Spring Sale: Get 1 Year, Save 58%

“Morning Joe” has got to go

MSNBC's “Morning Joe” co-hosts Joe Scarborough and Mika Brezinski violated some of the cardinal rules of journalism. Journalists, so those maxims go, should never make themselves the story or get too close to those they are covering.

During a 24-minute segment, Scarborough and Brezinski admitted they “went to Mar-a-Lago to meet with President-elect Trump on the previous Friday.” Scarborough said they “talked about a lot of issues…It should come as no surprise to people who watch the show that we didn’t see eye-to-eye…, and we told him so.”

Brezinski then chimed in, reading from a carefully prepared script, “What we agreed on was restart communications.” She compared the meeting with Trump to meetings her late father, and former National Security Advisor to President Jimmy Carter, would have with world leaders with whom he disagreed.

Brezinski reported that Trump was “cheerful, upbeat, and interested in finding common ground with Democrats…” She claimed it is “time to do something different…not just to talk about Donald Trump, but to talk with him.”

This unexpected announcement ignored the threat Trump poses to the United States. It focused on why it was OK for Scarborough and Brezinski to pilgrimage to Trump’s Florida estate.

As a long-time viewer of “Morning Joe,” I am quite used to Scarborough and Brezinski's self-aggrandizing soliloquies. But I was still shocked by Monday’s self-dramatizing use of their platform.

In truth, this was their Kevin McCarty moment. Recall that McCarthy, then House Minority Leader, denounced Trump in the immediate aftermath of January 6. However, two weeks later, McCarthy made his own journey to Mar-a-Lago. 

He got photographed, smiling with the man who he had said “bears responsibility” for what happened when Trump’s supporters stormed the Capitol. McCarthy had even told his Republican colleagues that he would urge Trump to resign. 

When McCarthy met Trump, all that was quickly forgotten. 

Like McCarthy, Scarborough and Brezinski want us to forget. As Megyn Kelly noted, prior to their meeting with the president-elect, they “repeatedly slammed Trump as a racist and fascist.” This radical inconsistency is why Kelly was right to brand their sit down with Trump an “absurd farce.”

Why would Scarborough and Brezinski make such a big deal about their off-the-recording sit down with someone they once regarded as a racist and fascist? There are many possibilities.

One possibility is that they wanted to assure their viewers that they would again be in the charmed circle of Washington insiders who have direct access to Trump. Kelly reminds us that “Morning Joe” helped "pump up Trump’s first run for the White House starting in 2015 when he consistently called into their show. She even played a clip of Scarborough saying he would be open to serving as Trump’s running mate.” Access to power, Kelly says, is “everything” to Joe Scarborough.

A second possible reason for their meeting with Trump is that Scarborough and Brezinski want to mend fences with Trump because they fear becoming targets of the president-elect’s promised campaign of retribution against his critics and political opponents. “According to two sources with direct knowledge of the matter,” CNN reports, “Scarborough and Brzezinski were credibly concerned that they could face governmental and legal harassment from the incoming Trump administration.”

CNN says, “Knowing that Trump has threatened retribution against his perceived political opponents and that Trump has promoted lies about Scarborough and Brzezinski in the past, the MSNBC hosts decided to reach out to the president-elect.”

We need your help to stay independent

A third possibility is that the on-the-air revelation of the Mar-a-Lago meeting was the price they had to pay before the president-elect would agree to see them. Exacting such a price would appeal to someone like Trump who wants to make people kowtow to him publicly.

Trump seems to take special pleasure when he can do so after he has mocked, insulted, or humiliated such a person. And he certainly has gone out of the way to mock, insult, and humiliate Scarborough and Brezinski.

According to NPR, seven years ago, “President Trump unleashed one of the most vitriolic insults of his presidency… saying MSNBC 'Morning Joe' host Mika Brzezinski was ‘bleeding badly from a face-lift’ while at his Palm Beach, Fla., resort for New Year's Eve. He also described her as ‘low I.Q. Crazy Mika.’"

At the same time, Trump labeled Scarborough “Psycho Joe” and suggested that Scarborough had pathetically overstayed his welcome in Mar-a-Lago the previous New Year’s Eve.

Or, to offer another example of  Trump’s treatment of “Morning Joe’s” co-hosts, four years ago he suggested that “MSNBC’s Joe Scarborough had committed murder.” In May 2020, Trump took to Twitter to ask, “When will they open a Cold Case on the Psycho Joe Scarborough matter in Florida? Did he get away with murder? Some people think so,” Trump wrote. “Why did he leave Congress so quietly and quickly? Isn’t it obvious? What’s happening now? A total nut job!”

None of those insults or innuendos stood in the way of Scarborough and Brezinski’s effort to make peace with Trump. 

Of course, there is nothing wrong in trying to repair a breach. The problem is Scarborough and Brezinski have had a field day criticizing others, like Kevin McCarthy, or Texas Senator Ted Cruz, who have done the same thing after Trump insulted them or their families. 

Scarborough called McCarthy “sad and pathetic” for not criticizing Trump after the then-former president met with a prominent white nationalist. He was quick to attribute McCarthy’s silence to the fact that he “thinks his support depends on having white nationalists and supporters of neo-Nazis voting for him for speaker of the House.”


Want a daily wrap-up of all the news and commentary Salon has to offer? Subscribe to our morning newsletter, Crash Course.


In 2020, Scarborough savaged Cruz in a series of tweets “accusing him of selling his 'soul' by supporting Donald Trump after the president 'called your wife ugly and said your dad killed JFK.'”

Now Scarborough and Brezinski have followed in Cruz’s footsteps. 

Whatever their motives, their hypocrisy undermines the credibility of the program they host. But more importantly, it feeds into the Trumpian narrative that the press, the media, and journalists cannot be trusted. 

There is ample evidence of the hold that the Trumpian narrative now has on the public. Last month, Gallup reported that “Americans continue to register record-low trust in the mass media, with 31% expressing a ‘great deal’ or ‘fair amount’ of confidence in the media to report the news ‘fully, accurately and fairly,’ similar to last year’s 32%. Americans’ trust in the media — such as newspapers, television and radio….For the third consecutive year, more U.S. adults have no trust at all in the media (36%) than trust it a great deal or fair amount.”

Journalism professor Jesse Holcomb explains, “Midway through the 20th century, the news media was among the most trusted institutions in the United States. Today, it sits near the bottom of the list, outflanked only by Congress in most surveys.” Holcomb continues, “It’s one of those social facts that elicits a sense of self-evidence (“We needed a survey for that?”). Everybody knows the media has a credibility problem.”

Part of that credibility problem can be attributed to what Dr. Jill Stein, the Green Party’s presidential nominee, calls the astounding “hypocrisy in mainstream media.” Scarborough and Brezinski exemplify that in spades. 

They should not have been surprised that viewers would see through their charade and be put off by it. And see through it, they did. That is why “Morning Joe” took an immediate ratings hit following Joe and Mika’s Monday morning revelation about the Trump meeting.

Beyond Scarborough and Brezinski’s astounding hypocrisy, by meeting with Trump they dishonored the profession they purport to be a part of. That is made clear by the words of former Supreme Court Justice Hugo Black, long one of the nation’s greatest defenders of the press. In 1971, Black argued that the press's job is “to serve the governed, not the governors…. And paramount among the responsibilities of a free press is the duty to prevent any part of the government from deceiving the people.” To do so depended on what Black called “courageous reporting,”

In the end, there was nothing courageous in Scarborough, and Brezinski sought to get back in the good graces of a man who had made a career of “deceiving the people.” 

That is why “Morning Joe” must go.

Resistance is not futile: Matt Gaetz’s implosion shows how MAGA’s chaos can be turned against Trump

Donald Trump isn't even in the White House yet, and already he's failing. Matt Gaetz, the trolliest of Trump's "Legion of Doom" Cabinet appointees, gave up on the dream of being attorney general on Wednesday. It wasn't just because the recently-resigned Florida congressman is intensely disliked, as much by fellow Republicans as Democrats. Despite the cowardly efforts of House Republicans to quash the findings of an Ethics Committee investigation into Gaetz's alleged sex crimes, the details kept getting leaked at a rapid pace: Reports of drug-fueled sex parties. Multiple witnesses who testified about seeing Gaetz have sex with an underage girl. An elaborate FBI-created graph showing all the cash exchanging hands allegedly to pay for the sex work and drugs. 

The New York Times' Matt Gaetz Venmo diagram: www.nytimes.com/2024/11/20/u…

[image or embed]

— Alex Wagner Tonight (@wagnertonight.bsky.social) November 20, 2024 at 9:03 PM

When CNN called Gaetz to let him know they were publishing another story about witnesses who saw him having sex with the 17-year-old at another orgy, he gave up the ghost, tweeting, "my confirmation was unfairly becoming a distraction to the critical work of the Trump/Vance Transition." 


Want more Amanda Marcotte on politics? Subscribe to her newsletter Standing Room Only.


This is welcome news, to say the least, and not just because Gaetz was a truly terrifying threat to basic law and order. It's a reminder that resistance is not futile. In the two weeks since Trump won, a dark cloud of depression has gathered over the heads of everyone who cares about the rule of law, basic decency, and freedom in this country. Not just because we rightfully fear the destruction Trump and his Project 2025 minions have planned for our once-great nation. So many people feel hopeless to do anything about it. There has been a lot of discourse regarding the fate of the "Resistance," the umbrella term that started in 2017 as a description of liberals en masse, but soon devolved into a term of derision for those perceived as overly earnest and easily excitable in their outrage over Trump. There was a real threat that the "savvy" take was that there is nothing we can do to fight back.

Gaetz throwing in the towel is a necessary reminder that it can pay to fight back.

Gaetz throwing in the towel is a necessary reminder that it can pay to fight back. Republicans were sullenly falling into formation behind this pick, as evidenced by the suppression of the ethics report. But because ordinary people showed some spine — and some interest in consuming news about the scandal — the embarrassing details about Gaetz kept coming out. Trump likely saw the Gaetz pick as a fun way to stick it to the #MeToo movement. Instead, the story was a reminder of why that movement was so necessary. It's hard for even the most devoted rape apologist to argue that we should all be cool about reports of grown men paying high schoolers to have sex. The MAGA backlash wants to see sexual predators as cool, fun-loving guys. The Gaetz debacle reminds us they are, in fact, sad and gross losers. 

That doesn't mean all critiques of "resistance" tactics are wrong or that we should return to 2017-style politics. I agree with Molly Jong-Fast that the tone of nonstop outrage from that era backfired, by making liberals seem joyless and hysterical. Not every provocation requires a response. And when we do respond, it cannot be just expressing outrage, especially when MAGA thrives on "liberal tears." We have to be smarter and more strategic, which I fully admit is easier said than done. But there are lessons to be learned from the Gaetz faceplant. 

The first and foremost is to recognize that chaos and wickedness aren't strengths of MAGA, but weaknesses. That's why I flinched to hear pundits describe Trump as a "strongman," and even worry at times about the word "fascist," though I use it out of a commitment to truth-telling. There's a widespread myth out there that dictators know how to "get stuff done," which authoritarians use to persuade people they are a necessary evil. But it is a myth. Mussolini did not make the trains run on time. Hitler wasn't ruthlessly efficient. He instead bankrupted his country with a horrific war that eventually led to much of the nation being bombed into oblivion. 

As I argued last week when Trump started rolling out his troll-nominations, the Achilles heel of authoritarians is they confuse power and domination, and end up struggling to hold a coalition together. When they were focused on defeating a common enemy — Democrats — Republicans were able to set aside their differences to get Trump over the electoral line. But now that he's won, the fractures are starting to show. Even more importantly, Trump doesn't know how to bring different factions to the table to compromise. Instead, his every instinct is to set people against one another in a never-ending contest to curry his favor. That's great for his ego, but it is not, thankfully, how to get stuff done. 

As we saw with the Gaetz immolation, there will be plenty of opportunity to stoke the intra-GOP tensions. As a bonus, it can be done without resorting to annoying "how dare they" tweeting, which can backfire by reminding Republicans of the common enemy they wish to defeat. What was so effective this time around was that Republicans were humiliated by having to defend Gaetz, and the drip-drip of details only made it worse. These people embrace authoritarianism because they want to feel powerful, and having to eat poop in public is the opposite of that. With characters like Tulsi Gabbard, Pete Hegseth and Robert F. Kennedy Jr. in the nomination funnel, there will be more opportunities to mock anyone pretending they are eminently qualified. We need less "how dare they" and more "ha ha people who give in are sad bootlickers." 

We need your help to stay independent

That doesn't mean Trump will be easy to defeat. He is going to be president, and that comes with a lot of power. He has a lot of goons whose commitment to ending democracy will overcome their reluctance to be photographed with the cartoonish villains Trump surrounds himself with. This is, to be absolutely clear, still bad. But it's not hopeless. The ballots have barely been tallied up and Trump has already sparked massive infighting within his caucus. That can be stoked. It's a potent weapon. 

Nor is this just about short-term wins, either. These tensions can be used for long-term gains. Take Speaker Mike Johnson beclowning himself by repeatedly covering for Gaetz. Johnson has made showy evangelical piety a big part of his political brand. For people who believe all that Christian talk about morality and decency, his behavior is a slap in the face. It's exactly the kind of "oh crap, they don't believe a word of this" wake-up call that people cite as the reason they eventually leave Christian conservatism and join the progressive cause. This is another fracture that needs to be publicized at every turn, not because it will stop Trump immediately, but because it helps drain the MAGA forces of younger people they need to refuel their movement. 

We're not going to win every round. There will be painful losses, including many people who die or suffer under Trump's far-right agenda. This is bad, super-bad, and no one should deny that. But it's also not over. The "resistance" will look different this time, and in ways that will hopefully be more effective. It probably won't even have a too-cute name this time around. But it's not dead. It's already banked a win, and it's still two months to the inauguration. 

“We don’t see our future”: Haitian immigrants in Springfield, Ohio “panicking” after Trump’s victory

Since President-elect Donald Trump won the election earlier this month, Haitian residents of Springfield, Ohio, have been living with a renewed fear of what may come should he follow through on his vow to terminate their temporary legal immigration status.

Many have packed their bags and left, while those who’ve called the Dayton suburb home for years and can't easily relocate scramble for information on their options for remaining in the United States as the threat of deportation during Trump's second term looms.

"Every place here — at church, at school, at work, everywhere — people are talking about what's gonna happen after [Temporary Protected Status] expires," said Evens Edouard, a Haitian resident of Springfield who works as a quality inspector for an automotive safety glass company in a nearby town. "We don't know. We don't know the plan."

Edouard, who said he received the status after losing his immediate relative visa following his divorce from a U.S. citizen he said abused him during their marriage, told Salon in a phone interview that he's most concerned about what his kids' lives will look like if Trump strips his legal status. Three of the 38-year-old's six children, five of whom are minors, hold temporary legal status. His other three children are U.S. citizens.

"I cannot take my kids who were born in the USA, and go back with them to Haiti. How are they gonna leave?" he said, adding: "When you say you have to send them back home, you send your own kids to a country that they don't know. They have the right to live here."

Though he said he believes Trump's campaign trail promise to end Temporary Protected Status was little more than political posturing to win over voters critical of immigration, he does feel the weight of what the election results could mean for his community. 

"I think this election blocked our progress. This election blocked our future in this country," he said, asserting that they're unable to plan for the future because of the uncertainty around what Trump will ultimately do with their legal status and what will happen after. 

"We don't know exactly if we're gonna have a chance to stay or not. We don't know if we have to move to Canada. We don't know if we have to plan to go back to our country. We don't know if we have to plan to go to another country — that's the impact of this election for the Haitian community," he added. "We don't see our future."

Thousands of Haitian people have built new lives in Springfield, and the majority of them live there legally, often via TPS. Their presence has given rise to an economic boost as local industries hire them to fill much-needed roles, but the influx of new residents has also sparked community tensions and strained the city's resources — conflicts that Trump capitalized on during his campaign promise to end the program.

The now-president-elect repeating a false rumor that Haitian residents of Springfield, Ohio, were abducting and eating cats brought the community into sharp focus during the presidential debate in September after his running mate Ohio Sen. JD Vance first amplified the falsehoods on social media. Since then, the community has been at the center of his promises to carry out mass deportations and with it, eliminate the Temporary Protected Status that grants them the legal ability to live and work in the U.S. temporarily. 

Slashing the program could disrupt the lives of thousands of people who have lived in the United States for years. Many would lose work authorization and have to return to untenable conditions in troubled countries, and families would splinter with parents forced to leave their U.S.-born children here.

But even as he beefs up his Cabinet picks with immigration hardliners, Trump's vow of a mass removal of TPS holders currently functions more as a scare tactic than an easily executable plan, legal experts told Salon — and that tactic is working.

"With this type of rhetoric that they've heard, then the fear rips up, and [Haitian clients] believe that maybe they will be deported," said Lana Joseph, a founding partner of Georgia-based immigration law firm L. Marcius Joseph and Associates. "I have explained to them that even though Trump has promised to terminate TPS, it's not a process that is 1, 2, 3, meaning that once he is sworn in on January 20, he's going to get rid of it. It is a process."

Who is at risk if Trump eliminates TPS

In an interview with News Nation last month, the president-elect said he'd "absolutely" revoke the status and vowed to send immigrants back to their country. Vance has also consistently characterized Haitians in Springfield and other TPS recipients as "illegal aliens" granted "amnesty" by the Biden administration with the wave of a "magic government wand."

Trump's advisors have doubled down on the future administration's intent to terminate TPS. His recent spate of Cabinet picks including immigration hardliners makes that threat more pronounced.

"Even those who are here legally can probably face wrongful deportation and that brings fear to families."

Trump selected South Dakota Gov. Kristi Noem to run the Department of Homeland Security, which would give her the authority to decide whether a country's conditions merit a TPS designation. He also chose Thomas Homan, who led the Immigration Customs Enforcement agency during the first Trump term, to manage border policy for the White House, and Stephen Miller, who was instrumental to Trump's first term crackdown, to be the White House deputy chief of staff and oversee deportations, according to The New York Times.

Joseph, also a Haitian woman who goes by "Avoka Pèp La" (the people's advocate) in Kreyol, told Salon that her office has received an influx of calls from distraught clients across the nation — including Springfield — since Trump won the election. People have called, crying and stressed, with fears of family separation, deportation and leaving their homes.  

"We understand, once there is mass deportation, that he will use different ways to see how they can deport people, and even those who are here legally can probably face wrongful deportation and that brings fear to families," she said. "That's, I think, why people are panicking — because even those who are here legally [know] that they can still face wrongful deportation or wrongful action against them."

The Temporary Protected Status program began in 1990 to assist people residing in the U.S. who could not return to their home country because of violent conflict or humanitarian crisis and who had no serious criminal record. More than 800,000 immigrants from 16 countries currently hold the legal status, which lasts for up to 18 months, before the government must reevaluate whether to renew it with end dates varying by country. 

The largest group of people with protection under the program, at around 350,000 holders, comes from Venezuela, due to economic devastation and political repression under the Maduro regime, according to the Times. Immigrants from other countries, including El Salvador, Honduras and Nicaragua, have been eligible for TPS for more than 20 years, a fact that fuels program critics' concerns that the status can run indefinitely. Other countries, like Ethiopia, Ukraine and Lebanon, were made eligible more recently.

About 300,000 Haitians are currently eligible for TPS through to Feb. 3, 2026, as the Caribbean nation faces government collapse and thousands killed by gangs that have since seized control in the wake of the 2021 assassination of the country's president. Some Haitian TPS holders have lived in the U.S. since former President Barack Obama granted the status in 2010, after a magnitude 7.0 earthquake killed around 250,000 people, displaced over a million more and caused environmental devastation the nation hasn't yet been able to fully recover from. 

We need your help to stay independent

Should the Trump administration end TPS status for Haitian and other immigrant groups nationwide, the Department of Homeland Security would make the decision at least 60 days prior to the status' expiry date, according to the American Immigration Council. 

Julie Nemecek, the founder of immigration law firm the Nemecek Firm in Columbus, Ohio, told Salon that TPS holders with more serious criminal records, alongside those who have prior removal orders and no other recourse, would be at the highest risk of immediate deportation if Trump revokes TPS.

"Those people, many of them, are even checking in with ICE as part of the protocol," Nemecek, who's practiced immigration law since 2004, said in a phone interview. "So what can happen to them? They can go to an ICE check, and they can be detained and they can be deported. Or they can be picked up on the street and deported. Those people are the high-risk group."

"We've been through all of it, but one thing with Haitians is that we have proven over and over that we are people of strength, resilience and unwavering faith."

People with active court cases before an immigration judge, though in a "pretty good position," face the next greatest risk as most of them likely have asylum applications while having sought TPS, Nemecek said. If they're in court with applications for asylum and TPS, the TPS being approved for the next month or two would allow an immigration attorney to "get them out of court, get their cases terminated, and then refile with [U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services]," which has a "friendlier" climate. 

TPS holders who were given parole or never placed in removal proceedings are in the "best shape" even though, without status, they'll have to figure out their next steps, Nemecek explained. While they may have to leave the country and return in order to seek relief, most of them could file affirmative asylum applications with USCIS, or pursue benefits through family relationships. 

While a large-scale mass deportation spectacle is unlikely, Nemecek argued, the country will likely see the administration make efforts to make winning immigration cases or filing applications for the relief immigrants are entitled to more difficult. Trump's mass deportation plan also makes family separation like what the nation witnessed in his first term almost an inevitability, she added.

What could happen to communities like Springfield, Ohio next

But Trump ending TPS doesn't beget an immediate end to life in the U.S. for immigrants currently holding the status. While some will be forced to uproot their lives, others will have other immigration relief options, Joseph explained. If the circumstances in Haiti remain the same or worsen in the next few years, people with a fear of persecution upon returning to the country may become eligible for asylum relief. Those who are legally in the country also have a Constitutional right to due process before being deported.

The other challenge to Trump's grand plan to remove immigrants is the "manpower" and "mechanisms" needed to carry it out, she said. More government resources will have to go into hiring more Immigration and Customs Enforcement officers, potentially creating more detention centers and adding personnel to transport people back to their home countries, which will also take time to materialize.


Want a daily wrap-up of all the news and commentary Salon has to offer? Subscribe to our morning newsletter, Crash Course.


In the meantime, organizations like the Immigration Attorneys Association and the American Civil Liberties Union are gearing up to fight legal battles against the Trump administration if he decides to terminate TPS arbitrarily or for political reasons, Joseph said, noting that this happened before. 

The Trump administration attempted to cut TPS in 2017 and 2018 for Haiti, El Salvador, Honduras, Nepal, Nicaragua and Sudan, but was challenged in federal court in the Ramos v. Nielsen case. The ACLU won a preliminary injunction in 2018 that allowed the program to continue, with the court finding, in part, that the Department of Homeland Security had not provided any justification for its new rule and that the Trump administration had, if anything, implemented it out of racial animus in violation of equal protection.  

The Trump administration appealed, and the case remained before the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit even after Trump left office. But the Biden administration's support of the program — which has seen 16 countries' protections renewed, reinstated or added during his term — led the court to vacate the appeal in late 2023. 

Any legal challenges to the incoming Trump administration's effort to revoke TPS "could be a long, drawn-out process in court" that could take years, "although we do understand with this term that maybe he may have more leeway with the courts," Joseph said. "But we're also confident that the law must be upheld." 

Still, the impact of Trump's administration cutting off TPS will be widely felt, Nemecek said. The economic boom in places like Springfield will flatline as workers lose their authorization and homelessness will rise as immigrant families with lower incomes are forced to live in shelters and cars — an outcome Nemecek said she's already seen among her clientele. Should ICE detain people en masse, certain immigrants may be unable to pay bonds, and language barriers will compound all those issues, she said.

"When we're moving an entire community and shipping them off, that has a much larger effect," she said, referencing the ICE deportations of Mauritanian immigrants in Columbus in 2018. 

Those possibilities aren't lost on Edouard, the Springfield resident. Part of the appeal for settling in Springfield was its affordability relative to other cities, the tight-knit community that allows for newcomers to rent rooms from more established residents without the typical financial hurdles of apartment hunting and the relative ease in finding work. Cancelling TPS, he said, will only place many holders in limbo without work authorization or immediate relief, making it harder for them to provide for themselves and their families. 

As he urged the incoming administration to consider amnesty to remain in the country permanently, he also said he blames the U.S., in part, for the violent upheaval Haiti has seen in recent years, pointing to its backing of Haiti's unpopular prime minister and the influx of U.S. guns that have been trafficked into the country.

"You choose who can be the president, who can be the prime minister. You do whatever you want. You give guns, you give everything, and then you destroy the country," he said. "Because people cannot stay in their home country, they leave and they come to your door. They knock [on] your door, they enter. Now you want to send them back? No."

But Joseph remains hopeful that Haitian communities across the country will be able to overcome the next four years of likely hardship under Trump. Her office, along with other immigration offices and the Haitian Lawyers Association, have met to strategize ways to assist immigrant communities, help them navigate the process and provide legal services. Her office has also conducted direct outreach with communities, holding conferences, seminars and free consultation drives, connecting with community leaders — including those in Springfield — and visiting churches to educate congregations on what protections they have in the immediate future and how to prepare. 

While those community support networks will be crucial to the months and years ahead, she underscored that the Haitian community has been here before and "endured unimaginable hardship in the past." 

"We've been through all of it, but one thing with Haitians is that we have proven over and over that we are people of strength, resilience and unwavering faith, that no matter what, we will thrive, we will stand and we'll continue to fight," she said. "That spirit still lives within us, and we will continue on no matter what. That's why our motto for our flag is 'Unity makes strength,' because united, we stand strong."

More people are drinking toxic “forever chemicals” than ever, EPA report finds

On Wednesday, the Environmental Protection Agency released newly-acquired data showing that over 143 million Americans are exposed to so-called “forever chemicals,” or PFAS. The source of this exposure is their drinking water — and as more data comes in, that number is expected to rise.

In the analysis, the EPA learned that 11 million more people are exposed to PFAS (per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances) in their drinking water than was previously reported. The EPA performs an annual set of studies known as the Unregulated Contaminant Monitoring Rule, of which this was the fifth iteration. The UCMR mandates that water utilities across the U.S. test drinking water for 29 different PFAS compounds. PFAS are linked to health problems like high blood pressure, liver disease, lowered sperm count, and various cancers.

The EPA believes that pesticides are a major source of this PFAS contamination. In a paper cited by the EPA in their research, scientists publishing in the journal Environmental Health Perspectives recommended “a more stringent risk assessment approach for fluorinated pesticides, transparent disclosure of ‘inert’ ingredients on pesticide labels, a complete phase-out of post-mold fluorination of plastic containers, and greater monitoring in the United States.”

A March report by the nonprofit Center for Biological Diversity (CBD) reached a similar conclusion. After discovering that pesticides are filled with PFAS, the center urged the EPA “to take control of this situation and remove pesticide products that are contaminated with these extremely dangerous, persistent chemicals."

PFAS go by the nickname "forever chemicals" because they never organically degrade. The chemicals are fluorinated to prevent many microorganisms from breaking down the strong carbon-fluorine bonds. These bonds tend to be very chemically inert, which makes it difficult for biological systems to interact with them — but also makes them uniquely able to repel oil, water and stains. This is why they are popular in a wide range of consumer products from umbrellas and clothing to furniture, cookware and food packaging.

Democrats can still pull off a victory before year’s end: Lowering drug costs once more

Democrats have a golden opportunity to lower drug prices — again — before the next Congress begins on Jan. 3.

Democrats and Republicans alike support two bills that'd rein in pharmacy benefit managers — the gigantic and secretive "pharmaceutical middlemen who squeeze small pharmacies' profits and raise costs for consumers," as Vice President Kamala Harris described them during the campaign. If congressional leaders bring the bills up for a vote during the post-election lame duck session, they'll almost certainly pass — and thus save Americans billions of dollars at the pharmacy.

Americans of all political stripes want lawmakers to rein in PBMs, who are inflating prescription drug costs at patients' expense. One recent poll conducted by Morning Consult found that over two-thirds of registered voters think Congress should consider passing PBM reform legislation before the end of the year.

It's no mystery why so many Americans feel this way. Currently, around one in four adults struggle to afford their prescribed medicine, while about three in ten don't adhere to prescriptions due to cost, according to the health policy research group KFF.

Pharmacy benefit managers perform several tasks within the health care industry. They negotiate drug prices with manufacturers on behalf of insurers, process prescription claims, and manage formularies — insurers' lists of covered drugs. But somewhere along the way, the companies realized they could ring up steep profits at the expense of patients.

That "market structure" is the result of big insurers, PBMs, and pharmacies teaming up — by means of mergers and acquisitions — to control the industry.

PBMs decide which medicines get covered by insurance plans, and they use that gatekeeping power to extract massive discounts from drug manufacturers. The PBMs pocket a percentage of those savings as income.

This gives them a warped incentive to put the most expensive medicines on formularies, with little regard for cheaper alternatives. The higher a drug's nominal "list" price, the bigger the discount, and the more the PBM makes.

And the rest of the savings from PBM negotiations generally aren't passed on to patients at the pharmacy. In fact, insurance companies typically set coinsurance and copay amounts based on a drug's original list price, not the negotiated price. According to a 2022 report from the University of Southern California, patients pay up to 20% more for generic drugs than they would if they got to benefit from PBM savings.


Want more health and science stories in your inbox? Subscribe to Salon's weekly newsletter Lab Notes.


In July, the Federal Trade Commission published an investigation into the sector, in which it reported that a "vertically integrated and concentrated market structure has allowed PBMs to profit at the expense of patients and independent pharmacists."

That "market structure" is the result of big insurers, PBMs, and pharmacies teaming up — by means of mergers and acquisitions — to control the industry. Each conglomerate favors its own pharmacies, which pushes smaller ones out of the market. These tactics helped shutter nearly 2,200 pharmacies between December 2017 and December 2020, leaving dozens of communities, many of them rural, with limited access to medication.

Fed up with this behavior, lawmakers are now proposing common-sense reforms.

We need your help to stay independent

One bill would eliminate the perverse incentive for PBMs to put more expensive drugs on formularies — by delinking PBM compensation from the list price for drugs. Instead of earning a percentage of a drug's list price, the middlemen would receive a flat fee.

Another legislative proposal would make sure that any savings negotiated by PBMs are passed on to patients at the pharmacy counter. This bill would require that patients pay coinsurance rates based on a drug's negotiated, discounted price, rather than on its full list price. The proposal would cut out-of-pocket costs for Medicare Part D patients with asthma and congestive heart failure.

These two strategies — delinking and sharing the savings — would achieve the ultimate goal of cutting patients' out-of-pocket costs.

Washington is about to look a whole lot different. But there's no reason that the two bipartisan PBM reform bills need to wait. Congressional leaders from both parties agree on the need to pass PBM reform, and the current "lame duck" legislative session is an ideal opportunity to do so.

Ariana Grande’s health: A timeline of the obsession surrounding her body image

Ariana Grande ought to be celebrating.

The actor and singer is receiving rave reviews for her comedic turn in John M. Chu's big-screen adaptation of the hit Broadway musical "Wicked." With her onscreen partner in crime Cynthia Erivo, the two have traversed the globe to promote their movie, which serves as a prequel to "The Wizard of Oz" and follows the evolution of Glinda (Grande) and Elphaba (Erivo) from frenemies to best friends at Shiz University in the magical world of Oz. 

Ultimately, "Wicked" is the tale of friendship overcoming how Elphaba has been ostracized for her unusual appearance: her bright green skin. However, this message about superficial prejudice has not fully penetrated to people online who continue to pick apart Grande's appearance.

Over the last several weeks as the stars have promoted their film, viral posts across several different social media platforms have been pointing out Grande's slender frame while also sharing their opinions about the artist's mental health. It's a disturbing pattern Grande herself had to address last year. But despite her plea for people to refrain from commenting on her body and anyone's body, that hasn't stopped the unfounded diagnoses.

Salon goes over the timeline of the focus placed on Grande's body and mental health over the years:

June 2018: Grande discusses mental health issues after 2017 Manchester concert bombing 

At her 2017 sold-out Manchester, England concert, Grande was present during a terrorist attack that claimed 22 lives and injured more than 500 people.

In an interview with Elle, the star opened up about the residual trauma from the deadly attack. 

“When I got home from tour, I had really wild dizzy spells, this feeling like I couldn’t breathe,” she said. “I would be in a good mood, fine and happy, and they would hit me out of nowhere. I’ve always had anxiety, but it had never been physical before. There were a couple of months straight where I felt so upside down.”

April 2019: The singer posted a scan of her brain, opening up about her PTSD

After the Manchester attack and the sudden overdose of her off-and-on boyfriend and rapper Mac Miller, Grande shared a photo of her brain scan. 

In a follow-up post, Grande said she was doing her best even though her brain “looks like the world map.” She continued, “Didn’t mean to startle anyone with my brain thingy.

“I love science and seeing the physical reality of what’s going on in there was incredible to me. Someday, when I’m more healed up, we can talk more about it. I am constantly working on my health/learning how to process pain (aren't we all)," she said.

April 2023: Grande posts a TikTok addressing people's comments about her body

Body-shaming comments seem to have hit a nerve with Grande last year. The star was still filming "Wicked" in the Spring of 2023 when her Instagram was flooded with comments and concerns about her thinness and what people perceived as a visible weight loss.

The singer then took to TikTok to address the rampant speculation and "concern" around her weight. On the video was a caption that stated, "You have talked a lot about it over the past decade or longer so I'd like to join in this time.

"I think we should gentler and less comfortable commenting on people's bodies — no matter what. If you think good or well-intentioned — whatever it is — healthy, unhealthy, big, small, this or that. We just shouldn't. We should work towards not doing that as much," she emphasized.

She suggested that people should aim towards tweaking their compliments or ignoring something that bothers them so they don't comment at all to "keep each other safer."

Grande added, "There are many different ways to look healthy and beautiful. I know personally for me, the body you've been comparing my current body to was the unhealthiest version of my body."

The singer revealed that in the past, "I was on a lot of antidepressants and drinking on them and eating poorly and at the lowest point of my life when I looked the way you consider my healthy. But that in fact wasn't my healthy."

She also reiterated she didn't have to explain this but wanted to have an openness and vulnerability with her audience to enact some positive change. 

"You never know what someone's going through. Even if you are coming from a loving place and a caring place, that person probably is working on it or has a support system that they are working on it with," Grande said. "So, be gentle with each other and with yourselves."

October – November 2024: Numerous popular posts claim Erivo and Grande have eating disorders

While Grande has already addressed the concerns around her weight the hypervisiblity of the "Wicked" press tour has revived the discourse. But this time it included Erivo too.

In viral posts across platforms like Reddit, X, Instagram, Facebook and TikTok, people are speculating about why both Erivo and Grande look thinner. As their proof, they are posting photos of the actors years before they filmed "Wicked" comparing them to photos after filming the movie, while they're promoting the movie

Others on TikTok are claiming that they have insight into the actors' weight loss and bodies. One post said, "Anyone who's been in a mutually destructive competitive ED friendship knows exactly what's going on."

Influencer Chloe Forero said, "You could not pay me to say that Ariana Grande looks healthy because she does not. She looks sick . . . I want to approach this with sympathy because I understand that Ariana Grande is in the limelight and that comes with so much pressure. We have no choice but to acknowledge she is a role model and she does set an example for a lot of people. Little girls might see the billboard on the highway of Ariana looking strikingly thin and think they should look like that.”

In a USA Today interview, an eating disorder expert, Dr. Elizabeth Wassenaar at the Eating Recovery Center explained, "These comments about how your body is acceptable or unacceptable, it reinforces again that you are not worth more than your body and that you have to present yourself a certain way for the world to find you acceptable."

She continued, "It just reinforces that sort of superficial, body-focused idea that we know is so painful and harmful for every single one of us because we are so much more than this vessel that carries us."

We need your help to stay independent

Nov. 6: On "Las Culturistas," Grande calls out people who try to diagnose her

On the podcast "Las Culturistas," Grande, along with her "Wicked" co-star Bowen Yang and podcast co-host Matt Rogers were joking about the internet's intrusive ability to diagnose a celebrity with a mental illness without the full picture.

Rogers said, "I have a mental illness that no one can tell me what it is!"

Grande chimed in, "Well, Twitter will tell you!"

Rogers replied, "One day they all came for me like 'Matt has ADHD' and I was like 'Pfft stop!' Now I'm like, 'I do!'"

Grande then shared, “They tell me I have a lot of things . . . You're actually invasive and scary, and triggering. Just wrong and loud, and unhealthy — that's toxic.”

Instacart becomes first online grocery platform to launch SNAP eligibility screener for customers

Instacart, the San Francisco-based grocery delivery company, has launched an all-new Supplemental Nutrition Access Program (SNAP) eligibility tool that lets consumers anonymously check whether they qualify for benefits in less than 60 seconds, the company announced in a Thursday press release. Powered by Advocatia Solutions, Inc., the new tool also allows customers to find relevant state resources to make the enrollment process more efficient. 

“Everyone deserves access to fresh, nutritious food, and we're committed to using the power of Instacart to break down barriers that too often stand in the way,” Dani Dudeck, Chief Corporate Affairs Officer at Instacart, said in a statement. “With food insecurity at an all-time high in the U.S., affecting more than one in every eight people, it's more important than ever to raise awareness of critical assistance programs like SNAP that can help families meet their needs. By introducing our SNAP eligibility screener, we're making it simpler for families to find out if they qualify and take the first steps toward putting more food on their tables.”

Instacart is the first online grocery marketplace to launch a tool focused on SNAP eligibility on its platform. In 2023, Instacart “became the first online grocery marketplace to expand online SNAP acceptance to all 50 states and Washington, D.C.,” per its recent press release. The grocery marketplace first launched online SNAP acceptance in 2020. Today, it can connect nearly 98% of U.S. households enrolled in SNAP to approximately 180 retail banners and over 300,000 retailers online, including Costco, Kroger, Aldi and Sprouts.   

As of April 2023, 41.9 million people in 22.2 million households across the country (or 12.5% of the total U.S. population) received SNAP benefits, according to the Pew Research Center. In the 2022 fiscal year — which was from Oct. 2021 through Sept. 2022 — an average of 41.2 million people in 21.6 million households received monthly SNAP benefits.

Research conducted by the non-profit organization No Kid Hungry, the University of Kentucky and Instacart found that “online grocery shopping helps low-income families, including SNAP households, stretch their food budgets, save time, reduce stress, and purchase more produce without increasing their total grocery spend,” Instacart said in its press release.

Warning to “Wicked” theatergoers issued by AMC Theaters: Nobody wants to hear you sing

There is a time and a place for belting into song, with some appropriate options being the shower, the car, cleaning the house, making a pot of spaghetti, etc. Absent from the list of when and where to unleash the melody in your heart, however, is a movie theater. Unless maybe the theater is screening "The Rocky Horror Picture Show" or something. 

AMC Theatres, hip to the discourse surrounding "Wicked" fans' exuberance for singing along with Cynthia Erivo and Ariana Grande in packed theaters, and the annoyance expressed by others who paid good money to enjoy the songs from the film sung by the actors actually performing them, and not local drama nerds, have made effort to crack down on this carrying on. Will it work? Probably not. But the effort is appreciated by some.

"Yall theater nerds better not be singing during my screening of 'Wicked' tonight," one fan wrote in a post to X, expressing a view held by many following the out-of-place trend that began as soon as the film hit theaters in early screenings ramping up to its official November 22 wide release.

"To avoid a full theater of people singing along, I got tickets to a 3D screening of 'Wicked' tonight. Infinitely more excited," wrote another fan.

Stepping in front of a rising issue here, AMC Theaters' new advisory will now run before each screening, with the warning: "No talking. No texting. No singing. No wailing. No flirting. And absolutely no name-calling. Enjoy the magic of movies." 

The fear is that this advisory may inspire people to sing even louder, out of rebellion and an unharnessed love for musical theater, such as in the case of one fan who posted to X that they are more than ready to break the rules, writing, "Me seeing the 'Wicked' movie singing along after I'm told not to," along with a clip of Kyle Richards singing on the Fox reality show, "We Are Family."

Brazilian police indict Bolsonaro and accomplices for 2022 coup attempt, alleged plot to kill Lula

Brazil's federal police announced Thursday that they had indicted former President Jair Bolsonaro and 36 other people on charges of attempting a military coup, accusing the far-right politician of having "full knowledge" of a plot to kill the 2022 election victor, President Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva, multiple outlets reported.

Despite Bolsonaro repeatedly challenging the legitimacy of the election, he has denied involvement in attempts to overturn the results. Testimony and video footage presented to Brazilian law enforcement and judges in the course of investigations over the past year, however, suggest that he directly approached military officers in a bid to remain in power through force.

While most high-ranking officers allegedly warned Bolsonaro not to take his idea any further, his supporters attacked the buildings of the Supreme Court of Brazil, the National Congress of Brazil and the Planalto Presidential Palace on Jan. 8, 2023 in a failed bid to instigate a wider revolt. Lula accused Bolsonaro of provoking the unrest. Bolsonaro, who was not in Brazil at the time, condemned the rioters the following day and denied involvement.

Involvement in the Jan. 8 attacks was far from the only accusation leveled against Bolsonaro, even before the investigation began into the alleged military coup attempt. Last year, the Brazilian Superior Electoral Court barred him from running for public office until 2030 due to his attempts to undermine the legitimacy of the election and for abusing his power by using official government functions and resources to promote his campaign. Bolsonaro has also been investigated for potentially smuggling diamond jewelry into Brazil without properly declaring it, and falsifying his and others' COVID-19 vaccination status.

In February 2024, federal police raided the properties of former government officials and ordered Bolsonaro to surrender his passport as part of the coup investigation. Multiple army and navy officers then testified that Bolsonaro had approached them after the election with a scheme to overthrow the government-in-transition.

On Tuesday, police arrested five officers who they said were involved in plans to kill Lula and his running mate, Geraldo Alckmin, as well as Supreme Court Justice Alexandre de Moraes. It was Moraes who authorized the  arrests and received on Thursday the police's findings regarding Bolsonaro's alleged involvement. The case will now be referred to Prosecutor-General Paulo Gonet, who will decide whether or not to press charges.

In 2016, RFK Jr. desribed Trump voters as ranging from “belligerent idiots” to “outright Nazis”

Donald Trump’s pick to lead the Department of Health and Human Services, vaccine-denier Robert F. Kennedy Jr., had harsh words for the president-elect and his supporters following his 2016 win.

In a December 2016 episode of his “Ring of Fire” radio show, unearthed by CNN’s KFile, Kennedy blasted Trump’s voters as “belligerent idiots” allied with “spineless fellow travelers.” The now-thought leader of the Make America Healthy Again platform also said that “outright Nazis” inside Trump’s orbit were advanced by the “cowards” and “bootlickers” within his camp.

Kennedy went on to compare Trump to Nazi leader Adolf Hitler, concluding that the Republican was in some ways worse.

“[At least] Hitler was interested in policy,” Kennedy said.

The former independent presidential candidate joined the Trump team in August, abandoning his promise earlier that month that he was not open to joining Trump’s cabinet and drawing cheers from the very same crowd he once called “idiots,” “opportunists” and “fleshy dominoes.”

On the radio in 2016, Kennedy attacked Trump’s populist playbook, comparing him to European dictators like Francisco Franco and Benito Mussolini, as well as American white supremacists George Wallace and Father Charles Coughlin.

“You can see that every statement that Donald Trump makes is fear-based … trust in me, vote for me and everything will be great again. And of course, that whole thing is like a carnival barker,” Kennedy said..

In a statement to CNN, Kennedy explained his flip-flop by demonizing the press, expressing gratitude for working with Trump today.

“I allowed myself to believe the mainstream media’s distorted, dystopian portrait of President Trump. I no longer hold this belief and now regret having made those statements,” Kennedy said.

Assuming Trump doesn’t axe his nomination, Kennedy wouldn’t be the lone voice to have likened Trump to Hitler in the West Wing. Vice President-elect JD Vance once called the then-candidate “America’s Hitler” years before joining him on the GOP ticket.

“Do not do that at my table”: CNN’s Abby Phillip shuts down Trump surrogate’s “condescending” remark

A CNN panel over Donald Trump’s since-withdrawn attorney general pick Matt Gaetz’s sordid history of sexual misconduct investigations got heated on Wednesday night when a Trump surrogate hurled a condescending dismissal.

In a segment discussing a web of former Florida Rep. Gaetz’s Venmo transactions leaked to the New York Times, host Abby Phillip had to shut down MAGA surrogate and ex-director of the National Diversity Coalition for Trump, Bruce LeVell.

“Is this really the best we can do? Somebody who has real allegations– wait a second,” Democratic strategist Julie Roginsky said as LeVell tried to cut her off. “He has real allegations of having underage sex, according to people who are Republicans on the House floor.”

Gaetz was the subject of a Department of Justice probe and a House Ethics inquiry over alleged sexual misconduct, including allegations he had sex with a 17-year-old girl. Senate Republicans have largely refused to comment on the allegations, as House GOP leadership seeks to bury the report.

Philip chimed in, noting that Gaetz more closely fit the “profile of the type of person” the Department of Justice would investigate. 

“The DOJ investigates– the Merrick Garland DOJ– they investigated this,” LeVell said before Philip clarified that the investigation began during the first Trump administration.

“Okay, and all during– the bottom line is the DOJ said there’s nothing there,” LeVell claimed.

Roginsky interjected, disputing the claim and adding the DOJ only “said they didn't have enough to indict.”

“It’s a charge, dear,” LeVell said, triggering an impassioned response at the misogynistic slight from Roginsky.

“Dear? Excuse me,” the Democratic strategist responded before Philip intervened.

“I’m just gonna stop it right here because we’re not gonna get off on a wrong foot. Please do not address a grown woman as ‘dear’ in a condescending tone. Do not do that at my table,” the host said.

Philip had to shut down a fiery panel discussion earlier this month when a different Trump-backing pundit turned to transphobia to explain why Democrats lost the White House, prompting a reaction from commentator Jay Michaelson. Another panel last month devolved into chaos when Trump surrogate Ryan Girdusky hurled an anti-Muslim joke at journalist Medhi Hasan. Girdusky was banned from future CNN appearances.

WATCH: “Please do not address a grown woman in a condescending tone as ‘dear’. Do not do that at my table.” abby phillip steps in when former Trump ‘National Diversity Coalition’ ED Bruce Levell talks down to @julieroginsky.bsky.social

[image or embed]

— The Tennessee Holler (@thetnholler.bsky.social) November 20, 2024 at 11:18 PM

Musk and Ramaswamy are banking on the Supreme Court letting Trump unilaterally slash spending

Elon Musk and Vivek Ramaswamy, two billionaires appointed by President-elect Donald Trump to oversee the so-called Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE), say they will rely on recent Supreme Court rulings to justify unilaterally cut down federal agencies and wipe away existing regulations.

In an op-ed published by the Wall Street Journal on Wednesday, the pair of MAGA businessmen pointed to two particular rulings that will prove especially helpful, in their view. In 2022, the court found that federal agencies cannot address "major questions" with broad economic or social impact without explicit congressional approval. Later that same year, the Supreme Court overturned its own precedent that had called on courts to defer to an agency's interpretation of ambiguous laws.

Both decisions have empowered courts to intervene in federal policy, striking down Biden administration rules they characterize as overreach, including student loan forgiveness and an overtime pay expansion. Now that Musk, Ramaswamy and their allies are at the executive steering wheel, they believe that the courts will back their rollback of thousands of other policies, amounting to about $500 billion in cuts.

Programs on the chopping block include the Corporation for Public Broadcasting, as well as international aid and money for Planned Parenthood.

Some legal experts say their confidence is misplaced. William Buzbee, a professor at Georgetown Law, told Reuters that the Musk-Ramaswamy interpretation of recent cases is "very confused," and that while Trump has latitude to ask agencies to "go easy" on enforcement, neither court decision restricts federal agency powers as much as Musk and Ramaswamy might wish.

But even a partial realization of their plans could severely disrupt government services essential for a functioning society, especially if they end up firing federal workers en masse or inducing them to retire. Musk has admitted as such, suggesting that Americans would have to suffer immediate "hardship" in exhange for long-term prosperity. 

Read more

about Trump's billionaires

SEC Chair Gary Gensler stepping down as crypto industry pushes for friendlier agency

Securities and Exchange Commission Chair Gary Gensler plans to resign on Jan. 20, a decision that paves the way for President-elect Donald Trump to reshape the agency into a more favorable environment for crypto and Wall Street. 

Gensler, a nominee of President Joe Biden who began his role in April 2021, led an agency that cracked down on cryptocurrencies and other regulatory issues. His resignation, announced on Thursday, allows Trump to select a replacement immediately. 

SEC commissioners serve five-year terms, so Gensler could have stayed longer. But Trump had pledged on the campaign trail to remove him. He has not named a replacement.

Candidates under consideration have included Daniel Gallagher, a former SEC official now at financial services firm Robinhood, and current Republican SEC commissioners Hester Peirce and Mark Uyeda, according to the Washington Post. 

Under Gensler, the SEC had several high profile disputes with the crypto industry, including a legal fight with Grayscale to block bitcoin ETFs, CNBC reported. Grayscale won, and billions of dollars have flowed into those funds since they launched in January, CNBC reported.

The SEC also sued several large digital asset companies over how they were handling or selling crypto, including Coinbase, CNBC reported.

Crypto corporations emerged as a major player in the 2024 election, pouring over $119 million into candidates' coffers — accounting for 44% of all corporate political spending, according to data compiled by nonprofit watchdog Public Citizen. 

The industry sent hundreds of pro-crypto candidates to the U.S. House and some to the Senate, according to data compiled by Stand with Crypto tracker.

Bitcoin has jumped 40% since Trump's win, The Associated Press reported, and was nearing $100,000 Thursday. It jumped again after Gensler's resignation was announced.

Trump has promised to make the U.S. the "crypto capital of the planet." But industry watchers have raised questions about who will keep crypto donors in check and consumers safe.

Crypto's resurgence comes two years after an industry-wide collapse resulted in failed exchanges and massive fraud at FTX. The firm's founder, Sam Bankman-Fried, is serving a 25-year prison sentence after he was convicted of defrauding customers.

Twist in Jussie Smollett saga: Conviction overturned in high-profile “hate crime” case

"Empire" actor Jussie Smollett found himself at the center of an embarrassing legal saga in 2021, after a jury in Cook County, Illinois found him guilty of five out of six charges of felony disorderly conduct for making allegedly fabricated police reports claiming he'd been the victim of a racist and homophobic hate crime in 2019.

Sentenced to 150 days in county jail, plus 30 months of probation and $130,000 in restitution in a push on the case when the Cook County state’s attorney asked the state to conduct an independent inquiry with a special prosecutor after the charges against him were initially dropped in March 2019, Smollett's case has taken yet another turn.

An opinion released on Thursday by the Illinois Supreme Court now rules that the special prosecutor’s decision to retry Smollett violated his rights, according to Variety, stating, “We are aware that this case has generated significant public interest and that many people were dissatisfied with the resolution of the original case and believed it to be unjust. Nevertheless, what would be more unjust than the resolution of any one criminal case would be a holding from this court that the State was not bound to honor agreements upon which people have detrimentally relied.” 

In a statement made to press following this latest development, special prosecutor Dan Webb — who indicted Smollett again in February 2020 — said, “Make no mistake — today’s ruling has nothing to do with Mr. Smollett’s innocence. The Illinois Supreme Court did not find any error with the overwhelming evidence presented at trial that Mr. Smollett orchestrated a fake hate crime and reported it to the Chicago Police Department as a real hate crime, or the jury’s unanimous verdict that Mr. Smollett was guilty of five counts of felony disorderly conduct. In fact, Mr. Smollett did not even challenge the sufficiency of the evidence against him in his appeal to the Illinois Supreme Court.”

With “A Man on the Inside” Ted Danson sweetly leads us into the mystery of getting old and going on

Mike Schur devised a mostly foolproof formula for the perfect modern workplace sitcom that began with “The Office” and steadily evolved through “Parks and Recreation” and “Brooklyn Nine-Nine.” Watching enough of his shows and you'll notice a repeating pattern of types, starting with the well-meaning but weird protagonist who is good at his job but takes some effort to fall for. Every episode after the pilot is a courtship between that character and the audience, facilitated by the wingmen and wingwomen surrounding them. 

Those are familiar personalities too – the stardard-bearer for normalcy (like Rashida Jones’ Ann Perkins in “Parks and Rec”), the skilled weirdo (Dwight Schrute in “The Office”), the lovable dim bulb (Manny Jacinto’s Jason in “The Good Place").

Sometime during “The Good Place,” Schur began to break pattern. Somewhat. "The Good Place" is still a workplace fable connected to a post-life, rules-defined bureaucracy that's eventually defeated and rebooted by a few souls pursuing the meaning of goodness. It was reliably and breathtakingly hilarious, heartfelt and often heartbreaking.

“A Man on the Inside” meets our current moment of yearning for connection.

His latest, Netflix's “A Man on the Inside," operates as a twist on an old maxim. If dying is easy and comedy is hard, making the years leading up to death humorous without making the people living through them into a joke takes . . . something else. Here, Schur brings the audience into the reality of what it means to keep going after much of what you've taken for granted fades away.

Pulling that off requires prioritizing heartfelt moments over brazen hilarity which, again, few TV storytellers do well. I'm guessing that's because in the youth-obsessed entertainment industry, few know what it’s like to be old or conceive of that age as being a time of renewed independence and agency. "Every great thing in your life, looking back on it, feels like a miracle," says one of its dearest figures, and he's talking about simple moments like meeting his wife and cooking for her for the first time.

For “A Man on the Inside,” inspired by the 2021 documentary “The Mole Agent,” Schur reconnects with “Good Place” star Ted Danson as  Charles Nieuwendyk, a retired engineering professor living in San Francisco who struggles to keep going after his wife’s recent death. 

Already this diverges from Schur’s previous hits, in that Charles doesn’t have a corporate structure to navigate or any professional obligations. He's unmoored, and that's the problem. Charles is at once a Renaissance man and a Luddite. Without prompting he'll enthusiastically offer up fun facts about the Golden Gate Bridge, the subject of his book, or the root system of a sequoia. At the same time his idea of maintaining a connection with his daughter Emily (Mary Elizabeth Ellis) is snail mailing her newspaper clippings of random esoterica, like an art forgery at a German museum.

When she cites how distant he’s grown and urges him to take up a new hobby, Charles answers a classified ad from a private detective, Julie (Lilah Richcreek Estrada), looking for help with a jewelry theft case at the Pacific View Retirement Home. 

A Man on the InsideLilah Richcreek Estrada, Kerry O'Malley and Ted Danson in "A Man on the Inside" (Netflix)Julie instructs Charles to infiltrate Pacific View, and at first, he pictures himself as the city's version to John Le Carré’s George Smiley, diving into spy mode by sliding a pocket square into his stuffy sport jacket. But he’s quickly pulled into the seductive web of active senior living, which entails a lot of drinking, hanging out, and childish gossip – which, if you’ve spent any time visiting someone living in one of these complexes, is accurate.

“A Man on the Inside” is not a slapstick snort-fest in the mold of so many movies headlined by elderly stars misbehaving, thank goodness. Earnest and genuine in its storytelling, it's populated with fully realized characters who only somewhat adhere to Schur’s closet of personality types. Danson does find a love again — a Schur signature — only here, that spark isn’t for any one person or the community Charles stumbles into. He's forging a new relationship with the joy of living. 

Instead of reaching for the easy joke, or any at all, “A Man on the Inside” makes tenderness and honesty its North Star.

Nevertheless, the Pacific View residents fall into a few familiar categories. There’s an incurable curmudgeon (Lori Tan Chinn), the hardheaded jerk everyone tolerates (John Getz), and the popular girls (Margaret Avery and Sally Struthers). Despite flirtatious overtures from Struthers’ Virginia, Charles doesn’t feel a pull toward anyone except, maybe, for Susan Ruttan’s Gladys, for reasons that have nothing to do with romance, and Stephen McKinley Henderson's Calbert.

Some stunning monologues weave naturally into the script, and Calbert does gorgeous work with some of the best of them. A standout in the seventh episode chronicles the tumbling cascade of infirmities that come with old age that start with aches that never go away. Then the words start to leave you, he says. The nouns go. Then, the sleeplessness. 

"We're all in denial," he says. "You have to be. Only way to cope." Henderson steeps his delivery not in tragedy, but with a pure knowing and empathy. It is comforting and real. If I could I'd watch that speech a thousand times. I just might.

“A Man on the Inside” is a reminder of how much “The Good Place” was a product of its time, having debuted at the beginning of the first Trump administration and steadily amping up its examination of what it means to be good until it landed with an uplifting, tear-soaked conclusion in 2020.


Want a daily wrap-up of all the news and commentary Salon has to offer? Subscribe to our morning newsletter, Crash Course.


“A Man on the Inside” meets our current moment of yearning for connection by placing the question of finding it in the hands of a withdrawn widower intellectualizing his way through his days, which Danson plays with easy charisma. Even Charles’ goofier moments gleam with a satin elegance that scrapes against the no-nonsense manner of Estrada’s P.I.  

Her role operates as more of a device than that of Ellis’ Emily or Stephanie Beatriz’s retirement community director Didi, whose emotional bond to the residents reflects the level of care Charles is advised to refrain from having, but that can’t be helped. 

Ellis channels the exasperation and hurt that comes with a parent pulling away in their twilight years. She’s also terrific as a mom weighted with the responsibility of raising three sons who aren’t the brightest bulbs. In Emily’s household, everybody is a “bro,” which makes her erudite father’s distance even more infuriating.

Beatriz plays with a spectrum that wasn’t available to her as Rosa Diaz in “Brooklyn Nine-Nine,” personifying the balance Schur and his writers strike between serious matters and laughter. Didi enables the actor to explore her dramatic breadth within a comedy that is decidedly and intentionally funny.

That is said with a firm recognition and respect for the writers’ restraint in that department – an easy edit given the deep bench of seasoned performers in its cast. 

A Man on the InsideMargaret Avery and Sally Struthers in "A Man on the Inside" (Netflix)Where other comedies about retirement focus on the wealthy and extraordinary – would that we could all sail into our golden years with Grace and Frankie’s bank accounts and health! – this story’s strength is its common relatability. A subplot that revolves around memory loss brings a skillful performance in Danson and his scene partner.

Balancing out Danson are standout performances by Struthers and Ruttan, but Henderson's anchoring turn as a solitary figure Charles values at first as a resource but soon comes to cherish for personal reasons, infuses the story with grace and soul. 

“A Man on the Inside” doesn’t take long to find its way, but its thoughtful treatment of loneliness and grief is wonderful in the way it makes it OK to ache along each discovery about Charles and the people he gets to know without tumbling into oversentimentality.

Instead of reaching for the easy joke, or any at all, “A Man on the Inside” makes tenderness and honesty its North Star. It’s not the funniest comedy on TV, but it may be the most watchable and poignant. We can always use reasons to laugh, but the stories that remind us of our humanity and worth at any age have higher value – especially now.

"A Man on the Inside" debuts Thursday, Nov. 21 on Netflix.

“Becoming a distraction”: Gaetz withdraws from consideration for AG amid sexual misconduct claims

Former Florida Rep. Matt Gaetz withdrew himself from consideration as President-elect Donald Trump’s pick to lead the Department of Justice on Thursday as details of a sexual misconduct report rattled members of his own party.

“While the momentum was strong, it is clear that my confirmation was unfairly becoming a distraction to the critical work of the Trump/Vance Transition," Gaetz posted to X on Thursday. “I'll be withdrawing my name from consideration to serve as Attorney General. Trump's DOJ must be in place and ready on Day 1,” Gaetz said, adding that he will “forever be honored” Trump picked him.

Gaetz had spent Wednesday in talks with key GOP senators, seeking to reassure them not just over his alleged sexual misconduct but his perceived extreme agenda.

“Look, I’m not going to go there and indict Liz Cheney, have stormtroopers bust through the studio door at MSNBC, and arrest Anthony Fauci in my first week,” Gaetz told senators, per The Bulwark.

According to the Bulwark report, senators left that meeting with a sense of unease.

While Gaetz promised to break “the cycle of weaponizing DOJ,” some seemed sure he would do just that, especially given Trump’s claimed mandate to gut the entire department. 

Other concerns about Gaetz’s potential misconduct, including an alleged sexual encounter with a 17-year-old, also weighed down his AG bid. House Speaker Mike Johnson argued against releasing a House ethics report on the allegations against Gaetz, while high-ranking Texas Sen. John Cornyn demanded his chamber be allowed to read it before a vote.

Though it isn’t clear whether Trump could have ultimately forced a recess appointment or strong-armed the GOP Senate delegation into clearing Gaetz, it would have, as the nominee pointed out, been an increasingly costly endeavor.

The ex-Rep. already gave up his seat in the House, calling it quits just days before the House Ethics report into his alleged sexual misconduct and drug use was set to be released.

Jiminy jillikers! On “The Simpsons,” Milhouse will sound a little different as voice actor retires

Pamela Hayden, the voice actor who has played Millhouse on "The Simpsons," announced her retirement after 35 years on the animated comedy.

The actor's final episode titled "Treehouse of Horror Presents: Simpsons Wicked This Way Comes,” will air on Sunday, Nov. 24. Hayden has voiced Milhouse Van Houten, Bart Simpson's blue-haired and red glasses-wearing best friend for 35 years since the show's first episode in 1989.

In a retirement announcement video posted to AniDom's YouTube page, Hayden shared, “People come up to me and they quote Milhouse lines.”

She continued, “People are always saying what a nerd he is. But one thing that I love about Milhouse is he’s always getting knocked down, but he keeps getting up. I love the little guy.”

In the video, various clips of Milhouse's best scenes played and archival footage of Hayden is also shared. She said, "Who knew that it was become this phenomenon? It's the greatest job in the world!"

Besides Milhouse, she has voiced characters like school bully Jimbo Bones, Ned Flanders’ sons Rod and occasionally Todd, Chief Wiggum’s wife Sarah and Lisa’s friend Janey Powell. Hayden has been credited for 694 episodes of the FOX animated sitcom. Variety reported that the show will now begin casting new voice actors for her several characters.

 

Trump expected to name Project 2025 architect Russ Vought to head White House budget office

After a year of claiming he had nothing to do with Project 2025, President-elect Donald Trump is appointing one of its chief architects to lead the Office of Management and Budget, multiple outlets reported. Russ Vought, who previously occupied the role for two years in Trump's first term, will return with wide-ranging powers to shape Trump's budget and examine the federal bureaucracy to ensure that it complies with his chosen policies.

No formal announcement has yet been made. But if Vought is appointed and confirmed by the Senate, he will once again be working in an office that he has sought to drastically downsize. He wrote the Project 2025 chapter, "Executive Office of the President," supporting proposals to give the president total power over all federal agencies. To that end, he has suggested reclassifying federal workers as political appointees so they can be fired en masse and ending the autonomy of some federal offices, like the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau and Amtrak, which currently operate independently of the president's direction.

“My belief, for anyone who wants to listen, is that the president has to move executively as fast and as aggressively as possible, with a radical constitutional perspective, to be able to dismantle that bureaucracy and their power centers,” Vought said on Tucker Carlson's podcast this week, claiming that there was no such thing as independent agencies.

Vought also has an expansive view of the historical moment, claiming in a 2022 essay that the United States is in a "post-constitutional time" in which Americans "need to be radical in discarding or rethinking the legal paradigms that have confined our ability to return to the original Constitution."

When serving as Trump's budget chief in his first term, Vought pushed the president and Republicans in Congress to maintain a hardline stance in budget negotiations with Democrats and threaten to breach the debt ceiling in order to get budget cuts passed. During his years in exile, he increasingly couched his policy arguments in the framework of culture war, promising to take the axe to a "woke and weaponized" federal government.

 

Ellen DeGeneres and Portia De Rossi have ditched the US for rural UK after election, source says

It seems that Ellen DeGeneres and wife Portia de Rossi may have said goodbye to the United States for good.

The couple appears to be calling rural England their new home, putting up their Montecito, Calif., estate on the market. The Wrap, citing a source, reported the couple told friends that they had fled the U.S. with no plans to return following President-elect Donald Trump's election win.

Even before the election, DeGeneres has had a difficult couple of years. Her long-standing talk show, "The Ellen DeGeneres," was shuttered in 2022 following allegations of bad behavior and a toxic workplace environment. In her new stand-up special, "Four Your Approval" on Netflix, DeGeneres claimed that she was "kicked out of show business." The comedian further elaborated that you "can't be gay in show business."

"Mean, old and gay," DeGeneres said. "I was the triple crown."

After decades in comedy and working as America's favorite talk show host, DeGeneres has reportedly relocated to the Cotswolds, England. The source told The Wrap that her Montecito mansion, an hour outside of Los Angeles, is in the process of being listed.

DeGeneres isn't the only person seeking to leave because of the election results. As late night host Stephen Colbert recently pointed out, Google internet searches for people looking up how to move abroad were up by 1,000%, including "move to Canada," which was up 1,270%. There is even a cruise line offering four-year trips to those looking to avoid a second Trump term on the mainland.

McDonald’s invests $100 million in marketing to rebuild trust after E. coli outbreak

Following a recent E. coli outbreak, McDonald’s is launching a $100 million marketing campaign and providing more than $60 million in support to franchisees in affected states, according to Jordan Valinsky at CNN.

The marketing campaign highlights a value deal focused on chicken nuggets. McDonald’s also announced that recent tests showed no E. coli in its food, and its Quarter Pounder burgers topped with slivered onions are now back on menus nationwide. In October, the CDC and FDA identified the onions as the likely source of the outbreak, which sickened more than 100 people across 14 states. The CDC also reported one death linked to the outbreak.

In a memo, Michael Gonda, chief impact officer for McDonald’s North America, and Tariq Hassan, chief marketing and customer experience officer, emphasized the company’s commitment to rebuilding trust. “The relevance, trust, and love for the Golden Arches has been hard-earned over nearly 70 years by our unwavering commitment to do the right thing. The past three weeks have only further exemplified that,” they said. 

CEO Chris Kempczinski also reiterated the company’s dedication, saying McDonald’s is “ready to do more if we need to” in order to restore confidence and lean on the loyalty of its long-time customers.

The campaign includes commercials promoting deals such as 10 nuggets for $1 and the continuation of its $5 meal deal.

Meet the peach that traveled the Trail of Tears and the elders working to save it

It's November and it's unseasonably warm as John John Brown, a Muscogee elder, works to replant peach saplings. "I haven't had much luck growing them from seed," he says. The reason, he thinks, is because peaches need lower temperatures. 

Around him, tiny peach trees the size of pencils stand above the browning grass underneath their parent tree. Brown harvested around 200 peaches this year from his small orchard — enough for his family and neighbors — but he had competition: A fox has been poking around. "The animals know when the peaches are ripe quicker than I do," Brown laughs. "They start coming in and stealing my peaches."

Brown's peaches aren't your everyday peaches, they're heirlooms: direct descendants of peach seeds brought across the continent on the Trail of Tears. Brown calls them "Indian peaches" while other Muscogees call them "Trail of Tears peaches." There has been little research on this particular variety, and it's unknown just how many genes they share with commercial peaches. While grocery store peaches are soft and fleshy, Indian peaches don't get much bigger than a lemon and are extremely firm but sweet.

The Indian peach is threatened by climate change. Where hurricanes, flooding, and higher temperatures have massive impacts on crops, including peaches, around the nation, heirloom varieties, like the Indian peach, are also threatened. This fruit, that crossed a planet, carried by traders and travelers, and eventually by a few Muscogees along The Trail before they found a new home outside Sapulpa, Oklahoma, is a connection to another time and place. 

"One of the greatest gifts Creator gave me is these peaches and the ability to share these trees with our community and everyone," Brown said. 

There are only 50 Indian peach trees on the Muscogee reservation that Brown knows of — some grow in some peoples' backyards, and some at a local daycare — and between climate-driven changes to growing cycles and high temperatures, they face a difficult future. Luckily, they have people like Brown working to protect them.

Peach cultivation is thought to have begun around 8,000 years ago in the Yangtze Valley in China. One of the first mentions of peaches in literature appears in the fictional novel Journey to the West, written in 1592, that describes peaches as a fruit that could grant longevity and "make a man's age equal to that of Heaven and Earth, the sun and the moon."

From China, peaches made their way to Europe, then to the Americas in the 1600s on Spanish ships — the beginning of a kind of crop exchange between the continents: potatoes and tomatoes from South and Central America went to Europe while peaches made their way to the Georgia coast, and quickly, into Indigenous diets

"Indigenous people were already caring for and managing forests and other kinds of tree foods," said Jacob Holland-Lulewicz at Pennsylvania State University, who studies archaeology and ethnohistory. "That would have allowed them to adopt peaches super quickly and know really well how to create healthy peaches."

Within a few decades, and with the help of a vast network of trade routes, peaches made their way across the continent, as far as the Southwest, where tribes like the Navajo sun-dried and stewed them. 

Around 1780, thousands of peach trees tended by the Seneca and Cayuga tribes along the Finger Lakes in western New York State were destroyed by President George Washington, in an attempt to ethnically cleanse Indigenous peoples from the region. Washington wrote in a letter to one of his generals that the goal was "to lay waste all the settlements." He added, "It will be essential to ruin their crops now in the ground and prevent their planting more."

In 1830, President Andrew Jackson signed into law the Indian Removal Act that led to the Trail of Tears — a death march that forced around 60,000 Indigenous people to leave their homes and move west, across the Mississippi River, to Oklahoma. 

Vernon Courtwright grew up eating Indian peaches. Now 75 years old, the Muscogee elder and veteran says his family brought Indian peach seeds and planted them when they were done walking The Trail. "That was the beginning of our life and the peaches' life in Oklahoma," he said. When he was a child, his grandmother, Emma Bruner, was the one who taught him about how to grow and tend to the fruit. "We grew up eating these peaches."

Courtwright says in the 1970s, he began to see Indian peaches disappear. With each passing year, there was less on the landscape. "I just knew that our orchard had to be taken care of," he said. When his grandparents passed, he took on the work of caring for the trees, and eventually, met John John Brown, who helped cultivate seeds and saplings to give out to other Muscogees.

"It's our legacy," said Courtwright. "It's my family's legacy to the tribe."

Georgia, the Peach State, produces nearly 25,000 tons of peaches every year, but falls far behind California, which produces nearly 475,000 tons each year. Globally, nearly 24 million tons of peaches are grown each year, with most coming from China.

Climate change is having a big impact on those numbers, though. One of the biggest threats to the peach industry is rising temperatures. Peaches need "peach chill" — a certain amount of time in temperatures that are under 45 degrees Fahrenheit. Without adequate peach chill, peach trees won't produce, and with rising temperatures, blooms will sprout too early. In 2017, around 70 percent of peach losses could be attributed to lack of peach chill. "Lack of chill is something that we think is going to be the biggest issue for us and our industry," said Dario Chavez, a peach geneticist at the University of Georgia. "If you are in a northern climate, you don't worry too much about the chill. But I think they're starting to see the physiological responses to issues with chill."

Then there are extreme weather events supercharged by climate change that can inflict immediate, wide-spread damage. This year, Hurricane Helene killed at least 226 people. It also devastated Georgia's agricultural economy to the tune of nearly $6.5 billion dollars.

But Helene's path was only the beginning. Hurricanes bring flooding, which is especially bad for peaches — peach trees don't like to be too wet and can prematurely drop fruit if under water. They're also susceptible to diseases like brown rot, which can be triggered after heavy storms.

For the Indian peach, peach chill and extreme weather aren't as big a threat as they are in the South. However, Oklahoma is expected to become around two and a half degrees hotter in the next 20 years. Even though the peach is a resilient plant, peach chill will become an issue. Natural disasters like floods become more of a threat to the lives and livelihoods of tribal members — tribal lands in Oklahoma are the most prone to flooding in the state. 

But to protect Indian peaches, and a little part of tribal history, John John Brown has been giving out saplings for the better part of a decade to anyone interested in growing them.

Brown regularly travels to Georgia and Alabama to visit the proposed Ocmulgee Mounds National Park and Preserve — located on Muscogee homelands. On his drives, he often passes peach orchards filled with the variety most Americans are used to. "You don't think they would be able to produce peaches," he says as he eyes the tightly-pruned rows. "They cut 'em back real small." 

He goes down to the homelands to remind settlers in the area that the Muscogee survived despite the United States attempts at genocide and demos making canoes and bows the traditional way out of local wood during the annual Ocmulgee Indigenous Celebration. To Brown the peaches are a symbol of resilience. 

"When our ancestors brought these peaches up from the South you think about how devastating it was, to lose loved ones, and not know if the seeds will sprout," he said. "I do this to honor them, and their strength."

                 

This article originally appeared in Grist at https://grist.org/indigenous/meet-the-peach-that-travelled-the-trail-of-tears-and-the-elders-working-to-save-it/.

                 

                 

Grist is a nonprofit, independent media organization dedicated to telling stories of climate solutions and a just future. Learn more at Grist.org

"This story was originally published by Grist. Sign up for Grist's weekly newsletter here."

                

Revenge investing: How to fight Trumpism with your money

Trump is headed back to the White House, and more than 74 million Americans who voted for Kamala Harris are wondering how to cope. Boycott companies associated with him and his allies? Switch grocery stores based on the owners' politics?

Feeling hopeless and overwhelmed can spur you to take action and make some small differences between now and the next election, and fighting a second Trump term with your finances is an option to consider. 

From investing in causes you care about to shopping at places that share your values, here are some tips on using your money to make your point.

Environmental, social and governance funds

ESG funds are an investment strategy focused on companies' financial performance as well as those that consider environmental, social and governance issues. Investors might put their money into funds that consider a company's efforts to improve air quality and conserve energy, or its equal employment opportunities and ethical business practices. Some ESG funds exclude oil companies or tobacco and weapons manufacturers.

These managed funds are a way to support left-leaning causes while still investing in the general stock market, said certified financial planner Gordon Achtermann, of Your Best Path Financial Planning.

“If you care about climate change, you can only turn out so many lights, or plant so many trees, or forgo so much meat,” he said. “But when you divest from a company that works and lobbies against any progress toward a low-carbon economy, you are reaching a sector that has been unreachable until now. In our capitalist economy, your money is your voice. ESG investing is the only way to be fully heard.”

We need your help to stay independent

ESG funds come with risks. Some say they're too limited, while others believe they're more of a marketing ploy to attract investors. Profit takes priority over social responsibility in ESG funds, critics say. 

Also, not all ESG funds are created equal. For example, financial expert and author of “Green Money” Kara Perez says the SHE fund supports companies with gender diversity. However, it includes companies that others might find anti-ESG, like Exxon, Bank of America and Chevron.

“It’s a bit of greenwashing,” she said, referring to the practice of misleading the public about environmental efforts.

Some ESG funds have higher fees and lower performance results than regular funds. And if you’re solely investing in your 401(k), you may only have a couple of ESG fund options that aren’t ideal. This means you may have to make an uncomfortable decision between your values and your finances.

“Critics fail to understand that when you diverge from any benchmark, your investment performance will not correlate precisely with that benchmark,” Achtermann said. “For example, in 2020, the energy sector lagged the rest of the market, so many ESG funds beat their benchmarks. Then, in 2022, the trend reversed, and those funds that outperformed in 2020 now underperformed.”

Direct indexing

If you want more control over your investments while reaping the benefits of an index fund, you can try direct indexing. Instead of buying shares from an existing index fund, you would buy shares of the same companies directly. So instead of owning a few shares of an index fund, you might own partial shares in hundreds of different companies.

But instead of replicating the index, you can be choosy about which companies you add. For example, you can exclude Tesla because of Elon Musk’s support of Trump. You can also remove companies whose CEOs or founders have given money to Trump’s campaign.

“Investors who wish to execute a specific political strategy would need to ask their adviser if they offer direct indexing and the ability to blacklist individual stocks from their portfolio,” Achtermann said. 

While this may be more of a hassle, it puts you in the driver’s seat when it comes to allocating your dollars.

Other ways to push back

Consider changing banks. If you’re worried about climate change under the next Trump administration, you might consider moving your checking and savings accounts, especially if you’re with a bank that funds fossil fuel projects, Perez said. She suggests using local credit unions instead of major national banks.

“Credit unions are on the ground institutions in communities,” Perez said. “Your money is going to stay in your community. If you use a credit union in Iowa, your money’s going to stay in Iowa.”

This can also help your finances, since credit unions often offer higher interest rates on savings accounts than major banks. Another alternative is a community bank.

"You have to see your dollar as a vote"

“You have to see your dollar as a vote,” Perez said. “I do believe your dollar is actually more powerful than your vote. Your dollar is a direct hit or a direct line of support.”

Shop local. Shopping locally doesn't require an all-or-nothing approach. For example, if shopping at your neighborhood grocery store or bookstore is more expensive, consider making one out of every five purchases there. Knowing the politics behind certain stores can inform your decision-making.

You can also support local businesses for free by leaving positive reviews, mentioning them to your friends or sharing their posts on social media.

Live sustainably. People often imagine giving up plastic straws or switching to recycled paper towels in order to help the environment. Instead of focusing on small individual changes, Perez recommends joining a group.

“One person can’t make much change on a systemic level, but a group of people can,” she said.

Keith Lee reviewed a Seattle sushi joint on TikTok. Then viewers spotted a “worm” in his food

A Seattle-based sushi chain has landed itself in hot water following an eyebrow-raising visit from popular TikTok food reviewer Keith Lee that left his fans questioning the chain’s food safety measures. 

During his recent food tour in the city, Lee visited FOB Sushi Bar, which he said was “one of the most recommended places” to try. The sushi joint serves sushi by the pound and offers over 30 sushi and nigiri varieties. Lee said he only picked out 10 pieces of sushi and nigiri because most of the other options contained shellfish, to which he’s allergic.  

“[This is] sushi done in the most unique way I’ve ever seen in my life,” Lee told his viewers in a review made on Nov. 10. Although the social media star was impressed by the sushi chain’s concept and style of ordering, he wasn’t a fan of the sushi rice, which he claimed was overcooked in several instances. Lee did praise the fish, saying it was fresh.

@keith_lee125 Fob Sushi taste test 💕 would you try it 💕 #foodcritic ♬ original sound – Keith Lee

For the most part, Lee had nothing but positive things to say about the sushi establishment. “Overall, this absolutely is a place that I would come back to. And I can see if you love sushi and you don’t have a shellfish allergy, this is heaven,” Lee said at the end of his video.

However, many of his viewers noticed what appeared to be a live worm moving on a piece of Lee’s sushi around the 1:50 mark of his video. Surprisingly, that piece of sushi was Lee’s favorite from his entire box.

“Someone bring me back when he addresses the worm…but thanks for letting me know where not to eat Keith,” commented one user. Another commenter asked, “KEITH LEE ARE YOU OKAY??”

Several of Lee’s fans demanded a response from FOB Sushi Bar, which eventually posted a statement on Instagram. “Recently, a video has been circulating online that claims worms were found in our sashimi,” the sushi chain wrote. “We want to address this claim directly and assure you that it is entirely false.”

“At FOB Sushi, we are committed to upholding the highest health and safety standards to provide clean, fresh, and safe food for every customer,” the statement continued. The sushi chain also claimed that the movement seen in Lee’s video “may result from natural elasticity or the pressure of chopsticks when applied to its structure.”

“We want to assure our customers that this is not indicative of worms or any health concerns,” the statement added.


Want more great food writing and recipes? Subscribe to Salon Food's newsletter, The Bite.


In a follow-up video posted Sunday, Lee addressed the worm rumors and FOB Sushi’s response. “Somebody slowed the video down, and it did appear that something moved,” Lee said. “I can’t confirm or deny what it was, but I can confirm I am OK.”

“For the restaurant to post a statement indicating that me holding the sushi or me holding the chopsticks a certain way is why the sushi moved — I personally don’t agree with it,” he continued. “Because I’ve had sushi a thousand times, and I’ve held sushi a thousand different ways, and never once have I seen sushi behaving that way.”

@keith_lee125 💕 Keith Speaks 💕 God Is Amazing 🙏🏽 #foodcritic ♬ original sound – Keith Lee

“As a customer, I shouldn’t be the one getting blamed for if it was something moving in the food.”

Lee said he decided to post a response because he saw a video alleging that someone was hospitalized after eating at FOB Sushi Bar per his recommendation. 

On Monday, FOB Sushi announced on Instagram that due to “recent food safety concerns,” it was closing its restaurant locations “until further notice.” The sushi chain said it was “conducting a thorough investigation to address the situation and will take all necessary measures to prevent it from happening again.”

Novo Nordisk’s Wegovy launches in China, offering obesity drug at a fraction of US prices

Semaglutide and tirzepatide medications have transformed weight loss, diabetes management, and overall health in recent years. Now, people in China will have access to Wegovy, potentially at a much lower price than in the United States.

According to Reuters and CNN, Novo Nordisk announced Monday that it has launched its popular obesity drug Wegovy in China, the world’s second-largest pharmaceuticals market, where more than 180 million people live with obesity.

Eli Lilly, Novo Nordisk’s direct competitor and the manufacturer of Mounjaro and Zepbound, has also secured approval for its obesity treatments in the country, but has yet to launch them. Both companies are ramping up production to capitalize on the growing weight-loss market, which analysts project could exceed $150 billion by the start of the next decade, CNN reported.

A dose of four Wegovy injections will cost 1,400 yuan ($194), a fraction of the drug’s U.S. price, according to the Chinese website Yicai. However, patients in China will have to pay out of pocket for the treatment, as it is not yet covered by the national healthcare insurance, João da Silva of BBC reported.

Wegovy, launched by Novo Nordisk three years ago, is now available in the U.S. and 15 other countries. The company also produces Ozempic and Victoza.