Spring Sale: Get 1 Year, Save 58%

Trump floats dubious new legal defense in lengthy Truth Social tirade at FBI

Former President Donald Trump wasted little time on Thursday once again attacking the Department of Justice and the Federal Bureau of Investigation for executing a search warrant on his Mar-a-Lago resort to retrieve top-secret government documents that he had refused to hand over.

“Even though I am as innocent as a person can be, and despite MY campaign being spied on by the Radical Left, the FISA COURT being lied to and defrauded, all of the many Hoaxes and Scams that were illegally placed on me by very sick & demented people, and without even mentioning the many crimes of Joe and Hunter Biden, all revealed in great detail in the Laptop From Hell, it looks more and more like the Fake News Media is pushing hard for the Sleaze to do something that should not be done!” Trump began, and he wasn’t close to being done.

“Joe Biden said he knew nothing about the Break-In of Mar-a-Lago or, the greatest political attack in the history of the U.S. Does anybody really believe this???” the twice-impeached former president wrote in a followup post.

“The Radical Left Democrat prosecutors are illegally trying to circumvent, for purely political gain, the Presidential Record’s Act, under which I have done absolutely nothing wrong,” Trump wrote after this. “It can not be circumvented, for me or any other President. They illegally Raided my home, and took things that should not have been taken. They even broke into my safe, an unthinkable act!”

In fact, the search of Mar-a-Lago was conducted legally after the DOJ obtained a search warrant from a judge who thought that there was probably cause to believe the search would uncover evidence of multiple crimes.

Trump then followed up this post with an all-caps message that simply read, “PRESIDENTIAL RECORDS ACT!”

Trump concluded his Truth Social tirade with yet another attack on the DOJ and FBI.

“The Justice Department and FBI are “leaking” at levels never seen before – and I did nothing wrong!!!” he fumed.

Wife of GOP congressman died after taking herbal remedy marketed for diabetes and weight loss

SACRAMENTO, Calif. — The wife of a Northern California congressman died late last year after ingesting a plant that is generally considered safe and is used as an herbal remedy for a variety of ailments, including diabetes, obesity, and high cholesterol, KHN has learned.

Lori McClintock, the wife of U.S. Rep. Tom McClintock, died from dehydration due to gastroenteritis — an inflammation of the stomach and intestines — that was caused by “adverse effects of white mulberry leaf ingestion,” according to a report from the Sacramento County coroner that is dated March 10 but was not immediately released to the public. KHN obtained that report — in addition to the autopsy report and an amended death certificate containing an updated cause of death — in July.

The coroner’s office ruled her death an accident. The original death certificate, dated Dec. 20, 2021, listed the cause of death as “pending.”

Tom McClintock, a Republican who represents a district that spans multiple counties in northern and central California, found his 61-year-old wife unresponsive at their Elk Grove, California, home on Dec. 15, 2021, according to the coroner’s report. He had just returned from Washington, D.C., after voting in Congress the night before.

It’s unclear from the autopsy report whether Lori McClintock took a dietary supplement containing white mulberry leaf, ate fresh or dried leaves, or drank them in a tea, but a “partially intact” white mulberry leaf was found in her stomach, according to the report.

McClintock’s death underscores the risks of the vast, booming market of dietary supplements and herbal remedies, which have grown into a $54 billion industry in the United States — one that both lawmakers and health care experts say needs more government scrutiny.

“Many people assume if that product is sold in the United States of America, somebody has inspected it, and it must be safe. Unfortunately, that’s not always true,” U.S. Sen. Richard Durbin (D-Ill.) said on the Senate floor this spring when he introduced legislation to strengthen oversight of dietary supplements.

Daniel Fabricant, CEO and president of the Natural Products Association, which represents the dietary supplements industry, questioned whether McClintock’s death was related to a supplement.

“It’s completely speculative. There’s a science to this. It’s not just what a coroner feels,” said Fabricant, who oversaw dietary supplements at the FDA during the Obama administration. “People unfortunately pass from dehydration every day, and there’s a lot of different reasons and a lot of different causes.”

Fabricant said it would have been ideal had the coroner or the family reported her death to the FDA so the agency could have launched an investigation.

Such reports are voluntary, and it’s not clear whether anyone reported her death to the agency. FDA spokesperson Courtney Rhodes said the agency does not discuss possible or ongoing investigations.

The FDA, Fabricant added, has a system in place to investigate deaths that might be linked to a supplement or drug. “It’s casework,” he said. “It’s good, old-fashioned police work that needs to be done.”

Tom McClintock has remained mostly silent about his wife’s death since he released a statement on Dec. 19, 2021, announcing it and gave a tribute to her at her Jan. 4 funeral. Until now, the cause of death had not been reported.

Tom McClintock, contacted multiple times by phone and email Wednesday, was not immediately available for comment.

At his wife’s funeral, McClintock told mourners that she was fine when he spoke with her the day before he returned. She had told a friend that “she was on a roll” at a new job she loved in a Sacramento real estate office, he said, and “she was carefully dieting.”

“She just joined a gym,” he said. “At home, she was counting down the days to Christmas, wrapping all the gifts and making all the plans to make it the best family Christmas ever, and it would have been.”

According to the coroner’s report, however, the day before her death, “she had complaints of an upset stomach.”

Sacramento County spokesperson Kim Nava said via email Wednesday that the law prohibits the coroner’s office from discussing many details of specific cases. As part of any death investigation, the office “attempts to locate and review medical records and speak to family/witnesses to establish events leading up to and surrounding a death,” she said.

If any medications or supplements are found at the scene or if pertinent information is in the person’s medical records, those are passed along to the pathologist to help establish cause of death, Nava said.

“Any information the office obtains from medical records can’t be disseminated to a third party except by court order,” she said.

The leaves and fruit of the white mulberry tree, which is native to China, have been used for centuries in traditional medicine. Academic studies over the past decade have found that the extract from its leaves can lower blood sugar levels and help with weight loss. People take it in capsule or pill form, as an extract or powder. They can also brew the leaves as an herbal tea.

Lori McClintock’s reaction seems unusual. No deaths from the white mulberry plant have been reported to poison control officials in the past 10 years, according to the American Association of Poison Control Centers.

Since 2012, 148 cases of white mulberry plant ingestion were voluntarily reported to poison control officials nationally, most involving accidental ingestion by children 12 and under, said Kaitlyn Brown, clinical managing director for the association. Only one case required medical follow-up, she said.

While poison control centers track exposures to the white mulberry plant, the FDA oversees dietary supplements, such as products that contain white mulberry leaf extract. Since 2004, two cases of people sickened by mulberry supplements have been reported to the FDA, according to its database that tracks “adverse events.” It relies heavily on voluntary reports from health care professionals and consumers. At least one of those cases led to hospitalization.

White mulberry leaf can have side effects, including nausea and diarrhea, according to research. Independent lab tests ordered by the coroner’s office showed McClintock’s body had elevated levels of nitrogen, sodium, and creatinine — all signs of dehydration, according to three pathologists who reviewed the coroner’s documents, which KHN redacted to remove McClintock’s name.

White mulberry leaves “do tend to cause dehydration, and part of the uses for that can be to help someone lose weight, mostly through fluid loss, which in this case was just kind of excessive,” said Dr. D’Michelle DuPre, a retired forensic pathologist and a former medical examiner in South Carolina who reviewed the documents.

Dietary supplements, which include a broad range of vitamins, herbs, and minerals, are regulated by the FDA. However, they are classified as food and don’t undergo the rigorous scientific and safety testing the government requires of prescription drugs and over-the-counter medicines.

Lawmakers aren’t proposing to put supplements into the same category as pharmaceuticals, but some say they are alarmed that neither the FDA nor the industry knows how many dietary supplements are out there — making it almost impossible for the government to oversee them and punish bad actors.

The FDA estimates 40,000 to 80,000 supplement products are on the market in the U.S., and industry surveys estimate 80% of Americans use them.

Legislation by Durbin and U.S. Sen. Mike Braun (R-Ind.) would require manufacturers to register with the FDA and provide a public list of ingredients in their products, two provisions that are backed by the Council for Responsible Nutrition, another industry group that represents supplement makers.

But the council is lobbying against a provision that would require supplement makers to provide consumers with the ingredient amounts — or the blend — in their products, something they say is akin to giving a recipe to competitors. That’s proprietary information only government regulators should have access to, said Megan Olsen, the group’s senior vice president and general counsel.

Olsen explained that supplement manufacturers are regulated just like other food companies and are subject to strict labeling requirements and inspections by the FDA. They also must inform the agency about any adverse effects reported by consumers or doctors.

“Companies are testing products throughout the process, are reviewing how they’re being manufactured and what’s going into them,” Olsen said. “All of that is overseen and dictated by FDA regulation.”

The dietary supplement provisions were rolled into a larger Senate health committee bill that reauthorizes FDA programs, and senators are currently in negotiations with the House of Representatives. The Natural Products Association opposes all of the dietary supplement provisions.

Because dietary pills, teas, and other supplements are regulated as food products, manufacturers can’t advertise them as treatments or cures for health issues. But they can make claims about how the supplements affect the body. So someone who wants to lose weight or get their diabetes under control might reach for a bottle of white mulberry leaf extract because some supplement makers advertise it as a natural remedy that can lower blood sugar levels and promote weight loss.

Those kinds of claims are appealing to Americans and have been especially potent during the pandemic, as people sought to boost their immune systems and fend off covid-19, said Debbie Petitpain, a registered dietician nutritionist and a spokesperson for the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics.

But dietary supplements can be dangerous and don’t affect everyone the same way. Mixing supplements and prescription medicines can compound the problem, according to the FDA.

“I think a lot of people are thinking, ‘Oh, it’s a plant.’ Or, ‘Oh, it’s just a vitamin. Certainly, that means that it’s not going to hurt me,'” Petitpain said. “But there’s always a risk for taking anything.”

It’s not clear why Lori McClintock was taking white mulberry leaf. Friends and family who gathered for her funeral described a vibrant, happy woman who loved her family and her work and already had wrapped Christmas presents under the tree in mid-December. She was planning to buy a recreational vehicle with her husband in retirement.

“We grieve the loss because of all the things she was looking forward to doing and all the years yet ahead,” Tom McClintock told mourners. “And we grieve for something else, because we’ve all lost a genuinely good person in our lives.”


This story was produced by KHN, which publishes California Healthline, an editorially independent service of the California Health Care Foundation.

KHN (Kaiser Health News) is a national newsroom that produces in-depth journalism about health issues. Together with Policy Analysis and Polling, KHN is one of the three major operating programs at KFF (Kaiser Family Foundation). KFF is an endowed nonprofit organization providing information on health issues to the nation.

This story can be republished for free (details).

Subscribe to KHN’s free Morning Briefing.

“That’s not what our report said”: Ex-Mueller prosecutor says Barr’s Trump memo is “legally wrong”

Former federal prosecutor Andrew Weissmann on Wednesday pushed back on a newly released Justice Department memo explaining the decision not to charge former President Donald Trump with obstruction in special counsel Bob Mueller’s investigation.

The Justice Department on Wednesday released the unredacted version of a 2019 memo that argued Trump should not be charged with obstruction in response to a court ruling. The Mueller report detailed 10 potential acts of obstruction of justice by Trump but left the decision on whether to charge him to DOJ leaders.

The nine-page memo by DOJ lawyers Steven Engel and Ed O’Callaghan argued that the DOJ should decline to bring charges against Trump even if there were no constitutional questions.

The memo argued that Trump should not be charged with obstruction because Mueller did not establish any “underlying crime related to Russian interference.”

“Given that conclusion, the evidence does not establish a crime or criminal conspiracy involving the President toward which any obstruction or attempted obstruction by the President was directed,” the memo argued. The document also argued that Trump may not have been seeking to cover up potential crimes but merely making “efforts to defend himself from public criticism… or to discourage the witnesses from making what the President believed might be false statements in exchange for a lesser sentence.”

Then-Attorney General Bill Barr announced that the DOJ would not prosecute Trump the same day the memo was delivered, citing its reasoning. The watchdog group Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington (CREW) sued for the release of the unredacted memo. Judge Amy Berman Jackson, during the proceedings accused Barr of being “disingenuous” about his summary of the Mueller report findings and that Barr’s mind appeared to already be made up before the memo was even written.

Weissmann, who served as a lead prosecutor on Mueller’s team and successfully convicted former Trump campaign chief Paul Manafort, disputed the memo’s arguments and pushed back on the claim that Mueller’s investigation found no evidence of an underlying crime.

“That’s not what our report said,” Weissmann told MSNBC. “It said that there’s evidence. It’s just that we didn’t think there was evidence beyond a reasonable doubt. So, the sort of upshot is I can understand why the department fought long and hard not to have this see the light of day and it’s quite a shocking document.”

Weissmann added that the DOJ reasoning is also “dead wrong.”

“That is legally wrong,” he said. “Our report actually addresses that… and this memo simply does not successfully, at least in my view, address the legal precedents, and it is not the case that you cannot be guilty of obstruction if you didn’t commit the underlying crime.”

Weissmann called the memo a “doozy” and zeroed in on a specific passage of the memo urging Barr to make a decision.


Want a daily wrap-up of all the news and commentary Salon has to offer? Subscribe to our morning newsletter, Crash Course.


“Although the Special Counsel recognized the unfairness of levying an accusation against the President without bringing criminal charges, the Report’s failure to take a position on the matters described therein might be read to imply such an accusation if the confidential report were released to the public,” the memo said. “Therefore, we recommend that you examine the Report to determine whether prosecution would be appropriate given the evidence recounted in the Special Counsel’s Report, the underlying law, and traditional principles of federal prosecution.”

Weissmann called out the passage during his appearance on MSNBC.

“There is a sentence in here that is astounding to me,” he said. “The two senior staff, say to Bill Barr that the reason he should make the decision is because if the memo comes out it might be read to imply that the president committed obstruction.”

Weissmann added that the memo appeared to show why Barr did not consult Mueller on whether the president committed a crime.

“We now know clearly from his memo that he did not send it back to Mueller — who reported to him — was because he knew exactly what the answer would be,” Weissmann said. “Because it says in black and white that this memo could be read to conclude that the president committed obstruction.”

Other legal experts also criticized the DOJ’s arguments. Norm Eisen, a former White House ethics lawyer and the co-founder of CREW, called the memo “garbage.”

“NO wonder a series of judges have slammed Barr for dishonesty in connection with all this,” he tweeted. “Anyone else woulda been prosecuted. Barr should be disciplined.”

CREW President Noah Bookbinder said in a statement that the memo takes a “breathtakingly generous view of the law and facts” and “twists the facts and law to benefit Trump.”

“The memo is not just wrong; it is dangerous coming from a usually respected office at the Department of Justice,” he said. “It is clear why Barr did not want the public to see it.”

America has a chance to retreat from madness: Will the midterms save us — or doom democracy?

President Biden, who hasn’t been seen much in public lately, spent the last week working on canceling $10,000 in student debt for people making less than $125,000 annually. It was also announced that struggling farmers will get some debt reduction relief via new legislation passed by Congress (that is, by the Democrats) and signed into law by Biden.

These combined efforts will go a long way to helping out many voters who follow Donald Trump and frequently vote Republican. If the Democrats can craft a competent message out of these actions, it could also help their cause in the coming midterm elections. Never fear, they’ll find a way to muck it up.

So what did the GOP do to help Americans this week?

Donald Trump spent the last week screaming about the 700 pages of classified documents found at Mar-a-Lago, as if he were a toddler in a sandbox.

“Mine,” he repeatedly yelled.

The documents included material from the CIA, NSA, FBI and on a “variety of topics of national security interest,” it was reported. Trump filed a frivolous lawsuit this week requesting that a special master be assigned to the case and that the documents Trump says are “mine!” be returned. Laughter could be heard across the country as lawyers capable of cogent thought replied with loud guffaws. To them, Trump’s lawsuit sounded more like a press release, and a poorly written one, even from a Trump point of view.

Meanwhile, other members of the Trumplican club — who still call themselves Republicans — were busy pulling their hair out while racing to the finish line in the “Who’s the Craziest Bastard in Congress” contest. Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene is apparently in the lead, but her House colleagues Lauren Boebert, Matt Gaetz and Jim Jordan are running neck and neck for second, less than a furlong behind. With all of these nuts, you’d think there would be a sundae around here somewhere. 

No one has seen Mark Meadows, Trump’s last White House chief of staff, since the last full moon when he sat baying like a coyote on the plains, and Jared Kushner has a fiction book (sorry, a “memoir”) he wants you to buy. All of them still claim fealty to the Don, who now seems content to use hundreds of pages of government documents as scratch pads and toilet paper. Why did he really keep all of those documents? The answer will likely be chilling. Stay tuned.

Meanwhile, as we coast into the midterm elections, the country — as always — is divided. Half think Donald Trump is crazy and half think he’s merely a criminal. I’m just kidding. Everyone knows he’s a crazy criminal.

Some Democrats, however, have decided that whoever is left worshiping Trump are “stupid white people.” I’ve heard that on three separate occasions during the last week, as well as “criminal white people.”

It isn’t just white people who worship the Don, but if you want to address those “stupid white people,” they’re not all stupid — and they are the group of Trump voters most likely to leave him. The criminals — well, they’re criminals. But there are many who are being called stupid because they are afraid the Democrats want to take away their rights. They see the Black Lives Matter movement as a threat, religions other than those who worship the Christian “Gawd” as a threat, and any move toward LGBTQ+ equality as a threat to their rights. Don’t even start with the “hordes of illegals” swarming across the border, either to take all our jobs or sap the country of its vitality and social services. 

These are not necessarily stupid people — though indeed some are. They are fearful people. They have been programmed, and they need to be deprogrammed.

Consider this your “Handy-Dandy Trumper deprogramming guide.”


Want a daily wrap-up of all the news and commentary Salon has to offer? Subscribe to our morning newsletter, Crash Course.


Let’s start with the “hordes of illegals.” The numbers, comparatively speaking, are not much different than they’ve been during the last 40 years — and if you want to make a point with those who are programmed, please remind them that big business (particularly corporate agriculture) encourages and pays for many migrant workers because they are cheap and necessary labor. When have any of the big agribusiness conglomerates ever faced prosecution for hiring migrants? I’ll wait. The Simpson-Mazzoli Act, signed into law in 1986, made it illegal to hire undocumented immigrants, but few have ever faced any repercussions for doing so.

Ask your Trumper friends whether they really want the government telling them what they can and can’t do in the bedroom.

Then let’s move on to the GOP’s supposed problems with invasive policies. Most of the Trumpers decry government overreach and will tell you that the government needs to mind its own business — as many have said before, “government governs best that governs least.” The Republicans are fine with that — until you talk about the bedroom, and then they’re all up in your business. Ask your Trumper friend if they want the government telling them what to do in their bedroom, or what to do with their own body.

And then remind your Trumper neighbor or relative that when it comes to taking away rights, only one party has successfully done that during the last 50 years, and it’s the Republican Party.

That’s the coup de grace. It’s something they might actually understand. 

While many Trumpers may, on the surface, cheer the reversal of Roe v. Wade with the Supreme Court’s Dobbs decision, that’s actually the single largest bipartisan issue in the country — and Democrats still need to flip some Republican voters to win this fall. If Democrats lose the House and the Senate, the country is done. I say that not as a partisan, but as an observer who firmly believes the country has rotted from within since Ronald Reagan’s administration and we’re quickly losing our ability to save it. 

Electing Democrats this fall will not guarantee the country won’t fall apart. It merely remains the best choice to give the United States a fighting chance of remaining so. Otherwise, it’s time to mothball democracy and start flying the fascist flag. 

Thus the need to appeal to at least some of the “stupid white people,” who if properly courted might just vote Democrat.

How do I know? I’ve had conversations with several of them: more than a dozen and less than several million. Many hardcore Trumpers will eventually admit to something like this: “Well, I don’t really care what someone else does as long as I can do what I want to do.” The problem is, there’s a disconnect. They think the Democrats want to mandate Pride parades and transgender stripper poles in preschool and denounce God as Satan while letting Black people enslave white people as cultural revenge for something their ancestors were guilty of. Call it stupid. Call it ignorant. Just deal with it.

Remember, 90 percent of the population is ignorant and the other 10 percent doesn’t want to have anything to do with us. But hey, that 10 percent sure does like to vote — and in elections where 50 percent turnout is considered great, that 10 percent can make a huge difference. Of course if you subtract the zealots who think “Gawd” is running the country and spend more money on education, society would also benefit. But we’re talking short term here. Let’s get through the midterms. Much of the American voting public is just sentient enough to order McDonalds, only to have the order get screwed up in drive-thru — and then eat it anyway on the road to Walmart, where they’ll go shopping in  yoga pants and thongs for the cheapest buckets of lard and transmission fluid.

America’s shallowness runs deep.

And the truth is, we face monumental problems in this country that we cannot solve if we do not talk to each other, no matter how repugnant we may find our neighbors, friends or relatives. I know: Others want to divide. I want to multiply.

When it comes down to it, we’re a nation of spoiled children divided into tribes. I am reminded of a great line in “The American President,” delivered by Michael Douglas: “America isn’t easy. America is advanced citizenship. You gotta want it bad, ’cause it’s gonna put up a fight. It’s gonna say, ‘You want free speech? Let’s see you acknowledge a man whose words make your blood boil, who’s standing center stage and advocating at the top of his lungs that which you would spend a lifetime opposing at the top of yours.'”

I disagree with what you say, but I’ll defend to the death your right to say it. That was the guiding principle. It has been abandoned as each side refuses to discuss common goals and instead seeks satisfaction in demonizing the other.

For the Republican Party, it isn’t about issues — it’s about Trump. It’s about a cult that clings to whatever maniacal rantings are spewed from the cavernous depths of one man’s demented soul — or from those into whom he’s breathed life.

For the Democrats, if they want to hold onto the Senate and the House, it amounts to numbers. They have them, and the GOP does not. If everyone votes by party affiliation — and if everyone votes — the Democrats win. Gerrymandering aside, it would be tough for Republicans to hold onto anything.

Republicans are not on the right side of history (or popular opinion) on any issue. But in a country suffering from political mental illness, it’s not a foregone conclusion that they will lose.

Republicans have no issue that resonates with the majority of the voting public. On every single issue of importance, they betray their true nature. They’re not on the right side of history on any issue — that is, when they bother to embrace any issue at all, rather than trying to scare voters to death.

When has any party ever been looked upon favorably by history if it supports book-burning, revoking civil rights, promoting state-sponsored religion or an economic system that makes feudal lords look like socialists?

I’ll tell you when: Never.

But there is no guarantee that when the November midterm elections are in the record books common sense will overcome stupidity — particularly with the corporate media acting like lobotomized stenographers who pretend that national politics in 2022 is business as usual.

Deprogramming the media? That’s a whole different story. 

For now I’ll settle for defeating autocracy and seeing Trump indicted. But in a country that collectively seems to suffer from political mental illness, it’s not a foregone conclusion that either event will occur.

The irony of course, is as wiser men than me have observed: If our republic is to fall, it will collapse from within rather than being conquered from outside. 

So we find ourselves at an inflection point in history, when our actions will have an immediate effect, likely to determine life not only in the United States but across the globe for the next 50 years or longer — and could lead to the end of American democracy.

We missed the clues when Trump first stepped into the public arena. Now we’re dealing with an ex-president who was twice impeached, who faces potential criminal charges and who willfully kept and did God only knows what with incredibly sensitive government documents.

And for some reason, this man’s minority cult-party still could take over the Senate and House this fall.

From the outside looking in, it must appear that Americans embrace insanity on a grand scale. The verdict on that observation will be issued the day after the November election is settled.

Far right claims big wins in Florida school board races — but the fight is just starting

Republicans are claiming a massive victory after a number of Florida school board candidates — who enjoyed unprecedented support from right-wing groups and politicians — won their races Tuesday. In total, five school boards in the state flipped to conservative control, including Sarasota County, which will now have a 4-1 conservative majority, and Miami-Dade, which will become the nation’s largest school district to be overseen by elected conservatives.

Many of the candidates received endorsements and campaign support from right-wing activist groups like Moms for Liberty and the 1776 Project PAC — founded in 2021 explicitly to support right-wing school board candidates — as well as Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis, who has made attacking public education a cornerstone of his administration, and Rep. Byron Donalds, a Florida Republican who has argued that “the battle for our country” runs through America’s schools. (Donalds’ wife, Erika Donalds, runs a consulting business dedicated to launching charter schools affiliated with Hillsdale College, the influential conservative Christian school.)

In mid-July, as Salon reported, DeSantis spoke at length at the first national summit of Moms for Liberty, highlighting some of his numerous endorsements of school board candidates in Florida. On Tuesday afternoon, he tweeted a list of 30 such candidates on the ballot that day, declaring them all “committed to the student-first principles of the DeSantis Education Agenda.” Twenty-five of those candidates ended up winning their elections, prompting Steve Bannon, CEO of Donald Trump’s 2016 campaign and former White House chief strategist, to crow about “the moms who are taking over the school boards.”

Other conservatives involved in the races were also quick to claim credit for the wins. On Tuesday night, 1776 Project PAC founder Ryan Girdusky tweeted that all the counties where his group had campaigned had been flipped. On Wednesday, Moms for Liberty boasted that 43 candidates it had backed had either won their races or were advancing to runoffs.

1776 Project PAC celebrated Florida parents’ supposed rejection of “transgender ideology,” promising, “We are removing left-wing ideologies from our schools one county at a time.”

The results, Girdusky told Breitbart News, showed parents’ desires to reject “transgender ideology, critical race theory, critical gender ideology, and equity which destroys merit in education.” On Tuesday night, the PAC tweeted, “Yesterday a Texas school board that we flipped last May banned CRT and gender ideology. Today our PAC helped flip FIVE Florida school boards from majority liberal to conservative, including Miami Dade. We are removing left-wing ideologies from our schools one county at a time.” 

Other conservative actors got involved as well. As writer and podcaster Hemant Mehta reported this week, the pastor of a Palm Coast church in Flagler County, Greg Peters, recently brought three conservative school board candidates on stage, citing the candidates’ endorsements by the 1776 Project PAC and urging his roughly 1,000-member congregation to vote for them “in order for the school board to be flipped from liberal to conservative.” Should they win, said Peters, the candidates “will rise up against a woke agenda and they will seek to promote truth as it is spelled out clearly in [God’s] word.”


Want a daily wrap-up of all the news and commentary Salon has to offer? Subscribe to our morning newsletter, Crash Course.


One of those three candidates, incumbent Jill Woolbright, made news for a separate church appearance in recent weeks, where she described her time on the school board as spent battling “satanic” forces. “I have never in my life been in such a satanic warfare, spiritual warfare, that I’ve felt for the past two years on the board and especially during this election season,” Woolbright said, calling for a “breakthrough” that would institute a “conservative, God-fearing majority on our board.” 

Although it bills itself as a grassroots organization, Moms for Liberty has plentiful ties to powerful conservative organizations and leaders, as well as opaque but substantial financial backing from right-wing groups. In July, Maurice Cunningham, author of the 2021 book “Dark Money and the Politics of School Privatization,” argued in the Tampa Bay Times that Moms for Liberty’s rapid nationwide expansion had occurred “at a pace that only a corporation’s monetary resources could manage.” The same month, Politico reported that Julie Jenkins Fancelli — the heir to the Publix grocery store fortune who also donated $650,000 to fund Trump’s Jan. 6 rally, plus $60,000 to cover Kimberly Guilfoyle’s speaking fee that day — has supplied nearly the entire budget of the the Moms for Liberty PAC. The PAC in turn contributed modest donations to more than 50 school board candidates, earmarking the rest for advertising campaigns to replicate its success “all over the country.” 

A number of Florida’s conservative school board candidates also benefited from the in-kind support of conservative activists and media, who helped stir up controversies about their opponents or their existing local school board composition. On Tuesday, anti-CRT activist and Manhattan Institute fellow Christopher Rufo re-publicized the claims of a father in Clay County — another district that will now have a conservative majority — who charged that the school district had “secretly transitioned” his child by using the pronouns and name the student requested. 

A defeated incumbent school board member in Duval County last week was the subject of another Breitbart story charging that she had used racist language against a Black conservative working with Moms for Liberty, by referring to her as a “token.” And earlier this month, conservative media and influencers, including the high-traffic right-wing Twitter account Libs of TikTok, shared a video of Sarasota School Board vice-chair Tom Edwards saying, at a community forum for educators concerned about Florida’s revisionist new civics standards, that there are Florida school board members who “are ‘woke'” and who are “working from the inside” to protect teachers.

“You need to know, we have your backs,” Edwards told a panel of educators at the forum. “And we’re working in the best strategic spot because we’re on the inside.” 

That story was picked up and shared across conservative media, ranking coverage from Fox News, Breitbart and Moms for Liberty, which tweeted, “Yes, please woke school board members — be more vocal about your plans to subvert parental rights.” The video was originally posted by Christian Ziegler, vice-chair of the Florida Republican Party and husband of current Sarasota School Board member Bridget Ziegler — who herself has been a formidable right-wing activist, helping draft DeSantis’ 2021 Parents’ Bill of Rights and serving as one of the original co-founders of Moms for Liberty. 

As Dan Goodwin, a reporter at Ars Technica, wrote on Twitter last week, the story led to a string of slurs against Edwards, who is gay, claiming that he was “pushing the child grooming agenda.” 

Right-wing campaign materials described liberal Sarasota candidates as “BLM/PSL/ANTIFA RIOTERS, PLANNED PARENTHOOD BABY KILLERS” who “WANT GROOMING AND PORNOGRAPHY IN OUR SCHOOLS.” 

The race in Sarasota also brought out a number of far-right supporters of the three conservative candidates: Ziegler, Timothy Enos and Robyn Marinelli, all of them also endorsed by the 1776 Project PAC and DeSantis. (Ziegler and Enos were additionally endorsed by Moms for Liberty.) A right-wing PAC called ABCD campaigned on behalf of the three candidates under an acronym of their last names, “ZEM,” including by driving a mobile billboard around the area that called one of the trio’s opponents a “LIAR” and “BABY KILLER” because she had once worked at Planned Parenthood. (Goodwin also noted that a campaign leaflet promoting the “ZEM” slate called their opponents “BLM/PSL/ANTIFA RIOTERS, PLANNED PARENTHOOD BABY KILLERS, [who] WANT GROOMING AND PORNOGRAPHY IN OUR SCHOOLS.”)

That mobile billboard was such a glaring violation of norms for school board races, which by law are supposed to be nonpartisan, that even DeSantis denounced the move. Yet according to local parent and public school advocate Jules Souliere, the far-right groups ended up becoming the campaigns’ most obvious street presence.

“The Republicans didn’t want the ‘ZEM’ signs, but on every street corner, Proud Boys were out there waving them,” Souliere told Salon. “The Republicans ran a normal campaign for their candidates but the ZEM promoters, made up mostly of Proud Boys, Moms for America [a distinct right-wing group from Moms for Liberty] and other extremists such as [Michael] Flynn, were the ones with boots on the ground out there doing the work for the Republican-backed candidates.”

In late 2021, Souliere co-authored an op-ed for the Herald-Tribune denouncing one Sarasota school board member and another candidate for speaking at a town hall event sponsored by a group founded by Proud Boys members. Earlier this month, the Sarasota Democratic Party decried the “ugly politicization” of the school board races, noting that one of the “ZEM” candidates, Marinelli, had been forced to withdraw from a campaign event in June “when it was learned that members of the terrorist group the Proud Boys were listed as VIP attendees.” 

Yet in the end, a victory was a victory for Florida Republicans. On Twitter Tuesday night, DeSantis spokesperson Christina Pushaw shared the Libs of TikTok post of the Edwards video, writing, “Sarasota School board had a 3-2 liberal majority. Today @RonDeSantisFL endorsed candidates won and flipped the school board so it’s now 4-1 anti wokes [sic] indoctrination and pro parental rights.” 

Overall, conservatives in Florida and beyond were celebrating. The 1776 Project PAC boasted of their wins Wednesday, inviting readers on Twitter who “want us to get involved in a school board race” in their districts to apply for an endorsement. And groups and figures from the PAC’s Girdusky to Moms for Liberty to Florida first lady Casey DeSantis all sounded a common message: They were only getting started.

There were some signs of momentum in the other direction on Tuesday night, however. In Flagler County, incumbent school board member Jill Woolbright — she of the “satanic warfare” — lost her re-election bid after student activists campaigned to replace her. Woolbright had also tried to remove an LGBTQ-themed book, “All Boys Aren’t Blue,” from school libraries, even filing a criminal complaint with the county sheriff.

But in Flagler County, school board member Jill Woolbright — who fought to remove an LGBTQ-themed book from school libraries — was defeated after student activists campaigned against her.

In the Alachua County school district, which became a particular target of DeSantis after bucking his 2021 ban on school mask mandates, none of the candidates backed by the governor won. Former district superintendent Dr. Carlee Simon — who was fired in March after DeSantis filled an open school board seat with a homeschooling missionary and local Republican operative — heralded the defeat of the conservative candidates there on Wednesday. “DeSantis pumped major money into our county to turn Alachua’s School Board ‘Red.’ He failed miserably!!” tweeted Simon, who has since founded a progressive PAC, Families Deserve Inclusive Schools. “Every candidate he funded/endorsed lost with huge margins. The appointee he inserted to terminate me… she’s gone too! Stop meddling @RonDeSantisFL, we don’t want you here!” 

In deep-red Polk County, where DeSantis also endorsed a candidate, there was a surprising outcome, notes education writer and former school board member Billy Townsend. In races for four open seats, two Democratic-backed candidates were defeated, including the first openly LGBTQ person ever elected to a Florida school board. But two other pro-public education candidates won or advanced to the general election, largely because, Townsend argues, a number of Republican voters seemingly defected from the conservative slate. 

“They succeeded in drawing some blood, most notably in Sarasota County,” Townsend told Salon. “But strong, fighting school board members stood their ground and won big battles in Alachua, Monroe and Seminole counties.” (Among those victories was Sue Woltanski, a board member in Monroe County who spoke to Salon this winter about Hillsdale College’s influence in Florida education.) “It’s a fight with angry cranks,” Townsend concluded. “It’s not won, but it’s not lost either.” 

It’s happening: Abortion rights and the threat to democracy are reshaping the midterms

A bellwether New York primary Tuesday confirms what polls in the last week have been telling us: The cup of American democracy, which many advocates have long seen as half-empty, may actually be half-full. Americans now seem ready to take their twin desires to preserve democracy and abortion rights to the polls in November. 

In a closely watched swing district north and west of New York City, Democrat Pat Ryan defeated Republican Marc Molinaro, 52% to 48%. In late campaigning Ryan’s message was largely focused on protecting abortion rights and the need to counteract threats to American democracy. 

Ryan’s victory was presaged by polls released earlier this week. This apparent good news arrives against the backdrop of  long-running concerns about the public’s commitment to democratic norms and values.

A 2016 study found that when Americans were asked to rate on a scale of one to 10 how “essential” it was for them “to live in a democracy,” 72% of people born before World War II responded with 10, the highest value. But among people born since 1980, fewer than one in three expressed a similar belief about the importance of democracy.

Another study published in 2020 by political scientists Matthew Graham and Milan Svoloik found that only 3.5% of voters would “realistically punish violations of democratic principles” if candidates they otherwise supported did something destructive of those principles.

A December 2021 article in Vox explained that “the politics of saving democracy look like a sped-up version of the politics of climate change. In theory, everyone… knows it’s important. In practice, the threat feels remote and abstract — far enough removed from [people’s] everyday concerns that they aren’t willing to change their behavior to avert looming catastrophe.”

But new polling suggests that Americans may be more aware of the threat to democracy, and more concerned about it, than those earlier bleak assessments suggest. 

An NBC News poll, conducted Aug. 12 to 16, asked for the first time about threats to democracy on the list of issues facing the country. It found that 21% of registered voters ranked those threats as the most important issue facing the nation today, five points higher than the second-ranked issue, the cost of living. 

When respondents were asked to choose their top two issues, threats to democracy tied with cost of living as the leading concern for 29% of respondents, followed by jobs and the economy at 28%.

Asked earlier this week about the poll results, even Sen. Mitch McConnell, the Republican leader in the U.S. Senate, acknowledged that threats to democracy are “an important issue.”

The NBC poll also found that 66% of the public thinks that Donald Trump bears responsibility for the Jan. 6, 2021, attack on the U.S. Capitol. Furthermore, Americans believe that the investigations into Trump’s involvement should continue, by a 57% to 40% margin, though there remain sharp partisan divides on this issue. 

This last statistic helps us understand the finding about the public’s concern about threats to democracy, which appears directly related to Trump’s attempts to end democracy, rather than his claims of ballot fraud. 

The House Jan. 6 committee’s June and July hearings on Trump’s attempts to overturn the 2020 election seem to have affected America’s consciousness, and the steady drumbeat of publicity about the former president’s legal troubles also seems to be registering with the American people.


Want a daily wrap-up of all the news and commentary Salon has to offer? Subscribe to our morning newsletter, Crash Course.


In addition to the select committee hearings and Trump’s legal troubles, the Supreme Court’s June decision overturning Roe v. Wade arrived as a wake-up call, demonstrating clearly what Americans have to lose if we abandon democracy and individual rights. 

That decision “lit a fire under people,” in the words of former Kansas Gov. Kathleen Sebelius. In early August, voters resoundingly defeated an anti-abortion amendment to the state constitution.

Of course one set of polls and one referendum in a heartland state do not prove that protecting democracy and rights will drive the vote in November. Fortunately, there are other polls in battleground state elections that suggest a national environment increasingly favorable to those who stand for rights and for free and fair elections. 

An Aug. 17 poll by Public Policy Polling found that more than 60% of Wisconsin voters expressed  “serious” or “very serious” concerns about Trump’s “lies about an election he knew had lost.” And 55% of Wisconsinites had concerns about Sen. Ron Johnson, a Republican incumbent up for re-election this year, and his alleged efforts “to put fake elector documents from Wisconsin and Michigan into [Mike Pence’s] hands” on Jan. 6.

In Arizona, according to an Aug. 18 Fox News poll, incumbent Democratic Sen. Mark Kelly leads Republican election-denier Blake Masters by eight percentage points.

The same pattern showed up in an Aug. 21 Trafalgar Group poll in Pennsylvania’s key Senate race, with Democratic Lt. Gov. John Fetterman leading Dr. Mehmet Oz, by five points. Oz, an ally of Trump, has supported overturning Roe. Tuesday’s victory by Ryan in upstate New York — where many experts believed the Republican had the advantage — reinforces the meaning of that poll.

Whatever the MAGA base does, one thing is becoming clear in 2022: Most Americans support abortion rights, want to keep democracy and reject election lies.

Another poll released on Aug. 22 by Suffolk University and the Reno Gazette-Journal shows that in Nevada, incumbent Democratic Sen. Catherine Cortez Masto’s lead over Republican Adam Laxalt has grown from just three points in April to about seven points now. Laxalt has supported Trump’s election falsehoods and called the Supreme Court’s original Roe decision “a joke.” 

All these polls occurred after the Aug. 8 FBI search of Trump’s home and resort at Mar-a-Lago. As further evidence of the sharp partisan divide, a Politico/Morning Consult poll conducted on Aug. 10 showed Republicans rallying around Trump, with support declining for Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis, a potential 2024 opponent.

That could prove a temporary bounce or a lasting one, but either way, the message of the recent polling is this: Whichever way the 30% to 40% Republican MAGA base turns, the vast majority of Americans value and want to keep democracy, generally support abortion rights and dislike those who deny legitimate election results.

These findings give Attorney General Merrick Garland some room for maneuver as he pursues his investigations of Jan. 6 and Trump’s potential crimes

They also suggest that, despite her primary loss in Wyoming, Rep. Liz Cheney may find a receptive audience for her new pro-democracy campaign, dubbed “The Great Task.”

In launching that effort, Cheney said, “I’m going to be very focused on working to ensure that we do everything we can not to elect election deniers. We’ve got election deniers that have been nominated for really important positions all across the country. And I’m going to work against those people. I’m going to work to support their opponents.”

The great task of preserving American democracy is not just the distinctive work of our generation. It has been with us all along. From the beginning, America’s leaders have warned about democracy’s fragility and tried to rally citizens to its cause.

In 1787, at the conclusion of the Constitutional Convention, a woman on the street in Philadelphia reportedly asked Benjamin Franklin what form of government the convention had created. He replied with a warning, “A Republic, if you can keep it.”

These recent polls suggest that Americans’ worries about democracy will propel many to vote in November, and to organize others to vote. Hope feeds action. For every one of us ready to take up the task that Franklin long ago set out, the cup of American democracy looks more than half-full.

CREW head Noah Bookbinder: Here’s why Bill Barr “didn’t want public to see” Trump memo

Following a watchdog group’s win in court last week, the Biden administration on Wednesday released an unredacted memorandum from 2019 about whether then-President Donald Trump obstructed special counsel Robert Mueller’s probe of Russia’s election interference.

Noah Bookbinder, president of Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington (CREW), a nonprofit watchdog group, highlighted that then-Attorney General Bill Barr pointed to the memo from the Department of Justice’s Office of Legal Counsel to claim there was no justification for charging Trump with obstruction of justice.

“The memo presents a breathtakingly generous view of the law and facts for Donald Trump,” Bookbinder said. “It twists the facts and the law to benefit Trump and does not comport with a serious reading of the law of obstruction of justice or the facts as found by Special Counsel Mueller.”

As Bookbinder explained: “The memo is premised in large part on the argument that there was no underlying criminal conduct and that it’s hard to charge obstruction without an underlying crime. Of course, that’s not what Mueller actually found.”

“Mueller found there was not sufficient evidence to charge Trump and others with conspiring with Russia,” Bookbinder continued. “He didn’t find no crime, just not enough evidence for charges. Of course, Trump couldn’t know about that future conclusion when he decided whether or not to obstruct.”


Want a daily wrap-up of all the news and commentary Salon has to offer? Subscribe to our morning newsletter, Crash Course.


He also noted that the document “takes an exceedingly cramped view of prior cases” and “relies on Trump’s use of open-ended language [about] his ‘hope’ the investigation would be let go, and his delegation of firing prosecutors or narrowing investigations to others when he could have done it himself, as exonerating Trump.”

“The memo is not just wrong; it is dangerous coming from a usually respected office at the Department of Justice,” Bookbinder added. “It is clear why Barr did not want the public to see it.”

In a series of Wednesday tweets contrasting the memo with Mueller’s report, New York Times reporter Charlie Savage said that the newly released document “reads like a defense lawyer’s brief.”

California pushing to ban gasoline-fueled new car sales by 2035

California is expected to implement a groundbreaking measure on Thursday that will ban sales of all new gas-powered cars by 2035, The New York Times reports.

Home to the largest new car market in the U.S., California’s new rule is expected to have far-reaching impacts in Washington, D.C. and around the world by accelerating electric vehicle (EV) production and reducing auto pollution—the country’s top source of greenhouse gas pollution.

“This is huge,” said Margo Oge, an electric vehicles expert who headed the Environmental Protection Agency’s transportation emissions program under three presidents. “California will now be the only government in the world that mandates zero-emission vehicles.”

The California Air Resources Board’s new rule will require that 100% of new cars sold in the state by 2035 be free of fossil fuel emissions. Before the 2035 ban takes effect, emission targets will be enforced incrementally—requiring 35% of new passenger vehicles sold in the state to produce zero emissions by 2026, and 68% of passenger vehicles by 2030.

More than a dozen states follow the California Air Resources Board’s lead when setting their own emissions policies and roughly a third of the United States automotive market is expected to adopt California’s new zero-emissions targets.

“This is indeed huge,” Fossil Free Media director Jamie Henn tweeted. “California is the fifth-largest economy in the world and this will help turbocharge the transition to EVs everywhere.”

The ambitious policy was made possible by the Biden administration’s restoration of the Clean Air Act waiver—a climate policy that was discontinued by former President Donald Trump—that grants California the power to enact vehicle pollution standards that are stricter than federal ones.

According to the Times, the new vehicle standards are projected to cut emissions 40% below 2005 levels by 2030—and experts said that the rule, “in both its stringency and reach, could stand alongside the [Inflation Reduction Act] as one of the world’s most important climate change policies.”

Environmental organization Stand.earth lauded the new rule on Twitter while acknowledging more needs to be done by ramping up investment for charging infrastructure, public transit, and walkable and bikeable neighborhoods.

“Gas-powered cars are a major source of air pollution that create toxic smog and threaten public health,” said Jenn Engstrom, CALPIRG state director, in a statement. “We cannot address climate change without phasing out oil-powered transportation, and we applaud California for embracing the promise of clean transportation.”

CNN’s Jake Tapper says “Boomers ruined everything”

Generational politics were on full display on CNN on Wednesday as Generation X anchor Jake Tapper interviewed Generation Z leader Maxwell Frost one day after he won the Democratic Party nomination for Florida’s 10th congressional district.

“Frost prevailed over more experienced Democrats, including former members of Congress Corrine Brown and Alan Grayson, and state Sen. Randolph Bracy, to secure the nomination. He will be the favorite in November in the reconfigured Orlando area district,” The Washington Post reported Wednesday. “Frost campaigned on support for Medicare-for-all, demilitarizing the police, legalizing ‘sex work’ and recreational marijuana, expunging all marijuana convictions, and restoring voting rights to the incarcerated.”

Tapper noted Frost worked for the gun safety group March for Our Lives before running for Congress and has been driving for Uber to help make ends meet.

“Tell me how your experience will inform your time in Congress,” Tapper said.

“My experience is going to form my time in Congress because I have been organizing for the past decade,” Frost replied. “I have seen how gun violence has ravaged our communities first-hand and understand the urgency surrounding the issue and truly believe we need to work to have a Congress that looks like the country, and yes, that means in race, but it also means in age, and it also means in life experiences.”

Age was a theme.

“A lot of folks blame our generation and say it’s because we’re living beyond our means, but we know the truth,” Frost said. “It’s not because we have lived beyond our means. It’s because we have been denied the means to live.”

“That’s why we need diversity of opinion, thought, experience, and age in Congress because I understand the urgency as it relates to student debt,” he explained. “This is a good step forward, and when I’m in Congress, I’m going to fight to insure we can do even more to insure that people have relief that they need so they can live their lives without the shackles of debt.”

“I don’t blame Generation Z,” Tapper said. “Let me give you a secret, it’s all the fault of the Boomers. They ruined everything.”

Watch below or at this link.

Nancy Pelosi’s husband receives jail sentence for DUI

Paul Pelosi, husband of U.S. House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, has been sentenced to 5 days in jail following his arrest on May 28. According to a release from the Napa County District Attorney’s Office, his arrest was “based upon an automobile collision and driving under the influence.” 

A plea deal was entered that was accepted by Judge Solga who “dismissed the second charge of driving with .08% blood alcohol level or higher causing injury in the interests of justice,” according to the release. The full details of the sentencing are detailed below:

(1) placed on summary probation for 3 years; (2) pay a $1723 court fine; (3) serve 5 days in jail; (4) submit to a blood, breath, or urine test if requested by any law enforcement officer or probation officer if suspected of driving with a measurable amount of alcohol; (5) pay $4927.53 in victim restitution for medical bills and lost wages as well as a standard $150 restitution fine; (6) do not operate a motor vehicle with a measurable amount of alcohol; (7) immediately enroll in, pay for, and successfully complete a licensed DUI program for 3 months; (8) do not operate a motor vehicle unless it is equipped with a functioning, certified ignition device for 1 year. Based upon this conviction, the Department of Motor Vehicles can suspend Mr. Pelosi’s driver’s license for one year. The Court will retain jurisdiction for any future restitution bills.

According to NPR‘s reporting on the court records, “Pelosi has already served two days, and will not have to stay in jail for two of the days due to good behavior.”

Police records on the night of the incident show that Pelosi “pulled out in front of a Jeep at a dark intersection on May 28, resulting in a crash that sent both vehicles careening off the road around 10:15 p.m. near the intersection of California Route 29 and Oakville Cross Road,” per earlier coverage by Fox News. “Pelosi was photographed with bruises on his hands and forearms, but police documents indicate at least some of them were unrelated to the crash,” according to Fox.


Want a daily wrap-up of all the news and commentary Salon has to offer? Subscribe to our morning newsletter, Crash Course.


 Dash cam footage showing Pelosi being pulled over and questioned by police on May 28 can be seen below:

“Orphan: First Kill” horror homages, from the ribbon around the neck to that knowing bird

It’s never an easy time to be a disabled horror fan

I love the genre of horror more than any other, yet an overwhelming amount of films feature disabled bodies as the big scare and disability as the reason — often, the only motive at all — for murder and worse. “Orphan,” Jaume Collett-Serra’s 2009 film, existed uncomfortably in this space, though its then-child star Isabelle Fuhrman elevated the role of Lena, a grown woman presenting as a young child due to hypopituitarism, a real condition. The movie was also justifiably criticized for its portrayal of an adopted child, presenting her as evil.  

The new prequel “Orphan: First Kill” attempts to show the real evil is ableism, as other villainous characters spew prejudice after prejudice. But as Sezín Koehler writes on Black Girl Nerds: “[Lena’s] hypopituitarism has not caused her psychopathy and mass-murdering tendencies. Yet, in ‘First Kill,” her appearance and disability are continuously linked to her evil deeds, as if being different automatically makes you a killer.”

Falling back upon tired ableism is a disappointing aspect the film shares with horror predecessors from “Friday the 13th” to “Midsommar,” linked in a lineage of stereotype and willful misunderstanding. But we can have horror without hate. It is possible, even if storytellers don’t always get it.

And Lena, going by the name of Esther, isn’t even the scariest person in the film. What are some of the more positive, surprising nods to horror from the past? Fortunately, the film has plenty of those too. Let’s take a look:

The creepy, knowing bird

“Orphan” referenced the first family of the main character, who brought Lena to America, and it is this family the prequel focuses on. Those parents take her to a child therapist in “First Kill.” (Unfortunately, they don’t take her to a pediatrician or dentist, who might have solved a lot of their problems a lot sooner.) Therapists figure prominently in many horror films, but this doctor takes it a step further by having a pet bird in her office. I can’t imagine a squawking parrot is always a comfort to young patients dealing with trauma, but anyway, the doctor has one. The cage is right there in the office, and the pet is a pivotal point.

Birds can be creepy in film. They move fast, their eyes are beady. Ravens eat carrion. Crows can apparently do much worse, although there’s a scientific reason. Edgar Allan Poe brought a talking bird out of the shadows and into our nightmares forever with “The Raven,” and Alfred Hitchcock uses a whole aviary of winged horror in “The Birds.” Birds can also, as Audubon puts it, “discern and repeat sounds, parrots are the pros,” according to the bird protection society, because parrots can imitate sounds after hearing them.

A parrot trash-talked its way in the horror spoof “Scream 2.” Netflix’s “Sandman” has the chatty raven Matthew (and beloved predecessor Jessamy), and who can forget Mrs. Gambolini, the cranky parrot of the even crankier Bunny (RIP), a bird inherited by Oscar (Martin Short) on Hulu’s “Only Murders in the Building“? Oscar keeps hoping against hope the witnessing bird will solve the case, while Howard (Michael Cyril Creighton) says, “This bird has seen too much.”

That unfortunate rodent

The parrot isn’t the only prominent animal in the film. “First Kill” may dwell in ableism but at least not intentional animal cruelty. Lena is taken to live in a huge mansion with her apparently wealthy family. Like most drafty mansions, it has mice. Specifically, one rotund rodent who finds itself in her room, adorably squeaking.

You’d think the psychopath known as Lena (well, now known as Esther) would kill the creature. But this isn’t “Firestarter” (2022). Lena takes care of the rodent, showing a loving side of herself, and an example of just how desperately lonely and isolated she is. (Were her parents ever planning to enroll her in school? And other convenient plot points.)

Like birds, rodents wiggle their way into horror films quite a lot. Some horror is based entirely around them like “Willard” or 2016’s “Rats.” In the film “Graveyard Shift,” based on a Stephen King story, a huge colony of rats has been allowed to evolve and mutate, unchecked. In “Flowers in the Attic,” a mouse, adopted much like Lena’s visitor, suffers a poisonous fate intended for the children. Rodents function like canaries in the coal mine in this regard, an alert system.

Lena could be mistaken for a Victorian ghost.

Lizzie Borden dress

Clothes play a major role in “First Kill” in setting scene and establishing character. Part of Lena’s deception comes with her clothes. She favors, not simply children’s clothes but old-fashioned dresses with long sleeves and lace collars, looking more like a porcelain doll from an ad in “Readers Digest,” which could be yours for only a few monthly installments, and less like a contemporary child. 

Not only is she pretending to be a kid, but with the antique-looking dresses and pigtails, she’s presenting as a much younger one. This is used to very creepy effect in an early scene with a guard.

Lena could be mistaken for a Victorian ghost. Or, as annoyed teen brother Gunnar (Matthew Finlan) tells her in an insult, she’s wearing a “Lizzie Borden dress.” Borden, of course, was the young woman tried for murdering her parents with an ax in the late 1800s. Borden was acquitted but the rumors (and rhymes) persist. As a woman in the Gilded Age, Borden wore full, long skirts and puffed sleeves, not unlike Lena. The character has made an appearance, in various forms, in films like 2018’s “Lizzie” and Lifetime’s 2014 “Lizzie Borden Took an Ax.” “American Horror Story: Asylum” also includes a character based on Borden

Orphan: First KillIsabelle Fuhrman as “Esther” in “Orphan: First Kill” (Steve Ackerman/Paramount Pictures)The ribbon around her neck

The most unmistakable aspects of Lena are her accessories. The character wears a distinctive ribbon choker and two ribbon bracelets around her wrists, which appear to be velvet. The accessories serve a utility purpose: they are to hide the scars she has received from repeatedly fighting against restraints. But they’re also her signature. She’s obsessive about them, giving them a place of honor in her drawer, putting them on reverently, especially the ribbon choker, which draws your eyes instantly in posters for both films.

And if someone tries to take Lena’s ribbon off? Well, heads may not roll literally. Or, they may but they won’t be hers. 

The ribbon around the neck is a classic horror tale with a long and complicated history, possibly as far back as the French Revolution. Many readers may recall its adaptation in Alvin Schwartz’s “Scary Stories to Tell in the Dark.” In that version of the story, a woman named Jenny always wears a green ribbon around her neck and won’t tell her eventual husband Alfred why or ever take it off. On her deathbed, she finally unties the ribbon. And her head rolls off. 

In her wonderful Book Riot article on the story, Kelly Jensen calls the Schwartz tale “a title many cite as a story which has never, ever left them.” Carmen Maria Machado in her stunning collection “Her Body and Other Parties” uses the green ribbon lore in her short story “The Husband Stich.” 

And if someone tries to take Lena’s ribbon off? Well, heads may not roll literally. Or, they may but they won’t be hers. 


Want a daily wrap-up of all the news and commentary Salon has to offer? Subscribe to our morning newsletter, Crash Course.


Fencing mask

A hockey mask is a mask of choice for murderers, though “Texas Chainsaw Massacre” would have you know a mask of skin will do and Ghostface of “Scream” prefers oh, a ghost face. But it’s a fencing mask that specifically comes into play in “First Kill,” as fencing does in general. 

The workers who help run “Squid Game” (Noh Juhan/Netflix)Consider how evocative the fencing mask appears: its mesh front completely disguising the face, its extraterrestrial look. The fencing mask shows up in horror such as “Urban Legends” where a killer sports one.

The guards in “Squid Game” are clad not only in pink jumpsuits, but black fencing masks which contribute to the guards’ menacing and anonymous look. You cannot tell who someone is behind a fencing mask. When it comes to the guards, they will not see you, save you. And at least according to the Academy of Fencing Masters Blog in an article going into the lengthy benefits of fencing when it comes to horror films, “There are reasons why fencers would be the ones to make it to the sunrise on the day after the long night of mayhem.” Is this a good mask for horror going forward? En Garde!

“Orphan: First Kill” is now in theaters and on Paramount+. Watch a trailer via YouTube.

When it comes to making bourbon, why is corn so important?

On a cloudy November morning about seven years ago, I huddled shoulder-to-shoulder with a group of Castle & Key employees inside the distillery’s wrought iron gates. It wasn’t quite winter weather, but the air in Frankfort, Ky., was cool enough that our collective breath formed a tiny cloud of steam that hovered around our faces. Finally, the gates opened, and some greeted the entering delivery truck with a small, but hearty cheer. 

The hatch-door of the truck was backed up to a small metal basin, and head distiller Marianne Eaves readied her iPhone to record. Within a few seconds, the hatch opened. Fat, dried corn kernels — which were the color of fresh buttermilk — pelted into the basin. Slowly at first with a heavy plunkplunk, then more quickly until the sound of grain hitting metal roared like some kind of mechanical wave. 

Once the final kernel hit the pile, Eaves stopped recording and stood up straight. “This . . .” she said while pushing her phone into her coat pocket. “This is a really big day. It’s just incredible. Receiving this grain today is a huge part of that.” 

She continued, “We are, as of today, about three weeks away from our first production at Castle & Key for the first time in over 40 years, almost half a century.” 

At this point, Eaves — who holds the distinction of being Kentucky’s first female bourbon Master Distiller since Prohibition, and has since moved on to start her own business Eaves Blind — had spent nearly a year refurbishing the dilapidated distillery grounds that once housed the historic Old Taylor Bourbon Distillery

The fact that the distillery was finally about to start making bourbon again was momentous. As with all bourbon, a big part of why that was possible was this shipment of corn


Want more great food writing and recipes? Subscribe to Salon Food’s newsletter, The Bite.


When you look at the mashbill (the combination of grains used in a distiller’s recipe) of any given bourbon, you’ll see that corn always makes up at least 51% of the mixture. This isn’t an accident — it’s a stipulation that was written into law more than 100 years ago. But how, exactly, did corn become such an integral part of America’s Native Spirit? 

The first residents of the region were, of course, Native Americans, including the Cherokee, Chickasaw and Shawnee. Many of these indigenous tribes were skilled in agriculture, including the cultivation of multiple varieties of corn, a crop that was not only respected but also revered. It grew well in the region, thanks to the geography and climate. 

I think the Encyclopedia Britannica entry about the Corn Belt, which includes Kentucky, actually explains it quite beautifully: 

Soils are deep, fertile and rich in organic material and nitrogen, and the land is relatively level. The warm nights, hot days and well-distributed rainfall of the region during the growing season are ideal conditions for raising corn.

When immigrants, who were largely German and Scots-Irish, later settled in the region, they too began to grow corn. The harvests were plentiful enough that many farmers would distill any extra grain into a spirit that could be sold during the lean winter months. In many ways, this spirit mimicked the Irish whiskeys sold overseas, with one notable exception — the use of corn, which gave the drink a unique robust sweetness (and a little subtle leatheriness as it aged). 

For that reason, corn became a recognizable flavor in “Kentucky whiskey.” 

For that reason, corn became a recognizable flavor in “Kentucky whiskey.” 

As the historian Michael Veach has written, James C. Crow was a Scottish chemist-turned-distiller, who worked at the Old Oscar Pepper Distillery in the 1830s. He is loosely credited with perfecting a majority-corn mash bill that was so popular, it began to be imitated by other distillers. 

It would be another hundred years, however, before corn’s place in whiskey would be codified into law. In 1909, former President William Howard Taft’s “Decision on Whiskey” was released, which stipulated bourbon whiskey must have a mash bill that is majority corn. 

Then finally, in 1935, the Standards of Identity for Distilled Spirits, which is part of the U.S. Code of Federal Regulations, mandated that bourbon must include 51% corn in the mash bill. 

To this day, Kentucky’s bourbon and corn industries operate hand-in-hand. According to the U.S. Department of Agriculture’s National Agricultural Statistics Survey, Kentucky produced the largest corn crop ever grown in the commonwealth in 2021, which numbered 274 million bushels. About 20 million bushels were used by the bourbon industry. 

Dogs cry tears of joy when reunited with their owners, study says

The human-dog relationship is unique among animals: having co-evolved for so long, most dog owners will attest to the uncanny ability that their canines have when it comes to reading and responding to emotions. But a new study suggests that the dog-human connection is so profound that our dogs actually cry for us, or with us. 

Jason Bittel, a contributing writer at National Geographic, covers animals for a living — and he’s felt this kind of canine connection firsthand. Speaking with Salon by email, he recalled a powerful experience he felt when his ten-pound Pomeranian, Marla, was swarmed by yellow jackets.

“I found her flattened to the ground and shivering, so I scooped her up and ran to the bathroom, turned on the shower, and stood there pulling the stinging insects out of her thick black fur with my bare hands,” Bittel recalled. “I’ll never forget the look in her eyes, first of sheer terror, and then, after the dirty work was done, teary-eyed gratitude.”

“After tens of thousands of years of dogging our footsteps, it seems pretty reasonable that hormones, tear-ducts, and whatever else is associated with emotional interactions would co-evolve right along with us, too.”

This memory did not return to Bittel out of nowhere. It was prompted by a new study published in the scientific journal Current Biology which proves that, when dogs are reunited with humans who they love and have not seen in a while, their eyes produce tears of joy.

In the study, scientists took advantage of knowledge of a key hormone shared by humans and canines alike — oxytocin, the so-called “happy hormone.” When an oxytocin solution was applied to dogs’ eyes, their tear volume increased, suggesting a link between feelings of happiness and the quantity of tears their eyes produce. They also measured the tear volume produces by dogs before and after they reunited with different types of humans (one type being their owner; the other type, a familiar person who was not their owner). When dogs were reunited with humans in the former group, their tear volume significantly increased; when it was with the latter, it did not. That suggests a teary-eyed response occurs when reunited with someone they were fond of. 

Finally, to show that humans bond with dogs through canine tears as much as vice versa, the scientists asked human participants to rank their sense of emotional attachment to various photographed dogs. Humans generally gave more positive scores to dogs whose eyes had produced more tears.

“Dog[s] shed emotional tears associated with positive situations,” Takefumi Kikusui, PhD, DVM, a professor at Azabu University and corresponding author on the study, told Salon by email. “This is the first report, as far as we know, to show emotional tears in animals.”

Kikusui added, when asked for an explanation for this behavior, that a “dog’s teary eyes can facilitate human caregiving behavior to dog —. and this enhances the bond.” The study indicates that “dogs’ emotions are expressed in a similar way to human emotions” and that this “helps humans understand canine emotions.”

Renee Alsarraf, a veterinarian and author of “Sit, Stay, Heal: What Dogs Can Teach Us About Living Well,” told Salon by email that the study is a “good start” in terms of illuminating the phenomenon that many veterinarians and pet parents suspected — that dogs can “cry.”


Want more health and science stories in your inbox? Subscribe to Salon’s weekly newsletter The Vulgar Scientist.


The specific type of canine crying in question is what Alsarraf called “psychogenic tears,” meaning tears that derive from a psychological rather than physical origin.

“We know for a fact that when dogs and their pet parents look into each other’s eyes, it feels good to the canine as their oxytocin levels rise — a hormone that makes us feel good,” Alsarraf explained. “We also know that dogs produce basal and reflexive tears but typically there has been the scientific belief that they are not capable of psychogenic tears. However, this study shows that there is an increase in some tear production within the eye during a happy, emotional period.”

“I think this study is an incredible confirmation of something we’ve always known – that eye contact fosters a powerful, emotional connection between two living things.”

Alsarraf also had some criticisms of the study. For one thing, Alsarraf observes that they do not state if the test for measuring tear volume was “positioned in the eye for a specific time period. The standard duration of placement for which we have a tremendous amount of data is [one] minute.”

Alsarraf also expressed an interest in seeing statistics that could “assess if the increase in tear production is statistically significant.”

“An increase in tear production does not necessarily mean all dogs will have tears flowing down their faces as we humans often do when crying,” Alsarraf noted.

For the questions raised by these observations to be addressed, other scientists will need to try to replicate the research in Current Biology. Even so, the paper remains a major step forward in demonstrating that dogs’ tears are connected to their emotions — and that, in the case of their fortunate human companions, those emotions are associated with affection.

“I think this study is an incredible confirmation of something we’ve always known – that eye contact fosters a powerful, emotional connection between two living things,” Joel Sartore, a National Geographic Explorer and photographer wrote to Salon. Sartore has been specifically photographing images of animals for over a decade, taking care to emphasize their eyes. “I photograph every animal on plain black and white backgrounds so that each one is the same size, and thus has an equal chance of being noticed. When people can look into their eyes, it moves people, and often engages their feelings of compassion and a desire to help,” Sartore says.

Bittel, for his part, reacted to the study — and to his reflections on his experience with his canine companion, Marla the Pomeranian — by suggesting that maybe humans have co-evolved with their furry best friends.

“Maybe I let my own emotions get the best of me in that interpretation, but I also think that we’ve seen sled dogs adjust their microbiomes to eat what we eat and dog brains reorganize their structure to better perform the jobs we breed them,” Bittel explained. “After tens of thousands of years of dogging our footsteps, it seems pretty reasonable that hormones, tear-ducts, and whatever else is associated with emotional interactions would co-evolve right along with us, too.”

What’s for dinner? Protein — and its large water footprint

When it comes to the question of “what’s for dinner?” protein is typically at the center of the meal. Production and consumption statistics show that, for a majority of people, protein generally means meat, but it also increasingly includes other non-animal proteins like beans and quinoa. This reflects the fact that, as of 2018, 8% of those surveyed in the United States identified as either vegetarian or vegan.

Even as that shift has happened, however, America’s fixation on protein has not waned. From burgers to chicken, lentils to veggie nuggets, protein — especially from animal products — manages to stay at the center of our plates.

In a culture that obsesses over weight loss and aspirational fitness trends, high protein diets are always in vogue, but it is not always true that the average person needs more of it. According to the World Resources Institute, Americans are eating far more than the 51 grams of protein per day that most adults need.

So why does it matter if we’re over-consuming protein? For starters, protein-rich foods tend to carry a larger foodprint than others. Carbohydrates are easy for plants to produce, but proteins are a little harder, and as a result, they’re less concentrated in plant foods than fats and sugars. While animal foods are more concentrated protein sources, those animals have to eat a lot of plants to grow. As a result, producing protein-rich foods can take a lot of resources, including one that’s often overlooked: water.

Even if more of us could eat less of them, protein-rich foods are still an important part of our diets, and not all of them have the same water footprint. Here’s our guide to meeting your protein needs in a way that minimizes your water footprint.

The water footprint of protein-rich foods

The recently released Water Footprint of Food Guide presents water footprints of ‘typical’ American servings of over 100 foods and beverages, sorted by largest to smallest footprints. A glance at the Guide shows that foods high in protein fall in many of the top spots when compared to whole fruits and vegetables.

Foods with the top 25 largest water footprints include eight types of animal products and seven types of nuts (including peanuts, which are included with nuts in this Guide). In third place behind chocolate and almonds, 4 ounces of beef takes 463 gallons of water to produce. Quinoa and soy burgers also make the list at 135 gallons and 133 gallons of water per four-ounce serving, respectively  — not an insignificant amount of water in a meal.

The water footprint of meat

The water footprint of animal products is larger because, put simply, animals eat a lot of food. Yes, they drink water and water is used in their care, but the bulk of an animal’s water footprint is due to their food. Most livestock raised in industrial systems are given feed made from crops like corn, soy and alfalfa. Those raised on pasture spend (sometimes very long periods of) time eating pasture forage and grasses, or they eat both.

Many of the crops food animals eat are irrigated, which increases the blue water footprint (which refers to irrigation from surface and groundwater sources). Animals that are primarily raised on pasture rely on a certain amount of rainfall to supply moisture to the forage and grasses, which increases the green water footprint (which refers to rainfall and soil moisture).

When pastured animals graze in areas that are dry or in drought, the pastures are often irrigated or the animals are given feed. If water resources are stressed enough so that no forage or feed is available, herd sizes often have to be reduced by slaughtering the animals.

With surface and groundwater sources under constant pressure from use by all sectors like electricity generation, drinking water utilities and especially agriculture, high demand for protein from animal products puts more pressure on agriculture to consume more water. Farmers are facing major hurdles as climate change alters precipitation patterns, often changing where, when and how precipitation falls.

In addition, longer, more intense droughts in agricultural centers like California and Arizona are threatening business as usual by limiting available water supplies that farmers have historically relied on, as is now happening in the lower Colorado River basin. These conditions will likely persist as the atmosphere warms and the climate continues to shift into less predictable and more extreme weather patterns.

The water footprint of nuts

Most nuts grow on perennial trees and bushes that require regular rain water to keep them alive and producing. Trees and shrubs across the industry are irrigated which greatly increases their productivity — and in some places, increases water stress.

Almonds, for example, thrive in a Mediterranean climate, which tends to be more arid but with regular rainfall. At over 80% of global production, California has become the main almond-producing region in the world, due to its semi-arid climate and (historically) ready access to steady irrigation water, which greatly increases productivity of the almond trees.

The ongoing megadrought in the lower Colorado River basin states has changed the availability of irrigation water supplies, and many almond growers face having to cut down their trees. Even still, while many almond farmers have become more efficient with their water use which helps to ease pressure on local water resources, the total acreage dedicated to growing almonds in California is increasing, because the increased productivity makes them a very profitable crop.

Other tree nuts are similarly water intensive and are often grown in similar environments.

The water footprint of pulses

Pulses include beans, peas and lentils. As whole foods that offer significant levels of protein, ounce for ounce, pulses require less water than animal products. Pulses are cool season crops that, like nuts, are often grown in arid to semi-arid environments. They are grown as dryland and irrigated crops in the Northern Plains and Palouse regions of the United States.

The pulses presented in the Guide take from 20 to almost 70 gallons of water per four-ounce serving, which makes them a more sustainable option for those looking to meet their protein requirements while keeping their water footprints in check. The only pulse-related food that made the top 25 water footprints was soy burgers at 113 gallons per four-ounce serving. Soy burgers are representative of heavily processed, plant-based burgers, in which the extra processing and ingredients drive up the water footprint.

A low-water diet

While it’s helpful to understand the impact that individual foods have on water, diets are about broader patterns. While there is no one size fits all diet that will solve both nutritional deficiencies and the environmental impacts that come with food production, some ways of eating have a lower overall water footprint. Diets that reduce or eliminate meat intake, like flexitarianism, vegetarianism and veganism, have a significantly lower water footprint than meat-heavy diets, and there can be other environmental and health benefits as well.

A 2018 Johns Hopkins study evaluated different dietary scenarios in 140 countries based on varying levels of meat on a spectrum, to no meat, vegetarian and vegan models that were designed to meet healthy diet guidelines. Study authors evaluated the water footprints and greenhouse gas emissions for each country if they were to adopt that particular diet.

According to the authors, results varied widely by country due to differing agricultural production methods, trade patterns and nutritional needs. And while they identified that people in poor countries might benefit from diets that included more animal products, countries like the United States that don’t struggle with protein intake could dramatically lower their footprints by shifting to more plant-forward diets.

Likewise, each person has to tailor their own diet based on their nutritional requirements and health needs. However, as the saying goes, you can’t manage what you don’t measure. An excellent way to measure your individual impact on water resources is to find your personal water footprint with the Water Footprint Calculator. You can then check out the Water Footprint of Food Guide to see how much a meal will cost you in dietary water consumption. The Guide will help you make some easy substitutions that could create a big drop in your water footprint and help you lessen your impact on the world around you.

Reducing the water footprint of your diet

Keeping in mind that there’s not a one-size-fits-all approach, here are our top strategies for reducing the water footprint of your diet:

Don’t overconsume protein

In the US, we might be eating too much protein throughout our day which creates demand that drives up water consumption in water scarce areas. Excess protein just gets excreted from our bodies as waste, making it a literal waste! Be mindful of your protein intake.

Don’t waste food

One of the best ways to reduce your water footprint is to stop wasting food. The US wastes roughly 40% of the food it produces. Wasting edible food also means wasting all of the resources it took to produce it, including water, land, fertilizers and pesticides created from oil and gas, seeds, money, animal lives and labor. FoodPrint has lots of ideas and resources for how to reduce your household waste. You’ll be helping to fight climate change in addition to reducing your water footprint.

Eat less meat

Consumption of meat — including beef, poultry and lamb — is increasing in the United States, as well as worldwide. This could have dire consequences if both consumption and climate trends — including drought — continue.

FoodPrint has lots of resources and ideas for eating less meat, including practicing Meatless Monday, which offers an easy way to achieve a 15% reduction in meat consumption by skipping meat one out of every seven days.

Eat lower down on the food chain

You can save water by eating lower down on the food chain. For instance, while a serving of beef takes 463 gallons per four-ounce serving, the same amount of turkey takes 130 gallons, and black beans take only 49 gallons.

Eat less processed food

Whole foods require less processing, which means there are fewer steps and ingredients involved in creating the food items on your plate. Less processing means less water involved in making your food.

“Trying to dunk on stroke survivors”: Dr. Oz called out over “disgusting” attack on John Fetterman

Dr. Mehmet Oz is being widely rebuked after the Republican candidate’s campaign for Pennsylvania’s open U.S. Senate seat said that his Democratic opponent Lt. Gov. John Fetterman would not have suffered a stroke earlier this year if he “had ever eaten a vegetable in his life.”

In a statement released early Wednesday, Fetterman’s team said the comment from the Oz’s senior communications adviser Rachel Tripp was an “unhinged” and “nasty” thing to say even during a high-stakes political race, in addition to being “irresponsible” coming from a physician who should know better.

“I had a stroke. I survived it. I’m truly so grateful to still be here today,” Fetterman said.

“I know politics can be nasty, but even then,” he added, “I could never imagine ridiculing someone for their health challenges.”

Fetterman had a stroke in May just ahead of winning the Democratic primary and recently returned to the campaign trail after weeks of recovery. Fetterman has been a relentless critic of Oz, trolling the celebrity doctor turned Trump-backed politician for not living in Pennsylvania until recently and criticizing the ultra-millionaire for being screamingly out of touch with regular, working-class voters.

The topic of vegetables recently became a point of contention between the two after Fetterman and his supporters lambasted Oz for a video in which the Republican candidate complained about how much it cost at the grocery store to put together a crudités, a French word for veggie platter.

The Fetterman campaign has also tried to portray Oz as a charlatan who has used his status as a doctor to push questionable treatments and health advise on his unsuspected television audiences. Earlier this month, as Common Dreams reported, a group backing Fetterman and calling itself “Doctors Against Oz” put forward the case that the GOP candidate should be seen as little more than a “quack” doctor only interested in getting rich.

During a press conference Tuesday afternoon, Dr. Arkoosh, chair of Montgomery County Board of Commissioners and a member of the Doctors Against Oz, condemned the comments by the Oz campaign.

 

“No real doctor—or any decent human being, to be honest—would ever mock a stroke victim who is recovering from that stroke in the way that Dr. Oz is mocking John Fetterman,” said Arkoosh. “It’s disgusting.”

Where food sustainability and disability clash

A few years ago, I walked up a New York City avenue laden with cloth shopping bags, trying not to cry. As part of a personal study in zero waste living, I had taken the subway, then a bus, and then journeyed on foot a few blocks to one of the few uptown stores selling bulk produce, pantry items and cleaning products. With reused plastic containers full to the brim, I now struggled to get everything back home.

“I’m in pain,” describes Hana C., an ICU nurse disabled by several autoimmune conditions in the southwest. “I can’t go to the farmers’ market, buy organic kale and garlic, and make dinner. It’s not that I don’t want to. I just can’t.”

Like Hana, I’m disabled by chronic illness. Like Hana, I consider myself an environmentalist. I hadn’t anticipated that a dedicated study of zero waste living would heighten the difficulties of eating sustainably while disabled. But blending homemade almond milk during a migraine and lugging bulk items fifty blocks home proved hazardous to my health.

Services like grocery and meal delivery are generally not environmentally or worker-friendly, using lots of single-use plastic and relying on underpaid gig workers. But they’re often the safest and most accessible avenues for disabled and chronically ill people.  “I am forced to focus almost entirely on my survival because community care options are so limited and inaccessible in our society,” says Lisa Trainor, a neurodivergent and chronically ill writer in Princeton, New Jersey. “Sometimes that means putting my environmental goals on the back burner, which I feel terrible about. But I’m not in a place to think about that over my own needs.

Financial inaccessibility

Disabled people are more than twice as likely to live in poverty as non-disabled people. This makes them less likely to be able to afford the increased costs of local foods. And puts them at greater odds of living in under-resourced neighborhoods with limited access to local and sustainable markets and services like curbside recycling.

“It’s nice to say, ‘You should do a weekly shop and get everything you need,'” says disabled writer s.e. Smith. “But how am I going to do that in a power chair when the closest bus stop is five blocks away, and I can only deal with two bags of groceries at once? Also, my Social Security doesn’t come in until next week, and I have five dollars, and the bus fare is four dollars. There’s a lack of understanding about disability-specific barriers to what people think of as common sense food sustainability things.”

Physical inaccessibility

Farmers’ markets often prioritize social interactions that create adverse barriers for those with disabilities. They’re frequently located in recreational areas not easily traversable for mobility aids users, and interacting with multiple vendors requires constant cognitive processing and can increase viral exposure for the immunocompromised. And community recycling or composting programs may not be accessible for those who cannot physically collect, transfer and dispose of such products regularly.

Energetic inaccessibility

Many people disabled by chronic illness live with consistently limited energy. “Buying in bulk and locally is the dream, but that takes extra cognitive and physical energy,” says Claire Huntley, an Australian yoga teacher with Myalgic Encephalomyelitis. “They can involve extra planning, sourcing, decisions, calculations, budgeting, ordering, carrying, storing and decanting —compared to making one grocery order a week and selecting from what is available.”

Cooking with bagged produce requires less energy than cleaning and slicing individual items. Tossing food scraps in the trash takes less effort than bagging compostable items for a weekly trip to the transfer station. “I have been trying to accept that I can use paper plates or other single-use items without feeling guilty,” adds Abby*, a person in Connecticut with multiple chronic illnesses who is unable to housekeep when sick in bed for days on end.

How to battle eco-ableism

Disabled people are often blamed for utilizing unsustainable food systems that help them stay alive. Take the straw ban, which notoriously pitted those who need bendable, disposable plastic straws to safely eat and drink against those who view straws as a wasteful convenience item. Or when a New York City Whole Foods announced a new produce butchering service where customers could have their produce chopped to their specifications and packaged in their personal reusable containers and media backlash summarized potential users as spoiledlazy or lacking “the basic skills necessary to function as independent human beings.” “Many people dunked on it extensively,” Smith remembers of them not recognizing how this service would reduce reliance on set amounts of prepared produce sold in single-use plastic packaging. “And I was like, ‘This is awesome! I would totally use this because I could get produce prepared and packaged in something more sustainable.'”

“Personal responsibility for climate change is insufficient to address the crisis. Period,” says Eliza Orlins, a New York-based public defender with ADHD, of how many disabled people feel blamed by non-disabled eco-conscious friends for their reliance on unsustainable systems when true impact can only be made on a much larger scale. Still, there are many ways non-disabled individuals can help create more accessible, sustainable food systems for disabled individuals and communities — right now.

Decrease the financial gap

Many disabled people navigate both decreased income and heightened medical expenses. But where many food programs offer discounts to seniors, few do the same for disabled people who could become regular consumers of local goods and contributors to sustainability conversations if offered a little financial aid. On an individual level, non-disabled people can offer to add a disabled friend to your membership or discount program so that they can utilize otherwise unaffordable services.

Create accessible local food spaces

Remember when grocery stores offered dedicated hours to seniors at the top of the pandemic? This decreased potential virus exposure, eased physical mobility, reduced stimulation and minimized idle time.

Local food venues, like farmers’ markets, could have a designated time regularly implemented for disabled people and address where mobility aid users might struggle to navigate or if a little less sound or light stimulation might better welcome those with sensory disorders. Online ordering and curbside pickup programs would help save disabled people energy and physical effort. And articulating accessibility options on marketing materials would ensure that disabled people know they can utilize these services.

Help with mealtime

Many people cook using single-use containers of prepared produce, accepting increased packaging waste as the cost of time and energy saved. But for those with persistent fatigue, pain and mobility disabilities, such items are not a convenience but a necessity. “Sometimes having easily accessible foods makes the difference between me eating somewhat healthfully, getting expensive fast food delivered, or eating at all,” says Leslie Kay Stratton, a Central Kentucky-based graduate student with several chronic illnesses.

Friends and community members can help meet this need by offering to assist with weekly meal planning and preparation. You could clean, prepare and package ingredients in reusable containers, then ask where to store them so that they’ll be most easily accessed: Several people with ADHD shared that they’re most likely to use items stored in their line of vision while those in produce drawers tend to be forgotten and rot. If you’re financially able, consider offering to pay for a private chef or cleaning service for a friend or family member that can regularly help reduce their physical load of cooking and cleaning.

The most important thing is to ask someone first what would best meet their needs. Don’t show up unannounced with prepped items you presume someone can or wants to eat. “You’ve now passed the need to sort and possibly throw food away onto someone already struggling,” says Rook Stone, a chronically ill disabled writer in California’s Central Valley. “There’s guilt on top of it because you want to be grateful, but now that’s hard.”

Communal shopping

Disabled and chronically ill people have suffered disproportionately during the Covid-19 pandemic. But the increase in the number of grocery delivery services and the lower prices, thanks to competition, has made food shopping safer and more affordable for those always looking to cut back on energy expenditure. More establishments now accept EBT. And some deliver within short time windows, too. “This is great for when I forget an ingredient for something I want to make or simply forget to buy food,” adds Orlins of meal food shopping with ADHD.

To help decrease the packaging and transportation costs inherent in such services, friends and neighbors can pool delivery orders. Consider offering to fill a disabled friend or neighbor’s grocery list every time you head to a local market. And buy bulk items together to save money.

Broaden transportation services

Farm stores and co-ops should consider making one daily delivery to local disabled people. Or CSAs can offer flexible pickup options, as does Ohio’s Yellowbird Foodshed: “If you’re late for your usual spot, you can get it at the next location,” says Jen Radomski, the chronically ill and disabled co-founder of Ohio’s Wild Prairie Flower Farm, of Yellowbird offers five pickup locations. “I can get fresh, seasonal, local food without expending precious limited energy thinking about it, which allows me to prioritize my nutrition even on my worst days.”

Individuals can offer to carpool to farmers’ markets or local fairs. And organizations can create programs where volunteers pick up or drop off items to disabled people in their neighborhoods.

“I can’t personally compost,” says Hana C., the ICU nurse. “But if someone came by and grabbed my food waste for a community-based compost effort, I’d be happy to collect it separately.”

Push for systemic change

Assisting disabled friends and loved ones can make an immediate positive impact on their quality of life and help to deepen their environmental commitment. But for greater ripple effects, look to where you can help transform businesses within your local foodshed to make them more easily accessible to all. Offer to help coordinate volunteer programs across community outreach and operations that increase access for all area residents. If hygiene or other regulations challenge a food businesses’ sustainability efforts, bring creative and effective solutions to your local officials. And if you can connect dots between a sustainability issue and a solution — say, stores in your area might contribute to a composting program if offered —discuss with others in your community how to make such a program possible.

“In a lot of conversations about disability and sustainability, all of the burden is put on individuals [with disabilities],” says Smith. “A whole society exists. So you need to build your networks. You need to make sure that those networks are diverse. And you need to make sure that you are talking to people to see whether you are proposing is what they actually want or need.”

*Not her real name

Greene says she was “swatted” at home and nearly “murdered” by police: “I picked up my gun”

Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene, R-Ga., revealed on Wednesday that she immediately grabbed her gun when a SWAT team visited her home earlier that morning.

According to police reports, someone called 911 dispatchers with a report that a shooting had taken place a Greene’s home early Wednesday morning. The tactic is known as “swatting.”

“I jumped out of bed and threw my clothes on and I picked up my gun,” Greene recalled to Real America’s Voice guest host Jack Posobiec. “That was my instinct because I’m a gun owner, I’m a Second Amendment supporter and I believe in defending myself. And normally I answer the door with a gun.”

But Greene said that she had a “weird gut instinct” to put her gun down before answering the door.

“What could have happened if you had been holding your gun when you answered the door?” Posobiec wondered.

“I don’t know,” Greene replied. “That’s the danger and that’s how people accidentally get killed.”

“If there’s a police officer that has a happy trigger finger, you know, you don’t know what could happen if they saw me with a gun, they may have fired at me,” the lawmaker opined. “I would hope not. But that’s what has happened in the past.”

She added: “That’s why swatting is so dangerous. It’s like death by cop. It is a murder. Someone is sending police to in their hopes kill the person that they’re targeting.”

Watch the video below from Real America’s Voice.

Dobbs was a game changer: Democrats eye abortion as key to midterm success

Weeks after a draft of Justice Samuel Alito’s decision overturning abortion rights leaked in May, an extremely low turnout election in Texas’ Rio Grande Valley served as a grand indicator of a massive red wave. Rep. Henry Cuellar, the lone anti-abortion Democrat serving in the House of Representatives, narrowly defeated progressive challenger Jessica Cisneros. His win was confirmed by recount nearly a month later. In the intervening weeks, however, a Republican flipped a neighboring Democratic seat in a special election. The narrative was set: Democrats are facing midterm disaster.

Then the Supreme Court’s decision to overturn the landmark Roe v. Wade and Casey v. Planned Parenthood cases affirming a right to abortion in the U.S was made official, and a clear new pattern emerged: American voters are now fighting to protect what remains of abortion rights.

 On Tuesday, the New York special election served as the first competitive contest since the June ruling — and the last big electoral test before the November midterms. The seat, which opened up when Democrat Antonio Delgado vacated it to become lieutenant governor, was the definition of a true toss-up. ​​The district voted for Barack Obama in 2012, Donald Trump in 2016 and Joe Biden — by less than 2% — in 2020.

Pat Ryan, the Democrat, made abortion rights a centerpiece of his campaign. His first ad was released right after the Supreme Court’s decision. “Freedom includes a woman’s right to choose,” the Iraq War veteran asserted. 

The Republican, Marc Molinaro, tried to nullify the issue on the campaign trail, claiming that a federal ban wouldn’t survive scrutiny by the courts. But the Democrats hounded him for opposing abortion rights as a state legislator. A poll released in the days leading up to Election Day put Molinaro up eight percentage points over the Democrat. On Election Day, the Democrat won. 

As inflation shows signs of easing, polls show concern over abortion rights growing as Democrats have overtaken Republicans on the generic ballot. 

Down in Florida, a Democratic primary was the test case for abortion rights, as a longtime incumbent state representative who campaigned with Republican Gov. Ron DeSantis to promote the state’s newly passed 15-week abortion ban, and the lone Democrat to vote for the ban that includes no rape or incest exemption, was ousted Tuesday by a progressive challenger who was Trayvon Martin’s high school English teacher.  


Want a daily wrap-up of all the news and commentary Salon has to offer? Subscribe to our morning newsletter, Crash Course.


On Wednesday, Cook Political’s House outlook — which in May had a GOP gain of 20-35 seats —  downgraded to a 10-20 seat GOP gain. “Red wave looks more like a ripple,” the editors wrote. 

As inflation shows signs of easing, polls show concern over abortion rights growing as Democrats have overtaken Republicans on the generic ballot. 

In Michigan, a poll conducted this month discovered that abortion is now tied with inflation and rising prices as the most important issue to voters — and Democrat Gretchen Whitmer is leading in the gubernatorial race. Nationally, nearly two-thirds of Americans said the end of Roe represented a “major loss of rights” for women, according to a Washington Post-Schar School poll conducted last month. A Pew poll released on Tuesday found that 56% of registered voters said the issue of abortion will be very important in their midterm vote, up from 43% in March. “Virtually all of the increase has come among Democrats,” Pew wrote

“Red wave looks more like a ripple.”

As Salon’s Amanda Marcotte reported, more women are registering to vote as Democrats across the country in the wake of Dobbs — and have been pivotal in Democratic wins and the effort to protect abortion rights, as was the case in Kansas last month. 

Even closer-than-expected special elections for the House in districts won by Donald Trump in Nebraska and Minnesota this summer saw Democrats lose more narrowly than expected, thanks to high turnout in small cities and suburbs. Sarah Palin’s race for the open congressional seat in Alaska even has the Democrat leading the first round with a stronger than expected showing in a ranked-choice election.

Despite Democrats’ newfound success, however, a spat of abortion bans are still set to go into effect in three more states this week, including Texas’ infamous new bounty system.

Biden student debt plan hailed as “good start” but progressives say it shows he “can cancel it all”

After years of activist organizing, U.S. President Joe Biden on Wednesday announced a plan to cancel $10,000 to $20,000 in federal student loan debt per borrower, a move that drew both praise and admonition from progressives—many of whom want to erase $50,000 or even all educational debt.

Biden tweeted that in order “to give working and middle class families breathing room as they prepare to resume federal student loan payments in January 2023,” his administration will forgive $10,000 in student loan debt for borrowers who attended college without Pell Grants and who earn less than $125,000, or $250,000 as a household. Borrowers who received Pell Grants will have $20,000 in debt erased.

The president—who said he would discuss details of the plan at a Wednesday afternoon press briefing—also said that the pause on student loan repayments, first put in place during the early months of the Covid-19 pandemic, would be extended one final time through the end of the year.

While appreciating that “up to 20 million people could have their balances reduced to zero” under Biden’s plan, Astra Taylor, co-founder of the Debt Collective, told MSNBC that “every penny of student debt should be erased because college is a public good and it should be free.”

“But there’s no doubt this is a huge stepping stone—a milestone—on the path to that end,” she added. “The call for debt cancellation was extremely unusual when we first raised it 10 years ago, and now the president is doing it.”

Sen. Elizabeth Warren, D-Mass., tweeted that “today is a day of joy and relief,” calling Biden’s move “a powerful step to help rebuild the middle class” that “will be transformative for the lives of working people all across this country.”

Rep. Ayanna Pressley, D-Mass., said that “to every organizer who fought so hard, this victory is yours. This is going to change and save lives.”

Some progressives implied that canceling more student debt was a matter of priorities.

Referring to the U.S. Small Business Administration’s Paycheck Protection Program, which provided loans to buoy businesses during the Covid-19 pandemic, Sen. Bernie Sanders, I-Vt., asserted: “The average amount of debt forgiveness to businesses receiving PPP loans: $95,700. If we could afford to cancel hundreds of billions in PPP loans to business owners in their time of need, please do not tell me we can’t afford to cancel all student debt for 45 million Americans.”

Anti-poverty activist Joe Sanberg tweeted that “any form of broad cancellation is proof that he can cancel it all. We must keep the pressure on for full cancellation and tuition-free college to make higher education accessible and equitable for all.”

Others decried what they called the insufficient relief offered by the president’s plan, with former Ohio state Sen. Nina Turner arguing that erasing just $10,000 in debt “isn’t something to be ‘grateful’ for.”

“This tough guy act is pathetic”: Ex-Navy pilot rips Ron DeSantis for “Navy pilot cosplay” in new ad

A former pilot for the U.S. Navy has publicly criticized Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis (R) for his new campaign advertisement inspired by the 1986 classic film, “Top Gun.”

According to HuffPost, the campaign ad featured the Republican governor who “donned aviator shades and a bomber jacket and plopped into what appeared to be the pilot’s seat of a fighter jet as he talked about taking on the ‘corporate media.'”

At one point during the ad, he described himself as the “Top Gov.” in the ad, and Ken Harbaugh is not pleased. “It’s not just cringy,” said Ken Harbaugh. “It’s literally Navy pilot cosplay.”

Harbaugh, a former member of the U.S. Navy who now hosts the “Burn the Boats” podcast, was featured in a new clip posted to social media by MediasTouch.

In the clip, he displayed his jacket with authentic pilot wings as he offered a comparison of both their roles in the maritime service branch. “Now, unlike Ron DeSantis, I didn’t pick this jacket up at Party City,” Harbaugh said. “These are actual pilot wings.”

He also noted that while DeSantis did serve in the U.S. Navy, he did so as an attorney. While Harbaugh also acknowledged that there is “nothing wrong with that,” he did criticize the governor for appearing to embellish his role.

“Nothing wrong with that,” Harbaugh said of DeSantis’ work in the Navy. “Until you start strutting around the flight line wearing aviator shades and pretending to be a badass.”

Harbaugh went on to offer a critical assessment of the political ad and the persona DeSantis attempted to portray.

“This tough guy act is pathetic, especially from someone like Ron DeSantis. This campaign ad from Ron DeSantis is just one more example of a Republican politician appropriating the honor of others because he has none.”

To view Harbaugh’s full reaction, watch below or at this link.

Trump complains about classified docs: “I don’t understand why I can’t have these things”

Former President Donald Trump said he doesn’t understand why he can’t have classified and top secret documents that were seized from Mar-a-Lago by the FBI, according to a report.

A source told The Wall Street Journal that Trump wants the FBI to return about two dozen boxes that included 11 sets of classified information.

“He has said, ‘People put this stuff in their library. How can they put it in their library if it has to go back to the Archives? I don’t understand why I can’t have these things,’ ” the source said.

The search of Trump’s Mar-a-Lago estate came after the former president refused to return documents belonging to the National Archives.

Trump has claimed that he declassified all of the documents but has not presented any evidence of the declassification.

“This order is hilarious”: Trump-appointed judge sends back his DOJ suit because it makes no sense

Former President Trump and his legal team have filed a motion asking a federal judge to pause the FBI’s review of alleged classified documents taken from his Mar-a-Lago resort so a neutral special master can be appointed to inspect them.

The motion was included in a federal lawsuit filed by Trump targeting the FBI’s justification for the Aug. 8 raid. According to reports, Trump had more than 300 classified documents at his Palm Beach resort that he allegedly took from the White House at the end of his tenure.

But in a new development this Tuesday, the judge overseeing the case gave Trump and his legal team until Friday to give more specifics as to why they think their motion should be granted.

“Judge Aileen Cannon seems skeptical about Trump’s lawsuit over the search of Mar-a-Lago, including what exactly he is trying to do and why he filed a separate case instead of just asking Judge Bruce Reinhart to address his grievances in the existing matter,” explained New York Times reporter Charlie Savage.

“The judge assigned to Trump’s civil complaint is basically telling them they need to do better,” tweeted Reuters reporter and legal expert Sarah Lynch.

As CBS News’ Steven Portnoy pointed out, the judge wants Trump’s legal team to provide “the asserted basis for the exercise of this Court’s jurisdiction,” “the precise relief sought, including any request for injunctive relief,” and the “the effect, if any, of the proceeding before” Magistrate Judge Bruce Reinhart.

“This order is hilarious,” added David French of The Dispatch. “Any decent litigator would read it and shudder–basically the judge is saying to Trump’s team, ‘Do your job.'”

“Translation: Trump’s motion is a mess and the judge needs them to spell out exactly what they’re asking for and why they think they’re entitled to that relief,” tweeted Renato Mariotti, a former federal prosecutor.

Donald Trump reaps the mistrust he sowed: Mar-a-Lago leaves him paranoid and confused

During the pandemic, there was a lot of discussion about the use of “trusted voices” to persuade people to get vaccinated against COVID-19. This is apparently a well-known concept in the field of public health because it’s often difficult to get people to change behaviors or accept unfamiliar interventions. You’ll recall that it was often advised that people speak to their family doctors if they had questions since surveys show that people trust them to tell the truth. Health care organizations also advised outreach to faith leaders, particularly in communities of color, since many “will only trust voices, leaders, and organizations that have consistently served them, and many of those voices are found in their places of worship.” Farmers were recruited in rural areas because they know about vaccinations and “herd immunity.”

This makes sense. There is a lot of information floating around and it’s logical to seek out someone you deem to be credible to help you understand the situation. Unfortunately, there is so little respect for people in public life these days that they have to work very hard to persuade the citizenry that they can be trusted at all. Pew Research did polling on this issue back in 2019 and elected officials were are the very bottom of the list of leadership groups, below business leaders and (gasp) journalists. At that time, pre-pandemic, scientists were at the top of the list but I suspect they have slipped quite a bit since then. In fact, the entire list, which included the military, police, public school principals, religious leaders and college professors, has probably declined since then. Trust is not in great supply in American society at the moment.


Want a daily wrap-up of all the news and commentary Salon has to offer? Subscribe to our morning newsletter, Crash Course.


There are many reasons for this and it’s been coming on for decades, but the last few years with the mendacious Donald Trump being at the center of our politics has made it exponentially worse. Take, for example, the treatment of Dr. Anthony Fauci, the head of infectious disease at the National Institute of Health. Formerly one of the most highly respected medical scientists in the world, recipient of countless awards including the presidential medal of freedom, Fauci would once have been seen as a trusted voice to whom the nation turned for leadership when we were hit with the COVID pandemic. For many, he was and still is. But for tens of millions of Americans, he is seen as a mass murderer, based on sheer propaganda. 

Trust is not in great supply in American society at the moment.

Here’s Rep. Marjorie Taylor Green speaking about Fauci after he announced his retirement this week:

Granted, Green is a far-right provocateur. But she is not alone. Sen. John Kennedy of Louisiana, a Republican, among many others, is promising to haul him before GOP tribunals if the Republicans win the November election.

It’s all performative nonsense stemming from the right-wing media’s insistence on pushing snake oil cures so they could pretend the pandemic was over (to help Donald Trump get re-elected) and Fauci had the temerity to follow the science instead. They have since worked up a massive conspiracy theory that he worked with the Chinese government to create COVID and unleash it on the world, for reasons that remain obscure. The campaign of character assassination against this man is downright horrifying.

For those same people on the right, Donald Trump is considered the ultimate trusted voice and Fox News is just as trusted as Trump. (After all, they were the ones who managed to persuade the Republican base that wearing masks and getting vaccinated were intrusions on people’s God-given freedom, even when hundreds of thousands of them were dropping dead.) It’s important to understand this as we anticipate how the latest scandalous Trump legal problems might unfold.

One of the most impressive aspects of the January 6 committee hearings earlier this summer was the use of Republican members of Trump’s inner circle to tell the story of his attempts to overturn the election and obstruct the peaceful transfer of power. To Trump’s adversaries and opponents, these people were a mixed bag that included former Trump loyalists who were compelled to tell the truth about the corrupt boss they had loyally served. And I think it was assumed that for some Trump supporters these people might be seen as trusted voices because of their previous devotion to the Dear Leader. There were staffers and former Cabinet members, some of whom were quite well known as faithful Trump agents, such as former Attorney General William Barr, who could not be portrayed as Democratic dupes, giving evidence that Trump simply refused to accept the truth and went to bizarre lengths to deny it. Surely, people would have to realize that this steadfast coterie must be telling the truth. But they don’t. They believe that every last one of them is a liar. No amount of previous fidelity to the party or the cause counts for anything.

Trump knows what he has done and he knows that his closest associates from the White House and now at Mar-a-Lago are cooperating with both his political adversaries and the law

Perhaps the best example of this is Liz Cheney, hardcore conservative to the bone, member of the House leadership and daughter of a GOP icon, who might have been expected to make some Republicans reassess their belief in Donald Trump when she sacrificed her seat and jeopardized her future to speak truth to power. But she is not only not a trusted voice, she is a pariah.

The Washington Post’s Greg Sargent pointed out this week that the Mar-a-Lago National Archives scandal is likewise the result of Trump insiders being compelled to tell the truth about his strange behaviors regarding these stolen classified documents. The reporting and evidence show that the FBI has been interviewing witnesses whose revelations helped trigger the subpoenas and search warrant. Trump denies it all, and once again, his followers believe him over all the evidence.

Trump’s supporters’ stalwart loyalty propels the Republican establishment to go along. They know their voices are only trusted if they conform to what Trump is saying. There is only Trump’s word — and his word is law.

But you have to wonder what he’s thinking. 

The only voice he can trust is the one in his head telling him to keep dancing as fast as he can. It must be exhausting.

Sure, he’s gleefully collecting money from the small donors who love to give the billionaire their hard-earned cash. And he’s pursuing his usual strategy of flooding the zone with nonsense and staying in the news which he believes is a key to his success. But Trump knows what he has done and he knows that his closest associates from the White House and now at Mar-a-Lago are cooperating with both his political adversaries and the law. In the latter case, he has no idea who they are so everyone must be a suspect, even his own family. The only voice he can trust is the one in his head telling him to keep dancing as fast as he can. It must be exhausting.

Florida GOP primary loser Laura Loomer cries fraud: “I’m not conceding because I’m a winner”

Far-right extremist Laura Loomer refused to concede her Florida Republican primary defeat to Rep. Daniel Webster, R-Fla., on Tuesday after coming surprisingly close to an upset.

Webster, a six-term incumbent who served for three decades in the Florida legislature, narrowly edged out Loomer, a far-right activist and self-described “proud Islamophobe” banned from most social media and payment platforms for spreading election lies and attacks on Muslims.

Loomer broke down in tears during a speech to supporters Tuesday night and refused to concede after losing by six points.

“I’m not conceding, because I’m a winner!” Loomer declared, pushing baseless allegations of election fraud.

“We are losing our country to big-tech election interference,” she claimed. “And I am pleading with the Republican Party to please start taking this issue seriously, because the American people deserve representation.”

Despite citing zero evidence to back up her claims, Loomer’s supporters pushed similar allegations of fraud based only on the rate at which ballots were counted.

Loomer, who was previously backed by former President Donald Trump in a 2020 race for a different congressional district that she lost by 20 points, is the latest Trump ally to refuse to accept defeat in her own party’s primary. Mesa County, Colo. Clerk Tina Peters, who was indicted for election tampering, refused to concede her secretary of state primary defeat despite finishing third and bilked supporters out of hundreds of thousands to pay for a recount that confirmed her loss. Fellow Trump ally Joey Gilbert similarly made baseless fraud allegations after his defeat and filed a lawsuit that was immediately dismissed by a judge over a total lack of evidence.

Loomer has been one of the more high-profile far-right provocateurs of the Trump era, rubbing shoulders with former Secretary of State Mike Pompeo and attending a Trump fundraiser at Mar-a-Lago. But her racist rhetoric and attacks on Muslims have gotten her booted from most online platforms, not unlike the former president. Loomer has been banned by social networks Twitter, Facebook, Instagram and Medium, payment platforms Paypal, Venmo, GoFundMe and Chase, and ride-sharing apps Uber and Lyft. She was even banned by the Conservative Political Action Conference (CPAC), which regularly welcomes extremists.

Loomer in 2017 expressed her support for “ethnonationalism,” declaring herself “pro-white nationalism” while bashing “left-wing globalist Marxist Jews.”

She repeatedly attacked Muslims on social media before getting banned.

“I never want another Muslim entering this country EVER AGAIN,” she tweeted in 2017.

After being banned by the social platform, Loomer handcuffed herself to the Twitter headquarters in New York City.

“Fondly remembering the time Laura Loomer handcuffed herself to the door of Twitter’s NYC office—but only to one of the two double doors, allowing employees to continue entering and exiting as they pleased,” Axios reporter Lachlan Markay recalled after her defeat on Tuesday.


Want a daily wrap-up of all the news and commentary Salon has to offer? Subscribe to our morning newsletter, Crash Course.


The narrow margin in Loomer’s loss sparked alarm about how close the fringe extremist came to winning a Republican congressional primary.

Former Rep. Denver Riggleman, R-Va., called Loomer an “awful, radical scumbag” who nevertheless “received lots of support.”

“Sitting members are or have supported these folks. Unhinged candidates are a disease,” he tweeted.

“Nothing sums up the extremism of the modern GOP right now than this race in Florida,” wrote MSNBC host Mehdi Hasan. “Laura Loomer, a far-right anti-Muslim candidate who was once banned from CPAC as well as multiple online platforms, should be nowhere close to winning this GOP primary race.”

Mother Jones’ Ali Breland suggested Loomer might be the first person to “ever run a congressional campaign that was about trying to be racist on Twitter.”

“You can’t formally measure racism,” he wrote. “But if you could, Laura Loomer would have had a solid chance of becoming the most publicly racist Congressman in the last decade if she had won last night.”