Spring Sale: Get 1 Year, Save 58%

Martha Stewart’s unusual technique for tenderizing meat is surprisingly perfect for Dry January

It’s no secret that Martha Stewart knows a thing or two about martinis. The James Bond of DIY has her own formula for the “perfect” martini, and the menu at her Las Vegas restaurant includes the aptly titled Martha-tini.

This Dry January, Stewart endeavored to join the scores of drinkers who decided to swear off alcohol for 31 days. However, rather than simply staring at the Tito’s on her bar cart — she sells her own — the lifestyle guru decided to put those vodka bottles to good use.

From deep cleaning to eliminating bad odors, who knew there were so many things to do with vodka aside from actually drinking it? Leave it to Stewart, whose hilarious new ad for Tito’s has racked up more than 115,000 likes on Instagram, to show us.

“Hey, I get it, it’s dry January, so you’re not drinking much,” Stewart said as she looks into the camera. “But, if you’ve got Tito’s lying around, don’t just stare at it — use it.”

As this collaboration between Tito’s and Stewart shows, Dry January is no longer merely a fad. Jordan Valinsky reported for CNN that “last year, a Nielsen-owned food and drink research firm said that 35% of legal-age U.S. adults skipped alcohol for the entire month — a trend that’s growing in popularity as drinkers look to reset their bodies in the New Year. That’s an increase from the previous high of 21% who completed Dry January in 2019.”

Back to Stewart, who demonstrated the numerous things one can do with a bottle of vodka that don’t involve imbibing. She added an “extra kick” to creamy pasta sauce, cleaned “messy surfaces,” perked up fresh cut flowers, spritzed shoes to minimize odors — and so much more.

https://www.instagram.com/p/Cm9JSsJIBzW/?hl=en

Apparently, you can also use a vodka bottle to tenderize your meat, as in literally give it a few good whacks. Yup, Stewart grabbed a very large bottle of Tito’s and used it to smash a big hunk of red meat with reckless abandon.

The latter didn’t require one of the seemingly custom attachments that Stewart added to her vodka bottles. Turns out, they actually exist in real life, as Tito’s released a “DIY January Kit.”

“We can’t guarantee the outcome of these DIY uses for Tito’s,” the company wrote in an accompanying disclaimer. “They are legally non-binding because this is a joke and we’re a vodka brand.”


Want more great food writing and recipes? Subscribe to Salon Food’s newsletter, The Bite.


The kit, which included three bottle toppers (a “cleanerizer,” a “deodorizer” and a “flavorizer”), is already sold out.

Perhaps, though, it would be best to just steer clear of liquor bottles, or like Stewart, you might be tempted to actually whip up a martini.

“I certainly can’t think of anything else I’d rather be doing with my Tito’s,” she said at the end of the ad. “Ah, f**k it, Martha needs a drink.”

Luckily, it’s easier than ever to stock your bar cart with nonalcoholic options. That’s why Salon Food rounded up a list of the 15 best nonalcoholic libations for Dry January — and beyond.

Salon Food writes about stuff we think you’ll like. While our editorial team independently selected these products, Salon has affiliate partnerships, so making a purchase through our links may earn us a commission.

Fallen Capitol officer Brian Sicknick’s girlfriend sues Trump for $10M for “inciting” Jan. 6 mob

Sandra Garza, the girlfriend of late Capitol Police Officer Brian Sicknick, is suing former President Donald Trump for inciting the violent mob that she says led to his death.

CNN reports that Garza and Sicknick’s estate filed a civil lawsuit against Trump for telling his supporters to go to the Capitol even though he allegedly knew they were armed and ready for violence.

“As Officer Sicknick and hundreds of others—including other police officers, elected officials, and rank-and-file workers at the Capitol—were put in mortal danger, and as the seat of American Democracy was desecrated by the insurgent mob, Defendant Trump watched the events unfold on live television from the safety of the White House,” the complaint states. “The horrific events of January 6, 2021, including Officer Sicknick’s tragic, wrongful death, were a direct and foreseeable consequence of the Defendants’ unlawful actions.”

Although Washington D.C.’s chief medical examiner ruled that Sicknick died from natural causes after suffering a stroke shortly after the January 6th Capitol riots, the examiner also said that “all that transpired” in the hours leading up to his death played a role in his condition.

In total, the complaint is seeking damages from Trump of more than $10 million.

The FDA quietly expanded access to medication abortion pills. Here’s what the change will do

This week, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) updated a rule on medication abortion pills, expanding access to retail pharmacies like CVS and Walgreens. Previously, the pills could only be dispensed by certified doctors, clinics or a few mail-order pharmacies. Patients also had to pick up the prescription in-person, which is no longer the case; now, they can even be mailed.

The news on the change broke after the FDA updated its website on January 3, without a formal announcement, to reflect the finalized rule, as reported by the New York Times.

Abbasi Hoskins, president of the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, said in a statement the change is “an important step forward in securing access to medication abortion.”

Medication abortions occurring through the brand name drug Mifeprex, which has been approved by the FDA for use for more than 20 years, are a two-step process. First, a pregnant person takes a mifepristone pill. Either 24 to 48 hours later, a second pill containing misoprostol is taken. Medication abortion works up to 70 days after the first day of a person’s last period — usually when they are 10 weeks pregnant. According to data from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, medication abortions account for an estimated 42 percent of all abortions in the United States.

The Biden administration set the change in motion in 2022 when they terminated the rule that patients had to pick up the medication in person. The January 3 update formally codifies this change, in addition to allowing more retail pharmacies to dispense the pills; however, these pharmacies have to complete a certification process.

Abbasi Hoskins, president of the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG), said in a statement the change is “an important step forward in securing access to medication abortion.”

“Mifepristone must be prescribed by a certified prescriber who meets certain qualifications and agrees to follow certain guidelines for use,” the FDA stated.

“ACOG has long advocated that mifepristone be made available in retail pharmacies, just like other prescription drugs, to allow more patients access to abortion care without clinically unnecessary hurdles,” Hoskins said. “This change will empower patients who choose medication abortion to have the option of going to a pharmacy for immediate care rather than waiting for a mail order if that is right for them.”

Notably, the FDA’s update doesn’t mean that people can access the abortion pill over the counter. Patients will still need a prescription from a certified healthcare provider and pharmacies must become certified to dispense mifepristone.

“Mifepristone must be prescribed by a certified prescriber who meets certain qualifications and agrees to follow certain guidelines for use,” the FDA explains. “Under the Mifepristone REMS Program, mifepristone can be dispensed by a certified pharmacy or by or under the supervision of a certified prescriber.”

ACOG noted that the change “will not solve access issues for every person seeking abortion care, it will allow more patients who need mifepristone for medication abortion additional options to secure this vital drug.”

A lingering question is whether or not retail pharmacies like Walgreens and CVS will get certified and allow their pharmacies to sell the abortion pill, especially in states with abortion restrictions and bans.

“While this change potentially allows for more access points in states where abortion is still legal, we do not yet know how many pharmacies will participate in the program or how much it will truly expand access,” Melissa Fowler, Chief Program Officer at the National Abortion Federation said in a statement. “Today, too many people live in states where they have lost access to essential abortion care, and we have much work to do to so that people have the same access to health care no matter where they live.”


Want more health and science stories in your inbox? Subscribe to Salon’s weekly newsletter The Vulgar Scientist.


On Thursday, The New York Times reported that Walgreens will seek out certification to dispense the pill.

“We intend to become a certified pharmacy under the program,”  Fraser Engerman, a spokesperson for Walgreens, told the publication. “We are working through the registration, necessary training of our pharmacists, as well as evaluating our pharmacy network in terms of where we normally dispense products that have extra FDA requirements and will dispense these consistent with federal and state laws.”

CVS said in a statement to CNN: “We plan to seek certification to dispense mifepristone where legally permissible.”

An online pharmacy called Honeybee health said on its Facebook page in light of the FDA’s update, it quickly became “the first pharmacy certified to dispense medication abortion.”

“With telemedicine on the rise and abortion pills now accounting for the majority of abortions in the US, we’re proud to play such an important role in abortion provision today,” the company said on its Facebook page. 

“I feel so f**king dirty”: Ex-Herschel Walker staffer claims CPAC’s Matt Schlapp groped his crotch

Far-right MAGA Republican and former football star Herschel Walker was among the Donald Trump-backed candidates who suffered defeat in the 2022 midterms. Walker ran what his critics believe was an incredibly flawed U.S. Senate campaign in Georgia, ultimately losing to Democratic incumbent Sen. Raphael Warnock in a runoff election.

Matt Schlapp was one of the GOP activists who fought hard to save Walker’s doomed campaign. Now, according to the Daily Beast’s Roger Sollenberger, he is being accused of sexual harassment by a former staffer for that campaign.

Schlapp is a prominent figure on the right. In addition to chairing the American Conservative Union since 2014 and co-leading the consulting firm Cove Strategies, Schlapp is the main organizer for the Conservative Political Action Conference (CPAC) — which featured Hungarian strongman Viktor Orbán as a speaker at its Texas event in 2022.

According to Sollenberger, the ex-Walker staffer, a male, alleges that Schlapp made “sustained and unwanted and unsolicited” sexual contact with him in October when he was driving the conservative activist back from a bar in Atlanta. A Schlapp attorney is vehemently denying the ex-staffer’s allegations.

Sollenberger reports, “The staffer said the incident occurred the night of October 19, when Schlapp, chair of the American Conservative Union and lead organizer for the influential Conservative Political Action Conference, ‘groped’ and ‘fondled’ his crotch in his car against his will after buying him drinks at two different bars. The staffer described Schlapp, who had traveled to Georgia for a Walker campaign event, as inappropriately and repeatedly intruding into his personal space at the bars. He said he was also keenly aware of his ‘power dynamic’ with Schlapp, widely regarded as one of the most influential figures in national conservative politics.”

The former staffer, interviewed by the Beast, alleged, “It was a public space, and I was thinking that he got the hint. I did not want to embarrass him. But it escalated.”

Sollenberger did some bombshell reporting on Walker’s Senate campaign in 2022. It was Sollenberger who broke the allegations of a former girlfriend who said that Walker impregnated her and urged her to have an abortion. Supported by many far-right white evangelical Christian fundamentalists, Walker campaigned on imposing severe abortion bans and opposes abortion even for rape victims.

The Beast interviewed Charlie Spies, an attorney for Schlapp who is denying the former Walker campaign staffer’s allegations. Spies told the Beast that Schlapp “denies any improper behavior,” adding, “This appears to be now the 12th Daily Beast piece with personal attacks on Matt Schlapp and his family. The attack is false, and Mr. Schlapp denies any improper behavior. We are evaluating legal options for response.”

Sollenberger notes that the former Walker campaign staffer asked him not to reveal his name in his January 6 article but may want his name revealed later.

According to Sollenberger, “The staffer, in his late thirties, recalled that while he drove Schlapp back to the hotel, Schlapp put his hand on his leg, then reached over and ‘fondled’ his crotch at length while he was frozen in shock, calling it ‘scarring’ and ‘humiliating.’ When they arrived at the hotel, the staffer said Schlapp invited him to his room. The staffer said he declined and left ‘as quickly as I could.’ He informed the campaign about the incident the next morning.”

Sollenberger adds, “When the staffer got home that night, he received a call from Schlapp — shortly after midnight, according to call records the staffer shared with The Daily Beast — to confirm that the staffer would still chauffeur him to an event in Macon the next day. The staffer described the call as ‘short and perfunctory,’ but after confirming he would drive him, the staffer ‘broke down.’ He then recorded a series of tearful video accounts detailing the evening, which he shared with The Daily Beast as well as with two people close to him, including the staffer’s wife.”

In a video made in October, according to Sollenberger, the former staffer alleged, “Matt Schlapp of the CPAC grabbed my junk and pummeled it at length, and I’m sitting there thinking what the hell is going on, that this person is literally doing this to me…. From the bar to the Hilton Garden Inn, he has his hands on me. And I feel so f*****g dirty. I feel so f*****g dirty. I’m supposed to pick this mo*********r up in the morning and just pretend like nothing happened. This is what I’m dealing with. This is what I got to do.”

NY judge threatens Trump’s lawyers with sanctions over “frivolous litigation”

According to Business Insider, a state judge in Manhattan is considering “frivolous litigation” sanctions against three law firms that have represented former President Donald Trump.

The move comes as part of the $250 million civil fraud case by the New York Attorney General, Letitia James, against Trump’s businesses.

“The threat against three Trump-defending law firms by New York State Supreme Court Justice Arthur Engoron was revealed in court filings Thursday night,” reported Laura Italiano. “‘This court is considering imposing sanctions for frivolous litigation against attorneys from Habba Madaio & Associates LLP; Continental PLLC; and Robert & Robert PLLC,’ the judge said in a January 4 email to all parties in the attorney general’s lawsuit. “

“The unspecified penalties would punish the three firms for filing motions to dismiss the lawsuit that set forth ‘the same legal arguments that this court previously rejected,’ Engoron wrote. That rejection had come in November, in his denial of Trump’s request for a preliminary injunction halting the attorney general’s lawsuit,” said the report. “The judge said Trump’s repetitive arguments for dismissal include that New York Attorney General Letitia James does not have legal standing to sue, that her lawsuit is part of a political ‘witch-hunt,’ and that a simple disclaimer — essentially warning lenders to check Trump’s math — gives the former president immunity from James’ fraud claims.”

“In a response filed Thursday night, the three law firms countered that Engoron’s November rejection of their arguments was ‘a preliminary finding’ and does not preclude them from raising the same arguments now,” said the report. “The three law firms also said that the judge’s email ‘provides troublingly little notice and time for counsel to respond.’ Engoron had asked the attorney general’s office and Trump’s defense lawyers to respond to his ‘frivolous litigation’ accusation within one day.”

This comes as one of Trump’s key attorneys at one of the firms under scrutiny, Alina Habba, also faces a lawsuit from a Black employee who claims she used racial slurs repeatedly.

In North Carolina, more people are training to support patients through an abortion

Lauren Overman has a suggested shopping list for her clients preparing to get an abortion. The list includes a heating pad, a journal, aromatherapy oils — things that could bring physical or emotional comfort after the procedure.

Overman is an abortion doula.

She has worked as a professional birth doula for many years. Recently, Overman also began offering advice and emotional support to people as they navigate having an abortion, often a lonely time. She makes her services available either free or on a sliding scale to abortion patients. Other abortion doulas charge between $200 and $800.

Overman is one of around 40 practicing abortion doulas in North Carolina, according to an estimate from local abortion rights groups — a number that could soon grow. North Carolina groups that train doulas said they’ve seen an uptick in people wanting to become abortion doulas in the months since Roe v. Wade was overturned.

Every three months, the Carolina Abortion Fund offers free online classes for aspiring abortion doulas. Those sessions used to have 20 sign-ups at most, according to board member Kat Lewis. Now they have 40.

“It’s word of mouth. It’s people sharing ‘This is how I got through my abortion or miscarriage experience with the help of a doula.’ And someone being like, ‘That’s amazing. I need that. Or I wanna become that,'” Lewis said.

Demand for training has also surged at the Mountain Area Abortion Doula Collective in western North Carolina, which started in 2019. Ash Williams leads the free four-week doula training and includes talks on gender-inclusive language and the history of medical racism. The course also includes ways to support clients struggling with homelessness or domestic violence.

“The doula might be the only person that that person has told that they’re doing this. … That’s a big responsibility,” Williams said. “So we really want to approach our work with so much care.”

Going to the clinic and holding a patient’s hand during the procedure are among the services abortion doulas can offer, but some clinics don’t allow a support person in the room. So doulas like Overman find other ways to be supportive, such as sitting down with a woman afterward, to listen, share a meal, or just watch TV together.

It’s “holding space — being there so that they can bring something up if they want to talk about it. But also, there are no expectations that you have to talk about it if you don’t want to,” Overman said.

Overman uses Zoom to consult with people across the country, even in states where abortion is restricted or banned. She can help them locate the closest clinics or find transportation and lodging if they’re traveling a long distance.

Overman makes sure her clients know what to expect from the procedure, like how much bleeding is normal after either a surgical or medication abortion.

“You can fill up a super maxi pad in an hour. That’s OK,” she explained. “Fill up one or more pad every hour for two to three hours consecutively, then that’s a problem.”

Abortion doulas are not required to have medical training, and many do not. It’s not clear how many work across the U.S., because the job is not regulated.

There has been a jump in the number of people requesting her abortion doula services over the past several months, Overman said, from around four people a month to four every week.

If people are afraid to talk to their friends or relatives about an abortion, she said, sometimes the easiest thing to do is reach out to someone on the internet. A doula may start out as a stranger but can become a person who can be relied on for support.


This article is from a partnership that includes NPR, WFAE, and KHN.

KHN (Kaiser Health News) is a national newsroom that produces in-depth journalism about health issues. Together with Policy Analysis and Polling, KHN is one of the three major operating programs at KFF (Kaiser Family Foundation). KFF is an endowed nonprofit organization providing information on health issues to the nation.

Subscribe to KHN’s free Morning Briefing.

“Breakdown in trust”: Expert says judge’s order suggests DOJ suspects Trump has more classified docs

A federal judge on Wednesday ordered former President Donald Trump’s lawyers to turn over names of private investigators who searched Trump’s properties last month for additional classified documents, according to The New York Times.

Chief Judge Beryl Howell of the Federal District Court in Washington issued an order siding with the Justice Department, which is looking to question the investigators about the search.

The November search, which turned up at least two additional documents marked classified at a storage unit near Mar-a-Lago, was conducted months after the FBI seized about 100 documents marked classified from the president’s residence in August.

A top DOJ official told Trump’s lawyers in October that the department believed the former president still had classified materials. Trump’s attorneys had previously affirmed that the former president had returned all classified documents last summer before investigators found the additional materials.

The DOJ’s request to identify the private investigators who conducted the November search “suggests an increasing breakdown in trust” between prosecutors and Trump’s lawyers, whom they have accused of not being forthcoming about the documents, according to the Times’ Alan Feuer.

Prosecutors under new special counsel Jack Smith in sealed court filings last month asked Howell to hold Trump’s lawyers in contempt for failing to comply with the original subpoena issued in May for all of the classified documents.

Howell has still not made a decision on the contempt request, according to the Times.

The latest request from the DOJ came after prosecutors asked Trump’s lawyers to turn over the names of the investigators who searched the storage unit and other Trump properties, including Mar-a-Lago, his Bedminster, N.J., golf resort and Trump Tower.

Trump’s lawyers offered to make the investigators available for questioning but wanted to keep their identities hidden by a protective order over concerns of potential leaks, according to the report. Prosecutors did not agree to the protective order and asked Howell to compel the release of the names.


Want a daily wrap-up of all the news and commentary Salon has to offer? Subscribe to our morning newsletter, Crash Course.


Prosecutors have already questioned several Trump associates in the case, including Walt Nauta, a former White House military valet who went to work for Trump at Mar-a-Lago. But prosecutors have “indicated they are skeptical” of his initial account about moving documents stored at Mar-a-Lago and have been “using the specter of charges against him to persuade him to cooperate with the inquiry,” according to the Times.

Prosecutors also conferred immunity on former Trump aide Kash Patel to force him to testify to the grand jury after he initially invoked his Fifth Amendment rights and refused to answer questions.

The new request suggests that Smith’s team may still believe there are more documents still out there.

“If the Special Counsel were convinced it has all classified documents once squirreled away by Trump, it wouldn’t care who the investigators are,” tweeted MSNBC legal analyst Lisa Rubin. “But by pressing for their names, investigators are revealing how much they want to talk to the P.I.s about what’s still out there.”

Legal experts have suggested that Trump’s lawyers could face prosecution themselves after they falsely affirmed last year that the former president had returned all of the documents before investigators turned up even more.

Trump also faces a DOJ investigation into his role in the Jan. 6 Capitol riot, which is also being overseen by Smith, and a Georgia investigation into his efforts to overturn the 2020 election. He is also facing a $250 million civil lawsuit from New York Attorney General Letitia James. The judge overseeing the case said in court filings that he is “considering imposing sanctions for frivolous litigation” over Trump’s attempt to dodge the lawsuit with an end-run around to a Florida judge using “the same legal arguments that this court previously rejected.”

NY docs are now required to prescribe naloxone to some patients on opioid painkillers

Without opioid painkillers to dull the ache in his knees and other joints, Arnold Wilson wouldn’t be able to walk half a block. The 63-year-old former New York City nurse has crippling arthritis for which he takes OxyContin twice a day and oxycodone when he needs additional relief.

For the past several years, he’s kept another drug on hand as well: naloxone, an overdose reversal drug often referred to by the brand name Narcan.

Although overdose deaths from illicit drugs sold on the street make headlines, the risk of overdose is just as real for patients who take opioids prescribed by their doctors.

“It gives me a sense of relief and security,” said Wilson, who keeps Narcan nasal spray in his car and at home. His pain management doctor at Montefiore Medical Center in the Bronx prescribed the opioids in 2013, after a bout with meningitis exacerbated joint problems Wilson had as a result of two brain aneurysms and several strokes. His doctor urged him to start carrying Narcan in 2017.

Naloxone, which begins to reverse an overdose within minutes, is typically administered by others. Though he’s never needed it, Wilson’s 18-year-old daughter knows how to use it. “I’ve instructed her how to do it, in case I’m lethargic,” he said. His girlfriend and friends know what to do, too.

A recently enacted New York law aims to ensure that naloxone is available if needed by people like Wilson who take prescription opioids.

Under the law, which took effect last summer, doctors must co-prescribe naloxone to certain patients who are at risk of an overdose when writing the patients’ first opioid prescription each year. Risk factors that would trigger the requirement include taking a high daily dose of an opioid (at least 90 morphine milligram equivalents, or MME); taking certain other drugs, like sedative hypnotics; or having a history of substance use disorder.

At least 10 other states have similar laws, according to research by the Network for Public Health Law.

“Sometimes patients, especially if they’ve been taking opioids for a long time, don’t understand the risks,” said Dr. Laila Khalid, co-director of the chronic pain clinic at Montefiore Medical Center. The clinic provides free naloxone to patients through the state’s opioid overdose prevention program.

Someone may forget the timing of their last dose and inadvertently take too much, for example, or have a few extra drinks at a party, Khalid said. Alcohol and some medications, like benzodiazepines, amplify opioids’ effects.

“Drug overdose deaths continue to climb, as they have nearly every year for more than two decades,” said Emily Einstein, chief of the Science Policy Branch at the National Institute on Drug Abuse. In 2021, Einstein noted, overdose deaths in the United States topped an estimated 100,000 for the first time, according to provisional data from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. According to this provisional data, Einstein said, the vast majority of those deaths — over 80,000 — involved opioids. While most opioid overdose deaths were attributable to illicit fentanyl, approximately 17,000 deaths involved prescription opioids, including methadone.

Naloxone, available as either a nasal spray or injection, is considered safe and causes few side effects. It’s not addictive. The CDC recommends that people at risk of overdose carry it with them so that a family member or bystander can administer it if necessary.

Experts in drug policy point to a key statistic that laws like the one in New York aim to address: In nearly 40% of overdose deaths, another person is present, according to the CDC.

If bystanders had had naloxone, “most of those people wouldn’t have died,” said Corey Davis, director of the Harm Reduction Legal Project at the Network for Public Health Law.

In every state, including New York, pharmacists are authorized to dispense naloxone, often under “standing orders” that allow dispensing without a prescription, typically to people who are at risk of overdose or are in a position to help someone at risk.

So then why require physicians to write scripts?

Mandating is more effective than recommending, experts said. By requiring physicians to prescribe the drug, more people who might need naloxone would have it on hand — if they fill the prescription. But there’s no guarantee they will.

A prescription can also help remove the lingering stigma of asking for an overdose drug at the pharmacy counter.

“It removes friction points,” said Davis. “You just drive through the window and pick it up.”

In a 2019 analysis, pharmacists in states that required co-prescribing naloxone with opioids filled nearly eight times as many naloxone prescriptions per 100,000 people as those in states that didn’t require it.

Missouri doesn’t have a co-prescribing law, but Danielle Muscato’s pain management doctor recently suggested she carry Narcan. The 38-year-old civil rights activist, who lives in Columbia, takes the prescription opioid tramadol and several other drugs to keep her chronic severe lower back pain in check. She’s glad to have the nasal spray tucked in her purse, just in case.

“I think it’s a wonderful thing” that people carry it and know how to use it, she said. “I wish this was standard everywhere.”

Since the New York law went into effect, “I have definitely seen an uptick of prescribers adding naloxone to opioids, especially if it’s a large order,” said Ambar Keluskar, pharmacy manager at Rossi Pharmacy in Brooklyn.

Patients don’t always understand why they’re getting it, though, said Toni Tompkins, supervising pharmacist at Phelps Hometown Pharmacy in the upstate New York town of Phelps.

A two-dose package of naloxone spray typically costs about $150. The medication is now available in generic form, which may reduce the out-of-pocket cost. Most insurers cover it, although patients typically owe a copayment. The uninsured can generally get naloxone through state programs.

In New York, private insurers are required to cover naloxone, and Medicaid also covers it, said Monica Pomeroy, a spokesperson for the state health department. The state’s Naloxone Co-Payment Assistance Program (N-CAP) covers the cost of copays up to $40 for those with insurance, Pomeroy said. Uninsured people or those with unmet deductibles can get it free at one of the state’s opioid overdose prevention sites.

In November, the FDA announced it is considering making naloxone available without a prescription.

Although offering it over the counter would make the drug easier to get, some people are concerned that insurance might not cover it. Further, “if a patient is just picking it up somewhere without getting any guidance on how to use it, that could be a downside,” said Anne Burns, vice president of professional affairs at the American Pharmacists Association.

Some professionals believe naloxone should be dispensed with every opioid prescription, regardless of risk factors. In Rochester, New York, and surrounding Monroe County, that’s what happens. In 2021, the county executive, Adam Bello, signed Maisie’s Law, named after a local 9-month-old girl who died after swallowing a methadone pill she found on a neighbor’s kitchen floor.

“It’s horrible what happened,” said Karl Williams, a pharmacy law professor and chair of the board of the Pharmacists Society of the State of New York. “Maybe it’s a next-level standard that should become law.”


KHN (Kaiser Health News) is a national newsroom that produces in-depth journalism about health issues. Together with Policy Analysis and Polling, KHN is one of the three major operating programs at KFF (Kaiser Family Foundation). KFF is an endowed nonprofit organization providing information on health issues to the nation.

Subscribe to KHN’s free Morning Briefing.

Does it even matter who the next Speaker of the House is, if insurrectionists are running the show?

Today is the second anniversary of the January 6 insurrection. On that day a group of right wing extremists breached the U.S. Capitol, declaring, “this is OUR house.” They ransacked the place and attempted to hunt down Vice President Mike Pence and Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi with the intention of staging a coup d’état. Two years later we are witnessing another group of right wing extremists attempting a takeover. This time, they’re staging an insurrection against their own party by refusing to allow a new speaker to be elected unless their demands are met. And unlike two years ago, they’re going to be successful.

Yesterday, Majority Leader Kevin McCarthy endured a third straight day of ritual humiliation as his party was unable to get the 218 votes needed to grant him the Speakership after 11 rounds of voting. This is the first time since 1859, on the cusp of the Civil War, that the process has taken this many votes. As Congressman-elect Jeff Jackson, D-N.C., quipped when it went to the 10th ballot, “the last time it took this many ballots to elect a Speaker, Davy Crockett had a vote.”

A group of about 20 defecting members continues to vote against McCarthy, switching back and forth between alternatives and giving angry speeches about “the swamp” and McCarthy’s character flaws. They’re getting plenty of screen time and seem to be enjoying themselves. But they do have an agenda beyond simply stopping the hated McCarthy from becoming speaker, as much as they desire that outcome. They want to run the place.

As the NY Times laid out, most of these insurrectionists are members of the House Freedom Caucus. The majority are election deniers and all but one of the incumbents were “objectors” to the electoral vote count two years ago. Seventeen of them were endorsed by Donald Trump although they don’t seem to care about his opinion since they are all ignoring his entreaties to vote for McCarthy. All but Rep. Lauren Boebert of Colorado are from very safe red districts where their voters love to see the RINO establishment take a beating, and they all have independent fund-raising capabilities through the use of right wing media. 


Want a daily wrap-up of all the news and commentary Salon has to offer? Subscribe to our morning newsletter, Crash Course.


It’s been hard to pin down the specifics of what they want out of all this aside from the total mortification of Kevin McCarthy. But over the last day or so a list of demands has emerged. The one that has been touted as the most important is the requirement that only one member is necessary to move to “vacate the chair,” which is essentially a call for a no-confidence vote against the Speaker. One can understand why McCarthy was reluctant to grant that under these circumstances. If he can’t even get them to vote for him in the first place, it’s highly likely it will be used with abandon anytime he looks at one of them sideways.

According to Robert Costa of CBS News last night, there’s more. Much more. They also want a number of rules changes, budget promises and committee guarantees, making the Freedom Caucus “central” to the House.

Costa tweeted:

If this deal goes thru and McCarthy become speaker, you’re looking at a House where McCarthy is speaker and/but the Freedom Caucus is at the table on all big things: rules for floor, standoffs on budgets, and spreading HFC moves to key fiscal committees (approps, budget, etc.)

It’s comparable as one person puts it to Boehner welcoming the Tea Party into the leadership in 2011 and making the RSC’s right wing a powerful force on all tricky fiscal and spending items… others say it could tie McCarthy’s hands in terms of any deals with President Biden.

Florida Rep. Matt Gaetz appeared on Fox News and confirmed it:

That’s correct. Kevin McCarthy is negotiating to turn the Speaker of the House into a ceremonial position. Surely he can keep that big office Matt Gaetz charged he’s “squatting” in illegally, although if it’s necessary to let Boebert have it as part of the deal, I’m sure he’ll agree to that too. Nobody has ever wanted a title as much as Kevin McCarthy wants this one.

It’s hard to see how the nation stays unscathed when they hold the debt ceiling hostage in order to destroy everything they can.

None of what they are giving away in this negotiation really changes anything. McCarthy isn’t really giving up much of substance. As they have demonstrated this week, they already run everything. With a majority this narrow, it only takes a handful of shameless sh*t-disturbers to bring everything to a crashing halt until they get their way. And let’s face it, 90 percent of the GOP caucus is more or less on board with the Freedom Caucus policy agenda. They may squabble a bit about the details but overall they’re fine with it.

This Congress was always going to be a circus. We knew that going in. And when it became clear that the margin was so narrow, it also was clear they would hold their usual “oversight” spectacles without any restraint. The country can survive that, although it’s a degrading exercise for everyone involved. But it’s hard to see how the nation stays unscathed when they hold the debt ceiling hostage in order to destroy everything they can.

With this Speaker pageant, they’re proving they will do it. And nobody, least of all Kevin McCarthy (or any other Speaker they produce) can do a damn thing about it. We went through this before in 2011 and 2013 when Republicans used the debt ceiling to prolong the recovery from the financial crisis. (You will note that they very docilely acquiesced to raising it during the Trump years.) They are ten times as volatile now.

It remains to be seen if Kevin McCarthy manages to abase himself enough to squeak through and get the ceremonial Speaker’s gavel. Unless Republicans all throw up their hands and decide to vote for one of the Insurrectionist 20’s obscure back bench alternatives like Florida Rep. Byron Donalds or Oklahoma Rep. Kevin Hern, it’s hard to imagine anyone else wanting the job at this point.

Maybe that’s the best argument McCarthy has going for him right now. He’s the only one who is self-destructive enough to want it in the first place and he’ll do absolutely anything to keep it. Matt Gaetz gets that and I won’t be surprised if the rest of the holdouts see it too. Kevin McCarthy will make a very nice Freedom Caucus ceremonial bobblehead. Maybe they’ll even let him keep his parking place. 

What I want to leave behind in 2023

I used to watch older kids bust guns as soon as the clock struck midnight on New Year’s Eve back in the day, which is something you shouldn’t do. Now I have a new ritual — deleting things in the New Year with the hopes of finding more comfort and focus — which is something we should all do. 

Let’s take a stroll back to early 1990-something, deep into the alley past Mrs. Ellen’s house, around the prickly, fat, toothy rats, over the unfinished wooden gate attached to the bricked-in two-story that led straight to a passage to the only house that had a semi-working fire escape. That fire escape, extra-rickety and made of rust, gave us a clear pathway to the roof, but it required a little work. My friend Mumbles would clutch his fingers together, providing me and some of the other kids with a sturdy platform to dig our Nikes into after getting a running start, and partnering with his strength, he’d catapult us up to the ladder, where we’d catch hold, swing a bit, then pull ourselves up and climb to the top. 

For context, this is Baltimore, meaning that we didn’t have many uses for roof access in the early ’90s, no sunbathing or time spent gazing at the skyline or stars. But on the Fourth of July, that patchy, tarred roof was the best place in the city to watch the fireworks, and on New Year’s Eve, kids loved to climb up to the top of the roof and bang their pistols into the dark skies in celebration of new beginnings. I’m not a gun guy, but I loved that tradition as a child because everyone else was so excited about it. I loved that they loved blastin off, all the way up until I learned those bullets find their way back to the earth, where they can hurt or even kill people. Needless to say, that tradition ended abruptly for me. 

As I grew older, parties seemed to be the best way to bring in the new year, long nights full of drinking and smoking and making impossible resolutions we would all abandon within the first week, like “I’m going to read more books!” or “I’m going to lose weight!” or “I’m going to spend less money!” As we would all go on to read less, gain more and spend, spend, spend our way into the next year, again pledging the same. 

Traditional resolutions suck, but we can take the start of a new year to call out the unnecessary people and conversations that suck up time and energy and distract us from the things that matter.

Now that I have a family, my end-of-the-year celebrations are even more simple, like dinner with my wife and daughter, maybe church — maybe — and always a movie the three of us can fall asleep watching. I did that this year, had an amazing time eating pasta at a nice restaurant and watching Disney’s “Coco” for the 34,678,377,289th time with my toddler who won’t dare watch anything else and would be proud to do the same next year. And along with that, I have my new tradition of identifying the things I’m planning to leave behind in the previous year.

Traditional resolutions suck, but we can take the start of a new year to call out the unnecessary people and conversations that suck up time and energy and distract us from the things that matter.

Like Donald Trump. Dump Trump, please, for God’s sake. 

I’m sick of Trump Discourse. Nothing reported about this man has done anything to educate or enlighten anyone or make their quality of life better. This year, we should pay him attention at the rate he pays his taxes. Candace Owens can be left in 2022 as well, because what in the hell is she talking about, ever? She makes no sense at least 100 percent of the time.

This year, I will be fighting to avoid YouTube scholars at all costs — people who use the term “deep dive” in regular conversations, the Flat Earthers, the Sovereign Citizens. And let’s tank Twitter in 2023 while we’re at it. Twitter has been dying a painfully slow death over the past five years, but I think Elon Musk is the perfect captain for sinking the ship. The once beautiful bird app that used to be full of people I respected, debated and collaborated with is now overrun by bots, one-sided opinions and extremism. People who begin sentences and statements and rants with “All women are,” or “All men are” or “All Black people are,” or “All white people are,” are always wrong, all of the time. 

Twitter has been dying a painfully slow death over the past five years, but I think Elon Musk is the perfect captain for sinking the ship.

Thinking people understand privilege and the role society plays in oppression. But thinking people should also be smart enough to see that matching hate and over-generalizing about any group will not allow us to move forward as a collective. It will only create more hate.

One fix, however, is simple. Get off Twitter this year and talk to people instead. For example, I have a white friend named Cullen, and I don’t blame him for slavery and Jim Crow and police violence, we just talk about how the world is and what it could be. And sometimes he buys the first round when I bump into him at a bar, and sometimes I buy rounds, and as left-leaning idealists, we fight and agree and disagree and learn and grow. This is the only way to mend the problems that plague our country — not shutting each other out just because we hail from different demographics or belief systems. 

And God, Lord, Jesus, Allah, Buddha, Scientologist auditor, or whomever else there is pray to — please, please, in 2023, stop calling me BIPOC. I know what the term means but I don’t like it. I’m Black. Listen to me, respect me, and stop calling me BIPOC. 

Let’s leave reboots back in 2022 as well. I have no interest in what the cast of “90210” or “Who’s the Boss” or Steve Urkel is up to. On the other hand, I do love “Wednesday,” “Cobra Kai” and “The Best Man: Final Chapters.” Some reboots can stay. TikTok dance routines, sustainable clothing that costs over $500, and exhaustive coverage of the British royal family — leave all of that in 2022 where it belongs. In 2023, I’d love to not hear anything about Ye, formerly known as Kanye West. Anything!

Some of the things I want to leave behind are just annoying. But some are serious. They block love. So I’m going to get serious about where I direct my attention because I dream of loving big in 2023. 

Public health agencies try to restore trust as they fight misinformation

OKLAHOMA CITY — By the summer of 2021, Phil Maytubby, deputy CEO of the health department here, was concerned to see the numbers of people getting vaccinated against covid-19 slipping after an initially robust response. With doubt, fear, and misinformation running rampant nationwide — both online and offline — he knew the agency needed to rethink its messaging strategy.

So, the health department conducted something called an online “sentiment search,” which gauges how certain words are perceived on social media. The tool found that many people in Oklahoma City didn’t like the word “vaccinate” — a term featured prominently in the health department’s marketing campaign.

“If you don’t know how your message is resonating with the public,” Maytubby said, “you’re shooting in the dark.”

Across the country, health officials have been trying to combat misinformation and restore trust within their communities these past few years, a period when many people haven’t put full faith in their state and local health departments. Agencies are using Twitter, for example, to appeal to niche audiences, such as NFL fans in Kansas City and Star Wars enthusiasts in Alabama. They’re collaborating with influencers and celebrities such as Stephen Colbert and Akbar Gbajabiamila to extend their reach.

Some of these efforts have paid off. By now, more than 80% of U.S. residents have received at least one shot of a covid vaccine.

But data suggests that the skepticism and misinformation surrounding covid vaccines now threatens other public health priorities. Flu vaccine coverage among children in mid-December was about the same as December 2021, but it was 3.7 percentage points lower compared with late 2020, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. The decrease in flu vaccination coverage among pregnant women was even more dramatic over the last two years: 18 percentage points lower.

Other common childhood vaccination rates are down, too, compared with pre-pandemic levels. Nationally, 35% of all American parents oppose requiring children to be vaccinated for measles, mumps, and rubella before entering school, up from 23% in 2019, according to a KFF survey released Dec. 16. Suspicion swirling around once-trusted vaccines, as well as fatigue from so many shots, is likely to blame.

Part of the problem comes down to a lack of investment that eroded the public health system before the pandemic began. An analysis conducted by KHN and The Associated Press found local health department spending dropped by 18% per capita between 2010 and 2020. State and local health agencies also lost nearly 40,000 jobs between the 2008 recession and the emergence of the pandemic.

This made their response to a once-in-a-century public health crisis challenging and often inadequate. For example, during covid’s early days, many local health departments used fax machines to report covid case counts.

“We were not as flexible as we are now,” said Dr. Brannon Traxler, director of public health at the South Carolina Department of Health and Environmental Control.

At the start of the pandemic, Traxler said, only two people worked on the media relations and public outreach team at South Carolina’s health department. Now, the team has eight.

The agency has changed its communication strategies in other ways, too. Last year was the first year, for example, that South Carolina published data on flu vaccinations every two weeks, with the goal of raising awareness about the effectiveness of the shots. In South Carolina, not even one-quarter of adults and children eligible for a flu shot had been vaccinated by early December, even as flu cases and hospitalizations climbed. The flu vaccine rate across all age groups in the U.S. was 51.4% last season.

Those who have opted out of both the covid and flu shots seem to be correlated, Traxler said.

“We’re really just trying to dispel misinformation that’s out there,” Traxler said. To that end, the health department has partnered with local leaders and groups to encourage vaccinations. Agency staffers have also become more comfortable talking to the press, she said, to better communicate with the public.

But some public health experts argue that agencies are still failing on messaging. Scientific words such as “mRNA technology,” “bivalent vaccine,” and “monoclonal antibodies” are used a lot in public health even though many people find them difficult to understand.

A study published by JAMA found that covid-related language used by state-level agencies was often more complex than an eighth-grade reading level and harder to understand than the language commonly used by the CDC.

“We have to communicate complex ideas to the public, and this is where we fail,” said Brian Castrucci, CEO of the de Beaumont Foundation, a charitable group focused on strengthening public health. “We have to own the fact that our communication missteps created the environment where disinformation flourished.”

Most Americans support public health, Castrucci said. At the same time, a small but vocal minority pushes an anti-science agenda and has been effective in sowing seeds of distrust, he said.

The more than 3,000 public health departments nationwide stand to benefit from a unified message, he said. In late 2020, the foundation, working with other public health groups, established the Public Health Communications Collaborative to amplify easy-to-understand information about vaccines.

“The good guys need to be just as well organized as those who seek to do harm to the nation,” he said. “One would think we would learn from this.”

Meanwhile, a report published in October by the Pew Research Center found 57% of U.S. adults believe “false and misleading information about the coronavirus and vaccines has contributed a lot to problems the country” has faced amid the pandemic.

“I was leery like everyone else,” said Davie Baker, 61, an Oklahoma City woman who owns a business that sells window treatments. When the shots became widely available in 2021, she thought they had been developed too quickly, and she worried about some of the things she’d read online about side effects. A pharmacist at Sam’s Club changed her mind.

“She just kind of educated me on what the shot was really about,” Baker said. “She cleared up some things for me.”

Baker signed up for her first covid shot in May 2021, around the same time the health department in Oklahoma City noticed the number of vaccines administered daily was starting to decline.

The department updated its marketing campaign in early 2022. Instead of using the word “vaccinate” to encourage more people to get their covid shots — the term the agency’s social media analytics revealed people didn’t like — the new campaign urged people to “Choose Today!”

“People don’t trust like they used to,” Maytubby said. “They want to make up their own minds and make their own decisions.” The word “choose” acknowledged this preference, he said.

Maytubby thinks the “Choose Today!” campaign worked. A survey of 502 adults in Oklahoma City conducted during the first half of 2022 found fewer than 20% of respondents reacted negatively or very negatively to a sample of “Choose Today!” advertisements. And an estimated 86.5% of adults in Oklahoma City have received at least one dose of a covid vaccine — a rate higher than the state average of about 73%.

Other factors are likely at play that have helped bolster Oklahoma City’s vaccine numbers. In the same survey of Oklahoma City adults, some people who were recently vaccinated said family members or church leaders urged them to get the vaccine, or they knew someone who had died from covid. One person said money was the motivation — they received $900 from their employer for getting the covid vaccine.

Meanwhile, the war against misinformation and disinformation wages on. Childhood vaccination rates for the immunizations students typically need to enter kindergarten are down 4.5% in Oklahoma County since the 2017-18 academic year as parents increasingly seek exemptions to the requirements.

That worries Maytubby. He said the primary tactic among those trying to sow distrust about vaccinations has been to cast doubt — about everything from the science to their safety.

“In that aspect, they’ve been pretty successful,” Maytubby said. “Misinformation has changed everything.”

KHN (Kaiser Health News) is a national newsroom that produces in-depth journalism about health issues. Together with Policy Analysis and Polling, KHN is one of the three major operating programs at KFF (Kaiser Family Foundation). KFF is an endowed nonprofit organization providing information on health issues to the nation.


This story can be republished for free (details).

KHN (Kaiser Health News) is a national newsroom that produces in-depth journalism about health issues. Together with Policy Analysis and Polling, KHN is one of the three major operating programs at KFF (Kaiser Family Foundation). KFF is an endowed nonprofit organization providing information on health issues to the nation.

Subscribe to KHN’s free Morning Briefing.

Lost sleep and jangled nerves: The rising onslaught of noise harms mind and body

 

SACRAMENTO — Mike Thomson’s friends refuse to stay over at his house anymore.

Thomson lives about 50 yards from a busy freeway that bisects California’s capital city, one that has been increasingly used as a speedway for high-speed races, diesel-spewing big rigs, revving motorcycles — and cars that have been illegally modified to make even more noise.

About the only time it quiets down is Saturday night between 3 and 4 a.m., Thomson said.

Otherwise, the din is nearly constant, and most nights, he’s jolted out of sleep five or six times.

“Cars come by and they don’t have mufflers,” said Thomson, 54, who remodels homes for a living. “It’s terrible. I don’t recommend it for anyone.”

Thomson is a victim of noise pollution, which health experts warn is a growing problem that is not confined to our ears, but causes stress-related conditions like anxiety, high blood pressure, and insomnia.

California legislators passed two laws in 2022 aimed at quieting the environment. One directs the California Highway Patrol to test noise-detecting cameras, which may eventually issue automatic tickets for cars that make noise above a certain level. The other forces drivers of illegally modified cars to fix them before they can be re-registered.

“There’s an aspect of our society that likes to be loud and proud,” said state Sen. Anthony Portantino (D-Glendale), author of the noise camera law. “But that shouldn’t infringe on someone else’s health in a public space.”

Most states haven’t addressed the assault on our eardrums. Traffic is a major driver of noise pollution — which disproportionately affects disadvantaged communities — and it’s getting harder to escape the sounds of leaf blowers, construction, and other irritants.

California’s laws will take time and have limited effect, but noise control experts called them a good start. Still, they do nothing to address overhead noise pollution from circling police helicopters, buzzing drones, and other sources, which is the purview of the federal government, said Les Blomberg, executive director of the Noise Pollution Clearinghouse.

In October 2021, the American Public Health Association declared noise a public health hazard. Decades of research links noise pollution with not only sleep disruption, but also a host of chronic conditions such as heart disease, cognitive impairment, depression, and anxiety.

“Despite the breadth and seriousness of its health impacts, noise has not been prioritized as a public health problem for decades,” the declaration says. “The magnitude and seriousness of noise as a public health hazard warrant action.”

When there’s a loud noise, the auditory system signals that something is wrong, triggering a fight-or-flight response in the body and flooding it with stress hormones that cause inflammation and can ultimately lead to disease, said Peter James, an assistant professor of environmental health at Harvard University’s T.H. Chan School of Public Health.

Constant exposure to noise increases the risk of heart disease by 8% and diabetes by 6%, research shows. The European Environment Agency estimated in 2020 that noise exposure causes about 12,000 premature deaths and 48,000 cases of heart disease each year in Western Europe.

While California Highway Patrol officials will spend the next few years researching noise cameras, they acknowledge that noise from street racing and so-called sideshows — where people block off intersections or parking lots to burn out tires or do “doughnuts” — has surged over the past several years and disturbs people right now.

Cars in California are supposed to operate at 95 decibels — a little louder than a leaf blower or lawn mower — or less. But drivers often modify their cars and motorcycles to be louder, such as by installing “whistle tips” on the exhaust system to make noise or removing mufflers.

In 2021, the last full year for which data is available, the highway patrol issued 2,641 tickets to drivers for excessive vehicle noise, nearly double 2018’s 1,400 citations.

“There’s always been an issue with noise coming from exhausts, and it’s gained more attention lately,” said Andrew Poyner, a highway patrol captain. “It’s been steadily increasing over the past several years.”

The American Public Health Association says the federal government should regulate noise in the air, on roads, and in workplaces as an environmental hazard, but that task has mostly been abandoned since the federal Office of Noise Abatement and Control was defunded in 1981 under President Ronald Reagan.

Now the task of quieting communities is mostly up to states and cities. In California, reducing noise is often a byproduct of other environmental policy changes. For instance, the state will ban the sale of noisy gas-powered leaf blowers starting in 2024, a policy aimed primarily at reducing smog-causing emissions.

One of the noise laws approved in California in 2022, AB 2496, will require owners of vehicles that have been ticketed for noise to fix the issue before they can re-register them through the Department of Motor Vehicles. Currently, drivers can pay a fine and keep their illegally modified cars as they are. The law takes effect in 2027.

The other law, SB 1097, directs the highway patrol to recommend a brand of noise-detecting cameras to the legislature by 2025. These cameras, already in use in Paris, New York City, and Knoxville, Tennessee, would issue automatic tickets if they detected a car rumbling down the street too loudly.

Originally, the law would have created pilot programs to start testing the cameras in six cities, but lawmakers said they wanted to go slower and approved only the study.

Portantino said he’s frustrated by the delay, especially because the streets of Los Angeles have become almost unbearably loud.

“It’s getting worse,” Portantino said. “People tinker with their cars, and street racing continues to be a problem.”

The state is smart to target the loudest noises initially, the cars and motorcycles that bother people the most, Blomberg said.

“You can make every car coming off the line half as loud as it is right now and it would have very little impact if you don’t deal with all the people taking their mufflers off,” he said. “That outweighs everything.”

Traffic noise doesn’t affect everyone equally. In a 2017 paper, James and colleagues found that nighttime noise levels were higher in low-income communities and those with a large proportion of nonwhite residents.

“We’ve made these conscious or subconscious decisions as a society to put minority-race communities and lower-income communities who have the least amount of political power in areas near highways and airports,” James said.

Elaine Jackson, 62, feels that disparity acutely in her neighborhood, a low-income community in northern Sacramento sandwiched between freeways.

On weekends, sideshows and traffic noise keep her awake. Her nerves are jangled, she loses sleep, her dogs panic, and she generally feels unsafe and forgotten, worried that new development in her neighborhood would just bring more traffic, noise, and air pollution.

Police and lawmakers don’t seem to care, she said, even though she and her neighbors constantly raise their concerns with local officials.

“It’s hard for people to get to sleep at night,” Jackson said. “And that’s a quality-of-life issue.”


This story was produced by KHN, which publishes California Healthline, an editorially independent service of the California Health Care Foundation.

KHN (Kaiser Health News) is a national newsroom that produces in-depth journalism about health issues. Together with Policy Analysis and Polling, KHN is one of the three major operating programs at KFF (Kaiser Family Foundation). KFF is an endowed nonprofit organization providing information on health issues to the nation.

Subscribe to KHN’s free Morning Briefing.

Two years after January 6, the House Speaker fight may be encouraging more domestic terrorism

Throughout the battle between House GOP leader Rep. Kevin McCarthy of California and a small group of congressional Republicans blocking his election as Speaker, most media coverage of negotiations has focused on arcane procedural disputes. The anti-McCarthy faction calls for more control over House committees and more power to oust a Speaker, and promises to hold votes on certain controversial issues. The press excitement stems from the suspicion that the demands are arbitrary and capricious, believed to be little more than a way to justify what is primarily an effort to oust McCarthy as a raw show of power. 

But while some of these demands are alarming because they invite legislative chaos for the next two years, there’s one aspect of this very public fight that may be even more dangerous: The way that both the demands of the anti-McCarthy group and his concessions to them could signal to would-be domestic terrorists that they have the support of the Republican party. While the conflict between McCarthy and his Republican opponents seems at a stalemate as of Friday morning, both sides do agree on these security-related issues. Two years after Donald Trump incited an insurrection at the Capitol in a desperate bid to remain in power, the Republican-controlled House is making moves that read strongly as winking encouragement not just to the people who rioted that day, but to anyone who would follow in their footsteps. 

“At this point, the Republican party’s entire strategy is incitement,” Melissa Ryan, an expert in right wing extremism who writes the “Ctrl Alt-Right Delete” newsletter, told Salon. “They’re keeping the MAGA base constantly worked up with increasingly violent rhetoric.”


Want more Amanda Marcotte on politics? Subscribe to her newsletter Standing Room Only.


Even before the drama of seeing McCarthy repeatedly lose the vote to become Speaker began, the first, dramatic gesture was made by House Republicans: The metal detectors in the halls of Congress were taken down, even though it’s not at all clear that, without an elected Speaker, Republicans have the authority to do this. The detectors were installed after January 6, as then-Speaker Nancy Pelosi worried about more attacks on Congress, or even that some of the more insurrection-sympathetic members may pose a danger to their colleagues. Since then, her worries have only been substantiated, as more radical Republicans in Congress complain about the detectors, implying their presence is an assault on their Second Amendment rights to carry weapons on the House floor. 

David Neiwert, a journalist who covers domestic terrorism, told Salon the gesture echoes of how Trump wanted no “metal detectors at his speech” on January 6, “because he didn’t believe anyone would be bringing a gun to attack him.” The people who were in danger were primarily congressional Democrats. Taking down the metal detectors, Neiwert argues, “sends the same message” to Democrats in Congress. 

Some other items McCarthy agreed to in negotiations are just as concerning, if not more so. He offered to reinstate the Holman rule, which would allow the House to vote to terminate the salaries of any federal employee. The goal of this, Greg Sargent of the Washington Post notes, is to threaten the salaries of any federal law enforcement officials who are investigating Trump or anyone else connected to the January 6 insurrection or other domestic terrorism plots.

McCarthy also agreed to create a subcommittee of the Justice committee titled Weaponization of the Federal Government, claiming it’s necessary to investigate FBI and other federal law enforcement overreach. Detractors, however, argue that this is meant to elevate Donald Trump’s conspiracy theories about the “deep state” and to delegitimize efforts by the FBI to investigate and prosecute domestic terrorists.


Want more Amanda Marcotte on politics? Subscribe to her newsletter Standing Room Only.


“This new committee sounds like it was ripped from a Tucker Carlson monologue,” Matt Gertz, a senior fellow at Media Matters, told Salon. “The Fox star and his ilk have spent the last two years concocting an alternate reality for their viewers in which the people who stormed the U.S. Capitol on Jan. 6 and assaulted scores of law enforcement officers are actually the real victims of a purported war President Biden’s administration is conducting against his political opponents. You can bet that they will amplify and cheer on whatever that body ends up doing.”

Many of the Republicans pushing for this committee have gone on the record claiming that January 6 insurrectionists who have been arrested and charged are “political prisoners.” There have also been efforts to frame the way that President Joe Biden’s Justice Department has looked into right wing threats against election workers and local school boards as scandals. Republican politicians and pundits have been falsely claiming that the Biden administration is criminalizing peaceful protest when, as the Associated Press found, the investigations have been targeted toward legitimate threats. 

“For McCarthy to take these steps, especially after the recent attack on Paul Pelosi, is an open invitation to reenter the Capitol and commit more violence,” Ryan pointed out, referring to a violent attack on the outgoing Speaker’s husband, after an alleged would-be kidnapper broke into the Pelosi home. She noted that McCarthy isn’t just endangering “his colleagues and everyone else who works in the building,” but “also putting himself and his staff in danger,” especially now that he’s become such a hate object for the MAGA right. 

Domestic terrorists are emboldened when they feel supported by their political leaders. This was amply demonstrated by the January 6 committee, who repeatedly showed in their hearings and final report that the people who stormed the Capitol on January 6 did so because they felt like Trump was telling them to do so. “We basically were just following what he said,” Stephen Ayers, a rioter who testified before the committee, explained. (Trump has denied that was his intent, but the committee has strenuously disagreed, pointing both to reports that he wished to join the rioters and the hours he spent resisting those who urged him to call the whole thing off.) 

It’s not just political point-scoring and posturing to shame politicians who make jokes about or minimize political violence. There’s legions of people out there who are ready to take violent action, and are often just waiting for a cue that such actions would be welcomed by the people they view as leaders. There’s all manner of speculation — from political expedience to true belief — about the intentions of Republicans behind gestures like taking down the metal detectors or framing insurrectionists as the real victims. But whatever their reasons, there should be no doubt about the risks. These moves are easy to read as endorsements of political violence. Unfortunately, the country is rife with people who are eagerly awaiting such signals as their cue to act. 

New research shows that Donald Trump’s fascist attacks on democracy may have backfired

The internet and social media are a type of experience machine.

At their worst, the internet and social media function as a self-reinforcing echo chamber and closed episteme in which many people confuse huge amounts of free and otherwise readily available “information” and “content” with true knowledge and hard-earned expertise.

The Algorithm is designed to keep “users” “engaged” by amplifying negative emotions and feelings of conflict where individuals who are experiencing emotional and spiritual emptiness, loneliness and other unmet human needs are stimulated into an endless if not compulsive cycle of clicks, scrolling, posts, comments, “likes”, “shares” and other reactions. To that point, people who engage in “compulsive” internet use are more likely to exhibit the “Dark Triad” traits of Machiavellianism, narcissism, and psychopathy.

In many ways, rage, anger and other negative emotions and behavior are the currency (and business model) of social media and the internet.

A 2021 Pew Research survey showed that 31 percent of American adults report being “constantly” online.

In a new essay at TomDispatch (republished at Salon) investigative journalist Andy Kroll reflects on what he learned researching conspiracy theories online and the toxic seductive power and allure of such spaces:

A confession: on a few of those late nights spent in the online ruins, I caught myself starting to nod along with some of the wild-eyed nonsense I was reading. Maybe I found a particular Reddit thread surprisingly convincing. Maybe the post in question had sprinkled a few verifiable facts amid the nonsense to make me think, Huh? Maybe my sixth cup of coffee and lack of sleep had so weakened my mental safeguards that madness itself began to seem at least faintly reasonable. When I felt such heretical thoughts seep into my stream of consciousness, I took it as a sure sign that I should log off and go to bed.

Thinking back on those moments, I admit that the first feeling I have is pure and utter embarrassment. I’m an investigative reporter. I make a living dealing in facts, data and vetted information. Heck, my first job in journalism was as a full-time, trained fact-checker. I should be impervious to the demented siren song of conspiracy theories, right?

The correct answer is indeed: Right. And yet……

That frictionless glide from one post to the next, video after video, tweet upon tweet, plays tricks on the mind. Spend enough time in that realm and even the most absurd theories and narratives start to acquire the patina of logic, the ring of reason. How else to explain the sheer number of QAnon adherents — one in five Americans, according to an analysis by the Public Religion Research Institute — who believe that a secret cabal of pedophile elites, including Tom Hanks and Oprah, run the world, or that the Earth is indeed flat, or that the moon landing more than half a century ago was faked, no matter what news broadcaster Walter Cronkite might have said at the time?

Kroll continues:

Put simply, we don’t stand a chance against the social media companies. Fueled by highly sophisticated algorithms that maximize “engagement” at all costs by feeding users ever more inflammatory content, Facebook, Twitter, YouTube and the rest of them don’t simply entertain, inform, or “connect” us. As New York Times reporter Max Fisher writes in his book “The Chaos Machine,” “This technology exerts such a powerful pull on our psychology and our identity, and is so pervasive in our lives, that it changes how we think, behave, and relate to one another. The effect, multiplied across billions of users, has been to change society itself.”

Spending so much time burrowing into such websites, I came away with a deep sense of just how addictive they are. More than that, they rewire your mind in real-time. I felt it myself. I fear that there’s no path out of our strange, increasingly conspiratorial moment, filled with viral lies and rampant disinformation, without rewriting the algorithms that increasingly govern our lives.

As seen on Jan. 6 and throughout the Age of Trump and the global democracy crisis, the internet and social media are a playground and a type of force multiplier for right-wing extremists including fascists, conspiracists, terrorists, religious fundamentalists, white supremacists and other malign actors to organize and plan, as well as to radicalize and recruit new members.

Donald Trump embodies the worst of human behavior. As the leader of a political cult movement, he has given his followers permission to be their true horrible selves. Fascism and other types of illiberal politics are those antisocial and antihuman emotions and impulses harnessed in the form of a reactionary revolutionary destructive political project.

To that end, Trump, the Republican fascists, and the larger white right were able to use the internet and social media to grow their base of support into a movement comprised of many tens of millions of (white) Americans. As many democracy experts and other observers have concluded, Trump’s rise to power was empowered by the internet, social media, and how the American right wing has spent several decades creating a parallel media machine and other institutions that together function as a type of alternate universe for its followers.

Democrats, liberals, progressives and other pro-democracy Americans have no such equivalent countervailing force.


Want a daily wrap-up of all the news and commentary Salon has to offer? Subscribe to our morning newsletter, Crash Course.


Writing at the Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, journalist Alan Miller offers this context:

The 2016 presidential election was a watershed in the evolution of misinformation and disinformation. It was also a breakthrough in public awareness of the scope and impact of harmful misinformation online and of the kaleidoscope of bad actors who produce it.

The public learned how much the companies running the platforms knew (especially Facebook), and how little they had been willing to do to curb it. The public also found out about the Russians’ aggressive disinformation campaign to influence the election’s outcome, pit Americans against each other, and undermine faith in democracy.

All these forces were at play before Donald Trump became president, but he relentlessly exploited and exacerbated them with constant prevarications and attacks on the news media. When journalists sought to hold him accountable, he dismissed their reporting as “fake news.” He systematically eroded political norms and the rule of law. He spread harmful falsehoods about COVID-19 that cost an untold number of lives. And he undermined his supporters’ faith in the election process.

Having gone from “alternative facts” (a phrase that entered the lexicon just two days after Trump’s inauguration) to alternative realities upon his contentious departure from office, Americans now not only cannot agree on what the facts are; they cannot even agree on what a fact is.

This poses one of the great challenges of our time, because facts are the central nervous system of public life. They are the basis for what is taught in schools. For scientific inquiry and findings. For the legal system and jurisprudence. For societal debates and decisions about what constitutes effective public policy.

And facts most certainly are not partisan. If they are in trouble, we are on the path not only to an information dystopia, but very possibly to autocracy.

Trump, the Republican fascists and their allies were able to use the internet and social media to take control of the White House and other governing institutions as part of a much larger and ongoing assault on American democracy and freedom.

During the midterms, enough Americans voted to slow down the Republican fascists’ assault on democracy and freedom. The Democrats would maintain control of the Senate. Instead of a clear majority in the House, the much-discussed “red tide” largely dissipated, leaving the Republican Party with a tenuous majority.

Recent research by Shaun Bowler, Miguel Carreras and Jennifer L. Merolla, which is featured in the journal Political Research Quarterly, suggests that the results of the midterm elections are a sign that Trump’s power to use social media and the internet as part of his war on American democracy has been diminishing over time. Moreover, Trump’s attempts to mobilize Republican voters and his cultists online may have actually helped the Democrats in the midterms.

Writing at PsyPost, Eric Dolan summarizes these findings:

Carreras and his colleagues found limited evidence that exposure to some of Trump’s rhetoric moved people in a more anti-democratic direction. Independent participants who read Trump’s attack on Congress tended to be more supportive of the idea of the president disregarding Congress and the courts. Trump’s attack the media also lead to a greater endorsement of the president disregarding Congress among Republicans. These effects were mostly reversed among Democrats.

But the researchers found no evidence that exposure to Trump’s tweets attacking the media, Congress, or the courts influenced attitudes regarding support for democracy. Those exposed to the control tweet were just as likely as those exposed to Trump’s attacks to agree with the statement “Democracy may have problems, but it is better than any other form of government.”

Trump’s tweets attacking the media, Congress, or the courts also appeared to have no impact on support for strong leaders among Republican participants but decreased support for strong leaders among Democratic participants. In addition, those exposed to Trump’s attack on the media were more likely to disagree with the statement “When the press publishes inaccurate information about the government, the president should be able to remove their license,” an effect that was largely driven by Democrats.

“The key finding is that Trump’s undemocratic messages in 2019 (a series of Tweets attacking other liberal institutions) did not lead to an erosion of democratic attitudes. On the contrary, the results suggest there is significant pushback against anti-democratic messages, especially among Democrats,” Carreras told PsyPost.

Carreras concludes: “Our results add an important caveat to the literature on polarization and democratic erosion in the United States. Previous studies have emphasized the risk posed by partisan polarization for citizens’ attachment to democratic norms. One possible silver lining of partisan polarization is that it can lead supporters of a pro-democracy outparty (i.e., the Democratic party during the Trump administration) to coalesce around democratic norms to fight against authoritarian excesses by the incumbent party.”

This research complements the findings by Jon Green, William Hobbs, Stefan McCabe, and David Lazer as recently published in the prestigious journal Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (PNAS) that right-wing conspiracy theories about the Big Lie and “stolen elections” are correlated with lower turnout for Republican candidates in the 2021 Georgia Senate runoff election and increased voting for Democratic candidates.

The abstract of “Online engagement with 2020 election misinformation and turnout in the 2021 Georgia runoff election” summarizes these findings as: “Liking or sharing messages opposed to conspiracy theories was associated with higher turnout than expected in the runoff election, and those who liked or shared tweets promoting fraud-related conspiracy theories were slightly less likely to vote.”

At their best, the internet, social media and other digital technologies can be used to improve the human condition by providing information and facilitating communication and coordination in ways, that until very recently, were viewed as almost impossible. Unfortunately, those same traits have empowered malign actors and other anti-social and anti-human forces to attack and subvert democracy and the good society.

As many democracy experts and other watchdogs have repeatedly warned, the ability of the internet and social media and other technologies to exercise an outsized and often profoundly negative impact on society – and to do so under the near exclusive and accountability-free control of corporations and other private actors – highlights the need for more transparency, public accountability and regulation of such technology.

The future of global democracy (and society) may literally depend on how we collectively decide how much and in what ways the internet and social media, and these new technologies more broadly, should influence our lives, futures, and relationships to one another — and the powerful.

Missing link? A newly-discovered fossil looks like the halfway point between birds and dinosaurs

A recently discovered bird with a T. rex-like skull was unearthed in China — epitomizing, in one bizarre fossil, a visual representation of the long, strange evolution from dinosaurs to birds.

Called Cratonavis zhui, the strange hybrid died some 150 million years ago and was uncovered by paleontologists from the Chinese Academy of Sciences in Beijing. Cratonavis most likely behaved like a raptor, flitting from tree to tree and pouncing on prey with its sharp claws. It’s a remarkable find that illustrates mosaic evolution, or the slow transition of some traits while others remain the same.

The evolutionary history of birds is nothing short of spectacular. The diversity of feathers, beaks, claws, diet and preferred geography is broad, not to mention the ability to majestically fly better than any other animal. But the differences between birds and dinosaurs are substantial, and experts still aren’t entirely sure how this transition happened.

There are other features of the Cratonavis skeleton that are a bit strange. It has an atypically long shoulder blade, a bone called the scapula, as well as longer bones in the feet.

Evolution is a dynamic, not a logical process, and the transition from dinosaurs to birds involved dramatic changes in morphology — it didn’t happen all in one single jump. For example, dinosaurs evolved feathers, which became a defining trait of birds, but feathers appeared millions of years before the necessary bone structures for flight. That marks another example of mosaic evolution.

The Cratonavis fossil contains just one adult individual, but this feathered specimen has a lot to tell us about one of the most fascinating aspects of evolutionary history. It was discovered in Xiaotaizi Village in the northeastern Liaoning Province, in a region known as the Jiufotang Formation, which has yielded many fossils from the Early Cretaceous about 100 to 145 million years ago.

The first part of the bird’s name comes from the North China Craton, a giant chunk of continental rock that stretches through China into Mongolia and North Korea. The “avis” part simply means “bird” in Latin and the final aspect, “zhui,” is a tribute to Dr. Rixiang Zhu, who did much pioneering work in the North China Craton.

The skull, including the sharp, pointy teeth, is also oddly similar to the Jurassic Park logo.

Using an industrial computed tomography scanner, which is sort of like an MRI machine but with a rotating X-ray tube, the researchers blasted the Cratonavis skull with 150 kilovolts of beam energy. This bounced back a 3D image at a resolution just shy of 17 nanometers. A nanometer is one-billionth of a meter. That’s pretty high definition for a dead bird (or pseudo-bird).

This allowed the researchers to digitally excavate the skull and reconstruct it, predicting its original shape and function. Then, they compared these features using a data matrix of 280 morphological characters and 82 groups of organisms, including Tyrannosaurus rex and Archaeopteryx sp., one of the earliest known birds.

The scientists discovered that the skull most closely resembled dromaeosaurid Balaur bondoc, an unusual feathered theropod dinosaur that lived on islands about 70 million years ago. The skull, including the sharp, pointy teeth, is also oddly similar to the Jurassic Park logo. However, the rest of its features were far more bird-like. So basically a bird with a dinosaur skull. The findings were published in the peer-reviewed journal Nature Ecology & Evolution on January 2nd.


Want more health and science stories in your inbox? Subscribe to Salon’s weekly newsletter The Vulgar Scientist.


There are other features of the Cratonavis skeleton that are a bit strange. It has an atypically long shoulder blade, a bone called the scapula, as well as longer bones in the feet, “which are rarely seen in non-avialan paravians,” the authors wrote.

To date, this elongated scapula has only been discovered in two other ancient bird fossils, Apsaravis ukhaana and Yixianornis grabaui. “Their evolutionary changes across the dinosaur–bird transition demonstrate how deeply conserved skeletal elements re-acquired evolutionary versatility,” the authors wrote.

In other words, this weird bird with the dinosaur head show the unique plasticity of bird evolution. The researchers also hypothesize these strange bone features may represent “experimentation in volant [ability to fly or glide] behavior early in bird diversification,” as Dr. Wang Min, a lead author of the study, said in a statement. Ultimately, Cratonavis sheds a lot more light on where birds came from.

Oklahoma Republicans seek to criminalize gender-affirming care for people under 26

Republicans in the Oklahoma State Senate have proposed legislation that would criminalize doctors for providing gender-affirming care to transgender individuals under the age of twenty-six.

Senate Bill 129 not only contains prohibitions on procedures such as hormone treatments, transition, and reassignment surgery – but it also establishes that male and female are the only two sexes “in the context of reproductive potential or capacity.”

The introduction states:

An Act relating to health care; creating the Millstone Act of 2023; defining terms; prohibiting provision of or referral for gender transition procedures; providing exceptions; prohibiting certain uses of public funds, public facilities, public employees, and state Medicaid program; providing for criminal, administrative, and civil enforcement; authorizing certain civil actions and relief; providing certain construction; providing for codification; and declaring an emergency.

SB 129, as it is written, further declares that medical practitioners who perform said operations or have in the past are presumed to have committed a felony.

If SB 129 is signed into law by right-wing Republican Governor Kevin Stitt, its draconian statutes would apply retroactively:

A physician or other healthcare professional found to have knowingly referred for or provided gender transition procedures to an individual under twenty-six (26) years of age shall, upon conviction, be guilty of a felony.

Prosecution for a criminal violation of this subsection must be commenced within forty (40) years after the commission of such offense.

Any referral for or provision of gender transition procedures to an individual under twenty-six (26) years of age is unprofessional conduct and shall, upon an adverse ruling by the appropriate licensing board, result in immediate revocation of the license or certificate of the physician or other healthcare professional.

On Wednesday, Harvard Law School Cyberlaw Clinic instructor Alejandra Caraballo – who is transgender – explained in a Twitter thread why SB 129 and its extreme language are so uniquely dangerous.

Notably, Caraballo pointed out that SB 129 completely negates the conservative argument that their goal is to protect kids:

WE TOLD YOU SO. It won’t stop until they ban transition entirely. They’ll just keep increasing the age. It was never about children.

We have been warning everyone that the inevitable goal of the anti trans movement was to ban all gender affirming care and effectively criminalize trans people from existing. Groups like Genspect have been laying the groundwork for this.

I transitioned at 25. That would have been illegal under the gender affirming felony ban. They are going to effectively criminalize the existence of trans people in Oklahoma by making access to gender affirming care a felony.

This is not the only bill that raises the age. Other proposed bills in Oklahoma and South Carolina would ban gender affirming care for anyone under 21. It’s only the first week of the year, there will likely be several more bills increasing the age of bans.

This raises all kinds of absolutely horrifying prospects. For instance, if a 24 year old trans person is driving through Oklahoma and gets into a car accident and needs to be hospitalized for weeks, they will be forcefully detransitioned and taken off HRT by their doctors.

It will create a terrifying chilling effect on all trans people’s healthcare. Doctors will be afraid to work with trans patients for fear of losing their medical license and or getting criminally investigated. Cis and intersex people will have their prescriptions scrutinized.

Have PCOS and need Spiro? The pharmacist might think you’re secretly trans and refuse to fill it. Intersex and need HRT? Same thing. Exceptions don’t matter. We saw this with abortion where women were literally being tortured and left to approach near death before doctors helped.

‘Stop the Steal’ organizer claims to have dirt on Marjorie Taylor Greene

“Stop the Steal” organizer Ali Alexander threatened to expose some unspecified crime that he claims Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene (R-GA) committed.

The right-wing agitator stepped up his attacks on the Georgia Republican, whose support for Kevin McCarthy (R-CA) as House speaker opened a rift with Rep. Lauren Boebert (R-CO), with an apparent blackmail threat and a string of misogynist slurs, reported Right Wing Watch.

“I will not suffer this harlot,” Alexander said on his Telegram page. “I will not be taught vows and loyalty, commitment from a whore! You have got me mistaken for some damn fool, and a fool, Ali Alexander has never been called.”

Alexander, who faces his own legal troubles over his role in planning the rally that preceded the Jan. 6 insurrection, did not provide any details about the crime Greene allegedly committed, but he said it occurred in Georgia and could result in her expulsion from Congress.

“In the coming days I’m going to reveal that Marjorie Taylor Greene, in my summation and the summation of lawyers, committed a crime,” Alexander said. “That crime is going to be handed to the state of Georgia, and the state of Georgia will decide whether they adjudicate that crime or not. The House Ethics Committee and House Rules [Committee] must expel Marjorie Taylor Greene when this evidence comes to light.”

“Ho, go home! I am done with you,” he added. “You are lukewarm, I am spitting you out of my mouth. You played me, and no more. Everyone will know about your drunken night, because the consultants who have drunk with you will have to choose whether they fear me or whether they fear you, and they fear me, Marge. They fear me a lot more than they fear you.”

“No good cause”: Election-denier Kari Lake fails attempted end-run around AZ judge

On Thursday, the Arizona Supreme Court shut down Republican Kari Lake‘s attempted end-run around the state’s lower court – denying her petition for an immediate hearing, and sending her back to the Arizona Court of Appeals where she’s currently awaiting a previously scheduled hearing. 

The ruling comes a day after Lake imagined herself Arizona’s “duly elected governor” during an appearance with far-right content streamers. Video clips of her remarks circulated in tweets on Wednesday. 

“The way we get it changed is we get a — the real governor, the duly elected governor, myself, in there to work with lawmakers to change our laws, put some teeth into the laws, and frankly, we need to recall every one of the Maricopa County Board of Supervisors,” she told the program’s host. 

The high court is just the latest of the state’s institutions to deliver a reality check to Lake. After Arizona Democratic Gov. Katie Hobbs beat Lake by more than 17,000 votes in the state’s 2022 gubernatorial race, Lake entered a state of election denial, suing for a do-over on baseless claims of a rigged race. When Lake failed to provide evidence, a Maricopa County judge tossed out the suit in December. Lake is now appealing. In a separate case the same month, a judge ordered Lake to pay Hobbs $33,000 – plus 7.5% annual interest – to cover Hobbs’ court costs. 

Within hours of the high court’s Thursday ruling, Lake turned to convicted subpoena-dodger and right-wing media figure Steve Bannon. Bannon, described by a US federal judge as a “bad faith” actor, gave Lake air time on his streaming show to repeat her claims. 

“Katie Hobbs was not duly elected,” Lake told Bannon. “Everybody in the state knows that. And she can play house and play governor for a while. But eventually, the truth is going to catch up and we will win.”


Want a daily wrap-up of all the news and commentary Salon has to offer? Subscribe to our morning newsletter, Crash Course.


“She knows when she took that oath that she stole this election,” Lake continued, in further unfounded statements. “The good thing about this being dragged out a little bit is that more and more information is coming our way … We’re going to expose each and every one of them. And the walls are going to start to close in on them.”

Critics have been swift to denounce Lake’s fabrications. 

“With the swearing in of Katie Hobbs, Kari Lake’s baseless effort to overturn the will of the voters is dead,” attorney and former U.S. Ambassador Norm Eisen recently told Newsweek. “She may appeal, but she will lose.”

In the same article, former federal prosecutor Neama Rahmani noted that Lake’s appeal would take at least several weeks to resolve, and called the match: “It’s over for Lake.”

“Even if she wins her appeal because the trial judge applied the wrong legal standard by requiring proof of intentional misconduct or clear and convincing evidence, at best Lake gets a new trial,” Rahmani said. 

Distaste for Lake may likewise be growing among Arizona’s Republicans. In a recent interview with The Hill, one GOP consultant doubted whether Lake had any future in Arizona politics. He cautioned that Lake was hurting her own chances with the appeal. 

“I think the enormous amount of ill will that she’s going to create as a result of the appeal — I mean, it’s OK to file a case, but then some of the stuff she’s been saying on media and posts and just the degradation of the Arizona institutions — I think is really going to hurt her out here,” said Arizona Republican consultant Chuck Coughlin. 

“And I don’t really think she’s got a future in terms of her own electoral space here in Arizona.”

The strange case of the undead writer

On Tuesday, a user with the name of Susan Meachen posted on her own Facebook fan page. That wouldn’t seem that unusual except if you consider that she was supposed to be dead.

The post (now deleted) begins, “I debated on how to do this a million times and am still not sure if it’s right or not.” The post went onto say that the user expected questions “and a lot of people leaving the group I’d guess.” The group is called The Ward, the online meeting place for readers of self-published romance writer Meachen, whose 10 books include titles like “Losing Him, Finding You,” “My Crush” and “Smokey Mtn. Love.” Meachen wrote that her “family did what they thought was best for me and I can’t fault them for it.”

What the post did not come out and directly say is that more than two years ago, Meachen died due to suicide. At least, her fans and the larger world were led to believe that she did. What the writer’s family thought was “best,” according to Meachen? Faking her death. Her readers? Not so much fans of the idea.

Salon digs into the mystery of the genre writer who was’t dead.

“Love to Last a Lifetime”

In September 2020, a person claiming to be Meachen’s daughter posted on the fan Facebook page saying Meachen had died. The person had logged into Meachen’s account and posted under her username. The self-described daughter went onto to post, under Meachen’s username, multiple times in the subsequent weeks and months.

Writer Samantha A. Cole described many of the posts as “rants” about the book world’s treatment of Meachen, who published all her own books such as “Stolen Moments” and “Special Delivery,” romances and erotic novels with stock photos of bearded, muscled men on the covers embracing long-haired women. The men wear flannel, denim work suits or tuxes. The women look away seductively, clutching roses.

The daughter alleged that Meachen had been bullied into suicide by her harassers. Posts by the person calling themself Meachen’s daughter said that Meachen’s grieving family wanted no part of the book world that had tormented Meachen. However, Meachen had been working on a new book, intended as a gift to her daughter for her daughter’s wedding. She was not able to complete it before her alleged death, but her daughter finished the book. And fans were urged to pre-order it, as moderator Connie Ortiz, Meachen’s former personal assistant, wrote on The Ward. Others took up the rallying cry.

Fans did pre-order it. That book “Love to Last a Lifetime” is about a 25-year-old man who falls for his best friend’s teen girlfriend. “From that moment on my whole purpose in life was to get her to go out with me,” the synopsis reads. The book is currently ranked #144,956 on Amazon’s Kindle Store, not bad for a 50-page self-published romance.  

But it was not, apparently, Meachen’s last book.

“How far would Satan go for love?”

According to Cole, Meachen assumed a fake name, TN Steele, and started to post on The Ward under that pseudonym, eventually becoming moderator of the page. After Ortiz posted a call for new moderators, due to her family’s health issues, Steele wrote, as reported by Jezebel, “I’ll take it Connie Ortiz. I will overhaul it and hope that it pleases you and Susan.”

Indeed. 

Steele is also an indie romance novelist. Both Steele and Meachen write they are from the South, though living in different states. Steele’s Facebook page (describing herself as a “Want to be Author. Wife, office manager, and all-around goofier. Love to interact with others,”) highlights a book coming in spring 2021, a few months after Meachen’s reported death. Titled “Dance with the Devil,” the book’s tagline is “How far would Satan go for love?” 

Mental health

In Meachen’s “Surprise, I’m alive!” post, the author acknowledges past self-harm. Previous posts on The Ward discussed her mental health. While she does not offer an explanation or even an apology for allegedly faking her own death, she writes in her return post, “I almost died again at my own hand.” Meachen shifts the blame for the deception onto her family, writing “They had to go through that hell again,” and, while never naming the fake death idea, swears her “family did” it.

Meachen, who, despite being “dead” on Facebook apparently never left TikTok, writes, “I am in a good place now, and I am hoping to write again. Let the fun begin.”

It is not clear whether Meachen actually has a daughter. Meachen describes herself as a mom in her Amazon bio. But then, she also describes herself as a “meme.” 

Bullying and the book community 

It is also not clear what specific bullying Meachen may or may not have received. Reviews for her books on Goodreads are mostly positive. But the book world is full of examples of harassment, perhaps particularly in the area of genre fiction, the devotees (or critics) of which can be especially passionate, opinionated — and cross some lines. Writers have been pressured into publicly declaring their sexuality or explaining their disability. Women writers, writers of color, queer writers and disabled writers are particular targets of vehemence and intrusion. 

The call to action for fans to purchase Meachen’s books, especially her “last” one, wasn’t the end of the deception.

Julia Carpenter wrote in Glamour, “Women who write romance are particularly vulnerable to abuse. These are people who create narratives around sex, pleasure, and female happiness — in other words, women who are magnets for targeted sexist harassment.” 

The internet has only accelerated unfettered access to public figures like writers. Whereas before one might receive a creepy note in a P.O. Box, now writers, especially women, receive unsolicited missives daily from strangers across multiple channels: email, DMs, comments on unrelated social media posts. With increased access comes increased attention — and opportunities for harassment. 

Writer Violet Catte wrote on Twitter,If you are in a bad place, mentally, as an author, stepping away is completely acceptable. Faking your death and accepting donations to your nonexistent funeral, however, is not acceptable. It’s fraud and emotional abuse. No one should buy Susan Meachen’s books.”   

Consequences of faking your death

Could the real Meachen be in trouble? Faking your own death, also known as a staged death or pseudocide, “isn’t inherently a crime,” James Quiggle of the Coalition Against Insurance Fraud said to Live Science in 2012, “but it involves so many built-in frauds that it’s virtually impossible to legally fake.” Mental Floss reported, “Someone who fakes his or her death may commit crimes such as conspiracy, fraudulently collecting life insurance money, evading taxes, having a spouse file a false police report, forging a death certificate, or delinquency on loan payments.”

Agatha Christie did not post that she was dead, nor ask fans to pre-order her book. 

The call to action for fans to purchase Meachen’s books, especially her “last” one, wasn’t the end of the deception. Fans and fellow writers contributed to crowdfunding for funeral expenses, raising over a thousand dollars for Meachen’s family. An anthology was dedicated to her, whose proceeds may have also gone to the family. A lot of fans want their money back.  


Want a daily wrap-up of all the news and commentary Salon has to offer? Subscribe to our morning newsletter, Crash Course.


In 1926, beloved and very famous mystery writer Agatha Christie disappeared for 11 days. Her car was found abandoned, her fur coat still inside despite the cold night, and foul play was suspected. However, Christie did not post that she was dead, nor ask fans to pre-order her book. The writer was found staying at a hotel under a pseudonym. She claimed to have suffered amnesia from a car accident, though several factors, including a fraught relationship with her husband at the time, and the fact that Christie’s hotel pseudonym was his mistress’ name, have led fans to believe — like a good mystery — more may have been at play.

It’s not unheard of for writers to drop out of social media or the literary scene, to want to disappear, to quit or to take a break. Most, however, don’t leave a legacy of harm to survivors of loved ones lost to suicide or people who have struggled with mental health. As the dedication to the anthology for Meachen reads, “Words can hurt but they don’t have to.”

Matt Gaetz suggests a new option for Speaker of the House . . . Trump

During Thursday’s seventh voting session for Speaker of the House, Florida Republican Rep. Matt Gaetz threw a somewhat predictable curveball by casting his vote for Trump.

Having made his distaste towards Republican Rep. Kevin McCarthy known over the duration of the previous voting sessions, in which McCarthy consistently came up short on the amount of votes needed to land in his desired role as speaker, Gaetz went so far as to refer to him as a “squatter” on Tuesday night. That being said, his move to introduce Trump as an option is a clear break from the 19 other representatives leaning away from McCarthy, all of whom cast their vote for Republican Rep. Byron Donalds, as The Hill points out.  

On Thursday afternoon, Gaetz tweeted a photo mockup of Trump wielding the speaker’s gavel, resulting in a storm of reactions.

“Would he take it?” asked commentator Sam Ikin.

“Yes,” one person was quick to reply.


Want a daily wrap-up of all the news and commentary Salon has to offer? Subscribe to our morning newsletter, Crash Course.


In video footage of Gaetz vocalizing his vote for Trump on the House floor on Thursday, Republican Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene is seen sitting next to him, reacting with what looks to be a smile of approval.

“Cool vote, bro,” quipped writer Jarrett Bellini.

“MOCKERY!!!!! This is what you get for voting in Sea Creatures. GOOD!!!!” tweets actor Michael Rapaport.

Regardless of the shake-up in votes, the House is nearing the end of yet another day without a speaker, and Trump himself has yet to weigh in on the vote, at the time of this post.

As The Hill highlights in their coverage of Thursday afternoon’s session, this idea to vote for Trump as speaker did not originate with Gaetz.

On Wednesday, Republican Rep. Lauren Boebert  suggested that she herself might nominate Trump, which brought about a fiery response from Fox News host Sean Hannity who said “Is this a game show? Like we’re gonna pick Jim Jordan one day, Trump the other day?”

 

Damar Hamlin’s dreadful collapse: Just another reason to defund football

The catastrophe of Buffalo Bills player Damar Hamlin on ESPN’s “Monday Night Football,” which caused the unprecedented suspension of an NFL game, brought home for a national TV audience the variegated harms of America’s most popular sport. (At this writing, Hamlin is in critical condition in a Cincinnati hospital. He reportedly had to be resuscitated twice, first on the field and later at the hospital.)

Hamlin suffered cardiac arrest after a blow to the chest while making a fairly routine tackle. It may have been caused by a condition called commotio cordis. Doctors are still assessing whether there were other contributing factors for Hamlin. Similar cardiac events have taken the lives of at least 12 football players at all levels, according to data assembled by Scott Anderson, the retired head athletic trainer of the University of Oklahoma’s football team. The most recent was Michael T. Ellsessar, a 16-year-old high school player in Sutton, Massachusetts, in 2010.

There are multiple observations one could make about the cold-hearted calculus of the NFL and football world. Some of them surround the domino effect on the league’s TV and potential playoff schedules from suspending the game after Hamlin’s Buffalo Bills teammates and the opposing Cincinnati Bengals players were obviously in no state to continue playing.

To these, I add something I saw on my feed of the ESPN broadcast, via a California cable system: As studio commentators were vamping during the long delay while Hamlin was being treated on the field — in what felt like a sports-world variation on TV’s JFK assassination vigil — a pop-up message came on my screen. I don’t know if it was really part of the ESPN production or, perhaps, some kind of creepy techno prank out of “Black Mirror.” The screen overlay informed viewers that all gambling action that night was being waived in the wake of the Hamlin tragedy. The message was fleeting and I didn’t capture the full text or the company purportedly behind it (it was not DraftKings). I assumed this would leave a footprint on social media, but so far I have not located one.


Want a daily wrap-up of all the news and commentary Salon has to offer? Subscribe to our morning newsletter, Crash Course.


Getting back to football and death and near-death … A cynic might say that it would have been the football world’s worst nightmare if Hamlin’s terrible injury had resulted not from a single, discrete hit, but rather from an accumulation of hits, a flashback to an earlier collision or collisions that had caused, for example, a brain bleed.

In all the current fashionable — and, in my opinion, superficial — attention to concussions, the viewing public remains little aware that the phenomenon of chronic traumatic encephalopathy (CTE) does not require a concussion or concussions per se. It can also result from multiple sub-concussive hits.

As terrifying as what happened to Hamlin was, a cardiac event might have seemed extraneous to football. In 1971, Detroit Lions wide receiver Chuck Hughes died of a heart attack during an NFL game. If commotio cordis was the cause of Hamlin’s collapse, though, his cardiac arrest would also be tied to the trauma of violent contact. So Hamlin’s injury could have been something of a “hybrid” bad case.

It remains to be seen what lasting lessons are drawn from this tragedy in terms of the participation levels in football, all the way down to high school, middle school and pee-wee leagues. While the nation’s conversation proceeds over the libertarian limits of ultra-professional gladiators who literally risk their lives to entertain the masses, the use of our public schools, public fields and other subsidies to support this $15 billion-a-year industry requires a different perspective. Football does not need to be banned, and given its gravity-defying popularity, cannot be banned. But, like cigarette smoking or any other socially acceptable activity that damages public health, it ought to be downsized.

Every year in this country, several kids drop dead just from maniacal football coaches’ over-the-top conditioning drills, which are mostly performative exercises in “toughness.” People aren’t just dying from concussions. They are suffering lifelong neurological, orthopedic or internal organ damage of various kinds, at tremendous cost to public health, lost productivity and metrics of substance abuse and domestic violence. Counting on Damar Hamlin’s gruesome and tragic collapse to change these dynamics is probably a bad bet.

For 2023, I’m giving up loneliness

It started as an astrology meme, one of those images some of my friends post on social media, and I scroll past. I don’t believe in astrology, but the image seemed like a specific attack. For 2023, my particular sign needed to be more social. Go where the people are, the Clip Art-adorned image urged. 

I identify most as an ambivert. I’m often introverted, preferring to be alone — I am a writer, after all — but need and appreciate regular social outings like an extrovert. As a mother, of course, it doesn’t matter; I’m rarely without my child. Family is great and all, but I very much miss the rich social life of pre-pandemic friends too.

 It changed what we collectively viewed as healthy, what we thought of as safe. We had to be alone to protect ourselves.

Long before it became a new norm, I did my job remotely, but pre-pandemic, I would work among others in coffeeshops or libraries (on Friday afternoon: at my favorite cidery). I was fortunate to live in a small community with a big heart and tons of creative people. A friend held weekly art nights at his home, where a bunch of us just sat on the floor, sketched and ate homemade scones. In the winter, another friend would host cozy knitting or painting sessions. I couldn’t leave the house without running into someone I knew.  

The pandemic changed so much, big and small, including my living circumstances as my family moved across the country to the biggest city I’ve lived in, in decades. I wasn’t the only one to move, prompted by the dire-feeling conditions of the pandemic. It also changed what we collectively viewed as healthy, what we thought of as safe. No matter where we lived, we had to be alone to protect ourselves. It’s beyond year three of COVID. It’s 2023. Another strain of SARS-CoV-2 is taking over the U.S. — something else, also terrible. Despite very real pandemic fatigue, I won’t disregard the protections I established for my family. But this year? I’m giving up loneliness. 

COVID set off a chain reaction of other ills that became epidemics: a plague of joblessness, evictions, major setbacks for women and mothers along with children. And for many, the isolation of COVID launched a tidal wave of feeling alone, which has real-world consequences. As 2022 research for the American Psychological Association shows, loneliness “could have implications for people’s long-term mental and physical health, longevity and well-being.” Feeling lonely isn’t just unpleasant. It “constitutes a risk for premature mortality and mental and physical health,” according to the American Psychological Association.

Loneliness is also widespread. In 2021, 36% of respondents to a survey said they felt lonely “‘frequently’ or ‘almost all the time or all the time’ in the prior four weeks.” As the Harvard Gazette reported, a surprising finding of the survey was the relatively young age of those affected: “61% of those aged 18 to 25 reported high levels” of loneliness. Isolation has impacted everyone, even those thick in the normally social years of high school, college and early adulthood.   

How do we live in the broken world we have? How do we live in it with others?

It’s harder to make friends as you age and it’s hard to keep them in a world of Zoom, virtual cocktails and plans canceled frequently and abruptly due to increased illness. We’re not back to normal, we can’t be due to rising virus rates (and other severe viruses); there may never be a so-called normal again. So, how do we live in the broken world we have? How do we live in it with others?

I’m used to finding community where I live. The mayor once knocked on my door because he heard me singing and knew I was home; he needed to ask a constituent a question about road paving. Another time a beloved neighbor called through my back screen door, surprising me in the kitchen, but he wanted to know what I was cooking because it smelled good. 

It’s different where I live now — and it’s also a different time. Last summer, my neighborhood held its first block party since the pandemic started. My family and I met a bunch of wonderful people. And never saw them again. People don’t come out onto their porches here. A lot of people don’t have them, no one has backyards, especially not unfenced. People are more guarded, worried, and dealing or not dealing with collective trauma.

Nothing brings people together like complaining about how sore we are. 

If I go where the people are, I have to leave the neighborhood. Maybe the time for coffeeshop working has come again, or parks. A good friend from home told me sometimes the only people she speaks to in a given day are baristas, but that’s better than nothing; that’s enough right now. I’m also going to try to better keep in touch with friends back home, not solely though screens (which can get pretty fatiguing), but old-fashioned letters and care packages — remember those? I hope that the act of reaching out helps, even if it’s still long-distance. 


Want a daily wrap-up of all the news and commentary Salon has to offer? Subscribe to our morning newsletter, Crash Course.


Last year, I tried taking an art class after work. We wore masks, and it was a tiny class, in a building with a garage door frequently opened, good for staying well. But not, as it turned out, great for meeting new people, especially as two out of the four class participants were in a couple. This time, my year of pushing aside loneliness as best I can, I’m going to try a ballet class. Slightly larger, also masked, but nothing brings people together like complaining about how sore we are. 

A big city might mean less community but it does have more opportunities. I’ve been scanning the arts listings for open mics, something I used to do quite a lot. Maybe avoiding loneliness means getting back to ourselves, even in partial ways, remembering who we were and what we loved. Community now might mean compromise, not when it comes to virus protection but when it comes to hearing amateur music. I’ll take it, if it means leaving the house.

William “came at me”: Harry details getting knocked down in violent attack by brother

Prince Harry‘s memoir hasn’t been published yet, but that hasn’t stopped some of the most damning bits from leaking.

In particular, Harry claims he was physically attacked by his brother, William, Prince of Wales, during an argument concerning his marriage to Meghan Markle, Duchess of Sussex, according to The Guardian.

The confrontation is detailed in Harry’s highly anticipated memoir “Spare,” which was obtained by the UK daily newspaper prior to its Jan. 10 release. Harry says the incident took place at his London home — Nottingham Cottage — in 2019, where William confronted him about “the whole rolling catastrophe” of their relationship and rifts with the press. Upon William’s arrival, he was, as Harry describes, already “piping hot.”

Harry then says that his brother complained about Meghan, specifically calling her “difficult,” “rude” and “abrasive,” which Harry writes is a “parrot[ing of] the press narrative” about his wife. The brothers’ squabble soon grew physical when William allegedly attacked Harry after Harry offered him a glass of water to help him calm down. 

“He set down the water, called me another name, then came at me. It all happened so fast. So very fast,” Harry recounted in his memoir, per The Guardian. “He grabbed me by the collar, ripping my necklace, and he knocked me to the floor. I landed on the dog’s bowl, which cracked under my back, the pieces cutting into me. I lay there for a moment, dazed, then got to my feet and told him to get out.”

Harry says that William urged him to hit back but when he refused, William left then returned “looking regretful, and apologized.” William also insisted that Harry not tell Meghan about the attack, which he didn’t immediately. Instead, he called his therapist.

The Guardian report further details Harry’s recollection of the incident, adding specific quotes and Harry’s narration from the memoir. There’s also snippets on Harry recounting a story from his birth, his late mother, Princess Diana, and his late grandmother, Queen Elizabeth II, who died last year.

As explained by The Guardian, the title of Harry’s “Spare” comes from “an old saying in royal and aristocratic circles: that a first son is an heir to titles, power and fortune, and a second is therefore a spare, should anything happen to the first-born.” The memoir comes just a month after the Duke and Duchess of Sussex’s bombshell, six-part Netflix docuseries, “Harry & Meghan,” which caused quite a stir in Buckingham Palace before its release. Several royal insiders reacted to its trailer with “horror and an increasing sense of anger,” while another said, “I don’t see how anyone could view it as anything other than a declaration of war.”


Want a daily wrap-up of all the news and commentary Salon has to offer? Subscribe to our morning newsletter, Crash Course.


Harry returned to the topic of his brother in a sit-down interview with “Good Morning America” host Michael Strahan, which will air in full on Monday morning. In a preview for the interview, Strahan mentions that Harry referred to his brother as both his “beloved brother” and his “archnemesis” in the book.

“Strong words. What did you mean by that?” Strahan asks.

“There has always been this competition between us, weirdly,” Harry explains. “I think it really plays into, or was played by, the ‘heir/spare.'”

House GOP’s top priority if they ever get a speaker? Protect wealthy tax dodgers

Republicans began their control of the 118th Congress Tuesday with a narrow majority that failed six times to elect a speaker but had in hand “hit-the-ground-running” plans to pass legislation that critics say will “protect wealthy and corporate tax cheats” by rescinding tens of billions of dollars in new Internal Revenue Service funding in the Inflation Reduction Act.

On Monday, Steve Scalise, R-La., a party leader, said that the lower chamber’s first order of business after electing a speaker will be taking up the Family and Small Business Taxpayer Protection Act.

“This Republican bill is ill-named because what it actually does is protect tax cheaters by repealing most of the new IRS funding set forth in last year’s Inflation Reduction Act,” Mother Jones senior editor Michael Mechanic wrote.

In a December 30 letter to House Republicans, Scalise said the legislation—along with 10 other bills and resolutions he proposed—would let GOP lawmakers “hit the ground running in our first weeks in the majority.”

Scalise said in the letter that the Family and Small Business Taxpayer Act “rescinds tens of billions of dollars allocated to the IRS for 87,000 new IRS agents in the Inflation Reduction Act.”

Although the “87,000 new IRS agents” claim has been widely debunked, it has nevertheless become a GOP talking point.

Writing for The American Independent, Josh Israel noted: “It has appeared in ads run by the campaigns of Sen. Ron Johnson, R-Wis., and North Carolina Republican Senate nominee Rep. Ted Budd; it has been used in Senate Leadership Fund attack ads in Georgia, Nevada, New Hampshire, North Carolina, and Ohio; and the right-wing Club for Growth Action and Congressional Leadership Fund have run spots lying about the number of new IRS agents. The Senate Republican conference’s official Twitter account and those of dozens of other House and Senate Republicans have also tweeted the bogus 87,000 number.”

As Mechanic pointed out, “From 2010 to 2018, even as the IRS received 9% more tax returns, its annual budget was slashed by $2.9 billion—a 20% reduction that cost the agency more than one-fifth of its workforce.”

“Virtually no partnerships were audited in 2018,” he continued. “By then, with [former President] Donald Trump in the Oval Office, the kneecapped IRS was scrutinizing the individual returns of just 0.03% of those $10 million—plus taxpayers, down from a peak of 23% in 2010. Audits of the $5 million—to—$10 million filers fell from just under 15% to a scant 0.04%.”

Mechanic added:

A fair subset of superwealthy Americans doesn’t even bother filing. The Treasury Department’s Inspector General for Tax Administration reported in 2020 that nearly 880,000 “high income” non-filers from 2014 through 2016 still owed $46 billion, and the IRS was in no condition, resource-wise, to collect. The 300 biggest delinquents owed about $33 million per head, on average. Fifteen percent of their cases had been closed without examination by IRS staffers, and another one-third weren’t even in line to be “worked.”

“The recently enacted IRS funding—$80 billion over 10 years—was meant to remedy this shameful state of affairs,” he wrote.

Despite the disunity evident in the speaker struggle, House Republicans appear united when it comes to slashing Social Securitygutting ethics safeguards, and pursuing policies like the IRS defunding measure that exacerbate inequality in one of the most unequal societies in the developed world.