Help keep Salon independent

Will Harris’ plan to expand Medicare and cover home care costs work?

P.S. Wilson, an entrepreneur in Atlanta, Georgia, knows what it’s like firsthand to care for an older family member. In the earlier stages of her dementia diagnosis, his late grandmother lived with him, which he described as both “rewarding and challenging.”

“Later, she moved to my uncle’s home in D.C., where he had access to additional resources to support her care,” Wilson said, adding that coupled with seeing his family care for his paternal grandmother, showed him “how difficult it can be for families without the manpower or resources to care for their loved ones.” 

“It truly highlighted the need for accessible, comprehensive care options for all families facing similar challenge,” he said, adding that now he is the founder of a professional home health care agency, P.S. Wilson Healthcare. “I have seen firsthand how the costs of long-term care place a significant burden on families.”

Earlier this month, Vice President Kamala Harris proposed a solution to ease this burden: expanding Medicare benefits to cover home health care, which would be a first for the United States, as Medicare currently only covers short-term care for rehabilitation.

Harris made the announcement Oct. 8 on the television show The View, in an attempt to capture the attention of a voter demographic who is likely caring for both children and aging parents. Also known as the “Sandwich Generation,” it’s estimated that about one in seven middle-aged adults provide financial support to an aging parent and a child. Nearly half of adults in their 40s and 50s have a parent age 65 or older, who has a 70 percent chance of needing some kind of long-term care in the future. An estimated 20 percent of 65-year-olds today will need long-term care for more than five years. 

"We do not have any sort of guaranteed support system for home care."

“There are so many people in our country who are right in the middle,” Harris said on The View. “They’re taking care of their kids and they’re taking care of their aging parents, and it’s just almost impossible to do it all, especially if they work.”

This predicament can cause major financial burdens, emotional stress, and even lead some people to leave their jobs to become full-time caregivers, often resulting in a family’s loss of income. In 2023, the average cost of private long-term care — meaning for a private room in a nursing home — was $116,796 per year. Currently, Medicaid, a program that provides medical and health-related services to low-income people, covers only 1% of total long-term care costs in the United States, in part because it has strict income limits and eligibility requirements.

However, by offering Medicare to cover more of those costs, using a government health insurance program that is aimed at adults who are aged 65 years or older, it could help millions of aging people ease the burden of long-term care, and provide the option to receive care at home. Notably, Harris indicated that recent reductions in Medicare drug costs, which were negotiated by the Biden Administration, would cover the costs of this proposal.

Many who have seen the long-term care crisis unfold were happy to hear Harris prioritize the crisis during this election season. 


Want more health and science stories in your inbox? Subscribe to Salon's weekly newsletter Lab Notes.


Nicole Jorwic, the chief of advocacy and campaign at the organization Caring Across Generations, said the reality is that the U.S. relies on unpaid family caregivers when caring for older and disabled people. 

“We do not have any sort of guaranteed support system for home care,” Jorwic told Salon. ‘So what that means is relying on unpaid family caregivers or spending every last penny you have to get the care you need.”

Expanding Medicare to cover in home care would “absolutely” help ease the financial burden, she added. While costs range by state, in-home care can cost between $30 to $40 an hour to $325 a day for live-in care. Some people have to pay over $100,000 a year for in-home care, out of pocket.

“Adding 20 hours, or whatever people need, in terms of home care would take a tremendous amount of burden off of families,” Jorwic said. “Family caregivers are providing a trillion dollars of unpaid care to the economy.”

Recently, the AARP called on legislators to expand services to help seniors remain in their homes as they age, in addition to providing paid family leave for people caring for seniors, and expanding “access to family caregiver support and respite services.” 

“Family caregivers are the backbone of a broken long-term care system, providing $600 billion in unpaid labor each year and saving taxpayers billions,” said Nancy LeaMond, AARP's executive vice president, said in a media statement. “It is long past time for lawmakers to enact commonsense solutions that support family caregivers and help older Americans live independently in their homes, where they want to be.” 

We need your help to stay independent

While some are supportive of the proposal, others are a little more skeptical. In an email statement to Salon, Clif Porter, president & CEO of the American Health Care Association/National Center for Assisted Living, said the organization is “supportive” of finding ways to make long-term care more affordable and accessible for everyone. However, the most “critical aspect is investing in the health care workforce.”

“The growing caregiver shortage is a looming crisis for our nation’s seniors,” Porter said. “Without proper resources and policies to help develop more nurses, nurse aides, CNAs [certified nursing assistants], and other caregivers, we simply won’t be able to meet the demands of our aging nation — regardless of the setting in which they need the care.”

“With a rapidly growing elderly population, there isn’t a moment to waste,” he added. 

While legislation would need to pass such an expansion if Harris won the presidential election, Jorwic said she’s hopeful it’s a bipartisan issue. 

“I think there is a recognition that care is something that everyone has in common,” she said. “It’s a multi-generational crisis that needs to be addressed for the financial reasons and also so that people can age with dignity.”

Humans can smell much faster than we blink, study reveals

If you compare a human’s nose to a dog’s nose, the former usually comes up wanting. Canine noses are so sensitive, they can smell a human’s stress and use the various odors around them to paint a picture of reality akin to what human eyes do with different colors. By contrast the human nose — though able to distinguish between 1 trillion different scents — seems like a weak imitator.

Yet a recent study in the journal Nature Human Behavior revealed that humanity’s collective sense of smell may not deserve its poor reputation. Scientists from the University of Chinese Academy of Sciences and the Ohio State University studied 229 participants over 649 sessions as they sorted through different scents ranging from apple-like and lemon-like to onion-like.

They learned that human noses are much faster than previously believed, distinguishing between different odors in an interval as short as 60 milliseconds on average. To do this, the scientists built a machine that attaches to the nose and can measure the delivery of a scent with the precision of just 18 milliseconds.

Saying human smell detection is as fast as a blink of an eye is a literal understatement. It is, in fact, half the time it takes for humans to blink, a lightning-fast 120 milliseconds.

"Our study shows that humans are inherently sensitive to fast chemical dynamics within a single sniff,” the study's lead author, Dr. Wen Zhou from the Chinese Academy of Sciences' Institute of Psychology, told Salon. “Not surprisingly, this temporal sensitivity varies from one individual to another. We know from daily experience that some people have a better sense of smell than others. On the other hand, practice makes perfect. There is good empirical evidence that we can develop olfactory expertise by training our nose. We devised an apparatus capable of delivering different odors with high temporal precision within a sniff. For individuals curious to specifically train their olfactory temporal acuity, our apparatus could be helpful."

These lightning-fast olfactory capabilities are not interesting merely as biological trivia. Although less dependent on smell to process reality than other animals, humans still need it and will suffer from mental health disorders when that ability is impaired or eliminated through a condition known as anosmia. By learning more about how humans distinguish between different odors, scientists can ultimately illuminate the many mysteries about how humans are related to other animals… including our more nasally adept canine best friends.

“Not the words I would use”: Vance goes all-in on Trump’s 2020 election denial

After dodging the question for weeks, Donald Trump running mate JD Vance finally admitted where he stands on the question of whether or not the former president lost the 2020 election. 

During a rally in Pennsylvania on Wednesday, Vance said that he doesn't believe Trump lost to President Joe Biden in the last election. The Ohio senator gave his take on that contest after being asked about it by a reporter in the crowd. 

“I’ve answered this question directly a million times,” Mr. Vance said, per the New York Times. “No. I think there are serious problems in 2020. So did Donald Trump lose the election? Not by the words that I would use.”

That belief, shared by many Trump supporters, animated a slew of legal challenges from Trump and led to the storming of the U.S. Capitol by a right-wing mob on Jan. 6. Trump himself is currently on trial for a range of election interference charges related to his attempts to disrupt the certification of Biden's victory. 

Though Vance has previously shared that he thought the election was stolen from Trump, he's refused to stand behind that claim since being tagged as a vice presidential candidate. Vance ducked the question from Democratic vice presidential nominee Tim Walz at their debate earlier this month, a move that Walz called a "damning non-answer."

He continued to side-step the topic in an interview with the New York Times, which asked Vance to share his thoughts on 2020 five times in a single interview. 

“This is a democracy!”: Harris unloads on Trump’s “enemy within” comments during Fox News interview

Kamala Harris could hardly get a word in edgewise during her interview with Fox News' Bret Baier, but when she did she made it count. 

The vice president railed against Donald Trump's recent comments that people opposed to his presidency represented an "enemy within" the United States and his cavalier attitude toward calling in the military on American citizens

"He has talked about turning the American military on American people. He has talked about going after people who are engaged in peaceful protest. He has talked about locking people up because they disagree with him," she said. "This is a democracy. The president of the United States… should be willing to be able to handle criticism without saying he'd lock people up."

Trump has repeatedly shared the idea that dissenters to his political goals are "enemies" of the United States in recent days. During his own interview with Fox News' Maria Bartiromo on Sunday, the former president said that people who disagree with him have "destroyed our country."

"We have some very bad people, sick people, radical left lunatics," he said. "And it should be easily handled by, if necessary, by National Guard, or if really necessary, by the military." 

Baier attempted to goad Harris into saying something equally disparaging about Trump voters on Wednesday, asking her if she thought his supporters were "stupid." 

"Oh, God. I would never say that about the American people," Harris said. "[Trump] is the one who tends to demean and belittle and diminish."

 

Liam Payne, former One Direction member, dead at 31

Liam Payne, former member of boy band One Direction, has died at the age of 31. 

According to the Associated Press, the British pop star fell from the third floor balcony of his hotel on Wednesday. Payne had been staying at the CasaSur in the Argentinian capital's Palermo neighborhood. Police in Buenos Aires shared with the outlet that they were called because of an "aggressive man who could be under the influence of drugs or alcohol.” Security Ministry of Buenos Aires spokesperson Pablo Policicchio said that Payne “had thrown himself from the balcony of his room.”

However, other authorities have refused to share whether they believe Payne's death was the result of intentionally leaping from the balcony. Alberto Crescenti, the director of the city's public medical system, said that investigators are conducting an autopsy and looking into the circumstances of Payne's death. Medics confirmed his death at the hotel.

Payne rose to fame after competing in the British singing competition "The X Factor" in 2010. On that series, Payne was brought together with Niall Horan, Harry Styles, Zayn Malik and Tomlinson to form the group One Direction. The band placed third on that series but went on to be one of the most successful pop bands of all time.

All of the members have released solo efforts since the band's decision to split in 2016. Payne's solo album "LP1" launched the single "Strip That Down," which went platinum in the U.S. and across the pond. He had been in the city to see Horan perform, sharing earlier in the month on social media that he was traveling to Argentina and hoped to catch up with his one-time bandmate.

“I think we might just go and say hello,” he said in a video shared to Snapchat. “It’s been a while since me and Niall have spoken. We’ve got a lot to talk about. And I would like to square up a couple of things with the boy. No bad vibes or anything like that. But just we need to talk.”

Payne was later spotted dancing and clapping at the concert.

Payne shared a son, 7-year-old Bear Payne, with his ex-girlfriend Cheryl Tweedy. Tweedy was also a veteran of the pop band ecosystem, having performed for years with the group Girls Aloud. 

This is a developing story.

Why is the Victoria’s Secret Fashion Show back, and what’s changed?

Victoria's Secret has been riddled with glaring issues for years. The long-standing lingerie brand has been publicly scolded for its lack of body inclusivity, for being out of touch with the times and for alleged abusive behavior towards its models.

As the fashion industry grappled with body positivity, transgender rights and the MeToo movement, the Victoria's Secret Fashion Show was on hiatus for six years. But in recent years, the brand took a step back and seemingly listened to the criticism. Now, Victoria's Secret has had a revamp.

The brand's flashiest night came back swinging Tuesday with a show that streamed on Prime Video, featuring musicians like Thai star Lisa opening the gig, South African pop star Tyla, and the timeless Cher taking the stage. The lingerie brand of times past is fighting to stay current to “reflect who we are today," the company said.

Why is the Victoria's Secret Fashion Show back and what has actually changed? Salon answers all your burning questions about the lingerie brand's controversies:

What are some of the controversies that have plagued the brand before?

Despite the change that is defining the brand now, it has weathered serious controversies within leadership and the culture of the brand, which has seeped into the zeitgeist. 

Hulu's documentary, "Victoria's Secret: Angels and Demons," highlighted a series of troubling internal woes which included parent company L Brands' CEO and founder Leslie Wexner's close relationship with sex offender Jeffrey Epstein. Epstein became Wexner's primary financial adviser. Epstein was even granted Wexner's power of attorney over all his financial and legal matters.

This led to the alleged exploitation of Wexner's properties and wealth so Epstein could abuse young girls. He would pretend to be a Victoria's Secret recruiter to lure young models. Wexner was notified of his behavior and the documentary stated that no action was taken as the abuse continued for years.

Outside of the legal stickiness of the Epstein case, the brand's lack of inclusiveness with transgender and plus-size models was an alarming issue for customers and fashion show viewers. In an interview with Vogue in 2018, former Chief Marketing Officer and architect of the Victoria's Secret Fashion show Ed Razek said, "If you're asking if we've considered putting a transgender model in the show or looked at putting a plus-size model in the show, we have."

He doubled down and said, “It’s like, why doesn’t your show do this? Shouldn’t you have transsexuals in the show? No. No, I don’t think we should. Well, why not? Because the show is a fantasy."

Razek later apologized for his statement and resigned the same year. However, the New York Times published an
exposé in 2020 alleging the company's “culture of misogyny.” It also singled out Razek's alleged treatment of the brand's models. The report claimed that models and employees complained of inappropriate conduct, including attempts to kiss models and touching one’s crotch.

Razek said the allegations were “categorically untrue, misconstrued or taken out of context,” and the company said it is “committed to continuous improvement and complete accountability.” 

Even the brand's models have pushed back on its toxic marketing and messaging, specifically for its "Perfect Body" campaign. This 2014 campaign featured 10 thin models, several with visible ribs. The words in the advertisement stated, "A Body for Every Body," ABC News reported.

Not long after the highly criticized campaign, one of the brand's high-profile models, Karlie Kloss, left the company because she “didn’t feel it was an image that was truly reflective of who I am and the kind of message I want to send to young women around the world about what it means to be beautiful.”

Another model, Robyn Lawley, also led the charge to boycott the brand altogether, stating that Victoria's Secret tells women “only one kind of body” is beautiful, Forbes reported.

So years later, what's changed with Victoria's Secret?

With dwindling viewership numbers, competing brands like Rihanna's SavageXFenty put inclusivity at the forefront of their brand and pushed Victoria's Secret out of the game.

By sheer cultural force, the brand said it moved "away from telling its customer 'what's sexy and how to look' in favor of supporting consumers 'throughout every phase of their life.'"

Right before Razek's resignation in 2019, the brand hired its first trans model, Valentina Sampaio. Shortly after, it also hired its first plus-size model, Ali Tate Cutler, and then canceled its fashion show. Then in 2021, Wexner officially left L Brands, which ultimately opened the door for more change within the company.

Teen Vogue reported that the company began selling maternity bras for the first time. It also launched a new campaign that included women of all body types from various professions including tennis star Naomi Osaka, Sampaio and plus-size model Paloma Elsesser. The company's stores also began displaying curvy mannequins nationwide. 

"It's a change led by an entirely new board of directors that consists of seven people, six of whom are women," writer Marilyn La Jeunesse wrote for Teen Vogue.

Now, for its 2024 fashion show, it still highlighted some of the brand's thinner and most popular supermodels, with Gigi and Bella Hadid opening and closing the show. Even legend Adriana Lima made her return to adorn some angel wings. But they did come through with at least some of their promised changes, celebrating plus-size models Ashley Green and Elsesser.

The show also showcased Tyra Banks, the brand's first-ever contracted and cataloged Black model. Banks' voice opened the show as she boasted, “A brand new Victoria’s Secret fashion show, where women take the reins and the spotlight.”

We need your help to stay independent

Other models also celebrated were transgender models Alex Consani, Sampaio and '90s supermodels like Kate Moss and Carla Bruni

While the brand has made efforts for diversity, inclusion and body positivity, Teen Vogue associate editor Aiyana Ishmael wrote, "It is true that women were center stage in this show, though they always have been. Removing male performers helped alleviate the male gaze, and any event that does result in women feeling good about themselves is largely a net positive. But just because we speak the words doesn’t usher in the action."

Ishmael found that people online begged for a Victoria's Secret Fashion show of times past that included very harmful narratives about women's bodies. She said outside of the few plus models like Green and Elsesser, "the proof is in the pudding, and aside from a few 'plus' models (who, it’s worth noting, mostly fit into straight sizes), the runway was overwhelmingly thin."

“Increasingly unstable”: Harris calls Trump “unfit” for office after bizarre town hall

Vice President Kamala Harris called Donald Trump "unfit" to for the presidency after a bizarre town hall that ended with Trump swaying onstage to music for over half an hour. 

Speaking to reporters ahead of a rally in Pennsylvania on Wednesday, Harris said that "people who have worked closely with" Trump have noted he's unwell. 

"Donald Trump is increasingly unstable," she said. "And as has been said by the people who have worked closely with him, he is unfit to be President of the United States."

Harris' comments from Pennsylvania follow a disastrous Trump event in the same state on Monday. Though Trump's stop in suburban Philadelphia was billed as a town hall, he only answered four questions before pivoting to nearly 40 minutes of dancing to music. The town hall was twice interrupted by fainting attendees, according to the Washington Post, and Trump refused to be put back on track by moderator and South Dakota Governor Kristi Noem. 

“Let’s not do any more questions. Let’s just listen to music. Let’s make it into a music [sic],” Trump said. “Who the hell wants to hear questions, right?”

Trump interjected over his playlist rarely after he stopped taking questions, occasionally tossing out canned lines about the election. According to a report by the Washington Post, he mostly acted as an MC for the rally playlist.

“Nobody’s leaving. What’s going on? There’s nobody leaving. Keep going,” he said, over Rufus Wainwright’s cover of “Hallelujah." “All right, turn that music up! Turn that up. Great song!”

The rest of the week went no better for Trump, who rambled and drifted during an event at the Economic Club of Chicago on Tuesday.

Harris campaign blasts “creepy” Trump for claiming he’s the “father of IVF” at Fox News town hall

Former President Donald Trump declared himself the “father of IVF” to an audience of exclusively women at a taped Fox News town hall event that aired Wednesday morning.

Trump fielded a range of questions from women voters who were almost entirely Republican and hand-selected by Fox News, The Independent reported. The conversation shifted to reproductive rights towards the end.

“I want to talk about IVF. I’m the father of IVF, so I want to hear this question,” Trump said before one woman spoke.

“We really are the party for IVF,” Trump continued to tell host Harris Faulkner. “We want fertilization, and it’s all the way, and the Democrats tried to attack us on it, and we’re out there on IVF, even more than them. So, we’re totally in favor.”

IVF, the fertility treatment responsible for about 2% of U.S. births, emerged as a central issue in the presidential race earlier this year when Alabama’s Supreme Court ruled that frozen embryos should be considered children and that people can be held legally responsible for destroying them. At least 12 other states now have pending legislation that threatens the legality of IVF.

Throughout his campaign, the 78-year-old Republican nominee has repeatedly tried to frame himself as a defender of IVF, despite handpicking the Supreme Court justices responsible for overturning Roe v. Wade. GOP party members have also twice voted to block legislation that would legally protect those who choose to undergo IVF. The party's platform also endorses the concept of “fetal personhood,” which threatens access to all reproductive care, including IVF.

“Donald Trump called himself ‘the father of IVF,’ What is he talking about?” Vice President Kamala Harris wrote on X. “His abortion bans have already jeopardized access to it in states across the country—and his own platform could end IVF altogether.”

Gwen Walz, the wife of Harris’ running mate Tim Walz, was also baffled by Trump’s self-proclaimed title. 

 “The father of IVF? More like the father of Georgia’s abortion ban," she said at a campaign event in Georgia. The mother of two has previously shared that she underwent fertility treatment herself. 

“The 'father of IVF' isn’t just creepy," she added, "it’s downright nuts."

Chutkan: Trump “could share responsibility” for Jan. 6 without encouraging rioters

U.S. District Judge Tanya Chutkan let slip that Donald Trump could still go down for election interference without having a direct connection to the January 6 rioters. 

Chutkan shared in a ruling released on Wednesday that Trump "could share responsibility for the events of January 6 without such express authorization of rioters’ criminal actions."

Chutkan's ruling mostly denied the Trump team's request for wide-ranging discovery of classified documents on election interference in the 2016 and 2020 elections. Trump's attorneys claimed the reports on election interference would help establish Trump's state of mind in the lead-up to January 6, painting the former president as awash in materials that made him believe the integrity of the election was under attack.

Chutkan largely dismissed the arguments of Trump's team, pointing out that many reports Trump's team was seeking refuted the idea of widespread election interference and noting that material Trump did not have access to before January 6 could not have influenced his actions. 

"Defendant does not claim to have reviewed the records he seeks, their sources, or their conclusions before or during the time period of his indicted conduct," Chutkan wrote.

The ruling comes the same day as a filing from special counsel Jack Smith that alleges Trump is directly responsible for the U.S. Capitol riot. Smith's team wrote that Trump "willfully caused others" to attempt to disrupt the certification of Joe Biden's election, saying that their case will “link the defendant’s actions on January 6 directly to his efforts to corruptly obstruct the certification proceeding.”

FTC rule makes it easier to cancel memberships, subscriptions

The Federal Trade Commission on Wednesday finalized a rule that requires businesses to make it easier for people to cancel unwanted subscriptions and memberships. 

The "click to cancel" policy says that if customers signed up online, they must also be able to cancel online without additional steps, media outlets reported

The rule also prohibits businesses from misleading people about subscriptions and requires them to obtain consent before charging for memberships, auto-renewals and programs linked to free trial offers, The Associated Press reported. Businesses will also need to tell consumers when free trials or other promotional offers will end.

“Too often, businesses make people jump through endless hoops just to cancel a subscription,” FTC Chair Lina Khan said in a statement. “The FTC’s rule will end these tricks and traps, saving Americans time and money. Nobody should be stuck paying for a service they no longer want.”

The Biden administration had said in August it was advancing the proposed rule, announced last year.

FTC commissioners voted 3-2 to approve it. The agency said most portions would take effect 180 days after it is published in the Federal Register. 

After the rule was finalized, Planet Fitness was trending on social media. The gym franchise doesn't allow members to cancel over the phone or online.

The new rule received more than 16,000 comments from consumers, consumer advocacy groups and trade associations, the AP reported. 

The U.S. Chamber of Commerce has said it would micromanage business practices and lead to higher costs for consumers. 

"Businesses succeed by being responsive to customers and have a far better track record of customer service, streamlined paperwork and prompt response times than the federal government," the business lobbying group said in a statement.

“American Horror Stories” gives a tepid crash course on liminal spaces in “Backrooms”

On Tuesday, Ryan Murphy released his latest contribution to what's starting to feel like a streaming platform takeover, following up "American Sports Story: Aaron Hernandez," "Monsters: The Lyle And Erik Menendez Story," "Grotesquerie" and a string of others with his return to "American Horror Stories," which plopped into our laps in a five-episode dump on Hulu, just in time for peak spooky season. 

If you're saying to yourself, "Wait, I didn't know there was a new season of 'American Horror Story,'" there isn't. This is "American Horror Storie(s)" — plural — and how that differs from "AHS" proper is that by centering each episode on a standalone story that begins and ends in 38–49 minutes, Murphy takes a break from fiddling around with how to land the end of a full season narrative arch, which he historically gets called out for fumbling. Interweaving plot lines that come together satisfyingly after 9 or 10 episodes? Too hard. Throwing together whatever bonkers thing he can think of for one nonsensical (but in a fun way) episode? Yeah, that's his sweet spot. And that's exactly what we get here.

In the new "American Horror Stories," Murphy, per usual, keeps his finger on the pulse of pop culture much in the same way we all do, by farming the hive mind (AKA, TikTok) for content. And as is also his way, he musters up one big swing that cracks harder than all the rest. In Season 2, that was an episode titled "Milkmaids" which centered on people quite literally eating pus and made me also quite literally puke. This season, it's "Backrooms," where he sets a child-murdering Michael Imperioli loose to go nuts in liminal spaces — those eerie, dreamlike abandoned rooms that TikTok has been haunting most of our "For You" pages with for years. And while Murphy and the episode's writers, Jon Robin Baitz and Joe Baken, do a very watchable job of providing viewers with a crash course on liminal spaces and the "backroom" phenomena, TikTok does it better. It usually does. 

The set-up of "Backrooms" is as such: We're introduced to Imperioli's character — a self-absorbed, award-winning screenwriter — and as soon as it's mentioned that his young son went missing, we immediately know that whatever was done to this boy, he did it. The fun of Murphy's shows is never the "how" of it all, it's the "what's next?"

The twist of this episode, given away in the title, is that by keeping the truth of his child's whereabouts a secret, the father detaches from reality and dips in and out of an in-between place — finding himself in uncanny grocery stores when he had, moments prior, been in his apartment. Or in eerie linoleum-lined rooms mid-visit to a restaurant bathroom. 

And because Murphy wants this to be easy for everyone, he gives us some exposition on just what the ever-lovin' heck is going on here by way of a signature Murphy ™CrazyMan.


Want a daily wrap-up of all the news and commentary Salon has to offer? Subscribe to our morning newsletter, Crash Course.


After Imperioli's character does some research and chances upon a video made by a guy who used a Super 8 camera to capture footage of backrooms, he visits him at the prison where he's being detained for vehicular manslaughter — a deception that broke him from his own reality, landing him in liminal spaces of his own — and we get the full breakdown via visiting room prison phone, which feels so right.

But even with this exposition, TikTok explains it or, rather, shows it better.  

For an even bigger scare, Google "are liminal spaces real," and you'll come across articles from sites like How Stuff Works which details that, yes, they are.

"Liminal spaces are transitional or transformative spaces that are neither here nor there; they are the in-between places or thresholds we pass through from one area to another," the article explains, citing University of Missouri professor Dr. Timothy Carson who uses the pandemic as an example of how a person can dip into them, referring to it as an "involuntary social liminality, a time/space that was full of uncertainty and ambiguity, all the landmarks gone, the future undefined."

An analysis of liminal spaces, like one in the YouTube video below, put Murphy's "backrooms" to shame but after watching his episode of "American Horror Stories" and viewing it as a gateway, he's actually given us a gift in that today, most assuredly, is now creepier than yesterday was. And, as always, it's just fun to watch Michael Imperioli run around and do stuff.

Musk and other billionaires keep Trump afloat, donating over $350 million to MAGA super PACs

Tesla CEO Elon Musk and three other billionaires have contributed over $350 million to super PACs supporting Republican nominee Donald Trump this cycle, according to new filings with the Federal Election Commission.

While Trump’s campaign fundraising has paled in comparison to the money raised for Vice President Kamala Harris, Musk, along with Timothy Mellon, Miriam Adelson and Dick Uihlein, have kept Trump’s campaign financially afloat with their individual support.

According to the FEC filings, Adelson, wife of the late casino magnate Sheldon Adelson, was the GOP’s top donor. She gave $95 million to the super PAC, “Preserve America,” which primarily spends on pro-Trump TV ads in swing states.

Musk donated $75 million to his own “America PAC,” which has spent nearly $96 million to support Trump. Musk also donated $1 million to “Early Vote Action PAC,” which targets young Republican men in swing states.

Uilhein donated $49 million to the "Restoration PAC," which spent over $2 million to sway a House race in Maine. In August, it was revealed that Mellon, the heir to the Mellon Banking fortune, donated over $125 million to “Make America Great Again Inc.,” another super PAC.

Despite the billionaire-boost, Harris and the Democratic party raised nearly double the amount of their GOP rivals, bringing in over $652 million from July to September of this year. According to sources familiar with the numbers, Harris' total haul now exceeds $1 billion.

“Shrinking” returns with a more assured and legitimately therapeutic second season

Therapy rarely begins smoothly. Initial sessions tend to be colored by weeping, hesitancy and half-truths as the clinician and client get a feel for each other. You could say the same of many TV shows, but since we’re talking about “Shrinking,” surely you see parallels. Season 1 was all awkward introductions, with Jason Segel’s Jimmy Laird sticking his hand out for a nice-to-meet-you shake, with standard-issue TV wounded healer listed on his Hello My Name Is tag. Jimmy, our psychologist, is barely making it through talk therapy sessions because he’s not quite holding it together.

We’re dropped into Jimmy’s life not long after his wife died, leaving him and their teen daughter Alice (Lukita Maxwell) to make sense of the unthinkable. At work, his mentor Paul (Harrison Ford) acts more like a father figure toward Jimmy, and his colleague Gaby (Jessica Williams), who was also Tia’s best friend, ends up sleeping with him.

All this spins around Jimmy’s wild prescriptions to his most unstable patients, including Sean (Luke Tennie), a veteran whose tour in Afghanistan left him with explosive rage and PTSD. But just as Jimmy starts to pull his life together again, his patient Grace (Heidi Gardner) pushes her abusive ex off a cliff.

Around 18 months after that ending, the healing can officially begin.

The only obligation “Shrinking” has is to make us laugh, and to the credit of its creators Segel, Bill Lawrence and Brett Goldstein, that quickly became its emphasis midway through its 10-episode first season. Simply maintaining its funny wouldn’t be especially remarkable, regardless of Ford’s admirable comic timing as the group’s unofficially patriarch/wise man/curmudgeon.

Luckily these new episodes escalate the stakes, hitting us in our feelings similarly to the way Lawrence’s and Goldstein’s other great Apple TV+ plus show met us four years ago.

Invoking “Ted Lasso” nowadays nets mixed reactions, but our first taste of that sugar came back in 2020 when rancor and bitterness defined our existence. Its magic was in reminding us of a basic truth that humans can be and usually are good to each other.

“Shrinking,” being a show about therapy and grief, asks us to consider something brave — especially before an election that has many hyperventilating into paper bags. It proposes we practice empathy and consider granting absolution to the people who gravely hurt us.

ShrinkingLukita Maxwell and Michael Urie in “Shrinking” (Apple TV+)

Tia didn’t just keel over, remember. She was killed by a drunk driver. Alice isn’t another surly teen. She was abandoned by her father when she needed him most, taking emotional refuge with their next-door neighbor Liz (Christa Miller) and her go-along-to-get-along husband Derek (Ted McGinley).

Lawrence, something of a master of the heart-forward, quirky sitcom, dialed the original therapy themes back for a while to recreate something closer to “Cougar Town” in its best seasons.

Which is to say, “Shrinking” has settled into the salving vibe of a hangout comedy, what with Jimmy’s workplace and neighborhood families of choice comfortably overlapping without sacrificing the therapeutic spaces that make it distinct. It reminds us that everybody is aching in some way and therefore deserving of forbearance.

For the most part that’s an easy proposition since nobody in Jimmy’s orbit is unlikeable. Even when Damon Wayans Jr. shows up as a romantic possibility for Gaby, nobody can find anything bad to say about him. Not even Jimmy.

“Shrinking” makes a strong case for expanding the episode counts for stories that are worth the additional time, with 12 episodes to work with instead of 10. Instead of existing to prop up one or two main characters, the show gives us an ensemble whose individual lives and personalities merit fuller examination. (That’s also true of Goldstein’s character, the antithesis of Roy Kent, which Apple TV+ has asked critics to keep under wraps until he’s introduced.)

We need your help to stay independent

Miller’s Liz probably gets the shortest stick of all the regular players, but a subplot fleshing out her character’s relationship dynamic with McGinley’s Derek transforms him from an eternally smiling goofball into something lovelier and more fragile than the background figure barely introduced last year.

The writers rightly assume that viewers aren’t troubling themselves much about the questionable ethics of the lead character’s methods: For all of Paul’s finger-wagging at Jimmy’s professional lapses, we wouldn’t trade a moment of Paul’s romance with his former neurologist Julie (Wendie Malick). Doctor-patient boundaries? Whatever. Malick and Ford are brilliant together.

Against all odds and ethical soundness, Sean is now Jimmy’s greatest success story in part because he moved into his pool house and redirected his rage into full-contact mixed martial arts classes.

ShrinkingLuke Tennie in “Shrinking” (Apple TV+)

He and Liz run a food truck together, as well as giving her and Jimmy’s wealthy households a reason to band together and rail against one of their racist neighbors – something the writers effectively surface now and then as a running joke.

Listing these catch-up details reveals the introductory episodes’ overemphasis on the situation instead of leaning into the comedy of it all. The cast’s performances and undeniable chemistry shored up the many fissures threatening to collapse the premise’s integrity—at least, enough to pull us through.

But the latest chapters (11 of which were made available to review) keep enough of that treatment theme going to grant the comedy heft and heart, earning the moments when someone’s stifled anguish or self-doubt gets the better of them.

Grace, in her way, becomes the thematic mascot of a new season that widens its panorama beyond Jimmy’s issues. In the premiere, Segel’s character seizes on someone’s offhanded description of his meddling as “Jimmying” and tries to make it his “thing,” despite Grace taking his advice a little too literally and far.

Now she’s in jail with no interest in getting sprung. She believes her inner flaws are too big to mend, in the same way the onset of Paul’s Parkinson’s symptoms forces him to confront his ego and the ways it has stymied his connections with others.

Gaby’s humor and flagrant success mask nuggets of self-resentment and low-key dread at having to assume some of the caretaking duties for her mother that she’s largely left with a sister (Courtney Taylor), a recovering addict who resents being saddled with that responsibility.


Want a daily wrap-up of all the news and commentary Salon has to offer? Subscribe to our morning newsletter, Crash Course.


Season 2’s best subplots follow Tennie’s Sean and Michael Urie’s Brian, who fully blooms a performance that balances outsized physical humor with surprising depth and he and his husband Charlie (Devin Kawaoka) consider expanding their family.

In the meantime, Sean’s forward progress slams to a halt when the father (Kenajuan Bentley) he’s been avoiding comes back into the picture.  So do others who threaten the group’s peace and equilibrium.

In each person’s story, there are reasons for their missteps and a way through, especially when that road seems to be closed or unnavigable.

“Sometimes the idea of forgiving someone feels, like, impossible,” Jimmy tells someone. “Then you realize that the villain in your story is just a person who made a big mistake.”

Granted, that prescription won’t close our culture’s sanity rift. But if we can narrow our efforts to millions of one-on-one interactions, that could be the start of something.

“Shrinking” returns with a two-episode premiere on Wednesday, October 16 on Apple TV+. New episodes premiere weekly on Wednesdays.

Pope Francis urges world leaders to transform military spending into investments in food and health

To mark World Food Day on October 16, Pope Francis emphasized the importance of combating food insecurity and ensuring that everyone has access to adequate food and drink, especially during wartime.

According to Vatican News, the official news portal of the Vatican, Pope Francis wrote on X, formerly Twitter, “War brings out the worst in humanity: selfishness, violence and dishonesty … Let us reject the line of reasoning that embraces weapons, and instead transform massive military expenditures into investments to combat hunger and the lack of healthcare and education.”

https://x.com/Pontifex/status/1846498824057127016

The pope also urged the Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) to "listen to the demands of those at the end of the food chain, such as small farmers, and to intermediary social groups, like families, who are directly involved in feeding people." He highlighted that the theme of World Food Day — "the right to food for a better life and a better future" — is a priority that "satisfies one of the basic needs of human beings: to feed oneself in accordance with adequate qualitative and quantitative standards."

Pope Francis specifically mentioned that the needs of "workers, farmers, the poor, the hungry, and those living in isolated rural areas must never be overlooked." He aims for the church to help provide "a plurality and variety of nutritious, affordable, healthy, and sustainable foods," while further committing to the goal of "eradicating hunger and poverty" to ensure that "everyone can have adequate food, in both quantity and quality."

Your favorite chef’s favorite chef: How Blanca’s Victoria Blamey is redefining fine dining

Victoria Blamey has been one of the most sought-after chefs in New York City for over a decade now. Her career started a world away, though.

Blamey, who was born in Santiago, Chile, traveled throughout London, Australia and Spain in the beginnings of her career, working her way through the kitchen (and the world) alongside some of the most recognizable names in international cuisine.

As her technical abilities grew — primarily within the realms of fish cookery and pastry — Blamey began to take on the States, working at restaurants in New York City before becoming the executive chef at Chumley's, a classic tavern, where she became well-known and celebrated for her bold takes on meat-forward dishes, both traditional and re-imagined.

After that, she cooked at Fulgurances Laundromat, a Brooklyn outpost of a successful Paris restaurant. Soon after, she opened MENA, which was an absolute hit with critics, but unfortunately ended up closing its doors after just six months in 2022. Blamey said she was not involved in the decision, which was made by the hospitality group that leased the restaurant space, who cited “financial reasons” factoring into the closure. 

Not soon after that, though, Blamey and chef Carlo Mirachi happened to collaborate — and Blanca 2.0 was born.

Mirachi is the executive chef and co-owner of Roberta’s — a nearly 15-year-old cult-favorite pizza stalwart that shares a space and address with Blanca — and his newest restaurant Foul Witch. In 2011, he won Food & Wine’s Best New Chef designation and his cooking was once deemed “kitchen poetry” by the New York Times. 

He and Brandon Hoy originally opened Blanca in 2012. The restaurant secured two Michelin stars, but closed during the pandemic. It recently reopened earlier this spring with Blamey at the helm. In the intimate, 12-seat restaurant, Blamey serves an expertly crafted 18-course menu to great acclaim. 

"This Bushwick counter has finally returned, and some things have not changed,” the Michelin guide noted. “You still have to walk through Roberta’s, past the roaring pizza ovens and through the backyard, to find this lofty space. The playlist is as high-energy as ever, and the mood is collectively lighthearted."

It continued: "The kitchen is now under the command of Chef Victoria Blamey, who brings her own style and story to this robust tasting menu. Oyster with kalamansi cream, Dungeness crab empanadas, and surf clams with nixtamalized sweet potato reflect wide-ranging inspiration; and something is always grilling, like dry-aged pheasant or grass-fed lamb."

Clearly, both Roberta's and Blanca are legendary restaurants putting out high-end food, just two sides of the same coin. As Forbes put it back in February in regards to their collaboration and the rebirth of Blanca after its temporary shuttering, the "stars have aligned."

Salon recently had an opportunity to speak with both Mirarchi and Blamey, talking about all things Blanca, their visions for what's to come, their "mascot" and so much more.

Chefs Carlo Mirarchi and Victoria BlameyChefs Carlo Mirarchi and Victoria Blamey (Courtesy of Blanca)

The following interview has been lightly edited for clarity and length. 

Chef Carlo Mirarchi: 

Salon: Over at Foul Witch  — always loved that name — I'm struck by the "whimsical Italian" moniker. What differentiates that style from other Italian and Italian-American restaurants? Congratulations on the James Beard nomination, by the way!

CM: Thanks! I like to think that we take a pretty traditional approach while still trying to make things interesting and fun.

How would you describe the changes at Blanca over the years?

We have always been a restaurant driven by ingredients and that hasn’t changed, but our approach is constantly evolving. I have always cooked instinctively, whether that comes from place or memory, it doesn’t really matter. What does matter is constantly challenging those instincts in order to grow.

Bringing on Chef Victoria, who cooks in a similar way, is obviously a great change, but very much representative of what Blanca is as a restaurant at its core.

What led to Blanca's original opening?

We started doing a small menu once a week in Roberta’s and I think we got lucky. It was well received by the right people at the right time.

The fish on the wall is the same as the fish on the website landing page. What does that fish represent to Blanca?

The tuna was landed in Montauk, in 1978, I believe. It's been with us since day one. It's our official mascot! Good days or bad days, it’s always hung in there.

Blanca Restaurant InteriorBlanca Restaurant Interior (Courtesy of Blanca/Alessandro Cinque)

Blanca only has 12 seats. How does that impact both the service and the overall dining experience for the guests?

We are able to focus more on the individual guest experience each evening. It also allows us to secure ingredients and products that are in nominal supply, as well as highlight certain farmers and producers who work with more limited availability.

I know that the natural wine program is well-honed at Blanca. Can you tell me a bit about it? How does it differ from the Foul Witch wine menu?

Our wines serve to both highlight and compliment the food at Blanca and for the most part, to work within the environment of a tasting menu. Foul Witch has a lot of wines on the list that are just great and fun to drink, period, completely on their own, regardless of what you are eating.

Roberta's and Blanca couldn't be more different, but they have such a connection. Can you speak to that?

They do share a lot of the same DNA, and Victoria and I have a lot of the same ideas when it comes to food, especially in the context of a tasting menu and the rhythms you need to maintain to keep the palate engaged. We also both cook instinctually and I think guests can see that on the plate. The food isn’t an intellectual exercise, but rather comes from somewhere within.

Crab empanadaCrab empanada (Courtesy of Blanca/Todd Midler)

Chef Victoria Blamey:

Salon: What are some of your top, non-negotiable ingredients you work with on a daily basis?

VB: Olive oil, chiles, citrus, spices

What lessons and elements do you impart from your Chilean upbringing in leading a professional kitchen?

Not sure it's a Chilean lesson, but I guess a family lesson from my mother and that is to lead with intention and to be true to myself.


Want more great food writing and recipes? Subscribe to Salon Food's newsletter, The Bite.


Could you tell our readers a bit about your culinary background and pedigree? What came before Blanca?

There's so much out there already! It’s been a trip!

In a very concise way, I can tell you that I started working in England for two and a half years, then Melbourne in Australia. I have worked in Spain and in Miami very early on in my career and then I came to New York for reasons other than cooking and I stayed here for the longest time — 14 years.

Blanca Restaurant ExteriorBlanca exterior/entrance (Courtesy of Blanca/Alessandro Cinque)

What can you tell me about how and when you began to work with Carlo Mirarchi in heading up Blanca after such a long COVID break?

We met in April 2023. I received a random call from a friend that we have in common. We were in conversation for months until we decided to work together in October 2023. We re-opened Blanca mid January 2024. It’s been an exciting challenge.

In The New Yorker, Helen Rosner said that Blanca "is not for beginners," referencing the "flavors that are strong, unexpected and occasionally disorienting." Do you feel that that sums up the food at Blanca well?

I think Blanca is a place to taste things that could be familiar to some, but always in a different and unexpected light. We are not trying to break off the mold intentionally.

I read that Blanca had "nominally Italian outlines. Do you feel as though you work along those lines in the current menu iteration? 

Well, clearly my line is not Italian. Have I worked in an Italian restaurant in my life before? Yes. I think we are who we are in the space that we inhabit. The pastas are there as a reminder of the legacy of its founder, but I have never seen Blanca as one or the other.

In South America and Spain, people call the chef’s cuisine “Cocina de autor” and it always bothers me that here in the US, they try to box someone’s cuisine in such a simplistic way.

The current menu is 18 courses. Can you talk a bit about that progression?

Now we are actually at 15 [or] 16 and I think the progression is thought out, but not to the extreme. We take cuisine seriously, but not to the point of being dogmatic. I think we go with a feeling as a common denominator. Feeling the heat of a spice, feeling the temperature of the dish — then we see where it fits on the menu.

What stands out for you as a formative moment that got you into cooking or food at large?

I was studying history and I used to stay up late at night, not always studying or writing essays, but cooking. During one Christmas, I was obsessed with making Christmas Pudding [the Chilean version] and German ginger cookies. I was up until 4 a.m. because I told my mum to sell them in her office. Bear in mind, my mum had been working at that time for Nestle for 30 years and here comes her daughter asking her to sell Christmas puddings. They loved them so much, but [I] couldn’t keep up with production!

I guess my passion became a commitment. That’s when I knew I had to drop out of University and pursue cooking. It wasn’t so easy to realize. I always thought my options as a woman in a conservative country like Chile were limited. So my horizon had to be abroad.

CevicheCeviche (Courtesy of Blanca/Todd Midler)

What is your favorite cooking memory?

My great aunt Filomena making empanadas and sweet tortillas with blackberry jam. All her cooking was just divine.

What’s your biggest tip for cutting down on food waste?

To challenge yourself, that creativity comes from moments where we are also “forced” to do something unexpected.

We need your help to stay independent

How do you practice sustainability in your cooking and in your restaurants?

It’s hard. I try to not have much waste, but regardless of how much waste we have, we do not have the infrastructure that can also facilitate that. If something so simple and old school like compost can not happen in this city, well that tells you how behind the US is. We cut budgets in a city like New York on compost — that’s so short-sighted to me.

How did your experiences at Chumley’s and all of the other restaurants you've worked at all coincide in your current work at Blanca?

I see them all as formation years. I’m still forming, always learning. Defining who I am through cooking is never ending.

You’ve received such rave reviews in your career and Blanca is obv. No exception. What’s next on the horizon for you?

I think that’s a very good question. Right now I’m trying to get Blanca where I think it can be and to make Blanca a fun and different spot for people to experience my cooking, the hospitality of the staff, the unique work of our cook  and feel familiar with our faces.

In the future, I’m not so sure if I’ll be here 100% of my time. NY has changed a lot for me and perhaps I’m thinking where the next chapter of my life is. I’m going to be 45 this year and I think we all need time to see more and live a little more.

“His brain is completely out of commission”: Moderator repeatedly calls out Trump for rambling

Speaking at the Economic Club of Chicago on Tuesday, an unfocused and irritable Donald Trump botched answers to basic questions about how his agenda would impact American businesses and consumers while not denying that he has been having phone calls with Russian President Vladimir Putin. Trump’s meandering replies consisted of the usual grab-bag of tangential anecdotes and endless grievances, his interviewer repeatedly forced to keep him on track by reminding him of the topic he was supposed to be discussing.

The performance, coming a day after a Trump “town hall” devolved into the Republican nominee meandering on stage for 39 awkward and alarming minutes as his fans listened to his favorite songs, did not reassure critics who say the former president’s recent behavior is a sign of cognitive decline. The Republican nominee was never one for specifics, or staying on message, but his claimed “weave” — rambling about something else before returning to the topic at hand — appears less intentional and more like a man experiencing the inevitable effects of aging.

“Should Google be broken up?” interviewer John Micklethwait, editor in chief of Bloomberg News, asked Trump on Tuesday.

Trump’s immediate response, in full:

"I just haven’t gotten over something the Justice Department did yesterday, where Virginia cleaned up its voter rolls and got rid of thousands and thousands of bad votes. And the Justice Department sued them, that they should be allowed to put those bad votes and illegal votes back in and let the people vote. So I haven’t — I haven’t gotten, I haven’t gotten over that. A lot of people have seen that and they can’t even believe it."

Readers, like Trump’s interviewer on Tuesday, will try and fail to find anything about a search engine in that answer.

“The question is about Google, President Trump,” Micklethwait reminded the 78-year-old Republican (as for the Justice Department: It is indeed suing Virginia after it said the state, ostensibly targeting immigrants, illegally purged scores of U.S. citizens from its voter database).

Given a second chance, Trump talked not about Google parent company Alphabet and its hold over online advertising, for example, but how he personally had been wronged.

“They’re very bad to me,” Trump said. “I’m getting a lot of good stories lately, but you don’t find them in Google. I think it’s a rigged deal. I think Google’s rigged, just like our government is rigged all over the place.”

Trump was also asked about his core economic agenda, which is basically taxes: lowering them for corporations and hiking them on all imported goods, the 78-year-old Republican promising to rebuild domestic manufacturing with tariffs that he wrongly claims would be paid by foreign countries.

“I’m going to put the highest tariff in history,” Trump boasted Tuesday.

In reality, businesses tend to pass on their costs to consumers — a 20% tariff on goods from China would be experienced as a 20% rise in prices at Best Buy — a fact that Micklethwait brought up during Tuesday’s discussion. Earlier this summer, 16 Nobel Prize-winning economists warned that Trump’s tariff plan would “reignite” inflation. The Committee for a Responsible Budget earlier this month also said Trump’s tax-and-spending plans would widen budget deficits by at least $7.5 trillion over the next decade, double the estimate for Vice President Kamala Harris’ proposal to boost social spending and cut middle-class taxes, The Wall Street Journal reported.

Confronted with these criticisms, Trump grew petulant.

“What does the Wall Street Journal know? I’m meeting with them tomorrow, what does the Wall Street Journal know? They’ve been wrong about everything. So have you, by the way. You’ve been wrong about everything,” the former president replied.

This, in the words of the Trump campaign, was the Republican nominee putting on a “master class.” To others, it looked an awful lot like a man in decline, devoid of any intellectual curiosity or ability to accept good-faith criticism, resorting to petty insults to obscure his own fundamental lack of understanding.

But that’s also Trump’s appeal: What looks to some like a weak man lashing out and whining to others looks like a tough guy putting one of those pompous reporters in their place.

“Trump Schools Bloomberg Editor on Tariffs,” the right-wing outlet Breitbart assured its readers, citing the exchange where Trump called his interviewer, The Wall Street Journal and over a dozen Nobel laureates “wrong” but at no point explained why.

We need your help to stay independent

When one’s appeal is emotional, it does not matter if there is no substance. Trump can be as incoherent as President Joe Biden on a very bad day and it does not matter so long as the billionaire from television put some “elites” in their place (economists and some guy from Bloomberg in this case; liberals and immigrants in others).

Bullying as overcompensation for obvious insecurity and resentment that the world does not view their mediocrity as excellence? There are millions of American men who either do the same or who now live vicariously through one who does. So long as Trump is promising to hurt their shared enemies — intellectuals, minorities, women — he can say whatever; his base doesn’t know how “tariffs” work either and it’s actually suspicious if you do.

Grasping that emotional appeal is the key to unlocking Trump’s power. If that appeal isn’t there, then one is freed to judge the three-time Republican candidate for president as one would any other politician with a record to examine. Trump saying it would be “a smart thing” to talk to Putin from Mar-a-Lago, where he stashed some of the nation’s most sensitive national security documents, or insisting there was a “peaceful” transfer of power on Jan. 6, 2021, as he did Tuesday — it starts to look like lies or far worse.

“His brain is completely out of commission,” conservative attorney George Conway posted on social media regarding Trump’s scattered responses. But former Rep. Joe Walsh, R-Ill., a Tea Party activist turned critic of MAGA, went a step further, channeling what would have been the conservative response to any other politician keeping in constant contact with an adversary after having tried go overthrow the republic: “He’s a traitor to this country.”

Unfortunately for Trump’s conservative critics, the movement they built has become a cult of personality willing to embrace anything, up to and including treason, so long as it means pain is inflicted on everyone else. The Republican candidate can say whatever he likes about tariffs, or say nothing at all; that the right people are mad about it is more than half of the attraction.

Judge rejects Georgia rule that could have delayed election by requiring hand count of ballots

A county judge in Georgia on Tuesday blocked a new rule passed by the GOP-controlled State Elections Board that would have mandated a hand count of ballots. Judge Robert C.I. McBurney said that such a sweeping change so close to an election, and one that has been criticized by election officials as an attempt to delay the results to sow doubt on the process, was “too much, too late.”

The decision only affects the current election. McBurney said that he is weighing the rule's merits and whether it could be applied in future cycles.

Nevertheless, the outcome is a relief to voting rights activists and election officials, including state Attorney General Christopher M. Carr, a Republican who warned that the State Elections Board was overstepping its authority in pushing through the change just before the election.

In a statement, Vice President Kamala Harris' campaign praised the judge's decision, saying that "this rule was an effort to delay election results to sow doubt in the outcome, and our democracy is stronger thanks to this decision to block it."

The rule was set to come into effect on Oct. 22, seven days after early voting commenced and less than two weeks before election day. While McBurney, a judge appointed by Republican former Gov. Nathan Deal in 2012, made his decision largely on those grounds. He said that while the board "may be right" about the hand counts being "smart election policy," he also criticized the rule as overly vague and lacking clear parameters.

"As of today, there are no guidelines or training tools for the implementation of the hand count rule,” McBurney wrote. “Nor will there be any forthcoming: the secretary of state cautioned the S.E.B. before it passed the hand count rule that passage would be too close in time to the election for his office to provide meaningful training or support.”

McBurney's decision on the hand count rule is the second time he blocked a GOP election proposal in 24 hours. On Monday, he rejected an argument by allies of former President Donald Trump that local election officials can refuse to certify election results. Once again, McBurney cited bad timing as the crux of his reasoning.

“This election season is fraught; memories of Jan. 6 have not faded away, regardless of one’s view of that date’s fame or infamy,” he wrote. “Anything that adds uncertainty and disorder to the electoral process disserves the public.”

More schools than ever are serving vegan meals in California. Here’s how they did it

Three years ago, Erin Primer had an idea for a new summer program for her school district: She wanted students to learn about where their food comes from. Primer, who has worked in student nutrition within California's public school system for 10 years, applied for grant funding from the state to kick off the curriculum, and got it. Students planted cilantro in a garden tower, met a local organic farmer who grows red lentils, and learned about corn. "Many kids didn't know that corn grew in a really tall plant," said Primer. "They didn't know that it had a husk." 

The curriculum, focused on bringing the farm into the school, had an effect beyond the classroom: Primer found that, after learning about and planting ingredients that they then used to make simple meals like veggie burgers, students were excited to try new foods and flavors in the lunchroom. One crowd pleaser happened to be totally vegan: a red lentil dal served with coconut rice. 

"We have had students tell us that this is the best dish they've ever had in school food. To me, I was floored to hear this," said Primer, who leads student nutrition for the San Luis Coastal district on California's central coast, meaning she develops and ultimately decides on what goes on all school food menus. "It really builds respect into our food system. So not only are they more inclined to eat it, they're also less inclined to waste it. They're more inclined to eat all of it."

Primer's summer program, which the district is now considering making a permanent part of the school calendar, was not intended to inspire students to embrace plant-based cooking. But that was one of the things that happened — and it's happening in different forms across California. 

A recent report shows that the number of schools in California serving vegan meals has skyrocketed over the past five years. Although experts say this growth is partly a reflection of demand from students and parents, they also credit several California state programs that are helping school districts access more local produce and prepare fresh, plant-based meals on-site. 

Growing meat for human consumption takes a tremendous toll on both the climate and the environment; the U.N. Food and Agriculture Organization estimates that livestock production contributes 12 percent of global greenhouse gas emissions. Specifically, cattle and other ruminants are a huge source of methane. Animal agriculture is also extremely resource-intensive, using up tremendous amounts of water and land. Reducing the global demand for meat and dairy, especially in high-income countries, is an effective way to lower greenhouse gas emissions and mitigate the rate of global warming. 

The climate benefits of eating less meat are one reason that school districts across the country have introduced more vegetarian — and to a lesser degree, vegan — lunch options. In 2009, Baltimore City Public Schools removed meat from its school lunch menus on Mondays, part of the Meatless Mondays campaign. A decade later, New York City Public Schools, the nation's largest school district, did the same. In recent years, vegan initiatives have built upon the success of Meatless Mondays, like Mayor Eric Adams' "Plant-Powered Fridays" program in New York City. 

But California, the state that first put vegetarianism on the map in the early 20th century, has been leading the country on plant-based school lunch. "California is always ahead of the curve, and we've been eating plant-based or plant-forward for many years — this is not a new concept in our state," said Primer. A recent report from the environmental nonprofit Friends of the Earth found that among California's 25 largest school districts, more than half — 56 percent — of middle and high school menus now have daily vegan options, a significant jump compared to 36 percent in 2019. Meanwhile, the percentage of elementary districts offering weekly vegan options increased from 16 percent to 60 percent over the last five years. 

Student nutrition directors like Primer say the foundation that allows schools to experiment with new recipes is California's universal free lunch program. She notes that, when school lunch is free, students are more likely to actually try and enjoy it: "Free food plus good food equals a participation meal increase every time."

Nora Stewart, the author of the Friends of the Earth report, says the recent increase in vegan school lunch options has also been in response to a growing demand for less meat and dairy in cafeterias from climate-conscious students. "We're seeing a lot of interest from students and parents to have more plant-based [meals] as a way to really help curb greenhouse gas emissions," she said. A majority of Gen Zers — 79 percent — say they would eat meatless at least once or twice a week, according to research conducted by Aramark, a company provides food services to school districts and universities, among other clients. And the food-service company that recently introduced an all-vegetarian menu in the San Francisco Unified School District credits students with having "led the way" in asking for less meat in their cafeterias. The menu includes four vegan options: an edamame teriyaki bowl, a bean burrito bowl, a taco bowl with a pea-based meat alternative, and marinara pasta.

Stewart theorizes that school nutrition directors are also increasingly aware of other benefits to serving vegan meals. "A lot of school districts are recognizing that they can integrate more culturally diverse options with more plant-based meals," said Stewart. In the last five years, the nonprofit found, California school districts have added 41 new vegan dishes to their menus, including chana masala bowls, vegan tamales, and falafel wraps. Dairy-free meals also benefit lactose-intolerant students, who are more likely to be students of color.

Still, vegan meals are hardly the default in California cafeterias, and in many places, they're unheard of. Out of the 25 largest school districts in the state, only three elementary districts offer daily vegan options, the same number as did in 2019. According to Friends of the Earth, a fourth of the California school districts they reviewed offer no plant-based meal options; in another fourth, the only vegan option for students is a peanut butter and jelly sandwich. "I was surprised to see that," said Stewart. 

Making school lunches without animal products isn't just a question of ingredients. It's also a question of knowledge and resources — and the California legislature has created a number of programs in recent years that aim to get those tools to schools that need them. 

In 2022, the state put $600 million toward its Kitchen Infrastructure and Training Funds program, which offers funding to schools to upgrade their kitchen equipment and train staff. This kind of leveling up allows kitchen staff to better incorporate "scratch cooking" — essentially, preparing meals on-site from fresh ingredients — into their operations. (The standard in school lunch sometimes is jokingly referred to as "cooking with a box cutter," as in heating up and serving premade meals that come delivered in a box.) Another state program, the $100 million School Food Best Practices Funds, gives schools money to purchase more locally grown food. And the Farm to School incubator grant program has awarded about $86 million since 2021 to allow schools to develop programming focused on climate-smart or organic agriculture. 

Although only the School Food Best Practices program explicitly incentivizes schools to choose plant-based foods, Stewart credits all of them with helping schools increase their vegan options. Primer said the Farm to School program — which provided the funding to develop her school district's farming curriculum in its first two years — has driven new recipe development and testing. 

All three state programs are set to run out of money by the end of the 2024-2025 school year. Nick Anicich is the program manager for Farm to School, which is run out of the state Office of Farm to Fork. ("That's a real thing that exists in California," he likes to say.) He says when state benefits expire, it's up to schools to see how to further advance the things they've learned. "We'll see how schools continue to innovate and implement these initiatives with their other resources," said Anicich. Stewart says California has set "a powerful example" by bettering the quality and sustainability of its school lunch, "showing what's possible nationwide." 

One takeaway Primer has had from the program is to reframe food that's better for the planet as an expansive experience, one with more flavor and more depth, rather than a restrictive one — one without meat. Both ideas can be true, but one seems to get more students excited. 

"That has been a really important focus for us. We want [to serve] food that is just so good, everybody wants to eat it," Primer said. "Whether or not it has meat in it is almost secondary."


                 

This article originally appeared in Grist at https://grist.org/food-and-agriculture/california-vegan-school-lunch-plant-based-environmental-climate-grants/.

                 

                 

Grist is a nonprofit, independent media organization dedicated to telling stories of climate solutions and a just future. Learn more at Grist.org.

                

Delta Air Lines shuts down hot meal service on several Detroit flights due to “food safety issue”

Delta Air Lines suspended its hot meal service on more than 200 flights out of Detroit Metropolitan Airport over the weekend because of a “food safety issue,” CBS News reported. Delta said it was notified of an issue following a routine Food and Drug Administration inspection of its Detroit meal service facility, which was promptly shut down.  

“During a recent inspection at a DTW [Detroit Metro Airport] kitchen, Delta's catering partner was notified of a food safety issue within the facility. Delta and its catering partner immediately shut down hot food production and subsequently suspended all activity from the facility,” the airline said in a statement to CBS News.

“Hot food and other onboard provisioning will be managed from other facilities,” Delta said. The airline added that “we will continue to take necessary precautions to ensure food safety.”

At this time, no illnesses have been reported by Delta employees or passengers, Delta said. Those affected by the suspended meal service were given travel vouchers or frequent flyer miles as compensation.

This isn’t the first time Delta has had issues with its in-flight meals. Back in July, passengers on a Detroit-to-Amsterdam Delta flight were served moldy chicken. Several passengers fell sick, forcing the flight to divert to John F. Kennedy International Airport in New York City. Delta was also forced to serve only pasta for several days on certain flights.

Taylor Swift announces new “Eras Tour” book as her lengthy stretch on the road comes to an end

After almost two long years of touring across the world, Taylor Swift is giving her fans one last treat: an "Eras Tour" book.

The pop star shared on Tuesday that the 256-page hardcover book — released on Black Friday as a Target exclusive — will feature over 500 photographs from the tour; many of them taken behind the scenes; as well as her own personal reflections on the experience of cranking out record-breaking shows for such an impressive length of time.  

"We’ll be kicking off the final leg of The 'Eras Tour' this week, which is hard to comprehend," Swift said in her book announcement on Instagram. "This tour has been the most wondrous experience and I knew I wanted to commemorate the memories we made together in a special way. Well, two ways actually."

Along with the release of the book, "The Tortured Poets Department: The Anthology" will be made available for the first time ever on vinyl and CD, both of which will also be Target exclusives on Nov. 29. 

Since the "Eras Tour" started in early 2023, Swift has performed across five continents and released one new studio album, "The Tortured Poets Department," and two re-recorded albums, "Speak Now" and "1989." Overall, the tour has grossed over $1 billion since its start, making it the highest-grossing tour of all time and the first to hit $1 billion, Rolling Stone reported.

“It’s not funny. Because you’re a threat to democracy”: Colin Allred confronts Ted Cruz at debate

Texas Rep. Colin Allred, the Democratic Senate nominee, swung hard against Republican Sen. Ted Cruz during a debate on Monday in hopes of closing the two-term incumbent's small but stubborn lead in the polls.

While Allred accused Cruz of hypocrisy over Jan. 6 and failing to address the material hardships faced by everyday Texans, Cruz, a slick and experienced debater who appeared to find his match in Allred, called the Democratic lawmaker and former NFL linebacker a radical who would just be another rubber stamp for a potential President Kamala Harris.

It's an attack Republicans believe still has resonance in a state that Democrats hope is transforming from a GOP stronghold into a purple battleground. If Allred manages to untangle himself from a string of close but disappointing statewide losses for Democratic candidates since 2018, his victory could be decisive in keeping Democrats in control of the Senate.

Since winning a second term by a 2.5-point margin in 2018, Cruz has landed in a series of unflattering headlines that Allred tried to make sure Texans wouldn't forget. The Democratic candidate repeatedly dinged Cruz for escaping to Cancún, a resort town in Mexico, while a winter storm disabled Texas' electricity grid in February 2021, killing 200 people and leaving millions more freezing in their homes.

Allred put the story in context of Cruz's votes and positions in an effort to portray him as uncaring about the people he represents, including an exchange over Cruz voting against legislation that would cap the price of insulin, a life-saving medication, at $35 a month for everyone who needs it.

"It's not surprising, he's one of the biggest recipients of donations from Big Pharma lobbyists in the entire United States Senate," he said, as Cruz laughed. "It's true. This is a pattern. This is somebody who goes to the Ritz-Carlton in Cancún, do you really think he cares about inflation and about working families? His entire career he spent his time trying to cut taxes for the rich and not looking out for working folks."

"Congressman Allred takes no responsibility for his own voting record, takes no responsibility for the trillions in spending that has driven inflation, takes no responsibility for the war on Texas energy and LNG and oil and gas," Cruz responded, later claiming that illegal immigration was driving up inflation. According to a recent analysis by the Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas, the effect of immigration is negligible.

Allred also blasted Cruz for his role in enabling the Jan. 6 insurrection, labeling his frequent expressions of support for police officers as hollow given that he was also "for the mob" that injured multiple officers in the attack.

When Cruz tried again to laugh off the criticism, Allred told him pointedly: "It's not funny. Because you're a threat to democracy."

"Sure," Cruz muttered, before laughing some more.

Allred, who was on the scene as a U.S. congressman, recalled texting his "wife Aly, who was seven months pregnant with our son Cameron and at home with our son Jordan who wasn’t yet two, 'Whatever happens, I love you."

"I took off my suit jacket and I was prepared to defend the House floor from the mob," he continued. "At the same time, after he’d gone around the country lying about the election, after he’d been the architect of the attempt to overthrow an election, when that mob came, Senator Cruz was hiding in a supply closet."

We need your help to stay independent

Cruz often responded to moderators' questions and Allred's attacks by declining to answer or pivoting to issues he thought would make his opponent look extreme or hypocritical. On a discussion about political violence on Jan. 6, Cruz criticized Allred for not "talking about the antifa and Black Lives Matter riots that burned cities across this country." When asked about his stance on abortion rights and whether he supported exceptions for rape and incest, Cruz spun a soliloquy about how it's a controversial topic that can be decided at the ballot box, then called Allred an "extremist" on the issue. Allred accused Cruz of lying before talking about women in Texas who suffered from strict abortion laws.

“Senator Cruz just called himself pro-life,” Allred said. “It’s not pro-life to deny women care so long that they can’t have children anymore. It’s not pro-life to force a victim of rape to carry their rapist’s baby.”

When the moderators asked Cruz to clarify his stance a third time, the GOP senator turned the question around. “Jason, I’m curious. Why do you keep asking me that?”

Later, it was Allred's turn to dodge, repeatedly deflecting questions over why he now supports expanding a barrier at the southern border after previously saying that former President Donald Trump's proposed border wall was "racist." Cruz pounced, saying that on this issue, Allred and Harris are essentially the same. “They voted in favor of open borders over and over and over again, and now they are desperately trying to hide that from the voters," he said.

Cruz's attacks on Allred over transgender rights did not land as effectively. Allred, accused by Cruz of supporting laws that would lead to "boys playing in girls' sports," responded that such claims were false, and that the senator "wants you thinking about kids in bathrooms so you’re not thinking about women in hospitals … because it’s indefensible that we have Texas women being turned away from hospitals, bleeding out in cars, in waiting rooms, being found by their husbands.”

In their closing remarks, both candidates stayed true to form. Cruz said that Allred was running on the "same radical agenda" as Harris, while Allred accused Cruz of abandoning Texas for Cancún when his constituents were "relying on the senator to spring into action … if you give me the chance to be your next United States Senator, I'll never abandon you."

“We shattered records today”: Massive turnout on first day of early voting in Georgia

A record number of votes were cast on the first day of early voting in Georgia, according to data from the Secretary of State's office.

Over 300,000 votes were cast by the end of the day on Tuesday, breaking the previous record by nearly 200,000 votes.

“We shattered records today. Georgia’s voting system has proven secure, efficient, & accurate,” Georgia Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger wrote on X. 

Georgia has emerged as a key battleground state in this year’s election, with Republican nominee Donald Trump currently leading Vice President Kamala Harris 49-48 in the state's polling average

Voting in the state has faced relentless uncertainty and scrutiny in the last few months as the Georgia State Election board passed a number of controversial rules intended to give county election boards discretion in certifying election results. On Tuesday, a Fulton County judge ruled county election boards must certify election results under any circumstances. 

In 2020, President Joe Biden won Georgia by a razor-thin margin, which led to a number of attempts to overturn the state's election results. Four years later, election integrity in the swing state remains a concern for both Democrats and Republicans.

Georgia is also grappling with the aftermath of Hurricane Helene, which killed over 300 people and left thousands without power or water. 

Raffensperger said in a press conference Tuesday morning that his office’s goal is to ensure casting a ballot takes as little time as possible, The Georgia Record reported

“We want to make sure that they’re less than an hour. We loved when we had in 2022 the average wait time was less than three minutes and got down as low as two minutes at times,” Raffensperger said. 

Early voting in Georgia ends on Nov. 1, the Friday before Election Day.

“Increasingly unstable and unhinged”: Trump’s “enemy from within” comments worry Democrats

Former President Donald Trump remained adamant that Democrats are “enemies from within" during a taped town hall interview on Fox News on Tuesday night, NBC reported. 

The Republican nominee previously made the comment about Democrats on Fox News’ “Sunday Futures,” when he referred to Rep. Adam Schiff, D-Calif., and other prominent Dems as “lunatics” and a threat to national security. 

“I always say, we have two enemies, we have the outside enemy, and then we have the enemy from within, and the enemy from within, in my opinion, is more dangerous than China, Russia and all these countries,” Trump told Fox News host Maria Bartiromo. 

He also suggested deploying the military on “radical left lunatics” to deal with potential Election Day chaos.

Vice President Kamala Harris was quick to point out the authoritarian nature of Trump’s comments at a rally in Pennsylvania on Sunday. 

“He considers anyone who doesn’t support or who will not bend to his will, an enemy of the country,” Harris told the crowd. “It’s a serious issue.” She added that a second Trump term would be a “huge risk for America and dangerous.” 

“Donald Trump is increasingly unstable and unhinged,” said the Democratic nominee. 

But Trump defended his comments on Tuesday night, telling Fox News’ Harris Faulkner and the audience of all-women voters that he, nor his comments are unhinged. The 78-year-old maintained that Democrats are “sick” and “evil,” according to reporting from NBC. 

“We have China, we have Russia, we have all these countries. If you have a smart president, they can all be handled. The more difficult are, you know, the Pelosis, these people, they’re so sick and they’re so evil,” Trump said.

The town hall interview taped in Cumming, Georgia will air Wednesday morning.

Trump's critics have increasingly sounded the alarm over the former president's rhetoric.

“There is not a case in American history where a presidential candidate has run for office on a promise that they would exact retribution against anyone they perceive as not supporting them in the campaign,” Ian Bassin, a former associate White House counsel who heads the advocacy group Protect Democracy, told The New York Times. “It’s so fundamentally, outrageously beyond the pale of how this country has worked that it’s hard to articulate how insane it is.”

The MAGA “weave”: Donald Trump picks up steam as he dissembles on stage

Is Donald Trump losing it for real this time? That's a question being asked and answered all over social media and cable news this week in the wake of his bizarre performance in Pennsylvania on Monday night. I know his weird behavior is something we're all very aware of and also unfortunately aware that it has been normalized over the past few years to the point that it hardly even gets mentioned by the mainstream media much less analyzed with the same focus and fervor given to Joe Biden's verbal stumbles or Hillary Clinton's emails. But Monday night's very eccentric performance even got the Washington Post's attention. The paper described it with this headline: "Trump sways and bops to music for 39 minutes in bizarre town hall episode"

After the Trump campaign left thousands of people stranded in the desert in the middle of the night following his Coachella, California, rally over the weekend, they once again dropped the ball by holding his crowded Oak, Pennsylvania, town hall in a venue without air conditioning, and a couple of people fainted shortly after it began. (Trump later posted on his social media site that they fainted from the excitement. He really does think he's Elvis.)

Just listen to that laughter when he insults the Wall St. Journal and the editor of Bloomberg News. That's not about their wallets. Their wallets are fine. That's about their ids.

The campaign briefly halted the program, as they often do when these situations happen. Still, this time, once they played a little musical interlude from Trump's playlist, he abruptly decided he didn't want to take any more questions. Instead, he had his minions continue to play his very eccentric song selection for almost 40 minutes as he danced his little dance on the stage with the sycophantic moderator, South Dakota Gov. Kristi Noem, awkwardly trying to follow along.

I have a sneaking suspicion that Trump has seen that the Harris campaign has a DJ entertaining people at her rallies and thought he could replicate it with his special Mar-a-Lago playlist featuring Pavarotti and Sinead O'Connor. But watching him try to get down with Slash's ripping guitar solo on Guns N' Roses' "November Rain" was so embarrassing one had to look away. It was a trainwreck and the campaign knew it.

That's why they assembled every surrogate, henchman and TV pundit supporter to fan out on Tuesday the minute Trump finished his event at the Chicago Economic Club to pretend that it was a triumph, in a vain attempt to swallow up the growing public realization that Trump is far more addled and mentally chaotic than what we've seen previously.

Top aide Stephen Miller called Trump's rambling "the greatest live interview any political leader or politician has done on the economy in our lifetimes." 

Fox News' Sean Hannity was similarly effusive in his praise for Trump's performance, claiming "Trump frankly masterfully navigated the situation." 

That's ridiculous. Trump was unable to answer any questions directly, instead meandering from one topic to another, clearly out of his depth when pressed for details and often just outright lying. At one point he was asked whether Google should be broken up and he answered that he couldn't get it out of his mind that the Justice Department had intervened in a voting rights issue in Virginia. That's not a rational response to that question.

We need your help to stay independent

At another point he got angry at the interviewer, John Micklethwait, editor-in-chief of Bloomberg News, when he tried to bring Trump back on topic, explaining to Micklethwait that he was doing "the weave," his latest excuse for the mental incontinence he displays on the stump. The so-called weave is now being used to rationalize his inability to keep a single train of thought or give a straight answer in an interview.

He finally regressed to his usual juvenile belligerence and insulted Micklethwait and the friendly Wall St. Journal, saying they don't know what they're talking about.

You'll note the cheering and laughing at Trump's ignorant insult from the audience. Now, it's possible that the Trump campaign managed to fill the room with his fans, but it seems unlikely that Chicago, home of the highly influential University of Chicago School of Economics, wouldn't have mostly serious members of its Economic Club in attendance. But audiences at both the New York and Detroit events seem to have given Trump a very enthusiastic reception as well. It makes you wonder how savvy these so-called pillars of the financial community really are.

A few days back, former president Barack Obama held a rally for Harris in Pennsylvania in which he made a case that's especially relevant in the context of Trump's ongoing chest-thumping about his supposedly historically successful economy. Obama pointed out that Trump inherited a thriving economy only made possible by Obama's hard-won rebuilding from the financial crisis (which he inherited from the previous GOP president, George W. Bush.) Obama is right about that. The data is clear.

Even more galling, Trump is trying to do the same thing again. The country's economy was in shambles from his mishandling of the once-in-a-century pandemic and he left the mess for Joe Biden to clean up, which the president has done impressively. Trump is making the rounds to these economic clubs all over the country and is babbling incoherently about tariffs and "drill baby drill," saying that all of his ideas will be paid for by "growth" which Biden and Harris have failed to achieve — which is a lie, of course. On virtually every measure, the economy is doing very well. Even if you remove the year of COVID, growth under Biden exceeded Trump. The cover story of this week's Economist magazine is "The American economy, the envy of the world."

The Wall Street Journal polled economists, who were in overwhelming consensus on their expectations should Trump or Harris win the election:

The New York Times actually interviewed members of the audience at the Detroit Economic Club event last week and all seemed to be business and financial types you might expect to be concerned with their bottom lines above everything else. They rationalized their support for him by saying they didn't believe Trump would actually carry out all those unseemly threats he makes about deporting millions of people or going after his political enemies. They told the reporter they believe the media blows it all out of proportion or it's all just an act. Despite their protestations, it's an act they apparently enjoy quite a bit.


Want a daily wrap-up of all the news and commentary Salon has to offer? Subscribe to our morning newsletter, Crash Course.


According to the Times, Trump was just an avuncular fella, entertaining the folks with some funny stories about his body, his hair, muscle cars and Elon Musk with just a few "rough edges" about stolen elections and the like. I watched that speech. It was the usual rambling, incoherent, ignorant nightmare:

I'm not sure if it's more alarming that he said it or that the Times and the allegedly sophisticated financial whizzes in the audience all thought it was charming and reassuring.

It's been very difficult for many of us to understand how this race can be so close considering all we know about Trump's unfitness. It's clear there is a hardcore base of Trump followers who cannot be budged from their support. You see them interviewed at his rallies and they are so far down the conspiracy rabbit hole that they are no longer in touch with reality.

But I think we imagined that the type of people who belong to the Economic Club of a major city might be able to rationalize their support for him in service of their portfolios. It is a bit surprising to realize that they actually like all the things they purport not to believe are true about him. Just listen to that laughter when he insults the Wall Street Journal and the editor of Bloomberg News. That's not about their wallets. Their wallets are fine. That's about their ids.

These are the respectable members of the cult and it explains why we might only be able to count on a small percentage of Republican voters to cross over and vote for Harris. MAGA isn't just the people waving around the huge Trump flags. It's the people in the pin-striped suits laughing at his puerile insult "comedy" and loving watching him sticking it to the libs. The Trump cult contains multitudes.