Help keep Salon independent

JD Vance says he will keep calling legal Haitian immigrants “illegal aliens”

Sen. JD Vance, R-Ohio, doubled down on false claims about Haitian immigrants in Springfield, Ohio, insisting that he will refer to them as “illegal aliens” despite their legal immigration status, NPR reported.

In remarks at a Raleigh, North Carolina rally, Donald Trump’s running mate claimed that Haitian immigrants, who were paroled into the country and have authorization to work, have been unlawfully protected from deportation. He said that he and the GOP presidential nominee would respond to this with the  “largest ever deportation."

Under President Joe Biden’s administration’s Humanitarian Parole and Temporary Protected Status programs, many Haitian immigrants arrived in the U.S. legally if they had a sponsor and met stringent criteria. These individuals are eligible to live and work in the country while they seek a longer-term immigration status, Newsweek reported.

"If Kamala Harris waves a wand, illegally, and says these people are now here legally, I'm still going to call them illegal aliens," Vance asserted. "An illegal action by Kamala Harris does not make an alien legal. That is not how this works."

Temporary Protected Status (TPS) was recently extended for immigrants from Haiti living in the U.S. through Feb 3, 2026, protecting them against deportation, regardless of their legal status. Trump himself extended the same status to other immigrants when he was president.

Vance insisted he would continue to mislabel Haitians in his home state, regardless of their legal status.

"I'm still gonna call them an illegal alien," the Ohio Senator said.

Aaron Reichlin-Melnick, policy director at the American Immigration Council, condemned Vance's words, writing on social media: "Every person approved entered with official US government permission and broke zero laws. Calling people who have never been out of status illegal aliens is a nihilistic view of law."

“Delusional and unsettling”: Trump forgets there was no debate audience, claims crowd “went crazy”

Former President Donald Trump appeared on a taped segment of Fox News' "Gutfeld!" Wednesday, complaining once again that the ABC News debate moderators bothered to fact-check him while falsely claiming that the debate audience "went crazy" for his performance. Host Greg Gutfeld chose not to fact-check Trump over the fact that there was no debate audience whatsoever, per the rules set by ABC News and agreed to by both campaigns.

"They didn’t correct her once,” Trump complained, referring to Vice President Kamala Harris. “And they corrected me, everything I said, practically. I think nine times or 11 times. And the audience was absolutely — they went crazy.”

MSNBC anchor Chris Hayes argued that the Republican candidate's remark validated concerns about his age and mental capacity.

"Trump talking about 'the audience' at the debate (where there famously was no audience) is more delusional and unsettling than any moment of Joe Biden misspeaking all year and it’s not close," Hayes wrote on social media.

As for Trump's complaint about fact checking: The discrepancy between him and the vice president corresponds to the number of falsehoods each candidate told. An analysis by CNN fact-checker Daniel Dale found that Trump made "at least 33 false claims," including falsehoods about Haitian immigrants abducting and eating pets, while Harris made "at least one."

“Frankly, I don’t have enough time here to run through each specific Trump false claim. I urge people to go to our CNN website or our app to read our team’s detailed fact checks on this and a whole bunch more," he said. The one falsehood he highlighted for Harris was her claim that “Trump left us the worst unemployment since the Great Depression"; the unemployment rate in January 2021, while high by modern standards, was the worst to begin a presidential term in the last 20 years, not since the 1930s.

That has not stopped conservative pundits from characterizing ABC's fact-checking as overzealous and unfair to Trump, who claims he had "great debate" despite viewers and pundits largely agreeing that it was "disastrous."

"You got a lot of people watching, we had 75 million people watching, something like that. You have to do well, you can't do badly," Trump said, adding that he wondered if the Democrats would swap Harris out of the ticket if she performs badly. The latter comment earned Trump some laughter and applause from the now-real audience.

On the day of the taping, Trump was in New York for a rally in which he suggested that he would win the state which he lost by more than 20 points in 2016 and 2020, unless Haitian migrants kill him first.

It’s now all fiction. Donald Trump destroyed reality

Republicans are openly proud of their lies — but our disdain for the truth is bipartisan

Nobody’s making it easy for anyone these days.

Let’s start with Donald Trump. The former president still won’t accept he lost the 2020 election, he lies about immigrants eating pets and continues his baseless claims that women are carrying fetuses full term – only to kill them after they are born. He's also an adjudicated rapist and convicted felon, but that’s another story.

The rampant stupidity and numb ignorance from him is frightening. But Trump is just the vanguard for political hatred and violence.

No one is making it easy for anyone these days. Donald Trump is merely the worst offender among the worst of us.

Consider this: Israel has a right to defend itself. Innocent Jews and Palestinians have a right to live their lives without threats. Both are still dying in the Middle East as Israel blows up pagers. Gun violence is unacceptable, but we don’t want to regulate automatic weapons. Politics is about ideas and ideals, but only if we “like” the politician. War is unacceptable, but we accept it. We want criminals to serve time – unless they’re running for president. 

We are a country, and a world, chasing its tail – vacillating between hatred, anger and a desire for peace. Many of us seem incapable of understanding critical or rational thought. We just point our finger at those we disagree with and call them foul names – or worse.

Good news? Well, the Federal Reserve tried to deliver some Wednesday by lowering its prime interest rate by .5 percent, but Trump screamed foul. His minions claimed they were victims. They also screamed “It’s all the Democrats’ fault,” as well as, “We’re going to Hell,”  we’re a nation in decline, and if you’re not frightened by now, then by the way, World War III. Trump really doesn’t want to make it easy.

It’s a withering attack and a continuing one on rationality and the nation’s well-being, where there’s a guard on every door and a drink on every floor (apologies to Tom Petty.)

How can this continue, some ask?

Good question. I’m still trying to come to grips with the fact that thousands of pagers and walkie-talkies blew up simultaneously in Lebanon killing and injuring hundreds of people. The targets were apparently Hezbollah operatives targeted by the Israeli government, we’re told. Casualties included children. It was an act of blatant terrorism – and apparently taken by a sovereign nation. Who knew it could even be done? Who thought it up? How insidious is it? It’s like a scene out of a James Bond movie, or "The Kingsmen." It’s real comic book crap.

When I asked a senior White House official if they could speak to whether or not similar booby traps were contained in American communication devices I was rebuked; “I can’t speak to that.” I was told. Ummm, That’s not reassuring. Neither was NSC spokesperson John Kirby’s refusal to answer any specific questions in the briefing room Wednesday about who was behind the explosions, if we are in danger, or whether or not the conflict in the Middle East is widening – even as it obviously is. That we don’t acknowledge the widening of the conflict tells you just how pervasive propaganda and disinformation are within the government, politics and the press.

The only thing we know for certain, according to Kirby, is we weren’t behind the pager explosions. Israel? Our government ain’t saying nothin’. Not making it easy. 

We need your help to stay independent

The one question Kirby did answer was about Russian disinformation. “It’s a constant topic of conversation,” Kirby explained. That’s food for thought. Press Secretary Karine Jean Pierre had to field a question about the security of the coming election. We expect “free and fair elections” and the peaceful transfer of power, respecting the results of the election, she said on Wednesday. Even though polls show some Republicans would try to forcefully overthrow the government if they lose, Jean-Pierre kept her cool as she clumsily tried to walk reporters through the renewed prospect of Biden defending the Capitol from violent insurrection should Donald Trump lose another election — all because of his irritating inability to accept any defeat.

Meanwhile, if you’re still wondering what is real and what isn’t, the CIA, according to a whistleblower, lied to Congress and the FBI about the “Havana Syndrome.” And while the CIA continues to say they haven’t done that, facts indicate otherwise.

None of us are immune from fictional fabrications, and many in public life use those manipulations to make their lives easier at the expense of others.

So, I’m back to this: No one is making it easy for anyone these days. Donald Trump is merely the worst offender among the worst of us. But none of us are immune from fictional fabrications, and many in public life use those manipulations to make their lives easier at the expense of others.

In one of my last conversations with Sarah Huckabee Sanders at the White House during the Trump administration, she informed me she was leaving her post to take care of her kids.

“If you’re telling me the truth,” I said to her, “then good for you. Work will always be there but you only have one chance to raise your kids. That’s a wise choice.”

A short time after she left the White House she announced she was running for governor in Arkansas. Exactly. Flash forward and over the weekend she announced that her kids keep her humble and then attacked Vice President Kamala Harris for not having any kids to keep her humble. Sanders isn’t making it easy to like her with that statement. There was little truth and no humility in it. But hypocrisy and rage is all the MAGA crowd has left – and they play the few notes they have as virtuosos. 

As Bob Dylan noted, the Trump crowd doesn’t see the frowns as the jugglers and clowns do all of their tricks for them. Forget the rock guitar player who can make it on just three chords (though Neil Giraldo’s “Three Chord” bourbon is an exception), there are modern politicians of the Trump ilk who are making it on just three notes; despair, anger and hatred. Or, if you prefer the Hee Haw version, it’s “Gloom, Despair and Agony on Me,” with Trump, Sanders, JD Vance and House Speaker Mike Johnson subbing in for Grandpa Jones, Gordie Tapp, Roy Clark and Archie Campbell. I mention actors playing fictional characters in a former popular television show because that’s where we are: fiction.

We see it in our politics. Want to understand Donald Trump? Walk through a mall. Go to church. Ask for customer service. It’s all a fiction, and Donald Trump uses it to try and manufacture a reality in his own head – then he tries to force the rest of us into accepting his solipsistic fictional universe as reality. That’s why he refers to Hannibal Lecter as a real human being. That’s why his minions buy whatever he says. Facts are fiction. Fiction is fact, and oh, look they have a sale on sneakers at the mall. Not making it easy. Don’t worry. That’s what Jesus wants.

There are more websites dedicated to fiction than fact. There are corners of the internet that spend more time worrying about the etymology of Darth Vader’s name than the policies of any politician.

We have all the access we want to fiction and little that we need to understand facts. It is why Fox News reporter Peter Doocy can chastise the White House for calling Donald Trump a threat to democracy – when Trump’s own words have done that. It’s a fiction of convenience that speaks not only to MAGA and Trump’s particular disdain of the truth but to Trump’s supporters being unable to discern the truth. In fact, Trump counts on that. Fiction for self-preservation is the rule among the MAGA crowd. 

I know Doocy and Sanders. They are both kind human beings. But there is nothing kind about what is done publicly in the MAGA world. The closer your attachment to Trump, the less kind you become. Lara Loomer anyone?

Thus, you can understand on one hand why Harris limits her interaction with the press. We don’t make it easy. While our manipulation of facts into fiction is also a part of the problem, it should never be forgotten that this separation of facts from reality is courtesy of the U.S. government which has systematically destroyed the free press during the last 40 years. We’re now only about selling you information that supports your personal beliefs – whether or not those beliefs are tethered to the facts or reality.


Want a daily wrap-up of all the news and commentary Salon has to offer? Subscribe to our morning newsletter, Crash Course.


The only thing left worth trusting is the weather report – no matter how inaccurate it is. At least the weather report isn’t tainted by politics. Okay, so there’s climate change – I guess I’m wrong there too. Maybe sports reporting? Wait. No. Entertainment? Forget it.

Though Trump, again, is symptomatic of the disinformation problem, he is not the cause. We all share in that responsibility. Trump is merely the man most effective at using the tools to confuse you. He’s very good at conning millions of people into buying his grift. If you’re a Christian, you take him on faith and believe your world is full of enemies to be vanquished rather than neighbors to be loved. If you’re a MAGA supporter, then you believe him to be a truth teller, and if you’re anyone else you believe he’s nothing more than a grifter. 

Either way, Trump’s ride is coming to an end like a character out of a Bob Dylan song. He is becoming increasingly invisible now as we find he no longer has any secrets to conceal. He’s on endless repeats with his litany of tirades, venomous and hate-filled rants. We’ve heard it all before, the only thing new is Harris as she laughed at Trump’s “eating the cats and dogs” statement during the debate, giving everyone else permission to laugh at the unserious man who demands fealty to his very dangerously serious cause – himself.

Like a character out of a Lou Reed song Trump has spent his lifetime saying, and in some cases placing ads preaching that we should give him our hungry, tired and poor so he could “piss on ‘em.” Well, that’s what the Statue of Bigotry says.

Harris has spent her time singing a different song. Like Sly Stone, she tells us we’re all the same whatever we do. We’re all everyday people. Yeah. Yeah. So, Madam Vice President, could you please have a press conference already?

We have to live together, and as Tom Petty told us, It is hard to say who we are these days but we run on anyway. Don’t we baby?

Like I said, no one is making it easy on anyone else.

The teacher pay gap is even worse now than it was in the 1990s, a new report finds

Teachers in the U.S. are earning less money compared to similar professions than ever before, according to a report written by Sylvia Allegretto, a senior economist at the Center for Economic and Policy Research and research associate at the Economic Policy Institute, think tanks based in Washington, DC. The report found that, in 2023, teachers on average earned 73.4 cents for every dollar relative to the earnings of "similar professionals," far less than the 93.6 cents they made in 1996.

The widening gap in pay is already producing dire consequences for education as a whole, with decreasing rates of retention and recruitment straining already understaffed schools and overworked teachers.

Average weekly wages for teachers did improve by 1.7%, but the pay penalty — the gap between the weekly wages of teachers, who must hold a college degree to work in public schools, and college graduates in other professions — grew to a record 26.6% this year.

"Providing teachers with compensation commensurate with that of similarly educated and experienced professionals is necessary to retain and attract qualified workers into the teaching profession," the report said, warning that college students, encouraged by their parents, are forgoing teaching careers for better-paying jobs.

The data compiled by Allegretto — which is adjusted for inflation and takes into account the "summers off" issue — shows that the drop in relative compensation has been even more precipitous for female teachers, decreasing from a 3.3% premium pre-1994 to a penalty of 21.4% in 2023. While much of this is related to the expansion of professional opportunities for women, who once formed a captive labor pool of sorts for teaching jobs, such an exodus from schools underscores a broader aversion towards a career that does not offer commensurate pay for work.

"Simply maintaining the quality of the current labor market pool for teachers will require significant raises in real teachers’ pay to compete with other professions for female workers. Otherwise, the quality of education will be compromised," the report said.

The penalties calculated by Allegretto exceed 20% in 36 states, with Colorado coming in worst with a 38.4% penalty; Wyoming fares best with a 9% premium.

Much of the discrepancies, Allegretto wrote in another report with Emma García, a senior researcher at the Learning Policy Institute, and Elaine Weiss, a research associate at EPI, has to do with existing funding mechanisms that rely "primarily on state and local resources, with just a tiny share of total revenues allotted by the federal government … most analyses of the primary school finance metrics—equity, adequacy, effort, and sufficiency—raise serious questions about whether the existing system is living up to the ideal of providing a sound education equitably to all children at all times."

We need your help to stay independent

The 2024 election is likely to have significant ramifications on teacher pay and U.S. education in general. In contrast to the report's recommendation that the federal government support cash-strapped school districts to improve equity, both Project 2025 and the Republican Party platform call for the federal government to "return education to the states" by closing the Department of Education altogether. Furthermore, while the report suggests that public-sector collective bargaining should be expanded so teachers can advocate for improved job quality and better pay, Republican candidates have consistently attacked teachers' unions.

In some Democratic-controlled areas, too, school funding has been put on the back burner. New York City Mayor Eric Adams' initial proposed 2024 budget, for example, would have cut as much as $550 million from the city's schools.

"Too often and in too many places, we are failing to attain one of our highest ideals as a nation: our promise to educate every child without regard to means," Allegretto concluded. "This is a question of political will, with profound implications for our children, their families and communities, and the future of our nation."

GOP senator’s “discriminatory and vitriolic attack” shows Republicans weaponized anti-Muslim bigotry

In the midst of Donald Trump spewing lies demonizing Haitian immigrants in Springfield, Ohio causing a spike in hate and bomb threats in the small midwestern town —  Republican Senator John Kennedy opened up a new front in the GOP’s war on non-white people.  This latest assault came Tuesday in the form of baseless and vile accusations of terrorism by Kennedy against a leader in the Arab and Muslim American community. Ironically, Kennedy’s assault occurred during a Senate hearing to combat this very type of bigotry. 

Even before Tuesday’s exchange in the Senate hearing titled, "A Threat to Justice Everywhere: Stemming the Tide of Hate Crimes in America," Judiciary Committee Chair Dick Durbin, a Democrat from Illinois, had already pushed back against people like GOP Senator Lindsey Graham of South Carolina who objected to addressing hate crimes against Arab and Muslims—demanding instead the sole focus be on anti-Semitism. Apparently the fact that Muslims and Arabs in 2023 experienced a record number of hate crimes—including the murder of six-year-old Palestinian American Wadea Al-Fayoume in Oct. 2023 by a man yelling anti-Palestinian comments-didn’t merit concern by Graham. Durbin rightfully remarked, “What we are trying to do is identify a problem in America that extends beyond the Jewish population, to the Arab population, to the Palestinian population,” adding, “All of those hate crimes are unacceptable." Republicans, for their part, did not acknowledge the killing of Al-Fayoume, whose mother was in attendance for the hearing.

Then came Kennedy — whose unabashed bigotry drew audible gasps from the audience. The Republican began his questioning of Maya Berry, executive director of the Arab American Institute and a longtime friend, by accusing her of supporting Hamas

“You support Hamas, do you not?”

Berry — being the professional she is and having far less of a temper than me — calmly responded, “Senator, oddly enough, I’m going to say thank you for that question because it demonstrates the purpose of our hearing today.” At that point, the Louisiana Republican interrupted, “Let’s start first with a yes or no.”

Berry answered, “Hamas is a foreign terrorist organization that I do not support.” She then added, “But you asking the executive director of the Arab American Institute that question very much puts the focus on the issue of hate in our country.”

The GOP is not interested in keeping minority groups safe. They simply view us as red meat to target when it comes time to animate their base.

Kennedy continued to badger Berry, accusing her of supporting the Iranian-backed terrorist group Hezbollah, saying, “You support Hezbollah, too, don’t you?” Berry responded, “Do I support Hezbollah?” The answer is I don’t support violence, whether it’s Hezbollah, Hamas, or any other entity that invokes it. So no, Sir.”

Despite her saying no, Kennedy simply lied by declaring, “You can’t bring yourself to say no, can you?” After she repeated her “No,” he then asked, “Do you support or oppose Iran and their hatred of Jews?”

After more back and forth along those lines with Kennedy again accusing her of supporting Hamas and making unconfirmed allegations against the Palestinian relief agency UNRWA, he told Berry, “You should hide your head in a bag.”

Kennedy’s comments were despicable and hypocritical but not unexpected. The hypocrisy comes in Kennedy virtue signaling that he’s concerned with terrorism when Kennedy himself is a vocal supporter of Trump who incited the Jan 6 act of “domestic terrorism”—as the FBI has designated that attack.  And Kennedy both peddled election lies that fueled that terrorist attack and was one of only eight senators to vote to overturn the 2020 election after the mob was driven from the Capitol. Kennedy apparently has no issues with terrorism when it’s in pursuit of GOP power. 

We need your help to stay independent

The American Civil Liberties Union condemned Kennedy’s “discriminatory and vitriolic attack” in a statement. “To use a hearing about the disturbing rise in anti-Muslim, anti-Arab, and antisemitic hate crimes to launch personal and discriminatory attacks on an expert witness they’ve invited to testify is both outrageous and inappropriate. This kind of racist rhetoric should be widely condemned. It has no place in Congress, or in politics.”

The lack of surprise to Kennedy’s remarks comes from the fact that the GOP under Trump has become in essence an anti-Muslim and anti-Arab hate group. While anti-Muslim bigotry simmered in the GOP for years after 9/11, Trump weaponized it in ways never before seen during his 2016 campaign—much like he’s currently doing versus the Black immigrants in Ohio. 

Trump fabricated stories that “thousands” of Muslims in New Jersey cheered on 9/11 as the Twin Towers collapsed.  He claimed Muslims in our nation were protecting terrorists, that Muslims were leaving mosques with “hatred and death in their eyes” and that “Islam hates us.” All of this built to a hate-filled crescendo when Trump in December 2015 called for “a total and complete shutdown of Muslims entering the United States.”  

It was not surprising that Trump’s non-stop demonization of Muslims during that campaign resulted in a dangerous spike in hate crimes versus Muslims and Arabs in 2015 and 2016 that jaw-droppingly eclipsed the number of hate crimes endured in the year after 9/11. Women wearing hijabs were punched, Muslim American students saw a spike in bullying and mosques were defaced by bigots using the word, “Trump.”

Kennedy’s smear of Berry was consistent with the years of hatred spewed by the GOP towards Arabs and Muslims. And if Trump sees a benefit to trafficking in bigotry against these two communities in the final six weeks of the campaign, we all know he will do just that.


Want a daily wrap-up of all the news and commentary Salon has to offer? Subscribe to our morning newsletter, Crash Course.


At the end of Kennedy's questioning, Durbin asked Berry if she wanted to add anything else. Berry’s response summed up this incident well, “It’s regrettable that I, as I sit here, have experienced the very issue that we’re attempting to deal with today.” Berry then added powerfully that the way this hearing was conducted by people like Kennedy and other Republicans is not “how we keep Arab Americans or Jewish Americans or Muslim Americans or Black people or Asian Americans, anybody safe.”  

https://twitter.com/JudiciaryDems/status/1836108743349604403

She’s right. But the GOP is not interested in keeping minority groups safe. They simply view us as red meat to target when it comes time to animate their base. And Kennedy’s comments Tuesday—along with Trump’s demonization of Black immigrants—are simply the latest examples of the hate that fuels today’s GOP.

Georgia’s abortion ban killed a young mother. The Christian right now blames the victim

Pro-choice activists warned in the immediate aftermath of Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health that the subsequent cascade of abortion bans would kill women. Two years after the Supreme Court decision overturning Roe v. Wade, we're not finding out that it didn't take long. Amber Nicole Thurman, 28, died on August 19, 2022, less than a month after Georgia passed its draconian abortion law that banned the treatment that could have saved her life. While the doctors and nurses tasked with her care did not speak to ProPublica, who first reported on this death this week, a 10-member committee set up to examine maternal mortality cases has deemed Thurman's death "preventable," and ruled she would have likely lived if doctors had used the protocols that had been in place before the Georgia law made them a felony. 

The same anti-abortion activists insisting they'd honor these phony "exceptions" to abortion law are also currently pumping out endless propaganda insisting that women who have medically indicated abortions are liars.

But Republicans and Christian right activists don't want to take responsibility for the loss of this healthy young mother of a 6-year-old boy. Instead, they're casting blame on everyone else: the doctors in the Georgia hospital, abortion providers in North Carolina, and, though they will deny doing so, they're blaming Thurman herself. Thurman chose abortion. They're blaming her choice for her death. 

In her rant on Twitter about it, anti-choice activist Lila Rose repeatedly emphasized how she believes Thurman did this to herself, declaring she "died from sepsis after taking legally obtained abortion pills." Acknowledging that Thurman "sought out an abortion" and traveled to North Carolina for the pills, Rose insists, "Abortion killed Amber Thurman. Abortion killed Amber's twin babies." She also blames Thurman for waiting "days before seeking medical care." While Rose will pretend otherwise, the victim-blaming is not subtle. 


Want more Amanda Marcotte on politics? Subscribe to her newsletter Standing Room Only.


Rose's finger-pointing is dishonest to a grotesque extreme. Thurman's death is not due to her choice to take medication abortion, which has a mortality rate of .0003%, which is 1 in every 377,000 cases. (Out of 377,000 women who give birth, in contrast, 83 will die.) Thurman, as the report makes clear, would have almost certainly survived if she had received the pre-Dobbs standard of care, which is an immediate removal of an incomplete miscarriage. But Georgia's law, as written, makes this a felony. As ProPublica explained:

It prohibits doctors from using any instrument “with the purpose of terminating a pregnancy.” While removing fetal tissue is not terminating a pregnancy, medically speaking, the law only specifies it’s not considered an abortion to remove “a dead unborn child” that resulted from a “spontaneous abortion” defined as “naturally occurring” from a miscarriage or a stillbirth.

Anti-choicers are lying about this, so here is a link to the bill. As anyone can see, no exception is made to cover emergency care for a woman who deliberately induced her own miscarriage. Abortion opponents are insisting the doctors would not have gotten in legal trouble for saving Thurman's life. However, this is not how the law is written. But even if it was, doctors still had every reason to be afraid. If Thurman had received timely medical care and survived, a right-wing prosecutor could argue she wasn't that sick to begin with. That's the double bind of these supposed "exceptions." 

Rose is far from the only one shifting the blame from Republican legislators to the deceased victim. SBA Pro-Life insisted "this tragedy began with abortion drugs" and lamented that Thurman's "twins deserved better," ignoring that Thurman did not want to have twins. The American Association of Pro Life OBGYNs claimed the "drugs were the root cause" of her death, even though it would have been safe to take these drugs in a state where abortion was not banned. Katie Glenn Daniel of SBA Prolife tweeted, "She and her twins should be here today," again implying that Thurman did something wrong by not wanting to give birth at this point in her life. 

Of course, anti-choice activists deny that they're blaming Thurman for her death. They pretend to blame the "abortion industry," which they paint as forcing abortion on women. This argument assumes women are too stupid to make choices about their bodies. In this case, it's adding insult to injury. It's clear from the reporting that Thurman was smart and capable. She wasn't a passive vessel controlled by the mythical "abortion industry." She followed the news, hoping abortion advocates would get an injunction on the ban quickly. When that didn't happen, she scheduled an appointment in North Carolina, took time off work, got a babysitter, and marched through a crowd of anti-abortion protesters. Even the most diehard skeptic of female autonomy will struggle to deny that this is a story of a woman taking charge of her life. 

Not only will conservatives pass laws that kill women, but they will defame them in death by painting them as reckless and stupid.

The Christian right contempt for Thurman is not hard to spot. Kristan Hawkins of Students for Life sneered, "A woman pregnant WITH TWINS took Chemical Abortion Pills," which is clearly meant to demonize Thurman. That's the general tone across the anti-choice efforts to spin this case. They ping-pong between insinuating Thurman was a bad person for not wanting to have twins and suggesting she was too dumb to understand what abortion even is. At no point is there an understanding that she was a person who made a perfectly rational choice for herself and her family, and persevered despite misogynist lawmakers trying to stop her. 

Now there's a second story from the same batch of Georgia reporting at ProPublica. Candi Miller, a 41-year-old mother of three, had been told by doctors that "having another baby could kill her." Miller "had lupus, diabetes and hypertension and didn’t want to wait until the situation became dire." She took abortion pills ordered online, but, like Thurman, had an incomplete abortion. In pre-Dobbs Georgia, this would not be a problem, because she could go to the emergency room and walk out a few hours, safe and pregnancy-free. Instead, she died in bed, afraid and in pain. The state committee that reviewed her case "immediately decided it was 'preventable' and blamed the state’s abortion ban."

We need your help to stay independent

The Christian right spinning on Miller's death is just as disgusting. The American Association of Pro Life OBGYNs flat-out lied, declaring doctors in Georgia could "help if her pregnancy threatens her life." This is false. As ProPublica points out, the Georgia law's "life of the mother" exception is exceedingly narrow and limited to acute emergencies. Miller's conditions were chronic. Miller was smart to want to abort her pregnancy before it got to the point where she was near death. Anti-abortion activists talk about her like she didn't understand the situation, when in fact, she understood perfectly well that the law wouldn't allow her a legal abortion until severe and likely irreversible damage had been done to her already fragile body. 

The same anti-abortion activists insisting they'd honor these phony "exceptions" to abortion law are also currently pumping out endless propaganda insisting that women who have medically indicated abortions are liars. They especially hate Kate Cox, a Texas woman who had to travel out of state to abort a pregnancy because the fetus had a rare genetic disorder that usually kills the baby within a few days of birth. Cox's health was also imperiled, but because, like Miller, she hadn't yet reached death's door, the doctors couldn't legally justify it. Unlike Miller, Cox got a legal and medically supervised abortion and survived. Her reward is she is now subject to relentless lies from anti-abortion groups denying that her abortion was medically necessary. 

That's the bind the Christian right puts women in. If you die, they say it's your fault for not having faith in the "exceptions." If you complete your abortion and live, they accuse you of being a liar and a murderer and insist the exceptions should not have covered you. As we see in these two cases, not only will conservatives pass laws that kill women, they will defame them in death by painting them as reckless and stupid. However, anyone who reads Miller and Thurman's stories can see that they made the smartest decisions they could have made under impossible circumstances. 

Republicans always knew abortion bans would kill women. They just don't care. Donald Trump's running mate, Sen. JD Vance, R-Ohio, has made it quite clear with his relentless ranting about "miserable" and "sociopathic" women who are childless "cat ladies." The Christian right believes that women's purpose on earth is to make babies. In this view, any woman who declines a pregnancy — whether out of choice or necessity — has no right to exist. 

 

An Alabama principal lost her job after she came out. Her conservative community rallied around her

VESTAVIA HILLS, Ala. — Principal Lauren Dressback didn’t think about it after it happened. After all, she was workplace-close with Wesley Smith, the custodian at Cahaba Heights Elementary School, in this affluent suburb of Birmingham. She called him “the mayor.” She said that he knew her two children, asked about her family almost daily and made a point of interacting. “Every day, a huge bear hug,” she recalled. 

So, when Dressback, just after last Valentine’s Day, asked Smith to come into the nurse’s office and shut the door, and then shared three photos on her phone of who she had just started dating, it felt ordinary. Afterward, she said, “I just moved right on about my day.”

But the 2-minute and 13-second exchange — captured on video by the nurse — would prove fateful. 

In a few short months, after a two-decade career, Dressback, a popular educator, would go from Vestavia Hills City school district darling to controversial figure after she came out as gay, divorced her husband, and began dating a Black woman. 

Within days of showing the custodian the photos, she was ordered to leave the building and was barred from district property. Soon, she found herself facing a litany of questions from district leaders about a seemingly minor issue: employee timesheets. In April, she was officially placed on administrative leave. On May 2, during a packed school board meeting, she was demoted, replaced as principal, and sent to run the district’s alternative high school.

It matters that this story is unfolding in Vestavia Hills. The city’s motto is “A Life Above,” and the municipal website declares that it “exemplifies the ideals of fine southern hospitality.”

At that school board meeting, as he had for weeks, Todd Freeman, the superintendent, refused to offer an explanation, even to Dressback. Rather, at the beginning of the meeting, he read a statement that “we have not, cannot, and will not make personnel decisions based on an individual’s race, sex, sexual orientation, religion, national origin or disability.” (When contacted, Vestavia Hills City Schools spokesperson Whit McGhee said the district would not discuss confidential personnel matters and declined to make Freeman available for an interview. He provided links to school board meeting minutes, district policies and Alabama educator codes without explaining how they applied in Dressback’s case. Freeman and two other district officials involved in the situation did not respond to emails requesting interviews or a list of detailed questions.)

Despite Freeman’s assertion regarding personnel decisions, many people in the community believe differently. So many, in fact, that “the Dressback situation” has lit up social media (one TikTok post has more than 313,000 views), spurred supermarket conversations and online chatter — and challenged allegiances. 

“The entire situation has divided the community,” said Abbey Skipper, a parent at Cahaba Heights Elementary. Some people, she said, are “trying to label everyone who is on the side of Dressback as leftists or Democrats or radicals” and assuming “everyone who supports the superintendent and the board is a Republican — which isn’t true.” 

A private Facebook group, “We Stand With Lauren” quickly gathered 983 members, while a public Facebook post by a fifth grade teacher at Cahaba Heights complained of the “news frenzy and whirlwind of social media misinformation” and stated that, “We Stand for Our Superintendent, Our District Office, Our Board, and our new principal, Kim Polson.” The May 8 teacher post, which got 287 likes and 135 comments, both in support and challenging the post, went on to say, “To do our jobs to the best of our ability, we trust the people who have been charged to lead us.” 

Alabama has among the strictest anti-gay policies in the nation. This past legislative session, the House passed a bill to ban LGBTQ+ flags and symbols from schools. It also expands to middle schools the current “Don’t Say Gay” law, which prohibits instruction or discussion of LGBTQ+ issues in elementary schools. Its sponsor, Rep. Mack Butler, who represents a suburban community in northeast Alabama, stated that it could “purify the schools just a little bit.” He later walked back the comment. The bill died in the Senate, but Butler has vowed to reintroduce it next session.

The bill was one of dozens introduced or passed in states around the country restricting classroom discussion of gender identity, books with LGBTQ+ characters and displays of pride symbols. The laws have contributed to a climate in which “every classroom has been turned into a front” in a battle, said Melanie Willingham-Jaggers, executive director of GLSEN, which advocates for LGBTQ+ individuals in K-12 education. “Every educator, every administrator now has to be on that front line every single day,” she said. “We’re seeing educators leave because of the strain of the job made worse by the political moment we’re in and we’re also seeing because of the political moment we’re in, educators being targeted for their personal identity.”

Tiffany Wright, a professor at Millersburg University in Pennsylvania who studies the experience of LGBTQ+ educators, said right now many “are very on edge.” Wright and her colleagues have surveyed LGBTQ+ teachers and principals four times since 2007, with new 2024 data to be released in November. While the past decade has seen strides toward acceptance, “the regional differences are huge,” she said. “Folks in the South definitely felt less safe being out to their communities and students.” November’s presidential and statewide elections could yield even sharper differences in LGBTQ+ protections between red and blue states. 

While quite a few states long had laws barring discrimination based on sexual orientation, it took a 2020 Supreme Court decision, Bostock v. Clayton County, to bring such protections to Alabama. That changed landscape spurred Dressback to engage lawyer Jon Goldfarb, who filed a complaint alleging work-based discrimination with the federal Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, which is investigating. This fall, he expects to file a separate federal civil rights complaint. In 30 years of practice in Alabama, Goldfarb said, “I’ve had a lot of people that have come to me and complain about being discriminated against because of their sexual orientation.” Until Bostock, he would tell them, “There is nothing we can do.”

A review of Dressback's personnel file shows no reprimands until June, when she received an evaluation questioning her professional conduct that followed her EEOC complaint (Goldfarb said that he later amended the complaint to allege that the district retaliated against her for the filing). This raises a question: Why was she removed? 

Dressback’s situation, however, is about more than the law. It also challenges her place in the white Christian, predominantly conservative community she grew up in, belongs to and loves. And it offers a test case in a divided political time: Will her removal and the outcry that followed harden partisan alignments — or shake them? Even in Alabama, a Pew Research Center survey shows, more than one-third of those who lean Republican say homosexuality should be accepted.nb 

We need your help to stay independent

Brian DeMarco, a local attorney and high school classmate of Dressback’s, was sporting bright print swim trunks, a T-shirt and a Vestavia Hills baseball cap when we met at the public swimming pool where he’d brought his kids. We sat at a picnic table; the squeals of children released to the joys of summer carried in the warm Alabama air. He said he understands why some people may not be comfortable with a gay elementary school principal.

“Her coming out as an educator, being around children, I think that frightens people, certain people all over the country,” he said. And in the South, in a conservative town, “it does become a bigger issue to people.” Politically, DeMarco tends “to swing right,” but sent Dressback a message of support on Facebook. “Everybody that knows Lauren knows she is a good person,” he said.

In fact, Dressback’s case has spurred public outrage because so many people do know her. She attended Vestavia Hills Public Schools — Class of 1997 — and her mother, now retired, was a popular high school English teacher and yearbook adviser. She followed her parents into education (her father was a geography professor) and returned to teach social studies at the high school. 

In 2015, she was named secondary teacher of the year; in 2017, the graduating class dedicated the yearbook to her. She moved into administration and advanced; in 2022 she was appointed principal of Cahaba Heights Elementary School. She was awarded a three-year contract, effective July 2023, following a probationary year. In December — weeks before she was told to gather her things and was escorted off school grounds — she was given a positive write-up by an assistant superintendent who observed her running a meeting of teachers about the school’s “core values.”

It also matters that this story is unfolding in Vestavia Hills. The city’s motto is “A Life Above,” and the municipal website declares that it “exemplifies the ideals of fine southern hospitality.” The community was born as a post-World War II subdivision and incorporated in 1950 with 3,000 residents (it now has 38,000). It is an effortfully attractive place with well-kept painted brick homes and clipped lawns. It is named for Vestavia, the exotic estate of former Birmingham Mayor George C. Ward whose Roman-inspired home was here. The 1930s-era news accounts describe lavish parties with male servers draped in togas.

Vestavia Hills is also one of the “over the mountain” suburbs of Birmingham. When you drive over Red Mountain out of the urban core with its reminders of steelmaking and jazz, of Martin Luther King Jr. and the Negro Leagues, away from streets where shabbily dressed men push wheeled contrivances, where pride flags fly and breweries sprout, where drag queens coexist with affirming churches, you enter a different world. Birmingham is a Black city; Vestavia Hills is 86 percent white. 

And like surrounding white suburbs of Mountain Brook, Homewood and Hoover, Vestavia Hills competes on lifestyle, including its public schools. Alabama is hardly an education leader, yet the four districts earn mention in U.S. News rankings. Church is also central to life here; biographies for public officials name which they attend. 

“You move a child into the school system, there’s two questions they’re asked,” Julianne Julian, a resident and another Dressback high school classmate, said when we met at a coveted rear table inside the Diplomat Deli, a popular Vestavia Hills lunch spot. “Who are you for as far as football — Alabama? Auburn? — and what church do you go to?”

Teams matter in Vestavia Hills — the high school’s in particular. The district itself was founded in 1970 amid federal desegregation orders, when residents broke away from the Jefferson County Schools and agreed to pay an extra tax. They adopted the Rebel Man in Civil War military uniform as the district’s mascot. Dressback’s 1996 junior year high school yearbook includes a photo of students at a rally waving massive Confederate flags. “It was just kind of the way we were growing up,” said DeMarco, who in high school displayed a Confederate flag on his Nissan pickup. “It was just kind of cool.”

It wasn’t until 2015 that the district considered changing the mascot. After contentious public meetings in which some argued that the mascot and flag were not racist — a point ridiculed by John Oliver on national television — the district chose to adopt the 1Rebel rebrand. (Mess with one Rebel and you mess with us all, is the concept. They are still called “The Rebels,” but simply use the letters “VH.”)

We need your help to stay independent

When I met with Dressback, days after school let out, she answered the door to her apartment wearing a T-shirt that read “love. empathy. compassion. inclusion. justice. kindness.” She looked like she could use every one of those things. She was welcoming, but said she was nervous about talking. She had not spoken publicly since she was escorted out of Cahaba Heights Elementary in February. We sat at her dining table — I brought an Italian sub, no onions or peppers, hot, from Diplomat Deli, Dressback’s regular order — and in our conversations then and later, she appeared to believe the best about people.

Others in Vestavia clearly believe the best about her: Since things erupted, her phone has pinged with messages, including from former students. “Thank you for making an impact on my life,” said one of the many that she shared with me. “You stood up for me in class when someone made fun of me for having depression and I’ll never forget that,” wrote another. And, “you may not remember me, but I had you as a teacher during my time at VHHS and even when I was not your student, I still saw you as a person who cared for all students, not just the ones on your roster.” (Dressback said she has “not received any negative messages. Not one.”)

At Cahaba Heights, parents noticed her gift for calming children with behavior issues. A mother of twins who got tripped up by transitions (drop-off is “the hardest part of our morning”) said that, with Dressback greeting them at the curb, “We didn’t have that struggle this year at all.” Sometimes Dressback would slip on a wig or costume — Santa, Minion, astronaut, among others; before winter breaks she donned an elf outfit and climbed atop the brick marquee in front of the school to the delight of arriving children and passing cars. She wanted to remind everyone that school is fun.

“Her love for the children just reached every square inch of the school,” said Skipper, the Cahaba Heights parent of a second grader who moved to the neighborhood specifically for the school. Her removal “plunged me into grief. I couldn’t eat, I couldn’t sleep, I lost weight. The amount of upset was palpable. I loved her. She loved my child.”

Shane Dressback told me that he struggled with the news. On one of his worst days, however, he said that God told him to love her “no matter what.” The next day, he told Lauren, “I was going to love her unconditionally and unconventionally.” The marriage ending was painful, but they remain close. “I know she loved me for 23 years,” he said. “There was nothing fake there.”

As we sat at her dining table, Dressback shared that she sensed she was gay in high school but said that “it sort of felt clear to me that I couldn’t have that life here.” The only gay people she knew well were two family members. When her Uncle Dennis died of complications from HIV and her cousin Robyn died by suicide, as upset as she was, being out was tough to imagine. 

The tragedies coincided with her time at Samford University, the private Baptist college where her father taught. “It’s one of the most religiously conservative schools in the nation,” she said. “You go to Samford to not be different.” And it was there in a geography class that she met Shane Dressback when the two arrived early one day and “started chit-chatting.” They were engaged the next year, and married in January 2001, just after her December graduation.

“I met Shane and did very genuinely fall in love with him,” she said. “He is a wonderful man.” They had two children — Kaylee graduated from college in May and is playing semi-pro soccer, and Tyler is a senior in high school — and were consumed with family life. But then, as she approached becoming an empty nester, Dressback began having panic attacks around being gay, she said, feeling that “I’ve pushed this down for a really long time.” 

This past December, she came out to Shane. They didn’t speak for more than 24 hours. Then, she texted him to say she was going to church. Minutes after the service began, she told me, “He texted me and said, ‘I’m here. May I come sit by you?’ So, we sat together at this church service. Both of us cried the whole way through it.”

Shane Dressback told me that he struggled with the news. On one of his worst days, however, he said that God told him to love her “no matter what.” The next day, he told Lauren, “I was going to love her unconditionally and unconventionally.” The marriage ending was painful, but they remain close. “I know she loved me for 23 years,” he said. “There was nothing fake there.” 

The two held hands as they told their children and parents. They divorced, sold their home and rented apartments near one another. They still have family dinners and Shane cooks; leftovers of “Daddy’s Jambalaya” were in the refrigerator of Lauren Dressback’s apartment when I visited. Kaylee came by with her goldendoodle, Dixie, to grab a helping for lunch.

Throughout Dressback’s ordeal with the school district, Shane has been her defender. “Lauren is a child of God and should be treated as such,” he said, as we sat at a friend’s brewery during off-hours. He knows her to be professionally excellent; her personal life should not matter. “It was no one’s business what was going on in our bedroom beforehand and I don’t think that’s anybody’s business now,” he said. “People have drawn a line in the sand where I think it needs to be more about, you know, loving people as Jesus did.”

Shane was the one who urged Dressback to attend a brunch in early February organized by members of a LILLES Facebook group, which connects later-in-life lesbians. There she met her girlfriend, Angela Whitlock, a former medical operations officer in the U.S. Army and law student (she graduated in May). The two began a relationship that appears to charm and steady Dressback. At a dinner during my visit, they held hands under the table. 

Dressback says she came out to Freeman, the superintendent, at the end of a one-on-one meeting in January in the spirit of transparency. But the incident that appears central to Dressback’s removal unfolded just after Valentine’s Day, when Dressback asked Smith, the custodian, to come into the office of nurse Julie Corley, whom she described as a close friend at the time, and “close the door.” 

Dressback said it was Corley’s idea to show Smith the photos to see his reaction. He was in the lunchroom near Corley’s office. The brief exchange between Dressback and Smith was captured on video. (Dressback said she did not initially notice Corley filming, but did not stop her when she did, something she now regrets.) Corley did not respond to several interview requests by email and text, and, when reached by phone, said she was not interested in speaking and hung up. Dressback said she has not had any communication with Corley since being removed.

“You shared something about your past, I was going to share something with you,” Dressback says to Smith in the video. “Do you want to see a picture of who I’m dating?” She and Whitlock had had their third date on Feb. 14. He says reflexively, “Shane?” She responds, “He’s my ex-husband.” Smith appears surprised. “April Fool?” and asks how long they were married. She says, “23 years.” He expresses disbelief. “You and him broke up?” Dressback holds out her phone to show a photo of her and Whitlock.

“Who the hell is this? I mean, Who is this?” he asks. Several times Smith states that he doesn’t believe it. She hands him her phone. “Bullshit!” he exclaims as he looks at the three photos. “Stop lyin’!”

There is one of Whitlock kissing Dressback on the cheek, one with their faces cheek to cheek and one in which they are sitting at a bar with Dressback’s arms around Whitlock, their noses touching. Smith then says, “Wow, I’m sorry,” and pulls her into a hug. “Once you go Black, baby, you don’t go back,” he quips. She groans at his attempt at humor. 

Dressback’s lawyer said that an affidavit the district obtained from Smith “appears to be in conflict on several points with what the video shows,” including a claim that he was made uncomfortable by the encounter. When reached by phone, Smith insisted, “I made no type of statement” even as district officials were “coming at me” seeking to query him, he said. “I hadn’t talked to nobody about the incident.” 

(McGhee, the school district spokesperson, declined to provide answers to specific questions, including regarding the apparent affidavit from Smith.) 

Days after Dressback shared the photos, on the morning of Feb. 23, Meredith Hanson, the district’s director of personnel, and Aimee Rainey, the assistant superintendent who had given Dressback the positive write-up in December, arrived at Cahaba Heights for a surprise meeting. Dressback said they told her that someone had complained that she shared “explicit” details of her relationship at a meeting with teachers. Dressback knew that to be untrue. “I kind of relaxed because I was like, ‘Oh, yeah, that absolutely did not happen,’” she recalled.

They questioned her in a way she found confusing. She asked for details of the complaint, but was told, “You know, ‘explicit.’ And I’m like, I know what ‘explicit’ means. Like are you going to tell me what they said I said or what?” They asked if she showed Smith photos of her and her girlfriend. She said she did. Meanwhile, she observed to me later, “There is a picture of Shane and me kissing on our lips at our wedding on the bookshelf right behind them.” (Hanson and Rainey did not respond to interview requests or to a list of detailed questions for this story.)

Dressback says she was then told to gather her belongings, and that she was being placed on “detached duty,” requiring that she work from home. She was barred from school property. She was escorted from the building, which she said made her feel “like a criminal.” She expected to be gone for a few days. 

But several days later, Dressback was informed of a new problem: timesheets. In January, she had met with staff to remind them about clocking in and out (everyone must clock in, and paraprofessionals must clock out during lunch). 

On March 4, while still barred from the Cahaba Heights campus, Dressback met with Freeman, Rainey and Hanson in the conference room at the central office to discuss timesheets. Two days later, she was told that the following morning, March 7, she was to fire two employees for irregularities on their timesheets. One, she knew, had an attendance problem. She said that she had already discussed with Hanson not renewing him at the end of the school year. 

The other was a close friend, Stefanie Robinson, a paraprofessional who worked with students with severe disabilities, including those requiring help with feeding and diapering. Robinson often stayed in the classroom during her lunch breaks to aid the special education teacher because one student had as many as 30 seizures a day. When I met Robinson at her home, she acknowledged to sometimes forgetting to clock out or in, or not being able to do so if she was attending to a child’s needs. “If I’m in a massive diaper situation, I’m not going to remember to clock out, or if I’m helping a kid that’s having a seizure or, you know, one that’s in crisis,” Robinson told me. 

What most upset Robinson, however, was that shortly after Dressback was escorted out of the school and placed on “detached duty,” requiring she work from home, Robinson faced 45 minutes of questioning by Hanson and Rainey about Dressback’s dating life that she says “felt like an interrogation.” After confirming that she and Dressback were close, Robinson says she was asked questions such as, “When Lauren goes on a date, what does she say happens? And I was like, ‘What do you mean? What do you want to know?” They pressed: “Well, when she goes on a date and the date ends, what does she say happens after that?” Robinson insisted, “I don’t ask her how her date ended.” 


Want a daily wrap-up of all the news and commentary Salon has to offer? Subscribe to our morning newsletter, Crash Course.


On March 7 at 5:58 a.m., Robinson received a text from Hanson asking her “to start your day at the Board of Education” instead of Cahaba Heights. As soon as she arrived at the central office, she saw Dressback in the room; Dressback said Freeman had told her to fire Robinson. “I could tell she’d been crying,” said Robinson. “And I just smiled at her, I was like, ‘It’s OK.’” Robinson recalled Dressback saying, “in the most robotic tone, ‘It’s my recommendation to the board that your contract be terminated immediately.’”

She hugged Dressback, told her she loved her, and left. Robinson texted the parent of one of her students, a second grade girl who is nonverbal, uses a wheelchair and has cerebral palsy and epilepsy. The girl’s mom, Payton Smith, no relation to Wesley, told me that she’d appreciated how Dressback had welcomed her child to the school a few years earlier. The principal had asked, “‘What do we need to do to make your kid feel comfortable?’ and recognized her as a child,” and not a set of legal educational requirements to meet, Smith recalled. Despite Robinson’s key role in her daughter’s education, Smith said she was not officially notified until March 19 — nearly two weeks later — via email that “Mrs. Robinson is no longer working at VHECH,” district shorthand for Cahaba Heights.

Yet an email of district documentation shared with me states the date of Robinson’s leaving as April 5, and said that she had resigned. Nonetheless, the district continued to pay her for the rest of the school year, which she said felt “like I was being paid off because they knew what they did was wrong.” She is now a clinical research data coordinator for University of Alabama at Birmingham School of Medicine. (Neither McGhee, the district spokesperson, nor Hanson, in charge of HR, responded to email requests seeking comment on why Robinson was fired, the claim that she had resigned, or the discrepancy in her pay.) 

Meanwhile, on March 13, Dressback emailed Freeman asking to be reinstated to her position at Cahaba Heights, immediately. “I believe the action the system has taken against me is discrimination because of my sexual orientation, my interracial relationship, and my gender,” she wrote. The next day, Goldfarb, her lawyer, filed the EEOC complaint. (Goldfarb said that he later amended the complaint to allege additional discrimination and that the district retaliated against her for the filing.)

On April 18, Dressback received a letter signed by Freeman officially placing her on administrative leave. It states that she is “not to contact any employees of the Vestavia Hills Board of Education related to your or their employment or relationship with the Vestavia Hills City Schools.” The letter does not state a reason for the action.

As a result, to parents and some educators, Dressback seemed to have vanished. “I thought like, ‘Oh, I bet she’s sick. That’s really sad,’” said Lindsay Morton, a Cahaba Heights parent, a reaction echoed by others. Then, on April 27, two of Dressback’s classmates from high school posted videos on social media. 

“Where is Principal Dressback???” a schoolmate and friend, Karl Julian, titled a video on his YouTube channel. It has been viewed more than 11,000 times. Lauren Pilleteri Reece, who as laurenpcrna has 228.7K followers on TikTok, posted several videos narrating Dressback’s battle; the first has more than 313,000 views and 3,400 comments. Reece has known Dressback since high school.

When the Vestavia Hills School Board called a meeting five days later, on May 2, to take up Dressback’s employment, everyone seemed to know about it. People rallied outside the district headquarters holding posters with messages such as “We Stand with Principal Dressback” and “Love is Love.” Many people wore green, Dressback’s favorite color, to signal support. Local TV and news reporters showed up. 

“We are all watching this. It is not just a Vestavia Hills issue anymore,” said Rep. Neil Rafferty, the only openly gay member of the Alabama Legislature. The action, he said, signals “to your students who might be LGBTQ that they don’t matter.”

The room thrummed with emotion. There were angry, even tearful Cahaba Heights Elementary parents, teachers and retired teachers, students, former classmates and others who knew Dressback, plus some who didn’t know her. “I’ve never met her, I just know she had been wronged,” said Jim Whisenhunt, an advertising executive whose children, now grown, attended Vestavia Hills public schools. 

Dressback, fearing that she could not keep her composure, did not attend. Those who did attend had a lot to share. But before public comments were permitted or a vote was taken, Freeman read the prepared statement in which he said he wanted “to address, in general, personnel decisions made by the board.” He went on to say that they “have not, cannot, and will not make personnel decisions based on an individual’s race, sex, sexual orientation, religion, national origin, or disability” and that “all of our decisions are vetted thoroughly and thoughtfully.” He added that “district employees contribute to academic excellence and are committed to our mission to provide every child in our schools the opportunity to learn without limits.” Then, over the objections of many in the audience who demanded a chance to comment before a vote was taken, the board officially transferred Dressback from Cahaba Heights Elementary to the alternative school. 

When public comments began, the outrage was obvious. “We may color outside of your lines a little bit, but coloring outside of your lines at no point does that ever mean that we are unprofessional. Lauren did not become unprofessional overnight,” said a charged-up Reece, who also came out as an adult. “You started looking at her as unprofessional overnight.” 

Rep. Neil Rafferty, a Democrat who represents Birmingham, stated that he “felt compelled to drive straight here” after “a long week in Montgomery” even though it is not his district. “We are all watching this. It is not just a Vestavia Hills issue anymore,” said Rafferty, the only openly gay member of the Alabama Legislature. The action, he said, signals “to your students who might be LGBTQ that they don’t matter.”

Rev. Julie Conrady, minister of the Unitarian Universalist Churches of Birmingham and Tuscaloosa, and president of a local interfaith group, stood up to speak. “You are sending her a message that in Vestavia Hills it is not OK to be LGBTQ,” she told the board and superintendent. “You should not be punished in your job in 2024 because of who you love.” Conrady, in black liturgical robe and green stole, told the crowd “that there are consequences here for all these people. I want you to get pictures of every single name and vote them the hell out!” (The school board is appointed by the City Council, not elected.)

Another speaker, Allison Black Cornelius, who said she was “a conservative Republican,” focused on what seemed to make this issue explode: the silence. The superintendent and board had given no explanation, even to Dressback, as to why she was removed and now demoted, she said. “When you wait this long,” said Cornelius, “it puts this person in this black cloud.”

Her point underscored a question others raised at the meeting to a board that largely remained silent: If Dressback did something so egregious as to require she be escorted from school and barred from district property, why was she suitable to lead the alternative school? The district declined to answer this question.

The division, so apparent at that meeting, seemed to only harden a few weeks later during the board’s annual meeting on May 28. A group supporting the board and superintendent appeared in blue T-shirts and applauded after the board gave Freeman a new four-year contract that included a raise to $239,500 (he was paid $190,000 when he was hired in 2018) plus perks. Dressback supporters in green again spoke, sharing their frustration. 

This is not the first time Vestavia Hills City Schools have made unpopular personnel moves. In August 2020, Tyler Burgess, a well-loved bow-tied principal, was removed as head of the high school and assigned to oversee remote learning during Covid, when many classes were online; the board voted not to renew his contract in March 2021. Students organized a protest; 3,134 people signed a petition calling for his reinstatement. The board and superintendent did not provide an explanation for their decision. Burgess, who has a doctorate in education, is now director of learning and development at a large construction firm. He did not respond to multiple interview requests.

Danielle Tinker came to Vestavia Hills after more than a dozen years in Birmingham and Jefferson County schools, first as assistant principal at Liberty Park Elementary. In spring 2021, she was selected as principal of Cahaba Heights. From the start, Tinker, who is Black, felt unwelcome at the school where the teaching staff was nearly all white, she told me when we met for lunch. The day she was introduced as the new principal, a staff member emailed her, saying that “Cahaba Heights is a family” and that “today was hard on this family,” according to a copy of the email that she shared with me. Tinker said she was told by staff that the faculty had wanted a different principal; a later inquiry confirmed that staff felt “blindsided” when she was selected over that individual.

As principal, Tinker raised questions with Rainey, the assistant superintendent, over student articles in a fall 2021 newsletter, including two about race. They were titled “Anti-Racist Kids: Leading the Way to New Beginnings” and “Learning About Racism: How It Can Change Lives.” Tinker told me she feared those articles would be “more fluff than addressing the actual challenge” with claims such as “Racism is part of our lives, but it doesn’t have to be a bad thing if we are the ones ending it.” Rainey agreed to pause publication of the newsletter, which she said upset several teachers who wanted it published. 

On Dec. 16, 2021, several hours after Tinker told teachers that publication was being paused, Tinker emailed Hanson raising an “employee concern” after one of the teachers “stormed down the hallway” and was “pointing at me and yelling,” according to a copy of Tinker’s emails exchanges that she shared with me. The next day, Tinker received a letter from Freeman stating that he was recommending she be transferred to the alternative school, effective Jan. 3. In March, Tinker filed a complaint of racial discrimination with the EEOC and resigned, using her remaining personal time to cover her pay for the remainder of the school year. In February 2023, she and the district reached a settlement for an undisclosed amount. She is using the money to attend law school. (McGhee, the district spokesperson, did not answer questions about Tinker or Burgess; Rainey and Hanson also did not respond.)

On my last day in town in early June, Dressback gave me a guided tour of Vestavia Hills. We met inside the Diplomat Deli; Reece, Dressback’s high school classmate with the large TikTok following, joined us. As we walked out, Dressback, wearing a Care Bears T-shirt, showed off a new tattoo on her left forearm. In typewriter font it reads, “Speak the truth, even if your voice shakes.”

I slid into the passenger seat of her car, a red Buick Encore whose license plate reads “DBACK.” Reece hopped in back. An order of fries from Milo’s, a favorite Dressback fast-food spot since high school, leaned in a cup holder. Soon, we passed places they hung out as kids, schools they attended, new neighborhoods and old, the spot at Vestavia Country Club with a panoramic view where kids still take prom photos. 

The discussion jumbled together past and present, reminding these childhood friends — both of whom came out as adults — how much has changed. And how much has not. When we reached Vestavia Hills High School, Dressback stopped near a small sign at sidewalk level that reads “Alternative Placement” with an arrow. I descended metal stairs that span a rocky embankment; the alternative school, Dressback’s new assignment, is subterranean, its entrance nearly hidden from view. If architecture can relay shame, it might look like this.

Yet when I returned to the car, Dressback told me she saw the alternative school as an opportunity rather than an exit. The school has often operated without a principal (Tinker never stepped inside or interacted with students, partly because of the COVID-19 pandemic). At that late May school board meeting, Freeman could not say how many pupils attend the school. But Dressback was struck by what DeMarco, her classmate, told her. As a student, he spent time at the alternative school; he could have used someone like her.

“I’m not gonna just go and sit and read a book. I can’t do that,” Dressback said, as she pulled out of the high school driveway. She wanted to make it a place less about punishment and more about connecting with kids for whom the traditional school is not a fit. It should not be a dumping ground for educators or for kids, she said. “My mindset is I’m gonna go and I’m gonna make this the best damn alternative school in the state.”

In other words, Dressback is not willing to let go or to disappear. Yet “the Dressback situation” is hardly resolved. A few days after my visit, in early June, Dressback met with Freeman to receive an official performance review for the 2023-24 academic year, a copy of which she shared with me It was the first official yearly evaluation she had been given in her career in the district despite a stipulation in her contract that this occur annually, she said. It is searing. It finds that her “job performance is unsatisfactory.” The report was sent to the state Department of Education, per Alabama code requiring that personnel records and “investigative information” of employees placed on administrative leave for cause be reviewed by the department.

Most damning are six bullet points of claims. One alludes to Robinson’s employment and the timesheet matter. The most explosive is cast as “failure to demonstrate moderation, restraint, and civility in dealing with employees” and includes salacious assertions, including “public displays of affection and of photographs which would not, for example, be tolerated even among high school students” — presumably a reference to the photos shown to Smith, the custodian. It includes a charge Dressback had never heard before: a claim of “remote activation by your husband of a sexual toy on your person while you were in a school meeting.” 

Dressback was floored by the charges, and countered each in her rebuttal, which she asked to have filed with the state Department of Education in response to Freeman’s report. Regarding the sex toy claim, Dressback wrote that it is “false. I have never done that, and I would never do that.” The very idea of “remote activation” of a sex toy by her husband was absurd, she said. “I wouldn’t think that I would need to remind you that my ex-husband and I are divorced, that I have recently come out as gay, and that I am now in a committed relationship with a woman,” she wrote.

Such a thing never happened then, or in any school year, her rebuttal continued. She wrote that she “cannot imagine why you would credit this slanderous and irresponsible allegation” and include it in her personnel record, “other than to retaliate against me” for the EEOC filing. 

Her lawyer said in an email that the performance review “is further retaliation and an attempt to create further pretexts for the adverse employment actions the Board has already taken against her.” 

On Aug. 15, after the state Department of Education had reviewed the evaluation submitted by Freeman, the agency stated in a letter addressed to Dressback, cc’ing Freeman, that it had “examined information regarding an investigation in the Vestavia Hills City School System” and “decided to not take action against your Alabama Educator Certificate.” The same day, Freeman said in a letter to Dressback that she would “no longer be on administrative leave and may return to work” at the alternative school.

It has been baffling and infuriating to some in the community as to how such charges surfaced so soon after Dressback was given a three-year contract extension last year.  The mystery that remains is why some people — people who were eager for her to continue leading the elementary school — now want her gone. The battle has been drawn up and is now readying to be fought. Dressback told me that beyond feeling driven to “defend my name and my integrity,” she wants to speak up for others who come after — or who are now silent. 

Of course, Dressback had hoped this could all be avoided. “I tried to just be the good employee,” she told me. “I thought if I just do what they ask me to do, this is gonna get wrapped up and I’ll go back to work” at Cahaba Heights. 

Notably, she still feels loyalty, even love, for Vestavia Hills and its school system. 

“Maybe I shouldn’t feel the allegiance I feel,” she said when we spoke over Zoom several weeks ago. “But I can’t just turn it off. It’s not like a water faucet. You know, it’s my home. It’s where I grew up and it’s where I chose to plant my career. As betrayed as I have felt, I just can’t turn my back on the system.” Rather, she wants to nudge it forward.

This story about Vestavia Hills was produced by The Hechinger Report, a nonprofit, independent news organization focused on inequality and innovation in education. Sign up for the Hechinger newsletter

A landslide rang Earth like a gong for over a week. Climate change made it possible

An anomalous seismic signal recorded for nine days in September 2023 was caused by the impact of massive landslide and tsunami in Greenland following the collapse of a glacier, new research has found. The source of the anomalous signal was confirmed Sept. 5 by an international team of researchers that included 68 scientists from 40 institutions in 15 countries. The glacier's collapse was due to climate change, and more collapses are expected in the future. No people were harmed. 

The seismic signal crossed the globe in under an hour, from eastern Greenland to Antarctica, with massive waves sloshing against in stone walls of a narrow valley until they rung out through the earth like “a big musical instrument” for nine days — every 90 seconds. Thought they initially classified the signal as a "USO" — or, unidentified seismic object — they solved the mystery, reporting their findings Thursday in the journal Science.

“When I first saw the seismic signal, I was completely baffled. Even though we know seismometers can record a variety of sources happening on Earth’s surface, never before has such a long-lasting, globally traveling seismic wave, containing only a single frequency of oscillation, been recorded. This inspired me to co-lead a large team of scientists to figure out the puzzle," study co-author Stephen Hicks, of University College London Earth Sciences, said in a Friday release

"We do know that the tsunami washed away vegetation and soils from the walls of the fjord, but we do not know yet what the impact on fauna might have been," Hicks told Salon in an email. "A specific research working group will likely study this in the near future."

The scientists said the landslide sent an estimated that 25 million cubic meters of rock and ice crashing into Dickson Fjord from a collapsing 1.2 kilometer-tall (roughly three-quarters of a mile high) mountain peak. The resulting splashdown sent water surging 655 feet in the air, then created a 360-foot wave that crossed 6.2 miles of the fjord.

After image of landslide siteImage of landslide site taken on Sept. 19, 2023 following Sept. 16, 2023 event. (Danish Army)The event was not observed by human witnesses, but the high-speed force of the waters stripped the plant life off the shoreline of the fjord, then traveled on to destroy cultural and archeological heritage sites at a research base 43 miles away from the initial crash — with the latter waves still reaching 13 feet in height by that time. No one was directly injured by the event, though the splashdown occurred in a routinely trafficked tourist route. In a western Greenland fjord in 2017, four people were killed and two villages permanently abandoned when a landslide triggered a smaller tsunami. 


Want more health and science stories in your inbox? Subscribe to Salon's weekly newsletter Lab Notes.


As reported by Science, the team found a dark band of sediments on the glacier’s face when they later visited the site of the 2023 event. The band was left by the tallest waves of the sloshing water in the valley, with a high-water mark that was more than twice as tall as the Statue of Liberty.

The study's lead author, landslide scientist Kristian Svennevig, of the Geological Survey of Denmark and Greenland, noted the historic first and attributing the breakthrough to international cooperation.

“When we set out on this scientific adventure, everybody was puzzled and no one had the faintest idea what caused this signal. All we knew was that it was somehow associated with the landslide. We only managed to solve this enigma through a huge interdisciplinary and international effort,” he said.

The team confirmed that the tsunami was among the largest measured in recent history, and that this is the first known recording of sloshing water through the earth's crust. It is also the first known landslide and tsunami observed from Greenland, researchers said, "showing how climate change already has major impacts there."

Scientists at NASA's National Snow and Ice Data Center said last year that — regardless of the actions undertaken today — humanity will need to plan to for the likelihood of municipal failures in the coming decades, as sea levels are predicted to rise continually due to global warming effects of climate change. 

Massive population shifts in the United States and elsewhere are expected as rising sea levels threaten to displace billions of coastal residents via inland flooding, causing widespread damage to public utilities — such as physical infrastructure for sewage and drinking water, telecommunications, electrical and transportation. The highest risks of the most extreme forms of this damage, NASA said, are associated with the potential for rapid ice sheet loss.

“God spared my life”: Trump tells rally higher power saved him from assassination attempts

What some people might attribute to poor aim and a Secret Service detail on high alert, Donald Trump is attributing to God. 

The former president and current GOP candidate told a rally crowd in Uniondale, NY on Wednesday that the Almighty intervened to save him from two failed assassination attempts. 

"God has now spared my life, it must have been… Not once but twice." Trump said to cheers, before busting out one of the most egregious instances of "some people are saying" in history. " There are those that say he did it because Trump is going to turn this state around…He's going to make America great again."

 Thomas Matthew Crooks fired at Trump in July, grazing his ear with a bullet during a rally in Butler, Penn. The 20-year-old's volley of shots wounded one rallygoer and killed another before he was killed by return fire from law enforcement officers.

Immediately after the attempt on Trump's life, many among the punditry expected Trump to coast to an easy election victory off of a post-attempt bump. However, the decision of President Joe Biden to leave the race and a quick selection of Vice President Kamala Harris as the replacement nominee took the wind out of Trump's sails. 

Another plot on Trump's life this weekend was discovered by Secret Service agents before Trump came near the would-be assassin hiding along the course of the Trump International Golf Course in Palm Beach. Harris has maintained a healthy lead in recent polls. 

“Fine with me if they decided not to visit”: Springfield mayor tells Trump stay away following smear

The mayor of Springfield is the latest Ohio politician to push back against Donald Trump after the former president spread lies about the city's Haitian immigrant population. 

During his debate with Vice President Kamala Harris, Trump gave airtime to a far-right conspiracy theory that insisted Haitian immigrants who had recently settled in Springfield were eating local pets. That story, which filtered into the Trump campaign by way of running mate JD Vance, is an admitted fabrication. That hasn't stopped a deluge of bomb threats and other disruptions in the town since the rumor took hold in GOP circles. 

Speaking to reporters on Tuesday, Republican mayor Rob Rue worried about the "strain" that a Trump visit would bring to Springfield.

“It would be an extreme strain on our resources," he shared, per NBC News. "So it’d be fine with me if they decided not to make that visit."

Rue's comments follow a similar sentiment from Ohio Gov. Mike DeWine. Over the weekend, the Republican governor countered Trump's claims about immigrants eating pets and lauded recent immigrants to Ohio. 

"What we know is that Haitians who are in Springfield are legal. They came to Springfield to work. Ohio is on the move and Springfield has really made a great resurgence," he said, during an interview with ABC This Week.

Both President Joe Biden and Harris have countered Trump's claims about Haitian immigrants and accused the former president of spreading dangerous rhetoric.

 “This has to stop, what he’s doing. It has to stop,” Biden said in a press conference at the White House last week. 

Superbugs predicted to kill 39 million people by 2050, study finds

A new study published Monday in The Lancet predicts drug-resistant infections could be linked to approximately 169 million deaths by 2050, according to the latest findings of a global research group. And antimicrobial resistant pathogens — AMR, or superbugs — are expected to directly kill more than 39 million people by that year.

The world's first global analysis of such trends, the findings were presented by more than 500 researchers who analyzed data from more than 204 countries over a 30 year period for The Global Research on Antimicrobial Resistance (GRAM) Project. The study's authors are calling for the priority development of new antimicrobial drugs and new prevention methods by global health policymakers.    

"Our analysis of trends in AMR mortality by age suggests that there is a need for interventions to tackle the increasing burden of AMR in older age groups going forward. Findings from this study provide evidentiary support to policy measures that combat AMR and have the potential to save lives, by adopting strategies that decrease risk of infections through new vaccines, improved quality of health care in hospitals and health centers, improved access to antibiotics and promotion of antibiotic stewardship," the scientists wrote. 

The new findings continue The Lancet's 2024 series on antibiotic-resistant illnesses, in which the publication has continued to advocate for several global targets to help toward a larger 10% reduction in superbug mortality by 2030. The latest findings echo those found previously by the World Health Organization, which attributes superbug development to the overuse of antimicrobials to fight viruses, bacteria and fungi.

GRAM project research said that millions of deaths could be prevented through improved healthcare access. As reported by Time, the notable finding arrives just ahead of a United Nations meeting on superbugs to be held Sept. 24 in New York. 

Teamsters decline to endorse Harris or Trump, saying both are too pro-“Big Business”

The International Brotherhood of Teamsters declined to endorse a candidate for president on Wednesday, announcing that they'll throw their support behind no one in the upcoming presidential election. 

The decision not to endorse came shortly after the union released internal polling data that showed a strong preference for former president Donald Trump among the union's rank-and-file. Nearly 60% of the union's membership voiced their support for Trump in in-person straw polls that ran from April through September. Only 34% said they would vote for Kamala Harris.

“Our members are the union, and their voices and opinions must be at the forefront of everything the Teamsters do," Teamsters President Sean O'Brien said of the polls in a statement.

The union shared that their decision not to endorse came after they couldn't secure promises from either candidate.

“Unfortunately, neither major candidate was able to make serious commitments to our union to ensure the interests of working people are always put before Big Business,” O’Brien shared. “We sought commitments from both Trump and Harris not to interfere in critical union campaigns or core Teamsters industries – and to honor our members’ right to strike – but were unable to secure those pledges.”

The non-endorsement is the first time that the 1.3-million-member union has opted out of choosing a candidate in almost 30 years. It comes after O'Brien spoke at the Republican National Convention earlier this year, promising an openness to working with any candidate who would advance the goals of his union.

"We want to know one thing: 'What are you doing to help American workers?'" he said at the time.  "As a negotiator, I know that no window or door should ever be permanently shut."

The move comes as a surprise, as the union endorsed the Biden-Harris campaign in 2020. The Biden Administration also secured a significant victory for retired Teamsters, protecting their pensions from cuts under their COVID-19 relief plan.

Is Nebraska in play? How an unlikely candidate could upend GOP’s Senate hopes

Union steamfitter Dan Osborn is running against incumbent Republican Sen. Deb Fischer in Nebraska, one of the country's reddest states — and there are signs that the race could be much closer than expected. Osborn is an independent, not a Democrat, and insists he's not aligned with either major political party. But the narrow focus of his platform suggests a possible model for taking on Republicans in states where the Democratic brand is particularly weak.

The U.S. Senate race in the Cornhusker State suddenly registered on the national radar after a recent Split Ticket and Survey USA poll that found Osborn trailing Fischer by just one point, 39 to 38 percent.

Republicans have publicly dismissed the poll, and many political analysts have been skeptical — perhaps with reason — that an independent candidate could actually win in Nebraska, the Osborn campaign says internal polls have reported similar results. 

The Survey USA poll also suggested that undecided voters, who accounted for about 20% of survey respondents, may be friendlier to Osborn than to Fischer. In the poll's crosstabs, 20% of those undecided voters supported President Biden in 2020, while only 10% supported former President Donald Trump.

Osborn also runs close to Fischer among the state's heavily conservative rural voters, trailing her by 40 to 36 percent with Democrat Preston Love far behind at 22 percent. Furthermore, 17% of 2020 Trump voters in Nebraska say they plan to support Osborn in this election, while just 7% of 2020 Biden voters plan to support Fischer.

Osborn has refused to toe either party’s line, though he has certainly adopted popular positions on two issues that Nebraskans will weigh in on this November: cannabis and abortion.

When it comes to campaign funding, however, Osborn is in a more difficult spot. He has raised just $1.6 million this year and has only about $600,000 left in cash on hand. (As an independent, he's getting no support from a national party organization.) Fischer has raised more $6.2 million and has about $2.4 million left, according to the most recent Federal Elections Commission filings.

On the issues, Osborn has refused to toe either party’s line, though he has certainly adopted popular positions on two issues that Nebraskans will weigh in on this November: cannabis and abortion.

He has said he would vote to codify the constitutional protections formerly afforded by Roe v. Wade, a position that has plurality support of 45 percent in Nebraska, according to Survey USA poll. He also supports the federal legalization of medical cannabis, a position with 71 percent support in Nebraska, and supports removing cannabis from Schedule I, the federal government's most restrictive category. Both of those issues will come before Nebraska voters as ballot initiatives.

Beyond those hot-button issues, Osborn has maintained a highly disciplined campaign message with a relatively narrow focus. He has refused to take a position on the war on Gaza, for example, saying he did not want the issue associated with his campaign, according to the New York Times. Osborn’s campaign also declined to offer any comment for this story.

We need your help to stay independent

He has, however, discussed his positions on economic topics, striking notably pro-labor positions and indicating that he would likely vote for the PRO Act, which would expand legal protections related to union organizing efforts, or for similar legislation. Some Senate Democrats, including Sen. Mark Kelly of Arizona and Sen. Mark Warner of Virginia, have declined to support the PRO Act. 

Osborn has been endorsed by Nebraska's Teamsters locals and the United Auto Workers, as well as by other unions, and has laid the blame for recent inflation on corporate price-gouging rather than government policy. He’s also staked out populist positions on topics like "right to repair" — a major issue in a farm state — and railroad safety, two issues that typically don't have much resonance in U.S. Senate campaigns.

One area where Osborn is clearly seeking to distinguish himself from Democrats is on border policy, widely perceived as a Republican strength. While Osborn told Politico that he would be unlikely to join Republicans in seeking to impeach Homeland Security Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas, he has positioned himself as relatively hawkish on immigration, indicating that he would find a way to “bring together a majority” to pass border security legislation in the Senate, and would support closing the border until new legislation is passed. (Which would likely be both illegal and impossible.)


Want a daily wrap-up of all the news and commentary Salon has to offer? Subscribe to our morning newsletter, Crash Course.


Osborn has also tried to find a difficult middle ground on gun control and gun rights, saying that he would vote to expand universal background checks for firearms sales but would oppose an assault weapon ban.

In another effort to separate himself from mainstream Democrats, Osborn told Politico that he would have voted against the 2021 bipartisan infrastructure bill because it was likely to increase the national debt, an apparent gesture to fiscal conservatism. Fischer, the incumbent, was among a handful of Republicans to support that bill, which had major benefits for rural states like Nebraska.

In historical terms, Osborn still faces long odds in his effort to win in November. (There are currently three independents in the Senate, all of whom caucus with Democrats: Sen. Angus King of Maine, Sen. Bernie Sanders of Vermont and Sen. Kyrsten Sinema of Arizona.) According to the polls, Osborn is well ahead of where independent candidate Evan McMullin was in his 2022 challenge to Sen. Mike Lee, R-Utah, and about even with independent Al Gross was in his 2020 campaign against Sen. Dan Sullivan, R-Alaska. Both Lee and Sullivan ultimately won by comfortable margins.

 

“How will MomTok survive this?”: The Mormon MomTok sex scandal and show explained

Mormon moms run TikTok and now they run reality television too.

At the center of this modern online Mormon world is the Mormon influencer and mother of three, Taylor Frankie Paul. The internet clamored for the juicy details about Paul's life when she divulged on TikTok to her 4.5 million followers that she was getting divorced after what she dubbed "soft swinging" with her married friend group in Utah. During the TikTok livestream, Paul shared that she had fallen in love with one of the husbands she was swinging with and ultimately ended up divorcing her own husband of several years, with whom she shares two children. 

Outside of the sex scandal that rocked Mormon TikTok, Paul is in a group of new-age influencing Mormon moms involved with content creation on TikTok called MomTok. The new Hulu reality television show, "The Secret Lives of Mormon Wives" dives into the scandal around Paul. Still, mostly, the reality show highlights how members of the MomTok group are currently attempting to rewrite narratives around Mormon women and whether MomTok can withstand outside pressure and drama. While the drama around Paul's life is the focal point of the show, the rest of MomTok has enough drama to fuel an eight-episode season filled with Mormon women dismantling the notoriously conservative values of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints.

Here's all the juicy details about Paul, MomTok and Hulu's "The Secret Lives of Mormon Wives":

The "soft swinging" scandal

Paul is the main character of Mormon TikTok, the Mom influencer who stunned the platform when she revealed to her followers that her MomTok friends and her were involved in what she dubbed as "soft swinging." Soft swinging is defined as "a form of ethical non-monogamy, as long as all parties are aware and consenting."

In 2022, she shared that her then-husband Tate Paul — who she was divorcing — had an open relationship with other couples in MomTok. During the live stream, Paul did not reveal the names of people she and her ex-husband had had a relationship with. She described that none of the couples went "all the way" with each other unless their spouse was in the room, The Cut reported. She said in the video, “The whole group was intimate with each other.”

But Paul later admitted that she did go all the way with someone in the group, revealing that she had feelings for an unnamed man. “To be honest, we had an agreement, like all of us, and I did step out of that agreement.” 

“It wasn’t like I was going around, like, hooking up with my friend’s husband. It was like, we were at a party, I got belligerent, and we went and messed around by ourselves rather than the whole group,” she said. 

In the TikTok live, Paul said she was isolated from her friends even though "no one was innocent." Paul also said that she wasn't the only one who had feelings for people in the group.

“There are three divorces in our friend group right now,” she said. “One not really to do with this situation, but there are two of us who are getting divorced.”

While Paul exposed her own involvement in the swinging she did not share who else was involved — she said in the live that most of MomTok isn't involved. However, former members of the group Miranda McWhorter and her husband Chase were accused of being a part of the swinging. They denied the claims stating that Miranda fell out with Paul due to a rumor that Paul allegedly started about Chase being interested in Paul. Another member, Camille Munday, was also rumored to be in the group, but Paul denied these claims.

Other MomTokers — Mayci Neeley, Whitney Leavitt, and Victoria Zalic — also denied the swinging allegations with statements on TikTok.

"The Secret Lives of Mormon Wives" premieres on Hulu and blows up

Shortly after the sex scandal shook up Mormon TikTok, the MomTok group began filming a new reality television show, "The Secret Lives of Mormon Wives." However, the sex scandal wasn't the only chaos swirling around Paul and her co-stars and friends.

In 2023, Paul was arrested on assault and domestic violence after a physical altercation with her new boyfriend Dakota Mortensen. The fallout of the altercation between Mortensen and Paul was filmed for the pilot of "The Secret Lives of Mormon Wives." The distraught Paul also suffered an ectopic pregnancy alongside pleading guilty to one of the charges against her. The influencer took a plea deal and was on probation during the filming of the first season. She described the incident as "hitting rock bottom."

We need your help to stay independent

After the first episode, Paul's arrest and ectopic pregnancy, the reality show jumps forward a year in the second episode. It features members of MomTok such as Whitney Leavitt, Layla Taylor, Demi Engemann, Jessi Ngatikaura, Jen Affleck, Mikayla Matthews and Mayci Neeley. Most of the conflict in the series focuses on the division between the values and morals of the conservative and more progressive members of the group clashing against each other, calling each other "sinners" and "saints."

Members of MomTok like Ngatikaura, Neeley and Engemann are staunch advocates for a new version of Mormonism that fights against abuse and constraints the conservative church and its members have held and inflicted against LDS women. 

However, this has not been an easy road for MomTok in the Mormon community. Ngatikaura explained in an interview with ABC4, "Seeing the backlash from our community has been rough, but I also think that if they gave it a chance they would realize it’s just an empowering show about women in this religion and culture but navigating it differently because we’re all imperfect humans."

"The Secret Lives of Mormon Wives" is available to stream on Hulu.

“Don’t shoot anyone”: Stephen Colbert addresses gun owners post-Trump assassination attempt

Stephen Colbert on Tuesday's episode of "The Late Show" addressed gun owners directly, following the most recent apparent assassination attempt on former president Donald Trump.

“I just want to state the obvious right off the bat: Political violence has no place in America,” the host said, noting how he'd been at the Emmy Awards in Los Angeles on the day of the alleged attempt, which took place at Trump's West Palm Beach golf course. 

"In fact, can I talk to all the gun owners for just a second? Don’t shoot anyone. If you have even the vaguest idea that you might shoot someone, sell your gun and use that money to buy yourself a little treat," Colbert said, suggesting the money could be used to purchase “pancakes” or “one of those bicycle license plates with your name on it.”

“Or, you know what, a flute,” Colbert added. “Learn the flute. Call your kids and tell them you’re trading your guns for a flute. They might visit.”

Colbert continued by describing the suspect, Ryan Wesley Routh, who reportedly had staked out a hole on the ex-president's course and was equipped with an AK-47-style rifle with a scope. Routh, who Colbert described as a "truly deranged man" for spending 12 hours camped out on the course, was charged with federal firearms offenses on Monday, with The Associated Press noting that additional charges, including attempted murder, could be brought. 


Want a daily wrap-up of all the news and commentary Salon has to offer? Subscribe to our morning newsletter, Crash Course.


“That sounds like an evil plot straight out of 'Looney Tunes,'” Colbert quipped, before observing Routh's meandering political affiliations. Social media posts revealed prior support for MAGA, former Democratic representative turned GOPer Tulsi Gabbard, Nikki Haley, and Vivek Ramaswamy. “That’s like saying: ‘I’ll have the soup and if you don’t have that I will take sneakers,’” the host jested. "And if you don't have that, I'll take Vivek Ramaswamy."

Colbert also called out Trump for trying to foist blame for the attack on his Democratic opponents — President Joe Biden and Vice President Kamala Harris — citing a recent Fox News appearance in which Trump said, “Their rhetoric is causing me to be shot at, when … they are the ones that are destroying the country — both from the inside and out.”

“Nothing like blaming someone else for something you’re doing in the same sentence,” Colbert said. “‘Darling, you calling me unattractive hurts my feelings—marriage should be built on love, and I’m beginning to think you’re too fugly to understand that.’”

For Harris' part, she shared on X that she was "glad" Trump was safe. "Violence has no place in America,” she wrote.

Nutrition and healthy aging: The role of protein quality in combatting muscle loss

Getting out of bed and sitting on the toilet may be relatively simple tasks for many people, but they become more difficult with age.

This is because of one of the many bodily changes associated with aging: our muscles shrink and become weaker, a condition known as sarcopenia.

Most people are aware of the recommendations for regular physical activity, and the associated health benefits. They also know that good nutritional habits complement a healthy active lifestyle. Unfortunately, few people know what to put on their plates to ensure they hold on to their muscles as they age.

Food comprises three key energy-yielding macronutrients: carbohydrates, fats and protein. Protein — most commonly found in meat, fish, dairy, eggs, and to varying degrees in plants and grains — provides the building blocks (amino acids) to make important bodily tissues, such as skeletal muscle.

Aging may reduce our ability to digest, absorb and utilize the nutrients in food. To ensure older adults can continue to do the things they love well into their later years, we must emphasize the importance of increasing the amount and improving the quality of protein they consume.

 

Why more protein matters for older adults

Unlike carbohydrates, which are stored in muscle and liver as glycogen, and fats, which are stored in adipose tissue, we have nowhere to store excess protein/amino acids. So, we must consume enough protein daily to provide our cells with the materials needed to function correctly.

Current recommendations for protein intake are the same for all adults, regardless of age: 0.8 grams of protein per kilogram of body mass daily (g/kg/d). But estimates suggest that up to 30-76% of older adults aren't consuming enough protein.

Because older people's muscles can't use dietary protein as effectively as younger people to maintain muscle, experts suggest that older adults looking to keep their muscles should consume approximately 50% more protein (1.2 g/kg/d).

 

Quality, not (just) quantity

Eating more protein is certainly one way to overcome age-related impairments in muscle building, but this might not always be feasible for older individuals — particularly those with a smaller appetite or those with dental issues. Another strategy is to improve the protein quality and evenly distribute intake throughout the day.

Two key factors determine the quality of a protein: its essential amino acid content and how well it is digested and absorbed.

Leucine, one of the nine essential amino acids, switches on the body's muscle-building processes. So, proteins with a greater leucine content are generally considered better for muscle growth.

With concerns surrounding ethical food production and environmental sustainability, there is a growing interest in plant-based protein sources. Pea protein is one example of a promising plant-based protein source that contains sufficient leucine. But we know very little about its effect on muscle building in older adults.

 

Plant-based protein for older muscles

While part of Stuart Phillips's research group at the McMaster Institute for Research on Aging, I led a human randomized control trial to explore the impact of protein quality on the rate at which older adults build muscle.

We put 31 adults between 60 and 80 years old through a strict dietary intervention with two phases: a control phase of seven days in which participants were fed protein in line with current recommendations (0.8 g/kg), followed by a seven-day supplemental phase where participants were randomly assigned to consume an additional 25 grams of a protein supplement — whey, pea or collagen — at breakfast and lunch, totalling an extra 50 grams daily.

The supplements were consumed during breakfast and lunch because those are typically the meals with the lowest protein content for older adults.

We then performed muscle biopsies, which showed that consuming higher-quality (whey and pea) protein supplements at breakfast and lunch increased muscle-building in older adults by almost 10%. However, collagen protein — a supplement heavily marketed towards older adults — did nothing to bolster muscle-building in our older adults, as a previous study also found.

Adding more protein to the diet can improve muscle building, but the protein must contain sufficient essential amino acids, in particular leucine.

We also demonstrated that plant-based protein sources can be as effective as animal-based protein sources to build muscle in older adults.

 

Debunking common myths about protein

If you are worried about increasing protein intake because it may impact other aspects of your health, there is some excellent news to share.

Increasing protein intake will NOT give you cancer, cause kidney failure or dissolve your bones.

Older adults who increase their intake of high-quality protein (and engage in regular physical activity) may help slow the loss of muscle and extend the years spent in good health.

 

Pack your diet with enough high-quality protein

The benefits of more protein in the diet extend beyond muscle. Protein-containing foods also provide other essential nutrients such as vitamins, minerals and fibre from grain sources, and can help you feel fuller for longer, reducing the likelihood of excessive weight gain.

Make protein the focus of each meal and aim to consume roughly 25-40 grams — or about one to two palm-sized portions — of protein for breakfast, lunch and dinner. Preparing meals ahead of time and incorporating protein-filled snacks can help you stick to your daily protein goals. Some good options include Greek yogurt, cottage cheese, jerky, canned fish, eggs, and nuts.

Without a plan, sarcopenia can sneak up on you. So, whatever your dietary preferences, animal-based (meat, fish, eggs, dairy) or plant-based (tofu, nuts, seeds, lentils) protein can provide you with the nutrients needed to maintain muscle as you age.

James McKendry, Assistant Professor in Nutrition and Healthy Aging, University of British Columbia

This article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license. Read the original article.

“Are we no longer able to appreciate beauty?”: Melania Trump defends nude modeling past

Melania Trump spoke out on her history of nude modeling for the first time on Wednesday. 

"Why has the media chosen to scrutinize my celebration of the human form in a fashion photo shoot?" Trump asked, in a video shared to X that compared her modeling to classical art and sculptures. "Are we no longer able to appreciate the beauty of the human body?"

While there's absolutely nothing wrong with the fact that the one-time model posed nude throughout her career, the former First Lady has remained mum about her photo spreads even after they became the subject of a New York Post-generated controversy during the 2016 election. 

"We should honor our bodies and embrace the timeless tradition of using art as a powerful means of self-expression," Trump shared in her video.

Trump's past modeling work no doubt made for some awkward conversation around the Resolute Dinner Table after her husband Donald Trump signed on to a wide-ranging anti-pornography pledge that likely would have barred the sort of magazine covers on which the Slovenian-American model made her name.

Still, it's been quite a while since the Post tried and failed to make a fuss. As always, the answer to "why now?" in right-wing media circles turns out to be "they have a book to promote." Melania is planning to drop a memoir ahead of the election and her recent social media activity — including a strange, noirish clip from earlier this month — all point viewers toward a pre-order link.

“As a private person who has often been the subject of public scrutiny and misrepresentation, I feel a responsibility to clarify the facts,” Melania said of the book.

Joe Rogan says Kamala Harris’ campaign is “nailing it”

Vice President Kamala Harris may have found an unlikely fan in her debate strategy, as she seeks to become the next president of the United States. 

Joe Rogan, whose "The Joe Rogan Experience" podcast is well-liked amongst conservatives, said in the wake of the September 10 presidential debate that Harris was "nailing it."

During a recent podcast episode, Rogan said, “Whoever’s helping her, whoever’s coaching her, whoever’s the puppet master running the strings . . . ” finishing his thought with a chef's kiss gesture. 

The comedian added that he felt the Veep was "better prepared" in comparison to her Republican opponent, former president Donald Trump.

“The difference in that debate was not a difference in who’s gonna have better policies, who’s gonna be better for the country,” Rogan said. “The difference in the debate, in my opinion, was who was better prepared.”

While Rogan conceded that Trump was "funny like a comedian," he argued that the ex-president could have used his speaking time during the debate more efficiently. 

“Someone needs to tell him you’ve got these tiny little windows, and you should have all the words ready for those windows,” the podcaster continued. 

One would assume that — slight compliment to his comedic chops or not — this will irk Trump. Earlier this month, the former president bemoaned never being asked by Rogan to appear on his podcast, calling him "sort of a liberal guy."

Boar’s Head is closing its Virginia plant tied to deadly listeria outbreak, discontinues liverwurst

Boar’s Head is indefinitely shutting down its plant in Jarratt, Virginia, linked to a nationwide listeria outbreak concerning sliced deli meats. 

On Sept. 13, Boar's Head Provision Company announced that it is also permanently discontinuing production of its Strassburger Brand Liverwurst, which was made at the Jarratt plant and contaminated with Listeria monocytogenes. In addition to recalling the liverwurst, Boar’s Head expanded its recall “to include every item produced at the same facility as our liverwurst.”

The outbreak has been reported in 18 states. At least nine deaths have been reported and 57 people have been hospitalized since the outbreak. 

In a recent statement, Boar’s Head said they “regret and deeply apologize for the recent Listeria monocytogenes contamination in our liverwurst product.”

“We understand the gravity of this situation and the profound impact it has had on affected families,” the statement continued.

Boar’s Head said an internal investigation revealed the “root cause” of the listeria contamination was a “production process that only existed at the Jarratt facility and was used only for liverwurst.”

“Given the seriousness of the outbreak, and the fact that it originated at Jarratt, we have made the difficult decision to indefinitely close this location, which has not been operational since late July 2024,” the company added.

The latest announcement comes after the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) found several health violations at the Jarratt plant. The USDA's Food Safety and Inspection Service summed up 69 records of “noncompliances” flagged by inspectors over the past year at the Jarratt plant, according to records obtained by CBS News. On Aug. 29, an FSIS spokesperson told the outlet that the agency was working with the state of Virginia to “ensure the establishment [plant] has an effective system in place to produce safe food for the public.” They added that FSIS has “suspended inspection at the Boar's Head establishment in Jarratt, Virginia, which means that it remains closed until the establishment is able to demonstrate it can produce safe product.”

Records released by the USDA revealed that inspectors faulted Boar's Head several times for mold or mildew building up around the company's facilities in Jarratt. Last month, inspectors found what appeared to be mold and mildew around the hand-washing sinks used by workers preparing ready-to-eat meats, CBS News reported. Mold build-up was also seen outside of steel vats used by the plant and inside holding coolers between the site's smokehouses.

“A black mold like substance was seen throughout the room at the wall/concrete junction. As well as some caulking around brick/metal,” inspectors wrote in a record made in January, adding that some spots were “as large as a quarter.” 

The following month, one inspector said they found “ample amounts of blood in puddles on the floor” and a “rancid smell” throughout a cooler used at the plant.


Want more great food writing and recipes? Subscribe to Salon Food's newsletter, The Bite.


Records also detailed the presence of insects in and around deli meats at the plant. The situation was so bad that in one instance, the USDA had to tag more than 980 pounds of ham in a smokehouse hallway to be “retained” for an investigation. Flies were also seen going in and out of “vats of pickle” left in a room.   

“Small flying gnat-like insects were observed crawling on the walls and flying around the room. The room's walls had heavy meat buildup,” inspectors wrote in June. Other areas of the plant were also riddled with bugs, including what appeared to be “ants traveling down the wall” along with a beetle and a cockroach, inspectors said.

Boar’s Head said the recent closure will affect “hundreds” of employees. The company said it is appointing a new chief food safety officer and quality assurance officer. It is also establishing a safety council consisting of independent food safety experts, according to the Associated Press. Members include Mindy Brashears, a former food safety chief at the USDA, and Frank Yiannas, a former deputy commissioner for food policy at the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA).

“This is a dark moment in our company’s history, but we intend to use this as an opportunity to enhance food safety programs not just for our company, but for the entire industry,” Boar’s Head said.

Afraid to seek care amid Georgia’s abortion ban, she stayed at home and died

Candi Miller’s health was so fragile, doctors warned having another baby could kill her.

“They said it was going to be more painful and her body may not be able to withstand it,” her sister, Turiya Tomlin-Randall, told ProPublica.

But when the mother of three realized she had unintentionally gotten pregnant in the fall of 2022, Georgia’s new abortion ban gave her no choice. Although it made exceptions for acute, life-threatening emergencies, it didn’t account for chronic conditions, even those known to present lethal risks later in pregnancy.

At 41, Miller had lupus, diabetes and hypertension and didn’t want to wait until the situation became dire. So she avoided doctors and navigated an abortion on her own — a path many health experts feared would increase risks when women in America lost the constitutional right to obtain legal, medically supervised abortions.

Miller ordered abortion pills online, but she did not expel all the fetal tissue and would need a dilation and curettage procedure to clear it from her uterus and stave off sepsis, a grave and painful infection. In many states, this care, known as a D&C, is routine for both abortions and miscarriages. In Georgia, performing it had recently been made a felony, with few exceptions.

Her teenage son watched her suffer for days after she took the pills, bedridden and moaning. In the early hours of Nov. 12, 2022, her husband found her unresponsive in bed, her 3-year-old daughter at her side.

Her family later told a coroner she hadn’t visited a doctor "due to the current legislation on pregnancies and abortions."

An autopsy found unexpelled fetal tissue, confirming that the abortion had not fully completed. It also found a lethal combination of painkillers, including the dangerous opioid fentanyl. Miller had no history of drug use, the medical records state; her family has no idea how she obtained them or what was going through her mind — whether she was trying to quell the pain, complete the abortion or end her life. A medical examiner was unable to determine the manner of death.

Her family later told a coroner she hadn’t visited a doctor “due to the current legislation on pregnancies and abortions.”

When a state committee of experts in maternal health, including 10 doctors, reviewed her case this year at the end of August, they immediately decided it was “preventable” and blamed the state’s abortion ban, according to members who spoke to ProPublica on the condition of anonymity.

They came to that conclusion after weighing the entire chain of events, from Miller’s underlying health conditions, to her decision to manage her abortion alone, to her reticence to seek medical care. “The fact that she felt that she had to make these decisions, that she didn’t have adequate choices here in Georgia, we felt that definitely influenced her case,” one committee member told ProPublica. “She’s absolutely responding to this legislation.”

This is the second preventable death related to abortion bans that ProPublica is reporting this week. Amber Thurman, 28, languished in a suburban Atlanta hospital for 20 hours before doctors performed a D&C to treat sepsis that resulted from an incomplete abortion. It was too late. “This young mother should be alive, raising her son and pursuing her dream of attending nursing school,” Vice President Kamala Harris said of Thurman on Tuesday. “This is exactly what we feared when Roe was struck down.”

There are almost certainly other deaths related to abortion access. Georgia’s committee, tasked with examining pregnancy-related deaths to improve maternal health, has only reviewed cases through fall 2022. Such a lag is common in these committees, which are set up in each state; most others have not even gotten that far.

Miller's husband, Alex, and son Christian, with her ashes, at home in AtlantaMiller’s husband, Alex, and son Christian, with her ashes, at home in Atlanta (Rita Harper / ProPublica)

The details of their reviews are not shared with the public, but ProPublica obtained the Georgia committee’s summary report of Miller’s death. ProPublica also reviewed death records and Miller’s autopsy and spoke to her family.

Her case adds to mounting evidence that exceptions to abortion bans do not, as billed, protect the “life of the mother.” Harrowing stories about denied care have been at the center of the upcoming presidential election, during which the right to abortion is on the ballot in 10 states. ProPublica’s new reporting makes clear, for the first time, that in the wake of bans, women are losing their lives in ways that experts have deemed preventable.

It also underscores the reality that abortion bans have not actually led to a decrease in abortions. But for people like Miller, they have increased the degree of difficulty and risk.

No health exceptions

Miller grew up in Alabama and spent most of her adulthood in Atlanta, where she made a living braiding hair and doing nails. She had a soft spot for stray cats, nurtured a garden and was known to break into dance at the sound of old school funk like the Commodores. At 4 foot 9, she was a “firecracker,” her family said — quick to stand up for those she loved. That included her three kids, who range in age from 5 to 16.

But about eight years ago, she was diagnosed with lupus, an autoimmune disease in which the body attacks healthy tissue, her sister said. Symptoms include extreme fatigue; painful, swollen joints; heart complications; and kidney disease.

Miller experienced flare-ups of debilitating pain for which she had to seek radiation treatments. She often wasn’t able to stand for long periods and her hair fell out. It distressed her how often doctors dismissed her pain; she grew to doubt they could give her help when she needed it.

Soon after she was diagnosed, she suffered a major depressive episode, Tomlin-Randall said. For months, she barely left her bed. Tomlin-Randall cared for her sister’s children during that time.

There is no cure for lupus, but patients can manage symptoms with a mixture of drugs and therapies; 90% of those afflicted are women, and the condition is three times more common in Black women than white.

"People who are really suffering in these pregnancies really don’t know where to go."

Miller also had diabetes and hypertension. Those conditions, layered on top of her lupus, can be dangerously exacerbated by pregnancy and are highly unpredictable, during both the pregnancy and the aftermath, according to the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists and the Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine. Patients with those conditions are also more likely to have a pregnancy that ends in miscarriage or premature birth and are more likely to need a cesarean section, a major surgery that is especially hard for patients with diabetes to recover from.

With support, some patients can remain stable and have healthy pregnancies, though the experience can be physically taxing and painful. In the worst cases, pregnancy with lupus can lead to high blood pressure that can quickly progress to seizures, kidney and liver dysfunction and, ultimately, death. Studies have found the maternal death rate for women with lupus is 20-fold higher than for those without lupus. The chance of relapses and flare-ups are also high in the postpartum period.

Each patient’s situation is different and needs careful evaluation of their particular health risks, including discussion of the option to end the pregnancy, said Dr. Sarah Horvath, an OB-GYN representing ACOG.

Politicians who support abortion bans often point to their exceptions, which they say protect “the life of the mother.” During last week’s debate, former President Donald Trump called them “very important.”

But the anti-abortion groups that drafted the bans wrote the exceptions to be as narrow as possible and persuaded lawmakers to impose steep criminal penalties, fearing doctors might stretch definitions to create loopholes.

The exceptions are limited to acute emergencies, usually defined as when “necessary in order to prevent the death of the pregnant woman or the substantial and irreversible physical impairment of a major bodily function.” They also specifically prohibit mental health reasons from counting as health emergencies, even if a pregnant woman says she is thinking about harming herself. In Georgia, violating the law can cost doctors their license and subject them to prison terms of up to 10 years.

The laws typically don’t include any leeway for intervening earlier to treat patients with broader health risks that could make pregnancy more dangerous, such as lupus.

ProPublica surveyed dozens of doctors in nine states with abortion bans. None of their hospitals approve abortions for women with high-risk complications like lupus or diabetes unless the patient is already deteriorating and the issue is urgent.

Horvath regularly sees patients with complications from those conditions in Pennsylvania because they can’t get care in their own state. Often, the delay in figuring out where to go means their pregnancy is further along — and, as a result, their conditions have become more dangerous. They show up to outpatient clinics already displaying signs of trouble, Horvath said, and immediately have to be sent to the hospital where there’s an operating room and a blood bank.

It often takes time for patients and their providers to coordinate care in other states because there is so much confusion about the laws.

“People who are really suffering in these pregnancies really don’t know where to go,” Horvath said. “Or if they even can.”

An unsupervised alternative

Miller’s third pregnancy was difficult and she never fully recovered, Tomlin-Randall said.

When Miller learned she was pregnant again in 2022, she ordered abortion pills for about $80 from a website called AidAccess, according to her 16-year-old son, Christian Cardenas.

The organization, based in the Netherlands, is devoted to expanding abortion access to places where it is not legal. Patients contact a doctor in Europe who sends them pills from a supplier in India. According to one researcher, Aid Access serves about 7,000 patients a month in the U.S., nearly 90% of them in states with abortion bans or severe restrictions. Its founder, Dr. Rebecca Gomperts, said it was clear the abortion pill did not cause her death.

The committee also did not believe Miller’s death was caused by the abortion medication. Her autopsy found extremely high doses of diphenhydramine (the main ingredient in Benadryl) and acetaminophen (what’s found in Tylenol) in Miller’s system, along with the fentanyl. Considering the quantity of drugs and the timing of her death, the committee also did not suspect the abortion pills themselves were in any way tainted.

Self-managing abortions at home has skyrocketed since the Supreme Court overturned the constitutional right to abortion, because of access to pills that can be ordered online, researchers say.

Major studies, the Food and Drug Administration and the World Health Organization have found abortion pills to be more than 90% effective when taken correctly and in the first trimester. Deaths due to abortion pills are exceedingly rare. Complications can develop if some fetal tissue remains in the uterus, where it can lead to sepsis, a grave infection. Patients are supposed to follow up with a doctor to make sure the abortion has fully completed and go to the hospital if bleeding heavily or exhibiting other symptoms.

Miller’s family does not know how far along her pregnancy was when she took the abortion pills.

But soon enough, she was in excruciating pain.

And that’s how she remained, for days, until she took the potent drug mixture. Her family doesn’t know what she was thinking when she did it, but can’t fathom that she would want to end her life; she was excited about the future and drawing closer to her church, her sister Tomlin-Randall said.

“She was trying to terminate the pregnancy, not terminate herself,” she said.

It was significant to the state maternal mortality review committee that Miller did not feel she could seek medical care.

Although Georgia courts have said women can’t be prosecuted for getting abortions, the state has sent mixed messages. While some state bans explicitly say women can’t be prosecuted, Georgia’s ban leaves open that possibility. In 2019, a district attorney on the outskirts of metro Atlanta called abortion “murder” and said women “should prepare for the chance that they could be criminally prosecuted for having an abortion.”

That was the understanding in Miller’s family.

“If you get caught trying to do anything to get rid of the baby,” her son Christian told ProPublica, “you get jail time for that.”

Cassandra Jaramillo contributed reporting. Mariam Elba, Jeff Ernsthausen and Kirsten Berg contributed research.

ProPublica is a Pulitzer Prize-winning investigative newsroom. Sign up for The Big Story newsletter to receive stories like this one in your inbox.

Anna Delvey on “Dancing with the Stars” isn’t “brat,” it’s sad

When it was announced a couple of weeks ago that faux heiress and convicted grand larcenist Anna Delvey would be competing in the 33rd season of ABC’s “Dancing with the Stars,” the consensus reaction was, “Of course she is.” Because criminals being made into celebrities is very much a thing now.

Sentenced to four to 12 years in prison in 2019 for scamming businesses and wealthy elite out of $250k to live a lavish life of glamor and opulence that most would strain to imagine, Delvey’s name is among a running list of felons turned celebrities that includes “Party Monster” killer Michael Alig, Gypsy Rose Blanchard and, in some respects, former president Donald Trump — proving that the consequence of one’s actions now, more times than not, leaves room for residuals and, most importantly  . . . ratings.

Competing this season with dance partner Ezra Sosa, an internet personality and familiar face to fans of “DWTS” who has been dancing since he was two years old, Delvey is up against “90210” star Tori Spelling, NBA champion Dwight Howard, Jenn Tran from “The Bachelorette,” Olympic pommel horse darling Stephen Nedoroscik, actor Eric Roberts and “The Real Housewives of Atlanta’s” Phaedra Parks — none of whom sport federally mandated ankle monitors in their press photos, as she does. And none of whom answered the host’s question, “How do you feel?” after their dance of the evening with, “I feel happy that I don’t have to do this dance again.” But guess which one closed out the episode as its grand finale? Yeah, you guessed right. The one with the rap sheet.

Watching her co-competitors give it their absolute all — especially Roberts, who is still navigating around injuries from a serious car accident that landed him in a three-day coma in 1981 — It felt all the more grating to suspect from the jump that the show was saving its “best” for last. Moreso, when Delvey appeared on stage surrounded by shopping bags and danced like a wooden doll with dead black eyes to Sabrina Carpenter‘s “Espresso,” earning a score of straight 6’s (writer performs sign of the cross) which she would have received even if Sosa had just dragged her around by her hair flat like a mop on the confetti littered stage for a solid four minutes. It’s all too much. But is Delvey’s name at the top of every write-up about this new season? Yes. And am I adding to that right this very moment? Yes.

But why? God, I guess we just can’t help ourselves, can we? If it bleeds, it leads. And if it’s a sin, it sells. The villain will always be more interesting than the hero. Sucks to be true.

In 2014, just days after Michael Alig was released from a 17-year stay in the New York prison system for killing fellow club kid Andre “Angel” Melendez in 1996; dismembering him, dumping bleach on his remains, putting them in a box and dumping him in the Hudson River; I interviewed Alig across from Ray’s Candy Store on a bench in Tompkins Square Park. I bought him his first Cronut, which he cried while eating. I had my picture taken with him. I got paid for the article I wrote about him for Bedford + Bowery, a site run in collaboration with New York Magazine. I used that money to help pay my rent. And I re-read the article when, six years later, I read a headline from another publication saying that Alig had died from an accidental heroin overdose. The whole thing was like a match being blown out. Hot hot to get the interview, then a little stinky and smudged afterward. But, so many years later, would I still jump at the chance to interview Blanchard or Delvey? You bet I would. Why? See all of the above.

When Alig and I took our photo together on that park bench, he hit my messy bun with his arm and my whole body turned to stone like I’d come inches from stepping on a snake. He laughed. Because he knew. And it was thrilling, like riding a roller coaster. And although Delvey has never dumped anyone in a river, that we know of, this is the same appeal she has to “DWTS” viewers. And they know that too, which is why they closed the show with her, and not poor Tori Spelling.

The Donna Martin-ish people of the world never graduate. How tragic.


Want a daily wrap-up of all the news and commentary Salon has to offer? Subscribe to our morning newsletter, Crash Course.


Delvey being referred to as an entrepreneur by the show’s host, Alfonso Ribeiro, got some funny reactions from viewers lobbing their takes on social media, but seeing her on stage with but one identifiable thought in her head — “Everyone here is so poor” — she would, I’m guessing, 100% agree with that description of her. An entrepreneur being someone who takes on greater than normal financial risks in order to run a business? Yeah, that’s her. But, going by that definition of the word, it describes the show as well.

When asked by a co-host of “DWTS” on Monday why she wanted to be on the show, Delvey smiled with her mouth but not her eyes, saying, “Just  . . . Why not?” That answer, mixed with a flash to the audience where I swear I saw the haunted image of JoJo Siwa seated amongst the rest of the spectators, gave me the same “almost stepped on a snake” feeling I had when I was interviewing Alig. Are we in hell? Why are we doing this to ourselves? And why does dancing have to be a part of it?

Delvey’s ankle monitor — which she’s court-ordered to wear for the foreseeable future while under house arrest following immigration court proceedings for overstaying her visa — was as much of a prop in her performance as the shopping bags at her feet on the stage, both winks to her crimes.

In an interview with Women’s Wear Daily ramping up to the premiere of the first episode on Tuesday, “DWTS” costume designer Daniela Gschwendtner detailed her plans for making the “accessory” work on the show, saying, “We’ll try to probably do something fun with it — make it sparkly, maybe. We’re going to try and do something fun with it so it becomes part of the costume. The costume itself won’t be affected by it,” adding that she’ll “try to do something cute with it to make it look all pretty together.”

Honestly, aside from Delvey’s checked-out expression and refusal to join in on the fun with her co-competitors — like when some of the dancers were doing boxing hands at each other while Delvey stood with her arms out awkwardly like a T-Rex — the ankle monitor was all I could see. I think that was the point.

“I need me a woman who’s a little nefarious. A woman who does white-collar crimes for funzies. A woman pairing an ankle bracelet with her ~*couture*~. Anna Delvey, if you will. She’s my dream woman,” wrote one viewer in a post to X, days before the show aired, like parading crime is now part of this “brat summer” we’ve all been hearing about.

And although the specificities of Delvey’s crimes were, quite literally, danced around in this first episode of the season, make no mistake that they were the problematic highlight.

“I just wanna say something. When you came out on the dance floor there was a shift in the energy in this room,” one of the judges, Carrie Ann Inaba, said to Delvey after her performance. “And I would just like to say, let’s all just give this a chance, because I can imagine that this is scary for you, and I’m not pro, or for, against anything that you’ve done. But this is about your dancing here.”

Yeah. Sure it is.

How to order an espresso martini at a crowded bar

On a recent, bustling Saturday night at a trendy cocktail bar on Chicago’s near northwest side, my friend perused the menu full of bespoke drinks — most containing bitter aperitifs — and looked vexed. 

“I think I want an Espresso Martini,” she said. 

Between effusive apologies she ordered it, but the harried bartender took it in stride, replying, “We can create something similar.” 

The resulting Carajillo (espresso and Licor 43) variation arrived froth-capped and pretty as a picture, well within the reasonable timeframe for a busy weekend night. I wondered aloud whether my companion’s embarrassment stemmed from the drink itself or the fact that it was an off-menu, shaken cocktail. 

“I don’t know, I just feel so basic ordering it,” she said. Thirty minutes later, emboldened and caffeinated, she ordered one more.

We can’t get enough of the Espresso Martini, even as cocktail bar menus increasingly skew toward the bitter and the bespoke. Indeed, orders for the coffee-spiked martini that originated in 1980s London were up 50% during the 12-month period ending Sept. 30, 2023, nipping at the heels of the iconic Old Fashioned. This is according to OnPrem Insights from Union, which gathered data from more than 1,000 high-volume U.S. accounts using bar and restaurant POS platforms. Yet depending on the bar you’re in, the drink carries some basic-b**ch baggage. 

This feels heaviest when it’s self-imposed, since most bartenders I’ve asked don’t really care what we order.  

“Every generation has that drink that becomes so ubiquitous, so popular,” says Liam Davy, head of bars at acclaimed, London-born steakhouse Hawksmoor, which now has more than a dozen locations across the U.K., Ireland and the U.S. “The Espresso Martini is one of the few modern classics that was invented in the U.K. that’s become a global success. It’s a bit more grown up. It’s also iconic looking; you can spot it straight away. When people see it being made, they want one.”

The original version of British barman Dick Bradsell’s creation — aptly named Vodka Espresso — contained just espresso and a shot of vodka tied together with simple syrup. Later on he added Kahlua to it. By the end of the 1990s it was more commonly served in a coupe and broadly known as an Espresso Martini. At Hawksmoor it seems to transcend occasion; people order them before dinner and after as a pick-me-up with or as a dessert. 

We need your help to stay independent

“It’s a perfectly fine cocktail,” says Bradley Stephens, co-owner of cocktail and South American tapas bar Cereus PDX in Portland, Oregon, and vice president of the Board of Directors of the US Bartenders' Guild. “Just like the hot song of the summer, you hear it too many times, it can get annoying.”

On the spectrum of time- and labor-intensive drinks, the three-ingredient Espresso Martini pales in comparison to, say, a Ramos Gin Fizz, whose original recipe called for a 12-minute shake. It does require a “good, hard shake” of cooled espresso or cold brew concentrate with vodka and coffee liqueur to achieve its telltale cap of thick, creamy foam, Davy says, potentially frustrating as orders pile up. We the customers can exercise empathy and order a beer or glass of wine. But the shame of ordering something we deem too obnoxiously mainstream is our own challenge to overcome 

“I never know with bartenders if they’re going to love or hate Espresso Martinis,” says Nancy Sanders, general manager at Golden Gopher in downtown Los Angeles. Golden Gopher sells probably 20 Espresso Martinis per night on weekends, which is significant for a beer-and-shot type of joint. 

Sanders has noticed that orders are skewing toward sweeter, agave-centric drinks and Espresso Martinis, which she credits to Gen Zers, who unapologetically drink what they like. She agrees that drink menus have gotten more complex, as restaurants and bars offer their own takes on the classics and their derivatives. It’s a taller order for a bartender to keep everything straight, but that’s part of the job. 

"I never know with bartenders if they’re going to love or hate Espresso Martinis."

“If somebody asks for a drink, I’m a yes man, as we all should be behind the bar,” she says. 

What’s different now is that at well-managed bars, “almost everyone does most of the hard work behind the scenes in the prep and batching stage so cocktails themselves are quite sort of low lift,” Davy says. Homemade syrups, cordials and infusions are prepped ahead of time. Nonperishables like acid, sugar and spirits are mixed together pre-shift. Bar wells are stocked to prioritize components and tools for menu-based drinks. 

Even the comparatively analog Espresso Martini is easier than ever to build. The slew of quality cold brew concentrates to hit the market in recent years cut down on the time-consuming step of pulling then chilling shots of espresso a la minute. In March 2023, Ketel One rolled out a nitro Espresso Martini machine for bars and restaurants to alleviate the headache of shaking them for a crowd. Bartenders need only pour in the ingredients and pull the handle, dispensing the sweet, frothed-up martinis in a mere 20 seconds. Golden Gopher bought one earlier this year to the delight of its often slammed bar staff. “I swear, since we had that machine put in, every single bartender has called me or grabbed me in passing to say thank you,” Sanders says. 

Not everyone has gotten on the bandwagon. In the two years since Stephens opened Cereus in June 2022 — just as the Espresso Martini craze was kicking off — he has yet to field a single order for one at his bar. 

“I’ve got this wonderful problem at my bar, which is that 99% of all beverage sales are from my cocktail menu,” he says. 

When he first opened, he dutifully stocked his back bar with ingredients for de rigueur cocktails: cranberry juice for Cosmopolitans and a $100 jar of fancy olives for Dirty Martinis. “I ended up throwing it all away because it went bad,” he says. Last month, someone finally ordered a Cosmo, but the bar had long since stopped carrying cranberry juice. 

Fortunately, one of the bar’s signature drinks, the American Troubadour, does contain cold brew, just in case an Espresso Martini lover should ever darken Stephens’s door and summon the courage to order just what they like. 

Kate Middleton quietly returns to work after concluding cancer treatment

Kate Middleton has resumed working for the first time since her cancer treatment concluded, hosting a meeting at Windsor Castle on Tuesday.

The Court Circular, which keeps a record of the royal family's activities, wrote in a post that “The Princess of Wales, Joint Patron, the Royal Foundation of The Prince and Princess of Wales, this afternoon held an Early Years Meeting at Windsor Castle,” per CNN.

Middleton revealed her cancer diagnosis in March, ending monthlong speculation and rumors about her seeming disappearance from the public eye. Earlier this month, Middleton announced that she had completed chemotherapy, providing an update on the status of her health. 

“The last nine months have been incredibly tough for us as a family,” Middleton said in a three-minute video message. “The cancer journey is complex, scary and unpredictable for everyone — especially those closest to you. With humility, it also brings you face to face with your own vulnerabilities in a way you have never considered before, and with that, a new perspective on everything."

“Although I have finished chemotherapy, my path to healing and full recovery is long and I must continue to take each day as it comes," she added. "I am, however, looking forward to being back at work and undertaking a few more public engagements in the coming months when I can."

JD Vance claimed a false police report backed up his lie about Haitians eating cats, WSJ reports

On September 9, a staffer working for GOP vice presidential nominee JD Vance contacted the city manager of Springfield, Ohio, to ascertain the truth around rumors of Haitian immigrants eating local pets, only to be told that such claims were entirely baseless, according to a Wall Street Journal report. But that did not stop Vance, former President Donald Trump, and a constellation of allies from parroting those smears, sowing chaos in the small city and stoking widespread fury that is threatening the safety of Haitian-Americans.

The pet-eating rumor, originally circulated by neo-Nazi groups, has been part of a buffet of stories that Trump has used to inflame anger and fear towards immigrant communities. Vance posted the story on his X account in early September, and despite the flurry of criticism, later insisted on CNN that he heard firsthand accounts from Springfield residents confirming that Haitian immigrants were eating their pets. The media, he claimed, refused to pay attention "until Donald Trump and I started talking about cat memes … if I have to create stories so that the American media actually pays attention to the suffering of the American people, then that's what I'm going to do."

Springfield is now dealing with the fallout, with local officials receiving thirty-six bomb threats as of Tuesday evening, which Bryan Heck, the city manager, said has induced "fear and panic" and "depleting resources." Vance, refusing to back down, provided the WSJ with a police report in which a Springfield resident claimed that her cat might have been abducted by her Haitian neighbors. But when a WSJ reporter visited Anne Kilgore's house that evening, she said that Miss Sassy, who went missing in August, had since reappeared in her basement. Kilgore later apologized to her neighbors with the help of her daughter and a translation app.

Vance has also said that Trump would like to visit Springfield soon so that he might see with his own eyes the Haitian-American community that he has promised to deport en masse, despite most of them enjoying legal status.

About 15,000 Haitians, fleeing from violence and instability in their home country, have moved to Springfield in the past four years, helping the economically struggling town recover from a precipitous drop in population (from 83,000 in 1960 to 59,000 in 2020). The influx of new residents was initially welcomed by evangelical leaders and employers, who appreciated Haitian workers for helping them meet production goals and boost the local economy. But local resources strained to cover overwhelmed hospitals treating people who had fled from a country that lacked even the most basic healthcare, while the number of non-English speakers enrolled in local schools quadrupled to more than 1,000 children. A road accident in which a Haitian man without a valid U.S. license inadvertently drove his minivan into a school bus, injuring scores of children and killing Aiden Clark, a local student, further inflamed tensions.

Outside Neo-Nazi groups exploited the situation to hold rallies in Springfield and spread tales of pet-eating that have now reached the top levels of political discourse. Springfield officials have struggled to get Trump and his allies to back down on the rumors" we have told those at the national level that they are speaking these things that are untrue," Springfield Mayor Rob Rue, a registered Republican, told the WSJ. But he said the claims have been "repeated and doubled down on."

Numerous other towns with Haitian immigrant communities are also now in the crosshairs of right-wing influencers seeking to generate controversy. Libs of TikTok posted a video Tuesday purporting to show Vice President Kamala Harris' campaign busing in Haitian immigrants to work in food factories in Chaleroi, Pennsylvania. The post earned a rebuke from Pennsylvania state senator Camera Bartolotta, a Republican, who said that the immigrant workers were given transportation by the business owner, who was on the verge of having to close down his facility in a town with "no workforce" a few years ago, before an influx of Haitians escaping "horrific conditions in their home country" helped keep him afloat.

"You are playing into the hands of people who are jeopardizing the safety of innocent children in our local school," she wrote. "These Haitians are working hard, sending their children to school and opening businesses. They are here legally. They did not cross the border … please, check the facts before posting information that jeopardizes the safety of good, hard working people."