Spring Sale: Get 1 Year, Save 58%

Republicans’ problem with inflation

 As the current debate rages over inflation in America, it’s worth noting that much of this conversation is based on backward-looking data and that things are actually improving.  

While the news coming out today on inflation was stark, the good news is we should see a steady decline for the rest of the year. A report from Blue Chip Economic Indicators 2022 forecasts that the Consumer Price Index will fall to 3.0% by Q4 of 2022, and 2.4% by Q4 of 2023. Also another bit of good news from the report: wage growth outran inflation last month, at least on average. That means that real average hourly earnings for all employees actually increased from November to December.

All things considered, this is promising news, which one would think Republicans would welcome given how often they talk about the issue. But while they have relentlessly politicized this issue, Republicans have done nothing to fight it. If anything, they created this mess with their irresponsible COVID-19 inaction. If Republicans are serious about fighting inflation they would join Democrats in fighting the COVID-19 virus, ending the economic instability it causes. And if they really want to help Americans lower costs they would work with Democrats to pass the Build Back Better Act.

President Joe Biden has responded to the frustrations of the American people, vigorously fighting to bring down inflation. He released oil from the Strategic Petroleum Reserve and worked to fix delays at ports resulting in supply chain issues. Finally, he has taken steps to lower the cost of meat for consumers.  All this was coupled with the policies in the Build Back Better Act, once passed, will drive down costs for all Americans, once it is passed. 

RELATED: Humility is the Democrats’ Kryptonite

These strategic actions have already resulted in the prices of everything from gas and groceries to fall, a trend that is likely to continue this year.  As I have noted here in the past the economy is booming: in just 11 months President Biden has created nearly 6 million jobs, people are buying houses, wages are up, home values are up, personal debt is down, and perhaps most astonishingly, unemployment is back below pre-pandemic levels. Are things where we want them right now? No they are not, we must do more, but Republicans are not helping, if anything they are making things worse.

While Republicans love to talk about inflation they have done nothing to fight it. They also have no plan to fix this problem. Their economic policies have actively contributed to the pain of working-class Americans.  Their stubborn, misguided refusal in 2020 to follow basic COVID mitigation plans by health experts fueled the spread of this deadly virus. Their failure to fight Covid in 2020 created the inflation we are currently experiencing today. 

As Craig Kirsner, President of Stuart Estate Planning Wealth Advisors recently told Forbes:  “…For the past year and a half due to Covid, hardly anyone was spending money. Now that the economy is back open, people are spending and traveling and, as such, there is a bottleneck with very high demand. Our system isn’t set up for this high demand level, so that causes inflation in the short term.”

To be clear here, inflation is occurring because our economy is growing at a historic rate, the American people have money because the Biden Administration has invested in them. Americans are spending money, buying goods, and driving demand way beyond supply. Are Republicans who complain about inflation arguing that we should be slowing the growth of our economy and that American consumers should stop buying things? How does that make any sense?

Republicans’ abysmal failure to fight Covid brought us to this inflation challenge. It was Republicans who let the Coronavirus rage out of control and did not follow basic protocols to fight the virus with all the tools and their disposal.  

Our economy was shut down because Republicans did not take science seriously. Particularly outrageous, is the fact that they still do not take the virus seriously as they actively promote not wearing masks and not getting vaccinated. They are in part responsible for the pain and loss Americans continue to experience. Remarkably, Republicans are still not taking the virus seriously with Florida Senator Marco Rubio recently calling people’s reaction to the surge in Omicron cases “irrational hysteria.” Perhaps even more baffling Florida Governor Ron Desantis, amidst a testing shortage, actually let an entire warehouse full of Covid-19 tests expire.

Defeating COVID-19 is an economic imperative for all workers. Democrats have invested heavily in the American people, they have fought tirelessly to ensure the American worker was supported during the ongoing Coronavirus Pandemic. 

Biden and Democrats are waging an all-out assault on the coronavirus, to save lives, jobs, homes and to ensure Americans were fed during this crisis. Democrats led efforts to get 200 million people vaccinated, got them back to work, opened up our economy, and continue to invest in the American people.  These proactive actions taken fortified our country against the effects of Covid and the inflation voters are currently experiencing. 

Sadly, Republicans do not care that when they actively stoke the fires of anti-vaccination and anti-mask wearing, they are hurting our economy and our people. Republicans still have an opportunity to help fight costs related to inflation: they must join Democrats and pass the Build Back Better Act.  Recently 15 Nobel Laureate Economists released an open letter saying: “Because this agenda (BBBA) invests in a long-term economic capacity and will enhance the ability of more Americans to participate productively in the economy, it will ease longer-term inflationary pressures.” That’s on top of a letter released last year from 56 economists urging Congress to pass the Build Back Better Act and lower everyday costs for working families. These economists noted that those investments, along with tax cuts for the middle class, will ease the burden of inflation on Americans and allow them to keep more money in their pockets. 

It is unconscionable that Republicans continue to play politics with inflation, peoples’ livelihood, and their lives. Republicans have an opportunity to help relieve the economic pain of all Americans by passing the Build Back Better Act, and they are choosing not to. The next time you hear a Republican complain about inflation, take a moment and remember two things: The reason we are in this mess is because of their economic policies, and their failure to fight COVID created the inertia that led to higher prices for consumers. 

Will we really let ourselves be governed by irredeemable idiots? That’s the choice, America

As a thought experiment, see if you can consider any of today’s societal problems independent of politics. You may find it impossible, since many of us believe our problems are caused by our divisive politics.  

Voting rights. Climate change. The pandemic. Health care. The economy. Education. Infrastructure. All of them have a political component, and because of that a good argument could be made that divisive politics is the single largest problem we face.  

Nothing is more representative of that than Wednesday’s revelation that Republicans in several states forged electoral-vote letters on behalf of the former president in the 2020 presidential election. It does have the virtue of perhaps proving there was fraud in that election — but not by the Democrats.

RELATED: National Archives: Trump allies caught using forged documents to overturn 2020 election

If that doesn’t convince you, then watch Republican Sen. Rand Paul of Kentucky grill Dr. Anthony Fauci on Tuesday during a public hearing over the COVID pandemic. Engaged in a blatant effort to score political points with his “fans” (not his constituents), Paul verbally assaulted a government employee who is trying to deal with a crippling pandemic. Though Fauci has no power to impose mask mandates — or much of anything else — that hasn’t stopped Paul from calling him a “petty tyrant.” Kentucky’s junior senator has been Fauci’s chief Senate tormentor during the pandemic and has turned a health crisis into a blood sport. Fauci, who finally seems to have had enough, pointed out Tuesday that Paul has not only been harassing him, leading to death threats against Fauci and his family, but also fundraising off the harassment. 

What the hell took Fauci so long to call out Rand Paul? 

Yes, politics is the problem. President Biden also tried to deal with that Tuesday as he traveled to Georgia and spoke about voting rights and the need to get rid of the Senate filibuster in order to pass crucial voting legislation by simple majority vote. Kentucky’s senior senator, Mitch McConnell, threatened retribution if the Democrats modify the filibuster. Of course. Republicans don’t want to rely on a simple majority — they don’t have one. And perhaps the move says something else about the two senators from the Bluegrass State, neither of whom was actually born in the Commonwealth of Kentucky.

RELATED: Biden must make clear what Republicans know: The fight for democracy is a struggle over racism

“The goal of the former president and his allies is to disenfranchise anyone who votes against them,” Biden said, arguing for a national law guaranteeing voter access. “Simple as that. The facts won’t matter. Your vote won’t matter. They’ll just decide what they want, and then do it. That’s the kind of power you see in totalitarian states. Not in democracies.” He warned us that “the battle for the soul of America is not over.”

“I’ve been having these quiet conversations with members of Congress for the last two months,” the president said. “I’m tired of being quiet.” 

As Bruce Willis said in “Die Hard”: “Welcome to the party, pal.”

What the hell took you so long to get here?

In some circles, the mere suggestion of modifying the filibuster is treated as tantamount to removing someone’s lungs to cure a fever. Of course, that nonsensical reasoning comes from the same political party with members who cannot openly denounce Nazis, while endorsing taking horse deworming pills, injecting bleach and drinking their own urine — either to battle the coronavirus or perhaps because they don’t live in states where marijuana is legal and edibles are not readily available. I imagine weekends in those areas are mighty dull if you can’t ingest bleach and drink your own urine.


Want a daily wrap-up of all the news and commentary Salon has to offer? Subscribe to our morning newsletter, Crash Course.


I’m siding with science and common sense and right now only the Democrats seem to exhibit any common sense or belief in science. At least they aren’t advocating imbibing a libation made from your own micturition. At this point the Republican Party has no conscience. It is a party of fascists; angry, small-minded people with no sense of empathy,  overwhelmed by their own greed and avarice. Privately they may condemn the “Big Lie,” but they don’t have the temerity to do so publicly. They let the lies spread.

That’s how the remnants of the Republican Party are scamming millions of Americans, by publicly pretending that knowledge and science are political commodities to be traded in the public arena, like pork belly futures. And journalists are aiding and abetting their efforts.

RELATED: Right-wing media and the pandemic: A toxic feedback loop that nurtured fascism

In our struggle to be balanced and fair in the media (and with all due respect, we’ve never been either of those things), we give ignorance and charlatanism a seat at the table and feed this pair of reprobates regularly. Face it: The American public has a soft spot for soft heads and rewards these dotards with attention, repeated viewing and reading. So it isn’t just reporters. The whole country loves idiots. Reporters are just paying the bills by giving the people what they want — gullible, angry stupidity. 

The news business is horribly fractured and, in some circles, divisive reporting is seen as an even bigger problem than divisive politics. 

As Sam Donaldson writes in the foreword of my new book “Free the Press” — which will be released this week — “Today the cry of ‘fake news’ and denunciation of the press as ‘enemies of the people’ hounds the work of even the most careful and honest of news organizations, and the worst purveyors of off-the-wall conspiracy theories and laugh-out-loud falsehoods are followed with slavish devotion in the name of the First Amendment’s freedom of the press.” 

There is something to that too. Nothing could be easier than to fool a self-righteous, ignorant and arrogant reporter — and there are plenty of those around.

As H.L. Mencken pointed out, what ails most reporters is that they are people “without sufficient force of character to resist the blandishments” that surround them from the moment they set foot in Washington. “Journalists are, in the main, extremely stupid, sentimental and credulous fellows — because nothing is easier than to fool them,” Mencken warned us.

Today the overwhelming arrogance and stupidity of most reporters is a direct result of media monopolies eliminating jobs and hiring inexperienced and cheaper reporters while downsizing newsrooms in order to increase profits. That has left us with  inexperienced reporters who don’t know how to cover City Hall, much less the White House. 

We can’t “call them as we see them,” because most of us don’t know what we’re looking at. 

We’re looking at fascists. 

The Republican party is a fascist party. Moreover, it is a corporate fascist party.

It backed the Jan. 6 insurrection. It wants to curb voting rights.

It labels any forward-looking legislation, such as infrastructure, universal health care and family leave as “socialist” policies. It is a party that overwhelmingly and publicly backs a man who pushed an insurrection to overturn legitimate election results. The members of this party only care about their own power, nothing for you. And they want to exploit you for everything you’re worth — which, to them, is what you can bring to the table as a corporate indentured servant.

Yet we in the press have a hard time, because of our lack of experience combined with our sense of fair play, framing this narrative correctly — even as people like former Rep. Joe Walsh, former Trump fixer Michael Cohen, former Trump adviser Anthony Scaramucci, former Sen. Jeff Flake, longtime Republican lawyer George Conway and dozens of others have broken ranks and denounced their former colleagues for what they are. 

If you can separate politics from our problems, then take a look at the solutions proposed by the two major parties in this country and compare and contrast those proposals. In some cases, I question whether the Democratic Party understands the root cause of some of our problems. Their solutions are questionable at times.

But that still puts them light years ahead of the Republicans, who often have no answers at all. The stock in trade of the Republican Party is to make you afraid, bitter and resentful. They can only blame someone else, tear down reasonable solutions and counter science with bleach and urine.

RELATED: Don’t bleach it away: Remembering the day Trump turned the GOP into a death cult

“Keep the faith,” as Biden said Tuesday. “Let’s go get this done.”

When has a president been so direct and dire in his assessment of our country’s future — and yet still so hopeful? The last one to exhibit those traits was Franklin D. Roosevelt — also a Democrat, who faced similar backlash as he battled the Great Depression.

Faith can move mountains. But it takes a real butt-kicking to move some politicians.

Does Biden have the shoe leather for that?

The need is demonstrable every day. At one point during the Senate hearings on Tuesday, Republican Sen. Roger Marshall of Kansas asked Dr. Fauci a patently stupid question about Fauci’s income, blaming “big tech giants” for keeping that information from the public. The accusation was so unbelievably stupid (since Fauci’s finances are already a matter of public record) that Fauci shot back, “All you have to do is ask for it. You’re so misinformed it’s extraordinary.”

RELATED: Fauci’s fed up: Hot mic catches top COVID doctor mocking GOP senator as a “moron”

Then, as Fauci pulled away from the mic, he could be heard muttering, “What a moron! Jesus Christ.”

Yes. Morons. It sounds like a religion complete with its own Moron Tabernacle Choir (with apologies to the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints). We elected these morons. We get the government we deserve when so few of us vote and when so few of us are educated about the issues, and especially when we treat politicians as if they were professional wrestlers and we’re eager to see a smackdown. How close are we to seeing a President Dwayne Elizondo “Mountain Dew” Herbert Camacho?

As legendary TV newsman Edward R. Murrow said at the Radio, Television, News Directors Association annual meeting in 1958, “This nation is now in competition with malignant forces of evil who are using every instrument at their command to empty the minds of their subjects and fill those minds with slogans … we are engaged in a great experiment to discover whether a free public opinion can devise and direct methods of managing the affairs of the nation. We may fail. But in terms of information, we are handicapping ourselves needlessly.”

The day of reckoning is nigh upon us, and the midterm elections this year could decide for years to come whether or not we continue as a democracy. If we are successful, we have to quit playing games and get serious about reality.

As the computer Joshua warns us at the end of the movie “War Games”: “A strange game. The only winning move is not to play.”

Joshua was talking about global thermonuclear war. That’s hardly a game. But politics isn’t a “game” either. It’s supposed to be a way of working out our problems together in pursuit of common goals.

It would be nice if the American electorate were as smart as a fictional computer from a movie produced in 1984.

How to make sauce out of your pan’s brown bits (aka fond)

Inspired by conversations on the Food52 Hotline, we’re sharing tips and tricks that make navigating all of our kitchens easier and more fun.

Today: Don’t wash away them most flavorful bits in your pan. They’re called fond, and they’re the start of a very good pan sauce. Here’s what you need to know.

Picture this: You’re frying chicken breasts, maybe pan-searing a porterhouse steak. You’re basting it with rosemary- and garlic-infused browned butter, letting the caramelized, fatty butter coat the juicy meat. You remove said chicken or steak from the pan (ideally you’re using stainless steel or cast-iron) and see that there are all of these little browned bits stuck to the bottom of the pan. These caramelized bits, also known as fond, are culinary gold. They’re packed with so much flavor and are the base for gravy, or a red wine or white wine pan sauce.

What is fond?

In the universe of cooking, fond is the dark matter. Undetectable in a finished dish, these concentrated brown bits may seem small, but the impact they have on flavor is huge. Fond, quite simply, is the stuff that sticks to your pan after browning meat or vegetables on the stove top, or at the bottom of a roasting pan after it has come out of the oven. Pour off the oil or any remaining cooking liquid, and these stuck little bits will remain, daring you scrub to them away — but if you’re a smart cook, you’ll turn them into a rich, lip-smacking pan sauce.

How does fond form?

A quick note about the pronunciation and definition of fond: “Fond” (pronounced fahnis literally translated to mean “the bottom” or “base.” In classical French cooking, the word is also used to mean “stock,” another common base for various recipes. Fond is formed when proteins are exposed to heat, turning food that was once tender and pink into something crusty and brown. Chemists call this process the Maillard reaction, wherein a rainbow of chemicals erupt from the denatured proteins, unlocking flavor combinations that humans are hard-wired to find irresistible. Though similar, caramelization happens at a higher temperature than the Maillard reaction and to sugars instead of proteins. That being said, the two reactions often work together when both sugar and proteins are present.

However they find themselves there, these tasty bits are at the core of classical cooking. Of the five mother sauces that culinary school hopefuls memorize, at least three are based on fond and the technique known as deglazing — these include velouté, espagnole, and sauce tomate. Deglazing reintroduces fond to liquid, loosening and dispersing all of those concentrated flavors back into your dish. Flavor the fond with the addition of an aromatic or two — such as shallots or garlic — thicken it with flour, tomato, or vegetables, and you have the blueprint for hundreds of sauces and gravies

How to make a pan sauce

For a simple pan sauce, return the fond-encrusted hot pan to a medium-high or high heat. Use a wooden spoon to scrape the bottom of the pan and start to release the fond. Add minced onion, shallots, and/or garlic, and when the liquid from these begins to cook away — before you burn them! — add liquid (think: white wine for chicken, red wine for steak, tequila and lime juice would be delicious for chicken or bourbon for pork chops, but stock or water work just fine too, if that’s what you have). The acidity from the wine will help release the caramelized bits from the bottom of the pan; the alcohol will cook away during this process but you could also use a squeeze of lemon juice or a tiny splash of good-quality vinegar as a substitute. Scrape up the bits of fond into the bubbling deglazing liquid. After a minute or two, add a cup of water and deglaze again until the sauce is reduced by two-thirds. It should look thick, have a rich brown color, and resemble syrup or gravy. 

From dirty pan to a delicious sauce, the cooking process should take about five minutes — well worth it for a major upgrade to a piece of meat.

The best pans for your pan sauces

When it comes to cookware, some pans are more conducive to fond than others. Enamel-coated cast iron, in particular, gives great fond. And be sure that your scraping is done with a wooden spoon or similarly soft utensil like a silicone spatula, especially if you are using non-stick pans. No pan sauce calls for bits of Teflon and by using a metal utensil against a nonstick coating, you risk scratching the coating (most nonstick pans are made without the harmful coating these days but still, why ruin a pan when you don’t have to?).

It’s also important not to crowd your pan; when browning, give your protein or vegetable enough room to develop a healthy crust. Overcrowded pans, like overcrowded elevators, beget sweat and steam. You won’t get fond under these spa-like conditions.

When roasting a bird or other large piece of meat, you can maximize the fond by loading your roasting pan with some onions, carrots, and celery and perching the protein above it. As the meat cooks, releasing fond-laden juices, the vegetables will caramelize, adding aroma and depth. In this case, your pan sauce is essentially done. Deglaze with wine or even water, and you’ll never bid fond farewell again.

Additional recommendations from Food52 editors:

When it comes to pan sauces made from fond, most start with meat — you can’t always replicate those drippings with plant-based fat. If you’ve never turned fond into sauce before, making pan sauce from roast chicken drippings is an easy way to start, as you’ve done most of the work already. Merrill’s roast chicken, served with garlicky, herby pan sauce comes together by plopping the chicken-roasting pan directly onto the stove, to which butter, thyme, wine, and garlic are added. Chrissy Teigen has a recipe for an even quicker version, though the sauce has a few more ingredients: meet her Crispy-Skinned Chicken With Lemon-Rosemary Pan Sauce, made with seared, then oven-finished bone-in chicken breasts; to the fond, she adds garlic, red pepper flakes, rosemary, broth, heavy cream, and lemon juice.

Steak is another simple fond-producing meat that makes for pan sauces so good you may feel compelled to lick the searing-hot pan, like this salty-sweet brown sugar, fish sauce, and lime butter version served over a single-serving strip steak or ribeye. Or maybe a classic Steak au Poivre, made with shallots, black pepper, Cognac, and cream is more your speed? And when feeding a crowd, there may be no simpler fond-based sauce than this standing rib roast’s: just red wine, plum jam, butter, and pan drippings.

But guess what? You don’t actually need a piece of meat, nor their drippings to generate fond for pan sauce — butter or oil, heat, and some kind of vegetable will do the job, best served over pasta. As is the case with this fennel pasta, where you’ll caramelize onions and fennel in oil, then stir in white wine and cream. This creamy mushroom pasta is similar; instead, just make the fond with portobello mushrooms and butter, and finish with balsamic vinegar. Or this beyond simple braised onion sauce recipe, made with just butter-caramelized onions, salt, and Madeira.

Dislocation nation: Omicron surge brings another endless war against another unseen enemy

There were several roads through the northern Iraqi city of Mosul that American soldiers of the 101st Airborne Division used to call IED alleys. This was because 30 to 50 improvised explosive devices either exploded or were located and disarmed along the roads in that city nearly every single day. You had your choice of routes to take through the city — Mosul was (and is) a big city, with a population of about 1.2 million at the time the U.S. invaded Iraq in 2003 — but the closer you got to the huge base camp where soldiers from nearly every unit in the division had to go almost every day for supplies of food, ammunition, diesel fuel and repairs, the more dangerous the roads got.

Soldiers weren’t killed or wounded by IEDs in Mosul very often, but Humvees back then weren’t armored. Most had canvas tops but had lost (if they ever had) the canvas doors that typically came with the vehicles, so when you rode through Mosul there was nothing but air between you and whatever dangers were out there. Tactics employed by convoys included varying vehicle speeds, weaving from side to side, maintaining a larger distance than usual between Humvees and, of course, being on the lookout for anything suspicious, like a spot of freshly turned soil or a sudden lack of pedestrians along the roadside. Everyone who had to make a trip down one of the many IED Alleys knew there was a chance you could be hit, but soldiers climbed in their vehicles and drove those roads every single day.

I remember late one afternoon riding in a convoy that made that trip to the base camp to pick up a hot meal for the company. Inside the building where the company was housed, soldiers were chatting with each other, joking around, talking about their score in a video game or the stupid music one of their buddies played too loudly on his boombox. But they fell silent the minute they charged their weapons and started piling into the vehicles outside. The uncertainty was the worst part. You never knew if it might be better to be in the first vehicle in the convoy or the last, or even one of the two or three in the middle. You never knew if the route the convoy leader picked was the right one. If you were honest with yourself, you recognized that the unseen enemy had your fate in his hands. Whether you lived or were wounded or even killed when you went outside the wire wasn’t up to you. 

RELATED: Omicron is surging, and scientists are optimistic. How can both of these things be true?

Back here on the home front, we drive down COVID alleys every single day. As we enter our third year of the war against this deadly disease, it’s the uncertainty that really gets to you. We already went through two surges. Is this surge, or spike as they’re calling it now, the last one? Which route do we take through it? Is it OK to go out to restaurants? NPR reported on Tuesday that COVID-19 hospitalizations around the country had reached “a new pandemic high this week with 145,982 patients hospitalized.” 

And what about our kids? “Pediatric COVID hospitalizations are also at the highest rate of the pandemic,” according to NPR. There are reports in practically every state of school shutdowns — not because of the number of children infected, but because of shortages of teachers, school bus drivers, principals and other administrators, even among custodial staffers.

People are saying it felt better back during the early days of the pandemic because everybody knew what had to be done and we were all in it together … or at least it seemed that way. With businesses and schools closed, you stayed home unless you had to venture out for food and other supplies. Now? “COVID’s latest surge spreads an epidemic of confusion,” the Washington Post headlined a major story on Tuesday:

As Americans push into a third winter of viral discontent, this season has delivered something different: Amid the deep polarization about masks and vaccines, amid the discord over whether and how to return to pre-pandemic life, a strange unity of confusion is emerging, a common inability to decipher conflicting advice and clashing guidelines coming from government, science, health, media and other institutions. The messages are muddled: Test or don’t test? Which test? When? Isolate or not? For five days? Ten? Go to school or not? See friends and resume normal life, or hunker down again — and if so, for how long, to what end?

New cases have hit a seven-day average of more than 760,000, according to figures kept by the New York Times. Deaths on Tuesday hit 2,654, with a seven-day average of 1,735. We are smack in the middle of the latest spike in the disease.  More than 840,000 of us have lost our lives. 

But with the omicron variant running rampant across the country, businesses are open and some offices have returned to at least partial in-person work. Sit-down restaurants are serving meals. Supermarkets and big box stores and pharmacies and most mom-and-pop neighborhood businesses are also open. But according to the Kaiser Family Foundation, “three in 10 American adults remain unvaccinated.” And they are not a “monolith.” “Their reasons, backgrounds, politics and willingness to eventually get vaccinated all vary,” according to FiveThirtyEight. According to CNN, something like 60 percent of the unvaccinated are Republicans, but they’re not clustered in red states. They’re not wearing signs around their necks saying, “I refuse.” They’re everywhere. You can’t avoid them.


Want a daily wrap-up of all the news and commentary Salon has to offer? Subscribe to our morning newsletter, Crash Course.


That would have mattered a lot more with the delta variant, but not so much this time. Everybody is spreading the virus — vaxxed and unvaxxed alike. The unvaccinated get sicker, and their numbers account for the steep uptick in hospitalizations, which are putting excess pressure on medical professionals and hospital staff at all levels. But even if you’re vaccinated and boosted and have had a “breakthrough” case of COVID, you’re still vulnerable. In fact, usage of the word “breakthrough” is pretty much over. If you get it these days, you’ve got it, and that’s that.

I used the IED metaphor because that’s what this stage of the disease feels like: a war. But like our other endless wars, this one doesn’t have a front line or an enemy you can see or any guarantees of safety if you follow guidelines approved by experts. In Iraq and Afghanistan, every soldier was an expert because nobody knew any more than anyone else. Remember “counterinsurgency” and “asymmetrical warfare?” How’d that work out for us? We lost three wars listening to “experts” who thought they could tell us exactly how to fight an unseen enemy. 

Every trip outside your own home is a trip outside the wire. Every store, every restaurant, every office, every movie theater, every interior space is an IED alley in this conflict without borders. We’re fighting yet another endless war against an unseen enemy : So get your shots, wear your mask and, as soldiers have said since Alexander’s time, stay safe. 

Read more on what we know about the omicron surge:

How omicron is affecting children more than previous strains

Last week, the number of hospitalized children infected with COVID-19 rose to the highest levels seen since the beginning of the pandemic.

According to data released by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, the increase was most significant in children who were 4 and younger — an age group that is still not eligible for vaccination. An estimated more than 4 in 100,000 children under the age 5 were hospitalized with COVID-19 as of January 1, 2022, which is double the rate reported a month ago and about three times the rate of children under 5 being hospitalized this time last year. Since the beginning of the pandemic, 8.5 million children have tested positive for COVID-19. Nearly 11% of those cases were added in the past two weeks.

“There is an urgent need to collect more age-specific data to assess the severity of illness related to new variants as well as potential longer-term effects,” the American Academy of Pediatrics stated in a recent report. “It is important to recognize there are immediate effects of the pandemic on children’s health, but importantly we need to identify and address the long-lasting impacts on the physical, mental, and social well-being of this generation of children and youth.”

Is it possible that, unlike previous variants of the coronavirus that caused mild COVID-19 cases in children, omicron is causing more severe infection in children — especially those who are unvaccinated?


Want more health and science stories in your inbox? Subscribe to Salon’s weekly newsletter The Vulgar Scientist.


Fortunately, not exactly. Doctors tell Salon they don’t believe that’s the case because those who are being hospitalized typically have less severe hospitalized cases compared to those hospitalized during the delta wave, even though there weren’t as many children being hospitalized at that time. However, omicron does appear to be anecdotally affecting children differently.

“What we’re seeing is that children who are being admitted to the hospital with COVID-19 now are younger, and generally don’t have as severe of symptoms as previous surges,” said Dean Blumberg, chief of pediatric infectious diseases and associate professor in the Department of Pediatrics at the University of California, Davis. “During the surge last winter, and during delta, we were seeing more teenagers admitted to the hospital and they had pneumonia, lower respiratory tract disease, and they were being admitted to the ICU because they needed to be on the ventilator or other oxygen support.”

When asked if the omicron variant affects children differently than other variants, Dr. Natasha Burgert, a pediatrician and spokesperson for the American Academy of Pediatrics, told Salon in her offices, they are seeing “similar symptoms and illness severity as we have during previous waves.” Meaning, that in non-hospitalized patients, the symptoms don’t appear to be any more severe in children than with previous strains.

“Most kids in our area are presenting with sore throat, congestion, fatigue, cough and fever. less commonly they are presenting with vomiting and diarrhea, the difference with omicron is the sheer number of kids that are getting sick at the same time,” Burgert said. “I’ve never seen an illness that is able to so quickly take down all members of a family, and since it’s so tough to take care of a sick kid when you are not feeling well yourself — it’s making this wave feel particularly daunting.”

Indeed, scientists believe that omicron is two to three times as likely to spread as delta, but they don’t exactly know why that’s the case. A team of British scientists found that omicron excels at infecting cells in the nose, suggesting that when people breathe out through their noses, they release new viruses. The variant is also better than previous ones at escaping antibodies produced by previous infections and vaccines, which could factor into its increased contagiousness. However, it’s the increased transmissibility of the variant which makes doctors believe is the cause of more children being hospitalized with this variant.

“Omicron has proven to be the most contagious variant of the pandemic so far,” Burgert said. “With people being able to spread and contract the disease so easily, it’s not a surprise that so many children are getting infected.”

But there could be differences due to the properties of the variant, as Blumberg said, that mean the variant is affecting children differently than before. Blumberg told Salon that these younger patients, often under the age of five, “have more complications that we commonly see with other respiratory viruses that are transmitted in the community.”

“Things like bronchiolitis, or croup, that you can see with any common respiratory virus such as parainfluenza virus, adenovirus, RSV, and others,” Blumberg said. “So it does seem to be different and I don’t know if that’s because the virus itself is behaving differently or that children under 5 are more susceptible because they’re not eligible for vaccination.”

There is mounting laboratory evidence suggesting that omicron is less dangerous than delta because it doesn’t appear to infect cells in the lungs. Instead, it is more efficient at affecting cells in the upper respiratory tract. According to one study, in the first 24 hours, researchers observed omicron multiplying about 70 times faster inside the respiratory-tract tissue. As one coronavirus researcher explained to StatNews: “If your lungs don’t work, then your heart has to work harder, your kidneys have to work harder; there’s a big difference between pneumonia and an upper respiratory-tract infection.” Hence, why upper respiratory-tract infections like the barking cough croup and bronchiolitis are appearing in children with omicron when they hadn’t previously.

Blumberg cautions that while omicron is likely more mild, there is so much to learn about how omicron affects children — adding that he fears there is a lot of “mixed messaging” is a bit confusing.

“On the one hand, I think people are saying, it’s not so bad, it might result in a lot of immunity in the population, and so it may be our way out of the pandemic,” Blumberg said. “On the other hand, the kids who get COVID can be severely infected, and there can be a long-term impact.”

For example, a report from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention stated that children with COVID-19 could be twice as likely to be diagnosed with diabetes after a coronavirus infection, compared to those who had not had the virus. And then there’s long COVID-19 in children, which has yet to be fully understood. Doctors still don’t know if omicron will lead to long COVID in kids.

“We won’t have that answer for weeks,” Burgert said. “In addition, we won’t know how much immunity people are getting from the disease for quite some time.”

Blumberg said to protect younger, unvaccinated kids, parents can “double down” on what we know works to protect them.

“And that’s to ensure that everybody in the household is fully vaccinated and boosted, and that’s anybody who’s eligible for vaccination, that people wear masks when they’re indoors and around people outside of their usual households,” Blumberg said. “And kids as young as two can mask safely and can learn to do that consistently and routinely.”

Read more on kids and COVID-19:

Militant leader of flight attendants’ union may seek biggest labor job in America

Sara Nelson, president of the Association of Flight Attendants, who had signaled her intention to challenge longtime AFL-CIO president Richard Trumka’s re-election prior to his fatal heart attack last August, is considering pursuing that run against Liz Shuler, who was elevated from the labor federation’s secretary-treasurer post after quickly consolidating her support among some of its largest member unions. 

Shuler is filling out Trumka’s term, which will expire in June, when the annual AFL-CIO convention will feature an election for a full three-year term.

At the time she was elevated, Shuler said, “I believe in my bones the labor movement is the single greatest organizing force for progress. This is a moment for us to lead societal transformations — to leverage our power to bring women and people of color from the margins to the center — at work, in our unions and in our economy, and to be the center of gravity for incubating new ideas that will unleash unprecedented union growth.”

Shuler started her labor union career in 1993 where she went to work for the International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers in her native Oregon, where she organized clerical workers at Portland General Electric.She lobbied that state’s legislature for the union, and in 1998 attracted attention from the AFL-CIO when she led its drive to defeat a California bill that would have ended dues check-off rights for that state’s public employee unions and their members.

That earned her a promotion that sent her to Washington, D.C., to work in the IBEW’s political/legislative affairs department, and in 2004 she became executive assistant to union president Edwin Hill. Five years later, she was tapped by Trumka, who was seeking the AFL-CIO presidency, to run with him for secretary-treasurer.

While Shuler’s move up the AFL-CIO hierarchy has been the favored route to the organization’s presidency, Nelson will counting on her elevated profile as an outspoken leader of a militant union if she runs against someone who, at 52, is just three years older than her and the first woman to hold the most powerful job in the labor movement.

RELATED: Unions warned the CDC’s mask rollback would have consequences. They were right

Talk of Nelson seeking the job first surfaced in 2020, and in a recent interview she said the change at the top prompted by Trumka’s death had not derailed that idea.

“Americans want solidarity, and they are hurting,” she said. “They are looking for answers. You see that unrest everywhere. We have a moment where we have to harness the power of the labor movement that exists today to organize millions more people.”

Nelson added, “People don’t really have rights at work until they vote for their union and gain the rights of not only a union contract” but the union’s power to compel a company to abide by the law.

Even so, she added, “The courts, by the way, are stacked in favor of the corporations anyway.”

She said the success of her union, which is part of the Communications Workers of America, and others in the transportation sector in preventing massive layoffs despite a 97% drop in air travel early in the coronavirus pandemic, showed labor’s potential power. In passing the 2020 Payroll Protection Plan for the industry, as part of the Coronavirus Aid Relief and Economic Security (CARES ACT), Congress required airlines to maintain their workforce and not use the billions in federal support for CEO bonuses or stock buybacks.

“But all of that was really [made possible] just through the work of our unions, because 80% of aviation is organized, and with that kind of union density, we could demand that,” Nelson said. “When you give these companies money and tell them they can figure out the best way to spend it to keep their businesses afloat, it doesn’t trickle down to workers and it does create inflation. But our program that put money to the front lines, we see that airline ticket [prices] are actually lower than they were before.”

She said the CARES Act was relevant to the debate over whether President Biden’s $1.75 trillion Build Back Better plan would accelerate inflation.

“This idea that if you invest in the people of this country there is going to be inflation is absurd; we showed it’s otherwise,” Nelson said.

The last contested race to lead the AFL-CIO was in 1995, between Tom Donahue, then the incumbent secretary-treasurer, and John Sweeney, president of the Service Employees Union International.

The backdrop for that election was a steep decline in the percentage of unionized American workers. In 1979, 22% of the nation’s workers were in a union. By 1995, that proportion had dropped to 15.5%. It currently hovers at just over 10%.

Until Sweeney’s successful challenge, “the heads of the AFL-CIO were elected and basically served until they were carried out in a coffin,” said labor historian Joshua Freeman, a professor emeritus at the City University of New York Graduate School of Labor and Urban Studies.  

Trumka, then the president of the United Mine Workers, was part of Sweeney’s winning slate as secretary-treasurer.

Rather than rank-and-file voting, Freeman noted, “The [AFL-CIO] president is elected by a convention of the constituent unions,” whose votes are weighted based on the size of each union.


Want a daily wrap-up of all the news and commentary Salon has to offer? Subscribe to our morning newsletter, Crash Course.


He observed that Nelson’s challenge would come at a time of upheaval for America’s workers: According to the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, 13.1 million American workers quit their jobs from September through November last year — that number is a half-million more than the AFL-CIO’s current membership.

In this instance, Mr. Freeman said, “a lot of the dissatisfaction of workers, and their actions, have been taking place outside of a union context. So this is kind of a labor moment, but the union movement hasn’t yet taken advantage of it institutionally on a large scale.”

In a survey of workers who quit their positions, a Washington Post columnist got hundreds of online comments and dozens of emails from readers who described how “pandemic working conditions finally drove them out of jobs they would otherwise have stayed in,” in many cases because “their employers didn’t take the COVID-19 threat or their concerns about it seriously.”

Throughout the pandemic, the AFL-CIO and its constituent unions have been pressing the federal government, under both Donald Trump and Joe Biden, to implement workplace safety standards to protect essential workers from the virus.

“We are still in the midst of a deadly pandemic, and health care workers are facing dangerous exposures to COVID-19 and need the strongest possible protections in their workplaces,” Shuler tweeted on Jan. 5. “We must treat the surge in new cases as the crisis that it is.”

The same day, the AFL-CIO led a coalition of nurses’ unions in petitioning the U.S. Court of Appeals to order the Department of Labor’s Occupational Safety and Health Administration to issue a permanent standard that requires employers to protect health care workers against the virus.

Nelson said, “We need leadership and consistency to mitigate the spread and evolution of COVID. Battling this pandemic is a workplace safety issue and a layered approach. We need three components working together to keep people safe.

“First, access and incentives along with negotiated mandates for the vaccine with supportive paid sick leave and medical accommodations,” she continued. “Second, mask mandates for indoor, populated workspaces, including the public, and third, universal free COVID testing. When people have good information, resources and clear guidance, we make good decisions and act in solidarity.”

Read more on the pandemic-era comeback of organized labor:

Report debunks Joe Manchin’s inflation argument against Build Back Better

To justify obstructing one of his party’s top legislative priorities, Democratic Sen. Joe Manchin of West Virginia has repeatedly claimed that the Build Back Better Act would exacerbate rising inflation.

But a new report published Wednesday by the congressional Joint Economic Committee (JEC) argues that Democrats’ 10-year, $1.75 trillion reconciliation package would actually relieve inflationary pressures on the economy by slashing the sky-high costs of child care, prescription drugs, housing, and other basic necessities.

“By addressing the threat of climate change,” the report adds, “the bill would reduce the role of fossil fuel price spikes and extreme weather in driving future inflation, insulating the economy from key sources of price spikes that can lead to inflation—just as occurred in 2021.”

The report goes on to argue that because its costs would be funded by tax hikes on rich individuals and large businesses, the Build Back Better Act “does not present the risk of economic overheating—a concern that was waved aside as previous administrations passed trillions of dollars in tax cuts that were never paid for.”

The JEC released its analysis just as the Bureau of Labor Statistics announced Wednesday that the Consumer Price Index—which measures the costs of consumer goods and services—has risen 7% over the past year, the sharpest increase in four decades.

“Very, very troubling,” Manchin said of the new inflation figures.

But Rep. Don Beyer (D-Va.), chair of the JEC, offered a different perspective on the data. While acknowledging that rising prices are “straining household budgets”—particularly for those with low incomes—Beyer disputed the notion that the Build Back Better Act would make matters worse.


Want a daily wrap-up of all the news and commentary Salon has to offer? Subscribe to our morning newsletter, Crash Course.


In fact, Beyer argued in a statement, “the House-passed Build Back Better Act would make crucial investments to lower inflation and cut household costs by investing in workers, boosting productivity and making healthcare and child care more affordable—all while being fully paid for by asking the wealthy and corporations to pay their fair share.”

“The economic recovery and the Federal Reserve’s actions [on interest rates] will bring down short-term inflation in 2022, but the Build Back Better Act presents the best tool at Congress’ disposal to reduce inflationary pressure long-term, build economic resilience, and promote economic growth that is stronger, stable, and more broadly shared.”

Economists have also pushed back on the argument that the Build Back Better package would worsen inflation, which experts say has been fueled by a range of factors, from pandemic-related supply chain disruptions to corporate profiteering.

“There is also no good way to connect the dots between the Build Back Better agenda, which is currently being debated in Congress, and higher inflation,” Mark Zandi, the chief economist at Moody’s Analytics, wrote in a recent CNN op-ed. “The legislation provides support for public infrastructure and various social programs, and longer-term, it is designed to lift the economy’s growth potential, which will ease inflationary pressures.”

RELATED: Joe Manchin apparently no longer supports his own Build Back Better counteroffer

Despite its potential benefits for families, the economy, and the climate, the Build Back Better Act continues to languish in the Senate with no clear path forward as Manchin refuses to drop his objections to the expanded child tax credit (CTC), affordable housing investments, and other key provisions of the bill.

And as the Washington Post reported over the weekend, Manchin no longer even supports his own counteroffer to the White House, which excluded the CTC and other measures.

Nevertheless, Rep. Pramila Jayapal (D-Wash.)—the chair of the Congressional Progressive Caucus—said in a Wednesday appearance on CNBC that she believes Democrats will ultimately be able to pass some compromise version of the Build Back Better Act in the coming weeks.

“In the end, our view is that we can do Build Back Better, very close to the framework that Senator Manchin committed to the president on,” Jayapal said, referring to a proposal the White House released in October. “Right now, we are in the midst of a big push on voting rights… As soon as that is done, probably next week, our attention will turn back to Build Back Better.”

Kevin McCarthy lashes out at ‘illegitimate’ Jan. 6 committee — says he’ll refuse to testify

Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy said in a statement Wednesday night that he will refuse a request to testify before the House Select Committee investigating the Capitol insurrection.

“Pelosi’s select committee is illegitimate,” McCarthy wrote on Twitter above a link to his statement, hours after the chair of the committee, Rep. Bennie Thompson (D-MS), sent him a letter requesting his testimony.

“This committee is not conducting a legitimate investigation as Speaker Pelosi took the unprecedented action of rejecting the Republican members I named to serve on the committee,” McCarthy said in the statement. “It is not serving any legislative purpose. The committee’s only objective is to attempt to damage its political opponents – acting like the Democrat Congressional Campaign Committee one day and the DOJ the next.”

“The committee has demanded testimony from staffers who applied for First Amendment permits,” he continued. “It has subpoenaed the call records of private citizens and their financial records from banks while demanding secrecy not supported by law. It has lied about the contents of documents it has received. It has held individuals in contempt of Congress for exercising their Constitutional right to avail themselves of judicial proceedings. And now it wants to interview me about public statements that have been shared with the world, and private conversations not remotely related to the violence that unfolded at the Capitol. I have nothing else to add.”


Want a daily wrap-up of all the news and commentary Salon has to offer? Subscribe to our morning newsletter, Crash Course.


“As a representative and the leader of the minority party, it is with neither regret nor satisfaction that I have concluded to not participate with this select committee’s abuse of power that stains this institution today and will harm it going forward,” McCarthy said.

Last May, McCarthy indicated that he would be willing to testify about his phone call with former president Donald Trump that took place as insurrectionists stormed the Capitol.

McCarthy is the third GOP member of Congress to signal that he will not cooperate with requests from the committee for information, joining Rep. Jim Jordan (R-OH) and Rep. Scott Perry (R-PA).

It is now up to the committee to decide whether to subpoena them.

Read more stories like this:

Is my mask good enough to fight Omicron?

The highly transmissible omicron variant is sweeping the U.S., causing a huge spike in covid-19 cases and overwhelming many hospital systems. Besides urging Americans to get vaccinated and boosted, public health officials are recommending that people upgrade from their cloth masks to higher-quality medical-grade masks.

But what does this even mean?

At a recent Senate Health, Education, Labor and Pensions Committee hearing, top public health officials displayed different types of masking. Dr. Rochelle Walensky, director of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, wore what appeared to be a surgical mask layered under a cloth mask, while Dr. Anthony Fauci, chief medical adviser to the president, wore what looked like a KN95 respirator.

Some local governments and other organizations are offering their own policies. Los Angeles County, for instance, will require as of Jan. 17 that employers provide N95 or KN95 masks to employees. In late December, the Mayo Clinic began requiring all visitors and patients to wear surgical masks instead of cloth versions. The University of Arizona has banned cloth masks and asked everyone on campus to wear higher-quality masks.

Questions about the level of protection against covid that masks provide — whether cloth, surgical or higher-end medical grade — have been a subject of debate and discussion since the earliest days of the pandemic. We looked into the question last summer. And as science changes and variants emerge with higher transmissibility, so do opinions.

The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention has not updated its mask guidance since October, before the omicron variant emerged. That guidance doesn’t recommend the use of an N95 respirator but states only that masks should be at least two layers, well-fitting and contain a nose wire.

Multiple experts we consulted said that the current CDC guidance does not go far enough. They also agreed on another point: Wearing a cloth mask is better than not wearing a mask at all, but if you can upgrade — or layer cloth with surgical — now is the time.

Although cloth masks may appear to be more substantial than the paper surgical mask option, surgical masks as well as KN95 and N95 masks are infused with an electrostatic charge that helps filter out particles.

“From the perspective of knowing how covid is transmitted, and what we know about omicron, wearing a higher-quality mask is really critical to stopping the spread of omicron,” said Dr. Megan Ranney, academic dean for the School of Public Health at Brown University.

A large-scale real-world study conducted in Bangladesh and published in December showed that surgical masks are more effective at preventing covid transmission than cloth masks.

So, one easy strategy to improve protection is to layer a surgical mask underneath cloth. Surgical masks can be bought relatively cheaply online and reused for about a week.

Ranney said she advises people who opt for layering to put the better-quality mask, such as the surgical mask, closest to your face, and put the lesser-quality mask on the outside.

If you’re really pressed for resources, Dr. Stephen Luby, a professor specializing in infectious diseases at Stanford University and one of the authors of the Bangladesh mask study, said surgical masks can be washed and reused, if finances are an issue. Nearly two years into the pandemic, such masks are cheap and plentiful in the U.S. and many retailers make them available free of charge to customers as they enter businesses.

“During the study, we told the participants they could wash the surgical masks with laundry detergent and water and reuse them,” Luby said. “You lose some effect of the electrostatic charge, but they still outperformed cloth masks.”

Still, experts maintain that wearing either a KN95 or an N95 respirator is the best protection against omicron, since these masks are highly effective at filtering out viral particles. The “95” in the names refers to the masks’ 95% filtration efficacy against certain-sized particles. N95 masks are regulated by the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, while KN95s are regulated by the Chinese government and KF94s by the South Korean government.

Americans were initially urged not to buy either surgical or N95 masks early in the pandemic to ensure there would be a sufficient supply for health care workers. But now there are enough to go around.

So, if you have the resources to upgrade to an N95, a KN95 or a KF94 mask, you should absolutely do so, said Dr. Leana Wen, a professor of health policy and management at George Washington University. Although these models are more expensive and can be more uncomfortable, they are worth the investment for the safety they provide, she said.

“[Omicron is] a much more contagious virus, so there is a much lower margin of error in regards to the activities you were once able to do without getting infected,” Wen said. “We have to increase our protection in every way, because everything is riskier now.”

Wen also said that though these masks are characterized as one-use, unless you are in a health care setting, KN95s and N95s can be worn more than once. She uses one of her personal KN95s for more than a week at a time.

Another important thing to note is there are many counterfeit N95 and KN95 masks being sold online, so consumers must be careful when ordering them and be sure to get them only from a legitimate, trusted vendor.

The CDC maintains a list of NIOSH-approved N95 respirators. Wirecutter and The Strategist have both published guides to purchasing approved KN95 and KF94 masks. Ranney also recommends consulting the website Project N95 or engineer Aaron Collins’ “Mask Nerd” YouTube channel.

And remember, the risk of transmission depends not just on the mask you wear but also the masking practices of others in the room — so going into a meeting or restaurant where others are unmasked or wearing only cloth masks increases the odds of getting infected, no matter how careful you are. This chart demonstrates the huge differences.

Even with a mask upgrade, if you are still worried about omicron and, in particular, a serious case of covid, the No. 1 thing you can do to protect yourself is get vaccinated and boosted, said Dr. Neal Chaisson, an assistant professor of medicine at the Cleveland Clinic.

“There’s been a lot of talk about people who have been vaccinated getting omicron,” said Chaisson. “But I’ve been working in the ICU and probably 95% of the patients that we’re taking care of right now did not take the advice to get vaccinated.”

This story also ran on PolitiFact

“Eternals” – Marvel consulted me to help superheroes chit chat in Babylonian

In the Marvel film “Eternals” you’ll hear lines of Babylonian being spoken. It is the first major film to feature this ancient Iraqi language, which was spoken from at least 2000 BC to at least 500 BC.

Our knowledge of Babylonian comes from written sources, usually clay tablets in cuneiform script. The surviving body of these inscriptions, together with those in Babylonian’s close relative Assyrian, comprises some 10 million words. Thanks to this huge documentation, the language is well understood, and we have a good idea how it was pronounced — it was written with vowels, and there are ancient transcriptions into the Hebrew and Greek alphabets.

As I am one of the few researchers in the world who specialise in the Babylonian language, Marvel brought me on board as consultant to do the translations for the film and make sure that the words were pronounced authentically. This involved me providing written text and audio recordings, which the actors processed with the help of the film’s expert dialect coach, Sarah Shepherd.

I was not new to working with Babylonian in a film context, but “Eternals” presented a new set of challenges. For this language in particular, it’s exceptionally difficult to come up with words for more informal and chatty conversations.

Translating into a long-dead language

My first foray into Babylonian in film was with a short I directed in the language (“The Poor Man of Nippur“) with my students at the University of Cambridge. This was a dramatization of a Babylonian folk tale, and, though we smuggled in the odd line from elsewhere, it only used sentences from Babylonian sources. So the script didn’t require us to compose anything new.

In 2019, I also worked for the film “Godzilla: King of the Monsters” translating a song into Babylonian for the soundtrack. The elegy-like song had a “heroic” feel to it, and was quite similar to the sorts of things found in Babylonian poems. This meant that I had clear models to follow, which helped a lot with my work. I think I did it in an afternoon.

https://youtu.be/pjKDxWhPJqU

“Eternals” was different. It did include a “heroic” speech, for which I had plenty of models. But there were also shorter, snappier, colloquial-sounding expressions, such as “Can I help you?” and “Thank you.” These were much harder to translate, and really tested my grasp of the language to the limit. It was a paradox of the whole experience that things which sounded easy and natural to an English ear gave me kittens, while more highfalutin and complicated expressions proved much easier.

The difficulty in translating colloquial speech is that Ancient Mesopotamia was a world in which writing was a specific tool, used for specific things. Though we are lucky to have a huge mass of (wonderfully informative) documentation, most things went unwritten, and the tone of what did get written was rarely colloquial. This comes across very clearly in Babylonian private letters: they have a business-like, “transactional” character, with little or no chatty or gossipy messages to family and friends, such as we enjoy reading and writing today. For Babylonians, informal and chatty conversation happened only in speech, not in writing.

So, to come up with “chatty” Babylonian, I had to reassemble what we find in written documents, and generate expressions for which I had no exact models or parallels.

To take a simple example, early in the film the character Gilgamesh shouts, “Through the gate!” Babylonian documents normally use full sentences, with a verb, and it’s hard to prove how they might have clipped them. Also, Babylonian has a separate word for “city-gate” (abullu rather than bābu), but it seemed to me that with the urgency of the moment Gilgamesh would have used the shorter, more basic word – a bit as if an English speaker said “gate” rather than “gateway.” So I trusted in linguistic common sense, left out the verb, and made it ana libbi bābi “into the gate,” pretty much like the English.

When two words become one

Despite what I’ve said about the difficulty of accessing “chatty” Babylonian, we do have occasional hints. For example, we know that the prepositions ina “in,” “from” and ana “to, for” were sometimes run together with the word that followed. So “in the house” would become one word ibbīti, rather than the two-word ina bīti.

This raised the question: what to use in such cases, the one-word or two-word version? Hoping that this captured something of ancient usage, I decided to give more formal sounding speech the two-word versions, and more urgent or colloquial speech the one-word version.

https://youtu.be/x_me3xsvDgk

Another exciting challenge was that the film script included many English words that just don’t exist in Babylonian — like “to thank,” “to help,” “to feel,” “to vibrate,” “legend” and “myth.” This is, of course, a problem faced by all translators. There was no general rule for the conversions — each one had to be decided on a case-by-case basis. There was a lot of looking things up to check what phrases were available to me in existing Babylonian sources, to try and make sure everything sounded as “natural” as possible. Thus “myth” became “a lie of the singers,” and for a character who needed to say that they could feel everything around them vibrating I literally had them say “everything around me is constantly touching me,” combining the ideas of “feel” and “vibrate” into an “iterative” form of the verb lapātu “to touch.” I should say that it sounds better in Babylonian than it does in English.

Plus, trying to find the right paraphrase was a stimulus to thinking about what the English words actually mean — how does “to help” differ from “to enable”? And what exactly are we doing when we “thank” someone? These, and others, are things I am still thinking about.

The whole “Eternals” experience was great training in processing Babylonian as a spoken language — something I have always tried to build into my teaching.

Martin Worthington, , Trinity College Dublin

This article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license. Read the original article.

Ina Garten advises us to “drink more large cosmos” after reading Reese Witherspoon’s wellness tips

In a suspicious turn of events, the start of a new calendar year didn’t effectively wipe out the myriad of problems facing humanity. A “new year” typically means a chance for a fresh start, but our struggles are rudely unaffected by that notion. 

Thanks to a supply chain crisis that isn’t going away anytime soon, formerly mundane tasks like trying to shop for groceries and get dinner on the table are enough to make the apocalypse feel near. On top of that, Walmart and Kroger are hiking the price of COVID-19 tests, if you can find one in the first place. Plus, it’s almost time to file income taxes again — and your refund might be smaller. When processing all of this general existential dread, it’s understandably difficult to find balance.

RELATED: 16 Ina Garten recipes to channel your inner Barefoot Contessa

In contrast, those afforded luxuries like staying at home and avoiding sickness have more energy and mental space to focus on the tiers of Maslow’s hierarchy that aren’t essential for survival. You know, fitness, self-realization, wellness  all that good stuff. This class division makes itself especially evident when you examine messages about wellness broadcasted on social media. In a recent Instagram post, Reese Witherspoon shared the healthy habits she wants to adopt in order to improve her daily life. 


Want more great food writing and recipes? Subscribe to “The Bite,” Salon Food’s newsletter.


The four items on her list include kicking the day off with a glass of water and some outdoor light, reading without distraction and getting at least eight hours of sleep. All of these things are certainly respectable, but do we really need a beautiful, blonde, wealthy star of several addicting prestige TV dramas to be our wellness coach?

The simple answer is “no”; we don’t need to be advised on how to feel well. Let’s be honest: No one is whole after two years of this mess. Thankfully, the patron saint of indulging and letting loose when her husband Jeffrey is out of town swooped in to provide a moment of levity.

https://www.instagram.com/p/CYj1esyIAt-/

“That sounds great but I’m probably not doing any of those things!” Ina Garten, the longtime host of Food Network’s “The Barefoot Contessa,” wrote in the comment section of Witherspoon’s post with a laugh.

Garten went on to share her goals, a daily “formula” which she promised would be “easier” to follow: 

1. Drink more large cosmos.

2. Stay up late watching addictive streaming series.

3. Stay in bed in the morning playing Sudoku instead of reading a good book.

4. Spend more time (safely) with people you love.

This is far from the first time Garten has gotten real with her fans. Previously, she suggested an enormous cosmopolitan cocktail was the best way to cope as the world seemingly fell apart. “It’s always cocktail hour in a crisis!” she advised in that viral pandemic video

Indeed, the Barefoot Contessa has long been a symbol of relaxation, complete with her own “30 Rock” cameo to fulfill Liz Lemon’s fantasies of finally getting to relax. In that daydream, Garten appeared with bruschetta and white wine

Hi, neighbor! I’m Ina Garten. My husband Jeffrey is away, and I’ve got some bruschetta and a white white open. Why don’t you come over?

If the woman known for her comforting, foolproof recipes is going to stay up late and binge “Yellowjackets” like the rest of us mere mortals, then that’s good enough for me. I may not be hosting dinner parties in the Hamptons, but I will be putting myself and my comfort before any additional pressure to perform during this unprecedented time. How easy is that?

Simple (Ina-approved!) recipes to make at home: 

Could cannabis prevent COVID? To the authors of a new study, it sure looks like it

A groundbreaking new study published this week identified what could be an unexpected tool in the world’s fight against COVID-19: cannabis.

Yes, you read that right.

According to a peer-reviewed paper published this week in the Journal of Natural Products, titled “Cannabinoids Block Cellular Entry of SARS-CoV-2 and the Emerging Variants,” at least three compounds naturally occurring in the cannabis plant were shown in lab tests to be effective at stopping coronavirus molecules from entering human cells. The mechanism effectively mimics the activity of antibodies, with the cannabis compounds attaching themselves to the virus’ spike protein, one of the authors told Salon. The study concludes:

With widespread use of cannabinoids, resistant variants could still arise, but the combination of vaccination and CBDA/CBGA treatment should create a more challenging environment with which SARS-CoV-2 must contend, reducing the likelihood of escape.

In case any of that is confusing, the authors also included in the paper a handy illustration of the phenomenon:

An illustration showing how cannabinoids can block the entry of SARS-CoV-2 from human cells.An illustration showing how cannabinoids can block the entry of SARS-CoV-2 from human cells. (Courtesy the Journal of Natural Products)

The findings have gone viral, so to speak, trending on Twitter and inspiring much speculation online under the hashtag “#WeedPreventsCOVID.” But don’t reach for that joint just yet — the compounds, CBD-A, CBG-A, and THC-A, are non-psychoactive and degrade at high temperatures, which makes smoking or baking less-than-ideal ways to consume them. Pills or gummies are better, not to mention concentrates that have been designed to maximize the content of these specific substances.

Beyond that, the entire premise must undergo a series of clinical trials before researchers will say for sure whether it works in real life the way it does in the controlled conditions of a lab. Still, Dr. Richard van Breemen, one of the study’s authors and a professor of medicinal chemistry at Oregon State University, says the results are “incredibly promising.” 

“This is by far the biggest response to a study that I’ve encountered in my career,” Dr. Van Breemen told Salon.

“A number of hemp dietary supplements containing these compounds are available over-the-counter all over the country,” he added, meaning if the findings were carried over into successful clinical trials, the preventative treatment would immediately be accessible by millions of Americans. 


Want a daily wrap-up of all the news and commentary Salon has to offer? Subscribe to our morning newsletter, Crash Course.


The entire project was a collaboration between the Linus Pauling Institute and the Global Hemp Innovation Center, both headquartered at Oregon State University, which picked up research into the commercial and pharmaceutical applications of hemp several years ago after the USDA gave academic institutions the greenlight to resume research into hemp following a decades-long moratorium. The paper’s seven authors are all faculty members at either OSU or Oregon Health & Science University.

Researchers set out with the intention of testing a number of botanical extracts that they thought might bind with the spike protein of the SARS-COV-2 virus, which causes COVID-19. Dr. Van Breemen said they went through “dozens” of substances before discovering cannabis worked.

Another compound, this one found in licorice, was also found to reliably bind to the SARS-COV-2 virus — but more research is needed to determine if it will produce the same antiviral activity as the compounds found in cannabis. 

So what does all of this mean for the average person?

Simply put — it’s still too early to tell. But people are unlikely to experience any of the viral protection benefits from ingesting cannabis in a way that will also get them high. Because of the current research restrictions on THC-A (and its connection to the psychoactive compound THC), it will be effectively impossible to continue research into proper application methods for that compound.

Meanwhile, CBD-A and CBG-A are both acids that break down into CBD through the application of heat — a process called “decarboxylation.” That same heating process is responsible for the psychoactive qualities found in marijuana.

RELATED: Omicron is surging, and scientists are optimistic. How can both of these things be true?

While it’s still entirely unclear what dosage level may prove clinically viable, most all over-the-counter hemp supplements have to list their CBD-A and CBG-A content, which will at least make information about a given product’s efficacy easy to determine.

The other good news? It appears that testing suggests the cannabis compounds are effective against all known variants of COVID-19. 

“Our data show minimal impact of the variant lineages on the effectiveness of CBDA and CBGA, a trend that will hopefully extends to other existing and future variants,” the authors write in the study. 

Bryant Terry says he just wrote his last cookbook—but this top chef hasn’t finished leaving his mark

Bryant Terry, the James Beard Award winning chef acclaimed for his efforts to create a just and sustainable food system, is at the top of his game. His cookbook “Vegetable Kingdom” helped Americans interested in adding more vegetables to their diets eat more mindfully as they began to cook at home more than ever during a pandemic. We named it one of the best cookbooks of 2020, as did The Washington Post.

Terry followed up “Vegetable Kingdom” with “Black Food,” which received more rave reviews and again made The Post’s year-end list. (For the record, Salon Food didn’t name the top cookbooks of 2021, but “Black Food” would have definitely made the cut.) It goes without saying that Terry is at the top of his game, so it might come as a surprise that he claims he just wrote his last cookbook. 

RELATED: Lazarus Lynch on the politics and healing power of food: It’s “the conduit for all beautiful things”

“I always told myself I was going to go out when I’m on top. And I just have to say, ‘Vegetable Kingdom’ came out in February 2020, right before the pandemic blew up, shelter in place,” Terry told me when he stopped by our Manhattan studios to film an episode of Salon Talks. “And I was sad — I just thought the book was going to disappear. I was like, this pandemic is just going to overshadow my book.”

“Because people were home, and they were practicing cooking more, and a lot of people were interested in incorporating more vegetables into the diet, the book went on to do phenomenally well, making all these best year-end lists and all that,” he continued. “Coming off of such a successful year as an author in 2020 to this year with ‘Black Food,’ I’m just like, you know what? This is good. I can leave. I can hang the cleats up now.”


Want more great food writing and recipes? Subscribe to Salon Food’s newsletter.


If Terry does hang up his writer’s cleats, er pen, don’t worry. He hasn’t finished leaving his mark on how we cook. “Black Food” is the flagship publication of 4 Color Books, which is his new publishing imprint with Random House’s Ten Speed Press. Terry is currently focused on creating a library that reflects the contributions of diverse and inclusive creators like Rahanna Bisseret Martinez, the teenage chef prodigy

“I want to focus on becoming a better publisher — becoming a good publisher. I’m in a position now where I’ve done the rodeo many times as an author, and I know a lot about the internal logic of publishing — but it’s a whole new ball game,” he told Salon about the new venture. “I like being in a place of discomfort. I like being in a place where I have a lot to learn and a lot to reach for. I’m excited it about doing all that.”

***

When Terry recently appeared on “Salon Talks,” we talked about his new cookbook, simple ways to eat more vegetables every day, and what inspires him to bring his whole self to the kitchen. Run, don’t walk to pick up a copy of “Black Food.” To learn more, watch our conversation here or read our conversation below.

This transcript has been lightly edited for clarity and length.

Those of us who are familiar with your work know that music runs through it. Thus, I wasn’t shocked when I heard you’re also a part-time DJ. Is that right?

Because you’ve been digging in the crates! Yes, you know, I am a jazz aficionado, and I’ve been collecting jazz on vinyl for, I don’t know, two decades now. I have a lot of classics.

RELATED: Click here to order a copy of “Black Food” for your home 

I come out of retirement occasionally to do things like art gallery openings or intimate dinner parties, but that’s about it. I’m not out here doing raves or anything.

I asked you this to connect the dots. It was actually in high school that you listened to a hip-hop song that inspired you to become vegan. Is that also right?

That’s right. “Beef” by — I would argue one of the most important hip hop groups in history — Boogie Down Productions with their lead singer KRS-One. I think, like many people, I was convinced of the kind of propaganda that the meat industry puts in front of us, and I just thought that cows were just kind of running around in fields, and then they just go to sleep and end up on our plate. It was jarring hearing about the violence that takes place in our industrialized food system towards animals. It’s like no turning back after that, you know? I would argue that that moment kind of launched me into my food justice activism.

Now I will say this: Whatever stereotypes you and many of us might have of the dogmatic, self-righteous, judgmental, finger-wagging, on a soapbox all the time vegan — that’s what I became after that. I apologize to my parents weekly because I was such a jerk during that period. But you know, I’m really glad that I went through that period and had that just moment of zeal, because I think any time young people come into a new worldview of philosophy, I think you should be overzealous about this thing that you care about.

But as an educator, as an organizer, what I learned — especially when I ruminate on that period — is that the least effective way of broadening the table, widening the net, bringing more people into a conversation is yelling, screaming at them, judging them and making them feel bad for where they are on their journey. It’s all a part of the process, and it helped me to be a more kind and compassionate person who is interested in helping to shift people’s habits and attitudes and politics but not so heavy-handedly.

That’s why I like your approach to veganism. It comes from a place that’s not about restriction. You really embrace and love vegetables like fennel.

You know about that fennel?

I do know about that fennel. You apply your own cultural approach that runs through time to your approach to veganism. Can you tell us a little bit more about your approach?

My first solo book, my second book, was called “Vegan Soul Kitchen.” I know that when people hear that, they think about soul food. There are a lot of debates around what the title of that book should have been, and ultimately “Vegan Soul Kitchen,” I think, is a great title. But you can’t talk about African-American cuisine without recognizing that it’s a diasporic cuisine. I mean, if you consider the ingredients, flavor profiles, classic dishes, cooking techniques that have traveled from Western Central Africa to the new world, the way that they intermingled with the indigenous ingredients and cooking techniques and classic dishes of this land, and then the influence of European ingredients and cooking. I like to think of it as the original modern global fusion cuisine.

I’m always thinking about how I can nod to these different parts of that diaspora — and really take things that people might simply argue, “Well, that’s just a vegetable!” — but show the way in which you could look at it through the lens of the African diaspora and bring in some of those flavor profiles. My fennel in “Vegetable Kingdom,” where I use mojo, which is this Cuban citrus and garlic sauce, and then the plantain powder. It’s just these subtle things that I like to do to help people expand their ideas of what Black food actually is.

That’s why I asked about the fennel. We’re big fans of fennel here. We have an entire article praising the glories of fennel on Salon Food. It’s written by an Italian-American food writer, so it’s told through his perspective. It’s nice to hear your perspective on fennel and what it means to you.

Yes.

What do you say to people when they’re considering veganism? Is it easy? Is it just choosing Meatless Mondays? I know it can sometimes sound really intimidating to folks, right?

Well, I encourage people to approach it with a level of gradualism. I’ve seen so many people who, I don’t know, whatever the catalyst is, a documentary film, or this riveting book, or an essay where they’re like, “Yes! I want to abandon my meat-centric diet and become a vegan!” And they’re into it, and then three weeks in, they slip up and have a piece of chicken, and they’re like, “Well, OK, whatever, I’m back to the old thing.”

I just feel like it’s important for people to ease in — it doesn’t have to be black or white. I think there’s always gray area. I mean, look, if we want to have arguments about the ethics of eating animals, and especially animals that are a part of our industrialized food system, then I’m like, yes, this is something that needs to be avoided — just from a values-aligned perspective.

But I also know how humans work. I do encourage people to just think about Meatless Mondays, or “Vegan Before 6,” or just not feeling like they have to have meat at every single meal or animal products at every single meal. The thing is, experientially, what I found is that people start to notice differences — even my family members. I like to think my parents, in their 70s, they’re continuing to make these changes in their diet, and they’re not going to be vegans. I doubt that they’re ever going to be strict vegans, but the fact that they dedicate one meal per day to being meat-free. They don’t use white sugar anymore. They only use raw organic sugar. These are what people might consider insignificant, or just like very small changes, but it’s significant, especially for older people kind of stuck in their habits.

I just celebrate small victories, and I think as an educator, I’ve always done that. Working with young people, you plant seeds. You may not ever see the fruit, but I think you have to do it with the faith that one day they’ll get it.

You made me think of something: I’m from the south, and I love good barbecue.

Where are you from?

Alabama.

Oh! OK — my parents live in Huntsville.

Oh! That’s where my dad lives, too.

Oh, cool. OK!

I love good barbecue, right? When I was younger, it was all about the meat. What I didn’t realize was that I had all of these amazing sides on my plate, from collards to macaroni, et cetera. You can sort of reorient how you think about that plate, right?

Yes, and you know, for the longest time, I’ve avoided this whole “delete meat and add tofu” kind of ethos. At the same time, I have some recipes that kind of play around with barbecue.

For example, I do this barbecue tempeh. It was in my book, “Vegan Soul Kitchen.” People love it! Even the ardent meat eaters have been like, “You know, this isn’t ribs, but it’s, it’s OK! It’s pretty good.” I think creativity is key to me. I have a recipe for barbecue carrots. People love it! I do these barbecue carrots in “Vegetable Kingdom,” and then I pair them with white beans and some Memphis coleslaw. Everything just coalesced really beautifully — and it’s just vegetables.

That’s what I’m going to be making later this week.

(Laughter)

This is your sixth cookbook. First of all, congratulations.

Thank you — and last.

Really?

Oh, yes. I’m retiring after this.

No, you’re not!

Yes!

This is the first book from your new imprint. Does this signal that you’re going to focus more on editing? Can you share more details about your decision?

Well, there are a couple reasons. One, when I entered publishing, I always had this idea because I just hate to see people past their prime. Like, “Dude, you should have retired years ago! What are you doing? You just need the money?”

But I always told myself I was going to go out when I’m on top. And I just have to say, “Vegetable Kingdom” came out in February 2020, right before the pandemic blew up, shelter in place. And I was sad — I just thought the book was going to disappear. I was like, this pandemic is just going to overshadow my book.

Because people were home, and they were practicing cooking more, and a lot of people were interested in incorporating more vegetables into the diet, the book went on to do phenomenally well, making all these best year end lists and all that. Coming off of such a successful year as an author in 2020 to this year with “Black Food,” I’m just like, you know what? This is good. I can leave. I can hang the cleats up now.

But the other part of it is that, yes, this is the flagship publication for my new imprint, 4 Color Books, which is an imprint of Random House and Ten Speed Press. I want to focus on becoming a better publisher — becoming a good publisher. I’m in a position now where I’ve done the rodeo many times as an author, and I know a lot about the internal logic of publishing — but it’s a whole new ball game. I like being in a place of discomfort. I like being in a place where I have a lot to learn and a lot to reach for. I’m excited it about doing all that.

It sounds like you’re also paving the way for the next generation. In fact, you’re printing a book from a teenage chef. Can you tell us a little bit more about that project?

Rahanna Bisseret Martinez, the brilliant wunderkind, I like to think. Seventeen years old. She was 13 when she was a finalist on “Top Chef Junior.” She’s stopped at some of the best restaurants around the world, from Chez Panisse to Ikoyi in London. She’s cooked at the James Beard House.

I’m sure you know, because you’ve done research on me, but I have this position as chef-in-residence at the Museum of the African Diaspora in San Francisco. She and her mother would come to my programs, and I was so impressed seeing this teen in the audience rapt with attention, taking copious notes and asking great questions. I had been kind of watching her, and then eventually became a mentor. When the imprint came about, I, in my mind was like, I would love to do a book project with her. She and her agent ran the book proposal by us. We bought it, and we’re going to be publishing her book when she’s 19 years old. I’m super excited about her career. This is the first of many books. I think she’s going to have a long and splendid career, and I feel lucky to be her mentor and now her publisher.

One of my favorite reads in the book is the essay in which the author is asked the question, “What does Toni Morrison’s house smell like?” I was wondering if you could talk a little bit about Toni Morrison as an inspiration and this story, in particular, because it’s such an interesting one.

Sarah Ladipo Manyika’s essay, “Jollofing With Toni Morrison,” is just one of my favorite pieces in the book. She knew Toni Morrison was a big inspiration for the book, because when I emailed the more than 100 potential contributors to be in the book, I actually shared this quote in which Toni Morrison talks about racism being a distraction. The way that I see it, we’re just so consumed with whatever. Micro, macroaggressions, white supremacy, it prevents us from fully just being human and living because that’s constantly taking up psychic space. I think it’s important for people just to be free. What I told people is that, in terms of the thrust of the book, you can’t talk about our history or our food traditions without at least recognizing the historical and even contemporary ways in which have been exploited and erased and marginalized.

But I didn’t want the focus of the book to be on that. I wanted the focus on the book to be about our joy, our agency, our magic, our brilliance. I wanted it to be a conversation that we were having with each other and inviting the world to look in — but not being overly concerned about the white gaze, not feeling like we needed to translate things for outsiders, but just speaking each other. I talk about “FUBU.” FUBU was a popular clothing brand in the ’90s by Daymond John, this entrepreneur, but it means “for us, by us.” That’s what I told people — this is our book, and we’re inviting the world in.

A big inspiration outside of that for this book was Toni Morrison’s “The Black Book,” which is this kind of encyclopedic look at Black history and culture and all things Blackness that she put together in the late ’70s. I just love the way that she brought together song lyrics and archival photos and ephemera and all these things that just kind of showed the multiplicity and diversity and beauty of Black folks.

I’d like to say that’s the major inspiration for this, but the way in which I kind of brought all these things together in “Black Food” — I’ve done this in all my books. If you look at all my books, I’ve included art, I’ve had suggested soundtracks, I’ve offered film and book suggestions to help further educate people. This is the first time that I’ve had a good chunk of money to do it so beautifully.

I like to ask everyone who comes in this: At the end of the day, why do you cook? My grandmother is from Mexico, and cooking is what really connects me to my family and to my roots. Why do you cook at the end of the day?

I cook for my children. Everything I do is for them. I like to think that my ancestors were clear about their choices and actions and how they would impact progeny. I’m here. I know that so many of the things that they did prepared me, whether it’s literally our interactions and the way that they cared for me and told me stories and helped me understand who I am or things that are more metaphysical like prayers and thoughts and even me feeling a connection with them on the other side.

You know, whatever. Everybody cares for their kids. Most people, I guess, care for their kids, and they want to create a legacy for them. I’m writing these books because I am invested in helping transform our food system, helping to improve public health, helping to change the habits and attitudes and politics of all of us who participate in this food system. I’m doing this work because I want my kids to be proud of me. I want to model hard work. I want to model creativity. I want to model finding your passion and doing what you love. I do it for Mila and Zenzi.

Salon Food writes about stuff we think you’ll like. Salon has affiliate partnerships, so we may get a share of the revenue from your purchase.

Matt Gaetz’ ex-girlfriend testifies in front of federal grand jury as part of immunity deal: report

The walls appear to be closing in on Rep. Matt Gaetz, R-Fla., after his ex-girlfriend reportedly testified Wednesday before a federal grand jury in an ongoing sex crimes case against the conservative firebrand.

NBC News reports that the testimony was part of an immunity deal for the woman, whose name was withheld in news reports to protect her privacy.

The Department of Justice is currently in the middle of an investigation into allegations the 39-year-old Gaetz maintained a sexual relationship with a 17-year-old girl, a probe that has lasted for more than a year.

The inquiry began after a longtime Gaetz friend and local Florida politician, Joel Greenberg, was charged with a number of serious crimes, including defrauding taxpayers with a cryptocurrency mining scheme and leveling false allegations of pedophelia against political rivals. Greenberg previously pled guilty to sex trafficking the same minor Gaetz dated as part of a larger deal to cooperate with federal investigators.


Want a daily wrap-up of all the news and commentary Salon has to offer? Subscribe to our morning newsletter, Crash Course.


Experts told NBC that the woman’s testimony is likely a sign the DOJ is close to issuing an indictment against the Congressman. Department insiders told the network Gaetz is facing three distinct charges: sex trafficking of a minor, transporting women across state lines for the purposes of prostitution (a violation of the Mann Act), and obstructing justice. 

The Congressman continues to deny all of the allegations against him, likening the investigation into a political “witch hunt” with language similar to that of former President Donald Trump. He’s stated definitively that he’s never paid for sex and never had sex with a minor while he was an adult.

RELATED: Matt Gaetz’s no good — but not so horrible — 2021. What’s next?

“Congressman Gaetz pursues justice, he doesn’t obstruct it,” a spokesperson said last year.

As far as what Gaetz’ ex-girlfriend told investigators, three friends of the woman said she was involved in an open relationship with him from 2017-2018 and spoke openly about other women he was involved with. She was also present on a widely-scrutinized trip to the Bahamas with political allies of the Congressman’s — a jaunt which several reports suggest may have featured underage women.

“Cheer” returns and goes full out, even when COVID and a criminal arrest come for the cheerleaders

“Give me something to sing about,” Buffy Summers (Sarah Michelle Gellar) croons in the infamous “Buffy the Vampire Slayer” musical episode. “Please,” she pleads in Auto-Tune. This lyric ran through my head repeatedly during the second season of “Cheer,” Netflix’s documentary series about the world of competitive college cheerleading. Give them something to cheer about, I thought. Please. 

“Cheer” first premiered in January of 2020. Focusing on Navarro College, a community college in small-town central Texas that just so happens to have a 14-time national champion in its competitive cheer team, the Greg Whitely-directed series received an Emmy and international attention. It introduced the world to a misunderstood, intensely challenging and highly skillful sport that involves jumping, stunting and tumbling. Competitive cheerleading is different from the morale-boosting cheers on the sidelines at athletic games. The Navarro team does that too, but they reserve their highest flying, their most dangerous stunts, and their longest tumbling runs for their own matches.  

Specifically, Daytona. The Super Bowl of cheer, Daytona Beach hosts the National Cheerleaders Association (NCA) College Nationals, the biggest — and really only — chance for these college athletes to put their skills to the test in a fierce competition that family members struggle to watch on the internet. Most though not all of recent years Navarro has dominated in the category of Advanced Large Co-ed Junior College, bested only by their Texas rivals just up the road, Trinity Valley Community College.

RELATED: Netflix’s “Cheer” director: Cheerleaders are “the toughest athletes I’ve ever filmed”

“Cheer” brought the terms “full out” (a run-through performance), “on mat” (being selected to compete) and “mat talk” (pep-talking those who are competing, even if you’re not on the mat yourself) into our lives. It also brought coach Monica Aldama, who had the style of Connie Britton as Tami Taylor in “Friday Night Lights” and the command of Rebecca (Hannah Waddingham) from “Ted Lesso,” ruling her team with a near-perfect record of wins.

Season 2 of the show catches up with the charismatic break-out stars of the first season, some of whom were already famous before the show in the social media and cheer worlds, including: star Gabi Butler, silver-haired prodigious tumbler Lexi Brumback, compelling La’Darius Marshall with his self-proclaimed “tough exterior” and hurting heart of gold, and Morgan Simianer, whose farm girl to top girl storyline was worth rooting for, as teammate after teammate fell to injury in the first season.

This season also introduces some new athletes, like Maddy Brum, determined to stay top girl/flyer, and flyer Gillian Rupert, who “does not know how good she is.” We also see new coaches, like Kailee Peppers, a Navarro alum who steps in as assistant coach, despite being barely older than most of the students, as Aldama flies off to Hollywood to fulfill a dream of being in her favorite show, “Dancing with the Stars.” 

The impact of the first season fame trickles into the show. People quit the team. People are kicked off the team. People come back. Athletes are not sure they want to stay.

In a smart narrative shift, Whitely centers a good portion of this season on Navarro’s rivals, Trinity Valley Community College. HBO Max’s “Station Eleven,” with its whiplash flashbacks, could learn from how Whitely deftly weaves the two storylines together. At Trinity Valley, we meet soaring tumbler/flyer Jada Wooten, growing into her role as a team leader; tumbler DeVonte “Dee” Joseph who does spins “the human eye can’t recognize” (“Cool knows cool,” nonchalant Joseph says about his team); and Angel Rice, a powerhouse tumbler compared to Simone Biles, an athlete a recruit calls “the Madonna of cheerleading.”

We also spend time with the coaches at Trinity Valley, Vontae Johnson and Khris Franklin, interesting contrasts to Aldama in demeanors and coaching styles. Johnson does some stunts himself, stepping in to physically show his athletes how it’s done. 

We watch both teams train. It’s hard not to notice that Trinity Valley has more women of color on the team, that they train in an older-looking basketball court (and sometimes, a Baptist church), rather than the athletic center Navarro has access to. Aldama gets Navarro an actual performance stage built, a “band shell” that costs thousands of dollars (thanks, in part, to a $20,00 donation from the “Ellen Show”). Trinity Valley does full-outs in a parking lot. 

Navarro flies to their competition in Daytona, Florida. Trinity Valley takes a very long bus ride, and after competing, watches the award ceremony as a team (virtual, due to COVID) in a small, extremely crowded hotel room. Navarro views it in a hotel ballroom.  


Want a daily wrap-up of all the news and commentary Salon has to offer? Subscribe to our morning newsletter, Crash Course.


“Let’s have fun on three!” the Trinity athletes say in their huddle. “Take care of your bodies!” they shout to each other.

Trinity Valley is trying something different in 2020. Tired of losing to Navarro, they have brought in a secret weapon in the choreography department, one with which Navarro is intimately familiar. This would have been quite the showdown in Daytona. 

It’s a showdown that never happens, as it turns out (though they will get their re-match). In many respects this season is two shows: pre-COVID and COVID times, along with the liminal in-between. The cheerleaders eat in a cafeteria, while TV news plays in the background, something that can still be ignored. The athletes don’t think this virus will impact their season. We know, of course, it will end it. 

What happens when your season doesn’t go as planned? Season 2 of “Cheer” is a split show: before COVID came and then after. After is also the winter storm that decimated parts of Texas. After is trying to rebuild athletic programs in the midst of a pandemic where students may be quarantined and lose weeks of practice at any moment. As Trinity Valley Coach Franklin — who dispenses quiet wisdom and who gets his own, emotional “Coach Beard“-style arc — says: “Everything feels like eggshells.”

At Navarro, there is no homecoming. There is no cheering on the sidelines at games. Athletes new to the team express frustration that they barely know their coach, Aldama, due to publicity commitments. “It was almost like she forgot where she came from,” says Marshall, who butts heads with new coach Peppers.

“It’s not the same. It doesn’t feel the same,” Franklin says.

And neither does the show. “Cheer” is also split with the deep, burning fissure of the arrest of one of the show’s regular castmates. This is not a spoiler. The arrest made headlines, and “Cheer” addresses it head-on at the very start of the first episode. There’s no mat-talking a way out of this. 

Sexual abuse is a topic “Cheer” handles with care and respect, devoting significant time to the survivors, not just the perpetrator. The show makes parallels between abuse in cheerleading and abuse in gymnastics, both sports that put often very young children in unsupervised contact with adults; in cheerleading, adults can even compete on all-star teams with children. But then the show moves on, although the athletes can’t forget what their former teammate is alleged to have done, and the show can’t, either. Even if “Cheer” doesn’t talk about it again, his absence lingers like a long shadow.

“Can we have one normal day in Corsicana?” a Navarro athlete asks, amid Zoom calls and card playing, pet adopting and lonely days of the pandemic on a college campus. It’s worth watching to see in real-time the impact of COVID on college athletics, especially junior college athletes whose seasons are already shorter, whose careers end almost as soon as they’ve begun. “I would like to have some closure and some clarity,” Aldama says.

But real life doesn’t have closure usually, not in the way we want it to, not in the way we hope. “Cheer” does a good job of existing in that middle space, a space where we don’t know what’s coming and we haven’t recovered from what happened, not yet, maybe not ever.

“Learn when to give up,” Marshall says in a scene set in nature. He’s fishing, and seems as at home among trees and water as he is flying powerfully across a mat. “Learn to choose you over anything.” 

“Cheer” is full of such platitudes, one-liners the coaches and athletes say that would look great embroidered on a pillow, painted on a bedroom decor sign — or hand-written on a yellow poster board in a locker room. “Find your ‘why,’ whatever that may be, and do what you gotta do on this floor,” Wooten screams to her teammates in a leader-defining moment. 

The athletes of “Cheer” don’t just talk it, though. They believe it. They do it. “We’ve overcome worse odds,” Johnson reminds his team. And COVID and all, both teams have their season — and a showdown finish, worthy of any blockbuster sports film. 

“That’s a hit-and-hope kind of situation,” Coach Franklin says. He is speaking about his golf game, college cheer, and maybe our lives. “Hit and hope.”

“Cheer” season 2 is now available to stream on Netflix. Watch a trailer for it below, via YouTube:

More stories like this:

Capitol riot committee asks Republican leader Kevin McCarthy to share Jan. 6 Trump calls

The House Select Committee investigating the Jan. 6 attack on the U.S. Capitol is asking House Republican Leader Kevin McCarthy (R-CA) to speak with them about what happened that day, CNN reported.

“We also must learn about how the President’s plans for January 6th came together, and all the other ways he attempted to alter the results of the election,” wrote committee chair Rep. Bennie Thompson (D-MS). “For example, in advance of January 6th, you reportedly explained to Mark Meadows and the former President that objections to the certification of the electoral votes on January 6th ‘was doomed to fail.'”


Want a daily wrap-up of all the news and commentary Salon has to offer? Subscribe to our morning newsletter, Crash Course.


Earlier on Wednesday, the committee issued subpoenas to former advisers to Donald Trump Jr. — Andrew Surabian and Arthur Schwartz — and an adviser to former President Donald Trump, Ross Worthington. According to the Associated Press, Worthington was the one who wrote the speech Trump delivered on Jan. 6, 2021. The part where Trump urged the audience to walk to the Capitol was not included in the draft, according to several books published after the Trump administration.

Senior legal analyst Elie Honig commented on CNN that the committee should have asked McCarthy to appear long ago and noted that a subpoena might be necessary.

Read more stories like this:

DeSantis wants parents to sue schools that teach “critical race theory”: “Nobody wants this crap”

Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis on Tuesday asked the state legislature to approve a bill that would incentivize parents to sue school districts that teach critical race theory (CRT), arguing that parents should “have a say in what their kids learn in school.”

“Florida law should provide parents with the right to review the curriculum used in their children’s schools,” the governor said during his 2022 State of the State Address. “We should provide parents with recourse so that state standards are enforced, such as Florida’s prohibition on infusing subjects with critical race theory in our classrooms.” 

DeSantis first introduced the controversial measure – dubbed the “Stop WOKE Act” – back in December. Contained within the law, which formally bans the instruction of CRT in corporate or classroom settings, is a provision that would establish a legal “cause of action” for parents looking to sue school districts that contravene the ban. It’s a provision similar to Texas’ controversial, near-total abortion ban passed last year, which effectively put a bounty on anyone who assists someone in obtaining an abortion past six weeks into a pregnancy — a time when most people are unaware they are even pregnant at all.

RELATED: Ron DeSantis’ “Stop WOKE” bill, modeled after Texas’ anti-abortion law, targets teachers

CRT, of course, is not something often taught in K-12 schools. It’s an academic lens, taught primarily in law school, through which one views race as a social construct. CRT posits that race, law, and politics have been problematically interwoven throughout U.S. history, leading to systemic racial discrimination spanning centuries. 

At the time of the Stop WOKE Act’s unveiling, a December press release for the bill detailed a number of instances in which CRT had allegedly been used in classrooms across the nation — all of which happened out of state. A local news station even asked every Florida school district whether they teach CRT, and all denied ever doing so. 


Want a daily wrap-up of all the news and commentary Salon has to offer? Subscribe to our morning newsletter, Crash Course.


Still, DeSantis has repeatedly alleged that the phenomenon is widespread and needs to be routed out in the Sunshine State. 

“Nobody wants this crap,” DeSantis said last month.  “This is an elite-driven phenomenon being driven by bureaucratic elites, elites in universities and elites in corporate America. And they’re trying to shove it down the throats of the American people. You’re not doing that in the state of Florida.”

RELATED: “Moms for Liberty” group demands schools ban books with “sexy” pictures of seahorses

Last year, conservatives turned critical race theory into a hot button culture war issue, with many using it as a cudgel to call out the left’s apparent ideological “infiltration” into the nation’s public school system. Democrats and progressives have repeatedly argued that conservatives are using CRT as a shorthand to prevent teachers from talking about America’s problematic racial history.

Much of the conservative fight against CRT is being spearheaded by Moms for Liberty, a 501(c)(4) group that advocates for “parental rights” over how children are being taught in school. Though the group has largely presented itself as grassroots, Media Matters found that the nonprofit is “well-connected with a variety of Republican politicians and entities,” including Christian Ziegler, vice chairman of the Florida Republican Party; and the Heritage Foundation, a right-wing Koch-backed think tank.

Republicans have hijacked the process: Congressional hearings are now rife with conspiracy theories

No one should ever accuse Ted Cruz of being held back by a basic sense of dignity.

Last week, the Texas Republican got into hot water with Donald Trump loyalists, who will brook no criticism of the fascist insurrectionists who stormed the Capitol last year. Cruz, who has otherwise been an advocate of Trump’s Big Lie as one of eight senators who voted to throw out the results of the 2020 election so that Trump could illegally remain in power, dared to suggest that the people who used violence for that same goal had engaged in a “terrorist attack.”

Calling those Trump loyalists anything but peaceful patriots who have never done a bad thing in their entire lives is forbidden in Trumpist circles, of course. For his trespass, Cruz was taken to task by Tucker Carlson and other fascistic leaders in right-wing media far more beloved by the GOP base than the likes of Cruz. And as is his wont, Cruz has been crawling on his belly ever since, begging for forgiveness and making it clear he’ll say or do anything to get back in the good graces of the worst people in the country.

Cruz’s been on Fox News repeatedly since his momentary lapse in lying, hyping a conspiracy theory/apologia for the fascist insurrection that’s long been favored by Carlson: The FBI compelled Trump fans to storm the Capitol. Worse, Cruz has been abusing taxpayer funds in order to push this conspiracy theory. On Tuesday, Cruz spent his time during a Senate Judiciary Committee hearing going off about this idiotic claim that it was the FBI who caused the Capitol riot, not unhinged Trump supporters acting on Trump’s obvious and well-communicated wishes. 

RELATED: Republican voters don’t actually “believe” the Big Lie about January 6 — they’re in on the con 

Like most right-wing conspiracy theories, this one is both incoherent and easily debunked. (A quick Google search for “Ray Epps” leads to some good explanations as to why.) But, crucially, this narrative isn’t supposed to make sense. On the contrary, the nonsensical nature of it is very much by design. The whole point of these incoherent conspiracy theories is to create a cloud of bewildering disinformation so thick that the actual truth gets lost in a maze of lies, hand-waving and fart noises. 

Even more crucially, Cruz’s performance yesterday worked exactly as intended, providing ample video footage that could be cut up and re-edited into clips to be disseminated across right-wing land as “proof” that the FBI is hiding something. Misleading clips spread rapidly on social media with breathless text like “the FBI stonewalled and refused to answer” and “The American people deserve answers.” 


Want more Amanda Marcotte on politics? Subscribe to her newsletter Standing Room Only.


No one sharing these videos wants “answers,” however. They just want to make a bunch of noise to distract from the fact that there’s no mystery regarding what happened on January 6. It was an insurrection, instigated by Trump, for the purpose of overthrowing an election so he could be installed as an illegitimate president. 

Unfortunately, Cruz’s sleazy behavior Tuesday is not an anomaly, but part of a larger right-wing derangement feedback loop.

Far-right conspiracy theories first bubble up from the swamps of Infowars and various online Trump-loving forums. Republicans in Congress, desperate for both attention and donations, then use congressional hearings to float these conspiracy theories, knowing they’ll be cut into videos that get widely shared on social media and shown on Fox News. Those well-produced videos, in turn, legitimize the lies and embolden the people in the fever dream swamps to keep generating conspiracy theories. The whole thing has an addictive quality to it, with both Republican politicians and their audiences needing ever-nuttier conspiracy theories, in order to keep getting the same derangement high. 

RELATED: Why they hate him: Dr. Fauci triggers the right because he reveals their deepest insecurities

Cruz wasn’t even the only Republican in the Senate employing this tactic on Tuesday.

During another Senate hearing, this one held by the Health and Education Committee, both Sens. Rand Paul of Kentucky and Roger Marshall of Kansas used the presence of Dr. Anthony Fauci — Director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases and a favorite hate object on the right — to generate more propaganda footage. Both men floated elaborate and deliberately obtuse conspiracy theories about Dr. Fauci that simultaneously imply that he somehow created the coronavirus and also that COVID-19 is a socialist hoax.

Yes, these ideas contradict each other. No, the people who claim to believe these theories don’t care about that contradiction. As usual, the point is not to make sense, but to grind rational discourse into dust.

As an added bonus, Marshall kept making false accusations that Dr. Fauci is hiding his financial position, with an obvious intent to imply that Dr. Fauci is somehow secretly profiting off of the pandemic. The same pandemic that right-wing conspiracy theories paint as somehow both a bioweapon but also not an actual threat. Dr. Fauci got fed up with all this and called Marshall a “moron” into a hot mic. Sadly, Marshall is not actually a moron. He’s a cynical opportunist who is deliberately generating misinformation in order to increase his name recognition with the GOP base and rake in more money. Marshall, frankly, seems thrilled that Dr. Fauci called him a “moron.” He’s hyping the story, banking off the GOP base’s well-known hatred of Dr. Fauci. There is no better way in GOP fundraising circles to get attention and make money than to cast yourself as a primo liberal-triggerer. 


Want more Amanda Marcotte on politics? Subscribe to her newsletter Standing Room Only.


So right-wing politics should be understood as a topsy-turvy version of pro wrestling, where real-life heroes like Dr. Fauci are recast as the heel and real-life villains like Rand Paul and Ted Cruz get to play the role of the face. By hijacking congressional hearings in order to put on these wrestling matches, Republicans aren’t just wasting taxpayer money and destroying the ostensible purpose of hearings to gather and expose the truth, they’re using the prestige of Congress in order to disseminate their conspiracy theories more widely. It’s a derangement loop that’s driving the GOP base further away from reality and deeper into a fascist ideology.

RELATED: Republicans turned a serious hearing on a national security threat into another episode of “triggering the libs”

We only need to look at last summer’s hearing of the January 6 committee, where Congress heard testimony from law enforcement that was there during the insurrection, to see what happens when bad faith Republicans are barred from the microphones. That hearing generated real information, unmarred by the grandstanding and conspiracy theories of Republicans competing to see who can act the most maniacal for their base.

While there may be no legal way for Democrats, who technically control the gavels, to put a lid on the misuse of hearings this way, it’s time to explore the possibility of shutting Republicans up, or at least minimizing how much they can abuse the hearing process. Turning congressional hearings into little more than Infowars taping sessions isn’t just embarrassing for Congress, it’s undermining our democracy. 

Marjorie Taylor Greene suggests using “Second Amendment rights” against Democrats

Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene, R-Ga., on Tuesday suggested using “Second Amendment rights” to fight Democrats while defending her proposal for a “national divorce” akin to the Southern states’ secession of the 1860s.

“Ultimately the truth is it’s our Second Amendment rights, our right to bear arms, that protects Americans and give us the ability to defend ourselves from a tyrannical government,” Greene said in a podcast interview with former Trump aide Sebastian Gorka, while discussing Georgia gubernatorial candidate Stacey Abrams’ calls for stricter gun regulations. “And I hate to use this language but Democrats, they’re exactly — they’re doing exactly what our founders talked about when they gave us the precious rights that we have.”

Greene, who has repeatedly proposed a “national divorce” between red and blue states, quickly defended her comment.

“No one wants violence and I say all the time I am not a violent person,” she told Gorka. “I hope to never see a civil war in this country and that’s why you hear me toss around ‘national divorce.’ The federal government has grown so big and the Democrats are willing to use the power of the federal government, that it really violates people’s rights.”

RELATED: The line between right-wing trolling and violence is collapsing

Greene is only the latest far-right Republican to fantasize about violence against her political opponents.

Rep. Matt Gaetz, R-Fla., during a rally with Greene last year, urged supporters to “use” their gun rights to fight government tyranny while stoking debunked election conspiracy theories.

 “We have a Second Amendment in this country, and I think we have an obligation to use it,” Gaetz said, adding that the amendment is “not about hunting, it’s not about recreation, it’s not about sports.” Instead, he said, the Second Amendment protects “the ability to maintain an armed rebellion against the government if that becomes necessary.”

Former President Donald Trump, during his 2016 campaign, famously suggested that “Second Amendment people” could take matters into their own hands if Hillary Clinton won the election.

Rep. Madison Cawthorn, R-N.C., last summer predicted there would be “bloodshed” in future elections while stoking debunked conspiracy theories that the 2020 race had been “rigged” and “stolen.” Rep. Mo Brooks, R-Ala., who has been linked to the planning of the Trump rally that preceded the Jan. 6 Capitol riot, said one day after the attack that the only options in response to “lost faith in the ballot box” is either to “submit” or “you can resist, often through violence.”

These incessant suggestions of violence have had an alarming effect on the Republican Party’s base. A recent poll found that 30% of Republicans believe that “American patriots may have to resort to violence in order to save our country.”


Want a daily wrap-up of all the news and commentary Salon has to offer? Subscribe to our morning newsletter, Crash Course.


Rep. Dean Phillips, D-Minn., demanded that House Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy, R-Calif., take action against Greene after her latest comments.

“If suggesting ‘Second Amendment Rights Should Be Used Against Democrats’ doesn’t immediately compel [McCarthy] to take disciplinary action, I suggest Congress take action against both of them,” he said on Twitter. “This madness must be addressed or violence will ensue.”

Greene has increasingly discussed her “national divorce” proposal, last month suggesting that Democrats who move to red states should be temporarily banned from voting and “pay a tax for their sins.”

“There is no ‘National Divorce’ either you are for civil war or not,” Rep. Ruben Gallego, D-Ariz., wrote in response. “Just say it if you want a civil war and officially declare yourself a traitor.”

McCarthy, however, has continued to support Greene, defending her after House Democrats stripped her of committee assignments after she spread conspiracy theories and called for executing prominent Democrats.

McCarthy has vowed to appoint Greene to even “better” committees if the Republicans win back control of the House. On Monday he told Breitbart that as speaker he would likely boot Reps. Adam Schiff, D-Calif., Eric Swalwell, D-Calif., and Ilhan Omar, D-Minn., from their committees in retaliation.

Schiff responded by calling out McCarthy for failing to “hold his own members accountable.”

“I think the reality is McCarthy is a very weak leader and as a result, he is already being led around by the most extreme elements of his conference — the Marjorie Taylor Greenes and others that are calling for retribution because of their removal,” he told CNN, adding that McCarthy “will do whatever Donald Trump wants him to do, and if Donald Trump wants him to overturn the next election because Trump loses again, McCarthy will do it, and that is a real and present threat to our democracy.”

Read more on the Republican infatuation with violence:

The secret to tender and juicy meat on the grill

All too often, grilled meats suffer a similar fate: dry, overcooked and rubbery textures. When I’m invited to barbecues or tailgates and get grill duty, I can’t help but predict the outcome for meat that hasn’t been marinated correctly. There is a way to ensure juicy meat off the grill every single time using a common ingredient that’s probably available in your fridge right now.

So what’s the secret ingredient? Plain yogurt. It’s inexpensive, readily available and incredibly versatile.

Yogurt seems like an uncommon ingredient for cooking and grilling because most Americans eat it for breakfast or as a snack. I’m a huge fan of cooking with yogurt and using it in my marinades — it’s plain and accommodates any additional flavoring. In the summer, I add seasonal herbs and spices to yogurt for instant flavor and freshness. I also love making the marinade a day in advance to help me meal prep before a big party or busy week.

So why does yogurt work? By nature, it’s very acidic and has lots of lactic acid, which helps massage the muscles of the meat and tenderize it. Many people are familiar with a popular Indian dish called tandoori chicken, which is marinated in yogurt and cooked inside a tandoor clay oven that heats up to 800˚F. Marinating by way of yogurt keeps grilled proteins juicy, especially chicken. Use a thicker, plain, Greek-style yogurt, though regular works too.

Another trick is to use half a beer to jumpstart the tenderizing process and then load up a yogurt marinade brimming with ground spices like turmeric, cayenne, cumin and coriander to increase the punch. But don’t stop with chicken — turkey, lamb and pork will also benefit from yogurt. Keep in mind that yogurt needs time to do its work: a minimum of six hours, preferably overnight.

Indians have been using yogurt marinades for hundreds of years as it’s effective for tenderizing meat and the secret to keeping the meat extra juicy. Since I was five years old, I can remember my mother making fresh yogurt; like many other Indians, my mom has been using the same starter culture for more than three decades. To me, yogurt and chicken go hand in hand. Here’s one of my recipes to test it out.

***

Recipe: Indian Wings

Yields 4 servings

Ingredients

  • 3 pounds chicken wings
  • 3 cloves garlic, minced
  • 1 tablespoon ginger
  • 1/4 cup beer
  • 3/4 cup plain whole-milk, full-fat yogurt
  • 2 tablespoons cumin
  • 1 tablespoon ground coriander 
  • 1 teaspoon ground powder
  • 1 tablespoon smoked paprika
  • 1 teaspoon ground cayenne 
  • 1/4 cup fresh lemon juice
  • 1 teaspoon kosher salt, to taste
  • Lemon wedges (for serving)

Directions

  • In a large bowl, add all ingredients except wings and lemon, and mix together.
  • Add wings and marinate for 12 hours or overnight.
  • Heat grill to medium heat. Remove wings from marinade, shake off any excess and grill, covered and turning occasionally, until golden brown and crisp, 15–20 minutes.
  • Serve with lemon wedges.

By Chef Palak Patel, Institute of Culinary Education

Trump abruptly ends interview after NPR journalist grills him on GOP’s Big Lie

Donald Trump abruptly hung up on an NPR reporter while being questioned about his steadfast belief that the 2020 presidential election was “stolen,” insisting that Republicans should doubt President Joe Biden’s electoral victory. 

Trump’s rage-quit came in a Wednesday interview with NPR journalist Steve Inskeep, who pressed Trump on why he was still pushing his voter fraud claims amid overwhelming evidence that the election was free and fair. Trump called it “an advantage” to continue waging his election conspiracy, saying that “otherwise,” the Democrats are “going to do it [steal the election] again in ’22 and ’24.”

RELATED: Trump trashes GOP senator as “woke” for acknowledging that 2020 election was “fair”

“If I can just move on to ask, are you telling Republicans in 2022 that they must press your case on the past election in order to get your endorsement?” Inskeep later asked the former president. “Is that an absolute?” 

“They are going to do whatever they want to do—whatever they have to do, they’re going to do. But the ones that are smart—the ones that know, you take a look at,” Trump responded. “People have no idea how big this issue is, and they don’t want it to happen again. It shouldn’t be allowed to happen, and they don’t want it to happen again.”

Inskeep then attempted to pivot to a different question about a January 6 court hearing held on Wednesday, but Trump interrupted, still answering the last question: “And the only way it’s not going to happen again is you have to solve the problem of the presidential rigged election of 2020.”

“So Steve, thank you very much. I appreciate it,” Trump added, before hanging up. 

During the nine-minute interview, originally scheduled for fifteen minutes, Trump spoke on a narrow range of different subjects, including vaccination, the 2020 election, and his Republican opponents. 


Want a daily wrap-up of all the news and commentary Salon has to offer? Subscribe to our morning newsletter, Crash Course.


Asked about the vaccines, Trump said that Biden’s vaccine-or-test mandate, currently being scrutinized by the Supreme Court, is “hurting our country.”

“A lot of Americans aren’t standing for it, and it’s hurting our country,” he claimed. “The vaccines, I recommend taking them, but I think that has to be an individual choice. I mean, it’s got to be individual, but I recommend taking them.”

In another point of the interview, Trump baselessly claimed that the election results in Detroit were “out of balance,” even though Michigan Republicans found no evidence of outcome-altering voter fraud in the entire state. 

RELATED: “No evidence” of fraud: Michigan GOP committee rejects Trump’s “ludicrous” claims

“Go into Detroit and just ask yourself, is it true that there are more votes than there are voters?” Trump asked without providing a modicum of evidence. “Look at Pennsylvania. Look at Philadelphia. Is it true that there were far more votes than there were voters?”

“It is not true,” Inskeep responded. 

Later, Trump implied that Biden’s win couldn’t have been possible based on the turnout of the president’s campaign events. 

“How come Biden couldn’t attract 20 people for a crowd?” Trump asked. “How come when he went to speak in different locations, nobody came to watch, but all of a sudden he got 80 million votes? Nobody believes that, Steve. Nobody believes that.”

Biden’s inauguration was the third most watched in presidential history, just behind former Presidents Ronald Reagan and Barack Obama.

How to substitute allspice when you don’t have any left

Come October 1st, we’re all about allspice. That’s because so many of our favorite fall and winter recipes (particularly the sweet ones, but some savory dishes too) call for allspice. Contrary to its name, allspice is not actually a blend of “all the spices.” Rather it’s a specific spice that hails from Jamaica and is harvested from larger-than-life pimenta trees. However, it’s complex flavor does taste like the very best combination of cinnamon, nutmegs, and cloves, hence its all-inclusive labeling.

Substitutes for allspice

Leave it to our community members to come up with seamless substitutions for ground allspice that work perfectly in sweet and savory recipes alike. “I’d recommend a mixture of four parts ground cinnamon, one part ground cloves, one part nutmeg,” says CarlyFarine. Mix the three spices together and measure out as much allspice as your recipe calls for.

According to The Spice House, any of the following spices would be also apt substitutes for ground allspice: cloves, nutmeg, cinnamon, cloves, mace, pumpkin pie spice and ground black pepper, apple pie spice, and a chai blend. The brand also recommends using a trio of cinnamon, nutmeg, and cloves to make a substitute but prefers these ratios: 1/2 teaspoon of ground cinnamon, 1/4 teaspoon of ground nutmeg, and 1/4 teaspoon of ground cloves. Use as a 1:1 substitute in a recipe that calls for one teaspoon of allspice.

You can always use whole allspice berries if a recipe calls for the ground version. Use a spice grinder to crush the berries into a fine powder, but know that the flavor may be slightly different. A little bit of freshly ground allspice goes a long way.

How to cook with allspice

The warmth and flavor of allspice lends itself well to barbecue sauces and rubs to marinate meat. It’s also one of a few ground spices used to make our Old-School Swedish Meatballs. In baked goods, ground allspice is most commonly called for in apple pie and gingerbread cookie recipes but you’ll rarely need more than a teaspoon at a time (unless you’re making a big batch of cookies . . . save me some please).

The GOP is suddenly running scared from Trump’s Big Lie

Something unusual happened last weekend that may portend a little bit of dissonance in the Republican Party. A conservative senator went on television and directly refuted Donald Trump’s Big Lie. 

ABC’s George Stephanopoulos asked Sen. Mike Rounds of South Dakota, “What do you say to all those Republicans, all those veterans who believe the election was stolen, who have bought the falsehoods coming from former President Trump?” Rounds responded:

We looked — as a part of our due diligence, we looked at over 60 different accusations made in multiple states. While there were some irregularities, there were none of the irregularities which would have risen to the point where they would have changed the vote outcome in a single state.

“The election was fair, as fair as we have seen. We simply did not win the election, as Republicans, for the presidency. And moving forward — and that’s the way we want to look at this — moving forward, we have to refocus once again on what it’s going to take to win the presidency.

Trump was not a happy ex-president. He fired off a scathing response:

“Senator” Mike Rounds of the Great State of South Dakota just went woke on the Fraudulent President Election of 2020. He made a statement this weekend on ABC Fake News, that despite massive evidence to the contrary, including much of it pouring in from Wisconsin, Georgia, Arizona, Michigan, Pennsylvania, and other states, he found the election to be ok – Just fine.

Is he crazy or just stupid? The numbers are conclusive, and the fraudulent and irregular votes are massive.

Even though his election will not be coming up for 5 years, I will never endorse this jerk again.

And then the oddest thing happened. Rounds stuck by his comments.

“I’m disappointed,” the Republican said, “but not surprised by the former president’s reaction.”

However, he continued, “the facts remain the same. The former president lost the 2020 election.”

Rounds went on to argue that relitigating the past and attacking Republicans was no way to win elections. GOP Leader Mitch McConnell backed him up, saying, “I think Sen. Rounds told the truth about what happened in the 2020 election.” Sens. Kevin Kramer, R-S.D.,and John Thune, R-N.D., also agreed with Rounds. And here’s what Utah’s Mitt Romney had to say:

What makes this unusual is not that some Republicans are speaking out about something Trump has done. Over the years, many have expressed shock and dismay over some of his crude insults or egregious behavior, but they always back off once they realize that the rank and file are sticking with him. Soon after the night of the January 6th insurrection, when so many congressional Republicans made bold declarations of independence from Donald Trump, most slunk back into their safe spaces, afraid to admit what he did that day for fear of angering the base. On the one-year anniversary of the Capitol riot, Politico took a look at all Trump’s cabinet members who resigned from the administration in protest and found that none of them had spoken out since.

No, what makes Rounds’ comments, and the powerful senators backing him up even in the face of Trump’s spittle-flecked rebuttal, unusual is what they are saying. Top Republicans in the Senate are now disputing the central organizing principle of the GOP in 2022: the Big Lie.


Want a daily wrap-up of all the news and commentary Salon has to offer? Subscribe to our morning newsletter, Crash Course.


A Washington Post-Amherst poll released last week showed that only 21 percent of Republicans believe that Joe Biden was legitimately elected, which tracks with most other polling over the last year. Donald Trump’s relentless pounding of this issue, day in and day out, starting even before the election was held in November 2020 has done its work. Republican officials all over the country have used Trump’s sore-loser strategy to change voting laws, install partisans in the election system and generally prepare the ground to dispute elections whenever Republicans don’t win. The Big Lie is now the central organizing principle of the GOP.

RELATED: The evolution of Trump’s Big Lie: Republicans retool their conspiracy theory for the mainstream

All of this has the effect of not only validating the mistrust in the electoral system with Republican voters, it’s shaking faith in the system among Democratic voters as well. After all, if elections are being overseen by partisan Republicans chosen specifically for their willingness to back Trump’s delusional insistence that he won an election he lost by 7 million votes, people will be hard pressed to put much faith in the integrity of their decisions. This is not a problem for the GOP which will be happy to see Democrats flailing about trying to contest elections that really were “rigged.” They are not afraid of that.

So why are these Republicans testing the waters by speaking out about the Big Lie now? After all, it stands to benefit them if they can wire elections in their favor. But Rounds’ other comments make clear what they are concerned about. They are afraid that all this demeaning of the election system will keep their own voters from the polls In his first comments Rounds said:

 [I]f we simply look back and tell our people don’t vote because there’s cheating going on, then we’re going to put ourselves in a huge disadvantage. So, moving forward, let’s focus on what it takes to win those elections. We can do that. But we have to let people know that they can — they can believe and they can have confidence that those elections are fair.

He followed up later saying:

Why are we having that discussion today? I think because we’re getting closer and closer to 2022, in which we want people to get out and vote. We want them to have faith in the election process. We want them to feel like they’re a part of it and that their vote really matters.”

And while he only mentioned it in passing, these folks are very worried about Trump’s attacks on Republican incumbents and the fringe weirdos he’s endorsing to replace them.

Many smart Republicans understood that Trump’s insistence that the election was stolen was largely responsible for the loss of the Senate because of the way his lies played out in Georgia with the two Senate runoff races that sent Democrats Raphael Warnock and Jon Ossoff to Washington. It’s fair to assume that they hoped Trump would fade away by now and they could carry on about their business without having to confront him on this. But he’s still lying and there’s no getting around it.

Will this challenge hold up any better than any of the other times a few Republicans tried to stand up to Trump? Who knows? But as the Democrats continue to struggle in the Senate over the vital voting rights legislation that could help stave off some of this partisan electoral engineering based on the Big Lie, it’s interesting that there’s some nervousness among the GOP leadership about how it might affect them negatively as well.

Imagine if they could summon the intestinal fortitude to really do the right thing and acknowledge that a bipartisan vote to secure voting rights for everyone (as has been done regularly over the past 30 years) could go a long way toward solving all these problems? I’m not holding my breath. 

Vegetarians rejoice — Chipotle now has plant-based chorizo

Chipotle Mexican Grill has kicked off the new year in a delicious way — customers can now add plant-based chorizo to their bean burritos, rice bowls topped with shredded romaine lettuce and guacamole (yes, we know it costs extra), and salads. entirely from plant-based protein, chipotle peppers, ripe tomato paste, crushed garlic, Spanish smoked paprika, and extra virgin olive oil. Oh, and it’s made entirely without artificial flavors, colors, preservatives, grains, gluten, or soy.

In addition to the plant-based chorizo, Chipotle has also launched three new lifestyle bowls that each adheres to a Whole30, vegetarian, or vegan diet. All of the bowls are topped with Chipotle’s new plant-based meat and are available to order through the Chipotle app or through the brand’s website.

If you can’t make it to a Chipotle in person to try the latest offerings, try making these Chipotle-inspired vegetarian chorizo recipes at home.

Spicy, Smoky Vegan “Chorizo” Dip

“This smoky, meat-free puree is a wonderfully creamy dip that you can enjoy on its own or used to jazz up other recipes,” writes recipe developer Izy Hossack. It’s made with a combination of sundried tomatoes and sundried tomato oil, plus red kidney beans for heft. As for achieving chorizo’s warm and spicy flavor? That’s all thanks to sweet smoked paprika, crushed red pepper, and miso paste.

Quinoa and Vegetable Chorizo Salad

Learn how to make your own plant-based chorizo using sundried tomatoes, cashews, dried apricots, rice flour, and red chili peppers for heat. Once you’ve prepared and cooked the sausages, use them as a salad topping over quinoa, cherry tomatoes, diced apples, sliced onions, lima beans, and a Dijon vinaigrette.

Fully Loaded Vegan Burritos

Obviously Chipotle didn’t invent burritos, but they do certainly wrap up some of the best in under five minutes. This one uses pinto beans as a protein-packed substitute for meat and builds plenty of heat from jalapeño peppers, chili powder, ground cumin, and red pepper flakes.