Spring Sale: Get 1 Year, Save 58%

GOP candidate faces backlash after sharing Christmas ornaments of Democrats in nooses

A Republican congressional candidate posted an image of a Christmas tree decorated with ornaments of Democrats in nooses and later expressed regret after being hit with backlash. 

Former West Virginia state lawmaker Derrick Evans shared and quickly deleted the image, which showed miniature versions of politicians like President Joe Biden, Vice President Kamala Harris, former President Barack Obama and Rep. Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif., hanging from nooses, according to The Messenger. A Donald Trump ornament beside the display appears to be raising his hand in approval of the hangings.

After his post to X, formerly Twitter, was screencapped and embroiled in backlash, Evans claimed the pictured tree wasn't his and conceded that the image of the president hanging by a noose wasn't a good way to celebrate the holiday.

"Not my tree. Not my ornaments. Not in good taste. NOT a call for violence," Evans tweeted. "I shouldn't have used a day to celebrate the birth of Jesus for anything political (good taste or poor taste). Let's go celebrate this time with our families in love and peace."

"I’ve been very clear that I do NOT support violence," he added in a separate post before making a "Home Alone" reference. 

Evans, who resigned in January 2021 from the West Virginia House of Delegates after being federally charged over his participation in the Jan. 6, Capitol riot, is running for Congress in 2024.

We need your help to stay independent

He is a vocal supporter of Trump and the former president's baseless claims about the 2020 presidential contest being fraudulent and stolen. The former West Virginia legislator pleaded guilty to one felony count of civil disorder in March 2022 and later served a 3-month sentence in federal prison for his role in the riot, during which he livestreamed his felonious activities on Facebook, according to NBC News

“We’re taking this country back whether you like it or not! … Shame on all of you! … You listen to your liberal mayor instead of the Constitution … Patriots ain’t being quiet anymore. Patriots ain’t gonna stand down to tyranny anymore! Patriots ain’t gonna stand down for stolen elections anymore!” prosecutors said Evans yelled.

“I bet Trump would pardon anybody who gets arrested for goin’ in there," he said on the livestream.

Evans said he was only in the Capitol for approximately 10 minutes.


Want a daily wrap-up of all the news and commentary Salon has to offer? Subscribe to our morning newsletter, Crash Course.


On the second anniversary of the Capitol attack, the West Virginian announced he was running for Congress.

"I chose today to announce my bid for the House of Representatives because it is an important anniversary in US history," he wrote at the time. "While my name will indelibly be part of it, we should also use as a chance to remind ourselves about why democracy is so important and how easily it can be threatened."

In another Christmas Day post this year, Evans exclaimed that "Trump Won" after asking his followers to keep Jan. 6 prisoners in their thoughts during the holidays. 

"Please remember my fellow January 6th Patriots today. I’m happy to be out of prison and home with my family, but others are not as fortunate," he tweeted. "Prison is hard in general, but holidays are much harder. So many families being hurt by this illegitimate Biden regime."

Kanye West issues Hebrew-written apology to Jewish community following antisemitic outbursts

Kanye West, known by his stage name Ye, has formally issued a Hebrew-written apology to the Jewish community following a series of recent antisemitic outbursts.

The rapper made several antisemitic comments last year, which consequently prompted many major brands — like Adidas and Gap — to cut ties with both Ye and his fashion brand Yeezy. Ye previously accused music mogul Sean “Diddy” Combs of being controlled by Jews after Combs condemned Ye for launching his “White Lives Matter” shirts during Paris Fashion Week. Ye also once tweeted that he would be going “death con 3 on Jewish people.” Twitter removed the post the following morning and locked Ye’s account over hateful conduct.

Ye resumed his antisemitic streak earlier this month, saying, “Jesus Christ, Hitler, Ye,” during a Las Vegas event for his upcoming album “Vultures.”

In his apology, made Tuesday on Instagram, Ye said he did not intend “to hurt or demean” anyone with his prior rants.

“I sincerely apologize to the Jewish community for any unintended outburst caused by my words or actions. It was not my intention to offend or disrespect and I deeply regret any pain I may have caused,” he wrote, adding he was committed “to learning from this experience to ensure greater sensitivity and understanding.”

“Your forgiveness is important to me, and I am committed to making amends and promoting unity,” Ye concluded. 

The apology garnered more than 750,000 likes in five hours, per USA Today. “Vultures,” Ye's new album in collaboration with Ty Dolla $ign, was slated to drop earlier this month. Its release has been delayed until Jan. 12, according to Billboard.

In the new year, is it actually possible to cut out “hidden sugar”?

Earlier this year, I aimed to cut down on sugar. This didn’t seem too big a feat since I'm not a dessert person. Sure, I like the occasional good scoop of ice cream or frozen yogurt, but  I've never been a big cake, pie, cookie or brownie-type guy. I also have a sheer distaste for "sweet" savory food. I want my savory food to be deeply rich and, well … savory, with no errant sweet undertones whatsoever.

Unfortunately, if you mix some form of dairy with some sort of sweetener or flavoring and a few shots of espresso, you've got me. Between coffee drinks and Mountain Dew, in all its effervescent, neon green glory, I love a sweet drink, but even those indulgences are relatively easy to curb. 

Where things get trickier, however, isn’t in cutting out the sodas, candies, cookies and chocolates — but when there’s a glut of sugar in places you might not expect it, like your salad dressing or your protein shake. These have come to be known as “added sugars” or as the slightly more ominous “hidden sugars,” and everyone from Harvard Health to Johns Hopkins have issued warnings about just how pervasive they are. But in our current food system, where Americans are eating more and more ultra-processed foods, is it possible to actually avoid them?

"They're only 'hidden' if you don't know what to look for,” said Jessica Sylvester, a clinical, registered dietitian, nutrition practice owner, Credentialed Nutrition Support Clinician and National Media Spokesperson for The Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics. 

Added sugars are simply defined as any sugar added over and above any naturally occurring or present sugars, like those found in fruit. Typically added sugar is meant to “enhance flavor, texture, shelf life or other properties,” according to Nichole Dandrea-Russert, a dietitian and author of and "The Vegan Athlete's Nutrition Handbook.” 

"They're only 'hidden' if you don't know what to look for." 

Dandrea-Russert cautions that some products are marketed as “healthy,” but they are truly anything but — they’re just claiming to be so because they aren’t made with traditional sugar. Certified Diabetes Care and Education Specialist Deborah Malkoff-Cohen actually notes that there are 62 different names for sugar, from agave and malt syrup to dextrose and barley malt. Also, keep an eye out for sugars that end in “-ose,” like fructose or dextrose, as well as any syrups, cane juice or fruit juice concentrate (“because,” as Dandrea-Russert said, “it’s condensed and not in the form of a whole fruit, it’s considered added sugar”). 

According to the American Heart Association, men should consume no more than 36 grams of sugar per day and women should limit their consumption to 25 grams — but in a world of added and hidden sugars, that threshold can be reached relatively quickly. You may be going to town and consuming a certain product on a daily basis that you erroneously think is "healthy" and it's actually upping your sugar consumption exponentially. 

We need your help to stay independent

For instance, Malkoff-Cohen uses a specific example of Greek yogurt: a plain carton may contain three total sugars with no added sugars, while a flavored yogurt carton contains 11 total sugars, with 7 grams of added sugars. Clearly there’s a drastic difference, and the key to understanding that is right there on the pesky nutrition label. 

It can be tempting to avoid nutrition labels, but Malkhoff-Cohen recommends consumers become "label detectives" in order to avoid these covertly sweet items or products, especially if you are looking to prioritize your health in the New Year. 

In addition to yogurt, Dandrea-Russert points to salad dressings as a big culprit when it comes to hidden sugars, while Malkhoff-Cohen lists other common offenders: pasta sauce, ketchup, barbecue sauce, cereal, coleslaw and dried fruit. Drinks, including soft drinks and alcoholic beverages, are often full of added sugars. Dandrea-Russert also specifically mentions chocolate milk, which can "have up to 12 grams of extra sugar, making it a whopping 24 grams of sugar for just one cup of chocolate milk." 

So, where do you start if you want to begin cutting added and hidden sugars from your diet? Malkoff-Cohen offers some straightforward suggestions. The first is to prioritize foods that come without a package — like fresh fruits and vegetables — because they won’t contain added sugars meant to prolong shelf life. She also advises to "eat the real thing" when it comes to sweeteners, such as honey and maple syrup, but in smaller portions. She also states that in many instances, artificial sweeteners may actually be even more concerning than "real sugar"; from aspartame to acesulfame potassium and sucralose, all of these ostensibly "better for you" alternatives may actually cause higher coronary artery disease risk. 

Concerned about how your body (and taste buds) will react to the changes? Well, did you know that our taste buds actually change on a weekly basis? Sylvester says that "how we perceive flavors is affected by the foods we are accustomed to eating and any changes to our palate," referencing that if you were to legitimately cut out all sugars and artificial sweeteners, you'd be bowled over by how naturally sweet many foods actually are all on their own. 

She challenges consumers to test it out on their own — cut out all sugars and artificial sweeteners for two weeks and perceive your tastes, behavior and physiological changes — you may be struck by how jarringly saccharine certain" diet" foods, drinks and candies may seem (oftentimes due to the fact that most artificial sweeteners actually are typically much more “potent in sweetness,” as Sylvester put it, than sugar.)

Dandrea-Russert concurs that eliminating any and all added sugars from your diet is entirely doable  and that gradually “you can minimize and eventually eliminate added sugar from your diet." Utilize whole foods, fruits, date paste, making your own salad dressings and soon enough, your "taste buds will slowly acclimate to less sweetness.” 

While it can be pesky to suss out these nefarious sugars, it's certainly both tenable and possible. It just might require a touch more vigilance and research when deciding on what to get for dinner or what to have for a snack.

FBI investigating threats to Colorado judges as Trump pours “gasoline on the fire”

The FBI and law enforcement are investigating reported violent threats made against the Colorado Supreme Court justices who ruled in favor of removing former President Donald Trump from the 2024 primary ballot for violating the 14th Amendment. “The FBI is aware of the situation and working with local law enforcement,” FBI Public Affairs Officer Vikki Migoya said in a statement to CNN on Monday. “We will vigorously pursue investigations of any threat or use of violence committed by someone who uses extremist views to justify their actions regardless of motivation.”

Last week, the Colorado Supreme Court ruled that Trump violated Section 3 of the 14th Amendment, which prohibits individuals who have "engaged" in an insurrection from pursuing public office, per The Messenger. The names of the four concurring Democratic justices have appeared in a number of "incendiary" posts online, a nonpartisan research organization discovered and shared with CNN in a report. “There remains a risk of lone actor or small group violence or other illegal activities in response to the ruling" though there haven't been specific threats to the justices, the analysis found according to CNN. One post cited in the analysis, according to CNN, reads, "All f— robed rats must f— hang," in a supposed reference to the justices. Master Trooper Gary Cutler, a Colorado State Patrol spokesman, told CNN that any threats against judges would be handled by local law enforcement. 

"You have Donald Trump, a former President of the United States, making vivid vitriolic personal attacks on prosecutors, on judges, calling them names, that adds gasoline to the fire into these chatrooms and people feel they are being called on," CNN law enforcement analyst John Miller said Monday. "The problem is, for authorities, is sorting out the noise from who the real player is going to be, who might show up and do something. You look at the Nancy Pelosi case where an individual showed up at her home in San Francisco, home invasion, assaulted her husband. Someone who was not on the radar screen and comes out of the woodwork. So these are difficult cases."

Legal expert says Jack Smith can get “devastating” Trump evidence: Juries “eat it up”

A recently discovered recording that reportedly includes audio of former President Donald Trump and RNC Chair Ronna McDaniel conspiring with Michigan officials to subvert the 2020 presidential election will be the focus of special counsel Jack Smith’s prosecutorial evidence, according to MSNBC legal analyst Danny Cevallos. "There was a lot of talk this last week about, well, could this expose him to liability in a Michigan court? Maybe. But far more interesting to me, having defended federal criminal cases, I can tell you federal court is not a fun place to be for a criminal defense attorney because the government is very good at what they do," the attorney said. 

"If I'm the government I'm thinking they're looking at this Michigan evidence as what we call 404-B, but all it is is prior bad act evidence that sometimes under certain circumstances can come into a prosecution," Cevallos continued. "So if I'm Jack Smith, maybe you look at that Michigan evidence or any evidence from any other state and bring that in as evidence in your D.C. court case and say, 'Look, this is what he was doing elsewhere, this was not a mistake. This is his modus operandi. This all should come in,' and it can be devastating evidence," he added. "I can tell you personally that bad act evidence that somebody did something else bad somewhere else is devastating and juries — they eat it up.”

“MAY THEY ROT IN HELL”: Trump blasted for hitting “new low” in Christmas Truth Social meltdown

Former President Donald Trump spent much of the holiday weekend firing off posts from his Truth Social platform, haranguing President Joe Biden and special counsel Jack Smith, and bemoaning a perceived fall from grace of “our once great U.S.A.”

Trump on Christmas Eve shared a series of messages targeting the committee investigating the Jan 6 Capitol insurrection and the “DERANGED” Smith. 

“JOE BIDEN’S MISFITS & THUGS, LIKE DERANGED JACK SMITH, ARE COMING AFTER ME,” Trump wrote. “AT LEVELS OF PERSECUTION NEVER SEEN BEFORE IN OUR COUNTRY???”

“WHY DID THE UNSELECT JANUARY 6th COMMITTEE OF POLITICAL HACKS & THUGS ILLEGALLY DELETE & DESTROY ALL OF THE EVIDENCE THEY USED TO WRITE THEIR FAKE REPORT,” the ex-president fumed on Sunday evening. “WHY DO THEY NOT SHOW THAT I USED THE WORDS ‘PEACEFULLY & PATRIOTICALLY’ IN MY SPEECH? THEY ACTUALLY PRETENDED THAT THESE WORDS WERE NEVER UTTERED. CROOKED POLITICS!!!”

“THEY SPIED ON MY CAMPAIGN,” Trump continued, “LIED TO CONGRESS, CHEATED ON FISA, RIGGED A PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION, ALLOWED MILLIONS OF PEOPLE, MANY FROM PRISONS & MENTAL INSTITUTIONS, TO INVADE OUR COUNTRY, SCREWED UP IN AFGHANISTAN, & JOE BIDEN’S MISFITS & THUGS, LIKE DERANGED JACK SMITH, ARE COMING AFTER ME, AT LEVELS OF PERSECUTION NEVER SEEN BEFORE IN OUR COUNTRY??? IT’S CALLED ELECTION INTERFERENCE. MERRY CHRISTMAS!”

Trump’s Christmas Eve invective followed a major blow to the special counsel’s team, in which the Supreme Court rejected a request to hasten arguments on whether Trump had presidential immunity from federal prosecution for crimes he is accused of commuting while in the White House in election subversion case. 

On Monday, the ex-president continued his tirade. 

“Merry Christmas to all, including Crooked Joe Biden’s ONLY HOPE, Deranged Jack Smith, the out of control Lunatic who just hired outside attorneys, fresh from the SWAMP (unprecedented!), to help him with his poorly executed WITCH HUNT against ‘TRUMP’ and ‘MAGA,’” he wrote.

We need your help to stay independent

“Included also are World Leaders,” Trump added, “both good and bad, but none of which are as evil and ‘sick’ as the THUGS we have inside our Country who, with their Open Borders, INFLATION, Afghanistan Surrender, Green New Scam, High Taxes, No Energy Independence, Woke Military, Russia/Ukraine, Israel/Iran, All Electric Car Lunacy, and so much more, are looking to destroy our once great USA. MAY THEY ROT IN HELL. AGAIN, MERRY CHRISTMAS!”

As noted by the Daily Beast, Trump's Christmas post included a reference to Smith's addition of attorney Michael Dreeben — a former member of special counsel Bob Mueller's team who has argued before SCOTUS more than one hundred times — to his legal team.

MSNBC’s “Morning Joe” panel on Tuesday sharply criticized Trump’s "anger" and "bad faith attacks" to close out the year.


Want a daily wrap-up of all the news and commentary Salon has to offer? Subscribe to our morning newsletter, Crash Course.


"I think it shows that these indictments and the civil case, despite his pretense otherwise, has gotten to him, because he's reacting and responding in a way of no one projecting self-confidence or like this is nothing,"  panelist Al Sharpton said.

"I also think it shows an inner kind of anger and displacement that he has, because who spends the holiday with this kind of venom, particularly when he is a guy that claims to be this self-confident, self-made guy with this kind of darkness, unless you are just that kind of dark person," he continued.

“We've certainly gotten used to Trump's unorthodox holiday messages, 'the haters,' but this one hit a new low, even for him," host Jonathan Lemire agreed. 

“This is like the 8th time”: Two Republicans say they got “swatted” on Christmas

Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene, R-Ga., said Monday that she was targeted in an attempted "swatting," with someone allegedly reporting that a fake crime occurred at her home in an effort to provoke a massive police presence, The Daily Beast reports. “This is like the 8th time,” Greene tweeted. “On Christmas with my family here.” Despite the alleged incident, Greene voiced her appreciation for her local law enforcement and added, “my family and I are in joyous spirits celebrating the birth of our savior Jesus Christ!"

Greene has claimed to have been "swatted" up to six times in recent months, including twice across two days in August of last year. The first of those August calls was confirmed by Rome City Police Department, who said at the time that a false report had been made alleging someone had “been shot five times in a bathtub” at Greene's address.

A second Republican lawmaker also reported he had been "swatted" on Monday, just hours after Greene was. "Our home was swatted this afternoon," Rep. Brandon Williams, R-N.Y., announced in a post to X, formerly Twitter. "Thanks to the Deputies and Troopers who contacted me before arriving. They left with homemade cookies and spiced nuts! Merry Christmas everyone!” In a follow-up tweet, Williams revealed that five police cars had arrived at his home after the fake report and that Capitol and local police were investigating the incident. “The deputies & troopers were polite, professional, & prompt. God bless them,” Williams added.

5 moments of hope for reproductive rights in 2023

In June 2022, the U.S. Supreme Court overturned the landmark ruling Roe v. Wade, ending the federal enshrinement of abortion rights in America. While Roe alone was never enough to protect access to abortion in America — as access has always hinged on a variety of factors including the state an American resided in and their ability to access care — the Supreme Court’s precedent established in 1973 was a pivotal moment in reproductive rights progress.

In an ideal world, the 1973 ruling would have ushered in a new era where abortion was accessible to all decades later with very few barriers. Instead, it triggered a backlash that ultimately resulted in its overturn in 2022. 

Since then, it’s certainly been a tough year in reproductive rights. 2023 marked the first full one year since the overturn, where many states went above and beyond to further clamp down on access to abortion care. As of December 2023, fourteen states enforced total bans while seven states restricted access under limits that would have been considered unconstitutional under Roe v. Wade. Guttmacher Institute estimated that 80 abortion restrictions were enacted in 2023, which has further restricted access to abortion care for millions of people. 

Despite all the darkness in reproductive progress, you might be surprised to hear there were some moments of hope. As Guttmacher Institute also noted, in 2023, 22 states and the District of Columbia had enacted 129 measures to protect access to abortion, which was the highest number of protections ever enacted in a single year. As anti-abortion activists further restrict access, abortion rights advocates are fighting back harder than ever. Yes, 2023 was certainly not a year to celebrate reproductive rights progress in America, but there were moments of hope that make us believe it can get better. 

01

Planned Parenthood resumed abortion care in Wisconsin 

After 15 months of being stuck in a legal limbo, Planned Parenthood resumed offering abortion care in Wisconsin in September 2023 in two of its clinics. In December, it resumed abortion care in a third clinic. Abortions were on hold because the overturn of Roe v. Wade triggered an archaic 1849 Wisconsin law that could have been interpreted as criminalizing abortion. Planned Parenthood described the decision to halt abortion care as “agonizing,” but felt it was necessary to protect abortion care providers.

 

Fortunately, a decision made by the Dane County Circuit Court in July 2023 clarified that the 1849 law was not enforceable for voluntary abortions, instead it was about banning feticide. Upon resume services at the first two clinics, Planned Parenthood told NPR slots were filled within 24 hours emphasizing that the need was certainly there.

02

Ohio enshrined abortion rights 

The November 2023 election was a win for abortion rights in many states, including the state of Ohio. A ballot measure seeking to enshrine abortion protections into Ohio’s state Constitution passed by a majority vote. The issue enshrined in the state’s constitution that every person in Ohio has the right “to one’s own reproductive medical treatment, including but not limited to abortion,” and barred the state from “burdening, penalizing or prohibiting” those rights.

 

The winning ballot measure was a huge win for Ohio as it was a state with an abortion-ban trigger law. After Roe was overturned, SB23 —  an extreme law that criminalized abortion care after about six weeks of pregnancy — went into effect for about a three month period.

 

“This victory ensures not only that Ohioans have the legal right to this essential care without question, but that abortion patients across the Midwest living in states where abortion access is limited or banned can also more easily get the care they need,” Brittany Fonteno, President & CEO of the National Abortion Federation, said about the win at the time.


Want more health and science stories in your inbox? Subscribe to Salon's weekly newsletter Lab Notes.


03

Three more states protected legal right to abortion in big ways

Minnesota, New Mexico and Oregon also made moves to protect the legal right to abortion in their state constitutions or state statutes. In Minnesota, Gov. Tim Walz protected the right to abortion and other reproductive health care by enshrining it into Minnesota statutes in January 2023.

 

In New Mexico, Gov. Michelle Lujan Grisham signed HB7, the Reproductive and Gender-Affirming Health Care Freedom Act, into law to prohibit any public body from imposing ordinances, policies, laws or regulations that prevent patients from receiving gender-affirming or reproductive care. And in Oregon, legislators passed House Bill 2002, which also focused on further protecting gender-affirming and reproductive care.

04 
Rhode Island’s ban on publicly-funded abortions was repealed

In 2023, lawmakers in Rhode Island approved and passed the Equality in Abortion Coverage Act (EACA) which eliminated a ban on public funding for abortion. The move was described by Planned Parenthood as a “historic victory for reproductive freedom,” as it gave an estimated 90,000 reproductive-aged Rhode Islanders access to publicly-funded abortion coverage via Medicaid or a state employee insurance plan. Rhode Island joined a list of 16 other states, including Connecticut and Massachusetts, added abortion coverage to their state Medicaid plans.

 

“The Equality in Abortion Care Act will help reduce financial barriers to accessing abortion in the state,” said Alexis McGill Johnson, president of Planned Parenthood Action Fund in a media statement. “This change is especially meaningful for Black and Latino Rhode Islanders, who are disproportionately affected by bans on abortion coverage.”

05

Opill, the first over-the-counter birth control pill, approved 

In July 2023, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved an over-the-counter birth control pill, marking the first time an oral contraceptive has ever been available without a prescription in the United States to prevent pregnancy. Known as Opill (norgestrel), the announcement was a historic moment for female health.

 

Opill was first FDA-approved in 1973 as a progestin-only medication, which refers to the class of drugs it falls under. Opill works by thinning the lining of the uterus, which can prevent sperm from reaching an egg by thickening mucus in the cervix. Experts believe over-the-counter availability will improve accessibility to birth control.

 

A study published in The Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law in 2021 found that low-income people and people of color are more likely to live in contraception deserts. While this is not a replacement for access to abortion, experts said it will be one piece to the puzzle that enables people to make their choices about their reproductive health. At the time of the announcement, the manufacturer said Opill will be on store shelves in early 2024.

Trump’s last challenge of 2023: Will Maine become the second state to boot him off the ballot?

Augusta, Maine – Maine Secretary of State Secretary of State Shenna Bellows intends to announce her decision between the Christmas and New Year’s holidays as to whether former President Donald Trump is eligible for or disqualified from placement on Maine’s presidential primary ballot next year.

Bellows could become the nation’s first state election official to disqualify a candidate for federal office.

While Trump getting booted off the ballot in Colorado, a reliable blue state, would probably have no impact on the outcome of a presidential election, a Trump disqualification in purple Maine would more likely affect the Electoral College tally, were Trump the Republican nominee.

Colorado has evolved from being a swing state to voting Democratic in every presidential election since 2008 – for Barack Obama twice, for Hillary Clinton, and for Joe Biden – while its governor, both U.S. Senators and five of its eight U.S. House members are Democrats. Colorado’s 10 electoral votes seem to be a safe bet for a Democratic nominee.

Maine, on the other hand, splits its four electoral votes proportionally by congressional district, rather than winner-take-all. (Nebraska is the only other state to do this.) Though Trump lost statewide in 2016 and 2020, he captured one Maine electoral vote in both elections for carrying the more conservative 2nd Congressional District covering northern Maine, and he would be favored to do so again in 2024, if he were on the ballot.  (Joe Biden and Hillary Clinton each won three electoral votes in Maine, one for carrying the 1st Congressional District and two for winning statewide.)

Maine’s 2024 presidential primary is scheduled for March 5, the most crowded date on the election calendar, known as Super Tuesday, because 15 other states also plan to hold primaries and caucuses that day, including Colorado.

Secretary Bellows intended to announce her decision on December 22, one week after holding a public hearing on Trump’s ballot access, but she delayed it after the landmark Colorado decision on December 19 and invited both sides to submit supplemental briefs.

THE POWER TO DECIDE

In Maine, Colorado, and all states where challenges to Trump’s ballot access have been brought or are pending, the basis for disqualification is Section 3 of the 14th Amendment of the U.S. Constitution, adopted after the Civil War, in 1868, which bars any previous state or federal office holder, who’d sworn an oath to the U.S. Constitution but “engaged in insurrection” against it, from holding office again.

The threshold question before Secretary Bellows is whether a state official has the legal authority to disqualify a candidate for federal office or whether only Congress or a court can?

The Maine challengers to Trump’s ballot access are five voters, including a bipartisan pair of former state legislators who were present for the hearing, Ethan Strimling, a Democrat who also served as Portland’s Mayor from 2015 to 2019, and Tom Saviello, a Republican from rural Wilton.

Strimling and Saviello, like challengers in other states, assert the defining moment barring Trump was the January 6, 2021, Capitol riot he incited as part of his plot to retain power by overturning the results of 2020 presidential election he lost to Joe Biden.

The riot, following months of Trump lies about a stolen election and dozens of lost lawsuits alleging election fraud, disrupted and delayed Congress’ certification of the Electoral College tally that officially deemed Biden the winner.   

“Look, Trump’s a traitor, and we shouldn’t allow traitors to run for President,” Strimling said in an interview. “We’re bringing this challenge forward, because I want to be on the side of history that said, ‘We did everything we could to make sure a wanna-be dictator doesn’t become President of the United States.’”

“Our country was in jeopardy at that point,” Saviello said in an interview, about January 6. “When they’re running around the hallways looking for [Vice President Mike] Pence to hang him, and [House Speaker Nancy] Pelosi.”

Saviello, who voted twice for Trump, continued, “I’m sorry, he’s not qualified to be President. He’s broken the Constitution and threatened the country I love.”

We need your help to stay independent

Leading Trump’s defense team in Maine is Scott Gessler, a lawyer and former Secretary of State in Colorado, where he led the Trump team opposing the Republican-led ballot challenge.

“We strongly contest the arguments that President Trump ever engaged in insurrection,” Gessler told Bellows during the public hearing.

During the all-day hearing, which lasted eight hours inside the largest committee room in the Maine State House, Bellows sat with two aides at the center dais, while the adversaries sat on opposite sides of a wooden horseshoe-shaped table.

Gessler disagreed that Trump’s speeches and tweets (shown during the hearing) on and before January 6 were an incitement to violence, in contrast to the House of Representatives’ vote to impeach Trump in January 2021 or the December 2022 report by the House Select Committee to Investigate the January 6th Attack On The United States Capitol.

One fact both parties agreed on in the Maine hearing: There is no prior instance in U.S. history of a state election official disqualifying a candidate for federal office under Section 3 of the 14th Amendment.

Until the Colorado Supreme Court decision to dump Trump, no state judge or judges had ever acted to remove a federal candidate from its ballot either.

“For good reason,” Gessler said at the Maine hearing. “States do not have jurisdiction.”

Gessler and co-counsel Gary Lawkowski argued to Bellows that only Congress is authorized to resolve such disputes.

“You could have 50 different standards. You could have 50 different outcomes. You could have cases where a presidential candidate is qualified in some states, not others, and that would be very bad for our democracy,” Lawkowski said. “If we were to determine that each Secretary of State were to evaluate contested qualifications on their own, you run the risk of chaos.”

Trump’s attorneys contended state election officials may consider only the three qualifications for president listed in Article 2 of the Constitution – being a 35-year-old natural-born citizen who has lived in the U.S. for at least 14 years.

Besides Trump, five other Republican presidential candidates, including Florida Governor Ron DeSantis and former South Carolina Governor Nikki Haley, qualified for the Maine primary ballot after submitting petitions by the Dec. 1 deadline with the required 2,000 signatures from registered Maine Republican voters. (Former New Jersey Governor Chris Christie fell short).

Mike Soboleski, a Republican State Representative running for the U.S. House in the 2nd Congressional District, told the hearing, “To have struck Mr. Trump’s access to our presidential ballot is to blatantly disenfranchise the voters who signed those petitions” and would “deprive Maine Republicans of their choice.”

Only Biden and Minnesota Congressman Dean Phillips qualified for the Democratic ballot.

Heather Sprague, a Republican activist from the midcoast Maine town of Cushing, and a one-time state legislative candidate, sat in the front row of the gallery during the hearing, wearing a red “Trump for Maine” baseball cap.

She’s collected signatures for Trump to get on the ballot and does not believe he engaged in insurrection.  

Sprague said in an interview, “He hasn’t been formally charged. He hasn’t been found guilty. Therefore, I don’t see their argument as being valid. I am also here to protect my vote and my voice. I feel like that is being canceled out of spite or hate for Trump.”

The Senate impeachment trial for incitement of the Capitol riot fell short of the two-thirds majority required for a conviction, and Trump’s federal trial for election obstruction stemming from January 6th is months away.

“In the end, we the people are on trial here, basically because, I mean, they’re trying to take our votes away, tell us who we can and can’t vote for,” Sprague said. “That is not very democratic.”

Sprague would have no qualms voting for Trump again if he were convicted in any of his four pending criminal trials.

She said, “Even if he’s in jail, I will vote for him. I will work for him.”

HISTORY LESSON

The only witness called by the Trump ballot challengers in Maine was Indiana University Law School Professor Gerard Magliocca, who has taught Constitutional law and history for 22 years and also testified in the Colorado ballot challenge.

Magliocca told the Maine hearing, “Engage in insurrection means any voluntary act, by word or deed, that is in furtherance of an insurrection against the Constitution, including words of incitement.”

Magliocca, a scholar of the legislative history of the 14th Amendment, said Section 3 did not apply automatically to all former Confederates, but only to those who had held an elective or appointed office that required an oath to the U.S. Constitution. 

That was “a major point of emphasis for ratifiers and drafters of the provision,” Magliocca said. “Only those who had taken an oath would be disqualified from office, because those who had taken an oath and broken it were the moral equivalent, in their eyes, of perjurers who could not be trusted with power, unless they could get some official forgiveness or clemency.”

Magliocca disagreed with a Trump defense argument that the presidency is not an applicable “office” and the president is not an “officer” of the United States subject to disqualification by Section 3.

Office included the presidency,” Magliocca said. “Nobody said the presidency was excluded.”

The professor pointed to the Senate floor debate, when one senator asked why the presidency and vice presidency were not listed. The response came from Senator Lot Morrill, of Maine, who had been Maine’s governor at the outbreak of the Civil War and replaced Senator Hannibal Hamlin when he became Abraham Lincoln’s first vice president.

“It is covered. Look at the words ‘any office,’” Morrill replied, according to Magliocca.

Section 3 of the 14th Amendment:

No person shall be a Senator or Representative in Congress, or elector of President and Vice-President, or hold any office, civil or military, under the United States, or under any State, who, having previously taken an oath, as a member of Congress, or as an officer of the United States, or as a member of any State legislature, or as an executive or judicial officer of any State, to support the Constitution of the United States, shall have engaged in insurrection or rebellion against the same, or given aid or comfort to the enemies thereof. But Congress may by a vote of two-thirds of each House, remove such disability.

Magliocca added that it was widely understood at the time that former Confederacy President Jefferson Davis and other leading rebels were disqualified from being president or vice president unless Congress were to grant them amnesty. 

Representative James Blaine, of Maine, a future presidential candidate himself, reaffirmed that in 1876, during debate over a bill to expand amnesty for former Confederates.

On the House floor, Blaine said, “‘I’m objecting to giving him amnesty, because if you do that, that’ll make him eligible to become President,’” Magliocca recounted. “Now, this speech was big national news. It was widely reprinted and commented on in newspapers.”


Want a daily wrap-up of all the news and commentary Salon has to offer? Subscribe to our morning newsletter, Crash Course.


President Andrew Johnson, president at the time the 14th Amendment was ratified, referred to himself as the ”chief civil executive officer of the United States,” Magliocca said, adding, calling the president an officer of the U.S. “was common parlance at the time of Reconstruction.” 

The Colorado Supreme Court noted in its Trump ballot access decision that the U.S. Constitution refers to the presidency as an “office" 25 times.

IN THE SPOTLIGHT

Beyond the 14th Amendment, the parties disagree on whether Maine law allows the Secretary of State to remove Trump. The challengers, quoting one of the two statutes governing ballot petition review, argue the petition unambiguously requires “a statement that the candidate meets the qualifications of the office the candidate seeks,” and that Trump’s declaration is false. But Trump’s lawyers counter-argue, he does meet the qualifications listed on Maine’s candidate consent form and defined by Article 2 (age, citizenship, residency) of the U.S. Constitution.

Now the spotlight is on Bellows, 48, a Democrat, the first woman to serve as Maine’s Secretary of State, elected by the Democratic-controlled State Legislature, in 2020. Bellows previously served four years as a state senator after losing a 2014 U.S. Senate run against incumbent Republican Susan Collins.

As Secretary of State, Bellows has been an advocate for voting rights and election security, pushing for the passage of new laws to protect poll workers and election officials from threats and to secure voting machines. She has kept Maine affiliated with the Electronic Registration Information Center (ERIC), a national organization established to improve the accuracy of voter registration rolls.

Bellows might find validation for disqualifying Trump in the Colorado decision, or she could dismiss the challenges on procedural grounds, like her counterparts in New Hampshire and Oregon, or courts in Michigan and Minnesota. All found they did not have the authority to bar Trump from the ballot.

Either way, the parties can appeal her forthcoming decision to the Maine Superior Court.

Toward the end of the hearing, Bellows asked the lead attorney for the challengers, Jamie Kilbreth, if Section 3 of the 14th Amendment explicitly prohibits placing someone who engaged in insurrection against the Constitution on a presidential primary ballot.

“If you read it any other way,” Kilbreth said. “You encourage people to vote for a candidate who cannot hold the office. That just creates a kind of chaos that everybody would like to avoid. I think voters are entitled to know, when they vote, whether the candidate they vote for is actually eligible.”

“The engagement in an insurrection or rebellion,” Bellows replied, “that requires a determination of some sort with due process rights for the defendant, no?”

Kilbreth agreed it required a determination unlike confirming age, citizenship, and residency.

“The fact that it’s, you know, more complicated, and it’s harder, and you know, there are political cross currents doesn’t mean that you shouldn’t make the decision. Nobody wants to make the decision. That’s quite clear. It’s a tough decision, but it’s one, we think, is charged to you.”

“Be careful what you ask for”: Experts warn Trump’s “immunity” filing could backfire with judges

Former President Donald Trump’s lawyers on Saturday asked a federal appeals court to toss his D.C. election subversion case, arguing that he has “presidential immunity.”

Trump’s lawyers in a 71-page filing to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit, argued that the former president’s actions to undo his loss following the 2020 election "constitute quintessential presidential acts" and "fell within his "official duties."

"During the 234 years from 1789 to 2023, no current or former president had ever been criminally prosecuted for official acts. That unbroken tradition died this year, and the historical fallout is tremendous," the filing argues. "The indictment of President Trump threatens to launch cycles of recrimination and politically motivated prosecution that will plague our nation for many decades to come and stands likely to shatter the very bedrock of our republic—the confidence of American citizens in an independent judicial system."

The filing argued that Trump’s case should be dismissed because he was not convicted by the Senate in his second impeachment trial, claiming that being prosecuted constitutes double jeopardy even though he was charged with different offenses in the impeachment trial.

The filing asks the appeals court to stay the case if they disagree with Trump’s argument so that the Supreme Court could take up the issue instead.

The Saturday filing came a day after the Supreme Court rejected special counsel Jack Smith’s request to fast-track the case. Trump’s lawyers opposed Smith’s request, arguing that the matter should make its way through the appellate court process first.

Former U.S. Attorney Harry Litman predicted that the appellate court judges are not going to like Trump’s argument.

“I think the court of appeals is not going to be very welcoming of this general immunity argument. What he's trying to say, basically, is he was acting as president not as a candidate, not trying to do anything wrong just looking out for the election integrity,” Litman told CNN.

"I don't think that's a position that's going to fly," he continued. "On the other hand, right now it does delay the start of the trial and in that sense, he gets an important advantage on one level."

We need your help to stay independent

Litman predicted that Trump would try to delay the case further if his immunity bid is rejected, asking the full appeals court panel to hear the case before taking it to the Supreme Court.

“But if the court of appeals gives us a stay with a short fuse, which is just what the Colorado court did a few days ago, that will hand him in and that's going to be the real lookout,” he said.

"Will they keep him from delaying?" he added. "They seem to be onto his game and worried about letting things trail along too long."

Dave Aronberg, the state attorney for Palm Beach County, predicted the filing could backfire.

“I think now we know why Donald Trump didn't want the Supreme Court to weigh in on this yet. It's such a ridiculous argument. He knows he's going to lose and this is all about delay. The courts will throw coal in his stockings after reading these briefs,” he told MSNBC.


Want a daily wrap-up of all the news and commentary Salon has to offer? Subscribe to our morning newsletter, Crash Course.


"He is essentially saying that once you are acquitted by the Senate, by a bunch of political cronies in the Senate, he will become a king — it's a permanent get out of jail free card," he continued. "That's not how any of this works."

Aronberg warned that “one thing judges don’t like is to be told they have no power.”

"That is what Trump is telling the courts. 'Hey, you judges have no power over me. I can do what I want.' By the way, be careful what you ask for,” he added. “If immunity like this, this absolute immunity applies to Trump, it would apply to Joe Biden. Joe Biden could say arrest Trump and then go through the impeachment and get acquitted and then the president for life. It's not so funny when it happens to you, right?"

GOP’s Biggest Losers of 2023: Kevin “I Never Quit” McCarthy

This is the first in a five-day series.

Whoever fears camp is dead should treat themselves and watch the "farewell speech" delivered by Rep. Kevin McCarthy, R-Calif., on December 14. It is no exaggeration to say I guffawed my way through it. The term "stuffed shirt" was invented for a character such as McCarthy, who resigned his office after being ousted as speaker of the House earlier this year.  It's unfathomably huge, the gulf between his self-conception as a noble statesman and the sniveling clown perceived by everyone else. It would be tragic if it weren't so hilarious, a conflict that is the ground from which camp takes root. 

"I loved every single day," McCarthy started. It felt like hearing a man toast his wife at their 50th-anniversary party even though everyone knows he hasn't lived with her since the infamous "buying a boat without telling her" incident of 2003. 

So many of the Republicans who have played handmaiden to Trump's fascist designs have yet to pay a price for it, so it was a delight watching McCarthy take a year-long pie in the face.

"If there's advice I can give," continued a man famous for selling his soul for the speaker role that he lost less than 9 months later. "Do not be fearful—"

It is at this point, reader, that coffee shot out of my nose and onto my iPad screen, inadvertently stopping the C-SPAN video mid-sentence. For if there was one quality that most people will remember about the congressman from Bakersfield, it was his fearfulness. Donald Trump sent a murderous mob after McCarthy and the rest of Congress. Those who do not fear would take a stand after their near-murder. Yet all McCarthy could do was slither on his belly to kiss Trump's feet.


Want more Amanda Marcotte on politics? Subscribe to her newsletter Standing Room Only.


"Do not be fearful you could lose your job," is where this speech, it turns out, was actually heading. This time, I had to pause just to catch my breath, lest I break a vein laughing. The defining impetus of McCarthy's career was a fear of losing the job he so badly wanted. It's why he groveled before Trump and made deals with odious backstabbers like Rep. Matt Gaetz, R-Fla. It's why McCarthy endured the humiliation of 15 votes on the House floor before he finally squeaked out his role as speaker. It's why he agreed to the ridiculous condition of allowing a single member to call a vote for his ouster, handing a loaded gun to the members of his party most eager to fire it.

His speech went on for 8 minutes, but I'll relent in quoting it. Fans of cringe comedy are free to watch it themselves. Snippets are enough to really get a sense of the high self-regard McCarthy has for himself, which is in direct contrast to how everyone else sees him. 

So many of the Republicans who have played handmaiden to Trump's fascist designs have yet to pay a price for it, so it was a delight watching McCarthy take a year-long pie in the face. He earned the record for the shortest tenure of a speaker not taken out by some odd 19th-century disease. It was especially satisfying because McCarthy was ruined by the same MAGA forces he cynically championed, in hopes of being repaid with power. Instead, they viewed him with contempt for being such a wiener. Gaetz and his crew of MAGA trolls called for McCarthy's ouster in late September and by October 3, McCarthy was out. 

He then resigned from Congress in December, despite having declared a few weeks before, "I never quit."

Those who do not fear would take a stand after their near-murder. Yet all McCarthy could do was slither on his belly to kiss Trump's feet.

But oh, somehow it's all even more demeaning than that. Everywhere he went this year, one could almost hear the "Curb Your Enthusiasm" theme music following. Especially with regard to McCarthy's apparently sincere delusion that Trump would return all the loyalty shown by the boot polisher he calls "my Kevin." The Washington Post reported that McCarthy had reached out to Trump during the ouster fight, asking for Trump to repay the enormous debt Trump owes after McCarthy spent years covering up for Trump's crimes. Even though Trump could get the Republicans opposing McCarthy to back down with one threatening social media post, Trump declined to help. 

"F—k you," McCarthy reportedly responded. But Trump likely knew "my Kevin" didn't dare leave his side. Sure enough, the Post also reported that the "two continue to speak and text," despite Trump gleefully tossing McCarthy overboard for no other reason than the sheer pleasure of watching him drown. 

We need your help to stay independent

McCarthy's debasement is only compounded because of all the details that have become public, showing how willing he is to fluff Trump's pillows and wipe Trump's brow. The funniest by far is from former Rep. Liz Cheney, R-Wyo., who detailed the excuses McCarthy made for his post-January 6 trip to kiss Trump's ring at Mar-a-Lago.

"They’re really worried," McCarthy said of Trump's aides. "Trump’s not eating, so they asked me to come see him."

The pathos of the excuse was compounded by the obviousness of the lie, as many a late-night host reminded us that Trump has never missed a meal in his life. Even Trump, always ready to gratuitously abuse McCarthy just to see how "my Kevin" will endure, jumped in with a Truth Social post saying, "I was eating too much." Which is the sort of thing you know Trump will only admit because it's an opportunity to bully McCarthy. 

Just as funny, to me at least, was the story about McCarthy sucker-punching Rep. Tim Burchett, R-Tenn., in apparent retaliation for Burchett's vote to oust him. McCarthy denied sidling up to Burchett and elbowing him in the kidney, just as he denied the "Trump's not eating" story. But no one believes McCarthy, and not just because there's witnesses to both. It's because both stories epitomize the chump we all know McCarthy to be. He's a man who wants to do dumb and cowardly things, like visit Trump at Mar-a-Lago or hit people from behind. But he doesn't have the guts to admit it, instead continuing to play-act like he's a great man, even though no one is buying the act. 

McCarthy accomplished almost nothing of note in office, mostly being there in hopes that he'd be famous enough to be recognized in coffee shops. But he did manage to pull off one trick of comity in a time of great national division, by finding the one thing liberals and Matt Gaetz can agree on: Kevin McCarthy sucks. 

“If Trump wins the 2024 election …”: Leaving the “carnival of madness” that was 2023 behind

In the best of times, the New Year season is very challenging for many people. The end of the year (and the holiday season more generally) brings an increase in depression, loneliness, interpersonal violence, stress, anxiety, drug use and alcohol use.

In the United States, this negative behavior is made worse by economic precarity and consumerism. There is also the tedium of travel, forced socializing, and the transition from one year to the next serving as an occasion for many people to reflect on time and the trajectory of their lives.

"If Trump wins, I will spend the New Year and the weeks before talking to my family about whether we stay or leave."

This year, the wars in Ukraine and the Middle East rage on. The fates and futures of entire populations are being decided through massive violence.

The Age of Trump and ascendant neofascism is most certainly not the best of times.

Trump has promised to be a “dictator” on “day one” of his presidency if he returns to power in 2025. He is publicly channeling the evil of Hitler and the Nazis. Public opinion polls show that the American people are increasingly feeling down and depressed about the present and future of their country and lives. Still, he is leading President Joe Biden in the early 2024 election polls, with some polls showing that Trump’s lead is increasing as Biden and the Democrats are losing the support of their base voters. It's a harsh juxtaposition and source of great frustration and dark feelings among Democrats and other pro-democracy Americans: Donald Trump’s popularity is remaining steady (if not growing) because – and not despite – his Hitlerian dictatorial threats and plans as well as his multiple criminal trials.

In what should be a source of huge hope that “things can get better” in the struggle to save American democracy from Trumpism and American neofascism, the Colorado Supreme Court ruled on Tuesday that Donald Trump is, per the United States Constitution, disqualified from being on the presidential ballot in that state because of his role in leading the Jan. 6 coup attempt and insurrection. However, as many leading legal scholars and other experts have pointed out, the right-wing controlled United States Supreme Court will likely side with Donald Trump, and he will be able to use the just movement to remove him from the ballot as fuel for his political campaign and march to the White House under the banner of being a “victim” who is being “persecuted." There is also a scenario where removing Trump from the ballot via the courts leads to a tit-for-tat cycle of retaliation where, in further rejection of democracy and responsible governance, “red states” will decide to disqualify Democratic presidential candidates for non-existent “crimes” and “violations” of the Constitution. This will be a spiral of escalation and one more step towards the worst-case outcome of a second civil war or sustained violent insurgency.

In an attempt to make better sense of this tumultuous last year, I asked a range of trusted experts for their thoughts and reflections, and what, if anything, surprised them. I also asked them to look ahead and share what they will likely be doing a year from now if Donald Trump defeats Joe Biden in the presidential election.

Steven Beschloss is a journalist and author of several books, including "The Gunman and His Mother." His website is America, America.

Optimism is a struggle right now, especially as Donald Trump and his sycophants have made it clear they’ll aggressively push toward dictatorship and the end of democratic rule, an independent judiciary and a nonpartisan civil service, as well as pursue the deportation of millions of migrants without due process, the use of military against domestic protestors, the installation of thousands of loyalists and retribution against political opponents and the media. But this outcome is not inevitable—even as the authoritarians want Americans to believe it is and lose hope that there’s anything they can do to stop it.

That heightens my own conviction that those of us dedicated to the survival of democracy—and with public platforms—have a responsibility to expand peoples’ imagination about a better future to push back against indifference and despair and activate political participation. That means clanging the alarm bell, yes, but also giving fresh shape to the rather tattered narrative of democracy and its promise of self-governance, equality, and justice.

I hesitate even imagining a second Trump term, exactly because it will lead to the end of the American democratic experiment that has survived for over 245 years. That will mean we failed to build the necessary hope, imagination and commitment necessary between now and November 2024. It may also mean we failed to look clearly enough and speak vividly enough about what Trump was saying and doing and where that would lead. Every generation faces its own duty to their country: Defending democracy is ours.

Norm Ornstein is an emeritus scholar at the American Enterprise Institute and contributing editor for The Atlantic.

I am fearful. The elections in Argentina and the Netherlands were unsettling. Voters will roll the dice with extremists if they are unhappy enough with those governing, and that can be true here. It is dreadful to think of all the people ready and willing to vote for a reckless dictator who will imprison his enemies, call out troops when there are demonstrations against him, set up concentration camps for immigrants and others, blow up NATO, sacrifice Ukraine and probably Taiwan, give North Korea free rein with nuclear weapons. But it is real. And even if he would lose in a head-to-head with Biden, No Labels and the other third parties could still give him a victory.

We need your help to stay independent

To be honest, there is nothing I know now that I did not know then that would make any difference in where we are. If Trump wins, I will spend the New Year and the weeks before talking to my family about whether we stay or leave.

Brynn Tannehill is a journalist and author of "American Fascism: How the GOP is Subverting Democracy."

It's bad out there. The Democratic coalition is splintering over what is happening with Israel and the Palestinians. Trump is making it clear that he plans to rule as a dictator from day 1, and Russian media is crowing about it. At the same time, the American public remains fairly apathetic about the stakes, and Republicans are actively encouraging the narrative that Trump won't be that much different from Biden to drive down Democratic Party turnout. I'm just taking time off over the holidays to spend some time with my kids, the oldest of whom is coming home from college. It's about finding a distraction.

"At the beginning of the year, I thought [Ron] DeSantis would be more of a challenge in the primary."

At the beginning of the year, I thought [Ron] DeSantis would be more of a challenge in the primary. Truthfully though, I am not surprised at the Republican base's appetite for a dictatorship: I wrote about social dominance orientation and a feeling of a need for revenge against "those people" in American Fascism back in 2020. I guess my biggest unpleasant surprise is that Trump has stopped even pretending that he won't try to rule as a dictator… and that independents and some democrats are finding rationalizations to sit out the election because Biden didn't give their particular pet rock enough love and attention (when Trump would clearly take a sledgehammer to it.)

If Trump wins, next holiday season is going to be very grim. We'll see how his proposed cabinet is shaking out, and we'll have a good sense of his day one executive orders, a number of which are likely to affect me personally. Trump can't keep his mouth shut, and he'll give us a big 'ole preview of what's coming next (like Mike Flynn being the next Secretary of Defense, removing all the trans people from the military, national abortion bans using FDA, bans on health care for trans people of all ages, etc…) All in all, if things continue down the path they are, I expect to be spending next Christmas poring over the numbers, looking at preparing the house for sale in 2025 to pull the ripcord and depart to someplace safer.

Nate Powell is a graphic novelist and the first cartoonist to win the National Book Award. Powell has also won four Eisner Awards. His forthcoming graphic novel, Fall Through, will be released in February 2024, followed by a comic adaptation of James Loewen’s influential "Lies My Teacher Told Me" in June.

I’ve tried to identify and separate my Spidey-sense of general dread and anxiety from the concrete feelings of despair, anger, and hope I feel while I stay informed from day to day. It’s been disappointing to see people in media write about the American people being willing to usher in fascism based on “vibes,” and I think that’s very misleading. We’re caught in a mediasphere-curated sense of powerlessness, of watching a slow-motion disaster, but the forces actively pushing to eradicate democracy are doing so quite explicitly, publicly, and on-camera without any measurable consequences. So, for myself, it's helped to acknowledge what I do have some power to affect, whether that’s voicing my concerns publicly, donating to humanitarian efforts and democracy-reinforcing organizations, and making plans for events throughout 2024 centered around the miseducation of US history, right-wing book ban campaigns, and how this relates to the very survival of our democracy. We can defeat next year’s attempt to end democracy, but that’s also just a step in the ongoing process to guard democracy itself against these fascists—something our institutions have largely failed to do in the past three years.

I’m surprised that I’m still surprised to see how many people have apparently forgotten what we’ve all been forced to learn over the past nine years or so, especially in regressing to a privileged, late-90s notion of “both parties are the same, and I can’t allow myself to vote against fascism because both parties participate in atrocity.” I recognize that, in the eight years since the 2016 election we’ll have a new generation of young voting voices, and I feel that the conviction of their voices is essential for clarifying the ideals we strive for—but at the same time, it’s essential that we operate with the understanding that participating in the electoral process is strategic and highly imperfect. There often feels like there’s no way to win—but there is a very clear, distinct, and permanent consequence for allowing fascism to win. This is all that matters right now. We don’t have any time or energy to spare for strategic hair-splitting, or for anything which dilutes a consistent, unified effort to stop a fascist dictator.

If Trump wins the 2024 election, I will be making plans based on the rapid-fire changes on the ground, joining my neighbors in the streets of our community. I’ll be making plans for 2025 to expand how and where I speak in a professional capacity about American history, disinformation, right-wing censorship campaigns, and the strengths and vulnerabilities of graphic novels in that context. I’ll likely be making other plans which, by necessity, will be underground and not to be publicly aired, to help directly defend community members against the multitude of organized fascists and white supremacist groups in my area. I’ll be urging anyone who’ll listen to shift all available resources toward the kinds of mass mobilization pro-democracy America successfully utilized from 2017 through 2020.

This awful timeline would be full of daily horror, violence, domestic terrorism, and repression; it would not be a dream from which we would awaken. I describe these possibilities with the understanding that it would be a permanent shift in our existence, both public and private, and there will be no turning back.

Rich Logis is a former right-wing pundit and high-ranking Trump supporter. He describes himself as "a remorseful ex-Trump, DeSantis and GOP voter." 

I have a bon mot I frequently employ: cautiously poss-imistic. I admit I often war with cynicism. Some of my political pessimism is an historical recognition that every known democracy has, to use the words of our second president, John Adams, committed suicide. There is no guaranteed safeguard embedded in our republican (lower-case r) form of government.

Optimistically, American democracy has sometimes thrived (although, I respect that some may disagree), and has sometimes survived. Dictatorships are brutal, and brutally simple: the people subjugate themselves to the despot or perish. Democracy, though, is, by its nature, a complex, ebb-and-flow model, which never moves in a linear direction; American democracy has been no different. Perhaps the primary reason for our enduring democracy are centuries of unlikely, but necessary, alliances committed to democratically (lower-case d) empowered equality. None should construe this statement as anything but urgent: the right-wing/MAGA will be historically repudiated in November; and political and media realignments, as well as a reckoning of the archaic ideology of conservatism, will then occur. We will need those opposed to American democracy suiciding to be less apolitical.

Given what we know now/see more clearly at the end of 2023 as opposed to the beginning of the year/end of 2022, what do you wish you knew then that you know now? I was an early Trump supporter and MAGA activist from 2015-21. It was in Summer 2021 when I began to have doubts about supporting MAGA; it took a mentally anguished year to fully conclude that I was wrong to support Trump and MAGA. I wish I knew then what I know now: that every right-wing mythology I adhered to turned out to be the exact opposite of what I thought; had I recognized this, I doubt I would have supported Trump. After my personal and political epiphany, I also came to realize why, and how, persuading others to leave MAGA is such a Herculean effort; I will continue to work to persuade and am undeterred by the prospects of failure. Progress is never guaranteed and is always accompanied by struggle. Optimistically, I do believe there are more MAGA quiet quitters, and some in the nascent stages of remorse, than we realize. The vast majority of Americans are close with MAGA supporters; I implore you to engage them in a way that humanizes them. If impugning MAGA voters worked, no one would be MAGA!


Want a daily wrap-up of all the news and commentary Salon has to offer? Subscribe to our morning newsletter, Crash Course.


If Trump wins the 2024 Election? Despite my prognostication that the right-wing and MAGA will be electorally renounced in November 2016 showed us the capriciousness of voters. Get registered to vote, if you’re not; be not afraid to ask everyone you know if they’re registered to vote; and, if you’re unsure as to how to get someone registered, contact me, and I’ll show you how. A second Trump presidency will irreparably damage our democracy. What would that mean and look like? I don’t know; no one does. Despite our flaws, there is no nation in world history such as the United States; we have no past, or peer, country whose democracy was irreversibly harmed to turn to for guidance. We are, for the most part, on our own in figuring out how to continue the work of perfecting our Union.

I acknowledge that I am unsure how America would move forward after the denouement of our experiment in self-government.

If you are inclined to prayer, let us pray that we avoid this “what if?”; prayer, however, must be complemented by education and action. Threats to the democratic order are relentless; nonviolent offense against these pernicious forces must be more relentless.

Jared Yates Sexton is a journalist and author of the new book "The Midnight Kingdom: A History of Power, Paranoia, and the Coming Crisis."

Finding the right word to describe 2023 feels almost impossible. I'm angry. I'm disappointed. I'm afraid. As you know, I have spent the last seven years, like you and others, trying like hell to warn people and I'm looking at everything and shaking my head. I cannot believe how little some people have learned. And things are accelerating in a hurry.

I wish I could go back in time and fully appreciate how absolutely ripe everything was for exploitation and that growing coalitions were going to be so vulnerable. The work I've been doing is focused on trying to rebuild those broken coalitions, and it's no surprise that, just as they were coming back online, there was one thing after another that attacked them in an effort to divide them. If Trump beats Biden? I don't know. What will I be doing? Preparing? Trying to figure out exactly how to protect myself and the people I love. And I don't know how to do that yet.

Jason Van Tatenhove served as the national media director for the Oath Keepers. He documented his experiences with the Oath Keepers in his book "The Perils of Extremism: How I Left the Oath Keepers and Why We Should be Concerned about a Future Civil War". 

The predominant emotion I've felt this year is a mix of apprehension and defiance. The ongoing crises in democracy and the myriad troubles both in the US and globally have created a sense of unease, akin to walking into an unknown and potentially dangerous situation.

Reflecting on the year, I wish I had understood earlier the depth and interconnectedness of the societal issues we face. From political unrest to social injustice, 2023 has been a year of eye-opening revelations, showing us the realities and consequences of our collective actions and inactions.

If Trump wins the 2024 election, I anticipate a period of intensified activism and creativity. I envision it as a time to harness the power of words and ideas to challenge and navigate through the potential upheavals that such a political outcome might bring.

This year’s journey has felt like navigating the eerie, dimly lit corridors of the Haunted Castle at Six Flags Great Adventure in the early 80s. There, I confronted a mix of fear, morbid curiosity, and defiance, much like the emotions stirred by this year's events. In those moments, the line between thrilling uncertainty and real danger was as thin as the safety regulations at the infamous Action Park.

On a fateful night in '84, shortly after my visit, the Castle became a roaring inferno, tragically claiming lives due to overlooked dangers. This memory resonates with our current societal landscape. Like that makeshift maze, we find ourselves in a complex web of challenges where our perceived safety is often just a façade.

As 2023 unfolds, it feels like we're in a carnival of madness, witnessing a relentless assault on our rights and democratic norms. These issues mirror the forgotten perils of the Haunted Castle, reminding us of the importance of vigilance and the need for a rebellious spirit.

In this grand cosmic joke, it's the bold, the imaginative, and the defiant who will carve a path through the shadows, wielding our pens like lightsabers to cut through the fog of misinformation and illuminate the truth in a world teetering on the brink of madness.

Darrin Bell is a Pulitzer Prize-winning editorial cartoonist, creator of the syndicated comic strip Candorville, and author of the graphic novel “The Talk." He is also a contributing cartoonist for the New Yorker.

The emotion that describes my 2023 is anxiety. I’m working on two graphic novels at the moment in addition to my comics and editorial cartoons. I’m processing it by having my characters experience it.

Personally, I wish I’d known the stock market was going to skyrocket and there’d be no recession. I’d have earned enough to buy an escape home in one of the dwindling number of countries where democracy and the safety of minorities isn’t at risk, and where the country isn’t on the verge of electing a leader who’s vowed to persecute his critics. I don’t want to raise my children in a nation where they may have fewer rights and opportunities than I’ve had.

If Trump wins the 2024 election, what will I be doing this time next year?

I’ll do what I did during the first Trump term: I’ll spend those weeks commenting through my work on a nation that’s given up on decency and reason and given in to fear and sadism.

Drug companies must update their evidence for COVID-19 treatments

Strong science, particularly vaccine development, helped us steer our way through the Covid-19 pandemic. Now, as the pandemic recedes, it’s time to hold drug companies accountable for the treatments they’ve developed. The evidence for these medications has not kept pace with major changes in the nature of the Covid-19 pandemic, and updated studies should be required to maintain approval for these very profitable drugs.

The Covid-19 drug development battlefield is littered with 479 failed or inactive drugs, while 358 are still in clinical or preclinical trials, according to a tracker maintained by the Biotechnology Innovation Organization, a trade group. The only oral Covid-19 therapy approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration that is recommended for first line outpatient use is Pfizer’s Paxlovid (nirmatrelvir-ritonavir), a two-drug combination that stops the SARS-CoV-2 virus from replicating in the body. Hailed as a game changer, Paxlovid is a very good antiviral drug that has saved many lives, and its incredibly rapid development was a feat of science. The major study leading to its approval, called the EPIC-HR trial, showed that it reduced the risk of hospitalization and death by an impressive 89 percent in high-risk, unvaccinated people.

But there is a lack of high-quality research on how Paxlovid affects outcomes beyond severe Covid — such as duration of illness, how the drug affects transmission, and whether it prevents long Covid. Nevertheless, some physicians are promoting the drug for these uses based on weak, inconsistent data. The stakes are high: If we fail to set a requirement for well-designed studies of Paxlovid’s impact on all concerns besides hospitalization and death, we will be setting up a slow-moving, disastrous recreation of mistakes made with drugs for other diseases such as influenza.

Early in the Covid-19 pandemic, the explosive, unorganized growth of clinical trials for treatments was intended to save lives from this fearsome new disease. But many trials were small and of low quality, with a few exceptional trials providing much of our good data. In that initial desperate push for Covid-19 treatments, experimental, everything-but-the-kitchen-sink approaches became widely used.

There is a lack of high-quality research on how Paxlovid affects outcomes beyond severe Covid — such as duration of illness, how the drug affects transmission, and whether it prevents long Covid.

The case of ivermectin is instructive: This antiparasitic drug was used in tremendous volumes based on poor quality and sometimes outright fraudulent data, despite advice against its use from the FDA and in formal treatment guidelines. Social media amplification of the increasingly dubious evidence base led to a near-delusional belief in its benefit — and impressive profits for some opportunistic doctors. A few well-coordinated and well-designed trials up front would have shortened the controversy, saved costs, and avoided duplicated effort of smaller low-quality trials. Most importantly, showing it to be ineffective earlier may have prevented the ensuing social media crusade, perhaps allowing some high-risk people to accept evidence-supported treatments like Paxlovid and the intravenous antiviral remdesivir rather than requesting, or even suing hospitals, to administer ivermectin.

Covid-19’s infection outcomes changed unusually rapidly across waves of the pandemic, which meant that studies could be outdated in months if they did not reflect the current viral strains and population immune responses. Data collection in the EPIC-HR study, which still guides treatment with Paxlovid, took place in 2021 when hospitalization rates were high, many were unvaccinated (including all trial participants), the viral strains were different than today, and the main outcome of interest in many communities was “flattening the curve,” or preventing hospitalization. Now, almost everyone has been vaccinated, infected, or both. In a recent study, 96.4 percent of U.S. blood donors had Covid-19 antibodies by September 2022. The overall risk of hospitalization and death has also decreased significantly.

Essentially, we are now dealing with a different disease. We are more focused on outcomes such as time lost from work, transmission risk, and long Covid risk. Yet there is almost no direct evidence about Paxlovid’s effect on these outcomes.

Paxlovid was approved for the treatment of mild to moderate Covid-19 in adults at high risk of developing severe disease. However, physicians and pharmacists have told me, it is increasingly being prescribed off-label for lower risk patients. This contention is supported by a recent U.S.-based preprint showing that 42 percent of more than 111,000 Paxlovid recipients had no major medical comorbidities, with treatment eligibility defined by having at least one risk factor for severe Covid-19. Some physicians are extrapolating from hamster studies and lab data to suggest it reduces Covid-19 transmission. And they’re prescribing it to reduce long Covid risk based on very weak studies that analyzed administrative databases for Covid-19 complications rather than tracking long Covid symptoms in treated and untreated patients.

This matters because Paxlovid treatment for people who are not high risk has not shown significant benefit. One still unpublished randomized trial of lower-risk patients was terminated because low rates of hospitalization overall (in treated and untreated people) made it impossible to see a benefit. Even in higher-risk groups, a recent meta-analysis of observational studies has shown very little absolute reduction of mortality, and no benefit in such patients under age 60. At the same time, people taking Paxlovid face possible side effects, drug interactions, and volatile drug pricing. They do not know if Paxlovid is worth all of that. They don’t know if the drug will reduce transmission to others, if they are less likely to get severely ill, if they will need time off work, or if it will spare them from long Covid.

Infectious diseases specialists like myself are experiencing an alarming sense of déjà vu. Tamiflu (oseltamivir), a treatment for influenza, was licensed in 1999 with data showing a modest benefit in reducing illness by one day. The reviewers noted that a “more definitive demonstration of clinical or public health relevance” would require additional data. But 24 years later, we are not farther ahead — important questions about Tamiflu remain unanswered, with longstanding debates about the benefit of the drug and a false advertising lawsuit that went on for nearly 10 years before being dropped in July. The guidelines for the use of Tamiflu in influenza vary tremendously because of varied interpretation of a poor evidence base, and newer studies call its use as an influenza treatment into question. Even so, in its first 15 years on the market, Tamiflu made $18 billion in sales.

It is hard to stop a prescribing practice once it has become the norm, despite inadequate data. This is a recognized driver of cost increases in health care.

Pharmaceutical companies play a pivotal role in the research and development of effective therapies, and their lifesaving contributions during the Covid-19 pandemic have been commendable. However, the major investments these companies make in R&D should not give them free rein to market high-cost, high-volume drugs of public health importance without continued scrutiny of their effectiveness if the initial registration studies no longer stand because of changes in the disease.

Some bold, novel options could help address this gap in evidence. In exceptional circumstances (such as pandemics), pharmaceutical companies could be required to conduct studies to reassess a drug’s effectiveness after it has entered the market if conditions have meaningfully changed since the initial trials. Another option could require companies to put a small portion of drug profits towards funding well-designed, independent trials so that crucial, commercially successful drugs would be part of ongoing studies. The FDA and other agencies should judiciously require and support such studies that could help guide treatment decisions, while balancing the need to support appropriate research and new drug development.

The medical community has responsibility, too: Professional societies that draft treatment guidelines must take a more consistently assertive stance in advising against uses for which there is insufficient evidence, rather than leaving it open to prescriber judgment. Both prescribers and potential patients need to accept and use evidence to help sustain health care systems, and lobby for changes needed to define the best treatments for people with Covid-19.

It is hard to stop a prescribing practice once it has become the norm, despite inadequate data.

We are at a unique juncture in the fight against Covid-19, as fear gives way to complacency — and the path forward is scientific rigor. Failing to mandate high-quality evidence for treatment choices may lead us back down the path of inadequately researched treatments, opinion-driven guidelines, and wasted resources.

Pfizer has raked in about $20 billion dollars in revenue from Paxlovid alone over the last two years. This sum is nearly half of the National Institutes of Health’s entire budget for 2022. It is not surprising that the company has not voluntarily started additional trials after approval based on the stellar results in that first, now-irrelevant trial.

In the wake of the pandemic, we have an opportunity to improve both what we are doing, and how we may address research challenges in a future crisis. Paxlovid’s price is set to increase — from $530 to $1,390 before insurance — next year, but there is no corresponding increase in our knowledge of its value. The cost of this information gap will be very high, for both individuals and health care systems.


Lynora Saxinger is a journalist, infectious disease physician, and professor at the University of Alberta who headed a Covid evidence synthesis group during the pandemic. She is currently a Fellow in Journalism and Health Impact at the Dalla Lana School for Public Health.

This article was originally published on Undark. Read the original article.

How 3,000-year-old Babylonian tablets help scientists unravel one of the weirdest mysteries in space

Among the most enigmatic mysteries of modern science are the strange anomalies which appear from time to time in the earth’s geomagnetic field. It can seem like the laws of physics behave differently in some places, with unnerving and bizarre results — spacecraft become glitchy, the Hubble Space Telescope can’t capture observations and satellite communications go on the fritz. Some astronauts orbiting past the anomalies report blinding flashes of light and sudden silence. They call one of these massive, growing anomalies the Bermuda Triangle of space — and even NASA is now tracking it. 

With all the precisely tuned prowess of modern tech turning its eye toward these geomagnetic oddities, you might not expect that some key scientific insights about them could be locked inside a batch of 3,000-year-old Babylonian cuneiform tablets. But that’s exactly what a recently published study in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences suggests. 

“The geomagnetic field is one of the most enigmatic phenomena in earth sciences,” said study co-author Lisa Tauxe in a release. “The well-dated archaeological remains of the rich Mesopotamian cultures, especially bricks inscribed with names of specific kings, provide an unprecedented opportunity to study changes in the field strength in high time resolution, tracking changes that occurred over several decades or even less.”

This newly discovered connection between ancient Mesopotamian writing and modern physics is more than an amusing academic fluke. It highlights just how much is at stake for 21st-century scientific progress when budget-slashing lawmakers, university administrators and private industry investors shovel funding into STEM field development while neglecting — and in some case, actively destroying — the humanities. 

Led by the University College London, the team of researchers who studied the clay cuneiform captured key data about an ancient anomaly thought to be quite similar to the so-called Bermuda Triangle of space (or the South Atlantic Anomaly, as NASA calls it). Studying the clay’s iron oxide grains in a method known as archaeomagnetism, researchers were able to see a snapshot of the aberration known as the Levantine Iron Age Anomaly.


Want more health and science stories in your inbox? Subscribe to Salon's weekly newsletter Lab Notes.


Both the SAA and LIAA represent instances where, for a limited period of time, the earth’s magnetic fields are much weaker or stronger in a specific region than they should be — acting out of step with our normal magnetic north and south poles, and producing unsettling phenomena. There are substantial differences between the anomalies, but they both offer geoscientists clues about how our planet’s deepest core effects its most far-flung adventurers. And researchers’ latest measurements confirm high-paleointensity geomagnetic spikes occurred during the LIAA, hinting that there may be more similarities under the surface. 

It wouldn’t be the first time that the LIAA was examined through the lens of historical artifacts, though. In 2017, researchers followed the archaeomagnetic trail east along the 30-degree longitude line through near-Levant eastern Anatolia, Turkmenistan to Georgia (3,000 km from Lavant) where they examined hundreds of ancient baked-clay fragments and pottery shards in a bid to find the differences in paleointensity. In other instances, Moroccan stalagmites helped draw the map of the LIAA. 

"Rivaled only by the extraordinary astronomical records from ancient China, the Babylonian Astronomical Diaries are one of, if not the longest continuous research program ever undertaken"

“We often depend on dating methods such as radiocarbon dates to get a sense of chronology in ancient Mesopotamia. However, some of the most common cultural remains, such as bricks and ceramics, cannot typically be easily dated because they don’t contain organic material. This work now helps create an important dating baseline that allows others to benefit from absolute dating using archaeomagnetism,” co-author Mark Altaweel said of the recent UCL study. 

Even so, archaeomagnetism isn’t a silver bullet that can completely replace the linguistic analysis of inscriptions like these. Nor is it even a straightforward endeavor. Despite advances in the past five years or so, archaeomagnetism is still methodologically complex and often tedious work, often cautious data sifting to arrive at accurate interpretations. The more accurate of which come from analyzing layers upon layers of strata. 

But when combined with the expertise of the humanities — from historians and linguists, to religious scholars and anthropologists? Archaeomagnetism opens up new worlds of study across all disciplines. 

In fact, the team’s results show that the strength of the magnetic field in Mesopotamia was more than one and a half times stronger than it is in the area today, with a massive spike happening sometimes between 604 B.C. and 562 B.C. By combining the results of archaeomagnetic tests and the transcriptions of ancient languages on the bricks, the team was able to confirm this spike likely occurred during the reign of Nebuchadnezzar II. 
  
Hand in hand with the sciences, the LIAA trail was illuminated by historical accounts of descriptively similar events, recorded from ancient authors as far west as the Iberian peninsula and well into Asia. Archaeomagnetism has now allowed researchers to not only confirm the presence of the LIAA in ancient Mesopotamia from 1050 to 550 B.C. — itself a first for science — but offers cultural historians a new way to verify and apply context to a vast tide of early scientific information. 

Interdisciplinary interdependence 

The symbiotic interdependence between the humanities and sciences deepens further in the thicket of time when one considers that the original locations of the team’s fragments likely include the earliest known centers of astrology and mathematics in Sumeria, such as Nineveh near modern-day Mosul, Iraq. At the ancient city’s royal library of the Assyrian Empire, a site dating back to around 650 B.C., a trove of thousands of tablets were excavated in the mid-1800s containing precise astronomical data surpassing that found in any previous discovery. 

Among those, the "The Plough Star" tablets bear inscriptions dating to 687 B.C. and are the first known instances of humans tracking lunar and planetary orbits through both the solar ecliptic and 17 constellations. The same trove yielded the awe-striking collection known as the Astronomical Diaries, currently held in the Ashmolean Museum at Oxford, originating from near modern-day Baghdad. The oldest of which dates to 652 B.C. The latest, 61 B.C.

It wasn't only an 'arts and culture' problem when US war-vultures looted 17,000 Mesopotamian antiquities following the 2003 invasion of Iraq

Hermann Hunger and David Pingree, the foremost historians on their excavation, minced no words on their value to to modern science. 

“That someone in the middle of the eighth century BC conceived of such a scientific program and obtained support for it is truly astonishing; that it was designed so well is incredible; and that it was faithfully carried out for 700 years is miraculous,” they wrote.    

In his 2021 book, “A Scheme of Heaven,” data scientist Alexander Boxer cites the two historians and observes that the “enormity of this achievement” lay in the diaries’ preservation of a snapshot of celestial knowledge of the age which — paired with accounts of weather patterns, river water tables, grain prices and even political news — allow us to pinpoint historical events from thousands of years ago, in time-windows as narrow as just a day or two.

“Rivaled only by the extraordinary astronomical records from ancient China, the Babylonian Astronomical Diaries are one of, if not the longest continuous research program ever undertaken,” writes Boxer. 

The cuneiform tablets studied by the UCL team extend this interdisciplinary legacy of the sciences and humanities beautifully by allowing us to read not only the celestially relevant data of geomagnetic history, but by reaffirming the importance of early cultural studies. One fragment, for instance, is dedicated by Nebuchadnezzar II to a temple in Larsa. The site was devoted to carrying out astrological divination traditions, and it’s where we get our earliest clue about the authorship of the Astronomical Diaries. 

Charmingly, that clue appears in the court testimony of a temple official who gets scolded for sounding a false-alarm about an eclipse, embarrassing the temple scholars in front of the whole city.

From clay star-lore to solar magnetic storms

These Neo-Assyrian and Old Babylonian astrologers gave us more than antics, though. In further records at Nineveh, they would ultimately help researchers at the University of Tsukuba — some 2,700 years later — track what were likely massive solar magnetic storms in the area, enabled by geomagnetic disruptions that may be yet linked to the LIAA.

In their dutifully recorded daily observations, one astrologer records a “red cloud” while another tablet-writer observes that “red covers the sky” in Babylon.

“These were probably manifestations of what we call today stable auroral red arcs, consisting of light emitted by electrons in atmospheric oxygen atoms after being excited by intense magnetic fields,” the authors said. "These findings allow us to recreate the history of solar activity a century earlier than previously available records…This research can assist in our ability to predict future solar magnetic storms, which may damage satellites and other spacecraft."

We need your help to stay independent

So when a state legislature hands out tax incentives and sweetheart deals to industry-friendly science departments with corporate-funded research teams — but scratches out budget line items funding classes in ancient pottery — then it’s as much in the interest of science departments to speak up as it is the beleaguered chairs of the arts. And when short-sighted administrative fiends gut ethics and philosophy classes from the required curriculum of computer science and biochemistry majors, it’s not just a problem for the cultural studies professors.  

Just like it wasn't only an “arts and culture” problem when US war-vultures looted 17,000 Mesopotamian antiquities following the 2003 invasion of Iraq only to hoard them in some disgusting Hobby Lobby warehouse — or when hundreds of thousands of cuneiform clay tablets ended up in the hands of dealers after the 1991 Gulf War — or when some gutless third-rate jackal in Oklahoma tried to flip the actual inscribed-stone Epic of Gilgamesh. The looting, destruction and loss of cultural history is the sciences’ problem too. 

When universities short sell the arts and humanities, we humanities students might lose our poetry, but we can write more. The science folk, on the other hand, might cost themselves another 75 years of research and $70 billion in grants trying to re-invent the Babylonian wheel because the destruction of its historical blueprint was “an arts problem.” 

An earlier version of this article originally appeared in Salon's Lab Notes, a weekly newsletter from our Health & Science team. 

Treacherous Christmas blizzard conditions expected in the Plains and Midwest

By Sunday night, over 1,000 flights in the U.S. scheduled for Monday were delayed — with about 250 cancellations — in anticipation of Christmas blizzard conditions across huge swaths of the Northern and Central Plains and Upper Midwest regions, according to a new report from NPR

According to the publication, South Dakota and Nebraska are expected to get major snowfall starting early Monday morning. While most areas can anticipate over 4 inches of snow, some parts of south-central and central South Dakota can anticipate at least twelve inches. Farther north, residents can expect sleet. Combined with freezing rain and strong winds, travel conditions are expected to be treacherous. 

The National Weather Service has advised that isolated power outages are possible in the region as 55-mile per hour wind gusts could bring down tree branches and power lines. 

However, for the rest of the country, The National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration has said the warm Pacific weather pattern known as El Niño would cause warmer-than-usual temperatures and precipitation over Christmas.

As “You’ve Got Mail” turns 25, here’s what I sorely missed on a walking tour of its NYC locations

"You've Got Mail" is a quarter-century old, but some of its themes resonate more than ever – for better and for worse.

The 1998 rom-com "You've Got Mail" is the most recent onscreen retelling of a story based on the 1937 Hungarian play "Parfumerie" that was later adapted into 1940's "The Shop Around the Corner" and 1949's "In the Good Old Summertime. Nora Ephron's take on the tale follows Kathleen Kelly (Meg Ryan) and Joe Fox (Tom Hanks), two anonymous online friends who instant message through AOL. But what they don't realize is that they are enemies in real life because Joe runs the mega book store Fox Books (modeled after Barnes & Noble) that is putting Kathleen's independent book store The Shop Around the Corner out of business.

On one hand, the Nora Ephron classic that turned the affable Hanks into a greedy, capitalistic suit and embraced personal computer use is as dated as its AOL-centered premise. On the other hand, Ephron's sharp script hits on some crucial cultural conversations surrounding connections and capitalism that we still discuss today.

To celebrate the anniversary of the beloved Ephron movie, I took a walking tour of all the film's major New York City locations and learned some surprising things about the movie that uses the bustling city as its backdrop and about the city itself. The tour was both entertaining and bittersweet, as the realities of filming in New York were made apparent from what we could and couldn't see.

Kathleen's Upper West Side apartment

The Upper West Side is at the center of the world in "You've Got Mail," so I traveled an hour on the train to get to West 89th Street which is where Kathleen's spacious and airy apartment exteriors were filmed. Most of the film's online chat scenes with Joe and Kathleen supposedly took place in that very brownstone – although the interiors were actually filmed on a New Jersey sound stage.

"There's also a [multi-]generational element to this neighborhood, which you can see in 'You've Got Mail' where Kathleen's mom owns the store."

When I arrived at the apartment, I was met by Grace Briskman, a tour guide for On Location tours. In her first run of this "You've Got Mail" tour with real guests, she's dressed in a red peacoat with a dozen red roses in her tote bag. She's a big Meg Ryan and Nora Ephron fan and looks the part too.

When I asked Briskman why the Upper West Side is the perfect place for the film's setting and why we never leave the neighborhood in the movie, she said: "They say it's a sleepy Upper West Side. I think this neighborhood, specifically compared to other neighborhoods in New York City, really has a small community feel with the brownstones and the local schools."

She nannied in the neighborhood and said the kids "would always recognize their neighbors and their classmates. I think that's unique to this part of Manhattan as well. Also, we tend to find that the people that live in the Upper West Side stay in the Upper West Side.". "So there's also a [multi-]generational element to this neighborhood, which you can see in 'You've Got Mail' where Kathleen's mom owns the store. They have regulars and they recognize all of the people in this community." 

But most importantly, Ephron chose the neighborhood ​​"because it felt like a small village." She saw "the Upper West Side as a small community. In the same way that the village and shop around the corner was a small community to establish this, Ephron showed scenes at the beginning of the film of bread being dropped off outside of these close little stores to feel like a village even though they're in a huge city of New York," Briskman said.

Fox Books was filmed in a now-closed Barney's

As five women including myself bopped around the Upper West Side on that brisk December afternoon, we stopped by the restaurant Barney's Greengrass. The Jewish deli institution opened in 1908 in Harlem but moved to the Upper West and has been a neighborhood staple ever since. As the group stopped by the deli to take pictures around lunchtime, the eatery was filled with locals of all ages. It looked exactly like the scene in the movie when Kathleen had a lunch date with her mother's close friend Birdie (Jean Stapleton).

As we continued the tour, Briskman told us that the movie's villain, the capitalistic Fox Books, modeled after Barnes & Noble, denied the production access to film in the mega bookstore's Upper West Side location. The movie's intent to vilify the bookstore was a no-go for Barnes & Noble so the Fox Books seen in the movie was filmed in the now-closed 7th Avenue Barney’s department store. Unexpectedly, one of the members of the tour, Marisa Kavas said, "That’s where my parents met!”

When I asked her if her parents' meet-cute was in that exact Barney’s she replied, “Yeah! My mom was working there and my dad came in and that’s how they met. Like another rom-com layer! I can't wait to tell them.” 

Sharing in that real-life rom-com moment added to the poignant nostalgia we all had for "You've Got Mail," but we'd soon discover that the closed Barney's department store wasn't the only location that no longer existed or wasn't available to enter on the tour.

Cafe Lalo: ShopGirl and NY152's first meeting 

Cafe Lalo in You've Got MailCafe Lalo in Cafe Lalo in You've Got Mail You've Got Mail" (Nardos Haile)"You've Got Mail" takes a turn when Kathleen as the AOL user ShopGirl finally asks Joe as user NY152 to finally meet in person. Like a scene out of an episode of MTV's "Catfish" or a first date off of Tinder or Hinge, she plans to meet him at Cafe Lalo, where she'll be seated with a copy of "Pride & Prejudice" and a single red rose. Joe, a bumbling nervous wreck, shows up but he brings along his best friend Kevin (Dave Chapelle) while staying out of sight. He's so nervous he can't even bring himself to look into the cafe to see if she's there. So Kevin looks instead and reveals that Joe is there to meet none other than his bookstore rival Kathleen Kelly.

More than two decades ago, Ephron lived across the street from the cafe, which is likely why she chose that location for that fated first meeting. Briskman said it was the right location to have Joe and Kathleen's real-life counterparts meet because "The vibe of this place feels very first date. It feels intimate, but it still feels a little more public than perhaps like a real hole-in-the-wall location."

When we arrive outside the cafe, it is dark inside and there is a sign plastered to the front door that says it is closed for renovations. One of the members of the tour said it was closed because of back rent. Another said it closed during COVID-19 times. But online sleuthing revealed that the cafe is facing a lawsuit that was filed last year for missing rent. The owners of the famous cafe at the heart of "You've Got Mail" faces potential eviction if it loses the suit.

Longingly looking at the vacant cafe, two of the members of our group said they both used to visit all the time. Fox News reporter Tonya Powers said she lives 20 blocks from the cafe and used to visit the cafe with her daughter. “My daughter went to school down the street we used to come here for the desserts. The desserts were amazing," she said.

“I used to work around the corner,” another group member, Melissa Bamgart said. “One of my friends came from Tulsa, and 'You've Got Mail' is her favorite movie so I took her here on my own walking tour.”

H&H Bagels no longer exists

While Cafe Lalo is vacant, it is still standing, unlike the 80th Street H&H Bagels location.

"We were gonna be passing by some places where this was a location but now it's a Verizon store," Briskman said highlighting the ever-changing nature of commercial franchises taking over independently owned locations in the city. "Now unrecognizable as such but we recognize it either way," Briskman added.

This specific H&H Bagel location was one that Joe regularly visited almost daily with his golden retriever Brinkley. It closed down in 2011. Now a Verizon store sits where H&H once stood, much like how Fox Books thrived while the Shop Around the Corner closed. The former H&H location is also a few doors from the Starbucks where Joe and Kathleen had many fateful meetings but also missed connections.

All hope for H&H Bagels isn't lost though. There are other locations in the city even though that specific Upper West Side shop closed down. Last year, the bagel shop reopened on Columbus Avenue between 85th and 86th Street. So while the city is changing, thankfully some of its staples are still around, just at a different location.

The iconic Zabar's 

Zabar's in You've Got MailZabar's in "You've Got Mail" (Nardos Haile)The one and only Zabar's is another Upper West Side multi-generational institution. Opened in 1934, the family store is basically anything you want it to be. It's a grocery store filled with gourmet items, a deli, a coffee shop — it's got all that you need. When we arrive at the location it takes up most of the block of the corner of Broadway and 80th Street. Its large orange-colored storefront name is unmissable. 

"You just order from Zabar's for them to cook for Passover," Briskman joked. But also she shared that "You've Got Mail" has been the only movie that has been filmed in the busy grocery store. The scene between Joe and Kathleen shopping in the store illustrated their tension as rival bookstore owners as they purposefully ignored each other in the small circle surrounding their little Upper West Side neighborhood.

But the famous store hasn't just been mentioned and shown in "You've Got Mail," it's been named-dropped in NYC-centered shows like "Sex and the City," "Seinfeld" and "The Marvelous Mrs. Masiel."

As we neared the end of the tour, we stopped through Verdi Square, the irregularly shaped traffic island named for the Italian opera composer. Right by it was the hot dog shop Gray's Papaya where Joe and Kathleen's newly formed friendship began to flourish, even though Fox Books aided in the demise of her family bookstore. This location a part of the city that is fast-moving and doesn't ever show signs of slowing down.

Gray's Papaya in You've Got MailGray's Papaya in "You've Got Mail" (Nardos Haile)

The Shop Around the Corner is now a Magnolia Bakery

"The Shop Around the Corner very much represents Kathleen's late mother, and with her dying, the bookstore dies."

When we finally reached the location of Kathleen's bookstore, 100 W 69th Street, we found the location is actually now a famous NYC bakery, Magnolia Bakery. Briskman said that the interiors of The Shop Around the Corner were shot on a set inspired by the interiors of another store called Books of Wonder which is located in Chelsea. The Shop Around the Corner's exterior shots used to be a cheese and antique shop named Shaper Cheese and Antiques, which had closed in 2009.

"By making [the bookstore] its own personification, we feel the loss as Kathleen feels the loss during that sequence where she's crying and missing her mom. I think the Shop Around the Corner very much represents Kathleen's late mother, and with her dying, the bookstore dies," Briskman shared. One couldn't help but relate to Kathleen's loss as more of New York's more unique locations no longer existed except on film.

We ended the tour at 70th Street and Briskman gave each one of us a rose just like Kathleen's rose at Cafe Lalo. It symbolized the end of something but also the beginning of an eternal love story between Joe and Kathleen in the sleepy corners of the Upper West Side that started online.

Verdi Square in You've Got MailVerdi Square in "You've Got Mail" (Nardos Haile)

[CORRECTION: A previous version of this story stated that the interiors of The Shop Around the Corner bookstore were shot inside Books of Wonder, but they were in fact sets designed to mimic those interiors.]

“Incorrectly boarded”: Spirit Airlines placed unaccompanied 6-year-old on wrong holiday flight

On Thursday, Maria Ramos went to pick up her 6-year-old grandson at Southwest Florida International Airport in Fort Myers — only to be told that he was actually 160 miles away in Orlando. As reported by WINK-TV, a television station in Fort Myers, the child was an unaccompanied minor who had been traveling from Philadelphia to visit family. He was boarded onto the wrong flight by Spirit Airlines amid the holiday travel rush. 

“I want them to call me [and] let me know how my grandson ended up in Orlando,” Ramos told the station. “How did that happen? Did they get him off the plane? The flight attendant — after mom handed him with paperwork — did she let him go by himself? He jumped in the wrong plane by himself?

Spirit Airlines has since apologized that the child was “incorrectly boarded,” but has not offered any details on how the mistake was made. In a weekend statement, the airline said: “The child was always under the care and supervision of a Spirit Team Member, and as soon as we discovered the error, we took immediate steps to communicate with the family and reconnect them … We take the safety and responsibility of transporting all of our Guests seriously and are conducting an internal investigation.” 

 

Could taking cod liver oil every day actually make me a happier person?

I took the first shot almost as a dare. The breakfast buffet at our hotel in Iceland had been laden with extraordinary delights — smoked fish, homemade bread, the most outstanding butter — and right there at the front of the line, a big bottle of cod liver oil and a row of neatly lined up shot glasses. Assuming a casual "when in Reykjavik" attitude, I knocked one back. The flavor was exactly as unpleasant as I assumed it would be — and I've been drinking it every morning since. As strange as it sounds, I've come to believe that downing an ounce of something that tastes like cat food smells every day somehow makes me happier. 

We know that what we eat affects our bodies, but the connection between food and the mind is often overlooked. And as an already sleep deprived, anxiety attack-prone person facing the darkest, dreariest season of the year, I figured it was worth a shot to try to nourish my way to a better attitude. The evidence is encouraging. "Research has shown that a diet rich in omega-3 fatty acids can help to reduce depression rates," says registered dietician Alyssa Pacheco. Pacheco notes that "Salmon, sardines, herring, chia seeds, flaxseeds, and walnuts are some great sources of omega-3 fatty acids." And cod liver oil, an old-fashioned staple of Scandinavian culture that deserves a renaissance here.

What is it about omega-3's? Celebrities like Gwyneth Paltrow are fans, but their apparent anti-inflammatory, serotonin boosting properties are still being debated. A 2020 study out of England concluded that "Omega-3 intake does not prevent depression or anxiety," but a 2018 JAMA review found the fatty acids may be helpful in alleviating existing symptoms.

Other foods seem to have an impact on mood in different ways.

"Research shows that probiotics can have a small but significant impact on improving depression rates," Pacheco says. "There's exciting and emerging research coming out in recent years showing just how important a healthy gut microbiome is. Ideally, we want to strive for having a diverse gut microbiome — or a variety of different, beneficial bacteria in our digestive tract. Fermented foods such as Greek yogurt, kefir, kimchi, sauerkraut, kombucha, and tempeh can also provide your body with these beneficial gut bacteria."

And while healthy classics like fish and yogurt are … fine, I love that my favorite indulgence is also a mood booster. "Dark chocolate stimulates the production of endorphins, chemicals in the brain that create feelings of pleasure," says Paul Daidone, Medical Director at True Self Recovery. "It also contains phenylethylamine, which can act as a mood elevator."

We need your help to stay independent

Just as food can lift the  spirits, it appears it can also bring them down. The relatively new field of nutritional psychiatry is opening up the exploration into the ways in which diet and nutrition  play a part in  mental health. That connection can be particularly keen during comfort food season. As my colleague Michael La Corte reported recently, research in the journal Frontiers in Nutrition and Nutrients found that subjects who ate high fat, high carb croissants in the morning had a "significant difference in how their bodies recover from stress" over a control group. The study authors recommended "nibbling on fruits and vegetables instead," an admittedly tall order on the days when I feel like climbing inside of a tray of eggplant parm.

"During the colder months, people often crave carbohydrates and may overindulge in comfort foods," notes Dr. Daidone. "While this might provide temporary relief, it can lead to a cycle of mood swings as blood sugar levels spike and crash. A balanced diet that includes plenty of fruits, vegetables, lean protein, and whole grains can help keep your mood stable." He also recommends filling up on complex carbs. "Foods like pumpkin seeds, apples, chickpeas,
strawberries, and oatmeal are complex carbs that can increase the production of serotonin, often referred to as the feel-good hormone."

But it's also not just what you eat, but how often and how much that counts. As a certifiably hangry type, I know that my outlook on life gets bleaker when my blood sugar dips. Eating regular meals with sufficient portions — and keeping a granola bar or two in my bag for emergencies — keeps me a more solid footing for whatever else the day brings.

My daily spoonful of omega-3 rich cod liver oil, which has the added mood elevating oomph of vitamins A and D, is  definitely an acquired taste. But the body seems to absorb nutrients better this way than in capsule form, and I don't have to guess my way through the confusing barrage of pills in my local vitamin aisle.

Alyssa Pacheco says, "While supplements may be helpful, food is always the best option for getting healthy fat sources into your diet. Food sources of omega 3 fatty acids will also contain other beneficial nutrients such as protein, fiber, vitamins, and minerals." Similarly, she says, "Although probiotic supplements show promise for being part of a treatment approach for depression, it's also a good idea to optimize your gut health through foods too."

I wish I could say that I now just throw a few chia seeds at my problems and all my depression and anxiety have magically melted away. Hahahahah no. But adding more  probiotics and omega-3 's in my diet and restricting my caffeine and alcohol consumption — along with working out, getting outside in nature, prioritizing my sleep and reaching out to friends — really have made a difference in just a few weeks. I still like French fries and red wine, always will, but I can't ignore the subtle shifts in my mental health lately. Just like the Tin Man, it turns out I just needed a little oil to loosen myself up.

“It was grueling”: “The Boys in the Boat” director George Clooney and star Callum Turner on rowing

Directed by George Clooney, and based on the book by Daniel James Brown, “The Boys in the Boat” is a sepia-toned feel-good inspirational underdog sports drama about “the most difficult team sport in the world” — rowing

"It was really important to us that that the rowing community actually had a film that captured the thrill of what that is, and the speed."

Set in 1936, it recounts the true story of nine young men from the University of Washington in Seattle who join the junior varsity crew team and end up competing in the Olympics in Berlin. The main character is Joe (Callum Turner) who has been abandoned by his father (Alec Newman) since he was 14. Broke, he tries out for rowing as a way to earn some money. Instead, he earns self-worth.

He also earns the respect of his coach (Joel Edgerton). Joe trains with his teammates and achieves swing — a term that means where rowing is more poetry than sport — which helps them break records in regattas and end up competing in the Olympics, overcoming the odds even as they face setbacks (financial and otherwise). 

Turner anchors “The Boys in the Boat” with his largely internal performance. The actor absorbs the emotional waves Joe experiences as he faces challenges, falls in love with Joyce (Hadley Robinson) and competes. 

Clooney and Turner spoke with Salon about rowing and making “The Boys in the Boat.”

I really enjoyed your film because I have been connected to the rowing community here in Philadelphia and I worked on a book, “Boathouse Row,” and attended regattas. We have the Dad Vail and the Stotesbury.

George Clooney: It was really important to us that that the rowing community actually had a film that captured the thrill of what that is, and the speed. It never looks that way. It was important for us for people who like rowing to get that part right.

George as a director, you are like a coach or coxswain. Were you a cheerleader or drill sergeant? How did you motivate or encourage the cast to perform, and well, have swing?

Clooney: Most of the time I’m a cheerleader in life. There were a couple of times when you guys were f**king off a little bit. 

Callum Turner: You didn’t veer far off from cheerleader very much. You were very generous.

"The unison you have to be in to succeed is fascinating."

Clooney: Everyone once in a while, though. These guys trained for five months to get to the final race. Their first crack at it, they were kind of moseying down that water. And I was like, “Are. You. Out. Of. Your. Minds?!” Remember that? But these guys made it easy. I didn’t really have to do anything. You cast the right people and sit back and let them do their thing.

Turner: They really set us up to succeed. We rowed for four hours a day, every day, for the first two months and then an hour after filming. I didn’t realize how special an experience it was whilst I was doing it. But in hindsight it was the most profound sport it is. The unison you have to be in to succeed is fascinating.

Clooney: Have you ever been to the Oxford or Henley races? It’s really something.

The Boys in the BoatThe Boys in the Boat (Laurie Sparham © 2023 Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer Pictures Inc.)

Callum, Joe enters rowing with no experience. Prior to making the film, what knowledge and experience did you have with rowing? You look buff and like you know what you’re doing.

Turner: They gave us a physio and a trainer. It was so grueling that people were giving us massages. The only rowing I’d ever seen was the Oxford-Cambridge race on the Thames. I really didn’t know anything about it. None of us in the boat did. We came with fresh eyes. I played football or soccer, when I was a kid up until I was about 17, and understanding what it meant to be part of a team helped me. Nothing could help me for the sheer weight and pressure of being in the boat. We all got better at different rates. That was the hardest part. I had Bruce [Berbelin-Earle] behind me who looks like a Greek God . . .

Clooney [laughs] The guys kept saying, “Oh, he could really row!” That was demoralizing!

Turner: That was most challenging thing, but that also enabled us to push on because we were so competitive with each other. Jack [Mulhern] and I had a few arguments, some of the other boys clashed. It felt like being part of professional sports team, and I think that only gives the film more weight, because we were actually doing what you see on screen.

George, how did you approach the material as a director — and lean into or away from inspirational sports movies tropes in the racing sense? I did find them exciting.

Clooney: A sports film is kind of like a romantic comedy. You figure out how it is probably going to end. We need to enjoy the journey and be entertained along the way.  What was interesting was if it was not a true story, they really would be tropes — like the guy gets sick before the race. He really did! There were money issues. There was the photo finish. All of these things really happened. We shot it like old-fashioned film; I’m a fan of old-fashioned sports film. I loved “Hoosiers” and “The Natural.” It’s weird to call them old-fashioned films, but they are more than 30-year-old sports films. We dealt with it that way even to the romance parts of it. The kiss at the train is shot like a 1940s musical. We really wanted it to feel like it was old-fashioned. Of course, there are some stereotypes, but that is the story that were telling, so that is the fun of it.  

What about creating the tone of the film? You take viewers on an emotional journey over the course of the film.

Clooney: When you see it in a big theater with people it is a fascinating thing. People sit in their chair and do this [Clooney rocks back and forth]. They are rowing, going back and forth. There is an unbelievable energy. People felt patriotic!

The film is about teamwork. Callum, can you talk about starring in the film, and building a relationship with your costars as you training and prepared for the role?

"These guys, and people who take chances in their lives, won’t have regret. They stuck their necks out."

Turner: We spent seven to eight hours a day trying to improve this new skill we were learning. As you know, rowing lends itself to teamwork. If you are not on it, you are going to let everyone down and the boat is going to slow down. That competitive spirit was the thing that drove us on. That is a wonderful thing to have when you are trying to achieve what we were trying to achieve. After three weeks you [indicating Clooney] and Grant [Heslov, Clooney’s producing partner] came to see how far we got along . . .

Clooney: It was terrifying. They literally looked like eight blind men paddling. It was crazy. I just smiled and put my thumbs up. 

Turner: You could see the pain through this smile.

Clooney: Grant and I got in the car afterwards, and looked at each other and then looked at the ground, and wondered, “How much would it cost to do head replacements with Olympic rowers?” It was a disaster. But they got it together in the best possible way.

Turner: Our goal was to get to 46 strokes a minute. We eventually managed to do that, but the up-and-down nature of it really brought us together. I remember doing the 46, there was a euphoria in the boat. This disbelief we managed it. When we rowed back, it was almost eerie knowing this was the last time and what we achieved together and the time we spent together. It was such a bond.


Want a daily wrap-up of all the news and commentary Salon has to offer? Subscribe to our morning newsletter, Crash Course.


What observations do you have about Joe’s character? He’s proud, stubborn, determined. Joe is very sensitive about his background, getting angry about it. What do you think the film says about class and privilege? How did you each identify with him?

Turner: I am a working-class kid from an estate in Chelsea. I love watching films that depict working-class people as normal and not villains or thieves in this dark world. It was The Depression and a scary time for everyone. Joe lives in a car. But we didn’t show them in that way. We showed them as human beings. One thing about working-class people is that they are aspirational and want to better themselves no matter what. He was really down in the dumps for a lot of his life and what he managed to do was really remarkable.

Clooney: He had a great career afterwards.

Turner: He went and worked for Boeing

Clooney: I am a big believer in all of those things. I grew up in a small town in Kentucky, I cut tobacco for a living. The career that I have is not something I foresaw. I suppose one of the things I look back at and think of is that the worst thing that can happen in your old age is to have regret, and to have not tried to do the thing that you loved. Because I know people who are old now and have regret, and it is a pretty bitter thing. These guys, and people who take chances in their lives, won’t have regret. They stuck their necks out.

“The Boys in the Boat” opens Christmas Day in theaters nationwide.

 

The “Doctor Who” Christmas specials are a glorious new start, yet annoyingly hold onto the past

Ncuti Gatwa’s 15th Doctor came into our world pantsless. That was not the first clue distinguishing his era from tenures of past Time Lords on “Doctor Who” but it set the tone in a very way.

“Doctor Who” has spent 60 years establishing and reminding us of all the ways Time Lords differ from humans despite looking the same as some of us do. Gallifreyans have two hearts and can exist for billions of years.

They are not born, they regenerate, with subsequent incarnations wearing new faces and personalities while retaining the memories and experiences of former selves.

Well, most regenerate. At the climax of the third 2023 special, “The Giggle,” the 14th Doctor (who is also the10th, played by all-time fan favorite David Tennant) had been fatally shot by none other than the Toymaker, revived in our era by Neil Patrick Harris. Everyone around the Doctor including his best friend Donna Noble (Catherine Tate) and classic companion Melanie Bush (Bonnie Langford, featured in the 1986 and 1987 episodes), expected him to dissolve in a burst of energy and return as somebody else. That's what always happend before.

Except . . . he didn’t. A flummoxed Fourteen instructs Donna and Melanie to pull each arm, which they do . . . pulling Gatwa’s Fifteen out of his body. The Toymaker condescendingly calls them handmaidens but really, they’re midwives. Gatwa's Time Lord arrives in half of 14th’s clothes – the button-down shirt, casually undone tie, high-top sneakers, and cotton boxer briefs, leaving his predecessor in his undershirt and suit, sans sneakers. 

It works, because Gatwa has the legs to pull it off. He doesn’t cover his bottom half until Christmas – and even then, the first getup we see him in is a kilt. At a nightclub. Where he’s dancing his ass off. The actor isn't shy about showing off his physique evident in his Doctor's tendency to leave his shirts unzipped to show off his sternum. Nor should he be! As Melanie declares at the first sight of the man, Gatwa's Doctor is beautiful.

As fantastical as “Doctor Who” can get, the cleverest being in the universe always has an explanation for everything. Gatwa’s Doctor was not born or regenerated but “bi-generated.” It’s supposed to be a myth, he says before cracking his neck and laughing brightly. “But . . . look at me!”

Look at him, indeed.

Also, since we can’t help it, look at Tennant. And look at Russell T. Davies, ushering in a rebirth for “Doctor Who” for a new age – the one on Disney+, But let’s put that aside for a moment and look at Tennant again. Why is his Doctor still around when Gatwa's so confidently owns the role from the moment he steps into the picture?

Festive season specials traditionally serve as handoffs between actors playing The Doctor, and “The Church on Ruby Road” follows that convention by introducing Fifteen to his first companion Ruby Sunday (Millie Gibson), an orphan plagued by a run of clumsiness that turns out to be caused by goblins who look a lot like the title monsters of "Gremlins.”

Doctor Who Christmas specialMillie Gibson and Ncuti Gatwa in "Doctor Who" Christmas special "The Church on Ruby Road" (Disney+)In the course of their adventures, the 15th Doctor pulls off a variety of stunts with ease – defying "mavity," placating prickly grandmothers, solving a crisis with a flawless song-and-dance number.

“Doctor Who” has always been a family show, something longtime viewers forget whenever The Doctor looks back on his trauma or unleashes his anger. Tennant was spectacular at the former, with his successor Matt Smith wielding fury with an arresting dimensionality.

Gatwa’s Time Lord, though, is purposefully different. He’s a sensitive hero with vigor and swagger, a traveler in love with the universe with all its faults and perils instead of wearied by its greed and destructiveness. He’s also the first modern Doctor since Christopher Eccleston to sport a leather jacket and be conscientiously fashionable.

If The Doctor’s clothes are an extension of his personality, the 15th’s funky drip hints his ride is one we don’t want to miss. Gatwa may have played a Ken in “Barbie” but his Doctor isn’t sexless; in one scene he explains his ability to escape the ropes binding him by saying, “I spent a long, hot summer with Harry Houdini.”

Gatwa’s Time Lord is purposefully different. He’s a sensitive hero with vigor and swagger, a traveler in love with the universe instead of wearied by its greed and destructiveness.

With Davies writing for Gatwa, elder Whovians may rest easy knowing this (bi-)generation will hold to the best of what “Doctor Who” was, both back in the day and back in the new day Davies ushered in between 2005 and 2010.

Yet it can’t be lost on those fans who never thought we'd see someone other than a white man step into this iconic role that Gatwa, other than being the first Black queer man to play The Doctor, is the first to share his reign with a previous Doctor.

Not just any incarnation, but the fandom’s favorite Time Lord, next to Tom Baker’s fourth.

Davies’ seasons with Tennant are the revived “Doctor Who's” standard bearers. Steven Moffat’s time was acclaimed too, but he worked under Davies, leaving Moffat a strong blueprint to expand upon.

Chris Chibnall, who came after Moffat and wrote for Jodie Whittaker’s 13th Doctor – another first, being a woman – could not benefit from that connection. So when both Whittaker and Chibnall left and Davies’ return was announced, many expressed relief. At last, a return to par, to the way it used to be – a mode of thinking The Doctor has proven to be wishful thinking countless times over the show’s six decades.

In finding a way for “Doctor Who” to move forward with Gatwa while anchoring itself to Tennant's past glory, Davies is striving to appeal to both the fantasts (some of whom are purists and possibly racists) and the futurists. That’s never going to make everybody happy, initially. But, given the business circumstance, some version of this strategy also seems inevitable.

Besides, Davies’ return via the three “Doctor Who” specials starring Tennant, and Gatwa’s first solo outing, “The Church on Ruby Road,” is more triumphant than not.

Fourteen’s return precipitates a reunion with his best friend Donna Noble (Catherine Tate). In the course of their new adventures, Davies introduces Yasmin Finney as Rose, Donna’s daughter, without simply dropping her in unannounced. “The Star Beast,” the first of the three, shows a brief glimpse of Rose contending with bullies and her well-meaning gran Sylvia (Jacqueline King) struggling to use the correct pronouns.

Rose is also the non-binary child helping to shoulder her mother’s binary burden — special, because of who she was born to be.

This is an affirming and elegant resolution to a trap that was supposed to split Tennant’s Time Lord from his best friend forever. In this universe, though, forever is constatnly taking detours.

We need your help to stay independent

Right-wing viewers have scoffed at “Doctor Who” in recent years for its supposed newfound push into social advocacy, ignoring that it has always had such leanings, same as all lasting speculative fiction. Much of it is faux outrage by small-minded attention seekers.

Most who watched this hour or “Wild Blue Yonder,” which momentarily shows The Doctor and Donna’s consequential encounter with Isaac Newton, probably didn’t care that the man who figured out gravity was played by a non-white actor Nathaniel Curtis (who worked with Davies in “It’s a Sin”), or that Rose is trans.

What matters more is that because The Doctor and Donna blew across Newton’s path, gravity isn’t called that anymore, and Donna, Rose and Shaun Temple (Karl Collins) are the loving family the 14th Doctor can claim as his.

So yes, we have two Doctors sharing an existence, but not necessarily stealing the other’s electricity.

But the fact that we’re talking about their adventures instead of expressly digesting Gatwa’s is frustrating. You could argue that this angle is also a choice, which is true, but it’s one we’re obligated to address prior to Gatwa’s tenure officially launching in the spring.

Using a previous actor and his iconic character as a bridge to a new era instead of relying expressly on the newcomer's talent and charisma may be a fruit of the production firm Bad Wolf's era of “Doctor Who.” For the first time since 1963, the show is no longer under the BBC’s control and is instead fully in Davies’ creative power along with Bad Wolf founders Julie Gardner and Jane Tranter, who worked with the show in 2005.

As for what Davies and “Doctor Who” gain more broadly from signing on Disney+ as its international distributor, watch the Christmas Special and the three leading up to it and see for yourself. Which is to say, a Disney-fied budget does wonders for its look.

Fetching as Gatwa is, The Doctors’ latest TARDIS is a modernist’s dream, all sweeping curves and ramps, along with the good old jukebox. The CGI is more polished, although Davies doesn’t entirely abandon the rubbery costumes and puppets that are a “Doctor Who” signature.

In exchange, “Doctor Who” may now go the way of other Disney IP and retry spinning off stories from the mother TARDIS, as the BBC once attempted with “Torchwood” and “The Sarah Jane Adventures.” That could be good . . . if Davies can keep a handle on the plot.

Doctor Who Christmas specialNcuti Gatwa in "Doctor Who" Christmas special "The Church on Ruby Road" (Disney+)Difficult as it may be to not take the attention split away from Gatwa somewhat personally it is, in fact, a business decision that could make his Time Lord more immortal than others. Because he is a truly fresh creation – a Time Lord wandering the galaxy who is still awed at the way it adapts and renews itself — on a much broader platform.

Davies invites us to marvel at Gatwa's Doctor, and the worlds around him, including ones on Earth we haven’t been accustomed to seeing on TV until recently. Where a white orphan can be raised by a Black foster mom and play in a band with a trans woman lead singer, and these details are simply that.

That same world can place a wrung-out, “thin as a pin” billion-year-old hero in a humble London home with his best friend, and at a workplace where a scientist, Shirley Bingham (Ruth Madeley, from Davies’ “Years and Years”) uses a tricked-out wheelchair and may be as clever as he.


Want more health and science stories in your inbox? Subscribe to Salon's weekly newsletter The Vulgar Scientist.


That Davies would choose Tennant for this purpose makes sense, given the accommodations made to enable his Doctor to show his romantic yearning and loss.

The Black sci-fi viewer in me chafes at Davies’ choice to make  Gatwa’s inauguration an offshoot of a longstanding character’s extensively developed emotional journey. That same part of me winced when the 15th Doctor kissed the 14th, saying “I got you,” because of the way it harkens to every all-knowing wise Black friend we’ve seen throughout the decades that “Doctor Who” has shared the airwaves with them.

The Whovian in me also softened at that same sight out of an old love for Tennant and a new one for Gatwa, who is part of a generation that’s less squeamish about men or male-presenting Time Lords showing physical signs of empathy and understanding.

The message at that moment revolves around how worn out Tennant’s 14th Doctor is from carrying the pain and guilt over people he couldn’t save with him all these years. It doesn’t serve him, and as Gatwa’s Doctor shows in “The Church on Ruby Road,” it doesn’t help those who need him either. There is only fixing what you can, claiming the victories that present themselves, and steaming full speed ahead.

So yes, we have two Doctors sharing an existence, but not necessarily stealing the other’s electricity. When Gatwa’s 15th Doctor responds to Tennant’s Doctor amazedly whispering “You’re me,” upon meeting him with, “No, I’m me . . . I’m really, really me . . . I’m completely me!” we can say for certain that he speaks the truth.

"The Church on Ruby Road” premieres Monday, Dec. 25 at 9:55 a.m. PT/12:55 p.m. ET, on Disney+, where "The Star Beast," "Wild Blue Yonder" and "The Giggle" are currently streaming. 

A Christmas message to the evangelical church — and the rest of us

I had some rough Christmases as a kid. But when my family moved back in with my grandparents there was one Christmas that seemed magical. I was in the third grade at the time, and I got to have that moment of coming downstairs to see two bikes under the tree — one for my brother and the other for me. I couldn't even ride a bike at the time, but the possibility was overwhelmingly exciting.  

Those were the days when kids got on their bikes and rode off alone. We lived in Plainfield, New Jersey, which wasn't necessarily the safest area. I didn't care. That bike was the symbol of freedom and possibility. I often went off on my own into the middle of town, looking for snacks but with little understanding of how traffic lights worked. One afternoon the inevitable happened: I was hit by a car and thrown from my bike. Someone called an ambulance but I refused to go for fear of getting in trouble, and ran away with blood dripping down my leg, dragging my bike and its bent wheel. I never even told that story to anyone in my family until I was well into my 30s.  

But here's the point I'm reaching for: That bike was the freedom to make my own choices and explore my limits, even if that meant getting hurt. I would say that even though society has progressed in many ways since that Christmas, we don't have the same freedom to explore, discover and get hurt. 

The Christmas season is understood as a time of giving, but within the Christian faith and especially the evangelical church, it seems to be about raising millions of dollars. Pastor Robert Jeffress wants his followers to give millions. The American Center for Law and Justice, a right-wing nonprofit, wants millions as well, to fight all the evils they claim are destroying America.  

Evangelical leaders want to spend those millions on attacking women as murderers for simply taking control of their reproductive rights, and on fighting the great scourge of the family-destroying rainbow flag. Evangelicals have managed to weaponize the Christian faith and turn it into a military-style operation. One thing is certain: Those millions won't go to the poor and the downtrodden of America. They will likely be spent on designer suits, fueling up the private jets and funding media outlets that cater to (or prey on) evangelicals and fundamentalists. And of course that money will also go toward electing Donald Trump.  

We need your help to stay independent

Here's what evangelical leaders do not understand about their congregations, or about those suffering outside of their churches.  The fellowship of evangelical believers has become remarkably diverse, including a great number of migrant families from Asia and Central America. More than half of all evangelical women have had an abortion. Evangelical families are divorcing at a higher rate than do families outside the church. These are people who working hard and continue losing in most aspects of their lives, yet all the evangelical leaders can do, it seems, is raise more millions for culture-war politics and fighting liberal causes.  

To bring it back to my Christmas story, most people within the evangelical fellowship just want a new bike, one that will give them the opportunity to fail, fall, get up and succeed, and explore the limits of their talents and hard work. Currently, America is failing to provide those metaphorical bikes, and evangelical leaders seem completely uninterested in doing anything to help their own people, let alone those outside the church.


Want a daily wrap-up of all the news and commentary Salon has to offer? Subscribe to our morning newsletter, Crash Course.


I'd like to propose four simple Christmas lessons for the evangelical church, along with a few New Year's resolutions, that might put them back on the path toward a more genuine version of Christianity.

  1. Family values: Care about families struggling to pay their bills. Stop persecuting LGBTQ people; Jesus never proclaimed you should do anything of the sort.
  2. Life and liberty: Fight to protect women from hate crimes, and stand up for equal pay. Stop attacking women for simply trying to control their own bodies.
  3. Healing the sick: Fight for health insurance for all. Jesus healed the sick and the destitute.
  4. Welcoming the foreigner: Any Christian who embraces the idea that immigrants are "poisoning the blood" of America should be ashamed. As a poor, homeless migrant himself, Jesus preached clear lessons on this subject.

Lastly, it's unforgivable for evangelical pastors to manipulate their followers into giving them millions. In the entire ministry of Jesus, neither he nor the disciples who followed him ever once asked for money to support their cause. Paul, the writer of most of the New Testament after the Gospels, supported himself as a tent maker. Jesus was a wandering carpenter without any formal education. He never flew in a private jet or even rode on a camel, as far as we know. He walked, as did Paul, Peter, John and anyone else of great significance found within the Bible,  

Christian leaders should stand with the poor and the downtrodden and should look for every possibility to provide every American with that opportunity I got to explore freedom, failure, success and independence. Everyone deserves that hopeful feeling of a child receiving a bike on Christmas morning, even if he cannot ride it yet.  

Reindeer biology is super weird and new research helps explain why

Reindeer are traditionally associated with Christmas lore — and, if you follow the latest research on reindeer, you can see that there is a good reason for this. While real-life reindeer do not fly, they have a number of other freaky biological traits, and like Rudolph's nose, recent research is illuminating what makes reindeer tick.

For instance, a study in the journal Current Biology revealed that reindeer chew their cud while sleeping, an intriguing way in which reindeer eating habits are opposite those of humans. While humans are advised to avoid eating shortly before going to sleep, these Norwegian reindeer who are in the process of ruminating have brain waves similar to those present during NREM (non-rapid eye movement) sleep; in other words, when they undergo the complex process of chewing and digesting their food, the reindeer brains undergo a sleep-like experience. They even derive a benefit from this for periods when they are not ruminating.

"Having eaten all the oats the kids left out for them, the reindeer will need time to ruminate (chew their cud) and catch up on the sleep they didn’t get while delivering presents," Dr. Gabi Wagner, a chronobiologist from the Norwegian Institute of Bioeconomy Research, told Salon by email, both literally and figuratively tongue in cheek.

“The more reindeer ruminate, the less additional non-REM sleep they need,” first author and neuroscientist Melanie Furrer of the University of Zurich, said in a statement. “We think it's very important that they are able to save time and cover their sleep and digestive needs at the same time, especially during the summer months.”

The reindeer being monitored are owned by the Arctic University of Norway in Tromsø, where they live in outdoor enclosures that resemble that of wild animals — but they have also grown accustomed to humans.


Want more health and science stories in your inbox? Subscribe to Salon's weekly newsletter Lab Notes.


"To protect the health of Rudolph's eyes, kids might want to think about orange juice and carrots as ideal treats."

"To help them get familiar with us, we spent a lot of time just being with them," Wagner explained. "Thanks to all these long term preparations, the animals accepted that we glued the electrodes onto their skin to measure brain activity (EEG). This is a non-invasive method used in the children’s hospital in Zuerich, where first author Melanie works." Wagner added that surveillance cameras enabled the scientists to monitor the reindeer remotely.

It's not just reindeer sleep habits that are odd, but also their vision. Namely, they can detect ultraviolet (UV) light, which is unusual for most mammals. Dr. Nathaniel J. Dominy, an anthropologist from Dartmouth College, explained that human eyes can be damaged by seeing UV light, which is why they block it as much as they can.

"But ascorbic acid (Vitamin C) is a great way to repair UV damage and reindeer eyes have lots of it," Dominy explained. "So, to protect the health of Rudolph's eyes, kids might want to think about orange juice and carrots as ideal treats."

To make matters even more mysterious, scientists aren't sure why reindeer can see UV light in the first place. Dominy's research on the matter, recently published in the journal i-Perception, proposes that it helps Scottish reindeer feast on their primary food source, lichen.

"In contrast to every other species of ruminant, reindeer graze on lichens, especially during winter," the study explains. "The idea that reindeer use UV vision to detect vegetation amid snow was suggested almost a decade ago, with evidence that vascular plants — but not lichens — are visually distinctive in snow."

While those authors studied a type of lichen that reindeer do not eat, however, Dominy and the other contributors to his study investigated Cladonia rangiferina, which reindeer very much enjoy. While it was difficult for the researchers to spot this lichen amidst the spring snowmelt with just their human eyes, their spectral data revealed that lichen could be very apparent to reindeer during the twilight.

"They also cast new light on the benefits of a luminescent nose — it may light the way for Santa to see by, but it is Rudolph's blue-eyes that allow him to find dinner after a long Christmas season," the Dominy and his co-authors write. If anything, he added, the bigger enigma is why reindeer enjoy this lichen, which is much less nutritious than the plants preferred by large herbivores like reindeer.

"Smaller mammals (think rabbits, pikas) can eat lichens, but their caloric needs are far less than, say, a moose or bison. A reindeer's ability to subsist on lichens is a mystery — an animal of its size shouldn't be able to do it," Dominy explained. "But it is mainly a winter phenomenon, suggesting lichens are a food of last resort."

We need your help to stay independent

Dominy had one other observation about how the science of light can inform reindeer behavior on Christmas, drawing on a 2015 scientific article for children he wrote explaining Rudolph the reindeer's iconic red nose.

"Although rare, red luminescent noses are optimal for human aviation under foggy conditions," Dominy told Salon. "Red light travels farther, or rather scatters less, than other colors, which is why airports and towers use red blinking lights. So Rudolph's red nose is ideal for Santa's vision and need for safe navigation at night, whereas Rudolph's vision is optimal for detecting his favorite food under winter twilight."

Wagner also had a Christmas-related observation about reindeer that related to her study on their rumination and sleep habits.

"As reindeer do not sleep more in winter than in summer and also do not eat as much, they should have enough time to bring the presents," Wagner pointed out.

Israel’s “heavy cost” in Gaza: 15 soldiers killed this weekend

Military officials in Israel reported Sunday that at least 15 soldiers have died in fierce fighting in Gaza this weekend, with Saturday one of the bloodiest days of the current war. According to a BBC report, 154 Israeli soldiers have been killed during the Gaza invasion so far, and the New York Times reports that more than 300 Israeli troops were killed during the Hamas attack on Oct. 7, along with more than 800 civilians. 

Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said in a statement Sunday that the war in Gaza "is exacting a very heavy cost from us," but added, "However, we have no choice but to continue to fight.”

Hamas also issued a statement Sunday describing the Israeli invasion as a "failure" and saying that the Qassam Brigades, Hamas' armed wing, had “defeated [Israel's] soldiers and inflicted them with great losses.”

The Gaza health ministry, which is run by Hamas, reported that 166 Palestinians had been killed Saturday, and that more than 20,000 people — mostly women and children — have been killed in Gaza since the Israeli invasion began. Israeli military officials claimed in a separate statement to Reuters that they have killed roughly 8,000 Palestinian militants since Oct. 7.

According to the BBC, talks hosted by Egypt aimed at achieving another truce in Gaza and further exchanges of Israeli hostages and Palestinian prisoners have not yet reached an agreement. Egyptian officials reportedly "presented a new three-stage plan that would begin with a two-week humanitarian truce" and result in the release of 40 hostages held by Hamas and 120 prisoners held by Israel. The third stage would involve creating an independent entity to oversee humanitarian relief and reconstruction efforts in Gaza.

Big in Japan: How American Christmas cakes became a global holiday tradition

The most expensive strawberry in Japan is the Bijin-hime or “Beautiful Princess,” which can sell for up to $500 per palm-sized fruit. Some sellers display each vibrant red berry in individual ring boxes, swaddled in a cloud-like poof of cotton candy pink felt, both to really underscore the luxury of such a purchase and to protect the soft, honeyed flesh from any bumps or bruises. 

Even more commercial-grade strawberries sold in Japanese grocery stores, which tend to retail for a more reasonable $10 pack of nine berries, are distinct from the American supermarket set in a few notable ways. They are sweeter and redder, more candylike than acidic. In the States, strawberry season is our collective reward for making it through the winter, as white snow gives way to white strawberry blossoms, which eventually bud and burst with fruit. 

That was the case in Japan, too, up until several decades ago. However, a shared cultural reverence for “hatsumono” or first-of-the-season produce, as well as a then-burgeoning consumer economy, slowly inspired farms to compete to bring their strawberries to market earlier and earlier each year, until the growing season was impacted country-wide. As Daisuke Miyazaki, chief executive at Ichigo Tech, a Tokyo-based strawberry consulting firm, told The New York Times, “Peak strawberry season went from April to March to February to January and finally hit Christmas.”

Now, strawberries are a major winter fruit in Japan — enough so that tourists are actually advised to plan their personal strawberry-picking trips after January since the farms are so commercially picked-over by early December — where they often adorn yet another seasonal staple: the decorated, multi-layered, Christmas sponge cakes that have risen over the last century as a perhaps unexpected symbol of festivity and economic prosperity in a country where less than one percent of the population actually observes the holiday. 

Culinary historians suggest that Christmas cakes were first introduced to Japan in 1910, the same year that Fujii Rinemon opened a patisserie called Fujiya in Yokohama. That December, in an effort to attract business from the foreign populations in the Yamate and Kannai districts near his bakery, Fujii began selling simple decorated cakes for the holiday. These were a more traditional British-style fruit cake, heavy with prunes and raisins and alcohol and steamed in the oven until dense and slightly craggy. Fujii decorated these with a basic white sugar glaze and silver bobbles. 

Then, in 1921, Fujii visited America where he was introduced to the classic strawberry shortcake: made by topping a slightly crunchy scone with fresh-whipped cream and fruit. He was delighted, but tweaked the dessert slightly upon his return to Japan, substituting the crumbly biscuit-like base with light sponge cake layers. Thus, the Japanese ichigo shotokeki, or winter strawberry shortcake, was born. 

The next year, Fujii opened two new Fujiya bakery locations where, as journalist Elizabeth Sok writes, they captured the interest of Japanese customers in addition to foreigners. 

We need your help to stay independent

“It is posited that the cake’s color scheme, red and white or kouhaku, reserved traditionally for festive occasions in Japan (as well as the Hinomaru national flag!), contributed to the popularity of the strawberries and fresh cream pairing,” she wrote. “Still, however, in the 1920s, these cakes were very extravagant, and without refrigerators in most homes, their potential for the astronomical fame which awaited would remain dormant until the postwar period.” 

As further reported by Diana Lee, conditions shifted in post-war Japan in such a way that made the proliferation of American-inspired Christmas cakes possible. The sugar and flour rationing of wartime had been lifted, while strides in manufacturing technology made the mass production of Fujiya’s Christmas cakes economically feasible. “To the Japanese, Christmas cakes were the symbols of modernity, Westernization and higher social status,”  Lee wrote. 

By the 1960s, Lee writes, most Japanese households had a refrigerator, so whipped cream gradually replaced buttercream icing, resulting in the Christmas cake style that is most common now: multiple layers of moist sponge cake topped with thick mounds of (occasionally fresh vanilla-flavored) whipping cream, decorated with perfect strawberries and fondant characters, like snowmen, Santa Claus and elves. 

In the hundred years since Christmas cakes were first introduced to Japan, their popularity has continued to skyrocket. In 2014, Fujiya reported that  it sold more than 900,000 pieces of whole and cut Christmas cakes the year prior. Along with their popularity, the price of Christmas cakes has continued to rise, too. 

As Japan Times reported earlier this month, the average price of whole Christmas cakes in Japan this year is up 7.8%, or about $2.20, from a year earlier, reflecting surging costs of almost all major ingredients, making the average cost of the cakes over $31— a little luxury, much like the strawberries on top.