Spring Sale: Get 1 Year, Save 58%

Scott Pruitt, Trump’s scandal-scarred EPA chief, files to represent Oklahoma in U.S. Senate

Scott Pruitt, Donald Trump’s Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) chief, has filed to represent Oklahoma in the U.S. Senate, ending weeks of speculation that the scandal-scarred official was considering a bid. 

Pruitt, 53, would be replacing Sen. Jim Inhofe, R-Oklahoma, who announced in February that he would be stepping down. 

Apart from gutting a whole host of EPA regulations, Pruitt is most known for committing numerous ethics violations during his time as the agency’s administrator, as The Seattle Times reported

At one point during his tenure, Pruitt was living paying $50 per night in rent at a Washington  condo co-owned by the wife of an energy lobbyist. He was also heavily scrutinized over his personal use of taxpayer money, which included, among other things, a $43,000 sound booth for his office and a 20-member, 24-hour security detail. 

On top of his bizarre spending habits, Pruitt was also mired in controversy around his use of multiple emails and his four-day trip in 2017 to Morocco, wherein the ex-EPA chief promoted the export of liquified natural gas (LNG). That same year, Pruitt unilaterally fired a number of scientists from several EPA advisory councils, leading to a wave of at least 700 resignations, 200 of which came from scientists, according to The New York Times. 

Pruitt repeatedly rejected the scientific consensus on climate change, saying in 2016 that “[the global warming] debate is far from settled.” According to NASA, 97% of climate scientists believe in the existence of climate change.


Want a daily wrap-up of all the news and commentary Salon has to offer? Subscribe to our morning newsletter, Crash Course.


RELATED: Focus on Scott Pruitt’s scandals ignores the biggest of all: Destruction of environmental safeguards

As a regulator, Pruitt scrapped the Clean Power Act, curtailed the Clean Air Act, drastically lowered fuel efficiency regulations, suspended the Clean Water Act, lifted chemical plant safety rules, and more.

Pruitt resigned in 2018 in the face of at least 14 separate federal investigations by the Government Accountability Office. He later became an energy lobbyist with the Indiana Lobby Registration Commission on behalf of Sunrise Coal, the state’s second largest coal producer.

On Friday, Pruitt told the Associated Press that he “led with conviction in Washington, D.C.”

“And I made a difference in the face of that,” he added. “I think Oklahomans know when the New York Times and CNN and MSNBC and those places are against you, Oklahomans are for you.”

RELATED: How did Scott Pruitt become a conservative hero? Because the right abandoned its principle

This simple Easter menu updates classics like deviled eggs, lamb with mint and spring peas

Whether you’re religious or not, Easter always feels like a celebration of rebirth and spring. Buds begin to form on trees, daylilies start to peek out from the mulch and — after a dark, dark winter — the sunshine finally stays out a little bit longer. 

It also marks a shift in how I cook. While winter entertaining often centers on elaborate pasta dishes and braised cuts of meat or slow-roasted veggies, spring is a time to peel back the layers and serve fresh ingredients that are indicative of the season, cooked in such a way that preserves their natural flavors. 

This Easter menu offers some updated takes on classics — such as lamb with mint sauce, roasted potatoes and deviled eggs — along with a few simple surprises

Appetizers

Dill and mustard deviled eggs

Deviled eggs are an Easter staple and a couple of simple condiment swaps can make them an even more egg-celent addition to your holiday spread. Rather than using your typical mayo of choice, grab the Kewpie

Related: How to hard-boil eggs to dye for Easter

I’ve waxed poetic about Kewpie, the original and most recognizable brand of Japanese mayo, before. Unlike its American counterpart, Kewpie is made using just egg yolks, compared to the entire egg. Add a splash of rice vinegar and a hit of umami flavor, and you end up with one of the most craveable condiments on the planet. 

Then swap the plain mustard for Inglehoffer Creamy Dill Mustard with Lemon and Capers, which you can find at many specialty markets or order online. It’s light and herby, plus you get a little brininess from the capers. Combined, the Kewpie and Inglehoffer make infinitely more flavorful deviled eggs without veering too far from what makes them a classic. 

Spring pea soup

There’s nothing worse than starting to prepare for dinner guests and realizing that the one special ingredient you need is missing from your grocery bags. That’s why riffable recipes, like this spring pea soup, are the savior of any dinner party. 


Want more great food writing and recipes? Subscribe to Salon Food’s newsletter.


The general formula is simple: sauté some alliums, add some stock and peas to the pot, swirl in something a little creamy and gently flavor with some herbs or zest. Let the whole thing simmer until you’re ready to serve, preferably along with some fresh, crusty bread or toasty croutons

Why is this dish a winner? It’s customizable based on your guests’ dining preferences, as well as what you happen to have in your kitchen that day. 

Second course

Marinated lamb chops

When I was growing up, my family typically ate ham for Easter, but I’ve come to really appreciate the ease of serving individual lamb chops for the holiday. There’s no massive cut of meat to handle or carve (or endless leftovers). As Eric Kim wrote for our friends at Food52, “They take hardly any time at all to come up to temperature in a hot pan (120°F for rare and closer to 145°F for well-done — I prefer the former).” 

“Not to mention that lamb, even more than steak, seems somehow more adept at gaining an absolute perfect sear every time, which means you get the best of both worlds: caramelized crust on the outside, juicy rare meat on the inside,” he added.

Honey-mint sauce

Through the years, mint sauce has gained a reputation for being a little staid and stuffy, but I absolutely love the flavor of mint — especially when paired with savory cuts of meat and veggies. That said, a little update is never a bad thing. This mint sauce is packed with complementary flavors like citrus zest, garlic and red pepper flakes. 

Roast potatoes

Sometimes a slight technique shift can radically change how an ingredient cooks. Case in point: parboiling potatoes before roasting them. As Emma Laperruque wrote for Food52: “Parcook is culinary-school-speak for partially cooking an ingredient, so it can be finished later on. This is useful in restaurants, when an order comes in and you only have a few minutes to make it. And with potatoes, it’s even more useful, whether you’re in a restaurant or at home.”

By doing this, the potatoes get beautifully creamy on the inside and incredibly crispy on the outside. They’re perfect with just a little oil, paprika, garlic powder and good salt. 

Dessert

Effortless panna cotta

“Panna cotta is sort of the Italian version of crème brûlée,” Bibi Hutchings wrote for Salon Food. “A key difference between the two is that you use gelatin to make panna cotta. In addition to giving it an amazing mouth feel, this makes serving dessert at exactly the right time easier. When you’re ready to dig in, you simply take it out of the refrigerator.”

That makes panna cotta ideal for entertaining, too. Dress it with a simple berry compote, fresh spring fruit or a sprig of mint. 

More inspiration for your Easter celebration: 

Salon Food writes about stuff we think you’ll like. Salon has affiliate partnerships, so we may get a share of the revenue from your purchase.

“Dual” director on a world where Karen Gillan duels her own clone for survival: “Karen is a maestro”

Written and directed by Riley Stearns (“The Art of Self-Defense”), the nifty sci-fi flick “Dual” is set in a world where people can be cloned to “maintain their identity” after death. The idea is to spare their friends and family grief after losing their loved one. However, both doubles and their original cannot coexist, so in such cases, there is a duel to the death between folks and their clones.

This canny idea is played out in the film as Sarah (Karen Gillan) is told she is terminally ill. (She is throwing up blood.) She decides to invest in a clone and puts her life in order only to be told she is in remission, and now must deal with the consequences. This includes not just a duel to the death with her dual, but also separating from her husband Peter (Beulah Koale), who prefers Sarah’s clone over Sarah. 

Taking matters into her own hands, Sarah hires Trent (Aaron Paul), a personal combat trainer, to prepare for the duel. But then something happens . . . 

RELATED: Meeting my hot doppelgänger: A Salon After Dark read

“Dual” delivers a clever satire on relationships, violence in society, and issues around individuality, change, and freedom. Stearns recently spoke with Salon about his stylish new film. 

“Oh, they are going to have to duel themselves to the death!”

What prompted you to make a film about cloning? This is becoming a real subgenre.

I wrote a short film after I made “Faults,” that had a person interact with their future self. I really liked the idea of having an actor perform opposite themselves on screen. I know that’s something that we’ve seen before, but I thought there might be another cool way of turning that visual into feature. I came up with the idea of replacing yourself if you know that you’re dying so your family won’t have to suffer to suffer the loss of you. I thought that was an interesting idea, but why is that worth making? We have now seen things similar to that, with “Swan Song,” but once I asked the question of what would happen if that person went into remission, it became, “Oh, they are going to have to duel themselves to the death!” And that’s where the film became a film for me and worth pursuing. I really liked the humor of exploring the mundane things in life that make us sad, or feel like our lives are in a rut in the context of this bigger thing that she’s training for and run with that. 


Want a daily wrap-up of all the news and commentary Salon has to offer? Subscribe to our morning newsletter, Crash Course.


“Dual” suggests what a “new” life might look like, and I appreciated the themes of reinvention. Your film gets at both the happiness we can pursue in our lives when we have freedom, as well as how we want to change the people we love. What are your thoughts on these provocative topics which are raised in the film? 

I liked the idea of looking at yourself and wondering, “Am I the best version of myself?” If something bad happens in your life, do you let that bring you down, or do you now say I am going to make a better version of what I had before? In “The Art of Self-Defense,” a lot of it is about Casey (Jesse Eisenberg) trying to find something that makes him better, and find meaning in his life and a community to belong to. Similarly, in “Dual,” Sarah is actively trying to make a change for the better in her life, and obviously it can’t always work that way, and even if we are trying, it doesn’t mean life is going to go in that direction that we want it to go. But it was important for me to say things in a personal sort of way, but in the context of a sci-fi narrative. Most writers try to put themselves in the story but then not make it a story about yourself. These are all things I think about. I like the introspection. I like the thought of, “Who am I? Do I define who I am? Does my life define who I am? Can I change that?” These are all things that I was cognizant of while I was writing, but I also wanted to make it funny, so you find things to bring a sense of humor out, even if it’s dark. I followed my instincts.

“Dual” is a darkly funny satire. I especially like the reverse “Clockwork Orange” bit where Sarah watches violence to become more comfortable with it. I also snickered at the line Sarah’s husband Peter tells her, “Even if I can’t be with her, I don’t want to be with you.” Can you talk about the deadpan nature of this film in particular, and your films in general?

The way that an actor delivers their lines can benefit a world or take away from it. In delivering these lines, if you say them as a normal person would, the people are going to sound crazy, and the world is not going to make sense. The world in “Dual” looks a certain way, and the lines are being said a certain way — all of that feeds into each other. I really feel if you say some of these things like a joke or like a normal person would, they are not funny, but if you say it matter-of-factly, that’s where humor comes from. There are moments when the actors emote a little more, or let their emotions shine a little more, or give more of an inflection on a line, but for the most part, it is about trying to stay removed, where nothing shocks you in the world. I try to stay in this space.

The film has a very sterile feel which pulls viewers in. Can you talk about your visual approach to telling the story?

My visual approach was to remain not necessarily voyeuristic — I feel that word is used improperly — but I wanted folks to feel they are watching everything happening and not participating. When the camera goes handheld, I feel like you are actively participating more, but I didn’t need that for this. There is handheld scene when Sarah and Peter are having a fight on the porch, and I felt it warranted coming in closer and being involved more, to feel what they are feeling, but a lot of it is feeling like an observer. I like we had minimal camera moves – subtle dollies and slow zooms. It’s a little bit less abstract than “The Art of Self-Defense;” “Dual” is more grounded. But folks feel that nobody talks like that, it’s sterile, or impersonal, but it’s funny because it feels really relatable, and personal, and grounded to me. 

What can you say about building the world which is dystopian, but also resembles life as we know it. Can you talk about that dichotomy?

I like that the film starts in that [familiar] space and opens up to this bigger world. But it’s important to know the rules going in. It’s not changing as things go along. Knowing the construct, you can follow the rules. We don’t want to over-explain technology; we actively went against that. When Sarah is about to get information on how something works, she actively skips it because it’s not interesting enough. That kind of exposition can weigh a film down. So, I use that as humor; that was funny to me and a nod to exposition.

I love building worlds and I love that we were able to shoot in Finland and have it feel like our world. It may be in the Pacific Northwest, but why is the architecture so different and the skies the way they are, and everyone has different accents? It’s never stated where we are on purpose because I wanted you to live in a world and not think about the United States. At one point money is literally placed in my hand — and it’s still cringey that I’m in the movie — so you know we are in the States in one shape or form, but it’s removed of everything you know.

“Karen is the maestro.”

How did you work with Karen to create two distinct characters, but also create the ambiguities to keep viewers off guard?

We were very adamant that the characters not feel too different, but embrace the subtitles of difference; not to feel like night and day. It was important for the audience to see that Sarah’s double was her own person. Karen was extra diligent in the lines she had to learn and the way she had to deliver them. Normally, you have another person [acting with you], but she’s doing it all herself. I can’t take any credit there expect for how I wanted her hair and makeup to be ever so slightly different and her performance to be ever so slightly different. Karen is the maestro.

Dual(L-R) Aaron Paul as Trent and Karen Gillan as Sarah in the sci-fi film, “Dual” (Photo courtesy of RLJE Films)Like “Self-Defense” you have a teacher/mentor relationship in this film. Why does that theme reappear in your work? Do you have a sensei or coach that had an impact on your life? 

Not directly. It’s a by chance thing, and the duel and needing to train for that. I train and teach jiujitsu, and I have been doing that for nine years. There are people in my life who I’ve looked up to as mentors. But those have not directly related. I haven’t had a self-defense mentorship or sensei. It is more this idea of being indoctrinated by someone. In “Faults,” and “Dual” and “Self-Defense” and even my short, “The Cub,” it’s learning from someone who has ill will or ill intentions, and I liked that this was a mentor where even as I set him up as someone who maybe he does not have Sarah’s best interest at heart — but maybe he does — it was subverting expectations. 

Let’s ask a question raised in “Dual”: Do you have a killer instinct? What prompts it to come out?

Wow, that’s crazy! Getting back to jiujitsu, when I am in sparring mode or when I compete, my killer instinct comes out when I am ahead in points. When I am behind, I tend to fall into that, but there’s this motivation when you are ahead, or when I am on top, that I kind of just want to rub it in their face. I should be relaxing in that moment and trying when I am behind. I’m not like that in any other aspect in life.

“Dual” is in theaters April 15. Watch a trailer for it below, via YouTube.

More stories to read: 

How breadfruit matzo balls became a staple for the Barbadian Jewish community

Creativity and resourcefulness form the backbone of the quaint Jewish Community in the Caribbean island of Barbados. Barbados boasts one of the oldest synagogues in the Western hemisphere, built by Sephardic Jews who first settled in Barbados in 1628. Today, the community is made up of second and third generation Sephardic Jews who migrated from Eastern Europe after the war, as well as long term visitors who call Barbados home during the winter months. Though the small community is active, there is no resident Rabbi, or many of the modern Jewish conveniences that larger communities are used to, such as easy access to delicious Jewish foods and ingredients. Generations of local Jews of Barbados, have improvised and formed their own unique recipes to age old Jewish recipes using locally sourced ingredients. 

Related: Why this classic Romanian-Jewish dish is nearly impossible to find

One of those recipes is Breadfruit Matzo Balls, made using the flour from local breadfruit in place of matzo meal. 

A breadfruit can be best described as a large, round potato that grows in a tree in the Caribbean and South Pacific regions. Once peeled, the starchy fruit is very versatile and can be roasted, baked, boiled, fried, or dried and ground into flour. Breadfruit is a dietary staple in the Caribbean; it is packed with nutrition, gluten free and has a low glycemic index. Breadfruit flour is growing in popularity as a healthy wheat flour alternative. 

Matzo balls are considered to be a type of dumpling. The main difference between matzo balls and any other dumpling is that these balls are made with matzo meal, which is ground matzo crackers, and most other dumplings are made with all purpose flour. According to the late Gil Marks, culinary food historian, and author of “The Encyclopedia of Jewish Food,” matzo balls were a Jewish adaptation of European soup dumplings. 

Just as matzo ball soup is one of the most iconic Jewish American foods, dumplings are also a staple in Barbadian soups. Caribbean cuisine is a complex medley of African, European and indigenous influences, with broths, soups and stews forming a solid foundation of the Barbadian kitchen. 

This recipe offers a unique and healthy Caribbean twist to the traditional matzo balls. 

***

Recipe: Breadfruit Matzo Balls 

Yields
8 servings
Prep Time
25 minutes
Cook Time
30 minutes

Ingredients

2 eggs 

2 tablespoons oil 

2 tablespoons soup stock or water or seltzer/soda water

1/2 cup breadfruit flour

1 teaspoon salt

Fresh herbs such as parsley or dill

 

Directions

  1. Beat eggs slightly with fork. 
  2. Add other ingredients, except breadfruit flour, and mix. 
  3. Add breadfruit flour gradually until thick. 
  4. Stir all ingredients together.
  5. Refrigerate for 20 minutes in a covered bowl.
  6. Wet hands and form dough into balls. 
  7. Bring 1 quart of water with 1 tablespoon of salt to boil
  8. Drop balls into bubbling water in a large wide pot
  9. Cook for 30 minutes. 

 

 

 


Cook’s Notes

  • Do not store matzo balls in your chicken soup; they will absorb the liquid and become mushy. Store separately and heat with your soup.
  • You can make the matzo ball mixture up to 24 hours before you plan to use it.
  • Use Seltzer/soda water instead of water if you like your matzo balls to be light and fluffy. 
  • The use of baking powder can also produce light and fluffy matzo balls. 

 

More Passover essays and recipes: 

Italian rosemary buns for a sticky-sweet Easter treat

The Perfect Loaf is a column from software engineer-turned-bread expert (and Food52’s Resident Bread Baker), Maurizio Leo. Maurizio is here to show us all things naturally leavened, enriched, yeast-risen, you name it — basically, every vehicle to slather on a lot of butter. Today, pan di ramerino, an Italian Easter-time sweet bun.

Pan di ramerino, or rosemary bread — a sticky and sweet little bun studded with raisins — is a traditional Easter-time treat commonly found in Tuscany, in the central part of Italy. They’re remarkable because they have an uncommon ingredient woven into an enriched dough: rosemary. While we often think of the woodsy, piney herb as a savory-only affair, it sometimes finds its way into the sweeter side of things. With these sweet buns, rosemary brings a gentle backdrop of savoriness that is unique, and its flavor is the highlight of these sticky and soft buns.

The dough for these buns can be made in a variety of ways with a variety of different enrichments, from milk to butter to extra-virgin olive oil, as I have done in my pan di ramerino recipe. All of these fats bring suppleness to the bun, and in my adaptation of this old-school pastry, I opt for a large quantity of only olive oil for extreme softness plus an added fruity and herbaceous flavor.

Let’s answer some pan di ramerino F.A.Qs. (I certainly wondered about them.)

Why add the olive oil after the initial dough-mixing?

When adding fat to dough it’s beneficial to hold back some, or all, during the initial dough mixing and strengthening. Fat — like butter, oil, or lard — impedes gluten formation due to the way it coats the proteins in flour (and their job is eventually to form gluten). By holding back some, or in this case all, of the fat in that first part, we give gluten a chance to develop and the dough to strengthen quickly and efficiently. This is why you’ll often see dough recipes instruct adding softened butter once the dough is strong enough to pass the “windowpane test.”

These sweet buns call for a substantial amount of olive oil added to the dough, which helps make the buns bake off with a soft texture, but if the oil was added all from the start of mixing, it would take many, many minutes more to strengthen the dough sufficiently (and possibly never reach the desired gluten development).

Why sourdough?

Pan di ramerino are typically leavened with commercial yeast, but, as I’m wont to do, I created a sourdough version where the flavors of natural fermentation are mild, yet still wholly evident. The dough isn’t fermented overnight at cold temperature, as some sourdough bread might be, which leads to minimal acidity in the final bun. But! Even though the acidity is minimal, it still brings ample flavor complexity to the dough. It’s like adding a secret layer of zing to your baked goods, much like a skilled baker might use almond or vanilla extract to heighten the flavor interplay amongst the other ingredients.

So, since we’re using naturally leavened sourdough in this dough for rise and flavor, we need to first take a look at the other ingredients and how they might affect fermentation — the most important on the list: sugar.

Why so little sugar in the dough?

I’m not a big eater of sweets. Sure, I’ve been known to eat a doughnut or two on occasion, but for the most part, my baking recipes lean toward doughs with less sugar and little adornment at the end. However, when developing the recipe for these sweet buns, I started with the sugar a little on the high side at 15% to the total flour weight. For sourdough, that high sugar content directly translates to long fermentation times, as it impedes fermentation activity. Using instant yeast, especially an osmotolerant variety, which is specifically designed to thrive in high-sugar or salt environments, doesn’t have this problem — which is typically why you’ll see recipes for yeasted brioche or other bread and pastry call for a specific type of, often osmotolerant, yeast.

So what does this have to do with these little buns? When I had sugar at 15% to total flour, the total fermentation time required to properly ferment the dough was incredibly long, and in my cold, winter kitchen, it required an overnight bulk fermentation on the counter — far longer than I prefer to wait for buns. Further, after baking the buns, they tasted overwhelmingly sweet. While you might see instant yeasted recipes for these sweet buns have a higher sugar content, I find with sourdough, and its subtle acidic flavor built up during fermentation, all flavors are amplified (much like a gentle squeeze of lemon juice over many foods awakens the palate).

In the end, and through subsequent testing, dropping the sugar all the way down to 6% of the total flour in the recipe (that’s going from 60 grams of sugar all the way down to 27) yielded a more typical bulk fermentation time of 4 hours, plus a shorter final proof of 3 hours. Bonus: the flavor was spot on — buns that are a touch sweet, savory, and with a gentle pop from the acidity in the dough.

Wait — Are they hot cross buns?

While I admit these small, sticky buns do look somewhat similar to the crisscrossed Easter treat, these pan di ramerino couldn’t be more different, both in flavor and texture. Hot cross buns have a completely are spicier, with nutmeg, cinnamon, and sometimes allspice. They’re typically softer, given the addition of butter and milk in the dough. While hot cross buns are of course sweet (especially with their simple syrup glaze), the flavor is where hot cross buns go left and pan di ramerino goes right. The fruity olive oil and piney rosemary notes in pan di ramerino puts them in a class of their own.

I hate raisins! Can I use another dried fruit in these buns?

Raisins are without a doubt the traditional fruit for these sweet buns, but I could see so many additions working very well with this dough. In taking cues from hot cross buns, try adding soaked and drained Zante currants, which are like mini-raisins after all. I could also see proper currants (the small black or red berry) working well in these buns, which would bring tartness and intensity not found in raisins. If adding proper currants, I’d likely half the amount added to the dough so as not to overwhelm. I’m also keen on trying these with dried and chopped apricots (a favorite dried fruit of mine) which go very well with rosemary and other herbs.

***

Recipe: Sourdough Pan di Ramerino

Makes
12 buns
Prep Time
19 hours
Cook Time
40 minutes

Ingredients

Dough

  • 90 grams raisins (Thomspon or golden)
  • 336 grams water, divided
  • 460 grams all-purpose flour, plus more as needed
  • 151 grams ripe sourdough starter, 100% hydration
  • 27 grams superfine or granulated sugar
  • 9 grams fine sea salt
  • 2 large eggs
  • 1 large egg yolk
  • 50 grams extra-virgin olive oil
  • 3 grams (about 1 tablespoon) washed and finely chopped fresh rosemary leaves
  • 15 grams (1 tablespoon) whole milk

Glaze

  • 50 grams water
  • superfine or granulated sugar

 

Directions

  1. Feed sourdough starter and soak the raisins (night before mixing at 9:00 p.m.)

    In a small airtight container with a lid, combine the raisins and 100 grams of the water (use enough water so they’re just covered). Cover the bowl and leave it out on the counter. Feed your sourdough starter around this time to give it 12 hours of fermentation time.

  2. Mix the dough (9:00 a.m.)

    In the morning, your starter should be bubbly on top and at the sides, have risen in the jar, have a sour aroma, and with a loose consistency. If it was cold in your kitchen overnight or the starter isn’t displaying these signs, give it one more hour to rise and check again.

    To the bowl of a stand mixer fitted with the dough hook attachment, add the remaining 236 grams water, 460 grams flour, 151 grams ripe starter, 27 grams sugar, 9 grams salt, 1 of the eggs, and 1 egg yolk. With the mixer to low speed, mix until the ingredients are combined and no dry bits of flour remain. If the dough looks very dry, drizzle 1 scant tablespoon of water to the mixing bowl with the mixer running to help hydrate the flour. Increase the mixer speed to medium-low and mix for 5 to 6 minutes, until the dough starts to clump around the dough hook. At this point, the dough should be strong enough to partially pull away from the bottom and sides of the mixing bowl. If the dough still looks very wet and does not remove from the sides of the bowl, add more flour by the tablespoon and mix for another 1 to 2 minutes until incorporated.

    Let the dough rest for 10 minutes in the mixing bowl, uncovered.

    With the mixer on low speed, slowly drizzle in the olive oil in small bursts, about 4 to 6 minutes total. Once all of the oil is added, increase the mixer speed to medium-low and continue to mix until the dough smooths and once again begins clinging to the dough hook, 2 to 3 minutes. Scatter the rosemary on top of the dough. Drain the raisins of their water, squeezing out a bit more with your hands, and add to the top of the dough. With the mixer on to low speed, mix until the inclusions are mostly distributed, about 1 minute. At the end of mixing, the dough will be very soft, but will firm back up during bulk fermentation.

    Transfer the dough to another large container (or leave it in the mixing bowl) for bulk fermentation. 

  3. Bulk ferment the dough (9:30 a.m. to 1:30 p.m.)

    Cover the dough with a reusable airtight cover and let it rise at warm room temperature (76°F/24°C) for a total of 4 hours. During this time, you’ll give the dough two sets of “stretches and folds” (see next instruction for explanation) to give it additional strength.

    To stretch and fold: after 30 minutes of bulk fermentation, uncover the dough. Wet your hands, grab the north side (the side farthest from you) of the dough, and stretch it up and over to the south side. Then, stretch the south side up to the north. Then, perform two more folds, one from east to west and one from west to east. Cover the dough and let it rest for 30 more minutes, then give it another set of stretches and folds. Let the dough rest, covered, for the remaining 3 hours of bulk fermentation.

  4. Divide and shape the dough (1:30 p.m.)

    Check the dough; after 4 hours, it should have risen in the bulk fermentation container, have a few scattered bubbles, be smoother, with a slightly domed top, and be moderately light and fluffy to the touch. If the dough still looks sluggish or feels dense after 4 hours, give it another 30 minutes to rise in a warm spot, like your oven turned off with the light on the inside (74 to 76°F/23 to 24°C).

    Line two 13×18-inch sheet pans with parchment paper. Flour the top of the dough and use a bowl scraper to gently scrape it out onto a work surface, flour-side down. Flour the (new) top of the dough. Using a bench scraper and floured hand, divide the dough into 12 (90-gram) pieces (you might have a little scrap dough leftover: discard or bake it off). 

    Using as much flour as necessary to help prevent the dough from sticking to your hands and the work surface, shape each of the 12 pieces of dough into a very tight ball by pushing, twisting, and dragging the dough against the work surface with the bench scraper. Pushing and pulling will create tension on the top of the dough, creating a uniformly smooth surface. 

    After shaping each ball, transfer to a prepared sheet pan (6 per pan with even spacing between them). Cover the sheet pans with a large plastic bag, plastic wrap, or sheet pan cover and seal.

  5. Proof dough (1:45 p.m. to 4:45 p.m.)

    Proof the dough at a warm temperature (74 to 76°F/23 to 24°C is ideal) for about 3 hours. If your kitchen is on the cool side, expect the dough to take longer to proof. Extend the proof time as necessary until the dough is puffy — a gentle poke should feel like poking a marshmallow.

  6. Bake and finish (4:45 p.m.)

    Heat the oven to 425°F (220°C) with racks in the top and lower third. In a small bowl, whisk together the remaining 1 egg and 15 grams of milk for the egg wash.

    Using a pastry brush, lightly brush the surface of each piece of dough with the egg wash. Using a razor blade, baker’s lame, or sharp knife, score each piece of dough at the top-center with a pound sign (“#”) on top. Due to the soft dough, it can be challenging to score: move quickly with your blade, but it’s OK if the score isn’t clean and precise (they’ll bake up delicious regardless). Slide the sheet pans into the oven, and bake for 20 minutes. Rotate the baking sheets back to front and top rack to bottom rack. Reduce the oven to 350°F (175°C) and bake for another 15 to 20 minutes, until the buns are golden-brown and the internal temperature is around 200°F (93°C). 
    While the buns bake, make the simple syrup, in a small saucepan over medium heat, bring the 50 grams of water to a boil. Once boiling, pour in the 50 grams of sugar, stirring to help dissolve. Bring back to a boil then remove from the heat. Set aside to cool.

    Remove the buns from the oven, and using a pastry brush, immediately apply a thin layer of the simple syrup (you will have some leftover, see headnote). Let the buns cool for 15 minutes before eating.

    These buns are best the day they’re baked but keep in an airtight container and on the counter. Reheat them in a 350°F oven for a few minutes before serving.

Rest doesn’t just mean sleep: What “downstate” means, and why you need more of it

We know we’re bad at sleep. We know we stay up late, doomscrolling through the day’s tragedies as disruptive blue light pours into our eye sockets. We know our jobs expect us to be on call 24/7. We know that neither our kids nor our aging parents keep regular hours when they need us. And they we feel guilty and anxious about not getting enough sleep, which just serves to keep us up nights.

So what if we eased off a little? What if, rather than stressing about the hours of sleep we get, we put some more energy into making our waking hours more balanced and restorative? That’s the premise of Sara C. Mednick’s reassuring and practical new book, “The Power of the Downstate: Recharge Your Life Using Your Body’s Own Restorative Systems.” Mednick, a cognitive neuroscientist and author of “Take a Nap! Change Your Life,” knows that tricks like trying to “catch up” on sleep over the weekends just lead to a fog of self-induced jet lag. Instead, she wants to help us connect the dots between sleep and exercise, diet and meditative work, so we can actually feel more rested — and more energetic. Salon talked to her recently about how to build a better day, so we can enjoy a better night.

This conversation has been edited and condensed lightly for clarity.

What is the downstate, Sara? How is that different from sleep?

It’s much more. The downstate is all of the restorative processes that our bodies need to experience every day to combat the wear and tear of the other side of the rhythm, which is the upstate.


Want more health and science stories in your inbox? Subscribe to Salon’s weekly newsletter The Vulgar Scientist.


It starts with the idea that we’re rhythmic animals, and rhythms have two states. They have an upstate, where you’re primed and ready for energy mobilization, exertion, and activity. That’s followed by a downstate, where you can replenish your resources. You go back into your cave and think through the things that you experience when you’re in the upstate, process your emotions, solidify those memories, and then get yourself recharged for the next upstate, which is coming soon enough.

This idea of rhythms is very powerful because it’s universal, and it prioritizes the doing, the exertion, and the stuff that our society always pushes us to do. But it also prioritizes the downstate recovery because the recovery is just as important. That’s where we actually generate all the strength to be ready for the next upstate.

We are constantly trying to work against our own nature. We do so many things to keep the upstate upstating longer than it should. Keep us in the state of high caffeine, high productivity, increasing our strength, our speed, our intelligence, and our communication with people as though if you just keep pushing, and keep exerting yourself, that’s going to reach whatever goal you have. The pushing is actually what’s getting us to the state of collapse and emotional burnout that a lot of people are experiencing, especially now with the transition out of the pandemic. Now we suddenly have this mega shift that’s just as severe as the shift into the shutdown mode.

The shutdown mode was such a terror because we suddenly had to re-understand who we were, and recreate all sorts of new rhythms. We had nothing to go on, because we’d never experienced this before. But now, we’re into a state of having to reestablish not the same old rhythms, but even newer ones. Things that are sort of now we’re in this post pandemic, what does this look like? What do our lives like life? I think that’s also very stressful for people. How do we then establish rhythms that work in this new state?

RELATED: Startup propaganda has demonized sleep as “for the weak.” That couldn’t be less true

A word that you use a lot in this book is balance, which is hard. And one of the things you say is that your body is not designed for adrenaline 24/7.

No, it’s going to kill you. That’s it, right? I talk about these more simplified terms of rev and restore. Rev is that feeling of revving high, where you have the high stress hormones, cortisol, and your heart rate is at its ceiling and just stays there. You’re really exerting all of your concentration and energy. That’s good to do when you need it. But if you continue doing that into a long period of time, it’s going to basically lead to chronic stress, and all of the chronic diseases that we see taking over our population.

Very often, this gets very drilled down into, well, we need more sleep. We don’t really talk about more rest, more downstate. I want to talk about out the circadian rhythms aspect of it, and the ways in which you say we’re on permanent jet lag, and respecting our rhythms. What does that look like?

I like the terms of, what is organic to us? What is harmonizing with our own internal rhythm? These are not easy questions when you are somebody who has children, has parents, has a job, has a relationship and a social life that you want to maintain. These are all things that they can seemingly be at odds with trying to find downstate. One of the things is to not necessarily see these things as separate from your downstate, but try to find harmony with all of these things. It’s not yet another stress that we’re putting on ourselves that, “Oh my God! I have to find time for the downstate!”

It’s the same thing with, “I just have to sleep better?” That’s exactly what’s going to make people sleep worse. Because then, you just start worrying about yet another thing you have to do.

Back to the question about how do you find your own internal rhythm? One of the points is that you may not be as individualistic as you think. There are some universal rhythms. Even though some people might be roosters, and some people might be owls, for the most part, those are rare cases. The moment that you wake up is when you start your upstate, and that is when your metabolism is going to be its highest, in the early part of the day.

By 3 PM, your insulin levels just start to drop. By 6 PM, your melatonin levels, if you’re not dosing yourself with blue light, will naturally start to rise because that’s when the sun starts to set. I feel like the stress of trying to figure out your own personal schedule may not even be needed very much, because we’re part of this universe. This universe was started billions of years ago, and it’s been doing its thing way longer than each one of our lives. Just f settling into this universal rhythm, the daytime is when I’m most primed for activity, and at some point during the night, I need to really slow the F down.

How do you find time to downstate even during the day? That idea that sleep is the downstate, and we need to push everything to nighttime, it doesn’t work anymore. People still do a lot in the night. They don’t really lay down their sword and take off their armor. They’re still doing at night. What can we do during the day so that by the end of the day, you don’t get to the place of being to totally exhausted, and you need to rejuvenate also during the day? If you have this highly revving state, how can you bring more restore into your day to day rhythm?

If you are thinking about when you should be exercising, how do you think about that rhythm of exercise as a big burst in rev, and timing that big burst in rev to then coincide with restore that comes like six to 12 hours later. You want that to coincide with sleep, with nighttime, with this time of natural shutting down the systems so that you have this even larger restore response.

Intellectually, we know, yes, we need to rest and well, I guess I should exercise, and I guess this should eat right. But you tie it all together that those things are not discrete from each other. The things that we do to move our bodies, and the food that we put into our bodies, then affect our ability to have a better, more healing, restorative downstate. Tell me what we can do in that space of our waking time.

A lot of this idea of balance has to do with what the activities you do during the day, and when you time them. Eating, exercise, heavy thinking, all these things, they jumpstart your rev system. Actually anything you put in your mouth, you immediately start the process of digestion, which requires a lot of glucose and ATP. It requires a lot of energy to do this stuff. That puts you in a high upstate, high rev response. Exercise when you’re already primed to have your metabolism be at its height, to already have your body and brain completely recharged, and filled up with glycogen, the energy currency of the body and the brain.

Once you do a supercharge of revving yourself up, either with exercise or eating, you’re going to have a slower, long term increase. As rev decreases, you’re going to have an increase in restore. The stronger your restore system, the better it is at calming down the rev system. You need have a strong restore system, because that is what calms you down. It’s like two twins, and one is the rabble-rouser, and the other one is the the calming force. You need to have them be in opposition, but also work together because they need to. And so, when you can time your rev activities such that the restore response from those rev activities coincides with your sleep time, that is the greatest. That is truly making your whole system hum and resonate with itself.

You spend a lot of time talking about how to just stop, slow down, take a few breaths. When I’m spinning out in the middle of my day, talk to me about how I can achieve that taste of the down state that might really turn around my energy level, my stress level.

I think that there’s always that, “Oh, just do some deep breathing.” But nobody really knows why you’re doing that deep breathing.

When you get worked up, you either stop breathing, or you start breathing very rapidly and shallowly. There’s this thing called email apnea. You open up your email and you basically just stop breathing. It’s a shocking thing. You think, “I’m just reading this stuff,” but immediately, you get a fight or flight response of “What am I missing? What have I done wrong? What are people demanding of me?” We have these multiple experiences during the day that set. us up into like a highly revved up state.

What does deep breathing do? The slow, deep breath is controlled by the restore system. It’s calming down your arousal state, but it’s also sending a message of self-control and self-regulation to the brain. When you can physically calm down the breathing, you are increasing restore, and you’re telling the body, everything is fine. You don’t have to freak out, you don’t have to worry, I got this. There’s no reason for me to run, there’s nothing for me to go at attack. Stepping away from whatever it is that is revving you up, gives you across the day moments where you’re just taking the air out of all of the stress. By the end of the day, you’re not just this big ball of stress, and you’re asking sleep to do all the magic for you.

One of the reasons why I think we’re having trouble with sleep is that we haven’t really done anything all day to prepare for sleep. All we’ve been doing is just revving all day. Then we expect sleep to kind of just take us away. Of course, we can’t because we’re too revved up.

We expect sleep to do too much heavy lifting. We definitely expect that of weekend sleep, which is also another of the many lies we tell ourselves.

Yeah. Because the daily wear and tear of the stressors that we experience are actually building up.Without good restore function, and good deep sleep, you’re not using that natural plumbing system to flush out all the toxins in your brain and your body. If your sleep isn’t that great during the week, just sleeping in on the weekend, won’t make up for the amount of wear and tear that’s already built up across the week. There’s disturbing information to say that the kind of sleep deprivation, and sleep restriction, or poor sleep people have in their forties and fifties can predict their onset of dimension Alzheimer’s in their seventies.

There is the cost of not respecting the downstate. It takes a toll on our bodies. You said it ages you, it can put your risk for dementia. Tell me what those risks are, and when we activate the downstate more, what are the benefits that we can start to see?

One of the things that I think is important to think about is that view of aging. You get into unhealthy weight, you stop exercising, you stop having bright light in the morning to sort of spark up your circadian rhythm, and you start having cognitive loss, and immobility due to frailty issues. I think there’s so much of that can get chalked up to an early giving away of all of our down states. Basically just trading them like baseball cards. You stop taking long walks, you stop having intimacy, you stop being in nature, you stop doing yoga, meditation, whatever sort of deep breathing routines that you would normally do when you’re young and you have time to go to yoga.

In our forties, we stop doing these things. We start having more sleep problems. There’s the daily wear and tear, but then, there’s the long term wear and tear where you start to have premature aging, increased risk for diabetes, increased risk for being overweight, cardiovascular risk because you have increased blood pressure, also metabolic disorders, because you’re over stressing your insulin engine, and the insulin just poops out. It just can’t keep up anymore. And then, of course, the cognitive disorders that come with giving up your downstate is the dementia, and Alzheimer’s risks.

The people who are really keeping themselves cognitively sharp and fit are the ones who are living longer. The ones who are doing all the stuff that it takes to learn. Do something that increases your, heart rate variability, doing some sort of meditation practice, breathing practice. The people who are using brain training games that do kind of executive function training, like working memory, learning new languages, are also people who are living longer. Particularly exercise. That burst of rev comes with a really strong restore system also has feedback to this whole network that keeps you stronger, and also then affects your sleep. Also eating and having enough light, not staying indoors all day. Old people stay indoors all day long and their circadian rhythms are totally whacked.

I feel like just giving full a sense of the why, and the big picture, is better than trying to tell people that there’s like a silver bullet. Just do this one thing, just eat this supplement, or just change your diet in this way. No, that’s not the point. Once you kind of get your head around it, and you can understand the process, it’s easier to actually execute. It’s just a better way of thinking about the whole body and how it all works together.

It deflates the over emphasis we put on the idea that if you have a bad night sleep, you’re ruined. I’ve learned that if I’ve had a bad night’s sleep, but I still eat a good breakfast, and I still exercise, and I still figure out time to just even take a few deep breaths, I’m going to be okay because it’s not all up to sleep. It’s such a relief.

I think that all of these different devices that people now have to track their sleep has made people a little overly obsessive about the sleep number. Maybe if we can take some of the air out of that pressure and just say, “Hey, it’s the whole system. Sleep is one part of your downstate, but everything you’re doing can be helpful.”

More simple sheet pan recipes we love: 

What to do with alllll that leftover brisket

A good meal makes for great leftovers. Sure, a sit-down Thanksgiving dinner is delicious, but what I really look forward to is a late-night, second piece of pecan pie and/or a breakfast sandwich layered with buttermilk biscuitssliced roast turkeycornbread stuffingshredded Brussels sprouts, and cranberry sauce. If I manage to not completely inhale penne alla vodka for dinner from the hole-in-the-wall Italian restaurant near my apartment, I will count down the hours until it is socially acceptable to reheat and inhale the leftovers. That’s because leftovers are delicious, and leftover beef brisket is no exception.

The tricky thing with leftover meat — whether it’s brisket or beef tenderloin or roast chicken — is that it’s always at risk of drying out when reheated. Not to be dramatic, but there’s nothing worse than spending half a day looking forward to leftovers only to burn or overcook them. We’ll walk you through the best way to reheat brisket so it stays juicy, but we’ll also share some of our go-to leftover brisket recipes. As a note, not all of these ideas for repurposing leftover brisket are kosher, but they are all delicious. Feel free to make tweaks according to any dietary restrictions that you may follow.

How to reheat brisket

We turned to our community members to get perspective on the best way to reheat brisket. First and foremost, most of you agreed that the best way to tackle leftover brisket is by slicing only what you want to eat, rather than trying to reheat the entire cut of meat. Makes sense! Community members Monita and Tarragon both said that from there, the best way to heat the slices of brisket is by placing them in a pan or skillet, covered, with some of the accumulated juices and then sticking the whole thing in a 250°F to 300°F oven for 30 minutes. Just skim the fat from the juices before serving to avoid extra-greasy leftover brisket.

Sandwich

First and foremost, we have to talk about a brisket sandwich. Follow the above instructions for reheating and then layer it on leftover dinner rolls, your favorite sandwich bread, or a burger bun (though we’d recommend something hearty that can hold its own against the juicy meat). Eat it as is, or add some barbecue sauce, coleslaw, and pickles.

Nachos

Why aren’t brisket nachos more popular? The combination of crunchy corn tortillas with the smoky flavors of brisket (plus maybe some beans, cheese, salsa, avocado, and sour cream) is guaranteed to be my new favorite snack, and yours, too.

Pizza

Shred the brisket as if it’s pulled pork and layer it over a white pizza with a trio of cheeses (say mozzarella, ricotta, and Parmesan). If you have any jus from the leftover meat, drizzle that on top of the pie too for a brisket pizza. Barbecue sauce would also be delicious . . . I’m going to cut myself short here because I need to make this ASAP.

Quesadilla

Use the same pan for the quesadillas that you used to heat up the leftover brisket. Not only does this mean fewer dishes (a win for early-morning meals), but the flour tortilla will absorb some of the smoky brisket flavors, making for an even more delicious stuffed quesadilla. If there is an excess of juices, scoop some out so the tortilla doesn’t get soggy. Like any quesadilla, it will only get better when you add a lot of cheese and maybe some leftover vegetable sides, too. I triple-dog-dare you to only eat one.

Tacos

The morning after seder, prepare breakfast brisket tacos with the leftover meat, sautéed onions, scrambled eggs, and cheese. Create the easiest-ever DIY taco bar if you’re hosting guests; less work for you and more fun for them!

“No way, José”: Alabama governor sparks cries of racism with new campaign ad attacking Joe Biden

Gov. Kay Ivey on Monday lamented the idea that Americans would be forced to learn Spanish if President Biden keeps “shipping illegal immigrants” in the country. 

“If Joe Biden keeps shipping illegal immigrants into our states, we’re all going to have to learn Spanish,” Ivey said in a new 30-second ad spot released this week. “My message to Biden: no way, José.” 

“That’s why I sent national guard troops to protect the Southern border. That’s why we banned sanctuary cities in Alabama. The left can try to cancel me, I don’t care. But here in Alabama, we’re going to enforce the law,” the conservative governor added. 

Ivey, first elected in 2017, is seeking re-election in 2022. According to Alabama Political Reporter, the election is hers to win. The ad comes just six weeks before the state’s primary.


Want a daily wrap-up of all the news and commentary Salon has to offer? Subscribe to our morning newsletter, Crash Course.


Ivey Campaign Manager William Califf told a CBS affiliate that Ivey “recognizes that a country without borders isn’t a country at all.”

“Illegal immigration is at an all-time high thanks to the Biden Administration’s weak border policies – resulting in record numbers of illegal immigrants and deadly drugs flooding across the border into our communities,” Califf added. 

RELATED: Marsha Blackburn mocked on Twitter for claiming “Tennesseans want a wall on our southern border”

The ad has drawn criticism.

 

“If Ivey gets any more racist than her latest ad,” Alabama columnist Kyle Whitmire wrote this week, “she’s going to need another can of shoe polish.”

Carlos Aleman, CEO of the Hispanic Intrest Coalition of Alabama says that Ivey’s ad alienates the very voters she is attempting to reach.

“I don’t think these types of attacks are successful,” Aleman told local NBC affiliate WVTM. “We should be creating a more inclusive that is more welcoming.” 

Ivey first deployed National Guard troops to the southern border in 2018 at the request of Donald Trump. Last January, the Alabama governor renewed that commitment at the request of the chief of the National Guard Bureau, sending a 750-troop battalion to the border.

Failed GOP culture war bills, “fraudits” cost taxpayers hundreds of millions to defend in court

In her column for USA Today, author Jill Lawrence called out Republicans across the country who continue to use taxpayer dollars to reinstate Donald Trump back in the White House while at the same time spending even more money defending culture war laws they passed at the state level in the courts.

Writing, “Whether you love their goals or hate them, Republicans are wasting your money and mine by constantly filing or provoking lawsuits that are often impossible to win,” Lawrence suggested it is all in the service of “scoring political points.”

As Lawrence explained, the costs range from millions spent on audits (“fraudits”) attempting to prove that the 2020 election was stolen from Donald Trump, the legal costs of taking their cases to the courts where they are inevitably shot down, and purchasing new election equipment because the machines have been compromised during the audits.

Those items in addition to defending in court anti-LGBTQ laws Republican lawyers have passed at the state level, repairs to the Capitol after Donald Trump incited an insurrection, the costs of prosecuting rioters who showed up on Jan. 6 at Trump’s urging, court battles over both voter restriction bills and COVID-19-related bans and mandates.

“What is the price tag for all this? We may never know,” Lawrence wrote. But here’s one indicator: The Associated Press found that, from 2011 to 2017, under two terms of Florida Gov. (now Sen.) Rick Scott, taxpayers had spent $19 million in expenses and fees on lawyers who won their lawsuits against the state (including more than $1 million in a case about whether doctors could discuss gun safety with patients) and $237 million on outside lawyers the state hired to defend itself.”

Writing, “Republicans are doing things that I and many others view as illegal, unconstitutional, immoral and dangerous – for individuals and U.S. democracy,” the columnist continued, “We shouldn’t need an exact calculation to recognize that too many Republicans are wasting too many taxpayer dollars on quests to end abortion, suppress Black voting and history, undermine public health protections, damage families that don’t fit ‘Father Knows Best’ sitcom fantasies, and overturn free and fair elections by any means necessary – even a violent attack on the seat of government.”

Lawrence added, “if these objectives anger or sicken you, or you’d simply prefer your tax dollars to be spent in more constructive ways, you’ll need to get fired up and vote. Because handing power to a party like today’s GOP simply guarantees more endlessly expensive days in court.”

Israeli forces accused of “barbaric premeditated attack” on Palestinian worshipers during Ramadan

Israeli forces on Friday launched a raid on the Al-Aqsa mosque compound in occupied East Jerusalem, injuring more than 150 Palestinians as they gathered to worship on the second week of Ramadan.

Sheikh Omar al-Kiswani, the director of the Al-Aqsa Mosque—one of Islam’s holiest sites—told Middle East Eye that “what happened today is an attack on all peaceful worshipers.”

“This was a barbaric premeditated attack on worshipers,” he added.

Israeli police fired tear gas, stun grenades, and rubber-coated steel bullets as a small group of Palestinians hurled rocks, reportedly injuring three Israeli officers.

“The Palestinian Red Crescent emergency service said it treated 152 people, many of them wounded by rubber-coated bullets or stun grenades, or beaten with batons,” the Associated Press reported. “The [Islamic endowment that administers the mosque] said one of the guards at the site was shot in the eye with a rubber bullet.”

After firing tear gas and projectiles on the perimeter, Israeli police eventually entered the mosque and arrested hundreds of Palestinians.

According to Middle East Eye, “The buildings inside the complex were damaged in the attack, with some of its historical windows smashed by Israeli forces, according to eyewitnesses.”

“Medics, journalists, mosque volunteers, and women were targeted, according to Palestinian media reports,” the outlet reported. “Journalists Muhammad Samreen and Rami al-Khateeb were among those injured. At least one child was detained. Meanwhile, Israeli guards stationed at the mosque’s gate stopped Palestinians from entering the site ahead of Friday prayers… Worshipers coming from the occupied West Bank and within Israel were allowed to enter shortly after.”

Amazon union organizer’s appearance on Fox News with Tucker Carlson sparks debate

On Thursday, Christian Smalls, the former Amazon worker who successfully led a union organizing effort amongst some of the company’s New York warehouse workers, appeared on Fox News. Smalls’ appearance on a right-wing network known for its anti-union rhetoric, during which he argued that he didn’t need the support of progressive lawmakers in Congress to ensure the movement is successful, has since sparked debate amongst activists and commentators on the left.  

“It wasn’t just her,” Smalls told Carlson of Rep. Alexandra Ocasio-Cortez, D-N.Y., who he has previously criticized over her choice to pull out of an appearance at an Amazon labor rally in Staten Island last August. “It was all of them,” he added, suggesting that no progressives showed up. “Once again, we have no ill will against them. We know that whether they showed up or not, they didn’t make or break our election.”

“Yeah, I mean, it’s a weird moment,” Carlson responded. “Because I’m on the right. I’ve never been particularly pro-union. But it does seem like Amazon needs some counterbalance. It’s a huge company, the workers have no power, and maybe we could share a little power with the people who work there.”

RELATED: Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez called out after Amazon workers win historic first union vote

Smalls also noted that Amazon, the country’s second-largest employer, has been anti-union from the beginning of the company’s existence. 

“They created a system that they have full control of the working people,” the labor leader said. “Having a union brings representation for the workers.”

“I mean maybe if they throw some more woke slogans at you, you’ll forget you can’t feed your family,” Carlson quipped.  

The unlikely interview unleashed a cascade of backlash and counter-backlash online between commentators on the left, some who felt that Smalls shouldn’t have appeared on Fox News, a right-wing network that has relentlessly attacked labor movements across the country. 


Want a daily wrap-up of all the news and commentary Salon has to offer? Subscribe to our morning newsletter, Crash Course.


Andrew Lawrence, Deputy Director of Rapid Response at Media Matters, claimed Smalls’ appearance lent Carlson undue “credibility.”

“Tucker carlson is a hateful bigot and he uses his program every night to spread his hateful bigotry,” Lawrence tweeted. “Someone like smalls appearing on his show only gives tucker credibility he doesnt deserve.”

“If you’re Tucker, precisely what you want from this segment – which, in its entirety, features Smalls using the platform quite deftly to advocate for labor – is for leftists to take the bait, resent Smalls, or else join (Tucker, more so than Smalls) in vilifying an ally,” echoed writer Sam Adler Bell. “Don’t play his game.”

RELATED: “This seems totally illegal”: Amazon may ban union terms like “pay raise” in internal messages

But others felt that Smalls’ interview was a good decision, rejecting the notion his appearance on Fox News was bad publiclity for the union.

Steven Thrasher, an assistant professor of journalism at Northwestern, tweeted that it’s “very curious how many liberals want Chris Smalls, whose rising coalition is winning in arenas they never have, expect him to [sic] comform to their norms and behaviors – even as their coalitions are consistently losing.” 

“I don’t want to big up Tucker but it’s worth seeing (again) how good Chris Smalls is at this simply by being true to himself,” chimed author Tressie McMillan Cottom. “Media pros go on these shows and fail at it all the time. The Big Homie just stuck his landing and presumably had lemon pepper wings after.”

Earlier this month, for the first time in the company’s history, Amazon workers successfully voted to form a union. Warehouse workers in Staten Island cast 2,654 votes, or about 55% of the electorate, in favor of the effort. Amazon, for its part, has repeatedly indicated that it seeks to overturn the move, alleging that the union driver’s organizers meddled with the election by disrupting the company’s anti-union messaging campaign. 

Amazon Labor Union attorney Eric Miller has called Amazon’s claims “patently absurd.”

The employees have spoken,” he said. “Amazon is choosing to ignore that, and instead engage in stalling tactics to avoid the inevitable – coming to the bargaining table and negotiating for a contract.”

Jen Psaki agrees Peter Doocy sounds like a “stupid son of a b****” — but blames Fox News

White House press secretary Jen Psaki agreed that Fox News reporter Peter Doocy sounds like a “stupid son of a bitch,” but that it’s the network who is to blame.

Psaki’s statement was in response to the question of whether “Peter Doocy is a stupid son of a bitch or does he just play one on TV?” during a live episode of the “Pod Save America” podcast on Thursday. 

“He works for a network that provides people with questions that, nothing personal to any individual, including Peter Doocy, but might make anyone sound like a stupid son of a bitch,” Psaki replied.

The question was referencing a Jan. 24 press conference where President Joe Biden mocked Doocy after he asked whether inflation is a political liability going into the midterms. There was much debate on whether or not Biden knew the microphones were on, or if he forgot about the hot mic.

RELATED: Jen Psaki, Biden’s press secretary, leaving White House for MSNBC

“No, it’s a great asset,” Biden said sarcastically. “More inflation. What a stupid son of a bitch.”

Shortly after the remark, Biden called Doocy to “clear the air,” Doocy said during an interview with Fox News host Sean Hannity. 

“It’s nothing personal, pal,” the president said, according to Doocy.

 

“You don’t have to like everything Peter Doocy says or does, but that is certainly a moment of grace by Peter Doocy,” Psaki said of the reporter. Doocy, Psaki said, could have used that interview with Hannity to slam the president after that call.

DOJ busts Russians who tried to influence member of Congress with “all expenses paid” trip

The U.S. Department of Justice on Thursday unsealed an indictment against three Russian citizens for “conspiring to use an agent of Russia in the United States without prior notice to the Attorney General, conspiring to violate U.S. sanctions and conspiring to commit visa fraud.”

The charges are against Aleksandr Mikhaylovich Babakov, 59; Aleksandr Nikolayevich Vorobev, 52; and Mikhail Alekseyevich Plisyuk, 58.

One American member of Congress was allegedly targeted in the scheme, but the Department of Justice did not reveal the member’s name.

Aleksandr Babakov, a Russian legislator, and two of his staff were implicated.

“Among other things, the defendants contacted members of the U.S. Congress from 2012 into 2017 to seek meetings and to offer free travel to at least one Congressmember on behalf of Babakov, as well as other foreign officials aligned and associated with Babakov. For example, in 2012, at the direction of the defendants, CC-1 sought to secure a meeting for Babakov with multiple members of Congress, including by offering an ‘all expenses paid’ trip to a particular Congressmember to meet with European politicians and receive “an award.” Congressmembers rebuffed these efforts,” the DOJ reported. “Also in March 2017, the defendants contacted at least one member of the U.S. Congress to offer free travel to a Babakov-affiliated conference in Yalta, part of Russia-controlled Crimea, as a service to benefit the purported ‘Prime Minister of Crimea,’ Sergey Aksyonov. Aksyonov was organizing and attending the conference, and had been sanctioned by the Department of Treasury’s Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) as a Specially Designated National (SDN) since 2014 based on his role in actions and policies threatening the sovereignty of Ukraine.”

Assistant Director Alan E. Kohler Jr. of the FBI’s Counterintelligence Division said, “This FBI investigation highlights the lengths the Russian government will go to undermine our rule of law.”

Mike Lee begged Meadows for help defending election scheme: “Please tell me what I should be saying”

Sen. Mike Lee, R-Utah, wanted to help Donald Trump remain in the White House despite losing the election, but he became increasingly dismayed by the arguments offered by the former president’s legal team.

The Utah Republican and Rep. Chip Roy, R-Texas, exchanged more than 100 text messages with then-White House chief of staff Mark Meadows, which were obtained by CNN, and the communications show Lee pushing right-wing attorney Sidney Powell into Trump’s orbit — and then turning on her after a disastrous news conference with campaign attorneys Rudy Giuliani and Jenna Ellis.

“I’m worried about the Powell press conference,” Lee texted Meadows shortly after the Nov. 19, 2020 event. “The potential defamation liability for the president is significant here … For the campaign and for the president personally … Unless Powell can back up everything she said, which I kind of doubt she can.”

Meadows agreed he, too, was “very concerned,” but Lee wasn’t ready to give up yet.

“The temptation will be to do nothing for now,” Lee wrote to Meadows. “I’m not sure doing nothing is a good option.”

The GOP senator appeared very concerned that some of the subjects of Powell’s conspiracy theories about the election would sue for defamation — which some of them later did — and he feared that Trump would be implicated.

“Unless Powell can immediately substantiate what she said today, the president should probably disassociate himself and refute any claims that can’t be substantiated,” Lee texted. “He’s got deep pockets, and the accusations Powell made are very, very serious.”

“That is an especially bad combination when you consider the damages that could easily be claimed (and indeed proven) and the deep pockets involved,” he added.

But the very next day, Lee came back to Meadows begging for better talking points than the legal arguments offered by Powell, which even she later admitted weren’t meant to be taken seriously.

“Please give me something to work with,” Lee said. “I just need to know what I should be saying.”

Two days after that, on Nov. 22, 2020, the senator again begged Meadows for guidance.

“Please tell me what I should be saying,” Lee texted.

That same day, Lee expressed worry that other senators were losing faith in Trump’s legal team, which still included Powell, but he continued offering advice a day later, on Nov. 23, 2020.

“I have an additional idea for the campaign,” Lee texted. “Something is not right in a few states. I think it could be proven or disproven easily with an audit (a physical counting of all ballots cast) in PA, WI, GA, and MI.”

Then he promoted the work of right-wing attorney John Eastman, who crafted the so-called coup memo detailing how vice president Mike Pence could delay the congressional certification of Joe Biden’s election win and alternate electors sent by state legislatures could then install Trump into another term.

“John Eastman has some really interesting research on this,” Lee texted. “The good news is is that Eastman is proposing an approach that unlike what Sidney Powell has propose could be examined very quickly. But to do this, you’d have to act very soon. Some believe today might be the deadline for some of this in PA.”

He pushed that plan even harder on Dec. 8, 2020.”

If a very small handful of states were to have their legislatures appoint alternative slates of delegates, there could be a path,” Lee texted.

Meadows said he had already been working on that same strategy, and Lee came back the following week asking for White House guidance.

“If you want senators to object, we need to hear from you on that ideally getting some guidance on what arguments to raise,” Lee texted on Dec. 18, 2020. “I think we’re now passed [sic] the point where we can expect anyone will do it without some direction and a strong evidentiary argument.”

“Unfit”: Trump-backed Nebraska GOP candidate accused of groping 8 women — including state senator

Eight women including a Republican state senator have come forward to accuse Charles Herbster—a front-runner in Nebraska’s GOP gubernatorial primary who is endorsed by former President Donald Trump—of sexual assault or other grossly inappropriate behavior, according to a report published Thursday.

The Nebraska Examiner reports Herbster, the CEO of Conklin Company, stands accused by Nebraska state Sen. Julie Slama (R-1) of reaching up her skirt in the middle of a crowded ballroom during the Douglas County Republican Party’s annual Elephant Remembers dinner in 2019. Another event attendee told the Examiner that they witnessed the assault; that person and two others also said they saw Herbster grope another woman’s buttocks at the dinner.

Responding to the paper’s allegations, Slama tweeted a statement affirming that “today’s Nebraska Examiner report about Charles Herbster sexually assaulting me in 2019, when I was 22 years old, is true. I indirectly referenced the assault in a February 2022 floor speech in the Legislature and prayed I would never have to relieve this trauma.”

“When the Nebraska Examiner contacted me about a witness account of my assault and the seven other women who shared their stories, I was not going to deny the truth,” she added. “I am not seeking media attention or any other gain, I simply was not going to lie and say it did not occur. I would request my family’s privacy be respected at this difficult time.”

According to the Examiner:

Six women… told the Nebraska Examiner that Herbster touched them inappropriately when they were saying hello or goodbye to him, or when they were posing for a photograph by his side. The women said Herbster groped them on their buttocks, outside of their clothes, during political events or beauty pageants.

Each woman said she was grabbed, not inadvertently grazed, by Herbster. A seventh woman said Herbster once cornered her privately and kissed her forcibly. All the incidents occurred between 2017 and this year, according to those involved. The women ranged in age from their late teens to mid-20s at the time of the incidents.

Other than Slama, all of Herbster’s accusers spoke to the Examiner on condition of anonymity, with some saying they feared the candidate’s wealth and power and others expressing concern for their careers or over how their families and churches would react. Two of the women said they are considering filing police reports.

“Being a conservative Republican woman in politics, you just expect to be treated with respect,” one of the women told the Examiner. “To be treated in that way in a public event, in front of everyone, just to prove, I believe, that he could get away with it, and not having recourse, it’s terrifying.”

“I’m scared for any young women that he would be dealing with in the future,” she added. “Don’t send your daughters to work for this guy.”

The paper continued:

The Nebraska Examiner corroborated six of the women’s accounts with at least one witness to each incident. The other two women told at least one person about the incident on the same day it occurred. Each witness and confidant confirmed the women’s description of what happened.

One witness said he saw Herbster grope a woman during a large conservative gathering and was appalled. The witness, a combat veteran, asked the woman if she wanted him to intervene. She asked him to restrain himself because she didn’t want to cause a scene.

A witness to a different incident showed the Examiner a photograph of a young woman posing with a group after meeting Herbster. Herbster’s arm is stretched behind the woman, just below her waist. Both the woman and the witness have confirmed that Herbster was grabbing the woman’s buttocks at the time.

Herbster is endorsed by Trump—who in 2015 appointed him chair of the White House Agriculture and Rural Advisory Committee—as well as his son, Donald Trump Jr., who joined the candidate on a three-city campaign tour Wednesday. According to recent polling, Herbster is the front-runner in the GOP gubernatorial primary.

In the wake of Thursday’s report, GOP Nebraska Gov. Pete Ricketts and every female state senator—including five Republicans—condemned Herbster’s alleged behavior.

“This is beyond horrible,” Ricketts said in a statement, adding that Herbster “should beg forgiveness of the women he has preyed upon and seek treatment. Sexual assault is criminal behavior and should disqualify anyone from elected leadership.”

The bipartisan group of 13 female state senators said that “this is not a question of politics—it is an issue of character and basic human decency. Charles Herbster’s behavior is completely unacceptable for anyone, especially someone seeking a public office of authority and trust. Herbster’s actions as outlined by the Nebraska Examiner render him unfit to serve.”

For his part, Herbster denied the allegations as “libelous” and “100% false,” while blasting the Examiner report as “libelous fake news” by a “leftist news site.”

Herbster is the owner and CEO of half a dozen agribusiness and manufacturing companies, including Conklin Company, which bills itself as being “dedicated to having a positive impact on the future of America while building a business to the glory of God.”

George Conway: Mike Lee Jan. 6 texts show Trump “did not care whether there was evidence or not”

Appearing on CNN just moments after the network revealed that Sen. Mike Lee (R-UT) and Rep. Chip Roy (R-TX) were in constant contact with former White House chief of staff Mark Meadows seeking help to overturn the 2020 election results — only to realize there was no case to be made — conservative attorney George Conway called the messages a “remarkable chronology” of the attempt to subvert the election.

Speaking with host John Berman, Conway explained, “It’s a remarkable chronology and I think the key significance is the contrast with Trump’s behavior.”

“The judge in California who said that Donald Trump likely committed crimes pointed out all the evidence that was presented to Trump or available to Trump that he should have known that there was no fraud sufficient to overturn the election,” he elaborated. “And what you see with these texts is a remarkable chronology in real time of them wanting to see, find evidence of fraud, and then not hearing any from [Rudy] Giuliani and Sidney Powell. — and all the cases they lost, 60 plus in federal, state courts throughout the country — and they came to the conclusion that there was no constitutional way to overturn this election, and yet Donald Trump persisted.”

“These two members, Lee and Roy, Senator Lee and Representative Roy, basically saying, help me help you,” CNN host Berman interjected. “But then over time they realized there was, in their words, ‘no help there.’ Just look at the evolution from Chip Roy, he said: ‘We need ammo. We need fraud examples.’ later he is saying the president should have never have ‘spun up something to Americans that is not true.”

“No there there,” Conway repeated. “That’s the point that the judge was making about Trump’s probable intent. He did not care whether or not there was evidence or not.”

Watch below:

This bread is beloved in Paris — and a relic of Jewish history

You don’t hear much about the pletzel these days. On one hand, it’s an Ashkenazi Jewish flatbread covered with raw onions and poppy seeds. On the other hand, it’s a neighborhood in Paris.

The name comes from the Yiddish for “little square,” as in a little area within a city. (Technically, the Yiddish spelling of the neighborhood is “פּלעצל,” which transliterates to “pletzl.” The flatbread, on the other hand, is more commonly spelled “pletzel.”) The Pletzl in Paris sits in the Marais neighborhood of the Fourth Arrondissement. A nondescript plaque on the corner of Rue des Rosiers and the Rue Ferdinand Duval tells the story of Ashkenazi Jews rushing to Paris in the late 19th century, fleeing persecution primarily from pogroms throughout the Russian empire. Jewish immigrants continued to arrive in the city from Romania, Russia, and throughout the Austro-Hungarian empire.

I’ve traveled to places my Jewish ancestors came from, like northeastern Slovakia and northern Romania: Plaques are few and far between, and Jewish bakeries, butchers, and delis are mostly nonexistent. But in the Pletzl of Paris, you get a glimpse of Jewish life left undisturbed by time. Restaurant and bakery signs are covered in Hebrew characters and you can see the tzitzit, fringes worn predominantly by Orthodox Jewish men, swinging with the bounce in their step.

But I came to the Pletzl for one reason, and one reason alone: to visit Florence Kahn’s bakery. I first heard of her bakery when I spotted her cookbook, “Yiddish Cuisine: Authentic and Delicious Jewish Recipes,” on the shelves of my local bagel spot in Berlin, Fine Bagels. I was drawn to the book by her use of the word “Yiddish” front and center. “Yiddish” just means “Jewish” in the Yiddish language, but you don’t usually see it on a book cover.

Kahn met me outside of her bakery on a brisk fall afternoon. I’d already been there earlier in the day for lunch. There was a line out the door, and the smattering of tables outside were full. An impossibly adorable elderly couple started singing to one another while standing behind me, as if they were in their own musical and the rest of us were just extras.

Shuffling inside, I panic-ordered the first thing I saw in front of me in broken French. Fortunately, what I saw was a sign promoting their “pletzel sandwich.” As it turned out, this was like finding high-shelf whiskey at an open bar.

All the recipes are family recipes, Kahn told me when we sat down a few hours later. They come from her mother, her grandmother, and her ex-husband’s family. “We don’t change the ingredients,” she said. “It’s always the same.”

Kahn said it was essential for her to open a Yiddish bakery in the neighborhood, but can’t quite put her finger on why. But after thinking about it for a moment, she came up with an answer. “I noticed that survivors of the Shoa, their relatives and descendants, lost the taste of their childhood,” she said. “I feel like I had this mission to bring that back for people.” But it’s not just about looking back. It’s about preserving a culinary legacy for future generations. “It’s everything,” she said of Yiddish cuisine. “It’s my life.”

As family members who grew up eating these dishes pass away, Kahn worries that younger generations are losing classic Yiddish recipes. Her cookbook and her bakery are meant to preserve this culinary legacy so that it may continue to live.

But back to that pletzel — the sandwich, not the square. Traditionally, a pletzel is a simple flatbread with onions and poppy seeds. At Florence Kahn, it’s a puffier, oniony sandwich bread filled with pastrami, turkey, or corned beef; topped with eggplant, caviar, red peppers, tomatoes, cucumbers, and pickles.

Food writer Arthur Schwartz called the historical pletzel “a tough bread,” on an episode of “Joan Knows Best.” “You need good teeth for pletzel.” Of course, flatbreads are hardly unique to Ashkenazi Jewish cuisine, but Schwartz says it’s the onions that make it a Jewish dish. “Onions were the main flavoring of Eastern European Jewish food,” he said. “Because we didn’t have much else.” In the episode, Joan Nathan, a matriarch of contemporary Ashkenazi Jewish cooking, surmises that most people in 1930s New York City used leftover challah dough to make their pletzels.

When I thought of what to stuff inside my dream pletzel, my mind immediately went to sabich, the Israeli pita sandwich brought to the country by Iraqi Jews. Similar to a falafel wrap, sabich are stuffed with hummus, fried eggplant, a tomato-cucumber salad, and hard-boiled eggs, then topped with tahini, spicy zhug, and a tangy pickled-mango sauce called amba. To make my own pletzel-pita hybrid, I adapted my challah recipe with white whole-wheat flour, olive oil, and a bit of honey before stuffing and covering the dough with onions and poppy seeds. I also leaned toward Kahn’s sandwich adaptation, making for a thick, chewier bread than the flatter variety. This is a sandwich that touches on Jewish culinary roots from Eastern Europe to the Middle East. It’s a sandwich full of context, relying on simple ingredients and flavors. It’s a sandwich that takes me back to a special little place, the Pletzl of Paris.

Ohio school district bans children’s book with rainbow cover

A children’s book about unicorns was banned from a school district in Ohio after the book was deemed inappropriate due to the rainbow on its cover. 

On April 6, author Jason Tharp was scheduled to appear at the Buckeye Valley Local School District for a reading of his book “It’s Okay to Be a Unicorn,” which centers on a unicorn who believes himself to be a horse until embracing his true nature.

That premise, however, did not sit well with one parent, who, according to The Independent, thought that Tharp was “coming with an agenda to recruit kids to become gay.”

“I was just shocked – and all from one parent,” Tharp told The Washington Post. “I never ran into an issue like this … I never in a million years thought I’d have to defend this book.”

For remedy, Tharp offered to read the kids another one of his books – “It’s Okay to Smell Good!” – which features a skunk who lives in a foul-smelling world and eventually learns to appreciate the beauty of pleasant scents. However, his proposal was rejected, Tharp said, “because apparently it could be twisted into an agenda as well.”

RELATED: Assistant principal fired for reading students a children’s book called “I Need a New Butt!”

Prior to the event, Tharp was also reportedly instructed by the school principal not to discuss “It’s Okay to Be a Unicorn” or “It’s Okay to Smell Good!” And upon visiting Buckeye Valley West Elementary, The Independent reported, Tharp discovered that students and staff had removed all of their artwork featuring unicorns and rainbows in anticipation of the event. 


Want a daily wrap-up of all the news and commentary Salon has to offer? Subscribe to our morning newsletter, Crash Course.


After the event, the school board reportedly held an “emergency meeting” in which multiple members of the community aired out grievances over the district’s treatment of the author. 

One parent has reportedly started a GoFundMe in order to ensure that Tharp’s next event at the school will be free. 

“It’s Okay to Be a Unicorn” makes no explicit mention of the LGBTQ+ community, and Tharp believes that conservative parents may have projected their own fears onto the work. 

“I’m not here to entertain adults that want to project their own whatever issues onto a children’s book,” he told a CBS affiliate. “I’m here to create books that inspire kids to dream big, embrace themselves, understand the importance of self-kindness, to really learn how to manage your emotions because it’s a confusing world we live in, and being a human is not easy.”

RELATED: Fired over CRT: Missouri high school teacher accused of teaching “critical race theory” loses job

Tharp is just the latest author or educator to get caught in the culture war crossfire around race, sex, and gender.

Just last week, a Missouri high school teacher was fired for passing out a 15-question worksheet titled “How Racially Privileged Are You?”. And last month, an assistant principal in Mississippi was sacked for reading his students a book called “I Need a New Butt!

There are no moderate Republicans: Greg Abbott, Glenn Youngkin and GOP self-immolation

Texas Gov. Greg Abbott’s latest attempt to garner national attention and trigger the libs was always likely to blow up in his face. Now it’s apparent that Abbott’s effort to one-up fellow Republican Gov. Ron DeSantis went a bit too far — seemingly upsetting everyone from Customs and Border Patrol (CPB) to truckers to the Trump-supported agriculture commissioner in Texas. 

Abbott “is taking actions to move migrants without adequately coordinating with the federal government and local border communities,” said CBP chief Chris Magnus said this week, after the governor’s pointless and sadistic decision to bus newly arrived migrants all the way from Texas to the front steps of Fox News’ Washington, D.C., studio. 

As Amanda Marcotte points out in today’s edition of her Standing Room Only newsletter, the basic premise behind Abbott’s political stunt was that ordinary people in the nation’s capital and other “sanctuary” states or cities would be horrified by the idea of immigrants arriving where they live. In other words, it reflects a deep-seated belief that everyone is xenophobic deep down inside. 

RELATED: Greg Abbott’s new border stunt: sending undocumented immigrants to sanctuary cities

Yet somehow Abbott managed to anger the Border Patrol twice in one week

The CPB, along with the Texas Trucking Association, which recently endorsed Abbott for reelection, has also spoken out against Abbott’s decision this week to introduce lengthy new inspections for commercial trucks crossing the border from Mexico. That too was a stunt, built around the claim that the Biden administration has an “open-border” policy and is permitting illegal drugs and human traffickers to flow into the country unrestricted.

The entirely predictable result was massive delays for trucks loaded with legitimate imports from Mexico, which is the source of much of the fresh produce Americans consume every day, along with numerous other products. “The current situation on the border simply cannot be sustained,” the Texas trade group said in a statement, calling on an end to Abbott’s blockade before the “economy endures further irreparable damage.”

Which was pretty much the whole point of Abbott’s stunt in the first place.


Want a daily wrap-up of all the news and commentary Salon has to offer? Subscribe to our morning newsletter, Crash Course.


As Sid Miller, the Trump-endorsed Texas agriculture commissioner, explained, Abbott’s truck inspections “stopping food from getting to grocery store shelves and, in many cases, causing food to rot in trucks.” Some truckers arriving from Mexico told the El Paso Times they had experienced more than 10-hour waits thanks to Abbott’s policy. Further east at larger border crossings, the wait has reportedly exceeded 24 hours.

It’s not a stretch to argue Abbott is deliberately backing up the supply chain at crucial choke points so that inflation is made even worse ahead of the midterm elections — and he doesn’t appear to care about the collateral damage to truckers, grocery workers, consumers or the overall economy.

Of course American truckers are a diverse group, but many cherish their reputations as mavericks and their long association with conservative politics. In 2020, Bloomberg News found that truckers were among the occupations most likely to donate to Donald Trump, which was not a huge surprise. Just last month, truckers were hailed by the likes of Texas Republican Sen. Ted Cruz as the working heroes of America, after groups of truckers led right-wing demonstrations both in the U.S. and (far more effectively) in Canada. The Texas Trucking Association’s endorsement of Abbott, came only two months ago. Now, after spending the early months of 2022 egging on truckers’ unruly political demonstrations, Republicans are suddenly silent about the damage Abbott’s stunt is causing both individual truckers and their entire industry. Go figure. 

There’s a pattern at work here: Greg Abbott used to be a “mainstream” Republican, at least in comparative terms. But like so many other figures in his party, he’s joined a race to the bottom — haunted by the shadow of Donald Trump’s impending 2024 campaign — in which Republicans are willingly harming their own base. 

Glenn Youngkin ran as a moderate, more or less. Now he wants to re-criminalize marijuana and runs a snitch line for people to report teachers who address “divisive subjects.”

For another example, consider Virginia Gov. Glenn Youngkin, who this week vetoed dozens of bills passed in bipartisan fashion — including a three-year statute of limitations on the collection of medical debt — purely as revenge on Democrats in the state legislature. Youngkin, who ran as an approximate moderate and kept his distance from Trump, is now recommending increased criminal penalties for marijuana possession after pledging during his campaign to not roll back marijuana legalization in the commonwealth. Meanwhile, his administration is fighting to keep secret the calls to a state hotline where people can snitch on teachers who teach “divisive subjects” in public schools.  

Youngkin was elected last year almost entirely because 800,000 fewer people showed up to vote for Terry McAuliffe, his Democratic opponent, than had voted for Joe Biden a year earlier. In Florida, fewer than 33,000 votes gave Ron DeSantis the governorship, yet that hasn’t stopped him from doing his utmost to write Democrats out of existence in the Sunshine State. Far from governing as the moderate bridge-builder such a narrow victory might portend, DeSantis has led Republicans in passing anti-CRT, anti-LGBTQ, anti-abortion and anti-free speech legislation. He has even wrested control of the redistricting process away from Republican state legislators to draw his own electoral maps.  

RELATED: Trump 2.0: Ron DeSantis is the future of the Republican Party

There’s nothing new here. This is the Republican playbook: Win at all costs and by any means necessary, and then govern as a radical — even if it means sacrificing your own base. Then rewrite the rules to make sure you can’t lose.


Want a daily wrap-up of all the news and commentary Salon has to offer? Subscribe to our morning newsletter, Crash Course.


Recall that Republicans were caught cheating on every level this week, from Trump supporters in The Villages, an upscale retirement community in Florida, to a former Trump aide running for Congress in New Hampshire to Trump’s former chief of staff, Mark Meadows, who apparently registered to vote at a remote rural trailer home he had never even visited.

This week the Republican National Committee also announced that it plans to withdraw from presidential debates, after not even bothering to write or present an official party platform in 2020. That makes perfect sense, if we consider that the point of a debate is to persuade undecided or wavering voters that they should vote for you. That’s got nothing to do with Republican political strategy, which hinges upon turning out the party faithful in ever-greater percentages, while suppressing the vote on the other side. It’s absolutely not in their interests to subject candidates to a debate, where they’re likely to be called out for grotesque lies and distortions. If you can’t answer questions from the moderators, then the most logical choice is to not allow the moderators to ask the questions.

At this point, the big question concerning the 2024 Republican presidential primaries is whether they will happen at all, or whether the entire party will once again prostrate itself before the greatness of Donald Trump. It would be nice to believe that such a craven display would doom them to defeat, but that’s hardly a sure thing.  

Read more on the wonders and delights of the Grand Old Party:

“This will end badly”: New texts reveal Mike Lee played key role in Trump’s Jan. 6 election scheme

Sen. Mike Lee, R-Utah, and Rep. Chip Roy, R-Texas, played a key role in lobbying and encouraging former President Donald Trump’s attempt to overturn the election on Jan. 6, 2021, according to text messages obtained by the House committee investigating the insurrection and reviewed by CNN.

Lee and Roy exchanged dozens of text messages with White House chief of staff Mark Meadows in the weeks leading up to the deadly Capitol riot, encouraging Trump’s effort to block the certification of President Joe Biden’s win within days of the election. Lee even urged Meadows to connect Trump with attorney Sidney Powell, who pushed completely debunked conspiracy theories in legal challenges and now faces court sanctions and defamation lawsuits.

A source familiar with the committee’s investigation told CNN that Lee used “legal language to push blatant conspiracy theorists into the Trump orbit.” But by January, both lawmakers appeared wary of Trump’s legal team and his plan in Congress. On Jan. 3, Lee texted Meadows that it “could all backfire badly.”

The texts show that Lee was all-in on Trump’s effort to reverse his election loss right after the race was called.

On Nov. 7, 2020 — the day the election was called for Joe Biden — Lee texted Meadows to offer his “unequivocal support for you to exhaust every legal and constitutional remedy at your disposal to restore Americans faith in our elections.”

Lee argued that “this fight is about the fundamental fairness and integrity of our election system.”

“The nation is depending upon your continued resolve. Stay strong and keep fighting Mr. President,” he wrote.

Roy also encouraged Meadows to find “ammo” for their post-election fight.

“We need fraud examples. We need it this weekend,” he texted Meadows on Nov. 7.

RELATED: Jan. 6 PowerPoint reveals many more Republicans were in on Trump’s coup plot

Lee immediately urged Meadows to allow Powell, who had represented disgraced former Trump national security adviser Michael Flynn, to gain access to Trump.

“Sydney [sic] Powell is saying that she needs to get in to see the president, but she’s being kept away from him. Apparently she has a strategy to keep things alive and put several states back in play. Can you help get her in?” Lee wrote, sending along Powell’s phone number and email address.

Lee pressed Meadows to allow Powell to meet Trump again on Nov. 9, insisting that she was a “straight shooter.”

Roy, however, was a bit warier, urging Meadows to get Trump to “tone down the rhetoric and approach the legal challenge firmly, intelligently, and effectively without resorting to throwing wild desperate haymakers or whipping his base into a conspiracy frenzy.”

Which, of course, is exactly what happened. While the early effort appeared focused on seeking out potential voter fraud in the election, Lee appeared taken aback after Powell joined Trump’s legal team and held a bizarre press conference with fellow Trump attorneys Rudy Giuliani and Jenna Ellis, alleging without any evidence that not only had widespread fraud occurred but that voting machine companies, in cahoots with China and Venezuela, had rigged their software to flip votes from Trump to Biden. Voting tech companies Dominion Voting Systems and Smartmatic have since filed multi-billion-dollar defamation lawsuits against Powell, Giuliani and others who spread the conspiracy theory. In a legal filing in response to those suits, Powell has argued that the conspiracy theory was so off base that “no reasonable person would conclude” those “were truly statements of fact.”

“The potential defamation liability for the president is significant here,” Lee warned Meadows after the press conference. “For the campaign and for the president personally. Unless Powell can back up everything she said, which I kind of doubt she can.”

Meadows wrote back, “I agree. Very concerned.”


Want a daily wrap-up of all the news and commentary Salon has to offer? Subscribe to our morning newsletter, Crash Course.


A spokesperson for Lee told CNN that Lee has been “fully transparent,” noting that the senator had called for an investigation into fraud allegations but ultimately voted to certify the election results and recognized Biden as the winner.

A spokesperson for Roy told the outlet that the congressman’s text messages “speak for themselves.”

By late November, Lee had moved away from promoting Powell and both he and Roy urged Meadows to connect with attorney John Eastman.

“Have you talked to John Eastman?” Roy texted Meadows on Nov. 22 while criticizing Giuliani’s efforts.

Eastman ultimately met with Trump and top administration officials and crafted a legal memo making the case that Vice President Mike Pence had the power to block the certification of Biden’s win, which was rejected by Pence and countless legal scholars. A federal judge last month ruled that Eastman and Trump had “more likely than not” violated federal law by pushing a “coup in search of a legal theory” and ordered the lawyer to turn over documents to the Jan. 6 committee.

By December, both lawmakers were concerned that Trump’s effort was doomed to fail.

“If you want senators to object, we need to hear from you on that ideally getting some guidance on what arguments to raise,” Lee texted Meadows on Dec. 16, 2020. “I think we’re now passed the point where we can expect anyone will do it without some direction and a strong evidentiary argument.”

On New Year’s Eve, Roy texted Meadows a dire warning about the whole scheme.

“The president should call everyone off. It’s the only path. If we substitute the will of states through electors with a vote by congress every 4 years… we have destroyed the electoral college… Respectfully,” he wrote.

A week before the Capitol insurrection, Chip Roy texted Mark Meadows a warning: “The president should call everyone off. It’s the only path.”

The plan hinged on a theory that states could send alternate slates of electors to Washington in the event of a tainted election, which Trump and his legal team repeatedly failed to prove. Lee warned that the effort was illegitimate if it did not comply with state laws. The effort had been orchestrated by Giuliani and others but required top state officials to sign off, which none did, and send alternate slates to Congress, which they didn’t do either.

“I only know that this will end badly for the President unless we have the Constitution on our side,” Lee texted Meadows on Jan. 3, 2021. “And unless these states submit new slates of Trump electors pursuant to state law, we do not.”

Lee and Roy ultimately both rejected the failed attempt to object to the certification of electoral votes from contested states after the Capitol riot, though Sens. Ted Cruz, R-Texas, and Josh Hawley, R-Mo., continued to lead the effort in the Senate.

“I have grave concerns with the way my friend Ted is going about this effort,” Lee wrote to Meadows. “This will not inure to the benefit of the president.”

Lee warned Meadows that unless the effort complied with state law, the move would only help Cruz and Hawley to the “detriment” of Trump.

After the Capitol riot on Jan. 6, Roy condemned Trump’s role in stoking conspiracy theories.

“The President should never have spun up certain Americans to believe something that simply cannot be,” he said on the House floor.

He also texted Meadows. “This is a shitshow,” he wrote. “Fix this now.”

Read more on the aftermath of Trump’s attempted coup:

State regulations are shutting down doctors prescribing abortion pills

Soon after Dr. Mai Fleming finished her medical residency in the San Francisco Bay Area, she got to work on her Texas medical license. The family medicine doctor had no intention of moving there but invested nine months to master Texas medical law, submit to background checks, get fingerprinted, and pay hundreds of dollars in licensing fees.

It’s a process she has since completed for more than a dozen other states — most recently New Mexico, in February.

“Where I live is an area where abortion is really readily accessible,” said Fleming, who practices in San Francisco, California. “My approach has been to broaden access beyond my geographic bubble.”

Fleming is among a wave of doctors, nurse practitioners, and other health care providers who are getting licensed in multiple states so they can use telemedicine and mail-order pharmacies to help more women get medication abortions.

But they’re increasingly being stymied by state regulations. Many states already restrict doctors’ ability to consult with patients online or by phone and/or dispense abortion pills through mail-order pharmacies. A crop of new legislation could shut them out, pushed by lawmakers who oppose abortion and argue the medication is too risky to be prescribed without a thorough, in-person examination.

So far this year, 22 states have introduced a combined 104 proposals attempting to restrict medication abortions, such as by prohibiting the mailing of abortion pills and/or requiring them to be dispensed in person, according to the Guttmacher Institute, an organization that researches and advocates for abortion rights. Four of those proposals have already been enacted by South Dakota.

In Georgia, lawmakers are considering a measure that would require the pills to be dispensed in person and would prohibit anyone from sending them through the mail. The bill, which has passed one of two chambers of the Georgia legislature, also requires pregnant patients to appear in person for tests to check for rare complications and gather other information, a common strategy anti-abortion lawmakers have used to make medication abortion more difficult to obtain.

“We wouldn’t have a telemedicine visit and teach a woman how to perform a surgical abortion,” said Bruce Thompson (R-White), the Georgia state senator who introduced the measure. “Why would we do that with pills when, frankly, we have plenty of physicians or medical clinics around the state?”

If it passes, Georgia will join the 19 other states that prohibit telemedicine for medication abortions.

In a medication abortion, people who are up to 10 weeks pregnant can terminate their pregnancies by ingesting two pills over 48 hours: mifepristone, which terminates the pregnancy, and misoprostol, which expels it. The method has become increasingly popular, and more than half of abortions in the U.S. in 2020 were medication abortions.

Last year, the FDA made it easier for health professionals to prescribe the drugs used in medication abortions by removing the requirement that they be dispensed inside a clinic or hospital. That opened the door for patients to consult with a certified doctor online or over the phone and get a prescription mailed by a licensed pharmacy.

Dr. Lester Ruppersberger, a retired OB-GYN and president of the Catholic Medical Association in 2016, opposes telemedicine abortion, saying patients should make the decision face-to-face with a doctor.

Women need testing beforehand, he said, as well as access to surgeons or OB-GYNs in case of complications afterward.

“If somebody really wants an abortion, whether it’s surgical or it’s medical, and the closest facility where you can safely get access to that particular procedure is three hours away, then you’ll get in your car, perfectly healthy, and drive three hours to take advantage of the medical system,” said Ruppersberger, who is the medical director of two crisis pregnancy centers in Pennsylvania that provide pregnancy care while discouraging abortion.

But some abortion providers saw the FDA’s regulatory change as an opportunity to expand access for people in states that are restricting abortion procedures and/or medication abortions.

For nearly two years, Fleming flew to Texas a few days a month to perform abortion procedures, but that ended in September 2021, when SB 8, a Texas law banning almost all abortions after about six weeks, went into effect. Since then, similar laws have been introduced or passed in Idaho and Oklahoma.

This summer, the U.S. Supreme Court likely will rule on Mississippi’s proposed 15-week abortion ban, a case that could end the national right to abortion enshrined by Roe v. Wade and leave the question up to states.

Now, Fleming primarily uses telemedicine to try to bring abortions to more people, despite the crackdowns. Many of her patients are from states with permissive abortion rules but live in rural or other areas where abortions are hard to find.

“Ultimately this kind of work does broaden access to folks who have no other options,” Fleming said. “But it’s not actually solving the root issue and the restrictions that shouldn’t exist in the first place.”

At the crux of Fleming’s argument: No matter how many providers get licensed in states that allow telemedicine and mail-order abortion prescriptions, they can’t provide those services in the growing number of states that don’t.

“We’re reaching a point where the states with favorable regulatory situations are already served,” said Elisa Wells, the co-founder and co-director of Plan C, which helps patients get medication abortions.

Once the FDA adopted the new regulations last year, Wells awarded research grants to some providers to get their telemedicine practices up and running. They used the money for malpractice insurance, licensing, and other costs.

One of those doctors, Dr. Razel Remen, based in the Detroit area, has since obtained licenses in multiple states. Remen performs abortions at a Michigan clinic and can serve patients in Colorado, Illinois, Minnesota, and New York and through telemedicine.

Remen said she was inspired to get into telemedicine when she saw the work of Dr. Rebecca Gomperts, who founded a group called Aid Access.

Aid Access relies on nine U.S.-based clinicians to provide medication abortions in the states that allow it via telemedicine. To serve patients in the remaining states, the group works through a doctor and pharmacy based outside the U.S.; neither is subject to U.S. regulations. Gomperts practices in Austria and prescribes abortion medication through an Indian pharmacy.

Joanne Spetz, director of the Philip R. Lee Institute for Health Policy Studies at the University of California-San Francisco, said doctors interested in providing medication abortions across state lines can only do so much as more states shut down the practice.

“These efforts to credential and train and educate more clinicians certainly can help to reduce the pressure on the system,” Spetz said. But “unless somebody wants to try to flout those state laws, it doesn’t necessarily help.”

Methane emissions soar to highest level ever recorded

Methane emissions rose by a record amount last year, making the biggest jump since the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration began monitoring them 40 years ago. Carbon dioxide emissions also climbed at a historically high rate for the 10th straight year.

The new numbers come on the heels of the latest report from the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, in which scientists warned that the world is on track for catastrophic warming, with fossil fuel emissions driving an “almost inevitable” breakdown of some of Earth’s life-supporting systems.

“Our data show that global emissions continue to move in the wrong direction at a rapid pace,” Rick Spinrad, NOAA’s administrator, said in a statement. “The evidence is consistent, alarming, and undeniable.”

Methane, a potent greenhouse gas, leaks out of oil wells and gas pipes, vents from rotting food in landfills, and escapes from cows in their burps and manure. It’s one of the main drivers of climate change, responsible for 30 percent of the warming since preindustrial times, second only to carbon dioxide. While methane doesn’t linger in the atmosphere as long as CO2, it’s much more powerful at heating the planet in the short term.

That makes cutting methane emissions a high priority. But as the new data from NOAA show, the world is heading in the wrong direction. Atmospheric levels of methane jumped 17 parts per billion in 2021, beating the previous record set in 2020. 

This surge is happening just as methane is getting more recognition as a problem that requires urgent action. Last fall, the United States and European Union initiated an effort to cut methane emissions 30 percent by the end of the decade. Roughly 100 countries have joined the Global Methane Pledge since then, minus a few of the top emitters, like China and Russia. A new initiative called the Global Methane Hub launched this week to support these efforts, putting $340 million toward helping countries track and reduce emissions.

Measuring methane accurately has proven to be a challenge of its own. A report from the International Energy Agency in February found that governments were undercounting methane emissions from oil, gas, and coal, which satellite data showed were about 70 percent higher than previously estimated. 

But on the bright side, the IEA said, many of these emissions could be trimmed relatively easily by installing leak-proof equipment and putting a stop to the common practice of burning surplus natural gas, known as flaring. Rapid cuts to global methane emissions, according to one study, could stave off half a degree Celsius (nearly 1 degree Fahrenheit) of warming by the end of the century. These reductions could have quick effects, as methane disappears from the atmosphere after about nine years.

Carbon dioxide, on the other hand, can continue to warm the atmosphere for thousands of years. 2021 marked the 10th year in a row that CO2 emissions had risen by more than 2 parts per million, “the fastest sustained rate of increase in the 63 years since monitoring began,” according to NOAA.

Today’s atmospheric concentration of carbon dioxide is as high as it was 4.3 million years ago — when the sea level was roughly 75 feet higher, the Arctic was covered in forests, and global temperatures were 7 degrees F hotter than right before the Industrial Revolution.

Do the Democrats know how to fight? Jan. 6 committee signals it’s still scared of Trump

In America, there is one set of rules, laws and justice for rich white men and another set for everyone else. Donald Trump is living proof of that fact. Despite overwhelming public evidence of his high crimes, it appears likely that the House select committee investigating the events of Jan. 6, 2021, will not recommend to the Department of Justice that Trump should face criminal charges. This abdication of responsibility — to speak plainly, this act of cowardice — in the name of politics and appearances is a horrible mistake.

Indeed, it appears increasingly likely that there will be few if any negative consequences for Trump and his fellow coup plotters for their numerous crimes. In total, Jan. 6 may be one of the greatest crimes in American history and also one of the least punished, offering another example of how American democracy is dying, a little bit at a time.

RELATED: “Trump knew exactly what was going on”: Inside the thinking of the Jan. 6 committee

Last Sunday, The New York Times reported that the leaders of the House committee “have grown divided” over the question of whether to make a criminal referral regarding Trump to the Justice Department, “even though they have concluded that they have enough evidence to do so.” Some committee members are reportedly “questioning whether there is any need to make a referral,” partly in hopes that Attorney General Merrick Garland has his own investigation underway, and partly out of reluctance “to saddle a criminal case with further partisan baggage” at a moment when Trump is openly flirting with another presidential campaign. 

This shift in strategy, the Times reports is related to the ruling two weeks ago by a federal judge in California who found that it was “more likely than not” that Trump and his legal adviser, John Eastman, had both committed federal crimes:

The ruling led some committee and staff members to argue that even though they felt they had amassed enough evidence to justify calling for a prosecution, the judge’s decision would carry far greater weight with Mr. Garland than any referral letter they could write, according to people with knowledge of the conversations.

The members and aides who were reluctant to support a referral contended that making one would create the appearance that Mr. Garland was investigating Mr. Trump at the behest of a Democratic Congress and that if the committee could avoid that perception it should, the people said.

It’s certainly true that the House Jan. 6 committee is controlled by the Democrats, since only two renegade Republicans agreed to take part. But if its leaders decline to refer Trump to the Department of Justice for prosecution, they will demonstrate once again that they lack the most basic understanding of how the Republican Party, and the larger neofascist movement surrounding it, pose an existential threat to the future of the United States.

It is not just that today’s Democratic Party is “bad at politics,” although that’s true enough. The deeper truth is even worse: The Democrats are engaging in willful self-sabotage.

Democrats continue to behave as though they truly think the Republicans’ embrace of fascism is just a phase.

The examples are many. Republicans overwhelmingly view Democrats as their enemies, yet Democratic leaders continue to view Republicans as possible or at least potential partners in good government. The Democratic Party’s leaders behave as though they truly believe that the Republicans’ embrace of fascism and authoritarianism is just a phase or passing flirtation that will soon fade.

Such a pretense is beyond naïve. In a moment of existential democracy crisis, it is actually dangerous stupidity.

Today’s Republican Party and the larger white right have abandoned normal politics with its expectations of compromise, respect for existing democratic norms and institutions, and a shared investment in protecting the country’s democratic culture. They have instead become a reactionary revolutionary party, embracing political paralysis and destruction. As the entire nation should have learned on Jan. 6, Republicans and the white right view political violence and terrorism as a legitimate means to achieve their goals. To this point, the Democrats have offered no effective response.


Want a daily wrap-up of all the news and commentary Salon has to offer? Subscribe to our morning newsletter, Crash Course.


Republicans no longer believe that the Democrats (or liberals, progressives or the “left”) should have any legitimacy, power, authority or social standing. Their ultimate goal is to create a one-party state along the lines of Hungary, Turkey or Russia, governed by what political scientists describe as a system of “competitive authoritarianism.”

Republican leaders have already signaled that if and when they take control of the House of Representatives after the 2022 midterms they are likely to impeach Joe Biden, follow through on their witch-hunt obsessions with his son Hunter, launch innumerable investigations of the Democrats for imaginary crimes and corruption, continue to advance Trump’s Big Lie and more generally do everything possible to stop the Democrats from passing any legislation or pursuing any policy reforms. They will almost certainly also do whatever they can to overturn existing legislation, however popular those policies may be, in pursuit of their revolutionary goal to remake American society in their own evil image.

Disbanding the Jan. 6 House select committee will almost literally be Republicans’ first priority, and they may well replace it with some McCarthy-style kangaroo court designed to punish those who stood up to Donald Trump’s incipient fascist regime. Yet in the face of all this, Democratic leaders and the Jan. 6 committee remain concerned, first and foremost, about political optics, even as their Republican “colleagues” continue to give aid and comfort to Trump’s followers and the larger neofascist movement.

At the New Republic, Michael Tomasky explores the logic behind the concerns that a criminal referral of Trump might “backfire”:

Democrats really have to stop worrying about things backfiring and just do them. Of course it may backfire. Lots of things may backfire. That isn’t a reason not to do them.

Do Republicans worry about things backfiring? Hardly ever that I can see. They just do them. Eighty jillion Benghazi hearings. Voting, as nearly 150 of them did, to deny Joe Biden the presidency. Pushing these blatantly undemocratic voter-suppression laws. They never worry about backfiring. The irony is that sometimes their zealotry does backfire on Republicans. The impeachment of Bill Clinton backfired on Newt Gingrich such that he lost his job over it. But they just keep on doing outrageous things, and their winning percentage, tragically, is pretty good.

In other words: The backfiring worry is very overstated in a hyper-polarized age. Of course a formal referral will infuriate Trumpists. And it will give Trump a little fodder to complain about a partisan “witch hunt.” But Democrats can counter that the committee has two Republicans. Liberals will nod, conservatives will be enraged, and most voters in the middle will shrug. It’s a relatively minor thing, this referral. There’s no harm in doing it.

In an essay for MSNBC, Charles Sykes warns that the select committee and the Justice Department “both seem to be caught in a cycle of hand-wringing”:

They worry about the “taint” of a referral and agonize over fears that Trump and the GOP will discredit any investigation as a partisan witch hunt.

But here’s a reality check: No matter what they do, no matter how cautiously they act, Trump will react with bad faith and demagoguery.

The Justice Department could hire an avatar of respectability and integrity to handle the prosecution (see: Robert Mueller) — and it wouldn’t matter. Whatever it does, Trump will let loose the dogs of disinformation, deceit and obstruction.

Knowing it can’t control the reaction, maybe the select committee should just do the right thing — and finally, finally end the cycle of timidity, self-deterrence and buck-passing.

Public opinion polls show that an increasingly large percentage of Americans have lost interest in the events of Jan. 6. and want the entire matter to be thrown down the memory hole. A great deal of this sentiment results from the fact that many leading Democrats and pundits repeatedly say that Trump and the Republicans are a threat to American democracy, yet in real-world terms do not act as if that really matters. Why should the American people care that Trump and his cabal attempted to overthrow democracy if the Democrats are continuing with business as usual?

In their losing war against the rising far-right tide, Democrats have been backpedaling since at least the Obama years. Republicans are constantly on the attack, and have all the momentum on their side.

In their losing war against the Republicans, the “conservative” movement and the larger white right, the Democrats have been trading space for time since at least Barack Obama’s presidency. By comparison, the Republicans are constantly on the attack, spreading the “critical race theory” moral panic, circulating the QAnon conspiracy theory, weaponizing anti-LGBTQ bigotry or terrorizing white parents with lies that Democrats are sexual predators who are “grooming” children. Republicans have all the momentum on their side and are using it to shape the political battlefield such that Democrats are forced to react from a position of weakness.  

As documented by historian Nancy MacLean and other experts, and contrary to what some observers would like to believe, Republicans are not simply improvising their culture-war tactics. When viewed in the aggregate, these attacks serve a highly refined strategy. Democrats also seem to think that somehow the Republican-fascists and their allies will become tired, or will have an epiphany that their cause is immoral, irrational or misguided.

As is their habit, the Democrats and too many liberals are projecting their own reasoning and motivations onto their enemies. This too is a classic mistake in politics or war. 

The Republican Party and the neofascist movement are engaged, energized and willing to fight. In comparison, most Democrats — whether “centrists,” mainstream liberals or left-progressives — appear exhausted, frustrated and increasingly demobilized.

If the House select committee decides not to issue a criminal referral to the DOJ for Trump’s crimes, that marks another Democratic surrender in the battle to protect American democracy. The Republican-fascists and their allies have no respect for the supposed rules of political combat in a democracy, and have consistently demonstrated that they will offer no quarter or compassion to their opposition. They view the Democrats’ talk of bipartisanship, compromise, consensus and democratic norms with contempt, as a form of weakness not worthy of respect.

In the end, the Democratic Party and its leaders must approach this political battle not as “normal” politics but as a life-or-death struggle for the future of America. Victory in war is all too often fundamentally determined by the human factors: morale, discipline, dedication, belief in the cause and motivation. By those criteria, the Democrats are losing badly. Is it too late for them to turn the tide?

Read more on the continuing investigation into Jan. 6, 2021:

Will Russia’s war crimes in Ukraine convince the U.S. to consider its recent past?

Americans have been shocked by the death and destruction of Russia’s invasion of Ukraine, filling our screens with bombed buildings and dead bodies lying in the street. But the U.S. and its allies have waged war in country after country for decades, carving swathes of destruction through cities, towns and villages on a far greater scale than has so far disfigured Ukraine. 

As we recently reported, the U.S. and its allies have dropped more than 337,000 bombs and missiles, or 46 per day, on nine countries since 2001 alone. Senior U.S. Defense Intelligence Agency officers told Newsweek that the first 24 days of Russia’s bombing of Ukraine was less destructive than the first day of U.S. bombing in Iraq in 2003.

The U.S.-led campaign against ISIS in Iraq and Syria bombarded those countries with more than 120,000 bombs and missiles, the heaviest bombing anywhere in decades. U.S. military officers told Amnesty International that the U.S. assault on Raqqa in Syria was also the heaviest artillery bombardment since the Vietnam War. 

Mosul in Iraq was the largest city that the United States and its allies reduced to rubble in that campaign, with a pre-assault population of 1.5 million. About 138,000 houses were damaged or destroyed by bombing and artillery, and an Iraqi Kurdish intelligence report counted at least 40,000 civilians killed.

Raqqa, which had a population of 300,000, was gutted even more. A UN assessment mission reported that 70% to 80% of buildings were destroyed or damaged. Syrian and Kurdish forces in Raqqa reported counting 4,118 civilian bodies. Many more deaths remain uncounted in the rubble of Mosul and Raqqa. Without comprehensive mortality surveys, we may never know what fraction of the actual death toll these numbers represent.

The Pentagon promised to review its policies on civilian casualties in the wake of these massacres, and commissioned the Rand Corporation to conduct a study titled, “Understanding Civilian Harm in Raqqa and Its Implications For Future Conflicts,” which has now been made public. 

Even as the world recoils from the shocking violence in Ukraine, the premise of the Rand Corp. study is that U.S. forces will continue to wage wars that involve devastating bombardments of cities and populated areas, and that they must therefore try to understand how they can do so without killing quite so many civilians.

The study runs over 100 pages, but it never comes to grips with the central problem, which is the inevitably devastating and deadly impacts of firing explosive weapons into inhabited urban areas like Mosul in Iraq, Raqqa in Syria, Mariupol in Ukraine, Sanaa in Yemen or Gaza in Palestine.  

The development of “precision weapons” has demonstrably failed to prevent these massacres. The United States unveiled its new “smart bombs” during the first Gulf War in 1990-1991. But they in fact comprised only 7% of the 88,000 tons of bombs it dropped on Iraq, reducing “a rather highly urbanized and mechanized society” to “a pre-industrial age nation” according to a UN survey

Instead of publishing actual data on the accuracy of these weapons, the Pentagon has maintained a sophisticated propaganda campaign to convey the impression that they are 100% accurate and can strike a target like a house or apartment building without harming civilians in the surrounding area. 

During the U.S. invasion of Iraq in 2003, however, Rob Hewson, the editor of an arms trade journal that reviews the performance of air-launched weapons, estimated that 20% to 25% of U.S. “precision” weapons missed their targets. 

U.S. “precision” weapons do not perform like space lasers in a video game. Many are 100% lethal up to a 10-meter radius, and will shatter every window within 100 meters.

Even when they do hit their target, these weapons do not perform like space weapons in a video game. The most commonly used bombs in the U.S. arsenal are 500-pound bombs, with an explosive charge of 89 kilos of Tritonal. According to UN safety data, the blast alone from that explosive charge is 100% lethal up to a radius of 10 meters, and will break every window within 100 meters. 

That is just the blast effect. Deaths and horrific injuries are also caused by collapsing buildings and flying shrapnel and debris – concrete, metal, glass, wood etc. 


Want a daily wrap-up of all the news and commentary Salon has to offer? Subscribe to our morning newsletter, Crash Course.


A strike is considered accurate if it lands within a “circular error probable,” usually 10 meters around the object being targeted. So in an urban area, if you take into account the “circular error probable,” the blast radius, flying debris and collapsing buildings, even a strike assessed as “accurate” is very likely to kill and injure civilians. 

U.S. officials draw a moral distinction between this “unintentional” killing and the “deliberate” killing of civilians by terrorists. But the late historian Howard Zinn challenged this distinction in a letter to the New York Times in 2007:

These words are misleading because they assume an action is either “deliberate” or “unintentional.” There is something in between, for which the word is “inevitable.” If you engage in an action, like aerial bombing, in which you cannot possibly distinguish between combatants and civilians (as a former Air Force bombardier, I will attest to that), the deaths of civilians are inevitable, even if not “intentional.”

Does that difference exonerate you morally? The terrorism of the suicide bomber and the terrorism of aerial bombardment are indeed morally equivalent. To say otherwise (as either side might) is to give one moral superiority over the other, and thus serve to perpetuate the horrors of our time.

Americans are rightfully horrified when they see civilians killed by Russian bombardment in Ukraine, but they are generally not quite so horrified, and more likely to accept official justifications, when they hear that civilians are killed by U.S. forces or American weapons in Iraq, Syria, Yemen or Gaza. The Western corporate media play a key role in this, by showing us corpses in Ukraine and the wails of their loved ones, but shielding us from equally disturbing images of people killed by U.S. or allied forces.

While Western leaders are demanding that Russia be held accountable for war crimes, they have raised no such clamor to prosecute U.S. officials. Yet during the U.S. military occupation of Iraq, both the International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC) and the UN Assistance Mission to Iraq (UNAMI) documented persistent and systematic violations of the Geneva Conventions by U.S. forces, including of the 1949 Fourth Geneva Convention that protects civilians from the impacts of war and military occupation.

The ICRC and human rights groups documented systematic abuse and torture of prisoners in Iraq and Afghanistan, including cases in which U.S. troops tortured prisoners to death. 

Although torture was approved by U.S. officials all the way up to the White House, no officer above the rank of major was ever held accountable for a torture death in Afghanistan or Iraq. The harshest punishment handed down for torturing a prisoner to death was a five-month jail sentence, although that is a capital offense under the U.S. War Crimes Act.  

In a 2007 human rights report that described widespread killing of civilians by U.S. occupation forces, UNAMI wrote, “Customary international humanitarian law demands that, as much as possible, military objectives must not be located within areas densely populated by civilians. The presence of individual combatants among a great number of civilians does not alter the civilian character of an area.” 

The report demanded “that all credible allegations of unlawful killings be thoroughly, promptly and impartially investigated, and appropriate action taken against military personnel found to have used excessive or indiscriminate force.”

Rather than investigating its own war crimes, the U.S. has actively covered them up. After killing 70 civilians in the Syrian town of Baghuz, the military bulldozed the site.

Instead of investigating, the U.S. has actively covered up its war crimes. A tragic example is the 2019 massacre in the Syrian town of Baghuz, where a special U.S. military operations unit dropped massive bombs on a group of mainly women and children, killing about 70. The military not only failed to acknowledge the botched attack but even bulldozed the blast site to cover it up. Only after a New York Times exposé years later did the military even admit that the strike took place.  

So it is ironic to hear President Biden call for President Putin to face a war crimes trial, when the U.S. covers up its own crimes, fails to hold its own senior officials accountable for war crimes and still rejects the jurisdiction of the International Criminal Court (ICC). In 2020, Donald Trump went so far as to impose U.S. sanctions on the most senior ICC prosecutors for investigating U.S. war crimes in Afghanistan.

The Rand study repeatedly claims that U.S. forces have “a deeply ingrained commitment to the law of war.” But the destruction of Mosul, Raqqa and other cities and the history of U.S. disdain for the UN Charter, the Geneva Conventions and international courts tell a very different story.

We agree with the Rand report’s conclusion that, “DoD’s weak institutional learning for civilian harm issues meant that past lessons went unheeded, increasing the risks to civilians in Raqqa.” We take issue, however, with the study’s failure to recognize that many of the glaring contradictions it documents are consequences of the fundamentally criminal nature of this entire operation, under the Fourth Geneva Convention and the existing laws of war. 

We reject the whole premise of this study, that U.S. forces should continue to conduct urban bombardments that inevitably kill thousands of civilians, and must therefore learn from this experience so that they will kill and maim fewer civilians the next time they destroy a city like Raqqa or Mosul.

The ugly truth behind these U.S. massacres is that the impunity senior U.S. military and civilian officials have enjoyed for past war crimes encouraged them to believe they could get away with bombing cities in Iraq and Syria to rubble, inevitably killing tens of thousands of civilians. 

They have so far been proven right, but U.S. contempt for international law and the failure of the global community to hold the United States to account are destroying the very “rules-based order” of international law that U.S. and Western leaders claim to cherish. 

As we call urgently for a ceasefire, for peace and for accountability for war crimes in Ukraine, we should say “Never Again!” to the bombardment of cities and civilian areas, whether they are in Syria, Ukraine, Yemen, Iran or anywhere else, and whether the aggressor is Russia, the United States, Israel or Saudi Arabia.

And we should never forget that the supreme war crime is war itself, the crime of aggression, because, as the judges declared at Nuremberg, it “contains within itself the accumulated evil of the whole.” It is easy to point fingers at others, but we will not stop war until we force our own leaders to live up to the principle spelled out by Supreme Court Justice and Nuremberg prosecutor Robert Jackson:

“If certain acts in violation of treaties are crimes, they are crimes whether the United States does them or whether Germany does them, and we are not prepared to lay down a rule of criminal conduct against others which we would not be willing to have invoked against us.”

Read more from Medea Benjamin and Nicolas J.S. Davies on peace and war: