Spring Sale: Get 1 Year, Save 58%

The salad of peak summer is California Fattoush

Fattoush is one of the bright, simple joys of summer: Tomatoes spill sunshine, pita shards and cucumbers take turns showing off their snap, sumac puckers, and mint and parsley cool, often, in a single bite.

But at her restaurant Reem’s California, chef Reem Assil keeps the peak experience of this staple Arab salad alive year-round. “The medley of vegetables is what makes fattoush so special,” she writes in her debut cookbook “Arabiyya.” “If you’re not a purist, you can make it a medley of anything.”

In winter, when tomatoes go into hibernation in the Northern hemisphere, that can mean swapping in juicy citrus and fried sunchokes to mimic cucumber’s crunch. In spring, it could be a rainbow of heirloom radishes. Even in summer, Reem cycles in grilled or raw corn, pomegranate seeds, pickled cherries, or fresh purslane.

The anchors that define her always-in-season California Fattoush Salad are greens like arugula and Little Gem lettuce, craggy pita chips (homemade from stale pita or even store-bought), and a vinaigrette so simple and powerful, it deserves a role in our dinners forever.

It’s made up of a handful of ingredients that are easy to keep on hand, either buzzed in the blender or whisked in a bowl. The crux is the pomegranate molasses, a powerhouse of sweet-sour brightness made by simmering pomegranate juice down to a sticky syrup. Add lemon juice, crushed garlic, olive oil, salt, pepper. Done.

Reem adds depth but not effort by layering the salad with a chef’s perspective: She tosses the sturdiest ingredients — tomatoes, cucumbers, onions — in the dressing, adding only half the pita to start soaking.

Then she piles the arugula onto a platter naked to keep it from wilting, tops with the dressed salad, then tucks in the remaining pita for maximum crunch. Whole parsley and mint leaves and sumac are the last bright bursts, riding on top.

Reem’s thoughtful construction also means this is an ideal salad to take to a potluck or picnic. Of course the grilled pizza and root beer floats at my husband Mike’s birthday barbecue were popular, but the moment that brought everyone together was when I pulled out all my Tupperwares of radish slivers and cucumber wheels, tossed, and then piled it up layer by layer.

It felt a little like the cover photo of “Arabiyya” — a crowd at a table cheers as the host unmolds a ma’louba. It wasn’t the intended cover, Reem told me as I interviewed her for this week’s episode of The Genius Recipe Tapes, but she knew it was the right one as soon as she saw it.

“Hospitality is for everyone,” she told me. “Everybody is welcome at the Arab table.”

Recipe: Salatet Fattoush (California Fattoush Salad) from Reem Assil

Tired of avocado toast? Here’s your lemony, summer-approved replacement

Before I started writing this column, I reached out to a few of my friends about what kinds of plant-based, weekday-friendly meals they’d like to learn how to make. Most respondents offered their suggestions, but one individual had a request: “Just please no avocado toast.” 

My friend went on to explain that while most things in life are at least a little more delicious when served on a hunk of toasty breadavocado being no exception — as a vegan, she felt like avocado toast was her only option at most breakfast and lunch joints. Fatigue had set in. 

“But,” she texted, “if you have any alternatives . . .”

And now I do. 

Earlier this week, I was on Instagram when I scrolled past a photograph on the Rancho Gordo profile. For the uninitiated, Rancho Gordo is a specialty producer and seller of heirloom beans with a cult-like following. Launched in 2001 by Steve Sando, their annual Bean Club subscription memberships have, at times, had a 35,000-person waitlist

In the below image, Sando holds up a toothpick stacked with large creamy-white beans and thin slivers of anchovy, punctuated with pops of roasted red pepper.

“I think this is going to be the appetizer to beat this summer,” Sando wrote. “Remember, you heard it here first.”

He continued, “I used cooked Royal Coronas but cooked and marinated would obviously be more interesting.”

Gordo is totally right. Marinated beans are obviously more interesting than their undressed counterparts. They also just so happen to be the ideal topping for toast, especially in the summer. 

You can start with either dried or canned beans — both have their benefits. Canned beans shine when it comes to convenience and not having to turn on the oven in the summer. Dried beans are more cost-effective; they often have better texture and flavor; and there are tons of cool varieties to choose from (like these gorgeous vaquero beans, which kind of look like the side of a piebald horse). 

For this recipe, use something with a mild flavor and creamy interior texture, such as cannellini beans, chickpeas, great northern beans or navy beans


Want more great food writing and recipes? Subscribe to “The Bite,” Salon Food’s newsletter.


Regardless, once you have about 3 3/4 cups of tender beans, the fun really begins. Raid your refrigerator and pantry for marinade ingredients. Think about it a little bit like putting together a good salad dressing. You’re going to want some acid, so citrus juice or vinegar. Alliums — like minced onion, shallots and garlic — and herbs belong in the mix. Spices, salt and good olive oil tie it all together. 

Cover the beans in the marinade for at least a few hours, though overnight is preferable. Once you’re ready to serve, drain most of the marinade and lightly mash the beans with a fork or the back of a spoon. You don’t necessarily want to purée them like hummus (you could and it would be delicious), but smashing them just a bit really allows them to cling to the toast. 

Speaking of toast, go for a thick-cut French or country loaf or perhaps some hearty sourdough aka something that won’t fold under the weight of those beautiful beans. I’d recommend griddling it in a skillet with some olive oil and a sprinkle of salt, but the old toaster is a-okay, too. Spoon your lightly mashed beans onto the toast and enjoy. 

Marinated Beans on Toast 
Yields
4 servings
Prep Time
10 minutes, plus marinating time
Cook Time
5 minutes

Ingredients

  • 3 1/4 cups cooked, drained beans 
  • 1/2 cup olive oil
  • 2 to 3 teaspoons dried red pepper flakes 
  • 1 teaspoon coriander
  • 1 teaspoon dried, powdered fennel seed 
  • 1 clove garlic, minced 
  • 1 scallion, finely chopped 
  • 1 lemon, juiced and zested
  • 1 tablespoon finely chopped dill 
  • 1 tablespoon finely chopped parsley 
  • 4 pieces toasted bread 

Directions

  1. In a large bowl, combine the olive oil, red pepper flakes, coriander, fennel seed, garlic, scallion, the juice and zest of one lemon, dill and parsley. Stir to combine, then add the beans. 

  2. Cover the bowl and allow the contents to refrigerate for at least 4 hours. 

  3. Before serving, drain any excess liquid from the beans, then lightly mash them with a fork or the back of a spoon. Serve on toasted bread. 
     

Salon Food writes about stuff we think you’ll like. Salon has affiliate partnerships, so we may get a share of the revenue from your purchase.

Anne Heche’s car crash reveals our conflicting attitudes toward mental health and substance abuse

Anne Heche is sadly in the news again, raising questions about society’s attitudes about mental health.

The 53-year-old actor is in a coma after a car accident on Friday, in which she crashed her vehicle into a residence in Los Angeles. “At this time Anne is in extreme critical condition she has a significant pulmonary injury requiring mechanical ventilation and burns that require surgical intervention. She is in a coma and has not regained consciousness since shortly after the accident,” a representative for the actor said in a statement, reports Variety.

According to reports, the Mini Cooper Heche was driving initially struck the garage of a home, and may have gone further inside the structure. The vehicle became engulfed in flames, as did the home. The Los Angeles Times and others report Heche has been hospitalized with serious burns. Deadline related the account of a veteran reporter who observed the crash via helicopter, and called it a “miracle” anyone escaped the car alive.

It was not the first emergency incident Heche has been involved in, and not her first crash that day. Allegedly, Heche had another minor car accident earlier on Friday, crashing into a wall in an apartment complex, but drove away from that crash. In 2002, Heche was hospitalized after police responded to calls about the actor who had shown up to a stranger’s house, asked to take a shower, began speaking incoherently about spaceships and refused to leave.

As of Monday, Heche is under investigation for a misdemeanor DUI and hit and run, according to CNN. Friends of the woman whose residence was destroyed in the accident, say she barely escaped alive and have started a GoFundMe to help after the loss of her home. In contrast, an outpouring of support for Heche is notably lacking. To have a mental health crisis in America, especially when substance abuse is involved, is not an easy thing.

On Saturday, actor Alec Baldwin posted an Instagram video expressing support for Heche, whom he calls an “old pal,” saying, “There’s not a lot of women I’ve worked with that are brave in the way that Anne is brave.” Many of the more than 800 comments on the video are negative, in disbelief that Baldwin would support Heche, who caused the crash, possibly while under the influence of alcohol. “You’re disgusting . . . Are you proud of her because she almost killed people??????” one comment reads

https://www.instagram.com/p/Cg7wlTjsTAR/

“My heart goes out to you. I’m sorry you had this tragic thing happen to you,” Baldwin says in the video, notably using passive voice to describe the crash, as if it was not the result of Heche’s actions. According to Baldwin, he has been sober since the mid-1980s. The actor has long been public about a past drug overdose and battling alcoholism.

Heche has also been public about turning to drugs and alcohol to escape trauma of the sexual abuse she says she suffered as a young child, abuse perpetuated by her father, who died in 1983. Heche’s family also dealt with homelessness. In 2001, she told ABC News about one of her coping mechanisms: “I had a fantasy world that I escaped to. I called my other personality Celestia. I believed I was from that world. I believed I was from another planet. I think I was insane.”

But Heche’s mental health crisis in 2002 was largely treated as a joke. As the Los Angeles Times wrote in 2004, “Four years ago, you could have called Anne Heche crazy. Why not? That’s what the tabloids took to calling her, and it’s what she called herself.” Heche’s 2001 memoir was titled “Call Me Crazy,” seemingly seeking to reclaim the label ascribed to her by everyone from late night comedians to a play called “Call Us Crazy: The Anne Heche Monologues

Jokes that went unremarked upon in the early 2000s are less likely to be accepted now. But the understanding for struggles with alcohol and drug abuse, and how that often goes hand-in-hand with mental health issues, remains complicated. 

Along with Baldwin, actor Rosanna Arquette also tweeted support for Heche, describing the accident as “really tragic” and writing that people should pray for Heche. After commenters criticized Arquette, bringing up their own experiences with drunk drivers or the fact that Heche could have done even more harm, Arquette tweeted, with an apology, “I will always have compassion for anyone who is suffering a mental health crisis like anne [sic] Heche driving under the influence and clearly not ok by putting others [sic] lives in danger is so tragic.”


Want a daily wrap-up of all the news and commentary Salon has to offer? Subscribe to our morning newsletter, Crash Course.


Investigators of Friday’s crash are awaiting the results of a blood draw they received a warrant to conduct. That morning, hours before the crash, an episode of Heche’s podcast “Better Together” was posted in which Heche said she had been drinking vodka “with wine chasers” before recording. On the podcast, Heche allegedly talked about using alcohol to deal with a “very bad day.” Despite the episode being released the day of the accident, a producer of the podcast says it was recorded earlier

The episode has since been taken down. The accident, meanwhile, is still under investigation.  

We’ve come a long way when it comes to talking about mental health, at least knowing not to make cruel jokes about it. The journey toward considering and having empathy for all victims of substance abuse, however, is one we’re still taking. 

“Chilling”: 4 of the most shocking revelations from a new book about Trump’s war with his generals

A new crop of books about Donald Trump and his final days in office is set to be published in the coming months. One such book, “The Divider: Trump in the White House,” from veteran reporters Peter Baker and Susan Glasser, was excerpted in The New Yorker on Monday morning, complete with a previously unpublished resignation letter from General Mark Milley, Trump’s final chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff.

After mostly refraining from publicly criticizing Trump, top Trump officials are now running to make their disagreements with him clear. In response, Trump now says the men who he once boasted were “my generals” are “very untalented people and once I realized it, I did not rely on them, I relied on the real generals and admirals within the system.”

As the Executive Editor at Texas National Security Review noted, the excerpt paints an image of a Trump White House that is “chilling.”

Here are the 4 most explosive revelations from the excerpt into Trump’s war with his generals. 

01
“Why can’t you be like the German generals?”
As many probably imagined was uttered during his White House tenure, Donald Trump reportedly searched for ways to be more like Adolf Hitler. 
 

“You fucking generals, why can’t you be like the German generals?” a frustrated Trump reportedly asked his chief of staff, John Kelly. 

 

“Which generals?” Kelly asked.

 

“The German generals in World War II,” Trump responded.

 

“You do know that they tried to kill Hitler three times and almost pulled it off?” Kelly reminded the president.

 

“No, no, no, they were totally loyal to him,” Trump insisted.

 

After Trump demanded the military be sent in to clear the Black Lives Matters protesters, Trump’s generals refused.

 
“You are all losers! You are all f***ing losers!” Trump lashed out, according to the book. “Can’t you just shoot them? Just shoot them in the legs or something?”
02
“Look, I don’t want any wounded guys in the parade. This doesn’t look good for me”
After returning from his trip to France in 2017, Trump raved about the Bastille Day parade in Paris and told Kelly, “You are going to be doing this next year.” 
 
As was reported at the time, Trump ordered his people to immediately get to work on planning the “biggest, grandest military parade ever for the Fourth of July.” Trump had a very specific aesthetic in mind for his military parade.
 
“Look, I don’t want any wounded guys in the parade,” Trump made clear to Kelly about the members of the armed services selected to participate. “This doesn’t look good for me.”
 

“Those are the heroes,’ Kelly told Trump. “In our society, there’s only one group of people who are more heroic than they are — and they are buried over in Arlington.”

 

Trump reportedly remained unmoved: “I don’t want them. It doesn’t look good for me.”

03
Gen. Milley’s unsent resignation letter
The New Yorker published a resignation letter from Gen. Mark Milley, who served as chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, the country’s top military official, in its entirety.  But Miley did not resign in the end. 
 

In his letter, Milley told Trump, “You are using the military to create fear in the minds of the people — and we are trying to protect the American people.”

 

“I cannot stand idly by and participate in that attack, verbally or otherwise, on the American people,” Milley wrote. “The American people trust their military and they trust us to protect them against all enemies, foreign and domestic, and our military will do just that. We will not turn our back on the American people.”

 

He continued: “It’s now obvious to me that you don’t understand that world order. You don’t understand what the war was all about. In fact, you subscribe to many of the principles that we fought against. And I cannot be a party to that.”

04
Mike Pompeo privately doubted Trump’s Big Lie
Baker and Glasser detail what they call an “extraordinary arrangement” in the weeks after the election between Mike Pompeo, Trump’s secretary of state, and General Milley. The two held daily morning phone calls with Mark Meadows, the White House chief of staff, in an attempt to keep Trump from going off the rails with his Big Lie.
 

“‘The crazies have taken over,'” Pompeo told Milley during a conversation after the election at Milley’s kitchen table, according to the authors.

Krispy Kreme celebrates pumpkin spice season early with new lineup of doughnuts and drinks

Krispy Kreme is ringing in fall early with an assortment of pumpkin spiced doughnuts and beverages.

On August 8, the brand officially debuted their new lineup of autumnal goodies, which includes the all-new Pumpkin Spice Latte Swirl Doughnut — a dessert rendition of the popular seasonal beverage — and Pumpkin Spice Iced Coffee. A selection of fan favorites, like the Pumpkin Spice Original Glazed Doughnut, Pumpkin Spice Original Filled Cheesecake Doughnut and Pumpkin Spice Cake Doughnut, also made their highly-anticipated comebacks.

This year, Krispy Kreme kickstarted pumpkin spice season a month early, compared to 2021, in hopes of giving fans more time to celebrate and enjoy fall’s most signature flavor.

“Sure, pumpkin spice is generally associated with fall, but true fans of the flavor will agree that August is close enough! So, we’re pulling fall forward, enabling our guests to indulge and enjoy early with delicious pumpkin spice doughnuts and drinks, including our Pumpkin Spice Latte, which you can get iced or frozen, by the way,” said Dave Skena, Global Chief Brand Officer for Krispy Kreme, per a recent press release.


Want more great food writing and recipes? Subscribe to Salon Food’s newsletter, The Bite.


Krispy Kreme’s complete pumpkin spice menu items are available beginning August 8 across stores nationwide. Here’s a quick list of all the treats:

  • NEW Pumpkin Spice Latte Swirl Doughnut: A brand new doughnut that’s dipped in a pumpkin spice/sugar blend and topped with a generous swirl of vanilla and coffee buttercream.
  • Pumpkin Spice Original Glazed Doughnut: A classic Krispy Kreme Original Glazed doughnut with an added kick of pumpkin spice flavors.
  • Pumpkin Spice Original Filled Cheesecake Doughnut: A Pumpkin Spice Original Glazed doughnut with creamy cheesecake filling and adorned with cheesecake icing.
  • Pumpkin Spice Cake Doughnut: A spiced old-fashioned cake doughnut coated in a simple glaze.
  • Pumpkin Spice Latte: A signature latte flavored with pumpkin pie sauce, topped with whipped cream and pumpkin spice seasoning. Also available hot, iced or frozen.
  • NEW Pumpkin Spice Iced Coffee: An iced coffee blended with pumpkin pie sauce.

“We’re scared for our families”: Killings of 4 Muslims in Albuquerque “may be connected”

The murders of four Muslim men of South Asian descent in Albuquerque, New Mexico in recent months—with the latest killing taking place Friday night—have horrified the local community, fueling fears of a serial killer targeting people on the basis of their religion and race.

Following their discovery of 25-year-old Naeem Hussain late Friday, Albuquerque authorities said the killing “may be connected” to the murders of Muhammad Afzaal Hussain, Aftab Hussein, and Mohammad Ahmadi, each of whom was reportedly ambushed and gunned down in New Mexico’s largest city.

The three most recent killings have taken place over a span of just two weeks. Mohammad Ahmadi was killed in November 2021.

Naeem Hussain, who had become a U.S. citizen just two weeks before his murder, was reportedly shot while on his way home from a burial service for two of the other victims.

“The perpetrators of the vicious attacks against Muslim men in the Albuquerque community must be found and brought to justice,” said Gabe Vasquez, a U.S. House candidate in New Mexico. “There is no place for this violence in New Mexico or anywhere in the country.”

The killings have deeply shaken the Muslim community in Albuquerque. Ahmad Assed, the president of the Islamic Center of New Mexico, said in a statement that “we are incredibly sickened with the idea that someone has this much hate against innocent people.”

“We’re scared for our families, we’re scared for our children,” Assed added. “And we are incredibly confused about why this is happening.”

Muhammad Imtiaz Hussain, the brother of murder victim Muhammad Afzaal Hussain, told the New York Times that his “kids won’t let me go outside of my apartment,” fearing that he too will be killed.

The Associated Press reported Monday that police suspect the same vehicle was used in “all four homicides—a dark gray or silver four-door Volkswagen that appears to be a Jetta with dark tinted windows.”

“Two of the men—Muhammed Afzaal Hussain, 27, and Aftab Hussein, 41—were killed in the past week. Both were from Pakistan and members of the same mosque,” the outlet noted. “Authorities said they cannot determine if the shootings were hate crimes until they have identified a suspect and a motive.”

The murders have drawn national attention, with U.S. President Joe Biden writing in a social media post Sunday afternoon that he is “angered and saddened by the horrific killings of four Muslim men in Albuquerque.”

“While we await a full investigation, my prayers are with the victims’ families, and my Administration stands strongly with the Muslim community,” Biden wrote. “These hateful attacks have no place in America.”

“Mitch doesn’t have a clue”: McConnell keeps getting attacked by Donald Trump

After Senate Democrats managed a last-minute resuscitation of President Joe Biden’s major domestic agenda, passing their long-awaited health care, tax and climate package on a party-line vote, Donald Trump once again lashed out at Senate GOP Leader Mitch McConnell, R-Ky.

As Biden has seen a rapid succession of legislative accomplishments in recent weeks, his predecessor has repeatedly seemed triggered to take out his frustration on McConnell. 

“Mitch McConnell got played like a fiddle with the vote today by the Senate Democrats,” Trump wrote on Truth Social. “First he gave them the fake Infrastructure Bill, then Guns, never used the Debt Ceiling for negotiating purposes (gave it away for NOTHING!), and now this,” Trump said.

“Mitch doesn’t have a clue – he is sooo bad for the Republican Party!”

Trump previously tore into the bipartisan gun reform package that passed through the Senate last month, even though he has previously supported provisions contained with the measure. 

“The deal on “Gun Control” currently being structured and pushed in the Senate by the Radical Left Democrats, with the help of Mitch McConnell, RINO Senator John Cornyn of Texas, and others, will go down in history as the first step in the movement to TAKE YOUR GUNS AWAY,” Trump wrote on Truth Social at the time. “Republicans, be careful what you wish for!!!” 

Fourteen Senate Republicans joined with Democrats to pass the first federal gun control legislation in decades. Dubbed the “Bipartisan Safer Communities Act,” the recently signed law is set to improve mental health resources, restrict straw purchases, and improve incentives for states to enact red flag laws, which allow law enforcement to confiscate firearms from gun owners who present a danger to themselves or their communities. 

McConnell praised the measure as the product of bipartisan negotiation, saying that the Democrats “came our way” in ironing out the details. 


Want a daily wrap-up of all the news and commentary Salon has to offer? Subscribe to our morning newsletter, Crash Course.


Though Trump has positioned himself in the past as a defender of the Second Amendment, he has also expressed the need for stronger gun control in the wake of various mass shootings. In 2018, after seventeen people were murdered in the Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School shooting in Parkalnd, Florida, Trump threw his support behind expanded background checks for would-be gun owners. 

And in 2019, following two mass shootings in Dayton, Ohio and El Paso, Texas, Trump openly backed the enactment of red flag laws. “We must make sure that those judged to pose a grave risk to public safety do not have access to firearms and that, if they do, those firearms can be taken by rapid due process,” he said at the time. “That is why I have called for red flag laws, also known as extreme risk protection orders.”

Jon Skolnik contributed to this reporting.

Paul Manafort admits he shared Trump campaign info with Russian agent “purely to make money”

In an interview with Business Insider, former Donald Trump campaign manager Paul Manafort admitted he was in contact with the Russians and shared information during the former president’s 2016 presidential run.

For years, questions have been raised about Russian involvement in the campaign that saw the New York businessman beat former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, and Manafort is now stating that he handed polling data over to the Russians — in particular to “Konstantin Kilimnik, a longtime business associate with suspected ties to Russian intelligence.”

According to the report, “Kilimnik then passed the data on to Russian spies, according to the US Treasury Department, which has characterized the data as ‘sensitive information on polling and campaign strategy.'”

In the interview, Manafort excused his actions stating he wasn’t looking for help getting Trump elected and did it purely to make money, with Business Insider reporting, “Manafort told Insider that he directed his deputy, Rick Gates, to feed Kilimnik polling data via email to ‘keep Konstantin informed.’ The goal was to use his access to Trump to drum up business for himself.

“The data that I shared with him was a combination of public information and stuff for the spring that was — it was old,” the former Trump, advisor explained.

The report adds, “Manafort said he had no reason to think Kilimnik was spying for Russia and pointed out that Kilimnik had been vetted and cleared by Yanukovych’s staff, stating, “None of us believed KK worked for Russian intelligence.”

You can read more here — subscription required.

Biden’s big win exposes GOP’s nihilism: Republicans resort to lies to fight Inflation Reduction Act

Even though the historic Democratic climate bill — coyly named the Inflation Reduction Act — has been secretly in works for months, the timing of its passing on Sunday had the air of an emergency. The hot, humid weather on the East Coast that surrounded the Senate building where the “vote-a-rama” was held was universally described as “oppressive,” with a dangerous heat index reaching into the triple digits. The feeling is made worse by the understanding that these record heats aren’t an anomaly, but the new normal for a planet that has already gained 1.1 Celsius in average temperatures and keeps getting hotter. This heat follows other apocalyptic weather events, including the horrific floods in Kentucky that have killed at least 3 dozen people

While President Joe Biden heads to the Bluegrass State on Monday to survey the suffering caused by the floods, Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell thinks he knows who the real bad guys are: The Democrats who are trying to do something to slow down such catastrophic weather.

“The American people are clear about their priorities,” McConnell said in a statement insisting that Americans don’t care about the environment. “Environmental regulation is a 3% issue.” As people in his state are still burying the drowning victims, McConnell argued that what they are really worried about is “inflation, crime, and the border.” 

It’s all lies and distortions, of course.

Yes, inflation is a pressing issue for Americans, but this bill, as its title indicates, is actually meant to address that. And not just in the short term, either. The long-term investments in clean energy directly address the driving engine of much of our inflation woes: the staggering cost of gasoline. More to the point, climate change is an existential issue for not just Americans, but humanity, which is why two-thirds of Americans want the government to do something about it — a number that includes more than half of Republican voters.

It’s not just that they will destroy the planet to stick it to the liberals, Republicans are even standing in the way of the kind of corporate giveaways that used to be the bread-and-butter of Republicanism.

Indeed, that even Republican voters are onboard is something of a miracle, as they’ve been subject to literal decades of propaganda portraying climate change as a hoax. Long before Donald Trump’s Big Lie or the small-but-evil lies pouring out of McConnell this weekend, the GOP was embracing disinformation as its main political strategy through false claims that climate change was made up by nefarious leftists for vaguely “socialist” purposes. It’s arguable that the GOP embrace of the noxious climate change lie started the party on the path to becoming the party of Trump, a nihilistic party wholly built on lies, which stands in opposition to basic decency often for no reason other than mindless opposition to anything that smacks of progress.

Sunday’s vote on the climate change bill was crystal clear proof of this.


Want more Amanda Marcotte on politics? Subscribe to her newsletter Standing Room Only.


What’s remarkable about the Democratic bill is that it contains few, if any, of the environmental regulations on industry that traditionally fuel Republican hostility to fighting climate change. As the New York Times analysis explains, “lawmakers replaced the sticks with carrots.” Gone are previous proposals for hard limits on carbon pollution or even strategies like a carbon tax. Instead, the bill is a giveaway to both consumers and industry, a bunch of tax credits and direct investment to get Americans to switch to clean energy. And most of the money, frankly, is going straight to business interests. 

Republicans love pretending to be “pro-life,” but with this vote against the climate bill, we’re once again reminded they’ve turned into a death cult. 

It cleverly illustrates just how deeply anti-progress the GOP is now. It’s not just that they will destroy the planet to stick it to the liberals, Republicans are even standing in the way of the kind of corporate giveaways that used to be the bread-and-butter of Republicanism. They are now standing in the way of their traditional support for corporate profits by voting against this bill. They would rather condemn their own children and grandchildren — as well as all the babies they wish to force on women through abortion bans — to an increasingly unliveable environment, rather than let Democrats have a political win. 

The idea that the Republicans have become a “death cult” took hold during the COVID-19 pandemic, as Republicans reflexively opposed any effort to slow the spread of the virus. That wasn’t just true when the disease could only be checked by business-hurting lockdowns. Republicans also opposed efforts to vaccinate Americans, despite the fact that doing so would return the economy — and corporate profits — back to normal. Democrats wanted to end the pandemic, so Republicans ended up functionally fighting on the behalf of the virus. 

As I argued in my 2018 book “Troll Nation,” hatred of Democrats has so consumed the Republican Party that they have a knee-jerk opposition to anything that Democrats care about, no matter how banal or non-controversial. Later that year, Adam Serwer of the Atlantic made a similar point in a viral essay, arguing that what binds Republicans together as a party is sadism. “The suffering of others is an adhesive that binds them to one another, and to Trump.”

The vote on the climate bill is further proof of this Republican depravity.


Want more Amanda Marcotte on politics? Subscribe to her newsletter Standing Room Only.


Every single Republican senator voted against the climate bill, and for no real reason outside of an instinctual distaste for relieving the suffering of the people they’re elected to represent. Thanks to the donor-controlled Democrat from Arizona, Sen. Kyrsten Sinema, the bill is no threat to the wealth inequalities Republicans have always defended. As environmental journalist David Roberts outlined on his podcast, the only reason this bill is expected to be effective is because it gives money to industries that already wanted to go greener anyway. There’s no real reason for Republicans to oppose this bill, outside of “sticking it to the liberals.” 

It’s all very much like the Republican insistence on pushing anti-abortion laws on the public.

Voters hate abortion bans and economic projections suggest they will be a disaster not just for individuals, but for the country as a whole. Republicans don’t care, however, because their loathing of feminists has eclipsed all common sense. They’d rather destroy democracy than let voters get in the way of their sadistic intentions. That they are fighting to make the planet even more miserable for all the babies they would force on women just adds to the overall sense that what fuels Republicans nowadays is unchecked malice. 

Monday morning, Judd Legum and Kyle Tharp of Popular Info published a searing expose of a shadowy group called United for Clean Power, which has been running ads claiming to oppose the climate bill from the left. Using pictures of progressive members of Congress — and falsely implying they oppose the bill — the group demanded “demand environmental justice or kill the reconciliation bill.” This all-or-nothing demand, unsurprisingly, turned out to be funded by Republican interests, masquerading as progressives, hoping they could leverage people’s desire for more climate action to keep anything from happening at all. 

These ads speak deeply of how the Republican Party has become nothing but a party of trolls. They know that reducing carbon emissions is both necessary and popular. They know that their actual reasons for opposing the climate bill are utterly indefensible. So instead they turn to dishonest tactics like this, trying to sow internal fights among Democrats over whether the bill goes far enough. The hope is that people forget that, if Republicans had their way, the response to climate change would be “burn it all down.” It’s a tactic of a party that has nothing to offer but destruction and lies.

Republicans love pretending to be “pro-life,” but with this vote against the climate bill, we’re once again reminded they’ve turned into a death cult. 

“News dump”: Twitter blows up over photos of Trump documents flushed down White House toilet

Axios on Monday published photos showing former President Donald Trump’s handwritten notes flushed down a White House toilet that were obtained by New York Times reporter Maggie Haberman.

White House staff “periodically discovered wads of printed paper clogging a toilet — and believed the president had flushed pieces of paper,” according to an excerpt from Haberman’s upcoming book “Confidence Man” published by Axios earlier this year. The report raised concerns that Trump may have illegally destroyed records that are required to be preserved.

Trump at the time called the report a “fake story,” issuing a statement calling the claim “categorically untrue and made up by a reporter in order to get publicity for a mostly fictitious book.”

Haberman turned the photos over to Axios to corroborate her reporting. One photo shows a White House toilet with an unintelligible note, a source told Haberman. Another photo shows a note with Trump’s handwriting thrown into the toilet on an overseas trip. It’s unclear what the note says but it mentions the name of Rep. Elise Stefanik, R-N.Y., the No. 3 Republican in the House.

“The document dumps happened multiple times at the White House, and on at least two foreign trips,” according to the report.

“That Mr. Trump was discarding documents this way was not widely known within the West Wing, but some aides were aware of the habit, which he engaged in repeatedly,” Haberman told Axios. “It was an extension of Trump’s term-long habit of ripping up documents that were supposed to be preserved under the Presidential Records Act.”

The National Archives previously reported that some of Trump’s White House documents had to be taped back together after they were destroyed. Other records and gifts were improperly taken from the White House to Trump’s residence in Mar-a-Lago.

Trump spokesperson Taylor Budowich did not specifically deny the content of the photos but pushed back on the report.

“You have to be pretty desperate to sell books if pictures of paper in a toilet bowl is part of your promotional plan,” Budowich told Axios. “We know … there’s enough people willing to fabricate stories like this in order to impress the media class — a media class who is willing to run with anything, as long as it anti-Trump.”


Want a daily wrap-up of all the news and commentary Salon has to offer? Subscribe to our morning newsletter, Crash Course.


Haberman on CNN called her reporting “gross and important.”

“The point is about the destruction of records which are supposed to be preserved under the Presidential Records Act, which is a Watergate-era creation,” she said. “It’s important because who knows what this paper was? Only he would know and presumably whoever was dealing with him, but the important point is about the records,” she added.

CNN’s Dana Bash said the photos “look nefarious.”

“It’s not legal,” she said citing the Nixon-era law, adding that “it’s a Sharpie and it looks like Donald Trump’s handwriting.”

Twitter exploded after Haberman shared the photos.

“Too early in the week for this kind of news dump,” quipped Amanda Carpenter, a former aide to Sen. Ted Cruz, R-Texas.

“The former guy shredding & flushing documents down the toilet makes sense. The shitter was always full at the Trump White House,” tweeted Olivia Troye, who served as an adviser to former Vice President Mike Pence.

“A flushing toilet should be the last sound we ever hear of the Trump presidency. A clogged toilet being plunged will forever be my lasting image of his presidency,” wrote former Rep. Joe Walsh, R-Ill.

“How many essays will be launched by folks pondering the metaphor of Congresswoman Elise Stefanik’s name firmly stuck to the bottom of Trump’s toilet bowl,” wondered journalist Soledad O’Brien.

“Maybe this is why Trump was so obsessed with water flow regulations,” joked Washington Post columnist Catherine Rampell, referring to Trump’s frequent White House rants about water pressure.

“We have a situation where we’re looking very strongly at sinks and showers, and other elements of bathrooms,” Trump mused in 2019. “People are flushing toilets 10 times, 15 times, as opposed to once.”

The 3 best frozen desserts at Trader Joe’s right now

Alongside its impressive selection of packaged meals, the Trader Joe’s frozen food aisle touts an equally impressive selection of sweet treats. Bite-sized ice cream sandwiches, tart creamsicles and chewy, creamy mochis are just a few creative desserts available.

The options at TJ’s are both enticing and endless, which makes it all the more difficult to choose what to try first. To help make the process easier, Salon Food highlighted the top three frozen desserts you need to try from Trader Joe’s now, per recommendations from a group of trusty Reddit users, who are also regulars at the California based retailer.

01
Brownie Crisp Coffee Ice Cream Sandwiches
Brownie Crisp Coffee Ice Cream SandwichesBrownie Crisp Coffee Ice Cream Sandwiches (Photo Courtesy of Trader Joe’s ©2022)
TJ’s decadent dessert flaunts a generous scoop of coffee ice cream — made with coffee syrup, Colombian coffee extract and espresso grounds — sandwiched between two fudgy brownie crisps. To top it all off, the crisps are bedecked with large chocolate chunks, which pair wonderfully with the deliciously bitter coffee flavors.
 
The Brownie Crisp Coffee Ice Cream Sandwiches are a favorite pick amongst a handful of TJ’s Redditors. According to user u/insubordinance, the ice cream sandwiches are “the only thing that are a must-buy.”
02
Hold the Cone Varieties
Chocolate Chip Hold the ConeChocolate Chip Hold the Cone (Photo Courtesy of Trader Joe’s ©2022)

These miniature cones are hard to pass up because they come in not one but three unique flavors, including Chocolate and Vanilla, Chocolate Chip and Coffee Bean. The tops of each cone is encased in a rich chocolatey coating, which adds a nice crunch to each bite of ice cream. That same coating also lines the inside of each cone and prevents the ice cream from seeping out when it melts.

  
On Reddit, user u/Detronyx recommends trying all the flavors because they are so incredibly good! “[A]ll the seasonal Hold The Cone flavors are amazing, so I can’t narrow down to just one. Grab whatever flavors you see.”  

03
Ube Mochi
Ube MochiUbe Mochi (Photo Courtesy of Trader Joe’s ©2022)
A one-of-a-kind creation, TJ’s Ube Mochi is a Japanese-inspired dessert made from ube, also known as purple yam or greater yam. Each mochi is filled with sweet ube ice cream — which tastes like a mix of vanilla and pistachio ice cream, per TJ’s official website — wrapped in a chewy rice-flour-based dough.
 
Fans of TJ’s Ube Mochi on Reddit also suggest trying the brand’s Vanilla Mochi, which contains luscious vanilla ice cream enveloped in a white-hued sweet rice dough.

“Prime instigator”: Michigan investigation links Trump-backed GOP AG candidate to voting breach

Michigan Attorney General Dana Nessel requested a special prosecutor investigate her Republican opponent after a monthslong investigation linked him to voting machine breaches in multiple counties.

The probe by Nessel and state police into voting machine breaches across the state led investigators to Matthew DePerno, a Kalamazoo lawyer endorsed by former President Donald Trump to be the next state attorney general, according to documents obtained by Politico.

DePerno and two others “orchestrated a coordinated plan to gain access to voting tabulators” that were illegally seized from county election clerks, Nessel’s office said in a petition last week seeking a special prosecutor, calling DePerno “one of the prime instigators” of the plot.

The petition, which was filed to the Michigan Prosecuting Attorneys Coordinating Council, says that DePerno was present at an Oakland County hotel room in early 2021 where the tabulators were tampered with.

Nessel requested the special prosecutor after it became clear that DePerno, a key backer of Trump’s false election claims in Michigan, was a subject of the investigation.

“When this investigation began there was not a conflict of interest. However, during the course of the investigation, facts were developed that DePerno was one of the prime instigators of the conspiracy,” the petition said. “A conflict arises when ‘the prosecuting attorney has a personal interest (financial or emotional) in the litigation,'” it added.

The petition went on to note that it is a five-year felony to “obtain undue possession of a voting machine used in an election.”

Nessel in a letter to Secretary of State Jocelyn Benson wrote that the actions of the individuals in the probe are “very serious,” adding that she requested a special prosecutor to review “possible criminal charges against several of the individuals involved.”

The list of individuals includes DePerno’s law partner, Stefanie Lambert, and state Rep. Daire Rendon, who was part of the fake electors plot. Nessel’s office alleged that the three “orchestrated” the effort to illegally seize a voting tabulator from Roscommon County, one of at least 11 voting system breaches in the state. The list also includes Barry County Sherriff Dar Leaf, a Mike Lindell ally and so-called “constitutional sheriff” leading his own “voter fraud investigation.”

“To ensure Michigan’s elections are secure in the future, there must be consequences now for the people who illegally accessed the state’s voting machines,” Benson spokesperson Jake Rollow told Reuters, which first reported the special prosecutor request.

DePerno is set to formally receive the Republican nomination for attorney general later this month after gaining the endorsement of the state GOP in April. He previously led a November 2020 lawsuit against Antrim County, which was at the center of numerous TrumpWorld conspiracy theories. The county had a tabulator error on election night that was quickly corrected but Trump and his allies have cited the error to push debunked allegations of election fraud. DePerno’s false claims alleging voting machine irregularities in Antrim even made it into a Trump White House draft order instructing the military to seize voting machines that was ultimately never issued.

Nessel’s office in its petition said that evidence uncovered in its probe found digital IDs matching the illegally seized voting machines that DePerno used as evidence in the lawsuit.


Want a daily wrap-up of all the news and commentary Salon has to offer? Subscribe to our morning newsletter, Crash Course.


DePerno was also involved in the so-called “forensic audit” of the results in Arizona’s Maricopa County, which ultimately also found that Trump lost the state, according to Politico. DePerno during the Jan. 6 Capitol also met with a top Trump State Department official to discuss “how the election was stolen.”

Trump quickly embraced DePerno, giving him his endorsement nearly a year ago. He later hosted a fundraiser for DePerno at Mar-a-Lago and campaigned for him in Michigan. Trump at the event touted DePerno as a candidate who would root out alleged “shenanigans” in the state’s elections.

“This is somebody that can fix it. There aren’t that many people around that can do it,” he said. “I talked him into doing it.”

DePerno’s campaign “categorically” denied the allegations made by Nessel’s office, calling the petition an “incoherent liberal fever dream” and accusing Nessel of using tax dollars to target her opponent.

“The claims presented by Nessel show a completely unwarranted and erroneous attack purely based on political prosecution,” the campaign alleged in a statement without addressing any of the specific allegations.

The four breaches investigated by Nessel were among at least 11 in the state and 17 nationwide, according to Reuters. There were similar breaches in Pennsylvania, Ohio, North Carolina, and Colorado. Republican election officials have also sought to meddle in vote-counting this year, refusing to certify primary results or count all valid votes in at least three states.

“What’s clear is this is a nationally coordinated effort,” Benson warned in a Politico interview last month. “It’s multi-year, multi-faceted … not just pressuring election officials, but pressuring local elected officials as well.”

Election officials are also concerned that Trump-backed election conspiracists could win positions overseeing elections in their states.

“We were very fortunate in 2020 that no sitting secretary bought into the Stop the Steal effort,” Benson said. “I don’t think we’ll get that lucky again.”

“Alarming”: GOP quietly funnels millions into Democratic primaries to wipe out progressives

The American Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC) has spent more than $24 million to defeat progressive candidates in this year’s Democratic primaries.

The United Democracy Project (UDP), an AIPAC-affiliated super PAC, has already spent $24.2 million on Democratic primaries this cycle, including millions that it raised from top Republican megadonors like Paul Singer and Bernard Marcus. The money has helped AIPAC-backed candidates wipe out progressives in primaries in Michigan, Maryland, North Carolina, Pennsylvania, Texas, California and Ohio.

UDP and other pro-Israel groups tied to AIPAC – Democratic Majority for Israel (DMFI), Urban Empowerment Action PAC and Pro-Israel America PAC — spent more than $10 million combined in three Michigan primaries, The Intercept reported, to defeat progressive candidates, including last week’s loss for Rep. Andy Levin, D-Mich., who has been called the most progressive Jewish member of the House.

“I’m really Jewish,” Levin, a former synagogue president, told MSNBC last week. “But AIPAC can’t stand the idea that I am the clearest, strongest Jewish voice in Congress standing for a simple proposition: that there is no way to have a secure, democratic homeland for the Jewish people unless we achieve the political and human rights of the Palestinian people.”

UDP spent more than $4 million on ads opposing Levin and backing his opponent, Rep. Haley Stevens, D-Mich., after they both opted to run in the state’s 11th District following redistricting. Stevens on Tuesday defeated Levin, 60-40.

It’s unclear how much impact spending by the Israel lobby, or other groups like Emily’s List, which also backed Stevens, had on the actual race. The Atlantic’s Yair Rosenberg argued that UDP was merely backing the more electable candidate in Michigan and other races. But critics denounced the group for funneling Republican money into Democratic contests.

Levin after his defeat lamented that he was the “target of a largely Republican-funded campaign set on defeating the movement I represent.”

Sen. Bernie Sanders, I-Vt., during a campaign rally with Levin last week, argued that AIPAC’s involvement in the race had “nothing to do, in my view, with Israel.”

“It is simply trying to defeat candidates and members of Congress who stand for working families and are prepared to demand that the wealthy and large corporations pay their fair share of taxes,” he said, calling on Democratic leaders to ban super PAC money from its primaries.

An AIPAC-affiliated super PAC has already spent $24.2 million on Democratic primaries this cycle, including millions that it raised from top Republican megadonors like Paul Singer and Bernard Marcus.

UDP fired back at Sanders over his criticism. 

“Bernie and his allies are struggling with the fact that the majority of progressive Democrats in the country are pro-Israel,” Patrick Dorton, a spokesperson for UDP, told Salon. “They come up with attack after attack because they don’t like the pro-Israel nature of the Democratic Party.”

Dorton was quick to note that UDP has also received donations from Democrats, including megadonor Haim Saban.

“UDP is funded by Democratic and Republican donors who have set aside their partisan preferences in a hyperpolarized political environment to support a better U.S-Israel relationship,” Dorton said.

He argued that it was “hypocritical” for Sanders to complain about pro-Israel spending because “all kinds of Bernie-allied groups are spending in these primaries,” criticizing the “nasty attacks” from groups like J Street targeting Stevens in the primary.

J Street, a liberal Jewish group, called out AIPAC for endorsing and funding 109 Republicans who voted to overturn the election on January 6 while attacking candidates like Levin as “extremists.”

“It is alarming that this race, like many other Democratic primaries this cycle, was heavily impacted by the aggressive outside spending of AIPAC and its super PAC, the United Democracy Project,” the group said in a statement, calling on other Democratic candidates to “disavow and decline the support of AIPAC and its super PAC—which have come as a surprise to at least some of them.”

AIPAC’s official PAC pushed back on the criticism.

“We are proud to engage in the democratic process to help elect leaders who will strengthen the US-Israel relationship – including scores of progressive candidates,” Marshall Wittmann, a spokesperson for AIPAC-PAC, said in a statement to Salon. “In fact, we have supported over half of the Congressional Black Caucus and Hispanic Caucus and nearly half of the Progressive Caucus.  It is completely consistent with progressive values to stand with the Jewish state.  We will continue to support progressive candidates who will stand with our democratic ally, Israel – and oppose detractors of the Jewish state.”

AIPAC was less successful in campaigning to elect Michigan state Sen. Adam Hollier in the 13th District despite funneling more than $4 million into the race. State Rep. Shri Thanedar, who spent $5 million of his own money, ultimately prevailed in the race with just 28% of the vote, benefiting from a nine-candidate field. But the group has seen a strong return on its investment in other states.

UDP and DMFI spent about $1.5 million to help Rep. Shontel Brown, D-Ohio, take down progressive Sanders ally Nina Turner. UDP spent $2.3 million to help attorney Steve Irwin, a former Republican Senate staffer, defeat progressive state Rep. Summer Lee in Pennsylvania after she led by 25 points. UDP dropped nearly $2 million to help Rep. Henry Cuellar, D-Texas, beat back progressive challenger Jessica Cisneros in a tight matchup. And it’s not just Sanders-allied progressives: UDP spent a whopping $6 million to help former prosecutor Glenn Ivey beat former Rep. Donna Edwards, D-Md., who was backed by House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif., and other top Democrats, because she was seen as not pro-Israel enough.


Want a daily wrap-up of all the news and commentary Salon has to offer? Subscribe to our morning newsletter, Crash Course.


All of the candidates targeted by the PACs have expressed support for Palestinian rights or have criticized the billions in aid the U.S. provides to the Israeli military. They have also supported prominent progressive proposals like Medicare for All, climate action and more left-wing economic policies. Despite spending heavily to influence Democratic primaries, UDP “has not been similarly active in Republican primaries, even in races where Republican candidates have been widely criticized for antisemitic comments,” The American Prospect reported. But AIPAC has endorsed numerous controversial Republicans, including Rep. Jim Jordan, R-Ohio, and Rep. Scott Perry, R-Pa., who last year compared Democrats to Nazis.

AIPAC has funded ads lashing out at some far-right Republicans like Sen. Rand Paul, R-Ky., and Rep. Thomas Massie, R-Ky., pressuring them to support funding for Israel’s Iron Dome defense system. AIPAC-PAC backed Rep. Young Kim, R-Calif., in her primary, though UDP has not been involved in any Republican primaries.

All of the candidates targeted by the PACs have expressed support for Palestinian rights or have criticized the billions in aid the U.S. provides to the Israeli military.

“We’re looking at Republican races, we’re looking at Democratic races,” Dorton insisted. “Our goal is to build the largest bipartisan coalition in Congress. Unlike other groups, we don’t feel like the way to do that is to support candidates that align themselves with the most persistent critics of Israel in the U.S.”

Dorton said that UDP focuses on races “where there is a contrast between a pro-Israel candidate and a candidate who is an active detractor of Israel.”

“We also take into account viability, demographics of the district and other factors that would impact an election, number of candidates, that kind of thing,” he said. “So we are looking to help pro-Israel candidates win races.”

This election cycle has marked a drastic change for AIPAC, which did not have a PAC or even endorse candidates until earlier this year. Former Clinton labor secretary Robert Reich cited the group’s heavy expenditures to label them “the single most influential big money group in Democratic electoral politics.”

Though UDP has argued that its funding is aimed at helping candidates who will be more friendly to Israel, some observers argue that it is just a pretense to defeat more progressive Democrats.

“Very often when these establishment pro-Israel organizations target a progressive candidate, those candidates are also targeted by groups that are not focused on Israel-Palestine but simply want to defeat that person because that person may be to progressive on questions of healthcare, or they may support the Green New Deal,” Peter Beinart, a professor at the Newmark Graduate School of Journalism and editor-at-large at the conservative Jewish Currents, told Democracy Now. In some cases, he added, groups like the Democratic Majority for Israel “work out of the same offices with the same staff” as seemingly unrelated groups that target progressives on issues that have nothing to do with Israel.

Dorton argued that UDP is merely “exercising our First Amendment right to bring voters publicly available information,” dismissing criticism that the ads aren’t focused on Israel because, he said, “there was a clear contrast” that voters were already aware of.

J Street, which has far less money to spend than its deep-pocketed rivals at AIPAC, has sought to counter the group’s influence by funding ads backing progressives in these races, including spots attacking Stevens in Michigan, though the group’s PAC has only spent about one-tenth as much as UDP alone this cycle. J Street warned after the latest defeat that AIPAC’s intervention, funded in part by Republican megadonors, threatens to harm the Democratic Party, foreign policy and “ultimately the state of Israel.”

Dorton disputed the argument.

“There is increasing danger to the historical, bipartisan support for Israel in Congress because of politicians mostly on the left, but some on the far-right, but mostly on the far-left, who claim to be pro-Israel but aren’t,” he told Salon.

Though AIPAC’s focus has been fairly limited on a couple of handfuls of races, the big money pouring into the races could have a chilling effect on other Democrats, J Street warned.

“With their overwhelming spending, AIPAC hopes to send an intimidating message to others: Cross our red lines, and you could be next,” the group said in a statement. “While political space for open and healthy debate over US foreign policy has opened up considerably in recent years, they appear determined to close it down. Instead of building sustainable bipartisan support for Israel, AIPAC has harmfully turned Israel into one of the sharpest wedge issues in American politics.”

Texas targets trans voters with restrictions

As a transgender man living in Texas, the rapid rollback of fundamental civil rights across our nation has been horrifying. I’ve watched ill-informed, aggressive political attacks on my health care, my livelihood, and my friends and family spread from Texas to every corner of the country.

In the last few months alone, elected officials in Texas have pushed ruthlessly to deny life-saving medical care to transgender youth, investigate the loving families of trans teenagers for ‘child abuse,’ and force teachers to report their trans students to authorities.

These situations reveal how the LGBTQ+ community has not been properly represented in our nation’s elections, through no fault of our own. Yet while it’s more urgent than ever that transgender people make our voices heard at the ballot box, our voices have been systematically silenced, allowing lawmakers to place these hateful targets on our backs. The reason is clear: The simultaneous attack on voting rights sweeping our country is pushing transgender people like me to the outskirts of our democracy.

The deep gratitude and relief I felt after my transition was overpowered by fear the first time I visited the polls presenting as a man. My driver’s license was out-of-date, no longer matching my name and gender, and I was terrified of being questioned or harassed about it.

The inability to meet strict voter ID requirements have caused over half of transgender adults to miss at least one election in their lifetime, and over 40% of transgender adults have previously chosen not to vote in an election because of fear of harassment at the polls. I’m deeply lucky that I was able to cast a vote that day without substantial issues. I know that many transgender people can’t say the same.

While voting options that were adopted during the pandemic, like no-excuse absentee voting and mail-in ballots, could provide safe alternatives for transgender people, states like mine are pushing restrictions that make these options less accessible and unneccessarily burdensome.

On top of that, not everyone has the resources to be able to pay for an official name change – getting fingerprints taken, making multiple trips to the DMV, and conquering all of the other obstacles it takes to officially change one’s name require significant time and money. And in states like mine, those processes aren’t always safe.

 The same lawmakers that are targeting our fundamental rights are also cutting off our access to resources that would help us to vote. After I transitioned, the medical facility that provided my gender-affirming care connected me to resources that helped with my name change. But that facility, the largest gender-affirming care program in the state, was shut down completely due to partisan political pressure in March, causing even further perpetuating the cycle of harm to our community.

Without the resources that facility provided me with, I’m not sure I, as a college student, would have been able to successfully cast a vote in the elections that I have since then. Barriers to registration, acceptable voter ID, and comfort and familiarity with the voting process are even higher for students and other young voters like me. We move more frequently, especially across state lines, than older voters, and are less likely to own cars to drive to the polls on election days.

The Youth Voting Rights Act, newly introduced by Senator Elizabeth Warren and Representative Nikema Williams, would make strides in expanding access to registration and voting. This bill would guarantee the acceptance of student ID as voter ID in places where it’s needed, require public colleges and universities to provide voter registration services, require public colleges and universities to erect polling locations for all federal elections, and more.

Using college campuses as registration and polling centers is crucial, not only in ensuring that young people have greater logistical access to the polls. As a student at one of Texas’ most diverse universities, I know that other transgender people feel safer and more encouraged to vote in familiar environments, like their college campus, compared to random, unfamiliar jurisdictions.

It’s never been more urgent for transgender people, and the entire LGBTQ+ community, to have equal, protected, and unhindered acces to the ballot than it is right now. Our elected officials must live up to the ideals of American democracy and pass legislation that will protect our right to vote and control our own futures.

What happened to Glenn Greenwald? The former trans ally now sides with right wing transphobia

In 2022, Pride month — June — gave way to an explosion of invective against LGBTQ rights, helped along by allies in right-wing media, particularly Fox News. But there’s also rising anti-trans sentiment in the liberal-left sphere, and it’s being driven by some elements of what might be called the “post-left,” onetime champions of progressive outlooks who have now tilted to the right. Former Intercept writer (and Salon columnist) Glenn Greenwald is one of those leading the charge, turning his audience on to fringe elements of a growing hate movement. 

It wasn’t always like this. Greenwald was once a stalwart defender of trans rights — perhaps in connection with his advocacy for U.S. Army whistleblower Chelsea Manning and his friendship with since-assassinated Brazilian politician and activist Marielle Franco. “If you want to get a taste for how widespread warped & creepy hostility against trans people is, mention Chelsea Manning & survey the bile,” Greenwald tweeted on Sept. 10, 2016.

In 2017, Greenwald called Milo Yiannopoulos’ notorious appearance on Bill Maher’s show “the most trans-hating discussion I’ve seen on television.” He referred to Maher’s attacks on trans people in general as indicative of a complex of  “thinking you’re brave & subversive for mocking the most marginalized, while reliably sycophantic to actual power.” 

Greenwald recognized the extent of anti-trans bigotry and the dangers it posed in the U.K. at least as recently as June 2020. That month, he celebrated an article at the now-shuttered outlet the Outline wondering why British media had become so transphobic and said Harry Potter author and anti-trans advocate J.K. Rowling’s “victimhood complex is suffocating & narcissistic.”

In March 2017, Greenwald urged his audience to follow ACLU lawyer Chase Strangio for Trans Day of Visibility, as well as out lesbian tennis star Martina Navratilova — because she had a trans coach. Today, Greenwald expresses great hostility toward Strangio, and cites Navratilova’s skeptical comments on trans people as evidence of her courage and strength rather than exclusionary bigotry. “In 2019, Martina Navratilova was *expelled* by LGBT groups for questioning the fairness of trans women competing in the professional women’s sports leagues she helped build,” he tweeted on June 17, 2021, in a typical post that walked up to the line of endorsing the comments while giving himself an out.

Last fall, Manning directly addressed the person Greenwald has become, telling her onetime champion that she was “terrified” of him. “You’re greedy, unprincipled, and I’m embarrassed for ever considering you a friend,” Manning said. In response, Greenwald released private chat records showing Manning’s messages to him when she was feeling depressed.

Last fall, Chelsea Manning directly addressed the person Greenwald has become, saying she was “terrified” of him: “You’re greedy, unprincipled, and I’m embarrassed for ever considering you a friend.”

How did this happen? One might date Greenwald’s coming out as transphobic — or at least trans-skeptical — to a video interview he did with anti-trans media figure Katie Herzog in March 2021. During the conversation, the pair talked about how trans people, in their view, were taking up more than their share of a presumably limited amount of civil rights. “The minute you declare yourself nonbinary or trans,” Greenwald declared, “you catapult up the ladder of oppression that absolutely confers concrete benefits.”

A zero-sum view of civil rights doesn’t easily allow for solidarity between marginalized groups. But Greenwald’s shift on trans rights has also coincided with his tilt toward the far right in recent years. While Greenwald has long had a friendly relationship with extremist Fox News host Tucker Carlson, he’s gone further and further down a conservative media rabbit hole since leaving The Intercept in late 2020. It would have once been nearly unthinkable to imagine Greenwald chumming it up onstage with the likes of social conservative Erick Erickson or giving a softball interview to notoriously homophobic conspiracy theorist Alex Jones — but both of those things have happened. Perhaps cultivating a new audience of right-wing media consumers has pushed Greenwald to embrace social conservatism and bigotry against trans people.


Want a daily wrap-up of all the news and commentary Salon has to offer? Subscribe to our morning newsletter, Crash Course.


Greenwald recently laid out his view of the trans rights movement on June 23 during an appearance on the Vanguard YouTube show. In response to a question about his engagement in multiple culture-war issues, almost invariably on the side of the political right, Greenwald claimed that he was just asking questions about “what has become of the trans agenda.”

“I know you get accused, if you say they’re legitimate questions, of, like, empowering hatred against trans people,” Greenwald continued, “which I think is incredibly an intellectually dishonest way to coerce and bully people, to accept your views that ‘if you don’t immediately accept all of my newfound promises about this new ideology I’m trying to get society to embrace that radically changes so many things about how we think about gender and sex and how we organize society.'”

A week later on an edition of his video streaming show on June 30 — during which he interviewed Christopher Rufo, the hard-right intellectual force behind the panic over “critical race theory,” who has now set his sights on LGBTQ rights — Greenwald questioned “this new agenda of trans issues like, you know, demanding everybody say trans women are women.” Rufo has made little secret of his intentions to propagandize against the LGBTQ community, laying out part of the strategy in a June 17 tweet in which he suggested that “Conservatives should start using the phrase ‘trans stripper’ in lieu of ‘drag queen'” because “it has a more lurid set of connotations and shifts the debate to sexualization.”

During his congenial, unchallenging discussion with Rufo, Greenwald pegged the beginning of the trans rights movement to the end of the same-sex marriage fight, saying that the push for trans civil rights was a byproduct of winning that battle. Faced with either going home victorious but unemployed or pivoting to a new fight, according to Greenwald’s version of events, equality activists chose to keep the spigot of cash flowing. “Instead, they immediately switched to the trans movement, which they barely had talked about before, because there was nothing else for them to do,” Greenwald said — connecting to the zero-sum civil rights argument he made with Herzog over a year earlier.

The mean-spirited comments were notable, perhaps, but they’re no longer particularly novel. Greenwald has been lobbing insults and attacks at trans people and trans advocates for well over a year.

His defense of the “Libs of TikTok” account — after Washington Post reporter Taylor Lorenz dug into who was behind the social-media screen and using their platform to go after teachers and others for adopting accepting language toward LGBTQ people — was that LoTT was targeted as a “real enemy” of corporate journalism and a group of “citizens with the wrong politics.” Greenwald made championing the LoTT account a point of pride, boasting at one point that he was its “godfather,” despite the fact that it has helped drive the recent spate of street violence and legislative restrictions against queer people.

At times, Greenwald affects concern for transitioning people who, he contended in May 2021, were at risk from “life-altering hormones and surgeries.” Yet Greenwald’s brand of anti-trans activist journalism could well lead to violence, even if that’s not his intent. Media Matters LGBTQ program director Ari Drennen described on my podcast a “permission structure” created by major media and political figures for violence against marginalized communities. We saw the results of that permission structure as attacks on Pride events around the country increased in number and ferocity this year. An ongoing legislative assault at the state level, particularly though not exclusively in Florida, has added to the siege.

Earlier this year, journalist and commentator Katelyn Burns told me that some of those on the right who would prefer not to be tarred by the same brush as their allies in the anti-trans movement have pulled back slightly from the consequences of their rhetoric, particularly as legislatures in states like Florida have accelerated their attacks on trans people and also have gone after gay and lesbian Americans.

“All of a sudden they’re concerned about the rhetoric and, well, you started this,” Burns said. “You guys were the foundation for bringing moderates into the anti-trans movement, and now you’re getting upset that it’s turned against you. Trans people have been over here telling you this is what was going to happen.” 

But Greenwald doesn’t seem to care about the consequences of his rhetoric about trans people — commentaries that have become a hateful refrain aimed at a marginalized community under increasing attack.

Republican Senator Chuck Grassley gives mixed messages about his insulin cap vote

Republican Senator Chuck Grassley (IA) tweeted on Sunday during the debate over a component in the Inflation Reduction Act that would put a cap on the cost of insulin to $35.

In the United States, insulin costs over $98 per unit, whereas the rest of the world it costs less than $10. The medication keeps many people alive.

But when Grassley took to Twitter he said that he voted to support insulin and that it was Democrats who eliminated it from the bill.

A video of the vote on C-SPAN, shows that Grassley voted no.

In 2019, Grassley penned Washington Times editorial with Sen. Mike Braun (R-IA) that complained about the high cost of insulin.

“Why are prices so high? There are a lot of factors, but it boils down to the fact that the process of getting a drug from its manufacturer to the patient is too complex, opaque and expensive. The pharmaceutical supply chain is wrought with special interests that too often prioritize profits over patients,” the senators wrote.

“This should never be the case,” they say.

See comments about Grassley’s tweet below:

Bartiromo disagrees with Dershowitz on Biden being moderate

Fox News host Maria Bartiromo lost her cool after attorney Alan Dershowitz praised the “great things” accomplished by President Joe Biden.

“He’s done great things in Ukraine,” Dershowitz told Bartiromo in a Sunday interview. “I think he has done good things on domestic policy, gotten some very good things passed.”

“He is the candidate who restores normality and if Trump is going to run, I think that even a low-ranking candidate with essentially moderate views, he won’t win,” the attorney continued. “But Trump will lose. So nobody is going to win this next election if it’s Trump vs. Biden. It will be who has the most negatives and who loses the election.”

Bartiromo reminded Dershowitz that he “supported Trump” by defending him during impeachment.

“You said Joe Biden was moderate!” the Fox News host exclaimed. “You said he has moderate policy. You said he has passed some good things. You said he did a good job in Ukraine. I don’t know what you’re talking about! This is not a moderate president. OK?”

“I don’t know what you’re talking about in terms of Joe Biden being moderate, Alan,” she complained.

“Compared to who?” Dershowitz replied. “I mean, compared to President Trump, who I did not vote for. I defended him against an unconstitutional impeachment but I didn’t vote for him. But compared to President Trump, the current president, Biden, is a moderate. So is his attorney general, a moderate.”

“No, he’s not a moderate!” Bartiromo shouted back. “He’s not a moderate! It’s just not true! And I know that’s the B.S. line that Democrats have been trying to sell us since day one during the campaign. But his actions and his policies are indicative that he’s not a moderate!”

She added: “Not only is he not a moderate but his son has been selling influence. Hunter Biden and the investigation is continuing there.”

Watch here:

12 spine-tingling facts about “Tales From the Crypt”

Yanked from the tasteless, imaginative, and classic E.C. comics that incited a Congressional investigation in the 1950s, HBO’s “Tales from the Crypt” — which premiered on June 10, 1989 — was one of the few television shows where A-list Hollywood talent regularly appeared both in front of and behind the camera. Robert Zemeckis (“Back to the Future“) was an executive producer, along with Richard Donner (“Superman: The Movie“) and Walter Hill (“The Warriors“). Each week, the anthology series would deal out a bloody morality tale, framed by the cackling Crypt Keeper (voiced by John Kassir). Boils and ghouls curious about the show’s history should keep reading, or more puns will follow.

1. “Lethal Weapon” is partly responsible for “Tales from the Crypt.”

Producer Joel Silver was on the set of 1987’s “Lethal Weapon” when he and director Richard Donner began talking about Silver’s failed attempts to adapt “Tales from the Crypt” as a feature film: the disappointing reception to 1983’s “Twilight Zone: The Movie” and 1982’s “Creepshow” had lessened enthusiasm for horror anthologies. Unmoved by those failures, Donner said he’d be interested in joining the project. When the series idea was brought to HBO, they were intrigued that so many feature film talents were backing the idea. When Zemeckis — who was working with Silver on 1988’s “Who Framed Roger Rabbit “at the time — got involved, the network agreed to move forward with the show.

2. The Crypt Keeper has Chucky’s eyes.

When a film or television show needed a creepy animatronic puppet, they usually called Kevin Yagher. As the horror world’s Jim Henson, the prolific special effects expert has been responsible for the Crypt Keeper, Chucky of the “Child’s Play” films, and various versions of Freddy Krueger‘s make-up. To create “Tales from the Crypt”‘s decomposing host, Yagher used the clear blue eyes from his Chucky fabrication; it took six puppeteers to make him fully operational.

3. Arnold Schwarzenegger directed an episode of the series.

“Tales from the Crypt” was famous for luring a number of noted feature directors to television at a time when it was considered a step down from movies. While having producers like Donner and Zemeckis making phone calls helped, the primary attraction was getting to shoot what amounted to a short film with minimal interference. For actors, it was also a chance to step behind the camera without the burden of an extended shoot. Arnold Schwarzenegger, who was paid scale ($15,000) to direct an episode, said at the time “It was, I would say, the greatest joy I’ve ever had in the movie business.”

4. The series brought Humphrey Bogart back from the dead.

Zemeckis’s involvement often meant that “Tales from the Crypt” would take any opportunity to explore new techniques for visual effects. In the episode “You, Murderer,” a career criminal murdered by his wife and best friend posthumously narrates the events leading up to his demise. When the character looks in the mirror — the show takes place from his POV — viewers see the resurrected features of Humphrey Bogart. Zemeckis used footage from “Casablanca“, “The Maltese Falcon,” and other Bogart films to capture footage and digitally insert it into the frame. During wraparounds, the Crypt Keeper also converses with a seemingly above-ground Alfred Hitchcock.

5. It helped create the “It’s not TV, it’s HBO” tag.

Because it was free from the restrictions of broadcast networks, HBO had no problem pushing boundaries with its content. When the channel enlisted a new ad agency to develop a marketing campaign for “Tales from the Crypt”, they screened a collection of racy footage from the show along with other original programming. When the lights came up, someone said, “It’s not TV.” Another person said, “No, it’s HBO.”

6. Two versions of each episode of the show were shot.

For Zemeckis, Donner, and the rest of the show’s high-profile producers, “Tales from the Crypt’s” financial payoff was always thought to be a move to syndication. Because HBO was more permissive in terms of content, they needed to prepare for an eventual screening on broadcast TV stations. When “Tales from the Crypt” was bought by Fox for a late-night Saturday slot in 1994, the episodes were re-edited to include alternate takes that eliminated most of the original episodes’ gore and nudity. The show also had actors record PG-rated versions of otherwise profane dialogue during shooting. While HBO normally values exclusivity, it didn’t mind the deal: Uncut episodes were still an attraction and, as one executive pointed out, “The show is called ‘HBO’s Tales From the Crypt’.” Free advertising never hurt.

7. “Tales From the Crypt’s” axe-wielding Santa had been seen before.

One of the show’s earliest episodes featured Larry Drake (“L.A. Law“) as a murderous Santa Claus stalking a woman who had just murdered her husband and couldn’t exactly plead with the police for assistance. While the premise was based on an E.C. story, it wasn’t the first time it had been filmed. In 1972, a production company named Amicus released a “Tales From the Crypt” feature: in one segment, Joan Collins appears as the freshly widowed wife being hunted by a significantly less sinister-looking Santa.

8. John Kassir called into radio shows in charater.

As an anthology show, “Tales from the Crypt” didn’t have any recurring cast members to help drum up publicity. The only familiar face (and voice) was Kassir’s. So HBO had him make the media rounds at the start of each season, calling into radio shows as the Crypt Keeper. “We would launch a new season and I would spend a week in the morning doing 50 or 60 radio interviews as the Crypt Keeper,” he told CrypticRock.com. “I would naturally have to improvise all of that. I would have some bullet points and all that to talk about when the show was coming on . . . [the Crypt Keeper] would sit there and talk. ‘How are you, Frank? Ha ha ha.'”

9. The series moved to the UK for its final season.

After six seasons, “Tales from the Crypt” had more or less exhausted California’s reserve of actors and filmmakers. For its final season, the production moved to Ealing Studios in West London. Producer Gil Adler endorsed the switch for enabling new faces and locations to be utilized. As a result of the change, Ewan McGregor and Bob Hoskins were among the actors who popped up on the series.

10. It got G-rated for an animated series.

The success of “Tales from the Crypt” in live-action prompted Silver to consider alternative revenue streams for its popular host, who once sat in with “The Tonight Show” band. In 1993, ABC aired a Saturday morning cartoon show, “Tales From the Cryptkeeper,” that featured a somewhat softer approach to the morbid material: characters didn’t die, and being dismembered was off-limits. While the original intention was that episodes would be introduced by the puppet version of The Crypt Keeper, concerns over his appearance — he is essentially a rotting corpse, which might disturb children — led producers to replace him with an animated substitute. John Kassir still provided the voice. The light alternative didn’t resonate with viewers, who tuned out after two seasons.

11. It also spawned a game show.

The unwieldy title was probably a fair warning: “Secrets of the Crypt Keeper’s Haunted House” was a 1996 production that featured Kassir and his puppet alter ego in a game show that aired on CBS on Saturday mornings. Shot at Universal Studios Florida, teams of contestants awkwardly interacted with a green screen and 1990s-era computer graphics while the Crypt Keeper taunted them. The effects were so peculiar that the show’s premiere was delayed by a month while technical difficulties were sorted out. It lasted one season, but that was enough to make some kind of TV history: by this point, the character had appeared on ABC, CBS, Fox, and HBO.

12. There was also a Christmas album.

Reminded that Freddy Krueger once performed with the Fat Boys, Kassir recorded several albums in character for Warner Bros. The first, “Have Yourself a Scary Little Christmas”, was released in 1994, with memorable song titles like “Deck the Halls with Parts of Charlie” and “‘Twas the Fright Before Christmas.”

This article was originally published in 2019; it has been updated for 2022.

Why feminist horror novel “The Stepford Wives” is still relevant, 50 years on

On August 26 1970, 50,000 women marched down Fifth Avenue in New York City in a Women’s Strike. Organized by feminist activist Betty Friedan, the march highlighted the fact women still performed the vast majority of domestic work.

The Women’s Liberation Movement wanted many things in 1970, but one of the most important was freedom from “unpaid domestic servitude at home.”

Half a century later, most women are still waiting for their freedom. Women still do far more domestic and care labour than men.

Since the 1960s, more and more women have taken up paid employment, but a problem remains: how would their unpaid domestic work be replaced?

Dramatizing women’s suburban alienation

Ira Levin’s novel “The Stepford Wives” offered a bleak answer: women themselves would be replaced. Levin powerfully dramatized women’s suburban alienation and men’s resistance to feminist change.

“The Stepford Wives” begins with Joanna Eberhart, a wife, mother and photographer, who moves with her family from Manhattan to the suburban town of Stepford. She is interested in tennis, photography and women’s liberation. Joanna and her husband Walter have a happy, respectful marriage. Yet Walter joins the mysterious Stepford Men’s Association, where the men of the town spend their evenings.

Joanna finds it hard to make friends in their new home: all the women of Stepford are too busy cooking and cleaning. In the 1975 film adaptation (directed by Bryan Forbes, with a screenplay by William Goldman), Joanna and her only friend, fellow newcomer Bobbie, begin a consciousness-raising group – designed to raise women’s feminist awareness – which is derailed by an intense discussion of the merits of Easy-On Spray Starch.

The women of Stepford transform into glassy-eyed housewives within months of arriving. Watching one of them admiring her washing, “like an actress in a commercial,” Joanna thinks: “That’s what they all were, all the Stepford wives: actresses in commercials, pleased with detergents and floor wax, with cleansers, shampoos, and deodorants. Pretty actresses, big in the bosom but small in the talent, playing suburban housewives unconvincingly, too nicey-nice to be real.”

Joanna and Bobbie realize, with mounting horror, that the Stepford women have literally been replaced by robots, in a scheme masterminded by their husbands – and they too, will be similarly transformed. Bobbie is first. She tells Joanna: 

“I realized I was being awfully sloppy and self-indulgent. [. . . ] I’ve decided to do my job conscientiously, the way Dave does his.”

The women’s personalities have been erased, but their families don’t seem to mind – Bobbie’s son is delighted because his mother now makes hot breakfasts, while the husbands are thrilled because their “new” wives love sex and housework.

Fearful that she “won’t be me next summer,” Joanne realizes Walter has also changed. He tells her the women of Stepford have changed only “because they realized they’d been lazy and negligent [. . .] It wouldn’t hurt you to look in a mirror once in a while.”

Joanna agrees to see a psychiatrist, who prescribes her a sedative. But soon after, her voice vanishes from the novel, as she too has been transformed. At the story’s close, Joanna is gliding slowly through a supermarket, telling an acquaintance that she no longer does photography because “housework’s enough for me.”

An extraordinary feminist horror novel

“The Stepford Wives” is an extraordinary feminist horror novel. Its vision of a group of men who engineer housework-loving robots to replace their restless wives offered not only a satire of male fears of women’s liberation, but a savage view of heterosexual marriage. In this telling, a man would rather kill his wife and replace her with a robot than commit to equality and recognize her as a whole person.

Sarah Marshall, co-host of the podcast “You’re Wrong About,” argued the novel dramatized a real problem of the 1960s and 1970s: suburban living did transform women into robots. Tranquillizers like valium were massively over-prescribed for women who were suffering from “suburban neurosis,” both in Australia and the U.S.

The extraordinary 1977 Australian documentary “All In The Same Boat” suggested suburban women had to take drugs to cope because their husbands refused to shoulder their share of the burdens of home and family. In short, what was happening to the women of Stepford was happening to women everywhere. They were losing their identities in a sea of endless domestic labor.

Joanna’s bafflement at her neighbors’ absorption in domestic chores echoed the feelings of many women of the era. Betty Friedan’s “The Feminine Mystique” resonated with so many white women in the 1960s because it articulated their dissatisfaction with the postwar gender order. Friedan declared: “we can no longer ignore that voice within women that says: ‘I want something more than my husband and my children and my house.'”

Like many who joined women’s liberation, Joanna also wanted something more. The novel made it clear that “more” would be difficult for many women.

From post-feminism to “Get Out”: cultural influence

It is telling that in post-feminist 2004, the Joanna in the Frank Oz film remake of “The Stepford Wives” is not a woman seeking liberation, but a TV network president who creates crass reality TV programs. Women’s liberation had been transformed into corporate feminism, and the engineer of the scheme was not the Stepford Men’s Association, but an exhausted career woman who wants to return to a “simpler” life. The remake took a feminist premise and made an anti-feminist film.

Despite the dismal failure of the 2004 film, “The Stepford Wives” left a significant cultural footprint. The term itself entered the vernacular. Filmmaker Jordan Peele cited “The Stepford Wives” as a key influence on his horror film “Get Out,” also set in white suburbia. And Alex Garland’s 2014 film “Ex Machina,” centred on a lifelike female robot who turns on her creator, was a biting critique of tech bro misogyny.

In a post-Roe v Wade world, where many men still seek to control women’s bodies and curtail their imaginations, Levin’s novel remains as chilling as ever.

Michelle Arrow, Professor of History, Macquarie University

This article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license. Read the original article.

Fewer and fewer OB-GYNs are taught how to perform abortions. What happens when there’s no one left?

It’s one of the most ruthlessly effective weapons in human history: the destruction of knowledge. Opponents of reproductive rights in America understand this well. It’s not enough to restrict or outright ban access to abortion. It’s not enough to make it prohibitive to access safe and legal options. You have to wipe the out teaching of it, the training of it.

And that’s exactly what has been happening in the United States.

The erosion of abortion education is not new. A National Academies Press report, titled “The Safety and Quality of Abortion Care in the United States,” raised the alarm about the problem back in 2018. “Although most women’s health care providers will interact with patients navigating issues of unintended pregnancy and abortion, abortion training is not universally available to physicians or APCs [advanced practice clinicians] who intend to provide reproductive health services,” they noted at the time.

Limitations to training included “geography, institutional policy, and state law” as well as the rise of “the largest group of religiously owned nonprofit hospitals” in the nation — Catholic and Catholic owned facilities, which must follow the strict Ethical and Religious Directives of the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops. This has meant that for a growing number of aspiring reproductive health providers, “medical students, residents, and other health professional students are often responsible for seeking out learning opportunities themselves.” And this was four years before the Dobbs decision.

“43.9% of residents currently train in states predicted to outlaw abortion.”

Back in May, research out of the David Geffen School of Medicine at the University of California Los Angeles reported in the journal Obstetrics & Gynecology that “43.9% of [OB/GYN] residents currently train in states predicted to outlaw abortion, a component of obstetrics and gynecology residency required for accreditation.” The ominous possibilities are obvious. As the authors went on to note, “In 2020, 92% of obstetrics and gynecology residents reported having access to some level of abortion training. We predict that if Roe v. Wade overturned, this would plummet to at most 56%.” And it gets worse, because “This likely underestimates the training implications of overturning Roe v Wade, in that residencies outside of obstetrics and gynecology, such as family medicine, were not included in the study.” 

Speaking with MedPage Today, the report’s lead author, Kavita Vinekar, MD, MPH, said, “I fear that a lack of abortion training in residency will negatively impact residents’ skill sets in emergent uterine evacuation, office procedures, miscarriage management, patient-centered counseling, and trauma-informed care. These are all skill sets that are central to abortion training.”


Want more health and science stories in your inbox? Subscribe to Salon’s weekly newsletter The Vulgar Scientist.


“It’s almost half of all residents,” says Dr. Katharine White, an associate professor of OB-GYN at the Boston University School of Medicine and author of “Your Sexual Health: A Guide to Understanding, Loving and Caring for Your Body,” says of this systemic closing off of abortion training. “It has great implications for all pregnancy capable people that they take care of for the rest of their careers.”

As anyone with even the vaguest understanding of reproductive systems knows, creating a void in any form of medical training has far reaching consequences. “It impacts the skills with abortion procedures and the medication management with medication abortion,” says White, “regardless if it is pregnancy termination for abortion or with regards to miscarriage. That is hundreds of thousands of people who are having pregnancy loss each year, who are at risk of not having a provider who is comfortable treating them.” And if an ever dwindling number of providers know how to manage a D&C, how many more individuals will be forced to carry their dead fetuses in their bodies than are already enduring that nightmare now? How many more will find their own lives at risk because their pregnancies are not viable?

This all but inevitable shift in training will impact not just where students choose to go to school, but where they will settle down, and by extension, which communities they will serve. A 2021 AAMC report on resident retention found that “More than half (57.1%) of the individuals who completed residency training from 2011 through 2020 are practicing in the state where they did their residency training.” And if that Obstetrics & Gynecology prediction is even close to accurate, that’s an astonishing number of our incoming OB-GYN providers being trained in and staying in states where they haven’t been taught abortion techniques.

“Next year’s match for residency is going to be very, very interesting in OB-GYN.”

“Residents and providers in these states have to decide, should I stay or should I go?” says Dr. White. “For residents it’s, ‘Do I try to get this training elsewhere? Do I accept that I won’t get it?’ For people who are applying to residency, do I even apply to programs that are going to limit my training? I think next year’s match for residency is going to be very, very interesting in OB-GYN.”

White is concerned about the long-term ripples these choices will ultimately make.

“If you have providers and trainees leaving these states,” she says, “it’s going to exacerbate the already existing health disparities, because we have good data that states that restrict abortion have higher maternal mortality rates. There’s a huge moral conflict for providers and learners. Do we take care of the people in this state who desperately need us, or go someplace else where there is also need, and get to actually provide all the kinds of care? We’re not talking about small numbers. Half our residents will get this training. Half our residents stay where they practice, or stay where they train. It’s a lot of exponential impact.”

Even in states that do offer more comprehensive abortion training, the effects are still unavoidable, subject to the religion-based directives of specific institutions, or a lack of facilities. “The numbers are not great and they’ve definitely declined over time,” says Los Angeles OB-GYN and “Menopause Bootcamp” author Dr. Suzanne Gilberg-Lenz. “but that doesn’t mean that there are not enough people to provide abortions. The problem is where they are. The problem is more like, ‘Look, there are providers in California, but there’s nobody in Fresno.'”

And this, she explains, goes deep into the some of the most troubling dynamics of reproductive care. “If you really look at the overall reproductive justice movements, there’s a lot of issues with white supremacy,” Gilberg-Lenz says. “There’s probably hundreds of abortion providing doctors and services in Los Angeles County, for instance. When someone can afford to go to Fresno and do free clinics, yes, they’re providing a service, but also it’s potentially very white supremacy-ish, colonial-ish, because now they’re making it much harder for a brown or a Black person to move into that community full time and make a living doing it.”

“When we talk about medical racism,” she continues, “we have to understand that this is not just affecting patients, but it’s affecting trainees, potential doctors, doctors. How healthcare is provided and administered is largely impacted by who’s providing that care. That’s a really important point, and it’s being discussed a lot in the abortion providing community.”

Even if a future provider winds up, for personal or professional reasons, never performing a single on demand abortion in their career, who in their right mind thinks that not equipping doctors with the most skills to handle the most possible medical scenarios is anything short of wildly irresponsible? Yet that is exactly the path the United States appears poised to send its providers now down. “I think, philosophically,” says Dr. Suzanne Gilberg-Lenz, “that not requiring every single OB-GYN resident to learn how to do an abortion is just morally and ethically wrong.”

Where do we stand with MSG?

Carolyn Nguyen grew up in a household in which a few pinches of monosodium glutamate (MSG) factored into practically everything her mom cooked. 

“I’ve always enjoyed watching her cook and learning from her,” said the Vietnamese-American chef/owner of Revolution Taco in Philadelphia. “Growing up, she’d show me, ‘add a little pinch of this and that, and don’t forget the MSG!’ She pretty much added it to everything from stewed dishes to pho, which she made every Sunday.”

Whenever Nguyen cooks at home, she hears her mom’s words in her head, coaxing her to sprinkle in a pinch of MSG for umami and balance. Yet she’s expressly avoided using the flavor enhancer at all throughout her professional cooking life — starting with food trucks like Street Food Philly and Taco Mondo through Revolution Taco, her brick-and-mortar restaurant featuring globally-inspired tacos, which she opened in 2016. 

“Often when customers would see I’m of Asian descent, they would automatically ask me if there was MSG in the food.”

“I started out with a food truck, which obviously involves a lot of customer-facing time,” she said. “Often when customers would see I’m of Asian descent, they would automatically ask me if there was MSG in the food. It still happens a lot, because, like, there’s still a lot of people out there that think MSG is bad for you. It doesn’t matter that it’s in everything from potato chips to canned food. There’s been a bad stigma attached to people of Asian descent [when it comes to] MSG.”

In fact, as of 2019 some 42 percent of Americans still said they believe MSG is bad for them — linked to health problems including headaches, palpitations, allergic reactions and even infantile obesity. This persists in spite of a cascade of scientific evidence to the contrary.

“You know, I think the unconscious bias and stereotypes reinforced in our culture, whether through media or the people you hang out with, it’s powerful,” said Taiwanese-American comedian, actress and activist Jenny Yang. “People sometimes don’t even understand that the negative perceptions of MSG might be associated with this kind of, for lack of a better term, racist propaganda that was very unscientific and that originated this idea.” 

What is MSG?

MSG is defined by the Food and Drug Administration as the “sodium salt of the common amino acid glutamic acid.” It was discovered more than 100 years ago by a Japanese chemist named Kikunae Ikeda, who wondered why his wife’s tofu and vegetable soup had such a deep, almost meaty flavor. When she explained it was because of the soup’s kombu (seaweed) broth, he reduced some all the way down to a crystalline powder — yielding monosodium glutamate. Glutamic acid, or glutamate, occurs naturally in all kinds of foods, from mushrooms to tomatoes, dry-aged meat, soy sauce and Parmesan. The average person eats 13 grams of naturally occurring glutamates each day, while glutamate intake from using MSG as an additive averages out to just over half a gram per day. (By the way, your body processes synthetic MSG the same way it processes natural glutamates.) 

Modern synthetic MSG is made by fermenting starch, sugar beets, sugar cane, or molasses. By itself, it tastes a little like salted, dehydrated meat. But in Doritos, instant ramen and bottled ranch dressing, it’s that savory umami flavor that makes us say “Mmmm!” and keep going back for more. That’s because its presence signals umami, aka the fifth taste. 

“Umami is one of the five basic tastes” alongside sweet, sour, salty and bitter,” said Christopher Koetke, executive chef of MSG producer Ajinomoto and 40-year culinary industry vet. “This means, essentially, that each one of those basic tastes has to be at a level where it needs to be to make food delicious. And it’s fascinating, because chefs and cooks and people have always cooked with a sense of umami in mind even though they didn’t understand it consciously, because we’re drawn to it.” 

MSG Panda ShakerMSG Panda Shaker (Photo courtesy of Ajinomoto)

Indeed, from French brown sauces to fish sauce to garum, the precursor to ketchup that graced tables of households in the Roman empire, umami has been around as long as people have cooked and fermented their food. The demonization of MSG in America began in 1968, when a Maryland doctor wrote a letter to the New England Journal of Medicine, in which he described experiencing symptoms similar to an allergic reaction every time he ate food from a Chinese restaurant. The unfounded claim, which he summarized as “Chinese Restaurant Syndrome,” prompted others to write in with their own experiences feeling flushed or getting headaches after consuming Chinese food. Shortly thereafter, the New York Times published a story citing MSG as responsible for symptoms people experienced after eating Chinese food; in 1993 “Chinese Restaurant Syndrome” even took up official residence in the Merriam-Webster dictionary. (It has since been revised, thanks in part to lobbying by Ajinomoto.) 

Koetke admits that his own glutamate epiphany came later than it should have largely because he hadn’t questioned lingering misperceptions. While teaching a culinary arts lecture on advanced charcuterie at Kendall College in Chicago over 20 years ago, he rattled off MSG among “a bunch of additives we are not going to use,” he said. “There was a Filipino student in my class, and I caught the look on her face when I said that — just total confusion. After class, she said, ‘Chef, what’s wrong with MSG?’ This is not an example of good teaching, but I didn’t actually know; I was repeating what I’d heard.”

She cooked him a plate of scrambled eggs seasoned with salt, pepper and MSG, which he says changed his life.

She cooked him a plate of scrambled eggs seasoned with salt, pepper and MSG, which he says changed his life. He now works with Ajinomoto to educate chefs through events like a recent MSG immersion event at Ajinomoto’s Itasca, Illinois, headquarters, where they cooked and compared dishes made with and without MSG. What excited Koetke in the Kendall kitchens all those years ago is finally resonating with more chefs who are connecting the science to the art. 

“I don’t fault chefs for not knowing,” he said. “Umami wasn’t proven the fifth taste till 2002 — so it’s still relatively new. Many of us grew up never understanding umami. Chefs aren’t just rediscovering it, but are better understanding what it is — that the glutamate in MSG is exactly the same amino acid as that in Parmesan cheese.” 

Max Robbins, culinary director at Chicago-based restaurant group Lettuce Entertain You and veteran chef of such restaurants as Longman & Eagle and Blackbird (RIP), considers MSG a powerful tool in chefs’ arsenals for increasing savoriness in everything from vinaigrettes to vegetables and meat. Whether he deploys it via fish sauce, shiro dashi, anchovies, pork floss, Parm, chicken bouillon, or a few well-placed shakes of MSG, he deems it essential to his penchant for “mixing really classic, simple techniques with the nostalgic flavors of childhood for something that’s unmatched.”

He hasn’t taken pains to vocalize his use of the additive, chiefly because he sees no reason to. “If menus don’t have to include notes about dishes containing like, 3,000 calories in butter or a crazy amount of sodium — things that are actually harmful, in other words — why would we notate something with no proven negative effects?” 

On whose shoulders?

And yet, armed with the knowledge of how pervasive misinformation about MSG remains, Robbins wondered aloud if he should do more on the consumer education side to prevent the trauma from continuing, which overwhelmingly affects Asian Americans. (At least one Asian-American chef I contacted refused to talk about it because of the negative connotations.)

“Why have we collectively as a food community not felt the need to break down these myths as we lean into use of this product? People have no problem doing Alsatian wine dinners to educate people about grape production. Why not do the same thing for ingredients?”

He thinks that it’s important for big food conglomerates with the resources to support causes to take a lead, rather than putting so much onus on micro-economies. As of publishing, Frito-Lay hadn’t yet responded to emails asking why they continue to market and label a line of snacks made without MSG when it’s not considered an allergen. (The site verbiage explains that “some people report sensitivity.”) 

Yang agrees that everyone from chefs to influencers to food scientists to packaged food producers to consumers themselves all bear responsibility “for whatever influence or platform they have, you know?” she said. “People need to be informed, sure, but let’s not sway them according to prejudice that is not real, and not based on scientific evidence.”

Actress and activist Jenny Yang at an MSG-themed dinnerActress and activist Jenny Yang at an MSG-themed dinner (Photo courtesy of Ajinomoto)When we spoke, Yang was awaiting a response from Gwyneth Paltrow, actress and creator of wellness company Goop, to a dinner date featuring MSG as the star flavoring and a conversation to set the record straight on the additive. Yang launched the #DinnerwithGoop campaign, in partnership with Ajinomoto, via an Instagram post in June. In it, she talks about the power of Goop in her hometown of L.A., cheekily referencing some of its more — ahem — unique beauty treatments, like oil pulling and red light therapy. She calls the site out for unfairly pegging MSG as “unclean,” despite a stack of scientific evidence proving that it’s safe.

“I’m all for clean eating, I just want to make sure it’s informed by science,” she said in the video. “Otherwise, who gets to decide what’s ‘clean’? Is my grandma’s famous red-braised pork belly somehow less clean than your grandma’s chicken pot pie?”

It’s dangerous for a lifestyle site with over 8 million subscribers, “many of whom follow its advice to a tee without critical thinking,” to be exposed to false information, especially the kind that that comes with xenophobic and racist baggage, Yang said. Since the campaign rollout, Ajinomoto says that Goop has removed some of its problematic MSG articles, but Yang thinks the most change will come through hearing from the Goop goddess herself. 

“Number one, I would love to have dinner with Gwyneth — delicious MSG food — and shoot a video of her being like, ‘hey thanks for calling me in! I didn’t know we were contributing to the perpetuation of the idea that MSG is a terrible thing for you. I’ve been educated,'” Yang said. 

She continued: “In addition to scrubbing articles from the site … I’d love for them to affirmatively feature a conversation to educate people. Food is a universal language, flavors are universal, the most accessible and relatable thing. That’s why to me it is so important to clarify things about the food of my culture; that’s an entry point for also clarifying who I am in my identity.” 

But one conversation had already made an impact. Simply by talking about MSG had emboldened Nguyen to reconsider adding it to her full-service dinner and brunch menus. She knew it would lend balance and umami to her Korean barbecue and sweet-and-sour chicken; moreover she figured its mere presence may help educate those who weren’t sure why they were avoiding it in the first place. 

“Maybe more of the foodie people know it’s not bad for you by now,” she said. “The more everyone else sees and tastes it, the more common it becomes.” She paused briefly, “even though it’s in pretty much everything.” 

Inflation Reduction Act bill passes Senate and makes its way to House

After a marathon voting session that took place over the weekend, the Inflation Reduction Act bill has passed Senate on a 51-50 vote with Vice President Kamala Harris casting her tie-breaking vote. As USA Today highlights in their coverage of the bill’s passing, this bill delivers “a major win for President Joe Biden and his agenda before the midterm elections.”

The bill will not only serve to reduce prescription drug prices, but will also create a 15% minimum tax for corporations making $1 billion or more, bringing in more than $300 billion in revenue. Although the bill did pass, the divide in votes was clear with every Democrat voting in support of it, and every Republican voting against it. 

The bill was negotiated in origin by Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer and Sen. Joe Manchin, who issued the following statements on Sunday:

“To the tens of millions of young Americans who have spent years marching, rallying, demanding that Congress act on climate change: THIS BILL IS FOR YOU,” says Schumer in a victory lap on Twitter.

“For years, I have worked across the aisle to determine the most effective way to increase domestic energy production, lower energy and healthcare costs, and pay down our national debt without raising costs for working Americans,” says Manchin.

Before President Biden signs the monumental bill into law it must first clear the House, which it’s expected to do as soon as Friday, according to USA Today.

“Today, Senate Democrats voted to lower the cost of Rx drugs, health insurance, and energy — all while reducing the deficit and making the richest corporations pay their fair share,” Biden said in a statement on Sunday. “I ran to make government work for working families again. That’s what this bill does — period.”


Want a daily wrap-up of all the news and commentary Salon has to offer? Subscribe to our morning newsletter, Crash Course.


“My father used to say that a job was about a lot more than a paycheck. It was about your dignity, your respect, your place in the community,” Biden furthers in his statement on the bill. “It was about being able to look your child in the eye and say it was going to be okay. That’s the economy I’m determined to build.”

Washing meat is cultural, yet mandatory

felt sick the first time I ate unwashed chicken.

I watched my friend de-package the chicken breast. He rinsed one side for all of one second; placed the chicken, with its package juice-water still dripping, in a baking pan; sprinkled a few seasonings then popped the pan in the oven for the breast to bake. I knew people didn’t wash their chicken, or any meat for that matter, but witnessing it was an entirely grotesque experience.

Even though the USDA does not recommend washing raw poultry, beef, lamb, pork or fish because bacteria can spread to other foods, surfaces and utensils, I can’t bear not washing meat. In my family, washing meat is the start to well-prepared food and something my parents, sister, cousins, and so forth do. To us, it’s a ritual, a mandate. We care equally about cleaning, eating, and communing. Because of this, I don’t eat food from potlucks; I can’t vouch for who may or may not have cleaned the meat.

My process of washing meat starts with a running water rinse, then soaking in a large bowl of cold water plus lemon juice and/or vinegar for a few minutes to “wash” away the germs. I inherited washing meat from my Belizean-Nigerian family.

Cousin Bobbi, my family’s matriarch, recalled buying meat and fish at the only market on the river in Belize City approximately half a century ago. “Outside of extremely wealthy people, most bought their food, raw meat, fish, fruit, vegetables and seasonings, at the market. Beef was hung up and you told the person — he wasn’t a butcher; he could have been a farmer or a man there to just sell meat — what part you wanted, and he chopped it off and gave it to you.” At 83 years old, Cousin Bobbi’s memory is still sharp. She adds, “There weren’t mosquitoes or bugs flying around so that wasn’t a worry, but you saw someone handling your meat with their bare hands. That was more than enough reason to wash it at home.”

When she left Belize for the United States, she left the open market shopping behind; when she returned to her home country for subsequent visits, the market was replaced by modern grocery stores, all with pre-packaged meat. Yet, it never changed her stance on meat washing.

I never visited the market Cousin Bobbi referred to, but growing up, I always accompanied my mother to a live poultry shop for fresh-killed chicken. Feathers were everywhere, and I recall a Spanish-speaking man wearing a thick rubber apron and rubber boots splattered with water and flecks of blood. He used to jokingly ask me to show him which fowl to pick. I hid behind my mother’s hips and peeked out only when the chicken he grabbed from the cage started to squawk. The feathers floated to the ground and left a trail as the man disappeared in the back, the chicken’s neck firmly in his large hand. Shortly after, he always handed my mother a heavy brown paper bag which was placed in a white plastic bag. That was our dinner. When we got home, my mother washed all of the chicken by soaking it in a water, lemon, and vinegar mixture. Sometimes she let the neck sit a little longer since it was harder to wash.

My mother no longer frequents live poultry houses and local butcheries; neither do I. Instead, I purchase most poultry and meats from Trader Joe’s in vacuum-sealed packages labeled natural or organic, and yet, I still wash each piece.

Cousin Bobbi’s meat washing process varies slightly from mine. She washes her meat in designated bowls or aluminum pans by rubbing half or quartered lemons on each piece. Immediately after, she seasons the meat, then cleans her sink and countertops with the leftover lemons to avoid cross contamination. I refuse to sanitize with used lemons, preferring to clean my sink, surfaces, and utensils with apple cider vinegar followed by soap and water. Sometimes after washing the utensils, I still place them in the dishwasher and turn on the antibacterial setting. My process is more time consuming but personally more reassuring.

The only person I know of Caribbean descent who does not wash their meat is my acquaintance Tracy. “I don’t have time for that,” she once said. “My mother did that often but it’s an old and outdated practice.”

I have also never seen a chef wash meat as I sat at the chef’s table or in a restaurant that has an open view to the kitchen. And while culinary shows are edited for television, I have also not seen one piece of meat washed. Lastly, the handful of times I participated in culinary classes, no one ever suggested that the meat needed to be washed. So. I know restaurant chefs are unlikely to wash their meat, yet, Julius Jackson, a St. Thomas-based professional chef, author, boxer, and former Olympic competitor, does. “The United States Virgin Islands was a port for slavery. Food for [slaves] were leftovers kept in dirty buckets. [By nature], animals aren’t clean. Chicken feet, pork feet, and pork snout are especially unclean,” he said in a phone interview.

“I wash down meat when I cook at home and cater for others,” Jackson continued. In his cookbook, My Modern Caribbean Kitchen, Jackson doesn’t need to tell recipe-followers to wash their meat before seasoning; this pre-preparation stage is expected. Again, it’s cultural. “Everyone I saw in the kitchen, including my mother, cleaned their meat before seasoning. My mother used acid — warm water and lemons or vinegar — to wash meat. This was especially true for chicken.”

Growing up, the women in my family did most of the cooking. My Nigerian dad, who I’ve seldom seen cook, is big on things being clean and organized, so I asked him about his preparation practices. When he cooks, he washes every piece of meat three times with a lemon-water mixture and after, cleanses it again with just lemons, then adds seasonings. While my dad’s practice started with meat, he extended a similar process to almost all food; he washes produce and rice thrice in water as well.

***

Of course, not everyone agrees with the process of washing meat. Jamila Robinson, assistant managing editor for food, dining, and community through food at The Philadelphia Inquirer, is totally anti-washing since it can spread salmonella and e-coli everywhere. For fish, she rinses and pats it dry.

“Meat washing is such a curious thing to me. You would never wash ground round or sausage so why wash a chicken?” Robinson says. “I definitely think it’s cultural. It’s important not to castigate cultural practices around food but also raise awareness about food safety.”

When washing meat, there is always the possibility of cross-contamination and spreading bacteria. This is why cleaning sinks and surfaces is integral to decontamination. In addition to Cousin Bobbi’s quick clean method and my lengthy one, Chef Jackson offers a step-by-step approach for cleaning meat. “Use a really large bowl because it prevents splashing and try to avoid washing in your sink.” He recommends using a stainless-steel bowl because it holds bacteria less than plastic. When it’s time to clean surfaces, “Always have vinegar because it doesn’t go bad. It also cleans and sanitizes surfaces if you don’t have bleach,” he said. Alternately, if vinegar is unavailable, lemon or limes work just as well, Jackson indicated.

Remember my opening story about my friend dripping chicken juice? I always believed meat juice was the culprit for spreading bacteria; it was the reason for my disgust and not just a figment of my imagination. While meat washing as well as cleaning and sanitizing after varies by individuals, even within my family, there is one thing every who washes meat should have: bleach.

Benjamin Chapman, professor and food safety extension specialist in the Agricultural and Human Sciences Department at North Carolina State University stated, “Any time we’re doing meal preparation at home, it’s important to understand raw meat, poultry, fish and egg products can come into our kitchens contaminated. The challenge with raw meat and poultry is the water that purges out of the meat during storage or refrigeration. That liquid contains pathogens that can be easily spread from the packaging, the meat itself, hands, countertops, and utensils. Sometimes it contains pathogens, sometimes it doesn’t.” He added, “Washing meat does not reduce the risk; it increases the chance of pathogens.”

But, for people like myself, my family, Jackson, and countless others who accept this practice as a cultural norm, Chapman adds, “Bleach-based solutions are the safest for cleaning. We don’t have good data that proves vinegar kills what’s in your sink. It does [help], but lemons and vinegar don’t do enough. Look at the liquid like it’s a pathogen, limit where it may tread then do a good job of cleaning and sanitizing. Clean to remove the liquid then sanitize to take care of any bacteria that may be remaining that you can’t see.”

I started keeping a notebook with recipes for my son. While he’s too young to touch raw meat, I allow him to pour vinegar in the water for soaking. When he’s older, I’ll show him how to wash meat to maintain family and cultural traditions; it will also ensure I’ll dine at his home. Today, however, I will, update my family tradition by sanitizing with a bleach-based solution instead of vinegar because tradition can change a little.

It’s too easy to make your own everything bagel spice mix

Fall may be for pumpkin spice, but everything bagel mix knows no season.

The everything bagel — showered in an extravagant portion of seeds and spices — is the quintessential kitchen sink delicacy. Legend has it that back in 1980, a teenage Brooklyn bagel shop worker named David Gussin had a eureka moment when cleaning out the oven’s debris at the end of the day.

And just like that . . . an icon was born.

While there’s nothing quite like that bottom-of-the-oven flavor you get from a great bagel purchased at a bagel shop (the main thing that continues to tether me to New York), a homemade mix is cheap, easy to throw together and even easier to throw on everything you love to eat.

Over the past few years, the “bagel” part of the equation has become optional, as the crunchy mix has enjoyed broad crossover appeal. Like salty, oniony things? Like stubborn poppy seeds between your teeth? That experience is now as close as a Trader Joe’s spice section.


Want more great food writing and recipes? Subscribe to “The Bite,” Salon Food’s newsletter.


For some reason, I find that most homemade recipes omit the caraway seeds, though I consider them to be part of the everything bagel canon. I wouldn’t make you buy a whole jar of the stuff just for a single purpose, but if you’re pro-caraway seeds, they add so much to the whole experience.

Of course, this mix was made for avocado toast and eggsquisite eggs. I also love to generously coat chicken or pork tenderloin with this stuff before it goes in the oven. And stirred into plain yogurt with chopped tomatoes, it makes for a luxurious breakfast that’s almost better than bagels themselves.

***

Inspired by Minimalist Baker

Everything Bagel Spice Mix
Yields
 20 – 30 servings
Prep Time
 5 minutes
Cook Time
 0 minutes

Ingredients

  • 1 1/2 tablespoons poppy seeds
  • 1 1/2 tablespoons white sesame seeds
  • 1 1/2 tablespoons black sesame seeds (or just double the amount of white sesame seeds)
  • 1 tablespoon dried minced onion
  • 1 tablespoon dried minced garlic
  • 1 tablespoon caraway seeds
  • 1 tablespoon flaky salt (or 1/2 tablespoon of fine sea salt)

Directions

  1. Mix all the ingredients in a small lidded bowl or jar and combine thoroughly. Store sealed. Your bagel mix will keep about 3 months in a cupboard or 6 months in the fridge.

Salon Food writes about stuff we think you’ll like. Salon has affiliate partnerships, so we may get a share of the revenue from your purchase.