Spring Sale: Get 1 Year, Save 58%

“Men” is Alex Garland’s glossy, gendered fever dream that bewitches as much as it befuddles

Around the midpoint of “Men,” writer/director Alex Garland‘s spellbinding psychological thriller, a vicar (Rory Kinnear) asks Harper (Jessie Buckley), “Do you prefer things to be comfortable or true?” This film is rarely comfortable, and what exactly is true will be up to viewers to decide.

“Men” opens with a hypnotic, dreamlike episode where Harper, looking out a window, sees a man (Paapa Essiedu) falling to his death. It is soon revealed that the man was James, Harper’s husband. He had threatened to kill himself as a response to her filing for divorce. James told Harper he wanted to kill himself so that she would be forced to live with the guilt. But did he really fall to his death, or did he slip by accident?

Garland is nothing if not precise in how his characters speak and he is even more precise in the images he composes.

The guilt may be what motivates Harper to get out of London and stay at a “dream country house.” But her efforts to heal from her trauma are hardly restful. Biting into an apple she picks off the tree in the estate’s front lawn, one can certainly ascribe sinister meaning to her actions. Even the home’s caretaker, Geoffrey (Rory Kinnear), jokingly mentions her eating “forbidden fruit.” 

RELATED: “Pleasure” is a gutsy, empathetic film about the ambitions of porn stardom

Garland is nothing if not precise in how his characters speak and he is even more precise in the images he composes, which range from startlingly beautiful ripples of water to just plain startling — a very bloody, very graphic shot of a hand being severed that looks incredibly painful.  

MenMen (Kevin Baker/A24)

“Men” is often unsettling but not necessarily in the expected ways, which is mostly to the film’s credit. Early on, Harper takes a walk through the nearby woods, and has a nice moment echoing sounds in a tunnel. But then she sees a man in the distance and runs from him, getting a bit lost. Is this real, or has Alice fallen down a rabbit hole? Harper takes a photo in a field, and a fully naked man (Rory Kinnear in a multiple role) appears in the shot, disturbing her. That he later follows her home and torments her, prompts Harper to call the police. The episode also triggers a vivid image of James impaled on a fence. 


Want a daily wrap-up of all the news and commentary Salon has to offer? Subscribe to our morning newsletter, Crash Course.


As masterful as Garland is with his precision, he can get a bit pretentious … If only viewers can be bothered to puzzle it out.

Harper is haunted, and Buckley conveys her anxiety with wide, darting eyes, or twisting her mouth in a moue. When she wails in pain in a church pew, viewers can feel her grief ripping through them. The actress, who has been exceptional in everything from “Beast” and “Wild Rose” to “I’m Thinking of Ending Things” and “The Lost Daughter,” gives another bravura performance shifting from villain to victim in the divorce story and going from powerless to powerful in the horror story. (A Iengthy, unnerving sequence features her alone in the house like a final girl, brandishing a knife as someone or something tries to get her.)  Buckley is commanding on screen because she projects an air of confidence even when she is most freaked out. 

But as masterful as Garland is with his precision, he can get a bit pretentious. There is an episode featuring a decaying dead deer that may be gorgeously filmed — the camera dives into the animal’s eye socket — but it kind of folds in on itself. There are dazzling images, courtesy of Rob Hardy, Garland’s ace cinematographer, of the naked man adorning himself with leaves, or blowing dandelion seeds, as well as mystical, portentous shots of stone faces that all must mean something. If only viewers can be bothered to puzzle it out. 

MenMen (Kevin Baker/A24)

One of the problems with “Men” is that it is so ambitious and so ambiguous that it is easier to just let the film run its course and think about it later — if at all. That is not to say the drama is not intriguing; it is absolutely beguiling as it shapeshifts across time and genres. What is the deal with a boy who wants Harper to play Hide and Seek, and calls her “a stupid b***h” when she declines? And what is really going on when Harper sees things and hears things that may or may not be real? Sure, it is impressive to see Rory Kinnear appear as a half dozen different characters in the local pub when Harper goes for a drink. And there are two (if not more) WTF episodes late in the film that are sure to be talked about and admired for their sheer audacity and indelible imagery. But what exactly is Garland saying here? 

“Men” is certainly a commentary on gender inequality, mental health and depression, and there are points being made about how men and women communicate, as well as issues of power and control exerted in love and relationships. (One of the film’s creepiest moments has a male character ask Harper about losing her virginity and describes how he pictures it). But the ideas about survivor’s guilt and coping with trauma seem to get a bit lost among all of the weirdness. The motivations of the characters are unclear, which may be deliberate, but it is also obfuscating. 

Garland, however, delights in teasing and provoking viewers. He fills his film with surrealistic moments that counterbalance some of the harsher realities he depicts. He has constructed a glossy fever dream that bewitches as much as it befuddles.

“Men” opens in theaters May 20. Watch a trailer for it below, via YouTube.

More to read: 

 

Lessons I learned from renovating my small kitchen

No Space Too Small is a brand new column by Laura Fenton that celebrates the idea that you can live well in a small home. Each month, Laura will share her practical findings from years of observing how people live in tight spaces, and her own everyday experiences of living small — from the hunt for the perfect tiny desk and managing everyday clutter to how to smooth the frustrations out of cooking in a galley kitchen.

I have no complaints about having a small kitchen. I’m an avid home cook, and find it just as easy to create a great meal in my tiny galley as a large chef’s kitchen. In a confined space, everything you need is right at hand, and several years working as a cook for a catering company taught me that you can truly cook anywhere (including the deck of a boat and behind a dumpster in two rare instances).

However, design can make or break a small kitchen’s utility. When my husband and I bought our apartment seven years ago, our lease on our rental was expiring, so we had to renovate the awkward kitchen on the cheap — and in a hurry. Our remodel was an IKEA special that moved none of the original appliance placements. We did a pretty good job planning it, but with a little more time to get to know the space, I could have designed something even better. Now, seven years in, I am contemplating how to get even more utility out of our small space.

Designing a kitchen is tricky, especially if you have a finite budget, but it’s worth the time and effort to get right because you’re unlikely to renovate again. If you’re hoping to redesign your current kitchen, take the time to observe how you use the space. Make a list of what you like and don’t like about your existing kitchen. Note which places always seem to end up a mess. These will give you clues about how to redesign it for better function.

Here are 14 tips for renovating a small kitchen:

Pare back

Before moving into our current home, I did a major edit of our belongings. I was particularly ruthless in the kitchen category, eliminating the duplicates (do we really need two pairs of spring tongs? Two mesh strainers?) and the rarely-used items (goodbye silicone bundt pan!). If your kitchen is feeling cramped, I recommend starting with a long, hard look at what you can do without. For those infrequently utilized items you’re not ready to part with, consider storing them elsewhere: our party and entertaining gear is all stashed in a closet and sideboard.

Pay attention to materials

We opted for a basic Shaker-style IKEA door that was in stock, but I wish we’d sprung for the Semihandmade doors we were considering. In a small space like the kitchen, you will be touching and experiencing the materials daily. Luckily, cabinet doors are something I can upgrade with the turn of a screwdriver, if (and when) I want to refresh our space. Now that Plykea is available stateside, I’m considering their birch plywood cabinet fronts; I’m also in love with these colorful wood knobs.

Don’t skimp on the sink

Choosing a too-small basin is a common mistake in small kitchen designs, but you need a decent amount of space to wash dishes. One thing I wish we’d had the time and money to do is install a built-in drainboard, which streamlines your sink area by eliminating the need for the usual clunky plastic tray beneath your drying rack.

Explore your dishwasher options

When we first designed our kitchen, I couldn’t figure out how to fit in a dishwasher without moving plumbing in major ways. Two years into living in my apartment, I discovered that GE makes an under-the-sink dishwasher and we quickly decided to have it installed. If you don’t have the standard 24 inches to spare, an 18-inch dishwasher can do a day’s worth of dishes for most families.

Rethink the refrigerator

Don’t fret about opting for a smaller fridge. Once you shift your shopping habits, I think you’ll discover there are advantages to less cooling space. For one, with a petite fridge, you are much less likely to buy more food than you can eat before it goes bad — and it is less likely to become a black hole of mystery leftovers and ancient condiments.

Embrace new stove tech

My big regret in our small kitchen is the cooking range. We kept the 24-inch gas stove that came with our apartment because it had never been used, but it was a cheap model. Knowing what I know now about the indoor air quality issues with gas stoves, I would definitely opt for an induction cooktop instead. For now, I’m waiting for a 24-inch induction range to come on the market, in the hopes that I won’t have to rip everything out to replace the stove. Induction is a great choice for a small space because it gives it a streamlined look, and it doesn’t heat up your space unnecessarily.

Go tall with cabinets

Cabinets that go all the way to the ceiling greatly increase your storage space and they eliminate the awkward above-the-cabinet space that usually collects dust. I use my high-up storage for items I use infrequently, like vases and specialty cooking tools. If you’re not ready to replace cabinets, place bins or baskets in the under-utilized space above your cabinets. (You can store items you’ve bought in bulk, like paper towels, foods from a wholesale club, rarely-used appliances, and party supplies.)

Think big for tiles

It may be counterintuitive, but I recommend larger tiles in a small space because choosing bigger tiles reduces the number of grout lines and therefore visual clutter. I have extra-large 1’x2′ floor tiles on our floor and mid-size 3″x6″ tiles on our backsplash. I would especially recommend avoiding backsplash of teeny-tiny tiles with contrasting grout in a small space.

Consider your color scheme

Prior to my current apartment, I did a kitchen with the popular “tuxedo” look with a darker color on the bottom and lighter cabinets on the top, and I went back to a single-color kitchen because I found that the two-tone look made the space feel smaller. In the same vein of thinking, I’d avoid high contrast between walls and cabinets because it will visually chop up the room.

Enlarge entrances

Opening up doorways and the openings between rooms is a classic architect’s trick to make a small space feel larger without major renovation. It’s a particularly nice way to make a small kitchen less claustrophobic. My own kitchen came with an arched opening that almost goes to the ceiling, but if your room is closed off, consider asking your contractor to open things up.

Ditch the microwave

I am bracing myself for the backlash in the comments, but here you go: I have never had one in the 24 years since I moved out of my parents’ home. Whether built-in or sitting atop the counter, a microwave takes up a serious amount of real estate in a small kitchen. We heat things up on our stovetop or in our toaster oven and are grateful for the extra square feet of space we’ve gained by losing the appliance.

Trick the eye

I was inspired to commission a mirror backsplash on one side of our galley kitchen after seeing one in a kitchen by Thomas O’Brien. The reflective glass was more expensive than tile, but I like how it amplifies the daylight and gives the illusion of more space (it’s also a cinch to clean). In an earlier No Space Too Small column, a Food52 community member suggested hanging a mirror above the sink to create the effect of a window — a great way to fake a view!

Don’t forget the little details

Use wall-mounted and hanging accessories to free up space elsewhere; for example, a wall-mounted, magnetic knife rack is a much more efficient way to store your knives than a traditional knife block. I’m considering adding a hanging fruit basket to clear up some additional counter space. Likewise, put the fridge to work with magnetic organizers. In my kitchen I have a paper towel holder and hooks for potholders and scissors. I’m eyeing a set of magnetic spice jars after seeing them on Instagram in Marie Viljoen’s apartmente. One note of caution: Don’t cover every vertical surface with storage or the room will start to look crowded.

Strive for beauty

This last tip is more philosophical: I’ve come to the conclusion that beauty matters in a small kitchen. Little touches like a fresh set of dish towels or decanting your dish soap into a pretty pump can do wonders to elevate the look and feel of your cooking space. Any time you purchase anything for your kitchen, whether it’s a broom or a kitchen scale, ask yourself if you find it attractive. As you slowly replace the strictly utilitarian with useful beautiful things, you’ll notice a difference in your small space.

Unlike social media, video games may actually be raising kids’ IQs, study finds

When I told Bruno Sauce that my hand-eye coordination disability makes it difficult for me to play video games, he empathized — and offered advice.

“You may be adopting a definition of video games that is too narrow,” Sauce observed in writing. “Sure enough, hand-eye coordination is a barrier to entry for many genres of video games…” and here the assistant professor and senior lecturer at Vrije University’s department of biological psychology ticked off examples that have frustrated many aspiring gamers with hand-eye coordination disabilities: Venerable franchises (Mario), music rhythm games (Guitar Hero), the multiplayer online battle arena strategy (MOBA) subgenre (League of Legends). At the same time, Sauce pointed out that other genres exist that are not as hand-eye coordination intensive — from puzzles to turn-based and story-driven games — and that “the industry seems to be taking some (slow) steps in the direction of better accessibility.”

RELATED: Lessons from “League of Legends”: Why I taught my son to play violent video games

Back in the 1990s, when conservative social groups fought to regulate video games out of fear that they were corrupting youth, it would have seemed absurd to predict that in 30 years scientists would view gaming as being potentially healthy and therefore want it to be more accessible. Indeed, because it is logistically difficult to organize well-controlled and comprehensive studies, scientists have struggled to reach a consensus about the correlation between gaming and benefits like increased intelligence. Many studies do seem to reveal a positive effect, but others find none at all or even a slightly negative one. The challenge has been getting a large sample size of people who regularly play video games and can be studied in a way that yields reliable, long-term data.

“I believe the beneficial effects we found from video gaming are for intelligence more broadly – not only restricted to visual-spatial skills or mental speed,” Sauce explained.

new paper written by scientists in The Netherlands, Germany and Sweden as part of a study of brain development and children called the ABCD Study — and published in the journal Scientific Reports — claims to have taken a big step forward in overcoming those obstacles. In the process, researchers believe they have produced valuable evidence that video games help the intelligence of people (particularly children) who play them on a routine basis. By analyzing the screen time records for 9,855 kids as part of its larger study on the “impact of digital media on children’s intelligence,” the scientists found that those children who routinely played video games for more than the mean daily duration of 1 hour over a two-year period saw an IQ increase that was 2.5 points higher than the overall average IQ increase.

Though that is not large enough to definitively establish a causal link, it is a big enough jump to raise eyebrows given the sheer scope of the study itself.

To reach this conclusion, the researchers followed up with their cohort of participants to cover their intellectual development over a two-year period. The scientists also accounted for both socioeconomic background and genetic predispositions toward gaming and/or having high intelligence. Sauce, who co-authored the paper, defined “socioeconomic background” to Salon as including variables like “household income, parental education, and neighborhood quality.” To determine genetic predispositions toward intelligence, the scientists used “polygenic scores,” or “an index that summarizes the best current estimates of additive genetic influences towards a particular trait” and is based on a recent and large “genome-wide association study with 1.1 million people.”


Want more health and science stories in your inbox? Subscribe to Salon’s weekly newsletter The Vulgar Scientist.


Finally, and perhaps most importantly, this study followed up with a large cohort of participants over a long period of time. This allowed the scientists to dig deep into data that showed how children who regularly played video games intellectually developed in areas like comprehension and vocabulary, executive function, visual-spatial skills and learning ability. Overall, they found that the net intellectual effect of consistent gaming was positive.

“I believe the beneficial effects we found from video gaming are for intelligence more broadly – not only restricted to visual-spatial skills or mental speed,” Sauce explained. “That conclusion makes sense to me. Lots of children play games that are story-driven or about solving puzzles and self-control.” He added that when he had to learn English as a second language while growing up in Brazil, video games helped him. “When you see a cool-looking game, you can do miracles to understand what the characters are saying.”

The study’s conclusions were not without their caveats.

Looking at other forms of digital media, the new study found that “time spent on social media, texting, and video chatting did not affect the change in intelligence” for children.

“Note that the intellectual gains we found are, on average, small and only meaningful after multiple years,” Sauce told Salon. “For each child, some might get larger benefits from gaming, while others might get very little benefits and some no benefits at all. This might depend (I’m speculating here!) on the type of game, motivation, or difficulty of the game. Those possibilities are in desperate need of more research.” Sauce also pointed out that there are studies establishing that playing video games excessively can lead to conditions like eye strain, headaches, tendon inflammation and muscle injuries like carpal tunnel syndrome.

Looking at other forms of digital media, the new study found that “time spent on social media, texting, and video chatting did not affect the change in intelligence” for children. As for watching television and online videos such as YouTube content, “the impact was positive after two years, but smaller than video gaming, and that effect disappeared when we controlled for parental education (as opposed to controlling for the combined factor of socioeconomic background).” Sauce added that “to be honest, that result took all of us authors by surprise and motivated many discussions.”

For this article, the author spoke with Brian Davis, my friend since childhood and a skilled gamer who has observed how this journalist’s hand-eye coordination disability has caused him to struggle to play video games. Davis told Salon that he personally prefers strategic video games that require players to plan ahead and use critical thinking skills, and like Sauce, he also hopes that one day people with hand-eye coordination disabilities such as mine will be able to benefit from the joy of gaming in the same way that he has done.

“Any type of intelligence that anyone might have, there is a game out there that rewards that type of intelligence,” Davis argued. He has known this for years, and yet it never hurts that Sauce and his colleagues have once again confirmed that he and the other gamers who were aware of its intellectual benefits are absolutely correct.

For more Salon content on video games:

A new Daredevil series is headed to Disney+ (details on the show)

Well, Marvel fans, it looks like “Daredevil” will finally make its way back to streaming with new episodes. Since its cancellation in 2018 – thanks to the great Disney purge on Netflix in the wake of the company establishing their own streaming arm – fans have been clamoring to be returned to their beloved show.

When “Daredevil,” “Jessica Jones,” “Luke Cage,” “Iron Fist,” and “The Punisher” were brought under the Disney+ umbrella, it shook the Internet.

Everyone had expected Charlie Cox to reprise his role as Matt Murdock in a Marvel property outside of his own show. Prior to his appearance in “Spider-Man: No Way Home rumors had been flying about how he’d be introduced into the MCU. Kingpin’s inclusion in “Hawkeye” also raised eyebrows.

“The Defenders Saga’s” appearance on Disney+ was simply the icing on the cake. It changed the game because the streamer brought TV-MA content to its heavily family friendly platform. And, while this understandably ruffled feathers considering the Lizzie McGuire revival had been axed for being “too mature,” (Justice for Lizzie!) it also ushered in a new era.

So, the report from Variety announcing that a “Daredevil” series is being developed at Disney+ shouldn’t come as too much of a surprise to fans who’ve been paying attention. We will, however, note that the announcement didn’t come from the streamer or Marvel Studios (their reps don’t comment on projects in development).

Variety has learned this news through sources. According to their report, Matt Corman and Chris Ord have been tapped to write and executive produce the series. They’re known for their work on “Covert Affairs,” “The Enemy Within,” “The Brave,” and “Containment.”

Will Charlie Cox play Daredevil in the Disney+ series?

Charlie Cox is the face of the character in the MCU thanks to his cameo in the last “Spider-Man” movie. Remember, Feige said at the end of 2021 that Cox would reprise his role. It’s clear he didn’t mean in a simple cameo, Cox’s Matt Murdock is here to stay.

The big question is whether or not the story that had been told on Netflix will be continued on Disney+ or if we’ll be charting a new path with the streamer’s show.

There have been rumors that both Matt Murdock and Jessica Jones could make an appearance in the upcoming “She-Hulk” series set to debut on August 17. Considering Jennifer Walters is a lawyer, we could definitely see a cameo from Charlie Cox and Krysten Ritter in the cards.

If Ritter does make an appearance, we’ll be keeping our eyes peeled for “Jessica Jones” revival news coming down the pike.

Will the Disney+ Daredevil series be TV-MA?

However, if we’re charting a new path, does that mean Disney+’s Daredevil will be TV-MA? Yes, “The Defenders Saga” retained its mature rating, however, the Disney+ original Marvel series have only gone as high as TV-14.

We’re of the mind that an exception will be made for Daredevil considering its brand. All of the Netflix Marvel shows contained mature content, for some fans that was part of the appeal. We doubt Disney+ is going to try to rebrand “Daredevil” this late in the game. However, they may still curb some of the show’s violence. After all, they’re not Netflix and the House of Mouse is walking a thin line even with parental controls.

We’ll keep you posted on more news concerning Disney+’s “Daredevil.” Stay tuned to Hidden Remote.

How to keep cut flowers fresh (almost) forever

There’s no denying the instant boost that fresh flowers can give to any room. Be it a generous arrangement you’re lucky enough to receive, or a bunch you grabbed from Trader Joe’s, flowers — or even just leafy stems, for that matter — can make any room feel warm and inviting.

But there’s also something deeply upsetting about tossing a wilted bouquet; it always feels like it was just yesterday that you were fluffing up your still-closed ranunculus, and suddenly they’re stinking up the kitchen with their funky water. So, how does one go about keeping pretty blooms alive for more than a few days?

Below, Christina Stembel, founder of Farmgirl Flowers shares her best tips for extending the life of your stems, along with her homemade flower food recipe — much like the little packets that come with a bouquet.

1. Use a dark vase

First things first: “We strongly recommend using either a dark glass vase or ceramic vessel,” says Stembel. “Darker glass or ceramics won’t allow sunlight into the water, which can increase the rate at which the stems decay.” Sure, mason jars are adorable, but if you’re planning on displaying the bouquet where the indirect sun hits, go for a darker vessel.

2. Add DIY flower food

“When we first started making flower food, we followed an older recipe from Martha Stewart (the queen!),” Stembel says. “Since then, we’ve made a few tweaks to suit our production and the ingredients we have on hand.” Farmgirl’s industrial formula is: 1 gallon of water + 4 teaspoons bleach + 4 teaspoons vinegar + 4 tablespoons sugar. To scale that down for your own bouquet, go with 1 quart water, 1 teaspoon bleach, 1 teaspoon vinegar, and 1 tablespoon sugar.

Bear in mind, according to Stembel, “The truth is, flower food is most effective for flowers that are fresh cut.” But as the flowers age, they still get a boost from this DIY food and the bleach component also helps to kill bacteria. Some people even use Sprite or other clear sodas as sugary flower food. If you take this route, Stembel still recommends a little bleach (in the same proportions as earlier stated), but with one-part clear soda to three-parts water. Don’t use diet soda because there’s no sugar and make sure it’s a clear variety, like Sprite. Colas or even ginger ale won’t work for this!

3. Trim stems daily

Keeping stems fresh ensures they can most effectively absorb water. Stems should be trimmed at least half an inch when they first come home with sharp, clean clippers and plopped back in the water immediately. Once cut, the stems will begin to seal up. “Delaying putting them in the vase will inhibit their ability to hydrate properly,” Stembel warns.

4. Keep flowers in a cool location

Keeping your flowers out of extreme conditions (like super-hot window sills) will prevent them from dying faster and creating build up and bacteria in the vase. Most flowers prefer cool, shady spots, so keep them away from the radiator in the winter, too.

5. Change the water daily

Just like humans, flowers don’t thrive when they’re drinking stagnant, dirty water. Daily water changes flush out any bacteria that flowers are sitting in, and they also eliminate any odor that comes with rotting plants.

6. Remove any stems as they die

Pruning dead stems will remove sources of excessive bacteria since decaying flowers release bacteria into the water faster than fresh stems. You should also remove any leaves that fall below the waterline each time you change the water.

7. Clean your vase

It’s important to do this after removing a dying bouquet to make way for a new one. A lot of people don’t consider the bacteria that can be in the vase before the bouquet goes in. A good rinse with warm water and soap will make sure the flowers have a clean start.

Boosted by Candance Owens, The Daily Wire spends thousands on ads to discredit Amber Heard: report

As the Amber Heard-Johnny Depp trial continues in Virginia’s Fairfax County Circuit Court, social media persists in trying the divorced couple in the court of public opinion. Conservative outlet The Daily Wire has been throwing its hat into the ring in a major way.

As Vice reported, The Daily Wire has spent thousands of dollars to promote misleading social media ads about the case. Overwhelmingly, ads from The Daily Wire focus on discrediting Heard.

RELATED: “Saturday Night Live” becomes part of the Heard-Depp media circus problem with its disturbing skit

Founded in 2015 by political commentator Ben Shapiro and director Jeremy Boreing, The Daily Wire has grown to be currently the second most popular publisher on Facebook. In 2021, in a story headlined “Outrage As A Business Model: How Ben Shapiro Is Using Facebook To Build An Empire,” NPR reported The Daily Wire “received more likes, shares and comments on Facebook than any other news publisher by a wide margin” in part by “turn[ing] anger into an art form” with repackaged, conservative-slanted pieces. 

Since the Heard-Depp trial started, The Daily Wire has consistently been promoting Facebook and Instagram ads featuring false and misleading articles and discredited information about the case. Vice reported they have spent between $35,000-$47,000 to do so, garnering about 4 million impressions. Many of the ads have been promoted on the Facebook pages of prominent right-wing public figures, including Candace Owens

Ads include the paid promotion of an article headlined “The Attempted Character Assassination of Johnny Depp” which states, “The only negative words written about the Hollywood A-lister came from the occasional film critic. Until he married Amber Heard,” and includes false claims.

In a post promoted by The Daily Wire, Owens wrote that she hoped Depp bankrupted Heard with the court case and, “It has been absolutely ridiculous to see what that woman has been allowed to do because she flew under the radar of the MeToo movement.”

Other paid ads promoted by The Daily Wire that take a misogynistic view of the case include a video describing Heard as “a complete lunatic” with images of her crying while Depp is laughing.


Want a daily wrap-up of all the news and commentary Salon has to offer? Subscribe to our morning newsletter, Crash Course.


Heard and Depp are in court after Depp sued Heard following her publication of an op-ed in The Washington Post where she disclosed being a survivor of sexual and domestic violence. Heard then counter-sued Depp for career damage. Though Heard did not name Depp in her op-ed, many details of alleged violent and horrific abuse have been revealed as both parties have taken the stand to testify.

More stories like this

CPAC Hungary: Global right doubles down on “replacement” theory: “This is what tyrants do”

The second day of CPAC Hungary was marked by vitriolic denunciations of immigration, declarations that leftists are seeking to eradicate “white Western nations” and that mass migration is being used as a “weapon of mass destruction” worse than a nuclear bomb. Less than a week after a mass killing in Buffalo motivated largely by the racist “replacement theory,” speakers at CPAC didn’t shy away from reiterating its key argument: There is a concerted effort underway to “replace” the white majorities of countries in Europe, North America and elsewhere with nonwhite immigrants. 

Already in the lead-up to the conference, which concluded Friday evening in Budapest, Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor Orbán had doubled down on his frequent invocation of replacement theory, which in Hungary is effectively treated as a matter of state policy. In a speech last Monday, as he was sworn into his fourth consecutive term in office, the Guardian reported, Orbán charged that “the great European population exchange [is] a suicidal attempt to replace the lack of European, Christian children with adults from other civilizations — migrants.”

RELATED: What “great replacement”? Right wants us to shut up about Buffalo shooter’s ideology

Over the last two days of CPAC Hungary, speakers repeatedly made similar arguments. On Friday, Ernő Schaller-Baross, a member of the European Parliament from Hungary’s ruling Fidesz party, said that the European refugee crisis of 2015 — which he described as “illegal migrants” coming to “Europe for hope of a better way of living” — had been welcomed by many Western European nations “as a cure for a degrading population.” By contrast, he said, Hungary’s “conservative approach” of believing that “the sovereign nation has the right to decide with whom they want to live within its thousand-year-old borders,” had been attacked. 

Vincenzo Sofo, another member of the European Parliament, from Italy’s “post-fascist” Fratelli d’Italia party, spoke of the “need to protect the independence of European nations” from “mass immigrations and ideological immigrations as well and military immigration and invasion as well. We conservatives need to show that we have always been standing and we need to continue to stand because we are the last chance of Europe so we cannot allow it to fail.” 

Georgia Meloni, leader of the “Brothers of Italy” party, which has run descendants of fascist dictator Benito Mussolini as candidates, also addressed the conference via video, saying that once the war in Ukraine concludes, conservatives should unite internationally to destroy the “woke ideology” that has damaged Europe.

Another Italian speaker, Lorenzo Fontana, a legislator from Italy’s right-wing populist Lega party (and author of the 2018 book, “The Empty Cradle of Civilization,” about Italian demographic decline), said, “I think that the end of the ideological system of political correctness uses immigration to try to create a new population. Because they don’t want [Europeans to] have a strong identity and strong tradition, because when you have a strong tradition and strong identity it’s difficult for the population to be controlled.”


Want a daily wrap-up of all the news and commentary Salon has to offer? Subscribe to our morning newsletter, Crash Course.


The most vitriolic arguments, however, came not from European speakers but their American peers. David Azerrad, a professor at Hillsdale College in Michigan, a Christian institution that has become a major influence in U.S. conservatives’ fight against public education, described immigration as a tyrannical means of breaking a country’s will. “There is simply no precedent in human history for sovereign states voluntarily importing into their homelands untold millions of peoples of different colors, creeds and cultures for decades on end,” he said. “This is what tyrants do to conquer a broken people, to pacify them. It is not something that the natives willfully do to themselves.”

Azerrad argued that the only people “dumb enough to believe” that immigration and multiculturalism had improved Western nations were libertarians eager to exploit cheap immigrant labor and sell to immigrant markets, “cosmopolitans” who like to eat foreign food, and “militant leftists who jubilate at the thought of eradicating white western nations.” The “leftists,” he said, were not quite as “dumb as the first two because they know exactly what the net effect of this immigration will be: it will be to fundamentally transform these nations.” He compared various European capitals with Hungary’s, in the wake of Orbán’s crackdown on immigration: the result, he said, is that “today Paris and London are unrecognizable; Budapest is not.” 

RELATED: How this tiny Christian college is driving the right’s nationwide war against public schools

Talk of the ethnic or cultural “transformation” of countries through large-scale immigration is a commonplace euphemism for replacement theory claims. But Azerrad also spoke more bluntly. “One of the greatest victories of the left,” he said, was “to have convinced so many of us that these [immigration] policies can’t be changed. That history is on their side and that we should resign ourselves to become minorities in our own countries.” 

Relegating white people to minority status, Azerrad said, was exactly what the “ruling class” intended. After World War II, he said, those elites had learned “one lesson”: that expressions of nationalism in white Western nations must inevitably lead to Nazism. “If a white Western nation turns to nationalism, if it has the temerity to understand itself for what it is — a particular nation, rooted in a particular land, living a particular way of life — that can only mean one thing: it’s on its way to fascism.” 

The “ruling class … came to equate whiteness with evil,” said Hillsdale College professor David Azerrad. “Therefore making Western nations less white became a moral imperative.”

But the “ruling class didn’t just demonize nationalism,” he continued. “They came to equate whiteness itself with evil.” As a consequence, Azerrad argued, those elites had decided that “the problem in nations is having majorities of white people. And therefore making Western nations less white became the moral imperative, hence the turn to third world immigration.” 

Now, he said, the elite “jubilates” whenever the year 2045 is mentioned, since that is the projected date by which the U.S. is predicted to become a majority-minority nation.

Following Azerrad, James Carafano, the vice president of a foreign policy institute within the Heritage Foundation, warned in one of the final panels of the conference that immigration wouldn’t just transform Western countries, but might obliterate them completely. 

“This is not a conspiracy,” Carafano said. “There is a global effort to have a world without borders. This is a serious, organized effort and it directly targets governments that get in their way and it tries to take over governments like ours and use them as instruments to do this.” 

“There are a lot of problems with that,” he continued. “One of the biggest ones is that this is introducing one of the most horrible weapons of mass destruction in modern history, maybe even more horrific than a nuclear weapon. It’s the weapon of mass migration.” It had happened in Syria, Belarus and other countries, he said, and it was a significant national security threat facing the U.S. as well: “Someday, somebody’s going to go to Latin America and say, ‘Here’s a billion dollars. Go send a million people to the United States and destabilize them.’  

Read more on the far right’s “great replacement” theory:

Why are Republicans attacking WIC: GOP finds new scapegoat for baby formula outrage

On Wednesday, nine House Republicans voted against a bill to help low-income families access baby food amid the nation’s formula shortage, arguing that parents on federal food assistance benefits would be depriving middle-income families of the products they need as well. Now those same Republicans are defending their vote by pointing to America’s most vulnerable families as the true cause of outrage. 

The bill, dubbed the “Access to Baby Formula Act” (HR 7791), would allow the U.S. government to waive a number of restrictions for families on Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants, and Children (WIC), which helps low-income families access baby food. Roughly half of all formula products are purchased through the program. 

Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene, one of the bill’s detractors, called WIC a “problem” and implied that low-income families might hoard the products for themselves. The Biden administration, Greene said during her radio program this week, aims to make WIC “an even bigger customer, when in reality many of the parents that can’t buy baby formula for their baby, they’re not on the WIC program.”

“The WIC program is making it more difficult for them to buy baby formula because if you’re on WIC, if you’re someone that needs to be on that government assistance, you’re allowed to buy as much baby formula as you want to with your WIC vouchers and they’re increasing that for those parents,” the conservative freshman added. 

RELATED: GOP slams President Biden on baby formula shortage, then refuses to vote for supply increase

Rep. Andy Biggs, R-Ariz., echoed Greene’s sentiment, saying that the bill “would make baby formula shortages worse for most Americans.”

“It will allow WIC to utilize a far greater portion of the baby formula market, crowding out many hard-working American families,” he added.  


Want a daily wrap-up of all the news and commentary Salon has to offer? Subscribe to our morning newsletter, Crash Course.


Rep. Matt Gaetz, R-Fla., also joins the chorus, parroting Biggs’ talking point to a tee. 

Though Republicans have sought to paint low-income families as potential opportunists amid the shortage, families on WIC are in fact most likely to be impacted by the scarcity. That’s because the shortage is in large part driven by a recall recently issued by Abbot labs, America’s chief manufacturer of baby food, whose products serve 90% of families using WIC, according to the Agriculture Department’s Food and Nutrition Service. 

According to Roll Call, the Department of Agriculture has urged states to have “maximum flexibility” for families on WIC, encouraging states to allow recipients to purchase different brands and sizes of formula. However, that order is legal only because the U.S. is still in the midst of the COVID-19 crisis, meaning that once the public emergency declaration is lifted, Congress would have to pass a bill providing WIC recipients with more formula options. 

RELATED: Republicans’ “pro-life” pivot: GOP suddenly outraged by baby formula shortage

Disney+ with ads plan details: How much will it cost? How many ads will pop up?

Earlier this year, Disney+ announced the company was working on an ad-supported plan that will be offered at a low cost. On May 17, ahead of Disney’s Upfront presentation, details about the ad-supported plan surfaced and we break up all the information you need to know, below!

When it comes to the cost of streaming platforms, Disney+ is among the cheapest services. Netflix’s standard package is about $13, but to watch on multiple screens, the price can be nearly $20. Prime Video is $8.99 a month or $12.99 if you get it with Amazon Prime (or $119 a year). CBS All Access is $5.99 with ads and $9.99 a month with no ads. HBO Max does not have an ad-supported plan, it’s $14.99 a month. Finally, we have Apple TV+, it does not have an ad-supported plan and is just $4.99 a month.

How much will Disney+ with ads cost?

At the moment, Disney+‘s current ad-free plan is $7.99 monthly or $79.99 a year. This plan will continue to be an option, but an ad-supported plan will begin to roll out in late 2022, and it will cost only $3.92. As soon as we have an official release date, we’ll update this post.

How will ads work on the Disney+ platform?

According to Variety, Disney+ with ads subscribers will only be subjected to four minutes of ads per hour (or less), which is a great deal. Additionally, no ads will play on Disney+ profiles that are for children. All in all, it sounds like a fantastic option. The price is low and parents will love that the child profiles won’t be subjected with ads.

Again, we’ll update you as soon as we have more information! Are you currently subscribed to the platform? Which streaming service is your go-to?

The source shares that Netflix is rumored to also be working on a cheaper, ad-supported plan. Will more platforms follow this idea?

New emails reveal Ginni Thomas’ attempt to pressure Arizona Republicans to overturn Trump’s loss

Ginni Thomas urged Arizona legislators to reject Joe Biden’s popular-vote victory in favor of Donald Trump electors, according to newly revealed emails.

The Washington Post obtained communications between Thomas and Russell Bowers, speaker of the Arizona House, and state Rep. Shawnna Bolick, who served on the House elections committee at the time and is currently running for secretary of state, showing the wife of U.S. Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas arguing that legislators had to intervene to counter baseless fraud claims.

“Stand strong in the face of political and media pressure,” Thomas wrote on Nov. 9, 2020, adding that the responsibility to choose electors was “yours and yours alone … to fight back against fraud.”

Thomas sent the message through an online platform that allows users to send pre-written form emails to multiple elected officials at once, and the emails show the conservative activist and outspoken Trump supporter was even more involved in pushing to overturn the former president’s election loss.

“Article II of the United States Constitution gives you an awesome responsibility: to choose our state’s Electors,” read the Nov. 9 email. “… [P]lease take action to ensure that a clean slate of Electors is chosen.”

She also signed an email to the same two GOP legislators on Dec. 13, the day before the Electoral College cast their votes to certify Biden’s election.

“Before you choose your state’s Electors,” Thomas wrote, “consider what will happen to the nation we all love if you don’t stand up and lead.”

Book ban jumps from public schools to private stores like Barnes & Noble

A book for a young adult audience that the American Library Association described as “the most banned book in the country,” is now under scrutiny for rejection from bookshelves at private stores. 

A Republican Virginia state delegate has filed a lawsuit against the author and publisher of “Gender Queer,” a book about the nonbinary and asexual experience, demanding the Barnes & Noble require parental consent before selling the book to minors. State delegate Tim Anderson and his client Tommy Altman, a state congressional candidate, said on Wednesday that “the Virginia Beach Circuit Court has found probable cause that the books ‘Gender Queer’ and ‘A Court of Mist and Fury’ are obscene to unrestricted viewing by minors,” according to a Fox affiliate. “My client, Tommy Altman, has now directed my office to seek a restraining order against Barnes and Noble and Virginia Beach Schools to enjoin them from selling or loaning these books to minors without parent consent,” Anderson wrote in a Facebook. “We are in a major fight. Suits like this can be filed all over Virginia. There are dozens of books. Hundreds of schools.”

RELATED: Tennessee mom wants “pornographic” Henrietta Lacks book banned from schools

On Monday, Virginia Beach City Public Schools officially banned “Gender Queer” from appearing on school shelves, alleging that the book contains sex acts that aren’t suitable for children. 

Anderson told a CBS affiliate that “you don’t have to learn about your sexuality by having illustration of two minors performing fellatio on each other. That’s what Gender Queer has. It has two minors on there hands and knees performing fellatio and it’s in vivid, graphic detail.” 

Emily Klein, a manager at AFK Books & Records, a bookstore in Virginia, told the outlet that she will now require parental consent for the book’s sale. 


Want a daily wrap-up of all the news and commentary Salon has to offer? Subscribe to our morning newsletter, Crash Course.


“If the book is explicitly rated ‘mature,’ we will require parental permission and have a parent present,” she said. “We brought it in shortly after its release; then it sold out. Once we heard it was getting banned, we brought it back in because we wanted it to be accessible to the people,

According to Bookriot, neither book contains pornographic content. 

The restraining order originally stems from a complaint made earlier this month by Virginia Beach School Board Member Victoria Manning. Back in December, Manning told 10 On Your Side she was also scrutinizing the books “Good Trouble: Lessons from the Civil Rights Playbook” and “Beyond Magenta: Transgender Teens Speak Out.

RELATED: What’s behind the right-wing book-ban frenzy? Big money, and a long-term plan

“Gender Queer,” written by Maia Kobabe, is just the latest book to be banned across the country. Among those frequently targeted by school boards include “Lawn Boy” by Jonathan Evison; “The Hate U Give” by Angie Thomas; “The Absolutely True Diary of a Part-Time Indian” by Sherman Alexie, and “The Bluest Eye” by Toni Morrison. According to Pen America, over 1,100 books were banned between July 2021 and March 2022, with a third of the targeted works centering on the LGBTQ+ experience.

Abbott enriched shareholders with stock buybacks amid deadly outbreak at baby formula plant

Financial documents and whistleblower testimony spotlighted by The Guardian on Friday show that the U.S.-based baby formula producer Abbott used the massive windfall profits it accumulated between 2019 and 2021 to enrich shareholders, even amid a deadly bacteria outbreak that has triggered nationwide outrage and contributed to a formula shortage.

“Abbott detected bacteria eight times as its net profits soared by 94% between 2019 and 2021,” The Guardian‘s Tom Perkins reported. “And just as its tainted formula allegedly began sickening a number of babies, with two deaths reported, the company increased dividends to shareholders by over 25% while announcing a stock buyback program worth $5 billion.”

Rakeen Mabud, chief economist at the Groundwork Collaborative, told the newspaper that “Abbott chose to prioritize shareholders by issuing billions of dollars in stock buybacks instead of making productive investments.”

“It’s important that we have high standards for something as vital as baby formula,” Mabud added.

In late February, Abbott recalled a lot of its Similac PM 60/40 powdered formula that was manufactured at a plant in Sturgis, Michigan after an infant who consumed the product died of a cronobacter infection. According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, at least four infants fell ill after consuming Abbott formula produced at the Sturgis facility, which has since been temporarily shuttered.

Abbott, which has faced a Justice Department complaint and scrutiny from federal regulators, insists that “there is no conclusive evidence to link Abbott’s formulas to these infant illnesses.” A whistleblower filing dated October 19, 2021 suggests the bacteria outbreak was caused by equipment at the Sturgis plant that was “failing and in need of repair.”

“A number of product flow pipes were pitting and leaving pin holes,” the complaint reads. “This allowed bacteria to enter the system and, at times, led to bacteria not being adequately cleaned out in clean-in-place (‘CIP’) washes. This, in turn, caused product flowing through the pipes to pick up the bacteria that was trapped in the defective areas of the pipe.”

A footnote of the whistleblower document states that the “complainant was advised by an operator that leadership at the Sturgis site was aware of the failing equipment anywhere from five to seven years from the [bacteria outbreak] occurring.”

The outbreak at the Sturgis facility—the largest baby formula plant in the U.S.—has exacerbated a nationwide baby formula shortage and, according to experts and progressive critics, spotlighted the dangers of corporate consolidation.

Abbott produces 43% of all baby formula in the U.S., and four companies—including Abbott—control roughly 90% of the nation’s formula market. The concentrated industry has lobbied aggressively to weaken bacteria testing standards.

Earlier this week, Sen. Ron Wyden (D-Ore.)—the chair of the Senate Finance Committee—launched an investigation into Abbott’s tax practices, specifically “whether the company used its windfall from Republicans’ 2017 tax cuts to enrich executives and shareholders, rather than ensure the safety of the manufacturing plant that produces infant formula.”

“I have long been concerned that windfalls from sweeping tax cuts for mega-corporations enacted by the 2017 Republican tax law would be used for padding the pockets of corporate executives and wealthy shareholders,” Wyden wrote in a letter to Abbott’s CEO on Wednesday.

“It appears my concerns have been validated in this case,” the senator added, “as Abbott chose spending billions on buying back its own stock instead of investing in critical upgrades to a plant essential to feeding our nation’s infants.”

GOP vote against bipartisan relief bill threatens to kill tens of thousands of small businesses

Advocates for independently-owned businesses warned that restaurants, gyms, and other Main Street businesses across the U.S. will be forced to close in the coming months after Republicans in the Senate on Thursday blocked a $48 billion package to provide relief to owners who have struggled to stay afloat during the coronavirus pandemic.

The bipartisan Small Business Covid Relief Act (S. 4008), which was meant to replenish the Restaurant Revitalization Fund (RRF) passed last year, was cosponsored by Sen. Roger Wicker, R-Miss., but still failed to get more than five Republican senators to support it.

The vast majority of GOP lawmakers claimed that helping locally-owned restaurants and bars to stay open and continue employing people in their communities would worsen inflation and contribute to the deficit, with Sen. Rand Paul, R-Ky., saying on the Senate floor that “dumping more money in the economy is simply pouring $5-a-gallon gas on an already out-of-control fire.”

As a result, said Erika Polmar of the Independent Restaurant Coalition (IRC), “we estimate more than half of the 177,300 restaurants waiting for an RRF grant will close in the next few months.”

The bill would have given $40 billion to independent restaurants left out of the restaurant relief program which passed last year but ran out of funds in just three weeks, with only one in three applicants receiving grants.

“Local restaurants across the country expected help but the Senate couldn’t finish the job,” said Polmar. “Neighborhood restaurants nationwide have held out hope for this program, selling their homes, cashing out retirement funds, or taking personal loans in an effort to keep their employees working.”

The RRF bill would also have given $2 billion for gyms and fitness centers, $2 billion for live event companies, $2 billion for bus and ferry operators, $1.4 billion for companies near border crossings which have shut down during the pandemic, and $500 million for minor league sports teams.

The Community Gyms Coalition told The Hill that although an RRF replenishment bill passed in the House, the Senate “failed to invest in fitness and exercise despite their obvious benefits for Americans’ mental and physical health.”

“After hanging on for another year, hurting restaurants and bars throughout America, especially in rural communities, may not see any relief despite the House passing a bill just last month to put more money into the RRF,” said Didier Trinh, policy and political impact director for Main Street Alliance (MSA). “The fate of these small businesses—including ones owned by women and people of color that were left behind—will be tied to those senators who voted down this lifeline today.”

Along with Wicker, Sens. Lisa Murkowski, R-Alaska, Roy Blunt, R-Mo., Susan Collins, R-Maine, and Bill Cassidy, R-La., were the only Republicans who joined Democrats in voting for the bill. The Democrats needed at least 10 Republicans to support the legislation to reach 60 votes required by the legislative filibuster.

“Senators who ensured this fate instead of providing the relief small business needs now must be held accountable,” tweeted MSA.

Tyler Akin, a board member of the IRC and a chef in Wilmington, Delaware, noted that the GOP’s rejection of the bill immediately followed a vote approving $40 billion of military and humanitarian aid for Ukraine—more than $7 billion than President Joe Biden had requested.

“Ironically, this filibuster followed a vote to stand in solidarity at a similar level of funding with a group of European allies that handled some of the worst effects of the past two years with far more grace and unity,” Akin told The Philadelphia Inquirer. “It’s clear that those who aligned with Senator [Pat] Toomey today have little or no desire to support small businesses.”

Texas GOP power grab threatens “biggest regression in minority voting rights” since Civil Rights era

TEXAS CITY — Miles inland from Galveston’s beaches and colorful vacation homes, a group of Black men dribble and jump on a covered basketball court, aiming for a chain-link net.

Carver Park in Texas City, created during segregation, is considered the first African American county park in the state. It sits on land donated by descendants of freedmen who survived slavery and pioneered one of Texas’ oldest Black settlements, the footprint of which sits just a few blocks away.

Until last year, the park sat at the heart of Galveston County’s Precinct 3 — the most diverse of the four precincts that choose the commissioners court, which governs the county along with the county judge. Precinct 3 was the lone seat in which Black and Hispanic voters, who make up about 38% of the county’s population, made up the majority of the electorate.

The precinct sliced the middle of coastal Galveston County, stretching from the small city of Dickinson on the county’s northern end through residential areas of Texas City and down to the eastern end of Galveston Island. Its residents included medical professionals and staff drawn in by The University of Texas Medical Branch, petrochemical workers that operate a large cluster of refineries and commuter employees of the nearby NASA Johnson Space Center.

The area stood as an exemplar of Black political power and progress. For 30 years, Black voters — with support from Hispanics — had amassed enough political clout to decide the county commissioner for Precinct 3, propelling Black leaders onto a majority white county commissioners court. They worked to gain stronger footholds in local governments, elevating Black people into city halls across the precinct. Two years ago, they reached a milestone, electing Texas City’s first Black mayor and a city commission on which people of color are the majority.

Attendees listen to traditional music during a Cinco de Mayo parade and festival on April 30, 2022.

Members of the community attend a Cinco de Mayo festival in Texas City. Black and Hispanic residents account for roughly 60% of the population. Credit: Annie Mulligan for The Texas Tribune

Leticia Solis gets close to the group of horses after they finished riding in a Cinco de Mayo parade in Texas City on April 30, 2022.

Leticia Solis approaches a group of horses after the Cinco de Mayo parade. Credit: Annie Mulligan for The Texas Tribune

But the white Republican majority on the Galveston County’s commissioners court decided last November to dismantle Precinct 3. Capitalizing on its first opportunity to redraw commissioner precincts without federal oversight, the court splintered Black and Hispanic communities into majority-white districts.

Under the final map, which will be used for this year’s election and possibly for a decade, white voters make up at least 62% of the electorate in each precinct, though the county’s total population is only about 55% white. Because white voters in Galveston — like Texas generally — tend to support different candidates than Black and Hispanic voters, the map will effectively quash the electoral power of voters of color.

The new map was so egregious to officials at the U.S. Department of Justice that it prompted the department to file its only federal lawsuit at the county level in the entire nation challenging a redistricting plan as discriminatory.

Black residents here have often needed federal intervention to help them pursue equality and fairness. Without it, it’s possible the white power structure will never voluntarily grant them them political equity and would continue threatening the gains they’ve achieved over the last few decades.

“With the district, people feel that they have a voice and a choice. Without it, no voice, no choice,” said Lucille McGaskey, a longtime Galveston County resident whose community in the city of La Marque was drawn out of Precinct 3. “It’s a shame … that it has come to people trying to wipe other people out.”

Fighting the past

Commissioner Stephen Holmes in his office on April 21, 2022, in Texas City.

Commissioner Stephen Holmes was appointed to the role after Wayne Johnson, the county’s first Black commissioner, died in 1999. Holmes is used to casting the lone dissenting vote on the Republican-majority commissioners court. Credit: Annie Mulligan for The Texas Tribune

Galveston’s ignominious racial past looks over the shoulders of the tourists and passersby traversing The Strand, a street of historic Victorian-style buildings just off Galveston Bay.

An imposing 5,000-square-foot mural, completed just last year, depicts the long journey from slavery to freedom that runs through Galveston. Known locally as the Juneteenth mural, it covers the side of a building overlooking the spot from which a Union Army general issued the order in 1865 that led to freedom for a quarter-million enslaved Black people in Texas, among the last to be freed after the end of the Civil War.

Galveston’s dreams of greatness in those days rested on its access to the water and proximity to cotton fields, and it boomed as a trade gateway for Texas and the Southwest. In recent years, historical markers have been added along The Strand to more fully recognize that those economic aspirations depended on the dehumanization of people kept as slaves.

The markers and the mural are symbolic, though they offer those with long ties to the area a more official — or at least public — acknowledgement of this community’s history and the way Black residents still find themselves fighting the past.

Though he’s a product of Galveston County, Commissioner Stephen Holmes did not initially grasp the significance of Precinct 3 to the community when he was suddenly appointed to the job in 1999 after the previous commissioner died. A prosecutor by trade, he inherited the seat from Wayne Johnson, who had become the county’s first Black commissioner in 1988.

Once in office, Holmes was struck by the intense pride his constituents took in Precinct 3, the ultimate spoils of a yearslong struggle to build coalitions, often assisted by federal intervention to protect voting rights. Early in his tenure, he met older voters who were the grandchildren of people who had been held as slaves. Some of his constituents had participated in sit-ins, paid poll taxes, attended segregated schools and lived through a long stretch during which their voices were shut out at the highest level of local government.

“This is a 1960s-style fight for democracy,” Holmes said from his precinct offices housed in an old Wal-Mart building turned government complex in Texas City.

Holmes — who is Black, the only Democrat on the commissioners court and the only one who is not white — said it’s impossible for him to win reelection when his term is up in 2024 given the new Republican map dissecting his precinct. He sees the effort not as an indictment of his public service but a repudiation of his constituents.

During his time in office, Holmes has grown accustomed to being on the losing end of 4-1 votes — the sole foil to the court’s Republican majority. But he has at least captured the voices of his constituents on agenda items that have recently included a local disaster declaration regarding the border, which is 400 miles away, and putting COVID relief funds toward building a border wall. He was the lone dissenter to keeping a Confederate statue on the grounds of the old county courthouse.

He has also built strong ties with his constituents in moments of both joy and despair.

Holmes proudly displays in his office a large panoramic photo of a jubilant crowd at one of the annual barbecues he hosts. The soiree is a community staple and highlight for some of the older, mostly Black residents who typically attend. In recent years, the event has included dance performances by some of those residents who dub themselves the “Stevettes.”

The photo hangs over a waiting area Holmes and his team used as a makeshift FEMA help center in the wake of Hurricane Harvey’s destruction when his constituents faced hourslong wait times to request assistance through the federal agency’s disaster phone line. Holmes set up county laptops so his constituents without computers or internet could access a FEMA website and he helped figure out transportation for those who couldn’t get to his office on their own.

Galveston County commissioners Darrell Apffel, Joe Giusti, County Judge Mark Henry and Commissioner Stephen Holmes pose for a group photo during a Galveston County Commissioners Court meeting in Galveston, TX, on Monday, April 4, 2022.

From left: Galveston County Commissioners Darrell Apffel and Joe Giusti, County Judge Mark Henry, and Commissioner Stephen Holmes pose for a group photo during a Galveston County Commissioners Court meeting. Holmes is used to casting the lone dissenting vote on the Republican-majority court. Credit: Annie Mulligan for The Texas Tribune

Republican power play

Set back behind a row of massive crepe myrtle trees with thick trunks that, like the rickety shiplap of nearby houses, are showing their age, the old entrance of the “Colored Branch of Rosenberg Library” sits on a quiet street near downtown Galveston in a portion of the island that used to fall within Precinct 3.

Given its proximity to her home, Sharon Lewis has had to explain the significance of the relic of segregation to her granddaughter, using the same refrain she uses to describe historical inflection points to her — “a moment in history.”

Lewis was among the last to speak of the roughly 40 mostly Black residents who packed the November meeting to vociferously oppose the court’s redistricting plan. Just two people testified in support. Pastors, local officials and longtime residents took turns admonishing the court for dismantling Precinct 3, leaving hardly any room for them to participate in the process and turning back the clock on their representation. The ordeal was in some ways a preview of what they feared will result from the county’s mapmaking — that they will no longer have a voice.

The events leading up to commissioners’ vote on the map had proved to be a bold exercise of Republican power wrangling.

The proposal was placed on the court’s agenda on the last day by which the county could make changes before the March primary election. The meeting — the only one allowing public testimony on the proposal— was scheduled for the middle of a workday in an annex building at the county’s edge instead of the larger county courthouse. The room was so small that only two commissioners and County Judge Mark Henry fit on the dais; Holmes sat at a small white table down in front of them.

Scores of residents showed up and many were left in the hallway straining to follow the proceedings or hear their names called to speak.

A statue of a returning Confederate soldier on Thursday, April 21, 2022 in Galveston, TX. Known as The “Dignified Resignation,” the monument has stood in front of the Galveston County Courthouse since 1911. Commissioner Stephen Holmes made a motion to have the statue removed in 2020 but it was not supported by any other commissioners. Credit: Contributor

District 1 councilmember Sharon Lewis poses outside of her home on April 21, 2022, in Galveston, TX.

District 1 councilmember Sharon Lewis poses outside of her home on April 21, 2022, in Galveston, TX. Credit: Annie Mulligan for The Texas Tribune

When people complained they could not hear, Henry tersely responded that the room did not have microphones and he wasn’t going to shout. When the crowd collectively scoffed at his remark, he threatened to clear them out if they made noise.

“I’ve got constables here,” said Henry, who did not respond to multiple requests for an interview for this story.

Henry and the other commissioners did not address any of the public’s concerns, except to say there was no time to consider anything except two proposals drawn up by a Republican consultant — both of which upended the boundaries of Precinct 3.

Just before the court’s vote, Holmes held the floor with an attentive audience that hummed in disapproval as he detailed the chicanery of the Republican maneuver.

County Judge Mark Henry greets attendees at a Galveston County Commissioners Court meeting in Galveston, TX, on Monday, April 4, 2022.

County Judge Mark Henry at a Galveston County Commissioners Court meeting on April 4. Henry, who voted in favor of the new map, has said the redistricting plan helps merge the coastal counties into one precinct. Credit: Annie Mulligan for The Texas Tribune

There had been no criteria adopted to guide the redistricting process, the only commissioner elected by Black and Hispanic voters was largely shut out of the process and the opinions of those testifying were being cast aside.

The crowd was cheering by the time Holmes pronounced they would not “go quietly in the night.”

“We’re going to rage, rage, rage until justice is done to us,” Holmes said.

The court passed its new map on a 3-1 vote (one commissioner was absent) and quickly adjourned. The other two commissioners who voted for the plan, Darrell Apffel and Joe Giusti, also did not respond to requests for comment, though Henry and Apffel have been quoted in the local newspaper arguing that the redistricting plan will benefit the county by consolidating its coastal areas into one precinct.

Under the county’s new map, most of Precinct 3 was cracked in three ways, significantly reducing its footprint to the whiter northwest portion of the county and shrinking its share of Black and Hispanic voters by 28 percentage points. Holmes’ former constituents in more diverse pockets of the county were split across the four precincts.

After the hearing adjourned, those who had gathered joined hands and transformed the ordinary government meeting room into a protest venue with a rendition of “We Shall Overcome.” Recalling that moment, Holmes noted he had sung those words many times throughout his life and certainly since taking office, including at events commemorating Black history. But he realized he had never personally taken on their weight the way activists and protesters did when they lifted the song up as a civil rights anthem.

“I will tell you that that may have been the first time that I really felt it in my soul, about what people during the civil rights movement felt when they were singing those songs,” Holmes said.

The Justice Department’s lawsuit landed four months later. In a complaint filed in federal court in Galveston, it argued the map was discriminatory because it denied Black and Hispanic citizens an equal opportunity to participate in the political process.

People play basketball at Carver Park on  April 21, 2022, in Texas City.

People played basketball last month at Carver Park in Texas City. The historical park, on land donated by descendants of freedmen, is considered the first African American county park in the state. Credit: Annie Mulligan for The Texas Tribune

“The way I think about this is that there’s been a consistent battle in Galveston for decades over ensuring fair representation for Black and brown communities,” said Hilary Harris Klein, a senior counsel for voting rights with the Southern Coalition for Social Justice, which also sued the county over the map on behalf of three local branches of the NAACP and a local LULAC chapter.

(The county has not yet formally addressed the legal issues raised in the lawsuits, which both claim the court ran afoul of the federal Voting Rights Act. Instead, the county asked for a postponement in the case until possibly 2023 while the U.S. Supreme Court considers a challenge out of Alabama that could further contract the Voting Rights Act’s protections from discrimination in redistricting.)

The redraw of Precinct 3 likely would have been blocked under federal oversight — known as preclearance — that existed before the U.S. Supreme Court’s 2013 decision in Shelby County vs. Holder, which dismantled the law designed to shield voters of color from being robbed of political power.

A lynchpin of the Voting Rights Act, the oversight, covered states like Texas with long histories of discrimination and required changes to elections and voting maps to clear federal reviews before taking effect.

That protection proved crucial in Galveston’s redistricting a decade ago when the commissioners court similarly attempted to reconfigure Holmes’ district but were blocked by the Justice Department. The court backed away and Precinct 3 was preserved.

But preclearance was gone by last year’s redistricting work, the first time in nearly half a century that lawmakers, both at the state and local level, could redo political maps without federal supervision. Freed from review, the Galveston County commissioners — led by the same county judge from a decade before — made good on their previous effort.

“That is something that the powers in play have been trying to do for a very long time and with the Shelby decision and with the dismantling of preclearance, they saw that as a tacit permission to do so,” Harris Klein said. “Galveston is really emblematic of what’s happening across the South post-Shelby. We’re seeing the biggest regression in minority rights since the Voting Rights Act was passed.”

Across the country and in Texas, Republicans are using the latest round of redistricting — and their new freedom — to preserve the GOP’s political dominance and cement their power even at the cost of communities of color.

In Galveston, the impending elimination of Holmes as the only Black commissioner echoes efforts in other parts of the country where the districts of Black elected officials from the county level to Congress are being chipped away in maps that erase decades of electoral gains by the voters of color. Just this week, though, Henry appointed Robin Armstrong, a Republican local doctor who is Black, to finish out the term of the county’s fourth commissioner, who recently died.

Anger and disappointment

The two legal cases against Galveston County are now at the start of what’s expected to be a drawn-out stay in federal court, but locals fear the fight could determine more than just the fate of Precinct 3.

Lucille McGaskey poses for a portrait outside of Galveston Houston Authority, where she works, on April 22, 2022.

“It’s a shame … that it has come to people trying to wipe other people out,” Lucille McGaskey says of the redistricting plans that took her city, La Marque, out of Precinct 3. Credit: Annie Mulligan for The Texas Tribune

In between the commissioners court’s decennial efforts to pull apart the precinct, the communities that comprise it have been quietly working to harness the power of their votes. In 2020, the voters of Texas City elected Dedrick Johnson, making him the city’s first Black mayor. He governs the heavily industrial city of 50,000, where Black and Hispanic residents account for roughly 60% of the population, along with a city commission of six members — four of whom are people of color.

Johnson ran unopposed for reelection this year. But in describing the fallout of dismantling Precinct 3, many residents wonder how long those gains can be maintained when the message Galveston County voters are receiving through the county is that their votes don’t matter.

From his desk behind the midcentury modern facade of city hall, Johnson said he understands those fears, especially given the treatment Precinct 3 residents received at the commissioner’s November meeting when they faced what he described as an “arrogant display” of disregard for their voices.

“One of the things that is a core tenet of the elected official is you are elected by the people to work for the people, and when you silence the voice of the people then one is unsure that those who are elected will actually do what they say they’re going to do,” Johnson said. “And if that [November meeting] is any indication of the representation that those people will subsequently get from this redistricting, then it confirms their anger. It confirms their disappointment.”

Others are bracing for what the devaluation of Black and Hispanic votes in the county will mean for efforts to bring more people into the electoral process.

That’s the mission community activist Roxy Hall Williamson has adopted since returning to Galveston Island a few years ago. She traces her ties to Galveston back to her grandmother who was a nurse there and her grandfather who worked as a ship’s cook. Williamson was born on the island, and her mother moved her family away when she was a child but she returned every summer.

Once her daughter graduated high school, Williamson returned to Galveston permanently. After attending a political event, she started seeking out opportunities to organize and has more recently been working to establish a local voter advocacy group through which she wants to create a suite of voter education tools, hoping to pass down voting literacy in the way some families pass down generational wealth.

But these days, Williamson grimaces at how she’d even convince someone to register to vote once they’ve heard the news of the new county map.

“It’s almost going to suck all the air out of it,” she said.

Roxy D Hall Williamson stands next to a historical marker commemorating Juneteenth in Galveston, TX, on Monday, April 4, 2022.

Community activist Roxy Hall Williamson stands next to a historical marker commemorating Juneteenth in Galveston. Credit: Annie Mulligan for The Texas Tribune

Williamson proudly shepherds out-of-town visitors to the Juneteenth mural in Galveston to share her community’s truth. She helped organize the turnout at the commissioners court’s November meeting, but when she walked out of the crowded room once it adjourned she realized how much the present was echoing the past.

Feeling that the Black people of Galveston County were again in need of protection from discrimination by their own government, she pulled out her cellphone and dialed the Department of Justice’s civil rights hotline.

“What did it all mean if they can just take it away?” Williamson said.


Tickets are on sale now for the 2022 Texas Tribune Festival, happening in downtown Austin on Sept. 22-24. Get your TribFest tickets by May 31 and save big!

This article originally appeared in The Texas Tribune at https://www.texastribune.org/2022/05/20/galveston-redistricting-black-voters/.

The Texas Tribune is a member-supported, nonpartisan newsroom informing and engaging Texans on state politics and policy. Learn more at texastribune.org.

Roe the last straw? 63% of Americans already believe the Supreme Court is politically motivated

About 63% of all American voters believe that the Supreme Court’s decision-making is primarily driven by politics, according to a new survey released by Quinnipiac University. 

The survey also revealed that just 32% believe that the court is mostly motivated by law, while as many as seven in ten Americans feel that the court’s justices should be given term limits. 

The survey was published just days after a Yahoo News/YouGov poll found that 74% of Americans believe the Supreme Court has become “too politicized.”

Jamison Foser, a progressive strategist and adviser to Take Back the Court, told The Washington Post that the Quinnipiac survey reflects “a growing recognition of the need to rebalance the Supreme Court and disempower the court’s right-wing majority.”

“Without doing so, everything from abortion and voting rights to environmental protections is likely to be struck down,” Foser added. 

RELATED: The Supreme Court guards its privacy. Too bad it doesn’t care about yours and mine

The survey comes amid a public uproar around what many critics on the left have derided as an array of partisan Supreme Court rulings in recent months. 


Want a daily wrap-up of all the news and commentary Salon has to offer? Subscribe to our morning newsletter, Crash Course.


Earlier this month, Politico reported that the court has already informally voted to overturn Roe v. Wade, the landmark ruling that established America’s constitutional right to abortion. Critics have also expressed outrage over the court’s rescission of President Biden’s mask mandate for private sector workers, as well as its reversal of the Centers for Disease Control’s eviction moratorium, first enacted in order to buoy millions Americans buckling under the financial consequences of the pandemic. 

The court, for its part, has been adamantly opposed to the notion that it’s motivated by politics. 

Back in September, Justice Amy Coney Barrett insisted that the bench is “not comprised of a bunch of partisan hacks.”

“The media, along with hot takes on Twitter, report the results and decisions,” Barrett later said. “That makes the decision seem results-oriented. It leaves the reader to judge whether the court was right or wrong, based on whether she liked the results of the decision.”

RELATED: Supreme Court hearing grows tense as Justice Kagan grills lawyer challenging Biden’s vaccine mandate

That same month, Justice Clarence Thomas echoed a similar sentiment, accusing the media of making “it sound as though you are just always going right to your personal preference.”

“They think you become like a politician,” Clarence told a crowd at Notre Dame University. “That’s a problem. You’re going to jeopardize any faith in the legal institutions.”

Thomas has been plagued by accusations of bias over the activities of his wife, Ginni Thomas, a right-wing activist who reportedly played an instrumental role in a failed scheme to reinstall Donald Trump as president in the 2020 election.

Trump-appointed judge hits Mike Lindell with sanctions for “frivolous” voting machine lawsuit

On Thursday, Bloomberg Law reported that MyPillow CEO and pro-Trump election conspiracy theorist Mike Lindell and his attorneys face sanctions for a “frivolous” lawsuit seeking to overturn the 2020 presidential election.

The decision was handed down by federal judge Carl Nichols, an appointee of former President Donald Trump.

“A federal judge in Washington on Thursday imposed sanctions on Lindell and his former lawyers as part of a decision throwing out the CEO’s defamation lawsuits against Dominion Voting Systems Inc. and Smartmatic Corp., which were falsely placed at the center of a vast conspiracy theory after the election,” said the report.

“Lindell, an outspoken supporter of former President Donald Trump, filed his suit after the companies sued him for defamation over his election-fraud claims,” said the report. “Nichols said the CEO failed to properly allege a conspiracy by the two companies or back up his claim that they defamed him. The judge also partially granted Smartmatic’s motion for sanctions and fees. The amount will be decided later.”

Lindell has repeatedly claimed, with no evidence, that he is on the verge of “reinstating” Trump to office with his legal actions.

“The CEO claimed in his suit that Dominion and Smartmatic ‘weaponized’ the courts in an act of ‘lawfare’ to silence him,” the report noted. “Lindell has said all the evidence of the conspiracy he alleges is on his website and that the Supreme Court will eventually expose it and rule in his favor.”

Election expert: Trump is about to get “embarrassed” in GOP primaries — and not just in Georgia

On CNN Friday, elections analyst Harry Enten said that former President Donald Trump is likely to be “embarrassed” by the results out of Georgia in next week’s primary.

The election will pit an incumbent governor against a Trump-backed challenger — who is likely to crash and burn, and even Trump appears to be bracing for it.

“We’re a few days from some big primaries including in Georgia, where the former President Donald Trump has worked hard, really hard, to defeat incumbent Republican Governor Brian Kemp,” said anchor John Berman. “So how is that going for him, Harry?”

“He’s about to probably get embarrassed, John,” said Enten. “So, look, this is a new Fox News poll that was released on Wednesday night. You need 50 percent of the vote plus one to avoid a runoff. And look at where Brian Kemp is. He’s at 60 percent. He’s at 32 points ahead of David Perdue. Look at where we were in March, folks. Brian Kemp was at 50 percent. David Perdue 11 points back. In that two-month period, David Perdue has basically fallen to the ground… Brian Kemp, the very clear favorite ahead of that primary on Tuesday.”

“And just to be clear, David Perdue is the candidate that Donald Trump very publicly endorsed; Brian Kemp, the candidate Donald Trump very publicly wants to defeat,” said Berman. “There are other races on Tuesday you’re watching also. There may be some — the possibility of tough results for Trump there as well.”

“Yeah, I mean, one of these is in Alabama,” said Enten. “Mo Brooks, remember Donald Trump endorsed him originally and then withdrew that endorsement and it was because he didn’t want to get behind a loser. When he withdrew that endorsement in March, Brooks… was behind by ten. Look what happened in that two-month period. Without Trump support, Brooks has gone up. Now you have this possibility not only in Georgia, where you see David Perdue going down, you have this possibility in Alabama where Trump’s old candidate does well without him. I think Tuesday could be one of those more embarrassing days for Donald Trump.”

Watch the video below or at this link.

CPAC goes to Hungary — and conservatives go there on abortion bans and “great replacement” theory

The Conservative Political Action Committee is meeting in Budapest, Hungary this week and it started off with a bang. It may not feature any of the usual folks dressed in tricorn hats and white wigs annually observed at CPAC’s stateside gathering — and I don’t think they have a gold Trump Idol on hand — but CPAC Hungary may have something even better: Hungarian president Viktor Orban.

He opened the conference with this powerful call to arms:

Conservatives in Europe and the United States must fight together to “reconquer” institutions in Washington and Brussels from liberals who threaten Western civilisation ahead of votes in 2024, Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor Orban said on Thursday.

“Progressive liberals, neo-Marxists dazed by the woke dream, people financed by George Soros and promoters of open societies … want to annihilate the Western way of life that you and us love so much,” Orban told the conference. “We must coordinate the movement of our troops as we face a big test, 2024 will be a decisive year,” he said.

It’s not entirely clear what Orban meant by “troops” but it’s obvious that he believes their movement is global and that they must join forces to fight their common enemy. You’ll note that while he normally rails against immigrants polluting their Great White culture, he is now equally focused on “progressive liberals, Neo-Marxists and promoters of open societies.” Orban has declared a World Culture War and he is the leader who is showing the way forward.

The next step in curbing the Great Replacement is forced childbirth.

The last time we talked about Viktor Orban, when he hosted Fox News personality Tucker Carlson for a week of shows extolling the virtues of Hungary’s white nationalism, it wasn’t entirely clear if he would be able to retain his seat in the next election. There seemed to be a strong opposition against him and there was some hope that he would be vanquished. Sadly, Orban’s policies of dominating the media and manipulating elections in his favor worked perfectly and he was “re-elected” in a landslide last month. He is now clearly feeling his oats.

RELATED: CPAC Hungary, Day 1: Conservatives embrace plan for “vast right-wing conspiracy”

Orban took the oath of office just last Monday and gave a speech obviously geared to the American right. His message is one that you may have heard quite a bit about recently:

“Part of the picture of the decade of war facing us will be recurring waves of suicidal policy in the Western world. One such suicide attempt that I see is the great European population replacement program, which seeks to replace the missing European Christian children with migrants, with adults arriving from other civilizations,” 

That’s right, Orban is the world’s most important proponent of the so-called great replacement theory, the motivating philosophy for the shooter who gunned down 13 people in Buffalo New York last weekend, 11 of whom were Black. That mass murderer would no doubt have been one of the “troops” Orban says must be coordinated for action in 2024. He just made his move too early.

But Orban wasn’t reacting to that horrible event. He’s been pushing the great replacement for many years. And he’s turned it into policy which right-wingers across the globe are watching very carefully. Aside from attacks on democracy and a free press, his Christian Nationalist values translate into a crusade against LGBTQ citizens and immigrants, as well as a strong push to make women give birth to as many children as humanly possible. All of this is in service of preserving Hungary’s cultural purity, which Orban believes is under assault from modern cultural forces.


Want a daily wrap-up of all the news and commentary Salon has to offer? Subscribe to our morning newsletter, Crash Course.


At the center of Orban’s “great replacement” program is an obsession with birth rates. In a speech a few years back to the right-wing “World Congress of Families” (headed by Brian Brown, known for his crusade against marriage equality here in the U.S.), Orban laid out his vision:

Our homeland, our common homeland, Europe, is standing to lose in the population contest of the big civilizations. It’s important to say that it’s a national interest to restore natural reproduction. Not one interest among others — but the only one. It’s a European interest too. It is the European interest.”

This at least partly explains his antagonism to LGBTQ rights. Of course, he believes that it is a deviant lifestyle but when Orban says that “gender ideology” is a threat, it’s largely because he believes that same-sex couples are “non-procreative” and therefore fail to advance the cause. 

Abortion is the one issue in which the U.S. is about to become the global leader of the far-right white nationalist movement.

Meanwhile, Orban has instituted many policies encouraging Hungarian women to have many children but interestingly has not yet banned abortion, although they do make it as unpleasant as possible. That’s one issue in which the U.S. is about to become the global leader of the far-right white nationalist movement. The next step in curbing the Great Replacement is forced childbirth.

RELATED: Right’s desperate Putin pivot: CPAC derailed by Ukraine invasion, struggles to blame “wokeness”

None other than CPAC’s Chairman Matt Schlapp made it explicit in an interview with Vice from Budapest on Thursday:

“Roe v. Wade is being adjudicated at the Supreme Court right now, for people that believe that we somehow need to replace populations or bring in new workers, I think it is an appropriate first step to give the…enshrinement in law the right to life for our own unborn children,” he said…

“If you say there is a population problem in a country, but you’re killing millions of your own people through legalized abortion every year, if that were to be reduced, some of that problem is solved,” Schlapp said. “You have millions of people who can take many of these jobs. How come no one brings that up? If you’re worried about this quote-unquote replacement, why don’t we start there? Start with allowing our own people to live.”

Asked again if he agreed with Orban’s comments about European countries “committing suicide” by embracing immigration, Schlapp said: “I think Orban is skeptical of their solution, and I think in America we have a solution that could be right around the corner.” 

That’s some good old American problem solving for you. The solution to the great replacement, then, is to simply force women to give birth against their will. Someone wrote a book about that a while ago. Everyone said it was a dystopian science fiction novel. It appears that it was actually a premonition. 

Madison Cawthorn threatens “Dark MAGA” revenge and end of “gentile politics” after election loss

Rep. Madison Cawthorn, R-N.C., on Thursday called for “Dark MAGA” forces to take revenge on establishment Republicans after his primary loss on Tuesday.

Cawthorn narrowly lost his Republican primary to state Sen. Chuck Edwards on Tuesday after an aggressive attack campaign by Democrats and Republicans alike. Prominent Republicans like Sen. Thom Tillis, R-N.C., campaigned against him and the freshman congressman faced mounting scandals — from his claims of cocaine-fueled congressional orgies to repeated citations for trying to bring a gun on flights to repeatedly getting caught driving with a suspended license to nude videos and photos of him wearing lingerie that were leaked to the press.

Cawthorn posted a list of people who supported him when the “establishment turned their guns on me.” The list included former President Donald Trump, who pleaded for voters to give Cawthorn a “second chance” despite “some foolish mistakes,” as well as Reps. Marjorie Taylor Greene, R-Ga., Matt Gaetz, R-Fla., Paul Gosar, R-Ariz., and Sen. Rand Paul, R-Ky., as well as others that Cawthorn said “came to my defense when it was not politically profitable.”

RELATED: Madison Cawthorn’s scandalous freshman term: 12 controversial moments since joining Congress

Cawthorn wrote that following his election loss he is “on a mission now to expose those who say and promise one thing yet legislate and work towards another, self-profiteering, globalist goal.”

“The time for gentile politics as usual has come to an end,” Cawthorn wrote, before editing the post to say “genteel politics.”

“It’s time for the rise of the new right, it’s time for Dark MAGA to truly take command,” he wrote. “We have an enemy to defeat, but we will never be able to defeat them until we defeat the cowardly and weak members of our own party. Their days are numbered. We are coming.”

Cawthorn’s “dark MAGA” reference was widely mocked, even among his own party.

“It’s like a MAGA hero who works in the shadows at night to fight crime in Gotham,” a senior Republican lawmaker joked to Politico.

But journalists who have tracked the far-right movement cautioned that “dark MAGA” has been a “growing concept among very online Trump supporters.”

“Basically it means you stole the election from us, NOW we’re going to be bad,” tweeted Daily Beast reporter Will Sommer.

Dark MAGA is a “post-alt-right aesthetic that promotes an authoritarian version of Trump in dystopian, Terminator-like images,” Newsweek reported last month. “Many of the messages posted by Dark MAGA supporters incite violence and contain misogynistic and/or racist comments.”

The movement has a “heavy victim mentality,” Alice Marwick, a University of North Carolina professor and researcher at the Center for Information, Technology Public Life, told the outlet.

“The general messaging that the Democrats are evil, that children are under threat, that people may need to take extreme acts, even political violence to protect their children and their values, I think is consistent across the (far-right) spectrum,” she said, adding that much of the rhetoric is about how “these evil people will get their comeuppance.”

The movement often uses memes to launder white nationalist and neo-Nazi imagery, Insider reported. Researcher Caroline Orr Bueno told the outlet that the movement is “inspired by accelerationist/neo-Nazi movements and iconography.”

Greene has been particularly active in engaging with and amplifying Dark MAGA supporters and helping to bring the fringe movement into the mainstream, Tim Squirrell of the Institute for Strategic Dialogue, a think tank that tracks extremism, told Insider.

“Marjorie Taylor Greene has a history of – I guess the technical term for it is shitposting – saying really provocative stuff as a mechanism for gaining attention for riling up the ‘libs,’ for dividing opinion amongst the MAGA caucus,” Squirrel explained. But the memes are “cloaked in five layers of irony” so “if you point it out, you always run the risk of people saying, ‘well, that’s not what I’m doing, you shouldn’t take this so seriously, what’s wrong with you?’ But it’s a serious movement. It has serious people behind it. It has serious money behind it.”

Researchers are increasingly worried that Dark MAGA could further radicalize an already radical movement.

“Anything which attempts to legitimize political violence,” Squirrell said. “which attempts to say that Trump should take no prisoners and that he should be engaging in quite Machiavellian action is dangerous.”

Read more:

Who has to get shot in America before we do something about guns?

If I ever had a chance to address Congress, I’d walk right onto the main floor of the Capitol Building, preferably during a joint session, and ask who must get shot in America before we do something about gun control? Really, who? 

Tens of thousands of people die from gun-related injuries in America every year. The number was 45,222 in 2020, according to the Pew Research Center. How can policymakers say they love America when they continue to allow this to happen? These jokers on the local level who are quick to ban books wouldn’t dream of working to ban assault weapons.

RELATED: For too many Americans, guns are tied to masculinity, patriotism and white power

I follow a terrible Instagram account: @murder_ink_bmore. The theme of the account is perfectly captured by its username­­: It’s a feed full of posts about murders, RIP remembrances, and occasionally people advertising their real estate companies or homemade haircare products. Every week I think about unfollowing it, but it’s almost the fastest way to keep tabs on the death toll in my city.

Sometimes I recognize the victims; they’re people I grew up with, people I knew personally, people I taught in their high schools and colleges.

Baltimore has been surpassing 300 murders per year, mostly young Black males, though the number of young Black women is rising every year. Sometimes I recognize the victims; they’re people I grew up with, people I knew personally, people I taught in their high schools and colleges. Sometimes they’re people I’ve seen buying my books, posting about my work and readings and events. Murder_ink_bmore is probably the most depressing account in the history of social media. But I’m not alone in following them; 150,000 people keep tabs on the account, just like me.

Last weekend, the account posted a photo of a clean-cut young man, sharply dressed in a suit and bow tie. At first glance, I thought this was a positive post for a change — maybe a local company advertising formal apparel — until I caught the caption: “Teen fatally shot after prom may have been robbed for his watch and sneakers.”  

RELATED: Why did gun violence go up during the pandemic?

The victim was a 17-year-old boxer named Jasmine Brunson Jr. His family said he had just attended his junior Prom and was at an after-party when gunshots rang, taking away his young life. 

I hurt for the victim, I hurt for the perpetrator, and mostly I hurt for the family.

The post had a second slide, so I swiped to see Brunson’s family celebrating him on his way to the dance, posing and taking pictures on the front porch under a two-toned balloon arch. That video made my heart sink. Not in a new way. It’s the same way I feel every time I learn of a person losing their life to a senseless act of violence. I hurt for the victim, I hurt for the perpetrator, and mostly I hurt for the family, as I know they will have to relive that night over and over again for the rest of their lives. 

“He was a light. He has lots of hopes and dreams for himself,” the family said in a statement. “He was a believer. He had a younger sister, and he was an awesome big brother. He was an awesome, well-rounded kid.”

I texted a friend the link to the post. He replied “SMH, I hate this f***in town,” before sending me another post from Thursday about a 38-year-old woman gunned down in east Baltimore. She was seven months pregnant. Her name was Angel Morgan Heather Smith. The doctors were able to deliver the baby; however, the child remains in critical condition. 

I couldn’t process Brunson’s or Smith’s killings. We shouldn’t have to. It’s not normal. Even if I had tried to make sense of it, I didn’t have time, because the news of the Buffalo massacre instantly followed. 

The suspect — Payton S. Gendron, 18, of Conklin, New York — is in custody and has been indicted in connection with this mass shooting. The authorities say he drove several hours from his home to a Tops Friendly supermarket in Buffalo, where he allegedly shot and killed 10 people and injured three. He has pleaded not guilty to first-degree murder charges. The shooting is also being investigated for possible federal hate crime charges. 

RELATED: Biden’s missed opportunity in Buffalo: He needs to tell white people the truth

A lengthy manifesto said to have been posted online by Gendron declares Buffalo the target site because of its Black population, echoes “Great Replacement” antisemitic and white supremacist views, and makes apparent a goal was to kill as many Black people as possible. Many of the victims were elderly. 

Shortly after the killings, the NRA tweeted, “Disarming law-abiding citizens and making good people helpless will not make bad people harmless.”

A retired police officer working as a security guard at the store, whom authorities say tried to stop the shooting, was among those killed. I can’t help but wonder if whoever is responsible for the NRA’s social media would have felt comfortable sending off that tweet if one of their family members had been shot and killed while they were out trying to buy groceries.

The scariest part of that bloody weekend is our collective numbness.

On the same day as the Buffalo shooting, on the other side of the country, a gunman opened fire on a Taiwanese church gathering, killing one and wounding five. 

The scariest part of that bloody weekend is our collective numbness. The families will suffer, but for the rest of us, our daily responsibilities — and our need to avoid confronting the crisis we are in — force us to keep pushing on as if this is all normal. We have deadlines. We have a workweek to get ready for. And then there’s the NBA finals, the new “Dr. Strange” movie and “Honey, you want takeout?” All of this pushes us back out of the reality that these headlines remind us of: We live in a country where people kill people just because they can, and the tools needed to do so are often readily available and, for the most part, easy to obtain. It keeps happening, over and over, and we just keep on keeping on — not because we don’t care, but because enough people in power don’t.

What does the perfect victim look like, whose death could wake America up to its gun violence crisis and force us to find a solution? We know it’s not Black teens at a Prom afterparty or Black grocery shoppers. We know it’s not elementary school children, college students or country music lovers. We know it’s not church or synagogue members, Walmart shoppers, subway commuters or “Batman” fans. It’s not even politicians. So who is it? Who has to get shot in America before we do something?

More stories about gun violence and gun control: 

NYC wants more rooftop solar. Its fire code is getting in the way

In 2014, former Mayor Bill de Blasio’s office announced an ambitious new climate target: 80 percent fewer emissions city wide by 2050. In order to reach that goal, the city aims to install 1,000 megawatts of solar technology within the five boroughs by 2030, enough to supply 250,000 homes with electricity. 

But New York City has fallen behind. As of April, it had only installed 333 megawatts of solar — less than half of the solar capacity it aims to achieve by the end of this decade. NYC has a 70 megawatt solar gap to close this year alone in order to fulfill its 2030 goal. 

A number of regulatory hurdles stand in the way of the city making progress on its climate ambitions. One of those obstacles can be found in a surprising place: New York City’s fire and building codes. 

In a city as densely populated as New York, rooftops play an essential role in deploying renewable energy. Without rooftop solar, the city can’t install enough solar capacity to meet its climate goal. City leaders know this — as of 2019, the city requires all new buildings and major renovations of existing buildings to include either solar panels or a green roof system. But putting a solar installation on every rooftop in the city isn’t easy — and especially on the rooftops of existing buildings. Solar panels are clunky objects that have to share space with bulkheads — structures on roofs that cover water tanks, shafts, or service equipment — mechanical equipment, stairways, railings, emergency pathways and exits, and more. 

The New York City Fire Department’s, or FDNY’s, fire code seeks to balance the long list of items, including solar panels, on NYC’s rooftops with the agency’s primary firefighting efforts. Firefighters often access rooftops to vent smoke from burning structures, perform rescue operations, and put out fires before they spread to neighboring buildings, and they need clear paths to do it. 

The code “balances requirements that are fair to all industries, while also maintaining safety,” a spokesperson for the FDNY told Grist. But solar industry experts say the FDNY’s code, one of the strictest in the nation, isn’t fair to solar companies and sidelines the city’s goal of reaching 1,000 megawatts of solar capacity by 2030 by unnecessarily squeezing the amount of panels that can go on a rooftop. “They’re constantly trying to encroach on the usable rooftop,” T.R. Ludwig, CEO of an NYC-based solar company called Brooklyn Solarworks, told Grist. 

A revision to the fire code that took place at the end of last year is at the heart of New York’s solar industry’s beef with the FDNY. In December 2021, after seeking input from the public and various industries within the city, the FDNY revised its 2014 fire code, and the city council voted to approve it. The updated code said that new buildings constructed in New York City would have to comply with even stricter safety requirements around rooftop solar — more access pathways around panels and railings around rooftops that have solar on them. Ludwig, the CEO of Brooklyn Solarworks, wasn’t thrilled about the change. “But we kind of gave in on that particular point,” he said, “if it was new construction.” 

Pretty soon, however, Ludwig noticed that the FDNY’s rooftop enforcement unit, a different unit from the one that had written the initial revision to the code, had interpreted the revision differently. It appeared as though that unit saw the code as requiring all buildings, not just new ones, to adhere to the updated safety requirements. The Department of Buildings, the agency that approves or denies building permits in the city based, in part, on whether a given work permit adheres to the fire code, seemed to interpret the FDNY’s revisions in a similar way and, in addition, now viewed solar panels as “serviceable equipment.” That triggers a new set of requirements for railings around the installations, which further squeeze the amount of rooftop space and cast shadows on the panels, making them less efficient. All of a sudden, Brooklyn Solarworks’ plan sets for solar installations on existing buildings, plans that Ludwig says would have likely had no problem getting the green light before the revision to the fire code, started getting rejected.

Ludwig provided Grist with 13 examples of new Brooklyn Solarworks installations on existing buildings that had failed to pass inspection because they didn’t comply with the revision to the fire code. “There’s been no communication with the industry. There’s been no public forum,” he said. “One decision has been made that’s going to cause a pretty serious ripple effect on solar system sizes, solar system production, and the cost.” 

Ludwig estimates that adding more pathways and railings around solar installations, in line with what the fire code and the Department of Buildings have been calling for, adds between $5,000 and $8,000 to the cost of a given project — a cost increase of between 10 and 20 percent. “That just seems counter to what New York City is striving for in terms of renewable energy deployment,” Ludwig said.

The FDNY sees things differently. “The FDNY’s Code dealing with Rooftop Access requirements is not and has never been retroactive,” the FDNY spokesperson said. “Rooftops existing in a legal state prior to the enactment of the 2022 code do not have to be brought into full compliance with the new requirements unless work is being done.” The problem is that the FDNY now sees solar panel installation as “work,” and the solar industry does not. “That’s really the crux of it there,” Ludwig said. “If there’s a new building or someone is tearing off the top level of a building and putting in a roofdeck with a building permit, then sure. But the fact that they’re coming back and saying solar is part of this, that’s not what we agreed on.” 

The FDNY spokesperson told Grist that “ALL work done on a rooftop that doesn’t fall under the category of repairs” triggers the new code requirements. As far as Ludwig is concerned, that contradicts what the industry understood the new code to mean when it was passed. “We do feel burned,” he said. 

There is a way around the new requirements. Companies can apply for a variance — a permit from the FDNY that allows a rooftop project to skirt a fire code requirement. Veronica Ciechowska Polanco, a project manager at commercial real estate inspection company Burnham who often applies for solar permits for commercial and residential buildings, said that when she runs into an issue with the fire code, she applies for a variance. “That’s just another additional application with FDNY that they kind of treat case by case,” she said. Ludwig pointed out that applying for a variance costs $420 and can add weeks to a process that’s already complex and time-consuming. Plus, in his experience, the FDNY hasn’t been amenable to variances around making access pathways narrower or eliminating railings in his experience. “What we’ve seen is they’re not terribly open to variances,” he said. 

Ludwig’s frustration with the FDNY’s fire code illuminates an underrated challenge in the city’s quest to decarbonize: NYC’s efforts to equip rooftops with solar panels are being slowed not by technological feasibility or even a lack of climate ambition on the part of city government. The issue comes down to a somewhat mundane conversation about how code should be interpreted. On one side, you have the city’s solar industry, which believes the code should encourage solar installation, not hamper it. On the other, the FDNY maintains that the fire code’s chief priority is to protect the public and its firefighters. 

“When you talk to anyone at any of these agencies, what they say is they’re very supportive of clean energy and climate goals,” Joe Lipari, who oversees permitting for rooftop solar installations at Brooklyn Solarworks, told Grist. “But the devil’s really in the details. There are bureaucratic hurdles they’ve proposed that introduce significant challenges that, frankly at this point in the climate crisis, I don’t think anyone needs to be dealing with.”  

Ben Furnas, who served as director of the New York City Mayor’s Office of Climate and Sustainability under de Blasio, told Grist that the task of balancing those two priorities doesn’t necessarily fall on solar companies or the FDNY; it should be shouldered by the elected officials who are responsible for meeting the city’s climate goal. Right now, that means both the city council and the administration of Eric Adams, who was sworn in as mayor in January and who oversees both the FDNY and the Department of Buildings. 

“I think this is an opportunity for folks in the administration now to be making sure that the fire code and the building code are aligned with the imperative of confronting climate change, recognizing that these aren’t easy tradeoffs,” Furnas said. “These are really serious issues with really important goals you’re trying to achieve on both sides and balancing it is sort of the job of elected officials and folks in government.” 

Balancing public safety and climate action was something Furnas focused on during his time in the de Blasio administration. “We carried the torch for the city’s solar goals,” he said. Adams will have to do the same if the city is to meet its targets. “The fire code is just a piece of legislation,” Furnas said, and the city council “is well within their rights to make adjustments based on what they see as the appropriate way of balancing these different things. And I think similarly, the mayor and folks in the mayor’s office can be striking this balance.”

The mayor’s office seems to have taken some of the criticism into consideration. In response to a request for comment from Grist, Rachel Finkelstein, a senior policy advisor for the NYC Mayor’s Office of Climate and Environmental Justice, which oversees the city’s climate change efforts, said that the Department of Buildings has reconsidered its view of solar panels as serviceable equipment. “After conversations with stakeholders,” Finkelstein said, the Department of Buildings “no longer interprets this section of Code as requiring railings for solar installations.” The fire code remains unchanged.

Jessica Reznicek set fire to Dakota Access Pipeline construction. Is she a terrorist?

On election night in 2016, Jessica Reznicek and Ruby Montoya set fire to a bulldozer and construction equipment at a Dakota Access Pipeline construction site in Iowa. Over the next few months, the activists used oxy-acetylene torches to melt holes in pipeline valves at three other locations in the state. It was at the height of the Indigenous-led protests against the 1,172-mile-long pipeline, which opponents like the Standing Rock Sioux tribe argued would pollute local water sources and contaminate soil. When Reznicek and Montoya’s actions failed to halt pipeline construction, they held a press conference and publicly took responsibility for their actions. 

The two women were subsequently indicted on nine felony counts of intentionally damaging energy infrastructure, and Reznicek ultimately pled guilty to one count of conspiracy to damage an energy facility. She was sentenced to eight years in prison by a district court in Iowa last year. 

Reznicek is now appealing her sentence. Before an Iowa appellate court last week, her attorneys argued that the district court had inappropriately decided that her actions constituted a federal crime of terrorism and applied a “terrorism enhancement” to her sentence. Had the enhancement not been applied, sentencing guidelines would’ve capped her prison term at a little under four years. 

Over the last few years, penalties for protesting pipelines and other fossil fuel infrastructure have increased dramatically. At the federal level, a provision of the 2001 Patriot Act, the national security law passed in the wake of 9/11, makes damaging energy infrastructure a federal crime.

And at the state level, in part responding to the protests against the Dakota Access Pipeline, lawmakers in at least 17 states have passed legislation to increase jail terms and monetary penalties for offenses such as vandalizing and tampering with so-called critical infrastructure. In recent years, nonviolent climate protesters have been charged with trespassingtheft, and terrorism.

At issue in Reznicek’s case is whether her conduct was “calculated to influence or affect the conduct of government by intimidation or coercion, or to retaliate against government conduct.” Prosecutors in the case argued that Reznicek’s conduct fit this description because she held a press conference in front of the Iowa Utilities Board office and used a crowbar to dismantle an Iowa Utilities sign.  

“They were trying to say to the government, ‘If you do this kind of thing, we’re going to go out there and take the law into our own hands and end the pipeline one way or the other,'” the government prosecutor said at the hearing. “That is incredibly dangerous and exactly what this enhancement is designed to stop.”

Robert Richman, Reznicek’s attorney, argued that her actions did not target the Iowa Utilities Board and that her statements and actions did not indicate she tried to “influence” or “retaliate” against the agency. “There’s no question that Ms. Reznicek was unhappy with the decision of the Utility Board to allow the pipeline, but the damage to private property was calculated to stop the pipeline, not to punish the board,” he said.

In a 2021 statement to the court, Reznicek, who has long been associated with the Catholic Worker Movement, which promotes a social-justice oriented interpretation of Catholicism, said she is “not a political person” and “certainly not a terrorist.”

“I am simply a person who cares deeply about an extremely basic human right that is under threat: Water,” she wrote.

The appellate court is expected to issue a ruling in the coming weeks. 

The “Joe Manchin of the House” bites the dust: Corporate Democrats keep falling, one by one

Three years ago, we helped write a report for RootsAction.org targeting 15 corporate Democrats in Congress who deserved to be primaried. We called the report “Bad Blues.” A common reaction back then was that those establishment politicians were too strong and entrenched to be defeated.

On Tuesday, yet another “Bad Blue” apparently went down to defeat — with Rep. Kurt Schrader of Oregon, a seven-term incumbent, running way behind community activist Jamie McLeod-Skinner in the slowly tallied Democratic primary.

Schrader is not the first “Bad Blue” on our list to face defeat by a progressive challenger. And he’s unlikely to be the last. 

He heavily outspent McLeod-Skinner — thanks to lavish funding from Big Pharma and other corporate PACs — but was out-organized on the ground. McLeod-Skinner called him “the Joe Manchin of the House.”

The current vote count indicates that constituents in that district south of Portland will no longer be represented by a Democrat who obstructs progressive initiatives on Capitol Hill, such as drug pricing reform and Build Back Better. (Despite his history of blocking key Democratic priorities, Schrader was endorsed in the primary by both President Biden and House Speaker Nancy Pelosi.)

RELATED: Centrist Conor Lamb loses by 30 points despite Joe Manchin’s endorsement and millions from Wall St.

Next Tuesday in South Texas, Rep. Henry Cuellar — who is now the only remaining anti-abortion House Democrat — may be ousted in a Democratic primary runoff by Jessica Cisneros, a progressive immigrants’ rights lawyer. As we wrote in our 2019 “Bad Blues” report, Cuellar is so corporate that he gets funding from the Republican-allied Koch Industries PAC.

But it’s not just Koch Industries that supports Cuellar against Cisneros. It’s also Pelosi. And that’s the crux of the problem — a blue wall of corruption and incumbency. 

Bad Blues in the House rely on support from old-line Democratic leaders like Pelosi and House Majority Whip Jim Clyburn, D-S.C., along with cash from corporate PACs that fund the leadership of both political parties.

The good news is that Bad Blues are being ousted by progressives who rely on small donors and support from grassroots activists.

Nancy Pelosi is sticking with the anti-choice Henry Cuellar — even after the FBI raided his home and after the leaked Supreme Court opinion that will end Roe v. Wade.

Pelosi reaffirmed her endorsement of Cuellar against Cisneros even after the FBI raided Cuellar’s home and campaign headquarters last January as part of a corruption probe. Then she doubled down on her endorsement of the anti-choice incumbent just days ago, even after the Supreme Court draft opinion overturning Roe v. Wade was leaked. Meanwhile, as the No. 3 House Democrat, Clyburn recently campaigned in Texas for Cuellar against Cisneros.

It’s worth remembering — and might serve as a source of inspiration — that the top of the blue wall of corruption is getting weaker all the time. The Democratic House leadership trio — Pelosi, Bad Blue Steny Hoyer of Maryland and Clyburn — are aged 82, 82 and 81 respectively. Well-funded by corporate interests, they serve the status quo. Running on an aggressive change agenda (Green New Deal, Medicare for All, and so on), the grassroots-funded Jessica Cisneros is not yet 30. 


Want a daily wrap-up of all the news and commentary Salon has to offer? Subscribe to our morning newsletter, Crash Course.


Of the 15 Bad Blues we identified in 2019, two have chosen to retire from Congress, and two were primaried and defeated in 2020. Democrat-in-name-only Dan Lipinski was defeated in Chicago’s Southwest Side and the neighboring suburbs by liberal activist Marie Newman. And then, in one of the most stunning upsets in recent U.S. politics, 16-term Rep. Eliot Engel from New York — the hawkish chair of the House Foreign Affairs Committee — was ousted from Congress by educator Jamaal Bowman, who promptly joined the progressive “Squad.”

Bowman, who was recruited as a candidate by Justice Democrats, won that seat largely thanks to a grassroots campaign that involved activists from many groups, including the Working Families Party and Democratic Socialists of America. 

On his path to Washington, Bowman owed no favors to big donors or to the status-quo Democratic leadership. He arrived in Washington ready to fight for the progressive reforms needed by his working-class constituents in the Bronx and Westchester.

Jamie McLeod-Skinner, as the replacement for Bad Blue Kurt Schrader in Oregon, would not be beholden to any of the many corporate PACs that supported him.

And if Jessica Cisneros can defeat Cuellar on Tuesday in South Texas, she’ll be ready to fight for the interests of her working-class district. 

And the rest of us will have gained two new congresswomen who are helping chip away at the blue wall of corruption.

Read more on the Democrats’ chances in the midterms:

CPAC Hungary, Day 1: Conservatives embrace plan for “vast right-wing conspiracy”

On Thursday morning in Budapest, the first Conservative Political Action Conference (CPAC) to be held in Europe began with a flourish. Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor Orbán delivered the opening keynote address, laying out a 12-point “open source” plan for right-wing advocates around the world to replicate the “Christian conservative success” of his nation. Hungary, said Orbán, “is the laboratory where we have come up with the antidote to progressive dominance.”  

One key ingredient of this “antidote,” Orbán said, was that conservatives must decide to “play by our own rules.” He also advocated the values of “national conservatism” (a central theme on the right these days —more on that tomorrow); a foreign policy based on national interests — a clear reference to the criticism Hungary has received for its tepid and uncertain condemnation of Russia’s war on Ukraine; and preemptively “expos[ing] the intent of your enemy,” a defense of Hungary’s “don’t say gay” law barring minors from accessing LGBTQ books or other content. In a tribute to CPAC itself, he also called for building institutions that can pass on conservative principles and crafting alliances with other right-wing actors around the world. 

RELATED: Right’s desperate Putin pivot: CPAC derailed by Ukraine invasion, struggles to blame “wokeness”

For the past several years, Hungary has increasingly taken on the dimension of a right-wing utopia among American conservatives, particularly as a number of movement intellectuals and media figures have made pilgrimage to Budapest on academic and think tank fellowships or thanks to speaking invitations. (In a recent Salon Talks conversation, Jordan Klepper of the “Daily Show” discussed his own visit to Hungary.) And while Orbán’s government has faced growing tensions with its European neighbors — in recent months, the EU has moved to sanction both Hungary and Poland for their illiberal policies on academic and press freedom, LGBTQ equality and women’s rights and judicial independence — it has basked in the admiration of U.S. conservatives and Republican leaders. 

That admiration didn’t seem to waver on Thursday as CPAC’s co-organizer for the event, the Hungarian Center for Fundamental Rights, apparently rejected the press credentials of numerous major U.S. media outlets that had sent reporters in person to cover the conference, including VICE, Rolling Stone, The New Yorker, Vox and others. 

That rejection was in keeping with another point in Orbán’s plan for “Christian conservative success”: that conservatives must “have your [own] media.” 


Want a daily wrap-up of all the news and commentary Salon has to offer? Subscribe to our morning newsletter, Crash Course.


“You can only present the stupidity of leftist progressives if you have the media to do it,” he said. Politics and media should, in theory, be separate, he admitted, but “the Democrats are not playing by these rules.” Given that, he said, the right needs more and more shows like that of “my friend Tucker Carlson” that could air “day and night, 24/7, as you say over there.” 

Orbán wasn’t the only speaker to vilify the media. In one particularly fiery speech, Gavin Wax, president of the New York Young Republicans’ Club, declared that America First conservatives “demand nothing short of an American Orbánism,” under which they “will establish a form of conservatism that sees the media as the enemy and actually conserves that we hold near and dear. Our national renewal will be preceded by a historic rebuke of not just the soulless Marxist elites of the left, but also the greedy, bloodthirsty neoconservatives and neoliberals of the right. They will be exposed, demonized and crushed beneath the waves of a rising tide of populism.” 

According to Ernst Roets of AfriForum, “there’s apartheid happening in South Africa” right now, but this time around, white Afrikaners are the victims of oppression.

While many of the first day’s speakers, predictably, targeted “wokeism” in general, one presenter took the theme to an audacious new level. Ernst Roets, deputy CEO of AfriForum, a right-wing South African organization primarily dedicated to spreading the claim that white South African farmers are the victims of an ongoing “white genocide,” argued, “There’s apartheid happening in South Africa” now, but this time around, it’s white Afrikaners who are victimized at the hands of Black citizens. In an offense-begging appropriation of terminology, he argued, “When the left implements apartheid, it’s not a crime against humanity; it’s a noble cause. And if you criticize their apartheid” — meaning the alleged oppression of white South Africans — “that somehow that makes you the racist… We’ve gotten to the point where if you’re against government overreach, that makes you a Nazi or if you do not want your heritage to be destroyed, that somehow somehow makes you authoritarian.” 

But perhaps the overarching theme of Day One was the call to build a unified international right, that would find strength enough in its common antipathy against the left to overcome whatever differences in doctrine or ideology it may have. 

István Kovács, the strategic director of Hungary’s Center for Fundamental Rights, which co-sponsored the event, declared, “Alone, Hungary is not sufficient. Alone, we’re doomed to failure against the opponents we’re talking about. We have to join forces and then we can win,” with everyone working together “in a coordinated manner.” He later added, “The cooperation of right-wing institutions, right-wing think tanks is one of the nightmares of the liberal elite.” 

Judit Varga, Hungary’s minister of Justice who, at a right-wing conference in Brussels this February, defended her government’s near-total ban on Muslim immigration and its restrictions of LGBTQ rights, also called for a united front. “However brave we are,” she said, Hungary’s 10 million people alone “are not sufficient. This is why we want to build alliances to attract the like-minded and to strengthen voices that fear for their nation and homeland. … This is why we’re grateful you came to Budapest to give us further spiritual ammunition and so that you can also have takeaways when you go home to strengthen your own mission. Dear friends, the future is ours.” 

Orbán himself said, “We have to stand up for this fight, and in this fight we can only be successful together.” He went on, “We need to have allies in one another. We have to coordinate the movement of our troops because we are facing a big battle. 2024, he said” — with both a U.S. presidential election and European Parliament elections — “is going to be an all-important year.” 

“The left has been warning about the vast right-wing conspiracy for years,” added Alvino-Mario Fantini, editor in chief of the quarterly magazine European Conservative. “Well, let’s give it to them.” 

Read more from Kathryn Joyce on the global far right: