Spring Sale: Get 1 Year, Save 58%

Video shows George Santos fume as he’s confronted with FBI investigation into alleged dog scam

The FBI is investigating Rep. George Santos’, R-N.Y., role in an alleged GoFundMe scheme involving a Navy veteran who claimed that Santos stole thousands of dollars from an online fundraising campaign intended to cover lifesaving surgery for his service dog.

Richard Osthoff told NBC News that he had been in contact with the FBI and provided text messages dating back to his exchanges with Santos in 2016, when the New York Republican had raised about $3,000 for his dog Sapphire.

“I’m elated the big guys finally picked it up,” Osthoff told Politico. “I turned over all my text messages and I’m in the process of turning over everything related to the GoFundMe campaign.”

Osthoff’s allegations gained national attention after Patch.com first reported that the funds Santos helped raise on GoFundMe were never made available to him. 

The alleged fundraising scheme is the latest scandal Santos is facing after making headlines for facing separate allegations related to fraud and lying. Despite receiving pushback to resign, the freshman Republican has refused to leave office but has stepped down from his assigned committees.

“I’m glad to get the ball rolling with the big-wigs,” Osthoff told Politico on Wednesday. “I was worried that what happened to me was too long ago to be prosecuted.”

Reps. Ritchie Torres and Daniel Goldman, both Democrats of New York, who requested that the House ethics panel investigate Santos’ campaign finances last month, cited the report to further criticize the congressman.

“There’s no one that poses a greater threat in Congress than Santos. It’s undeniable that he’s broken the law. We have to protect Congress from George Santos, who threatens it from within,” Torres said in an interview with Politico. 

“Given that a serial liar like Santos is still walking the halls of the Capitol, it is imperative that the Justice Department move quickly to determine whether an indictment is appropriate,” Goldman told the outlet.

When Santos was asked by a reporter about FBI agents investigating him, he fumed that he hadn’t spoken to them and had “no clue” about what was going on.  

He also claimed that he had never met Osthoff who had made the allegations against him. 

“I have no recollection of meeting him,” Santos said.

In an interview broadcast earlier this week, the freshman Republican sat down with the far-right One America News Network discussing how the media has portrayed him.


Want a daily wrap-up of all the news and commentary Salon has to offer? Subscribe to our morning newsletter, Crash Course.


“I come from humble beginnings. I’ve always said that I grew up in abject poverty in Jackson Heights, in Queens, in New York City. People like me aren’t supposed to do big things in life,” Santos said after Caitlin Sinclair asked him about his background.

Santos said there is no situation where it’s acceptable for a lawmaker to lie.

“There’s no circumstance, especially if you’re legislating for the American people right now,” he added. “So what I might have done during the campaign does not reflect what is being done in the office.”

Sinclair replied that the American people can “pretty much forgive anything, but that starts with a sincere apology” and remorse, but “prevailing opinion is you have not yet shown that.”

Santos pushed back and said he made his “sincere apology multiple times.”

“I earlier stated that I thoroughly apologize for lying about my education and embellishing the resume. I’ve made that very, very clear,” he said. “I don’t know what more can be said other than admitting. Is there anything more humbling, humiliating than admitting that on national television?”

Déjà Vuniverse: Why some physicists believe we could be living in a Groundhog Day universe

Something like 13.8 billion years ago, all energy in the universe was condensed into a single point. Until suddenly it wasn’t. The resulting detonation was the most massive explosion in all of the universe’s history, but from it, energy formed into all matter, atoms, molecules, planets and all life on Earth.

This is the Big Bang theory, a model that explains much of what we observe when we look out at the universe. Between all the stars, galaxies and clouds of gas is cosmic background radiation — heat residue from the Big Bang, which is still faintly visible today, and is one of the most glaring pieces of evidence that the universe started from a single point. Measurements using multiple different tools, including satellites and telescopes, indicate this residue is consistent with models of an explosive birth to our universe.

Even Albert Einstein toyed with the idea of a universe that springs back and forth, dying and expanding, over and over.

The universe is still expanding, at a rate of 73 kilometers per second per megaparsec, a metric known as Hubble’s constant. You can picture how this works by imagining two dots on a balloon. As the balloon is inflated, the distance between the two dots will increase; fill the balloon with dots, and everything appears to grow further away from everything else over time as the balloon inflates. If the universe is the balloon and the dots are galaxies, this is a good metaphor for how our universe is changing over time.

Many scientists predict that tens of trillions of years from now, the universe will eventually run out of steam and “freeze.” This will be the heat death of the universe. Also known as the Big Freeze, this theory describes the ultimate fate of the universe as it approaches maximum entropy. When this threshold is reached, there is no more thermal energy or heat. Stars cannot undergo nuclear fusion, so no life can exist.

But an intriguing alternative, even if it doesn’t carry much scientific weight, is that before everything ices over, the universe could fall back again — all the galaxies clumping together, swirling closer and closer instead, until it compacts once again to a point. Astronomers call it the Big Crunch. (Big Bang, Big Crunch… I’m sensing a theme here.) In the distant future, as everything condenses, packing tighter and tighter, it could create the conditions for a Big Bang all over again.

That’s the basic premise behind the cyclic or oscillating universe theory, which actually dates back to the 1930s. Even Albert Einstein toyed with the idea of a universe that springs back and forth, dying and expanding, over and over. Not unlike the 1993 romantic comedy “Groundhog Day,” starring Bill Murray as a weatherman stuck in a time loop, reliving the same day over and over, our universe could be repeatedly cycling through different iterations. Crunch, bang, crunch, bang.

Around this time, Richard Chace Tolman, an American physicist and cosmologist, was the first to really popularize this idea, but he initially set out to disprove it. In the early 20th Century, the Big Bang theory wasn’t mainstream. Most people believed the universe had always been there and always would be. In fact, for many years, “Big Bang” was used derisively, a way to dismiss how ludicrous the idea was to astronomers. But Tolman noticed that the ratio of hydrogen and helium — the two most abundant elements in the universe — could not have happened in a static universe. An explosion most likely kicked things off.

In 1934, Tolman published his book “Relativity, Thermodynamics, and Cosmology,” inspired in part by the descriptions of an expanding universe model first proposed by Edwin Hubble in 1929. He and Hubble actually published together once, a paper describing the expansion of the universe. It’s quite clear that stars and galaxies are spreading out like in our balloon metaphor. What was less clear to Tolman and other astronomers was whether or not gravity will eventually pull the universe back together. “He took the possibility of an oscillating universe quite seriously,” one biography of Tolman said.


Want more health and science stories in your inbox? Subscribe to Salon’s weekly newsletter The Vulgar Scientist.


As the Big Bang became accepted scientific theory, the oscillating universe theory faded away. But some physicists, like Paul Steinhardt and Neil Turok, have picked the idea up again, modified it somewhat and given it new life. A central part of the updated theory has to do with dark energy, a mysterious, not-fully-understood aspect of the universe that is thought to be the driving force behind our expanding universe.

In their 2007 book “Endless Universe: Beyond the Big Bang,” Steinhardt and Turok describe how they came upon this theory by postulating that dark energy could have existed before the Big Bang and is so powerful that it will eventually pull the universe back together using a “springlike” motion that stretches the “branes,” a term used in theoretical physics to describe a type of structure in the universe.

If this were true, that means that our universe is on a seemingly endless loop, a cosmic version of Groundhog Day on a rhythm stretching billions or even trillions of years.

“The potential energy would only be noticeable again after nine billion years of expansion had passed and the density of matter and radiation fell below the potential energy,” Steinhardt and Turok wrote. “Only then would the springlike potential energy take over again, just as it did before the bang. Once again, it would act like a source of dark energy that causes the stretching of the branes to accelerate, just what we are witnessing today….”

“Of course, if it could happen once, there is nothing to stop the whole process from happening again, and again, and again. The bangs could continue forever,” Steinhardt and Turok continued. “Suddenly and inadvertently, we had revived an ancient idea that we had been taught was impossible: a cyclic universe.”

If this were true, that means that our universe is on a seemingly endless loop, a cosmic version of Groundhog Day on a rhythm stretching billions or even trillions of years. Nonetheless, the theory isn’t widely accepted in science. It would be pretty hard to test oscillating universe theory, as no information would likely survive cycling through a Big Bang or a Big Crunch, though mathematical physicist Roger Penrose has argued that black holes from previous universes may have survived the transition.

There are many models of the universe, though in order for a model to be useful it needs to be testable. The Big Bang theory is the best model we have of the entire universe, how it formed and where it’s going. It could be totally wrong, but good luck disproving it. But until we know more about dark energy — arguably the most mysterious of the constituent matter and energy in the universe — we may not have enough evidence pointing to a repeating cycle of universal death and rebirth.

But intriguingly, there may be other universes with different fundamental constants that do have a cyclical quality to them. Of course, the existence of other universes would require the theory of the multiverse to be real. Incidentally, while there are aspects of our universe that hint that we may be living in a multiverse, this, too, is not provable.

Idaho Republican wants kids to “work to earn” their school lunch

An Idaho Republican state lawmaker thinks today’s children need to learn the value of good, honest work if they want to enjoy a hot meal during lunch.

As reported by The Daily Beast, Idaho State Rep. Ron Mendive this week pitched solving local schools’ budget problems by putting students to work in exchange for food.

“If we could find a way for the students to work to earn credits for their school lunch, I don’t think we’d see any of the waste we do in that program because it doesn’t mean much,” he said during a meeting on Tuesday.

Mendive did not elaborate on what kind of labor he wants school children to perform in exchange for basic nutrition, but The Daily Beast’s report notes that Idaho does have laws against non-agricultural child labor that could throw a wrench into the Republican’s plans to put the students to work.

The report goes on to document Mendive’s other controversial stances, such as his promotion of ineffective COVID-19 treatment hydroxychloroquine, his belief that being a prostitute is just as much of a “choice” for women as getting an abortion, and his desire to strip school curriculums or any reference to climate change.

Death in Memphis: Racism, dehumanization and the corrosion of America

Let’s put something in perspective.

In 40 years of covering the cop beat, I’ve never seen anything like the Memphis police murder of Tyre Nichols, the 29-year-old father of one who died on Jan. 10.

I’ve ridden with cops. I’ve been around them as they’ve arrested people for crimes ranging from having sex with chickens to mass murder. I’ve seen them take down serial killers.

I’ve ridden with cops. I’ve been around them as they’ve arrested people for crimes ranging from having sex with chickens to mass murder. I’ve seen them take down serial killers. I’ve never seen anything like the Memphis police murder of Tyre Nichols.

My very first day on the job as a reporter in Laredo, Texas, I did a “ride-along” with an officer who showed me two housing projects on the banks of the Rio Grande that would change my life. A rich white developer had subdivided land he didn’t own (he rented 1,000 acres) and then sold it — illegally — to undocumented workers he’d helped smuggle into the United States so he could exploit them. Many times I saw Border Patrol officers raid those subdivisions. The immigrants were deported, but the so-called landowner never faced any consequences until we started putting his story in the newspaper.

That first night I covered two shootings and a drug deal “gone bad” that ended up with one teenager losing his life after he lost his testicles in a shootout. My photographer threw up when he realized what the two lumps of flesh were sitting in a large puddle of blood.

I’ve witnessed gang fights and wars. I’ve seen good cops and bad cops. I’ve covered stories where cops shot and killed suspects. I’ve covered stories where suspects shot and killed cops. Each story is unique, often horrific and always gut-wrenching. My first book, “Shield the Source,” chronicles the story of a cop shot by two San Antonio brothers who were caught on the “wrong side of town” late at night. Police wanted to inflict “street justice” on the pair for killing the cop. It turned out that the cop in question was speedballing heroin and cocaine at the time of his death and started the encounter that took his life.

One of my favorite stories about a police officer doing the right thing concerns a cop I knew many years ago in San Antonio. He was a ruddy-complected man of German descent who spent his days on the beat on San Antonio’s segregated east side. He walked the beat among the icehouses and lower-income neighborhoods of a mostly Black community, and never had a problem.

One day my photographer and I were talking to him as I was working my beat and a teenager walked out of the 401 Icehouse and motioned to the officer with his finger aimed like a gun, signaling there was something going on inside. The officer didn’t call for backup, and didn’t draw his gun. He walked inside (with my photographer shooting video the entire time) and found a Black teenager pointing a gun at the clerk and arguing over the price of a soda. The officer talked the kid down, handcuffed him without incident and went on his way. In 25 years on the job, that officer told me, his greatest accomplishment in working that neighborhood was, “I’ve never had to draw my service revolver, I have never shot anyone and I have never struck anyone.” He was a neighborhood cop, respected because he respected the concept of “to protect and serve.” Even people I interviewed who he had arrested respected him. As far as I know, he retired without ever being in a gunfight or beating down a suspect.

Today if you look at TV cop dramas, gunfights are romanticized. “The Rookie” with Nathan Fillion, in its first season, spoke of “throwing bullets” as if that were a daily occurrence and one to be enjoyed. But popular culture only reflects real life — sometimes horribly so. 

In 1968 Mayor Richard Daley’s Chicago cops were villainized and vilified for beating protesters at the Democratic National Convention. What the Justice Department did to Bobby Seale in the ensuing criminal trial was considered not only extreme but unacceptable. The only Black defendant in the infamous “Chicago 7” case (he was the eighth) was bound and gagged in court at the order of a judge who openly showed contempt for the protesters in his courtroom. 

Today, we applaud the bullies and forget those who do the job correctly. Millions cheer watching police beat a suspect to death. The suspects are usually Black. The police are bullies in uniforms, and they come in all colors, shapes and sizes. Harold and Kumar got it right: Many of today’s cops seem to be high school bullies who found a way to keep on playing that role after they left school.

It is racism. Most victims of police brutality are Black. That’s nothing new. Richard Pryor joked about it more than 50 years ago — and made Black and white people laugh. White people had a different relationship with police officers, who generally lived in their neighborhoods. White people went bowling with the cops. Black people knew they had to explain that they were just reaching for their wallets so they wouldn’t get shot. 

The officers who congratulated themselves for relentlessly beating a 29-year-old father of one who was just trying to go home also doesn’t seem new. Pryor joked about that too: “Check the manual: can you break a n***er? Yep. You can. Good job, men. Good job.”

But humor is exaggeration aimed to make you laugh at a point that warrants introspection. There’s nothing funny about this exaggeration brought to life. Watching the cruel and dehumanizing beating of Nichols, first by the police and then aided and abetted by the medical first responders — who have been fired for not rendering proper aid — reminds us that there’s more going on here than just racism. When those who are hired to “protect and serve” show so much disrespect, we must realize the problem is bigger than that. Racism at its core is a symptom of dehumanization, and accepting racism allows dehumanization to spread. Nichols’ beating and the reaction of paramedics is a dangerous example of mob mentality, and shows that dehumanization has spread far further than many of us want to admit.


Want a daily wrap-up of all the news and commentary Salon has to offer? Subscribe to our morning newsletter, Crash Course.


Those police officers wore body cameras — and yet they thought they could beat a man to death with impunity. Watching the tape shows you that this wasn’t their first rodeo. They looked as if they were enjoying themselves. Every single arrest made by this Memphis unit, and every action by the officers involved, will now face fierce scrutiny. The fact that the medical first responders had such a callous attitude also demands investigation into every action taken by that unit. Make no mistake: What we saw in Memphis takes a toll on the human soul. It breaks down humanity and destroys the bonds that tie us all together. Hey, bees and ants work in harmony. People apparently cannot. 

We have the gift of self-awareness, but sacrifice it to treat others cruelly and kill members of our own species without any apparent care for the harm that does to all of us.

Patrick Yoes, the national president of the Fraternal Order of Police, issued a statement after the Nichols videotape was made public. “The event as described to us does not constitute legitimate police work or a traffic stop gone wrong,” he said. “This is a criminal assault under the pretext of law.” 

It was a state-sanctioned, cold-blooded murder.

Memphis Police Chief Cerelyn Davis canceled the SCORPION police squad to which the accused officers belonged, saying, “This is not just a professional failing. This is a failing of basic humanity toward another individual.”

The chief is right, of course, but the toll will be heavy. Police who “protect and serve” are needed in all communities. They, along with firefighters and EMS, are supposed to be the first people we call upon when we’re in trouble.

What we saw in Memphis takes a toll on the human soul. It breaks down humanity and destroys the bonds that tie us all together.

But if you don’t trust them, of course you won’t do that. By allowing this type of behavior to persist, we further break the bonds of civility and humanity that bind us together, making further chaos possible and giving anarchy free rein. The police thought they were exercising control. The rest of us understand that they lost control — and there are signs our entire society is losing control.

Into that void step authoritarians. Enter Donald Trump — or for that matter his former attorney general, Bill Barr. I met Barr on an elevator in Sacramento Tuesday night. I was the morning keynote speaker to begin the conference of the California Newspaper Publishers Association. Barr was scheduled as the luncheon speaker. He is on a tour promoting his new book and trying to flip the script on his record as the chief law enforcement officer under Trump. 

Barr has a lot to answer for, including helping to foster a climate that makes events like the Memphis killing inevitable. He lied about Robert Mueller’s report. He supported Trump, right up until the point where to do so could have led to his own indictment for obstruction of justice. We all saw it. If the top law enforcement official in the country can get away with it, why shouldn’t street cops think the same thing? Barr would not accept responsibility for anything he’s done in our elevator meeting, much less acknowledge that I’ve been trying to interview him since the release of the Mueller report.

We’ve seen it all before.

Unfortunately, if we don’t get a handle on those we have entrusted to protect and serve us, we’re going to see it again and again. This kind of rot starts at the top. Violence against innocent people for the joy of inflicting pain, whether it involves Bill Barr or a bunch of Memphis cops, is one of the reasons so many people buy firearms. They want to “protect” themselves — from the government — and have come to believe that we can only be safe when everyone is armed. In reality, the exact opposite is true.

I’ve been to places where everyone is armed. They’re called war zones.

With all the lying and manipulation by the former attorney general, added to mass shootings, police brutality and the overall divisiveness in our country, it may seem that the streets of America are a war zone. But this isn’t a civil war. It’s about as uncivil as it gets.

We’re at war with ourselves. We’re angry and desperate, and we cannot figure out why.

America needs to look in the mirror. And Bill Barr needs to answer my questions. 

MTG appeared to “let the truth slip” about reason for George Santos stepping down from committees

MSNBC News’ Chris Hayes recently broke down remarks made by Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene, R-Ga., that suggest Rep. George Santos, R-N.Y., did not willingly make the decision to step down from his committee assignments.

Just one day after Santos met with House Speaker Kevin McCarthy, R-Calif., reports circulated about the freshman representative’s decision to resign from the committees.

McCarthy claimed Santos made the decision. Sharing details about his conversation with the newly-elected lawmaker, McCarthy said, “We had a discussion and he asked me if he could do that. So, I think it was the appropriate decision.”

During his segment on Tuesday, Hayes offered a comparison of the contradictory remarks made by Greene and McCarthy. According to Hayes, Greene painted a very different picture than McCarthy about Santos’ committee departures.

“McCarthy made it seem like stepping down was entirely Santos’ idea,” Hayes said. “But then Marjorie Taylor Greene let the truth slip about what really motivated Santos to step aside.”

Hayes then shared a clip of Greene speaking with CNN where she insisted that McCarthy actually had Santos distance himself from the committees due to the Republican efforts being made to remove Rep. Ilhan Omar, D-Minn., from the House Foreign Affairs Committee.

“He just felt like that there was so much drama, really, over the situation, and especially what we’re doing to work to remove Ilhan Omar away from the Foreign Affairs Committee,” Greene stated.

Hayes then shared his reaction to the far-right lawmaker’s claims.

“Ahhh, yes,” Hayes reacted. “There you have it! Republicans wanted to clear the decks, get rid of this annoying argument, like, ‘You’re gonna let George Santos serve on committees?’ So now, they can move to kick Congresswoman Omar off Foreign Affairs for absolutely no valid reason because George Santos, who should never have been put on any committees in the first place, really, when you think about it, has given up his assignments.”

Nursing home owners drained cash during pandemic while residents deteriorated

After the nursing home where Leann Sample worked was bought by private investors, it started falling apart. Literally.

Part of a ceiling collapsed on a nurse, the air conditioning conked out regularly, and a toilet once burst on Sample while she was helping a resident in the bathroom, she recalled in a court deposition.

“It’s a disgusting place,” Sample, a nurse aide, testified in 2021.

The decrepit conditions Sample described weren’t due to a lack of money. Over seven years, The Villages of Orleans Health & Rehabilitation Center, located in western New York near Lake Ontario, paid nearly $16 million in rent to its landlord — a company that was owned by the same investors who owned the nursing home, court records show. From those coffers, the owners paid themselves and family members nearly $10 million, while residents injured themselves falling, developed bedsores, missed medications, and stewed in their urine and feces because of a shortage of aides, New York authorities allege.

At the height of the pandemic, lavish payments flowed into real estate, management, and staffing companies financially linked to nursing home owners throughout New York, which requires facilities to file the nation’s most detailed financial reports. Nearly half the state’s 600-plus nursing homes hired companies run or controlled by their owners, frequently paying them well above the cost of services, a KHN analysis found, while the federal government was giving the facilities hundreds of millions in fiscal relief.

In 2020, these affiliated corporations collectively amassed profits of $269 million, yielding average margins of 27%, while the nursing homes that hired them were strained by staff shortages, harrowing injuries, and mounting covid deaths, state records reveal.

“Even during the worst year of New York’s pandemic, when homes were desperately short of staffing and their residents were dying by the thousands, some owners managed to come out millions of dollars ahead,” said Bill Hammond, a senior fellow at the Empire Center for Public Policy, a think tank in Albany, New York.

Some nursing home owners moved money from their facilities through corporate arrangements that are widespread, and legal, in every state. Nationally, nearly 9,000 for-profit nursing homes — the majority — outsource crucial services such as nursing staff, management, and medical supplies to affiliated corporations, known as “related parties,” that their owners own, invest in, or control, federal records show. Many homes don’t even own their buildings but rent them from a related company. Homes pay related parties more than $12 billion a year, but federal regulators do not make them reveal how much they charge above the cost of services, and how much money ends up in owners’ bank accounts.

In some instances, draining nursing home coffers through related parties may amount to fraud: Along with The Villages’ investors, a handful of other New York owners are facing lawsuits from Attorney General Letitia James that claim they pocketed millions from their enterprises that the authorities say should have been used for patient care.

Deciphering these financial practices is timely because the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services is weighing what kind of stringent staffing levels it may mandate, potentially the biggest change to the industry in decades. A proposal due this spring is sure to spark debate about what homes can additionally afford to spend versus what changes would require greater government support. Federal Medicaid experts warned in January that related-party transactions “may artificially inflate” the true cost of nursing home care in reports that facilities file to the government. And the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services’ inspector general is investigating whether homes properly report related-party costs.

‘A Dog Would Get Better Care’

Beth Martino, a spokesperson for the American Health Care Association, said there is no evidence that related companies charge more than independent contractors do for the same services. “The real story is that nursing homes are struggling right now — to recruit and retain caregivers and to keep their doors open,” Martino said.

Lawyers for The Villages and its investors have asked the judge in the case for a delay until April to respond to the allegations of fraud and resident neglect in the lawsuit that the attorney general filed last November. One of the lawyers, Cornelius Murray, said in court papers that many allegations of short-staffing occurred during the pandemic when workers were out sick and the facility was required to accept any patient with covid-19. Lawyers declined to discuss the case with KHN.

In a deposition for that case, Ephram “Mordy” Lahasky, one of Fulton’s owners, disputed that he and fellow investors improperly depleted The Villages’ resources to the detriment of residents.

“I can assure you there was a lot of money left in the facility to make sure that it was not running on a shoestring budget,” he testified. The Villages, Lahasky said, was a “beautiful facility” with “beautiful gardens” where “residents look great” and employee morale was strong.

That wasn’t the opinion of Margarette Volkmar. She said in an affidavit filed with the state lawsuit that her husband was left in his bed with only a diaper on, was bruised by a fall, choked by another resident, given the wrong medication doses, dressed in other residents’ clothes, and covered in unexplainable bruises. After she moved him to another home, he gained back the 60 pounds he had lost and never fell at the new facility, she testified.

“I wouldn’t put a dog in Villages,” she said. “A dog would get better care than he did.”

Owners Invested in Hundreds of Homes

Both The Villages and its related real estate corporation, Telegraph Realty, were controlled by the same trio of investors, although they arranged for the nursing home to be listed in regulatory filings as solely owned by a silent partner and did not disclose their co-ownership of The Villages, court records show. One co-owner, David Gast, disclosed his net worth was $22 million and revealed that he had shares in more than 100 nursing homes, according to a loan application included in court records. Lahasky, whose disclosed net worth was nearly $73 million, said in a deposition he was the biggest nursing home proprietor in Pennsylvania and owned one of New York’s largest ambulance companies.

A third co-owner, Sam Halper, who reported a net worth of about $23 million, is under federal criminal indictment in Pennsylvania on charges of submitting false reports to the government about staffing and patient health at two nursing homes. He has pleaded not guilty. Added together, all the investors in corporations tied to The Villages have stakes or official roles in 275 other facilities across 28 states, federal records show.

The lease that The Villages had with Telegraph Realty required the home to pay up to $1 million in profits on top of the costs of debts and $50,000 a month for rent, according to a copy filed with the lawsuit. The attorney general alleged that, over seven years, the owners gave themselves and other investors more than $18 million from outsized rent profits, management fees, and proceeds from refinancing the property, an act that saddled The Villages with higher debt.

Lindsay Heckler, a supervising attorney at Center for Elder Law & Justice in Buffalo, which provides free legal help to older, disabled, and low-income adults, said she is concerned other nursing home owners in the state fail to provide quality care after purchasing facilities.

“When you see quality of care decline after an ownership change, the question needs to be asked: What’s going on with the finances?” she said.

Inflated Rents and a Plea to Die

Separating a nursing home operation and its building into two corporations is a common practice around the country. In New York, for-profit nursing homes with related-party realty companies spent 19% more of their operating revenue toward rent in 2020 than did for-profits that leased from unaffiliated firms, KHN found.

Fulton Commons Care Center, a nursing home on Long Island, spent nearly a third of its 2020 revenue on rent, a higher portion than all but three other facilities in New York, financial records show. In a lawsuit filed in December, the attorney general charged that the rent paid to Fulton Commons Realty, the company that owned its East Meadow, New York, building, was grossly inflated. Both the home and real estate company were owned by Moshe Kalter and his extended family, according to documents filed with the lawsuit.

In 2020, the nursing home paid nearly $10 million in rent to Fulton Realty, but an auditor for the attorney general calculated the property expenses that year were less than $6 million. The owners of Fulton and their families gave themselves nearly $16 million over four years from inflated rent, substantial management fees, and “no-show” jobs for Kalter’s eight children, the attorney general alleged.

“Rather than honor their legal duty to ensure the highest possible quality of life for the residents in their care, the Fulton Commons owners allegedly maintained insufficient staffing so they could take more money for their own personal gain,” James said in a statement.

Raul Tabora Jr. and David Yaffe, lawyers for Kalter, called the lawsuit’s charges “one-sided” in a written statement to KHN. They said that the payments to the children were not for jobs but because they were shareholders, and that Fulton kept an average balance of $3 million on hand to cover any pressing needs. “The evidence will demonstrate that any time resources are needed, they are provided by Mr. Kalter,” the lawyers wrote.

Residents’ families told investigators that staff shortages existed well before the pandemic. In an affidavit filed with the lawsuit, Frank Hoerauf Jr. said workers left his father sitting in adult diapers without pants and let his hair grow so long it covered his eyes. Another time, they left him screaming in pain from a urinary tract infection, he said.

“Fulton Commons seems like it was operated to be a cash machine for the owners where the care and the quality of life for residents there was very poor,” Hoerauf said.

Another resident, Elena Milack, who had lost one foot to diabetes, complained about poor care for years, including having to ring the call bell for an hour to get help to get to the bathroom, according to an affidavit filed by her daughter-in-law and health proxy. “GET ME OUT OF HERE OR TELL ME WHAT I CAN TAKE TO KILL MYSELF,” she texted her son in summer 2019. In 2020, she contracted an infection that turned her remaining foot black.

“Toes are all infected now,” Milack, a retired law school secretary, texted. “[M]y upper foot is dying and will soon fall off. I am hoping the good Lord will take me before that happens.” She died in November 2020.

Kalter said in a deposition he had never stepped inside his nursing home and did not supervise the quality of the care. He testified he granted full authority over the facility to its administrator and relied on his nephew, who was the controller of the home, to interact with the home’s leadership, according to court records.

In his deposition, Kalter said: “I have no personal knowledge of anything that’s going on in the nursing home.”

According to an affidavit from an auditor for the attorney general’s office, over the course of four years, Kalter deposited nearly $12 million from Fulton into his joint bank account with his wife, Frady.


KHN data editor Holly K. Hacker contributed to this report.

KHN (Kaiser Health News) is a national newsroom that produces in-depth journalism about health issues. Together with Policy Analysis and Polling, KHN is one of the three major operating programs at KFF (Kaiser Family Foundation). KFF is an endowed nonprofit organization providing information on health issues to the nation.

Subscribe to KHN’s free Morning Briefing.

EPA issues rare veto, halting Alaska’s Pebble mine

The Environmental Protection Agency used the Clean Water Act on Monday to veto a proposed copper and gold mining project near Alaska’s Bristol Bay. Not only does the veto apply to the Pebble mine project, which would have dug into the path of the world’s largest sockeye salmon run, it prevents any similar developments from moving forward in the watershed.

“While there are changes in nuance at the various stages, it has been clear for some time that EPA was determined to do something to safeguard the national treasure that is the Bristol Bay Fishery,” said Western Director and Senior Attorney with Natural Resources Defense Council Joel Reynolds, who was involved in the fight against the Pebble mine.

“It’s the wrong place for any large-scale mining project,” he said.

Plans for the mine date back to the early 2000s, when the California-based company Pebble LP proposed a massive, open-pit mine roughly 200 miles southwest of Anchorage, Alaska. Bristol Bay and its watershed sit on huge deposits of gold and copper. According to Pebble LP, the mine would produce hundreds of thousands of tons of the minerals each year, which it says are essential to the green energy transition (copper is often used in clean energy resources like solar and hydro power, and demand for the mineral is skyrocketing as a result). The company also said the mine would create jobs, employing up to 2,000 people.

But with a footprint over 300 square miles, environmental groups argued the mining project would essentially eradicate the Bristol Bay fishery, along with 3,500 acres of wetlands, ponds, and lakes. Sockeye salmon play an important role in Alaska’s economy. Up to 30 million salmon are caught each year during the commercial fishing season, according to the Alaska Department of Fish and Game. The industry employs roughly 15,000 jobs in the area and generates around $2 billion annually.

The Bristol Bay fishery is also an important cultural part of Alaska Native communities. “For us, this is about our Indigenous way of life,” said Alannah Hurley, Executive Director of United Tribes of Bristol Bay, a tribal consortium that has played a crucial role in the protection of Bristol Bay and first petitioned the federal government to use its veto power in 2010. “This is about our ability to remain Indigenous as we move into the future in our traditional homeland.”

In the last 30 years, the EPA has only used its Clean Water Act veto power three times. The agency made similar determinations in 2011 and 2008, blocking a surface coal mine in West Virginia and a flood control project in Mississippi, respectively. As part of its reasoning behind the Bristol Bay veto, the agency focused on the environmental impact of the mine’s waste, banning the disposal of material from the project’s construction and operation. 

“EPA has determined that certain discharges associated with developing the Pebble deposit will have unacceptable adverse effects on certain salmon fishery areas in the Bristol Bay watershed,” the agency wrote in its summary of the final determination.

Following the announcement from the EPA, Pebble LP called the decision “unlawful” and “unprecedented” in a press release, saying it would likely pursue litigation. “The Pebble Deposit is an asset belonging to the people of Alaska,” the company wrote. 

Alaska Governor Mike Dunleavy also spoke out against the EPA’s decision. “EPA’s veto sets a dangerous precedent. Alarmingly, it lays the foundation to stop any development project, mining or non-mining, in any area of Alaska with wetlands and fish-bearing streams,” Dunleavy said in a written statement.

But Reynolds said the governor’s warning mischaracterizes the agency’s intentions. The veto “has meaning for the upper Bristol Bay Watershed … It does not, by any stretch of the imagination, suggest that EPA will be pursuing similar action elsewhere in Alaska.”

The mine may not be not dead in the water, but advocates say the EPA’s announcement is a massive victory for those concerned about the health of the Bay. 

“Today, the Earth won,” Reynolds said. 

“Reckless and unlawful conduct”: Hunter Biden tries to turn the tables on GOP — and Fox News

Hunter Biden’s legal team is trying to turn the tables on his Republican critics, calling for an investigation into his stolen laptop and firing off cease-and-desist letters to Fox News.

Biden’s lawyers on Wednesday sent letters to the Justice Department’s National Security Division and the Delaware attorney general’s office calling for an investigation into “individuals for whom there is considerable reason to believe violated various federal laws in accessing, copying, manipulating, and/or disseminating Mr. Biden’s personal computer data,” including former Trump lawyer Rudy Giuliani, former Trump adviser Steve Bannon, and other allies of the former president, according to NBC News.

The letters also called for an investigation into John Paul Mac Isaac, the Delaware computer repair shop owner who said that Biden left his laptop and never retrieved it.

“Mr. Mac Isaac chose to work with President Donald Trump’s personal lawyer to weaponize Mr. Biden’s personal computer data against his father, Joseph R. Biden, by unlawfully causing the provision of Mr. Biden’s personal data to the New York Post,” the letter to the DOJ said, accusing Isaac and others of “theft of computer services” and Giuliani and others of “possession of stolen property.”

“This failed dirty political trick directly resulted in the exposure, exploitation, and manipulation of Mr. Biden’s private and personal information. Mr. Mac Isaac’s intentional, reckless, and unlawful conduct allowed for hundreds of gigabytes of Mr. Biden’s personal data, without any discretion, to be circulated around the Internet,” the letter to Delaware Attorney General Kathy Jennings said, according to CNN.

The letter also noted that Bannon claimed in September 2020 that he “possessed a copy of Mr. Biden’s computer data” and that he and others “accessed the hard drive’s contents at different points, without authorization from the owner.”

Giuliani and Bannon fired back at Biden over the letters.

“The work order is as clear as it can be. The laptop became abandoned property under John Mac Isaac’s control. Raising concerns now, after so many years, indicates just how devastating the texts and videos from Hunter’s laptop truly are,” a spokesperson for Giuliani told NBC News.

“I thought Biden told us it was all Russian disinformation,” Bannon told the outlet.

Mac Isaac’s attorney dismissed the letter, telling CNN it was an example of a “privileged person hiring yet another high-priced attorney to redirect attention away from his own unlawful actions.”

The letter also calls for an investigation into Giuliani’s attorney Robert Costello, who called the letter a “legally frivolous document.”

Biden has previously dodged questions about whether the content leaked from the laptop is legitimate but the letters appear to acknowledge that at least some of it is. The letters say that evaluating the data has been “exceedingly difficult because, for months, neither the New York Post ‘nor its source for the material, President Donald Trump’s attorney Rudy Giuliani, were willing to share’ that data with the public.”

“More recently, downstream recipients of what has been purported to be Mr. Biden’s hard drive have reported anomalies in the data, suggesting manipulation of it,” the letters added.


Want a daily wrap-up of all the news and commentary Salon has to offer? Subscribe to our morning newsletter, Crash Course.


“These letters do not confirm Mac Isaac’s or others’ versions of a so-called laptop,” Lowell told NBC News. “They address their conduct of seeking, manipulating and disseminating what they allege to be Mr. Biden’s personal data, wherever they claim to have gotten it.”

Mac Isaac has said that Biden dropped the laptop off at his shop in April 2019 and signed a contract that included a policy stating the laptop would become Mac Isaac’s property if it was not picked up within 90 days. Mac Isaac has said that he went through files on the laptop the day after it was dropped off. FBI agents served a subpoena and seized the laptop in December 2019, according to Mac Issac.

A copy of the hard drive was sent to one of Giulaini’s company’s addresses in August or September of 2020, according to Costello, and Giuliani sent a copy to the New York Post. Giuliani claimed at the time that he had “every right to use” the hard drive.

The letters also called for an investigation into Marco Polo, a research group run by Garrett Ziegler, a former aide to Trump White House adviser Peter Navarro. The group published emails and documents from the laptop on a public website. Ziegler told Politico that he received the copy of the laptop from Giuliani and former New York police commissioner Bernard Kerik.

Biden’s team sent a letter to the IRS calling for a probe into Ziegler and calling into question the group’s tax-exempt status.

The group “has failed to operate solely for charitable purposes,” the letter said, according to ABC News. “To the contrary, [Marco Polo] has operated as little more than a thinly disguised political operation to attack the Biden administration and the Biden family.”

Ziegler’s group said in a statement to NBC News that “the letter to the IRS about Marco Polo is full of speculations and basic misunderstandings about the case law surrounding 501(c)(3) organizations. Hopefully, federal and state investigators will see this for what it is: a desperate attempt by Hunter and his family to get the attention off of their crimes.”

Biden’s team also sent a cease-and-desist letter to Fox News and host Tucker Carlson, calling for a retraction and correction of a report that alleged that Biden was part of a “money laundering scheme to finance President Biden’s lifestyle” by paying him $50,000 per month in rent.

Carlson’s promotion of the story is in “flagrant violation of all journalistic professionalism,” the letter said, threatening “potential litigation” if the network does not comply.

Exxon reports record profits, doubles down on fossil fuels

While Americans were reckoning with sky-high gas prices at the pump last year, the country’s biggest oil giant was raking in more money than ever. Exxon Mobil, one of the world’s largest oil companies, reported on Tuesday that it made $56 billion in profits in 2022. That’s the most a Western oil company has ever earned and averages out to around $6.3 million an hour over the course of the year.

It’s not just Exxon. Other major oil companies such as Chevron and Shell are expected to report similar results in the coming weeks, pushing their combined profits to around $200 billion, according to the financial markets data firm Refinitiv. 

Darren Woods, Exxon’s CEO, praised the company’s results on calls with the press, calling them proof that it was right to resist pressure to pull back from fossil fuel production and invest more in renewables. Other oil giants like BP have shifted more of their resources to solar and wind projects – investments that don’t have immediate payoffs. 

“We leaned in when others leaned out, bucking conventional wisdom,” Woods said in an interview with CNBC. 

The unprecedented earnings stem from a combination of trends. In the early days of the pandemic, demand for oil plunged and gas prices nosedived, prompting companies like Exxon to cut costs by shuttering refineries and laying off workers. Just as the economy began to recover, Russia invaded Ukraine, causing a major supply squeeze as the demand for oil returned to pre-pandemic levels. The result: soaring gas prices and major profits for Exxon. 

Governments have responded with anger to Big Oil’s rising profits. In the fourth quarter of 2022, a new EU windfall tax dealt a $1.3 billion blow to Exxon’s overall earnings. The company is now challenging the policy in court. 

“It’s just unlawful and bad policy trying to tax something, when what you actually need is for it to increase,” Exxon’s CFO Kathryn Mikells told Reuters. “It has the opposite effect of what you’re trying to achieve.” The European Commission has maintained that the windfall tax is within its legal authority. 

President Joe Biden has also lashed out at American oil companies, accusing executives of limiting production at a time when gas was prohibitively expensive.   

“The latest earnings reports make clear that oil companies have everything they need, including record profits and thousands of unused but approved permits, to increase production, but they’re instead choosing to plow those profits into padding the pockets of executives and shareholders while House Republicans manufacture excuse after excuse to shield them from any accountability,” said White House spokesman Abdullah Hasan. 

Absent from the discussion is any mention of what boosting oil production could mean for the Biden administration’s climate goals. The International Energy Agency has said that no new oil and gas fields should be developed if the world is to stay on track to limit global temperature increase to 1.5 degrees Celsius above pre-industrial levels and avoid the most disastrous impacts of climate change. 

But the rush to wean European countries off Russian natural gas has driven the president to approve new fossil fuel projects. This week, his administration is reportedly planning to direct the Department of the Interior to grant partial approval to a massive new oil drilling project on federal lands in northern Alaska. Led by oil giant ConocoPhillips, the so-called “Willow project” is expected to unlock more than 600 million barrels of crude, a prospect at odds with Biden’s stated goals of taking action against climate change. 

After news of the upcoming report broke, environmental advocacy organizations such as the National Resources Defense Council blasted the Biden administration, accusing it of planting a carbon bomb at a time the world needs just the opposite. 

“We can’t keep drilling to the ends of the Earth while a runaway climate crisis ravages our world,” said Manish Bapna, the NRDC’s president, in a statement. “The administration needs to draw a line in the tundra, hold the line on carbon pollution, and speed the shift to cleaner, smarter ways to power our future.”

Auckland drenched by New Zealand’s wettest month on record

New Zealand’s capital remained under a state of emergency Monday after the heaviest rainfall on record flooded the city. This month’s unprecedented dousing, which the prime minister attributed to climate change, has left four people dead and thousands more with damaged homes.

Hundreds of emergency personnel are converging on Auckland to assist even as forecasts call for another soaking Tuesday. Authorities have evacuated scores of people. “We have more adverse weather coming and we need to prepare for that,” Rachel Kelleher, the Auckland Emergency Management duty controller, said during a press conference, according to Reuters.

January typically ranks among New Zealand’s drier months. The country’s National Institute of Water and Atmospheric Research says 13 inches of rain has fallen so far this month, an amount usually received during the entire summer. That figure easily eclipsed the 8-inch record for the month set in 1986 and makes it the wettest month since record keeping began in 1909 – surpassing the 11 inches that fell in July of 1998. Another 3 to 5 inches could sop the area in coming days.

“It’s a 1-in-100-year weather event, and we seem to be getting a lot of them at the moment,” Prime Minister Chris Himpkins said in a news broadcast on TVNZ. “I think people can see that there’s a message in that … Climate change is real, it’s with us. We are going to have to deal with more of these extreme weather events in the future. 

The flood follows deluges that soaked Canterbury in June and central New Zealand in August of 2021. Those floods, during one of the warmest winters in New Zealand’s recorded history, displaced more than 1,000 people. 

Rising global average temperatures are associated with the widespread changes in weather patterns, which can intensify extreme weather events. That, in turn, can create a positive feedback loop of more violent storms, more intense heat waves, rising sea levels, and higher temperatures. Studies have shown that such events will likely become more frequent and more extreme with human-induced climate change.

California, for example, experienced record rainfall as a series of atmospheric rivers dumped more than 17 inches of rain on the state in just three weeks after Christmas. The storms killed at least 19 people  and caused some $30 billion in damage from flooding, landslides, and problems. New Zealand can expect similar challenges. “When you have a significant rainfall event like this, rivers can rise quickly,” meteorologist Luis Fernandes said in a statement to CNN, “and roads can literally fall away or become covered and can cut off communities.” 

According to research published in May 2022, the seas surrounding New Zealand are expected to rise sooner than previously thought. With the rate of that increase doubling over the past 60 years, the prognosis suggested that while the global sea level is expected to rise more than 19 inches by 2100, New Zealand, which is sinking, could see more than 3 feet of sea level rise. That will bring a  higher risk of coastal storms, erosion, and flooding.

The overturn of Roe cost the GOP. So why are Republicans now doubling down on abortion bans?

If there was one inescapable takeaway from the midterm elections, it was this: Abortion is a losing issue for Republicans.

Despite reams of historical evidence suggesting November 2022 was going to produce a “red wave,” Democrats racked up dramatic wins, seizing state and federal offices and retaining control of the Senate. Much of the post-election data on why was messy— except when it came to abortion. On that issue, study after study showed that support for abortion rights after the overturn of Roe v. Wade in June was a major — and often deciding — factor. The implicit political advice to Republicans couldn’t be clearer: Back off the draconian abortion restrictions. They’ve done no such thing, however.

The Republican National Committee (RNC) passed a resolution on Monday calling for more attacks on reproductive rights, arguing that the reason Republicans lost so many races in November was that the party wasn’t anti-abortion enough. “Instead of fighting back and exposing Democratic extremism on abortion, many Republican candidates failed to remind Americans of our proud heritage of challenging slavery, segregation, and the forces eroding the family and the sanctity of human life,” read the resolution. To fix the problem, the RNC argued, Republicans need to pass even harsher anti-abortion laws, such as banning first trimester abortions. This resolution was one of the first orders of business after Ronna McDaniel won a fourth term as chair of the RNC, showcasing how serious GOP leadership is about doubling down on anti-choice politics. 

Why Republicans would want to go harder on an issue that most data shows hurts them at the polls is puzzling, initially. But a new study from PerryUndem, which specializes in crafting nuanced polls that dig into the deeper motivations of American voters, suggests why that might be. Their numbers show that, even as the country has grown more progressive on gender and sexuality, sexist views among Republican voters have only grown more entrenched. In addition, the data makes it clear that the driving force behind anti-abortion policies is a belief that women are not smart or moral enough to be allowed control over their own bodies. 

The single best predictor of whether someone opposes abortion rights is if they subscribe to negative stereotypes about women.

“The research tells us that anti-abortion attitudes” are about more than “babies or when life begins,” Tresa Undem, the co-founder of PerryUndem, told Salon. Instead, “views are about one’s fundamental beliefs toward women.” When it comes to Republicans, “they hold the most hostile sexist views.”

In other words, to keep the GOP base motivated to donate, volunteer, and vote in elections, the Republican party needs to appeal to sexist attitudes. The most effective way to win over misogynist voters is to attack reproductive rights. 

As the study shows, the single best predictor of whether someone opposes abortion rights is if they subscribe to negative stereotypes about women and/or are committed to “traditional” gender roles. It’s not just that anti-choice respondents were far more likely than pro-choice respondents to believe that “women are too easily offended” or “white men are the most attacked group in the country right now.” Abortion opponents were also more likely to deny that it’s rape if a man forces himself on his wife. A majority of anti-abortion respondents also believed men understand the biology of abortion better than women do. Over two-thirds of people who support abortion bans agreed “it bothers me when a guy acts like a girl,” while only 28% of pro-choice people disliked men they perceive as effeminate. 

Feminist writer Jill Filipovic summarized the findings by arguing that Republicans are “almost comically insecure when it comes to gender and gender roles,” and tend to view women as “overly-sensitive, irresponsible and immoral, ruining the natural order of things, and in need of male authority.”


Want more Amanda Marcotte on politics? Subscribe to her newsletter Standing Room Only.


Undem singled out one poll question in particular, which asked if “there are many irresponsible women who will decide to have an abortion up until the moment of birth.” The factually correct answer to this question is “no.” As family practitioner Dr. Meera Shah told Salon after failed Republican Senate candidate Mehmet Oz invoked this myth during a debate, “That’s just not something that happens,” and it “doesn’t even make sense,” because you can’t “abort” a pregnancy that is full-term. You just deliver the baby. 

“It’s absurd,” Undem said, “to believe that one woman, let alone ‘many,’ will decide to have an elective abortion, at say 39 weeks carrying around an 8-pound baby, out of irresponsibility.” And yet their polling data shows that nearly 8 out of 10 people who oppose abortion rights believe a sexist myth that defies not just medical science, but common sense. 

The issue isn’t abortion. It’s women’s autonomy.

The PerryUndem research comports with another study published in Political Psychology in November, which examines the attitudes about abortion among self-described libertarians, who mostly tend to vote Republican. Researchers found that this group opposed reproductive rights, but only for women. They supported laws giving men veto power over women’s abortions, as well as “financial abortion” laws that allow a man to opt out of financially supporting a child if a woman refuses to abort a pregnancy. Libertarians, researchers found, have “support for men’s and not women’s reproductive autonomy.”

These findings help explain why Republican candidate for Georgia’s Senate seat, Herschel Walker, lost very little Republican support during the 2022 election, despite widespread reports that he had demanded that two ex-girlfriends get abortions. The issue isn’t abortion, but women’s autonomy.  If the perception is that a man made the abortion choice for a woman, most Republican voters will not hold it against him at the polls. 

Sexist stereotypes about things other than abortion often get attached to bills restricting reproductive rights. In Tennessee, for instance, a bill allowing rape victims to get abortions comes with a poison pill provision that will likely prevent most, if not all, requests for the exception: If a patient makes a “false report or statement,” they can go to prison for a minimum of three years. But, as journalist Jessica Valenti points out, “women across the country have been accused—and arrested!—for making false reports for reasons as simple as a police officer didn’t believe them.” So-called “false” allegations are often quite true, but victims get snared by the myth that women make up rape accusations to get revenge or conceal their own sexual activity. In reality, false rape reports are estimated to be about .5% of overall rape numbers. Lying about rape to the authorities is vanishingly rare. Fear of being accused of lying, however, will likely prevent women from seeking help. 

On January 15, a Planned Parenthood in Peoria, Illinois was set on fire, causing what the clinic says is over a million dollars in damages. Soon authorities arrested a 32-year-old man named Tyler Massengill who admitted to the arson after initially denying the charges. The reason for the attack he gave? He was still bitter over an ex-girlfriend getting an abortion a full three years ago. Sure enough, reporters soon dug up Massengill’s extensive arrest record, which included two charges of domestic battery. Massengill took his behavior to the next level, but, as the PerryUndem data shows, this controlling attitude towards women is all too common, especially among Republican voters. 

These sexist views are “why Republicans can succeed using the rhetoric they do,” Undem told Salon. Republicans know that there’s no substantive voting constituency for their economic policies. Tapping into this anger over women’s economic and social gains allows the party to reach voters who would not be motivated by spending cuts to Social Security or tax cuts for the wealthiest Americans. So while most Americans may reject the misogyny that underpins abortion bans,  the anti-choice message is tapping a larger group of voters than Republicans could otherwise access. If they give up sexism now, they risk losing their core voters without necessarily getting new ones to replace them. Misogyny has been central to the Republican brand for too long, it turns out, for them to risk changing course now. 

The complex simplicity of Black cops and white supremacy

I almost broke my own rule by deciding to watch the new-age lynching video of Tyre Nichols. The footage is of five Memphis police officers savagely beating him like a “human pinata.” For a moment, I thought that watching the video could be the least I could do to bear witness to the tragedy that befell him.

Tyre Nichols’ funeral took place yesterday.

But I know what lynchings of Black people look like. I have seen them in analog form on postcards and in photographs. Memorialized in prints like “The Black Book”, “At the Hands of Persons Unknown: The Lynching of Black America”, “Without Sanctuary”, “A Spectacular Secret: Lynching in American Life and Literature”, “Trouble in Mind: Black Southerners in the Age of Jim Crow” and other books on the subject, all currently on my bookshelf. Of course, America and that vague thing known as “race relations” are much different now than they were in the 19th and 20th centuries. Police body cameras and smartphones now use pixels instead of light and ink. The evil, however, is the same whatever the medium or technology. The impact and purpose of lynching as a type of public ritual remains the same: to terrorize and dehumanize Black people both as individuals and as a group.

When surviving and living and other quotidian actions are exhausting then resting becomes a type of oppositional act and affirmation of our humanity and personhood.

The pleasures and excitement that many white people enjoy from watching Black bodies suffer are also much the same as from the spectacular lynchings of the Jim Crow era when police thuggery was first broadcast into homes. Those white people who are drunk on white racial innocence and who see a distorted view of reality through the white racial frame will likely find such an accurate and raw description of reality quite discomforting. The ability to choose when and how one will be uncomfortable is one of the great privileges of whiteness – and it is one that I do not cater to.


Want a daily wrap-up of all the news and commentary Salon has to offer? Subscribe to our morning newsletter, Crash Course.


The lynching ritual in post-civil rights America adheres closely to the following script:

Video

These images will be circulated widely online and through the mainstream media.There will be fake public “shock” and “amazement” that such things keep happening in America because “this is not who we really are!”

Protests

Civil rights activists, politicians, media personalities, and others will become involved as they promise to pursue “justice” for the victim and their families and community. Most of these people are sincere; too many others are opportunists. Celebrities and high profile politicians and other national leaders will attend the funeral of the victim or otherwise offer their support. Vice President Kamala Harris attended Tyre Nichols’ funeral on Wednesday. President Biden has invited his parents to the State of the Union address next week where he is set to comment about the need for “police reform.”

“Copaganda”

Police propagandists and their agents will spin up the “copaganda” machine to argue ad nauseam that “the vast majority of cops are good and they just do their hard job every day without much acknowledgment.” The mainstream news media will be complicit, of course, in advancing this narrative.

The “few bad apples” talking point will be endlessly repeated.

There will be the inevitable op-eds and other public statements by politicians, activists, and thought leaders that America’s police just need “more training” to prevent these wanton acts of thuggery and violence. The evidence, however, shows that such training and body cameras do not prevent this abuse. If anything, America’s police seem better trained at how to hide and otherwise avoid responsibility for their brutality.

Outrage

After the protests and probes, police defendants are not likely to be properly punished for their obvious crimes. The outrage cycle repeats. As part of this new-age lynching ritual, America will also engage in another tedious “national conversation” about race and racism. Black and brown faces will be featured for several days on the news to talk about “race relations.” Those same Black and brown faces will, with few exceptions, largely disappear from the mainstream news media until the next “racism story.” The (white) American public will quickly lose interest in the story. They — and too many people of all backgrounds — are more concerned with Black celebrities acting badly at the Oscars and other such foolishness.

In the case of Tyre Nichols, much discussion is centered upon the “discovery” that Black police can be agents of white supremacy as they harass, brutalize, and kill other Black people. The public displays of “shock” and “surprise” upon release of the footage should serve as an indictment of America’s broken educational system. After all, James Baldwin said the following about Black police officers and their brutality against the Black community in his 1985 book “The Evidence of Things Not Seen”:

Black policemen were another matter. We used to say, “If you must call a policeman” —  for we hardly ever did — “for God’s sake, try to make sure it’s a White one.” A Black policeman could completely demolish you. He knew far more about you than a White policeman could and you were without defenses before this Black brother in uniform whose entire reason for breathing seemed to be his hope to offer proof that, though he was Black, he was not Black like you.

“Spoiler alert: Black cops can be racist because they are Black cops,” writes Michael Harriot at TheGriot. “So when demonstrators, activists and regular Black people refer to the police as racist, they are not complaining about the content held within the individual hearts of cops”:

Farmers farm.

Singers sing.

Police perform racism.

“But why must all this ‘good’ come only after videos of Black people being killed by police have circulated on autoplay?” asks Washington Post columnist Karen Attiah:

Little has changed systemically in the decade of #BLM. So how do we, in the media, continue justifying this normalization of Black death? How are the graphic deaths of Black people acceptable to consume? Especially when White death — yes, the police kill White people, too — gets nothing like this treatment?

In total, the ritual of these new-age lynchings is a public spectacle of Black pain.

The impact and purpose of lynching as a type of public ritual remains the same: to terrorize and dehumanize black people both as individuals and as a group.

Georgetown Law professor and NBC News legal analyst Paul Butler further explained: “In the end, the most important constant in these new-age lynchings is how they are part of a larger dynamic where life in a racist society is exhausting and lethal for black and brown people.”

As I wrote in a previous essay here at Salon, “Beyond the clinical language, racial battle fatigue causes Black and brown people in America to live shorter lives than white people and to die at higher rates from heart disease, strokes, cancer, high blood pressure, and other maladies. Like other Black people in America and across the world, I know that racial battle fatigue is killing me, both slowly and quickly. I am not alone in this experience.”

We Black Americans are so very tired because anti-black police thuggery and other forms of institutional and structural violence are enduring features of American (and global) society. When surviving and living and other quotidian actions are exhausting then resting becomes a type of oppositional act and affirmation of our humanity and personhood.

In her book “Rest Is Resistance: A Manifesto”, Tricia Hersey writes:

All of culture is working in collaboration for us not to rest and when we do listen to our bodies and take reset, many feel extreme guilt and shame. Embrace knowing that you have been manipulated and scammed by a violent system as powerful evidence. Now with this knowledge you can grieve, repair, rest, and heal….

The idea of rest as resistance is a powerful counternarrative to the dominant story. Protest and resistance doesn’t look one way. It’s what’s really happening on the ground in the small and important details of our lives. It says, “No, this isn’t the full story. I have another perspective. I can speak for myself.” It’s living when someone told you you should die. It’s centering joy when pain and oppression surround you daily. It’s living in your truth, even when your heart trembles at the thought of being vulnerable. It’s napping when the entire culture calls you lazy. It’s sleeping when you have been told by capitalism that you aren’t doing enough. It’s honoring a day, a week, a second for Sabbath. It’s reimagining what a Sabbath can look like based on your own history. Resistance is laying down when you have been told to keep going.

If we Black and brown people were not exhausted, then we would not be fully human. And it is our full humanity that white supremacy is trying to deny us.

In the end, I decided that I do not need to see that horrible new-age police lynching video to know (again) that what happened to Nichols was evil and wrong. I will not subject myself to that trauma.

Instead, I chose to honor his memory by working to prevent such things from happening to anyone else – whatever their skin color may be — here in America or anywhere else. We need to rest to keep fighting against the inhumane system that killed Tyre Nichols because that struggle has lasted centuries and shows no sign of ending anytime soon. To rest is not an act of disrespect to Nichols’ memory. Instead, it is a strong affirmation of Black life and why Black lives matter in a society where those basic facts are viewed as anathema and a provocation by white America.

Why Groundhog Day has its roots in astronomy

As one of the few — okay, probably the only — Western tradition that revolves around a marmot’s morning ritual, Groundhog Day is a particularly bizarre North American superstition. Each year, on the morning of Feb. 2, it is said that if a groundhog comes out of its burrow and observes its shadow because the skies are clear, it will retreat out of fear, at which point winter continues for six weeks longer. If it does not observe its shadow due to overcast skies, spring will come early. The superstition comes from Pennsylvania Dutch culture, which makes sense given that the groundhog’s range is largely confined to eastern U.S. states like Pennsylvania as well as Canada. (Nowadays, much of the press coverage of Groundhog Day revolves not around any old groundhog, but a specific groundhog in Punxsutawney, Pennsylvania, nicknamed Punxsutawney Phil, and for whom the town holds a large festival annually.)

While clear skies usually mean winter is still near, and clouds in the sky mean the opposite, there isn’t anything scientific about this tradition. In fact, The National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) has reported that using a groundhog as a weather forecaster doesn’t really work most of the time. In the last 10 years, Punxsutawney Phil been correct about 40 percent with his predictions. Phil — or rather, the succession of western Pennyslvanian groundhogs who have borne the honorific of Punxsutawney Phil over more than a century — doesn’t have a good track record prior to that either, and has been consistently inconsistent since he got the gig in the late 19th century. 

“In 1887, when he made his debut as the official groundhog forecaster for the entire country, Phil saw his shadow,” NOAA explained. “His first prediction of six more weeks of winter was accurate for a few regions, but it came up short for several others.”


Want more health and science stories in your inbox? Subscribe to Salon’s weekly newsletter The Vulgar Scientist.


NOAA says predicting the arrival of springtime for an entire country is nearly impossible because of such varied regional climates, and Phil’s track record is a testament to that. And while Groundhog Day is ostensibly a meteorological event, the tradition has roots — surprisingly — in astronomy.

So what could a tradition about a burrowing land mammal possibly have to do with the motions of the stars and planets?

Groundhog Day is what astronomers call a “cross-quarter day,” and these days were used by the ancient Celts to signify markers of a new season.

The origins of the tradition, as explained by History.com, stem from an ancient Christian celebration called Candlemas where clergy would distribute candles for winter. These candles were meant to represent how long and cold the winter would be that year. Germans took this concept and replaced candles with an animal: the hedgehog. However, hedgehogs are native only to Europe, Asia, and Africa; they do not naturally occur in the Americas. Once Germans settled in Pennsylvania, the tradition morphed to using a groundhog as the weatherman instead.

Despite the evolution of Groundhog Day, the date — February 2 — has stayed the same. And it’s not a random date that the Christians chose; it was significant because it fell in the middle of the December solstice and the March equinox — the first of a few astronomical origins to Groundhog Day.

As Berkeley astronomer Bryan Méndez writes, it is likely not a coincidence that Groundhog Day coincides with the ancient Celtic festival called Imbolc.

“Imbolc is observed on February 1 to celebrate the start of spring at the cross-quarter day, which now occurs on February 3 in the Gregorian calendar,” Méndez says. “Some traditions of Imbolc held it as a day to divine when the coming of spring would be, considering a sunny Imbolc to indicate a late start to the spring season; this was very likely an influence on the Candlemas/Badger Day traditions that came later.”

Groundhog Day is what astronomers call a “cross-quarter day,” and these days were used by the ancient Celts to signify markers of a new season. As Ohio State University’s Astronomer Richard Pogge notes, The Celtic Solar Calendar and Japanese Luni-Solar Calendars used the cross-quarter days to mark the beginning of the various seasons. 

“The Spring and Fall Equinoxes are the times of equal-length day and night and the Summer and Winter Solstices are the longest and shortest day, respectively; in current usage these each define the official beginning of a season,” Harvard astronomer Avi Loeb explained to Salon. As an example, he noted that summer begins around June 21st. “However, a less-used parallel system holds that June 21st is actually Midsummer’s Day, which then requires the start of summer to be in early May.” 

In other words, a cross-quarter day — the midpoint between two seasons.

“Cross-Quarter Days mark the middle of each season under our current system, or seasonal boundaries under the alternative system,” Loeb elaborated. “Due to the insertion of a Leap Day on February 29th every four years, the exact dates of these eight astronomical events shift back and forth, with a total range of about 54 hours.”

This is all to say that Groundhog Day is yet another example of how ancient humans’ understanding of astronomy influences our lives today — much more than, say, the random convulsions of a ground-burrowing mammal in Pennsylvania.

Wrongful death lawsuit against Kyle Rittenhouse moves forward

Kyle Rittenhouse, a Wisconsin man who skyrocketed to fame in right-wing circles after shooting and killing two protesters during a social rights march in 2020, is now facing a wrongful death lawsuit filed by a victim’s father, according to PBS.

The lawsuit was filed by John Huber, the father of one of the two victims, and also includes city officials and police officers. U.S. District Judge Lynn Adelman dismissed motions from the city officials, police officers and Rittenhouse to dismiss the civil rights case in its entirety.

Huber’s lawsuit states that Rittenhouse conspired with police officers to intentionally cause harm to the protesters who were marching in reaction to the death of Jacob Blake, killed by a Wisconsin police officer.

Rittenhouse, an Illinois resident, drove to the demonstrations in Wisconsin and was a minor at age 17 at the time.

In the ruling, Adelman said Huber’s death “could plausibly be regarded as having been caused by the actions of the government defendants. Huber was killed after Rittenhouse was running after he shot and killed his first victim in the parking lot of a car dealership and, Huber hit Rittenhouse with a skateboard to disarm him. After falling to the ground, Rittenhouse fatally shot Huber and wounded another protester Gaige Grosskreutz, who also has filed a civil lawsuit against Rittenhouse.

Huber’s lawyers and private investigators needed over 100 hours to locate Rittenhouse to serve him with the civil lawsuit paperwork, eventually serving him at his sister’s house. Rittenhouse’s lawyers tried to argue the case should be dismissed because he was not properly served. The judge dismissed that claim.

Rittenhouse has become a popular Republican right-wing speaker at public events and has nearly 1 million followers on Twitter.

Capitol rioter bursts into tears after being sentenced to 68-months

A Marine Corps veteran who participated in the January 6 insurrection just received 68 months in prison — the longest sentence of anyone involved in the attack to date — shortly after giving a tearful speech to the judge trying to beg for leniency, according to POLITICO on Wednesday.

“Daniel Caldwell, a 51-year-old Marine Corps veteran, delivered a tearful apology in court to the officers he sprayed, expressing remorse for his actions that day and pleading with U.S. District Judge Colleen Kollar-Kotelly for mercy,” reported Kyle Cheney. “But Kollar-Kotelly repeatedly described Caldwell as an ‘insurrectionist’ and noted that his deployment of chemical spray at officers created such an intense cloud that it nearly broke the depleted police line by itself. Though no officers directly attributed their injuries that day to Caldwell’s actions, Kollar-Kotelly said his actions undoubtedly contributed to their physical and psychological trauma.”

“You’re entitled to your political views but not to an insurrection,” said Kollar Kotelly as she handed down the sentence. “You were an insurrectionist.”

“I must face my actions head on,” said Caldwell tearfully, in his speech. “I hope that you and our country never have to face another day like January 6th.”

Caldwell, a resident of The Colony, Texas, was caught on video using a chemical spray on more than a dozen police officers at the Capitol, making some violently sick and causing at least one to “vomit uncontrollably.” “The air was so thick with chemicals that it wasn’t clear whether the officers he hit were injured by him directly or by a combination of factors,” noted POLITICO.

Almost a thousand people have been charged, convicted, or accepted plea deals in connection with the January 6 attack — the largest-scale criminal prosecution ever to take place in U.S. history. The charges range from misdemeanor picketing and trespass to assault on police officers, as well as seditious conspiracy charges against ringleaders of the far-right groups the Proud Boys and Oath Keepers.

Senate Republicans are “deeply disturbed” by DirecTV dropping Newsmax

Last week, the cable provider DirecTV announced that it will be dropping the conservative news network Newsmax from its channel lineup and a handful of Republican senators, led by Senator Ted Cruz, are up in arms about it.

Per a statement from representatives for DirecTV, the decision was made after the two parties failed to come to an agreement after a back and forth regarding rate increases, but the GOP senators are seeing a different motive there.

On Wednesday, a letter written by Cruz along with Lindsey Graham, Mike Lee and Tom Cotton was reported on by The Hill in which they demand answers from DirecTV’s corporate leadership as to why they made the decision to no longer offer the channel as part of their package offerings.

“DirecTV’s decision follows recent revelations of collusion between Big Tech companies and Democrat officials to label conservative speech as ‘misinformation’ and censor it,” Cruz and the other senators wrote in their letter. “The silencing of conservative speech at the request of government officials is a direct assault on free speech and a threat to democracy.”  

According to The Hill, the senators are requesting information as to whether “DirecTV, or its parent company, AT&T, communicated with any federal, state, or local government officials,” prior to dropping the network, which has favorably covered Trump and other likeminded conservatives.


Want a daily wrap-up of all the news and commentary Salon has to offer? Subscribe to our morning newsletter, Crash Course.


On Wednesday afternoon, Newsmax ran an article on the senators going to bat for them,  detailing action points for how others can join in. In addition to listing a toll free number that people can call to “demand they bring Newsmax back on air,” they write in bold print that Trump personally urges users to cancel DirecTV as a result of the network being pulled.

“If DirecTV tells you we are still negotiating, that is a lie!,” said Newsmax “They have told Newsmax we will never be on a regular cable channel. DirecTV also replaced Newsmax with a channel that has no news and no ratings. Also, Newsmax’s livestream is ending soon on other platforms, so unless you get it on DirecTV you will have to cancel their service.”

Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis has also chimed in on the matter, according to Deadline, saying “I think there should be no ideological litmus test when you have these big companies that have the decision to make or break a news network, or any type of network. They will give different rationales for why they don’t want to do it, but the reality is they have so much other content that is very lightly viewed, and they keep that on, and it seems it is the One America News and the Newsmax that are being targeted. So I think it does warrant an investigation.”

DeSantis is urging Congress to take up the investigation.

 

3 biggest mistakes to avoid when cooking mushrooms

Because they provide so much depth and flavor, mushrooms are the starring ingredient in many of my favorite dishes to cook at home. They’re also a cornerstone of vegetarian and vegan diets. Why, then, do so many cooks struggle with correctly cooking mushrooms in the kitchen?

I love super buttery, sautéed mushrooms with lots of flaky salt and fresh herbs. I’m talking maybe a whole stick of unsalted butter (or even browned butter), a handful of finely chopped herbs and heaps of rich, deeply flavored, earthy mushrooms of different varieties.

I’ve been cooking with mushrooms for a long time, everything from mushroom pastas and soups to the super-crispy roasted mushrooms my mom asks for with her steak. No matter which way you decide to cook mushrooms, though, there are three important factors to keep in mind.

To guide you, I developed this primer on how to cook mushrooms at home. Whether you’re using cremini, oyster, portobello, white button or practically any other variety, these techniques are all applicable. If you’re looking to master mushrooms — especially when it comes to sautéeing them — here’s a rundown of the most important mistakes to avoid.

How to clean and prepare mushrooms

When it comes to cooking mushrooms, the key variables to consider are heat, pan size and salt. Before we get into the nitty-gritty, let’s first review how to clean and prepare this vegetable.

As with most produce, you’ll want to begin with the freshest product imaginable. If the mushrooms you pull out of the fridge are a bit slimy or foul-smelling, don’t take the risk and just discard them instead.

I love super buttery, sautéed mushrooms with lots of flaky salt and fresh herbs.

Don’t put the mushrooms under running water or throw them into a colander for a wash. Because mushrooms are uber-porous, they’ll soak up lots of that now-dirty water. Simply clean the mushrooms with a slightly dampened paper towel or cloth, removing as much grit, soil and grime as possible. Finally, make sure they’re as dry as can be before you put them in a hot pan.

If you’re preparing fresh morel mushrooms, you’ll use a slightly different cleaning approach. This type of mushroom is soaked, while others are not.

How to cook mushrooms

1. Heat

Don’t be spooked by high-heat cooking if you’re planning to use the stovetop. Many foods will only turn out the way you’d like them to if you’re willing to cook or sear them over high heat. This is the case for almost any type of mushroom.

I don’t love thinly sliced mushrooms; since there’s less surface area there, they don’t take to heat as well as thickly-sliced mushrooms or quartered mushrooms. They’re more likely to turn out flaccid and flimsy instead of crisp and brown. No matter how you cut your mushrooms, though, always grab a very sharp knife and a stabilized cutting board.

2. Pan size

When they’re ready to cook, reach for a pan or skillet that seems like it might be too big. You’ll need lots of room for properly cooked mushrooms. Cast iron is great, but practically any pan works.

Next, warm up some sort of cooking fat before adding the mushrooms to the pan. Because they’re super porous, the mushrooms will soak up some of the cooking fat. I tend to like using high-quality, unsalted butter and not a flavorless oil.

When you’re ready to add the mushrooms to the pan, make sure they’re in a single layer with little-to-no overlap, or else they’ll steam. Cook them in batches, if need be, but don’t overcrowd the pan, or the mushrooms will never brown properly. Also, remember that you’re going to be cooking over (at least) medium-high heat here.

3. Salt

This is the big one: Do not salt the mushrooms too early in the cooking process.

Salting too early often draws out too much of the inherent moisture or liquid, which can be a bit overwhelming if you’re a mushroom newbie making a large batch. (You might end up asking Alexa if it’s normal for mushrooms to give off so much water.) The liquid will seep out on its own over the course of the beginning of the cooking process, but adding salt will speed up that process and practically fill up your skillet with mushroom water.


Want more great food writing and recipes? Subscribe to Salon Food’s newsletter, The Bite.


A common-sense approach is to generally avoid salting mushrooms until they’ve been perfectly caramelized and crisped. You essentially want to cook them until the water has been released and evaporated or reduced, at which point the mushroom flavor should be doubly concentrated and the ‘shrooms should begin to brown.

Keep in mind that it’s quite literally impossible for mushrooms to crisp or brown if they’re sitting in a puddle of liquid and the heat isn’t high enough. Don’t disturb the mushrooms much; let them cook, brown and caramelize without being stirred about throughout the cooking process (something that really holds true for most foods). The moisture should evaporate on its own, which will also help embolden and deepen the intrinsic mushroom flavor even further.

Final thoughts

At the end of the cooking process, once the mushrooms have reached your desired color and texture and the pan is relatively dry, it’s finally time to season them with salt. For best results, I recommend reaching for flaky salt.

I think mushrooms are amazing on their own, or perhaps with butter and herbs, but some are fans of adding sherry or wine. Others even opt for vinegar or sauces like Worcestershire or fish sauce. As I always like to say, it’s your kitchen, so season according to your own tastes.

Magnesium: Everything you need to know about this important micronutrient

There’s been a lot of chatter on social media over the past few months about the importance of magnesium supplements. Many suggest that symptoms such as trouble sleeping, tense muscles and low energy are all signs you’re deficient and should be taking a magnesium supplement.

As it turns out, many of us probably are somewhat deficient in magnesium. According to research, most aren’t consuming the recommended amount of magnesium to support our body’s needs. It’s also estimated that in developed countries, between 10-30% of the population has a slight magnesium deficiency.

Magnesium is one of the many micronutrients the body requires to remain healthy. It’s essential for helping more than 300 enzymes carry out numerous chemical processes in the body, including those that produce proteins, support strong bones, control blood sugar and blood pressure and maintain healthy muscles and nerves. Magnesium also acts as an electrical conductor that helps the heart beat and contracts muscles.

Considering how important magnesium is for the body, if you aren’t getting enough, it can eventually lead to a range of health problems. But even though most of us are probably somewhat deficient in magnesium, that doesn’t mean you need to reach for supplements to make sure you’re getting enough. In fact, with the right planning, most of us can get all the magnesium we need from the foods we eat.

Signs of a deficiency

Most people with a magnesium deficiency are undiagnosed because magnesium levels in the blood don’t accurately reflect how much magnesium is actually stored in our cells. Not to mention that signs your magnesium levels are low only become obvious by the time you have a deficiency. Symptoms include weakness, loss of appetite, fatigue, nausea and vomiting. But the symptoms you have and their severity will depend on just how low your magnesium levels are. Left unchecked, a magnesium deficiency is associated with an increased risk of certain chronic illnesses, including cardiovascular disease, osteoporosis, type 2 diabetes, migraine and Alzheimer’s disease.

While anyone can develop a magnesium deficiency, certain groups are more at risk than others — including children and adolescents, older people and post-menopausal women.

Conditions such as coeliac disease and inflammatory bowel syndrome, which make it difficult for the body to absorb nutrients, may make you more prone to magnesium deficiency — even with a healthy diet. People with Type 2 diabetes and alcoholics are also more likely to have low magnesium levels.

Furthermore, the vast majority of people in developed countries are at risk of a magnesium deficiency due to chronic illnesses, certain prescription drugs (such as diuretics and antibiotics, which deplete magnesium levels), declining magnesium contents in crops and diets high in processed foods.

You can get enough in your diet

Given the many problems that can happen due to low magnesium levels, it’s important to make sure you’re getting enough in your diet.

The recommended amount of magnesium a person should aim to consume daily will depend on their age and health. But in general, men ages 19-51 should get between 400-420 mg daily, while women should aim for 310-320 mg.

Though fruit and vegetables now contain less magnesium than they did 50 years ago — and processing removes around 80% of this mineral from foods — it’s still possible to get all the magnesium you need in your diet if you plan carefully. Foods such as nuts, seeds, whole grains, beans, green leafy vegetables (such as kale or broccoli), milk, yogurt and fortified foods all contain plenty of magnesium. One ounce of almonds alone contains 20% of the daily magnesium requirements of adults.

While most of us will be able to get all the magnesium we need from the foods we eat, certain groups such as older adults and those with certain health conditions may need to take a magnesium supplement. But it’s important to speak with your doctor before starting supplements.

While magnesium supplements are safe in their suggested dosages, it’s important to only take the recommended amount. Taking too much can cause certain side effects, including diarrhea, low mood and low blood pressure. It’s also vital that those with kidney disease do not take them unless they have been prescribed.

Magnesium can also alter the effectiveness of several medications, including some common antibiotics, diuretics and heart medications, alongside over-the-counter antacids and laxatives. This is why it’s important to consult a doctor before starting magnesium supplements.

Magnesium supplements aren’t a quick fix. While they may be necessary at times, they won’t address the root causes of your deficiency, such as certain health conditions that may be contributing to low levels. This is why it’s important to focus on maintaining a healthy lifestyle, which includes exercise, good sleep and eating a balanced diet. Not to mention that vitamins and minerals are better absorbed by the body when they come from whole foods.

Hazel Flight, Programme Lead Nutrition and Health, Edge Hill University

This article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license.

George Santos: A democracy can’t easily penalize lies by politicians

George Santos is not the first politician to have lied, but the fables he told to get elected to Congress may be in a class by themselves. Historian Sean Wilentz remarked that while embellishments happen, Santos’ lies are different — “there is no example like it” in American history, Wilentz told Vox in a late-January, 2023, story.

Columnist Peggy Noonan wrote that Santos was “a stone cold liar who effectively committed election fraud.”

And now Santos has taken the dramatic step of removing himself temporarily from the committees he’s been assigned to: the House Small Business Committee and the Science, Space and Technology Committee. The Washington Post reports Santos told his GOP colleagues that he would be a “distraction” until cleared in several probes of his lies.

While Santos’ lies got some attention from local media, they did not become widely known until The New York Times published an exposé after his election.

Santos’ lies may have gotten him into hot water with the voters who put him in the House, and a few of his colleagues, including the New York GOP, want him to resign. CBS News reported that federal investigators are looking at Santos’ finances and financial disclosures.

But the bulk of Santos’ misrepresentations may be protected by the First Amendment. The U.S. Supreme Court has concluded that lies enjoy First Amendment protection — not because of their value, but because the government cannot be trusted with the power to regulate lies.

In other words, lies are protected by the First Amendment to safeguard democracy.

So how can unwitting voters be protected from sending a fraud to Congress?

Any attempt to craft a law aimed at the lies in politics will run into practical enforcement problems. And attempts to regulate such lies could collide with a 2012 Supreme Court case United States v. Alvarez.

Lies and the First Amendment

Xavier Alvarez was a fabulist and a member of a public water board who lied about having received the Congressional Medal of Honor in a public meeting. He was charged in 2007 with violating the Stolen Valor Act, which made it a federal crime to lie about having received a military medal.

The Supreme Court rejected the government’s argument that lies should not be protected by the First Amendment. The court concluded that lies are protected by the First Amendment unless there is a legally recognized harm, such as defamation or fraud, associated with the lie. So the Stolen Valor Act was struck down as an unconstitutional restriction on speech. The court pointed out that some false statements are “inevitable if there is to be open and vigorous expression of views in public and private conversation.”

Crucially, the court feared that the power to criminalize lies could damage American democracy. The court reasoned that unless the First Amendment limits the power of the government to criminalize lies, the government could establish an “endless list of subjects about which false statements are punishable.”

Justice Anthony Kennedy, who wrote the majority opinion in Alvarez, illustrated this danger by citing George Orwell’s dystopian novel “1984,” in which a totalitarian government relied on a Ministry of Truth to criminalize dissent. Our constitutional tradition, he wrote, “stands against the idea that we need” a Ministry of Truth.

Lies, politics and social media

George Santos, unlike Xavier Alvarez, lied during an election campaign.

In Alvarez, the Supreme Court expressed concern about laws criminalizing lies in politics. It warned that the Stolen Valor Act applied to “political contexts, where although such lies are more likely to cause harm,” the risk that prosecutors would bring charges for ideological reasons was also high.

The court believed that the marketplace of ideas was a more effective and less dangerous mechanism for policing lies, particularly in politics. Politicians and journalists have the incentives and the resources to examine the records of candidates such as Santos to uncover and expose falsehoods.

The story of George Santos, though, is a cautionary tale for those who hold an idealized view of how the marketplace of ideas operates in contemporary American politics.

Democracy has not had a long run when measured against the course of human history. From the founding of the American republic in the late 18th century until the advent of the modern era, there was a rough division of labor. Citizens selected leaders, and experts played a critical gatekeeping role, mediating the flow of information.

New information technologies have largely displaced the role of experts. Everyone now claims to be an expert who can decide for themselves whether COVID-19 vaccines are effective or who really won the 2020 presidential election. These technologies have also destroyed the economic model that once sustained local newspapers.

Thus, although one local newspaper did report on Santos’ misrepresentations, his election is evidence that the loss of news reporting jobs has damaged America’s democracy.

Lies that harm democracy

The election of George Santos illustrates the challenges facing American democracy. The First Amendment was written in an era when government censorship was the principal danger to self-government. Today, politicians and ordinary citizens can harness new information technologies to spread misinformation and deepen polarization. A weakened news media will fail to police those assertions, or a partisan news media will amplify them.

As a scholar of constitutional law, comparative constitutionalism, democracy and authoritarianism, I believe that Justice Kennedy’s Alvarez opinion relied on a flawed understanding of the dangers facing democracy. He maintained that government regulation of speech is a greater threat to democracy than are lies. Laws that targeted lies would have to survive the most exacting scrutiny — which is nearly always fatal to government regulation of speech.

Justice Stephen Breyer’s concurring opinion argued that a different test should be used. Courts, Breyer said, should assess any speech-related harm that might flow from the law as well as the importance of the government objective and whether the law furthers that objective. This is known as intermediate scrutiny or proportionality analysis. It is a form of analysis that is widely used by constitutional courts in other democracies.

Intermediate scrutiny or proportionality analysis does not treat all government regulations of speech as presumptively unconstitutional. It forces courts to balance the value of the speech against the justifications for the law in question. That is the right test, Justice Breyer concluded, when assessing laws that penalize “false statements about easily verifiable facts.”

The two approaches will lead to different results when governments seek to regulate lies. Even proposed, narrowly written laws aimed at factual misrepresentations by politicians about their records or about who won an election might not survive the high degree of protection afforded lies in the United States.

Intermediate scrutiny or proportionality analysis, on the other hand, will likely enable some government regulation of lies — including those of the next George Santos – to survive legal challenge.

Democracies have a better long-term survival track record than dictatorships because they can and do evolve to deal with new dangers. The success of America’s experiment in self-government may well hinge, I believe, on whether the country’s democracy can evolve to deal with new information technologies that help spread falsehoods that undermine democracy.

Miguel Schor, Professor of Law and Associate Director of the Drake University Constitutional Law Center, Drake University

This article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license. Read the original article.

College Board changes syllabus for AP African American studies after pressure from Ron DeSantis

The College Board on Wednesday released the official curriculum for its new Advanced Placement course in African American Studies, missing much of the content that drew critical pushback from Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis.

Stripped from the curriculum were the names of many prominent Black writers and scholars who discuss critical race theory, Black feminism and the intersection between race and queer identity. 

Another significant portion removed from the course was the topic of Black Lives Matter. Taking its place is a new subject — “Black conservatism” — offered as an idea for a research project. 

The AP course was announced in August, with the College Board claiming it was time to offer a class to high school students that discussed these topics. Many Black scholars, including Harvard’s Henry Louis Gates Jr., praised the course — but that was before an early draft of it was leaked to conservative publications like the National Review and The Florida Standard, sparking outrage among right-wingers. 

DeSantis, a potential 2024 presidential contender, announced in January that he would ban the curriculum from public schools in Florida, basing his decision on the draft version of the course. State education officials also claimed that the curriculum was not historically accurate and that it would violate state laws that regulate how topics related to race are taught in public schools.  

The Florida governor revealed on Tuesday his proposal to eliminate “ideological conformity” from higher education by mandating courses in Western civilization, eliminating diversity programs and reducing the protections of tenure.

The College Board is also facing opposition from more than 24 states who have tried to limit or ban critical race theory from the classroom, according to a tracking project by the law school at UCLA.

David Coleman, the head of the College Board, told The New York Times that the changes to the course were all made for teaching reasons, not because of political pressure. 

“At the College Board, we can’t look to statements of political leaders,” he said. Instead, Coleman said “the input of professors” and “longstanding AP principles” influenced the changes to course material.


Want a daily wrap-up of all the news and commentary Salon has to offer? Subscribe to our morning newsletter, Crash Course.


He explained to the outlet that during an initial test of the course this year, the board was told that the secondary sources provided were “quite dense” and that students would understand primary sources better, as that is always how AP courses have been taught.

“We experimented with a lot of things including assigning secondary sources, and we found a lot of issues arose as we did,” Coleman told the Times. “I think what is most surprising and powerful for most people is looking directly at people’s experience.”

The College Board has largely retreated from making any statements that could be perceived as political. The revised 234-page curriculum framework includes information on Africa, slavery, reconstruction and the civil rights movement, but leaves out significant contemporary movements such as Black Lives Matter, and topics like incarceration, the state of LGBTQ+ life in America, and the debate over reparations. 

Instead of including the latter in the exam, students are simply offered to study them for a required research project. However, in many states, even those topics “can be refined by local states and districts.”

Kimberlé W. Crenshaw, a law professor at Columbia, who is credited for writing foundational works in critical race theory, has been removed from the course material, as has legendary Black feminist writer bell hooks. 

Yale professor Roderick Ferguson, who has written about queer social movements, and Ta-Nehisi Coates, an NYU Journalism professor who wrote the award-winning “Case for Reparations” in 2014, have also been crossed off the list of important African American writers and scholars. 

AP exams have long been used to show a student’s academic performance when applying to college, with many higher education institutions accepting high scores on the exam as a form of college credit. 

Chester E. Finn, Jr., a senior fellow at Stanford’s Hoover Institution, told the Times that by not completely removing the “touchy parts,” of African-American studies, the College Board won’t get as much pushback from either side, making it a “smart strategy.”

“DeSantis likes to make noise and he’s running for president. But they’ve been getting feedback from all over the place in the 60 schools they’ve been piloting this in. I think it’s a way of dealing with the United States at this point, not just DeSantis,” Finn explained. “Some of these things they might want to teach in New York, but not Dallas. Or San Francisco but not St. Petersburg.”

However, Crenshaw told the Times that these topics are essential to the subject as a whole, explaining that the course “is a corrective, it is an intervention, it is an expansion.”

“For it to be true to the mission of telling the true history, it cannot exclude intersectionality, it cannot exclude critical thinking about race,” she explained. “African American history is not just male. It’s not just straight. It’s not just middle class. It has to tell the story of all of us.”

The new curriculum needs to be accepted in order for the College Board, a nonprofit, to earn additional revenue. The Times reported that the Board boasted more than $1 billion in program service revenue in 2019, with more than $490 million coming from “AP and Instruction,” according to its tax-exempt filing.

University of Houston asked students to wear neon vests after police drew weapon on a Black student

The University of Houston has walked back a policy requiring theater students to wear vests while rehearsing scenes outdoors, a move put in place after a campus police officer drew a gun on a Black student while he was rehearsing a play.

The university’s decision, which was first reported by the Houston Chronicle, comes after it was criticized by students, who argued that the policy put the burden of their safety on them rather than on police. Students criticized administrators and campus police officers for failing to acknowledge and address the traumatic nature of the incident on students of color.

“They wanted anything to identify that the students weren’t threats on their campus so that when UHPD pulled up, they could identify us,” said Brandon Sanders, a senior who is studying acting. “A bright green-colored vest is not gonna change the color of my skin, and my skin is black.”

On Nov. 4, University of Houston police received a 911 call reporting that a Black man was assaulting a woman with a knife on a loading dock behind a campus building that is located next to the School of Theatre & Dance.

According to the police report provided to The Texas Tribune by the university, the responding officer drew his gun in a “low-ready position” and “aimed his weapon in their general direction,” yelling at the students to get on the ground and show their hands.

Both students yelled that they were rehearsing and did as instructed. The officer returned the gun to its holster and explained he had received a report of an assault, noting in the police report that he tried to console the students, who were crying and shaking.

It turned out the student, Domonique Champion, wasn’t holding a knife. It was a white sheet of paper that was part of Champion’s script.

University leaders say they have reviewed the incident and determined the officer acted appropriately, according to protocols for reports of an assault involving a weapon.

Champion, who is in the masters program, declined to be interviewed for this story. He sent the Tribune a link to a recording of the town hall where he shared his experience with students and administrators.

“I’m terrifyingly aware that the gun was meant for me. Because of angling, I knew it was meant for me,” Champion said at the town hall, noting the gun barrel was not pointed directly at him. “I need it known [that] it’s more than the gun. It’s the fact the gun was already out, yes. … I need you to understand I did not feel safe moving until I heard the voice of a Black sergeant.”

“I don’t want to ever be known for something like this,” he said later in the town hall.

Champion also told University of Houston Police Chief Ceaser Moore at that town hall that when the officer explained what happened, he cracked a joke.

“He said, ‘You should get an A because you had us tricked,'” Champion said.

According to a letter sent to students by Andrew Davis, dean of the McGovern College of the Arts, the decision to have students wear the brightly colored vests was made during a meeting with faculty and a staff representative from UHPD to find a way to prevent a similar situation from occurring. The group decided that faculty should ask students to wear the vests so they can be identified as actors.

University spokesperson Shawn Lindsey said the university police chief was unaware of the decision to require vests outdoors until last Tuesday. Lindsey said the UHPD administrator who attended the faculty meeting said he was waiting for additional details about the plan before alerting the police chief.

“Asking student actors to wear vests following the incident was not the right course of action nor was it vetted or approved by Police Chief Ceaser Moore,” she wrote.

According to the Chronicle, Champion and other graduate students received vests in November. But some undergraduates, including Sanders, received them last week. Sanders said he started crying when he realized why he was being asked to wear the vest.

“We just woke up to the news of hashtag Tyre Nichols,” said Sanders, referring to the Black man who died three days after he was beaten by police officers during a traffic stop in Memphis. “This could’ve been hashtag Domonique Champion. What if he didn’t put his hands down? What if it was me, a vocal Black boy who would’ve cussed them out if they pulled the guns out?”

Sanders said he did not know about the November incident until vests were distributed last week. He and a group of students immediately went to the dean and expressed concerns with the policy.

Afterward, Davis sent an email to students in the theater school thanking them for expressing their concerns and proposing an open dialogue for the following week with students and administrators.

On Monday, Davis sent an email to all students within the Kathrine McGovern College of the Arts alerting them of the incident and the decision to rescind the vest policy, saying that “vests do not address the issue of providing our students safe and appropriate rehearsal spaces, especially for scenes involving purported criminal activity or violence.”

“Despite its shortcomings, this was a solution that was arrived at with the best of intentions on all sides,” Davis wrote. “The University of Houston is a community that cares, and our top priority is for our students to feel safe so that they can be successful in their studies and in everything they do on campus.”

Davis also noted that counseling would be available for students. The dean announced a new working group of students, faculty and staff to help administrators better respond to student needs moving forward.

Shortly after that letter was sent, Davis sent another message to students in the theater and dance school and said he was postponing the open dialogue until college leadership can share solutions “as completely as possible.”

Sanders told the Tribune on Tuesday afternoon that students will continue to hold their own event where students can share their perspectives on Wednesday. Lindsey said the dean allowed students to continue to host their own event and said he will attend.

“I should not have to signify myself,” said Sanders, who wrote “I am not a threat” across his vest, which he continues to wear around campus as a symbol of defiance. “There should be more sensitive human beings to know that I’m just a student on campus. Before you pull your gun out, look at the situation.”

 

Disclosure: University of Houston has been a financial supporter of The Texas Tribune, a nonprofit, nonpartisan news organization that is funded in part by donations from members, foundations and corporate sponsors. Financial supporters play no role in the Tribune’s journalism. Find a complete list of them here.

This article originally appeared in The Texas Tribune at https://www.texastribune.org/2023/01/31/university-houston-theater-vest-police/.

The Texas Tribune is a member-supported, nonpartisan newsroom informing and engaging Texans on state politics and policy. Learn more at texastribune.org.

Everybody relax: Marie Kondo isn’t a fraud. She’s simply as worn-out as the rest of us

Last week Marie Kondo broke two Influencer Commandments. The first was admitting that her life had changed and, therefore, so has she. The second was reminding her public that at the end of the day, and putting aside the many millions she’s made from taking The KonMari Method™ global, she is still as human as everyone else.

And, in the spirit of her life’s dedication to decluttering, it only took sharing four brief words with the Washington Post to send the Internet’s cul de sac of privilege into a tizzy: “My home is messy.

In a news cycle where George Santos is making a second career out of piling ridiculous lies upon lies, a person would think the “Tidying Up” expert would be met with empathy. Kondo made the admission as part of a media webinar and virtual tea ceremony, explaining how worn out she’d become since having her third child in 2021. Nearly any parent of young children should understand how starkly one’s priorities shift when one’s family expands.

“Up until now, I was a professional tidier, so I did my best to keep my home tidy at all times,” she said during the webinar. “I have kind of given up on that in a good way for me. Now I realize what is important to me is enjoying spending time with my children at home.”

Tidying Up with Marie KondoTidying Up with Marie Kondo (Adam Rose/Netflix)

Before we examine this more closely let’s not fool ourselves into believing that Kondo’s version of messy comes even close to the paper landslides in our homes. But if it does, so what? Realigning her idea of what’s important doesn’t violate the core of her mission.

Kondo’s new book “Kurashi at Home: How to Organize Your Space and Achieve Your Ideal Life,” preaches this. It is also the latest product in her ever-expanding brand of lifestyle goods. Being an internationally recognized organizational expert means selling things. This also makes people angry.

But that’s been the case ever since Kondo’s 2010 book “The Life-Changing Magic of Tidying Up” became a New York Times bestseller, the result of its 2014 release in the United States. She’s an ever-renewing source of awe, resentment and misunderstanding.

Central to Kondo’s KonMari Method is the concept of tidying and decluttering. That is not the same as minimalism although her neatly curated Instagram feed depicts this as her preferred aesthetic. Rather, Kondo finds virtue in respecting our objects and only surrounding ourselves with items we cherish, that “spark joy.”

Let’s not fool ourselves into believing that Kondo’s version of messy comes even close to the paper landslides in our homes.

Her 2019 Netflix series “Tidying Up” and its 2021 follow-up “Sparking Joy with Marie Kondo” mainstreamed connecting decluttering to increased contentment. Then again, professional organizers throughout the United States have been doing exactly this, minus the Shinto-influenced spiritual undertones.

From encouraging clients to greet their houses to instructing them to let go of things we don’t use or need with a heartfelt “thank you,” most people embraced Kondo’s holistic version of tidying in some fashion. Whether that meant embarking on the (theoretical) once-in-a-lifetime purge of unnecessary objects or bidding adieu to a sock drawer, that was, and is, entirely up to the individual.

When a sect of American home-keeping enthusiasts adopted KonMari as its new religion, the backlash to its teachings inspired an industry unto itself.

There were opportunistic parodies such as “The Joy of Leaving Your Sh*t All Over the Place” and homages like “The Life-Changing Magic of Not Giving a F**k.” But mostly, there were opinion pieces – so many opinion pieces. People went on about Kondo’s unrealistic expectations of perfectionism or her insistence on folding shirts a certain way. Pertinent to the topic at hand, however, were the pieces griping about her lack of consideration regarding the demands of parenting in either her original book or her 2016 follow-up, “Spark Joy.”

“Marie Kondo’s slightly deranged obsession with tidying is not something anyone should seek to emulate — least of all parents,” wrote Tanya C. Snyder in an essay that was also published in, yes, the Washington Post. “Parenting is an exercise in juggling priorities. Can we all agree that spending time watching your newborn learn to giggle, your toddler to walk, or your preschooler to read should be at the top?”

Actually, yes. That sensation of feeling overwhelmed is precisely what led Kondo to KonMari her priorities.

Tidying Up with Marie KondoTidying Up with Marie Kondo (Netflix)

As an extension of the practices the KonMari Method extols, the term “kurashi” roughly translates to “way of life” or, befitting Kondo’s brand and new life reality, “the ideal way of spending our time.” It is yet another fetchingly designed self-help tome inviting readers to be present in the precious moments in one’s life and has nothing to do with keeping or tossing one’s figurine collection.

But never mind all of that, because, to Kondo’s detractors, the world-renowned tidying expert’s admission that she’s messier than she used to be is further evidence of her hypocrisy.

Sarah Polley, the Oscar-nominated writer, and director of “Women Talking” (oh, the irony) reacted thusly on Twitter: “She admits she has ‘kind of given up’ on tidying after three kids. Where is the official apology to those of us who she influenced to make our clothes into little envelopes while we HAD three kids!” 

Polley deleted the tweet, insisting she meant it as a joke. Others do not.

“The irony was the elimination of this persona’s credibility once she opened up a shop selling solutions to problems that didn’t exist (but were aesthetically pleasing),” tweeted Nelly Leo. “Are we done with this sort of thing now? If so, I’ll have some cake.”

The shade goes on and on.

Nearly any parent of young children should understand how starkly one’s priorities shift when one’s family expands.

Those who take issue with Kondo selling organizational-themed items through her company have a point . . . as long as they also take issue with Martha Stewart’s merchandising. Did they also rant about products related to the magazine Real Simple, which has been selling its vision of pared-down domesticity and all manner of accouterments to make that possible since 2000? If so, I hope they also clapped back at the women on “The Home Edit” for their store or Ina Garten for saying, “Store-bought is fine.”

Tidying Up with Marie KondoTidying Up with Marie Kondo (Netflix)

Lifestyle influencers make a vocation out of selling some lovelier version of life, presenting a model to which we can aspire. But at the end of the day, they’re also just people.

Those for whom Kondo’s admitted relaxing of her tidying standards is tantamount to fraud may not admit that they ever viewed her as fully human in the first place. Many of the early trend stories about Kondo go into great detail about her height – she’s 4-foot-8 – and her frame, as if to meet the reader’s picture of her being some kind of otherworldly figure or anime drawing. During the height of her Netflix series’ popularity, it wasn’t uncommon to hear her being described as child-like, “cute,” or for someone to squeal something along the lines of wanting to put her into their pocket.

When those people are reminded that she’s a successful entrepreneur and a married person who has three kids, that flies in the face of all their expectations. After all, Kondo’s decluttering mission is domestic work, a burden in this country long borne by people of color.


Want a daily wrap-up of all the news and commentary Salon has to offer? Subscribe to our morning newsletter, Crash Course.


The ire directed toward Kondo right now is a new vintage of the classic hits she dealt with before. As many folks have pointed out, neither Kondo nor any representatives from her company came over to anyone’s house and forced them to do anything.

If you reduced your beloved home libraries to 30 books and regret getting rid of some volumes because you thought a famous stranger advised you to, that’s on you. (She insists there was a misunderstanding, that you could always keep your books.) If you were among the hundreds of thousands of folks around the country who stuffed Goodwill’s donation bins past bursting and feel lighter for having purged, does Kondo’s decision to ease up on making hospital corners with her bedsheets every day change that? Probably not.

Simply recognize that Kondo’s life has evolved, requiring her to make a few adjustments to it. Nothing about her methods has fundamentally changed, and her opening observation in the first “Tidying Up” episode proves it. “When you have young children, maintaining a tidy household is a struggle,” she said.

Four years later, she’s choosing to relent on struggling so hard. That shouldn’t “spark joy” at her expense. We should find comfort in her relating better to our present way of being, which says, “Relax. Decluttering can wait.”

13-year-olds should not be on social media, surgeon general warns

As anyone who has either raised or been a teenager in the 21st century can tell you, social media is omnipresent in modern youth culture. Whether it is finding new music on TikTok or finding new friends on Fortnite, teenagers use social media to connect with their peers, express their individuality and participate in a global community. Yet this new technological and social paradigm brings with it grave concerns: social media spaces that youth frequent are rife with bullying, misinformation and bigotry, which can have a detrimental effect on the self-esteem of developing young minds.

Now, the social ills of social media have spurred the United States Surgeon General to advise parents to keep their children off of social media even when they are as old as 13.

“I, personally, based on the data I’ve seen, believe that 13 is too early.”

“I, personally, based on the data I’ve seen, believe that 13 is too early,” US Surgeon General Vivek Murthy told “CNN Newsroom” on Sunday. “It’s a time where it’s really important for us to be thoughtful about what’s going into how they think about their own self-worth and their relationships and the skewed and often distorted environment of social media often does a disservice to many of those children.” 

Sen. Chris Murphy, D-Conn. appeared alongside Murthy during the interview and argued that social media has robbed youth of something intangible and special about interpersonal socialization.

“We have lost something as a society, as so much of our life has turned into screen-to-screen communication, it just doesn’t give you the same sense of value and the same sense of satisfaction as talking to somebody or seeing someone,” Murphy told CNN. He later noted that both he and Murthy were fathers of young children. “It’s not coincidental that Dr. Murthy and I are probably talking more about this issue of loneliness more than others in public life. I look at this through the prism of my 14-year-old and my 11-year-old.”


Want more health and science stories in your inbox? Subscribe to Salon’s weekly newsletter The Vulgar Scientist.


recent study published by neuroscientists from the University of North Carolina in the medical journal JAMA Pediatrics found that young people who check their social media accounts more often were also more likely to be sensitive to general social rewards and punishments. Social media even seemed to cause physical changes in their neurochemistry; the adolescents who seemed hooked to social media displayed greater neural sensitivity in parts of the brain like the amygdala. The study’s lead author Dr. Eva Telzer later explained to CNN that it is unclear whether (and if so how) this increased neural sensitivity is linked to social media use — or even whether these changes are necessarily a bad thing.

“Heightened sensitivity could lead to later compulsive social media behaviors, or it could reflect an adaptive neural change that helps teens navigate their social worlds,” Telzer told CNN. The study also had important limitations, including that it relied on self-reported accounts and did not include TikTok.

According to a recent Pew Research Center survey, 67 percent of teenagers between the ages of 13 and 17 use TikTok, 62 percent use Instagram and 59 percent use Snapchat, with the last two numbers spiking since 2014-2015. By contrast, only 32 percent of teenagers in that age group use Facebook, only 23 percent use Twitter and only 5 percent use Tumblr, all major declines since 2014 to 2015. The clear winner among teenagers, however, was YouTube, with 95 percent of the survey respondents reporting using the platform on a regular basis.

Priscilla Presley is contesting the “authenticity and validity” of daughter Lisa Marie’s will

Priscilla Presley is taking legal action to dispute who oversees the estate of her late daughter Lisa Marie Presley.  

In a petition filed in Los Angeles Superior Court on Jan. 26, Priscilla Presley contests the “authenticity and validity” of a 2016 amendment to Lisa Marie Presley’s living trust that removed her and former business manager Barry Siegel as co-trustees. Under the amendment, Lisa Marie Presley’s daughter Riley Keough and deceased son Benjamin Keough were appointed as trustees of the estate.

Both Priscilla Presley and Siegel are current co-trustees of The Promenade Trust, which was created in 1993 to manage the Presley estate. Per The Hollywood Reporter, the trust kept “a 15 percent stake in Elvis Presley enterprises, which owns the singer’s intellectual property, after Lisa Marie Presley sold 85 percent of the company’s assets for roughly $100 million.” Court documents obtained by ABC News add that Lisa Marie Presley “amended and completely restated” the trust in 2010, reinstating Priscilla Presley and Siegel’s roles.

“Both the 1993 original trust and 2010 restatement appear to be carefully drafted by competent estate planning attorneys,” Priscilla Presley says in the court documents.

The documents also state that Priscilla Presley learned of the amendment and the aforementioned changes shortly after her daughter’s death. They further outline several flaws within the amendment, including Priscilla Presley’s name being misspelled in it and Lisa Marie Presley’s signature being “inconsistent with her usual and customary signature.” Additionally, the amendment wasn’t witnessed or notarized or delivered to Priscilla Presley while her daughter was still alive.

Priscilla Presley “contends that the purported 2016 amendment is an invalid modification of the restated 2010 trust and that the 2010 trust is the authoritative and controlling document,” per ABC News. She also “respectfully requests” an order from the court to invalidate the purported 2016 amendment.

The documents add that Priscilla Presley believes Siegel “has already or will soon resign” as a co-trustee. Thus, Riley Keough would become a co-trustee alongside her grandmother “with respect to the trust and all trust created thereunder.”

Lisa Marie Presley, the only daughter of Priscilla Presley and Elvis Presley, died on Jan. 12 after suffering cardiac arrest at her home in Calabasas, California. She was 54 years old.