Spring Sale: Get 1 Year, Save 58%

“DOGE has no authority”: Attorneys general plan to sue to block Musk’s data access

Attorneys general representing over a dozen states announced their intention to sue the Trump administration on Thursday, claiming Elon Musk's Department of Government Efficiency had no right to access the federal government’s most sensitive records.

“This level of access for unauthorized individuals is unlawful, unprecedented, and unacceptable. DOGE has no authority to access this information,” the AGs shared in a statement. “In defense of our Constitution, our right to privacy, and the essential funding that individuals and communities nationwide are counting on, we will be filing a lawsuit to stop this injustice.”

The planned legal action comes amid reports that Musk and his lackeys have accessed wage and Social Security disbursement systems inside the Treasury Department and financial aid data inside the Department of Education containing millions of students’ personal information.

In their statement, the attorneys general expressed horror that that a handful of young, unqualified, and unvetted staffers were being granted access to "some of our country's most sensitive data.”

The Trump administration suffered a partial defeat in court on Thursday when a judge ruled that only two DOGE staffers could access Treasury Department payment systems, and deprived those two staffers of the ability to make changes to those records. One of those staffers has since resigned after news outlets uncovered their past bigoted social media posts.

Still, state representatives say the initiative’s wide reach needs to be stopped.

“This administrative coup of the federal government has upended the lives and livelihoods of thousands of faithful public servants,” Arizona Attorney General Kris Mayes said in a video on Thursday, claiming Arizonans flooded her phone lines with privacy concerns. “We cannot allow this illegal and reckless chaos from the Trump administration to stand.”

Elon’s army is falling apart: DOGE staffer resigns after racist posts uncovered

A 25-year-old DOGE staffer who a federal judge ruled could continue to access U.S. Treasury payment systems on Thursday morning was gone by the end of the day after his racist posts to X emerged.

Elon Musk’s Department of Government Efficiency has wrested control of the federal government from career civil servants in the early days of Donald Trump's second term. Marko Elez was a “special government employee” embedded at the Treasury as a part of DOGE. The federal funding slashing wunderkind and Musk lackey didn't account for his bigoted social media posts being uncovered by the Wall Street Journal, however. 

Per the outlet, Elez's posts signaled support for a “eugenic immigration policy” and for repealing the Civil Rights Act in recent weeks.

“You could not pay me to marry outside of my ethnicity,” Elez reportedly shared.

White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt told the Journal that Elez had resigned from his role when asked about the posts.

Just hours before his reported resignation, Elez, along with Tom Krause, chief executive of Cloud Software Group Inc., was cleared by a judge to retain “read-only” access to sensitive payment systems at the Treasury Department. Elez was part of a team waging a war on USAID on behalf of the Trump administration and canceling authorized payments to the agency's employees.

Prior to Elez's resignation, Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent claimed Elez and Krause were “highly trained professionals” and not “some roving band running around doing things” in an interview with Bloomberg published on Thursday.

Elez isn’t the only DOGE “disruptor” with a sordid digital footprint. 19-year-old Edward Coristine has access to sensitive US government systems. Wired reported on Thursday that Coristine has past connections to adversarial foreign regimes. Coristine’s Tesla.Sexy LLC company offers services targeted at Russian markets that the outlet suggested would complicate background checks needed for official government clearance.

One intelligence analyst told Wired that there was “little chance that [Coristine] could have passed a background check for privileged access to government systems.”

House Democrat Don Beyer of Virginia said in a Thursday night press release that Elez’s firing was proof of the dangers DOGE posed to government services. 

“Elon Musk gave a self-described ‘racist’ and eugenicist access to a system that controls all financial payments from the U.S. Treasury,” he said. “Everyone involved in hiring Marko Elez should be fired and ‘DOGE’ should be deleted.”

Hail to the Chiefs? Trump’s history with the defending Super Bowl champions

President Donald Trump is taking a break from testing the limits of the U.S. Constitution to attend Sunday’s Super Bowl match-up between the Kansas City Chiefs and the Philadelphia Eagles, making him the first sitting president to watch the big game up close.

For its part, the NFL is getting ready for Trump’s attendance, beefing up security protocols ahead of the game after a terrorist attack in New Orleans last month.

On Tuesday, the 47th president and WWE Hall of Famer declined to weigh in on who he thought would lift the Lombardi trophy, but he gave a nod to the reigning champs.

“I don’t want to say but there’s a certain quarterback that seems to be a pretty good winner,” Trump told reporters after signing an executive order withdrawing from the United Nations Human Rights Council.

With the president seemingly ready to cheer on the boys from Arrowhead, it’s worth taking a look back at Trump’s storied relationship with the football powerhouse and its personalities.

Travis Kelce (and Taylor Swift)

3-time Super Bowl champion, "Saturday Night Live" host and Chiefs star Travis Kelce has a complicated relationship with Trump, to say the least. Kelce largely avoids politics but did appear in a pro-COVID-19 vaccine commercial for Pfizer in 2023, enraging anti-vax members of the MAGA faithful.

Kelce’s girlfriend and superstar Chiefs fan Taylor Swift has twice endorsed Trump’s challengers in presidential elections and spoken out in support of progressive social issues. Her support of former Vice President Kamala Harris last year earned a hateful, all-caps callout from Trump on Truth Social.

Kelce and Swift were at the heart of a Trumpworld conspiracy theory last year when conservative media figures suggested the couple would endorse Joe Biden from the field after Super Bowl LVIII.

Ever the diplomat, the KC tight end told reporters it would be “a great honor” to play with the president in attendance.

“It's a great honor, I think – you know, no matter who the president is – I know I'm excited because it's the biggest game of my life,” Kelce said. “And having the president there – it's the best country in the world – and that's pretty cool.”

Patrick and Brittany Mahomes

Like his teammate, Patrick Mahomes has never endorsed or condemned the president, though he did say it would be “cool” to play in front of Trump.

The Chiefs quarterback was the subject of Trump’s latest flubbed anecdote earlier this week. Trump falsely credited Senator Tommy Tuberville, R.-Ala., with coaching Mahomes in college at Texas Tech. There was just one problem with the claim: Mahomes and Tuberville's tenures with the Red Raiders never overlapped. Tuberville left the team in 2012, and Mahomes played his first game for the school in 2014.

Tuberville clarified in an interview with Megyn Kelly that he “recruited” Mahomes but didn’t coach him, a claim which faced further revision from the all-star himself. 

“He did not recruit me at the time,” Mahomes shared with Philadelphia Inquirer reporter Gabriela Carroll. “I don’t remember if I ever got to meet him or not.”

Mahomes declined to weigh in on Trump ahead of the election last year, but his wife Brittany Mahomes stirred controversy with a click.

In August, social media detectives noticed Brittany Mahomes had liked – and later un-liked – one of Trump’s campaign posts on Instagram. While the move was from an endorsement, that didn't stop then-candidate Trump from taking it as one. The hard-campaigning Trump went on Fox News to claim one of the league's most visible WAGs was “a big Trump fan.” 

Patrick Mahomes brushed off Trump’s claim that his wife was a MAGA die-hard in a news conference last September.

“In these political times, people are going to use stuff here and there,” Mahomes told reporters. “But I can't let that affect how I go about my business every single day and live my life and try to live it to the best of my ability.”

That gentle brush-off didn't keep Trump from congratulating the couple on Thursday after the birth of their youngest daughter.

“Congratulations to the Chiefs' GREAT Quarterback, Patrick Mahomes, and his very beautiful and BRILLIANT wife, Brittany, on the birth of their new baby daughter, Golden Raye,” he wrote in a post to Truth Social. “It’s happy times in the wonderful Mahomes family. See you all on Sunday!” 

Harrison Butker

Kicker Harrison Butker is the most likely member of the Chiefs to have read the Project 2025 playbook.

Butker made headlines last summer for delivering a fire-and-brimstone commencement address at Benedictine College that many labeled misogynistic, antisemitic and homophobic. 

He later endorsed Trump as the most “pro-life” choice for president in September, days after speaking at a rally for far-right Missouri Senator Josh Hawley.

“I’m supporting the president that’s going to be the most pro-life president, and I think Donald Trump is the most pro-life president,” Butker told Laura Ingraham on Fox News last year. “That's a topic that is the most crucial topic for me. I want us to be fighting for the most vulnerable, fighting for the unborn, and that’s what we should prioritize.”

Andy Reid

Politics aside, the Chiefs' long-time head coach Andy Reid is ready to visit the Trump White House if his team wins.

Reid, who has led the Chiefs to a 15-2 record this season, visited former President Joe Biden in the White House twice, claiming then that he would do the same regardless of the president’s party.

"You know, you put all the politics aside. You're not Democratic. You're not Republican. You're not Independent. You're just, you're an American," Reid said on visiting the White House in 2023.

Reid was slated to visit Trump in the White House in 2020 following his first championship win with the Chiefs, but COVID-19 scrapped that trip.

The Hunt Family

Though Trump is reportedly floating axing special tax breaks for sports team owners that could hit Chiefs owner Clark Hunt right in the pocketbook, his family members have shown support for the two-time president.

His daughter, Gracie Hunt, said the president’s messages to the Chiefs were “pretty cool” and “pretty awesome” in a Wednesday appearance on Riley Gaines’ “Gaines for Girls” podcast. She went on to defend Butker’s controversial comments that she says were motivated by his faith.

“Harrison [Butker] is an amazing guy, and the most kind, genuine person,” the younger Hunt said. “He is an awesome family man, they're so sweet and precious… Harrison and his boldness in his faith encourages other guys to be bold in their faith.”

Go Birds?

Whether Trump and the Chiefs are rooting for each other or not, there’s no love lost between POTUS and the Eagles. In 2018, Trump disinvited the then-Super Bowl champs because a handful of players signaled their intentions to stay home. 

“The Philadelphia Eagles Football Team was invited to the White House. Unfortunately, only a small number of players decided to come, and we canceled the event,” Trump tweeted at the time. “Staying in the Locker Room for the playing of our National Anthem is as disrespectful to our country as kneeling. Sorry!”

Judge halts Trump admin’s “Fork in the Road” federal worker buyout deadline

A federal judge has paused President Donald Trump's attempt to cut-down the federal workforce through buyout offers.

Late last month, millions of civil servants received an email from the Office of Personnel Management with the subject line “Fork in the Road.” The email offered current federal employees the option of around eight months of severance pay, in exchange for an immediate resignation. The message echoed language used by billionaire Elon Musk in similar emails sent to staffers at Twitter (now X) after he purchased that social media app. 

Musk has been at the helm of a host of potentially illegal initiatives aimed at reducing the size of the federal government through his Department of Government Efficiency. At least 50,000 workers took the administration up on the offer, the White House claims. The deadline for a response was set for February 6.

US District Court Judge George O’Toole Jr. halted the Musk-pushed severance plan until a hearing scheduled for Monday afternoon.

"I enjoined the defendants from taking any action to implement the so-called 'Fork Directive' pending the completion of briefing and oral argument on the issues," said O'Toole in a hearing on Thursday. "I believe that's as far as I want to go today."

O'Toole's stay comes after the American Federation of Government Employees and AFL-CIO filed suit against the Trump administration earlier this week. Advocates and federal workers’ unions say the buyout offer is too good to be true.

“Despite claims made to the contrary, this deferred resignation scheme is unfunded, unlawful, and comes with no guarantees,” AFGE president Everett Kelley said in a statement on the suit. “We won't stand by and let our members become the victims of this con.”

The Trump administration argued in response that pushing back the Thursday deadline could “disrupt the expectations of the federal workforce, inject tremendous uncertainty into a program that scores of federal employees have already availed themselves of, and hinder the Administration’s efforts to reform the federal workforce.”

The stay is the latest legal setback for Trump and Musk, as they have looked to implement a smash-and-grab government via executive orders and questionably legal maneuvers.

Trump’s executive order redefining the 14th Amendment’s language granting birthright citizenship was indefinitely stayed by a judge on Wednesday. His administration was further stymied when US District Court Judge Loren AliKhan issued a temporary restraining order on a sweeping freeze of federal spending. AliKhan said in her ruling that the admin's “actions in this case potentially run roughshod over a ‘bulwark of the Constitution’ by interfering with Congress’s appropriation of federal funds.”

KitchenAid’s 2025 Color of the Year is inspired by “the most lovable ingredient of all”

KitchenAid has officially announced its Color of the Year for 2025. The shade will be featured in the kitchen brand’s annual limited-edition Artisan stand mixers.  

This year’s pick is Butter — specifically, “a soft, energizing butter yellow with a creamy satin finish,” KitchenAid specified on its official website. “Inspired by the most loveable ingredient of all, Butter is more than an indulgent, joyful color. It's an invitation to savor life's simple heartfelt moments,” the brand added.

Per KitchenAid, Butter is especially unique because it’s comforting (“The nostalgia associated with yellow spreads warmth and cherished memories, creating a heartwarming atmosphere like melted butter on toast.”), indulgent (“Pale, golden and velvety, Butter’s creamy richness elevates the simple into the extraordinary — from decadent pastries to precious memories.”) and inviting (“Soft and energizing, Butter beckons, welcoming you home and extending a warm invitation to stay a while longer and savor every moment.”).

Butter succeeds Blue Salt, KitchenAid’s 2024 Color of the Year. Previous colors include Hibiscus, Beetroot, Honey, Kyoto Glow and Bird of Paradise.

KitchenAid’s Artisan Stand Mixer comes with a 5-quart stainless steel bowl, a 3-quart stainless steel bowl, a flex edge beater, a pastry beater, a dough hook, a wire whip, a pastry scraper and a pouring shield. It’s the perfect kitchen essential for amateur and professional bakers alike!

Google, once a DEI leader, is retreating after Trump’s order

Google is scrapping the targets it set to hire more employees from historically underrepresented groups.

The tech giant is the latest company to scale back or abandon diversity, equality and inclusion policies after Donald Trump wiped DEI from the federal government and encouraged the private sector to do the same

Google sent a company-wide email on Wednesday saying it would no longer set hiring goals to improve workforce diversity, according to the Wall Street Journal.

Additionally, Google's parent company Alphabet changed its annual SEC report to remove a sentence affirming its "[commitment] to making diversity, equity, and inclusion part of everything we do and to growing a workforce that is representative of the users we serve." The sentence had previously been included in the company's reports from 2021 through 2024.

"We're committed to creating a workplace where all our employees can succeed and have equal opportunities," a Google spokesperson said, according to BBC. "We've updated our [annual investor report] language to reflect this, and as a federal contractor our teams are also evaluating changes required following recent court decisions and executive orders on this topic."

Google was one of many companies that responded to the 2020 murder of George Floyd with initiatives to increase diversity, equity and inclusion in the workplace. The company became a leader in DEI goals, saying it planned to increase the proportion of "underrepresented groups" in leadership positions by 30% in five years.

The tech industry has historically lacked diversity, especially Black and Latino employees. Google’s 2024 diversity report showed 5.7% of its U.S. employees were Black and 7.5% were Latino. Four years ago, those figures were 3.7% and 5.9%.

Google said it’s considering whether to continue releasing its diversity reports, despite having released them annually since 2014. The company also said it's reviewing other DEI initiatives, such as grants and training programs, with an eye on those that "raise risk, or that aren’t as impactful as we’d hoped."

"We’ll continue to invest in states across the U.S. — and in many countries globally — but in the future we will no longer have aspirational goals," the company's email said.

Howard Lutnick, Trump’s commerce pick, is on crypto task force despite conflicts

Howard Lutnick, a billionaire banker poised to run the Department of Commerce, has deep ties to the crypto industry. But he hasn't committed to recusing himself from Donald Trump's crypto task force that will develop policies on digital assets. 

Lutnick is the longtime head of Cantor Fitzgerald, an investment bank that serves Tether, a crypto platform with the most widely used stablecoin in the world. The Wall Street Journal reported last October that the federal government is investigating whether Tether's digital token has been used by third parties to fund illegal activities such as the drug trade, terrorism and hacking.

Cantor has around 5% ownership of Tether, valued at $600 million, the Wall Street Journal reported. Lutnick testified at his U.S. Senate confirmation hearing that Cantor's investment in Tether is in the form of a convertible bond.

In response to Democrats questioning whether this presents a conflict with his position on Trump's crypto task force, Lutnick said, "I will follow applicable government ethics laws and regulations based on guidance from the Ethics Office of the Department of Commerce," Politico reported.  

His nomination as commerce secretary cleared a Senate committee on Wednesday and is headed to the full chamber for a vote. 

Lutnick is the latest in Trump's super-rich administration to face questions about financial and business entanglements that could conflict with their government roles.

Federal law prohibits executive branch officials, with the exception of the president and vice-president, from taking actions that could financially benefit themselves or their families. 

Lutnick has agreed to divest from his business interests and step down from his positions at Cantor Fitzgerald and two other financial firms, BGC Group and Newmark Group. CBS News reported. He has not said whether he would recuse himself from Trump's crypto task force, Politico reported

He will still have a wide array of holdings even after stepping down from the businesses. If confirmed as commerce secretary, Lutnick will need to recuse himself — at least initially — from participating in certain matters involving 106 different corporate entities, according to The New York Times

It would be the largest number of recusal requirements imposed on a member of Trump's cabinet, which has combined assets worth at least $1.5 billion, per The Times.

Judge temporarily limits DOGE access to Treasury Department payment system

A federal judge signed off on an agreement Thursday that would temporarily limit the Department of Government Efficiency's access to sensitive Treasury Department payment systems. The ruling is part of a broader case brought against the Treasury Department, which a coalition of federal employee unions as accused of illegally sharing access to their members' information with Elon Musk's quasi-governmental operation charged with slashing the federal budget.

The lawsuit was filed by liberal nonprofit Public Citizen on behalf of the AFL-CIO and other groups.

U.S. District Judge Colleen Kollar-Kotellyon issued her ruling with the consent of both the unions and the Treasury Department, which is now barred from providing DOGE access to “to any payment record or payment system of records maintained by or within the Bureau of the Fiscal Service."

There are, however, exceptions.

Tom Krause, chief executive of Cloud Software Group Inc., and Marko Elez, an engineer who has worked for Musk’s private companies, will both retain ostensibly read-only access to payment information. Despite Treasury Department denials to the contrary, though, a WIRED report stated that DOGE staffers have actually enjoyed read-write access, which could allowed them to rewrite code that controls Social Security, tax payments and more.

According to CNN, Krause and Elez led DOGE's efforts to shut down payments to USAID employees using the Treasury Department's payment processing system, a step so out of line with normal process that former Acting Secretary David Lebryk, a career civil servant, told DOGE agents that he did not believe “we have the legal authority to stop an authorized payment certified by an agency."

Lebryk suggested a “legally less risky approach” that would involve the State Department rescinding the payments and examining whether they complied with President Donald Trump's executive order to freeze foreign development aid. Krause, in turn, told Lebryk that if he did not immediately comply, he could put himself at legal risk. Lebryk announced his resignation from government service last Friday.

The exchange underscores how far Musk and his underlings are willing to go in using their access to government agencies to cut off money to programs he doesn't like, which circumvents Congress' constitutional power over the federal budget. The speed and forcefulness of the Trump administration, while initially catching its opponents off-guard, has now provoked a flurry of lawsuits and rallies outside government buildings — and now the first time the judge has put binding limits on DOGE access.

Dunkin’ joins the value meal wars with brand-new $6 DunKings meal deal

Dunkin’ isn’t letting record egg prices stop it from releasing a brand-new discounted meal combo.

The breakfast chain is offering a DunKings meal deal for a limited time, according to a company press release. “For $6, guests can enjoy a hearty Sausage, Egg and Cheese Sandwich, crispy Hash Browns and a medium Hot (14 oz.) or Iced Coffee (24 oz),” Dunkin’ said. “It’s a meal that delivers big value with Dunkin’ classics that guests already love — whether to kick off the day or as a delicious afternoon pick-me-up.” (This deal doesn't include espresso drinks, cold brew beverages or loaded hash browns.)

Additionally, Sabrina Carpenter’s Brown Sugar Shakin’ Espresso will be available for just $3 after 12 p.m. Dunkin’ is also offering two new drinks on its menu: the Vanilla Creme Cold Brew and Toasted White Chocolate Coffee. The former is described as “an ultra-smooth cold brew layered with brown sugar syrup, a vanilla flavor shot and topped with sweet cold foam,” while the latter touts a classic iced coffee base with swirls of white chocolate syrup and pumps of cream.

Dunkin’s Raspberry Watermelon Refresher will also make a comeback after it was introduced in mid-2023.

“With the one-year anniversary of last year’s DunKings commercial approaching — and fresh off our big game teaser — Dunkin’® is pulling out all the stops,” the chain said in its recent press release. “DunKings™ and DunQueens™ across America, get ready to rally for the next chapter of this story. It all leads to Sunday, February 9, when the next big moment takes center stage at the start of the first commercial break of the big game.”

A teaser for this year’s Dunkin’ Super Bowl commercial features Ben Affleck, Casey Affleck and Jeremy Strong sporting the Ultimate DunKings Tracksuit, made in partnership with Juicy Couture.

“With an all-velour design, signature bedazzled details, and peak Y2K nostalgia, this is the ultimate uniform for DunKings and DunQueens ready to suit up for what’s ahead,” Dunkin’ added.

The 9 best — and most bizarre — films from the 2025 Sundance Film Festival

Weeks before the 2025 Sundance Film Festival was slated to begin in Park City, Utah, catastrophic wildfires broke out in Los Angeles. Organizers debated the next steps, but ultimately decided to continue with the festival as planned, saying that they hoped it could be “healing and catalytic.” Still, the ongoing tragedy in nearby California loomed large over Sundance. The Josh O’Connor-led drama “Rebuilding” hones in on a rancher whose property is destroyed by a wildfire, following him as he tries to find hope and community in the aftermath of devastation. The festival set up resources online and on the ground in Utah for those affected by the fires, while the disaster stayed in conversation as filmmakers, stars and Sundance employees all grappled with its effects firsthand. 

While not every movie was a surefire hit, you’d be hard-pressed to stumble upon something that wasn’t at the very least interesting.

But the wonderful thing about Sundance is that, unlike other film festivals where maintaining an air of exclusivity and glamour often seems like the top priority (sometimes over the films themselves), Sundance has always been about meeting people where they’re at. “Community” isn’t merely a buzzword, it’s what the festival was founded on. Sundance turns Park City into a hub for new independent cinema and heralds unique voices that might otherwise be shut out of the industry’s tightly locked doors. It’s a festival so defined by its spirit that it’s difficult to imagine attending it will feel any different when it switches location in 2027. Yes, this is the penultimate year of the festival being held in Utah, where it has taken place since its inception 46 years ago. But no matter where it goes next, important filmmaking is sure to follow.

This year’s lineup was no different. The slate was packed with exciting titles and fresh voices, all ripe for the picking. While not every movie was a surefire hit, you’d be hard-pressed to stumble upon something that wasn’t at the very least interesting. The festival also once again proved itself instrumental in showcasing timely works. The documentary “Heightened Scrutiny,” about ACLU lawyer Chase Stangio preparing to argue for gender-affirming care in front of the Supreme Court, felt perfectly timed to meet Trump’s anti-trans executive orders. Elsewhere, an updated version of Ang Lee’s “The Wedding Banquet” tackled not only Asian diaspora but fertility struggles and queer dynamics in contemporary family units. It was a year where Independent artists and A-List talent were on a level playing field, and it’s that kind of consistent uniformity that continues to set Sundance apart from every other major festival. 

Here, then, are nine of the best, most fascinating films from Sundance 2025 that are not to be missed.

01
“If I Had Legs I’d Kick You”
If I Had Legs I'd Kick YouIf I Had Legs I'd Kick You (Courtesy of Sundance Institute/Logan White)Image_placeholder

Writer-director Mary Bronstein’s latest film finds Rose Byrne in crisis. Well, crises. Byrne stars as Linda, a woman looking Murphy’s Law dead in the eye and screaming in its face. Her daughter is dealing with a mysterious illness, her husband is nowhere to be found and her therapist is proving increasingly unhelpful, even detrimental. The universe is constantly heaping new troubles onto Linda; wherever she goes, there they are. It sounds a bit like Cassavetes’ “A Woman Under the Influence” — and Byrne certainly has what it takes to go full Gena Rowlands — but her unraveling is both funnier and somehow even more nauseating. It’s a portrait of motherhood that unfolds like the antithesis of the you-can-do-it enthusiasm of last year’s “Nightbitch,” and Byrne is the perfect person to carry it. After three scorching seasons of Apple TV+’s vastly underrated “Physical,” Byrne’s turn in “If I Had Legs I’d Kick You” immediately confirms her as one of the most captivating screen presences of her time.

 

Where to watch: A24 will release the film sometime this year.

02
"Atropia"
AtropiaAtropia (Courtesy of Sundance Institute)Image_placeholder

One of the most high-concept films in Sundance’s 2025 lineup, “Atropia” jumps back 20 years to follow a group of actors at a military base deep in the California desert, where they simulate real-life in an Iraq war zone for soldiers who are about to be deployed. While the film is based on actual simulations that soldiers take part in, writer-director Hailey Gates — whom you know as the unlucky Tinder date in “Challengers” or the junkie mom in “Twin Peaks: The Return” — ratchets up the satire to ruminate on the inherent absurdity of American imperialism. “Atropia” finds star Alia Shawkat back in comedy mode as Fayruz, an aspiring actor desperately trying to turn this strange role-playing opportunity into her big Hollywood break. The film is an expanded, full-length version of Gates’ 2019 short film “Shako Mako” (also starring Shawkat), but with a more keen eye for visual flair and worldbuilding. Not every beat works, but Gates’ ambition is admirable and suggests the emergence of a major directorial talent whose first feature is the perfect primer for a promising career.

 

Where to watch: The film is still seeking distribution.

03
"Plainclothes"
PlainclothesTom Blyth and Russell Tovey in "Plainclothes" (Courtesy of Sundance Institute/Ethan Palmer)Image_placeholder

After his star-making performance in 2023’s “Hunger Games” prequel, Tom Blythe takes a welcome step back to the indies in “Plainclothes,” though one that’s just as filled with visual spectacle. Carmen Emmi’s film jumps between photography styles to capture its stars in ice-cold digital and the warmth of MiniDV, perfect for a movie about an undercover cop working sting missions to catch gay men cruising for sex, who happens to fall in love with one of his Johns. The visual style can be disorienting at times, but the film is structured well enough that its narrative remains arresting (no pun intended) throughout. “Plainclothes” takes a while to build its intrigue, but once it settles into its final act, viewers will find themselves moved and shocked in equal measure by Emmi’s conclusion.

 

Where to watch: The film is still seeking distribution.

04
"Twinless"
TwinlessDylan O'Brien and James Sweeney in "Twinless" (Courtesy of Sundance Institute/Greg Cotten)Image_placeholder

One of Sundance’s best surprises, “Twinless” is the final leap that Dylan O’Brien needed to go from one-time MTV teen heartthrob to full-fledged, bonafide movie star. In the film, O’Brien plays Roman and his twin brother Rocky, who died in a tragic accident that leaves Roman looking for answers in a bereavement group for twins who have lost their sibling. It’s there where Roman meets Dennis (James Sweeney, who also wrote and directed the film), and it’s not long before the two are bonded over their shared trauma. Initially, both men find that the other is the perfect proxy for the brother that they lost; Dennis fills the spot of Roman’s gay twin, and Roman fills the spot of Dennis’ straight twin.

But as they get closer, the two men discover that grief manifests itself in bizarre ways that neither of them is prepared for. Sweeney’s script is funny, unnerving and deeply heartwrenching, while his stylish direction makes for a consistently bewitching watch experience. But it’s O’Brien who surprises most often. He’s tender and enigmatic, and the film wouldn’t work nearly as well without the resonance that he supplies. Unfortunately, O’Brien’s fans leaked some of the film’s scenes online, causing “Twinless” to be yanked from the festival’s online portion in its final days. But while there may be some spoilers floating around, do your best to walk into this one blind. You’ll be glad you did.

 

Where to watch: The film is still seeking distribution.

05
"Peter Hujar's Day"
Peter Hujar's DayBen Whishaw in "Peter Hujar's Day" (Courtesy of Sundance Institute)Image_placeholder

The deceptively complex “Peter Hujar’s Day” is one of Sundance’s most brilliant showcases of talent across the board. Fresh off great work in Netflix’s “Black Doves,” Ben Whishaw once again joins forces with the great Ira Sachs, who directed Whishaw in 2023’s “Passages,” another Sundance stunner that ended up being one of the finest films of that year. Here, Whishaw plays photographer Peter Hujar, who meets up with writer Linda Rosenkrantz (Rebecca Hall) to, quite simply, discuss the day. It’s an intimate two-hander, deftly carried by Whishaw and Hall, two of the most overlooked actors working today who always manage to draw something uniquely compelling out of every role they take on. “Peter Hujar’s Day” is no different; it’s a simple, conversational, dialogue-forward film that lets its actors sink into their roles, bringing the viewer right along with them. What might be a bore in the hands of less capable artists turns utterly mesmerizing, making for one of the best entries at Sundance 2025.

 

Where to watch: Sideshow and Janus Pictures will release the film later this year.

06
"Sorry, Baby"
Sorry, BabyEva Victor in "Sorry, Baby" (Courtesy of Sundance Institute/Mia Cioffi Henry)Image_placeholder

There’s an undercurrent of strange tension that flows through “Sorry, Baby.” At times, writer, director and star Eva Victor shoots her feature debut like a horror film, lingering on empty spaces as if to suggest that something might pop out of a dark corner at any moment, or a door might slowly creak open after being shut. Victor’s prolonged takes are designed to give audiences a sense of her character Agnes’ pervasive paranoia, a fear that follows Agnes like a plague after she survives a terrible event. Victor’s film is a raw look at recovering from something you never asked for in the first place, and a wryly funny take on the highs and lows of coping. While its nonlinear structure lets some air out of the emotional thrust and the tone shifts too often, “Sorry, Baby” is nevertheless a charming debut from Victor, whose obvious talent is already attracting significant buzz as one of the festival’s most auspicious new voices.

 

Where to watch: A24 will release the film sometime this year.

07
"Pee-wee as Himself"
Pee-wee as HimselfPaul Reubens in "Pee-wee as Himself" (Courtesy of Sundance Institute/Dennis Keeley/HBO)Image_placeholder

This two-part documentary walks the line between artifice and reality as it explores a similar struggle that icon Paul Reubens had separating himself from his beloved character Pee-wee Herman, and how the perception of that character changed in the years following Reubens’ arrest for indecent exposure. Shot prior to Reubens’ death in 2023 and featuring intimate, introspective conversations with the actor, director Matt Wolf’s doc plays out like a story that has many different prospective endings. Reubens fashions himself as an unreliable narrator in the film, questioning his own memories of the past and the veracity of the facts along the way. There’s no easily digestible, meaningful message, only a portrait of a misunderstood yet completely adored performer who never got his due. “Pee-wee as Himself” is far from your average Sundance celebrity doc, but that’s exactly what makes it so appealing.

 

Where to watch: The film will stream on Max later this year.

08
"Kiss of the Spider Woman"
Kiss of the Spider WomanTonatiuh and Diego Luna in "Kiss of the Spider Woman" (Courtesy of Sundance Institute)Image_placeholder

If you’re a musical fan who is tired of the lack of pomp and circumstance in modern musicals, strap in, because you’re in for a wild ride with “Kiss of the Spider Woman.” Based on the stage musical of the same name — itself an adaptation of the 1976 novel and the 1985 film — the movie is set in an Argentinian prison where a gay hairdresser named Luis (Tonatiuh) spins tales of films starring the imaginary screen siren Ingrid Luna (Jennifer Lopez). These tales become objects of fixation for both Luis and Valentin (Diego Luna), a Marxist sharing Luis’ cell. The movie is the passion project of director Bill Condon, known for writing “Chicago” and “The Greatest Showman,” and directing 2008’s “Dreamgirls.” Not only does the film sport Condon’s flair for the flamboyant, but it also examines the evolution of queer rights around the world, making “Kiss of the Spider Woman” a timely musical that has the potential to dazzle and displease. What could be better?

 

Where to watch: The film is still seeking distribution, but is currently between bids from multiple distributors to aim for a release later this year.

09
"By Design"
By DesignBy Design (Courtesy of Sundance Institute)Image_placeholder

The logline, “A woman swaps bodies with a chair, and everyone likes her better as a chair” is easily one of the funniest film synopses I’ve ever read in my life. Fortunately, Amanda Kramer’s delightfully illogical film rises to the occasion to meet the brilliance of its summary at every turn. But Kramer’s film isn’t just a comedy, it’s a melange of perverse, achingly relatable desire. Juliette Lewis stars as Camille, a woman who yearns not just to be loved, but to be revered. When her eye catches a beautiful wooden chair in a design showroom, Camille is overcome by a longing so intense that she soon finds her soul sitting comfortably inside the object. How wonderful, being so undeniably beautiful — until it’s not. Gorgeously costumed and constructed, Kramer’s film is impossibly chic from tip to toe. Every perfectly manicured frame conjures deep admiration, enough to make you wish that you could become the film yourself.

 

Where to watch: The film is still seeking distribution.

Musk’s DOGE operation sued over effort to “intimidate and threaten” Department of Labor employees

A coalition of federal employee unions led by Democracy Forward filed a lawsuit Wednesday against Elon Musk's Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) in an effort to block the South African billionaire and his team from accessing and potentially tampering with Department of Labor databases.

According to the lawsuit, DOGE — a quasi-governmental entity that has already slashed its way through multiple federal agencies in the name of cutting wasteful spending — on Tuesday ordered Labor Department employees to hand over sensitive data and access to computer systems or "risk termination." Employees said that they were told to "do whatever they ask, not to push back, not to ask questions" whenever Musk and his team visited the department and provide access to any department of labor system even if they had to follow security protocols, per the complaint.

“DOGE seeks to gain access to sensitive systems before courts can stop them, dismantle agencies before Congress can assert its prerogatives in the federal budget, and intimidate and threaten employees who stand in their way, worrying about the consequences later,” the lawsuit said.

The lawsuit was filed by an array of federal labor unions, including the American Federation of Government Employees, the American Federation of Labor, Congress of Industrial Organizations and the American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees. It asks a federal court to block DOGE from unlawfully accessing department of labor systems and information, and also from retaliating against any worker who refuses to accept their demands.

Another lawsuit was filed by the liberal nonprofit Public Citizen on behalf of the AFL-CIO and others to block DOGE from accessing Treasury Department systems and information. The judge in that case signed off on an agreement Thursday to temporarily limit DOGE from sharing data outside of the department. DOGE has also seized access of systems at USAID and the Office of Personnel and Management, among other federal agencies.

In “Clean Slate,” Laverne Cox and George Wallace carry Norman Lear’s spirit into a homecoming story

From the moment car wash owner Harry Slate (George Wallace) rolls into the opening frames of “Clean Slate,” slowly gliding his classic convertible down the sunny treelined streets of his close-knit Alabama community, the audience knows they can relax.

This is a place where everyone knows everyone else and might find stuck-in-their-ways folks like Harry to be charming or crotchety. Regardless, they accept their neighbors as they are, as long as that acceptance is reciprocated.

That means that Harry’s child Desiree (Laverne Cox) should receive a soft landing when she returns home after 23 years without contacting him.

Maybe we understand that before she does since this homecoming tale starts with Harry processing the realization that the child he believed to be his son was, in fact, always his daughter.

Other comedies might make this an ongoing refrain. “Clean Slate” gives that facet of Desiree and Harry’s reunion the import it merits in the premiere, which is to say Harry is allowed his initial shock. But the blessing and relief is that Harry is never shown “getting over” or “getting past” this new information.

“I’m trying to roll with it. I’m trying,” Harry earnestly says — and we can see that, which is what makes Wallace’s performance so winning. At no point is Desiree’s identity presented in a way that clunks with “very special episode” messaging or talking points. Harry's task is to steadily comprehend, with Desiree’s patience and guidance, what it means for her to be her natural self.

Instead, “Clean Slate” sells palpable comfort. In past seasons, that description might have landed as a backhanded compliment — a “nice try” in the wake of some form-breaking comedy’s ascension as a critical darling. This was especially true after single-camera half-hours seized all the critical attention while reliable multi-cams did their thing without the benefit of pointy-headed celebration. (Just solid ratings.)

The late Norman Lear, who has a posthumous executive producer credit on “Clean Slate,” remained devoted to that format because of its assuring familiarity. He correctly wagered that allowing the audience to sit with one of his families inside their living space as they sort life challenges nurtures understanding and empathy.

This is not a queer story . . . It’s a community story with an endlessly amusing father and daughter as its engine.

Playing out that action within three physical walls and an invisible fourth allows us to wrap our heads and arms around heightened topics that, for many, may be conceptual.  But this comedy forgoes a soundstage to invite us into a bubble within Mobile (by way of Savannah, GA., where the series was filmed), that feels equally intimate. Desiree’s family extends beyond Harry to include her best friend Louis (a winning performance by D.K. Uzoukwu) and his mother Ella (Telma Hopkins), with Harry’s employee Mack (Jay Wilkison) and his precocious daughter Opal (Norah Murphy) squeezing into her inner circle.  

Cox co-created “Clean Slate” with Wallace and Dan Ewen, and their guiding hand in the comedy’s execution is subtle but unmistakable. The words “trans” or “transgender” are absent in the first couple of episodes, not out of a need to camouflage what the show is about but, rather, to reflect that this aspect of who Desiree is comprises a tiny part of the conversations she and Harry need to be having.

We need your help to stay independent

The writers recognize Desiree has larger concerns, like anyone else. She returns to Mobile after her dream of owning an art gallery in New York sours and her boyfriend betrays her. How quickly Harry learns to use the right pronouns is the least of her concerns. She’s broke, jobless and trying to figure out where to go next. Besides, the longer he struggles with it, the more cash she accrues in their version of a swear jar.

Episodes falling later in the season treat social and political topics with similar authenticity. There are moving subplots about voter suppression, coming out and the way Christian hypocrisy can sit in the same pew as churchgoers who are loving and kind. There’s messaging about neighbors with different political views co-existing amicably – or, if not that, detesting each other for reasons other than politics.  

Clean SlateDesiree (Laverne Cox) and Mack (Jay Wilkison) in "Clean Slate" (Courtesy of Prime)

Holding everything together are Wallace’s and Cox’s vibrant chemistry and comic timing. In an interview with Birmingham’s ABC affiliate, Wallace said he’d initially pitched Lear on rebooting “Sanford & Son.” Seeing Cox in “Orange Is the New Black” inspired him to approach her to collaborate on a new version of a story about a widower cohabiting with their adult child, one that replaces Fred Sanford’s all-purpose cantankerousness with acceptance and affection.

Desiree, meanwhile, lives out the same fears as other stories about big city transplants forced by a setback to boomerang home, in the same way that Desiree’s anguish and Harry’s bewilderment are offshoots of common, surmountable barriers between misfit adult children and their parent. One party feels insufficiently understood or loved while the other is baffled as to how they might have fallen short. They find common ground, ousting old clutter in the process. And Desiree reaffirms her appreciation for how far her hometown has come despite aching to return to New York — "a diverse, exciting woodchipper where everyone gets to wear scarves," she dreamily whispers to a curious Opal, a little girl dreaming about ending up someplace else, just like she was.

This is not a queer story, in other words. It’s a community story with an endlessly amusing father and daughter as its engine.


Want a daily wrap-up of all the news and commentary Salon has to offer? Subscribe to our morning newsletter, Crash Course.


Add the leavening of Lear’s style of humor executed by modern voices – nothing snide or so mean that another character can’t let it roll off their armor – and the culmination is an easy, welcoming space. Nobody in “Clean Slate” is snide, and the one or two who don’t act right aren’t rewarded with punchlines.

You may even pull for those wrongdoers to make a turnaround and, better, be warmed by the heroes’ refusal to be thwarted if they don’t. These qualities have often in the past been dismissed as maudlin pandering, which the thoughtful "Clean Slate” never is.  Instead, it’s a realistic reassurance that most people are better and more loving souls than some TV channels and political leaders portray them to be. That’s not just comforting. It’s something we need to sit with for the sake of our collective well-being and sanity.

All eight episodes of “Clean Slate” are available to stream on Thursday, February 6 on Prime Video.

“An invitation to foreign actors”: Bondi tells DOJ to quit worrying about foreign lobbying campaigns

Attorney General Pam Bondi issued a memo Wednesday to scale back the Justice Department's enforcement of foreign lobbying transparency laws while completely disbanding a specialized team dealing with foreign election interference threats.

Instead of dealing with those crimes, Bondi said in the memo, the Criminal Division’s Foreign Corrupt Practices Act unit will prioritize foreign bribery cases that facilitate the criminal operations of cartels and transnational organizations such as "human smuggling and the trafficking of narcotics and firearms."

The prosecutors shall “shift focus away from investigations and cases that do not have such a connection,” she said.

Meanwhile, enforcement of the Foreign Agents Registration Act is to focus only on "instances of alleged conduct similar to more traditional espionage by foreign government actors," per the memo. Bondi also called for shuttering the National Security Division’s corporate enforcement unit, which under the Biden administration had heavily targeted the intersection of corporate crime and threats from foreign adversaries, as well as the FBI Foreign Influence Task Force.

According to the FBI, which is part of the Justice Department, the task force was established to "identify and counteract malign foreign influence operations targeting the United States," including the use of false personas and stories to undermine U.S. institutions.

“To free resources to address more pressing priorities, and end risks of further weaponization and abuses of prosecutorial discretion, the Foreign Influence Task Force shall be disbanded,” Bondi wrote in the memo.

In Trump's first term, several of the president's associates were charged with working as unregistered foreign agents, including former fundraiser Elliott Broidy, who pleaded guilty to a felony charge of conspiracy to serve as an unregistered agent for a foreign individual (in that instance, a Malaysian businessman). Michael Flynn, Trump's onetime national security adviser, also worked as a lobbyist for Turkey during the 2016 campaign, a fact he admitted after departing the White House.

The instructions detailed in Bondi's memo represent a dramatic retreat from the DOJ's efforts in white collar enforcement — a topic Bondi would have been familiar with as a registered foreign agent lobbying on behalf of Qatar. Democrats on the Senate Judiciary Committee raised concerns over failure to disclose potential conflicts of interest as a lobbyist for Qatar and other wealthy special interests like Amazon and GEO Group, a private prison company.

"The American people deserve an Attorney General who avoids even the appearance of impropriety, and they deserve an Attorney General who will put them ahead of any wealthy special interest or foreign government," said Sen. Dick Durbin, D-Ill.

Experts voiced similar concerns.

“Taken together these changes are an invitation to foreign actors to interfere in American affairs," Aaron Zelinsky, a former DOJ national security prosecutor, told Bloomberg Law. "Even worse, it’s an invitation to Americans to help them do it."

CORRECTION: This article has been updated to clarify the criminal charge to which former Trump fundraiser Elliott Broidy pleaded guilty, which was inaccurately described on initial publication. 

Our republic’s arsonist: Trump lays the groundwork to claim a Pyrrhic victory

When my dad was a small child, gas stoves were standard but lacked igniters. Thus, every family in every home in my dad’s neighborhood sported a book of wooden matches to get the job done.

Two doors down from him lived a young kid, let’s call him Denny, who liked to take his mother’s box of matches and start fires. He’d start one out in the yard. He’d burn his toys. He torched his sister’s dolls. Then he sprayed them with water and sought praise from his poor mother for putting out the fires. Nobody knew where Denny’s dad was. And everyone in the neighborhood tried to help that poor single mother. It was the '40s. People cared, I guess.

One day, Denny started a fire that only ended when the city fire department showed up. Shortly thereafter Denny and his mother had to move away. It never pays to live in a burned out building. Dad said he never knew what happened to Denny, but I wonder if he moved to New York and changed his last name to Trump.

Donald Trump burned down the United States on Tuesday, and we’re stuck with the cleanup. Although the U.S. helped start the United Nations, Tuesday night Trump announced the U.S. has again withdrawn from the U.N. Human Rights Council: “The United States will not participate in the UNHRC and will not seek election to that body.” At the same time, he wants to review our participation in the UN Educational, Scientific, and Cultural Organization, better known as UNESCO. Trump says terrorists have taken over UNHRC and are suspected of infiltrating UNESCO. Rather than, as a charter member of the U.N., fighting against what he believes are interests contrary to those of the U.S., or to world peace and stability, Trump is willing to burn it all down and walk away. If you built the house, why won’t you defend it? After all, you can’t live in a burned-out building. Just ask Denny.

Donald Trump has turned the shining light on the hill into a scorched dung heap by the roadside; a shallow money trench filled with all manner of bilge.

Trump also announced in a press conference with Israel’s Benjamin Netanyahu Tuesday that the U.S. will take over the Gaza Strip and “own it.” He did not rule out sending American troops to the area to take it over, though his press secretary tried to walk that back Wednesday afternoon during a briefing. Trump urged all Palestinians to move out — suggesting the struggling survivors who have nothing left should move to Jordan or Egypt. I guess he thinks they all have the means and energy to move to their second homes in those countries. If it sounds a little like ethnic cleansing to you, then you’re among the millions who think so. Trump merely says living in Gaza “is hell.” He also said every Palestinian should move out. Bibi? He just grinned and said, “You know, when Israel and the United States work together, and President Trump and I work together, the chances [for success] go up a lot.” 

A short time later Trump was asked whether he should get the Nobel prize. "They will never give me a Nobel Peace Prize," he said. "It’s too bad. I deserve it, but they will never give it to me." Reporters with the president say he wasn’t joking.

Like my dad’s young neighbor, the arsonist wants to get credit for being the firefighter.

That would also explain why Trump started a fire by issuing tariffs on Mexican and Canadian imports, only to pull them back less than a day after issuing them. He said he did it because both countries had capitulated to his demands — but in fact they just committed to actions to which they’ve already agreed.

He then gloated while starting another fire, announcing his aims to shut down the United States Agency for International Development. He claims the USAID project is run by gypsies, tramps and thieves (apologies to Cher). President John F. Kennedy established the agency during the Cold War to counter the influence of the Soviet Union. Today, supporters of USAID argue that U.S. assistance in many developing countries counters Russian and Chinese influence. China also has a foreign aid program operating in many countries that the U.S. wants as partners. Republicans think the USAID project promotes a liberal agenda — which I guess includes clean water, vaccines and food.

It has been reported that sub-Saharan Africa could suffer greatly from this move. The U.S. gave the region more than $6.5 billion in humanitarian assistance last year. This week HIV patients in Africa arriving at clinics funded by an acclaimed U.S. program that helped rein in the global AIDS epidemic of the 1980s found locked doors.

Trump called all the angst about shuttering USAID a “hoax” and defended it with a statement from his communications office that sounded as smarmy as a Trump Truth Social post. “Ending U.S. taxpayer funding of transgender comic books in Peru, DEI in Serbia, and transgender operas (whatever those are) in Colombia is not akin to a ‘dictatorship’ — it’s holding unelected bureaucrats accountable for their spending decisions.”

We need your help to stay independent

Actually, all he had to do was end the parts of the program he didn’t like. That’s normal. But cutting off your nose to spite your face is not only a staple of the Trump regime but one of the principal reasons his fans are attracted to him: They worship the grotesque mutants now leading the American kakistocracy. On Wednesday, onetime Trump foe Marco Rubio, now America’s top diplomat, announced he was boycotting the upcoming G20 summit in South Africa, seemingly due to Trump’s baseless complaints about DEI.

Donald Trump excels at being both an arsonist and a fireman on any issue except the real fires out in Los Angeles. There he only claimed to turn on the water spigot after he visited. He initially blamed the fires on California Gov.Gavin Newsom (or "Newscum," for followers of Trump's social media) until they hugged on the tarmac in L.A.

Trump’s arsonist approach to politics has set off a series of blazes, aided and abetted by a foul and stiff wind called, not El Niño, but El-on Musk. He and his merry band of troublemakers and computer hackers, some of them reportedly as young as 19,  gained access to government computers and, potentially, to the private information of everyone in the U.S. While several news outlets broke that tidbit of info, including showing pictures of the young hackers Musk employed, Trump’s communication team also called that a hoax. Communications director Steven Cheung said the reports were “FAKE NEWS. Not even remotely true at all,” while top DOGE adviser Katie Miller claimed that "no classified material was accessed without proper security clearances." In other words, classified material was taken with “proper” security clearances. Whatever that entails. Sounds a lot like Trump’s defense of keeping sensitive classified documents in his bathtub at Mar-a-Lago.

At the same time, Trump has burned down any mention of science, replacing it with promotions of himself on nearly every federal website. He doesn’t like the science of climate change, so it’s been scrubbed from federal websites. He’s also threatened to “weed out” scientists who believe in climate change.  At the same time, some of the DOGE stooges, including Musk, were seen ravaging through National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration headquarters, scaring many into believing that the National Weather Service may be next on the hit parade. Many sites, including the U.S. Forest Service Climate Change Resource Center, the Climate Action Tracker and the National Roadmap for Responding to Climate Change, are gone. Trump has also ordered the removal of vaccine information from various websites. The CDC even ordered mass retraction and revision of submitted research across all science and medicine journals.

The official White House website now features a prominent picture and video of Trump, yet makes it incredibly difficult to find much else. “America is Back,” Trump declares on the landing page as he tries to convince people he’s putting out fires he started. Back from what? He doesn’t exactly say. But it’s clear where we are going. 

The USAID secures goodwill and peace across the globe. And our intelligence agencies ensure our domestic defense by keeping abreast of those who do not like the United States. 


Want a daily wrap-up of all the news and commentary Salon has to offer? Subscribe to our morning newsletter, Crash Course.


Well, that appears to be over with very soon as well. On Tuesday evening, CNN reported that the entire CIA workforce was offered a buyout — or at least early retirement. That will, according to both Republicans and Democrats knowledgeable of the situation, potentially clear out the most experienced in the agency and limit institutional knowledge. Recently-confirmed CIA Director John Ratcliffe said the move will "ensure the CIA workforce is responsive to the Administration’s national security priorities," and is part of "a holistic strategy to infuse the Agency with renewed energy."

By cutting your starters you may infuse your team with a lot of energy, but the results won’t be to your liking when you put in your backups. Ask the Democrats who cut Joe Biden how that turned out.

"America is Back," declares Donald Trump on the White House landing page, trying to convince people he's putting out the fires he started. Back from what? He doesn't say. But it's clear where we are going.

Today we are led by a man who believes the best thing to do to ensure world peace is to deny science, deny immigrants a chance at a decent life, quit investing in international health organizations, destroy the Palestinians while paving over Gaza and turn a deaf ear to international reactions to these policies by eliminating any ability to gather intelligence. He is sticking his head in the sand and plugging his ears to keep from finding out the consequences of his actions.

Less than three weeks into his second administration, Donald Trump has turned the shining light on the hill into a scorched dung heap by the roadside; a shallow money trench filled with all manner of bilge. Nearby, in a children’s lemonade stand, the president sells us baseball caps and T-shirts while his billionaire handlers loot the national treasury for their own nefarious ends.

The United States is being run by cartoon villains, and their equally cartoonish fans and haters. Some see the titular head of the villainy as their personal savior. Some, like former vice presidential candidate Tim Walz, see Musk as the real power. “Elon Musk is a terrible President,” the Minnesota governor posted on X, warning that the richest man in the world is sitting at the Resolute Desk ready to defund public education. “Trump should stop him.” 

Walz and others are describing the smoke while the country burns. Trump’s fans think the smoke is the smell of success and the fire is the purifying fire of righteousness. 

With that said, Democratic Rep. Al Green of Texas announced Wednesday that “the movement to impeach the president has begun.” He plans to file articles of impeachment against Trump for “dastardly deeds proposed and dastardly deeds done,” regarding the prospect of paving over Gaza and building a Trump resort.

There are Democrats, like Green and Chuck Schumer, who chanted “We will win!” in front of a Treasury building commandeered by Musk, who think they can smell victory. They're wrong. It’s just the smell of the ashes of a once-great nation.

Surviving an overdose can be excruciating. New research suggests it doesn’t have to be

Naloxone, the opioid overdose antidote, is a powerful tool in the overdose crisis, allowing friends, loved ones and even bystanders a way to put a fatal overdose in reverse and bring back breathing. But at high doses it also triggers a wave of miserable symptoms collectively called precipitated withdrawal. A truism for people who routinely use opioids like heroin or illicit fentanyl is that, well, coming back from an overdose sucks. 

“You wake up from an overdose, especially after that first time, and you’re like ‘dude I wish I had just died.’” says C, a person who uses drugs and has experienced an opioid overdose several times. Salon is only using their first initial to protect her privacy. C now leads grassroots outreach efforts for others who use drugs in Houston, and is a member of the Texas Drug User Health Union. This miserable experience C describes is the downside of this critical tool.

“It’s so crazy how intense the withdrawal is,” C explains. “If the fan is on and you can feel a little bit of air passing over you, that triggers nausea and diarrhea. If someone speaks, the pitch of their voice makes me nauseated. I have to be in a still, not dark but not well-lit space so I can s**t and vomit in peace. Anything sensory at all is overwhelming.”

Understandably, this is an experience that people who routinely use opioids will go out of their way to avoid.

“I have very, very sternly told people that if I fall out (experience an overdose), to avoid naloxone at all costs and to work on rescue breathing instead for at least a minute or two,” C says. One of the reasons for this dramatic, full-body response is that naloxone binds to opioid receptors all over the body, triggering involvement from organs like the skin and intestines, and not just the brain — which is what governs our breathing. But Dr. Brian Ruyle, an instructor at Washington University in Saint Louis believes this may not be a necessary part of reversing opioid overdoses in the future.

Understandably, this is an experience that people who routinely use opioids will go out of their way to avoid.

Ruyle researches the mechanisms that govern opioid-induced respiratory depression, or the slowing and stopping of breathing that makes opioid overdoses lethal. Ruyle’s recent work, published as a preprint, has shown us something truly remarkable: we may be able to reverse overdoses effectively without medication entering the brain, and based on study data, may actually avoid the pain of precipitated withdrawal altogether. The study used an experimental drug called naloxone methiodide.

It’s a simple modification of naloxone that cannot get past the blood brain barrier, essentially the brain’s security system. Instead, it can only circulate to opioid receptors outside of the brain, known as peripheral opioid receptors. His study showed that naloxone methiodide effectively reversed respiratory depression in rats that had been given fentanyl, and also the opposite — that rats given naloxone methiodide first, and given fentanyl afterwards, never developed respiratory depression.

And intriguingly, this happened without changing the rats’ vital signs and other physiologic data, leading Ruyle and his coauthors to suspect that while the rats were protected from respiratory depression, this was achieved without the notorious pain of withdrawal. 


Want more health and science stories in your inbox? Subscribe to Salon's weekly newsletter Lab Notes.


“In terms of our preclinical rat model, the antagonist naloxone methiodide appears to both prevent and reverse fentanyl-induced respiratory depression. And what’s exciting for us is that the reversal doesn’t appear to be aversive in the rats like naloxone is,” Ruyle said. Further, early signs also suggest that the rats who are pre-treated with a peripheral antagonist like naloxone methiodide may still be feeling the desired effects of fentanyl, while still having protection from respiratory depression. “Something we are going to do for future studies is really get into sedation, locomotor activity — a battery of additional tests. But the animals that got naloxone methiodide prior to fentanyl appeared very sedated and calm; definitely a euphoric sense. But physiologically, they were normal.”

The mechanism here isn’t well-understood, and Ruyle’s work points out the need for a clearer understanding of how opioid receptors throughout the body talk to the brain. He and his coauthors have some ideas — perhaps naloxone methiodide is able to interrupt communication to the brain (called afferent signaling) by opioid receptors. While this study highlights the involvement of opioid receptors outside of the brain, he emphasizes that the brain is still the organ actually dictating breathing. “We’re not saying there is no central effect. Clearly, there is,” he explains.

"The next step for this project is to move beyond naloxone methiodide and evaluate already FDA-approved peripheral antagonists."

An area of the brain especially implicated in opioid-induced respiratory depression is the nTS, or nucleus tractus solitarius. This area of the brainstem receives interoceptive input, or signals from the body about its internal state, like hunger, pain and fullness. What especially piqued Ruyle’s interest in the nTS is that it’s the first area of the brainstem to receive input from the large nerves that relay information about cardiorespiratory function.

Additionally, prior research has shown that the nTS is strongly activated when someone’s oxygen level drops, and that the nTS is loaded with opioid receptors — all supporting the idea that the nTS is at least a major player in opioid-induced respiratory depression. This is even further supported by data showing that peripheral opioid receptors are influencing the activity of the nTS in rats that were given fentanyl. By carrying out this study with a drug like naloxone methiodide, which only works via the pathway that includes the nTS, he was able to provide more evidence of how the nTS functions, and its role in opioid-induced respiratory depression.

While these findings are promising, more work has to be done. Ruyle and his team are preparing to expand their research on this topic. He’s also switching from naloxone methiodide to similar drugs that are already approved for human use in the United States, such as naloxegol (brand name Movantik), methylnaltrexone (Relistor) and naldemedine (Symproic.)

We need your help to stay independent

“The next step for this project is to move beyond naloxone methiodide and evaluate already FDA-approved peripheral antagonists and see if we can repurpose them to use in an overdose setting,” he says. All three other drugs they plan to explore are peripherally-acting opioid antagonists similar to naloxone methiodide, and are FDA-approved to treat opioid-induced constipation — a common side effect of opioids. Showing that one of these drugs might work to prevent or reverse an opioid overdose in rats would provide the foundation for studying their use for the same issue in humans.

Ruyle’s findings emerge at a time when ultra-potent opioid antagonists, namely nalmefene and high-dose naloxone, are attempting to gain a market foothold by claiming that fentanyl overdoses require especially strong drug options. This has been met with doubt by many in the overdose response space, with the growing consensus being that the opposite is true — giving small doses of naloxone is actually the better approach, and that tools like rescue breathing and physical stimulation are important and underutilized. In other words, we don’t need to make surviving an overdose as uncomfortable as possible.

“Perhaps with these peripheral antagonists, you wouldn’t have some of those [negative] side effects, even though the affinity for opioid receptors is lower for naloxone methiodide than it is for naloxone,” Ruyle said. “Perhaps it’s enough to reverse the overdose and keep the patient relatively calm but still save their life, which is the most important thing.”

Elon Musk’s war on Head Start childhood education exposes how “pro-natalists” are really anti-woman

Elon Musk's ongoing infiltration-style coup of the federal government continues to cause chaos across the country. As Musk seizes executive powers and rejects all congressional authority, it's increasingly clear that Donald Trump is shaping up to be more of a reality TV host in his return to office than the actual president. 

Last week, Trump pulled back the across-the-board "freeze" on all federal grants and loans, but despite the alleged "unfreezing," reports are streaming in from various states that money for Head Start has disappeared, forcing some centers to close or lay off staff. This is likely the doing of Musk, who has been interfering with the Treasury Department systems that disperse funds, and bragging on X that he has dictator-like powers to unilaterally destroy programs he doesn't like.

The targeting of Head Start, a program that provides early childhood education and support for over 800,000 children, isn't a surprise to those who combed through the Project 2025 handbook. This blueprint for a second Trump term explicitly calls for the elimination of Head Start, hiding behind false claims that the program is somehow bad for children. But the driving animus the right has long harbored against Head Start was never focused on children, who benefit tremendously in both long-term measures like increased likelihood to attend college and short-term measures like improved self-esteem and self-discipline. No, the program has long been targeted by conservatives because it makes it easier for young mothers to have jobs or go to school, helping women secure economic independence. 

“And if Head Start’s not available, it just causes panic. People worry about their jobs ’cause they can’t show up," Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer noted on Wednesday. "So this is very, very important to the lives, the average daily lives of so many."


Want more Amanda Marcotte on politics? Subscribe to her newsletter Standing Room Only.


Elon Musk taking a very illegal ax to the program is noteworthy because he frequently pushes pro-natalist views, arguing that people should have way more children than they currently do. (He claims he means all people, not just white people, but his alliance with white nationalists should cast doubt on this.) But, of course, anyone who sincerely wanted to increase the birth rate would not only protect Head Start but advocate for dramatically expanding it to become a universal daycare program. Research on this front is crystal clear: Women across the socioeconomic spectrum delay having children because they fear, correctly, that having kids young will harm their financial prospects. Free universal childcare may not, in itself, address these concerns. But any program that would work would likely start there. 

It's just an amped-up version of the same romanticization of female sacrifice that's endemic in conservative circles, where what makes a woman "good" is how much self-subjugation she can endure. 

If these well-worn arguments feel like a waste of pixels, it's because they are based on a false assumption: that "natalism" has anything to do with birthrates. Instead, natalism is a thin disguise for a movement whose real goal is to reinstate race and gender hierarchies that elevate white men above everyone else. That much was made clear during the presidential campaign, which featured an endless number of unearthed comments from now-Vice President JD Vance which showed his "natalism" was mostly just overt misogyny. He yelled about "childless cat ladies" and declared women shouldn't be able to leave men who beat them. He even agreed with a podcast host who argued that "the whole purpose of the postmenopausal female" is to help young mothers, so men don't have to bother with bedtimes and diapers. 

On Tuesday, the Washington Post published the approximately billionth profile of Simone and Malcolm Collins, whose entire existence is built around getting soft-focus media coverage meant to misrepresent the toxicity of their natalist ideology. The two are thin, wear nerdy glasses and repeatedly swear up and down that they're neither racist nor sexist, which is often enough for credulous audiences to code them as "liberal" or at least not MAGA. But of course, the ruse is a millimeter thick — and not just because they love Donald Trump. Despite the couple's empty claims to have an egalitarian marriage, they admit Simone Collins does most child care and housework, with the usual false claims that women are intrinsically better at these tasks. They also brag about how much money they put into genetic testing and IVF treatments to get the "best" babies, which is not only overtly eugenicist but cuts against their claim that they want everyone to have more babies. Most people have neither the money nor time to spend on such nonsense.

The Post profile overlooked it, but Hope Not Hate dug even deeper and found that the couple has suggested women not be allowed to own property, lambasted programs to reduce racial discrimination in hiring, and falsely suggested IQ scores are dropping as the U.S. population becomes more racially diverse. (The opposite is true, a fact so well-documented it has a name: the Flynn effect.) "You do not want to give money to women,” Malcolm Collins declared on one podcast

But what's viscerally creepy in the Post report is how fixated the couple is on imagining Simone's death in childbirth. "I’m happy to die in labor," she declared dramatically, an especially weird statement because she delivered all four of her children via C-section. Malcolm Collins also fantasizes about his currently pregnant wife's death, seemingly gloating that "she’s putting her life on the line." They deliberately inject unnecessary physical suffering into her pregnancies, including the use of IVF, an incredibly taxing and painful process, for the strict purpose of genetic engineering. He even brags about "her ability to withstand pain and gore." It's just an amped-up version of the same romanticization of female sacrifice that's endemic in conservative circles, where what makes a woman "good" is how much self-subjugation she can endure. 

The Collinses frequently speak at pro-natalist events, which also do a poor job of concealing the true, bigoted agenda under all this happy baby talk. As Gaby Del Valle reported in Politico last spring, this year's NatalCon featured a "mostly male audience," many "of whom are childless themselves." They speak a big game about creating "a culture in which child-rearing is paramount," but, of course, not for the men who want this change. That women will do most of the work is implicit. Indeed, that's not an unfortunate side effect, but the apparent goal. 

When it comes down to brass tacks, "natalists" like Musk seem only interested in raising birth rates in the most inhumane way possible, by force. Musk loves to bleat lies about how birth control is dangerous, which is an unsubtle pretext to take it away, perhaps by likely Health and Human Services Secretary Robert Kennedy, chosen because he puts MAGA ideology before science. Musk's billionaire buddy Peter Thiel has dumped huge amounts of money into spreading scary disinformation about birth control, as well. Vance certainly has no ideas for making motherhood a more appealing choice for women, but instead prefers shaming tactics like name-calling and lectures on "duty." And, of course, they've all allied themselves with the same GOP that's passing abortion bans as fast as they can. 

The other giveaway is that these "natalists" don't care one whit about the well-being of children after they've served the purpose of sinking a woman's ambitions. That's why Musk is going so hard after Head Start, even though it's demonstrably good for children's health and economic futures. Or why Musk and his goon squad are attacking the Department of Education. Or why they're allied with an anti-vaccination activist like Kennedy. Or why they're trying to shut down USAID, whose programs are critical for allowing women in poorer countries to give birth safely to healthy babies.

This utter disregard for what happens to a baby after she's born is also illustrated in the Post's profile of the Collins. The couple rails against car seat laws and daycare regulations, basic common sense measures that keep children alive and safe. Natalists claim they want more babies for the long-term good of humanity, but that's hard to square with the scorn for any measure that would keep children alive, much less help them be productive members of society when they're grown. When you pay attention to what they do and not what they say, it's clear that "pro-natalists" are anything but. It's just an elaborate intellectual rationale for plain old misogyny. 

New rules for radical resistance in the accelerated Age of Trump

Almost immediately upon becoming president for a second time, Donald Trump launched his promised “shock and awe” campaign to great effect. The country’s political and social institutions, democracy, the rule of law and the American people’s collective sense of normal and routine have been overwhelmed. So much has happened so quickly that it is difficult to process it all.

The Democratic Party, which should be strongly resisting Trump and the MAGA Republican’s assaults on democracy and the country’s governing institutions and laws, appears to be shellshocked. The Democrats have been in such a state since they lost the presidential election (and complete control of Congress) in November. These first few weeks of Trump’s shock and awe campaign have left the Democrats even more confused and inert.

In a Sunday story about the election of Ken Martin as chair of the Democratic National Committee, the New York Times paints this picture of a Democratic Party very much in disarray:

In private meetings and at public events, elected Democrats appear leaderless, rudderless and divided. They disagree over how often and how stridently to oppose Mr. Trump. They have no shared understanding of why they lost the election, never mind how they can win in the future….

More than 50 interviews with Democratic leaders revealed a party that is struggling to define what it stands for, what issues to prioritize and how to confront a Trump administration that is carrying out a right-wing agenda with head-spinning speed. Governors, members of the Senate and the House, state attorneys general, grass-roots leaders and D.N.C. members offered a wide range of views about the direction of their party.

Their concerns are spilling out into public, as the country’s most powerful and prominent Democratic politicians air sharp disagreements over how aggressively they should oppose Mr. Trump.

Where is the so-called Resistance? It appears that they are somewhere sleeping or practicing “self-care”. Trump has only been president for three weeks and they are already exhausted. Once the Resistance finally wakes up it will likely be too late.

As part of his opening salvo, Donald Trump has now signed approximately 100 executive orders and other decrees that will impact almost every area of American government, society and life. The most ominous and dangerous include voiding the 14th Amendment to end birthright citizenship, declaring a national emergency as part of his mass deportation campaign, freeing the MAGA foot soldiers who attacked the Capitol on Jan. 6, reversing more than 60 years of civil rights laws and protections with the goal of ending America’s multiracial democracy, targeting the LGBTQ community with laws that attempt to erase them from public (and private) life, further restricting women’s reproductive rights and freedoms, elevating White Christian nationalism as the country’s official state religion, remaking the Department of Justice and FBI into his personal enforcers by firing or otherwise forcing out senior leaders and the thousands of agents who were involved in the Jan. 6 investigations and who more broadly attempting to hold Trump and his followers accountable for their many alleged and proven crimes, firing inspectors generals, pausing foreign aid, withdrawing the United States from the World Health Organization and Paris Climate Accords, enacting a thought crime regime of “patriotic education” where schools deemed to be teaching “un-American” ideas will be denied funding and other assistance, trying to force many thousands of career civil servants out of their jobs so that he can replace them with loyalists, and ordering the federal government to stop paying its grants and loans. The latter move will potentially impact trillions of dollars and stop such programs as Medicare, federal student loans, healthcare, food and housing assistance for the poor, Head Start and other supports for vulnerable Americans.

As promised and threatened, Trump imposed high tariffs on goods from China. Trump quickly stopped the threatened tariffs on Mexico and Canada by claiming “victory” when in fact the outcome was very much a return to the status quo ante. These tariffs, if enacted, are estimated to cost the average American family at least $1,000 a year. By Trump’s own admission, tariffs will raise the cost of prescription medicine and other essentials. Trump, a billionaire, flippantly describes such hardship as some "short-term" pain for the American people. He told reporters on Sunday “I’m not concerned. We may have short-term a little pain….And people understand that.”

Trump also announced that Guantanamo Bay will be used as a prison camp for 30,000 “illegal aliens," undocumented people and others detained by ICE and other law enforcement. Guantanamo Bay is infamous as one of the sites where alleged terrorists were tortured by the United States government during the War on Terror. In a much-underreported story, the Trump administration is touting an offer from the government of El Salvador to use that country’s prisons as a type of penal colony for deportees as well as violent US criminals.

And of course, Trump began a revenge campaign against his and the MAGA movement’s “enemies”, as CNN reports:

With actions big and small, Trump has spent his first days in office pushing the levers of government – and his unique powers as commander in chief – to target his perceived political enemies both inside and outside the government.

The president has revoked security clearances from his critics. He’s canceled security details for officials who worked for him in the first administration. He’s personally announced the firings of individuals he loathes. And he’s teased a desire to launch wide-ranging investigation into both his predecessor, Joe Biden, and many others who criticized him after he left office the first time.”

It’s still too early to say how much Trump’s desire for political retribution will color his second term – and whether he will in fact push for far more drastic actions inside the Justice Department once his team is confirmed. The Trump Justice Department this week quickly reassigned at least 20 career officials from senior-level positions where they’ve worked for years.

But it’s clear from Trump’s rhetoric during his first five days in office that he still has a desire to do. The new president this week bemoaned Biden’s preemptive pardons of potential targets of Trump’s retribution – like former Rep. Liz Cheney. And he even suggested in an Oval Office interview with Fox host Sean Hannity on Wednesday that Biden made a mistake by not pardoning himself.

“I went through four years of hell by this scum that we had to deal with,” Trump said. “It’s really hard to say that they shouldn’t have to go through it also. It is very hard to say that.”

This is just a small sample of the unprecedented actions taken by Trump during the first few weeks of his reign. It is critically important for those of us with a public platform to detail and list Trump’s executive orders and other attacks on the country’s democratic norms and society (and their implications for everyday Americans) whenever possible because to summarize them in the interest of “efficiency” or the false assumption that “everyone knows already” is to do the work of enabling such aberrant and abnormal acts.

We need your help to stay independent

“Everyone knows this already” will be looked back upon as one of the phrases and type of reasoning that embodied the American mainstream news media’s failures to properly warn the American people about the existential danger of Trumpism and American fascism.   

None of Trump’s executive orders or dictates will do anything to substantively alleviate or end the economic pain of the white “working-class” voters he promised to protect if he were elevated by them back to the White House. Trump’s orders will actually make their economic lives, and that of most Americans, much, much worse.

The sum effect of Trump’s executive orders and shock and awe campaign has been to quickly cement his rule as the country’s first elected autocrat and dictator in waiting.

Trump will continue to behave as though he has a mandate and is above the law, knowing that the courts have no means of enforcing their decisions against him. Trump and his agents also know that even if his executive orders and other edicts are struck down, reversed, or otherwise not effective they have served the intended effect of intimidating the opposition and wasting the comparatively few resources that civil society organizations and individuals have to fight back against the limitless resources of the state, resources that Trump now personally commands with little oversight or limits.

In her newsletter, Ruth Ben-Ghiat, who is a leading historian and expert on authoritarianism, describes the terror and uncertainty that Trump’s shock and awe campaign is causing pro-democracy Americans and other people of conscience:

I want to address the discouragement and fear that many who care about democracy and peace and human rights are feeling in America and around the world right now.

The purpose of the Blitzkrieg of executive orders and other actions by the Trump administration is to overwhelm you, make it difficult to prioritize, and demoralize and terrify you. It’s no accident that Trump has twinned the surge of domestic measures with outrageous and belligerent proclamations about international affairs, whether it is his talk about United States taking Greenland, annexing Canada, or his plan to “clean out” the Gaza Strip.

Let’s take some of the domestic actions. The removal of oversight and reporting mechanisms in government regarding corruption and other forms of abuse (the firing of Inspector-Generals being one example), the pardons of violent January 6 participants, and the selection of individuals who have been accused of sexual assault for Cabinet appointments have the collective aim of making us feel that the brutes have triumphed and there is nothing we can do about it without endangering our safety.

As I wrote in Strongmen, every authoritarian state seeks to create states of hypervigilance and fear among the public, so that people will self-censor, and comply with whatever the leader asks them to do.


Want a daily wrap-up of all the news and commentary Salon has to offer? Subscribe to our morning newsletter, Crash Course.


The “sober” and “realistic” public voices in the news media and elsewhere have been counseling caution and perspective and for the American people to not panic because many of Trump’s executive orders will likely be deemed illegal (as in nullifying the 14th Amendment, stopping federal funds from being spent which is a violation of Congress’ power of the purse, firing inspectors-generals and other officials, etc.) and blocked by the courts. I am less hopeful of such an outcome. Trump is proceeding as though he has a mandate and is above the law, knowing that the courts have no means of enforcing their rulings against him. And even if Trump’s executive orders and other edicts are struck down, reversed, or otherwise not effective they have served the intended effect of intimidating the opposition and wasting the comparatively few resources that civil society organizations and individuals have to fight back against the limitless resources of the state, which Trump now personally commands with little oversight or limits.

Moreover, such “sober” and “realistic” public voices have little credibility as many of them were also condemning those who were sounding the alarm about Trump and MAGA’s growing danger to the country as hysterical and suffering from “Trump Derangement Syndrome.” In total, the American mainstream news media, pundits (especially the professional centrists and other “responsible” public voices), Democrats and the other institutionalists are generally aghast at what is happening but mostly because of incompetence, laziness, fear and self-interest are acting like they are powerless to do anything about it.

In so many ways, Trump’s second term has cemented a new political world with new rules, one that the establishment and mainstream voices and leaders are wholly unprepared for it. The narcissistic injury (at least to those members of the news media and other elites who are capable of introspection and critical self-reflection) and overall reaction to the rapid collapse of their episteme has left the establishment and mainstream political and media class like a broken computer powered by vacuum tubes in an old science fiction movie where it is caught in a feedback loop and smoke is coming out of the machinery before it bursts into flames.

This is largely their own fault as Trump and his allies and agents have been publicly announcing and detailing their plans for American autocracy and American authoritarianism since at least 2016.

I often wonder if Ed Wood is running the simulation that is the Age of Trump and the ridiculous and horrible and utterly surreal things that have now become the norm as American society and politics succumb to the spectacle that is authoritarian populism, naked kleptocracy, mass disinhibition, and a public mesmerized and zombified by the human zoo that is social media and digital culture and the screens on their various devices.

As I and other alarm-sounders have repeatedly warned, the elites and other leaders will not save you. The American people must take agency and control over their own destiny and in defense of democracy and freedom. This will mean doing such things as getting involved in politics on the local level. It will also mean getting to know your neighbors and joining groups, both small and large, that are defending democracy and a humane society. If you have the resources, donating to and otherwise supporting independent news media is also critical for resisting American autocracy and going around a mainstream news media that has consistently failed in its responsibilities to protect democracy and to speak truth to power. Seemingly apolitical activities such as the arts, planting community gardens, teaching literacy courses, volunteering at food banks, cleaning up litter, and helping people and animals in need are also a way to create the types of personal relationships, social capital, and networks that will be required for mutual aid, organizing, and other forms of pro-democracy work and collective action in this time of great crisis.

Two recent essays by Kim Lane Scheppele and Timothy Snyder provide much-needed guidance for understanding Donald Trump and MAGA’s blitzkrieg attack on American democracy and society and what to do in response to it. At the Contrarian, Scheppele, who is a professor of sociology and international affairs at Princeton University, advises that "Democracy dies when no one defends its promise of a life free from fear and without the requirement to grovel":

Buried in everything that happened in this exhausting first week of the new Trump administration, then, is this important big idea: Trump seeks to govern through cruelty and loyalty. Defending our constitutional democracy requires that we don’t look away when cruelty is visited on members of our community and that we refuse to allow our democracy to crumble into personalistic attachment to the leader. To stand up to this will require a unity of purpose so that we cannot be divided by fear and it will require that we defend the principle that no man is above the law—nor can he change the law to put himself above it. Those of us concerned about the future of our democracy need to regroup and prepare for a long hard fight. We cannot let ourselves be divided and conquered—or distracted by everything that is flooding the zone right now.

And in a new essay, historian Timothy Snyder, author of the bestselling book On Tyranny, offers this counsel:

As for the rest of us: Make sure you are talking to people and doing something. The logic of “move fast and break things,” like the logic of all coups, is to gain quick dramatic successes that deter and demoralize and create the impression of inevitability. Nothing is inevitable. Do not be alone and do not be dismayed. Find someone who is doing something you admire and join them.

"What is a country?" he asks. "The way its people govern themselves. Sometimes self-government just means elections. And sometimes it means recognizing the deeper dignity and meaning of what it means to be a people. That means speaking up, standing out, and protesting. We can only be free together.”

A recent report finds climate change is accelerating faster than predicted. Some experts disagree

Last year raised many major red flags for climate change, perhaps greatest of all it being the first year in which global average temperatures exceeded 1.5º C above pre-industrial levels. This is the threshold the majority of countries, including the U.S., vowed not to surpass in the 2015 Paris climate accord. 2025 isn’t looking much better, as January was already the hottest in recorded human history, shocking some scientists who had hoped the La Niña cycle would cool things down a bit. It hasn’t.

These are more than just ominous statistics — this extreme heat has translated into countless examples of real-world “weird weather” including unprecedented heat waves, wildfires, floods and extreme storms across the globe. Virtually nowhere has been untouched by climate change disasters, from California and the American southeast to Spain, Greece and Africa, all of which seems to be getting worse.

Meanwhile, we’re burning record amounts of fossil fuels, accelerating the crisis, all while world leaders like President Donald Trump deny and ignore climate science, even falsely claiming America has a “national energy emergency” which requires more drilling.

Yet if a recent study in the journal Environment led by iconic climate scientist Dr. James Hansen is correct, things are even worse than all of the latest news would make one believe: He claims Earth is about to blow past 2º C above pre-industrial levels. Major media outlets like The Guardian and Inside Climate News are sounding alarm bells about these findings but not everyone agrees with these conclusions.

Some scientists like Dr. Kevin Trenberth, a distinguished scholar at the National Center for Atmospheric Research, say that Hansen neglected to focus on one of the major variables contributing to climate change: water vapor.

"The biggest warming is not in the Northern Hemisphere oceans but in the Southern Hemisphere oceans where aerosols certainly were not responsible for the warming."

“Water vapor is at record high levels, and of course so is the ocean heat,” Trenberth said. Water vapor doesn’t linger in the air, so it doesn’t contribute to long-term climate temperature increases in the same way as carbon dioxide, but it can temporarily raise temperatures and overall amplify the effects of greenhouse gases. “Global integrated water vapor is some 7% higher in 2024 than in 2000. Of course, that is a feedback and depends on higher temperatures (in the right places), but it also very much depends on the warmer oceans,” Trenberth explained.

In particular, Trenberth took issue with the way Hansen “carefully compares things to cause exaggerations,” citing as one example how Hansen studies sea surface temperatures in the Northern Hemisphere for a much smaller region than in the Southern Hemisphere without properly weighting them.

“If he did the latter, he would find that, no, the biggest warming is not in the Northern Hemisphere oceans but in the Southern Hemisphere oceans where aerosols certainly were not responsible for the warming,” Trenberth said. “I am not saying they haven't played a role: they have, but not like Hansen believes.”

Trenberth does not criticize Hansen lightly. The Columbia University professor is a storied scientist, noted for testifying about climate change before Sen. Al Gore, (D-Tenn.), in 1988. This was shortly before Gore ran for president in a campaign that focused primarily on fixing climate change and in the process raised international awareness about the issue for the first time. Yet Hansen has since aroused controversy, such as when he argued in 2000 that non-carbon dioxide greenhouse gases like methane play a large role in climate change. Much research now suggests he was right. He has also been critical of the idea of “tipping points” in climate models, telling Salon last year that the concept is “greatly overused and misused.”


Want more health and science stories in your inbox? Subscribe to Salon's weekly newsletter Lab Notes.


Hansen was blunt in his response to criticisms of his latest paper: “Sorry, I prefer not to spend significant time responding to scientific illogic.”

Hansen raised the issue of albedo, or the fraction of light that a surface reflects: “Water vapor does not affect the albedo of Earth, so it did not affect our analysis of the magnitude of the aerosol forcing. I pointed out that the contributions to temperature change from doubled CO2 (the CO2 forcing, water vapor feedback, and surface albedo feedback by themselves, together) already provide almost 3º C warming.”

Still others disagree. University of Pennsylvania climate scientist Dr. Michael E. Mann cited an October study in the journal Communications Earth & Environment which found no evidence of any acceleration in global heating. Things are getting hotter, yes, but not surging faster than expected. Both Mann and Dr. Ken Caldeira, an atmospheric scientist at the Carnegie Institution for Science's Department of Global Ecology, pointed to an analysis by University of California, Berkeley climatologist Dr. Zeke Hausfather, who found that the current temperature increases are consistent with pre-existing climate models. Hansen urged skeptics to look at his study and its supplementary material.

“A simple linear fit reveals that the warming rate has been twice as fast since 2010,” Hansen said. “Anyone is free to doubt that it will continue — the real world is the judge, and so far she is on our side.”

"Water vapor does not affect the albedo of Earth, so it did not affect our analysis of the magnitude of the aerosol forcing."

He added, “Models that use the IPCC aerosol formulation yield negligible acceleration. The complete IPCC ‘model fog’ includes results with significant acceleration, but those models are not using the IPCC aerosols!” Hansen believes the prevailing models which incorporate aerosol emissions are inadequate by “producing a fog (range) of model results that the real world is certain to fall within it, so they can never be accused of being wrong. But that approach is hardly helpful to the public, to policymakers, or for the task of understanding the physics of observed climate change.”

Caldeira warned that Hansen may be making the same mistake as scientists who pointed to a warming trend from 1998 to 2012 as proof that there could be a “hiatus” in climate change, which has been cited as evidence that concerns about climate change were overblown.

“We need to be cautious in over-interpreting short-term fluctuations in the rate of warming,” Caldeira said. Hansen replied that “the leap in temperature is too large to be noise — it has a physical explanation, which we uncover persuasively.”

He added, “If the recent climate change, even the last two centuries, were all that we had to go on, the inferred climate sensitivity would be less certain, but the paleoclimate data confirm our assessment. Our conclusions are well-founded, based on real-world data.”

We need your help to stay independent

Mann, who told Salon that “unfortunately a lot of what Jim says is simply wrong,” argued that “the truth is bad enough — the planet continues to warm at a steady rate and will do so until our carbon emissions reach zero.” His concern about Hansen is that “exaggerating what is happening — particularly when it is used as an argument for very dangerous geoengineering interventions, as Jim does — is a pure gift to polluters and petrostates, who just love this sort of distraction and happily amplify it and weaponize it on social media.”

Hansen says his study “is urgently needed so that young people will have full information at their disposal. I get the impression that the people who try to outlaw even research are like those who shut down progress in nuclear power, which should be our cheapest energy with the smallest carbon footprint.”

It’s not enough to know if climate change is happening — that much is obvious — scientists must also figure out how fast it’s occurring, so we can respond appropriately. But the solution remains the same: we need to stop burning fossil fuels and eroding the environment, especially given its role in capturing carbon.

Regardless of whether one thinks climate change is increasing at the accelerated rate believed by the overwhelming majority of scientists or the hyper-accelerated rate asserted by Hansen, all of the scientists involved in this debate — just like at least 97% of climate scientists — agree on a key point: Human activity is causing temperatures to rise at a perilous rate. As of 2024, the carbon dioxide concentration in Earth’s atmosphere was 424.6 ppm, a jump of more than 50% from levels before our species began relying on fossil fuels less than three centuries earlier.

The increase, as Mann told Salon, is “at least an order of magnitude more rapid than any natural change we know of.”

“They will drive up costs”: Tariffs on China may be felt in a wide range of industries

President Donald Trump's tariffs on imports from China have thrown red ink all over the ledgers of ultra-low-cost online retailers like Temu and Shein.

In recent years, the popularity of these Chinese online retailers has skyrocketed, with the former even securing an ad spot in last year’s Super Bowl. These apps rely on one thing for their mainstream relevancy and success: absurd sticker prices.

If you’ve ever wondered how Temu can sell smartphones for under $100 and offer hundreds of dollars worth of coupons to each user — a big part of it boils down to a little-known trade rule called “de minimis.”

De minimis allows goods and packages worth less than $800 to come into the U.S. duty-free, skipping out on fees typically collected by customs. According to the Associated Press, Trump's executive order implementing a 10% tariff on goods imported from China has effectively suspended the exemption. That means Chinese imports will be subject to a double whammy of new duties and a newly imposed tariff.

“The vast majority of these orders are valued less than $800, which means all or virtually all of them are going to get caught in that,” Youssef Squali, an analyst at Truist Financial, told the outlet.

It’s not just trinkets and garments being caught in the crossfire. U.S. automakers are also concerned that the tariffs will impact auto parts and vehicle prices. The U.S. imports up to $17.5 billion worth of transportation products from China annually, per the U.S. International Trade Commission.

It’s not clear yet what or how prices will be affected, but the auto industry is already bracing for impact.

“There’s not a specific item coming from China that’s under this tariff that says, ‘Oh no, this is the thing that’s going to mess everything up’,” S&P analyst Stephanie Brinley told CNBC. “But they will drive up costs.”

“Guided by the truth”: CBS shares transcripts, unedited Harris interview to counter Trump suit

CBS shared the transcripts and unedited footage of their interview with former Vice President Kamala Harris on Wednesday, in an attempt to counter claims from a $10 billion lawsuit filed by President Donald Trump

Trump filed the lawsuit against the network ahead of Election Day, claiming a "60 Minutes" interview with Harris was edited deceitfully. Trump said the network engaged in "partisan and unlawful acts of election and voter interference" by editing an answer Harris gave about the Biden administration's relationship with Benjamin Netanyahu. The network aired a longer version of the answer during a promo on "Face the Nation." The answer was cut down to fit within the segment when it aired on "60 Minutes."  

“CBS’s distortion of the '60 Minutes' interview damaged President Trump’s fundraising and support values by several billions of dollars, particularly in Texas,” the lawsuit alleged.

In their post sharing transcripts of all three portions of the interview as well as the unedited video footage from the different shoots, CBS explained their editing process. 

"In reporting the news, journalists regularly edit interviews – for time, space or clarity. In making these edits, '60 Minutes' is always guided by the truth and what we believe will be most informative to the viewing public – all while working within the constraints of broadcast television," they wrote.

The network added that their transcripts and video  "show – consistent with 60 Minutes' repeated assurances to the public – that the 60 Minutes broadcast was not doctored or deceitful."   

The release of the transcripts and video comes just days after rumors circulated that CBS' parent company might settle with President Trump. Word of a settlement filtered out from the C-suite as Paramount brass worried that the Trump admin might squash an attempted merger with Skydance. 

ABC News followed similar math late last year, choosing not to fight a defamation suit brought after anchor George Stephanopoulos said Trump had been found "liable for rape." 

January 2025 was the hottest January in recorded history

January 2025 was the hottest January in recorded human history, with global temperatures entering record territory according to the Copernicus/ECMWF ERA5 dataset. According to climate scientist Zeke Hausfather’s newsletter The Climate Brink, January 2025 was warmer than every preceding January chronicled by scientists, surpassing the prior record set in January 2024 “by a sizable margin.”

“This means that January 2025 stands out as anomalous even by the standards of the last two years,” Hausfather explains. Writing for Discover Magazine, Tom Yulsman points out that scientists expected this January to be cooler than preceding Januaries because of the ocean current cycles like El Niño and La Niña. Yet those predictions did not come to pass.

“We don't have El Niño to kick around anymore,” Yulsman said. “It actually dissipated months ago. Adding to the puzzle is the fact that we're in the midst of a La Niña, which typically cools things down.”

The year 2024 was the warmest year in modern history, with average global temperatures exceeding 1.5º C above pre-industrial levels for the first time ever. The Atlantic hurricane season was unusually extreme, droughts and wildfires imposed widespread suffering and — despite all of this — humans still dumped a record-breaking 37.4 billion tons of carbon dioxide into the atmosphere through fossil fuel use. The total carbon dioxide concentration in the atmosphere has increased from 280 ppm before the Industrial Revolution to 420 ppm as of 2023, according to the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA).

“This human release of heat-trapping gasses is the primary cause of the increases in extreme weather, flood, drought, heatwaves and generally ‘weird weather’ that we are all experiencing,” Dr. Twila Moon, the deputy lead scientist and science communication liaison at the NSIDC (National Snow and Ice Data Center), told Salon in December. “It is well known that reducing these emissions is key to minimizing risk and damage into the future. And how to achieve these reductions is well mapped out, with the technology to do it. The pressure is now focused on social, cultural, business and political will.”

Trump signs executive order barring transgender athletes in women’s sports

President Donald Trump continued his executive attacks on transgender people on Wednesday, signing an order that barred trans athletes from competing in women's sports. 

“The radical left has waged an all-out campaign to erase the very concept of biological sex and replace it with a militant transgender ideology,” Trump said ahead of signing the order. “With this executive order, the war on women’s sports is over.”

The executive action, dubbed "Keeping Men Out of Women's Sports," ordered the Department of Education and Department of Justice to take action against any school that allows trans women to compete in women's sports. The order threatened the federal funding of any school found to be out of compliance. 

Trump's order said that allowing trans athletes to compete "deprive[s] women and girls of fair athletic opportunities" and "results in the endangerment, humiliation, and silencing of women and girls."

While speaking on the order, Trump falsely accused Olympic gold medalist Imane Khelif of being a man. The boxer was the subject of harassment during last year's Summer Olympics after she was falsely accused of being male.

It should be noted that a recent review of research on transgender athletes and their supposed advantages over their cisgender counterparts found that "sex differences" between athletes who have gone through puberty "are reduced, if not erased, over time by gender-affirming hormone therapy." 

The authors of the study, published in late 2023,  added that the underlying assumption of many attacks on trans athletes, that "men, who cannot succeed in sports among other cis men, would choose to misidentify as trans women to gain an advantage" is a phantom.

"There are no legitimate cases of this occurring," they wrote.

The Trump administration has been fixated on the specter of so-called "gender ideology" since taking office. Other Trump executive orders have stripped Title IX protections from transgender students, barred the discussion of transgender identity from K-12 schools, ordered a stop to federal funding of gender-affirming care for minors and ended federal recognition of any sexes beyond male and female.

Target hit with shareholder lawsuit over DEI policies

Shareholders have filed a lawsuit against Target alleging that the retail giant intentionally misled investors about the risks its diversity, equity and inclusion (DEI) policies posed to its stock prices.

In a class action lawsuit filed in Florida on Friday, the City of Riviera Beach Police Pension Fund claimed Target’s stock was "artificially inflated" because the retail chain failed to relay the scope of consumer backlash to its initiatives promoting diversity and LGBTQ pride.  

In May 2023, Target launched a Pride Month campaign with various home goods and clothing items celebrating LGBTQ+ people. Following the spread of misinformation about the promotion by right-wing influencers, the company removed some of the items from its stores. The post-Pride boycott impacted Target’s stock prices immediately, and they continued to be shaky all through 2024.

Target’s stock performed poorly over the last year when compared to similar companies like Walmart. The plaintiffs say Target issued “false and misleading” statements about how its social initiatives would impact its stock prices. Shareholders claim in the suit that they paid inflated prices for Target stock, fueling the company’s “misuse of investor funds to serve political and social goals.”  The lawsuit covers all shareholders who bought Target stock between August 26, 2022 and November 19, 2024.

Earlier this month, Target announced that it would be “concluding its three-year diversity, equity and inclusion goals.” The decision faced widespread backlash from progressives and was described as “cowardly” and “bowing to the Trump administration” by civil rights attorney Nekima Levy Armstrong.

Armstrong’s sentiment was echoed by many supporters, who urged potential Target customers to turn their patronage to companies that have expressed support for diversity and inclusion, such as Costco.

Winter-ready squash soup: Warm up with fast flavor, no limits

While some may often associate squash soup with autumn, why restrict yourself? Squash-based soups are just as great throughout winter, too, and that encompasses much more than just buttenrut, like kabocha or acorn.

National Soup Day is this week, so as Oprah once said to Lindsay Lohan, "Let's celebrate that."

Truthfully? I'll admit that squash soup isn't necessarily my favorite (as I've mentioned earlier), but I get why people love it. Its rich, smooth texture and flavor offers a familiarity that feels especially comforting on a blustery night. You can also customize gleefully here: go in a carnivorous direction with some crispy bacon atop the soup, go in a vegan direction instead, garnish with anything you want — there's no limits.

I make this often for my mom, who likes the bite that the roasted squash gives, but I have noticed that roasting the squash, onions and garlic can sometimes add a slightly bitter note. So if you're looking to avoid that (and save a little time, too!), you can totally omit the roasting aspect and simply cook everything in the cooking liquid of your choosing for a lighter version with a cleaner flavor profile.

I keep this soup quite minimal, but if it's to your liking, throw in some carrots or parsnips or whatever you have on hand to round out the flavors all the more. For a smooth, silky soup, opt for a high-powdered or immersion blender. If you'd rather a chunkier texture, though, then go for it.

As I always say, it's your kitchen.


Want more great food writing and recipes? Subscribe to Salon Food's newsletter, The Bite.


So, top with whatever feels right to you: a touch of miso, a dizzle of finishing oil or even a popcorn garnish. Fan of heat? Try some chili crisp or a subtler note with a warming spice, like cumin or garam masala. To add some body, opt for crème fraîche or plain yogurt or go lighter with just a smattering of freshly chopped chives. Go meaty with some crisped up bacon garnish or conversely garnish with some toasted and salted (or spiced?) nuts for a bit of texture and bite.

Throw in an apple or pear for a touch of sweetness (and fiber!) or even finish with a little sprinkling of cheese — you can also go chicken stock and heavy cream for body or stick with something like vegetable broth (or even well-seasoned water) with a touch of coconut milk or cream to balance it all out. 

And that's that! This soup is endlessly adaptable and is a perfect meal to warm you up this winter.

We need your help to stay independent

Squash soup
Yields
04 servings
Prep Time
10 minutes
Cook Time
45 minutes

Ingredients

1 large onion, peeled and diced

2 to 3 medium-sized butternut or other squash, carefully cut in this manner — you can also opt for a package of pre-cut cubes

4 cloves garlic, peeled (don't mince)

1 apple or pear, cored and roughly chopped, optional

Oil of your choosing

Kosher salt

Freshly ground black pepper

Herbs, optional (I'd stick with sage, rosemary or chives for this dish)

Stock, broth, water or cooking liquid of your choosing (enough to cover the vegetables)

1 to 2 tablespoons heavy cream, coconut milk or coconut cream

Warming spices, optional

Garnishes, optional (popcorn, toasted squash or pumpkin seeds, crème fraîche, drizzle of oil, chile crisp, nuts, chives, whatever)

 

Directions

  1. Preheat oven to 450 degrees.
  2. On a large sheet tray, toss onion and squash, plus the apple or pear, if using. Add a drizzle of oil and toss again. You can also toss some rosemary sprigs or sage leaves in at this point, too. Season well.
  3. Cook until tender and softening, about 20 minutes, but look out for any burnt ends.
  4. Add garlic in the last minute or two of cooking the vegetables. 
  5. Remove any herb stems. Add to large stock pot or Dutch oven, being careful not to transfer too much oil or any burnt pieces. Cover vegetables with cooking liquid of your choosing (no dairy or coconut product just yet), plus any warming spices you might be opting to use.
  6. Season again, stir well and turn heat to medium-high. Bring to a boil, reduce to simmer and let soup cook over low heat, about 15 minutes more. Check to make sure the squash is fork-tender; if so, you're ready to blend.
  7. Puree soup at this point: In a Vita Mix (carefully) or with an immersion blender or just leave it chunky and rustic.
  8. Serve in warmed bowls garnished with your preferred toppings.