Spring Sale: Get 1 Year, Save 58%

Quincy Jones’ cause of death revealed: Legendary producer died of pancreatic cancer

Quincy Jones' cause of death has been revealed.

According to a death certificate obtained by TMZ, the legendary musician and producer passed away from pancreatic cancer. The celebrity news outlet reports that there were no other contributing factors to his death, per the document.

Jones was 91 years old when he passed away on November 3 at his home in Los Angeles. The 28-time Grammy winner left behind a host of legendary film scores, indelible compositions, and best-selling albums. In addition to his work on the soundtracks of "In The Heat of the Night" and "Roots," Jones produced three megasellers for Michael Jackson ("Bad," "Off The Wall" and "Thriller").

"With full but broken hearts, we must share the news of our father and brother Quincy Jones’ passing," Jones' family shared at the time of his passing. "Although this is an incredible loss for our family, we celebrate the great life that he lived and know there will never be another like him.”

Jones was laid to rest in a private ceremony earlier this month.

Jones found success in nearly every decade between the 1950s and the present day. Because of his omnipresence in Hollywood, Jones became a repository of gossip and anecdotes. In his later years, Jones became known for his free-wheeling interviews that dropped previously unreported tidbits about famous names like Marlon Brando and Richard Pryor.

In a controversial 2018 interview, Jones called President-elect Donald Trump a "megalomaniac."

“I used to hang out with him. He’s a crazy motherf***er," Jones told David Marchese. "Limited mentally – a megalomaniac, narcissistic. I can’t stand him.”

Exxon CEO wants Trump to stay in Paris climate accord

ExxonMobil CEO Darren Woods has a message for President-elect Donald Trump: Do not pull the United States out of the Paris climate accord. Speaking to The New York Times from a United Nations climate summit in Baku, Azerbaijan, Woods said that “we need a global system for managing global emissions. Trump and his administrations have talked about coming back into government and bringing common sense back into government. I think he could take the same approach in this space.”

While Trump consistently denies basic facts of climate science, such as that humanity’s greenhouse gas emissions are primarily responsible for global heating, Woods argued that he should instead create incentives for fossil fuel companies to transition to clean energy while still earning large profits.

“The government role is extremely important and one that they haven’t been successfully fulfilling, quite frankly,” Woods said, arguing that his company must balance its environmental responsibilities with earning profits for their shareholders. Woods has previously denied fossil fuel companies are primarily responsible for climate change, despite the overwhelming scientific evidence saying otherwise. Investigative reporting has also documented the repeated attempts of ExxonMobil lobbyists to water down U.S. climate policy.

In contrast to Woods’ advice, Trump promises to significantly cut funding for environmental regulatory agencies like the Environmental Protection Agency and National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. He has also pledged to fire thousands of civil servants unless they pledge to be loyal to him, as well as scrub references to climate change from government documents.

“As I stated before the election, a second Trump term, which includes implementation of Project 2025, is the end of climate action as we know it, this decade,” University of Pennsylvania climate scientist Dr. Michael E. Mann told Salon earlier this month. “And if Trump dismantles our democracy, as many fear will be the case, and the world’s greatest power, the U.S., becomes — in essence — a petrostate, it’s game over for climate action full stop for the foreseeable future, unless the rest of the world unites and takes bold action, including potentially the most punitive possible sanctions against the United States.”

Rachael Ray discusses being child-free with celebrity trainer Bob Harper — and how she adores dogs

Rachael Ray recently spoke about her life being child-free, and she seems thrilled with her choice to remain so. 

On the fourth episode of her new podcast, "I'll Sleep When I'm Dead" — featuring conversations with people discussing the concept of drive and what motivates successful, driven people — she spoke with Bob Harper, the "Biggest Loser" trainer, sharing that people "bashed [her] . . . over the decades" over her choice to never have children.

The episode — which was released on November 12 —  kicked off with a discussion on how deeply they love and care for their dogs — in which Harper shared, "I grew up during a time when it was very uncommon for queer people to have kids," noting that that's not really the case anymore. Harper and Ray both highlighted the unconditional love they share with their dogs, with Ray noting, "They never talk back and they always want to hug you . . . it's such a beautiful circle of love" and Harper saying that his dogs teach him unconditional love "on a daily basis."

Ray also adds that her dogs are "a ray of light" and help to brighten up those "dark days." She notes, "For me, if I have the absolute worst day or I'm sick as a dog — as the expression goes — the thing that makes me feel best is to go home and literally climb into bed under a blanket with my dog."

Harper also spoke about his work ethic, how his childhood inspired that work ethic ("I was getting up at 5:00 AM, on that farm, all day long, five days a week) and how that inspired and influenced his career as a trainer, both on and off "The Biggest Loser." 

“Champion for the Constitution”: Trump nominates Gaetz for attorney general

Donald Trump has nominated Florida congressman Matt Gaetz to head up his Department of Justice. 

The president-elect tapped the Republican representative from Chipley to serve as attorney general in his upcoming term in a post to Truth Social on Wednesday. 

“Few issues in America are more important than ending the partisan Weaponization of our Justice System,” Trump wrote. “Matt will end Weaponized Government, protect our Borders, dismantle Criminal Organizations and restore Americans’ badly-shattered Faith and Confidence in the Justice Department.”

Trump called Gaetz a "champion for the Constitution" and said that he would "root out the systemic corruption at [the] DOJ."

Allegations of misconduct have hung over the legislator from the Florida Panhandle for years, thanks in part to his association with convicted sex trafficker Joel Greenberg. Gaetz has denied any wrongdoing, and the Department of Justice declined to charge Gaetz with any crime following an investigation. The House Ethics Committee launched a probe into Gaetz's potential misconduct in 2021. That investigation is still ongoing, though Gaetz has stated publicly that he will no longer cooperate with the committee's inquiry.

Gaetz led the effort to oust former House Speaker Kevin McCarthy, and McCarthy said that Gaetz was motivated by the ongoing probe. 

“A member of Congress wanted me to stop an ethics complaint because he slept with a 17-year-old,” McCarthy said in April of the motivations behind the MAGA caucus revolt that led to Rep. Mike Johnson taking up the gavel. 

In a post to X, Gaetz said that it would be "an honor to serve" as Trump's attorney general.

 

“Every single word”: GOP Rep. Nehls promises to pass anything on Trump’s agenda

GOP lawmakers continue to give indications that they're ready to fall in line behind Donald Trump's administration. 

Following a meeting between Trump and congressional Republicans on Wednesday, Rep. Troy Nehls of Texas said he was ready to pass "every single word" of the president-elect's second-term agenda. 

"There's no question he's the leader of our party," Nehls shared with reporters. "His mission, his goals and objectives, whatever that is, we need to embrace it. All of it. Every single word." 

Nehls went on to joke about intraparty loyalty to Trump, saying the president-elect could lead a congressional Hokey Pokey with little to no objection. 

"If Donald Trump says 'Jump three feet high and scratch your heads,' we all jump three feet high and scratch our heads," he said. 

Nehls painted the symbiosis between the incoming White House and Congress more colorfully than South Dakota Senator John Thune, but the newly elected Senate majority leader was equally straightforward about the role of the legislature in 2025. 

“This Republican team is united. We are on one team. We are excited to reclaim the majority and to get to work with our colleagues in the House to enact President Trump’s agenda,” Thune said during his victory speech on Wednesday. "We will have an ambitious agenda, and it will take each and every Republican working together to be successful."

Trump, for his part, has been nominating allies for posts in the executive branch. He recently announced that billionaires Elon Musk and Vivek Ramaswamy would lead the not-yet-created Department of Government Efficiency.

Martha Stewart isn’t especially fond of Drew Barrymore’s “touchy-feely” interview style

Drew Barrymore is oft acknowledged as being a likable, endearing celebrity who we've watched on screen since her childhood roles in various classic movies, but her talk show hosting and interviewing style has often been joked about or called into question, with some even describing it as "cringey."

In the latest in a growing list of these particular moments, the typically staid and reserved Martha Stewart was clearly not thrilled by the close proximity and intimacy with which Barrymore conducted a recent interview. One particular moment is resonating across social media, in which Barrymore, already quite close to Stewart and touching her arms, asks her what makes her "soft and gooey," blasting past Stewart's comfort zone even further by offering the example: "When you're treated like a lady."

"Yeah, that's nice . . . you're the wrong gender," Stewart shoots back, before playfully shoving Barrymore off in an awkward moment that the host leans into by dramatically falling back on the couch. Both Barrymore and Stewart smiled and laughed it off as the crowd applauded, but it definitely seemed clear that Stewart wasn't especially fond of Barrymore's classic "touchy-feely" interviewing style that's become a go-to penchant on the show. 

Barrymore also received some backlash both last year and earlier this year in interviews with both Oprah Winfrey and Kamala Harris, both times due to her physical proximity to both women, as well as her referencing "Momala," which Salon's Senior Critic Melanie McFarland deemed "a cringefest" back in May.

Dogecoin surges as Trump announces DOGE, a government efficiency group

Dogecoin, a cryptocurrency with a dog mascot and Elon Musk as one of its most famous fans, has surged in value since Donald Trump won the presidential election and announced a new government group nicknamed DOGE.

One dogecoin that was worth less than 16 cents before Election Day has more than doubled to around 41.5 cents today, The Associated Press reported

On Tuesday, Trump named Musk as one of the leaders of the "Department of Government Efficiency," an outside group Trump said will advise his administration on "large scale structural reform," according to The Associated Press. Former GOP presidential candidate Vivek Ramaswamy is another Trump supporter who will lead the group, which is not a government agency. 

Dogecoin's value is similar to other cryptocurrencies and based on how much people will pay for it. Its fan base has sometimes sent its price soaring, and tried unsuccessfully in 2021 to get Dogecoin's value above $1, per The Associated Press.

Musk said in 2022 that Twitter should accept dogecoin as payment for subscriptions. In 2021, he appeared on an episode of "Saturday Night Live" as the "Dogefather."

Bitcoin also seen a surge after Trump embraced it during his campaign. The cryptocurrency rose above $93,000 for the first time on Wednesday, according to CNBC

But dogecoin has been one of the biggest winners since the election, CNBC reported, gaining more than 150% since Election Day compared with bitcoin’s 30% rise in the same time frame.

Trump and Biden agree to “smooth transition” at White House meeting

President-elect Donald Trump visited the White House on Wednesday for the first time since leaving office in 2021 to meet with President Joe Biden.

The two men sat in the Oval Office and shook hands, a somewhat disorienting image given their history of volatile public feuds. The meeting comes just a week after Trump defeated Vice President Kamala Harris in the 2024 U.S. presidential election.

Biden told Trump he is looking forward to a “smooth transition” come January, saying that his administration will do "everything we can to make sure you're accommodated."

“Thank you very much,” Trump responded. "Politics is tough, and it's, in many cases, not a very nice world but it is a nice world today," he said to Biden, who stepped down as the Democratic nominee in July. "And I appreciate it very much. A transition that’s so smooth, it'll be as smooth as it can get, and I very much appreciate that, Joe."

Biden and Trump posed briefly for photos but did not answer any questions. 

First Lady Jill Biden had also invited Melania Trump to the White House on Wednesday, but the latter did not travel to Washington with her husband, ABC News reported.

In 2020, Trump failed to offer Biden a similar meeting in the White House as he refused to accept the results of the 2020 election. That refusal eventually resulted in the attack on the U.S. Capitol on Jan. 6, 2021

Before meeting with Biden on Wednesday, Trump addressed House Republicans, who are on the verge of formally winning a House majority.

“Isn’t it nice to win? It’s nice to win. It’s always nice to win. A lot of good friends in this room,” Trump said on Capitol Hill. “So you know we had like historic kind of numbers. Especially for the president, but we won’t get into that. But the House did very well.”

New Republican Senate leader John Thune says the GOP is united behind “Trump’s agenda”

Republicans elected Sen. John Thune, R-S.D., to serve as majority leader in next Senate session, replacing current GOP caucus leader Sen. Mitch McConnell, R-Ky., with another institutionalist distrusted by the MAGA world — but one largely willing to cooperate with President-elect Donald Trump to keep the GOP in power and pass conservative policies.

The current Republican whip prevailed over former whip Sen. John Cornyn, R-Texas, and former National Republican Senatorial Committee chairman Sen. Rick Scott, R-Fla., in a closed-door secret vote held Wednesday. Prominent MAGA figures rallied behind Scott, who frequently clashed with McConnell and was the most vocally loyal to Trump of the three candidates, but that did Scott little good: He was knocked out of the first round of voting with only 13 votes. In the subsequent runoff, Thune received 29 votes to Cornyn's 24.

“I am extremely honored to have earned the support of my colleagues to lead the Senate in the 119th Congress, and I am beyond proud of the work we have done to secure our majority and the White House,” Thune told reporters after being elected. “This Republican team is united behind President Trump’s agenda, and our work starts today.”

Thune was first elected to the Senate in 2004 after unseating the Democratic minority leader at the time, former Sen. Tom Daschle. He, Cornyn and just five other GOP incumbents came to the Senate before McConnell took charge of the Republican conference in 2007.

Thune has pledged to carry out a more transparent leadership style compared to his predecessor and open the Senate floor to more debate and amendments. But, like McConnell, Thune has found himself on the receiving end of Trump's anger. In 2020, the then-president ripped into the South Dakota senator for declining to aid him in his attempt to overturn the election results.

"RINO John Thune, 'Mitch’s boy,' should just let it play out," Trump wrote on what was formerly known as Twitter. "South Dakota doesn’t like weakness. He will be primaried in 2022, political career over!!!"

But Thune, who did not face a significant primary challenge, has worked hard to mend fences. He paid homage to Trump at Mar-a-Lago this spring and on Monday asserted that he would support Trump's policy agenda just as he did during his first term in the White House.

"If we fail to deliver on President Trump’s priorities, we will lose" the support of the coalition that elected him for a second term,Thune wrote in a Fox News op-ed. “They have trusted us with their votes. Now we have to roll up our sleeves and get to work.”

Transformers, My Little Pony and Phase 10 inducted into to the Toy Hall of Fame

They're more than meets the eye! Transformers, My Little Pony and Phase 10 are considered some of the most impactful and memorable toys of all time.

The Strong National Museum of Play which is home to the National Toy Hall of Fame announced Tuesday, Nov. 12, that the three toys, Transformers, My Little Pony and Phase 10 are 2024's inductees into the Hall of Fame.

“These are three very deserving toys that showcase the wide range of how people play,” said Christopher Bensch, Vice President for Collections and Chief Curator of the museum. “But for My Little Pony, in particular, this year is extra validating. The beloved toy was a finalist seven times before finally crossing the finish line!”

The colorful horse toys with brushable manes and tails were first created in the '80s and had a revival in 2003. They've been a toy staple in households across the country and inspired the animated series "My Little Pony: Friendship Is Magic," which became a pop culture phenomenon and inspired male fans known as "bronies."

As for Phase 10, the rummy-like card game was created by a Black inventor and entrepreneur Ken Johnson 1982. It's one of the best-selling card games in the world, right after the fan-favorite Mattel game Uno.

Forty years after its creation, the Transformers are finally getting their flowers. The toys that feature robots that can be transformed into vehicles, objects or creature began in the '80s as a collaboration between Hasbro and Japanese company Takara Toys. They launched an entire media franchise that includes Michael Bay blockbusters, TV shows, comic books and video games. The latest film, "Transformers One," was released earlier this fall, and was being considered for the first of a trilogy, although it had underperformed at the box office due to competition.

These three Hall of Fame inductees beat out other finalists like Apples to Apples, balloons and Pokémon trading cards.

 

“People call us nepo babies. I embrace it”: Damon Wayans Jr. on his dad, family legacy in Hollywood

Damon Wayans Jr. says his new CBS show "Poppa's House," in which he plays opposite his dad, comedy legend Damon Wayans, and serves as a writer on, may be his funniest job ever. "Something funny happens literally every day," Wayans Jr. explained to me on "Salon Talks." "From when we rehearse, to the table read. We're laughing the entire time.”

On the show, Wayans Jr. plays Junior, an aspiring director who's working at his father-in-law’s company while waiting for his dream to take off. Wayans Sr. stars as Poppa, a legendary radio host who does not quite have the language to speak to a younger audience. His popularity is declining so they hire Dr. Ivy Reed, played by Essence Atkins, to come in, cohost and woke things up. The comedy lives between the parallels of the two men, the one who was trying to change so that he can make it, and the one who has made it, but has to change to stay relevant.

Wayans Jr., also known from "New Girl," "Shrinking" and "Happy Endings," is from the funniest family in Hollywood. You can look at his face and know immediately who his father is, in addition to being the nephew of Keenen Ivory Wayans, Shawn Wayans, Kim Wayans and Marlon Wayans. “People call us nepo babies, and I embrace it.” Wayans Jr. said, “I like the idea of my family working their a**es off to make sure that I can come in, and potentially work my a** off because they'll let you in to see you, but they won't keep calling you back if you're not good.”

Watch my "Salon Talks" episode with Damon Wayans Jr. here, or read a Q&A of our conversation below to hear more about "Poppa’s House," his three favorite Wayans' projects and why he's invested in the next generation of Wayans entertainers.

The following conversation has been lightly edited for clarity and length.

Take us to the very beginning of “Poppa's House.”

The story my dad's been telling, this is actually true, is that he was having empty nest syndrome. There was a house that was available across the street from my house. We all went over there, me, him and my kids. My wife. The house was nice, and my wife kept going, "Oh, well, when you're bad, we're sending all you guys over to Poppa's house."

"I didn't want to be an actor back then, I wanted to be an animator."

It gave my dad anxiety and so he didn't get the house, because he didn't want to be across from us, and having all my kids at his house.

How many kids do you have?

I got six, man, I've got a lot. I have half a Nick Cannon amount of kids.

We're excited to see you in this new role. How does it feel?

I love it. It was a really great thing to happen for my father and I. I'm happy that not only do we have a show together, but we have a really good relationship outside of the show. And I feel like that kind of lends to the authenticity of the characters that we play. That chemistry, you can't manufacture it.

Is it difficult to have a good relationship? I just imagine, even with your whole family dynamic and setup, that the Thanksgiving table is probably kind of tough.

You've got to get there early or else you will not eat because there's a lot of us. We like to meet up just for the sake of it. We meet up all the time, just having family get-togethers, making each other laugh and hugging each other. Nothing like family.

What's the funniest thing that happened on set or in the writers' room so far?

I couldn't tell you; something funny happens literally every day. From the table read, to rehearsing, to shooting, every week there's something funny. We're laughing the entire time. Every week is just a blast. And it gets funnier and funnier, every frickin' week.

"People used to always yell out, 'Man, you look just like your damn daddy,' right in the middle of my set."

The [writers'] room is like, you can't even breathe. You're crying, laughing. A lot of stuff we probably can't put into the show because we're just riffing and saying things that CBS would never let us say – but some stuff gets in. That's what I love about the show, we're pushing that envelope. CBS is letting us spread our wings.

I always wondered why you didn't play the role of Junior on “My Wife and Kids.”

I didn't want to be an actor back then, I wanted to be an animator. I used to draw all the time. I think my dad did bring it up potentially, but I hadn't acted before. I think he just wanted somebody that knew how to actually do the job. George was great, shout out to George Gore. He the man. I love George. I think he did Junior justice, but that [character] was like a weird version of me. It's not like who I really am.

You were a writer on “My Wife and Kids,” though. Do you feel like that 30-minute sitcom has evolved dramatically since then?

Yeah, they are working in more drama. I think that's good storytelling. I think audiences have gotten smarter when it comes to storytelling. I think they expect the drama, they expect characters that are grounded in reality. There's a way to do both. There's a way to give really hard laughs, but also bring in relatable, dramatic storylines. And I think that we're doing that really well.

Let's get into Damon, your character on the show. He's optimistic, he’s ambitious, he's going to be this filmmaker, but as of now, he's trying to find his footing. If he were one of your friends in real life, what kind of advice would you give him?

I would tell him to really come up with a game plan. I think that's his problem, he knows where he wants to be in life but he just doesn't really know how to get there. When you don't know the way to get to where you want to be, it kind of leaves you in this limbo, and I think he's in this limbo right now. My advice would be, "Just sit down with me, draw out a plan and execute it."

Poppa is in a similar situation because he's at a crossroads. He's old school, and he has to be forced to try to fit into this new reality. You guys were comedians for a long time so I know you saw culture change. Have real-life conversations around the way comedy has changed become a part of creating Poppa for the show?

Yeah. We actually were experimenting with the title for the show. It's “Poppa's House” now, but we were experimenting with calling it “Raising Damon.” On first glance, you think, "Oh, it's about Poppa raising his son, Junior." Then when you start watching the show, you realize that there's some areas where Poppa has to grow. 

That's what I love about the old school/new school aspect of the show. It's like, “Is the old school way of disciplining better for children? Or is the new school way of disciplining better for children? Or is the best way somewhere in the middle?” I think we explore those questions really well, and Poppa grows from those questions.

"Funny transcends race. … I have a very mixed bag of people who I think are super funny to me."

I can't wait for people to see it, really. We've been working in a vacuum. We've got 11 episodes shot already. I can't wait for people to see the show, and go on this journey with us, and learn these family dynamics, and fall in love with the characters.

What's it like for a kid in the Wayans family who decides to go into comedy?

It's, “Are you willing to put in the work that it takes to go on this journey?” It's not an easy journey. People call us nepo babies, and I embrace it. I like the idea of my family working their a**es off to make sure that I can come in and potentially work my a** off because they'll let you in to see you, but they won't keep calling you back if you're not good.

What they do is, if they know that you're serious about it, if you're showing that you're serious about it, they'll give you great advice. They're open books. They really are very supportive of all of us. There's a lot of writers in my family that are Wayans, there's a lot of aspiring actors. My daughter is an aspiring actor. She does stand-in work on “Poppa's House.” She's a great writer as well, so I feel like she's definitely got the goods. My cousin, Chaunté Wayans, wonderful stand-up, hilarious. Great writer, as well. Whatever the first generation can do to help that journey, they do. They use it.

I read that you used a fake name when you started doing stand-up. How did that go?

That was a mistake. I wanted to be good at stand-up on my own merits. I didn't want to just walk on there, saying, "This is Damon Wayans' son." So, I go up there as Kyle Green, which is my middle name, and my grandma's maiden name. Then people used to always yell out, "Man, you look just like your damn daddy," right in the middle of my set. So eventually, I just got rid of the alias, and it was like, "Hey, I'm Damon Junior." I didn't do Damon Wayans Junior, I just did Damon Junior.

Is there a shorthand for working with family on set that makes the connection easier for you?

This is my dad's baby, right? He created this show. I definitely helped develop it, but it's his, ultimately. I defer to him, but he's also very collaborative. He's always open to hearing a good idea. Funniest wins, or best idea wins.

"If you make me laugh, I am going to be friends with you forever. "

We even bring in the other actors in, to be like, "Oh, how would you say that? Is it better for you to say it like that?" Then we'll rewrite it. Essence Atkins, she's a wonderful actress, huge comedic talent. Tetona Jackson plays my wife on the show. They sit in, and we all will rewrite during the rewrites, and they give their two cents. It's great, it's so collaborative and it's so funny. It's such an easy process.

You seem to be still connected to your castmates from “New Girl” and “Happy Endings” too. 

Sometimes jobs are just jobs. I've done jobs where I don't talk to the people afterwards, and I have a great time with them during the job. But then sometimes there's certain people that you think you'll be in their lives for the rest of your lives. All the “New Girl” guys, we talk every day. I'm still really close with all the “Happy Endings” guys as well. Those two shows were just kind of instrumental to my career, and they were my first two shows coming into the game. Those relationships are just lasting. 

If you make me laugh, I am going to be friends with you forever. That's just how it is. All those people make me laugh constantly. If you genuinely make me laugh, I'm not doing the polite laugh, if I'm belly laughing, and I have little tears coming down my eyes? Besties.

You grew up around Black comedy legends and are a part of that tradition, but you also have mainstream success. How does one navigate those worlds? 

It's just that's how I was raised. I've always been on both sides. I went to my elementary school; it was all Black. Then I went to an all-white middle and high school. I've been comfortable in both worlds my whole life, and so I don't really feel like I have to turn a switch on and off. I just love both.

Funny is funny. Funny transcends race. There are things that are funnier in different areas, but for the most part I think people just enjoy laughing and enjoy comedy. I have a very mixed bag of people who I think are super funny to me. My top five comedians are Richard Pryor, George Carlin, Patrice O'Neal – a lot of dead guys – Mitch Hedberg, Chappelle. Tony Roberts is a really funny physical comedian, to me. Actor-wise, Eddie Murphy, Will Ferrell. I have a mixed bag of who I think are funny, and who influenced me.

What are your top three Wayans' family projects?

All right. So, top three, and in no order. “Don't Be a Menace to South Central While Drinking Your Juice in the Hood,” “Major Payne,” “A Low Down Dirty Shame.” These are movies that I've watched, over and over and over again.

That's a fire list. I have: “Don't be a Menace,” “In Living Color,” –   

Oh, I thought you meant movies? You did say projects, but I assumed movies. 

Then I have “Blankman,” when you were a little kid.

That was going to be my third. But then I was like, two of my dad's projects? That's like hella bias. It's like my sperm donor, you know what I mean?

What's next for you?

I have this game show that I'm going to be shooting, right after we wrap on “Poppa's House.” Shooting that in Mexico, it's called “Raid the Cage.” It's about stealing stuff. They have this giant room full of these things, like Birkin bags, shoes signed by Michael Jordan, cars. They have all this stuff, and you get a certain amount of time to grab as many things as you can, and get out of the cage before it closes, or else you lose everything.

Then I have a movie coming out on Netflix in February, so, look out for that, too. It's called “Kind of Pregnant.” It's about a woman who sees how well pregnant women get treated, and so she fakes being pregnant to get the treatment.

Stephen Colbert jokes about Americans who want to flee U.S. after Trump win

Just a week after the 2024 election, Americans are questioning whether they want to even live in the U.S. as President-elect Donald Trump is building his cabinet for his second term.

On Tuesday's "The Late Show with Stephen Colbert," the host addressed the potential new Trump administration appointees like Sen. Marco Rubio, saying "[Trump] keeps your balls in a jar on their desk?” Rubio's name is being floated as possibly taking on the Secretary of State position. Colbert pointed out Rubio's newfound loyalty to Trump after years of a contentious relationship. During the 2016 race, Rubio had made fun of Trump's hands following his comments about Rubio's height.

Trump has also tapped Gov. Kristi Noem to head up Homeland Security. Elon Musk and Vivek Ramaswamy are set to run a new government agency called Department of Government Efficiency. Fox News anchor Pete Hegseth is also set to be the Secretary of Defense.

“Even if you spend years insulting Donald Trump, you can get back in his good graces just by praising him,” Colbert said.

“Which is why I’d like to take this opportunity to say to our new president-elect . . .” Colbert turned and looked directly into the camera, “Pass.”

As Trump's cabinet takes form, Colbert emphasized, "A lot of Americans are feeling unsettled since the election, which is one of the reasons why, according to Google, internet searches for how to move abroad are up by 1000%."

He added, "There's also been a spike in searches for 'frosting near me,' 'induce self coma how to' and 'cried so hard I pooped?'"

He said, "U.S. searches for 'move to Canada' increased by 1,270% making this a perfect time to debut my new reality show, 'Who Wants to Marry a Mountie?"

We need your help to stay independent

Another spike in searches included "cost to move to Canada from U.S?" "Can I move to Canada if Trump wins?" "Moving to Canada requirements."

Colbert also mentioned, "If you want to flee the country but can't get into Canada, one cruise line is offering four-year trips to people looking to avoid a second Trump term. The cruise takes place on a ship called the Odyssey. When I think positive travel experience, I think the Odyssey." He is of course, referring to Homer's epic poem that follows the travels of Odysseus and his crew, who faced perils such a the monster Scylla and giant whirlpool Charybdis.

"This is gonna be a long four years," Colbert observed.

"The Late Show with Stephen Colbert" airs every weeknight at 11:35 p.m. ET.

John Krasinski being named Sexiest Man Alive has sparked protest

People Magazine has unveiled its annual Sexiest Man Alive . . .  John Krasinksi.

As has become an annual tradition, people are divided about the pick, and are debating whether the "A Quiet Place" star and director was the right man for the title. After all, this is a year dominated by movie and television stars like Glen Powell, Adam Brody, Paul Mescal or Jonathan Bailey. Krasinski's title follows last year's popular winner, "Grey's Anatomy" veteran Patrick Dempsey.

Even Krasinski, known for his sardonic character Jim from "The Office," told the magazine that when he was named Sexiest Man Alive, he thought he was "being punked."

He continued, “That’s not how I wake up, thinking, ‘Is this the day that I’ll be asked to be Sexiest Man Alive?’ And yet it was the day you guys did it. You guys have really raised the bar for me.”

Nevertheless, Krasinski's self-awareness hasn't stopped the internet from expressing their displeasure with the pick. One person posted on X, “John Krasinski is People’s Sexiest Man Alive in 2024 . . . Another devastating Tuesday night in November.”

Another person also expressed the same shock, "John Krasinski?????? Our nation's most trying hour and you give us John Krasinski?!?!?!"

Before Krasinski was crowned Sexiest Man Alive, a person online correctly predicted the outcome before the midnight reveal on "The Late Show with Stephen Colbert." They said, "I’m not staying up for the sexiest man, it’s just that it’s going to happen soon and if it’s John Krasinski and not Glen Powell I’m going to die laughing."

 

“We need to work together”: Democratic governors plan to resist Trump and the “threats of autocracy”

Govs. J.B. Pritzker, D-Ill. and Jared Polis, D-Colo., have formed a coalition of fellow state-level executives to resist "increasing threats of autocracy" and potential power grabs by a second Donald Trump administration. Members of the new "Governors Safeguarding Democracy" will harness their collective powers to "catalyze collaboration across state lines," Pritzker said in a call with journalists reported by the Chicago Sun-Times

“It’s built off a model that all of us governors have already successfully pioneered through the Reproductive Freedom Alliance,” he said. “And together, what we’re doing is pushing back against increasing threats of autocracy and fortifying the institutions of democracy that our country and our states depend on.”

Pritzker, Polis and others like Gov. Gavin Newsom, D-Calif., have struck a defiant tone since Trump was elected president, promising to use all legal means at their disposal to protect their states against federal policies they deem harmful and unconstitutional. Last year, Pritzker formed Think Big America, a nonprofit aimed at passing abortion rights ballot initiatives.

GSD, the most encompassing iteration of state-level pushback against GOP rule in Washington, is supposed to be nonpartisan, but Pritzker and Polis did not mention any GOP participants in the press call. Despite the obvious shadow of Trump, his name was not mentioned, either.

“There’s been outreach to Republican governors,” Pritzker said. “Good conversations, I might add, and there is continued interest by lots of governors. But I’m not going to name the ones that we’ve talked to.”

Asked about a list of participating governors, Pritzker said that some do not want to be named publicly.

According to Pritzker and Polis, GSD participants will discuss a range of options, including safeguarding state-level environmental protection; defending their election systems from threats both foreign and domestic; and shielding immigrants from mass deportation. Pritzker said that they would form a response to proposals like Trump advisor Stephen Miller's proposal to send red state National Guard units to blue states to assist in the deportations.

The group, which is being funded by philanthropic efforts, is working with think tanks, legal experts, democracy and open government advocates to create plans that will “truly protect the rule of law," Polis added.

“We founded GSD because we know that simple hope alone won’t save our democracy,” Polis said. “We need to work together, especially at the state level, to protect and strengthen it.”

GOP Senate candidate Eric Hovde refuses to concede election in Wisconsin

All the major news networks have declared Sen. Tammy Baldwin, D-Wis., the victor in her re-election race, but her GOP opponent is refusing to concede. Eric Hovde, a businessman and bank executive, is claiming that because of alleged voting irregularities and the presence of a right-wing, pro-gun third party candidate, the election result was not legitimate.

That third-party candidate, Thomas Leager, had ties to the plot to kidnap Michigan Gov. Gretchen Whitmer. His campaign received some funding from Democratic donors in what Hovde said was an effort to siphon votes from him. While it's a tactic that the GOP has also used to prop up candidates on the opponents' left flank, Democrats have not used that as a basis to challenge an election result.

“We’re certainly disappointed that the Democrats’ effort to siphon votes with a fraudulent candidate had a significant impact on the race, with those votes making up more than the entire margin of the race right now,” Hovde said in a press release. “We will continue to monitor returns and make sure that every vote is counted.”

He also complained that he was leading in the count until a surge in absentee ballots ballots from Democratic-heavy Milwaukee tipped the balance in Baldwin's favor. Republicans have often claimed, without evidence, that Democrats overtaking them in the count is a sign that they are cheating, rather than a matter of logistics.

“At 1 a.m. I was receiving calls of congratulations, and, based on the models, it appeared I would win the Senate race. Then, at 4 a.m., Milwaukee reported approximately 108,000 absentee ballots, with Senator Baldwin receiving nearly 90% of those ballots. Statistically, this outcome seems improbable," he said.

Baldwin hit back in an X post that accused Hovde of "spreading lies from the darkest corners of the internet to undercut our free and fair elections."

"Wisconsin voters made their voices heard. It's time for Hovde to stop this disgusting attack on our democracy and concede," she wrote.

Hovde's refusal to give in is not altogether surprising. Throughout the campaign, he pushed conspiracy theories about the election process, claiming at one point that turnout in nursing homes couldn't possibly be correct because many of its residents were near death. Despite his defiance, however, he is not yet ready to commit to demanding a recount: Based on the current gap separating him and Baldwin, Hovde's campaign, which was largely self-funded, would have to pay for that

Nicole Kidman swipes at Martin Scorsese’s pattern of making films that are only about men

Nicole Kidman has been making the rounds to promote her latest film, "Babygirl," directed by Halina Reijn and scheduled for release on Christmas day, and as there are still a number of weeks between now and then, her interviews have relied on a mixed bag of talking points to build momentum.

In a recent chat with Vanity Fair, Kidman veered away from details pertaining to her role in the A24 erotic thriller to discuss her wish list of directors and producers she has yet to work with but would like to. When she got around to naming Martin Scorsese, she landed at the perfect opportunity to call out his preference for making films that center primarily on men.

"I’ve always said I want to work with [Martin] Scorsese, if he does a film with women," Kidman said in her quick but perfectly pointed swipe.

As IndieWire points out, Scorsese has worked with a number of women in the past (Sharon Stone, Lorraine Bracco, Juliette Lewis, Margot Robbie, etc.) but his overall history of leaning on men to carry his projects was highlighted during the release of “The Irishman” in 2019, in which Anna Paquin delivered only seven words of dialogue.

When challenged by a reporter at the time to explain his lack of female characters, he offered only, “If the story doesn’t call for it… it’s a waste of everybody’s time." 

“Quality prevails”: Chef Andy Quinn on why New York City offers “more holistic dining” than the UK

In Pete Wells's review for The Noortwyck in The New York Times last November, he wrote that Chef Andy Quinn "finds the middle ground between grandeur and informality," adding that he's "exacting and precise, with a whole arsenal of skills and a minimalist sensibility that calls for most of the technical stuff to be tucked quietly into dishes that look simple and straightforward, even when they’re not."

Robert Sietsma, at Eater, wrote in April 2023 that the Noortwyck is a "handsome but casual restaurant" that "may sound snooty; it's anything but."

Clearly, Quinn’s overseeing of the restaurant has made it appointment dining for many New Yorkers, as well as others who make the trek to try the food — a wise move, to be sure

Chef Andrew "Andy" Quinn, who grew up in Leicester, England, before moving to the United States to work at NYC's famed Eleven Madison Park, opened The Noortwyck in 2022 with co-owner and sommelier Cedric Nicaise. Quinn is meticulous about the food served at his restaurant — as all chefs should be.

Quinn recently shared that the restaurant’s ethos is “quality prevails.” Named after the original Dutch settlement on Manhattan where it stands, The Noortwyck offers a “timeless, New American” menu — a focus that’s evident at first glance. (He’s also partial to a bread course, which I adore!)

Quinn also spoke with Salon about the restaurant's opening, differences between the U.S. and UK dining scenes, signature dishes, efforts to reduce food waste, and his plans for The Noortwyck’s future.

Chef Andy QuinnChef Andy Quinn (Photo by Ileene Cho)
The following interview has been lightly edited for clarity and length. 

How did you imbue your experiences from Hibiscus and Eleven Madison Park into The Noortwyck? 

My time at Hibiscus and EMP, along with my entire culinary background, was rooted in high-end, precise techniques and classical training. Working with the finest ingredients helped to foster a culture of innovation in my cooking. At The Noortwyck, I’ve taken these refined techniques I’ve learned with high quality ingredients and presented them in a much more approachable, cost-effective fashion, creating an inviting atmosphere that feels accessible for an everyday neighborhood restaurant. 

All of the Noortwyck menus sound magnificent! I love that the menu has a dish with albufera sauce on it, too, which I always think is so underutilized. Practically every item is just mouth-watering. How do you normally approach menu development? 

Menu development is led by the seasons and local markets. While we have a few dishes on the menu that have become classics that our guests cherish and don’t change, new ideas often arise from what’s coming in fresh from the market. We aim to keep the menu dynamic and reflective of what’s available. 

Can you talk to me a bit about how you and Cedric Nicaise work together and how that partnership helps to define the culinary identity of The Noortwyck.

Trust is the biggest tenant of Cedric’s and my working relationship. We respect each other’s particular areas of expertise; culinary is my identity while the wine and everything front of house is his. Cedric would never dictate what would go or come off the menu, the same way I would never tell Cedric how the dining room should be run or what’s on the wine list. This collaborative approach allows us to maintain distinct culinary identities while enhancing the overall experience.

I'd love to hear a bit about the name, which I know stands for "north district." 

The name comes from our desire at the start of the project to honor tradition and history. The neighborhood was originally colloquially termed The Noortwyck, which geographically was the north district of the Dutch settlement of Manhattan in 1624.

The website notes that the restaurant "has a timeless, new American menu focusing on NY Producers and purveyors alongside a vast and fun wine list." Can you elaborate a bit on that? 

By “timeless”, we mean there’s recognizable, approachable dishes on the menu that appeal to a vast audience. “New American” signifies the cuisine is influenced by all the cultures that are present in New York City right now. We keep the wine list vast and fun, showcasing exciting selections and offer options for all tastes and palettes. 

We need your help to stay independent

My brother has always had an obsession with Beef Wellington. Can you talk a bit about the process behind yours?

We prepare everything from scratch. We get our beef on Wednesdays, clean it and create all the necessary components including the crepes, mushroom duxelle and puff pastry on Thursdays. On Fridays, it gets rolled and chilled down, applying finishing touches on Saturday, so it’s ready to be roasted by Sunday afternoon.

What would you say is the ethos of Noortwyck? 

Quality prevails. 

Do you have a personal "signature dish" at the restaurant? Could be the one that sells the most, could be the one you have most personal affinity towards up to you!

Whichever pastas are on the menu at the time. I think it’s something that we accidentally fell into here. Although I have no formal training in pasta making, it’s a personal passion that unexpectedly flourished here. There’s always a lot of emotion that goes into making pasta, it’s a very personal thing and I think it shows in every pasta dish we serve here. 

I adore the sound of bread courses. Is that something that changes often?

I love bread and it was really important when opening the restaurant that we had fresh bread made in house. I have to credit Chef Ileene for creating our famous Seeded Parker House Loaf, which was initially a trial and has now become a beloved staple on the menu and something we can’t change. So to answer your question, our bread is not something that changes often. 

I'm a cheese guy through and through and I see so many wonderful varieties on your menu. How do you go about ensuring you're procuring the highest quality cheeses? 

We do regular tastings with purveyors such as Chef Collective and Natoora out of Brooklyn and Murray’s Cheese across the street. Every few months they’ll bring cheeses in for us to taste and we usually find something that might pair well with our menu, we’re always looking for exciting flavors or stories to share.

We currently have a “Whitney” cheese on the menu, crafted at Jasper Hills Creamery in Vermont. The cool thing about it is that it's European style Alpine cheese and made with unpasteurized cow’s milk, which is pretty unique in the US and I knew I wanted to get it on the menu.

Duck BunDuck Bun from The Noortwyck (Photo by Ileene Cho)

How would you differentiate between restaurant culture as far as the UK and US? 

In my experience, New York emphasizes a more holistic dining experience. The wine, service, drinks, ambiance and vibe are all equally as important as the food or price you're paying. Everything plays a part in the experience. 

In London, there’s far more emphasis put on the food than anything else, I feel. Whenever I go back to London I am always slightly surprised at the level of service. I’ve been to some places with amazing food, but their cocktail program is non-existent or the vibe isn't there. On the flip side, you can eat at a restaurant in New York where it's impossible to get a reservation but the food isn’t very good, while in London if the food isn’t great, the restaurant won’t last.

Regarding clientele, diners in the UK seem to be more open minded in trying different flavors or cuisines, whereas New Yorkers know exactly what they want and they are going to find it.


Want more great food writing and recipes? Subscribe to Salon Food's newsletter, The Bite.


Do you have a number one favorite ingredient to work with? 

Foie gras is my favorite. I love its versatility – you can prepare it hot or cold and turn it into mousse or ice cream. It’s something not commonly found on menus because it’s high cost, but there are ways to incorporate it into dishes to add a piece of luxury that you don’t get everyday. 

At The Noortwyck, we have the foie gras butter that pairs with our Duck Bun and we also include it in the albufera sauce for our chicken dish. It’s always been one of my favorite things to work with.

Is there a standout menu item for you across all of your restaurants? Or one that particularly resonates with customers? 

Probably the duck. It has become another signature dish on our menu. Every great chef I've worked with has had their own unique duck dish, which has always been a standout menu item at those restaurants. I challenged myself in creating my own version and preparing a dish that blends various techniques I’ve learned through the years. 

What stands out for you as a formative moment that got you into cooking or food at large?

Cooking for my siblings when we were younger definitely helped shape my passion for cooking. My parents were working full time, so it was up to one of us to cook for the remaining two and I didn’t like the food either of my siblings made, so I decided to take charge. I quickly discovered I was pretty good at it, which kind of ignited my enjoyment and satisfaction I gained through cooking.   

What would you say are your three most used ingredients?

Butter, calabrian chili and sherry vinegar. 

What is your favorite cooking memory?

Grilling outside by a beach somewhere, with good friends and cold beer!

What’s your biggest tip for cutting down on food waste? 

Avoid over ordering. Many places tend to order too much food, which often ends up getting thrown away or going bad. For me, it’s much easier to buy smaller quantities and make them last rather than buying too much of something and figuring out how to use it or make it last.  

How do you practice sustainability in your cooking and in your restaurants?

We utilize all of the ingredients as much as possible. All our protein comes in whole – be it fish, duck or chicken etc. We break them down as needed and repurpose what is left to make sauces, stocks or other dishes. For example, we buy the ducks whole for our dry-aged duck breasts and use the legs for the filling in our duck bun. 

Would a non-drinker still be able to enjoy any N/A wine and cocktail offerings at The Noortwyck? 

Absolutely. We’re kind of famous for our Shift Drink, a non-alcoholic option that sells almost as much as our regular cocktails. We have a very strong and robust N/A cocktail and beer program. 

What's next for you? For The Noortwyck? 

We are intent on continuing to grow the team and culture here at The Noortwyck. We’re excited to explore new opportunities outside these four walls while continuing to build our classic dishes and bring some exciting new ones to our loyal clientele base. 

Moving to New York City cost us $10K in fees. Those fees are now banned

Last June, on a sweaty summer evening, in our 550-square-foot Brooklyn apartment filled to the brim with towers of stacked moving boxes, my partner and I took a final appraisal of what our cross-country move to New York City had officially cost us. We might as well have bought a new car.  

We’d moved from Chicago, renting a U-Haul that John drove across the country while I trailed him in our banged-up 2013 Ford Escape, our two dogs and numerous plants in tow. The truck, including gas, cost around $1,000. We hired movers in New York to help us unload the truck; their services cost $550. 

$1,550 for a cross-country move? Not terrible. Not something we’d still be financially recovering from, more than a year later. But moving to New York, and getting an apartment in New York, wiped out our cash savings. By the time we picked up the keys to the apartment, we’d spent nearly $13,000.

For our two-bedroom apartment in Brooklyn’s Crown Heights, we were charged $10,884 in collective fees and deposits. This included the first month’s rent ($2,800), a one-month security deposit ($2,800) and a broker fee of 15% of our annual rent, or $5,191. That’s because renters in New York have historically been held responsible for paying the broker that the landlord hired to find tenants.

Until recently, New York was one of two cities that required renters to pay for these services; the other is Boston. Typically, such broker fees range from 10% to 15% of a tenant’s annual rent; in a city where the average monthly rent is currently $3,898 per month, renters often had to pay several thousand dollars just to move. 

For a $3,898 per month apartment, a 10% broker fee would be $4,667, while a 15% fee would cost the renter $7,016. The high fees can trap renters earning lower or average wages in apartments for years, unable to shell out the cost of an $18,000 gold Cartier bracelet simply to move apartments. (It’s worth noting that you can’t put a broker fee on credit — tenants typically must wire the money directly to the broker. If you don’t have that cash on hand, you can’t move.) 

In a City Council hearing on a bill introduced to ban New York’s broker fee structure, Councilmember Chi Ossé described the fee structure as “an exploitative system that exists virtually nowhere else.” In Boston, legislation that would’ve banned the practice failed to advance earlier this year in the Massachusetts State Senate.   

But the New York City Council today approved The Fairness in Apartment Rental Expenses (FARE) Act. The bill, first introduced by Ossé in 2023, requires that a broker who is hired by a landlord — or a broker who publishes the rental property's listing — is to be paid by the landlord. It passed 42-8, with more votes than needed for a veto-proof majority. 

Numerous tenants and housing advocacy groups, including Make the Road New York, New York’s Working Families Party, the Community Service Society of New York and the Legal Aid Society, supported the legislation. And, broadly speaking, New York’s brokers aren’t fans of the FARE Act, with many arguing that broker fees are transparent and negotiable.

We need your help to stay independent

Brokers say getting rid of broker fees will actually lead to higher rents because landlords will refuse to pay brokers and instead include them in the rent — say, upping the rent by $400 a month, to spread out a $5,000 fee over a 12-month lease. “Landlords cannot pay fees. It’s not in their budgets and they won’t do it,” one real estate broker said at a demonstration of hundreds of real estate brokers at City Hall in June.   

“We have some of the strongest tenant protections,” Whitney Hu, civic engagement and research director at Churches United for Fair Housing, told Salon. “At the same time, we have some of the strongest counter forces that one could imagine.” 

Michael Corley, a real estate broker who’s worked in the city for more than 20 years, told Salon that requiring landlords to pay the brokers they hire would create a system eventually benefiting both renters and landlords. 

“They will pay a reasonable fee,” Corley said of most landlords in the city. But those landlords might demand more from some brokers who, Corley says, have been able to take advantage of the fact that they’re guaranteed to be paid by tenants. 

“I've told everybody that I speak with in the broker world, ‘You've got to establish a value proposition.’ And that's going to be hard in the beginning, because you've given this away for free,” Corley said. 

When combined with the requisite first month’s rent and security deposit in a city boasting some of the steepest rents on the planet, broker fees make moving in New York a cost-prohibitive luxury available to a select tier of renters with above-average access to cash. According to the Federal Reserve’s most recent Survey of Consumer Finances in 2022, the median savings account balance for U.S. households was $8,000. StreetEasy, the Zillow-owned listings site that represents as much as 70% of New York and New Jersey’s rental market share, published a report in February that found tenants in New York City pay an average of $10,454 in upfront costs for a rental property — up 29% from before the pandemic.

What kinds of tenants have been able to afford these fees? Renters with means, or good credit (or, fairly often, rich parents). When John and I moved to the city, we were relatively privileged renters compared to many others in Brooklyn, with remote tech jobs that allowed us to work safely throughout the pandemic and build our cash savings up to $13,000 – which, eventually, funded the move. 

But gone are the days when a remote tech job translated to real stability; two weeks after we moved to New York, John was laid off. Almost a year later, I was laid off from my job, too. 

Our lease is up next June, and we’re itching to move to an apartment with a bit more space for us and the two dogs we brought from Chicago (thank goodness we’re near a neighborhood park). We’ve managed to squirrel away a couple thousand dollars, but have since amassed nearly three times that amount in credit card debt (a reality not dissimilar from dozens of our friends and peers in the city). If we had the opportunity to break our lease tomorrow and move into a place offering more space, we couldn’t. Like the average New Yorker, we just don’t have the cash for that broker fee. 

Initially, some landlords might refuse to pay brokers, instead opting to handle the entire leasing process on their own. That won’t last long, Corley said.

“When they start being sued for fair housing discrimination and other things, which they will be, because they have no idea what they're doing, they will come back to us,” Corley said. He added, “The market will go through a correction phase, maybe 12 to 18 months. But when it's all done, it will be a much better environment for ethical practitioners, and everybody else will be gone.”

“Tools of tyranny”: House rejects bill that would expand Trump’s power to target critical NGOs

The U.S. House of Representatives voted down a controversial bill Tuesday that would have enabled President-elect Donald Trump to potentially crackdown on non-profits that displease him

The “Stop Terror-Financing and Tax Penalties on American Hostages Act,” also known as H.R. 9495, would provide tax relief for U.S. nationals who are wrongfully detained abroad, but it would also have granted the U.S. Department of Treasury authority to revoke tax-exempt status of “terrorist-supporting groups.” 

On the House floor Tuesday night, 145 Democrats and one Republican voted against H.R. 9495, just enough to deny the fast-tracked bill the two-thirds majority it needed to pass. Opposition to the bill was led by Rep. Lloyd Doggett, D-Texas, who cited Trump’s re-election as the primary reason for voting down what he called "the tools of tyranny." 

"This bill authorizes Donald Trump to impose a death penalty on any non-profit in America that happens to be on his enemies list," Doggett said on the House floor Tuesday. "With this bill he can destroy the very life of civil society in this country, one group after another, even though the group involved that he targets as a 'terrorist supporting group' has no violated a single law."

The bill faced strong opposition from activist groups, which warned that its would restrict non-profit organizations’ right to free-speech, as well as lead to the targeting of political opponents, media outlets and universities across the political spectrum. H.R. 4945 was first was first introduced in response to the protests on college campuses against Israel’s war on Gaza, but it was blocked by the Democrat-controlled Senate.

“This bill dangerously weaponizes the Treasury against nonprofit organizations and houses of worship — Christian, Jewish, or Muslim — that dare to support Palestinian and Lebanese human rights or criticize Israel’s genocidal actions,” the Council on American-Islamic Relations said in a statement.

In September, over 100 groups signed a letter to House Speaker Mike Johnson urging him to block the bill because it “poses a direct threat to the constitutional rights of any American nonprofit, house of worship, or advocacy organization, whether conservative, moderate, or liberal in orientation.”

Now, with Trump set for a second term, the bill's stakes were even higher, advocates and politicians warned. H.R. 9495 would give the president-elect exactly what he needed to carry out the crackdown on his political opponents that was a central promise of his campaign. 

We need your help to stay independent

“Passing this bill would hand the incoming Trump administration a dangerous new tool it could use to stifle free speech, target political opponents, and punish disfavored groups,” the ACLU said in a statement. 

Trump has repeatedly vowed to go after anybody who opposes his administration’s political beliefs and has even suggested that he would deploy the military on "radical left lunatics." 

Other Democrats who voted against H.R. 9495 echoed Doggett's reasons for dissent. 

“This legislation does not get us closer to that goal, rather, it would allow Trump unchecked power and grant his executive agencies the right to harass nonprofit organizations he disagrees with — bringing politically motivated investigations and stripping them of their tax-exempt status — to carry out his vindictive political agenda," Rep. Mikie Sherill, D-N.J., said in a statement

The ACLU praised the opposition, which at least temporarily stopped passage of the measure. "This is a victory for all our right to speak truth to power," the organization wrote on X. 

Still, over 200 Republicans and 52 Democrats voted to pass the bill. Doggett warned that H.R. 9495 is likely return to the House when a simple majority is needed to pass it next session.

"I was successful in stopping the bill tonight, when a 2/3 vote was required, but undoubtably it will be back because Trump’s thirst for unlimited power can never be quenched," he wrote on X. 

“I’m very concerned by this”: Alarm after Trump picks “extremist” Fox News host as defense secretary

Donald Trump, claiming a mandate from his narrow popular vote win, intends to purge the U.S. military from top to bottom and put a Fox News host in charge of the whole thing, hoping to root out any “woke” dissenters and install loyalists in their place who will not object to his using America’s armed forces in ways that may be ill-advised, malicious or both.

As the Wall Street Journal reported Tuesday, the president-elect’s transition team has reviewed an executive order, which Trump could sign on day one, that would create a “warrior board” of retired MAGA military guys who would recommend or rubber stamp the firing of anyone in the chain of command who they deem lacking in “leadership qualities.”

The current chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff is as good as gone. In 2020, Air Force Gen. CQ Brown Jr., who served as commander of the Pacific Air Forces during Trump’s first term in office, spoke out about racism following the police murder of George Floyd.

“I'm thinking about my Air Force career where I was often the only African American in my squadron or, as a senior officer, the only African American in the room,” Brown said in a video address at the time. The killing and subsequent conversation about institutional racism, Brown continued, had forced him to consider how he could better promote “the value of diversity.”

Such talk will not be tolerated anymore.

“First of all, you’ve got to fire the chairman of the Joint Chiefs.” So says Pete Hegseth, who at the start of the week was a Fox News morning show personality but by Tuesday afternoon was Trump’s pick to lead the Department of Defense and its 2.8 million employees. Speaking on a right-wing podcast before he was chosen to lead the Pentagon, the 44-year-old veteran of the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan made the case for a purge, calling for the termination of “any general, any admiral, whatever,” who had promoted “woke s**t,” per The Washington Post.

A former prison guard at Guantanamo Bay, Hegseth is best known for two things: Boasting that he does not believe in germs and acts accordingly — “Fox host says he 'hasn't washed hands in 10 years,’” the BBC reported in 2019 — and defending alleged war crimes. During Trump’s first term in office, the “Fox & Friends” alum was at the center of a to get the president to pardon soldiers who had been accused or convicted of murder.

Using his television platform, Hegseth tirelessly promoted the case for freeing Eddie Gallagher, who was accused by his fellow soldiers of brazenly murdering civilians. He was ultimately convicted by a military tribunal of “wrongfully posing for an unofficial picture with a human casualty” (an unarmed, teenage prisoner he had stabbed to death in Afghanistan) but found not guilty of more severe offenses; at Hegseth’s urging, Trump then granted him clemency and, overriding military leadership, restored his Navy SEAL Trident Pin — broadcasting that Gallgher’s sociopathic behavior was to be deemed honorable.

A member of the military must behave quite badly for their fellow soldiers, all trained killers, to turn them in. But in their raging against “woke” military elites, Hegseth and Trump are not merely concerned with diversity, equality and inclusion: no, liberal treachery, in their view, extends to the laws of war and the demands that U.S. soldiers comply with them.

We need your help to stay independent

That willingness to defend and indeed celebrate evil is no doubt a major factor in Hegseth’s rise; so too is his prominent jawline — he just looks like a military guy, which very much matters to a president who owes his rise to television — and the fact, too, that he is a relative nobody: "Who the f**k is this guy?" one defense lobbyist asked Politico. This is not a pick with sufficient gravitas to push back on a potentially illegal order, like a demand that U.S. troops go out and shoot protesters in the streets (as Trump considered doing amid the 2020 civil unrest, according to former Defense Secretary Mark Esper), but rather someone chosen because he’ll just be happy to be there, signing off on whatever the president wants.

“From silly diner interviews on Weekend Fox and Friends to Secretary of Defense?” former Fox News anchor Gretchen Carlson posted on social media, saying she was “stunned” by the pick.

“This guy is clearly a sycophant for Donald Trump,” Rep, Dan Goldman, D-N.Y., commented on CNN. He is also clearly unqualified, Goldman said, a troubling fact that points to why he was chosen — to “get revenge on generals” and turn the state into his “own personal fiefdom.”

“I’m very concerned by this, and I’m very concerned about what it demonstrated about Donald Trump’s priorities,” Goldman said.


Want a daily wrap-up of all the news and commentary Salon has to offer? Subscribe to our morning newsletter, Crash Course.


It’s not just Democrats sounding the alarm. Journalist and author Jeff Shartlet argues that the selection of Hegseth is as troubling a sign as Trump’s pick for deputy chief of staff, signaling his intent to carry out mass deportations and ensure that the military answers not to the U.S. Constitution but to one 78-year-old man. “[T]his is a Stephen Miller-level appointment,” Sharlet wrote on his website. “Full fash.”

To back up that claim — that this is the “fascism” that John Kelly and others warned about — Sharlet cites a recent book authored by (or attributed to) Hegseth, in which he fully embraces the president-elect’s rhetoric about the “enemy from within.” Indeed, Hegseth himself refers to the left as “domestic enemies,” writing: “Antifa, BLM, now Hamas supporters and other progressive storm troopers have done their best to create little Samarras,” referring to a city he deployed to in Iraq.

“Marxists are our enemies,” he continued, and while they’ve made gains the real battle for America has not yet begun. “Leftists stole a lot from us, but we won’t let them take this. Time for round two — we won’t miss this war.”

In the eyes of the military, Hegseth has already been dubbed an "extremist," as he himself admitted in an interview that aired earlier this year on Fox News. As a member of the National Guard, he was supposed to protect President Joe Biden's inauguration, despite the fact that he denies the outcome of the 2020 election. "Ultimately, members of my own unit in leadership deemed that I was an extremist or a white nationalist because of a tattoo I have, which is a religious tattoo. It's a Jerusalem cross," Hegseth claimed, feigning ignorance of the fact that cross has indeed been embraced by far-right activists who imagine themselves fighting a modern-day Crusade.

We do not know what 2025 will bring and forecasts of doom could well be punctured by the mere dismal reality of gross incompetence; the future may just be dumb. But what we can say for sure is that Trump has talked about using the military however he sees fit, including against immigrants and native-born dissenters, and he has now named to lead that military someone who has never once disagreed with him. It is not a good sign.

“Hidden good news”: Nate Silver predicts 2024 election loss will spur a Democratic comeback

Pollster Nate Silver is already predicting a comeback from Democrats in 2028, pointing to “hidden good news” for the party in this year’s election results despite President-elect Donald Trump’s win

Even in states that Vice President Kamala Harris lost, like Arizona, others Democrats, like Sen.-elect Ruben Gallego, succeeded, potentially pointing the way to a revival. In a newsletter blast on Tuesday, Silver compared Trump’s reelection to that of former President George Bush in 2004.

“Like Bush, Trump won thanks partly to a surge of votes from Latino and Asian American voters. Like Bush, he’ll win the popular vote — probably by a margin of around 1.4 percentage points once all votes are counted,” Silver wrote.

Bush’s second win was rock bottom for Democrats and forced the party to reflect and rebuild, Silver explained. The result was President Barack Obama, whose politics went onto define the Democratic Party for years to come.

The Democratic Party of today seems to be in a similar position since Nov. 5. Rather than dwelling on Trump’s existential threat to democracy as they did after his win in 2016, the party is trying to figure out where they went wrong and where they go next.

Though the GOP holds political momentum now, Silver predicts President-elect Trump, like Bush, will have a “challenging second term,” which will lead to a GOP loss in 2028. He pointed to some of Bush’s biggest failures, including the failure to reform social security, his response to Hurricane Katrina and the war in Iraq.

Silver added that most incumbent parties are “unpopular” and tend to lose elections anyways. 

This presents an opportunity for Democrats to regain popularity, particularly in swing states in Arizona, Nevada, Michigan and Wisconsin, Silver wrote. 

Despite his rather optimistic outlook, Silver clarified that Trump’s second term won’t be a “happy time for Democrats,” pointing to the president-elect’s 6-3 Supreme Court majority and “unchecked power.”

“But electorally speaking, these are the seeds out of which comebacks are made, and there’s a good chance that Trump is another octogenarian who overreads his mandate and overreaches in all sorts of ways,” Silver wrote.

“What normally happens is the losing party rebounds — so there’s always the next cycle for Democrats to look forward to,” he concluded.

“Awful sign”: Knives out in MAGA world over reported “disaster” Trump Cabinet pick

Reports that President-elect Donald Trump plans to tap Sen. Marco Rubio, R-Fla., for Secretary of State has thrown MAGA world in uproar.

Rubio, a rather conventional Republican, has worked hard to earn Trump's favor and spoke forcefully on his behalf in recent years, but he was not part of his old guard of supporters and is viewed with suspicion by those who are.

Rubio has been facing pushback on all fronts. Robert F. Kennedy Jr., whom Trump has granted influence in shaping his future administration, reportedly expressed opposition to Rubio occupying a prominent foreign policy role. MAGA-minded social media users were quick to cast doubt on whether the decision was even made by Trump himself and insist that Rubio was not yet a done deal. Many of them back Richard Grenell, Trump's former acting national intelligence director, for the post.

“Folks, word of wisdom. If Trump hasn’t confirmed it on Truth [Social], don’t jump to conclusions and don’t believe everything you see,” Charlie Kirk, an influential right-wing activist, wrote in an X post.

“We are still waiting on the decision from President Trump and the campaign leadership on what their official decision is,” one Grenell ally told Politico on Tuesday morning. “What we have been hearing is that no decision has been made.”

Grenell, a friend of Trump's son-in-law Jared Kushner, has his own enemies in Trump's inner circle, Politico reported. Many of Trump's advisors reportedly do not like his abrasive personality, his role in facilitating meetings between Trump and Ukrainian president Volodymyr Zelenskyy and that he was actively lobbying to be Secretary of State rather than waiting for the president-elect to pick him.

MAGA voices outside of Trump's closest orbit, however, consider Grenell to be a standard-bearer for the America First agenda. Rubio, a hawkish Republican who has consistently favored American military intervention overseas, nominally diverges from Grenell and other America First proponents who say that they to want prioritize U.S. interests rather act as a world policeman.

Conservative comedian Dave Smith said Tuesday that the pick was a "disaster" and an "awful sign." 

Trump "might as well give Liz Cheney the State Department," he wrote, possibly referring to Cheney and Rubio's shared support for American power projection or comparing Cheney's opposition to Trump with Rubio's uneasy conversion since the 2016 GOP presidential primaries.

But the desire to avoid costly wars is clearly a selective calculation. Many of Trump's most ardent MAGA supporters have called for a bombing campaign in Mexico to stop the flow of fentanyl, and the selection of former Arkansas Gov. Mike Huckabee to be ambassador to Israel was met with little backlash. Huckabee, who denies the existence of a Palestinian identity, has vowed to keep sending weapons to Israel and support their occupation of the West Bank, which he refers to as Judea and Samaria.

Despite the expressions of support for Grenell, the Trump cabinet hopeful himself pushed back on MAGA voices insisting that the fight was not over. “BS. Stop grifting. Not true," he said in response to one of those posts.

Blue state governors ready to fight back: Can they stop Trump’s terror?

It's been a week since the election of Donald Trump and the shock is just now beginning to wear off. The ritual Democratic self-flagellation is calming down a bit as most people finally take a breath and recognize that while the result was a terrible disappointment it was anything but a landslide for Donald Trump, nor was it a crushing rebuke of the Democrats.

As Philip Bump of the Washington Post points out in this preliminary analysis:

Trump’s popular-vote victory will likely end up as the smallest since 2000. It is due, in part, to fewer people voting. Exit polls are imperfect, but they suggest where each party gained and lost votes since 2020. … What we can say, though, is that this was not an electoral landslide, but a narrowly contested race in which Trump is likely to have benefited as much from who didn’t turn out to vote for his candidacy than who did turn out to vote for him.

Right now, the first order of business is to shake off the defeat and confront the challenge of Donald Trump's ghastly agenda. As we have seen in the last few days it's shaping up to be both more chaotic and more extreme than even in 2016.

Last time around, Trump at least had a transition team put together by former New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie, even if he threw most of their plans out almost immediately. They held meetings in Trump Tower in New York to vet candidates and policies in a more or less formal atmosphere. Now they're meeting at Mar-a-Lago in free-wheeling gab sessions around the golf course and the dining-room tables. Apparently, Elon Musk is a fixture, "weighing in on staffing decisions, making clear his preference for certain roles,"

As you've no doubt heard by now, Trump has wasted no time in naming Cabinet members and other staff. Musk himself was named, along with former presidential candidate Vivek Ramaswamy (also in attendance in transition meetings) to head an outside advisory board they're calling the Department of Government Efficiency, or DOGE. Musk and Ramaswamy think that acronym is adorable, since it refers to a beloved internet meme as well as a cryptocurrency in which Musk is heavily invested. The techno boys are having a rousing good time. By the look of that lunch table above, Trump is spending most of his time playing golf and tweeting, as usual.

The other Cabinet officials chosen so far have been typical Trump toadies and henchmen: Former congressman John Ratcliffe, who was acting director of national intelligence under Trump, will lead the CIA; South Dakota Gov. Kristi Noem will take over DHS; and former Rep. Lee Zeldin will be EPA chief. Team Trump caused a stir on Tuesday by naming Fox News personality (and former Guantánamo Bay officer) Pete Hegseth as defense secretary. His main qualification for the job appears to be pushing Trump to pardon war criminals. There's no telling who this braintrust is going to choose for attorney general or secretary of state — some semi-respectable names have been floated but there are also Hegseth-level choices out there as well.

This likely explains why Trump is demanding that the new Senate majority leader, whoever that runs out to be — Mitch McConnell is retiring from GOP leadership, at long last — will ensure that his nominations are handled by recess appointments rather than the usual constitutionally required confirmation process. It's entirely possible that even with a 53-seat majority in the Senate, Republicans couldn't get some of these unqualified extremists passed.

We need your help to stay independent

One thing is clear: Trump's team plans to hit the ground running with the mass deportation agenda. Trump has already officially named his "border czar," an unofficial position he apparently plans on imbuing with immense power. That will be former ICE acting director Tom Homan, who is best known for fashioning Trump's family separation policy. He has been all over TV assuring America that he plans to deport every undocumented immigrant and will use whatever force it takes to do it, including the military.

At this point, it's hard to know whether Democrats in Washington can do much to push back on any of this. The Senate will be in Republican hands, so the confirmation of Trump's Cabinet officials and judges is pretty much a done deal. It's still just barely within the realm of possibility that Democrats can win control of the House, which would add a necessary check on budgeting and appropriations. But that's not likely, which means a GOP candy store.

As for the judicial branch, we don't know for sure what the Supreme Court would do with cases aimed at stopping Trump's appalling agenda from coming to fruition. But we do know that the court's right-wing majority believes that virtually nothing he does could possibly be criminal, so he's pretty much got a free hand. In America's federalist system, however, there is another institutional check on his power and that's the states. And in many of the larger states run by Democrats we are already seeing a strong pushback, which they have been planning for months in case Trump managed to do the previously unthinkable and win again.

Gov. Gavin Newsom of California immediately called a special legislative session to shore up the state’s legal defenses to challenge Trump's plans around the environment, reproductive rights, LGBTQ rights and immigration. Illinois Gov. J.B. Pritzker held a news conference two days after the election and put the president-elect on notice, saying, “To anyone who intends to come take away the freedom and opportunity and dignity of Illinoisans: I would remind you that a happy warrior is still a warrior. You come for my people, you come through me."

New York Gov. Kathy Hochul and state Attorney General Letitia James have pledged to “protect New Yorkers’ fundamental freedoms from any potential threats.” Massachusetts Gov. Maura Healey, who made her name as state attorney general by filing lawsuits against the first Trump administration, said she would defend the freedoms of her people "in the face of any attempted federal overreach."


Want a daily wrap-up of all the news and commentary Salon has to offer? Subscribe to our morning newsletter, Crash Course.


Democratic states have passed laws protecting reproductive health care, have stockpiled abortion pills and pushed as many protections for threatened constituencies as they could onto the November ballots. These liberal state governors are reportedly talking among themselves about how to get promised federal funding for state projects into their treasuries before Trump takes over. He has, after all, explicitly threatened to withhold aid from any governor who tries to resist his plans.

He's not happy about this. He called out Newsom in a largely nonsensical Truth Social post:

For the moment, the pushback from state officials will largely come from lawsuits. But you have to wonder what "border czar" Homan, who claims he will have the military at his disposal, means when he says that governors of sanctuary states have to "get the hell out of the way," and that if they don't, "we may have to double the number of agents we send to New York City." Is he planning on an armed standoff with state police?

Whether the "big blue" states have enough power to push back Trump's larger agenda is unknowable, but unlikely. Unless the courts are amenable, which is a crap shoot these days, Trump will get away with much of it if he can summon up the resources and wherewithal to actually get it done. But it's hard to imagine that even his loony crew will allow Homan to send the military into New York and Los Angeles to roust immigrants from their homes in defiance of state and local authorities. There is a decent chance that these governors can "Trump-proof" their states, at least when it comes to the major population centers. We'd better hope so.

No, women aren’t likely to “boycott” men — but here’s why the idea matters

It is not women's responsibility to use sex to cajole men into sucking less. First of all: Gross. Second of all, there's no evidence that sexual persuasion works. But some people still argue that, somehow or other, it's up to women to lure men away from Donald Trump and the MAGA movement. In response to my cheeky article last week arguing that women should lean into the cat-lady lifestyle in response to Trump's win, Ana Kasparian got alarmingly heated on the Young Turks channel, which is something of a safe space for feminism-averse "leftists." 

"I just don't think this is a healthy mentality," Kasparian complained, essentially embracing the view that the "male loneliness epidemic" is women's problem, at least in part. She equated women openly refusing to date Trump supporters to those mythical misandrists who "demonize men altogether." Women, she said, have a responsibility to "engage in dialogue" with MAGA men in the hopes they might "change their minds." 

The dishonesty of this response is irritating, of course. Anyone who actually read the article could see that not only did I applaud men who voted for Kamala Harris, I invited them to share in the feminist resistance by telling MAGA men to step off. But it isn't surprising that Kasparian went with a bad-faith spin. The Young Turks have a largely male audience, and as progressive as the channel's voices may imagine themselves to be, there's a pronounced tendency toward the view that women are implicated in men's problems. One commenter actually cited "male depression, which has been brought on by feminists who hate them." Another griped that "the only people" likely to be hurt "are the women doing this," which sounds alarmingly like a threat.


Want more Amanda Marcotte on politics? Subscribe to her newsletter Standing Room Only.


Clearly, there's a lot of anxiety about women's anger, even among self-styled progressives. Over the weekend, a lot of people asked me about the 4B movement in South Korea, which I mentioned in passing in the "cat lady" column. In that movement, some Korean women are declaring they will "boycott" what they see as the four pillars of heterosexuality: dating, marriage, sex and childbirth. (All four words start with "B" in Korean.) On TikTok and other social media spaces, you can find American women discussing this whole idea, and some suggesting they might join in. 

 

@rabbitsandtea Cat lady era activated #4b #4bmovement ♬ USAAAAAAAAAAAAAA – Lawn

 

Since liberals cannot help but show off their college degrees, the 4B movement is being compared to the ancient Greek comedy "Lysistrata," in which Aristophanes imagines a community of women withholding sex from men, in hopes of bringing an end to war. Operating on the assumption that 4B amounts a "sex strike," it's easy for opinion writers to shrug it off as ineffectual and unlikely to gain momentum. I agree: women like sex, too, so they probably won't hold out forever.  

The 4B movement seems a lot less interested in cajoling men to alter their views or actions, and more in creating female solidarity and protecting women's safety.

But that condescending dismissal misses the point — both the point of the original 4B movement and why American women are talking about it now. A sex strike, after all, is rooted in the same assumption as Kasparian's argument: It's women's job to change men and sex is the tool we can use to do it. While the anti-4B side argues that women can persuade men to change by manipulating them with sex, the Lysistrata camp believes men can be convinced by deprivation. But if you actually read more deeply about the 4B movement, it seems a lot less interested in cajoling men to alter their views and actions, or even to see women as people, and more in creating female solidarity and protecting women's safety. It's not about boycotting men in order to change them so much as no longer wasting time on men at all. 

Ju Hui Judy Han, an assistant professor in gender studies at UCLA, told CNN that what undergirds 4B in South Korea is the question of "why and how could anyone imagine getting married and giving birth" in a deeply misogynist environment. That focus on self-protection is largely overlooked in the negative reactions to 4B in the U.S., but it shouldn't be. Most violence against women, in our society and around the world, is at the hands of men they know, typically their romantic partners. It's reasonable to fear that the risk is rising, after the election of an openly misogynist president who creates a permission structure for other men to be more domineering. 

But it's also a good idea not to be overly literal about the 4B movement. As Han told CNN, the actual number of women committing themselves to the movement is small, "but the sentiments behind it I think a lot of people empathize with." To talk about "boycotting" men has a lot of value, even if women ultimately don't do it, first and foremost because it helps women question toxic assumptions they were raised to believe. Maybe the biggest belief being challenged here is that women need men more than vice versa. Even in the 21st century, many young women have been socialized to feel that their social status, economic security and physical safety come from securing a romantic partnership with a man. We still live in a sea of cultural messages that portray women as the ones trying to build relationships with supposedly reluctant men. 

But the stereotype of romance-hungry women and love-reluctant men doesn't reflect reality. Maybe it was more true in the past, when deeply rooted sexism meant that women depended on men for many social goods. But in an era when women have educational and career opportunities that facilitate independence, that's all changed. There has also been a lot more public discourse on all the ways men depend on women, for everything from housework to companionship. Public debate over the "male loneliness epidemic," for instance, is largely about how much men's emotional needs are filled by women, and how single men aren't finding other outlets for sociability. As I wrote in the original "cat lady" column, many women are slowly awakening to the fact that they hold more cards in their romantic hands than they've been previously allowed to see. 

This isn't just about vibes, either. A 2020 Pew Research study on dating found that "Single men are far more likely than single women to be looking for a relationship or dates — 61% vs. 38%." It's no wonder, when you consider that women are more likely to report ugly or even scary experiences while dating, such as harassment or unwanted touching. Large numbers of women don't want to date Trump voters, but find that the market is overloaded with single men in MAGA hats. The hope of finding someone great is weakening, and the risks of the search seem too high. I know women in this situation, and while it's not exactly true that they're boycotting men, they're also not actively seeking out dates. Many of them aren't necessarily lonely: They meet interested men out and about, and have plenty of friends to keep them company. That experience seems far less common for single men. 

4B is giving American women a way to talk through their feelings and experiences in a way that encourages them to trust themselves and other women more, and to worry less about placating men. Most women who watch the 4B videos and comment online probably won't end up "boycotting" men. But they may feel a lot more empowered to be picky about who they date and more willing to focus on themselves, their friendships and their careers, rather than giving disproportionate energy to filling men's needs. It's absolutely a good thing for women to know that being on their own is better than being with a man who doesn't respect them. That attitude will keep them safer and happier, no matter what atrocious political choices American men may make.