News, Danielle Hegseth said that she had "chosen to come forward publicly, at significant personal sacrifice, because I am deeply concerned by what Hegseth’s confirmation would mean for our military and our country.”

Many of the descriptions she provided in the affidavit about Hegseth's alleged volatile and threatening conduct against his former wife, Samantha Hegseth, were also relayed by her to the FBI shortly after his first confirmation hearing, in which he had to answer questions related to allegations of drunkenness and sexual assault.

Reed said in a statement Tuesday: “As I have said for months, the reports of Mr. Hegseth’s history of alleged sexual assault, alcohol abuse, and public misconduct necessitate an exhaustive background investigation. I have been concerned that the background check process has been inadequate, and this sworn affidavit confirms that fact."

"The alleged pattern of abuse and misconduct by Mr. Hegseth is disturbing," she added. "This behavior would disqualify any service member from holding any leadership position in the military, much less being confirmed as the secretary of defense.”

When reached for comment by NBC News, Samantha Hegseth responded: “There was no physical abuse in my marriage. This is the only further statement I will make to you, I have let you know that I am not speaking and will not speak on my marriage to Pete. Please respect this decision.” 

A lawyer for Pete Hegseth, Tim Parlatore, dismissed Danielle Hegseth as an "anti-Trump far left Democrat who is divorced from Mr. Hegseth’s brother and never got along with the Hegseth family" with an "axe to grind" and her affidavit as just another false accusation.

The Armed Services Committee voted Monday to advanced Hegseth's nomination to a full Senate vote that is expected to take place as early as Thursday. The panel's chair, Sen. Roger Wicker, R-Miss., told NBC that he would not hold another hearing over allegations that are "anonymous, unsubstantiated and was contrary to some court documents that had been placed in the record at the hearing."

Electrolyte beverages can help your body stay balanced — but may worsen symptoms if you’re sick

For generations, Gatorade and similar electrolyte beverages have been helpful tools for athletes seeking a competitive edge.

In 1965, Dr. Robert Cade and a team of scientists at the University of Florida College of Medicine created Gatorade to help their football players combat heat exhaustion and muscle cramps during long practices in extreme temperatures.

The drink's winning formula of water, sodium, potassium and sugar works effectively with the human body to keep users hydrated, refueling them with energy and optimizing muscle function.

While I don't work for or receive funding from Gatorade, as a registered dietitian and nutrition instructor, I've watched how specific electrolyte beverages can be handpicked to boost hydration in hospitalized patients, student athletes and even myself.

And while Gatorade was one of the first electrolyte beverages heavily marketed to consumers, its ingredient combination has paved the way for the creation of even more sport and electrolyte beverages on the grocery store shelves today. If you're looking to gain a specific nutritional edge from a sports drink, you can seek out a registered dietitian for an individualized plan. Otherwise, if you've ever wondered what makes these colorful beverages a nutrition attraction, here's a closer look at some key ingredients.

The importance of hydration

Whether people are athletes or not, the human body is constantly losing water through normal human functions such as sweating, urinating and even breathing. When water is lost, the body also excretes key electrolytes such as potassium and sodium. These electrolytes are crucial for everything from heart function to muscle contractions.

Electrolytes get their "electro" name from having an electrical charge when dissolved in water. This charge allows them to work throughout the body in chemical reactions that maintain normal brain functioning, balance fluids inside and outside of body cells and even balance how acidic or alkaline your blood is.

Electrolytes can help you rehydrate after a workout by balancing fluids in our cells.

Major stress on the body can accelerate the dehydration process – whether it's intentional, like running a 5K, or unintentional, like getting a nasty stomach bug. If left unchecked, dehydration can cause more serious complications, such as fainting and irregular heartbeats.

To prevent these complications, you need to replenish the fluids and electrolytes you're losing. Stressful scenarios such as exercise and sickness are a perfect time to consider an electrolyte replacement drink.

A closer look at Gatorade's ingredients

Water, the main ingredient in most sports drinks, hydrates you. The human body is made up of approximately 60% water, so to stay hydrated, it is important to listen to your body and drink water regularly. When the body's water volume is decreased, it sends thirst signals to the brain.

However, these signals often lag behind your hydration status. So, once you feel thirsty, your body is likely already slightly dehydrated. For a more accurate hydration assessment, check the color of your urine. Darker yellow or golden urine? Grab some water. Pale yellow or clear urine? Keep up the good hydration.

Sodium, another ingredient in Gatorade, attracts water. When you are dehydrated, the body's blood is more concentrated because less water is circulating overall.

When you have a lower blood volume, your blood vessels don't expand as much as they normally would – ultimately lowering blood pressure. If blood pressure drops too quickly due to dehydration, you might feel dizziness, lightheadedness, nausea or weakness.

The good news is that sodium actively pulls water into the bloodstream. So during an intense workout or while dealing with a dehydrating illness, consuming a salty snack or sports beverage can help.

The potassium in Gatorade regulates muscle contractions. This electrolyte is especially critical for regulating your heartbeat, and it also aids in normal skeletal muscle contractions. If the body lacks enough potassium, painful muscle cramps or dizziness can disrupt your workout or day.

Sugar provides quick energy and nutrient absorption power. A traditional Gatorade beverage contains glucose and dextrose, which are both known as simple sugars. A simple sugar is one that the body can quickly digest and absorb, with the goal of quickly increasing blood sugar.

Strenuous aerobic exercise or strength training for longer than 60 minutes, performing activities in very hot or humid climates, or the physical strain of an unwelcome illness can all rev the body's metabolism and quickly deplete blood glucose. When glucose levels drop, you may experience fatigue, weakness, lightheadedness, nausea or difficulty concentrating.

The nutrient combination found in Gatorade was designed with athletes in mind, but it is also sometimes discussed as a remedy to consider during an unpleasant bout of gastrointestinal illness. Diarrhea and vomiting are easy routes for electrolytes such as sodium and potassium to escape.

Energy drinks' combination of simple sugars, water and electrolytes may be one strategy to maintain hydration during a time when food and fluids are difficult to stomach.

However, be cautious – many traditional sports drinks have a high sugar content aimed at refueling lost energy during a workout. When that same sugar content is introduced to an upset gastrointestinal tract, it can pull in extra water, leading to more diarrhea. If you find yourself in this situation, here are some other options to consider.

Opt for a lower-sugar electrolyte beverage. Beverages to consider include Pedialyte or even a broth-based soup. Both will hydrate with minimal added sugar content.

The human body is incredibly efficient at managing nutrients in the blood. In most cases, balanced meals and water consumption are enough to meet your daily nutrient needs. During intense physical exercise or an unexpected illness, however, the body may struggle to maintain its usual balance.

If you notice unusual symptoms such as dizziness, fatigue or persistent thirst, your body will need attention. In specific cases of dehydration from exercise or illness, a sports drink like Gatorade can be a simple tool to help you bounce back to your best self.

Bryn Beeder, Visiting Instructor in Kinesiology, Nutrition, and Health, Miami University

This article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license. Read the original article.

Trump picks “Stop the Steal” activist Ed Martin to oversee Jan. 6 cases

A vocal "Stop the Steal" activist who sat on a board advocating for Jan. 6 defendants has been named interim U.S. attorney for Washington. D.C., an office that has control over hundreds of cases related to the 2021 assault on the U.S. Capitol.

The appointment of Ed Martin, a longtime GOP operative from Missouri and board member of the Patriot Freedom Project, was confirmed by President Donald Trump's Justice Department. Trump had also appointed him as chief of staff to the Office of Management and Budget in December.

Martin is not only a supporter of the defendants and the effort to overturn the 2020 election results, but was an active participant in the effort to throw out former President Joe Biden's victory. In a speech at the Capitol on Jan. 5, 2021, he called on "die-hard true Americans" to work until their "last breath" to "stop the steal."

On Jan. 6, Martin tweeted that he was "at the Capitol," where he asserted that here was "nothing out of hand." He then compared the gathering of "love, faith and joy" to Mardi Gras — shortly after rioters breached the building and Ashli Babbitt was shot. Moments later, another rioter would drive a stun gun into a Capitol police officer's neck as the crowd sought to break through the lower west tunnel.

Martin previously served as chief of staff to former Missouri governor Matt Blunt and ran the state party. He gained national prominence in the last several years by aligning himself with anti-feminist activist Phyllis Schlafly, co-writing a book with her that urged conservatives to vote for Trump in 2016, shortly before her death.

In 2024, he served as a policy director for the Republican National Committee, where he advocated for the jailing of women who get abortions and a national ban without exceptions for rape and incest.

“You’re trained not to be too pushy”: Actor Julia Stiles had to unlearn being a “people pleaser”

"I'm a romantic at heart," says Julia Stiles. But anyone familiar with the actress' most indelible roles, from the flinty Kat Stratford of 1999's "10 Things I Hate About You" to the vengeful Lumen Pierce on "Dexter," would know that her romantic streak has been leaning a little dark for decades now. So perhaps it's inevitable that when, after years of searching for the right project for her directorial debut, she gravitated to novelist Renee Carlino's wry tearjerker, "Wish You Were Here." 

Stiles, who also co-wrote the screenplay with Carlino, described the wistful love-at-first-sight tale with a heartbreaking time limit as being "about the fragility of human life." The movie is "more mature than just the age of the characters," (played by "Orphan" star Isabelle Fuhrman and "Aladdin's" Mena Massoud), Stiles said.

During our "Salon Talks" conversation, Stiles shared the new experience of stepping into the director's chair, after decades of being an actress since her teens. "It's so ingrained in me to want to do what the director says or make sure that everybody's happy and make sure that everybody likes me," Stiles said. But stepping into her role as director, she realized, "I also have to be the leader, instead of just waiting for somebody to say, 'That's a good idea.'"

And she knew exactly the mindset she wanted to bring to her set. "All the directors that I really loved working with," she recalled, "were very calm on set and very kind, even though now I know they must've been insanely stressed out."

Stiles, who calls "Wish You Were Here" a story with an "old soul," launched her own career as one of Hollywood's youngest old souls. "I was 17 years old, and I would always get 'You're too serious. You need to be sexier. You're too intellectual, lighten up," she recalls. Her now classic performance in "10 Things I Hate About You" was the break she'd been waiting for, a chance to harness that serious, intellectual energy — and all within a crowd-pleasing romance.

Over two and a half decades later, Stiles sees the industry opening up in new ways for women behind the camera. "The cynical side of me is like, oh, it's changing because it's become commercially successful and it's a selling point, but that's okay. 'Barbie' can make a bazillion dollars and that opens the door for a lot of other women to direct films too, so that's fine." 

Stiles also opened up about collaborating with her old friend and fellow Y2K icon, musician Vanessa Carlton, on the movie, as well as being humbled by the Jumbotron at a Knicks game. And as for what's next for her, Stiles says, "I'm just happy being able to be a working actress and now a director . . . This honestly has been a career-long goal of mine."

Watch our "Salon Talks" here, or read it below to hear more about "Wish You Were Here," the impact of "Hustlers" on her career, and creating chemistry on set.

The following conversation has been lightly edited for clarity and length.

This movie is the “Aladdin”-“Orphan” love story I didn't know we needed. You’ve wanted to direct for a long time and were waiting, what was it about this project?

It has been a long time since I had the feeling that I wanted to direct. I haven't really been waiting, I've been actively looking for the right story. There were some projects that I tried to get off the ground that didn't go, but I was certainly looking for the right story, knowing that as a director you're devoting much more time to any given project. 

Five years ago, the actress that's in the movie playing the best friend Helen, her name's Gabby Kono, slid into my Instagram DMs and then contacted my agents properly and she said, "I heard you want to direct. What do you think of this book?" I read it and I had a really visceral response to it. I laughed at moments and then I cried at moments and I could so see it as a movie and I just knew that it would be the right project for me.

Initially, the thing that drew me to it – I mean I'm a romantic at heart and I love a good love story – but I felt like the love story was more mature than just the age of the characters. They're a very young couple, but the love story is so much deeper than that and has more of an old soul. In the five years since we set out to make it, the movie's story has only gotten deeper and more meaningful I think. It's kind of grown and taken on a life of its own. It's a lot about the fragility of human life.

What I liked about it is that most of these young love stories focus on love at first sight, or the first date, or the initial falling in love with somebody, but because these characters play out this storytelling fantasy – they play this game together where they imagine themselves as an older couple looking back on their lives – it's really a meditation on [how] we should be so lucky to find somebody that we connect with and create a lifetime of memories with them.

It's a story about what could be and what is  it's past, present and future all coexisting  and the lives we live at the same time. Was that something that appealed to you about it as well?

Yeah, there were elements of the book that I seized on and I was really drawn to, and I pulled those out and kind of highlighted them. I kept saying to [author] Renée Carlino, I want to keep the spirit of your book, the dialogue, the characters, all the heart that you put into this — but there's a lot that also needs to be distilled for the sake of a movie. 

"You never know until you actually get on set. I was so lucky that their chemistry was really, really great together."

One of the elements was — I think because I have kids — the connection with [the lead characters] is almost childlike. They play games together, they tell stories together. Adam, after we‘ve found out that he's in the hospital and it's not really looking good, says, "I can't spend the last days of my life here. However long that's going to be, I have to go out into the world." In the book, they actually do travel the world together, but that's too much for a film. I wanted to pick one place that was really special and land with the characters and just watch their interaction together. That was an example of something that's a departure from the book, but still maintains the spirit of it.

How did you as a director build chemistry and create such a strong rapport among the cast? It's a special thing and it doesn't happen all the time.

I was really lucky. I also would like to think that I picked the right people. You said the “Aladdin”/“Orphan” love story [earlier], Mena Massoud was in “Aladdin,” and Isabelle Fuhrman was in “Orphan,” and I played her mother in the sequel, “Orphan: First Kill.” 

When we were filming that, it was the height of COVID — once we could go back to work — and so you couldn't really socialize with anybody. During all the downtime you were by yourself. I'd go home from set and I'd be in my apartment and I was working on the adaptation of “Wish You Were Here” and watching her on set. I was like, “Oh my God, she's 23 years old playing an eleven-year-old girl. This girl is amazing.” She's an amazing actress. I also saw that she had the stamina to be in every single scene, every single day, which I also needed for “Wish You Were Here.”

I had seen Mena's work from afar in “Aladdin” and also his TV show. I thought they would be a good match, but you never know until you actually get on set. I was so lucky that their chemistry was really, really great together.

There's also the whole story of female friendship in it too. There's [Furhman’s character] Charlotte and her best friend, and we have the classic rom-com elements of the mother and the best friend pressuring her to go on a dating app and find the right guy, and those are the moments of levity in the movie. The chemistry between the two [actresses], you never know if they're going to actually like each other and be friends, and they — I swear — hit it off. I get jealous sometimes that they have so much fun together and I am too old to be a part of that.

Speaking of female friendship, your good friend Vanessa Carlton co-wrote the score. Tell me how that came about.

I'm so grateful that she composed the original score for the movie with her husband John McCauley, who's in a band called Deer Tick. It just brought the movie to life. 

"As an actress for so many years, decades of being an actress where you are a people pleaser, it's ingrained in me. I didn't realize it too, I thought I was over that."

I've known her since high school. We didn't really become friends until we were in our 20s. We were at a performing arts school where she was a ballerina, I was an actress. We didn't really cross paths, but in our 20s she had the hit “A Thousand Miles” come out, and I had movies, I think it was “10 Things I Hate About You,” or “Save the Last Dance,” or both that came out. We were becoming successful in our careers very young and gravitated toward each other going, “What is this?” And, “Wow, this is something that we've worked so hard towards and is really wonderful, but it's also really scary and nobody else really understands it.” Then we stayed friends through our 20s and now both have families.

She's always wanted to score a film and so when I had the opportunity, I was like, "Do you want to score my movie?" And she said, “Yes.” It's got her amazing piano compositions with John McCauley, who has a more masculine energy. The two of them together, it's just perfect, especially because they're a couple too, in a movie about a couple.

One of the things I've read you talking about a lot with this film was that you had to learn to stop apologizing. That is a hard lesson for anyone to learn, it's certainly hard for women. How do you do it?

It was my script supervisor who said it to me at one point. It was early on in filming, day two or something. She didn't really mean apologizing like actually saying “Sorry,” it's the way that we couch our opinions. Instead of just saying, "I need the cup to be white," I would say all the reasons why I thought white would be a good idea. She was like, "You're the director." 

I felt it in my bones, it was a protective instinct, I was like, “Oh, this is my movie. I am working with all these people and I am respectful of them and I want their opinions and ideas and to collaborate, but I also have to be the leader and I have to be front-footed about it instead of just waiting for somebody to say, ‘That's a good idea.’"

Also, I think as an actress for so many years, decades of being an actress where you are a people pleaser, it's ingrained in me. I didn't realize it too, I thought I was over that. It's so ingrained in me to want to do what the director says, or make sure that everybody's happy and make sure that everybody likes me. You're trained not to be too pushy, I guess, which can get in the way of being assertive. 

You were in a movie that Heather Graham directed, Anna Kendrick recently had a film come out, a lot of women who have been in front of the camera for a long time are now moving behind it. You've talked about how there's a lot of lip service paid to women in roles of leadership in Hollywood. Do you feel that that's changing now? 

I do think it's changing a lot now, and I think that the change in film is also trickling into other areas of entertainment. I was just saying the other day [while] doing press for this movie, “Oh, I'm noticing there's a lot more female photographers.” I think it is changing. The cynical side of me is like, oh, it's changing because it's become commercially successful and it's a selling point, but that's okay. “Barbie” can make a bazillion dollars and that opens the door for a lot of other women to direct films too, so that's fine. I do think it's changing a lot. Maybe I'm noticing more that actresses are having more of an opportunity to step in front of the camera, but that's okay.

Coming into this role as a director, you must have been drawing on all of the directing you've experienced in your life. As an actor, were you tucking away experiences and saying, “I'm going to do that, I'm never going to do that,”?

Yes. I've worked with a lot of great directors, and so I did soak up many examples. I think all the directors that I really loved working with, they had a common thread, which is that they were very calm on set and very kind, even though now I know they must've been insanely stressed out. 

I remember talking to a few of them. Rodrigo García is a director that I love, who I worked with as an actress, but also produced a short that I made as a director. I called him and I was like, "Wow, you really hid it very well, all the behind-the-scenes stress that you must have been dealing with." 

Then in terms of the bad ones, of course, I definitely tried to set a tone. I think I even made an announcement during a tech scout that all of the jobs on set are important. You can't make a movie alone, so we all need to be respectful of each other and each other's time. Some departments compete over how much time they have, and I would always, if it got a little tense, be like, "Everybody's job is important. Everybody gets their time."

When I look at your career, you've had this burst of activity early in your life — you go to college, you do smaller projects, you step away a lot, and then “Hustlers” comes along. That is a movie that is female-led, female-directed. I wonder about the impact that that film had on your career, both in front of and behind the camera.

So much. That was the first time that I really put myself out there and pursued a film. I had gone through a period as an actress after the big initial success where I was doing a lot of indie movies that would go to festivals, but nobody really saw. It was “Hustlers” where I started to be more thoughtful and strategic about, “Okay, what do I really want to do?” That script was amazing and I really wanted to work with all the actresses in it and Lorene Scafaria, the director. I watched her as a female director navigate that set with such grace that I was so happy to be there and be a part of that movie. I also got to watch her as an example of a director in charge of a lot of people.

Again, so grateful. The “Bourne” franchise was a huge part of my adult life. I didn't expect to be in four movies. My character was killed off in the first one initially, and then they recut it so that she survived. Also, I was really proud of that franchise because it was cool and it paved the way for a different kind of action movie, especially for the female characters. Same thing with Dexter, so grateful for all these opportunities.

"I would always get like, 'You're too serious. You need to be sexier. You're too intellectual, lighten up.'"

I try to keep it all in perspective. It's great to have fans, period, but I maybe distance myself from paying too much attention to it. For instance, the lead actor from “Wish You Were Here” invited me to a Knicks game. We're sitting courtside and it's this amazing experience and all the basketball players, you can hear them talking and you can hear the ref talking, and it's so exciting and people want to take pictures and it's so amazing. “Oh, this is so wonderful.” And the woman behind me asked for a photo. We take a photo and then a little bit later she goes, "Well, I guess they forgot to put you on the Jumbotron." It's like the minute your head explodes, you can come crashing down.

I'm just happy being able to be a working actress and now a director. This honestly has been a career-long goal of mine. There were many, many years when even after I found “Wish You Were Here” and we were trying to make it, I thought, “I don't know if we're ever going to pull it off.” Indie movies are hard to get off the ground. Then we had the SAG strike, which delayed our movie even more, and I kept thinking, “Oh my God, all this work is going to amount to nothing if we don't actually make the movie.” And here we are.

I have to ask about “10 Things I Hate About You.” You have said that that was the first role that you really, really wanted. What was it about that character?

I was 17 years old and I had been auditioning as a teenager in New York for commercials and TV shows. The romantic comedy trend, the teen movie trend was really taking off and I would always get like, “You're too serious. You need to be sexier. You're too intellectual, lighten up,” or whatever the criticism was that any actor's going to get, but as a teenager, you really take it to heart and you're just trying to figure out who you are.

Then I read “10 Things I Hate About You” and Kat as a character was this feisty, outspoken teenager who didn't give a s**t. She just didn't care. She's outspoken and feisty and didn't care about other people's opinions, and it was a hilarious script. I loved it and I gravitated towards it, was so happy to be cast in it, went out to LA to screen test for it a few times and ended up making the movie. Now, decades later, that people still talk about it is really affirming that I was on the right track.

Obviously part of your life is still in LA, is Hollywood based. With everything going on with the fires, how are you? How are the people you care about in the industry and your friends? What are you seeing and hearing from the people you care about?

I mean, it's absolutely devastating, and even from a distance, it's really scary. The people that I know who are actually living in LA and on the ground, it's terrifying, and luckily they're okay. I think Jennifer Grey, who was in our movie, lost her house. Most of my friends, I think [haven’t lost] their houses, but had to evacuate. No matter what, it's just terrifying because of the air and everything. People in gridlock traffic, having to abandon their cars and get away from a fire that's moving really fast. It's really scary. 

Then it's also surreal and challenging to be trying to promote a film on top of that or in the wake of that, because a lot of the people that I am working with through the distribution company, Lionsgate, are in LA. How do you call somebody and say, "What's the plan this week," when they might've lost their house?

“The Joe Schmo Show” returns with a charming, skeptical mark forged in the age of disinformation

The namesake mark of the latest “The Joe Schmo Show” isn’t your “schmo” of 21 years ago. In 2003, the show found its first “Schmo” in Matthew Kennedy Gould, a law school dropout living at home with his mom and dad. 

Its latest is Ben Frisone, a 28-year-old Baltimore-based electrician who owns a condo and smiles sweetly as he admits he doesn’t have a girlfriend. Ben is very concerned about not disappointing his family. To that end, Ben promises to do smart things with his winnings if he comes out on top, “. . . and maybe [get] a kitten,” he adds.

His father Franco describes him as “good through and through,” which he effortlessly lives up to during the intense and entirely fake gameplay for “The Goat,” an American version of a South Korean series all the other competitors claim to know but he’s never heard of. 

Once Ben drops into “The Goat,” he’s surrounded by reality show archetypes. Among them are the physically impressive, charismatic frontrunner Braxton (not his real name), a YouTuber named Ryan (played by a stand-up comic), and former child actor Jonathan Lipnicki—the actual performer who co-starred in “Jerry Maguire”— playing himself as a “Hollywood d-bag."

“The Goat” is powered by physical contests, housemate rivalries and an elimination ceremony involving Illuminati-style capes and denouncements, with those nominated for elimination placed inside stocks called the Capricorn Clamps. None of it is real – not Ben’s fellow competitors, who are all improv actors, or the gameplay stakes.

With “So You Think You Can Dance” host Cat Deeley leading Ben down the proverbial garden path – one requiring both to dodge actual goat scat – the game show within “Joe Schmo” blunders along with enough realistic tropes to string Ben along . . .  just barely. The only real detail is that if Ben makes it through 10 days of this, he’ll get $100,000.

“The Joe Schmo Show” probably isn’t designed to run for multiple seasons in a row — something its creators Rhett Reese and Paul Wernick figured out in 2004 when the second season's “Jane Schmo” figured out its fake romantic competition “Last Chance for Love” was an empty suit. 

The conceit worked back then because the reality genre as we know it had not yet become a TV constant —“Last Chance for Love” was only two years younger than “The Bachelor” — and could only continue to work if it stayed off the air long enough for people to forget "The Joe Schmo Show" existed. It would be a few years before we’d drown in Bravo Housewives or TV would wash up on “Jersey Shore,” and another nine before Spike tried its hand at Schmoery again in 2013, luring a normal guy into a show about would-be bounty hunters (and an insufferable Lorenzo Lamas, an actor who played one on TV) challenged to track down faux fugitives. 

"The Joe Schmo Show" (Courtesy of TBS and Warner Bros. Discovery)

Resurrecting “Joe Schmo” again nearly 12 years after that is less of a response to fan demand than market trends. “Jury Duty,” Amazon Freevee’s unexpected hit from 2023, owes a substantial debt to the original “Joe Schmo Show,” proving that with a few tweaks, it could work again. 

But the world has changed drastically since the previous “Joe Schmo Show” seasons, and Ben proves this by demonstrating a level of distrust many of his predecessors didn’t. For example, the producers orchestrate Ben’s alliance with the most normal-seeming person there — a skilled gamer named Maya — without predicting he’d also find a kindred spirit in a conspiracy theorist called Charles Michael. That colors Ben as the quintessential 2025 American Everyman – he’s non-judgmental, not entirely immune to disinformation, but also questions behavior and developments that might have been plausible a decade ago. 

We need your help to stay independent

At just about every turn, our loveable “schmo” suspects that something about “The Goat” isn't on the up-and-up — even at one point outright declaring that the whole show must be an elaborate prank on him. It only takes a few assurances from people he’s put his trust in overnight – who, like "The Goat," are presenting themselves inauthentically – for him to keep playing along.

“Jury Duty” charmed viewers by setting up Ronald Gladden — the only real person not playing a character in the show — to be the hero. Its producers highlighted his kind qualities while setting soft moral tests before him to see what he would do. Some were no-brainers; nobody in their right mind would agree to jump on the end of someone’s bed to help facilitate coitus. 

Regardless, Gladden naturally did the right thing every time. At the finale's reveal, one of the main performers spelled that out and hailed him for it. “Jury Duty” creators Lee Eisenberg and Gene Stupnitsky worked together on “The Office," structuring “Jury Duty” to follow a sitcom’s blueprint. They made him the sane man in an elaborate joke that co-starred James Marsden playing a self-involved yet somehow likable parody of himself.

"The Joe Schmo Show" (Courtesy of TBS and Warner Bros. Discovery)

Upraising Gladden’s goodness as a guiding force made the comedy funnier and naturally sweetened the show in a way that even won over cynics. It reminded viewers that the world might not be as meanspirited and dour as our politics leads us to believe.

Those who weren't charmed by “Jury Duty" saw in it a few similarities to the way the original "Joe Schmo Show" played up its target's gullibility. That this sourness tinges the latest “Joe Schmo Show” may be unavoidable. It isn’t a mockumentary about a civics process, it’s a satire that throws elements of “Big Brother” and “The Traitors,” shows that encourage duplicity, along with a prop element from the South Korean competition series “Physical 100,” into a blender.


Want a daily wrap-up of all the news and commentary Salon has to offer? Subscribe to our morning newsletter, Crash Course.


But Reese and Wernick, along with showrunner Dave Kneebone (who worked on “The Eric Andre Show” and “Nathan for You”), promote Ben’s accepting nature as a winsome character trait while turning the camera on the extent to which reality production teams manipulate outcomes. 

Ben understands classic reality TV strategies and reacts to the producers’ engineered plots by doing the math and planning his moves accordingly. (There are other unplanned chef's kiss moments too, such as when he reacts to a fake confrontation between two other housemates by yelling an adorable "threat" no one believes he'll act on.) They plan for him to succeed or fail at certain junctures but don’t fully take into account what he’s wired to question along the way. In fact, he so frequently challenges the producers to concoct new plans on the fly that they're drawn into an actual competition they cannot lose with the man they're trying to fool. 

That makes this latest “Joe Schmo” a cleaner fun than the version previous seasons presented, even if it doesn’t warm our hearts like “Jury Duty” does. Instead, it proposes we cheer for a game rigged in favor of the good guy, something we see less and less of these days. 

"The Joe Schmo Show" airs at 9 p.m. Tuesdays starting January 21 on TBS.

 

FDA proposes mandatory front-of-package nutrition labels to combat spike in chronic diseases

The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is demanding increased, in-your-face food transparency when it comes to nutrition labels. On Tuesday, the agency proposed a new requirement to include nutrition labels on the front of packaged foods and drinks in an effort to “[combat] the nation’s chronic disease crisis,” per a recent press release.

“If finalized, the proposal would give consumers readily visible information about a food’s saturated fat, sodium and added sugars content — three nutrients directly linked with chronic diseases when consumed in excess,” the FDA explained.

Formally called the “Nutrition Info box,” the proposed labeling system would detail the content of saturated fat, sodium and added sugars using three levels: Low, Medium and High. The new label would accompany the agency’s Nutrition Facts label, which details the amount of nutrients in each serving of packaged foods or drinks and typically appears on the back or sides of the packaging.

“The science on saturated fat, sodium and added sugars is clear,” FDA Commissioner Robert M. Califf, M.D., said in a statement. “Nearly everyone knows or cares for someone with a chronic disease that is due, in part, to the food we eat. It is time we make it easier for consumers to glance, grab and go. Adding front-of-package nutrition labeling to most packaged foods would do that. We are fully committed to pulling all the levers available to the FDA to make nutrition information readily accessible as part of our efforts to promote public health.”

Per the FDA, the latest proposal “is informed by a substantial body of research,” including a scientific literature review, consumer focus groups and a peer-reviewed experimental study all conducted by the agency. A 2023 experimental study consisting of nearly 10,000 U.S. adult participants analyzed consumer responses to three different types of front-of-packaging labels and identified which labels helped participants make “quicker and more accurate assessments of the healthfulness of a product.” The final results found that the traditional black-and-white Nutrition Info label with the percent Daily Value (%DV) was deemed the most efficient.

The need for stricter food labeling comes in the wake of rising health concerns related to diet and nutrition. Sixty percent of Americans have at least one chronic disease, the FDA reported. Individuals who consume high amounts of sugar and refined carbohydrates are at risk of suffering from chronic illnesses like type 2 diabetes, obesity and various metabolic syndromes, according to research from the University of California, Los Angeles. Diets high in both saturated fat and sugar can also increase the risk of kidney and liver diseases.


Want more great food writing and recipes? Subscribe to Salon Food's newsletter, The Bite.


The prevalence of ultra-processed foods (UPFs) has also reached an all-time high. Carlos Monteiro, the Brazilian epidemiologist who coined the term, told The Guardian back in July that UPFs are “increasing their share in and domination of global diets, despite the risk they represent to health in terms of increasing the risk of multiple chronic diseases.” An August study published in The Lancet Regional Health – Europe also suggested that ultra-processed plant-based foods — including plant-based snacks, burgers and dairy-free plant-based yogurts — could increase one’s risk of serious health conditions like heart attacks and strokes. The study found that every 10% increase in calories from ultra-processed plant-based foods was associated with a 5% higher risk of developing heart disease and a 6% higher risk of coronary heart disease.     

“Food should be a vehicle for wellness, not a contributor of chronic disease,” Jim Jones, FDA Deputy Commissioner for Human Foods, said. “In addition to our goal of providing information to consumers, it’s possible we’ll see manufacturers reformulate products to be healthier in response to front-of-package nutrition labeling. Together, we hope the FDA’s efforts, alongside those of our federal partners, will start stemming the tide of the chronic disease crisis in our country.”

The FDA’s proposed Nutrition Info box is part of the White House National Strategy on Hunger, Nutrition and Health to reduce diet-related illnesses by 2030. If approved and finalized, the proposal would require food businesses with $10 million or more in annual food sales to include a Nutrition Info box for most packaged products three years after the rule’s effective date. Food manufacturers with less than $10 million in annual food sales have four years to do the same.

Study finds air fryers emit less indoor air pollution than other cooking methods

Are you also an air fryer proponent? Perhaps, you should be.

According to a study conducted back in November by the University of Birmingham and recently published in "Indoor Air" recently found that, "Air fryers produce a tiny fraction of the indoor air pollution emitted by other cooking methods including pan and deep frying."

The study used a "campus-based research kitchen to bridge the gap between laboratory-based chamber experiments measuring pollution from different cooking methods and less well-controlled testing in domestic kitchens." Specifically, those conducting the study actually cooked chicken breast in five different manners: pan-frying, stir-frying, deep-frying, boiling and air-frying in order to collect and measure the VOCs (volatile organic compounds) corresponding with each method.

Pan-frying was highest, followed by stir-frying, then deep-frying. Boiling and air-frying were only separated by a fraction of a point (.7 vs .6), but air frying came out on top.

Lead author Christian Pfrang said, "There are a number of factors that will affect the levels of pollution from cooking alongside the method used, including the amount of oil used, and the temperature of the stove. What we can say with certainty, however, is that improving the ventilation in kitchens by opening windows or using extractor fans, will help to disperse polluting particles and reduce personal exposure."

New study show that tap water is often just as safe as bottled water — if not safer

A new study published in BMJ Global Health suggests that drinking tap water might be "healthier" than bottled water. The authors note that "misunderstandings about the safety and potential risks of bottled and tap water persist" and emphasize that "tap water is generally safe, inexpensive, convenient, and eco-friendly."

Korin Miller of Food & Wine explains that tap water is regulated by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) under the Safe Drinking Water Act, while bottled water falls under the jurisdiction of the Food and Drug Administration (FDA). Additional research highlights potential issues with bottled water, including nanoplastics that can leach from plastic containers into the water.

Still, tap water has its own concerns, such as contaminants like PFAS (per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances, also known as "forever chemicals"), heavy metals and the ongoing debate over fluoride. Natural disasters or other emergencies may also render tap water unsafe, making bottled water a necessity in those situations.

Bottled water is significantly more expensive than tap, but a middle-ground option might be purified tap water, which combines safety with affordability. 

It’s time to ditch toxic social media platforms

What does it mean to be an American now that Donald Trump, the country’s first president convicted of criminal felonies, is once again the leader of the free world?

In a new essay in the Washington Monthly, Dr. Gail Christopher shares this account of America’s grieving and mourning from Trump’s return to power:

This autumn, I stopped by a local nonprofit run by a friend who helps refugees, immigrants, and formerly incarcerated victims of abuse get jobs that can transform their lives. I was there to donate, and when I found my friend distressed, I asked why he was so down. He had recently lost his dog of 14 years. Then, days later, his mother passed. I embraced him, expressing my condolences. As we embraced, he said, “And then my country died.”

He referred to the election, which put one party in charge of the White House, Senate, and House. And in that moment, I realized that perhaps half of the nation’s voting population is grieving what they perceive to be the death of their country.

I contemplated how America came to this. After an election marked by harsh and extreme rhetoric, whatever the outcome, half the country would dwell in grief, convinced that the world’s oldest democracy was finished. Why?

This moment warrants a much deeper examination of what happened, how it happened, and the impact on our health, well-being, and hope for the future. It’s a bit cliché, but this must become a teachable moment. We must learn from this campaign never to be so divided again….

Our country didn’t die on November 5, but our country needs us to have open hearts and open minds during these transitional times.

Unfortunately, as shown by public opinion polls and other reports, what Dr. Christopher’s friend is experiencing is widespread. Anecdotes are not data, but I have heard and directly experienced and witnessed many such accounts of political-personal grief and mourning in these weeks since the election and now Trump’s return to power. So many are hurting. That so many other Americans are jubilant and excited by that pain and fear of what Trump and his agents’ have threatened and promised to do to “the enemy within” as they purify “the blood” of the nation is another sign of how pathological and self-destructive American society and culture are in this time of crisis.

Donald Trump was inaugurated on the same day as Dr. Martin Luther King Jr.’s Remembrance Day. This is a source of mourning and grieving as well for pro-democracy Americans and other Americans of conscience and honor. The pain and insult of that coincidence of those days is likely deeply felt by the freedom and hope warriors who sacrificed so much in the battles of the civil rights movement.

Donald Trump and Dr. King’s political and social projects are antithetical to one another. Dr. King fought and died for racial equality and social democracy. Donald Trump is a White racial authoritarian and the country’s first White president. In that role, Trump will further reverse the gains of the long Black Freedom Struggle and civil rights movement. Trump and his allies’ attempts to end multiracial democracy (which is a work in progress, very much imperiled even before the rise of Trump and MAGA) are so extreme that they intend to overturn the 14th Amendment to the Constitution which was put in place following the end of the civil war and the end of White on Black chattel slavery to guarantee the full and equal rights of Black Americans — and by implication all Americans — under the law.

In his 1967 speech at the Southern Christian Leadership Conference in Atlanta, Georgia, Dr. King issued this warning: “If America does not respond creatively to the challenge to banish racism, some future historian will have to say, that a great civilization died because it lacked the soul and commitment to make justice a reality for all men.” Some 60 years later, King’s warning has proven, again, to be prophetic.

In another version of America, Kamala Harris was inaugurated as the country’s first Black woman president on Monday. There would have been tears of joy and celebration of the symbolic meaning and power of her ascent to the presidency on Dr. King’s Remembrance Day. Instead, there were tears and fear at Trump’s return to the White House and what that will mean for the further gutting of Dr. King’s legacy.

"Just as marketers of beverages, tobacco and alcohol used emotional images and slogans to addict consumers to their products, today the social media world uses heightened, particularly negative emotions to entrap people within disinformation realities that can be overwhelming and destructive."

In an attempt to make better sense of the emotional dimension of Trump’s return to power and the collective feelings of mourning, grief, fear and overall distress that many tens of millions of Americans are likely experiencing, I recently spoke to Dr. Gail Christopher, an award-winning social change agent and author with expertise in the social determinants of health and well-being. She is a senior scholar with George Mason University’s Center for the Advancement of Well-Being and became the Executive Director of the National Collaborative for Health Equity.

This is the second of a two-part conversation.

Roughly half (really a third) of the country is in deep mourning and the other half (third) is celebrating and excited about Trump’s return. Trump’s threats and promises to punish “the enemy within” and the overall permission structure he and the MAGA movement have granted for the worst of human behavior. Given these realities, how do we reconcile as a national community, if at all?

This moment accentuates the need for cross-racial engagement in authentic experiences that increase capacities for empathy, compassion and shared understanding of the history of the United States. Our country has never attempted to build the civic connective tissue that is required for us to function well as a whole diverse culture and democratic society. However, if this multiracial, multi-religion, multi-ethnic and multi-gender democracy is going to survive, we must begin to do the work of building individual and collective capacity for empathy, compassion and understanding of our shared history. When this is accomplished at scale it will help to insulate our body politic from the kinds of political manipulation we have just experienced.

We need your help to stay independent

I prefer to think of it more as transformation than reconciliation. Reconciliation often connotes putting something back together. It is time that we recognize that we have never been together – that the factions and divisions were built into this society from its inception. These divisions remain as fault lines in our social fabric today. The work that is required is transformational. We must replace the belief in a false hierarchy of human value with a genuinely felt sense of our interdependence and interconnectedness as a human family. This is the work of the 21st century and this election outcome provides an opportunity to accelerate healing efforts throughout the United States. We call this work racial healing or community healing work.

Reading your powerful essay in the Washington Monthly about mourning and the election and your friend who is being impacted by so much loss all at once resonated with me. It also seems like the public mood is one of dread and zombification. The election and its outcome have amplified the existing pain and troubles that many people are feeling – and have been experiencing for a long time.

If we give in to the fear and anxiety or self-medicate with drugs and alcohol, the opposition claims victory. This is a time in which we must practice disciplines that calm our nervous systems and generate positive emotional responses. Our thoughts trigger our emotions; the mindset that we choose to create for ourselves through various self-care practices is needed during these times. Conventional medicine has minimized the power of emotions, but advertising executives and social media designers are exploiting the power of emotions. Just as marketers of beverages, tobacco and alcohol used emotional images and slogans to addict consumers to their products, today the social media world uses heightened, particularly negative emotions to entrap people within disinformation realities that can be overwhelming and destructive. The recent announcement that there will be no fact-checking on specific social media platforms is one of the most dangerous aspects of this political moment. I believe people should exit such platforms. The market will create new ones that adhere to better standards.

The power of our mental focus and our mindset is our most important resource during these critical times. We must stay focused on the future we want to see. We must envision a just democracy and use our creative energy to create that reality. In my work with communities, I always emphasize the importance of focusing on what we are for, not simply repeating what we are against. Every time we reiterate what we are against, we help to amplify it in society. We must paint different pictures of the possible. During the Biden administration, every federal agency developed an equity plan. Those of us in the progressive movement should all have and read those plans.

We must come together in a more robust and resilient way than we ever have before in modern times to stand for truth and to stand for fairness, but we can’t become like the opposition we face. We must transcend the shrill negative feelings and emotions that characterized the campaign season. The campaign season has ended. Governance and its many consequences will begin next week. The vast network of non-profit organizations working for justice will be prepared to challenge the absurd. Rational voices denounced the family separation immigration policy in the first administration and it was challenged in the court system; there will be comparable responses to absurd practices and policies that are put into practice by Trump in his second time as president. We will all need the strength that comes from disciplined emotional resilience and self-care practices. We must do the individual and collective work together.  

What role has social isolation, atomization and loneliness as a public health crisis played in the country’s democracy crisis and its related troubles and causes?

During the Biden administration our surgeon general, Vivek Murthy, MD has done a wonderful job of releasing reports and calls to action that offer guidance during these critical times. His book “Together” shows the health benefits of relationships and the harm that comes from isolation and loneliness. It is well-documented that protracted periods of screen time increase feelings of isolation and loneliness. The COVID-19 pandemic exacerbated this vulnerability. We have to put more intention into creating positive social connections. Dr. Murthy also released a report on social media and youth mental health. He also has a new report on the causal link between alcohol consumption and increased risk for at least seven different types of cancer.


Want a daily wrap-up of all the news and commentary Salon has to offer? Subscribe to our morning newsletter, Crash Course.


I emphasize Dr. Murthy’s leadership and the tremendous efforts of this Biden administration to move us towards health equity and justice. My deepest regret is that the Biden administration did not do enough to amplify their good work throughout the last four years and remind the broader American population of the benefits they were producing. There were legislative victories to create opportunity for all people and there was a steady drumbeat of work to create equity, particularly health equity. So now we must embrace the resources and fight to protect the gains. We must leverage these resources to help us make better decisions in the mid-term congressional elections in two years, as well as with our state and local government leaders. We all have to be very active participants in our democracy.  We have to make our voices heard. We will have to become our “brother’s and sister’s keepers.”

Black people are a “blues people.” We are also some of the most astute students of American politics and society and its potential and failures as a democratic society. We are also weathered and suffer great health disparities because of our experiences in a racist society and how we are the miner’s canary. Black women especially carry that burden and pain from the double marginalization of gender and race in America — and their roles as leaders in the long Black Freedom Struggle. So many Black folks are exhausted from the 2024 election and are stepping away from political life. We can’t carry the burden of defending and improving this democracy when so many of our fellow white Americans — and not just them but a growing number of Hispanics and too many young Black men — are willing to support Trumpism and what it represents and that betrayal.

The United States electoral system is deeply flawed. The Electoral College structure was created to support the Southern states’ power base that relied on slavery. Trump was victorious but the margin of victory was less than five million votes and it was the states that yielded the most electoral college votes that made the difference. Granted there was a popular majority vote, which is now being phrased as a mandate, but a closer look at the numbers shows a smaller margin of victory.

"The power of our mental focus and our mindset is our most important resource during these critical times."

 I don’t think despair should be the dominant reaction. We need to grow from this experience and put more energy into rebuilding the multiracial coalition that elected Obama for eight years. Our institutions, churches, organizations, fraternities, sororities and associations have been the source of our strength and resilience. They will continue to do so now. We must allow ourselves to be inspired by our ancestors who created the movement to abolish slavery. We should also be inspired by our Black ancestors who were soldiers in the Civil War and literally won that war for the North. I am reminded of the Harlem Renaissance era and the poetry that embodied our humanity and our strength. Langston Hughes’ poem "Mother to Son" is a favorite of mine. To paraphrase, we can’t sit down because we find it is kind of hard. We must keep climbing.

Trump became president of the United States for a second time on Monday, which was Dr. King's holiday. Channeling Brother King, where do we go from here?

We gain the strength and inspiration to move forward by better understanding the progress that has been made in the 20th and early decades of the 21st century. Ending slavery was a 100-year struggle. It took another 50 years to end Jim Crow. I highly recommend the book, "Waging a Good War: A Military History of The Civil Rights Movement, 1954-1968" by Thomas E. Ricks. The author, a war journalist, draws from his understanding of strategy to instruct the reader about what I view as the complexity, redundancy, modularity, robustness, resilience, communitarianism, and agency that were employed to achieve victory during the Civil Rights Movement era. I grew up during those times. My parents were part of the great migration of African Americans from the Jim Crow South (Alabama and Virginia) to the Midwest and the North. My high school years were filled with the sounds and images of Dr. King leading that movement.

The movement was so much more than Dr. King. It was comprised of a vast network of courageous, determined, loving human beings. These times are dominated by technology and new forms of media. This will require new strategies. As I continue this journey, I believe the most important strategy that has been omitted to date is holistic healing for our body politic. We must jettison the belief in a false hierarchy of human value. We must learn to appreciate our own and others’ awe-inspiring humanity. We must be humbled by the gift of life we live and have received and do our very best to make the future more viable and more just for our grandchildren and their children.

Who’s Ken Martin? Supporters say the Minnesota Democrat and would-be DNC chair is ready for battle

The chairman of Minnesota's Democratic-Farmer-Labor Party, Ken Martin, has emerged as a favorite in the race for chair of the Democratic National Committee on a platform of expanding Democrats' operations in every state and territory, contesting every election and year-round campaigning. Some of Martin's supporters, including current and former candidates for chair, describe Martin as well-positioned to bridge the ideological divide in the Democratic Party while competently wielding and building party infrastructure. 

Early in the race, Martin, the president of the Association of State Democratic Chairs, boasted the endorsements of well over 100 party insiders. More recently, CBS News reported that he enjoys the endorsements of some 51 state party chairs or co-chairs, including 20 whose endorsements were not previously public. 

"This is an opportunity to really reimagine the DNC and for me, that means really getting the DNC out of D.C.," Martin recently told Democracy Docket. "One of the shortcomings I believe of our national party committees is that they focus almost exclusively on just one election cycle with no longer term arc to their work. The DNC focus is primarily just on federal races, and while we have to win federal races for sure we also cannot ignore down-ballot races, state legislative bodies, local government races, frankly, where we're seeing a lot of disastrous public policy being passed in this country."

In addition to his support from party leaders, Martin has also garnered endorsements from two former candidates for DNC chair, including New York State Senator James Skoufis, who dropped out of the race and endorsed Martin earlier this month, and the president of the Arab American Institute, James Zogby.

Zogby told Salon that he's supporting Martin because of his vision for revitalizing party infrastructure and standing up a Democratic Party with the capacity to fight Republicans across the country. 

“I think it is an ideological battle and it’s also a battle of party infrastructure and whether we have a party,” Zogby said. “He is a Wellstone Democrat. When I hear him give a stump speech, it’s music to my ears.”

Martin’s DNC platform promises to contest every race, from the White House to local school board elections, and expand party infrastructure in all 50 states and seven territories. Specifically, he promises to have a Democratic Party presence in all 3,244 counties of the United States.

Zogby, who is a longtime DNC member himself, described himself as one one-time “Jesse Jackson Democrat” who now considers himself more of a “Bernie Sanders Democrat.” When asked about whether he trusts Martin to support a progressive agenda, Zogby said that the “DNC chair doesn’t set the agenda” but that he does trust Martin to support a progressive vision for the party.

“When I think of progressive, I mean: focuses on the economic concerns that are lifting everybody up — from concerns about healthcare to the minimum wage, public education and support for unions,” Zogby said.

Zogby, a vocal opponent of Israel’s war on Gaza, is not the only advocate for Palestine that is supporting Martin. Dan Engelhart, a DNC delegate for the Uncommitted Movement in the 2024 primary, has thrown in with Martin, telling NPR that he "was certainly fair to us as the uncommitted delegation,” even when much of the Democratic establishment snubbed the movement.

“We were treated fairly, and that's what really matters, given the general mindset towards the uncommitted delegation at the DNC,” Engelhart told NPR.

We need your help to stay independent

Skoufis, the New York senator who endorsed Martin after dropping his own bid for chair, told Salon that he sees him as the best choice for the job in part because he effectively involves the party’s members in the decision-making process and makes them feel heard.

“Not every member is going to win every time, but every faction is going to be seen and heard every time,” Skoufis told Salon. “I think that’s why you see frustration bubble over because people are blocked out of the decision-making process. If everyone has a seat at the table and everyone is meaningfully seen and heard, there’s buy in and that’s what Ken is hoping to do as chair.”

In addition, "I have not gotten a single whiff that he is interested in advancing an ideological angle as DNC chair," Skoufis said. "He is exclusively interested in building our coalition," he continued, and “the antithesis of an insider.”

“An insider would be keeping to his ivory tower and telling other people what they should be doing. Ken Martin is in the trenches with rank-and-file members and average Democrats,” Skoufis said.

Ron Latz, a Minnesota state senator, told Salon that he had seen an increase in the Democratic Party’s presence in the state over Martin’s tenure.

“For one, Ken has been very successful in raising money, which enables the presence all across the state of the party structure. In campaign seasons they have opened quite a few physical locations across the state,” Latz said. “He has not isolated himself in Saint Paul.”

Latz agreed with Skoufis’ assessment of Martin’s performance, saying that, during his tenure, he had seen an increased coordination between individual campaigns and the statewide Democratic apparatus. He also noted that Martin has successfully incorporated different ideological strains in the party while maintaining a united front. 

“I would also say that the party has gotten at the grassroots level and the central committee level more polarized,” Latz said. “Ken I think has been excellent and strategic at navigating that polarization and holding the party structure together.”

Latz also noted that, while he didn’t always agree with Martin in terms of policy, he always “pays good close attention when we’re talking.”

“I know I’ve always been able to get a hold of him when I felt the need to and he’s always been quite responsive and understanding of whatever my concerns are. He’s navigating a lot of sharp elbows of course in any political organization,” Latz said.

Trump: 25% tariffs on Mexico, Canada by Feb. 1

President Donald Trump said Monday he planned to put a 25% tariff on imports from Canada and Mexico by Feb. 1, but held off on previous pledges of across-the-board tariffs and even higher ones on China.

“We’re thinking in terms of 25% on Mexico and Canada, because they’re allowing vast numbers of people” into the U.S., Trump said Monday night, responding to questions from reporters. 

Trump said he "may" impose universal tariffs. He had previously said he planned 10% to 20% on imports from all nations. "Essentially all countries take advantage of the U.S.," he said Monday.

He did not mention China, which he has said would face tariffs of up to 60%. 

Trump, who enacted tariffs in his first term, has said the steeper ones will encourage more manufacturing in the U.S. Economists have said they could cause consumer prices and inflation to spike. 

The three nations are the largest U.S. trading partners, and tariffs would likely result in higher prices on larger items, such as vehicles, and smaller ones such as avocados, children's toys, chocolate and beer, CNBC reported.

Mexico and Canada, large importers of autos and energy, have said they would retaliate against American goods, Bloomberg reported. Nearly $2 trillion in goods and services were traded among Mexico, Canada and the U.S. in 2022, according to the U.S. Mexico-Canada Agreement negotiated during the first Trump administration. 

The proposed tariffs would hit the U.S. auto industry and Detroit carmakers particularly hard, Bernstein analysts have said. Bloomberg reported the additional levies would affect $97 billion worth of auto parts and 4 million finished vehicles that come into the U.S. from Canada and Mexico, and could increase average new-car prices by about $3,000, according to Wolfe Research.

“None of this should be surprising. The one thing we’ve learned is that President Trump at moments can be unpredictable,” Dominic LeBlanc, Canada’s finance minister, told reporters after Trump’s comments, per Bloomberg. He said the Canadian government would continue talking with Trump about border security and fentanyl, which Trump has tried to use as a bargaining tool.

Mexico has sought to placate Trump by reducing imports from China and carrying out a record fentanyl seizure, Bloomberg reported.

Border crossings in Mexico have dropped significantly since President Joe Biden signed an executive order in July effectively blocking undocumented migrants from receiving asylum, The New York Times reported, but the crossings remain higher than during much of Trump’s first term.

Exploiting disaster: Renters accuse Los Angeles landlords of “abusive and illegal” price hikes

Los Angeles-area landlords appear determined not to let a disaster go to waste, with tenant rights organizations and displaced people searching for shelter reporting that the prices for apartment rentals and hotels have increased by as much as 100 percent since wildfires engulfed sections of the city.

Because California is in a state of emergency, laws targeting price-gouging, including a ban on landlords raising rents by more than 10 percent of pre-emergency levels, should be in effect. But that hasn't deterred some landlords from apparently raising their rents by far more than that, creating bidding wars — which potentially allows them to "accept" an offer higher than the state-mandated limit — and leading activists to accuse them of callously exploiting displaced survivors who have lost almost everything to the fires.

"Authorities are focused on arresting the looters and boasting about how they've arrested so many of them, but they haven't done anything about these landlords who are looting people's wallets, trying to profit from the misery that they're are facing right now," Larry Gross, executive director of Coalition for Economic Survival (CES), told Salon.

Such drastic increases are worsening a rental housing market that was already tight before wildfires propelled by strong winds began ripping through Pacific Palisades, Altadena and other heavily-populated neighborhoods last week, wiping thousands of homes off the map. Some refugees unable to afford the new prices have found temporary shelter with friends and family, while others are huddling in their cars or in encampments set up across the city. But where they may be in a few weeks or months is a question few of them have a comfortable answer to.

It's not just people fleeing from fire-affected areas who are vulnerable to unfair treatment. Based on current state law, units made vacant are still nominally under rent control, but a landlord is free to set the new starting rent at any amount they want. As landlords seek to maximize their income, activists warn, they might evict their current tenants on short notice in order to make room for newcomers willing to pay the higher price. And like increasing rents by more than the legal amount, this tactic is often practiced with impunity.

"We will see a rise in not only in [rental price-fixing], but also the abusive and illegal, but unpunished, practices that landlords use to get tenants out of their rent-stabilized homes so they can re-rent to tenants at price-gouged market rates: issuing frivolous three-day notices, lying to people and threatening them, and filing evictions aggressively," Paul Lanctot, a spokesperson for the Los Angeles Tenants Union, told Salon. "In the past week, members have already reported landlords issuing invalid 3-day notices… before the fires were even starting to be contained."

Ryan Bell, Southern California regional organizer for the nonprofit Tenants Together, recalled how as wind and fire pummeled Los Angeles, a tree fell onto a rented house that was already in the middle of a lawsuit he was involved in because the landlord had refused relocate its tenants despite noisy construction all around. After the tree damage, the landlord changed his mind and evicted them because it was "no longer safe for habitation."

"Days later I look up this same unit on Zillow, which appears to have been quickly repaired, and the price has suddenly gone up 23.8 percent," he said.

While landlords face nominal restrictions during a natural disaster, actual prosecution for violators is rare, easily circumvented and, according to tenant rights advocates, insufficient in preventing widespread abuse. In 2018, the California attorney general’s office filed just two cases against landlords and real estate agents for alleged illegal price hikes after fires destroyed thousands of homes across Northern California.

Tenants rights advocate Chelsea Kirk, who serves as director of policy and advocacy at Strategic Actions for a Just Economy, told Salon that in her eight years of organizing, the most "justice" she's seen meted out to landlords amounted to a "slap on the wrist."

"They're used to being told to fix an issue and to not do it again rather than facing any serious penalty. Maybe they'll pay a fine that they can recoup in a month or two anyway, especially with the rates we're seeing," she said. "It's hardly a disincentive against illegal behavior."

We need your help to stay independent

On the weekend after the first fires, Kirk set up a public crowdsourced spreadsheet that to date contains more than 1,380 Zillow listings in which landlords appear to have raised rents by more than the legal limit, some by double or triple the original amount. Other individuals and organizations have launched parallel efforts, with the Los Angeles Tenants Union urging tippers to submit reports of sudden rent increases they have witnessed. Within a week, they received thousands of complaints.

So far, Kirk has been unable to formally submit the spreadsheet to Los Angeles County officials due to "bureaucratic red tape," and is resorting to filing complaints individually via the 311 city services channel. Even then, Kirk said, the list has been effective as a public resource and naming campaign that could "shame" landlords for exploiting its tenants, in addition to exposing them to a flood of angry calls and future criminal prosecution. Some of the illegal listings on the spreadsheet have since been taken down or revised to comply with the limit.

During the COVID-19 pandemic, state and local governments across the country, under pressure from housing rights groups, enacted rent freezes, eviction moratoriums and rent relief programs to protect tenants from potential homelessness. The policies worked for a time, then expired — by 2023, eviction rates in California had returned to pre-2020 levels. In an open letter published Wednesday, more than 30 organizations urged Los Angeles County officials to bring back those policies in response to the ongoing crisis.

"This surge in demand for housing will only compound our already-historic housing and homelessness crisis. We need rapid policy change to prevent spikes in rents and evictions, and ensure stability as our County moves forward,” the letter said.

Compared to previous housing crises caused by natural disasters, state and county officials are expressing a much firmer stance against opportunistic landlords and real estate agents, perhaps reacting in part to the magnitude of the fire's destruction and the depth of public outrage over their behavior. On Tuesday, Los Angeles City Councilmember Traci Park proposed increasing price-gouging fines from $10,000 to $30,000, a sum that activists say would still not be enough of a deterrence against corporate landlords who can make many times that number in rents.

Another proposal, a motion before the Los Angeles County Board of Supervisors to ease restrictions on short-term rentals, has been criticized by activists as a short-sighted mistake that would backfire on tenants.

"It's just going to encourage landlords to get more evictions, either through legal or illegal means, in order to get higher rents," said Gross, the CES executive director. "What we really need is an emergency eviction moratorium and rent freeze, not this."

Meanwhile, the office of California Attorney General Rob Bonta has set up a new website and hotline (at 800-952-5225) where Los Angeles residents can file complaints about price-gouging, with Bonta himself promising to go after landlords who broke the law. State prosecutors are currently working on more than 10 active investigations, with more cases being added daily, according to his office.

“Folks across the region are being preyed upon by greedy businesses and landlords, scam artists and predatory buyers looking to make a quick buck off their pain,” Bonta said. “They are seeking to re-victimize the victims of the fires — to exploit them in their vulnerable state.”

"We have boots on the ground conducting investigations as we speak, building the criminal cases against price gougers," he added.


Want a daily wrap-up of all the news and commentary Salon has to offer? Subscribe to our morning newsletter, Crash Course.


Even with those spoken assurances, tenant organizations have been disappointed before, and many of them are not taking for granted that the government means what it says this time. While repeat offenders and high-profile corporate landlords may face charges, many activists note that hundreds of other landlords are likely to escape prosecution even as tenant eviction courts remain open. And state law itself contains loopholes that are common knowledge among landlords.

"They're prohibited from raising rents by 10 percent, unless someone voluntarily offers to pay more," said Gross. "And so it's very easy for a landlord to send a message to somebody saying, 'well look, I have a lot of people who've signed up, but wink, wink, if you could voluntarily offer more, I could get you the apartment.'"

Tenant organizations are drawing up plans with or without government help. One of the ideas floated by Kirk and other activists has been to partner with private attorneys to sue landlords and bring injunctions against real estate marketplaces like Zillow and Airbnb, which have been accused of turning a blind eye to illegal price fixing on their website.

While Airbnb now says that they are blocking users from increasing rents by more than 10 percent, far higher price increases are reportedly still taking place in the marketplace — according to thousands of volunteers flooding crowdsourced spreadsheets, local news outlets, government channels and social media with tips accompanied by links and screenshots. The latter is a necessity, activists say, because Zillow and Airbnb still do not display rental price history despite concerns about a lack of transparency.

It's just the kind of collective action that tenant organizations hope will fill the hole where government cannot or will not step in.

"It's important that we harness this moment," said Kirk. "We have all these volunteers, all these people across LA who are rallying to demand action from the governor, to demand legislation that will protect tenants from natural disasters and people who would take advantage of them in a time of crisis."

“Sweeping assault on core principles”: Anti-immigrant Laken Riley Act passes with Democratic support

The Senate on Monday passed the contentious Laken Riley Act in a 64-35 vote. The bill would require Immigration and Customs Enforcement to detain and potentially deport undocumented immigrants arrested for — but not necessarily convicted of — various crimes, including shoplifting, burglary and theft.

Twelve Democrats voted to pass the bill, moving congressional Republicans one step closer to delivering President Donald Trump his first legislative win as his newly minted administration rolls out its immigration crackdown. The legislation will now return to the House for a final vote. 

According to the Senate vote summary, Democrats who voted to pass the bill include co-sponsors Sens. Ruben Gallego of Arizona and John Fetterman of Pennsylvania as well as Sens. Catherine Cortez Masto, D-Nev.; Maggie Hassan, D-N.H.; Mark Kelly, D-Ariz.; Jon Ossof, D-Ga.; Gary Peters, D-Mich.; Jacky Rosen, D-Nev.; Jeanne Shaheen, D-N.H.; Elissa Slotkin, D-Mich.; Mark Warner, D-Va.; and Raphael Warnock, D-Ga. 

Democratic critics of the act voiced frustration over what they viewed as their Democratic colleagues pushing to pass the bill in order to protect themselves from political vulnerability, according to The Hill.

Some Senators placed blame on Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y., giving those vulnerable colleagues license to advance the bill without a guarantee that Democrats would have a greater chance to amend the bill. Its handling, one anonymous Democratic senator told the outlet, seeded deep frustration among the caucus as the Senate Democratic Conference still reels from the loss of its majority. 

“There is huge concern because we’re talking about the mandatory imprisonment based on an accusation without a person even being charged, let alone being convicted, and this applies to kids,” the senator told The Hill, lamenting that the bill didn't go to committee. “It’s a sweeping assault on core principles, and it doesn’t even have a judicial review component.”

Before passing the bill Monday evening, Senators also voted 75-24 to amend it to include crimes resulting in death or serious bodily injury to the list of offenses that would require mandatory detention — a proposal submitted by Senate Majority Leader John Thune, R-S.D. Twenty-two Democrats joined Republicans in agreeing to the amendment.

The act, named after a Georgia college student who was murdered by a Venezuelan immigrant who had previously been arrested for shoplifting, also allows state attorneys general to sue the federal government over immigration decisions and block visas being issued to citizens of certain countries. It first passed the House earlier this month with backing from 48 Democrats. 

Critics argue that, if enacted, the legislation will further empower Trump to carry out his mass deportation plan at a significant cost and deny undocumented immigrants their right to due process. 

Because it was amended, the bill must be passed again by the Republican-led House before being sent to the White House and becoming law.

“It was a Nazi salute”: Historian dismisses claim that Musk’s raised arm was mere “awkward gesture”

While speaking to a crowd of MAGA faithful on Monday, Elon Musk made a grunting noise, placed a hand on his heart and extended it outwards in a quick, snapping motion, palm facing down. He then repeated the motion for the people behind him.

"My heart goes out to you. It is thanks to you that the future of civilization is assured," he declared.

Musk's gesture, covered by some news outlets live, immediately elicited comparisons to a salute first used by Italian fascists, then popularized by Adolf Hitler's Nazi Party. While the gesture is also known as the "Roman salute," there is no known Roman art or text that depicts or describes it, and the association was likely just a figment of fascist propaganda. The Nazi variation of the salute, still used as a sign of support and identification with Nazi and fascist causes, has been banned in some countries, including Germany.

“Did elon musk just hit the roman salute at his inauguration speech?” Hasan Piker, a popular left-wing commentator, asked on X.

The Anti-Defamation League, an organization that supported police crackdowns against pro-Palestine student protesters, thought not. Writing on X, the organization claimed that Musk had simply “made an awkward gesture in a moment of enthusiasm” and that it was “not a Nazi salute.” The post added that “all sides should give one another a bit of grace.”

Some of Musk's defenders posited that his rather stiff heart-to-crowd gesture was the "socially awkward" wave of an "autistic" man. But others, including experts on far right politics, believed what they saw was unambiguous. "Historian of fascism here. It was a Nazi salute and a very belligerent one too," Ruth Ben-Ghiat, a professor of history at New York University, wrote on Bluesky.

Regardless of Musk's intention, his gesture was well-received by neo-Nazis and far-right extremists, who have flourished on X, formerly Twitter, since the tech billionaire took control of the platform and promised to make it a bastion of free speech. Christopher Pohlhaus, the leader of the neo-Nazi group Blood Tribe, posted the clip of Musk on Telegram with a lightning bolt emoji (a reference to the insignia of the SS, a Nazi paramilitary organization) and the caption: “I don’t care if this was a mistake. I’m going to enjoy the tears over it.”

Andrew Torba, founder of the far-right social network Gab, shared the clip on his account with the caption: “Incredible things are happening already lmao."

Musk, who has allied himself with far-right causes in Germany and elsewhere, struck a defiant tone against his critics, sharing a user's post on X that said the "salute hoax" was part of a Democratic "dirty tricks campaign" against him. “Frankly, they need better dirty tricks,” Musk added. “The ‘everyone is Hitler’ attack is sooo tired.”

After giving the gesture, Musk continued to speak about "safe cities, secure borders, sensible spending" and America's "manifest destiny" to colonize Mars.

Walruses are threatened by climate change. The internet is trying to help save them

Melting sea ice due to climate change isn’t just a problem for people living in coastal regions that are slowly being flooded. It threatens the survival of species like walruses, which are uniquely dependent on the disappearing frozen environment. As we burn fossil fuels, trapping heat that melts polar ice, the roly poly pinnipeds struggle to find sea ice to live upon. Additionally as the ocean becomes more acidic because of human activity, it makes it difficult for walrus prey like crabs, clams and sea snails to build their shells.

Wildlife biologist Dr. Devin Johnson of the Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS) Marine Mammals Management Walrus Program isn’t entirely pessimistic regarding the plight of these animals. He has fond recollections of interacting with the Atlantic (Odobenus rosmarus rosmarus) and Pacific (Odobenus rosmarus divergens) walruses that inhabit the area.

“It is always special to see these animals in their natural habitat, and stresses the importance of sea ice, particularly for mothers with young calves,” Johnson told Salon.

Since 2023, the FWS and U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) have both operated research stations in the Chukchi Sea, a region of the Arctic Ocean between Alaska and Siberia, with one of the scientists’ goals being to protect walruses. And to get help, they’ve enlisted the assistance of the internet.

Since 2021, more than 37,000 citizen scientists have participated in the Walrus From Space project, a joint project by the World Wildlife Fund (WWF) and British Antarctic Survey (BAS) for monitoring walrus populations. Ordinary citizens can sign up to examine six years worth of satellite imagery so they can count walruses. A recent story in High North News drew attention to the ongoing success of the program, reporting that volunteers have so far reviewed two years of a total six years of satellite images.

"Pacific walruses are specifically adapted for life in and around sea ice."

These programs are essential because climate change is one of the biggest threats to the ongoing survival of walruses, experts like Johnson agree. He added that there are many ways ordinary people can help walruses in addition to working to reduce global carbon emissions.

“There are some on-the-ground conservation measures that may help alleviate the stressors of climate change on the Pacific walrus population,” Johnson said. “For example, the Alaska Native village of Point Lay has taken an active role in the protection of a large walrus haulout that occurs seasonally near the village – working with the FWS to reduce disturbance-related mortalities.”

Pacific walrusPacific walruses are harvested in Russia and Alaska. (Devin Johnson)

He also pointed out that humans who rely on walruses for food still have ecologically positive relationships with the species. The Alaska and Chukotka Native communities have harvested walruses for millennia without endangering their population.

“A recent study indicates that current harvest levels are within a sustainable range and can continue into the future despite stressors associated with climate change,” Johnson said.

These efforts are going to be increasingly important as walruses struggle with the challenges posed by climate change.


Want more health and science stories in your inbox? Subscribe to Salon's weekly newsletter Lab Notes.


“Pacific walruses are specifically adapted for life in and around sea ice,” Johnson said. “Walruses (particularly females and calves) use broken sea ice habitat for much of the year as a platform to rest on between foraging bouts that is close to their food resources (‘hotspots’ of high benthic invertebrate abundance) and provides safety from terrestrial predators e.g., polar/brown bears. Although recent research indicates that the population is currently large (over 250,000 animals) and healthy, sea ice across the Pacific walrus range is projected to decline significantly into the future.”

Recent studies by the research team published in the Journal of Wildlife Management and as part of Marine Ecology Progress Series confirms as much.

“With less sea ice and a longer ice-free interval in the Chukchi Sea, we predict that female and juvenile walruses will be forced to spend more time swimming to and from their foraging grounds, and less time resting,” Johnson said. “This comes at an increased bioenergetic expenditure, which over time can deplete energy reserves and influence reproductive success, along with potentially contributing to calf mortalities.”

We need your help to stay independent

As the Chukchi Sea experiences longer periods without ice and the female and juvenile walruses spend more time resting on land, it makes them vulnerable to human and predator activity. As airplanes or boats pass and predators like polar bears appear, the walruses panic and stampede into the water, causing trampling-related mortalities.

“Less sea ice in the future will likely also mean an expanding anthropogenic footprint in the Arctic,” Johnson said. “More human activity (e.g., shipping lanes through the Bering Strait, oil exploration in the Chukchi Sea) increases the potential for disturbance, either at coastal haul outs or on their foraging grounds, which can also affect walrus energy reserves and contribute to mortality events.”

Yet at the same time, Johnson said walruses still can flourish despite the odds against them.

“In 2021 I had the opportunity to visit Round Island, an Alaska State-run game sanctuary in Bristol Bay where intrepid visitors can watch thousands of adult male walruses resting at this summer haul-out,” Johnson said. “Seeing massive aggregations of animals is a striking reminder of both their abundance and their importance to the ecosystem.”