Spring Sale: Get 1 Year, Save 58%

Convicted Ponzi schemer freed by Trump charged with “brazen and sophisticated” $35 million fraud

The convicted Ponzi schemer who was granted clemency by former President Donald Trump in one of his final acts in office was hit with a new set of fraud charges after allegedly scamming investors in a series of fake deals. Eliyahu Weinstein, 48, was charged with wire fraud and conspiracy to obstruct justice on Wednesday along with four other men for defrauding at least 150 people out of $35 million, The New York Times reports.

The group is accused of leading people to believe they were making lucrative investments in limited COVID-19 supplies and baby formula as well as first-aid kits intended for Ukraine. “These were brazen and sophisticated crimes that involved multiple conspirators and drew right from Weinstein’s playbook of fraud,” New Jersey U.S. Attorney Philip Sellinger said at a press conference. Weinstein was ordered to be detained after his Wednesday appearance at a federal court in Trenton, New Jersey, alongside one of his co-defendants.

Weinstein was serving a 24-year prison term in relation to two schemes — one of which involved him scamming members of his close-knit Orthodox Jewish community out of over $200 million — when Trump commuted his sentence in January 2021 and freed him. According to the Times, the former used car salesman from Lakewood, New Jersey, was one of many who received clemency by skirting official processes and instead relying on influential lobbyists and attorneys to gain reprieve. 

“Ironic twist”: Jack Smith letter signals Trump could be charged with “trying to rig the election”

Special counsel Jack Smith’s letter informing former President Donald Trump that he is the target of the Justice Department’s Jan. 6 investigation signaled that he could be charged with a civil rights law that dates back to the post-Civil War Reconstruction era, three sources told The New York Times.

The letter cited three criminal statutes, including conspiracy to defraud the government and obstruction of an official proceeding, which were both included in the criminal referral from the House Jan. 6 committee. But the third law cited in the letter “was a surprise,” according to the Times.

The letter referred to Section 241 of Title 18 of the United States Code, which makes it a crime to “conspire to injure, oppress, threaten, or intimidate any person” in the “free exercise or enjoyment of any right or privilege secured to him by the Constitution or laws of the United States.”

The law was enacted after the Civil War to target Southern whites, including Ku Klux Klan members, who engaged in terrorism to prevent previously enslaved Black people from voting but in recent years has been used more broadly to target voting fraud conspiracies.

The potential charge is an “ironic twist,” wrote Charlie Savage, one of the Times journalists who reported on the development. “The modern usage of the law raised the possibility that Mr. Trump, who baselessly declared the election he lost to have been rigged, could face prosecution on accusations of trying to rig the election himself,” the report added.

The law has been applied in cases of casting false votes or falsely counting votes after an election, according to the Times, “even if no specific voter could be considered the victim.”

In one 1950 ballot-stuffing case, a judge wrote that the right to an honest election tally “is a right possessed by each voting elector, and to the extent that the importance of his vote is nullified, wholly or in part, he has been injured in the free exercise of a right or privilege secured to him by the laws and Constitution of the United States.”

A 1974 Supreme Court opinion upheld the use of the law to charge West Virginians who case fake votes. Every voter “has a right under the Constitution to have his vote fairly counted, without its being distorted by fraudulently cast votes,” Justice Thurgood Marshall wrote.

The development suggests that Smith may be targeting efforts by Trump and his associates to overturn his loss in several states, including his call to Georgia Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger demanding he “find” enough votes to overturn his loss and the plot to use fake electors to cast votes for Trump in states won by President Joe Biden. The call is also under investigation by Fulton County, Ga. District Attorney Fani Willis, who is expected to hand down indictments next month.

We need your help to stay independent

“It seems like under 241 there’s at least a right to an honest counting of the votes,” Norm Eisen, who served as a Democratic counsel during Trump’s first impeachment, told the Times. “Submitting an alternate electoral certificate to Congress (as opposed to casting false votes or counting wrong) is a novel scenario, but it seems like it would violate this right.”

Georgia “will be key” in Smith’s Sec. 241 theory, tweeted Georgia State University Law Prof. Anthony Michael Kreis.

“Given how focused Trump was on Georgia—the pressure on state officials, the conspiracy theories concocted about Fulton County, and the use of fake electors in an attempt to defraud—all to violate the rights of Georgia voters,” he wrote.

But some legal experts also believe the law could be used to apply to Trump fomenting a mob to attack the Capitol on Jan. 6.


Want a daily wrap-up of all the news and commentary Salon has to offer? Subscribe to our morning newsletter, Crash Course.


“It would also be in keeping with 241’s historic application to use of violence in deprivation of right to vote. Could explain Smith’s interest [into] threats of violence to election officials which culminates in use of violent mob on Jan. 6,” New York University Law Prof. Ryan Goodman wrote on Twitter.

“It depends on the evidence Jack Smith has gathered,” he added. “Otherwise the most straightforward application of 241 is the plot to cast aside peoples’ votes.”

Smith’s team has also shown an interest in the story of Georgia election worker Ruby Freeman, who was forced to flee her home with her daughter after receiving death threats when Trump and his allies falsely accused them of pulling fraudulent ballots from a suitcase, according to The Associated Press.

“Jack Smith is said to be looking at 18 USC § 1512, which is about tampering with witnesses who have information relevant to a federal investigation. That could certainly have possible applicability to Ruby Freeman and Shaye Moss who were harassed by Trump and his allies,” Kreis wrote. “This is also unlawful under Georgia law and the parallel provisions of the OCGA that bar election worker harassment and intimidation will likely be used by Fani Willis next month.”

Amid a dizzying week of news, somehow Donald Trump manages to hog the spotlight

While walking into the White House Wednesday morning, I passed the Eisenhower Executive Office Building, as usual, and saw a family taking pictures.

“Who was Dwight Eisenhower?” a cherubic teenager asked.

Times change, I know. But seriously?

When I first came to the White House in the 1980s, Eisenhower wasn’t an unknown, and AIDS wasn’t a thing. A reporter named Lester Kinsolving, a right-wing radio host and former Episcopal priest, changed that when he asked Larry Speakes, Reagan’s deputy press secretary, about the rising number of AIDS-related deaths. Speakes privately called him “a fairy.”

Kinsolving also asked a whole variety of other questions, on topics including but not limited to UFOs, aliens, Bigfoot and other topics that drew chuckles from reporters and disdain from Speakes and subsequent press secretaries at the White House.

One press secretary, when asked why he called on Kinsolving so often during briefings, reportedly said, “Because he makes the rest of you look like idiots.”

On Monday in the Brady Briefing Room, a reporter’s question about unexplained aerial phenomena, or UAPs (the new term for UFOs) was taken seriously by National Security Council spokesman John Kirby, a former Navy admiral who definitely knows who Eisenhower was. He also knows what UAP means, and answered the question straight on. “I mean, some of these phenomena, we know, have already had an impact on our training ranges … when pilots are out trying to do training in the air and they see these things, they’re not sure what they are, and it can have an impact on their ability to perfect their skills,” Kirby explained.

That is a shocking change from the formal stance of the Air Force at the end of Project Blue Book, when Pentagon generals dismissed the UFO phenomenon as hoaxes, reflections of the planet Venus and/or  “swamp gas.” “Now, we’re not saying what they are or what they’re not,” Kirby continued. “We’re saying that there’s something our pilots are seeing. We’re saying it has had an effect on some of our training operations. And so we want to get to the bottom of it. We want to understand it better.”
 
That’s a historic change. Our government admits that UAPs are real — whatever they actually are. 

“We’re not saying what [UAPs] are or what they’re not,” said John Kirby. “We’re saying that there’s something our pilots are seeing. … And so we want to get to the bottom of it.”

That’s not the only change brought about by time. White House press secretary Karine Jean-Pierre condemned Robert F. Kennedy Jr.’s antisemitic remarks about the COVID pandemic, which surfaced in a recent video. “The claim made on that tape is false. It is vile,” said Jean-Pierre, adding that the lies could “put our fellow Americans in danger.” Kennedy’s “assertion that COVID was genetically engineered to spare Jewish and Chinese people is deeply offensive and incredibly dangerous,” she concluded. 

Several members of the Kennedy family have also denounced the video. How times have changed — and my, how far that famous last name has fallen.

Finally, Kirby dropped a bomb when asked why abortion had anything to do with military readiness — this question came because Sen. Tommy Tuberville of Alabama (and there’s a name!) began blocking military postings because of the Pentagon’s stance on allowing service members to have abortions — and to travel out of state to do so, if necessary. It was an obvious question that previously had not been asked. Kirby was succinct:

One in five members of the U.S. military are women. Twenty percent. We’re an all-volunteer force. Nobody is forcing you to sign up and go. People volunteer to go. You raise your right hand and you say, “I’m going to do this for a few years or even for my life, and it might cost me my life to do it.
 
And when you sign up and you make that contract, you have every right to expect that the organization — in this case, the military — is going to take care of you, and they’re going to take care of your families, and they’re going to make sure that you can serve with dignity and respect no matter who you are or who you love or how you worship or don’t.

How times have changed. 

The military is a progressive force in our society? Who saw that coming? And as Kirby pointed out, the change in so many state abortion laws following the reversal of Roe v. Wade is already discouraging some from continuing service.
  
“So, if you don’t think there’s going to be a retention and a morale issue, think again,” he said. “It’s already having that effect. What happens if you get assigned to a state like Alabama, which has a pretty restrictive abortion law in place, and you’re concerned about your reproductive care? What do you do? Do you say ‘no’ and get out? Well, some people may decide to do that. And what does that mean? That means we lose talent — important talent.” 

It was an eye-opening and significant statement. Kirby and Jean-Pierre also opened a few eyes by talking about the Russian naval blockade that’s preventing grain shipments out of the Black Sea. 

Has the military — which guarantees abortion rights to all service members — become a progressive force in our society? Who saw that one coming?

How times have changed there. Russia thought it would overrun Ukraine in a few days — and 16 months later the Biden administration is dealing with a grain blockade and the fallout from the Wagner Group mutiny. When I asked if those two events were a sign of Russian weakness, Kirby said he did not know,  but that Putin’s actions were “completely irresponsible” and “reckless.” 

In another indication of how times change, record heat was recorded across the planet this week, bringing with it mounting deaths and collapsing infrastructure. Meanwhile, Rep. Ted Lieu of California came to the White House to talk about cyber-security, and Sen. Bernie Sanders of Vermont showed up to talk about unions and strikes — and also to recommend busting up media monopolies. 

“I believe one of the things we have right now is more concentration of ownership in virtually every sector of American society,” Sanders said. “You have three Wall Street firms combined that are major stockholders in 95 percent of the major corporations in America.” 

OK, so I asked the question that provoked that response — but it needed to be asked.

Finally, the president of Israel, Isaac Herzog — who is a largely ceremonial figure, not the head of government — showed up at the White House on Tuesday. He didn’t answer when I shouted, “Will there be peace in Palestine?” as he got out of the car. But I was asked to move by a reporter who wanted to take a selfie.

Since Joe Biden apparently no longer does press conferences of any type, his “bilat” pool spray — that is, his brief appearance before the press pool alongside Herzog — was a raucous affair, with shouted questions, pandemonium and all the decorum of feeding time in the primate house.

While that was going on, Vice President Harris was hosting a roundtable discussion with attorneys general from several states about the life-threatening nationwide problem of fentanyl overdose.

We need your help to stay independent

Look at how times have changed, and how dramatic and historic this week’s news has been: 

A potential alien incursion, life-threatening climate change, a war in Ukraine with a dangerous chance of expansion, peace in the Middle East, cyber-security concerns, American global military readiness, life-threatening drug epidemics and a woman’s right to choose her health care — and none of those things topped the news. 

What still takes up the most oxygen in the room? Donald Trump.

The former president got one of those “target letters” from Jack Smith. Again. And went nuts. Again. Where’s Forrest Gump when you need him?

Trump claimed in an email to his supporters that he is “our only hope” and that the deep state was coming to get him because Biden is a crook and Donald is outdistancing him in the polls.

But Trump is no Obi-Wan Kenobi. Not only is he not our only hope, his hope for eluding the long arm of the law is rapidly dwindling.

Trump has topped the news so far this week because, along with that letter from Smith about the federal investigation into the Jan. 6 insurrection, the Georgia Supreme Court (filled with Republicans) unanimously rejected Trump’s appeal to stop Atlanta District Attorney Fani Willis from indicting him for his efforts to overturn the presidential election in Georgia. At almost the same time, the 16 folks who signed up as fake Trump electors in Michigan found themselves under indictment, and finally, on Wednesday morning, Trump found out that he can’t file for a new trial in the E. Jean Carroll civil case. (So the verdict in that trial, which found Trump liable for sexually assaulting Carroll and then defaming her, will stand — and cost him $5 million.)

Times change. Donald Trump does not.

By Wednesday evening, most reporters across the country — the few that are left after corporate downsizing — were mainlining caffeine and chugging amphetamines to keep up. I’ll bet someone wished they hadn’t left their little baggie at the White House.

And while Trump continues to frame the argument and take up all the oxygen in the room, there are signs the Democrats may be finding their footing heading into campaign season — and they might have Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene to thank for that. 

That has nothing to do with the hideous display she made in a congressional hearing Wednesday, when she displayed lurid photos of Hunter Biden with an alleged prostitute and, as Speaker Kevin McCarthy’s chief congressional troll, tried to drag the administration hard.

But Times have changed. Trump would have had a massive fit and threatened widespread revenge on the deep state if anyone had tried to go after one of his sons that way. 

Joe Biden took a different approach. As he welcomed members of Congress to the White House for the congressional picnic, he called McCarthy his friend. “I don’t want to hurt his reputation, but I actually like him,” Biden told the gathered crowd.

As for the Republicans who continue to hound him and his son, he showed incredible reserve: “You know, for all the disagreements we have, you gotta  remember at the end of the day we’re friends,” he said. “That’s how it’s always been. You gotta be friends with each other. I mean, I think we’re getting there.”


Want a daily wrap-up of all the news and commentary Salon has to offer? Subscribe to our morning newsletter, Crash Course.


Times definitely change. 

After all, despite MTG’s demeaning and classless act in Congress, who knew she was a Biden fan?

She recently gave a speech meant to be critical of Biden, and the president’s re-election campaign has seized on it, not only agreeing with her, but using her words as narration in an ad that concludes with Biden saying, “I approve this message.”

He certainly leaned into it, accepting the criticism and flipping the script to make clear that Greene’s criticisms were actually endorsements of policies that benefit average Americans, embedded in social programs started by Franklin D. Roosevelt and enhanced by Lyndon Johnson.

During Monday’s briefing, Jean-Pierre seemed to swallow a smile as she described how well Greene had framed the argument. “We agree with her all around on this. We are opposed to rural poverty. And the president is committed to protect Medicare and committed to protect Social Security, as you heard from him over and over again over the past several months,” she said. 

The Biden campaign’s tongue-in-cheek compliment to MTG outlines an ongoing problem: Republicans are better at framing arguments, even when those arguments actually benefit the Democrats.

As tongue-in-cheek as the compliment to MTG was, it outlined the Democrats’ ongoing problem. Republicans are better at framing arguments — even when those arguments benefit the Democrats. Even in its stupidity, the GOP is better at messaging than the Democrats.

Oh, dare to dream: What if the GOP concentrated on things that truly matter? What if Kevin McCarthy and his MTG sock puppet talked about the prolonged, unrelenting heatwave that has scorched the planet for a record-breaking three weeks? Then, just maybe, the world might begin to address a problem so severe that scientists say there is no such thing as a “new normal.” They have no clue what the future will hold because our climate is so chaotic. This summer is “just the beginning,” scientists are saying, and as long as global temperatures continue to rise the world has to brace for escalating impacts.

Maybe that’s why the Pentagon is taking UAPs seriously. Some of the rich and famous might be looking to hitch a ride out of town, away from the new abnormal.

And if that happens, I’d still expect to see Donald Trump  at the top of the news — probably raging about how the deep state left him behind as it took off in those flying saucers.

Medical exiles: families flee states amid crackdown on transgender care

Hal Dempsey wanted to “escape Missouri.” Arlo Dennis is “fleeing Florida.” The Tillison family “can’t stay in Texas.”

They are part of a new migration of Americans who are uprooting their lives in response to a raft of legislation across the country restricting health care for transgender people.

Missouri, Florida, and Texas are among at least 20 states that have limited components of gender-affirming health care for trans youth. Those three states are also among the states that prevent Medicaid — the public health insurance for people with low incomes — from paying for key aspects of such care for patients of all ages.

More than a quarter of trans adults surveyed by KFF and The Washington Post late last year said they had moved to a different neighborhood, city, or state to find more acceptance. Now, new restrictions on health care and the possibility of more in the future provide additional motivation.

Many are heading to places that are passing laws to support care for trans people, making those states appealing sanctuaries. California, for example, passed a law last fall to protect those receiving or providing gender-affirming care from prosecution. And now, California providers are getting more calls from people seeking to relocate there to prevent disruptions to their care, said Scott Nass, a family physician and expert on transgender care based in the state.

“This was literally outlawing my existence and making my access to health care impossible.”

But the influx of patients presents a challenge, Nass said, “because the system that exists, it can’t handle all the refugees that potentially are out there.”

In Florida, the legislative targeting of trans people and their health care has persuaded Arlo Dennis, 35, that it is time to uproot their family of five from the Orlando area, where they’ve lived for more than a decade. They plan to move to Maryland.

Dennis, who uses they/them pronouns, no longer has access to hormone replacement therapy after Florida’s Medicaid program stopped covering transition-related care in late August under the claim that the treatments are experimental and lack evidence of being effective. Dennis said they ran out of their medication in January.

“It’s definitely led to my mental health having struggles and my physical health having struggles,” Dennis said.

Moving to Maryland will take resources Dennis said their family does not have. They launched a GoFundMe campaign in April and have raised more than $5,600, most of it from strangers, Dennis said. Now the family, which includes three adults and two children, plans to leave Florida in July. The decision wasn’t easy, Dennis said, but they felt like they had no choice.

“I’m OK if my neighbor doesn’t agree with how I’m living my life,” Dennis said. “But this was literally outlawing my existence and making my access to health care impossible.”

Mitch and Tiffany Tillison decided they needed to leave Texas after the state’s Republicans made anti-trans policies for youth central to their legislative agenda. Their 12-year-old came out as trans about two years ago. They asked for only her middle name, Rebecca, to be published because they fear for her safety due to threats of violence against trans people.


Want more health and science stories in your inbox? Subscribe to Salon’s weekly newsletter The Vulgar Scientist.


This year, the Texas Legislature passed a law limiting gender-affirming health care for youth under 18. It specifically bans physical care, but local LGBTQ+ advocates say recent crackdowns also have had a chilling effect on the availability of mental health therapy for trans people.

“It’s my job to continue to keep her safe. My love is unending, unconditional.”

While the Tillisons declined to specify what treatment, if any, their daughter is getting, they said they reserve the right, as her parents, to provide the care their daughter needs — and that Texas has taken away that right. That, plus increasing threats of violence in their community, particularly in the wake of the May 6 mass shooting by a professed neo-Nazi at Allen Premium Outlets, about 20 miles from their home in the Dallas suburbs, caused the family to decide to move to Washington state.

“I’ve kept her safe,” said Tiffany Tillison, adding that she often thinks back to the moment her daughter came out to her during a long, late drive home from a daylong soccer tournament. “It’s my job to continue to keep her safe. My love is unending, unconditional.”

For her part, Rebecca is pragmatic about the move planned for July: “It’s sad, but it is what we have to do,” she said.

The day after Missouri Attorney General Andrew Bailey sought to limit access to gender-affirming health care for transgender people of all ages this spring, Hal Dempsey launched a GoFundMe fundraiser for themself and their two partners to leave Springfield, Missouri. While Bailey withdrew his measure after the state legislature passed a more limited crackdown on care for minors, the three transgender partners moved at the end of May to Illinois, which requires state-regulated insurance plans to cover such care at no extra cost. (Bruce E. Stidham for KFF Health News)

A close call on losing key medical care in Missouri also pushed some trans people to rethink living there. In April, Missouri Attorney General Andrew Bailey issued an emergency rule seeking to limit access to transition-related surgery and cross-sex hormones for all ages, and restrict puberty-blocking drugs, which pause puberty but don’t alter gender characteristics. The next day, Dempsey, 24, who uses they/them pronouns, launched a GoFundMe fundraiser for themself and their two partners to leave Springfield, Missouri.

“We are three trans individuals who all depend on the Hormone Replacement Therapy and gender affirming care that is soon to be prohibitively limited,” Dempsey wrote in the fundraising appeal, adding they wanted to “escape Missouri when our lease is up at the end of May.”

Dempsey said they also got a prescription for a three-month supply of hormone therapy from their doctor in Springfield to tide them over until the move.

Bailey withdrew his rule after the state legislature in May restricted new access to such treatments for minors, but not adults like Dempsey and their partners. Still, Dempsey said their futures in Missouri didn’t look promising.

“I don’t want to be stuck and temporarily disabled in a state that doesn’t see my humanity.”

Neighboring Illinois was an obvious place to move; the legislature there passed a law in January that requires state-regulated insurance plans to cover gender-affirming health care at no extra cost. Where exactly was a bigger question. Chicago and its suburbs seemed too expensive. The partners wanted a progressive community similar in size and cost of living to the city they were leaving. They were looking for a Springfield in Illinois.

“But not Springfield, Illinois,” Dempsey quipped.

Gwendolyn Schwarz, 23, had also hoped to stay in Springfield, Missouri, her hometown, where she had recently graduated from Missouri State University with a degree in film and media studies. She had planned to continue her education in a graduate program at the university and, within the next year, get transition-related surgery, which can take a few months of recovery.

But her plans changed as Bailey’s rule stirred fear and confusion.

“I don’t want to be stuck and temporarily disabled in a state that doesn’t see my humanity,” Schwarz said.

She and a group of friends are planning to move west to Nevada, where state lawmakers have approved a measure that requires Medicaid to cover gender-affirming treatment for trans patients.

Schwarz said she hopes moving from Missouri to Nevada’s capital, Carson City, will allow her to continue living her life without fear and eventually get the surgery she wants.

Dempsey and their partners settled on Moline, Illinois, as the place to move. All three had to quit their jobs to relocate, but they have raised $3,000 on GoFundMe, more than enough to put a deposit down on an apartment.

On May 31, the partners packed the belongings they hadn’t sold and made the 400-mile drive to their new home.

Since then, Dempsey has already been able to see a medical provider at a clinic in Moline that caters to the LGBTQ+ community — and has gotten a new prescription for hormone therapy.

KFF Health News is a national newsroom that produces in-depth journalism about health issues and is one of the core operating programs at KFF—an independent source of health policy research, polling, and journalism. Learn more about KFF.

Subscribe to KFF Health News’ free Morning Briefing.

 

Donald Trump’s death wish for Hunter Biden

Donald Trump continues to threaten death, murder, and other mayhem upon his “enemies” or any individual(s) or group(s) who dare to oppose him and the neofascist MAGA movement. Last week, in a post on his Truth Social disinformation platform, Trump wished death upon Hunter Biden because President Joe Biden’s son was able to enter a plea deal in response to minor federal tax crimes.

Weiss is a COWARD, a smaller version of Bill Barr, who never had the courage to do what everyone knows should have been done. He gave out a traffic ticket instead of a death sentence. Because of the two Democrat Senators in Delaware, they got to choose and/or approve him. Maybe the judge presiding will have the courage and intellect to break up this cesspool of crime. The collusion and corruption is beyond description. TWO TIERS OF JUSTICE!

Trump’s death wish for Hunter Biden comes several weeks after Trump shared what he believed to be the address of former President Barack Obama’s home in Washington D.C. on his Truth Social platform. Trump’s intent was obvious: he wanted one of his cultists to assassinate or otherwise commit acts of serious violence against Barack Obama and likely his family. Trump would (almost) get his wish, when one of his followers, who was armed with several guns and hundreds of rounds of ammunition, apparently attempted to gain access to Obama. The man, named Taylor Taranto, bragged online about his plans to assassinate Obama. Taranto was also a participant in the Jan. 6 coup attempt and attack on the Capitol. Fortunately, the Secret Service stopped the would-be assassin before he could follow through on his nefarious plans.

The accused assassin was arraigned in a D.C. court where a judge showed him much more mercy and empathy than he likely deserves. However, Judge Zia Faruqui was correct when he said, with regret, that Taranto was following Trump’s “orders” when he allegedly targeted Obama.

As a practical matter, why would Donald Trump stop making violent threats?

As FBI agent Clarice Starling says of the serial killer known as Buffalo Bill in the film “The Silence of the Lambs”, “He’s got a real taste for it now, and he’s getting better at his work.”

Until very recently, Trump has never been held seriously responsible for his decades-long public crime spree that includes sexual assault as confirmed in the E. Jean Carrol civil case and a panoply of other antisocial and antihuman behavior. Trump attempted a coup on Jan. 6 that involved a lethal assault by his followers on the Capitol. He has repeatedly bragged about being able to kill someone in broad daylight and get away with it because of his popularity. At his rallies and other events Trump repeatedly encouraged his followers to engage in acts of violence against journalists, the news media, Black Lives Matters protesters, “Antifa” and others deemed to be “the enemy” because they are “not real Americans” like his MAGA followers.

We need your help to stay independent

Trump has publicly threatened, both explicitly and implicitly, the lives and safety of President Biden, Hillary Clinton, Special Counsel Jack Smith, Attorney General Merrick Garland, and the prosecutors and law enforcement who are trying to hold him accountable for his crimes. Trump’s main 2024 presidential campaign message is a promise that if elected there will be a “final battle”, a reign of terror and revenge against the Democrats, liberals, progressives and any other Americans who oppose the neofascist MAGA movement.  

Of course, Trump’s violent and other pathological behavior has not disqualified or otherwise seriously hurt his quest to be the Republican Party’s 2024 presidential nominee. In fact, the party and its voters are ever more united behind Donald Trump where his criminality and other aberrant behavior has made him more popular and not less.

The mainstream American news media largely ignored Taranto’s attempt to assassinate Barack Obama. Predictably, the news media did much the same in response to Donald Trump’s wishing death upon Hunter Biden.

Trump’s violent and other pathological behavior has not disqualified or otherwise seriously hurt his quest to be the Republican Party’s 2024 presidential nominee.

Earlier this week, the New York Times reported on Trump and his cabal’s plans to eliminate any and all opposition to the regime through the normal process of institutional checks and balances by civil servants, the rule of law, and other democratic institutions if he takes back the White House in the 2024 Election. Trump would in essence become an American dictator. If such a nightmare scenario were to materialize, then a man who has a demonstrated and proven attraction to and capacity to engage in violence and destruction would have almost free rein to follow through on his most dark and evil impulses.

Trump cannot achieve his revolutionary goal of destroying America’s multiracial, pluralistic democracy – and the Constitutional order more broadly – by himself. He needs a political party, a movement and other allies and forces to achieve such an outcome. On this, historian Heather Cox Richardson warns in a recent issue of her newsletter how the Republican Party “appears to have fully embraced the antidemocratic ideology advanced by authoritarian leaders like Russia’s president Vladimir Putin and Hungary’s prime minister Viktor Orbán”:

They claim that the tenets of democracy—equality before the law, free speech, academic freedom, a market-based economy, immigration, and so on—weaken a nation by destroying a “traditional” society based in patriarchy and Christianity.

Instead of democracy, they have called for “illiberal” or “Christian” democracy, which uses the government to enforce their beliefs in a Christian, patriarchal order.

Trump leads a fascist-authoritarian-fake right-wing populist cult of personality. As such, Trump exerts a powerful if not inexorable amount of influence and control over his followers which translates into his violent impulses and behavior spreading across American society like a plague.

New research by The Lincoln Democracy Institute on political polarization and violence in the Age of Trump and beyond reinforces how severe America’s democracy crisis really is:

The survey found that extremism is born out of increasing polarization and the normalizing of extremist rhetoric. The right and left deal with their competing worldviews by directing their anger at the “other side”. Long-standing generational divides further feed into this: the baby boomers are more likely to be extremist and have ideological divides than any other generation. Other divides include generational experiences such as the end of the Cold War, relationships with technology, and the propensity to embrace cultural change. 

This is all being fed by a new right wing media ecosystem that plays off the fears of its viewers and pushes them towards radicalization. Particularly troublesome is the new right extremist media that promotes election denialism and frequently pushes false narratives designed to anger their audience and the MAGA base.

“As the electorate is becoming more politically extremist, and some are radicalizing the threat of violence is growing exponentially,” said Trygve Olson, Survey author and Lincoln Democracy Institute Senior Advisor. “The lack of belief that a fair election is possible in 2024 is setting the stage for wholesale rejection of the results that could lead to violence during and after the election. This is a critical moment for democracy and it is imperative that the nation respond to the moment by supporting our democratic institutions and calling out bad actors.”

Donald Trump is 77 years old. He is not going to change. The greater concern in terms of American society and what happens in the years and decades to come – independent of Trump – is how the American people as a whole, the mainstream news media, and too many political elites have become so quickly used to and habituated to a former president, one of the most powerful people in the country, who routinely if not a daily basis threatens violence, death, mayhem and other harm upon his “enemies” in the rival political party and across society.

After the horrors of the Holocaust and World War II, social psychologists spent much time and energy trying to determine how an entire democratic and cosmopolitan society like Germany can quite literally go mad, intoxicated by violence and hatred in what would become a project of self-destruction.


Want a daily wrap-up of all the news and commentary Salon has to offer? Subscribe to our morning newsletter, Crash Course.


One does not have to look to the past or abroad for answers: The Age of Trump and the rise of American neofascism is providing a direct and personal lesson in real-time for the American people in how such horrors unfold and become normalized.

In an attempt to find some clarity during these horrible years, I have repeatedly returned to Milton Mayer’s important book “They Thought They Were Free: The Germans 1933-45.” The following two passages have proven to be remarkably helpful:

“But the one great shocking occasion, when tens or hundreds or thousands will join with you, never comes. That’s the difficulty. If the last and worst act of the whole regime had come immediately after the first and smallest, thousands, yes, millions would have been sufficiently shocked—if, let us say, the gassing of the Jews in ’43 had come immediately after the ‘German Firm’ stickers on the windows of non-Jewish shops in ’33. But of course this isn’t the way it happens. In between come all the hundreds of little steps, some of them imperceptible, each of them preparing you not to be shocked by the next. Step C is not so much worse than Step B, and, if you did not make a stand at Step B, why should you at Step C? And so on to Step D….”

“In the body politic as in the body personal, nonresistance to the milder indulgences paves the way for nonresistance to the deadlier.”

The Trumpocene and what it birthed has done great harm to us as individuals, collectively, and as a society.

We the Americans are very sick right now and most don’t even realize it. This includes the many tens of millions of Americans in the MAGA movement, the Republican fascists, and the larger white right who are very sick but believe that they are in fact healthy. The human mind’s capacity for denial and delusion is that extreme.

Samuel Alito and the fishing trip that set the world on fire

As U.S. temperatures set new records during yet another scorching summer, a Union of Concerned Scientists has revealed a list of politicians who protect the fossil fuel industry in exchange for campaign funds, a climate-destroying quid pro quo enabled by the Supreme Court’s 2010 Citizens United decision.  

Predicate facts underlying Citizens United were in play when Justice Samuel Alito accepted an expense-paid Alaskan retreat with Paul Singer, a billionaire fossil fuel investor, major GOP donor, and hedge-fund manager with cases before the court. The exclusive fishing junket was arranged by Leonard Leo, a Federalist Society activist who fights climate science and works to put conservative jurists with similar views on the federal bench.  

At first blush, the Alito-Singer trip was covered as just another right-wing justice accepting gifts from conservative donors with interests before the court.  On second look, however, it is apparent that the blossoming rot of dark money is what continues to cripple the U.S. response to climate change, even as forests burn around us and temperatures approach the uninhabitable. 

Alito’s misleading defense

Responding to criticism about his trip- and his failure to report it on his financial disclosures- Alito didn’t address campaign finance, Leo, or the pernicious effects of Citizens United. Instead, Alito delivered a misleading rebuke wrapped in entitlement. 

On his failure to recuse, Alito claims he was unaware of Singer’s interest in at least ten cases before the court, even though Singer’s role was heavily covered by the media. Alito explained, “Mr. Singer was not listed as a party… The entities that ProPublica claims are connected to Mr. Singer all appear to be either limited liability corporations or limited liability partnerships.” Corporate entities, Alito knows, do not typically list the names of directors, investors, or major shareholders in case captions except in rare cases asserting personal liability.  

Alito also said he’s reviewed “hundreds of thousands” of petitions for certiorari review, suggesting there were simply too many cases to track. However, the Supreme Court hears only between 100 to 150 cases each year. In his long 17 years on the court, Alito has heard 2550 cases at most, making his reference to “hundreds of thousands” of certiorari petitions intentionally misleading. He also invoked Supreme Court Rule 29.6 to legitimize his claim that staff- not he- checks for conflicts, and that it is “utterly impossible” for his staff to search filings with the SEC to identify individuals with financial interests before the court.  Rule 29.6 requires disclosure of company interests, not individuals, and his staff didn’t go on a personal junket with Singer, Alito did. 

We need your help to stay independent

Even if his misleading explanations on recusal somehow passed the sniff test, Alito recently voted to dismantle EPA climate protections while his wife was under contract to develop fossil fuels on family land.  If his own family’s business interests don’t present a conflict of interest prompting recusal, his fishing buddy’s wouldn’t either.

In the ten years following Citizens United, dark money and super PACs spent nearly $3 billion to influence federal races. 

Alito’s logic on his failure to report the gifted trip was equally acrobatic. He admitted Singer paid for his $200k flight, but says he didn’t need to report it because he merely took a seat that would otherwise have been empty.  “Mr. Singer …allowed me to occupy what would have otherwise been an unoccupied seat on a private flight to Alaska…” Apparently, to trigger ethical disclosure, Singer needed to fly him solo and perhaps arrange an in-flight foot massage.

The malign influence of Citizens United

Around the same time as the 2008 fishing trip, a not-for-profit called Citizens United released a film to hurt Hillary Clinton in the Democratic primary.  Because it exceeded limits set by the Federal Election Campaign Act, a judge granted summary judgment to the Election Commission, and the Supreme Court took up the caseAlito then joined a 5-4 majority to change 100 years of election law, striking the Election Act’s century-old limit on corporate campaign expenditures and opening the floodgates for special interests and corporations to influence the outcome of national elections.  


Want a daily wrap-up of all the news and commentary Salon has to offer? Subscribe to our morning newsletter, Crash Course.


In the ten years following Citizens United, dark money and super PACs spent nearly $3 billion to influence federal races.  From a baseline of $32 million in 2010 (the year Citizens United was decided), billionaire spending on elections rose exponentially to $232 million in 2014, $611 million in 2018, then $881 million in 2022. No SCOTUS decision — not even the overturning of Roe v. Wade — has been more controversial than Citizens United, which allowed Singer to spend hundreds of millions in dark money to support conservative causes.

Singer, Alito attack climate science for a reason

Singer’s hedge fund, Elliott Management, provides capital to acquire land for oil and gas production, while Singer supports candidates who deny or downplay the severity of climate change. No industry has benefited more from Citizens United than the energy sector, whose expenditures on federal elections — including a massive decades-long disinformation campaign — nearly quadrupled from 2010 to 2020.  Both Singer and the Federalist Society also spent large sums to ensconce Amy Coney Barrett on the high court, as Barrett confesses “no opinion” about whether climate change even exists.  

Paradoxically, the Union of Concerned Scientists reports that politicians most obstructive to climate efforts hail from states most affected by climate change; less paradoxically, these are the same politicians most supported by oil and gas money.  

By allowing deep oil-lined pockets like Singer’s to dominate the climate discussion, Citizens United has stymied US climate responses, even as the planet burns.  Alito, who can be flown to Alaska for free, continues to double down on Citizens United; he regularly delivers speeches defending the nefarious outcome, while simultaneously disputing climate science.  The Federalist Society, equally dismissive of climate science and enamored of Citizens United, features a Youtube video on their website explaining how allowing corporations to influence elections is a matter of “free speech.”   

The Supreme Court needs to stop the insanity, admit it was wrong, and revert to common sense limits on corporate electioneering. If Democrats retake the House and Senate in 2024, Congress needs to impose term limits and ethical standards on the current court, without delay, and add three justices guided by science rather than money.

Fossil fuel origins of accelerating climate change will likely become indisputable — even in Texas — in about fifty years when our children’s children are at the helm, but scientists say that will be too late. When our coastal cities are underwater and Midwestern crops refuse to grow, it will be up to a future Supreme Court to serve justice on fossil-fuel dark money and its entitled beneficiaries like Alito, Singer and Leonard Leo, whose destructive legacy will be sealed.

Alien biology: How will astronomers actually know if they’ve found extraterrestrial life?

While nobody really knows what an ‘alien’ looks like, Hollywood films and sci-fi novels often depict aliens as scary, supernatural beings. Typically they have a reverse teardrop-shaped head, buggy eyes and slimy, grey skin. They’re usually more intelligent than humans, perhaps even be immortal. Popular culture makes it seem as if one day Earthlings will find out extraterrestrial life exists when we encounter such a being, but the reality is likely going to be very different from what our imaginations suggest.

As U.S. lawmakers push to declassify UFO-related records, and the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) searches for extraterrestrial life on exoplanets via the James Webb Space Telescope, how scientists will know that they’ve found extraterrestrial life — and what it will even look like — is a question on many folks’ minds.

On Earth, the field of biology has core characteristics that define life. It must be made of multiple cells, respond to stimuli, be able to reproduce, adapt, grow, use a source of energy for metabolic activities and be capable of homeostasis. However, even with those tenets, life can look differently for each living being and species. The NASA definition of life in its search is “a self-sustaining chemical system capable of Darwinian evolution.” It’s likely intentionally vague, as the space agency points out, there is no “universally accepted definition of life.”

Jason Wright, a professor of astronomy and astrophysics at Pennsylvania State University, told Salon that as it stands, there are no set standards to define extraterrestrial life in astronomy.

“What are the standards for saying that we have found microbial life in the solar system, what is it going to take?” Wright asked, adding that standards are being set as science progresses and it’s unlikely there will be a “eureka moment” when scientists do find it. “It’s probably going to be a scenario where it’s an accumulation of evidence over time, of ambiguous evidence, until all of the evidence that comes together is overwhelming.”

“How can we even define what the standards will be before we know what evidence we’re even talking about?”

Wright used the example of when scientists announced that they detected the chemical phosphine (PH3), a molecule composed of phosphorus and hydrogen, in the upper atmosphere of Venus – and how that appeared to be a “promising” sign of life. But nobody knows for certain yet if life exists on Venus. If phosphine is the first step to discovering life on Venus, it’s going to be a long time before we do, Wright said, including starting and completing many of the planned missions to Venus.  

“This is going to be a long road,” Wright elaborated. “And that’s something that the community is still struggling with — how can we even define what the standards will be before we know what evidence we’re even talking about?”

How astronomers search for extraterrestrial life

Generally, astronomers and astrophysicists search for extraterrestrial life by looking for biosignatures — such as water, oxygen or chlorophyll — on other planets. That seems like a sound strategy in general. After all, life has existed on Earth for around 3.7 billion years, while industrial civilization has only existed for 200. However, let’s say there is compelling evidence that biosignatures found on an exoplanet suggests life exists there. Would scientists be able to scientifically confirm life exists from Earth, or have an idea of what it looks like?

“Secrecy is neither a possibility nor a policy.”

Unfortunately, Wright said it will largely depend on the quality of evidence. These questions are difficult to answer because astronomers are still trying to define standards that will define extraterrestrial life. Currently, in the search for extraterrestrial intelligence (SETI) community, there is a protocol for possible detection called the Declaration of Principles Concerning the Conduct of the Search for Extraterrestrial Intelligence. In the protocol, in the case of a compelling signal detection, astronomers are advised to verify that it’s truly an extraterrestrial source, announce its discovery to the world, and refrain from replying without first seeking international consultation.

As SETI senior astronomer Seth Shostak wrote, despite conspiratorial thinking, such news would not be buried by the government or media.        

“Rest assured that the first thing anyone would do upon detecting a tantalizing signal is to contact people at other observatories to request help in confirming the discovery,” Shostak wrote. “Lots of people would know. Secrecy is neither a possibility nor a policy.”

In an interview with Salon, Shostak said he doesn’t think it’s problematic that there are no set standards for extraterrestrial life.

“I think most scientists would say, we’re fairly confident that we could recognize that this is a deliberate signal and not just nature,” Shostak said.

As Salon previously reported, some astronomers do believe we have been searching for alien life by following the wrong clues, in part due to the power of our telescopes.

We need your help to stay independent

“The mainstream astronomical search for extraterrestrial life focuses on the telltale signatures of primitive forms of life because microbes emerged soon after the Earth cooled, whereas humans emerged merely in the last 0.1% of Earth’s history,” said Avi Loeb, Director of the Institute for Theory and Computation at Harvard University, via email. “But we now know that most stars in the Milky Way galaxy formed billions of years before the Sun and the billions of habitable planets around them are well ahead of the history of life on Earth.”

The idea of searching for life via technosignatures — such as radio waves, industrial pollution, light pollution, or anything that would suggest advanced technology is being used — is becoming more accepted.

“If we search our cosmic backyard we might find technologically-manufactured objects from our cosmic neighborhood, akin to tennis balls thrown by a neighbor,” Loeb said.

Wright said astronomy has put a lot of effort into finding life via biosignatures, but he believes extraterrestrial life could be found if more of an emphasis was placed on technosignatures.

“If we get a powerful radio signal from space, there’s no way that can be natural, there’s no arguing about ambiguity.

“If you were looking at the solar system from a nearby star, trying to prove it had life in the solar system, you’d be hard pressed to show that Earth had life — that would be a gigantic space telescope level thing, but it might be easier to show that it has technology because you could detect the radio waves,” Wright said. “If we get a powerful radio signal from space, there’s no way that can be natural, there’s no arguing about ambiguity like phosphine on Venus, there’s only technology that can create certain kinds of radio emission.”

Let’s say astronomers are confident they’ve come across life: is there any way intelligent life could look like the way culture depicts aliens? It’s actually possible. In 2018, astrobiologists published a study in the International Journal of Astrobiology showing for the first time that our evolutionary theory can be used to support alien predictions, such as how they look. Surprisingly, they landed on the conclusion that they would look a lot like humans.

“By predicting that aliens undergone major transitions – which is how complexity has arisen in species on earth, we can say that there is a level of predictability to evolution that would cause them to look like us,” Sam Levin, a researcher in Oxford’s Department of Zoology and the study’s lead author, said in a press release. “Like humans, we predict that they are made-up of a hierarchy of entities, which all cooperate to produce an alien.”

Wife of Gilgo Beach murder suspect files for divorce

In a Suffolk County Supreme Court filing dated Wednesday, Asa Ellerup, wife of over 25 years to Gilgo Beach murder suspect, Rex Heuermann, filed for an uncontested divorce. This comes shortly after the July 13 arrest of Heuermann in connection with three of the 10 murdered women found along Ocean Parkway on Long Island’s South Shore in December 2010, as reported by ABC News

Heuermann, a 59-year-old Manhattan architect and father of two, was identified as the main suspect in the case that was the basis for the 2020 film, “Lost Girls,” after female hairs were discovered on items used to tie-up and subdue the victims and mitochondrial DNA testing concluded them to be a 99% match for Heuermann’s wife. Per ABC News, “Police don’t believe she was involved, as she was out of the country when the killings occurred, according to cellphone records noted in the court records, but that Heuermann had the hairs on his body.”

Heuermann “pleaded not guilty to the killings of Melissa Barthelemy, Megan Waterman and Amber Costello and remains the prime suspect in the killing of a fourth victim, Maureen Brainard-Barnes,” according to court documents sourced by CNN. He’s been charged with three counts of first-degree murder and three counts of second-degree murder and is currently being held without bail. 

Spaceprobe captures Mercury’s high-powered X-ray auroras

New research in the journal Nature Communications details the weak, atmosphere-like exosphere surrounding the planet Mercury. Enroute to the planet since 2018, the twin spacecraft of the BepiColumbo mission swooped through the innermost rings of our solar system in 2021, flying just 124 miles above the tiny planet closest to the Sun. The endeavor is between the European Space Agency and Japanese Aerospace Exploration Agency (JAXA). Thanks to the spacecraft’s plasma instruments, astronomers have detected how solar winds (whipping charged particles across the surface of Mercury) create high-pressure conditions in the planet’s magnetosphere, unleashing a rain-shower of electrons that coats the planet with X-ray auroras that are invisible to the human eye.

“For the first time, we have witnessed how electrons are accelerated in Mercury’s magnetosphere and precipitated onto the planet’s surface. While Mercury’s magnetosphere is much smaller than Earth’s and has a different structure and dynamics, we have confirmation that the mechanism that generates aurorae is the same throughout the Solar System,” said JAXA’s Sae Aizawa, lead author of the research, said in a statement.

A decade ago, NASA’s Messenger mission to Mercury gave humans our closest view of the auroras. But at the time we didn’t understand what generated them and the celestial dance wasn’t observed directly. Now, however, we know that as dawn rises on Mercury — a spectacle that only occurs approximately once every 59 of our Earth days — a series of plasma processes accelerates the electrons of the planet’s magnetosphere, transported from the tail region of the solar winds until they’re showered down onto the planet’s crater-speckled surface. That’s when our fastest celestial sibling, hurtling around the sun at 107,082 miles per hour, its X-ray aurora bursting forth in a dazzling spray of high-powered, invisible energy.

George Santos had his bail conditions altered to allow for shopping

Rep. George Santos, R-N.Y.  — with the help of his lawyer — successfully filed for modifications to his bail conditions that will make it easier for him to shop and dine out at restaurants. 

According to Insider, Santos’ lawyer, Joseph Murray, “asked the judge overseeing his case to expand the area Santos is allowed to travel ‘to include a thirty-mile radius around the District of Columbia’ so that he doesn’t have to give ‘unnecessary notifications to authorities.'” 

“In light of the small geographical area of the District of Columbia, there is a frequent need to travel outside the District of Columbia for usual and customary functions of someone who lives and works in the District of Columbia, such as dining, shopping, meetings, events, and even use of the local airports,” Murray wrote, going on to say that this adjustment will make it easier for Santos to “live his life.”  Prior to the filing, Santos — who is awaiting trial on a 13-count federal indictment accusing him of wire fraud, money laundering, and theft of public funds — was restricted from traveling outside of New York and Washington and was asked to surrender of his passport. As previously reported, Santos’ $500,000 bond was signed for by his father and aunt, who will be called upon to pay that sum should Santos violate the conditions of his release. 

Police share new details on the reported disappearance of Carlee Russell

The Chief of Hoover Police, Nick Derzis, issued an update on Wednesday pertaining to the reported July 13 disappearance of Carlee Russell — an Alabama resident who called 911 after claiming to see a toddler walking alone on the side of the highway, vanishing for two days after the fact — but the new information leaves those curious about her case with more questions than answers.

According to intel from Derzis obtained from TMZ , “detectives were able to briefly interview Carlee who claimed when she got out of the vehicle to help the young child a man with orange hair and a bald spot came out of the woods, grabbed her, and led her over a fence and into an 18-wheeler trailer.” Per the woman’s account of the night in question, she managed to escape the trailer but was then put into another vehicle, blindfolded, and taken to a house where she was forced to undress and have photos taken of her. 

Mysteriously, a look at the cell phone left at the location of her disappearance revealed that leading up to the event she’d conducted the following searches: “Do you have to pay for an Amber Alert?” “How to take money from a register without getting caught?” “Birmingham bus station?” “One-way bus ticket Birmingham to Nashville” and also the movie “Taken,” which centers on abduction. Per Derzis, police will continue to look into the facts of the case, but have determined there to be “no threat to public safety.” 

 

Sheryl Crow slams Jason Aldean’s controversial song lyrics for “promoting violence”

Sheryl Crow took to Twitter to call out Jason Aldean‘s controversial lyrics in the chorus of his song “Try That in a Small Town.” The lyrics have been widely accused of being pro-gun and pro-lynching, although Aldean has ardently denied those claims, calling them “meritless” and “dangerous.”

In a Tuesday tweet directed at Aldean’s account, Crow wrote: “I’m from a small town. Even people in small towns are sick of violence. There’s nothing small-town or American about promoting violence. You should know that better than anyone having survived a mass shooting. This is not American or small town-like. It’s just lame.” Crow was specifically referencing Aldean’s 2017 Route 91 Harvest Music Festival performance when a gunman opened fire, killing 60 people and injuring hundreds.

Per Variety, Country Music Television (CMT) has officially removed Aldean’s music video for the song on Monday. Scenes in the video were shot at the Maury County Courthouse in Columbia, Tennessee, where a Black man named Henry Choate, was lynched in 1927. The courthouse was also the site of the 1946 Columbia Race Riot. Aldean, along with several conservative critics, have since defended the song on social media. “In the past 24 hours I have been accused of releasing a pro-lynching song (a song that has been out since May) and was subject to the comparison that I (direct quote) was not too pleased with the nationwide BLM protests,” Aldean wrote in a tweet. “These references are not only meritless, but dangerous.”

 

Expert: Trump Jan. 6 indictment could “accelerate” Judge Aileen Cannon’s timeline in documents case

Former President Donald Trump, who remains engulfed in legal battles and has already been criminally indicted twice, could soon be indicted in a third case, further deepening the political tension around his 2024 election campaign.

Trump said on Tuesday that he received a letter from special counsel Jack Smith notifying him that he is a target of his investigation into efforts to overturn the results of the 2020 presidential election, indicating that he could soon face charges. 

Legal experts told Salon that target letters usually present an opportunity for targets to testify before the grand jury and present evidence before they are indicted. Trump received a similar letter before he was charged in the classified documents case. 

But Smith’s letter to Trump regarding his role in efforts to overturn the 2020 election could also “accelerate” Judge Aileen Cannon’s timeline for the Mar-a-Lago classified documents case, Javed Ali, a former senior counterterrorism official at the Department of Homeland Security, told Salon.

“The degree of coordination between special counsel Smith’s investigation and Judge Cannon’s trial is unclear however, and the Department of Justice will likely have to ensure that both sides do not run afoul of each other’s respective efforts,” Ali said.

On Tuesday, Trump’s legal team told Judge Cannon that they didn’t believe she should schedule a trial date, but said if she does they would propose mid-November or later of next year, according to ABC News.

But Cannon, who Trump appointed to the federal bench, also seemed skeptical of prosecutors arguing that the case head to trial by December.

“I can appreciate more time is necessary, but some deadlines can clearly be established now,” Cannon said, according to NBC.

Trump pleaded not guilty last month to 37 criminal counts related to his handling of classified materials after repeatedly ignoring advice from his lawyers and advisers to return the secret documents containing information from U.S. nuclear secrets to the nation’s defense capabilities. 

Smith’s investigation on Jan. 6 examined the role Trump and his allies played in trying to keep him in office as well as their efforts in the Capitol riot. Prosecutors have reportedly questioned Trump’s lawyers, who were responsible for devising the unsuccessful plan involving alternate electors in battleground states won by President Joe Biden to reverse his victory in the state’s 2020 election.

The former president is also under scrutiny in a separate case involving his alleged attempts to overturn the 2020 election in Georgia, where he is being investigated by Fulton County District Attorney Fani Willis.

We need your help to stay independent

“Depending on the pace of the New York case, and the outcome of the Georgia investigation, Trump may be campaigning as a defendant in four criminal cases, in as many different jurisdictions,” former federal prosecutor Adam Kamenstein told Salon.

Trump was indicted by a grand jury in Manhattan in March for his involvement in paying hush money to adult film actress Stormy Daniels in 2016. He pleaded not guilty to 34 charges of falsifying business records.

Trump’s campaign travel schedule will likely be impacted, Kamenstein said, adding that, unlike civil cases, defendants are typically required to be present for every hearing in their criminal case. 


Want a daily wrap-up of all the news and commentary Salon has to offer? Subscribe to our morning newsletter, Crash Course.


“Neither case will have automatic priority over the other, so absent any statutory deadlines, it will be a bit of first-come, first-serve,” Kamenstein said. “The first court to set the calendar will essentially own those dates.”

On top of this, Trump could also use this opportunity “as an engine for fundraising,” he added.

“As for the impact of these and other legal matters for President Trump’s political fortunes for the upcoming presidential election, he will continue to promote the narrative that these are all politically-motivated efforts by Democrats to prevent him from winning, encourage his supporters to back his campaign, and lash out on social media against those he perceives are undermining him,” Ali said. 

In “Barbie,” of course Ken hijacks the journey of empowerment in a misguided tour of the patriarchy

Director Greta Gerwig‘s film “Barbie,” based on titular the Mattel doll (Margot Robbie), is an overstimulating riot of eye-popping, neon-colored costumes and sets. The world-building is simply fabulous, with imaginative designs that incorporate many of the doll’s accessories, dream houses, and more. 

But why is a film called “Barbie” somehow all about Ken (Ryan Gosling)? For a story about female empowerment, it is vexing that Ken’s neediness, loneliness and identity crisis hijack the plot for long stretches and force Barbie to help him, not the reverse. It feels disrespectful that she is so subservient because the film emphasizes the message that Barbie the doll inspired legions of women to go, be and do whatever they wanted — because “anything is possible.” “Barbie” states its message often, but at times, it feels more mechanical, like a doll talking, than motivational. 

The film opens with a cute, if corny, “2001” homage that is an origin story narrated by Helen Mirren, in which young girls reject “baby” dolls and admiring Barbie, an “adult” doll embodied by the oversized Margot Robbie in a stunning one-piece swimsuit that shows off her long, glamorous legs and dazzling smile. She is irresistible and perfectly cast. And when she winks, it is, indeed, magical. 

The film then immerses viewers in Barbieland, a diverse and inclusive world full of BIPOC, trans and full-figured actresses playing Barbies who are all governed by a Black Female Barbie President (Issa Rae). It is a place where feminism and equal rights allow women to live their Best Day every day. (Ah, the fantasy!) And Gerwig shows viewers what that great day is like. Barbie gets up, takes a shower, makes breakfast, goes to the beach where she has dozens of friends and then dances at a party before having a girls’ night. 

For Ken, a great day is “if Barbie looks at him,” suggesting he needs a woman’s approval. The film also has Ken (Gosling) “beaching off” with another Ken (Simu Liu) in what one might call a d**k-measuring contest — if the Kens were anatomically correct. (They’re not). Barbie has to break up their dumb fight. A big musical number/dance party follows, which is kind of fun, until Barbie ruins it by asking, “Do you guys ever thinks about dying?”

The next day, Barbie’s shower is cold, her breakfast is burnt, and her great day is ruined by her existential crisis featuring inexplicable thoughts of death, evidence of cellulite and — worst of all — flat feet. To address her “malfunction,” Barbie visits the misfit toy, “Weird Barbie” (Kate McKinnon, in a scene-stealing performance full of verve.). Weird Barbie explains Barbie has encountered a break in the portal between Barbieland and the Real World, and she must go to Los Angeles, and find the human who is “playing with her” to right things. 

The trip to the Real World is great fun — the film does have moments of inventiveness — with various Barbie fashions and props from cars and boats to campers and skimobiles. The artificial vignettes are almost enough to make Wes Anderson jealous. 

But once in L.A. the film slackens. Barbie and Ken get arrested, but they do get some fabulous outfits: a pink jumpsuit for her; a cowboy style fringe getup for him. However, Barbie’s mood really sours when she encounters the preteen, Sasha (Ariana Greenblatt), who calls Barbie a “fascist” and tells her that she makes “women feel bad about themselves.” It makes Barbie cry, and Robbie, who has perfected Barbie’s vapid look, gives this tear the same momentous energy she did in “Babylon.” It is nice that the film addresses this feminist critique, but then it spins off in a different direction, tracking Ken as he learns about the patriarchy in a sequence that goes on far too long. 

Moreover, there is a subplot involving Mattel’s all-male and mostly white board, whose CEO (Will Farrell, unfunny) trying to get Barbie “back in the box” to avoid the catastrophic situation of her (and Ken) being in the real world. 

BarbieMargot Robbie as Barbie in “Barbie” (Courtesy of Warner Bros. Pictures)The film’s theme of resisting the subjugation of women is admirable, and Gerwig plays it with a mix of playfulness and earnestness, which is fitting for a film about a doll that allows young and old to imagine the world they want, while being in the world they are in. But the film stumbles a bit here as “Barbie” gets a bit silly with a manic chase scene. It recovers when Barbie encounters Ruth (Rhea Perlman), who helps her escape. Barbie also meets Gloria (America Ferrara), who is with her daughter Sasha, and the three of them go back to Barbieland, which it turns out, is now ruled by Ken who lives in a Mojo Dojo Casa House and has introduced the patriarchy, turning all the Barbies into docile, brainwashed women who serve men and have no independent thoughts.

“Barbie” uses this conceit of reversing gender roles to mock women’s place in society, and set up a fantastic, applause-inducing speech by Gloria (Ferrera nails it) about how women must grin and bear life, like wanting things, but also being grateful for what they have or be a boss but not so tough that they are difficult to work with, etc. This rant galvanizes the Barbies to take back their power, and the film hits it stride in these moments.

But then it doesn’t. Ken feels slighted about his patriarchy crumbling, and Barbie has to woman-splain things to him. What is infuriating is that she even apologizes for not wanting to be or live with him. For all the female agency on display, Barbie still has to placate and mollycoddle the insecure Ken. This is, sort of, Gloria’s speech in action, and that is either wonderfully subversive and satiric or just plain stupid. Gerwig, lets viewers decide. 

We need your help to stay independent

The film offers other mixed messages such as Sasha doing a 180 and being completely on board with Barbie, forgetting all her earlier contempt. It is another voice speaking truth to power being silenced. How is that letting young women “go, be and do whatever they want?” 

Robbie charms in the title role, and her moments of despair display her comic timing. But the film is weakest when she is off screen. Ken gets a big, hyper-extended showstopping musical number that audiences will eat up — but again, it feels like he is stealing Barbie’s thunder. Gosling’s performance is mostly intense, as he is the villain of the piece, but he should be dumber and funnier. There is also a running joke featuring Allan (Michael Cera) who is not a Ken, and not a multiple, but it does not serve much purpose, or provide much humor. 

There are some bright moments, as when Barbie meets the discontinued Barbies, which provide a chuckle at their bad design. (One has a TV in her back. Her back! Why!?) The film’s other glimmer of wit comes from Mirren’s voiceover when Robbie’s beauty is questioned. 

Gerwig ends her film with some answers to Barbie’s existential crisis that involves her coming to terms with being “good enough.” Gerwig’s film is “good enough,” but in a perfect Barbie world, it would have been better, and made Ken a sidekick, not a co-star.

“Barbie” is in theaters Friday, July 21. 

How chefs became rock stars: The shifting attitudes toward restaurant work

Culinary shows such as Top Chef attract millions of viewers. Audiences eagerly tune in weekly to watch famous chefs in impeccable attire offer their advice or criticism of a variety of dishes. The success of these shows can be long-lasting. The Netflix the documentary series Chef’s Table has been running since 2015. It features virtuoso chefs from around the world who would appear to have no end of stories and elaborate recipes.

Today, chefs seem to have achieved a rock-star status that their yesteryear peers could barely have imagined. However, the road to such professional admiration has been long and arduous.

 

Dirt, heat, charcoal and alcoholism

From the opening of the first restaurants around 1860 until the first half of the 20th century, becoming a chef was not an attractive profession. The first reason was that they worked in dark and toxic environments. Indeed, kitchens were often located in basements, and the steam that filled them seemed to come from the mouths of hell. These places had virtually no ventilation, no light and were always overheated. Poultry feathers littered the filthy floor, which was also dripping with animal blood and dirty dishwater.

In addition, the use of coal for cooking in these confined spaces regularly caused the premature death of many of the people who worked there. Inhaling large quantities of toxic carbon dioxide fumes for several hours a day led to kidney failure, lung disease and other illnesses that significantly reduced life expectancy. As the famous chef Antonin Carême (1783-1833), who died quite young, said: “It’s the charcoal that kills us but what does it matter?”

The public opinion of chefs was also very negative. They were often portrayed as dirty, greasy characters with a penchant for alcohol.

In Down and Out in Paris and London (1933), George Orwell painted a vitriolic picture of his daily life in the kitchens of one of the French capital’s leading hotels, which he preferred not to name. According to him, the chef “is an artist, but his art is not cleanliness.” On the contrary, “to a certain extent he is even dirty because he is an artist, for food, to look smart, needs dirty treatment.”

Orwell also depicts the dirtiness of places and people by writing:

 

“We slithered about in a compound of soapy water, lettuce leaves, torn paper and trampled food. A dozen waiters with their coats off, showing their sweaty armpits, sat at the table mixing salads and sticking their thumbs into the cream pots. The room had a dirty, mixed smell of food and sweat.”

 

The concept of hygiene was not the same as it is today and inspections were not carried out to the same exacting standards.

 

The 20th century, the century of recognition

Despite this, the first half of the 20th century marked the beginning of gastronomic tourism. The Michelin Guide and its star system appeared, first in France, and then in other European countries. This helped to promote and legitimize top chefs. Later, in the 1950s, television brought them to the attention of an even wider audience, thanks to culinary programs. Raymond Oliver in France and Fanny Cradock in the UK were the first to host a long series of television programs that raised the profile of chefs and catapulted the best among them to stardom.

Later, chefs such as like Joël Robuchon in France and Mary Barry in the UK then skilfully used media such as television and radio or published recipe books to raise their public profile. From this period onwards, many of them also teamed up with industrial brands for advertising purposes.

Over the years, the greatest of them – such as Paul Bocuse and Alain Ducasse in France, Gordon Ramsay or Heston Blumenthal in the UK – have managed to turn their reputations into empires. In addition to their own restaurants, they acquired brasseries, opened restaurants abroad, set up training institutes and published their own gastronomic magazines.

 

Gastronomy 2.0: chefs take on social networking

The transition to the 21st century and the advent of social networking have changed the way chefs gain notoriety. Being excellent in the kitchen is no longer enough – they also need to know how to manage their image. Social networks allow them to spread their story, shape their image and have influence. For instance, Gordon Ramsay has a staggering 14 million Instagram fans. He is followed by Jamie Oliver, with 9.5 million fans. In many cases, chefs are also assisted by press agencies to develop their marketing strategy and get the best possible media coverage.

A new type of chef has also emerged in recent years, such as Jean Imbert. Completely unknown before his victory on Top Chef France in 2012, he has since made the most of the media and social networks, regularly posting on his Instagram account with celebrities such as Beyoncé or Robert de Niro. He is also considered one of the most influential and innovative chefs of his generation.

In the UK, Poppy O’Toole, who was trained in a Michelin-starred restaurant, lost her job during the pandemic and started posting videos of her cooking on TikTok under the handle @poppycooks. She now has 1.5 million followers and a book deal.

Today’s top chefs are celebrated, admired and listened to. Along with singers, actors and footballers, they are now among the French and British people’s 50 favorite personalities. But behind all the glitz and glamour, it is important to remember that this is still a demanding and difficult profession that requires deep dedication and iron discipline. As the series The Bear reminds us, only a tiny minority of chefs achieve “star” status. What’s more, female chefs, although increasingly asserting their presence in the kitchen, still receive far less honor or recognition than their male counterparts. This is regrettable.

Nathalie Louisgrand, Enseignante-chercheuse, Grenoble École de Management (GEM)

This article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license. Read the original article.

“Nobody has done more for her than I have”: Trump reportedly mad Sarah Sanders won’t endorse him

Tensions between former President Donald Trump and his former press secretary, Arkansas Gov. Sarah Huckabee Sanders, have mounted recently because, despite her team informing Trump’s campaign that she would endorse him in the 2024 presidential election after the end of her first legislative session in May, Sanders has yet to do so, two sources familiar with the situation told Axios.

Sanders is one of several Republicans who have chosen to remain neutral ahead of the 2024 Republican primary. Her neutrality is complicated, however, because of her former role as the voice of the GOP frontrunner’s administration. Due to their working relationship — and the fact that Trump endorsed her on the first day of her gubernatorial campaign in 2021 — Trump reportedly holds the Arkansas governor to a different standard than other GOP leaders. “You should always dance with the person who brought you,” an unnamed Trump ally said, describing the feeling. The New York Times first reported in March that Trump had asked Sanders for an endorsement, and she declined. Trump, however, vehemently denied the report on Truth Social, writing that he never asked her for an endorsement while adding that “nobody has done more for her than I have.”

Sanders has also built a relationship with Trump’s primary rival Gov. Ron DeSantis, attending the Florida Republican’s retreat for prominent donors last year and hiring his senior chancellor of the state’s Department of Education to be her secretary of education in Arkansas. She’s also gotten close with DeSantis’ wife, Casey, after their experience’s with cancer in recent years. Trump and DeSantis’ campaigns declined Axios’ requests for comment.

Ex-U.S. attorney: Evidence in Jan. 6 indictment “will be much stronger” than Trump defenders think

The former associate White House counsel for former President Donald Trump on Tuesday told CNN that the target letter special counsel Jack Smith sent Trump in the Jan. 6 criminal investigation signals the “legal jeopardy” the former president can expect to see.

“Look, it shows that there is a degree of legal jeopardy coming in the direction of the former president, and that’s always serious for anybody who receives a target letter,” Jim Schultz said, according to Mediate. “So, I do think that, you know, it’s something that needs to be taken seriously, and perhaps an indictment is on its way. We saw in the last case, that that preceded an indictment — I think we’re likely to see the same thing here, and he is probably not going to go in to testify.”

Other legal experts also pondered the severity of legal disaster that potentially awaits Trump. Former U.S. Attorney Joyce Vance warned Trump’s Republican defenders that “Jack Smith evidence, or what we see of it in his indictment, will be much stronger than people are anticipating,” adding that GOP primary rivals “who continue to shill for Trump will be forced to do an about face, perhaps not immediately, but it’s coming.” George Washington University Law Prof. Johnathan Turley added that “Trump lost the 2020 presidential vote in the District of Columbia, receiving a mere 5.4% of the vote. That means finding a Trump supporter in the district’s jury pool is only slightly more likely than finding a snow leopard.”

“Very odd”: Legal experts criticize Judge Cannon’s order for “legitimizing” Trump’s delay tactics

Judge Aileen Cannon, the Trump-appointed federal district court judge overseeing the Justice Department’s documents case against the former president, denied the special counsel’s motion for a protective order in the case Wednesday because the defense and the prosecution have not conferred sufficiently.

According to the Guardian and the Independent, Cannon told the Department of Justice that it can refile the motion for the protective order, required under section three of the Classified Information Procedures Act, once it has adequately conferred with attorneys for Trump and the personal aide charged alongside him, Walt Nauta.

The CIPA governs the use of classified materials during a case with section three requiring the court — at the government’s request — to issue an order “to protect against the disclosure of any classified information disclosed by the United States to any defendant in any criminal case.”

The DOJ reached out to the defense Friday regarding the proposed protective order but filed the motion Monday after not receiving any engagement from them that day or over the weekend, Bloomberg News reports. In the Wednesday hearing, Cannon told the DOJ that it needed to give Trump and Nauta’s legal teams more time to negotiate the terms for handling the sensitive materials.

Legal experts decried Cannon’s decision Wednesday, arguing that the move substantiates the efforts to delay the trial being made by Trump’s legal team, who the Guardian reported “weren’t interested in engaging” with the Justice Department to confer.

We need your help to stay independent

“This is a bad call by Cannon! The DOJ attempted to confer with defense counsel and didn’t hear back from them. This is on defense counsel, not DOJ. Cannon should hold defense counsels’ feet to the fire [fire emoji], and not delay CIPA proceedings because of the BS gamesmanship,” MSNBC legal analyst Katie Phang wrote on Twitter, calling it “another assist by Cannon that unnecessarily delays the proceedings.”

Former federal prosecutor Brandon Van Grack, who served on special counsel Bob Mueller’s team, said it was “very odd to deny the motion” instead of “requiring defense counsel to articulate objections.”

“On Monday, DOJ explained it had reached out to defense counsel on Friday, who did not wish to confer that day or over the weekend. Defense counsel cant get classified docs w/o a protective order,” he wrote on Twitter Wednesday.


Want a daily wrap-up of all the news and commentary Salon has to offer? Subscribe to our morning newsletter, Crash Course.


“This adds more delay,” legal analyst and former federal prosecutor Renato Mariotti tweeted

“Oy. When one side does not meet, it is hard to confer,” added former federal prosecutor Andrew Weissmann, another Mueller probe alum and NYU law professor. “This legitimizes defense delay tactic.”

Antibiotic-resistant bacteria in New Zealand’s wild cockles and watercress puts people at risk

Traditional harvesting sites, or mahinga kai, continue to be used throughout New Zealand to provide food and to share skills and cultural practices between families and generations.

But our new research shows that wild foods concentrate antibiotic-resistant bacteria and could put people at risk.

While water is regularly tested at recreational sites for potential pathogens, wild-harvested foods are commonly overlooked as a source of exposure to antibiotic-resistant microbes.

Wild foods are important to all cultures in Aotearoa. Both aquatic and terrestrial mahinga kai sites provide opportunities for recreation and social bonding. Entire regions may come to rely more heavily on wild foods during disasters that disrupt supply chains.

But there are no guidelines for people who harvest wild foods to inform them about the risk of antibiotic resistance. This needs to change.

Antibiotic-resistant bacteria make gastrointestinal infections from eating wild foods or contact infections acquired during harvest or food preparation more difficult, even impossible, to treat.

 

The creeping pandemic of antibiotic resistance

Antibiotic resistance is one of the biggest threats to global health and food security, according to the World Health Organization.

It occurs when bacteria become less responsive to the antibiotics used to prevent or treat bacterial infections. Over time, populations within any species of bacteria emerge with one, then two or more resistances to antibiotics, until we get potentially untreatable super strains.

This process is happening in all bacteria, pathogenic or benign, leading to super strains that are resistant to multiple antibiotics.

Because of the way antibiotic resistance genes clump together, super strains are usually super spreaders of antibiotic resistance.

Bacteria are linked together in a horizontal gene-sharing network. Genes can transfer between members of the same and different species at high frequency. So no matter in which species the resistant gene first appears, it can potentially be transferred to a pathogen.

 

E. coli on watercress and in mussels and cockles

In conjunction with the local hapū Te Ngāi Tūāhuriri Rūnanga and Environment Canterbury, we monitored waterways used to harvest kai (food) such as watercress. We found both rural and urban streams have high levels of Escherichia coli, a bacterium found in human or animal feces and commonly identified in freshwater and coastal environments in Aotearoa.

E. coli is used as an indicator for infection risk in water and food. In the sites we studied, concentrations of E. coli were consistently high over many years. These bacteria can cause diseases in their own right, but what makes them a good indicator is that they co-locate in the environment with other pathogenic bacteria and are easy to grow in the laboratory.

We identified E. coli on plants (watercress) and in animals (mussels and cockles) taken for kai. In some samples, up to 20% of the E. coli were resistant to the frontline antibiotic drug ampicillin.

This means infections by one in five E. coli might fail to respond to a frequently prescribed antibiotic, leading to more suffering or medical complications.

We also detected resistance to last-resort drugs such as ciprofloxacin. Ciprofloxacin is usually prescribed to treat bacterial infections when other antibiotics have already failed. Often, the bacteria we found were resistant to drug concentrations that exceeded what could be safely given to a patient.

 

Safe to touch does not equal safe to eat

Another observation we made was that mahinga kai, particularly shellfish, concentrate bacteria from the water they filter. Large cockles can filter three liters per hour and this concentrating effect was so powerful that we found antibiotic-resistant bacteria in the cockles even when we couldn’t detect them in water samples.

Bacteria extracted from cockles were “ingested” during high tide and showed us what the water was like over that time period. In contrast, water samples, such as those used to inform swimming guidelines, represent only the conditions at the time of sampling.

This is important, because rainfall and sewage overflow events transiently increase the number of bacteria in water and may not be picked up during routine monitoring.

Our calculations suggest that existing water safety guidance does not apply to the risk of contracting an antibiotic-resistant infection and could mislead those harvesting wild foods into taking greater risks.

The shellfish in our study were collected from popular sites in Waitaha/Canterbury. Local government monitors these sites and provides guidance on swimming safety. Our work shows that swimming guidance does not substitute for making decisions about whether or not to harvest wild kai.

We need improved guidelines for the safe harvesting and use of wild foods and more strenuous monitoring to protect those who rely on mahinga kai.

To maintain the benefits of harvesting wild foods, we should take a One Health approach that formalizes the links between medicine and the environment. It helps to prevent the cause — rather than just the symptoms — of infectious disease and antibiotic resistance.

The problem of contaminated water doesn’t end with aquatic mahinga kai.

These same waters can be used for drinking or irrigation. The climate is warming and resulting floods gather more contamination from cities and farms into waterways.

Mahinga kai sites are not just lifeboats in time of need. They are the canary telling us that we must change our ways.

Jack Heinemann, Professor of Molecular Biology and Genetics, University of Canterbury and Sophie Joy van Hamelsveld, Postdoctoral Scientist, University of Canterbury

This article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license. Read the original article.

Judge rejects Trump claim that jury cleared him of rape: “Jury found Trump in fact did exactly that”

Former President Donald Trump won’t get another chance to have a new trial in the civil suit with longtime columnist E. Jean Carroll, nor will the $5 million dollars in damages she won be reduced, after federal Judge Lewis Kaplan rejected Trump’s bid for a retrial. In May, Trump was found liable for defaming and sexually abusing Carroll, who has long claimed he assaulted her in a department store dressing room in 1996 and subsequently slandered her by publicly refuting her allegations. Since then, Trump has openly denied Caroll’s accusations, even filing a counterclaim arguing that she defamed him during a CNN appearance in which she confidently maintained her assertions against him

lengthy memorandum, which took into account the two separate lawsuits Carroll had filed against the ex-president, acknowledged that the “only point on which Ms. Carroll did not prevail was whether she had proved that Mr. Trump had ‘raped’ her within the narrow, technical meaning of a particular section of the New York Penal Law.”

“The jury’s unanimous verdict in Carroll II was almost entirely in favor of Ms. Carroll,” the opinion continued, adding, “The finding that Ms. Carroll failed to prove that she was ‘raped’ within the meaning of the New York Penal Law does not mean that she failed to prove that Mr. Trump ‘raped’ her as many people commonly understand the word ‘rape.’ Indeed, as the evidence at trial recounted below makes clear, the jury found that Mr. Trump in fact did exactly that.”

 

 

“They don’t realize how deeply racial bias permeates”: Central Park birder on where liberals fail

Trauma, heartbreak and letdowns are things we all experience, regardless of your background, ethnicity or where you come from. Often, people dealing with pain are taught to directly address the problem. For writer Christian Cooper, developing a pleasant distraction in nature that forces him to be present, is healing and freeing. He shared with me the many ways in which birding has been an outlet for nearly all his life.

“I started birding when I was about 10. I knew I was gay when I was about five. That was a hard place to be back in the 1970s,” he said on “Salon Talks.” “One of the things that birding does is that it gets you outside of yourself. That was important to me as a kid when I was a queer, nerdy, closeted kid.”

He went on to become a Harvard graduate and one of the first openly gay employees at Marvel Comics, who led the fight for inclusion by being a part of the teams that introduced the first gay storylines and the first gay male character in “Star Trek, “Yoshi Mishima, in the Starfleet Academy comic series. But the world didn’t get to know him and his gifts until his favorite hobby directly collided with America’s fractured relationship with race and bias.

On May 25, 2020, the same day that George Floyd was killed in Minneapolis by a police officer, Christian was doing what he does most mornings before much of New York City is awake – watching birds through his binoculars in Central Park. It was there where he encountered Amy Cooper, who had let her dog off leash. Leashes are required in the bird-watching area of the park, so Christian reminded Amy to follow the rules. She refused, and Christian, determined to not scare the birds he came to watch, offered Amy’s dog a treat to de-escalate the situation. Amy called the police and lied, “There is an African American man – I am in Central Park –he is recording me and threatening myself and my dog. Please, send the cops immediately!”

A video of this encounter went viral, exposing Amy, and the uncomfortable history of how white people have purposely weaponized police officers for their own convenience. Now, Christian has thousands of fans, an exciting travel television show on Nat Geo Wild called “Extraordinary Birder” and a new memoir, “Better Living Through Birding.”

Watch my “Salon Talks” episode with Christian Cooper here or read a Q&A of our conversation below to hear him reflect on that day in Central Park, why we need to keep having tough conversations about race, and the bird he’s been chasing for years but still hasn’t seen.

The following conversation has been lightly edited for length and clarity.

One of the things I was thinking about when I first heard about the show is I wonder if you can still go to Central Park and bird without people running up to you for pictures and scaring the birds away because they want to get that selfie.

Well, one of the things you have to remember is I tend to go very, very early before most people are awake, so that helps.

Then sometimes people come up and sometimes it’s the New York thing, because in New York we tend not to acknowledge celebrity. It’s part of our thing. You may notice that Jake Gyllenhaal just walked by you, but you don’t do anything about it. You just maybe smile a little. But then sometimes people come up and say something and it’s always very nice and it’s always very welcome and it’s a nice thing.

For a person who has never considered birding, could you talk about some different ways they can discover themselves through birding?

One of the things that birding does is that it gets you outside of yourself. That was important to me as a kid when I was a queer, nerdy, closeted kid. I started birding when I was about 10. I knew I was gay when I was about five, so all this is going on. That was a hard place to be back in the 1970s. 

“As you focus outward, all those other things just kind of fall away, at least for a little while.”

When you’re birding, you can’t be in your own head. You can’t be worrying about whatever your worries are. Whatever is getting you down or preoccupying you, you can’t be thinking about that when you’re birding. You’ve got to be focused on, okay, I’ve got to be alert to a certain kind of motion, or I’ve got to be listening for sounds that’ll tell me where to focus. As you focus outward, all those other things just kind of fall away, at least for a little while and you’re connecting with the larger world beyond you. That is incredibly healing and it makes you feel connected to something much bigger.

It forces you to be in the present.

Yeah, forces you very much to be in the present and outside of yourself to recognize that, OK, there’s all this stuff, but there’s all that stuff. Birding, I think because you’ve got to be focused on sight and sound, I’ve got to pay attention or I’m not going to see any birds, that gets you focused, so that’s a wonderful thing that birding can do for anybody.

If you’ve never done it, it’s open, it’s accessible to everybody. I don’t care if you’re in a wheelchair and you’re homebound, you can go to your window and you can look out your window and see what birds come to your fire escape or to your backyard or whatever you’ve got.

So you can bird anywhere.

You can bird anywhere.

As I was reading your book, and I’d take breaks to run errands, take my daughter to school and things like that, I was looking around because in Baltimore I feel like I just keep seeing the same bird over and over again, but I’m probably not looking close enough.

Well, you’ll be amazed. I mean, lots of people walk through Central Park and they’re like, “New York City is just pigeons,” and they have no idea what is going on around them, particularly during migration when birds funnel through Central Park in hordes. And they just don’t know, they don’t realize. 

It’s funny because the pandemic did that. There’s a lot of what we call pandemic birders, people who started birding during the COVID era. It’s wonderful that all these people have found birding, but when we run into them, so often they say, “I’ve been in Central Park for years and I had no idea until I started birding that all this was going on.” And now they’re hooked.

It’s always beautiful when you can just discover different things about your own space when you pay closer attention. I think that’s excellent. And it’s why I think so many people will enjoy your show, right?

I hope so, yes.

I’ve only had the luxury of watching a couple of episodes and I hope a lot of people tune in. People don’t realize how intense it is. When I saw a bird being put to sleep to test his fertility, my mind was blown.

Yeah, mine too. I hope that comes across.

Can you talk about that procedure?

There’s what we call an endemic bird, a bird found only in this one place. It’s called the iguaca. It’s a native Puerto Rican parrot. The Puerto Ricans are trying desperately to save it because they’ve been hit with hurricanes and deforestation and so many things that have made it very hard for this parrot to survive.

“In North America, in my lifetime, since I started birding, we have lost one third of the birds in North America.”

One of the things that’s making it hard for the parrot to survive is these parrots have a fertility issue. The parrot has almost become a symbol of Puerto Ricans and their tenacity and their determination to make their island work despite all the setbacks, despite all the hurricanes, so to help the parrot survive, one of the things they’re doing is they’re making sure that the males have got a good pair on them to make another set of babies. To do that, you’ve got to look inside the bird. So they send this little tiny microscope inside the bird, and you’re peering past air sacs to look at the testicles of an iguaca to see if this guy has a healthy pair of testicles.

We can test for fertility, but that doesn’t necessarily mean that this animal is going to reproduce. There are so many issues with extinction going on. Unfortunately, you haven’t seen the Hawaii episode, but that’s huge in the Hawaii episode. Hawaii has lost three quarters of their native birds. They’ve gone extinct already. That’s for a variety of factors all having to do with westerners having come to Hawaii and brought invasive species like cats and diseases, so it’s a mess over there in Hawaii.

Westerners mess up everything.

There you go. But again, for the Hawaiians, these animals are part of their mythology and they want to save them, so they are fighting tooth and nail. That’s what the title of the show “Extraordinary Birder” refers to, not to me, but to the biologists and just regular old birders who have dedicated themselves to protecting these birds and saving them and bringing them back. For example, in Hawaii, some of the people I met who are moving mountains to try to save the birds they have, are just so inspiring.

We do still have to worry about extinction very much so, especially in an era of climate change, because birds are our best indicator of climate change. The old metaphor of canary in a coal mine, there’s a reason why people say that. It’s because they would take the canary down to the coal mine. It would die from the fumes first, letting people know [it’s] time to get out of here.

Well, the birds are our best indicator. They are everywhere. They are visible, they are accessible to us, and they are trying to tell us something, because here in North America, in my lifetime, since I started birding, we have lost one-third of the birds in North America. 

“Do what our ancestors shed blood for and vote.”

Now I’m talking about numbers. For example, if there were three billion birds in 1970, there are now two billion birds. One billion birds, just gone. That’s trying to tell us something. Extinction is very much an issue.

The birds are trying to tell us, “Take care of your environment. Do something about climate change.” That’s on all of us to actually do something about it. We can’t wait for the government. Yes, it’s their job, but if we wait for the government to do it, we’ll all be dead, so it’s on all of us to take on the responsibility of doing something about climate change.

Has there ever been a bird that you’ve wanted to see and you just never caught it?

Oh, sure, sure. We call that your holy grail bird. Where you’re sort of hoping to see it one day, but you still haven’t seen it. Another word for it is your nemesis bird, if there’s a bird you’ve been trying to see and you keep missing it. For me, it’s probably a bird called a gyrfalcon. It’s the biggest falcon in the world, and it’s a bird of the foreign north. But every once in a while, one comes down south to New York, and when it has, I’ve chased it on Long Island, I’ve chased it in Westchester, hoping to see it. Both times it got away. I missed it.

Have any of your friends caught it?

Yeah, some of my friends have seen it.

Now, do they just look at it or do they snap pictures too?

Depends on the person. A lot more people these days are snapping pictures because the technology has gotten better, lighter, cheaper, easier to use. But I’m old school. I like to be in the moment and focus on the experience, so I still use a pair of binoculars. Some people carry both. Some people these days just use a camera. It really depends on how you bird.

I write memoir and I teach memoir too. When a lot of people decide to get into this genre, they want to stay on the outside of a story. They don’t really want to go deep into it. I think you went deep and there were some beautiful transformations throughout the course of the book. Was it difficult for you to put out?

Sure, because I’m not a very confessional person. Since you’ve read the book, you know I sort of pride myself on having, to use a Star Trek reference, a very Vulcan demeanor. I don’t like to act on emotion. I like to keep emotion on the inside, and yet I’m supposed to write a memoir. You got to put it all out there.

My editors were fabulous about that because there would be times when I’d sort of put something in very clinical Vulcan terms about what was happening, and they’d be like, “No, no, no, we need you to go back in that a little bit more deeply.” And I’m like, “No.” And they’re like, “Yes.” And I’m like, “No.” They’re like, “Yes.”

“You’re not just going to blow past this moment.”

Exactly. They were very good about that. Particularly when I started writing about family and when my family members, my mother, father, grandmother start dying off, that was really hard to write. I mean, that was very hard, so it took a while and I had to sort of knuckle down, but I wanted to put something honest on the page.

We need your help to stay independent

What frustrated me about the book, and I would love to hear your take on this, is I’m like, wow, this guy was a revolutionary person at Marvel, played a role in introducing the first gay character. Northstar?

Northstar.

Northstar, and then on “Star Trek” as well.

And then on “Star Trek.” Yeah, my role in Northstar was very minimal. I was the assistant editor on the issue of that comic book.

I mean, but still you were that voice in the room.

Sure, yeah.

You were that voice in the room as a Black man, as a gay man, as a person who loves comics and who knew that millions of people all over the world who can be inspired by that. So you had that in you.

You went to Harvard, which is an amazing accomplishment and you are a fascinating person. So I’m thinking, “Wow, how come I need some goofy lady in the park with her dog before I hear about this guy?” I’m like, “This is the biggest problem with our system because the bird show should have been out years ago.”

That’s true for so many people. I don’t look at it that way. I look at it the other way. I am incredibly privileged to be able to tell my story in my own words and have so many people read it, but there are so many people doing so many amazing things, again, I’ve met them working on the show, who contribute so many things to the world in big and small ways. Their story very often doesn’t get told.

“The point is not her. The point is the racial bias.”

All the things I’ve done in my life, I didn’t do them so that I could eventually write a memoir. I just did them because that’s what I do. The good thing about what happened with the incident is that it opened up some doors for me so that what I have always been doing, I now get to keep doing but on a bigger platform so it reaches more people.

I almost feel like how many people are being cheated out of meeting or understanding or learning about a Christian Cooper because a network or a publishing company or our greater society doesn’t see value in showing the dynamics or the multiple beauties that exist inside of a person until something bad happens. It frustrates me so much.

I hear that. I will share your frustration in terms of sort of our culture’s obsession with celebrity for stupid reasons. I mean, I didn’t even know what a Kardashian was for umpteen years, and I led a blessed existence until someone finally, I said, “What’s a Kardashian?” They looked at me like I had three heads. And sadly, now I know.

But that’s the kind of thing that our culture exalts these days. There are so many people doing amazing things. That’s one of the things I love about the show, is I get to take some of those people and put what they’re doing in front of the camera so that people know.

There’s a blind birder in Puerto Rico, so that highlights for people you don’t even have to be sighted. You can be blind and you can be a birder. That’s one reason why we say birder instead of bird watcher. This guy birds solely by ear, this guy in the Rockaways who took it upon himself just as a volunteer to save the piping plover out in the Rockaways. And he’s organized dozens of volunteers to do that. That’s amazing. So I get to tell his story. In our own ways we can correct that. We can push forward the stories of people who are doing amazing things.

You having the opportunity to talk about birding and to open it up to all of these different people is a way of moving the conversation forward. Sometimes I wonder, does that put us in a better place in having the conversation around race and race relations and how these things affect people?

I think it added to the conversation, and I think it added something that was necessary to the conversation. I think, and I always say this over and over again, that incident was not about her. It was about the racial bias that it revealed and how for a lot of, particularly white people, because we as Black people know, we’ve experienced it, but a lot of people were clueless. They’re like, “Ah, Obama was elected president. We’re all good now.”

They don’t realize just how deeply racial bias permeates our culture, and yet here it was for everybody to see in a city as liberal as New York with someone who didn’t use any slur but used the correct term African American and yet still this racial bias. 

“Don’t be distracted by her. Focus on the bias and how it bubbles up in these horrible ways that we can do something about.”

The point is not her. The point is the racial bias. I think bringing that racial bias, letting people understand that it’s there was important, particularly because it bubbles up in ways that are far more important in our society as evidenced later that same day when that racial bias made a police officer in Minneapolis, a white police officer, think it was okay for him to kneel on the neck of a Black man until that man was dead. And for three other officers or four, I forget how many, to stand around and not do anything as he did that. That’s the racial bias. That’s what we have to fight against.

The racial bias that percolates up, and the fact that Washington D.C., urban, largely Black and brown population has no representation, no voting representation in our political system in Congress, and yet you go to rural, mostly white Wyoming with fewer people than Washington D.C., you go to rural, mostly white Vermont with fewer people than Washington D.C., and they both have two senators each in the Senate. But nobody is doing anything for statehood for Washington D.C. Why is that? That’s the racial bias at work. That’s the racial bias we should focus on. Those are the things we can change. We should keep our eye on the prize. Don’t be distracted by her. Focus on the bias and how it bubbles up in these horrible ways that we can do something about.

Absolutely. I feel like I’m at a place in my career where I’m sick of talking about race. I’m sick of talking about it. I’m sick of having the conversations. I’m sick of the hot take on whatever just happened. But then the other part of me is like, “How do we move the ball forward if we’re not having these conversations?” And then you kind of get into this space where, is it going to do anything? It gets difficult.

The thing for me, because I think a lot of us feel that, when I start to feel I am sick of talking about this, I do something. Doing something instead of talking is such a great antidote.

I was out in Freeport, New York a month ago, registering voters out there because Long Island could go red, could go blue, and it could make the difference with who controls the House. We control who controls the house, that determines who will vote to make Washington D.C. a state, things like that. 

There are things we can do as individuals, instead of talking. First and foremost, do what our ancestors shed blood for and vote. But voting is not enough. Get your friends to vote, register other people to vote. All of this stuff, we can do as individuals. I find when I get sick of talking, doing just makes me feel so much better.

“Extraordinary Birder with Christian Cooper” is streaming on Disney+.

 

“These are very serious charges”: Experts say Michigan fake Trump electors face “open and shut” case

The charges Michigan Attorney General Dana Nessel announced on Tuesday against the 16 fake electors who signed certificates falsely claiming then-President Donald Trump had won Michigan in the 2020 election are “very serious” and present a significant deterrent to future potential “bad actors,” several legal experts said.

As CNN reported, the 16 individuals were hit with multiple felony charges “for their role in the alleged false electors scheme following the 2020 U.S. presidential election,” Nessel’s office announced. The charges include election law forgery, which carries a five-year maximum prison sentence, and conspiracy to commit forgery, which carries a maximum prison sentence of 14 years.

The charges filed by Nessel are separate from special counsel Jack Smith’s investigation into Donald Trump’s efforts to remain in power after the 2020 election as well as Georgia District Attorney Fani Willis’ probe into the former president’s alleged 2020 election interference in the state.

Former U.S. Attorney Barb McQuade, a University of Michigan law professor, praised Nessel for seeking to hold the fake Trump electors “accountable.”

“This crime is an affront to democracy,” McQuade wrote on Twitter.

Former federal prosecutor Laura Coates emphasized on CNN Tuesday evening the gravity of the charges against the Michigan 16, both for the false electors themselves and for American democracy.

“Remember, in states, these are the ones whose electors, based on the popular state votes, will then elect a President of the United States,” Coates said. “It relies on faith, it relies on credibility that what a voter believes will happen once their vote is cast, and they’re compiled, will actually happen.”

“These are very serious charges,” Coates continued. “Forgery, the uttering and publishing — a fancy way of saying you’ve endeavored to pass it off as a real thing. This goes to the core of our democracy.”

What’s notable about the Michigan attorney general’s indictment, she added, is that “this is a state-level prosecution and happening there as opposed to waiting for what’s happening for say, a Jack Smith or special counsel or DOJ… It tells you how wide-ranging it is, how specific it is, and how, for many people, the idea of what happened three years ago is not in the rearview mirror. It’s very much ahead of the attorney general’s focus.”

Renato Mariotti, a former federal prosecutor and legal analyst, also noted on social media late Tuesday that Nessel’s indictment against the false electors could be a deterrent for other potential “bad actors,” arguing that the charges are “more important than you might realize.”

“Our electoral system is run at the state level, and as we saw in the last election, there is room for bad actors to get to subvert the process. These charges will be a real deterrent,” Mariotti wrote on Twitter to open a thread detailing the legal and social implications of the indictments.

He clarified that the indicted individuals weren’t billionaires nor people who could otherwise glean fame or funds from the swath of charges against them but rather Republican operatives “who will be devastated by an indictment like a typical person is.”

We need your help to stay independent

“Getting indicted isn’t fun. It is a stressful, costly, and humiliating experience,” Mariotti continued. “Just like the charges of individual January 6th insurrectionists, these charges may deter foot soldiers who would consider joining an effort to overturn the *next* election.”

“So they matter more than you think. A lot of Trump’s followers stayed home when he urged them to turn out after he was indicted. The indictments of January 6th insurrectionists had something to do with that. Charges against fake electors could have a similar effect,” he concluded.

New York University law professor and former Pentagon special counsel Ryan Goodman argued that it will be next to impossible for the Michigan 16 to defend against the charges because the documents they’re accused of forging also include a falsehood that they “convened and organized in the State Capitol.”


Want a daily wrap-up of all the news and commentary Salon has to offer? Subscribe to our morning newsletter, Crash Course.


“It’s a detail that matters,” Goodman told CNN. “It mattered to the Trump campaign lawyer, and he said this is a problem. He is mapping out the secret memo how they can do these false electors across the seven states. Michigan may have a problem because it’s a legal requirement that you have to convene in the State Capitol. That’s why they obviously put it in their declaration that we are convened in the State Capitol. And it is just a falsehood.”

That lie is significant, Goodman added, because, “they can say, ‘oh, we thought Trump won the election and that’s why we did this.’ Did you think you were in the Capitol? You are not in the Capitol, you were in the basement of the GOP headquarters in Lansing. That’s where you were when you convened. It’s a false statement that they submitted to state and federal authorities that is almost an open-and-shut forgery.”

In an op-ed for the New York Times, Goodman and CNN legal analyst Norm Eisen, who served as special counsel to the House Judiciary Committee in the first impeachment of Trump, praised Nessel for the precision of her indictment against the fake electors, which they argued left “a clear lane” for Smith in his federal probe.

“The charges in Michigan will surely meet criticism on all sides. Some will say the case is not broad or bold enough, that Mr. Trump and the other alleged national ringleaders should have been charged as well,” they wrote. “Others will say Ms. Nessel cast too wide a net, pulling in low-level party functionaries who did not know better. We think those critiques are misconceived.

“Ms. Nessel got it just right, prosecuting crimes firmly within her jurisdiction, while opening the way for federal authorities to net even bigger fish,” they said, later noting the importance of her being able to establish intent in order to prove the case they dubbed “far more egregious” than most of the Michigan attorney general’s other prosecutions.

“If Ms. Nessel can move against these individuals in Michigan, Mr. Smith can and should do the same against the ringleaders,” they added. “Together, they can hold both the foot soldiers and their organizers accountable for their actions leading up to the Capitol riot.”

Legal scholar: Leaked possible Trump charges could “lead to a much faster conviction”

Former President Donald Trump announced on Truth Social that he had received a target letter from special counsel Jack Smith, implying that he could face criminal charges in connection to an investigation into the deadly Capitol riot and attempts to overturn the results of the 2020 presidential election. 

Trump’s latest run-in with federal prosecutors likely signals an impending indictment, which would be the third he has faced in recent months. Much of the probe has focused on Trump and his allies’ efforts to stir sentiment amongst fervent MAGA supporters by publicly and falsely claiming that President Joe Biden had “stolen” the election, actions which catalyzed the frenzy leading to the Jan 6 siege in Washington, DC. 

Though the ex-president in his Tuesday post did not disclose which criminal charges he could be facing, a person familiar with the matter told The New York Times that the letter cited three potential statutes, including conspiracy to defraud the United States: corruptly obstructing an official proceeding, conspiring to defraud the government and to make false statements, and wire and mail fraud. 

After conducting a thorough investigation into the Capitol attacks, the House Jan. 6 Committee as well as a federal judge in California felt it was “more likely than not” that Trump intentionally attempted to obstruct the certification of Biden’s victory, a crime which, if found guilty, could be punishable by up to 20 years of prison time. The Times reported that the legislation underpinning such punitive measures — Section 1512(c) of Title 18 — has already been used to prosecute rioters; however, Trump did not actively participate in the physical assault. Additionally, though Trump encouraged his supporters to march on the Capitol and “fight like hell,” he also requested that they do so “peacefully,” a point that the Times noted Trump’s legal team could underscore.  

The House Committee and the federal judge also stated that there was enough evidence to demonstrate that Trump conspired with others to defraud the government, a crime that could see an offender face up to five years in prison. The former president, along with various attorneys and allies, advanced claims of voter fraud despite the fact that he was informed his allegations were unsubstantiated. 

We need your help to stay independent

“The illegality of the plan was obvious,” Judge David O. Carter wrote in a ruling in a civil suit last year. “Our nation was founded on the peaceful transition of power, epitomized by George Washington laying down his sword to make way for democratic elections. Ignoring this history, President Trump vigorously campaigned for the vice president to single-handedly determine the results of the 2020 election.”

The Times reported the subpoenas issued by Smith and his team indicate that the special counsel is analyzing Trump’s political action committee, Save America, for potential wire fraud after the PAC raised $250 million by telling donors it needed to secure funds to combat election fraud. The House Jan. 6 Committee also acknowledged how, only a day after the election took place, Trump and his inner circle repeatedly asked donors to send money to a defense fund and challenge election results in court. 


Want a daily wrap-up of all the news and commentary Salon has to offer? Subscribe to our morning newsletter, Crash Course.


Former federal prosecutor Renato Mariotti observed that it was “interesting” that he is reportedly not facing charges for “inciting an insurrection or making a false statement.”

“Don’t fret it,” longtime Harvard legal scholar Laurence Tribe urged his Twitter followers, assuring them that the reason a potential indictment would not include all charges against Trump was likely a strategic choice by Smith. 

“If the indictment doesn’t include all the crimes — including aiding and abetting insurrection — that Trump may have committed, the reason is likely to be a strategic judgment that less is more: a streamlined, narrow trial could lead to a much faster conviction.”

Expert: Hearing shows Judge Cannon “learned from her prior blunder” — which could be bad for Trump

Judge Aileen Cannon, the Trump appointee overseeing his Mar-a-Lago documents case, on Tuesday appeared skeptical of special counsel Jack Smith’s request for a December trial but also seemed disinclined to push the trial schedule beyond the 2024 election as the former president’s legal team had asked.

Smith’s team urged Cannon to schedule a trial before the end of the year while Trump’s lawyers asked her to delay the trial indefinitely, citing his presidential campaign.

Cannon on Tuesday directly asked Trump attorney Christopher Kise whether he wanted to delay the trial after the election, according to The New York Times. Kise acknowledged that he did and fellow Trump lawyer Todd Blanche later said that if Cannon must schedule a trial date, it should be in mid-November 2024.

David Harbach, a top Smith deputy, told Cannon that the rule of law should apply to Trump as it would to any defendant.

“Mr. Trump is not the president,” Harbach said. “He is a private citizen who has been lawfully indicted by a grand jury in this district and his case should be guided by the federal code and the rules of this court like anyone else.”

Blanche, however, argued that it was inappropriate for Cannon to “ignore” Trump’s role as a candidate.

“It is intellectually dishonest to stand up in front of this court and say this case is like any other,” Blanche said. “It is not.”

Kise even suggested that the court battle over the classified documents was a legal version of the race between Trump and President Joe Biden, suggesting that the “two candidates were squaring off in this courtroom.”

Harbach rejected Kise’s argument, noting that Smith was appointed as special counsel to avoid the “specter of political influence.”

“The government says that claim is flat-out false,” Harbach said.

Cannon also appeared likely to set a date beyond the DOJ’s requested timeline. Prosecutor Jay Bratt acknowledged that the DOJ had proposed an “aggressive schedule” but assured Cannon that his team was “committed to doing the work to achieve it.”

But both Harbach and Bratt “seemed concerned” when Cannon raised the possibility of declaring it a “complex” case, which would slow its pace, according to the Times. Trump’s lawyers “quickly seized that opportunity, saying they wanted a complex-case designation even if they had not formally made the request in court papers filed before the hearing.”

Cannon during the hearing did not set a new date for the trial but said she would consider both arguments and issue a written decision “promptly.”

She questioned the Trump team’s argument that media attention on Trump would subside after the 2024 election and suggested that the large amount of discovery in the case, as well as issues related to classified materials and other matters, seemed like a more “suitable” framework to determine the trial timeline.

“I can appreciate that more time is necessary, but we need to set a schedule,” she said.

We need your help to stay independent

Cannon, who faces heightened scrutiny after issuing a series of rulings in favor of Trump that was later overturned by an appeals court, “peppered prosecutors and the former president’s lawyers with questions that suggested she was in command of her courtroom and well-versed in the facts of the case,” wrote The Times’ Alan Feuer.

Cannon’s focus on the volume and complexity of discovery materials “suggests that Cannon is mindful of relying on grounds that won’t be overturned on appeal,” tweeted former federal prosecutor Renato Mariotti.

“She learned from her prior blunder,” he wrote.


Want a daily wrap-up of all the news and commentary Salon has to offer? Subscribe to our morning newsletter, Crash Course.


“Judge Cannon, who has been far too deferential to Donald Trump in past rulings, appears so far to be taking a relatively reasonable approach to the timing of trial in the Mar-a-Lago national security case. We’ll see,” agreed former federal prosecutor Noah Bookbinder, the head of Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington.

Legal experts have been wary that Cannon, who was appointed by Trump in 2020, may aid Trump’s efforts to push the trial beyond the election.

“His advisers have been, in private conversations, pretty blunt that they see it as he has to win the election and that how is he guarantees that he does not face jail time,” New York Times reporter Maggie Haberman told CNN on Tuesday.

But Trump’s plans were complicated this week when Smith sent him a letter informing him that he is the target of the DOJ’s Jan. 6 probe, which signals that another indictment in D.C. may be imminent.

“This means that Trump will be indicted in the January 6th investigation. This indictment will likely be brought in D.C. federal court, which means that the importance of Judge Aileen Cannon’s rulings in the Mar-a-Lago case are diminished,” Mariotti wrote on Tuesday.

MSNBC legal analyst Lisa Rubin agreed that the implication of the Jan. 6 target letter is that even if Cannon caves to Trump’s demands not to set ANY trial date, she now can’t single-handedly prevent a federal trial before Election Day. The federal judges in DC have handled [hundreds] of 1/6 cases rapidly—and his should be no exception.”