Spring Sale: Get 1 Year, Save 58%

We’re closer than ever to flu-COVID combo vaccines

Moderna announced plans on Wednesday to move a novel vaccine design into its final stage of development following positive results from an earlier study. The vaccine is a 2-for-1 deal targeting both flu and COVID-19. The idea is that it will simplify the types of vaccines people get on an annual basis, as well as potentially increase vaccine uptake. Moderna is hoping that its shot, known as mRNA-1083, can earn approval from regulators in 2025.

"Flu and COVID-19 represent a significant seasonal burden for individuals, providers, healthcare systems and economies," Moderna CEO Stéphane Bancel said in a statement. "Combination vaccines offer an important opportunity to improve consumer and provider experience, increase compliance with public health recommendations and deliver value for health care systems."

Other companies are also racing to develop similar flu-COVID combos, including Pfizer and BioNTech, which intend to launch their version in 2024, according to CNBC. The vaccines work by generating an immune response against influenza and SARS-CoV-2 viruses, giving the body the ammunition it needs to fight off an infection in the real world.

Combination vaccines are not an entirely new idea. Many different ones have been developed over the years for a plethora of different conditions, such as MMR vaccines that target measles, mumps and rubella. A flu-COVID vaccine would be a first of its kind, however, offering important protection against respiratory viruses.

“Mockery”: How Clarence Thomas’ trip to the Koch summit undermines his ethics defense

ProPublica is a Pulitzer Prize-winning investigative newsroom. Sign up for The Big Story newsletter to receive stories like this one in your inbox.

Series: Friends of the Court:SCOTUS Justices’ Beneficial Relationships With Billionaire Donors

Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas’ decadeslong friendship with real estate tycoon Harlan Crow and Samuel Alito’s luxury travel with billionaire Paul Singer have raised questions about influence and ethics at the nation’s highest court.

For months, Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas and his allies have defended Thomas’ practice of not disclosing free luxury travel by saying the trips fell under a carve-out to the federal disclosure law for government officials.

But by not publicly reporting his trips to the Bohemian Grove and to a 2018 Koch network event, Thomas appears to have violated the disclosure law, even by his own permissive interpretation of it, ethics law experts said. The details of the trips, which ProPublica first reported last month, could prove important evidence in any formal investigation of Thomas’ conduct.

Thomas’ defense has centered on what’s known as the personal hospitality exemption, part of a federal law passed after Watergate that requires Supreme Court justices and many other officials to publicly report most gifts.

Under the exemption, gifts of “food, lodging, or entertainment received as personal hospitality” don’t have to be disclosed. The law provides a technical definition of “personal hospitality.” It only applies to gifts received from someone at that person’s home or “on property or facilities” that they or their family own. A judge would generally not need to disclose a weekend at a friend’s house; they would need to report if someone paid for them to stay at the Ritz-Carlton.

Numerous ethics law experts have said that gifts of transportation, such as private jet flights, must be disclosed under the law because they are not “food, lodging, or entertainment.”

Thomas has laid out a different view of the disclosure requirements. In his financial disclosure released in late August, Thomas asserted that the personal hospitality exemption extended to transportation. Justice Samuel Alito has made the same argument in an op-ed where he elaborated on his reasoning: private jets would count as “facilities” under the law’s definition of personal hospitality. In this view of the disclosure requirements, a key question would be whether the person providing a private jet flight actually owned the jet. So, for example, Thomas would not need to report flights on his friend Harlan Crow’s private plane because Crow owns it.

Thomas and Alito’s position is incorrect, many experts said, because it simply ignores the statute’s language: that the personal hospitality exemption only applies to food, lodging, or entertainment.

But there’s an additional reason the newly revealed trips should have been disclosed.

ProPublica recently reported that in 2018, Thomas traveled on a Gulfstream G200 private jet to Palm Springs, California, to attend a dinner at the Koch political network’s donor summit. He didn’t hitch a ride on a jet owned by a friend. Instead, he flew there on a chartered plane: a jet available through an Uber-like service that lets wealthy individuals rent other people’s planes. The owner of the jet at the time, Connecticut real estate developer John Fareri, confirmed to ProPublica that he didn’t provide the plane to Thomas and that the Palm Springs flight was a charter flight. That means someone else — not the owner — paid.

A Koch network spokesperson said the network didn’t pay for the flights. Because Thomas didn’t disclose the trip, it’s still not clear who chartered the plane. Jet charter companies told ProPublica the flights could have cost more than $75,000.

Experts told ProPublica they couldn’t think of an argument that would justify not disclosing the Palm Springs trip. “Even using Thomas’ flawed logic about the personal hospitality exception, there’s no way this chartered flight fits into that exception,” said Kedric Payne, a former deputy chief counsel at Congress’ ethics office.

Thomas and his attorney did not respond to questions about why he didn’t disclose the flight or if he paid for it himself. After the Palm Springs donor event, the plane flew to an airport outside Denver, where Thomas appeared at a ceremony honoring his former clerk, then back to northern Virginia, where Thomas lives.

Thomas’ undisclosed trips to the Bohemian Grove present a similar issue. As ProPublica reported last month, Thomas has for 25 years been a regular at the Grove, an all-men’s retreat held on a 2,700-acre property in California. Thomas has been hosted by Crow, who is a member of the secretive club, and stayed at a lodge there called Midway. Members typically must pay thousands of dollars to bring a guest, according to a Grove guest application form obtained by ProPublica and interviews with members.

Crow does not own the Grove nor does he own the lodge where Thomas has stayed. Experts said in these instances again, even by Thomas’ own characterization of the rules, he appears to have violated the law by not disclosing the trips.

“It makes a mockery of the statute,” said Richard Painter, who served as the chief ethics lawyer for the George W. Bush White House. Painter said that if charter flights and trips to Grove don’t need to be disclosed, “you could call everything personal hospitality. Broadway show tickets. A first-class ticket on Delta Air Lines. A trip on the Queen Mary.”

Following ProPublica’s reporting on Thomas’ failure to disclose gifts earlier this year, members of Congress sent a complaint to the Judicial Conference, the arm of the judiciary responsible for implementing the disclosure law. In April, the Judicial Conference said it had referred the matter to a committee of judges responsible for reviewing such allegations.

The law says that if there is “reasonable cause” to believe a judge “willfully” failed to disclose information they were required to, the conference should refer the matter to the U.S. attorney general, who can pursue penalties. But that would be unprecedented. As of May, the Judicial Conference said it had never made such a referral. The committee’s process appears to be ongoing.

In his filing in August, Thomas said that his view of the disclosure rules was based in part on conversations he had with staff at the Judicial Conference. Thomas did not respond to questions about the advice he received. A judiciary spokesperson declined to comment on whether it was ever the Judicial Conference’s position that gifts of private jet flights didn’t need to be reported.

This March, the judiciary revised its regulations to make explicit that private jet travel must be disclosed because transportation is not covered by the personal hospitality exemption. Experts said the update merely clarified what was always the case. (ProPublica reviewed other federal judges’ financial disclosure filings and found at least six recent examples of judges disclosing gifts of private jet travel before the regulations were updated.)

More than a decade ago, Thomas’ disclosure practices came under scrutiny following research by a watchdog group and a story in The New York Times about his relationship with Crow. Democratic lawmakers wrote to the Judicial Conference in 2011, saying that Thomas had failed to report the sources of his wife’s income and that he “may” have also received free private jet trips without reporting them.

What happened after that remains opaque.

In a four-sentence letter the following year, the secretary to the Judicial Conference said that the complaint had been reviewed. “Nothing has been presented,” he wrote, “to support a determination” that Thomas improperly failed to report gifts of travel. The letter did not detail what steps the conference took, the reasoning behind its decision or what information it had been presented with.

At the time, nothing in the public record had established that Thomas had ever accepted undisclosed private jet flights. But Thomas’ attorney Elliot Berke has cited the 2012 letter as vindication of Thomas’ practices. “The Judicial Conference issued a letter confirming that Justice Thomas had not improperly failed to disclose information concerning his travel,” Berke wrote.

ProPublica asked the Judicial Conference for details on the 2012 episode, including whether the committee conducted an investigation and an explanation of its ultimate conclusion: Did it determine that private jet flights need not be reported? Or did it determine that it wasn’t clear if Thomas had actually accepted such a gift?

A Judicial Conference spokesperson declined to comment.

How Ice Spice became music’s new It Girl seemingly overnight

Ice Spice is on everybody’s mind even if you don’t know who she is. The 23-year-old Bronx native is a drill rapper who has captivated the chronically online Gen-Z audience with a presence that even we Zoomers and offline people can’t escape.

So how did a girl from The Bronx – who was attending SUNY Purchase and working as a cashier at Wendy’s and The Gap, relatively unknown to most at the beginning of the year – win four VMAs, secure a Billboard No. 3 hit with another TikTok pop singer PinkPanthress, co-rap with Nicki Minaj on this summer’s hottest Barbie anthem “Barbie World,” feature on “Karma” with Taylor Swift, star in her own Dunkin commercial with uber Dunkin stan Ben Affleck and snag herself a “Saturday Night Live” opening season gig alongside everybody’s rumored boyfriend Pete Davidson?

Ice Spice was in Healy’s line of fire.

Ice Spice’s meteoric rise really began when she went viral in the latter half of 2022. Her song “Munch (Feelin’ U)” opened the gates for an entryway onto the zeitgeist’s radar. She followed up her viral success with other songs like the “Spongebob Squarepants” inspired song “Bikini Bottom” and the girl-empowered “In Ha Mood.” Eventually, she followed up with the EP in early 2023, aptly named “Like . .?” after her catchphrase. 

But the rapper really broke through the bubbling under success with her iconic verse on the mega-viral “Boy’s a Liar Pt. 2” by PinkPanthress. The infectious hyper-pop song tells the tale of a girl fed up with her love interest who has no room in his heart for singer PinkPanthress. When we get to Ice Spice’s verse she tears into the boy.

The rapper spits:

He say that I’m good enough, grabbin’ my duh-duh-duh
Thinkin’ ’bout s**t that I shouldn’t’ve (Huh)
So I tell him there’s one of me, he makin’ fun of me (Ha-ha)
His girl is a bum to me (Grrah)
Like that boy is a cap

Following the success of “Boy’s a Liar Pt. 2,” Ice Spice had hit the mainstream — no longer just a TikTok mini viral musician. She had finally broken through, and it happened fast. So fast that she became the topic of discussion for just about anyone even the likes of edgelord Matty Healy the frontman of the British indie-pop band “The 1975.” The British singer is notorious in online circles for saying offensive and creepy incel comments about women. And Ice Spice was in Healy’s line of fire. The scandal becomes seemingly more interesting when we add in that Healy was Taylor Swift’s new beau of the moment after her fresh breakup with long-term six-year boyfriend actor, Joe Alwyn. The internet blew up with discourse circling and questioning Swift’s commitment to allyship when she was dating someone who mocked Ice Spice by calling her “Inuit Spice Girl” and “Chubby Chinese Lady” (even though she’s Nigerian and Dominican). 

Healy apologized in a classic non-apology with “Sorry if I’ve offended you.” In a New Yorker profile, he said that his offense “doesn’t matter.” Swift never publically commented on the relationship or Healy’s disgusting comments on Ice Spice, instead, she decided she would feature the rapper on the song off of “Midnights” called “Karma.” Many called the move damage control, accusing the singer of exploiting her allyship, using the controversy as a way to cash in on the moment and avoid taking accountability for dating someone who publicly said he watched porn that brutalized Black women. People criticized Swift for seemingly claiming to be a supporter of Black women and the feminist cause . . . but only if or when it served her.

Her ability to home in on cultural moments with her catchy, female-centered rap shows us that Ice Spice is here to stay

The controversy bolstered Ice Spice to new levels of fame. Any sort of connection to Swift in this cultural moment can shoot a person up the mainstream celebrity accession ladder to an instant A-lister. I mean look at the tight end for the Chiefs Travis Kelce in the last two weeks after he was rumored to be Swift’s new beau. Needless to say, “Karma” featuring Ice Spice hit No. 2 on the Billboard charts, becoming the rapper’s second top ten entry following the success of “Boy’s a Liar Pt. 2.” At this point, if you didn’t know who Ice Spice was, you weren’t plugged into the culture. 

But following her two hits, she collaborated with her longtime idol and female rap legend, Nicki Minaj on two songs “Princess Diana” and this summer’s hit “Barbie World.” All these back-to-back hits – which have all reached the Top 10 of the Billboard charts – have made Ice Spice, the artist with the most Hot 100 Top 5 singles in 2023. She won best new artist at the VMAs where she was photographed being giggly with “big sis” Swift. The rapper continues to stun people with her appeal outside of music too. She has an impeccably timed new drink at Dunkin called the Ice Spice Munchkin drink – named after her fandom, the Munchkins – which is a combination of a frozen latte with Pumpkin Munchkin donuts with whipped cream and caramel drizzle.

Overall, the internet age’s new Princess Diana – that’s literally what people online call her – appeal lies in the fact that she’s just a normal, talented girl from the Bronx who knows who her audience is. She knows that she is making music for young women in their 20s looking to just let loose and enjoy their youth — just like she has done since she shot into her very rapid fame. Critics deemed the rapper a one-hit wonder but her ability to home in on cultural moments with her catchy, female-centered rap shows us that Ice Spice is here to stay.

 

Trump’s team files motion to dismiss D.C. election interference case

A filing made by Trump‘s attorneys has begun to circulate on Thursday, detailing a motion for Judge Tanya Chutkan to dismiss his election subversion indictment in D.C. altogether, on the basis that he’s “absolutely immune from prosecution because his alleged criminal conduct was part of his presidential duties,” per reporting from CNBC

In the 52-page document, his legal team makes a big swing, asking the judge “to recall a 1982 Supreme Court finding that stated that former President Richard Nixon had immunity from civil damages during his time in office and apply it to Trump’s criminal charges,” as The Daily Beast highlights in their own coverage of the motion.

“As the Constitution, the Supreme Court, and hundreds of years of history and tradition all make clear, the President’s motivations are not for the prosecution or this Court to decide. Rather, where, as here, the President’s actions are within the ambit of his office, he is absolutely immune from prosecution,” the filing further emphasizes. The full motion can be read below:

Leading up to this, Trump has continued to deny the charges against him in the case, shirking claims that he conspired to obstruct Biden’s rightful victory in 2020 in any way.

 

Medicine or food? People with diabetes in Liberia sometimes have to choose between the two

Diabetes is on the rise globally. Since the 1980s the number of people living with the disease has quadrupled from 108 million to 537 million.

This dramatic increase is largely due to the rise in type 2 diabetes and its associated risk factors such as being overweight or obese.

For many years, diabetes was considered a disease of affluence and thought to be rare in sub-Saharan Africa. This is no longer the case. Today 24 million people — one in 22 adults in the region — have diabetes and rates are rapidly increasing.

In Liberia, one of the poorest nations in sub-Saharan Africa, it is reported that an estimated 2.1% of its population of 5.2 million are living with diabetes. More than half of them are undiagnosed, underscoring the grave burden of diabetes in the country.  

Available research on diabetes in Liberia excludes people’s voices and stories. It is not rooted in people’s lived experiences. As a result, the research findings seldom lead to change.  

The goal of our study was to understand people’s lived experiences with diabetes in Liberia. We used a photovoice method, providing ten Liberian adults with cameras to take photographs representing their lives. Through discussing the meaning of their photographs, we gained insights into local assets and needs.

Participants were recruited from Redemption Hospital in Monrovia. Due to COVID-19 restrictions, we partnered with Adventist University of West Africa to help facilitate interviews.

Our study identified two major challenges: food insecurity and healthcare neglect.

 

Worrying about the next meal

Participants shared stories about worrying about obtaining food, compromising the quality of food they ate, skipping meals and experiencing hunger. They were often forced to choose between food and medication.

Not taking medication regularly for diabetes can lead to dangerous consequences like severe hypoglycemia or hyperglycemia, coma and sometimes death.

One of the participants who was diagnosed with diabetes four years ago had diabetic retinopathy, a common complication of diabetes that leads to vision loss.

He had been unable to work since his diagnosis and relied entirely on his sisters for financial help and the kindness of friends in his community.

During periods of extreme financial hardship, the 30-year-old experienced hunger.

 

When I don’t have money, I don’t eat.

 

If people like him survive the short-term consequences of hunger, repeated experiences of hunger can also place people living with diabetes at risk for long-term consequences such as cognitive impairment.

Participants also reported concerns about the limited food options that healthcare providers recommended for their diet. They  were  generally  advised  to  avoid  staple foods with high glycemic indexes such as white rice and cassava dumboy that raise the blood sugar quickly and to replace them with foods like bulgur wheat and green plantain, as they provided better blood glucose control.

It was not always possible to adhere to these recommendations as foods like bulgur wheat and green plantain were far more expensive.

 

Back of the queue

Liberia’s 14-year civil war coupled with the Ebola outbreak left a devastating impact on the country’s healthcare system.

As a result the country faces unique challenges in combating diabetes because of the country’s limited health infrastructure, which neglects people living with chronic illnesses.

In 2018, only about 22% of publicly funded healthcare facilities could provide diagnosis and management of diabetes. This makes it very difficult, for example, to get basic diabetes care such as testing, medication and diabetes education.

Participants on the research attested to this. One voiced his frustration with the local hospital and the lack of supplies and resources allocated to people living with diabetes. He was particularly disappointed that his local hospital was routinely out of medications:

 

Sometimes at the hospital, they don’t have all the medicine. Yeah, so the whole frustrating part is when you get there, and the medicine not there, you have to pay for your prescription. With the prescription, he can just write it for me, and I will try to get it, because I want to be treated. They give you prescription, then you go to the drug store.

 

Participants also shared how their religious faith helped them cope and sustain hope of living with diabetes. Their transcendent hope persisted despite hardship.

 

The way forward

Our findings demonstrate the need to improve the health and quality of life of people living with diabetes in Liberia.

Based on our findings, we recommended the following:

  • Increased prioritization and resourcing of diabetes management. This would involve allocation of adequate resources for screening, diagnostic testing, medications, diabetes supplies and diabetes education.  

  • Integrated diabetes centers to facilitate ongoing care. To the best of our knowledge, there is currently no public or private diabetes center in Liberia.

  • Community food programs with healthy options. These should include community gardens and food banks.

Paulina Bleah, Nurse Practitioner, PhD Nursing Student, Queen’s University, Ontario; Danielle Macdonald, Assistant Professor, Queen’s University, Ontario; Pilar Camargo-Plazas, Associate Professor, Queen’s University, Ontario, and Rosemary Wilson, Associate Director/Associate Professor of Nursing, Queen’s University, Ontario

This article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license. Read the original article.

Roy Wood Jr. is leaving “The Daily Show” after eight years, and we sadly understand why

Veteran fake news correspondent Roy Wood Jr. is leaving “The Daily Show” after eight years, he said in an NPR interview released Thursday. Wood’s announcement comes less than weeks before the Comedy Central topical satire is scheduled to return to the air.

His reason? Since the network hasn’t offered him the job to succeed Trevor Noah as the show’s permanent host, his energy would be better invested in nurturing his next act.

As Wood explained to NPR’s TV critic Eric Deggans, “I can’t come up with Plan B while still working with Plan A.” Four months ago, however, Wood dropped hints he might be headed for the door in a conversation with Salon’s D. Watkins.

“In the short game, I just need to host me a damn TV show. If we’re talking next two years, there’s a one-man show I want to work on based on just the idea of fatherhood,” Wood told Salon in June. “But in the short term, man, I think there’s a book I need to write. There’s a stand-up special I need to shoot, and there’s a late-night show that I need to host.”

Wood would have been, and still could be, a superb choice to succeed Noah.

In response to a request for comment, a spokesperson for “The Daily Show” provided this statement to Salon: “Roy Wood Jr. is a comedic genius and beloved teammate. His insights and hilarity helped us make sense of the 2016 election, the pandemic, and countless hours of Fox News. We thank him for his time with us and can’t wait to see what he does next.” 

Wood’s departure draws attention to the fraught nature of a host search process that, from the start, drew a few worrisome parallels to the highly publicized quest to find a successor to the late Alex Trebek on “Jeopardy!” While that was eventually revealed to be a mismanaged stunt that intentionally overlooked enthusiastic fan favorite LeVar Burton and Trebek’s handpicked candidate Laura Coates, the celebrity guest rotation through “The Daily Show” host chair that kicked off in January appears to be a more honest trial process.

The guest host run netted higher ratings for the program and continued until May 2, when the Writers Guild of America strike shut down all late-night productions. (This also occurred during the week Wood’s now-former colleague Dulce Sloan was to embark on her tryout period. She got one broadcast under her belt before the show went dark.)

Before production paused, however, Comedy Central provided ratings to NPR in April indicating that Wood’s week in the chair, during which former “Daily Show” host Jon Stewart appeared as a guest, was the second-most watched behind Al Franken. The Wrap’s ratings roundup of celebrity guest hosts placed John Leguizamo in second place behind Franken, with Sarah Silverman coming in third.

Nevertheless, when Variety released a report in August naming Hasan Minhaj as a top contender to replace Noah as the new “Daily Show” permanent host, that may have understandably made Wood reconsider his future with the show. (Comedy Central never officially confirmed Minhaj’s status or identified any of the other top contenders for the job, a list rumored to have included Silverman and Chelsea Handler.)

In the wake of Noah’s departure, I submitted my opinion that the next “Daily Show” host should be a woman, preferably a woman of color. At present no women are hosting any late-night talk variety programs.

But Wood would have been, and still could be, a superb choice to succeed Noah.  

We need your help to stay independent

His departure from “The Daily Show” further draws attention to the white male dominance of this space, which has persisted since its inception. Within the last few years, talk variety interview shows featuring Ziwe Fumudoh, Wyatt Cenac, Desus & Mero, Robin Thede, Sam Jay, Lilly Singh and Larry Wilmore have come and gone. Peacock scaled back “The Amber Ruffin Show” from weekly episodes to specials.

Minhaj, who left the “Daily Show” in 2018 to host “Patriot Act” on Netflix, was listed by The Wrap as the fifth most-watched guest host behind Kal Penn. His odds plummeted substantially following a damning story in The New Yorker revealing that he fabricated major stories in his live, narrative-driven acts featured in 2017’s “Homecoming King” and “The King’s Jester,” which debuted on Netflix earlier this year.

Variety followed up the New York report with a story indicating Minhaj’s odds of clinching the permanent host job had been downgraded and producers were returning to square one in their search.

All along Wood was right there, ready and able to effect a smooth transition into the show’s next era and well-positioned to continue Noah’s mission to evolve “The Daily Show” into a nimble, fierce creature of the Internet age with an eye on content virality.

Wood told NPR that if Comedy Central offered him the permanent host job, he would consider it.

During his eight-year run as a “Daily Show” correspondent Jordan Klepper, who came to “The Daily Show” as an alumnus from the Upright Citizens Brigade and Second City, received his own short-lived half-hour, “The Opposition,” leading out from Noah’s show and subsequent specials.

Pointing this out is relevant. The relative speed of Klepper’s rise and Minhaj’s, for whom Wood offered nothing but support in his NPR interview, tells a quite familiar story as to how this industry (and many others) works.


Want a daily wrap-up of all the news and commentary Salon has to offer? Subscribe to our morning newsletter, Crash Course.


Wood, who earned a broadcast journalism degree from Florida A&M and worked in a radio newsroom before embarking on a career in stand-up, has a strong fanbase cultivated on social media and through relentless stand-up touring. Before joining “The Daily Show” he was featured in the seventh season of “Last Comic Standing,” placing third overall. (In the fifth season of that show, a relatively unknown comic named Amy Schumer, one of the candidates to take over for Stewart when he left “The Daily Show,” came in fourth.)

This spring Wood hosted the White House Correspondents Dinner to rave reviews, a major feather in any topical news satirist’s hat.

Wood told NPR that if Comedy Central offered him the permanent host job, he would consider it. But as industry analysts have noted, late night as a whole is contending with declining viewership numbers. Now that online producers have become the main players in headline-driven topical comedy, the genre is in dire need of an overhaul.

“I just feel like after every strike, there is a creative molting that happens within the industry, especially on the unscripted side,” Wood said in his Salon interview. “You got to be ahead of the curve on that. You just got to, man. Something is changing.”

“I can’t pay the lawyers”: Mike Lindell’s attorneys quit over “millions” in unpaid legal bills

Lawyers for MyPillow CEO Mike Lindell, an avid peddler of 2020 voter fraud conspiracy theories, have dropped the Trump ally as a client because he failed to pay for their services, Lindell announced on the Thursday edition of former White House Chief Strategist Steve Bannon’s show. Captured by media watchdog Media Matters for America, Lindell told the “The War Room” host that all of the attorneys representing him in his defamation lawsuits with voting tech companies Dominion Voting Systems, which is seeking $1.3 billion in damages, and Smartmatic submitted filings declaring their departures in federal court 10 minutes prior to his appearance. 

“This comes from the lawfare, basically, and from the media, the attacks on MyPillow, what American Express did — just devastating our credit. We — I — can’t pay the lawyers. We can’t pay. There’s no money left over to pay them,” Lindell said, noting that he made the announcement to preempt the “attack” from the media.

Lindell’s attorneys asked to withdraw from the case in a court filing on Thursday, telling the court that Lindell is “in arrears by millions of dollars” and that they were informed that he is “not able to get caught up with or make any payment on the large amount they owe in arrears nor pay for anywhere near the estimated expense of continuing to defend against the lawsuits going forward.” The filing comes after Lindell revealed that his pillow company is facing five audits from the IRS, adding to his growing financial woes.

Democrat calls Trump’s bluff on Mar-a-Lago valuation by urging Florida officials to hike his taxes

A House Democrat asked Palm Beach County, Florida, to tax Donald Trump’s Mar-a-Lago resort property at a rate in accordance with the valuation the former president claims it has amid his ongoing New York civil fraud trial. Rep. Jared Moskowitz, D-Fla., made the request of Palm Beach County appraiser Dorothy Jacks in a letter exclusively provided to NBC News, noting New York Supreme Court Justice Arthur Engoron’s decision last week holding Trump liable for committing fraud for years by inflating and undervaluing his assets to banks and insurers. 

Trump has since railed against the ruling, claiming that his Florida beach club is worth “50 to 100 times” what New York prosecutors in the lawsuit have said, or “closer to $1.5 billion” in value. “Between 2011 and 2021, you value the Mar-a-Lago property between $18 million and $28 million,” Moskowitz wrote in the letter to the Palm Beach County appraiser. “Mar-a-Lago was listed as worth $490 million in financial documents given to banks,” he added. “If the property value of Mar-a-Lago is so much higher than it was appraised, will you be amending the property value in line with the Trump family’s belief that the property is worth well over a billion dollars?”

With Trump’s civil fraud trial garnering nationwide attention, the letter, NBC News writes, is an effort from the first-term congressman to emphasize the disconnect between Trump’s claims of his properties’ values and the values set by appraisers, which the judge had cited in the ruling

It’s impossible to tell where in the multiverse “Loki” is going. Thank the gods

Between the first season of "Loki" and its second, the Marvel Cinematic Universe's stranglehold on our cultural conversations took a nosedive. Its films still made more than the gross domestic product per capita of several countries, but less than previous chapters, with a few exceptions – primarily those involving Peter Parker. Appraisals from critics and fans have been less enthusiastic.

As for the TV spinoffs that came and went between the summer of 2021 and now, aside from "Ms. Marvel," most demonstrated the law of diminishing returns in action with its Nick Fury-fronted "Secret Invasion" feeling entirely inessential.

What about the latest season of "Loki"? Two episodes into the four-hour sample Marvel provided to critics left me feeling unmoored, unsure of where Tom Hiddleston's trickster and his soulmate variant Sylvie (Sophia Di Martino) were going or why Owen Wilson's Mobius lacked the singular focus that drove him in previous episodes. 

Frequently I had to pause and rewind so I could reassemble the first season puzzle with the second's new pieces changing everything. Devouring two more episodes left me no closer to knowing what was happening or where the season would land.

Fantastic. 

The creatively delirious second season of "Loki" may not be an intentional response to the MCU's distending monotony, but it certainly feels like its new head writer Eric Martin, inheriting the reins from Michael Waldron, wants to shatter expectations. 

Devouring four episodes left me no closer to knowing where the season would land. Fantastic. 

Where the first season was met with a few groans about the series trying to be "Doctor Who," these new episodes embrace that implication by tossing its players into a few period-specific away missions. Those don't seem too far out of the ordinary from life at TVA HQ, where all of the devices resemble obsolete technology from the 1960s and '70s while pulling off futuristic feats. Like, say, making portals to different existences materialize from nothing or cranking out identical slices of key lime pie for no fathomable reason.

If the two remaining episodes end everything in a jumble of wire and ribbons, we can't say that opening each package that brought us to that point wasn't a fun time. For once, or maybe the first time since the MCU entered this arena, we have a season of TV that doesn't feel overtly beholden to bridging other stories.

It is, same as the first season.  Jonathan Majors' He Who Remains has as many variants as Loki Laufeyson, the most consequential of whom pops up in "Ant-Man and the Wasp: Quantumania" movie as Kang the Conqueror, the next MCU phase's Thanos equivalent. (Apparently Majors' participation in Season 2 was unaffected by his March arrest on assault, strangulation and harassment charges related to attacking a former girlfriend. His trial was delayed three times, with its start now set for Oct. 25, one day before the fourth episode premieres.)

But since this "Loki" variant is fortifying its identity as a serialized story, it may not matter whether the latest incarnation of the villain meets up with his big-screen self. Frankly, it would be great if that character and everyone and everything else about this plot were left to their own devices, securing the separation between it and the MCU's theatrical identity. It may end up leaving us entirely discombobulated, but so far, it's a good mess.

For the audience, that is. At the Time Variance Authority, reality is imploding. Picking up where the events of the season finale left off, the so-called sacred timeline is branching out of control, a factor pushing the TVA's core stabilizing mechanism beyond its capacity. Terrible timing, since right before that happens, all TVA agents find out the organization to which they've devoted their lives is a lie.

LokiSophia Di Martino as Sylvie in "Loki" (Gareth Gatrell/Marvel)

Some of them choose to stay the course, figuring that remaining ignorant of their other lives' details is bliss. Others grow curious and go AWOL. These concerns aren't as pressing as what's happening to Loki, who is torn between the past and the present, a phenomenon called timeslipping, after Sylvie killed He Who Remains.

She's gone missing, but so has authoritarian TVA judge Ravonna Renslayer (Gugu Mbatha-Raw) – as is the TVA's A.I. administrative assistant Miss Minutes (voiced by Tara Strong), the cartoon clock that was an agent of He Who Remains all along.

We need your help to stay independent

Little of that matters upon our reentry to "Loki," although viewers who rewatch the Season 1 finale will have an easier time grasping the various threads fraying before everyone's eyes. 

The reality-shifting implications of what Sylvie has done matter less than what's happening to Loki, who tears apart and reassembles before our eyes, inspiring Hiddleston to toss his mane in signature Loki fashion each time he reconstitutes. (The actor's chiropractor must have a lot to say about the condition of his neck.) 

That disturbing, effects-driven shock to the system is one of many unsettling aspects of a thematically grimmer season that nevertheless maintains its gusto and sense of humor. 

Some is attributable to Ke Huy Quan's onboarding as O.B., the TVA's hidden tech genius, and our reminder that not everything that happened to the multiverse between 2021 and now was terrible. The "Loki" ensemble's incredible chemistry allows the show to percolate through scenarios that would fall on their face otherwise, and Quan's eternally curious, upbeat genius fits right in. 

LokiKe Huy Quan as O.B. in "Loki" (Gareth Gatrell/Marvel)

Where the first season was an examination of predestination, these new episodes play with determinism.

Heavier dramatic lifting is left to Wunmi Mosaku's Hunter B-15 who, like Mobius and Loki, sides with humanity over a bureaucratic logic that favors order over all else, including humanity. But that also leaves Mosaku with the burden of evoking the abject horror her companions would consider a luxury, especially the one who is still a god.

Despite the tremendous stakes, none of the new episodes slog through the extensive complications introduced because the themes are very simple. Where the first season was an examination of predestination and an identity reset for its namesake hero, these new episodes play with determinism – the theory that all our actions are inevitable. 

Mainly that examination plays out through Victor Timely, an incarnation of Majors' god that we haven't met before. 


Want a daily wrap-up of all the news and commentary Salon has to offer? Subscribe to our morning newsletter, Crash Course.


"I promise you this will make sense," Loki reassures Sylvie at a moment when the universe is falling apart yet again. But he could be talking directly to the audience, which may be as befuddled by everything they're witnessing as they are entertained, which makes its spiraling plots bearable. We'd rather put up with its attempts at braininess instead of rolling our eyes at another series solving problems with fists and explosions. Granted, "Loki" has its share of battle choreography and magical solutions. But this show doesn't punch its way through problems half as much as other shows do, choosing to gamble that its viewers prefer more intellectual solutions.

Saying this about a Marvel series more than two years after this show's first season, and following the many large and small screen franchise misfires, would have seemed unlikely a short time ago, given how energetically moribund the MCU feels. 

"Loki" and "WandaVision" enticed us with a new standard of creativity, broadening our concept of what cinematic adaptations of comic book stories could achieve. But the continuation of Wanda Maximoff's story in a theatrical feature squandered the goodwill her TV narrative built with the audience.

"Loki" avoids that trap in its second season, likely by design – its first ended with a message that the character would return in another season of his show, a tale that contradicts other title's expectations by being about much more than him. Hiddleston's trickster resented that fact in Season 1, and watching him battle his selfishness was both entertaining and moving. 

Now that he has embraced his relative powerlessness in the larger scheme of the multiverse, we can't predict what will happen next. It's about time.

"Loki" returns for its second season on Thursday, Oct. 5  at 9 p.m. ET/6 p.m. PT on Disney+.

 

Bestselling cookbook author Alison Roman offers “Solicited Advice” in her new podcast

Internet-famous cook and New York Times bestselling author Alison Roman is officially adding podcast host to her resume. Called “Solicited Advice with Alison Roman,” Roman’s all-new podcast debuts Oct. 5 and features Roman alongside special guests “who, like her, enjoys giving and/or receiving advice,” according to a recent press release.

“Together they will answer questions from live and recorded callers, covering everything from modern dating to awkward neighbor interactions, how to order a martini with confidence, and, of course, cooking,” the release said. 

Roman’s podcast is launching with distribution and revenue support from digital media outlet Talkhouse. The series’ first season is out now and includes conversations with Tinx, Cat Cohen, Raven Smith, Heléne Yorke, and more guests. New episodes are slated to drop each week on Thursday on all podcast platforms.

“I am so excited to have a better, deeper, wide-reaching platform to answer the questions I get on a daily basis, and to talk about something other than cooking (I contain multitudes!) with some of the funniest and smartest people I know,” Roman said in a statement. “It’s long been my dream to follow in Delilah’s footsteps, to stand on the shoulders of ‘Car Talk’ — here’s hoping this podcast comes close to either.”

In addition to writing for Bon Appétit, Buzzfeed Food and New York Times Cooking, Roman has published several bestselling cookbooks, including 2019’s “Nothing Fancy” and this year’s dessert book “Sweet Enough.” She also created the bi-weekly YouTube series “Home Movies,” and writes the bi-weekly Substack “A Newsletter.”

Why are thousands of Kaiser health care workers on strike? 5 questions answered

More than 75,000 Kaiser Permanente health care workers began a three-day strike in Virginia, California, Colorado, Washington state, Oregon and Washington, D.C., on Oct. 4, 2023, after company executives and eight unions representing aides, techs, support staff and other employees failed to agree on the terms of new contracts. This is the largest U.S. health care strike on record. In a statement it released when the walkout started, Kaiser asserted that it wanted to reach a deal soon with the striking workers.

Although hospitals and emergency rooms are still open during the strike, and Kaiser is making use of temporary workers, many of its noncritical services are temporarily closed or operating under reduced hours. The strike does not include any nurses unions or doctors.

The Conversation asked Michael McQuarrie, an Arizona State University sociologist who directs its Center for Work and Democracy, to explain why this strike is happening now and how labor actions like this can affect patient care.

Kaiser health care workers on the picket line outside of a Kaiser Permanente facility in Sacramento, Calif. It is the largest medical care worker strike in U.S. history.

1. Why is this historic strike happening now?

The two main reasons are concerns over staffing levels and practices and dissatisfaction with pay that hasn’t kept up with inflation and was too low to begin with.

Kaiser says its options are limited due to a national shortfall in all sorts of health care workers, including home health aides and nurse practitioners. Workers counter that higher pay and better working conditions would attract more applicants.

Health care workers have long worried that inadequate staffing is undercutting the quality of care for patients – this has been a central issue in contract negotiations and strikes for years. But the COVID-19 pandemic greatly exacerbated the problem.

At the same time, inflation has outstripped negotiated wage increases for Kaiser workers. Kaiser is currently offering some workers in Northern California and Washington state 4% annual raises for the four years covered by the new contract and lower raises for everyone else. The unions have rejected this offer, which they say would not make up for past inflation and would unnecessarily create different wage scales based on the region where workers are located.

“Why are we here? Patient care! How do we get it? Higher staffing. Why are we here? Patient care! How do we get it? Living wages.” Video by Amanda Mascarelli.

2. Has Kaiser’s financial management played a role too?

Kaiser, which provides health care for 12.7 million Americans, took in US$95.4 billion in revenue in 2022 but ran a $1.2 billion operating loss that it attributed to “strong economic headwinds in the financial markets” – suggesting that its investments were to blame rather than its health care operations.

For 2021, Kaiser reported that it had about $56 billion in unrestricted cash and investments, excluding assets tied to employee and retiree pensions.

Kaiser’s profits in the first half of 2023 totaled about $3.4 billion, however. And with the exception of its losses in 2022, Kaiser has been consistently profitable for years.

Concerns over low worker pay are growing while Kaiser’s executive compensation is increasing. As of 2021, its CEO Gregory Adams was making more than $15.5 million a year in pay and “other” compensation.

3. But isn’t Kaiser a nonprofit – and does that mean it has any special obligations?

Like many health care systems, Kaiser is a nonprofit. This means it pays very little in taxes. In exchange for their special tax status, nonprofits are supposed to provide public benefits.

Nonprofits may make more money than they spend, but they can’t distribute profits to its shareholders. Nonprofit executive compensation must be “reasonable,” according to the Internal Revenue Service – although it can be hard to determine how much is too much.

4. Are there any precedents for this strike?

Health care strikes are not unusual, with more than 40 occurring in the past two years. However, the industry and the workforce are heavily fragmented, which means that these strikes tend to be relatively small.

In September 2022, the Minnesota Nurses Association took 15,000 members on strike over many of the same issues, such as staffing and inflation. That strike, which lasted three days, was the largest health care strike in U.S. history by that point in terms the number of workers involved.

Prior to that, the largest was probably another Minnesota strike in 2010, in which about 12,000 nurses walked off the job for 24 hours.

Kaiser has experienced much smaller strikes in the past, such as a walkout in 2015 of about 75 mental health clinicians.

5. How much are patients harmed during health care strikes?

It depends on the strike, but usually not much.

Critical care Kaiser facilities will remain open, though the strike will likely cause some delays in care due to short staffing and long lines.

Some appointments and elective procedures at the affected hospitals are being postponed, and nonessential functions like labs and radiology departments are temporarily closed or their hours are being reduced.

Nurses, who are very important bedside caregivers, are part of a different coalition of Kaiser unions. While they won’t be on strike, they may have to help cover work not being done by aides and other support staff who are on the picket lines.

Michael McQuarrie, Director of the Center for Work and Democracy, Arizona State University

This article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license. Read the original article.

2 in 5 US babies benefit from the WIC nutrition program


CC BY-ND
 

A monthly average of more than 6 million U.S. women, infants and young children received benefits in 2022 from the nutrition program known as WIC.

The Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants and Children, which is federally funded and state-administered, has served hundreds of millions of American families since its inception in 1974. It provides infant formula, food, nutritional education and health care referrals to low-income pregnant women, the mothers of newborns and very young children and infants and kids up to 5 years old. The government spent about US$5.7 billion on it in 2022.

At its peak, in 2010, the program was helping feed over half of the babies born that year. Participation in the program subsequently declined. About 2 in 5 of the 3.7 million babies born in the U.S. in 2022 benefited from WIC.

 

Long-term benefits

I am a sociologist who researches food insecurity and participation in the safety net programs that help people get enough to eat. To do this, I analyze nationally representative data from the University of Michigan’s Panel Study of Income Dynamics, which started in 1968 and is the longest-running longitudinal household panel survey in the world. My colleagues and I have used this data to follow the same children from birth through adulthood, observing how their life circumstances change over time.

My research team followed a group of 1,406 individuals from low-income families from birth through ages 20 to 36 years. We looked at reports of food insecurity from their parents during childhood as compared with their own reports of food insecurity as adults living on their own.

We found that food-insecure children who received benefits from WIC and the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program, or SNAP, from 1984 to 2019, at anytime from birth to age 17, were four times more likely to report improved food security years later, as young adults, as compared with those who did not receive SNAP or WIC benefits as kids.

We have also found that being food insecure was correlated with having fewer years of formal education and a higher chance of being food insecure in the future.

 

Personal experience

I have also personally seen how WIC can make a big difference for families.

When I was born in 1985, both of my parents were employed — but we lacked health insurance. My mother found out about WIC through the well-baby clinic in Oakland County, Michigan. While she was on leave from work, my father working two jobs and my older sister still under age 5, the program provided us with health exams, food and additional benefits free of charge.

When my mother returned to her position as a public high school teacher, our needs changed. We no longer needed — or received — the assistance.

The results from the national data study tell my story and the story of many other people: Kids from low-income and potentially food-insecure households can realize a better future with public assistance.

 

Funding could be interrupted

Millions of Americans depend on public safety net programs, whether for a month or for years. That assistance will be jeopardized should the government shut down if Congress fails to pass a budget before its mid-November 2023 deadline.

Federal WIC funding doesn’t flow during government shutdowns. It “stops immediately when the shutdown occurs,” U.S. Agriculture Secretary Tom Vilsack told reporters in late September.

But county and state governments can make contingency plans to prevent disruption. Minnesota and Massachusetts are among the states doing that.

Even if Congress moves past this budget impasse without a shutdown, the program won’t necessarily be unscathed. House Republicans have been trying to scale it back and in June the House Appropriations Committee passed a measure that would reduce WIC benefits to trim spending. In contrast, legislation in the Senate would instead increase WIC funding in 2024.

Noura Insolera, Assistant Research Scientist, University of Michigan

This article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license. Read the original article.

Have a baguette and some mushrooms on hand? Try this exceptional (and super simple) appetizer recipe

October begins my slow, three month crawl into complete decadence, at least as far as eating and drinking go.

By the time Christmas dinner is over, I have just enough food enthusiasm left for one final hooray to make it through New Year’s. After that, I take a well deserved break, but from October through the end of the year: I am a machine. And I want it all: to bake, cook, slice, pour and serve (and be served) with abandon.

The cooler it gets, the more inspired I become.

As soon as our daily highs are consistently under 85 degrees or I feel the first hint of a cool breeze, I pull out my mixing bowls and measuring spoons. My first bake is usually a bit premature and done simply to appease the gods responsible for ending the long, sweltering, spirit-crushing days of summer and I approach my long abandoned oven with trepidation and humility. I hope only that what I have chosen to make does not offend and send us plunging back into triple-digit, record-breaking temperatures.

Before I know it, I am rearranging my spice rack so the cinnamon, nutmeg, ginger and cloves are more accessible, I’m buying mini loaf pans with the intention of gifting homemade bread to my neighbors, I’m . . . happy . . . because . . . I’m not hot! And like a bear emerging from hibernation, I’m ready to feast and enjoy being in the world again.   

This recipe for Mushroom Bread is one of the simplest in my most delicious fall recipe lineup. The sauce is really what makes it is so special and it is an easy one to make. Butter and cream get it started, then the addition of lemon juice and Madeira make it soar. In mere minutes, it is ready to be spooned and spread onto a store bought baguette and popped into the oven. It takes very little time from start to finish. The only ‘work’ is prepping a few mushrooms, chopping a shallot and grating some cheese.   


Want more great food writing and recipes? Subscribe to Salon Food’s newsletter, The Bite.


If you are unfamiliar with Madeira, it is a fortified wine named after the Portuguese islands where it originated. I was only introduced to it about ten years ago, never dreaming I would enjoy any dessert wine, but I have developed a real appreciation for it (and port, for that matter, too). 

Madeira has an interesting history as it was made accidentally during the 1600s when fortified wine — done at that time to prevent spoilage — was stored for long periods of time in hot cargo areas on ships. The high temperatures and constant churning on these very long journeys made for a happy accident: Rather than the heat and rough storage conditions ruining the wine as it was originally thought, the taste was something very special.

For this recipe, you can use either Madeira or port . . . and what a perfect time to pick up a bottle, with both cooler weather and the holidays approaching.    

We need your help to stay independent

Mushroom Bread
Yields
08 servings
Prep Time
15 minutes
Cook Time
25 minutes

Ingredients

1 long baguette 

1 shallot, peeled and chopped

4 tablespoons butter

1 carton baby portobello mushrooms, sliced or chopped

Juice from 1/2 lemon

1/2 to 2/3 cup heavy cream

1/8 cup Madeira or port

Salt and pepper

2 tablespoons chopped parsley

8 ounces Gruyere cheese, grated or thinly sliced

 

Directions

  1. Preheat oven to 350 degrees Fahrenheit. Slice mushrooms and chop shallot and set aside.

  2. Slice baguette in half lengthwise and pull out most of interior bread, leaving all crust fully intact. Place on a baking sheet and set aside.

  3. In a skillet over medium-low heat, melt butter then add chopped shallot. Cook a minute or so before adding sliced mushrooms, a little black pepper, a very small pinch of salt and lemon juice. 

  4. Cook a few minutes, allowing the mushrooms to release their juices and soften. 

  5. Turn heat to low and add cream and Madeira/port stirring constantly with spatula until thickened. Stir in parsley.

  6. Use all the thickened mixture to fill baguette halves. Top with Gruyere and bake 20-25 minutes. The last few minutes you can turn the oven setting to low-broil to brown top.

  7. Remove from oven, slice and serve warm.


Cook’s Notes

Serving options:

-You can reduce or omit the mushrooms and add cooked, shredded chicken to the mixture before baking if desired.

-Gluten-free option: If your local grocery store freezer case does not carry “Against The Grain” baguettes, you can try your local health food store. Made with tapioca starch, eggs, olive oil and mozzarella, these make an easy gluten-free option.

The menace two women face in “The Royal Hotel” makes for an uneasy, but memorable watch

What young women must endure is the theme of Kitty Green’s two features. It was the focus of her debut, “The Assistant,” in which the title character (Julia Garner) was abused and harassed in her workplace by a Harvey Weinstein-like boss. And it is the theme in her intense new film, “The Royal Hotel,” where two women Liv (Jessica Henwick) and Hanna (Julia Garner) are abused and harassed in the title establishment, a bar in the Australian outback

“I am scared of everything and everyone in this place.”

The film is inspired by the documentary “Hotel Coolgardie,” but it also feels like a distaff cousin of “Wake in Fright,” the ferocious 1971 Ted Kotcheff film about a schoolteacher stranded in the outback filled with drunk and violent men. 

Green wants viewers to share Liv and Hanna’s discomfort. The film’s opening music is a cue — a sinister instrumental version of Men at Work’s hit “Down Under,” that sets the uneasy mood, which gets darker and darker as the film goes on. But Green lets the tension simmer before it boils over. This is a slow burn thriller that suggests things can go very bad very fast, and it is not until late in the film before they do.

When Liv is out of cash, she and Hanna take jobs working in the Royal Hotel. It promises good money, but the catch is that it is in remote mining area. The young women are also warned that they will need to be OK with “receiving a little male attention.” The carefree Liv eagerly accepts, looking for adventure. Hanna, the more thoughtful of the pair, is rightfully skeptical. When they arrive in the Outback, they discover what they have really signed up for — poor accommodations, hard working conditions, questionable pay, no wifi and trapped with dozens of sweaty, dirty, drunken, sexist men in the middle of nowhere. Moreover, Hanna is taken aback when Billy (Hugo Weaving), who manages the establishment, calls her the C-word. At least there is alcohol. (Viewers could have a drinking game every time Liv or Hanna imbibes a shot.)

The Royal HotelHugo Weaving in “The Royal Hotel” (Neon)

It is not long before Hanna tells Liv, “This is all your fault.” Liv tries to brightside it, if only to self-protect, and make the best out of what is, indeed, a bad situation. But Green thrives on making things unpleasant as Liv and Hanna encounter the various men who belly up to the bar. Matty (Toby Wallace) teases Liv with some vulgar wordplay. Teeth (James Frecheville) acts kindly towards Liv, hoping it will secure him a night out with her and gets angry when it doesn’t. Then there is Dolly (Daniel Henshall), an imposing figure Hanna finds truly menacing. That Hanna rarely smiles is noted by Billy, among other men at the bar, but her situation really does not give her many reasons to smile. She repeatedly wants to leave, but Liv convinces her to stay a few weeks.

We need your help to stay independent

When Matty offers to take Liv and Hanna on a little road trip to go swimming — the Royal Hotel’s pool is empty, another disappointment — they agree if only to get out for the day. They see a kangaroo and do get to swim in some water. There is also a kind of détente reached, as Hanna learns Matty studied meteorology, and may not be the dumb bro she assumed he was. This may be why she kisses him when they return to the Royal Hotel, but she also kicks him out when he gets frisky, because she does not want things to go further. Of course, this causes some tension between them, and makes Hanna, who is justified in her behavior, more uneasy. 

“The Royal Hotel” benefits from Garner’s steely, flawless performance.

“The Royal Hotel” shows how the non-nonsense Hanna manages. She is told she is “tougher than she looks,” and “strong as old socks,” and Green puts viewers squarely in her corner as when she defuses situations at the bar when customers get rowdy. But Hanna is also incredibly vulnerable. When a snake gets loose in her room (cue phallic metaphor), she flinches as Dolly captures it. That Dolly kills it and puts it in a jar with her name on it simply unnerves her. 

“I am scared of everything and everyone in this place,” Hanna tells Liv, whose name may be short for “oblivious,” as she refuses to see the potential horrors around her. Late in the film, when Liv is drunk and going off with Dolly, Hanna is extremely concerned, and even picks up an axe, poised for attack. 

The female solidarity is strongest at this moment, and Green could have explored either how Liv and Hanna lean on each other more because they are alone together in this Godforsaken place, or how this “adventure” drives the friends to fall out. “The Royal Hotel” splits the difference, which feels like a missed opportunity. At least Carol (Ursula Yovich), an aboriginal woman who works as a cook at the Royal Hotel, is supportive towards Hanna as she proves herself working at the bar. 

Green also deliberately keeps Liv and Hanna’s backstory ambiguous. Liv explains that she came to Australia because it was the furthest place she could go. Another line of dialogue reveals their trip was for them to “get away from everything back home.” What “everything back home” was goes unsaid, but one can imagine, based on how Liv and Hanna behave, that it involved Liv being drunk and getting unwanted attention from men. 

“The Royal Hotel” benefits from Garner’s steely, flawless performance as she suffers micro- and macro-aggressions before she has had enough. Her reactions to Billy being drunk, or a man giving her a lighter with a topless woman on it, reveal how Hanna has to processes indignities large and small. As Liv, Jessica Henwick is appealing, and at times, sympathetic, but why Hanna is such good friends with Liv remains a mystery. 


Want a daily wrap-up of all the news and commentary Salon has to offer? Subscribe to our morning newsletter, Crash Course.


In support, Hugo Weaving, Toby Wallace, Daniel Henshall and James Frecheville all walk the tightrope between friendly and fiendish to an effective degree. 

“The Royal Hotel” does not provide a good experience for its protagonists, but it delivers a memorable 90 minutes for viewers.

“The Royal Hotel” opens in theaters nationwide Oct. 6.

 

 

“Sounds like a cooperation deal”: Campaign treasurer guilty plea may be “very bad for George Santos”

Rep. George Santos’, R-N.Y., former campaign treasurer has agreed to plead guilty on one or more federal felony charges, The New York Times reports, citing court papers and an official with the Eastern District of New York. Nancy Marks, who has overseen the finances of some of the state’s most powerful Republicans and sports a reputation marred by allegations of wrongdoing, is expected to appear in Central Islip, N.Y. federal court on Thursday to formally plead guilty, the court official and three sources familiar with the case told the Times.

It is unclear how the charges against Marks will impact Santos, who was indicted in May on 13 counts of wire fraud, money laundering, lying on federal disclosure forms and theft of public funds. The Republican representative has pleaded not guilty, and he has consistently denied any involvement in his campaign finances. He pushed full responsibility and blame for any related discrepancies on Marks, a close associate of his who worked with him from the start of his 2020 campaign through to his 2022 election, telling a conservative news outlet earlier this year that a “former fiduciary went rogue.”

Some legal experts speculated that Marks may have agreed to cooperate in prosecutors’ investigation of Santos. “Sounds like a cooperation deal,” former U.S. Attorney Joyce Vance tweeted. “If pursuant to a cooperation agreement (which I suspect it is), this is very bad for George Santos,” added Rep. Dan Goldman, D-N.Y., a former federal prosecutor. “It likely means more campaign finance fraud charges to come.”

Man arrested for bringing gun to see Wisconsin governor returns to Capitol with assault rifle

A man who illegally brought a loaded handgun into the Wisconsin Capitol seeking out Gov. Tony Evers, returned at night with an assault rifle after posting bail, a spokesperson for the state said Thursday, according to the Associated Press. The shirtless man first approached the first-floor governor’s office, which a police officer guards from a desk outside the suite of rooms in which it resides, around 2 p.m. Wednesday and demanded to see the governor, who was not in the building at the time, state Department of Administration spokesperson Tatyana Warrick said.

He was then taken into police custody for violating the law — which allows people with valid permits to bring concealed weapons into the Capitol — by openly carrying a firearm in the building, Warrick added, noting that the arrested man did not have a concealed carry permit. After the man was booked at the Dane County Jail and, later, posted bail, he came back shortly before 9 p.m. to the Capitol, which closes to the public at 6 p.m., with a loaded assault-style rifle. Outside the building, he again sought out the governor and was then taken into protective custody. 

Madison police said Thursday that the man, who remains unnamed, was taken to the hospital. “Capitol Police took control of the situation and so it’s over,” Evers told reporters Thursday, before declining to discuss what security changes may take place for him or the building. “I never, ever talk about what my security detail does or what they’re planning on doing,” Evers said. “But anytime something like this happens, obviously they reevaluate.” A spokesperson for the police department did not respond to the AP’s email seeking additional details.

Earth just set another heat record — by the largest margin yet

Of all the heat records broken this year – and there have been many – the one that September just notched might be the most absurd. 

Last month was the hottest September on record by 0.5 degrees Celsius (0.9 degrees Fahrenheit). That may not sound like a big deal, but as far as heat-record margins go, it’s massive — or, as climate scientist Zeke Hausfather posted on the social networking site known as X, “absolutely gobsmackingly bananas.” 

“We’ve never seen a record smashed by anything close to this margin,” Hausfather told Axios. “It’s frankly a bit scary.”

September’s average global temperature was 0.9 degrees C higher than the recent historical average and 1.8 degrees C above pre-industrial levels. The month’s mercury measurements — which come from the Japan Meteorological Agency and Europe’s Copernicus Climate Change Service — were more fitting for mid-summer. Though summer isn’t what it used to be either: July was the hottest month in 120,000 years, with the hottest week and day ever recorded, all during the hottest summer known to humankind. 

While scientists say climate change, fueled by the combustion of fossil fuels, is to blame for the planet’s long-term warming trend, this year’s gobsmacking record-smashing got a nudge from a cooling La Niña weather pattern giving way to a strong El Niño in the Pacific Ocean, which formed over the summer. El Niño typically has a stronger warming effect in its second year and could ascend to ‘super’-status levels by winter, according to a recent experimental forecast by scientists at the National Center for Atmospheric Research. 

Even though this year’s warming is consistent with predictions, the September record still came as a shock to some researchers. “I’m still struggling to comprehend how a single year can jump so much compared to previous years,” Mika Rantanen, a climate researcher at Finnish Meteorological Institute, posted on X. 

Even though this year’s warming is consistent with predictions, the September record still came as a shock to some researchers.

September’s unmatched heat showed up with near-100-degree weather in the eastern United States and Europe and a freakishly warm end to winter in South America, where highs hit 110 degrees F. Much of Europe was still sweltering under unseasonable heat at the start of October. 

At the bottom of the planet, the extent of winter sea ice in Antarctica hit an all-time low — 1 million square kilometers less ice than the previous record, set in 1986.

“It’s not just a record-breaking year, it’s an extreme record-breaking year,” Walt Meier, a senior scientist at the National Snow and Ice Data Center, told Reuters.

The searingly hot temperatures have, at least temporarily, put the planet beyond the 1.5 degrees C rise in warming that global leaders had pledged to avoid as part of the Paris Agreement. But what matters most, scientists say, is keeping the planet from sustaining that level of warming over many years. Luckily, that’s still possible, the International Energy Agency recently announced. To succeed,countries will need to triple renewable energy capacity and double energy efficiency improvements by 2030, according to the IEA. Demand for climate-warming fossil fuels is expected to peak this decade.

This article originally appeared in Grist at https://grist.org/extreme-heat/earth-another-heat-record-largest-margin-september/.

Grist is a nonprofit, independent media organization dedicated to telling stories of climate solutions and a just future. Learn more at Grist.org

 

Judge issues order to prevent Trump from hiding money after he started “Trump Organization II”

The New York judge who doomed several of Donald Trump’s key businesses in a summary judgment last week issued an order in the Trump family’s civil fraud case Thursday to ensure the former president doesn’t secretly move money around to save his real estate empire, the Daily Beast reports. According to the order, New York Supreme Court Justice Arthur Engoron directed the Trumps to identify any corporations they have and disclose any plans to shift around their assets in attempts to conceal or maintain their wealth.

The case’s defendants — Trump, sons Donald Jr. and Eric, and two other top executives in Trump businesses — were ordered to inform the court of “any other entities controlled or beneficially owned” by them, any “creation of a new entity to hold or acquire the assets,” and “any anticipated transfer of assets.” Engoron also authorized a court-appointed monitor, former federal judge Barbara Jones, to oversee this process until someone can be appointed to dissolve Trump’s companies. 

Engoron’s aggressive and preemptive move, issued on the fourth day of trial in the case, is intended to undermine the underhanded tactics Trump has pulled out so far during the three-year investigation. It follows the tumultuous first three days of the proceedings, in which the judge issued a limited gag order because of Trump’s online attack on his clerk, the former president complained about the trial in the courtroom and Trump’s defense aggravated the judge with delay tactics. Trump was previously accused of seeking to quietly transfer his assets after he formally started a “Trump Organization II” on the same day that the lawsuit was filed.

NFL defends embracing the Taylor Swift “pop cultural moment” despite haters

Taylor Swift is the new face of Sunday night football, and the NFL is not apologizing for it. In fact, the league is embracing it regardless of the backlash from football fans.

Ever since Swift was seated in a surprise appearance at a Chiefs-Bears game about two weeks ago to watch rumored beau Chiefs tight end Travis Kelce, the NFL has been in a pop culture moment. Reportedly, her presence at the game and chatter online drove up ratings but also has led to a rise in game ticket prices and Kelce’s jersey sales.

This past Sunday, the pop star again showed up at another Chiefs game, which drove Swifties and haters into another media tailspin. The NFL began playing into the buzz surrounding Swift at Kelce’s games by changing its official X (Twitter) bio to “NFL (Taylor’s Version)” and its Instagram bio read, “Chiefs are 2-0 as Swifties.” The following day the Swift references were removed but some football fans online were fed up with the constant Swift coverage.

In a statement to “The Hollywood Reporter,” the league said, “We frequently change our bios and profile imagery based on what’s happening in and around our games, as well as culturally. The Taylor Swift and Travis Kelce news has been a pop cultural moment we’ve leaned into in real time, as it’s an intersection of sport and entertainment, and we’ve seen an incredible amount of positivity around the sport.”

The league’s statement follows Kelce’s comments on his podcast. He said that he thought the coverage surrounding Swift at his game was “overdoing it.” He stated that he has no issue with people’s excitement with who is at the games because it brings more to the atmosphere but “I think everybody is just, like, overwhelmed,” Kelce said.

 

 

 

 

 

 

Ex-Trump lawyer warns Giuliani is in “a lot of trouble” after being left without any local attorneys

A second attorney for Rudy Giuliani is seeking an exit from his Georgia legal team, according to a Tuesday court filing, which would seemingly leave the former New York City mayor without any local representation in the state. 

Brian Tevis, who joined Giuliani’s legal team shortly before he surrendered to Fulton County authorities in August, submitted a motion to withdraw to the clerk Tuesday evening, leaving it to a judge in the case to sign off on the motion.

The move comes after several other attorneys who represented Giuliani have sued the former Trump lawyer for failing to pay his legal fees, including his longtime lawyer and friend Robert Costello, who sued Giuliani for more than $1.3 million in payments to his firm. 

The loss to his legal team also follows the departure of fellow Giuliani Georgia lawyer David Wolfe, who submitted his own motion to withdraw from representing the former mayor last week. 

Sources familiar with Giuliani’s situation told ABC News that he is close to obtaining new local representation.

Former Trump White House attorney Ty Cobb told CNN’s Erin Burnett Wednesday that the latest departure from Giuliani’s Georgia team puts the former mayor “in a lot of trouble.”

“I think it’s a huge problem,” Cobb continued. “I think it’s, like any American who saw him throw the first ball out at Yankee Stadium after 9/11 and thought he was ‘America’s Mayor,’ I think this is a tragic fall.”

“And the depths I don’t think we’ve necessarily seen yet,” Cobb added. “So I do think he’s in great difficulty. I think he needs a very strong attorney to assist him there.”

We need your help to stay independent

Other legal experts echoed Cobb’s sentiments.

“Have to imagine it’s rooted in Giuliani’s inability to pay, which is going to get hugely worse before (ie probably never) gets better,” Harry Litman, a former U.S. attorney, wrote on X, formerly Twitter. “Hard to see how he can climb out of the cavernous hole he is in financially and legally.”

“This poses a serious problem for Rudy Giuliani. He needs local Georgia counsel to defend him in this RICO prosecution,” MSNBC legal analyst Katie Phang tweeted. “If he cannot afford a lawyer or one cannot be appointed to him, will Giuliani represent himself?”


Want a daily wrap-up of all the news and commentary Salon has to offer? Subscribe to our morning newsletter, Crash Course.


“Rudy’s troubles compound exponentially. I am sure, however, there is a scrappy young member of the Georgia Bar willing to step in and do some solid work for the exposure,” added Anthony Michael Kreis, a Georgia State law professor. “That’s his best hope.”

Giuliani is one of 19 co-defendants, including the former president, in Fulton County, Ga. District Attorney Fani Willis’ sprawling RICO indictment, which alleges that the group conspired to overturn Trump’s electoral defeat in the state in 2020. The former New York mayor faces 13 charges — including conspiracy to commit false statements and writings, soliciting a public officer to violate their oath and conspiracy to commit impersonating a public officer — for his role in the scheme. He has pleaded not guilty.

Giuliani is also described as one of the unindicted co-conspirators in Trump’s federal election interference case. The New York Times reported Thursday that federal prosecutors have been asking witnesses about Giuliani’s drinking habits and the former president’s awareness of his alleged inebriation while Giuliani advised him. 

Mask mandates are returning to some hospitals. Should they be there to stay?

Remember back in spring 2020, when severe personal protective equipment shortages plagued hospitals across the country? Healthcare providers on the frontlines reused dirty masks or tried cleansing them with solar power as they posted heartbreaking photos of their faces nearly bruised from the pressure of wearing an N95 for hours on end. Some who expected they would be infected even rented out separate apartments to keep their own families safe from contamination.

Eventually, global supply chains beefed up the production of masks and other protective gear, vaccines were developed and released, which combined with natural immunity massively reduced the number of COVID-19 hospitalizations and deaths. In May 2023, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) rolled back some of its transmission prevention rules, recommending hospitals reinstate mask mandates as community transmission rises, but ultimately leaving it up to individual hospitals to decide when and how that process unravels while also removing universal testing requirements for patients and hospital staff. 

“Our elderly relatives, people with serious illnesses — these are the only places they can go to get care when they are in the worst shape of their lives.”

With COVID-19 cases steadily rising since June, and the EG.5 mutation (nicknamed “Eris”) contributing to a large portion of the spread, at least 18 hospitals nationwide have made headlines for bringing back mask mandates — but a federally mandated measure has yet to be put in place. While the chance of severe disease is reduced for those who have been vaccinated or who have already had a COVID infection, doctors are concerned about vulnerable patients in hospitals, which are by nature meeting points for all sorts of disease-causing pathogens, not just SARS-CoV-2, the virus that causes COVID. Hospitals are also at elevated risk of things like long COVID, which can occur even in the vaccinated, young and otherwise healthy.

“Our elderly relatives, people with serious illnesses — these are the only places they can go to get care when they are in the worst shape of their lives,” said Dr. Theodore Pak, an infectious diseases fellow, who has seen hundreds of COVID-19 patients at the hospitals he practices at in Boston, Massachusetts. 

“We may give somebody a powerful medication that takes away their entire immune system and then in order to get medical care, they have to go to a hospital where they sit next to people that are unmasked that could give them a disease that could kill them,” Pak told Salon in a phone interview. “We don’t really think about that or weigh that risk anymore.”

President Joe Biden declared the pandemic “over” in September 2022, but COVID-19 was the fourth leading cause of death that year. In 2023, it’s still the seventh leading cause of death. Although a new batch of no-cost vaccines became available last month, the jury’s still out on how many Americans will actually take them, especially due to hiccups in the rollout.

Despite solid evidence that masking works to reduce the spread of COVID-19, recent mask mandates in schools or other settings have been controversial, continuing the politicization that has delayed pandemic response throughout. When a security guard enforced a mask mandate in Rochester, New York in February 2022, he was criminally charged. Mask mandates in hospitals are no exception, with a hospital system in West Virginia facing backlash when it reinstated its mask mandate in January 2023 and some doctors arguing that the time for universal masking in hospitals has come and gone.

Many healthcare providers on the frontlines warn that loosening protective measures in hospitals can increase infections from not just COVID-19 but also flu and other viruses.

But other doctors are urging hospitals to put safety first. Research shows that when community COVID-19 transmission increases, it translates to an outsized COVID-19 spread in hospitals. One study of hospitals in England and Scotland found COVID-19 cases that originated in the hospital jumped 41% after they stopped universal testing upon admission. Another study in JAMA Oncology found more patients with cancer died from COVID during the winter Omicron wave than prior waves, which the authors linked partially to “the relaxation of policies to prevent SARS-CoV-2 transmission.”

Many healthcare providers on the frontlines warn that loosening protective measures in hospitals can increase infections from not just COVID-19 but also flu and other viruses. In one study within Brigham and Women’s Hospital, COVID-19 protocols cut the spread of the season’s other two major viruses, flu and respiratory syncytial virus (RSV), by 50%. Another study published today found pandemic protocols at the University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center reduced respiratory viral infections among vulnerable patients.

“It’s one thing for us to be over the pandemic in general society, shopping malls and whatever other settings,” Pak said. “But to me, hospitals, nursing homes and healthcare facilities are different places from a moral perspective.”

Not only have hospitals stopped universally testing inpatients for COVID-19, but the entire system to test and treat COVID has been dismantled outside of hospital systems, as PCR and rapid tests become less available and more expensive, said Dr. Lara Jirmanus, a primary care physician and clinical instructor at Harvard Medical School. As a result, public health agencies are having to rely on hospitalizations and wastewater data, which is available in fewer than half of U.S. counties, to gauge the level of the pandemic. However, hospitalizations are a delayed metric for tracking the spread of disease that by nature puts health care workers and vulnerable patients at the frontlines.


Want more health and science stories in your inbox? Subscribe to Salon’s weekly newsletter Lab Notes.


“With the end of the public health emergency, the CDC also stopped asking hospitals to report how many patients have hospital-onset COVID, so we don’t even have any way of measuring the serious impact, the damage we ourselves in the healthcare sector are doing to people by exposing them to COVID,” Jirmanus told Salon in a phone interview. “How are we supposed to assess the impact of a policy, if we have gotten rid of the evidence?”

In Canada, safety protocols are mandated by the provincial Ministry of Health. Dr. Paul Winston, a physiatrist in British Columbia, said on one hand that leads to some tension because hospitals don’t have a choice on whether to instate a mask policy or not. On the other hand, it does protect healthcare workers from violence or conflict, which they face in the U.S. when the onus of these mandates is left to them.

“It does take away the stress,” Winston told Salon in a phone interview. “You can just say, ‘Look, it’s now the rule. You have to mask in my clinical office.'”

The CDC is currently revising its 2007 isolation precaution guidelines for healthcare facilities, but the agency has been criticized for further weakening protective measures. National Nurses United said in a letter addressed to the agency that the workgroup that convened to discuss the revisions was “developed without input from many important stakeholders, including frontline personnel.”

The agency is working to get expert opinions on the guidance before finalizing a draft and a spokesperson told Salon that a response would be issued “very soon.”

We need your help to stay independent

Dr. Andrew Wang, a health equity researcher at Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, says at the end of the day, the responsibility shouldn’t be on patients, who may already be sick and vulnerable in hospitals, to mitigate the spread of COVID-19. Instead, it’s up to health leaders to establish standard practices for everyone to follow, he added.

“It’s the health care policymakers and leaders who are ultimately accountable for downplaying the risks of COVID in health settings,” Wang told Salon in a phone call.

“Trail of death”: Staffing crisis sparks largest health care strike in U.S. history

The day before close to 85,000 Kaiser Permanente workers in several states hit the bricks in the largest healthcare strike in American history, the Washington Post reported the results of an explosive year-long investigation that revealed the country’s life expectancy was cratering in large measure thanks to premature deaths due to chronic illness.

“Sickness and death are scarring entire communities in much of the country,” the newspaper reported. “The geographical footprint of early death is vast: In a quarter of the nation’s counties, mostly in the South and Midwest, working-aged people are dying at a higher rate than 40 years ago,” the Post found. “The trail of death is so prevalent that a person could go from Virginia to Louisiana, and then up to Kansas, by traveling entirely within counties where death rates are higher than they were when Jimmy Carter was president.”

The WAPO lede was to the point.

“The United States is failing at a fundamental mission — keeping people alive,” the newspaper declared. 

“After decades of progress, life expectancy — long regarded as a singular benchmark of a nation’s success — peaked in 2014 at 78.9 years, then drifted downward even before the coronavirus pandemic,” the newspaper reported. “Among wealthy nations, the United States in recent decades went from the middle of the pack to being an outlier. And it continues to fall further and further behind.”

For several years before the pandemic, the U.S. healthcare for-profit healthcare system was repeatedly rated as the most expensive with the poorest health outcomes of the dozens of its peer OECD countries. In 2018, CNN reported the United States would “take the biggest drop in ranking of all high-income countries, falling from 43rd in 2016 to 64th by 2040, with an average life expectancy of 79.8. The US will be overtaken by China, which rises 29 places to 39th in the table.

Today’s three-day walkout from Oct. 4 to Oct. 7 by the Coalition of Kaiser Permanente Unions is being staged by eight unions including members of SEIU and OPIEU in California, Colorado, Maryland, Oregon, Virginia, Washington, and Washington D.C.

Staffing, along with higher wages are key demands.

A NATION BLEEDING OUT

Healthcare unions have been sounding the alarm about what they call the acuity crisis years before the COVID pandemic which has so far killed more than 1.1 million Americans and permanently affected millions more. This nurses’ clarion call has been largely ignored by most elected officials, who all too often are reliant on the millions of dollars in campaign donations from the medical industrial complex that includes nominally non-profit conglomerates that pay their CEOs Wall Street-scale salaries.

And while the ongoing UAW and SAG-AFTRA strikes have commanded national media attention, the growing labor unrest in the healthcare sector is raising significant unaddressed public health concerns that affect the well-being of the entire nation’s population.

As a direct result of this unaddressed national acuity crisis, healthcare unions have had to move up the incorporation of staffing-nurse patient ratios into their top contract demands, on, or above wages and benefits. A healthcare staffing crisis that existed before the pandemic has only worsened, as more and more nurses are opting to leave the bedside after COVID required they put themselves and their families at risk of infection.

The government’s inattention to the deepening national wellness and healthcare staffing crisis has had consequences. Yet, the constant stream of pharmaceutical and healthcare advertising promotes the notion of the exceptionalism of American medicine, which as the Washington Post reports, is actually failing spectacularly at extending the average American’s life.

While the U.S. is just 4 percent of the world’s population it was 12 percent of the global death toll, medical experts explain in part, because such a large portion of the country was chronically ill and lacked access to healthcare before the pandemic.

According to the Guardian newspaper and Kaiser Health News, 3,600 nurses died in the first wave of COVID, 700 of them in New York and New Jersey, with two-thirds of them people of color. Many thousands more are believed to have lingering health issues in addition to dealing with PTSD from having to attend to a mass death event that could mean several deaths a day.

MORE OF US ARE SICKER

“Our patients are much more likely to be sicker than they were when I started bedside nursing thirty years ago — they don’t come in for one thing — it’s a complex of underlying co-morbidities like diabetes and heart disease,” said Judy Danella, RN, president of the United Steelworkers Nurses Local 4-200, which has, since Aug.4, been striking for safer staffing at the Robert Wood Johnson University Hospital in New Brunswick, NJ. 

The  RWJBarnabas system is a not-for-profit healthcare giant with a dozen acute care hospitals and a partnership with Rutgers University. The system has 38,000 employees and $6.6 billion in revenue. It relies on hundreds of millions of dollars in tax-exempt state-issued bonds for capital construction. The system’s recently-retired CEO and President Barry Ostrowsky earned $16 million in the second year of the pandemic, making him the highest-paid hospital executive in the New York area, according to Crain’s New York .

The hospital system’s latest IRS 990 filing includes links to dozens of “related organizations taxable as partnerships” that are identified with non-descript and anonymous-sounding names like Medmerge LLC or Jersey ASC Ventures LLC. There’s a C-corporation Major Investigations Inc., which is listed as “security”.

Under Schedule F in its IRS filings which catalogues its financial “activities outside the United States,” it describes “program services” listed in Central America and the Caribbean that’s a “financial vehicle” worth $41,174,204.   

For its public relations strategy, management is relying on MWW [MikeWorldWide], the powerhouse firm founded by Michael Kempner, described by  Politico as a “major Democratic fundraiser who bundled millions of dollars for Barack Obama’s campaigns.”  

According to Kempner’s LinkedIn profile, he is “active in progressive politics, having played roles in the presidential campaigns of Barack Obama, Hillary Clinton and most recently, Joe Biden.”

A COMPANY STATE, OWNED & OPERATED 

USW Local 4-200 has had just two meetings with a federal mediator with a third scheduled for this Friday. Last month, RJWBarnabas cut the healthcare coverage for the union’s 1,700 members and embarked on a major public relations campaign to discredit the union. The union rank and file responded, however, by reaffirming their strike vote at the request of the federal mediator.

In a sign of RWJBarnabas’s virtual lock on New Jersey’s power structure, it recently hired George Helmy, Gov. Phil Murphy’s longtime chief of staff, who had been speaking with the union leadership a few days into the strike and prior to the announcement of his new position several weeks later.

“I can think of no more respected policy leader in our region than George Helmy, and we are incredibly pleased to have him join our team,” said Mark E. Manigan, president, and CEO for RWJBarnabas Health “His depth of knowledge on a wide variety of issues facing our state is unparalleled, and we recognize that his contributions to advancing our mission of service to our patients and community will be significant.

One of New Jersey’s 40 state senators declined to comment on the nurses’ plight, noting he had an adult child who worked at RWJBarnabas. Last month, a judge restricted the union’s picketing at the New Brunswick facility, which is also the construction site of a billion-dollar expansion of a cancer center that bears the name of Jack Morris, a Democratic donor and philanthropist, who also chairs the RWJ University Hospital board of directors.

RWJBarnabas multi-million-dollar ad buys go a long way in a local news media market scrambling for revenue.

Back in 2021, SEIU 1199 won a union vote at another RWJBarnabas hospital, Clara Maass Hospital, in Belleville, NJ. Despite a recent agreement on higher wages, the represented members still are without their first contract. In a statement to Work-Bites, the union put their local struggle in the broader national context.

“Serious strains on our healthcare system existed well before the COVID-19 pandemic, including major staffing shortages, a growing mental health crisis, the opioid epidemic, and the need for more long-term care services in an aging society, COVID-19 intensified all of these related issues,” SEIU 1199 asserted. “Frontline healthcare workers know what’s at stake for the health of millions of Americans if hospital systems do not invest in raising standards for staffing and care, which is why they are raising their voices in New Jersey and across the country.”

The renewed push for staffing requirements and higher pay comes as a national survey predicted New Jersey would be shy 11,400 nurses by 2030, ranking it in the top ten state with a severe shortfall. Also, in that crisis mix Connecticut (27,926), New York (18,784), and Pennsylvania (16,430).

According to the American Hospital Association, 100,000 nurses left their profession over the last two years “due to stress, burnout and retirements, and another 610,388 reported their intent to leave by 2027,” according to a study released by the National Council of Nursing.

$16 MILLION BUYS WHAT?

Like RWJ Barnabas, only larger and multi-state, Kaiser Permanente is a multi-billion-dollar non-profit that paid its CEO $16 million annually.

“We’ve been raising the alarm about patient safety, but Kaiser isn’t hearing us. Kaiser executives keep refusing to listen to frontline healthcare workers on the issues that impact the care of our patients, and they’re violating the law by failing to bargain in good faith,” said Katrina Schaetz, OB-GYN clinical assistant, in a union statement. “We are standing up for more staff and better patient care. If Kaiser doesn’t stop committing unfair labor practices, healthcare workers are prepared to go on strike.”

“Our team is available 24/7 to continue bargaining with the coalition until we reach a fair and equitable agreement,” Kaiser Permanente said in a statement. “We remain optimistic that there is still time to find agreement before any of the work stoppages called by the unions begin at 6 a.m. on Wednesday.”

The nation’s largest non-profit hospital chain defended its current pay scale asserting that it led “total compensation is every market where we operate, and out proposals in bargaining would ensure we keep that position.”

“Kaiser used to hold itself out as the best place to get care and the best place to work, but it is now failing at both. Kaiser can and must do better,” said Linda Bridges, president, OPEIU Local 2. “We are demanding Kaiser bargain in good faith, stop violating the law, and address the healthcare staffing crisis. That is why today we have joined tens of thousands of our fellow Kaiser healthcare workers in voting to authorize a strike over unfair labor practices.”

“Even as some frontline healthcare heroes live in their cars and patients wait longer for care, Kaiser released new financials this month indicating they made $3 billion in profit in just the first six months of this year,” according to a press release from OPEIU Local 2. “Despite being a non-profit organization — which means it pays no income taxes on its earnings and extremely limited property taxes — Kaiser has reported more than $24 billion in profit over the last five years.”

In addition to Kaiser’s CEO, 49 executives at Kaiser get more than $1 million annually. “Kaiser Permanente has investments of $113 billion in the U.S. and abroad, including in fossil fuels, casinos, for-profit prisons, alcohol companies, military weapons, and more,” according to OPEIU Local 2.

Back in the spring, HPAE, New Jersey’s largest nurses’ union, with the strong support of the NJ AFL-CIO, held a major rally launching a statewide campaign to get Trenton to enact nurse-to-patient staffing ratios as was done in California in 2004. In the years since, peer-reviewed studies documented that California saw greatly improved patient outcomes, workplace safety, as well as nurse retention.

Debbie White, RN, is the president of HPAE which represents 14,000 nurses and healthcare professionals. In a response to a Work-Bites query, White wrote the national Kaiser Permanente three-day strike “highlights the critical need for staffing legislation in every state. All healthcare workers across the country have felt the impact of deliberate understaffing and, as a result, they are severely stressed and burned out. Even before the pandemic, hospital administrators were cutting staff to maximize profits. Now, we have a crisis in healthcare.”

“The national strike at Kaiser Permanente — prompted by growing concerns over staffing and safety as well as bad-faith bargaining — echoes the struggle of New Jersey nurses who are demanding improvements in jobs and care at hospitals affiliated with RWJBarnabas Health,” wrote SEIU 1199 in a response to a Work-Bites query. “Emerging from the greatest public health crisis in generations, healthcare workers are raising the alarm that hospital conglomerates must be accountable to the communities they serve and respect the voices of professional caregivers.”

The union statement continued, “It is outrageous that at Clara Maass Medical Center, for example, management has consistently rejected nurses’ call to have input in health, safety, and staffing committees. How can a hospital seek to improve standards of care if it refuses to hear the concerns of the very people who provide it?”

“HELP!”: Trump flails on Truth Social over “horror show” New York fraud trial judge

Former President Donald Trump raged on social media Thursday morning just hours before the fourth day of trial in his civil fraud case is set to begin. Though he stayed for the whole day in the trial’s first two days, New York Attorney General Letitia James, who filed the lawsuit against him, announced in the middle of the third that the former president had left early after peppering Wednesday’s session with courtroom grumbles and non-verbal displays of dissent.

“I’m in a rat’s nest of NEW YORK DEMOCRAT CORRUPTION, a reason so many companies are leaving New York, our Racist Attorney General filled a lawsuit whose facts and VALUATIONS are wrong, like $18,000,000 for Mar-a-Lago, when it is worth, perhaps, 100 times that amount, and numerous other properties, likewise, that this case is a political SHAM that should never have been brought,” Trump began in a post to Truth Social. He went on to bemoan the trial’s absence of a jury, which his lawyers neglected to request. “Therefore, a Radical Left Judge, who came up through Democrat Club System, will decide. It is not possible that he can be fair. Every decision he makes has been a horror show. It is why I do the set asides with the media – To explain the case, and what is going on. Our CORRUPT, RACIST, & INCOMPETENT A.G., Letitia ‘Peekaboo’ James, considered the WORST ATTORNEY GENERAL IN THE UNITED STATES, refused to bring this case under the respected ‘Commercial Division,’ where judges understand Valuations and Real Estate. This Trump Hating Judge doesn’t. The Appellant Division must intercede, NOW!”

“The ridiculous A.G. case against me in New York, brought by the Racist and Incompetent Peekaboo James, is being studied and mocked all over the World. Companies are Fleeing! It, and the highly political, Trump Hating Judge, are DESTROYING the Image and Reputation of the New York State Legal System & Courts,” Trump added in another post. “I don’t even get a Jury! All of this while MURDERS & VIOLENT CRIME HIT UNIMAGINABLE RECORDS! This is sooo bad for New York. HELP! The respected Commercial Division, where it should have been sent in the first place, must take over this ‘sh.. show.'”

“Mean Girls” 2004 cast: Checking in on the Plastics nearly 20 years later

When Cady Heron (Lindsay Lohan) asked Aaron Samuels (Jonathan Bennett) what day of the week it was in math class she changed the fabric of the universe as we know it. For the rest of eternity, Oct. 3 will be known as "Mean Girls" Day to any person who has a heart. The faux-national holiday was yesterday and there were traces of the film's impact all over social media. The Paramount TikTok account absurdly posted the entire film on the platform in 23 parts. Also, it was announced that the "Mean Girls" Broadway musical, which has been turned into a movie musical adaption, will be released to the public in January 2024 bringing it full circle. And then of course the original film will celebrate its 20th anniversary on April 30.

Close to its two decades of life, the film will never die and continues to take on a whole new form as new generations of people find it. In the film, Lindsay Lohan plays Cady, who had been homeschooled in Africa but now has moved to Illinois to attend North Shore High School where she meets the resident emo girl Janice (Lizzy Caplan) and the gay best friend Damian (Daniel Franzese). Janice has it out for the Plastics — the school's trio of untouchable hot mean girls, which consists of Regina George (Rachel McAdams), Gretchen Weiners (Lacey Chabert) and Karen Smith (Amanda Seyfried). Janice and Damian enlist Cady to infiltrate the Plastics for a classic teenage revenge story to expose the Plastics for the fake, soulless and manipulative girls that they are. However Cady, who is struggling to find her place and identity in an American high school, slowly but surely morphs into – as Janice says in the film – "cold shiny hard plastic."

The film became a cult classic and shaped the careers of mega-industry hitters McAdams, Lohan, Seyfried and many more.

Here's a look at where the "Mean Girls" actors started, what they did post-film and what's next for them.

01
Lindsay Lohan
Lindsay Lohan in Falling for ChristmasLindsay Lohan in "Falling for Christmas" (Netflix)
The resident 2000s It Girl and "Mean Girls" lead — Lohan has lived through many different phases in her life. Starting her career as a Disney child actor she starred in classics like "The Parent Trap" with iconic actors, Dennis Quaid and Natasha Richardson. Lohan played the separated-at-birth twin sisters Hallie and Allie, who serendipitously meet each other at summer camp and trade places to experience the parent they've never met. Lohan has starred in many other Disney classics but none will be as iconic as "Freaky Friday" with another legend Jamie Lee Curtis.
 
"Mean Girls" was Lohan's real break as a teen icon and to show she had real Hollywood chops. At the height of her career then, she was a frequent target of gossip sites and the tabloid culture in the late aughts alongside Paris Hilton and Nicole Richie. The star also experienced lows of celebrity attention and lifestyle with dueling and very public battles with her parents. Lohan also struggled with addiction and was sentenced to 90 days in jail in 2010 for violating her probation in connection to a drug arrest.
 
But she made a comeback. The former teen star and singer has been sober for years and made her film comeback in a 2022 Netflix Christmas film "Falling for Christmas" that feels like her contribution to the Hallmark-style holiday fluff. She just recently had her first child with her husband earlier this year. Lohan will also be starring in another Netflix film "Irish Wish," a rom-com fantasy that involve making wishes, alternate realities and finding true love.
02
Rachel McAdams
Rachel McAdams as herself in DaveRachel McAdams as herself in "Dave" (Byron Cohen/FX)
In the same year that McAdams starred as the iconically quotable and most memorable HBIC Regina George, she also starred in the big-screen  adaptation of Nicholas Sparks' "The Notebook" as Allie alongside former boyfriend, Ryan Gosling. It's no shock to anyone that her career has only grown as she was the face of two mega-blockbusters. The Canadian actress has been nominated for an Oscar for her work as a journalist in "Spotlight." While McAdams has been in several awards-contenders films and television shows, she also is clearly a great comedy actress and doesn't take her work that seriously. She is seriously funny in the underrated "Game Night" and surprisingly is in the MCU's "Doctor Strange."
 
This year she starred in the critics darling and Judy Blume book to film adaption "Are You There God? It's Me, Margaret?" McAdams is lauded as one of the best actresses in the industry and continues to make acting choices that don't box her into the quintessential, Hollywood It actress. She also was a guest star as herself in the FX comedy "Dave" for a few episodes in the third season.
03
Amanda Seyfried
Amanda Seyfried in The DropoutAmanda Seyfried in "The Dropout" (Beth Dubber/Hulu)
Seyfried's meteoric rise is more surprising than her co-stars' because of how little of Karen we see in "Mean Girls." She has some killer, daft lines about being able to tell the weather with her boobs as Karen but she isn't as much as a standout. But do not underestimate her quietly strong impact as a woman in the industry. The actress has starred in the hot girl demon satire "Jennifer's Body," and not one but two "Mamma Mia" films where she unexpectedly sings her heart out.
 
Recently, Seyfried won an Emmy and Golden Globe for her outstanding work as Silicon Valley fraudster and turtleneck-wearing Elizabeth Holmes in the limited series "The Dropout." It's in "The Dropout" where Seyfried completely transforms into a version of Holmes and surpasses whatever preconceived notions you had about the actress' abilities. She's brilliant and deeply disturbing as Holmes when she sings and dances to Lil Wayne's "How to Love." Seyfried even nails the menacing, lower-octave voice the fraudster cultivated. Post-Emmy win, Seyfried's upcoming project is called "Seven Veils," where she plays an earnest theatre director.
04
Lacey Chabert
Lacey Chabert in The Wedding VeilLacey Chabert in "The Wedding Veil" (Allister Foster/Crown Media)
Chabert's Gretchen Weiners is known for always trying to always make "fetch" happen. She's second in command to Regina and is perpetually in her shadow because of it. Chabert plays her wish-washy character perfectly.
 
Prior to her work in "Mean Girls," she was in the '90s drama "Party of Five" where she played Claudia Salinger, one of the younger of the five Salinger siblings who are suddenly orphaned when their parents die in a car accident. She is a studious and gifted violinist grappling with grief and being raised by her older siblings. So playing sexed-up Gretchen was definitely a transition for the actress.
 
Since "Mean Girls," she's appeared in a number of minor roles that didn't do much, in addition to voice acting. However these days Chabert has taken up the mantle as Hallmark Channel Christmas movie queen, especially after Candace Cameron's departure. She has been in countless holiday films and this year she has two lined up in November for the season: "A Merry Scottish Christmas" and "Haul Out the Holly: Lit Up"

Want a daily wrap-up of all the news and commentary Salon has to offer? Subscribe to our morning newsletter, Crash Course.


05
Jonathan Bennett
Jonathan Bennett in The Christmas House 2 Deck Those HallsJonathan Bennett in "The Christmas House 2: Deck Those Halls" (Allister Foster/Crown Media)
North Shore's empathetic, hot boy, Aaron Samuels, plays a major role in the reason why Cady and Regina fight for power throughout "Mean Girls." Bennett came out on the set of "Mean Girls," as did fellow actor Daniel Franzese, who played Damien. Though it was a private coming out at the time, a public one followed in 2017.
 
Bennett in real life was a teen heartthrob for many girls and boys post-"Mean Girls." He appeared in a number of minor roles, but he found his niche as the welcoming host of tasty reality TV competition shows "Cake Wars," "Cupcake Wars" and "Halloween Wars."
 
Like Chabert, he's also joined the Hallmark family and recently starred in the channel's first-ever holiday project that centers an LGBTQI storyline in "The Holiday Sitter." In March 2022, Bennett married actor and television host Jaymes Vaughan and wrote a cookbook playing right into the "Mean Girls" fandom's hands "The Burn Cookbook: An Unofficial Unauthorized Cookbook for Mean Girls Fans." He even had a cameo in Ariana Grande's "Thank U Next" music video which was partially inspired by "Mean Girls." His next project will involve hosting a show called "Battle of the Decades" on Food Network.