Spring Sale: Get 1 Year, Save 58%

Contrary to popular belief, Twitter’s algorithm amplifies conservatives, not liberals: study

A few weeks before the 2020 presidential election, Democrats and Republicans in Congress displayed a rare moment of bipartisan unity. The issue was whether Big Tech companies like Facebook and Twitter need to be broken up, and the House Judiciary Committee was holding a hearing. While many of the witnesses approached the subject by discussing antitrust law and similar regulatory questions, Rep. Jim Jordan (R-Ohio) made it clear that he had a very different axe to grind.

“Big Tech is out to get conservatives,” Jordan proclaimed. “That’s not a suspicion. That’s not a hunch. It’s a fact. I said that two months ago at our last hearing. It’s every bit as true today.”

Yet according to a new study, Jordan’s so-called “fact” seems to be quite far removed from the truth. Conservative media voices, not liberal ones, are most amplified by the algorithm users are forced to work with, at least when it comes to one major social media platform.

Published in the journal Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (PNAS), the authors of “Algorithmic amplification of politics on Twitter” reveal that they conducted a “massive-scale experiment involving millions of Twitter users, a fine-grained analysis of political parties in seven countries, and 6.2 million news articles shared in the United States.” Along with researchers from the University of Cambridge, University College London and the University of California, Berkeley, the study was co-authored by a member of Twitter’s Machine Learning Ethics, Transparency, and Accountability Team.

The findings are presented in two sections. One part, which focuses on the United States, examined whether major media outlets were more likely to be amplified by Twitter’s algorithm if they had a strong political leaning of some kind. (The exact ideology did not matter.) The other area of the study looked at tweets from seven different countries, but focused on those posted by elected politicians who came from major political parties. Although political observers worry about extremists disproportionately benefiting from social media platform algorithms, the researchers did not find evidence of Twitter’s algorithm amplifying extremist views more than mainstream ones. That said, they did note a revealing pattern when it came to how different types of media content fared on the site.

“Our results reveal a remarkably consistent trend: In six out of seven countries studied, the mainstream political right enjoys higher algorithmic amplification than the mainstream political left,” the authors explain. “Consistent with this overall trend, our second set of findings studying the US media landscape revealed that algorithmic amplification favors right-leaning news sources.”


Want more health and science stories in your inbox? Subscribe to Salon’s weekly newsletter The Vulgar Scientist.


This is not the first report to indicate that right-wingers have an unfair edge on social media, with the two giants being Twitter and Facebook. A senior engineer at Facebook was reportedly fired in 2020 after he collected internal evidence that right-wing pages were given preferential treatment over left-wing ones when it came to getting fact-checks removed and being able to get in touch with Facebook employees. (Facebook denied that he was fired for that reason.) One employee told BuzzFeed News that the company’s management had become afraid of conservatives because of Donald Trump, who was president at the time. After Trump was fact-checked by Twitter for trying to use the platform to spread misinformation about the upcoming election, he threatened to use government power to punish social media companies that he perceived as hostile. Both Facebook and Twitter ultimately banned Trump from their platforms in the wake of the January 6 Capitol Riots

It is unclear exactly how pressure from Trump and other conservatives may have led to pro-conservative alterations in the companies’ algorithms; despite criticisms for their lack of transparency, social media companies do not publicly reveal the details of the algorithms that shape what kinds of content users see. 

Meanwhile, there are other signs that social media giants give preferential treatment to conservatives. There were multiple reports in 2020 of Facebook employees protesting what they have described as unfair standards which favor Trump and conservatives. During the 2020 election cycle, outside researchers discovered a supposed “bug” on Instagram (which is owned by Facebook) that hid popular anti-Trump hashtags but did not do so for hashtags criticizing Trump’s election opponent, Joe Biden. It later came out that, despite promising to stop misinformation, Facebook’s algorithm allowed more than 10 billion views to accumulate on just 100 pages that frequently disseminated misinformation for eight months prior to the election. When using Facebook, those “repeat misinformers” were able to earn millions more interactions than the combined total netted by the top 100 traditional U.S. media pages.

These issues are not limited to the Biden-Trump election. When tweaking its newsfeed algorithm in 2017, Facebook reportedly capitulated to executives who wanted to make sure that the new policies would not disadvantage right-wing sites like The Daily Wire, which is owned by far right personality Ben Shapiro. (Facebook has denied giving preferential treatment to individual publishers or ideologies.) It was also revealed that the company knew its algorithm changes were disproportionately hurting left-wing media outlets like Mother Jones. 

Jury finds former cop Kim Potter guilty of manslaughter for fatal shooting of Daunte Wright

This Thursday, former Minnesota police officer Kim Potter was found guilty of first-degree and second-degree manslaughter for fatally shooting 20-year-old Daunte Wright, who is Black, when she mistook her service weapon for a Taser in April.

Potter did not react as Judge Regina Chu read the guilty verdicts in court.

The former policewoman had pleaded not guilty and claimed the shooting was an accident, saying she mistakenly grabbed her firearm instead of her Taser stun gun.

In emotional testimony she had described how what was meant to be a routine traffic stop became “chaotic” in Brooklyn Center, a suburb of Minneapolis, Minnesota, in April.

“I remember yelling ‘Taser Taser Taser.’ And nothing happens, then he told me I shot him,” Potter said, bursting into tears.

On Sunday, April 11, 2021, the white policewoman was patrolling with a colleague who decided to look up the driver of a white Buick that had committed a minor traffic violation.


Want a daily wrap-up of all the news and commentary Salon has to offer? Subscribe to our morning newsletter, Crash Course.


After realizing that the driver was the subject of an arrest warrant, the police officers decided to arrest him.

Wright, who was unarmed, resisted being handcuffed and restarted his car to try to flee. Potter then drew what she said she thought was her Taser.

On a body-camera recording of the scene, Potter can be heard shouting “Taser” several times, before shooting with her gun and fatally wounding Wright.

The incident came during the trial of white policeman Derek Chauvin, who had asphyxiated George Floyd in Minneapolis in May 2020 by kneeling on his neck for some nine minutes.

Floyd’s death sparked nationwide protests against racism and police brutality.

Wright’s death also triggered several nights of protests and unrest in Brooklyn Center before Potter’s own arrest calmed tensions.

RELATED: How George Floyd’s murder shone a light on previously invisible stories

“Today’s verdict is an act of accountability for the actions of one police officer in a system that regularly brutalizes Black, Indigenous and People of Color,” Mirella Ceja-Orozco and Elizer Darris, Co-Executive Directors of the Minnesota Freedom Fund, said in a statement.

“At the same time, no amount of prison time, money, or other forms of retribution can bring Daunte Wright back to his family and loved ones. That’s why this jury’s verdict is above all about the horrific loss of Mr. Wright, a young black man living in Minnesota, to police violence. We want to remember his life and uplift his family during this trying time. We long for the day that shootings like this aren’t initially shrugged off as just another example of police violence towards Black and Brown people.”

With additional reporting via AFP

Making Christmas candy or peppermint bark? Here’s how to melt your chocolate in an Instant Pot

So many holiday treats call for melted chocolate, from peanut butter truffles to peppermint bark. The usual processes for melting said chocolate — from using a double boiler to popping a bowl in the microwave — have their pros and cons but can often become a little unwieldy when attempting to make large batches of candies and cookies in a home kitchen. 

That’s where an unexpected kitchen tool can step in, like the Instant Pot

When it first hit the market in 2010, the Instant Pot was marketed as the ultimate do-it-all countertop appliance. “It’s 10 tools in one!” food bloggers would tout. Indeed, it works as a crockpot, pressure cooker, rice cooker, searing pan, steamer and yogurt maker (albeit to varying degrees of success). 

RELATED: Lidia’s chocolate chip cookies are an easy Italian spin on the classic

But where the Instant Pot really comes in handy this holiday season is that it enables users to uniformly melt larger batches of chocolate and then keep it melted for as long as you’re working in the kitchen. To get started, all you need is 3 cups of water, a large metal or glass bowl that is large enough to sit on top of your 6-quart or 8-quart Instant Pot (such as this one), and your chocolate. 

***

How to melt chocolate in an Instant Pot 

Add water to the inner base of the Instant Pot and select “sauté mode.” The water should begin to gently simmer within 4 minutes. 

If you’ve ever used the double boiler method to melt chocolate, the next step will be familiar. Once you see steam emerging from the Instant Pot, place a mixing bowl over the Instant Pot, then add chocolate. You can use chips, chunks or wafers. 

Using a spoon or a rubber batter spatula, slowly stir your chocolate until it is melted, smooth and totally cohesive. 

At this point, you can cancel the “sauté” setting and re-select the “keep warm” mode. The chocolate will remain melted for several hours, giving you plenty of time to knock through your holiday baking schedule. 

Clean-up is a breeze, as well. Simply use warm, soapy water to clean any lingering melted chocolate from the interior of the mixing bowl, then drain the water from the interior base of the Instant Pot. 


Want more great food writing and recipes? Subscribe to “The Bite,” Salon Food’s newsletter.


More stories about holiday sweets: 

“The Wheel of Time” has a Moiraine problem: She’s too interesting

The Wheel of Time” is the new fantasy hotness. The Amazon series is now [seven] of eight episodes into its first season, and while it’s been somewhat divisive among critics and fans of Robert Jordan’s book series (I’ve currently reading Book 4, for reference), I’ve enjoyed it pretty much from the start. Sure, it’s kinda cheesy in places and the some of the characters don’t run as deep as I’d like, but it’s got heart, terrific production values and a cast and crew who believe in it. The story — five fantasy ingénues go on an epic quest to discover if they’re the chosen one — is appealingly simple, but gets knottier and more intricate as the series goes on, and so far I think the show is doing a good job of balancing the mythic with the ordinary, the magic with the reality.

Up until now the show has been good with occasional glimpses of greatness, like when Moiraine gave a speech about Manetheren in the second episode. But the sixth episode, “The Flame of Tar Valon” was my favorite episode by far.

Episode 6 revolves around Moiraine Damodred, played by Rosamund Pike; apart from the cold open, she’s in every single scene. From the beginning, Pike has been the best performer in the cast and Moiraine the most compelling character. She’s strong, wise and noble-hearted, but also driven, secretive and manipulative. She’s a complex character and Episode 6 shows that off. She lies to characters we like in order to keep control over the situation; she shows real vulnerability through her relationship with Siuan Sanche, the leader of the Aes Sedai; and she rallies the troops to take them on a quest that could save the world . . . or doom it.

The whole thing is very well suited to Pike’s skillset. Moiraine is a character who prefers to keep her real feelings and motivations under the surface. She’s very careful about what she gives away to which character, so she acts different with Liandrin than she does with fellow members of the Blue Ajah than with the Emond’s Fielders than with Siuan Sanche. This episode finally breaks her surface, and scenes that could have been ordinary suddenly have levels. For example, when Siuan banishes Moiraine from the White Tower, it’s genuinely painful, both for obvious reasons — Moiraine is being publicly humiliated and sent away from her sisters — and because of the more intimate bond we now know Moiraine and Siuan share. It’s also political theater, because the two worked this out ahead of time. It’s thrilling to watch. The whole episode is a showcase for both Moiraine and for Pike, and they both nail it.

Moiraine isn’t the main character of “The Wheel of Time” . . . even if she should be

But there’s a caveat to all this: “The Wheel of Time” isn’t about Moiraine; it’s an ensemble piece at least as much about Rand and Perrin and Egwene and Nynaeve and the rest as it is about her. But so far, the show is unquestionably at its best when Moiraine is onscreen.

That’s not to say the other episodes haven’t been fun. I enjoyed Egwene and Perrin traveling with the Tuatha’an, and Rand and Perrin’s encounter with a Darkfriend was memorable. But they all felt a little more like standard fantasy fare next to the Moiraine scenes, which are on another level when it comes to subtlety and depth of feeling. I like the show, but “The Flame of Tar Valon” is the only episode I might love.

At first, I was just happy “The Wheel of Time” wasn’t terrible. But it’ll take more than “it doesn’t suck” for the series to have a long life, let alone become the rival to “Game of Thrones” Amazon so obviously wants it to be. It will need to find a way to make the rest of the characters as exciting and engaging as it’s made Moiraine, who I’m convinced is the favorite of showrunner Rafe Judkins. I don’t blame him; she pops off the page, too. But an epic, sprawling series like this can’t subsist on one fabulous sorceress alone. Hopefully the writing team is of diverse enough taste to spread the wealth around.

Happily, “The Wheel of Time” can afford to play the long game; there are 14 books to adapt and Jeff Bezos’ deep war chest to run through. I want “The Wheel of Time” to be a hit, both because I like the series and because I want the TV fantasy craze started by “Game of Thrones” to continue. With true believers like Judkins at the helm — I hope he’s put up safeguards against potential burnout — and characters like Moiraine to light the way, this could be the start of something very special.

9 cookbooks that make great last-minute holiday gifts for the foodie in your life

If the team at Salon Food had one small piece of holiday advice to impart, it would be this: Buy cookbooks for everyone on your shopping list. In terms of affordability and practicality, they really are the ideal gift, but there’s also something deeply personal about purchasing the right cookbook for the right person

It’s a simple way to say, “I see what makes you truly you.” The right cookbook can help someone adapt to new ways of eating, feel at home in a new city or country, further connect to their culture or step outside of their comfort zone in the kitchen. A cookbook really is a gift that keeps on giving — every time the recipient cooks (or mixes a cocktail) from it, they’ll think of you. 

Our editorial staff collected some of our favorite cookbooks from the past year, all of which are guaranteed to provide culinary inspiration well beyond the holiday season. In alphabetical order, here are nine cookbooks that make great (last-minute) holiday gifts for the foodie in your life: 

1. “Cookies: The New Classics: A Baking Book” by Jesse Szewczyk (Clarkson Potter Publishers)

For Christmas last year, I received a fancy baking cookbook. After thumbing through it once, I immediately regifted it. After all, how much is there left to say about brownies and snickerdoodles? Jesse Szewczyk changed my mind. The Kitchn columnist’s beautiful, thoughtful and incredibly inventive debut reimagines beloved desserts using novel techniques and ingredients in ways that are fresh, approachable and never gimmicky. Drawing upon the flavor groups of “Chocolaty, Boozy, Fruity, Nutty, Tart, Spiced, Smoky and Savory,” Szewczyk delivers exactly what you want from a book that definitely won’t get regifted — that sweet spot of comfort and novelty. I can’t stop thinking about his boozy fudge squares and meltingly delicious brown butter brownie cookies. — Mary Elizabeth Williams

2. “Death & Co: Welcome Home” by Alex Day, Nick Fauchald and David Kaplan (Ten Speed Press)

“Imagine you’re a rookie bartender and this is your handbook.” That’s how this show-stopping doorstopper opens, leading into more than 600 recipes alongside best practices, recipe-building notes, the mechanics of building a cocktail menu and all the indispensable knowledge any bartender, amateur or pro, could ever want to level up to Death & Co standards. The book itself, oversized in deep black cloth hardcover, is gorgeous. David Kaplan’s introduction, detailing the East Village craft cocktail powerhouse’s long journey to expansion — now in Denver and Los Angeles — and the ups and downs that 2020 wrought on the industry will make you ache for beloved bars that didn’t make it through the pandemic and extra-thankful for those that did. Hundreds of recipes are thoughtfully organized and labeled with handy symbols to differentiate between low-prep and “project” cocktails, plus easy identifiers for low- and no-ABV drinks, an essential for mindful drinkers and thoughtful hosts. Pair this with a set of Nick & Nora cocktail glasses or a powerful handheld citrus press. — Erin Keane

Courtesy Ten Speed Press
More than 600 recipes from the bestselling team behind “Death & Co: Modern Classic Cocktails.”
The ultimate guide to choosing ingredients, developing your palate, mixing drinks and leveling up your home cocktail game.

BUY ASAP FOR $36.80

3. “Girly Drinks: A World History of Women and Alcohol” by Mallory O’Meara (Hanover Square Press)

While Mallory O’Meara’s new deep dive, “Girly Drinks,” isn’t a book of cocktail recipes, it is a perfect gift for anyone interested in learning more about what, how and why we drink. O’Meara, New York Times bestselling author of “The Lady from the Black Lagoon,” a true-detective story slash feminist film history of the life and work of a Disney animation pioneer and classic horror film creature creator, pairs deep research with engaging and witty prose in this rigorous history that doesn’t read like schoolwork. “Girly Drinks” is a necessary addition to any booze enthusiast’s bookshelf, alongside such histories as Iain Gately’s “Drink: A Cultural History of Alcohol” and David Wondrich’s “Imbibe!”. You’ll learn that Hildegard of Bingen was the first person to write scientifically about hops, that women were the first sake brewers in Japan and all about celebrity bartender Ada Coleman, who became the first female head bartender of the American Bar in London’s Savoy Hotel in 1903. Pair this with a cocktail kit. I suggest the French 75, a classic “girly drink” that never disappoints. — Erin Keane

Courtesy Hanover Square Press
The new book from Los Angeles Times bestselling author Mallory O’Meara.
A lively and engrossing feminist history of women drinking through the ages.

BUY ASAP FOR $25.75

4. “The Japanese Art of the Cocktail” by Masahiro Urushido and Michael Anstendig (Mariner Books)

Katana Kitten mastermind Masahiro Urushido shares his precision-meets-playfulness philosophy in “The Japanese Art of the Cocktail,” a gorgeous full-color volume of recipes, techniques and essays on the flavors, history and culture that power his award-winning Greenwich Village bar, which “embodies the Japanese approach to the cocktail, filtered through a distinctly American sensibility.” Divided in three parts, the recipes begin with Katana Kitten drinks (highballs, cocktails, boilermakers), then move to more of Urushido’s favorite Japan-inspired drinks, plus contributions from mixologist friends, and finish with Katana Kitten’s lauded bar snacks like anori-tossed crinkle fries and mortadella katsu sando. Pair this with Suntory Toki whiskey, a glass beer mug (Katana Kitten tip: keep both in the freezer) and a bottle of highly carbonated soda water for perfect at-home highballs. — Erin Keane

Courtesy Mariner Books
The first cocktail book from the award-winning mixologist Masahiro Urushido of Katana Kitten.
Urushido shares his immense knowledge of Japanese cocktails with 80 recipes that best exemplify Japan’s contribution to the cocktail scene.

BUY ASAP FOR $27.60

5. “The New York Times Cooking No Recipe Recipes” by Sam Sifton (Ten Speed Press)

He had me at “meatball salad.” Or was it “pasta with chickpeas and a Negroni”? Sam Sifton, who has been preaching the gospel of relaxed, flexible cooking for years now in his New York Times columns, offers low maintenance and big, intense flavors along with plenty of encouraging tips and modifications for home cooks. His strategies often involve just looking at what you have and thinking about it in new ways — like, you know, meatballs and salad. I love his supportive endorsement for rotisserie chicken and his understanding that breakfast food is “any time” food. This is a book for people who already love to cook or wish they did and want to know how to get there. The secret might be more peanut butter and pickle sandwiches. — Mary Elizabeth Williams

6. “Rodney Scott’s World of Barbecue,” by Rodney Scott and Lolis Eric Elie (Clarkson Potter Publishers) 

James Beard Award-winner Rodney Scott makes history again by compiling the first cookbook by a Black pitmaster alongside writer and documentarian Lolis Eric Elie. The result is part personal memoir — starting with Scott roasting his first whole hog when he was 11 and chronicling his journey to finally open Rodney Scott’s BBQ — and part guide to specialties like barbecued spare ribs, pit-smoked turkey, smoked chicken wings and hush puppies. 

“Rodney Scott’s World of Barbecue” also serves as a poignant deep-dive into the foodways of South Carolina and the surrounding region, as well as into the ways Black culinary traditions and barbecue are interwoven throughout American history. — Ashlie Stevens 

Courtesy Clarkson Potter Publishers
James Beard Award-winning chef Rodney Scott pens the first cookbook by a Black pitmaster.
Scott celebrates an incredible culinary legacy through his life story, family traditions and unmatched dedication to his craft.

BUY ASAP FOR $$27.59

7. “My Shanghai: Recipes and Stories from a City on the Water,” by Betty Liu (Harper Design)

For American eaters, author Betty Liu writes, Chinese food isn’t necessarily associated with seasonality. However, Liu’s book “My Shanghai” shows a much truer picture of Shanghainese cuisine as one that is dictated by what is available in the surrounding waters and fields. Ripe produce and fresh meat and seafood are used in harmony with distinct blends of spices to create dishes that are both refined and intuitive. 

The recipes that shine the most from “My Shanghai” are also some of the most approachable for beginner cooks, such as Liu’s hearty scallion oil noodles or silky steamed eggplant seasoned with ginger and black vinegar. — Ashlie Stevens

Courtesy Harper Design
Experience the beauty and flavor of one of the oldest and most delicious cuisines on earth.
This evocative, colorful gastronomic tour features 100 recipes, stories, and more than 150 spectacular color photographs.

BUY ASAP FOR $32.20

8. “To Asia, with Love: Everyday Asian Recipes and Stories from the Heart” by Hetty McKinnon (Prestel Publishing)

No other cookbook this year gave me more solid home runs, from condiments to main dishes to desserts. I’m obsessed with McKinnon’s “reliable dumpling dipping sauce,” sheet pan chow mien and hauntingly delicious, soy sauce tinged brownies — and I haven’t even made everything I want to try yet. It’s a collection generations in the making. “While modern cooking can be an applied science, with copious rules and predicted outcomes,” McKinnon writes, “there is also so much to learn from the way our mothers, grandmothers and their ancestors cooked.” In sharing her family recipes and recollections, the self-described “Chinese girl born in Australia” (now living in the U.S.) has also created a beautiful piece of storytelling, a work to equally cook your way through and curl up with. — Mary Elizabeth Williams

9. “Veggies & Fish: Inspired New Recipes for Plant-Forward Pescatarian Cooking,” by Bart Van Olphen (Experiment)

The pandemic has served as a catalyst for many Americans to reassess how they cook and eat at home, myself included. Bart Van Olphen’s gorgeous “Veggies & Fish” is there to meet them. Van Olphen acknowledges the shift in how plates are put together in his introduction, “It was simple: When you put together a dish, you’d start by choosing your meat, game, poultry or fish, preferably in a generous portion of 6 1/2 ounces or more.” 

Then came the sauce, and finally, the vegetables and a starchy element. “Both were kind of filler, if anything,” he writes. “Sometimes they didn’t even complement each other very well.” 

As suggested by the cookbook’s title, “Veggies & Fish” takes a different tack; it’s filled with plant-forward, pescatarian recipes like cucumber soup with sea bass tartare, grilled zucchini ribbons with smoked sprats and Thai salad with spicy calamari. There’s a vibrant ease to Van Olphen’s recipes that make this cookbook practical for at-home cooking, while also making the end result feel a little elevated. — Ashlie Stevens

Courtesy Experiment
The acclaimed author of The Tinned Fish Cookbook turns to fresh, eco-friendly seafood.
Ninety-five veggie-loving, globe-trotting recipes—spectacularly photographed by David Loftus.

BUY ASAP FOR $22.95

Salon Food writes about stuff we think you’ll like. Salon has affiliate partnerships, so we may get a share of the revenue from your purchase.

Some speculate that omicron will spread fast and burn out, heralding the pandemic’s finale

The incredibly rapid spread of the omicron variant has sparked fears of another long, brutal COVID wave in the United States. Yet in contrast to recent reports predicting an exacerbated pandemic, some scientists theorize that omicron’s peculiar pattern of spread may actually be a sign that the pandemic is about to quickly wind down.

In less than three weeks, the omicron variant has swept through the United States. At the start of December, it accounted for fewer than 1 percent of new COVID-19 infections; by Dec. 20, it had managed to comprise more than seven out of ten new cases; by Dec. 22, it had been confirmed in all 50 states. The consensus view among experts has been that the American people should prepare for a very rough time. On Tuesday, President Biden delivered a historic address to announce new measures for helping Americans prepare for omicron’s spread, most notably urging everyone to get vaccinated (including booster shots) and promising to give out free at-home coronavirus tests.

Now, some scientists believe the situation facing Americans with the omicron variant could be less dire than the early red flags indicated. Beyond that, omicron may even mark the beginning of the end — when the pandemic moves from a pandemic to an endemic phase.

Part of the reason has to do with the situation in South Africa, one of the first countries to have been overwhelmed by the omicron variant. There, in the country where doctors first discovered the mutant virus, there has been a sudden drop in infections. Gauteng, the province that researchers believe was the epicenter of the outbreak, has passed its peak of infections, while most other provinces appear to be approaching a similar point. The overall number of new COVID-19 cases in the country has declined by more than 20 percent as of Dec. 18, according to a recent report by the National Institute for Communicable Diseases.

As national chair of the South African Medical Association Dr. Angelique Coetzee told CNN, the nation seems to be “over the curve” when it comes to omicron burning through the population. 


Want more health and science stories in your inbox? Subscribe to Salon’s weekly newsletter The Vulgar Scientist.


“If previous variants caused waves shaped like Kilimanjaro, omicron’s is more like we were scaling the North Face of Everest,” Salim Abdool Karim, South Africa’s top infectious disease scientist, told The Washington Post on Wednesday. “Now we’re going down, right back down, the South Face — and that is the way we think it may work with a variant like omicron, and perhaps even more broadly what we’ll see with subsequent variants at this stage of the pandemic.”

In other words, as omicron tore across South Africa, the number of new infections rose rapidly — and then fell at an equally rapid pace.

Then, there are early signs that the omicron variant may not be as deadly as some of its peer variants. According to researchers from the Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation (IHME) at the University of Washington’s School of Medicine, the United States may be in for a tidal wave of infections, but not nearly as many severe cases as one might expect to accompany them. The scientists estimate that the United States could see as many as 140 million new infections between Jan. 1 and March 1, peaking around late January with roughly 2.8 million new daily infections.

That said, according to IHME director Dr. Chris Murray’s comments to USA Today, more than 90 percent of the people infected with omicron may never show symptoms. This will likely make it harder to precisely monitor the variant (people who do not display symptoms are less likely to get tested), but it also means fewer people are likely to require hospitalization or risk death.

As Murray put it to USA Today, the bug is “less severe than flu but much more transmissible.” Because it can spread to more people, there is always a risk that it will lead to unexpected and dangerous symptoms that have yet to be detected.

Yet there is a school of thought which holds that the omicron strain’s high transmissibility could, in the long term, prove fortuitous for the American public. Because the omicron variant poses a great danger to people who are unvaccinated or have yet to get a booster shot, it is possible that it will cause a significant spike in both hospitalizations and deaths — even as it technically leads to a lower percentage of severe illnesses compared to other COVID-19 strains. The unvaccinated survivors of omicron, however, could wind up having a more robust form of so-called “natural immunity,” one that would help their immune system’s fight the next strains of the virus. This would not be as protective as getting fully vaccinated, but between their natural immunity and the fully vaccinated immune systems of most of the population, this could ultimately help rein in the pandemic.

“As all the public health folks have been saying, it’s going to rip right through the population,” Dr. David Ho, a world-renowned virologist and Columbia University professor, told CNBC. “Sometimes a rapid-fire could burn through very quickly but then put itself out.”

Despite these possible hopeful signs, the scientific consensus is still that Americans should exercise caution. The best way to stay safe is to get fully vaccinated, including with a booster shot if possible.

Read more on the omicron variant:

Ginger beer is a Jamaican holiday tradition — and my grandmother’s is the spiciest

When I was five, I vividly remember shouting, “Lawd, mommy, it’s hot!” The hot referred, not to temperature, but the intensity of my grandma’s home-made ginger beer. That was 1988, and I was spending weeks watching the bottles of ginger beer ferment in the pantry, on tenterhooks until I could take my first sips of the cloudy liquid that taunted me every time I went for a biscuit. One night we heard a bang followed by hissing. My dad sprang into action to defend us while I, like a schmuck cast in a horror-comedy, ran towards the commotion. There was ginger beer everywhere, and half of a broken bottle spun like a dreidel on the kitchen floor.

The carbon dioxide in the bottle swelled so much that the lid had flown off, and the glass exploded. There in the small hours of morning two days away from Christmas, my parents decided that since they were up and the smell of ginger beer was so enticing, they might as well “test” the other bottles to ensure they were ok. I had my first sip. Whined. Had some more. I succumbed to ginger beer’s beguiling taste. It’s now one of my favorite beverages, and I look forward to making a large batch whenever I’m home in Jamaica.

Though an integral part of a Jamaican Christmas, ginger beer first appeared in 18th century England. But how did Georgian England popularize a drink based on a spice that dates back to the 1st century AD in South East Asia? The answer: The Dutch-Portuguese War, aka the Spice Wars.

For centuries, the Portuguese controlled much of the sea trade between Europe and Asia, filling the void left by the fall of the Roman Empire. The first Portuguese ship arrived in India in 1498. By the dawn of the 17th century, Indian ports became integral trading posts, and Portugal, England, the Dutch Republic, France, and Denmark-Norway all squabbled for dominance. In 1602, the Dutch East India and West India Companies took Portugal to war to control the major spice routes. The Spice Wars went on for 59 years, the first 38 of which England supported the Dutch forces. And to allies go the spoils.

Ginger beer rose in popularity as a home-brewed, low-alcohol “soft drink,”a safer alternative to often-contaminated water. Though it’s called a beer, it contains neither wheat nor barley. The fermentation is that of the ginger combined with sugar — a crop that built empires. Europeans colonized the Caribbean and exploited enslaved workers on sugar plantations to satisfy the collectively voracious sweet tooth of the continent.

Per Michigan State University archeology archives, “Powered by the labor of enslaved Africans, French- and English-controlled Caribbean plantations became the world’s biggest sugarcane producers. By 1655, England also controlled Jamaica, the Caribbean’s most prolific producer of ginger, with over two million pounds exported to Europe each year. Jamaican ginger was considered especially flavorful and was a prized ingredient in ginger beer.” However, by the early 18th century, ginger beer in England had reached “11% alcohol by volume.” With the dawn of Prohibition across the pond, ginger ale eventually eclipsed its zestier cousin. But that would not stop the Gosling father and son duo from inventing the Dark’ N’ Stormy, a rum and ginger beer cocktail sometime after World War 1.” Thus, I reckon, influencing the Moscow Mule’s invention in 1941 at the tony Chatham Hotel in New York.

Besides the quality of the ginger, what gives homemade ginger beer its unmistakable zing, especially when compared to non-organic commercially-made brands, is the delicious funkiness of the symbiotic culture of bacteria and yeast (SCOBY). Yes, the same culture that gives kombucha its unique throat-tickling, lip-smacking tingle is there in homemade ginger beer. However, across the island, what to do with the SCOBY differs. Some families strain it off entirely and toss it, others strain and save the SCOBY for future batches, and some shake the bottle up and consume the cloudy piquant beverage in small amounts, almost like a tonic.

However, you choose to have your ginger beer, don’t forget to use brown sugar — the molasses content contributes to Caribbean ginger beer’s distinct flavor. And add my grandma’s not-so-secret ingredients, cream of tartar (which hastens the fermentation process) and whole cloves.

Homemade Jamaican Ginger Beer

This is my grandmother’s recipe, which yields around 15 one-liter bottles of ginger beer. The least I’ve ever made was a few years ago when I cut the recipe in half.

  • 3 gallons of water
  • 5 pounds fresh ginger root, peeled
  • 6 cups brown sugar
  • 1 cup fresh squeezed lime juice
  • 2 1/2 tablespoons cream of tartar
  • A dozen whole cloves

Directions: Fill a stockpot with three gallons of water, take out a few cups to blend the ginger and bring the rest to a boil. Remove the pot from the heat, add ginger puree, sugar and cloves. Cover the stockpot and let the contents steep overnight. Add lime juice, cream of tartar, mix and strain. Place in bottles or air-tight jars and let ferment for a week before serving. If you’re impatient, you may pop open a bottle after two days.

To make only a few bottles of ginger beer (approximately 2.5 liters), here’s how to do it:

  • 10 cups of water
  • 1 pound fresh ginger root, peeled
  • 1 1/3 cups brown sugar
  • 3 tablespoons freshly squeezed lime juice
  • 1/2 tablespoon cream of tartar
  • 3 whole cloves

Follow the instructions above.

“Evidence is mounting” for a disturbing reason the National Guard failed to act on Jan. 6: report

Almost a year after that the January 6 attack on the U.S. Capitol Building, the events of that day continue to inspire a great deal of analysis and discussion — including the fact that the National Guard didn’t get to the Capitol sooner when it was under attack. Writers Ryan Goodman and Justin Hendrix, in an article published by Just Security this week, argue that the National Guard was “restrained” by the Pentagon because of fears that then-President Donald Trump would “invoke the Insurrection Act.”

“One of the most vexing questions about January 6 is why the National Guard took more than three hours to arrive at the Capitol after D.C. authorities and Capitol Police called for immediate assistance,” Goodman and Hendrix explain. “The Pentagon’s restraint in allowing the Guard to get to the Capitol was not simply a reflection of officials’ misgivings about the deployment of military force during the summer 2020 protests; nor was it simply a concern about ‘optics’ of having military personnel at the Capitol. Instead, evidence is mounting that the most senior defense officials did not want to send troops to the Capitol because they harbored concerns that President Donald Trump might utilize the forces’ presence in an attempt to hold onto power.”

Trump slips in admission of electoral defeat in new interview

More than a year later, Donald Trump appeared to acknowledge his bitter 2020 election defeat. 

The former president made the admission while discussing his long-promised border wall in a Tuesday interview, lamenting President Biden’s discontinuation of the project back in April. 

“They could have had [the wall] done in four weeks if they pursued it,” Trump complained to host Gene Bailey. “We started building and we built almost 500 miles of wall, certain sections we couldn’t get rights to and now we have rights.” 

“And had they, had we won the election, it would almost be – it would be completed now,”
Trump added, seeming to admit the reality of his loss. 

It’s unclear whether the admission was a gaffe, given that the former president has aggressively contested Biden’s victory both during and after his time in office. 

Immediately following his loss back in November, Trump signaled that he would refuse to step down as president to allow for a smooth transition of power, standing by this claim for months. His posture on the transition became the subject of much speculation, with many pundits wondering whether the former president would have to be removed from the White House by force. 


Want a daily wrap-up of all the news and commentary Salon has to offer? Subscribe to our morning newsletter, Crash Course.


RELATED: Will Donald Trump step down if he loses re-election in 2020? Scholars echo Nancy Pelosi’s concerns

Finally, on January 7, just a day after the Capitol riot, the former president promised an “orderly transition” of power, saying: “Even though I totally disagree with the outcome of the election, and the facts bear me out, nevertheless there will be an orderly transition on January 20th.”

In June, Trump came the closest he’d ever been to admitting electoral defeat, telling Fox News’ Sean Hannity that “we were supposed to win easily at 64 million votes, and we got 75 million votes, and we didn’t win.” 

“But let’s see what happens on that,” he added dubiously.  

The president has by and large stuck to his guns with respect to the 2020 election, backing numerous state election audits and lawsuits by Trump allies – all of which have failed to provide any evidence of outcome-altering voter fraud. 

RELATED: Greg Abbott promised “transparency” for border wall funding — but donors clearly using fake names

According to Newsweek, Trump’s claim that he would have completed the construction of the border is “questionable at best.” The southern border spans roughly 1,900 miles. But throughout the course of his presidency, Trump only completed fewer than 500 miles.

How to store homemade fudge all holiday season long

We are firm believers that you don’t need an occasion to bake something sweet, whether it be a layer cake worthy of a birthday party or a batch of cookies. The same can be said for fudge. While this confection is often seen displayed in a long lineup of treats at a holiday party, it can and should be enjoyed year-round. But since it’s the holidays and you asked, we’re here to explain the best way to store fudge, homemade or store-bought, on the counter or in the freezer.

Storing fudge anytime, anywhere

Here’s the thing about homemade fudge: It’s temperamental. Way more temperamental than most cookies, cakes, brownies and bars, and quick breads, in fact. You need a candy thermometer, good-quality dark chocolate, and a careful eye to make it. Fudge is for all intents and purposes, candy. It’s important to store fudge properly to ensure that its creamy texture stays smooth and that its color remains a rich, dark chocolate brown.

Whether you make a batch of homemade fudge or bring home a pound of assorted flavors from the general store, the best way to keep fudge fresh is by transferring it to an airtight container and leaving it stored at room temperature. To keep fudge pieces from sticking to themselves, store the chocolatey layers with waxed paper, which provides a naturally nonstick surface.

Whatever you do, don’t put your Chocolate Walnut or Mystic Mud in the refrigerator. The refrigerator will not only alter the texture of your fudge (for the worse), but you always risk it absorbing other flavors floating around on crowded shelves.

How to store fudge in the freezer

But I want to enjoy fudge on the beaches of Miami in March or at Easter brunch or pack it in my child’s lunchbox on the first day of school or in my own lunchbox when I have to return to the office in February. Whatever scenario you’re picturing in which you’ll want to eat homemade fudge a few months after the holiday season, there’s a reputable way to go about freezing fudge to extend its shelf life.

Here’s how to do it: First, make sure that your fudge is completely cooled. Wrap the fudge tightly, first with layers of wax or parchment paper, and then an exterior layer of aluminum foil. Store the wrapped fudge in an airtight container, which will help prevent freezer burns and ice crystals from forming. If homemade fudge is properly stored, it shouldn’t taste any different than when you nibbled on it mid-December. Just don’t eat it after a few months and expect it to taste the same: While it is still perfectly safe to consume, the texture and flavor will begin to deteriorate.

This is the same rule of thumb for most baked goods, too. “Use airtight freezer bags, press as much air as possible out of them, and consider slipping them into yet another bag or airtight plastic container. Or use vacuum-sealed bags. Obsessive? Yes, but it helps prevent that telltale freezer flavor,” explains Alice Medrich.

***

Recipe: Chocolate Fudge

Prep time: 5 minutes
Cook time: 15 minutes
Makes: 64 1-inch pieces of fudge

Ingredients

  • 5 tablespoons unsalted butter
  • 20 ounces dark chocolate, chips or finely hand-chopped (I like to aim for 60% cacao or higher)
  • 1 (14-ounce) can sweetened condensed milk
  • 1 teaspoon espresso powder
  • 1/2 teaspoon flaky sea salt (such as Maldon), plus more to taste and sprinkle

Directions

  1. Line an 8×8-inch baking pan with parchment paper.
  2. Make browned butter: Add the butter to a small saucepan and set over medium to medium-high heat. Cook, watching like a hawk and stirring occasionally, until it foams, smells super nutty, and the solids at the bottom begin to turn the color of toasted bread. Remove from heat (it’ll brown a bit more as it sits) and transfer to a bowl, giving it a stir — let it hang out while you melt the chocolate. 
  3. Melt the chocolate: You can do this in a double boiler, or in a big bowl in short bursts in the microwave. Stir frequently until just melted (keep in mind that as you stir, the chocolate continues to melt). 
  4. Add the browned butter, sweetened condensed milk, espresso powder, and 1/2 teaspoon salt to the melted chocolate, and stir until combined. The mixture will become thick, like wet soil, as you stir. Taste and add another pinch of salt if it’s feeling too sweet — but keep in mind, you’ll sprinkle a bit more on top to finish the fudge. 
  5. Transfer the thick mixture into the prepared pan and use a damp spatula to smooth over the top as needed (your hand works, too!). Sprinkle the top with a pinch of salt.
  6. Cover and refrigerate for at least 90 minutes, until set and easily sliceable into 1×1-inch squares. If you’re having trouble cutting through the chilled fudge, try using a warm knife: run it under hot water, then dry it off before slicing. Store covered in the fridge for up to a week, or wrap tightly and freeze for a month. This is best served at room temperature.

Joan Didion, acclaimed author and iconic literary journalist, has died

Writer, reporter, and cultural critic Joan Didion has died, according to her publisher Knopf and others. Knopf wrote in an emailed statement Thursday, “We are deeply saddened to report that Joan Didion died earlier this morning at her home in New York due to complications from Parkinson’s disease.”

Didion was born December 5, 1934, in Sacramento, California, a fifth-generation Californian whose ancestors were descended from the Donner Party, according to the New York Times. California was central to Didion’s work, the place she returned to in books such as her debut novel, 1963’s “Run, River” about a family in Sacramento, and her second, “Play It as It Lays” (1970), about an actress dealing with a difficult life in 1960s Hollywood. Didion attended the University of California, Berkeley, earning a bachelor’s degree in English in 1956.

She married writer John Gregory Dunne in 1964. Together, the couple wrote screenplays, including “Panic in Needle Park” (1971), which starred a young Al Pacino. Other screenplays penned by the couple included an adaptation of “A Star is Born” (1976). In 2003, Dunne died at age 71 of a heart attack. His death, and less than two years later, the death of the couple’s only child, daughter Quintana Roo Dunne, at age 39, influenced Didion’s book “The Year of Magical Thinking” (2005), later adapted into a one-woman Broadway show. The book won the National Book Award for Nonfiction in 2005. 

In the introduction to an interview with Didion in 2003, Salon’s Andrew O’Hehir wrote, “Didion is not merely one of the greatest living practitioners of the literary journalism tradition, she more or less invented it, at least in its 20th century American incarnation.” Her many books also include the essay collections “Slouching Towards Bethlehem” (1968) and “The White Album” (1979), which detail life in California during the 1960s and ’70s. Her most famous work may be her essay “Goodbye to All That,” exploring why she left New York City, her adopted home and the place where she had written for publications such as Vogue and Mademoiselle. She also reported on politics for The New York Review of Books.

In a 1996 Salon interview with writer Dave Eggers, Didion said, “I never feel particularly successful. I always feel like I’ve not quite done it right, that I ought to be doing better or something. In terms of work…I always want to have done it differently, to have done it better, a different way.”

Didion was 87.

More Salon stories about Joan Didion: 

This beloved French Christmas dessert is made with . . . chard?

Head to any local purveyor of Niçoise specialties (from the chickpea flatbread known as socca to tuna-stuffed pan bagnat), and the dessert on offer will likely be a rectangular tourte de blettes: two slabs of buttery pastry, covered in confectioners’ sugar, sandwiching a deep emerald filling made with pine nuts, apples, raisins, and Swiss chard.

No, that’s no typo. A sweet Swiss chard pie might seem like an oddity at first, but locals are as besotted with this veggie-based sweet as the Japanese are with adzuki bean mochi or Americans with carrot cakezucchini bread, and pumpkin pie.

“I used to live upstairs from a bakery called Espuno in the Old Town, which sadly no longer exists, and I discovered tourte de blettes when we moved to Nice in 2004,” recalls Canadian expat Rosa Jackson, founder and owner of local Les Petits Farcis cooking school. “Something about it, I guess the raisins soaked in rum, reminded me of mincemeat pie, which I make at Christmas because of my British background.”

The dessert — and local affection for chard in any form — dates to long before the 16th-century arrival of other ingredients now practically synonymous with Mediterranean cuisine, like tomatoes, eggplant, and zucchini.

“Chard is our base vegetable, you know?” said local culinary historian Alex Benvenuto. The vegetable is so plentiful, it’s even in a quirky nickname residents have for themselves: caga blea, or roughly “chard pooper” in the local dialect. “In French, it’s vulgar,” said Benvenuto. “But in Niçois, it’s nice.” Locally, he said, chard is “the essential ingredient in any stuffing, be it sweet or savory, from farcis, or stuffed vegetables, to local ravioli to, of course, tourte de blettes. “Chard is part of our identity,” he said. “It’s our history.”

Given chard’s omnipresence, it’s hard to know when exactly locals first opted to bake it into a sweet pie. Benvenuto notes that the dessert was “emblematic enough” to appear in the very first cookbook on Niçoise cuisine, “‎La cuisine à Nice en usage à l’Ecole Hôtelière de Nice et du Littoral,” written by culinary instructor and chef Henri Heyraud and published in 1909. That recipe featured a flour- and butter-based dough sweetened with sugar, and bound with eggs and local olive oil.

“Going back in time, tourte de blettes would have been made with an olive oil pastry,” notes Jackson. “But these days most bakers prefer a butter pastry that is on the crumbly side, more of a pâte sablée.”

The filling features chard leaves only, no ribs. Indeed, many different varieties of chard are grown in Nice, and the most common for this cake is the leafy “spinach chard,” with very thin or no stems. The mixture is sweetened with Reinette apples and raisins soaked in rum, as well as local eau-de-vie or Pastis.

These days, most locals don’t actually make the time-consuming pastry at home, instead snagging some from a restaurant or a local bakery. “Very honestly,” said Benvenuto, “most bakeries make an excellent tourte de blettes.”

At Chez Pipo, a restaurant outside Nice’s historic center, manager Steeve Bernardo notes that tourte de blettes is “by far our best-seller.” His version is made with a buttery pâte brisée and is served at room temperature. “If it’s too cold, the butter makes the dough tough,” he said. He also forgoes the confectioners’ sugar featured in most versions and uses granulated sugar instead, which pre-dates the powdered stuff, and, he said, creates a more balanced finished product. “Confectioners’ sugar sweetens the dessert too much, and it masks the flavor of the filling.” The same, he said, is true of the cinnamon that some have started adding to their iterations of the classic.

As for the point of being so exacting, for Bernardo, it’s simple: neither to hide nor to highlight the flavor of the chard. “The chard greens used in the recipe are really quite neutral in terms of flavor,” he said. “Much more neutral than spinach, for example,” which, he said, some use once chard season is over (to the detriment of the dessert). “The flavor of this vegetable becomes too pronounced and dominating,” he said of spinach. “The marriage of the ingredients, essentially the apple and marinated raisins with chard, lends a balanced flavor to the dessert.”

At René Socca, an emblematic restaurant in the heart of historic Nice, meanwhile, Zélie Bonge notes that a pâte sablée or shortbread crust and a topping of confectioners’ sugar are preferred. But the same ultimate goal — balancing the chard without hiding it — remains true.

“Clients who aren’t familiar with it are sometimes skeptical,” said Bonge, who is the daughter and niece of two of the restaurant’s managers. “I think it’s something you either love or you hate.” When she was younger, even the native Niçoise said, “you couldn’t have paid me to eat a tourte de blettes. But as I got older, I tasted it, and what I found pleasantly surprising was that light sweetness.”

Today, locals are René Socca’s best customers. While curious tourists often order one piece for a group, just to taste, “they’re not that curious,” she said. “So Niçois people, who like it, are the ones who get it most often.”

The only time locals really make this dessert at home, according to Benvenuto, is at Christmas, when it features prominently as the centerpiece of the traditional Thirteen Desserts: a panoply of dried fruits, nuts, and more that conclude the Yuletide meal in Provence. “It’s a pretty long recipe to make,” he said, noting nevertheless that it’s an essential part of local culinary tradition.

“Tourte de blettes is one of our favorite ways to introduce children to cooking,” he said. “You get little kids to get their hands dirty as early as three years old. It’s a transmission tool.”

Jackson teaches her version of the recipe both in person in Nice and online. Her recipe is fairly traditional, with a healthy dose of rum. But neither she — nor Bernardo nor Bonge, for that matter — add one last secret ingredient Benvenuto said is “indispensable” to a true tourte de blettes: grated cheese.

“At the end of the 19th century, there were no apples yet, but there was already cheese,” Benvenuto said of the handful of Parmesan or Swiss Sbrinz added to the filling in Heyraud’s recipe. He’s adamant that despite this addition, tourte de blettes cannot and should not be categorized as a mix of sweet and savory. Rather, the cheese adds just the barest hint of richness and depth to the filling. “It helps bring out the sweetness,” he said. “That’s the real secret.”

For David Lebovitz’s tourte de blettes recipe — which does include cheese, click here.

The real crime wave that Fox News is ignoring: Domestic violence has increased drastically

In between bouts of denying the very real dangers of COVID-19, Fox News spends much of its airtime trying to rile its elderly white viewers about something that is likely not much of a threat to most of them: Violent crime.

Tune into right-wing America’s favorite network, and you’d get the strong impression that leaving your house, especially in any major city, is the equivalent of walking into a war zone, with hosts raving about “coast-to-coast crime crisis” and suggesting it’s impossible to walk “down the street in any major liberal city” without getting murdered lots. When a mentally ill homeless man set fire to the Fox News Christmas tree, this was taken as the ultimate proof that life in American cities is like living in Sarajevo in the early 90s, with hosts screeching that “no city is safe” and “no person is safe” from the supposed onslaught of “random violence.” 

It is all, like nearly everything on Fox News, total nonsense.

Yes, a lot of cities are dealing with a tragic escalation in homicides, which seem to be a side effect of the pandemic’s upheavals to schools and workplaces. As Axios noted in a piece on Ohio’s gun violence problem in October, the spike is being driven by “active street gangs” and, as the assistant police chief in Columbus told reporters, a “large percentage of the violence is being driven by a very small segment of this population.” In Philadelphia, there is a record number of murders, but a decline in crimes committed without the use of a gun. Gang violence is terrible and needs to be dealt with, but it’s also not exactly a threat to the white suburbanite Fox News viewers quivering with fear at their TVs.

RELATED: The Wisconsin parade and Gabby Petito: People keep dying because the law blows off domestic violence

There is, however, another contributing factor to rising crime rates that Fox News is largely ignoring because it’s not useful for scaring your grandma: Domestic violence.

While property crime and even other assaults actually remain low, the incidents of people attacking intimate partners appear to be skyrocketing. Considering that intimate partner violence typically accounts for around 15% of all violent crime, this explosion of violence is bound to have a significant impact on the overall picture of violent crime in the U.S. Because national statistics tend to take time to collect and thus lag behind by a couple of years, it’s hard to get hard numbers from the bird’s eye view, though sociologists have estimated that domestic violence went up over 8% due to the pandemic. Statistics are coming in from around the country suggest that picture may be even grimmer than that.

Domestic murder seems to be spiking faster than overall murder in many places. 


Want more Amanda Marcotte on politics? Subscribe to her newsletter Standing Room Only.


Philadelphia’s overall murder rate is up 55% since 2019, but the domestic homicide rate is even worse — it’s doubled in only the past year. Some of the killings in Philadelphia have truly sent shockwaves through the community. Jessica Covington, a 32-year-old pregnant woman, was murdered while unloading baby shower gifts. Sykea Patton, 24, was killed in front of her twin sons. Her ex-boyfriend was arrested for the crime.  

The Indiana Coalition Against Domestic Violence found 181% increase in domestic homicides from July 2020 to July 2021 over the previous year. In Ohio, domestic murders went up 62% during the pandemic, and 86% of the killings were done with a gun. Iowa has seen a similar spike in domestic murders, which were already rising even before the pandemic due to the state’s increasingly loose restrictions on guns. 

RELATED: Can we stop domestic violence before it turns to murder?

On the ground responders report dramatic increases as well, both to 911 calls for domestic violence and people reaching out for help from domestic violence hotlines. A domestic violence shelter in Santa Cruz, California, reports that “our service numbers nearly doubled from 2019 to 2020.” Another in Illinois reports a 40% increase in calls. The Tampa Bay Times reports that the local domestic violence agency saw a 35% increase in calls from July 2020 to July 2021. There was also a significant rise in the reports of strangulation, which is generally viewed as the leading red flag for potential homicide. 

Taken together, it’s a distressing picture.

As Rose Wong of the Tampa Bay Times notes, pandemic-related stressors such as “financial insecurity, threat of illness, homeschooling, loss of routine and social opportunities” likely contributed. And pandemic mitigation measures “such as social distancing, working from home and remote learning” are an abuser’s dream. Usually, abusers have to do a lot of brow-beating and emotional degradation to socially isolate their victims from friends and family members who might intervene. During the pandemic, however, the virus has been doing that work for them. 


Want more Amanda Marcotte on politics? Subscribe to her newsletter Standing Room Only.


All of which is why it’s doubly concerning to see Sen. Joe Manchin, D-W.Va., go out of his way to kill off President Joe Biden’s proposed Build Back Better bill. While the bill doesn’t address domestic violence directly, many of its provisions could go a long way to helping victims get out of bad situations. Many women are trapped at home and have even had to give up jobs because the pandemic has interrupted their child care access. For those in abusive relationships, that means losing a pipeline to the outside world and a source of income that allows them to escape. A bill like Build Back Better, which would expand child care access and loosen up money for parents, would help a whole lot of women restart their lives away from their abusers. 

In the meantime, the rise in domestic violence really underscores how deceitful it is for Fox News and other right-wing media to use “crime” as a way to stir up hysteria and reactionary sentiment. Crime is a problem, but it’s one frequently caused by or exacerbated by right-wing policies and social preferences.

Women’s position in society proved to be quite precarious indeed — after decades of right-wing resistance to feminist demands for equality in both the home and the workplace. It set up a situation where untold numbers of women found themselves in abusive situations, without any ability to escape. Not that you’d ever know it from watching Fox News, which continues to pretend “crime” is a thing that happens mainly between strangers and ignores the grim realities of people hurting people they know — often the people they are closest to. 

What are marrons glacés from “The French Dispatch”?

In Wes Anderson’s new movie “The French Dispatch,” slippery art dealer Julian Cadazio (played by Adrien Brody) bribes a prison guard with a marron glacé, or candied chestnut. The stone-faced guard unwraps the bite-sized confection and pops it into his mouth. Watching the film in a theatre near the Palais Garnier, I found the casting choice of marron glacé highly satisfying. Like the aperitif trays and old world locales, it was one of many rich details of French life that Anderson wove into his tableaux.

Marrons glacés are a fixture of the holidays in France. Marrons, a special chestnut from the Ardèche region, are harvested in early fall and their delicate candied form proliferates in sweets shops around the country in mid-November. With their stylish packaging and Willy Wonka-esque colorful wrappers, they’re a lovely and timeless gift idea. Take it from Proust, who mentions them as a New Year’s gift in his great masterpiece Swann’s Way (which I am yet to read but I do know that the crumby madeleines made a greater impression).

While marrons glacés are the kind of cultural touchpoint that most expats observe with rosy-hued appreciation, I can’t say I’ve always understood the hype (or the price tag — a box of eight from the iconic Angelina will set you back 38 euros; to be fair, you can buy the same at frozen food mecca Picard for 12.95). But perhaps I’m biased by experiences with their roasted cousins, which are sold in France (and neighboring Spain and Italy) in paper cones as a wintry street food. I’ve been seduced by their earthy, smoky aroma only to be disappointed by a taste that leaves something wanting. And then there’s the charred bits, which are a little too reminiscent of ye olde Christmas chimney. The French, however, are masters of making humble ingredients exquisite. Consider the croissant: Butter and dough folded with patience into something sublime. I trust them, if anyone, to sway this skeptic on fancy chestnuts.

To better understand the allure of France’s famed holiday treats, I reached out to Sophie Dolfi, who along with her father and three siblings, runs À la Mère de Famille, confectioners since 1761 and the cult spot to score marrons glacés in Paris. Dolfi told me that marrons glacés have been a holiday staple since the days of Louis XIV, and though the time-tested recipe for candied chestnut was never broken, she was determined to fix it.

“I really like the flavor of the marron itself and found that oftentimes marrons glacés tasted mostly like sugar,” Dolfi told me by phone. “I was a bit obsessed with making a marron glacé that wasn’t too sweet, which isn’t easy because the sugar tenderizes and conserves the marron.” She continued, “You need an equilibrium between the sugar, the vanilla, and the marron.”

And so, Dolfi worked with an expert artisan for years to achieve the specific flavor profile she had in mind. “After 10 years of tests, we finally achieved a recipe, the ‘recette mere de famille,’ which we sell in the boutique today.”

I asked her how many days it takes to prepare marrons glacés and whether it’s possible to tackle at home.

“Oh la la. It’s a long time,” said Dolfi. “It’s a real craft to make the marron glacé and there’s a huge number of steps. There’s the cooking, then you let them rest, then you dip them in a bath of sugar syrup, and repeat five or six times, draining the syrup after each time.” I told her that it sounded pretty impossible. “It’s not impossible to do at home, but you’d need a lot of time and patience. The quality of the marron is also very important.” Like baking baguettes and dying my eyebrows, this one seems better left to the experts. (There is, however, a recipe for marrons glacés in their Wes Anderson-esque cookbook.)

I asked if marrons glaces are their most popular holiday purchase and Dolfi said that the crown rests with their chocolates (which, I can attest, are extraordinary — I especially love their paper-thin chocolate disks that melt on the tongue like a Catholic host).

“The marron glace takes so much time to produce, which is why it’s rather expensive. It’s not the most popular gift, but it is a very precious gift.”

After a visit to À la Mère de Famille’s storybook-charming ninth arrondissement boutique, I finally got my hands on a dainty sleeve of their famed marrons glacés. Later that evening, after a dinner of leftover soupy rice, I unwrap one and take a moment to admire it. It looks like a translucent little brain, about the size of a walnut, and the color is dewy gold. I bite it in half, to slowly savor, and am instantly converted. At the risk of sounding sappy, it is transcendent. The texture is tender, almost fruity, and the sweetness is elegant, not cloying. It bears no relation to the roasted nuts of the paper cone and as I peel the bronze wrapper from a second marron glacé, I think, I get it. I’m filled with appreciation for French savoir-faire. They truly are a precious gift, to bribe someone for information, or to give someone you love.

Michael Flynn’s legal fight to avoid Jan. 6 inquiry shot down by judge one day after lawsuit filed

A judge on Wednesday shot down former National Security Advisor Michael Flynn’s lawsuit against the House Select Committee investigating the January 6 attack, arguing that Flynn would likely face no “immediate and irreparable harm” from a federal probe. 

In November, Flynn was one of six Donald Trump allies to be subpoenaed over his apparent connections to various Trump allies ahead of the insurrection on January 6. On Tuesday, Flynn filed a suit against the panel asking for a temporary restraining order, seeking to block the committee from accessing his phone records or subpoenaing him for testimony. 

“Like many Americans in late 2020, and to this day, General Flynn has sincerely held concerns about the integrity of the 2020 elections. It is not a crime to hold such beliefs, regardless of whether they are correct or mistaken,” his complaint read at the time. Flynn has broadly argued that the committee’s probe violates his Fifth Amendment right against self-incrimination.

RELATED: Most damning Mark Meadows text was sent from Rick Perry’s phone: report

The panel is particularly interested in a White House meeting Flynn attended in mid-December, during which numerous conspiracy theories surrounding the 2020 election were shared amongst Trump administration officials, according to The New York Times

Wednesday’s ruling was handed down by U.S, District Judge Mary Scriven, in Tampa, Florida, who pointed out that Flynn’s case failed to meet the procedural criteria for a restraining order. There was, she said, “no basis to conclude that Flynn will face immediate and irreparable harm.” According to federal law, a claimant needs to notify the other parties of their intent to seek a restraining order before filing for one – a requirement that Flynn’s legal team did not meet, according to NBC News


Want a daily wrap-up of all the news and commentary Salon has to offer? Subscribe to our morning newsletter, Crash Course.


Scriven said that Flynn can refile for a restraining order “if he believes he can comply with the procedural requirements.”

Though Flynn’s first counter-offensive against the January 6 panel has failed, it still remains unclear when the former Trump adviser is expected to procure the documents requested as part of his November subpoena. An original document deadline had been set in late November, but that deadline has since passed. 

RELATED: Jan. 6 committee zeroes in on GOP congressmen

Following the ruling, Flynn’s attorney, David Warrington, said that Scriven acknowledged the potential for harming Flynn if the committee expedites its document deadline. “A renewed motion for [temporary restraining order]” Warrington said, in that case, “may be appropriate.”

Flynn’s lawsuit comes as the committee continues to zero in on several Trump allies, including ex-Trump adviser Steve Bannon and Mark Meadows, Trump’s White House Chief of Staff – both of whom have already been charged in contempt of Congress. Other current and former officials under scrutiny include ex-DOJ officials Jeffrey Clark and Kashyap Patel, as well as Reps. Jim Jordan, R-Ohio, and Scott Perry, R-Pa.

A California classic salad is your easiest Christmas dinner

When my daughters were little and the mantle of hosting Christmas dinner passed to me, I made a determined vow that I was going to spend as much of the holidays with my family and as little of them fussing in the kitchen as possible. Christmas, in my opinion, should be for joyful chaos, not monitoring a large, temperamental piece of meat and several side dishes.

The holiday gods smiled on me the day they sent me the famous Zuni chicken salad, an outrageously flavorful dish that can easily scaled to the size of your crowd and mostly prepared in advance. It helps that it also mimics that poultry-and-stuffing-and-cranberries Thanksgiving vibe just enough to feel seasonally festive. For years, I would roast my chicken (or chickens) and toast the bread on Christmas Eve, and then just finish the final dish whenever we felt like wandering to the table on the big day. It was always a magnificent, easy hit.


Want more great food writing and recipes? Subscribe to Salon Food’s newsletter.


Now, I am lowering the bar even further. Last week, pretty much immediately after I turned in my final mountain of academic coursework for my semester, my mother died and my daughter was diagnosed with a breakthrough case of COVID. All the last minute holiday shopping and card sending, the picking up my other daughter from college, have been back burnered to make room for cremation and quarantine. And while I frankly would be fine eating a bowl of cereal over the sink and calling it a day, I am instead this December 25 going to rally just enough to do a cheat version of the California classic.

Maybe your 2021, and in particular your past week, have been in their own way a real kick in your pants too. For all of us, then, I offer this. The real Zuni chicken salad relies on its meticulous roasting technique and flawless ingredient list. My Sh_t Just Got Real version instead streamlines the steps considerably and uses whatever you’ve got and can make work. The final result is not as intense or rich as the original, but you can pull it together in about a half hour while crying, fielding multiple phone calls, or just staring into space and dissociating. 

RELATED: This Mediterranean potato salad is all you need for dinner

This dish still keeps Zuni’s addictive crispy skin and warm dressing, making the whole thing very satisfying and deeply comforting. It’s just the right combination of savory, sweet, salty and sharp to please everybody. And for right now, it’s more than good enough. So go ahead and join me in half-assing it a little here, because one of the best gifts we can give each other this strange holiday season is the gentle promise of as much ease and grace as possible, shared with the ones we love, and granted for the ones we miss. Merry Christmas.

***

Zuni Christmas chicken salad

Inspired by The Zuni Cafe Cookbook and Low Carb Maven

Makes 4 to 6 portions, with leftovers

 

Ingredients:

  • 1 rotisserie chicken
  • 1 loaf of your favorite crusty bread (Sourdough is not recommended but I personally don’t judge.)
  • 1 bag of prewashed salad greens of your choice 
  • 1/2 cup of light olive oil
  • 1 1/2 tablespoons of apple cider vinegar or whatever you’ve got
  • 2 tablespoons of raisins or dried currants (or your preferred chopped, dried fruit like apricots)
  • 2 tablespoons (or more, if you like) of pine nuts or other nuts you like
  • 2 – 3 cloves of thinly sliced garlic
  • 3 sliced scallions, green and white parts
  • 2 tablespoons of your favorite broth, or white wine
  • Salt and pepper, to taste

 

Directions:

  1. Preheat your oven to 450°F.
  2. Shred your rotisserie chicken, reserving the skin.
  3. Tear the bread into rough 2 – 3-inch chunks. (You can cut the crust off the bread before tearing it so it soaks up the flavors better, but I like the crunchy-chewy contrast.) You’ll want about 4 cups of bread chunks.
  4. Line two sheet pans with parchment.
  5. On pan one, stretch out your reserved chicken skin pieces and gently pat dry with a paper towel. Add a light sprinkle of salt and pepper. It will shrink, so you don’t want to oversalt.
  6. To pan two, add your bread chunks. Drizzle with about 2 tablespoons of oil and toss to coat. If you’re feeling like roasting your pine nuts, spread them out all together on one side of the pan. 
  7. Roast your chicken skin, bread and nuts for about 10 minutes TOTAL. Check the nuts after about 2 minutes, and remove them as soon as they get a little browned. Flip the bread pieces after about 5 minutes to get golden all over, and then remove. The chicken skin should be crisp after 10 minutes, but if it needs a little longer, give it 2 or 3 more.
  8. When the chicken skin is done, remove to a separate plate and lightly crumble. You want little pieces, not chicken dust. Reserve any chicken drippings left in the pan. (There may not be much.)
  9. In a large pan over medium flame, heat 2 – 3 tablespoons of your oil. Lightly sweat your garlic and scallions, stirring constantly. Add your stock or wine, and then your raisins. The raisins will plump a little. Add any reserved chicken drippings you have. 
  10. Remove the pan from the heat and add the remainder of your olive oil and your vinegar, along with salt and pepper to taste, and whisk. (I always like to add a pinch of sugar to any dressing for balance, but it’s optional.) Taste your dressing and adjust the seasoning as necessary.
  11. Add the dressing to your bread and toss. Don’t get overly enthusiastic, you want a mix of textures and flavors. Add your greens and your shredded chicken and toss again. Dish out onto a platter. Scatter your pine nuts and crispy chicken skin on top for a classy touch.
  12. Serve with the cake and cookies your nice friends sent you, because it’s been a rough one.

Note: You can make the chicken, toasted bread and dressing the day before. And if crisping the chicken skin sounds like one more chore and one more pan to wash, feel free to skip it.

More simple dinners we love: 

America got Scrooged by Joe Manchin — but Joe Biden believes in Santa

And so this is Christmas. And what have we done?

The country got “Scrooged” this Christmas.

In a remake worthy of the Bill Murray movie, starring Sen. Joe Manchin and the omicron variant, it looks like President Joe Biden will have a hard time delivering an upbeat spirit of Christmas future.

Prior to the perfect storm of disease and political pestilence, Biden was trying hard to convince the country that the newly passed infrastructure bill was the panacea for all of our ills: clean water, a working power grid and jobs.

That message nosedived on Sunday when West Virginia’s only Democrat in the Senate, former college quarterback Joe Manchin, dropped a bomb on Biden — saying on Fox News that the infrastructure’s even bigger companion legislation, Build Back Better, was most likely toast because he wasn’t going to vote for it. The dynamics being what they are in Congress — a very slim majority in the House and a 50-50 Senate — the Democrats absolutely need Manchin to have a hope of passing the legislation. 

Manchin’s proclamation set off a firestorm of recriminations, overindulgent speculation and specious political analysis. It was the journalistic equivalent of watching pundits pull out their hair and scream like Bart Simpson being choked by Homer. Worse, it helped to tank the stock market on Monday. You could literally hear Republican staffers on the Hill giggling with delight. At least I did, outside a couple of Republican congressional offices, as they discussed the issue.

RELATED: How Joe Biden lost Joe Manchin — and how he can win him back

On Sunday the White House issued a terse reaction to Manchin through press secretary Jen Psaki. Manchin responded to being taken to the woodshed by the president by blaming the White House staff for his displeasure with the Build Back Better agenda. “That’s the oldest dodge in D.C.,” a senior Biden official said — a sentiment echoed by Republicans who winced when they heard it. “It means the ball is still in play,” I was told.

Kurt Bardella, writing in USA Today, had the best take on the fallout of Manchin’s move — at least if you’re a loyal Democrat. “My advice to Democrats is assume you will lose everything in 2022. Knowing that, do what you need to do. Don’t let anything hold you back. Don’t operate from a position of fear. Instead, put the fear in everyone else.”

That’s good advice for Democrats who will see a total of 22 House members retiring in 2022, the most in the last 30 years. The realization that Biden’s window is closing on getting meaningful legislation passed only heightens the frustration with Manchin. Of course rumors of him switching parties doesn’t help either.

Others have called Manchin the “de facto president” for being a roadblock to his more progressive colleagues. But writing in Roll Call, John Bennett suggested it was time to quit calling Manchin that, since it misses a key point: Manchin isn’t the de facto anything. He’s just a rural-state senator, doing what the Constitution allows him to do.

But more to the issue, Sunday’s point and counterpoint revealed what was really going on. Blaming White House staff has been around as long as Washington. So, could Manchin’s move and the president’s reaction be nothing more than a strategic dance around the head of a pin? A mere (gasp!) political maneuver? Some kind of negotiating strategy?

I suspected it was, and asked Psaki that question Monday in her first briefing after the dust-up. “Moving forward,” I said, “you’ve already taken Sen. Manchin to the woodshed. Are you going to invite him back into the fold? Are you going to try to reach out to him?”

Psaki’s answer was, “Of course,” and then she went on to explain the importance of the Build Back Better agenda, saying the president had made it clear “that we absolutely want to work with Sen. Manchin and all Democrats to get this done.” Psaki even held out hope of enticing a few Republicans.

So the bottom line here is “kabuki theater,” as one reporter termed it. The BBB negotiations are still ongoing.

No, the BBB isn’t dead — and this is no Monty Python skit, either. Manchin and the president are still talking. But you can’t blame most of the pundits for missing this. Joe and Joe are a pair of old pros, engaged in old-fashioned politics as it was once practiced daily around here. Since that’s not done much anymore, it’s become harder to recognize. But as it turns out, old-fashioned politics is still alive, and gasping for air in the fetid stench of a very divided Washington. It’s also what Biden relishes. He’s a horse-trader working the market. During his long years in the Senate he was one of the best practitioners of this: finding common ground between adversaries.

If the president was done with Manchin, everyone would know it. Biden has never had a problem expressing himself — especially when he’s angry. But he’s in a different place now. At best, he has one election left in him. He knows his window is closing and he’s got the patience and determination to keep focused. He acknowledged that as well on Tuesday in the East Room, as he spoke about the omicron variant. “You’ve heard me say this before: Some people think maybe I’m not Irish because I don’t hold a grudge,” he said. “Look, I want to get things done. I still think there’s a possibility of getting Build Back Better done.”

Biden is passionate about the plan. In his East Room appearance he focused on what is at stake. “Imagine being a parent, looking at a child, and you can’t afford — you have no house to borrow against, you have no savings,” he said. “It’s wrong. But all the things in that bill are going to reduce prices and costs for middle-class and working-class people.” 

That focus makes it difficult for Manchin or any candidate to ignore the issue — especially if they’re running for office in 2022.

And as the president left the East Room Tuesday, he struck an optimistic note: “Sen. Manchin and I are going to get something done,” he said emphatically.

That’s the tell, poker players. As Yogi Berra once said, “It ain’t over til it’s over.” It ain’t over. Bet on the guy who’s staying focused.

What is over, though, was also readily apparent in Biden’s Tuesday appearance in the East Room. He’s done indulging those who are reticent to get vaccinated against COVID. He’s apparently had all he can take of the anti-vax, chlorine-drinking, Joe Rogan-worshipping anti-science heathens who are putting the world at risk. As early as Friday, members of the Coronavirus Task Force were saying, “We are intent on not letting omicron disrupt work and school for the vaccinated. You’ve done the right thing and we will get through this. For the unvaccinated, you’re looking at a winter of severe illness and death for yourselves, your families and the hospitals you may soon overwhelm.”

I asked Psaki about that on Monday, quoting her recent remarks back at her: “I mean, what you said recently, ‘Hey, for those who are vaccinated, it’s mild or asymptomatic. For those who are not, death and destruction awaits you.’ So are you pretty much done trying to be diplomatic on this?”

With her permanently polite smile, Psaki acknowledged that. On Tuesday, the president reiterated it. “The answer is straightforward: If you are not fully vaccinated, you have good reason to be concerned,” he said. “You’re at high risk of getting sick. And if you get sick, you’re likely to spread it to others, including friends and family. And the unvaccinated have a significantly higher risk of ending up in a hospital or even dying.Almost everyone who has died from COVID-19 in the past many months has been unvaccinated.”

Biden told people it was their “patriotic duty” to get the shot, and then took the (for him) unprecedented step of acknowledging and thanking Donald Trump, who recently announced he had received the booster.

RELATED: “Don’t, don’t, don’t”: Trump lashes out after crowd boos him for getting COVID booster

“Let me be clear,” Biden said. “Thanks to the prior administration and our scientific community, America is one of the first countries to get the vaccine. And thanks to my administration and the hard work of Americans, we led a rollout that made America among the world leaders in getting shots in arms.”

Watching Biden battle with Congress and the coronavirus with the vigor of a man half his age should remind everyone that, in the end, Ebenezer Scrooge changed.

Biden deserves criticism for his poor and inconsistent messaging. But on Build Back Better and the pandemic there has been no better warrior for the cause.

This week is pivotal in the Biden presidency. As noted, he faces a closing window to get meaningful legislation enacted. He’s holding no grudges and wasting no energy that can be put to use getting to the finish line — whether it’s playing politics with a colleague or being blunt with those who are willfully ignorant of the reality of the pandemic. There was a time when we were offering beer and prizes to those who weren’t vaxxed. Now, Biden is done and it’s time to move on: Deal with reality.

He’s showing genuine determination and resolve in dealing with the issues that have Scrooged us all. The future of, course, remains unwritten. Scrooge found out that things can change. Joe Biden is counting on that.

More from Brian Karem on the troubles and travails of the Biden White House:

Local pharmacists fill Rx void as big brands pull out of rural areas

Bill Mather, a pharmacist in the small Iowa city of Greenfield, wanted to make sure his neighbors could fill their prescriptions without driving long distances or enduring long wait times.

So when pharmacy chains and big-box stores began expanding into rural markets, he sold his drugstore in 2007 to Pamida, a grocery chain owned by the Shopko department store company, hoping that would keep his practice alive. Then, in 2019, when Shopko declared bankruptcy, shuttering more than 360 stores, he and another Shopko pharmacist helped open a new drugstore for the city of about 2,000 people.

Across the country, pharmacists like Mather are filling the voids left when large drugstore chains and big-box stores with pharmacies pull out of small communities. In some areas, pharmacists who were let go when big chains closed are now opening new drugstores, often in the same locations. In other areas, pharmacy owners from neighboring towns are opening new branches. Without them, numerous communities would have been left with no pharmacy.

It didn’t used to be this way. Big-box stores like Shopko started to move aggressively into the pharmacy market 30 years ago, hoping customers would fill their carts while the store filled their prescriptions. Large chains established beachheads in small towns by acquiring independent pharmacies or driving them out of business.

According to the Bureau of Labor Statistics, the number of pharmacists employed at big-box stores peaked at more than 31,800 in 2012. But as online sales and mail delivery of consumer goods and prescription drugs grew, the big-box stores had no reason to stay. By 2019, the number of big-box pharmacists had dropped to fewer than 18,000. (The bureau no longer reports the number.)

“The big-box stores came into smaller and smaller communities, and they, in essence, outcompeted all the other pharmacies in the area,” said David Zgarrick, a pharmacy professor at Northeastern University in Boston. “Now they’re completely gone and with them the pharmacy services and everything else they provided. They left a vacuum in a lot of these places.”

With CVS Health’s recent announcement that it will close 300 stores a year over the next three years, more towns could lose another tier of pharmacies: the big drugstore chains. CVS has not yet said which stores will close.

“We’re considering a number of factors when making these decisions, including local market dynamics, population shifts, store density, and the needs of underserved communities,” said Mike DeAngelis, a CVS Health spokesperson. “In fact, reaching underserved populations has been a priority for us all through the pandemic, such as the access to testing and vaccines we’ve provided.”

Kathleen Bashur, a spokesperson for the National Association of Chain Drug Stores, said chain pharmacies of all types and sizes play a significant role in meeting the health and wellness needs of communities throughout the nation. “The decision to close a store is a difficult one,” she said.

Zgarrick attributes much of the decline in big-box pharmacies to Amazon and other online merchants that undercut the profitability of their non-pharmacy sales. In the past, big-box stores could treat pharmacies as loss leaders and make up that revenue with sales of other goods. Now, Zgarrick said, big-box stores have to ask tough questions about how to allocate their space: “‘At the end of the day, how are we going to make the most money per square foot? Is it by having a pharmacy or by selling tires?'”

Nelson Lichtenstein, a University of California-Santa Barbara history professor who has chronicled the rise of Walmart, said big-box stores are constantly reevaluating their store locations, closing less profitable stores and opening new ones in places where they think they can make money.

“They just keep a kind of slow churn,” he said.

The cost of building a big-box store is about $10 million, Lichtenstein said, and such stores can net $200 million in annual revenue. Pulling out of a location is therefore not a huge loss for a big company if revenues falter.

“So they will shut down the stores and leave a devastated town because the Walmart put the other guys out of business,” he said.

Walmart did not answer questions about its closures.

The growth in online options for all kinds of items, spurred by people shopping from home during the covid-19 pandemic, has put further pressure on big-box stores.

“Now they’re less likely to do that roaming shopping than they were five years ago,” said Adam Hartung, a business strategy consultant with Spark Partners. “They’re not going to say, ‘Oh, let’s pick up a prescription and, while we’re at it, let’s walk through the store and look at vacuum cleaners.’ That doesn’t happen anymore.”

Hartung said that the U.S. retail market has an excess of shops, by as much as 40% compared with other countries, and that more big-box stores are likely to close in the coming years.

But closures provide opportunities for regional chains or pharmacists willing to strike out on their own.

In Orofino, Idaho, the mayor, the chamber of commerce and many residents appealed to pharmacist Rod Arnzen after Shopko pulled out. So Arnzen began delivering to Orofino from his store 23 miles away in Kamiah. He then opened a branch in Orofino in the building left behind by the pharmacy that had previously sold its business to Shopko.

Andy Pottenger, who owns a pharmacy 45 miles away in Lewiston, Idaho, added a second pharmacy in Orofino, population about 3,000, after receiving hundreds of responses to an ad he had placed in the local paper to gauge interest.

“It was overwhelming,” he said. “That kind of cemented the idea that we should do it.”

In Montana, Mike Matovich, a third-generation pharmacist, opened stores in Roundup and Hardin after Shopko closures there.

“It’s a pretty good-sized community and has a hospital and clinic in town,” Matovich said of Roundup, “and all of a sudden people are driving 50 miles one way to fill an antibiotic for a sick child.”

Matovich has seen what can happen when a rural community loses its only pharmacy.

“If there’s a hospital clinic and a pharmacy there, they’re going to do fairly well,” Matovich said. “Once you lose one or the other, the communities start to struggle because people start leaving to be closer to health care.”

For the residents of Greenfield, Iowa, Shopko’s decision meant they had to scramble. Shopko had sold the pharmacy records to a Walgreens 50 miles away. Some people turned to the Hy-Vee grocery stores in the nearby Iowa cities of Atlantic or Winterset, or to the Walmart in Creston — each at least a half-hour drive away. Others switched to mail order.

“It was sheer chaos,” former Shopko pharmacist Rachel Hall said. “People were trying to figure out what to do, where they should send their prescriptions.”

Mather, Hall and the rest of the Greenfield staff were given just one week’s notice after being told they had nothing to worry about. Their pharmacy had been among the chain’s fastest-growing locations.

“We literally had trophies from Shopko that we threw away when we left,” Hall said.

Former Shopko executives contacted by KHN declined interview requests. Shopko Optical, which operates in 11 states, said it is no longer affiliated in any way with Shopko Stores and declined to comment.

Mather and Hall didn’t want to give up on Greenfield. They reached out to NuCara, a chain with 30 retail pharmacies across five states, and it agreed to help them open a drugstore in their city.

NuCara opened pharmacies in two other communities that Shopko vacated. In the Minnesota cities of Cokato and North Branch, NuCara partnered with pharmacists who had previously sold their pharmacies to Shopko, said Brett Barker, vice president of pharmacies for NuCara.

In Greenfield, Hall and Mather were forbidden from telling customers about the new NuCara drugstore until Shopko officially closed its doors. Hall said Shopko management wanted to maintain the value of the customer files it was selling to Walgreens. So Hall and Mather asked the local chamber of commerce to get the word out.

They found temporary space at the local hospital, which relocated its billing office to accommodate them. A year later, they moved back into their former location in the old Shopko building, leasing the space from new owners, who were running a household goods store there.

After serving three generations of Greenfield customers, Mather was relieved the town still had a pharmacy. But he couldn’t get past how Shopko had ended things.

“The way they slammed the door, I was really unhappy about that,” Mather said. “It wasn’t fair to all the people at the Greenfield pharmacy and the people of Greenfield. Shopko couldn’t have cared less.”

Yet the move brought Mather full circle. Greenfield still has a pharmacy, just as when he started at Murdy Drug in 1968. It’s just a different storefront, with a new name on the sign.

KHN (Kaiser Health News) is a national newsroom that produces in-depth journalism about health issues. Together with Policy Analysis and Polling, KHN is one of the three major operating programs at KFF (Kaiser Family Foundation). KFF is an endowed nonprofit organization providing information on health issues to the nation.Subscribe to KHN’s free Morning Briefing.

What happens if Trump admits it all? Nothing much — at this point, that might help him

Fascism is terrifying. So most people look away.

Fascism is disorienting: A basic understanding of truth and reality, of what is certain in the universe, is replaced by “malignant normality,” a surreal environment. As a democracy slowly succumbs and then quickly collapses — which appears to be what America is experiencing right now — everything that was once familiar and comforting is replaced by a new order. Those who follow the fascist movement are subsumed in mass ecstasy. Others are disoriented as they variously decide to resist, to collaborate or simply to muddle through in their own day-to-day way.

In a new essay for the Guardian, philosopher and author Jason Stanley describes such a moment coming into existence in America:

There has been a growing fascist social and political movement in the United States for decades. Like other fascist movements, it is riddled with internal contradictions, but no less of a threat to democracy. Donald Trump is an aspiring autocrat out solely for his own power and material gain. By giving this movement a classically authoritarian leader, Trump shaped and exacerbated it, and his time in politics has normalized it.

Donald Trump has shown others what is possible. But the fascist movement he now leads preceded him, and will outlive him. 

America’s current democracy crisis and moment of interregnum feels like a state of collective cognitive dissonance.

Those outside the Trump-Republican fascist movement are increasingly disoriented and confused. They exist but are not truly alive in the civic, political and social sense. This is known as “zombie politics.”

Perhaps most confused are those who truly believed in the myth of American exceptionalism — the idea of the United States as the one “indispensable nation,” a shining city on the hill. The rise of neofascism, for those believers, is a type of narcissistic injury. It is also a shroud, marking the death of deeply ingrained but childish fantasies about American democracy, American society and America’s future.

RELATED: If America really surrenders to fascism, then what? Painful questions lie ahead

In 1920, W.E.B. Du Bois wrote the following in his book “Darkwater” about the global struggle against white supremacy, “And then—the Veil. It drops as drops the night on southern seas—vast, sudden, unanswering. There is Hate behind it, and Cruelty and Tears.”

Given that America’s native form of fascism is white supremacy, Du Bois’s insights ring with especially painful clarity today.

Most Americans, faced with the terror of fascism, will do nothing. That is not an opinion or a judgment. It is just a fact. They know something is wrong — almost everything, in fact — but do not know what to do about it. They have been captured by inertia.

*  *  *

How many years of life has the Age of Trump cost the American people?

We know that the coronavirus plague, made dramatically worse by the Trump regime, will take more than a million people’s lives in America.

It has also stolen millions of hours of life from the American people.

But what have the last five years or so cost us in terms of our peace of mind? How do we even quantify such a thing? What has this cost us existentially? What has already been lost, and what will be lost in the future?

On a personal level, I have concluded that the Age of Trump and this struggle has cost me at least five years of my life. I know this for a fact. In private conversation, other travelers have shared their number with me: Sometimes it is lower, and sometimes higher. The cost takes many different forms.

Since last Jan. 6, I have found myself repeatedly singing this part of David Bowie’s haunting song “Five Years”:

We’ve got five years, stuck on my eyes
Five years, what a surprise
We’ve got five years, my brain hurts a lot
Five years, that’s all we’ve got

I wonder daily about other Americans and what songs they sing in lamentation for their country.

I have also reflected on George R. Stewart’s essential science fiction novel “Earth Abides,” whose narrator shares memories of a country that no longer existed after a great plague had spread across the world:

It had been a great thing, in those Old Times, to be an American. You had been deeply conscious of being one of a great nation. It was no mere matter of pride, but also there went with it a profound sense of confidence and security in life, and a comradeship of millions.

There is much woe in my contemplation and reflection on America’s crisis of democracy, and what appears to be imminent doom. Anyone who is truly paying attention feels the same way.

Those of us who have insisted on warning the American people about the rising fascist tide have often become objects of rage and anger from the very people we are trying to help. I understand this logic: Somehow they believe that the horrible thing can be made to go away if those who keep talking about it can be silenced or driven to disappear. Those who feel powerless exercise what they perceive as their only remaining option, which is, in effect, to make the messenger be quiet.

In a recent conversation with historian Ruth Ben-Ghiat on my podcast, she explained this:

They want it to go away. They want the situation to go away. And sometimes they want you to go away. Sometimes they want me to go away. They wanted my book to go away…. The more interesting ones are the ones where they just can’t handle it, you are irksome to them…. They don’t want to accept what America is becoming. Some of those are the people writing us those notes.

America’s democracy crisis and the fascist darkness are not going away. They are only getting worse. This is a moment when those Americans who care about the country’s future need to lean into the fascist darkness and its collective evil with eyes fully open as to prepare themselves for what is to come next.

It has been almost a year since Donald Trump and his regime attempted a coup that involved a lethal attack on the U.S. Capitol and a nationwide plot to nullify the results of the 2020 presidential election. In the past year, the world has learned how perilously close American democracy actually came to the abyss.


Want a daily wrap-up of all the news and commentary Salon has to offer? Subscribe to our morning newsletter, Crash Course.


It was mostly incompetence, dumb luck, timing and the choices of a few patriots who refused to cooperate that prevented America from becoming a Putin-style autocracy, with Trump as de facto dictator. Such a revolution would not have occurred without widespread violence. Indeed, in that alternate timeline the U.S. might well now be in the midst of a civil war or sustained insurgency.

Here is a thought experiment: What would happen if Donald Trump were to now admit his crimes against American democracy? Of course he would do so in cowardly fashion, with a wink and a nod. Something like: I am not saying I did anything illegal — but what if I did?

Trump would continue by explaining that he did it all for the American people — the real Americans! He did it to save America from Joe Biden and the “socialist Democrats.” To save America from “cancel culture” and “political correctness” and “critical race theory”. He did it to Make America Great Again!

“I did it for you!” he would tell his believers. “I am always fighting for you! We will no longer be victims in our own country! I would do it again for the people who truly love America!”

Donald Trump is rapidly moving toward such a moment. He has repeatedly said that the Jan 6. coup attempt was an act of patriotism and that the “real” insurrection happened on Nov. 3 when the election was “stolen” from him and his followers, in what was surely among the greatest crimes of history.

Last Saturday, Trump issued this pronouncement from his shadow government headquarters at Mar-a-Lago:

All the Democrats want to do is put people in jail. They are vicious, violent, and Radical Left thugs. They are destroying people’s lives, which is the only thing they are good at.

They couldn’t get out of Afghanistan without disgracing our Country. The economy and inflation are a disaster. They’re letting thugs and murderers into our Country — their DA’s, AG’s, and Dem Law Enforcement are out of control. This is what happens in communist countries and dictatorships, and they don’t think they’ll be held accountable for rigging the 2020 Presidential Election.

The Jan. 6 Unselect Committee is a coverup for what took place on November 3rd, and the people of our Country won’t stand for it.

Trump is reportedly planning “counter-programming” on the anniversary of Jan. 6 to celebrate his Big Lie and further encourage his followers to attack American democracy.

Frank Figliuzzi, a former assistant director at the FBI, said in response that when Trump “sends out something like this it’s indicative that he’s learned something he didn’t know,” and that his targeting of Democratic district attorneys suggests that:

 Word has gotten to him that something is happening, about to happen to him. He doesn’t like where the investigation is going. He’s lashing out. It’s the possibility that either the state of New York or Manhattan district attorney’s office and/or the DOJ is getting closer to him. Some word has gotten back to him that triggered that message.

So what will happen if Trump literally admits to high crimes against American democracy and society? Likely nothing. President Biden and the Department of Justice have shown a deep reluctance to prosecute Trump or his inner circle for their many alleged or apparent crimes. Biden and Attorney General Merrick Garland remain afraid of “politicizing” the DOJ and creating a precedent that a former president can be held criminally responsible for their actions while in office.

In the most likely scenario, Trump and other members of his inner circle could face fines or suspended sentences. Perhaps Mark Meadows (or another ranking Trump sycophant) will be sacrificed for symbolic reasons and serve a brief prison sentence. Trump will face no significant consequences, and will be free to plot his return to power and his next attempt to bring down American democracy. Trump and his followers will, if anything, be even more energized in their crusade to seize and hold power.

RELATED: Stop calling the GOP fascists “hypocrites”: No one cares, and they have no shame

What will the Democrats do? Not much. They will continue to hold hearings. There will be resolutions, investigations, and press conferences. They will scream, rightfully so, about each new set of “revelations” and what they tell us about the perilous state of American democracy and the rule of law. The Jan. 6 committee will make referrals to the Justice Department that will result in nothing substantial. Perhaps some Republican collaborators in Congress will be censured or removed from committees, as has already happened with Rep. Paul Gosar and Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene. Even if Trump and his cabal admit to high crimes, Democrats will in all probability still be unable to craft an effective political message, and will remain riven by factional infighting.

As for the Republicans — they will be even more loyal to Donald Trump. His admission and public embrace of his criminal actions will become the new litmus test for being a “real Republican”. The coup plotters will be elevated to even higher status in MAGAworld as “role models” and “heroes.” Liz Cheney, Mitt Romney and a few other prominent Republicans will condemn Trump. But they are minority voices, near-pariahs at risk of purge or expulsion for disloyalty. Most Republican elected officials and national figures will remain silent — and a large and growing number will consent enthusiastically when Trump and his allies talk of “extraordinary times” and the need for “extraordinary measures”.

Republicans will almost certainly win control of the House and Senate after the 2022 midterms. As promised, they will seek revenge on the Democrats through endless investigations, rolling back legislation and perhaps attempting to impeach Joe Biden. It is increasingly likely that either Donald Trump or his hand-picked successor will take power in 2024.

For the mainstream news media, Trump’s hypothetical confession would be one of the largest stories in recent American history. But sustained and articulate advocacy for democracy in mainstream journalism will still be lacking. Some opinion leaders and other prominent media figures will tell the truth without fear. But the traditions, norms, incentive structure and institutional culture of the mainstream media are simply insufficient to effectively confront a bold and unapologetic authoritarian movement led by a former president.

RELATED: Democrats and the dark road ahead: There’s hope — if we look past 2022 (and maybe 2024 too)

After the initial shock and awe at Trump’s confession, the media’s focus will begin to fade. Soon it will move on to the next controversy, and the one after that.

As for the American people, Democratic voters and other liberals and progressives will be mobilized — at least for a while. There will be marches and protests and similar events. There may even be punctuated moments of civil unrest. But there will be no national strike, nor any sustained nationwide protests and other forms of direct action and corporeal resistance.

Republicans and “conservatives” will of course deny that Trump admitted to committing crimes or will simply support him. Any disapproval will be muted and polite, insufficient to turn Republicans and other Trump cultists against him. The Big Lie has become a master narrative, capable — for Trump’s followers — of encompassing almost all possible events.

Public opinion polls have shown that a large number of Americans, across party divides, are simply exhausted by the aftermath of Jan. 6 and they escalating democracy crisis. They just want all the discord to subside, and a collective return to some type of “normal.” Most Americans are politically disengaged, and will explain Trump’s confession as just another example of the corruption and dysfunction of a fundamentally broken system.

Trump’s followers — especially the right-wing paramilitaries and street thugs — will only be emboldened. Political scientists and other researchers have repeatedly shown that Republicans are increasingly willing to endorse violence against their perceived enemies — Democrats, “liberals” and “socialists,” nonwhite people and Muslims — as a legitimate political tactic.  

Benito Mussolini supposedly observed that if you pluck a chicken one feather at a time, people don’t really notice. America’s fascist movement has nearly plucked that bird naked before the world. 

Once again, the Republican fascists are telling the American people and the world what they are going to do. There is little subtlety or subterfuge involved.

The American people must peer steady into the fascist darkness and resist every temptation to avert their eyes or run away. Unfortunately, most do not have the courage for such a task. The burden falls on the rest of us.

Mainstream media forgets the Afghan people, as U.S. sanctions create risk of famine

As the United States withdrew militarily from Afghanistan in August, U.S. TV news interest in the plight of the country’s citizens spiked, often focusing on “the horror awaiting women and girls” (CNN Situation Room, 8/16/21) to argue against withdrawal (FAIR.org, 8/23/21).

Four months later, as those same citizens have been plunged into a humanitarian crisis — due in no small part to U.S. sanctions — where is the outrage?

UN: Afghanistan on 'countdown to catastrophe' without urgent humanitarian relief

UN News (10/25/21) quoted the head of the World Food Programme: “Afghanistan is now among the world’s worst humanitarian crises — if not the worst — and food security has all but collapsed.”

Experts warned of an impending humanitarian crisis in the wake of the U.S. withdrawal (IRC, 8/20/21). In recent months, the messages have become more urgent. A UN report (10/25/21) warned that “combined shocks of drought, conflict, Covid-19 and an economic crisis in Afghanistan have left more than half the population facing a record level of acute hunger.” One million children are so malnourished they are at risk of dying in the coming months (IRC, 12/3/21).

RELATED: Empire of chickenhawks: Why America’s chaotic departure from Afghanistan was actually perfect

Decades of conflict, invasion and occupation left Afghanistan with a highly precarious economy. In 2019, well before withdrawal, a record 50% of Afghans reported finding it “very difficult” to get by on their household income (Gallup, 9/23/21). While drought and the COVID-19 pandemic have contributed to the current humanitarian crisis, it is largely driven by the imploding economy. The entire banking system is collapsing, with government employees going unpaid and citizens unable to access their money or receive funds from relatives abroad.

As many have pointed out, the Taliban shoulder some blame, having banned women from most paid jobs outside of teaching and health care, costing the economy up to 5% of its GDP (UNDP, 12/1/21). But a much bigger driver of the crisis has been the U.S.-led sanctions on the Taliban. The U.S. occupation left Afghanistan dependent on aid for 40% of its GDP and 80% of its budget. After withdrawal, the U.S. froze some $9 billion of the country’s central bank reserves, and U.S. and UN sanctions cut off the central bank from the international banking system and drastically limited the aid flowing into the country (UNDP, 12/2/21).


Want a daily wrap-up of all the news and commentary Salon has to offer? Subscribe to our morning newsletter, Crash Course.


Despite pleas from around the globe, even, most recently, from former U.S. military commanders in Afghanistan and dozens of members of Congress (Washington Post, 12/20/21), the Biden administration has made only slight tweaks to its policies, which are ostensibly meant to punish and provide leverage over the Taliban, but, like other supposedly targeted sanctions, have the effect of putting millions of civilian lives in peril.

Vanishing interest

Since Nov. 1, well into the worsening crisis, FAIR has identified only 37 TV news segments from ABC, CBS, NBC, CNN, Fox and MSNBC that mentioned “humanitarian” in the same sentence as Afghanistan. That’s 37 segments in seven weeks.

For perspective, as the U.S. withdrew in August, journalists from those shows mentioned “women’s rights” in the same sentence as Afghanistan more often — 42 times — in just seven days. Today, as those women and girls face starvation, the deeply concerned TV reporters are virtually nowhere to be seen.

Even when reports did mention the crisis, they rarely highlighted the U.S. role. Of the 37 mentions, FAIR was able to find only four that named sanctions as a factor.

MSNBC twice (11/23/2112/16/21) brought on spokespeople from the International Rescue Committee to discuss the crisis, and CBS did so once (12/12/21); all three of these guests named the role sanctions play in Afghanistan’s economic collapse.

ABC: Country in Crisis

“One Million Children at Risk of Dying of Starvation” was the secondary point of ABC’s report (12/15/21); the main focus of the story was “Taliban Authority Being Challenged by ISIS Terrorists.”

ABC World News Tonight’s Ian Pannell (12/15/21), in a report from Afghanistan, made the only other mention of sanctions, in a vague and brief reference that named no names: “A mix of sanctions and drought has brought the country to the brink of catastrophe.” After showing an emaciated two-year-old and telling the child’s mother, “You must feel very hopeless, very helpless,” Pannell wrapped up his report by noting:

$280 million in emergency aid has been OKed by the United States and others, but it’s likely not enough. It won’t reach hungry mouths until the end of the year. And the situation right now in Afghanistan seems as bad as I can remember it in 20 years of reporting here.

With no mention of what was causing the crisis, or what kind of help was actually needed, Pannell’s report had the effect of painting the U.S. as a benevolent actor that just wasn’t doing quite enough to address a largely inevitable situation. The segment and its top-of-the-show preview were the only two mentions FAIR’s study found of Afghanistan’s humanitarian crisis on ABC during the study period.

More often, the crisis was covered with a brief soundbite that emphasized women’s rights over the broader humanitarian crisis, as on CNN Newsroom (11/28/21):

A group of female Afghan students graduated from a private university in Kandahar on Saturday. They were forced to wear veils, due to a rule imposed by the Taliban. Before the Taliban takeover, an estimated 100,000 girls were attending universities. The graduates fear finding jobs might be difficult, because of both the Taliban rule and the country’s worsening humanitarian crisis.

Finding jobs is also difficult when a powerful enemy has frozen the funds of your nation’s central bank — but that’s not the kind of problem U.S. corporate media is likely to dwell on.

More on the 20-year war in Afghanistan, and America’s ugly exit:

Corporate donations flowed into Joe Manchin’s PAC ahead of final “No” on BBB

New federal disclosures reveal that major corporations poured donations into Sen. Joe Manchin’s political action committee in the weeks leading up to his pivotal announcement on Sunday that he would oppose the Build Back Better Act, a stance that progressives argue is motivated by the senator’s deference to special interests.

CNBC reported late Tuesday that Federal Election Commission filings show that donors to Manchin’s Country Roads PAC raked in 17 contributions from corporations in October and 19 in November as he pared back and repeatedly threatened to tank the BBB package, President Biden’s $1.75 trillion social spending and climate legislation.

Manchin donors during that period, according to CNBC, included corporate behemoths such as Goldman Sachs, American Express, UnitedHealth Group, Blue Cross Blue Shield and Lockheed Martin, many of which took part in the massive big-business lobbying blitz against the bill, which included key child poverty-reducing benefits and significant investments in clean energy.

RELATED: Biden doesn’t need Manchin: 5 executive actions he can take right now to build back better

“Country Roads raised over $150,000 in October from corporate donors such as Verizon, Union Pacific, Wells Fargo, and PACs tied to the coal and mining industries,” CNBC noted.

As founder of the West Virginia-based coal company Enersystems, Manchin is well acquainted with the fossil fuel industry, which donated at least $400,000 to the West Virginia Democrat between July and October as he worked to gut the Build Back Better Act’s key climate provisions. The Washington Post reported last week that Manchin’s share in Enersystems — currently run by the senator’s son — is “worth between $1 million and $5 million.”

In a blog post earlier this week, former Labor Secretary Robert Reich noted that last year Manchin “made half a million dollars in Enersystems dividends (roughly three times the $174,000 salary he made last year as a senator).”

Reich cited such income — as well as the fact that Manchin “collects more campaign money from coal, oil, and gas companies than any other senator” — as possible explanations behind the West Virginia Democrat’s decision to block his party’s flagship legislation, which he announced in an appearance on the right-wing network Fox News.


Want a daily wrap-up of all the news and commentary Salon has to offer? Subscribe to our morning newsletter, Crash Course.


Democratic leaders are still working to salvage the Build Back Better Act, but it’s unclear how much they would have to water down the already badly weakened legislation to win Manchin’s support. The death of the BBB package would likely push millions of children back into poverty, potentially blow a $60 billion hole in the U.S. economy, and thwart what advocates see as a once-in-a-generation opportunity to pass meaningful climate legislation.

“This is the way things work when democracy has been weakened,” the Democracy Initiative — a coalition of dozens of civil rights, environmental and labor groups — said Wednesday. “The powerful get special access to our government, while we’re told, ‘Sorry, we can’t help you.'”

More on Joe Manchin, Joe Biden and the battle for Build Back Better:

A former right-wing media pioneer reveals Democrats’ big mistakes about the press and politics

Liberals spend a lot of time bemoaning the state of the Washington press corps. There are many very good reasons for that. But there’s a risk to focusing so much on the Times for its toxic bothsidesing or on Post reporters withholding information from the public until it comes time to sell their books. We risk giving the Democratic Party a pass.

If the press corps can’t be trusted to get the party’s message across, the party needs to do what the Republicans have done: invest heavily in creating an infrastructure for their ideas and rhetoric – or as Matthew Sheffield told me, creating an infrastructure of democracy.

“Republicans have spent decades whipping their furthest-right voters into a violent frenzy,” he said. “They literally fantasize about killing liberals. Democrats want to tell you about their latest policy idea.”

Sheffield knows what he’s talking about. He was an early pioneer of right-wing digital media, Ur-Breitbart, you might say. He founded Newsbusters, a site dedicated to exposing “liberal bias.” As a blogger, he was key to creating the controversy that ended Dan Rather’s career.


Want a daily wrap-up of all the news and commentary Salon has to offer? Subscribe to our morning newsletter, Crash Course.


Sheffield is an apostate now, alienated for good it seems. He’s now a regular source for news stories about the right-wing media apparatus, which is global in scale. I got in touch Tuesday to ask what he would say to readers of a small but respected newsletter for normal people.

Matthew Sheffield: When the right has problems, it gravitates toward tactical modification, not policy modification. Instead of changing the policy ideas they want, Republicans focus on how to better engage their base of voters. Democrats seem to think the public is more aware of their policy ideas than it actually is. This is likely a function of most left-leaning economic and social policies being more popular.

When polling showed weak support of the Republican tax cut bill, they passed it anyway. This was the story of most of Donald Trump’s administration. They’d come up with ideas and then just do them. By contrast, with Joe Biden, Democrats seem to be focusing their efforts on policies they see as popular. This is an obsolete approach.

Instead of focusing on how to alter larger political dynamics, as Republicans do, Democrats suppose that passing popular legislation, and spending nothing to market it, will prove beneficial. It hasn’t. People aren’t aware of what’s in the bipartisan infrastructure bill.

JS: What can be done about lies vs. facts? Take the “war on Christmas.” There is no war. Yet it dominates the imaginations of so many Americans. What do Democrats need to understand that they don’t?

MS: I wonder to what degree Democrats are aware that support for Republicans is based almost entirely on identity politics, and that this has been the case since long before Trump. His supporters are fully aware he lies, but they see his utterances as in the service of the larger goal of protecting their Christian identity. The lies about a “war on Christmas” are designed to feed this persecution complex.

RELATED: “I didn’t want to be complicit in so many lies”: Fox News contributor explains why he finally quit

Since the GOP has become openly oppositional to democracy, this actually is an outreach opportunity. But this is work that Democrats have to do themselves. They cannot outsource it to the mainstream news media that seems barely aware that it’s happened.

JS: To a certain degree, Democrats believe there are swing voters. The 2018 midterms seemed to prove that. Same for 2020. Democrats still think the press corps is interested in truth. What do you say to that?

MS: The mainstream press is interested in “filling the news hole” more than anything else. The profusion of elite journalists who withheld critical information about Donald Trump in order to make money selling it in a book has demonstrated that many, if not most, media elites are not interested in public service.

Elections are decided by both swing voters and by casual party loyalists, that is, people who are more against the opposition rather than in favor of the party for which they vote. For all the focus in DC on physical infrastructure by Democrats, they have spent almost nothing on creating an infrastructure of democracy. You have to go where the people are and to explain yourself. Flushing millions of dollars down the TV ad toilet is not explaining yourself.

JS: Some have argued, I have argued, that the Democrats should go full-on anti-racist. But what you’re saying seems to suggest they don’t have to change their rhetoric so much as build an infrastructure for it.

MS: Understanding how bigotry is integral to right-wing politics is critical for left-wing thought leaders, but this is advanced political science totally inscrutable to the average person who has other things to do. One of the biggest things I noticed since leaving the right is that there are hundreds of millions of dollars being thrown at people who want to advocate for Republicans to the public. There is much less money being spent for the same reasons and purpose by Democrats.

Simply “fact-checking” a lie is not enough. You have to provide an alternative so people vulnerable to it can have their needs addressed. We have a grossly asymmetric politics where about 30 percent of the media outlets advocate for the right and about 2 percent advocate for the left. It’s no wonder things keep drifting rightward.

JS: Liberals tend to think, “Well, if I know this, everyone does.”

MS: The public needs to understand how radical the GOP base is and what it wants. The mainstream media will never tell this story on its own, because it’s not about DC gossip and because doing so would jeopardize its access to Republicans who have said gossip.

At the same time, most people leaning Democratic are rarely spoken to outside of campaign season. Mainstream media has little to offer them. Right-wing media not only defends Republicans; it helps with right-wing organizing efforts. The “critical race theory” strategy in Virginia only worked because right-wing media helped it along.

RELATED: A sociologist explains the biggest mistakes the media is making about our political moment

Democrats seem to think that delivering some speeches and running some TV commercials is how you engage with your voters. Not true.

JS: It should be said the audience we are talking about is what I call respectable white people — white people invested in their public image as respectable among other respectable white people. Black people, people of color, LGBTQ et al — they already get it.

MS: I think it is true that people who are in the crosshairs of white Christian identity politics are more sensible, but even then, they are not nearly as engaged with our political system as the far-right.

Every few years, the Pew does a “typology” survey to go beyond D versus R. And what they’ve consistently found is that “faith and flag conservatives” are much more engaged than everyone else.

What’s happened on the political left is that a small group of highly educated group of mostly white people is talking to itself. And that it does not interact with or understand the concerns of the rest of its coalition members. That group is where most Democratic politicians and progressive journalists are in. It needs to get out more.

JS: I’ll end with a question from Thomas Zimmer, a historian. “I’d be interested in the relationship between the right-wing propaganda machine controlling the base versus the base following deeply-held ideological convictions about what ‘real’ America should be.”

MS: Right-wing media is a bidirectional system. Talk radio with its listener call-ins and websites with easily viewable traffic stats provide instant feedback to GOP elites about what the base wants to hear.

At the same time, it is undeniable that right-wing media does work to disseminate messaging campaigns created by elites. The Republican strategy of creating fear and panic over “critical race theory” is a good example of this. Right-of-center voters were certainly not concerned about CRT before the 2021 campaign. They had never even heard of it.

JS: Many thanks for being so generous with your time today.

MS: You’re welcome.

Roger Stone tries to auction off “Trump autograph NFT” to pay for his legal bills

Longtime Donald Trump ally Roger Stone is auctioning off a copy of a 1990s magazine cover he says was signed by Trump in an effort to pay his legal bills, POLITICO reports.

If a bidder exceeds $20,000 dollars, the bidder will get the physical version of the magazine along with “one of only one” digital copy, which Stone calls an NFT (non-fungible token).

While POLITICO was unable to confirm the magazine with Trump’s signature is real, Stone insists that it is.


Want a daily wrap-up of all the news and commentary Salon has to offer? Subscribe to our morning newsletter, Crash Course.


As of this Wednesday, there were no bids.

“Between the cost of defending myself in 6 remaining merit-less but sensationalized harassment civil suits and the J-6 [January 6th] Witchhunt my legal expenses are formidable,” he told POLITICO. He added that the “cancer therapies not covered by insurance for my wife are also not inexpensive.”

Read the full report over at POLITICO.

More stories like this:

Ohio Senate candidate J.D. Vance falls for online hoax

When a replicated version of the U.S. Department of Homeland Security (DHS) website surfaced on the internet suggesting that President Joe Biden had proposed plan for COVID concentration camps, Senate candidate J.D. Vance fired back with critical remarks aimed at the president. However, there is just one problem with his criticism: the website was completely fake.

Now, the gullible Trump-supporting Senate hopeful is on the receiving end of the criticism. According to The Daily Beast, there were a number of elements on the site that indicated it was a parody but apparently, the “Hillbilly Elegy” author and Yale Law School graduate overlooked those details and immediately launched his attack.

One of the most glaring details is the DHS Secretary listed on the parody. Instead of listing the correct person, the site features the name of an actor.

“The venture capitalist and would-be politician perhaps should have noticed that the site—which claimed to outline government intentions to restrict cross-state travel and set up Australia-like “quarantine centers”—listed the DHS Secretary not as present officeholder Alejandro Mayorkas but as Tim Woods, otherwise known as the DHS secretary in two seasons of the TV show 24,” the news outlet wrote.


Want a daily wrap-up of all the news and commentary Salon has to offer? Subscribe to our morning newsletter, Crash Course.


Fever Dreams co-host Will Sommer has also criticized Vance for his failure to pay attention to detail. He noted that Vance’s latest actions are another example of how his “culture-war shoutouts, they’re not landing right.”

Per The Daily Beast, “every time Vance spits out something inane (like telling voters they can dine with him and his buddy Peter Thiel if they donate $10,000 to his campaign), his rival Josh Mandel ‘brutally own[s]’ him—by, for example, offering to meet voters for $10 in a Chick-fil-A parking lot.”

The latest comes as Vance is on the campaign trail running for the Ohio Senate. Vance, who has been supportive of Trump and his “America First” policies is the latest to buy into more conspiracy theories and false information.

More stories like this: