Spring Sale: Get 1 Year, Save 58%

Ken Jennings tapped to join Mayim Bialik as “Jeopardy!” co-host … for now

The “Jeopardy!” hosting saga continues. 

Ken Jennings, known as the highest-earning “Jeopardy!” contestant of all time, will be joining Mayim Bialik as co-host of the game show through the rest of 2021, Variety reported on Thursday. Jennings will assist with hosting duties on an interim basis, as Sony continues its search for a permanent co-host to join Bialik for its 38th season.

Jennings and Bialik will reportedly “trade off as their schedules allow,” and film the remaining episodes of this year between Sept. 20 and Nov. 5. 

If you’ve been keeping up with the long, sprawling timeline of the “Jeopardy!” host search, you’ll recall Jennings is replacing Mike Richards, a former executive producer of the show whose brief tenure as host was mired in scandal. Richards was briefly selected — by himself and presumably others on a search committee — to co-host the trivia show, until an onslaught of controversy all but forced him to step down.


Want a daily wrap-up of all the news and commentary Salon has to offer? Subscribe to our morning newsletter, Crash Course.


Jennings is not without his own detractors. When he was initially named as a “Jeopardy!” guest host following the death of legendary host Alex Trebek last November, old tweets surfaced of Jennings mocking the disabled. He has since offered a full apology, posting, “Sometimes I said dumb things in a dumb way and I want to apologize to people who were (rightfully!) offended. It wasn’t my intention to hurt anyone, but that doesn’t matter: I screwed up, and I’m truly sorry.” 

He once again found himself mired in controversy in January after he came to the defense of John Roderick aka “Bean Dad,” who co-hosts a podcast with Jennings. Bean Dad apparently only allowed his nine-year-old daughter to eat if she could figure out how to use a manual can opener to open a can of beans. Six hours later, his upset daughter was finally able to eat, and Bean Dad shared this teachable moment triumphantly on Twitter. Outraged folks railed on him and subsequently uncovered Roderick’s racist, antisemitic and ableist tweets. When Jennings tried to chime in on behalf of his pal, he got pulled into the maelstrom. 

Despite all of this, Jennings is not as controversial as Mike Richards.

“Jeopardy!” fans were immediately outraged by the apparent corruption in Richards’ selection as co-host over fan-favorite LeVar Burton. After Richards was revealed as a frontrunner in the hosting search, previous lawsuits against Richards for pregnancy discrimination and mistreatment of employees while at “The Price is Right” resurfaced. So did disparaging comments he about women, Jewish people and people of color on a podcast he once hosted. Following this report, Richards stepped down as co-host, but stayed on as executive producer — with some eyebrow-raising conditions — for a couple weeks, before ultimately stepping down from the show entirely.

As Jennings takes Richards’ place in the coming months, he returns to “Jeopardy!” hosting duties after being the highest-rated guest host of the show in its 37th season. Since then the show filled its emcee slot with an expansive rotation of guest hosts. 

It remains to be seen who will be chosen or even if Jennings himself will claim the title. Being marginally better than the man who exploded his own career, however, isn’t the best qualification for the job. With the show’s reputation and legacy already tainted, whoever is chosen will have a huge PR ship to turn around.

A fond farewell to the “Brooklyn Nine-Nine” hero cops, who are ending this ride along just on time

Any law enforcement official harboring an action flick super-cop fetish is cruising for a comeuppance. Andy Samberg’s “Brooklyn Nine-Nine” hero Jake Peralta isn’t immune to that fact.

At various points throughout the show’s eight seasons Jake’s “Die Hard” worship and generalized fandom for other bullet-riddled classics has gotten him into trouble. Usually we can laugh at the scrapes Jake gets himself into.

The recently aired episode called “The Set Up” ends that streak. What begins with Jake excited to be handed a case involving a bomb threat on a bus – “a ‘Speed!'” he giddily calls it, all but skipping towards cinematic danger – ends with his suspension.

This is a just punishment, because Jake arrests an innocent man. The resulting wrongful detainment causes the man to lose his job, so he sues the department.


Want a daily wrap-up of all the news and commentary Salon has to offer? Subscribe to our morning newsletter, Crash Course.


That’s not enough of a deterrent to stop our hero. Jake tails the guy on his off-hours, suspecting he’s a plant hired by this season’s nemesis, the comically crooked, amoral union head Frank O’Sullivan (John C. McGinley), to mess up Jake’s stellar record.

But . . . why? The answer, posits our would-be John McClane, is that O’Sullivan is doing this to wreck the police reform pilot program Jake’s wife Amy Santiago (Melissa Fumero) is spearheading.

This has been Jake’s M.O. through the comedy’s eight seasons on Fox and NBC, and it’s a major reason “Brooklyn Nine-Nine” setups work. To the detective, every tiny misdemeanor and slight has the potential to be part of a huge conspiracy – and most of the time his circuitous theorizing and dogged skepticism pays off. Eventually.

Not this time. His unnecessary surveillance earns him additional intimidation charges and a five-month benching.

When the show’s eighth and final season kicked off a few weeks ago I noted the awkward position of its circumstances. Season 7 aired in April 2020, prior to George Floyd’s murder and subsequent calls to defund the police, reapportioning exorbitant police department budgets to programs devoted to promoting mental health and non-violent intervention.

It was tough to see how those tense and necessary debates would square with the show’s depiction of a New York City police precinct that honestly cares about the people it serves. Co-creators Dan Goor and Michael Schur, to their credit, didn’t try to soften our attitudes about policing.

Instead they affirmed them while closely guarding the image they created of a goofy good cop who’s also dedicated to being a good person.

As such, when Jake makes a terrible call that has a real cost to another human being, and then doubles down, he doesn’t wriggle his way out of it. He claims his wrongdoing and takes the hit.

Of course, we don’t witness him languishing much during his suspension since he passes the time in part enlisting Sergeant Terry Jeffords (Terry Crews) to sniff out another mystery hidden within the family tree of his bestie Charles Boyle (Joe Lo Truglio).

The following episode, and the series penultimate, marries Jake’s unquenchable thirst for detecting to that sitcom-ending standard, a wedding. Actually, a vow renewal – one that reels the whole gang and former detective Rosa Diaz (Stephanie Beatriz) into one last adventure with their boss Raymond Holt (Andre Braugher), Jake’s surrogate “dad.” 

Notice that these final half hours revolve less around the precinct than the lives of the people in it, intentionally reminding us that while “Brooklyn Nine-Nine” is a cop show, it’s a workplace comedy above all. 

It is also a comedy that tried in previous seasons and this one to walk the fine line between spotlighting and foregrounding the goodness and best intentions of its character and being honest and truthful about policing in America and its cops.

Past seasons jumped into issues such as racial profiling, homophobia and corruption as fearlessly as a kindly comedy could while still fulfilling its obligation to make us laugh.

In its best episodes, and that refers to most of them, “Brooklyn Nine-Nine” was a reliable feel-good sitcom. Even when Holt ran for commissioner and lost out to a stop-and-frisk-happy lug, he and the people who work for him rallied and continued striving to do the right thing.  

I predict it will continue to fill that role in its streaming and syndication afterlife. But I also wonder whether, in the coming years, people will recognize the ways in which the show in its very kindly way upholds the myth of the righteous hero cop.  

The writers address this in “The Set Up” when Holt, displaying the apex of his fury – a state he calls “huffy” – chastises O’Sullivan’s refusal to hold aggressive, discriminatory cops responsible. Holt reminds him that when officers aren’t held accountable for their mistakes, the police lose their community’s trust.

Earlier in that same half hour Amy lectures O’Sullivan for attempting to block her pilot program, which enacts proposals designed to reduce interactions in which armed cops are needlessly interacting with civilians. “It could save lives and restore trust with the community.”

Two episodes later both she and Holt are promoted, granting them the power to put these reforms into practice. Wish fulfillment is another staple of the sitcom’s farewell, right up there with nuptials. It is absolutely heartwarming. It also upholds the unrealistic notion that somewhere out there those good apples Trevor Noah talked about – the ones we never see stopping the bad ones.

But “Brooklyn Nine-Nine” die-hards aren’t going to miss this show for its procedural accuracy. They’ll miss the inclusive and welcoming family it built over eight seasons and two networks. The show may be ending at a time that its parody of cop drama excesses stopped feeling entirely right, but it’s tough to let go of a series that’s lasted this long and even tougher for fans to say goodbye knowing they’ve already saved it once.

Still, Goor, Schur and the writers have done a fine job of walking us through the stations of an honorable goodbye leading up to this week’s finale. We’ll miss the way Jake, Amy, Rosa, Charles, Terry, Holt, those idiots Scully (Joel McKinnon Miller) and Hitchcock (Dirk Blocker), and long-gone snarky administrator Gina Linetti (Chelsea Peretti) created a stable family of choice that brought out the best in each other.  

But this final ride along, including “The Set Up,” has presented the most persuasive argument that now is the right time for the comedy to bow out honorably.

The two-part series finale of “Brooklyn Nine-Nine” airs at 8 p.m. Thursday, Sept. 16 on NBC.

Biden blames GOP governors for remaining vaccine hesitancy

After first attributed the most recent lackluster jobs report to unvaccinated Americans, saying that there’s “no question” the country’s economic health is being held back by the spread of the COVID-19 delta variant, President Joe Biden is now blaming Republican leaders of “doing everything they can to undermine the life-saving requirements.”

“I propose a requirement for COVID vaccines, and the governor of that state calls it a ‘tyrannical-type move?'” Biden said on Wednesday, noting that the pandemic has killed over 660,000 people in the United States. “This is the worst type of politics…and I refuse to give in to it.” 

The president has recently become more vocal about making a direct link between the anti-vaccine stance of some Republican leaders and the faltering economy.

“Some wanted to see a larger number today, and so did I,” Biden said in a White House speech. “But what we’ve seen is continued growth month after month. We’ve added jobs in every single one of my first seven jobs reports.”

“This is the kind of growth that makes our economy stronger. Consistent progress, not boom or bust,” he added. 

According to the report, released by the U.S. Labor Department on Friday, hiring substantially slowed in the month of August, with 235,000 new jobs added – about 493,000 less than Refinitiv’s projection. August’s job growth is the smallest the country has seen since January, CNBC noted, with notable declines in sectors like restaurant reservations and air travel. June and July respectively, by comparison, saw gains of 1.1 million and 962,000 new jobs.

The National Women’s Law Center found that women benefited from just 11.9% of hiring growth in August. Analysts say that industries predominated by women – like leisure, hospitality, education, and health services – have been particularly crippled by COVID-19, leading to an aggregate reduction of opportunities within those industries. 

“These are some of the biggest sectors for women’s jobs,” Jasmine Tucker, director of research at NWLC, told CNBC. “Unfortunately, demand for these services could go down as COVID cases rise because people are going to dine and shop less, for example, if they’re worried about getting sick.”

The report also saw a slight dip in unemployment from 5.4% to 5.2% – a significant improvement from January, when it hovered around 6.3%. 

“What we’re seeing is an economic recovery that’s durable and strong,” the president said, emphasizing that the country’s recuperation will be a long process. “We need to make more progress in fighting the delta variant of COVID-19. This is a continuing pandemic of the unvaccinated,” he added. 

Biden noted that the economy will be buttressed by the Democratic-backed $1.2 trillion infrastructure bill and $3.5 trillion budget reconciliation measure. However, it remains unclear if and when those bills will advance through the House and Senate, seeing as they’ve both been mired in partisan bickering for months.  

The president further stressed that the economy’s recovery largely hinges upon the country’s ability to brace itself against the latest wave of COVID-19. 

According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, just 64% of all Americans are fully vaccinated. The explosive growth in new COVID-19 cases have largely been seen in southern states, where Republican lawmakers and governors have demurred or even outlawed public safety measures, like mask-mandates and social distancing. Last week, there were 1,338 hospitalizations in Florida – the highest out of any state in the U.S.

You’re vaccinated. You’ve got the sniffles. Is it a cold, allergies or a breakthrough case?

It started with the sniffles.

Ominously, I hadn’t had a runny nose since before the pandemic. I half-hoped that it was related to the wildfire smoke that had drifted to the San Francisco Bay Area from the Caldor and Dixie wildfires near Lake Tahoe. 

It got worse. The next morning I woke up stuffy, almost completely unable to breathe through my nose. And a sore throat accompanied. That’s when the panic set in.

This went beyond wildfire smoke symptoms or seasonal allergies. As the day continued, my sore throat worsened. I had sneezing fits, a headache, mild cough, and just an overall feeling of being sick. Even though I’d been vaccinated, I feared I had somehow contracted a breakthrough case.

I started obsessively googling breakthrough Covid symptoms. Alarmingly, according to the Zoe Covid study, headache, runny nose, sneezing, sore throat, and loss of smell, are the top five symptoms fully vaccinated people report when infected. I was four for five. My husband started to feel stuffy too, so he joined me in making an appointment to get a COVID-19 test the next day.

Nearly 24 hours later, our results were in: we were negative. Evidently, it was just a cold.

I was grateful, in more ways than one. Because I work from home, I easily avoided exposing anyone to the virus (besides, unfortunately, my immediate family). But the experience did spur a thought: mid-pandemic, the symptoms of a normal cold can be something more ominous. 

In part, that’s because the recommendations for quarantining due to even a mild case of COVID-19 — as most breakthrough cases are — are much more severe than for a normal cold. Those with symptoms like mine (which could have just as easily been COVID-19 are supposed to self-isolate until they’ve received their test results. If a fully vaccinated person tests positive, they have to self-isolate for at least 10 days. In other words, getting a cold post-pandemic is quite different from getting a cold in 2019.

The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) states that, with the delta variant (which is the dominant strain in the U.S.), fully vaccinated people can still spread the virus to others — though, notably, they do appear to spread the virus for a shorter time. 

My experience is not unique: millions of vaccinated Americans have or will experience similar symptoms, and fear the worst. I was lucky to easily be able to find and schedule a COVID-19 test, though not everyone is so lucky. In this situation, how are the fully-vaccinated supposed to know if their common cold symptoms signify COVID-19, allergies or just a plain old cold? And what challenges will we face this winter, when cold season starts in earnest?

In an interview, Dr. Amesh Adalja said when it comes to deciphering between seasonal allergies, a cold and a COVID-19 infection despite vaccination, the easiest to rule out are seasonal allergies.

“People with allergies usually have some history of seasonal allergies, so it’s not usually something that comes on out of the blue,” Adalja said. “It’s something that has triggers, based on certain pollen or certain times of the year, or certain exposures like cats or dogs or whatever it might be, so allergies usually have some history that helps to distinguish them from something that’s not analogy that’s an infection.”

Adalja adeed that allergies will usually not include a fever, which is usually a good indicator that a person’s body is fighting off an infection. Dr. Purvi Parikh, an immunologist with Allergy & Asthma Network, agreed.


Want more health and science stories in your inbox? Subscribe to Salon’s weekly newsletter The Vulgar Scientist.


“Generally allergies have more itchy symptoms — they are on bilateral or on both sides rather than one sided and there is a seasonal component,” Parikh said in an email. “Generally with cold flu or Covid, there’s fatigue, muscle aches and fever (over 100.4°) and loss of taste and smell. Covid and flu can also have stomach issues like nausea, vomiting or diarrhea.”

Doctors have reported seeing sneezing as a symptom in breakthrough cases, something that has been reported in the Zoe Covid study. Sneezing is a new symptom compared to the hallmark ones — cough, fever, fatigue, muscle aches— from the beginning of the pandemic. While there has been speculation that it is unique to the delta variant, that has yet to be scientifically confirmed. Yet researchers at the Zoe Covid study state: “If you’ve been vaccinated and start sneezing a lot without an explanation, you should get a COVID-19 test, especially if you are living or working around people who are at greater risk from the disease.”

Of course, people with breakthrough cases often experience very mild symptoms. The COVID-19 vaccines remain effective in protecting people from getting seriously ill or being hospitalized from COVID-19. Still, infections despite vaccinations can happen. As doctors continue to say, no vaccine is 100% effective.

Adalja said the only way someone can know for sure if they are experiencing a cold or COVID-19 is through a test.

“I think that because there’s a lot of public health importance to COVID-19 cases, even mild ones, that you can’t just brush off upper respiratory symptoms and assume that it’s inconsequential because you might be infected with COVID-19 and you might be able to spread it to somebody,” Adalja said. “I think that those types of symptoms should trigger testing or thinking about, ‘Do I have allergies?’ — all those types of questions.”

Adalja added that at-home testing is a good option for people in this situation. The BinaxNOW COVID-19 test is available at Walgreens, and provides results in 15 minutes, but it costs $23 for a kit of two tests. If these tests aren’t available near where you live, or if you can’t afford one, you will likely have to go find a nearby free testing site. This could be challenging for many during the winter, when colds and flus typically rise. 

“There are so many people who either don’t have paid time off, or who can’t take time off during the day, there are demands on them to be at work,” said Shelby O’Connor, a Professor in the Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine at the University of Wisconsin–Madison.

“It’s really difficult for them, and I’m not judging anyone — I just think it’s difficult to make those types of decisions.”

Dave O’Connor, who is also a professor in the Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine at the University of Wisconsin–Madison, believes the government should make at-home rapid tests free. O’Connor said this move could be “critically important,” and be the barrier between families sending their child with a cough or runny nose to school or not.

“More of that kind of testing could be really helpful in determining whether to send your kid to school or not,” Dave said. “But if it’s 25 bucks to buy a set for two of those tests, that’s going to be 25 bucks too much for a lot of families.”

Pennsylvania GOP subpoenas personal information of every voter for 2020 election “fraudit”

Pennsylvania Republicans on Wednesday voted to subpoena personal information on every voter in the state as part of a taxpayer-funded probe into former President Donald Trump’s election loss 10 months earlier.

Jake Corman, the Republican state Senate leader, disputed Trump and his allies’ false claims about election fraud in Pennsylvania last year but has since buckled under pressure from the Trump wing of the party and committed to conducting a “full forensic investigation” of the 2020 election after the former president and his allies pushed for an Arizona style election “audit.”  

The Republican-led state Senate Intergovernmental Operations Committee moved ahead with the probe on Wednesday, voting to subpoena Democratic Gov. Tom Wolf’s administration for detailed voter records including names, dates of birth, driver’s license numbers, last four digits of Social Security numbers, addresses and methods of voting for every voter who participated in the November election and the May 2020 primaries.

Committee chairman Sen. Cris Dush, who traveled to Arizona to review that state’s so-called audit, acknowledged during Wednesday’s hearing that there have been no “proven allegations” of fraud but insisted that Republicans were responding to “questions regarding the validity of people who have voted — whether or not they exist.”

“We are investigating the allegations to determine whether or not they are factual,” he said.

“There have been allegations about last year’s elections. I understand that,” Democratic state Sen. Steve Santarsiero shot back. “They’ve been proven to be without merit. Why do we now need this information?”


Want a daily wrap-up of all the news and commentary Salon has to offer? Subscribe to our morning newsletter, Crash Course.


There has been no evidence to support Trump and his allies’ false fraud claims, which were roundly rejected by courts in Pennsylvania and other states.

The subpoena issued by the committee also seeks communications between election officials and other documents related to election administration.

State Sen. Anthony Williams, the top Democrat on the committee, called the subpoena a “pure, unadulterated power grab” intended “to suppress voters’ rights.”

Democrats, who have labeled the dubious probe a “fraudit,” vowed to fight the subpoenas in court.

“Senate Democrats, going forward, intend to take legal action against this gross abuse of power by filing a lawsuit, challenging in the courts, and to ask the courts to declare the Senate Republicans’ actions in violation of separation of power, as well as declaring that they had no authority to issue these subpoenas,” state Senate Minority Leader Jay Costa told The New York Times.

State Attorney General Josh Shapiro, a Democrat, also vowed to take “legal action necessary to protect their private personal information from this charade.”

Wolf called the effort a “sham” aimed at perpetuating Trump’s “Big Lie” about the election by “undermining confidence in our elections by bringing an Arizona-style circus to Pennsylvania.”

“Let’s be very clear, this information request is merely another step to undermine democracy, confidence in our elections and to capitulate to Donald Trump’s conspiracy theories about the 2020 election,” he said in a statement. “It is a direct continuation of the same lies that resulted in the attack on the Capitol, and that have done so much to destabilize our political institutions over the ten months since last year’s election. As even members of the Pennsylvania Republican caucus have acknowledged, this charade has to stop.”

The state has already conducted two actual post-election audits that confirmed the results of the election.

“Republican lawmakers may be the only people in the country who actually want to relive 2020,” Democratic Lt. Gov. John Fetterman, who is running for Pennsylvania’s open U.S. Senate seat next year, said in a statement. “The election happened 10 months ago. Biden won. Get over it. Stop pissing away taxpayer money.”

Republicans have vowed to defend the subpoenas in court, which could stretch the process out for months and cost taxpayers even more. Dush said he also plans to hire a contractor to run the probe but could not guarantee that the vendor won’t have ties to Trump or other candidates after widespread criticism of Arizona’s decision to hire Cyber Ninjas, an inexperienced out-of-state firm whose owner pushed pro-Trump election conspiracy theories on Twitter. Dush said the vendor would not have ties to former Trump lawyer Sidney Powell, who faces legal sanctions for pushing baseless lawsuits challenging election results.

Corman, who previously said he also wants to obtain voting machines and ballots for the probe, vowed to ensure that voter information would be “secure,” though he provided no details on how he would ensure that. In Arizona, taxpayers will now be compelled to spend millions to replace voting machines that were decertified by the state after being handed over to Cyber Ninjas.

“We want to be very careful about this process so that we don’t cause any undue consequences,” Corman acknowledged to the Philadelphia Inquirer.

Election experts say it’s a risky bet.

“That’s a really bad idea to have private information floating around in a Senate caucus,” Marian Schneider, an elections lawyer for the ACLU of Pennsylvania, told the New York Times. “And it’s really not clear how the data is going to be used, who’s going to be looking at it, who can have access, how it’s going to be secured. And it’s unclear to me why they even need the personally identifying information.”

Pennsylvania is one of several states where Republicans are pushing Arizona-style probes. In Wisconsin, Republican lawmakers launched an audit led by former State Supreme Court Justice Michael Gableman, who ranted at a pro-Trump rally after the election that the presidency was stolen. Even so, a far-right group affiliated with former Milwaukee County Sheriff David Clarke, a staunch Trump ally, has called for a “broader audit” because they don’t trust the existing one. The state has already spent taxpayer money on four recounts that have confirmed the results of the election.

The States United Democracy Center last week released a memo comparing the Wisconsin audit to the Arizona effort, warning of “unqualified and hyper-partisan actors” who make a “mockery of official election procedures and sow doubt about our democracy.”

“It’s clear these are bad faith efforts,” former New Jersey Gov. Christine Todd Whitman, a Republican co-founder of the group, told reporters, “not fact-finding missions but rather political stunts to keep the lies of the 2020 election alive.”

Stop the malarkey, Biden: Ban the unvaccinated from airplanes already

On September 18, a group of MAGAheads plans to “rally” in Washington D.C. on behalf of the Capitol rioters who are facing charges for their crimes, deeming them “political prisoners.” There is a dispute about how worried folks in D.C. should be about this event. Journalists who follow the insurrectionist movement closely don’t think many people will show up. Law enforcement, however, is clearly worried, “taking no chances” and putting up fences around the Capitol and keeping the National Guard on standby.

Regardless of what happens, there is one clear moral to the story: President Joe Biden should have banned the unvaccinated from flying weeks ago.

Sure, the reason he should have done it is to save lives, stop the spread, and help return American life back to normal. But, hey, thwarting the travel designs of the fanny pack fascists would have been a nice added bonus. 

Jokes aside, the recent victory of California’s Democratic Gov. Gavin Newsom over a recall effort instigated by the “get COVID-19 to own the libs” crowd should be a sign to Democrats that they need not be afraid of ruffling the feathers of the willfully unvaccinated. (Though always wear a mask and carry hand sanitizer when around such ruffling.) The Republicans behind that recall effort made a big bet that they could convince pandemic-weary Californians to punish Newsom for the continued hassles of mask mandates and other pandemic mitigation measures, even though there haven’t been meaningful lockdowns in California for months. 

Newsom’s campaign, on the other hand, bet that Californians, the majority of whom are vaccinated, would blame right-wing COVID-deniers for dragging out the pandemic by refusing to get vaccinated. Newsom campaigned heavily on a message about the importance of pandemic mitigation measures, running ads highlighting how his main opponent, Larry Elder, promised to rescind vaccine mandates for school and health workers that Newsom had implemented. Newsom’s strategy worked, leading to a landslide victory with 64% voting “No” on the recall in an election which, mere weeks ago, was looking like it might be too close for poll predictions. Exit polls found that only 30% of voters thought Newsom’s COVID-19 policies were too strict

“We said yes to science. We said yes to vaccines,” Newsom said in his victory speech. “We said yes to ending his pandemic.”


Want more Amanda Marcotte on politics? Subscribe to her newsletter Standing Room Only.


The Biden White House clearly has been paying attention to polls that show growing support for vaccine mandates, which no doubt contributed to the decision last week to roll out executive orders mandating vaccines for federal workers, health care workers, and any company with more than 100 employees. The announcement is broadly popular, with 62% of Americans backing Biden’s plan. It’s no surprise, as 76% of adults have received at least one shot, but are being forced to adhere to mask mandates and other social distancing protocols because of vaccine refusers.

“We’ve been patient, but our patience is wearing thin,” Biden said while announcing the executive orders. 

Biden’s clear understanding of the resentment growing amongst the vaccinated is why it’s all the more confusing that he still won’t ban the unvaccinated from boarding an airplane. Such a move would be the quickest, cleanest way to send the message that remaining unvaccinated is not a viable option any longer. Getting the ban in place before the holiday travel season would give people both an incentive to get it done and do it in an urgent fashion. It would also help control the spread of the coronavirus by limiting the travel options of the unvaccinated.

On top of saving lives, banning the unvaccinated from planes is popular, with 61% of Americans supporting it in a recent Gallup poll — making vaccine mandates for planes even more popular than vaccine mandates for workplaces or even dining in restaurants. It would also be a more egalitarian move, making it so rich anti-vaxxers can’t evade the mandates that are coming down on ordinary workers. 

The political pressure is mounting, as well.

On Friday, Dr. Anthony Fauci, one of Biden’s top health advisors, came out publicly in favor of banning the vaccinated from planes. Last week, Rep. Don Beyer, a Democrat from Virginia, introduced a bill that would require proof of vaccination or a recent negative COVID-19 test for travel by train or airplane. But such legislation is unnecessary, as the same power Biden used to mandate masks for air travel can be used to mandate vaccines. 

When asked why Biden hadn’t instituted a vaccine mandate for air travel yet on Pod Save America on Monday, White House Chief of Staff Ron Klain responded by saying that the administration continues to look at it, but they are concerned  about the “burden on the vaccinated having to show proof every time you go on to an airplane, having to wait at longer lines in TSA.”

Of course, that is a political way of saying they’re worried about some redhat yahoos clogging up the airport with public tantrums about being turned away by the TSA. And no doubt that will happen — though probably less often than one would fear. Such stunts require purchasing an airline ticket for the sole purpose of filming yourself throwing a fit and then not flying anywhere. It’s a lot of upfront costs even for the most dedicated clout-chasers of right-wing social media. But sure, such incidents will still cause delays of probably 10, 15 minutes for the unlucky travelers who fly on those rare days.


Want more Amanda Marcotte on politics? Subscribe to her newsletter Standing Room Only.


So the administration shouldn’t worry that travelers will blame them. On the contrary, the viral videos of grown adults having childish meltdowns in airports will only hurt Republicans, as the vaccinated majority will only get more fed up with these right-wing antics. 

And if they’re really worried about it, the administration can put out a travel advisory telling people to build more time in for security lines, just as we did in the years after 9/11. In the grand scheme of sacrifices made to help end this pandemic, giving yourself an extra half-hour to make a flight is a minor one that most travelers will happily abide by. 

The Biden administration clearly can read a poll, which is why they’ve started to lean harder into vaccine mandates and political messaging that, correctly, blames the willfully unvaccinated for prolonging a pandemic that should be in the rearview mirror already. The hesitance to add vaccine mandates for travel is, under the circumstances, baffling.

Time is running out.

The latest date that people can start the two-shot vaccine protocol, in time to be fully vaccinated to fly on the day before Thanksgiving, is October 27. That’s less than 6 weeks from now. The sooner that the holdouts realize they need to get their shots to salvage their holiday travel plans, the better. The time to ban the unvaccinated from planes is now.

A spiced, no-bake chocolate “salami” that’s been around the world

I love how food brings us together in a global, generational game of telephone. A recipe is passed on, and it changes in the interpretation. It reflects a little of the person who told the story first, and the one who told it most recently. Think of all the ways in which the beloved dumpling appears on different tables across the world. Think of the regional incarnations of barbecue. Think of the chocolate salami.

I first met it as fridge cake, a hauntingly delicious Anglo-Irish confection made with chocolate, digestive biscuits and golden syrup. I next encountered it a few years ago on a trip to Sicily, where the biscuits had been transformed into biscotti and the cake had been rolled into a log to resemble uh, meat. Since then, I have seen Russian chocolate salami and Portuguese chocolate salami versions, always described as a “traditional” recipe of its country. And I discovered it anew after chatting earlier this summer with Leetal Arazi of the NY Shuk spice company.

Israeli-born Arazi says that “The chocolate salami is something we would eat as kids growing up.” She puts a new spin on the dessert by incorporating her blend of kafe hawaij into the recipe. “It has cardamon and cinnamon, all these warm spices,” she explains. “It’s is traditionally used in coffee, but I started baking with it. It works so well. There’s nothing not to like in it. I just love the combo of that spice with chocolate. I think it’s divine.” She is correct.

Arazi makes her chocolate salami with supermarket butter cookies and pistachio. For my version, I use sliced roasted almonds because that’s what I happen to have on hand, and ramp up the spice quotient even more with Swedish ginger thins. It’s an addictive dessert that would be at home nearly anywhere on earth, because it already is. Best of all, you don’t need to turn on your oven to make it, and as Arazi says, “It’s literally ten minutes to put together. For me, that’s a winner.”

***

Spiced Chocolate Salami

Inspired by NY Shuk

Makes 2 logs

Ingredients:

  • 1 cup of ginger thins or cookie of your choice, lightly crushed
  • 9 ounces of dark chocolate chips or chopped chocolate
  • 1 teaspoon kafe hawaij, ras el hanout, or cinnamon
  • ¾ cup of heavy cream
  • 4 tablespoons butter, cut into cubes
  • ½ cup sliced roasted almonds, or nuts of your choice (optional)
  • Powdered sugar, for serving

Directions:

  1. Place crushed cookies in a large bowl and add the nuts.
  2. Melt the butter in a small saucepan. Add the cream, spice and the chocolate, stirring until everything is melted and smooth.
  3. Add the chocolate mixture to the cookie and nut mixture and stir until combined.
  4. Chill 30 – 60 minutes, until it’s firm enough to work with.
  5. Lay out two sheets of parchment, plastic wrap or foil. Spoon half the chocolate mixture on the surface of one sheet, and gently roll into a log shape. Twist each end and then repeat for the other half of the mixture. Chill several hours.
  6. Remove from the fridge a few minutes before serving to make it easier to slice. Dust lightly with powdered sugar for the full salami effect.

More Quick & Dirty: 

Salon Food writes about stuff we think you’ll like. Salon has affiliate partnerships, so we may get a share of the revenue from your purchase.

 

 

 

GOP lawmaker leaves Republican Party over COVID-19 “extremists”

A former Republican New Hampshire lawmaker switched parties over the state GOP’s unwillingness to implement commonsense COVID-19 health policies, like mask and vaccine mandates. 

Now-Democratic Rep. William Marsh said that state moderates like himself are being squeezed out of the Republican Party, according to The Washington Post“Politics, I’m afraid, is a team sport,” he told the Post. “You’ve got to work with other people, and if nobody’s interested in what you have to say, you might as well go home.”

According to The Week, cases are sharply on the rise in New Hampshire, where infections and deaths are respectively up by 16% and 36% since the last month. The state is currently reporting roughly 340 new cases of COVID-19 daily – about the same as it was in the Spring of this year. 

“As we all know, the combination of the infectious delta variant [of the coronavirus] and waning immunity is causing Covid-19 to surge both in NH and throughout the United States. ICUs are filling up and younger people are getting sick and dying,” Marsh explained

“It’s not in the interest of the public to allow covid to spread in New Hampshire as it has in Florida,” he told the Post. “I’m a doctor first, so I stood up for my patients and said, ‘I’m done with this.’ And I left.”

The last straw, Marsh told NBC10, was when Republicans held a Tuesday rally over President Joe Biden’s proposed COVID-19 vaccine mandate for companies. 


Want a daily wrap-up of all the news and commentary Salon has to offer? Subscribe to our morning newsletter, Crash Course.


New Hampshire House Speaker Sherman Packard, a Republican, said that the demonstration was about “unconstitutional mandates and executive orders.” Marsh, however, disagreed.

“The faction that’s currently dominant in the Republican Party in the House in New Hampshire opposes vaccines and masks and mandates of any kind, and are of the opinion that public health measures are unconstitutional,” Marsh told NBC10. “I believe Supreme Court case law shows that not to be the case.”

During the rally, many protesters hurled criticisms at not only Biden but Republican Gov. Chris Sununu as well as various Republican state leaders who have apparently not done enough to fight against the Democrats. 

“We’re out here to try to help you, and now you’re attacking us,” Packard yelled at a number of hecklers in the crowd. 

Sununu, for his part, has maintained that he’s in support of the vaccine but against mandates, saying: “I am as pro-vaccine as it gets, but I do not support this mandate from Washington, as it is not the answer.”

Marsh has had disagreements with his own party before this. Back in June, the former Republican lost his seat as vice chairman of the key health committee after trying to sink a bill that would limit the state’s power to clamp down on the spread on COVID-19.

How to celebrate Hatch chile season when you’re not in New Mexico

The month of August brings with it a celebration of the season’s best produce, like peaches, tomatoes, and corn. But in New Mexico, the real excitement is all about one regional hero: the mighty Hatch chile. Scientifically speaking, the Hatch chile is a cousin of the Anaheim, though its sweet, floral flavor and status as a cultural icon distinguishes it from any other pepper. “Idaho has its potatoes, Georgia has its peaches, and New Mexico has its chile,” says Nate Cotanch, founder of Zia Hatch Chile Company.

When summer rolls around, New Mexico’s obsession with the spicy crop becomes even more obvious. Supermarkets import massive crates of the stuff, and roasting drums pop up in parking lots and roadside trailers statewide. Lines that rival those at Disneyland form around the roasters, packed with locals eager to bring home pounds of peppers to char and freeze, stocking up for the year. Sitting down as a family to roast and pack chile into plastic bags is an experience that unites many New Mexicans, including Cotanch and Chef Eric See, who runs the New Mexico–inspired restaurant Ursula in Brooklyn. “It’s part of your birthright,” See says. “Seeing my mom at the kitchen table peeling chile for hours and stuffing it in the freezer is a full sensory memory.”

Apart from the taste, the process of peeling and packing roasted peppers and the aroma that wafts seemingly throughout the entire state in August and September all contribute to the New Mexican chile’s cultural significance.

The pepper owes much of its signature flavor to the state’s climate, where the hot days and cold nights lead to a sweet, meaty product with a variable heat level. When picked before fully ripe, the green chile packs a bright, acidic punch. The fully ripened red chile trades some of the brightness for earthy sweetness. The growing conditions of chile are a double-edged sword; because it’s impossible to re-create them anywhere else, true New Mexican chile has long been limited to the southwestern corner of the United States.

This lack of access is what inspired Cotanch to start Zia Hatch Chile Company in 2014. “It was pretty crazy that even in New York, of all places, where cuisines from every part of the world are represented, New Mexican food still really wasn’t,” he says. After years of living in New York and missing the chile he grew up eating, he started working with a family farm in southern New Mexico to bring its celebrated pepper to the East Coast. Now Zia’s products are sold nationwide, and it’s easier than ever for home cooks to get a taste of New Mexico in their own kitchens.

Freshly harvested chile is a luxury only afforded to people who visit New Mexico in late summer (or who can get their hands on some imported peppers), but the frozen variety is the next-best thing when you have a hankering for chile outside harvest season, or outside the state. This preparation is primarily reserved for the green chile, which has a brighter, more vegetal flavor than its red counterpart. Thanks to retailers like New Mexican Connection and The Hatch Chile Store, frozen chile is no longer limited to the dedicated chest freezers found across New Mexican households.

The most common preparation of frozen roasted chile is also the most simple: chopped and put on everything. Smearing it on quesadillas or adding it to a cheeseburger highlights the chile’s meaty texture and subtle sweetness.

Drying chile for year-round use has been a part of New Mexican life for centuries. Originally, peppers were strung and hung together on patios and porches to facilitate the dehydration process and prevent pests. Now that technology has allowed for large-scale controlled chile drying, finding it outside of New Mexico is easier than ever.

Whole dried chile pods can be used to make an earthy salsa macha, but powdered New Mexican chile has almost infinite uses. At home, Cotanch combines dried red chile powder with salt as an all-purpose seasoning. See uses the less common green chile powder to dredge chicken before frying and to season potato chips.

Buying chile packed in jars is the most shelf-stable and widely accessible way to incorporate the pepper into your home cooking. Just like frozen chile, jarred varieties capture the ingredient’s flavor at the peak of harvest season. One major difference, however, is that the jarred version handles peeling and chopping the chile for you.

You can use the chopped chile as a condiment just like its frozen counterpart, but part of its charm is in its versatility. At Ursula, See combines chile with a classic aioli and folds chopped peppers and cheddar into scones.

While nothing can re-create the sights, sounds, and smells of chile harvest season, home cooks no longer require a trip to the Southwest to have a taste of New Mexico’s most iconic ingredient.

Joe Biden’s road show: A big win in California, but there’s trouble ahead

Joe Biden took his presidency on the road this week trying to address a variety of divisive issues facing the country, including but not limited to the pandemic, infrastructure, Afghanistan, China and the creepy former president who will do anything to try and stay in the daily news cycle.

Donald Trump’s ability to be mentioned is clearly tied to him spewing foul rhetoric so bereft of facts and reality that you would take it as an SNL parody skit — until you realize it’s Trump and he’s simply bat-guano nuts. He has stepped up his rhetoric with multiple press releases in any given news cycle, reminding us forever why it’s so nice he’s no longer on Twitter. His many rants against getting vaccinated while claiming responsibility for creating the “Trump vaccine” gives most of the sane world the impression he is the political equivalent of a toddler in a high chair throwing food around to get attention.

But millions respond to Trump’s antics because they agree with Trump, are envious of the attention he receives or perhaps are compromised in ways that would make a contortionist blush.

At the end of a long day of multi-state travel on Monday, Biden found himself in Long Beach, California, to stump for Gov. Gavin Newsom, who faced a recall election and addressed some of the stupidest things Trump and his minions continue to say about the ongoing pandemic.

The Trump minions had been particularly vocal about Newsom and were pushing to oust a governor who has sided with the CDC and science in dealing with the coronavirus pandemic. And, as one Trumper told me on Monday night, “We just want to wipe that smirk off of his face.”

In retrospect, the recall was a long shot. Biden nonetheless wanted to help drive a stake through the hoary heart of the California Trumpers, specifically, and national Trump supporters in general by helping to make sure Newsom wasn’t recalled.

Biden landed on time at the Long Beach airport, appeared at the top of the stairs of Air Force One with a grin, walked stridently into “The Beast” — his modified automobile of choice — avoided shouted questions while the travel pool stood by a jet engine shooting photos and the local press stood in a pen 30 yards away doing the same.


Want a daily wrap-up of all the news and commentary Salon has to offer? Subscribe to our morning newsletter, Crash Course.


Biden’s detractors love to say he has low energy and diminished mental faculties, but after a long day of cross-country travel and several personal appearances on Monday, that wasn’t evident. A small number of supporters showed up to greet Biden at the airport while more than a thousand showed up at a nearby college where he spoke. A handful of Trump supporters showed up to chide Biden for doing so.

The president seemed in his element even at the end of a long day and rose to the challenge of defending Newsom, while at the same time mocking those who question science.

By Wednesday morning, it became apparent Newsom would prevail and Biden issued a statement that didn’t mention Trump specifically but did criticize the former president and his militantly ignorant acolytes:

This vote is a resounding win for the approach that [Newsom] and I share to beating the pandemic: strong vaccine requirements, strong steps to reopen schools safely, and strong plans to distribute real medicines — not fake treatments — to help those who get sick. The fact that voters in both traditionally Democratic and traditionally Republican parts of the state rejected the recall shows that Americans are unifying behind taking these steps to get the pandemic behind us.

Biden and his team are using the California recall as a way to reassure the country they are on the right track and America is turning the tide on Trumpism.

But, even some of the president’s own people don’t believe that’s true.

“If we can get this result in the Bible Belt in the midterms, then I’ll be convinced,” one senior official told me privately.

The fact is, as NPR’s Tamara Keith pointed out in a tweet, that Trump is “throwing spaghetti against the wall,” and baselessly cast doubt on the integrity of the recall. So did some of Trump’s minions. And while there is no evidence that such malarkey occurred, there is also no evidence Trump or his zombies will rest with the California defeat.

Indeed, the few pro-Trump protesters I saw Monday in California parroted some of the same talking points from the former president spit out at me on Sept. 23 of last year, when I asked him ahead of the election if he would accept the results, “win, lose or draw.”

“We know there’s problems with the ballots already,” a Trump supporter told me outside the Long Beach college where Biden spoke at Monday evening. “You can’t trust anything the Democrats do.”

Trump continues pushing his “Big Lie” and in so doing gaslights the entire country and gets a fair number of people to question the cornerstone of our democracy: free and fair elections. Like a cancer that metastasizes, this Trump fantasy is still growing and multiplying.

That I saw it and heard it in California — where the Trumplicans are isolated and nowhere close to a majority — is a frightening indication of how this narrative likely plays in places like Florida where there are far more voters sympathetic to Trump, or anywhere else where Trumplicans are in the majority.

It’s true that after a while, speaking logically, when someone always questions the results of the election merely because they keep losing, it starts to sound like the complaint of a sore loser. But Trumpers are not known for their logic.

And while Biden’s extended foray into the hinterlands of the Midwest and California may help, part of Biden’s problems continue to be of his own creation.

Writing in Roll Call this week, John T. Bennett blamed the Biden administration for “Poor planning. Shoddy messaging. Stubbornness at the top,” and equated some of the worst Biden missteps with some of those made during the Trump era. 

This week’s Biden road show shows he’s well aware of that, or at least of the need to reach out and bind the wounds created by the GOP and Trump. It also highlights how real and dangerous these wounds are — and how impervious to reason, science and common sense the Trumpers are.

Even as California voters responded to the threat of abandoning common sense plans to battle the pandemic, Trump zombies continued to pump out sewage condemning mandatory vaccinations and wearing masks and attacking scientists for their efforts to control the pandemic.

These zombies remain a scourge, and Newsom beating a recall vote in California is not the panacea some believe it to be for what ails our country.

It is cause for hope and cautious optimism, but it also highlights the hard row to hoe that lies ahead and the need for more from the current resident of 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue to combat the blistering, arrogant ignorance that has infested the country and our politics.

Medicine is an imperfect science — but you can still trust its process

As an intensive care physician in Southern California who endured the onslaught of COVID-19 in 2020, it has been deeply disheartening to experience chillingly familiar scenes all over again. The ICUs in the University of California San Diego Health hospital network where I work are again overflowing — especially with patients who need ventilators. Families peer through tinted hospital windows for glimpses of loved ones. And hospital administrators scramble to keep up with necessary staffing and beds to accommodate the influx of patients.

What is so vexing is that COVID-19 is still the culprit, despite the availability of highly effective vaccines that slashed U.S. COVID-19 daily case numbers and hospitalizations within months. The vaccines also allowed economies to begin to recover and provided a way for people to experience some sense of normalcy again.

In early spring, the efficacy of the vaccine engendered hope that herd immunity — in which infectious viral spread is prevented through a high proportion of the population’s being immune to the disease — could be within reach in months. Instead, pandemic panic is again suffocating us, largely because a large part of the public still shuns vaccination – with only 62% of the eligible U.S. population fully vaccinated as of early September 2021.

I wanted an answer to the obvious question: Why?

Straight from the source

So I turned to my patients for answers. At the bedside in their hospital rooms, I first asked about how they were feeling and performed detailed exams before addressing the elephant in the room. “Did you receive the COVID-19 vaccine?” And if not, I gently asked, “Did you have a specific reason you could share with me, so I can understand better?”

Somewhat surprisingly, patients candidly told me their reasons for avoiding the vaccine.

A common response I heard was that it was simply inconvenient. “I was too lazy and I didn’t get around to it,” some admitted, looking away sheepishly as they did so. Curiously, they did not consider the myriad “inconveniences” of becoming infected, such as medical complications – including death – and associated costs for treatment, lost work, dependence on others for basic necessities such as child care, the risk of infecting family members, the potential for developing long-haul COVID-19 and more.

Others expressed a fervid distrust of vaccine-testing methods, stating that people had been “guinea pigs in past vaccine experiments that later caused autism.” Yet more than 25 studies in the past 20-odd years have disproved any causal link between vaccines and autism.

Some felt that the forceful public messaging to get vaccinated belied true motivations of the authorities, adding: “I mean, why are they pushing this so hard? Something must be wrong with it.” Yet few question the strong public health stance on healthy eating practices and exercise, or wearing seat belts while driving.

Still others feared the possibility of life-threatening side effects: “Thousands had heart attacks from the vaccine – it’s all on the CDC website,” they told me. So I took a close look at the CDC website to understand their claims better.

Reports of heart inflammation occurred in 699 cases out of 177 million vaccinated people, or 0.0004%, with causal links to the vaccines still being investigated. Development of blood clots causally associated with the Johnson & Johnson vaccine are also extremely rare, occurring in 28 cases out of 8.73 million doses given as of May 7, 2021 – a rate of 0.0003%. This extremely low risk of blood clots is still significantly lower than the risk of blood clots from an actual COVID-19 infection.

Medicine as art and imperfect science

In some cases, political affiliation can partially explain vaccine antipathy. But my patients’ responses highlighted two other themes to me.

First, people often forget that medicine is an art based on applied science, not a deductive science based on irrefutable forces in nature like gravity. Patients and families often ask me in the ICU to predict what will happen to loved ones unequivocally, only to be disappointed when I avoid speaking in certainties.

Once viewed as omniscient authorities, doctors now openly acknowledge that limitations of medical data require scrutiny and careful application to particular circumstances. COVID-19 has reinforced our appreciation that there are no perfect cures or 100% guarantees of success. Rather, medicine is governed by what is probable. What are the chances I still may have cancer if the test result returns negative? Am I more or less likely to survive pneumonia by taking this specific antibiotic?

Doctors must then engage in thoughtful analysis of the strengths and weaknesses of scientific methods and data to optimize and tailor our recommendations for individual patients – without the luxury of perfect or even complete datasets to rely on. The vaccine has clearly been shown – its rare side effects notwithstanding – to provide an overwhelmingly high likelihood of benefit over potential risks to almost all individuals. This includes people who have been previously infected with COVID-19. Yet the unvaccinated continue to fixate on rare side effects to justify skipping the shot.

Vaccines are medicines too

Many of my patients also seem to view vaccines and other public health-based recommendations like offers to buy a used car – with skepticism and independence, threatening to walk away at any moment. Doing one’s part to stop the spread of disease is a culturally nuanced civic virtue, like safe driving, which transcends absolute autonomy. In the U.S., most drivers willingly do not drive while intoxicated, cross lanes without warning or block other cars that are trying to merge. These are norms that make driving in the U.S. relatively efficient, safe and even pleasant compared with some other countries.

The path to herd immunity, like highway safety, requires majority participation without immediate guarantees of complete personal freedom. Vaccines succeed not because they are 100% risk-free to the individual but because collective efforts focus on achieving the common good.

Oddly, at the same time that my patients rejected the vaccine, they showed strong interest in receiving other types of medicine “shots” like monoclonal antibodies – which mimic natural antibodies – or anti-inflammatory medications. While some of these treatments have demonstrated benefits in certain situations – others have not. And some present the risk of very serious harm.

I reminded my patients that the COVID-19 vaccine stimulates a person’s own immune system to make antibodies that can neutralize the virus and that surpass the capabilities of commercially created antibody formulations. So the vaccines help prevent infection and development of serious illness from COVID-19 in the first place. People who experience the rare breakthrough infections following vaccination generally have a shorter and milder course of COVID-19 infection and are far less likely to end up hospitalized than those who are unvaccinated. Vaccines also confer longer-term protection, whereas the other medications are used reactively – when a serious infection has already begun – and those medications have shorter-term results.

How past vaccination efforts succeeded

In the past, many vaccines that successfully vanquished societal outbreaks of polio, measles and mumps are now routinely administered in childhood with minimal objection, despite the fact that there is no such thing as zero risk.

As I continue to have conversations with patients who suffer greatly from COVID-19 illness as a direct consequence of having avoided the vaccine, my own pain – for being an ineffective healer and witness to such loss – is inexorable. Overcoming this fourth wave of COVID-19 still feels out of reach until our vaccination efforts can somehow better emphasize the effectiveness of vaccines, even when scientifically imperfect, and prioritize civic health care responsibilities over pure autonomy. If not, I fear that our battle against COVID-19 will rage on.

The Conversation is running a series of dispatches from clinicians and researchers operating on the front lines of the coronavirus pandemic. You can find all of the stories here.

Venktesh Ramnath, Associate Clinical Professor of Medicine, University of California San Diego

This article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license. Read the original article.

“Orca,” the largest carbon removal facility to date, is up and running

The world’s largest plant capable of sucking carbon dioxide out of the air and stashing it securely underground has officially been switched on. 

About half an hour outside of Reykjavik, Iceland, nestled between green, rolling hills sits an array of eight rectangular steel boxes arranged in a U shape. Each box, about the size of a shipping container, holds fans and filters that pull in air and trap carbon dioxide molecules. Heat piped into the boxes releases the CO2 from the filters, after which it is combined with water and pumped deep underground. There, the CO2 that was once helping to warm the atmosphere reacts with basalt rock and will turn into stone over the course of two years.

This network of boxes, fans, and pipes is called Orca, and it is a partnership between Climeworks, a company that designs and operates “direct air capture” machines, and Carbfix, a company that turns CO2 into stone. As of Wednesday, Orca has begun removing carbon dioxide from the atmosphere for anyone willing to pay the price.

It is a major milestone for the carbon removal industry, which could become essential to keeping the planet at a livable temperature. Plants like Orca can be used to offset greenhouse gas emissions that are near-impossible to eliminate, like those from agriculture, and they might also eventually help reverse global warming.

The companies behind Orca claim that it can capture and store up to 4,000 metric tons of CO2 per year. Not only is it the largest direct air capture plant in the world, but it is also the only one that both runs on renewable energy — it sits on the site of the Hellisheidi geothermal power plant — and securely stores carbon underground. Thanks to these features, Climeworks boasts that over its whole lifespan, including construction, operations, and recycling, Orca will re-emit less than 10 percent of the carbon dioxide it captures. (Other proposed or operating direct air capture plants run on natural gas and sell captured CO2 for use in products like soda that eventually re-emit it, or to oil companies that use it to edge more oil out of the ground.)

The price, however, is steep. Individuals can pay between $8 and $55 per month to remove 85 to 600 kilograms of CO2 from the atmosphere per year, which translates to roughly $1,100 per metric ton. In the past, the company has named costs between $600 and $800 per metric ton, though Bloomberg Green reportsthat those rates are for bulk buyers like Bill Gates. 

Nonetheless, Climeworks has seen a steady stream of demand for its service, which is one of the only options on the market for truly traceable, permanent CO2 removal. Gates’ company Microsoft pre-purchased 1,400 metric tons of carbon removal from Orca for an undisclosed amount, and Shopify pre-purchased 5,000 metric tons. Just a few weeks ago, Climeworks landed a $10 million, 10-year deal with reinsurance giant Swiss Re to remove carbon, though it is unclear how much.

While it’s the first of its kind, Orca’s 4,000 tons per year is nowhere near a climate-relevant scale. Estimates of how much carbon removal the world might need to deploy to achieve the goals of the Paris Agreement range from 1.5 million metric tons per year to 15 million

A key trade-off that might limit the potential of direct air capture is that it requires lots of energy to separate CO2 from the ambient air. During an event unveiling Orca on Wednesday, Climeworks cofounders Christophe Gebald and Jan Wurzbacher were cagey when asked what the plant’s energy use and costs are.

“The simple answer is today, we just don’t know,” said Wurzbacher. “The Orca plant will tell us, but not today. It will tell us in a year, two years from now about how the economics work out at that scale, how the performance works out — that includes energy consumption.”

FAQ section on Climeworks’ website states that the expected energy consumption for scaled-up machines is approximately 2,650 kilowatt-hours to capture just one metric ton of CO2. That’s about a quarter of the energy the average U.S. household consumes in a year.

The company’s goal is to get the price down to $200 to $300 per metric ton by the end of the decade. Gebald alluded to plans in the works to build a new plant within the next two to three years that will be 10 times larger than Orca. Its name? Mammoth.

Editor’s note: Climeworks is an advertiser with Grist. Advertisers have no role in Grist’s editorial decisions.

Democrats may torpedo their big plan: Shielding billionaire wealth, making it tougher to get aid

Congressional Democrats are negotiating against themselves as they try to complete a spending plan that started at $3.5 trillion but is likely to shrink significantly in the weeks ahead. Though the party can pass the legislation without any Republican support, using the budget reconciliation process, pressure from Democratic moderates like Sen. Joe Manchin — amid a full-court lobbying blitz from pro-business groups — has already forced the sacrifice of several key aspects. Some progressive Democrats fear this is another example of the party abandoning key constituencies and core principles, and s say this could backfire badly at the ballot box.

Much of the focus in the negotiation has been on Manchin, the West Virginia senator at the chamber’s dead center, who has threatened to oppose the bill unless its spending is cut by more than half. But House moderates have made similar demands: A new draft proposal from the House Ways and Means Committee looks a whole lot different from President Joe Biden’s Build Back Better proposal and those offered by Senate Democrats. Many of these threats and revisions have come against the backdrop of a lobbying blitz by business groups who would like to defang the bill or kill it entirely, even as Republicans have gone largely quiet on the proposal.

There has been virtually no Republican ad spending to attack Biden’s sweeping plan, which includes climate change measures, free community college and child care, an expansion of Medicare and Medicaid, family care and many other provisions. Polls have consistently found that the proposals in the bill have strong popular support. The push to cut key provisions from the package has only emerged after an aggressive campaign by corporate groups to block some of the proposed tax increases.

“They’re lobbying to try to escape their obligation to pay the taxes they owe, leaving working families to pay a larger share of the burden,” Biden complained last week.

The lobbying push included key former Senate Democrats, including former Montana Sen. Max Baucus, who played a key role in crafting the Obamacare law and has since started a lobbying firm. Baucus has worked to preserve a tax loophole that allows the rich to pass down assets and investments to heirs tax-free, writing in an op-ed that closing the loophole would hurt family farmers and ranchers. In fact, Biden’s proposal includes an exemption for assets up to $1 million for individuals and $2.5 million for couples. Former North Dakota Sen. Heidi Heitkamp made a similar argument during a media blitz to oppose closing the loophole, painting it as damaging to “middle-class families.” That came after Heitkamp joined a dark money group that opposes the tax. Just months earlier, Heitkamp had assailed the very same loophole as “one of the biggest scams in the history of forever on income redistribution.”

“This is what oligarchy and a corrupt political system are all about,” said Sen. Bernie Sanders, I-Vt., who chairs the Senate Budget Committee, on  Twitter. “The rich and large corporations get richer, and their lobbyists do everything possible to protect their wealth and greed. Not this time.”


Want a daily wrap-up of all the news and commentary Salon has to offer? Subscribe to our morning newsletter, Crash Course.


But in fact, the incessant lobbying appears to have been effective. The House Ways and Means Committee — chaired by Rep. Richard Neal of Massachusetts, viewed with suspicion by many progressives — has released a draft proposal that would raise nearly $2.1 trillion in new taxes over the next decade but excludes Biden’s and Senate Democrats’ proposal to close the loophole. It also excluded Senate Democrats’ proposals to crack down on tax avoidance practices by wealthy moguls like Amazon’s Jeff Bezos or Tesla’s Elon Musk after intense pushback from moderate Democrats, according to The New York Times, choosing instead to “go after the merely rich more than the fabulously rich.”

“It’s important to address the fact that billionaire heirs may never pay tax on billions in stock gains,” Senate Finance Chairman Ron Wyden, D-Ore., said in a statement to Salon. “The nurses, firefighters, and teachers who pay their taxes with every paycheck know the system is broken when billionaire heirs never pay tax on billions in stock gains.”

The tax proposal would roll back the Trump era tax cut on top earners and increase the top capital gains tax rate from 20% to 25%, well below the 39.6% proposed by the White House, though it would apply a 3% surtax on those who earn over $5 million. The plan would also roll back the Trump era estate tax cuts. This plan, however, is very different from the one offered by Wyden’s committee, which called for a one-time surtax on billionaire wealth and an annual wealth tax. Biden has not backed a wealth tax but called for higher taxes on unrealized income and inheritances.

“America’s billionaires are popping Champagne tonight as the House Ways and Means Committee — led by Chair Richie Neal — fails the president, fails the country and fails history,” Erica Payne, president of the Patriotic Millionaires, a wealthy group that backs tax increases, said in a statement.

The House bill also falls short of Biden’s call to raise the corporate tax rate from 21% to 28% after Republicans slashed it from 35% under Trump. The House plan would lower the corporate tax to 18% for businesses that earn under $400,000 and raise the top rate for businesses that earn over $5 million to 26.5%, leaving it well below what it was before 2017. The bill would also raise taxes on companies’ overseas profits from 10.5% to 16.6%, less than the 21% sought by Biden. The Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget estimated that the House proposal would raise about $360 billion in revenue compared to $1 trillion under the White House plan. Polls have consistently found that most voters favor a wealth tax on the super-rich.

House moderates could also cut into the total revenue meant to pay for the social expansion with their demand to cut taxes for wealthy homeowners. Rep. Josh Gottheimer, D-N.J., and other members from affluent districts have demanded that the plan include a repeal of the cap on the State and Local Tax Deduction. Estimates suggest that about 86% of benefits from a SALT cap repeal would flow to the top 5% of earners. It could reduce the revenue raised to pay for the rest of the plan by $380 billion through 2025.

The House plan still includes Biden’s proposal to increase IRS funding to go after wealthy tax dodgers, but administration officials have warned that the plan drops a measure to implement new bank reporting requirements that would help the IRS find rich people who are avoiding their tax obligations.

“It is important to ensure that the reporting regime is sufficiently comprehensive, so that tax evaders are not able to structure financial accounts to avoid it,” Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen wrote in a letter to Neal on Tuesday. “Any suggestion that instead this reporting regime will be used to target enforcement efforts on ordinary Americans is wholly misguided.”

Other lawmakers worry that the committee’s plan would not provide key aid fast enough. The House proposal includes Medicare expansion to add coverage for dental hearing, and vision care, but the dental expansion would not be rolled out until 2028.

Officials inside the Biden administration have said it could take years to build out a system to include dental coverage, according to the Washington Post, and Democrats on the committee worry that the measure is “expensive” and delaying the start date would allow Congress to fund Medicaid expansion for states that opted out of the Obamacare expansion earlier in the 10-year plan. But the Ways and Means plan was released without any sign-off from the Biden administration or Senate Democrats, according to the Post’s Jeff Stein.

A source familiar with the committee’s discussions told Salon that while the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services already has limited systems in place for vision and hearing, it will require time for the agency to develop a fee schedule to pay dentists, develop standards for enrolling dentists and enroll providers.

Tricia Neuman, executive director of the nonprofit Kaiser Family Foundation’s Program on Medicare Policy, agreed that it might take time to stand up the system. But “some may be disappointed that the implementation is so far away because many people on Medicare have high out-of-pocket costs for dental care or go without because they can’t afford it,” she said in an interview. While hearing and vision benefits would be rolled out earlier, Neuman said the group’s research has found that “out-of-pocket spending is substantially higher” for people who receive dental and hearing care than for vision services.

Seniors, who typically make up the country’s largest voting bloc, often face big dental bills and nearly half of Medicare beneficiaries have no dental coverage, according to KFF. The plan could repeat “one of Obamacare’s big mistakes,” warned Slate’s Jordan Weissmann, noting that the health care law mostly didn’t kick in for four years, well after Democrats were wiped out in the 2010 midterms — mostly due to the backlash over the law that has since become so popular that an all-Republican government couldn’t repeal it. A recent poll found that 82% of likely midterm voters support adding dental coverage to Medicare.

“Democrats should work to ensure key parts of their agenda are felt by voters ahead of the midterms, particularly those that benefit high-turnout older voters,” pollster Sean McElwee, the executive director of Data for Progress, cautioned in an email to Salon.

Senate Democrats are pushing to provide the new benefit as soon as possible, potentially by sending vouchers or pre-paid debit cards worth between $600 and $1,000 to seniors to cover the new areas of coverage while the administration stands up the new system. But a source familiar with the House discussions expressed concerns that such a plan could result in fraud and identity theft without proper safeguards and that vouchers would lack standards for service providers.

Neuman said that the plan would certainly provide help faster but would also “substantially increase the cost of the potential benefit.”

“With physician services, for example, there is a Medicare fee schedule,” she said. “With a voucher or debit card, it’s conceivable there would be no limit on what one price is for a given service. It would just be whatever the charge is, which is, in some ways, no different than what occurs today.”

Sanders’ office did not respond to questions about the proposal from Salon.

Perhaps the biggest obstacles lie ahead on the Senate side, where Manchin called for the plan to be slashed from $3.5 trillion to between $1 trillion and $1.5 trillion. Sen. Kyrsten Sinema, D-Ariz., Manchin’s ideological ally, has also balked at the price tag. Some Democrats appear willing to go along with shrinking the plan. House Majority Whip Jim Clyburn, D-S.C., said last week that the $3.5 trillion figure is just a “ceiling,” not a “floor.” Progressives don’t agree, saying athat the $3.5 trillion is already a significant downgrade from Sanders’ $6 trillion proposal.

Manchin’s qualms aren’t limited to the top-line cost. The West Virginia senator has pushed back against Biden’s proposed corporate tax rate and some of the measures to combat climate change included in the proposal, which a majority of voters nationwide strongly support — but may be less popular in his home state. Manchin has been among the biggest recipients of campaign contributions from the oil and gas industry and progressives like Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, D-N.Y.., have accused him of being beholden to fossil fuel companies, which he denies.

Manchin has also called to make some of the aid in the proposal harder to get by imposing means testing and work requirements, a key aspect of ill-fated Democratic welfare proposals in the 1990s

Manchin says he opposes the proposed extension of the enhanced Child Tax Credit, which provides up to $300 per month per child, because it lacks work requirements or “education requirements.” Manchin also called to reduce the income cut-off for the credit from $150,000 to $50,000, calling for a more “need-based” approach. He told Insider that parents should have to provide a W-2 to show that they’re working to get the credit.

“Children of parents who are laid off or are struggling to find work should not be punished further by losing the lifeline of a monthly Child Tax Credit,” Seth Hanlon, a senior fellow at the Center for American Progress, told Salon, arguing that it’s “unlikely that parents who can readily find a decent job would want to live and raise children on $3,000 or $3,600.”

The credit also reduces barriers to work by allowing parents to afford child care, transportation and other necessities, Hanlon said. “By enabling their parents to provide basic expenses — food, stable housing, school expenses, after school — children will grow up healthier, do better in school and be more likely to stay in school, less likely to fall into the criminal justice system, less likely to fall victim to addiction, and they will ultimately work and earn more in adulthood.”

The enhanced CTC, which is already phased out for people who earn more than $75,000, lifted an estimated 3 million children out of poverty in its first month, a 25% reduction. More than 400 economists signed a letter to Congressional leaders on Tuesday arguing that the expanded CTC can “dramatically improve the lives of millions of children,” citing numerous studies finding that a “universal child allowance would have a negligible effect on employment.” A Reuters poll published on Tuesday found that 59% of Americans support the expanded CTC.

Sen. Michael Bennet, D-Colo., one of the architects of the expanded credit, “strongly opposes adding work requirements,” a spokesperson said in a statement to Salon.

“He believes punishing the poorest children in America because their family’s income is too low to qualify them for the CTC is self-defeating and incredibly compromising to them and to our nation’s future,” the statement said. “Study after study shows work requirements don’t work. Depriving families of economic security, food and shelter won’t help them find a job faster. In fact, countries with a child credit have a higher workforce participation rate than the United States.”

Sen. Sherrod Brown, D-Ohio, another architect of the program, also pushed back on the work requirements.

“Senator Brown believes that raising kids is work, and the families receiving the CTC are working hard every day to provide for their children — sometimes at multiple jobs,” s spokesperson for Brown said in a statement to Salon. “Sen. Brown’s been holding roundtables across Ohio since CTC payments started in July and he’s heard from many families that they’re using their CTC to pay for child care so that they can go back to work. The bottom line: these tax cuts have lifted millions of kids out of poverty and this policy should continue.”

Manchin’s lust for work requirements is unpopular among House Democrats either, and not just among progressives. Rep. Suzan DelBene, D-Wash., who chairs the moderate New Democrat Coalition, agreed that adding work requirements or other stipulations would “hurt middle-class families.”

“Before Democrats expanded the credit in the American Rescue Plan, one in three children were left out of receiving the full benefit because their families didn’t make enough money,” she said in a statement to Salon. “The Child Tax Credit is an important tax cut for middle-class families and in only two months is already having an incredible impact on American children. For every dollar we invest in the expanded Child Tax Credit, we save eight dollars and ensure a better future for our kids. New Dems are all-in on extending the American Rescue Plan’s Child Tax Credit for as long as possible and every Democrat — especially moderates — should be as invested in helping regrow our middle class.”

Various committees in both chambers of Congress are racing to complete the bill before the end of the month. House Speaker Nancy Pelosi vowed to advance the budget bill at the same time as the bipartisan Senate infrastructure bill in order to shore up support from progressives, who balked at the lack of climate spending and social investments in the Senate package. Pelosi has also cut a deal with House moderates to set a vote on the infrastructure bill by Sept. 27 in exchange for their votes to advance the budget resolution — but progressives say they won’t vote for that bill except in tandem with the larger spending package.

“As our members have made clear for three months, the two are integrally tied together, and we will only vote for the infrastructure bill after passing the reconciliation bill,” Rep. Pramila Jayapal, D-Wash., chair of the Congressional Progressive Caucus, said in a statement.

Progressives say they also won’t vote for a bill that slashes key parts of Biden’s agenda.

“Between an ongoing global pandemic, the worst economic recession since the Great Depression, and a climate crisis that grows more dire by the day, the overlapping crises we face demand a reconciliation package that meets the moment,” said Rep. Mondaire Jones, D-N.Y., in a statement to Salon. The $3.5 trillion, Jones said, “is not an arbitrary number,” but is what’s “necessary to fund President Biden’s Build Back Better agenda — policies like universal child care, climate action, Medicare expansion, and more that are widely popular with the American people.

“Anyone working to undermine this bill is working to undermine President Biden’s agenda and our nation’s economic recovery, plain and simple. If Sen. Manchin is serious about delivering for the people of West Virginia and our nation, it’s time for him to stop obstructing President Biden’s agenda and commit to supporting a bill that meets this moment.

So what’s the actual difference between jam and jelly?

Besides being a playful abbreviation of the word “jealous” (just me?), jelly is not the same as jam, which is not the same as preserves, though they’re all in the same family. Marmalade is also in that family, and so is compote, but in a cousin-twice-removed kind of way. We’ve broken it all down for you below, the way fruit breaks down to make delicious, delicious jam.

First things first: All of the above are forms of fruit cooked with sugar, an acid like lemon juice or vinegar, and occasionally pectin. Pectin occurs naturally in fruits, but low-pectin fruits like strawberries and apricots often need a bit of a boost in order to set into the jam-like texture we all love. That’s when powdered stuff comes in handy. Once cooked this way and safely canned, preserves can live on shelves for months, waiting to add the taste of a July plum to a January piece of toast.

Jelly

Jelly is the smoothest, jiggliest of the bunch, because it’s made from fruit juice. To make jelly, you have to cook crushed fruit and strain it thoroughly with cheesecloth or an appropriately named jelly bag. As for what to do with the excess fruit pulp, this thread on our Hotline has some great suggestions, from infusing liquor to adding it to homemade oat bars.

Jelly is great for fruits like blackberries, which have particularly irritating seeds that love to get stuck in your teeth. It’s also a great way to preserve mint, which pairs beautifully with lamb. It’s the easiest of the lot to spread over baked goods for its consistent texture, and ‘peanut butter and jam sandwich’ doesn’t quite have the same ring to it.

Here are some recipes that make the best of jelly’s smooth consistency:

Peanut Butter and Jelly Pie

Grape Jelly Meatballs

Jam

In terms of consistency, jam sits between jelly and preserves. It’s less fussy to make than jelly because you can skip the straining and just cook finely chopped, crushed or pureed fruit with the sugar-acid-pectin (if needed) combination until it’s ready to be canned. In summary: If it has tiny pieces of the fruit, skin, or seeds in it, it’s jam. That’s why you’ll sometimes see non-fruit spreads referred to as jam (see: bacon jamlettuce jam) — in the spirit of jam, they have small pieces of the ingredients throughout it.

Here are some fruit (and one vegetable) jam recipes that show how versatile it can be:

Roasted Tomato Jam

Banana Jam

Olia Hercules’ Watermelon Rind Jam

Pickled Strawberry Jam

Red Pepper Jam

Melon Jam

Preserves

Preserves are jams that have slightly larger pieces of cooked fruit in it, if not whole pieces of fruit (like blueberries). For example, in the following Pear and Black Pepper Preserves recipe, the pears are cut into 1/4-inch thick slices.

Pear and Black Pepper Preserves

3-Ingredient Strawberry Preserves

Marmalade

Marmalade is a preserve made with citrus fruit, rinds and all. It tends to be much tangier and more sour than jam, and thanks to the copious amounts of natural pectin in citrus rinds, it has a pleasantly gelatinous texture. It can be used in any way you use jam, and does an excellent job of cutting through rich foods for added zip; think of a less fussy duck a l’orange or this savory PB&J that uses marmalade as its “J”.

We have a few actual marmalade recipes too:

Sicilian Blood Orange Marmalade

Grapefruit Marmalade

Lemon Marmalade (Marmellata di Limoni)

Valencia Orange Marmalade

Compote

Like the examples above, making compote involves slowly cooking pieces of fruit with sugar and acid, but unlike them, it’s not meant to be set or preserved. (And remember, pieces of fruit, not a purée — that would be a coulis.) It will keep in the fridge for a couple of days. It’s a great option for topping pancakes, ice cream, or just eating on its own with a dollop of whipped cream. Here are more compote ideas and ways to use them:

Rhubarb Strawberry Compote

Tartines with Ricotta and a Quick Apricot Compote

Crème Fraîche Cheesecake with Apple Cardamom Compote

Crepes with Lemon Curd and Blueberry Compote

Dutch Baby with Cranberry Orange Compote

And no matter what, whichever of the above you decide to make, just know it’ll be delicious on buttered toast.

Robert E. Lee and the Trumpists: Why a Confederate “hero” is still important

Last Wednesday, a statue of Gen. Robert E. Lee was finally removed from Monument Avenue in Richmond, Virginia, the capital of the old Confederacy. The statue was erected in 1890, as Jim and Jane Crow tightened their hands, often literally, around the throat of Black America. The AP reported the big moment:

Hundreds of onlookers erupted in cheers and song as the 21-foot-tall bronze figure was lifted off a pedestal and lowered to the ground. The removal marked a major victory for civil rights activists, whose previous calls to dismantle the statues had been steadfastly rebuked by city and state officials alike.

“It’s very difficult to imagine, certainly, even two years ago that the statues on Monument Avenue would actually be removed,” said Ana Edwards, a community activist and founding member of the Virginia Defenders for Freedom Justice & Equality. “It’s representative of the fact that we’re sort of peeling back the layers of injustice that Black people and people of color have experienced when governed by white supremacist policies for so long.”

Gov. Ralph Northam, a Democrat, had ordered the statue’s removal last summer amid the nationwide wave of protest that followed the police murder of George Floyd in Minneapolis. But it took more than a year for lawsuits aimed at saving the statue to work their way through the courts. Northam called it “hopefully a new day, a new era in Virginia,” adding: “Any remnant like this that glorifies the lost cause of the Civil War, it needs to come down.”

Lee’s statue, like those “honoring” other Confederates, was the physical embodiment of centuries of racial intimidation, racial violence and threats against Black Americans and other people of color. Such statues and monuments were — and in many places still are — an attempt to create a usable past that reinforces and legitimates white supremacy, with the goal of defeating the civil rights movement and the long Black Freedom Struggle. In effect, they communicate that Black people are supposed to forever remain second-class citizens in their own country.

In addition, Confederate statues and monuments are symbolic acts of psychic and emotional violence against Black people. Many Black people — especially those who survived the era of Jim and Jane Crow — experience anger, pain, humiliation and other forms of trauma when they are forced to confront these statues and other symbols of racist hatred and white supremacy. Confederate statues and monuments are meant to make a claim on public space, one that creates boundaries of civic belonging and community. In that way, some public spaces are declared to be “whites only,” even long after the end of legal segregation.


Want a daily wrap-up of all the news and commentary Salon has to offer? Subscribe to our morning newsletter, Crash Course.


In a 2017 op-ed for the Washington Post, noted historian James Loewen, author of “Lies My Teacher Told Me” and “Sundown Towns,” offered this intervention against the distortions and lies about the Civil War offered by Donald Trump and other neo-Confederates, including the ludicrous notion that the war didn’t need to happen:

Trump’s conclusion about [Stonewall] Jackson places him in a camp of 1930s historians who called it a “needless war,” in the words of James G. Randall, brought about by a “blundering generation.” That view is a product of its time, and that time is now known as the Nadir of Race Relations. The Nadir began at the end of 1890 and began to ease around 1940. It was marked by lynchings, the eugenics movement and the spread of sundown towns across the North. Neo-Confederates put up triumphant Confederate monuments from Helena, Montana, to Key West, Florida, obfuscating why the Southern states seceded. They claimed it was about tariffs or states’ rights — anything but slavery. …

Today, when slavery has no state sanction anywhere, it seems obvious that the institution could not have survived to the 21st century. But if the South had prevailed, cotton would have resumed its role as “the largest and most important portions of the commerce of the earth,” to quote Mississippi’s secession document.

There is one more layer on this onion: The South did not quite secede for slavery, but for slavery as the mechanism to ensure white supremacy. On many occasions, its leaders made this clear. In 1863, William Thompson, founder of the Savannah Morning News, proposed a new, mostly white national flag for the Confederacy: “As a people, we are fighting to maintain the Heaven-ordained supremacy of the white man over the inferior or colored race; a white flag would thus be emblematical of our cause.” The government agreed and adopted his flag.

Some Trump partisans are clearly still fighting for that idea. Unfortunately, the Civil War settled only the issue of slavery — not white supremacy. 

There is a powerful historical symmetry at work in the reality of the Lee statue’s final removal from Monument Avenue. It was taken down and carted away by Team Henry Enterprises, a company whose CEO and president, Devon Henry, is a Black man.

Hundreds of thousands of Black men joined the Union Army during the Civil War. They were integral to turning the tide of battle and finally defeating Lee’s forces and the Confederate slaveholding oligarchy.

I personally believe that Lee’s statues and other monuments “honoring” the Confederacy should be shattered and otherwise destroyed, melted down and turned into chamber pots or other types of toilets. Those objects should then be auctioned off with the money going to civil rights organizations. I would be among the first people to bid on such a prize.

After Lee’s statue was removed in Richmond last Wednesday, Donald Trump, de facto leader of the white right and larger American neofascist movement, issued this statement:

Just watched as a massive crane took down the magnificent and very famous statue of “Robert E. Lee On His Horse” in Richmond, Virginia. It has long been recognized as a beautiful piece of bronze sculpture. To add insult to injury, those who support this “taking” now plan to cut it into three pieces, and throw this work of art into storage prior to its complete desecration.

Robert E. Lee is considered by many Generals to be the greatest strategist of them all. President Lincoln wanted him to command the North, in which case the war would have been over in one day. Robert E. Lee instead chose the other side because of his great love of Virginia, and except for Gettysburg, would have won the war. He should be remembered as perhaps the greatest unifying force after the war was over, ardent in his resolve to bring the North and South together through many means of reconciliation and imploring his soldiers to do their duty in becoming good citizens of this Country.

Our culture is being destroyed and our history and heritage, both good and bad, are being extinguished by the Radical Left, and we can’t let that happen! If only we had Robert E. Lee to command our troops in Afghanistan, that disaster would have ended in a complete and total victory many years ago. What an embarrassment we are suffering because we don’t have the genius of a Robert E. Lee!

On cue, the mainstream news media, many liberals and progressives and other members of the chattering class and commentariat began mocking Trump once again. There were numerous essays, op-eds and commentaries proclaiming Trump to be ignorant of history because of his lack of knowledge about Robert E. Lee, himself a slave-owner and leader of an evil and defeated cause. 

Laughing at Donald Trump may provide comfort for his detractors and opponents. But that laughter is actually rooted in helplessness, impotence and overall despair in response to Trump and his movement’s escalating assault on American society. In a recent conversation at Salon, psychiatrist Justin Frank explained this to me:

It is unhealthy humor. The humor you are describing is defensive in nature. It’s defending against anxiety and fear. Specifically, it is a defensive use of contempt. Through it, people can demean and insult Donald Trump, which in turn means they don’t have to be afraid of him. One of the ways a person can express contempt is through laughter. Thus it is a denial of one’s vulnerability, because contempt means the other person is harmless, therefore he or she cannot hurt you. In that way, Trump is made into a pathetic fool. “If I laugh, it’s not going to hurt me.”

Ultimately, defensive contempt is a way of dismissing Trump’s dangerousness. However, that type of contempt toward Trump is really an attack on reality. It is also an attack on one’s own perception because you have actually undermined your own ability to understand just how dangerous Donald Trump is.

Historians and other experts eviscerated Donald Trump’s public display of his severely limited historical understanding of Lee and the Civil War. That is well and good: Truth is an important weapon against the lies that sustain fascism. But one should make those interventions with the understanding that truth and facts alone is not sufficient to defeat Trumpism.

Instead of self-satisfied mockery, a more effective counter to Trump’s lies about Robert E. Lee (and other matters) is to ask oneself the following question: What is the meaning of this latest controversy? How should we locate Trump’s lies, distortions and propaganda relative to the larger context of America’s democracy crisis?

Some examples may help. Trump and his supplicants have repeatedly described the campaign to remove Confederate statues and monuments as part of a “politically correct” assault by “Radical Leftists”, “Black Lives Matter” activists, proponents of “critical race theory” and other perceived enemies of the “real” America.

Trump and his propagandists have repeatedly used white supremacist language and code — “our culture,” “our heritage,” “our history” — when defending Confederate statues and monuments. The worldview here is one fixated on white grievances and fake victimhood. Those claims and feelings are cornerstones for larger white supremacist fantasies of violence and revenge against Black and brown people (and their supposed white allies) who are engaged in a fantastical global campaign of “white genocide.”

The controversy over a different statue of Robert E. Lee was also the pretext for the “Unite the Right” rally and its ensuing white supremacist rampage in Charlottesville in August 2017. Donald Trump infamously defended those white supremacist thugs and their allies as “very fine people.”

Today’s Republican Party has largely embraced the neo-Confederate movement and its white supremacist “Lost Cause” narrative. These white supremacist fantasies about the Confederacy’s valor and heroism as defenders of “White Southern Civilization” are foundational to Trumpism and its racial authoritarian political and social project.

White Christian evangelicals (especially the Southern Baptists) are among Trump’s most loyal supporters. Those denominations can trace their origins back to the Southern slaveocracy and the white supremacist terror regime of Jim and Jane Crow. White Christian evangelicals remain deeply committed to the political and social project of creating a Christian nationalist theocracy.

The Confederate battle flag — which is a white supremacist hate symbol that threatens violence against nonwhites — is a fixture at Trump’s rallies and other events as well as those of the Republican Party and “conservative” movement more generally. Flags, hats and other MAGA regalia often prominently feature the Confederate flag.

Public opinion and other research have repeatedly shown that today’s Republican Party and its followers, especially Trump supporters, believe in the Lost Cause mythology and other white supremacist lies about America’s past and present. While the United States may have defeated the Confederacy and forced its surrender in 1865, as historian Heather Cox Richardson persuasively argues, today’s Republican Party and “conservative” movement are in many ways the Confederate States of America reborn in the 21st century.

On Jan. 6, Donald Trump’s assault force carried Confederate flags and at least one white Christian nationalist cross. Those thousands of Trump terrorists included Nazis, Klan members, and other white supremacists. Their goal was to overturn America’s multiracial democracy by nullifying the results of the 2020 presidential election and keeping Trump (and in their minds, white people) in power indefinitely. History echoes: The treasonous Confederates believed themselves to be “patriots” and the true heirs to the tradition of George Washington and the American founding. Donald Trump’s followers have deluded themselves in much the same way.

The Jim Crow Republican Party’s coup against democracy did not end on Jan. 6. Instead, it Is escalating, and scoring victories across the country. The dangers represented by Trump and the Republican Party’s threats against democracy are so great that George W. Bush recently declared that Trump’s terrorists and others of their ilk are of the same poisoned tree as the terrorists who killed thousands of Americans on 9/11.

Laughter may make you feel good. Fact-checking may give you a feeling of intellectual superiority. Liberal schadenfreude may provide momentary happiness. But none of that will save American democracy from Donald Trump, the Jim Crow Republican Party and their fascist movement. Only the hard work of mobilizing and engaging in corporeal politics can possibly do that.

Seb Gorka duped by fake Twitter account; young journalist says she’s being smeared

Right-wing radio host and former Trump aide Sebastian Gorka, the self-styled “Dragon of Budapest” who drives around the nation’s capital in his 2.3L EcoBoost Mustang, was duped by a fake Twitter account on Tuesday — which in a bizarre turn of events led to a former MSNBC intern being the recipient of an outpouring of online hate instigated by Gorka.

On Tuesday morning, Hajah Bah, a USC Annenberg journalism student, and former MSNBC intern, woke up to numerous Twitter notifications. Many of those notifications stemmed from Gorka’s tweet accusing her of being a “bigoted ableist.”

The former Trump adviser had clearly been duped by a fake account pretending to be the journalism student. As of Wednesday morning, after Salon had reached out to Twitter, the social media company suspended the spurious Bah account, which appeared to have been operated by a troll who frequently retweeted right-wing content, such as tweets from Fox News host Dan Bongino. 

“This person works for NBC12. Why is MSNBC OK with their employee calling someone she politically disagrees with a ‘retard?'” Gorka posted, implying that the fake account actually belonged to Bah. “What protects foul-mouthed bigoted ableists like @Hajahbahh?” 

That tweet sent out to Gorka’s over 1 million followers tagged a profile page of a troll account that used a picture of Bah, a former MSNBC and NBC12 Richmond newsroom intern. Then, as too often happens on Twitter, Bah’s real account was rolled into the drama. 


Want a daily wrap-up of all the news and commentary Salon has to offer? Subscribe to our morning newsletter, Crash Course.


In a phone interview with Salon, Bah said the incorrect Gorka tweet had provoked hatred from his followers and tarnished her reputation in the industry. 

“Wow, this is not what I said to him,” Bah explained, citing messages that the dubious account had sent Gorka pretending to be her. “I don’t even know who he is. So I’m like, what is going on!” 

Neither Gorka nor a spokesperson for Salem Radio Network, the conservative radio empire that employs him, returned a Salon request for comment. 

Speaking to the impact this incident has had on her young career, Bah said that Gorka’s irresponsible tweet had “tarnished MSNBC and NBC 12, which are amazing companies.” As to how and what needs to be done to correct the situation, Bah suggested the nattily attired but notably hot-tempered former Trump associate, who has built a subsequent radio career on his iconic baritone voice, should retract his tweet and issue a public apology. 

“He should at least acknowledge, ‘Oh, this is not her,'” Bah said, noting that she is “a young journalist trying to break into the industry, it’s just really wrong. I would like an apology.”

Bah said that she and some of her friends had attempted to make Gorka aware of the error via Twitter, but that Gorka had rapidly blocked them. 

In 2019, Gorka, a self-proclaimed free-speech warrior, told a reporter at the White House that he had blocked thousands of users on Twitter. “I block whoever I want to,” Gorka said. “I block 16,000 people because they’re asshats.”

Gorka holds a somewhat dubious doctorate from a university in Budapest, and has been long criticized as a “fake terrorism expert.” According to established national security experts who spoke to CNN, he “lacks practical experience in government, is not an expert on terrorism, and has never served in a diplomatic agency.”

Highlighting a persistent problem in the right-wing media ecosystem, Bah noted that the hate directed at her was genuinely horrific for no apparent reason. “It’s really ridiculous,” she said. “I have been receiving a lot of hate because of the tweet, and it’s not a reflection of my character at all.”

Trump thinks “Justice for J6” rally organized by ex-staffer is a setup: report

Donald Trump is worried about a Saturday rally in support of those arrested during the January 6th attack on the U.S. Capitol by his supporters seeking to overturn the election.

“Mr. Trump, aides said, has little interest in engaging with the protest and has no plans to be anywhere near Washington on Saturday,” The New York Times reported Wednesday. “Instead, his schedule includes a golf tournament at his Bedminster, N.J., club before he heads back down to his Mar-a-Lago resort in Florida, according to people familiar with his schedule.”

“Mr. Trump views the planned protest as a setup that the news media will use against him regardless of the outcome,” the newspaper reported, citing “people familiar with his thinking.”

The rally, being organized for former Trump campaign operative Matt Braynard, will backfire on Republicans, according to GOP strategist John Feehery.

“Anytime the attention is on Joe Biden it’s good for Republicans, and anytime the attention is on Jan. 6 it’s bad for Republicans,” Feehery said. “The only hope Democrats have of keeping the House is to make Jan. 6 the issue of the campaign. They know that, and we know that. The only people who don’t seem to know that are the activists.”

Congressional candidates Mike Collins and Joe Kent will scheduled to attend, the rally organizer announced on Twitter.

Democrat says GOP lawmaker Madison Cawthorn brought weapon to school board meeting

A Democratic candidate running against Rep. Madison Cawthorn (R-N.C.) claims the freshman congressman brought a weapon to a school board meeting, according to Citizen Times.

On Monday, September 13, Jay Carey took to Twitter with a photo of Cawthorn attending a meeting for the Henderson County Board of Education. During the meeting, the lawmaker criticized the COVID-19 mandate, but Carey noticed Cawthorn had what appears to be a knife.

“(Rep. Cawthorn) must have feared for his life, seeing as he brought a knife to the meeting,” tweeted Carey, a resident of Hendersonville.

Speaking to the Citizen Times, Carey offered a brief assessment of what he saw. The Democratic candidate made it clear he is “100% certain” Cawthorn had a knife in his possession.

“I’m 100% certain it was a knife,” he told the Citizen Times. “I was 20 years in the military. Attention to detail is my bread and butter and what kept me alive.”

Following Carey’s post, the Super PAC FireMadison.com also posted about the alleged weapon offering more clarity on it.

“The weapon allegedly smuggled into the Henderson County board of education meeting by [Rep. Cawthorn] has been identified as a MicroTech Borka Blade, beloved by mall ninjas worldwide,” the Super PAC tweeted.

The Super PAC submitted letters to Henderson Sheriff Lowell Griffin and Polk Sheriff Tim Wright as the organization’s president, David Wheeler, called on law enforcement to address the knife incident and conduct an investigation.

“Allowing a member of Congress to flout the laws of North Carolina should not be tolerated,” Wheeler said.

Under North Carolina state law, Cawthorn could be facing a criminal misdemeanor for the weapon. The publication reports: “Bringing a knife to an ‘educational property’ is a Class 1 misdemeanor, according to North Carolina General Statute 14-269.2 “

You can find more information at the Citizen Times.

Roger Stone served Jan. 6 lawsuit papers during live radio interview

Notorious GOP dirty-trickster and longtime Trump adviser Roger Stone had a radio interview interrupted by a process server.

Audio of the event was posted to Twitter by former federal prosecutor Ron Filipkowski.

“While Roger Stone was live on the air this morning with ‘Real Talk 93.3’ (St Louis) doing an interview about the 2024 election, he gets served by a process server with the January 6 lawsuit,” he explained, while posting a clip from Joe Hoft’s show.

Stone was answering a question about why he thinks it is “imperative” for Trump to run in 2024 when the interview was interrupted.

“Hold on a second, I have a process server at my front door about to serve me in the latest lawsuit,” Stone said.

Stone said the papers were for a lawsuit in civil court in the District of Columbia.

“Alright, I have just been served in the January 6th lawsuit — live, right here on your radio show,” Stone said. “This is a big, big stack of papers, which is good, because we’re out of toilet paper.”

Me Too founder on her healing memoir and creating change: “All of us contribute to rape culture”

I got a call from a friend. He was having a long week, “The longest week of his life,” he told me. He said, “D man, you won’t believe what I’ve been going through. Man, let’s go out for a drink on you.” And we linked at a bar where we knocked down glass after glass of vodka, swearing that old cliché to each other ––­­ tough times don’t last, but tough people do. 

The same friend numbed his issue with alcohol only to be hit by three or four brand new problems –– like the days of the week, they just kept coming. And he pulled up to my block with another bottle, looking to numb some more, so we drank even bigger cups, but this time we also hit the store and blew money on new Nikes and sweatsuits. The combination of new sneakers, clothes and Absolut was the perfect painkiller for his problem, a beautiful distraction that temporarily allowed him to move forward. The key word here is “temporarily,” because his issues were never fully resolved and the painkillers grew from clothes and drink to flashy cars and beautiful homes, all of which ultimately snowballed into a glacier of debt that only bought about more issues for him.

My friend’s case isn’t rare. Me Too founder Tarana Burke eloquently writes about the process of healing and the danger of avoiding in her new memoir Unbound: My Story of Liberation and the Birth of the Me Too Movement” (Sept. 14) published with Oprah Winfrey’s book imprint, Flatiron Books.

Burke talked to me on “Salon Talks” about how she found the strength to write about her turbulent journey, from being sexually assaulted at the tender age of seven to the years she spent after, blaming herself for the assault because of poverty, a gross lack of resources and colorism –– and then finally how she healed through activism, advocacy and being a mentor for so many other survivors. Unlike my friend, Burke dug deep down to the root of her problems, dug them out and began her own healing. “It was a difficult process. It was the most difficult creative process I’ve ever gone through,” Burke shared with me about her writing. Burke explained how healing is not a simple destination, but something ongoing that you must work at every day.

You can watch my “Salon Talks” episode with Tarana Burke here or read a Q&A of our conversation below to hear more about “Unbound,” her thoughts on the Texas abortion ban and why this may be her first and last book.

The following conversation has been lightly edited for length and clarity.

First and foremost, I’m extremely inspired by your work, and I want to say congratulations on the new book and the power of the movement you created. Can you start out by telling our readers and our viewers, what does Me Too mean to you in 2021?

It means the same to me in 2021 as it did in 2005 and 2006. I think people miss, because of the viral hashtag, people miss that Me Too is essentially about healing and about action, and it’s about a way to build community first between survivors. Between people who have experienced the same, or similar, kind of violence seeing each other, finding community with each other. So it’s just like any other reason why you would say, “me too.” I found myself in different spaces where people would share about what happened to them, and everybody in the room, or half the people in the room, could say, “Yeah, that happened to me too.” And ultimately, it was a situation where I couldn’t say “me too.” That made me realize how powerful those words actually were.

The reason why I framed the question like that is because it’s still an extremely powerful movement, and then dealing with the horrors of the last administration, on top of the pandemic and everything shutting down, I want to ask you how can people support survivors? People are still a little bit apprehensive about meeting up and going to big groups and spaces, so what can people do now?

I really appreciate that question because I think that not enough attention has been paid to the really specific impact that this pandemic has had on survivors. This is a moment where people have been complaining about having to be inside and having to be isolated, but being inside and isolated is actually more dangerous for so many people who deal with intimate partner and sexual violence in their homes. Children who are dealing with child sexual abuse and can’t get away from it.

One of the ways we can support survivors is by being keenly aware of the unique situation so many people have found themselves in over the last year and the lack of resources that exist for them. It’s heartbreaking when people ask me, “Well, what can I do?” There’s not a lot you can do for somebody who is locked in their home with their abuser. But if we can put resources into the places where they can go to get help, that’s one of the ways that we can support people, post pandemic. But also it’s kind of just understanding what people are up against. This moment in time has been like a spotlight on so many different problems in society, and this is another one. It’s illuminated just how serious this problem is, even more so, I think, than the hashtag.


Want a daily wrap-up of all the news and commentary Salon has to offer? Subscribe to our morning newsletter, Crash Course.


Your writing is beautiful. Before I became a writer, I luckily got a chance to meet the late great Maya Angelou, and one of the things she said is that I shouldn’t say I’m not a writer. My career didn’t start yet and I was still trying to find my voice. One of the things I took from her was in memoir and the power of identifying those universal truths that connect us. Reading your book, I felt like so many things aligned with me and my journey. And even though we’re from two different spaces with two whole different realities, there’s certain things that just bring us together. And that’s one of the most powerful things about “Unbound” to me. I feel like you’re dropping these gems, but you’re not preaching at us. It’s not didactic. You’re allowing your story to do the work. I’m going to assume that was probably part of the goal, and I want to know what was your writing process like, in regards to what you decided to keep in and take out?

I want to be really deep and profound and be like, “That was what I was really trying to get at.” But in truth, I think the reason why that was the end result is because at the end of the day, human to human, that is the reality. We get really caught up in the titles and the experiences, and those are important, right? The experiences that shaped us, where we come from, all those things are important. But when you strip that all away, how those things affect us are as human beings, and that affects how we show up in the world, and that’s where our commonalities kind of come from. And I think that’s why people can relate to it, right? 

At the end of the day, you’re a man, I’m a woman, blah, blah, blah. We come from different – all of the things you’re saying. But the way something pierces you and your spirit, the way something makes you feel, the way something sits on your heart, that doesn’t matter. I think that’s where people will connect. 

What I really tried to in the writing process was just tell the truth. I think that’s what everybody tries to do, but I mean the hard truth, right? It’s an ugly underbelly that sometimes we don’t get to, that we’re scared to talk about. It’s not easy to talk about people thinking you ugly, right? It’s not easy to talk about the worst things that ever happened to you in your life about being abused, violence that you experienced. But I needed to say it. I needed to say it out loud for myself, first and foremost, because there’s also something about facing that. It’s like facing your fears almost. And then there’s another part that’s like, if I need to say it for myself, there’s somebody else that needs to hear it, too.

It’s not easy to talk about things that hurt us, it’s not easy to always talk about things that we’ve been through, and it’s not easy to admit and be as transparent with any healing journey, but that’s also part of your healing, right? A lot of people feel like healing is something that you do, but then it stops. They don’t really understand that it’s just like learning. You’ve worked at it every day. Something that I focus on a lot, that I already knew about your story but I think that everybody needs to know, is you were on the ground doing this work for a long time before there were hashtags, and virality, and the whole big Ivy League universities doing studies on what going viral means. Could you talk about some of those experiences?

I think differently than other people who have had these viral moments kind of shape their work. For me, the work came first and then the viral moment propelled that work into the world. I’ve been an organizer most of my life. And I mean, really, most of my life, since I was a teenager. I’ve been engaged in community work since high school, I was raised in a very conscious family, very conscious about my Blackness, African sense of family. And so it was really important for me to be connected to community, to do liberation and justice work around community. And then that eventually moved into youth work and youth leadership development, because it’s the work that saved me and it helped shape my life. 

And then that work morphed. It’s like little by little as you get older and you kind of pare down on what it is your specialty is, it became really, really clear after a while that I wanted to work with Black girls. Once I got that clarity, I understood. Once I got that clarity, I was like, “This is where I’m going to be. This is the work I want to do.” And I got in that world, I saw what the needs were. And the needs of the same as my needs as a kid, right? I saw a bunch of young girls who had experienced sexual violence, on top of the other traumas that they had experienced in their communities, right? We forget that. And I’m not trying to tell a traumatic story. We are also joyful and full people, but there is a lot of trauma that happens in urban communities that we just normalize, right? My mother actually tells a story about the first shootout I experienced when I was like three or four years old, and I was just walking through. It’s like a joke in the family. “Oh, Tarana didn’t even duck.” That shouldn’t be real.

Right.

That shouldn’t be a reality, that I was in a shootout at three years old, right? But that’s trauma that we don’t think about. That’s the life that I decided I wanted, because I wanted to be able to impact young Black girls lives to make sure that they could even just be a modicum of difference than what I experienced, felt like liberation work to me. The kind of liberation work I wanted to be engaged in. And that is the more I connected with young girls who had experienced sexual violence, I knew this was where I had to direct my energy because I knew what it had done to my life.

Take us to that moment when it actually did go viral. When the Me Too hashtag went viral.

Well, I start the book with that moment because I’ve been asked that question so many times and I’ve had to answer it in soundbites for the last four years. Like, “Well, it was really hard. It was difficult.” Bah, dah, dah, dah, dah. But the truth is I went through it, right? Not just because it was viral and I couldn’t get my arms around it, but also I’m a Black woman, right? At the time I was a 44-year-old Black woman from the Bronx, seemingly up against the world, up against white women in Hollywood, up against famous people, up against even the virality of the hashtag that didn’t start with me. And it just felt like I was going to lose it, and I would never be able to shape the narrative.

It’s just been one big lesson for me for the last four years because, one, I realized very quickly it wasn’t meant for me. The other thing I realized is that that hashtag is not my work. So that hashtag happened, people still see #MeToo as something that is very different than the Me Too movement, which is the work that I started. And I will never fully regain that narrative, but that’s okay. Because what I try to explain to people is if you can’t both call me Tarana Burke, the leader of the movement, the founder of the movement, and say that you believe in my work, and then talk about white women co-opting it. What they have is #MeToo. That has nothing to do with what I’m doing. 

My work is about healing. My work is about action. It starts with Black and brown folks. It starts with Black and brown girls. It starts with people who are pushed to the margins. And if you believe that, nobody can take that away. Nobody can change that. That is where we stay. That’s where we’ve been. You can look at interviews, you can look at my track record for the last four years. I’ve been on all kinds of shows. I done talked about all kinds of things. But the work, the core of the work I’ve done, has been consistent. So I don’t worry about who co-opted what, who’s saying what, because honestly, think about it. White people have never prioritized our pain, right? They have never decided, “Well, let’s see what’s going on,” unless it’s something that is going to benefit them. It’s going to sell their newspapers. 

They started thinking about Black people, Black women, and sexual violence because they had an R. Kelly story to tell, or Russell Simmons story, or Bill Cosby story to tell, right? They can attach it to something. But they don’t talk about sexual violence in relation to Black Lives Matter, right? Because that’s a different story, like when they had the second-highest rate of sexual violence in this country. And Black people have the highest rate of adverse experiences with the police. If you want to talk about Black Lives Matter, why are you not talking about sexual violence? Because you know what the second-highest complaint against police is? Sexual violence. You do all of that math, that means not only are Black women dying at the hands of police, we’re also being sexually assaulted at the hands of the police. Look up Daniel Holtzclaw. You all don’t want to tell that story, right? So it’s up to us to tell that story and to do that work.

I’ve had tough conversations with people who wake up in the morning, pick up their phone, tweet something like “Black people count too,” and they say, “Okay, the work is done. Now I can go out and I’m an activist.” Activism is blood, sweat, and tears. 

So you’re a writer, right? Listen, I have a lot of friends. I was a journalist at some point too. There’s a connection there. If you are a writer, even, who is writing about these stories, who is telling a different story, you’re important to me because then I can use what you’re writing to educate the people I’m talking about, saying, “This is what I’m saying.” You can tell a deeper story, you can research, and then I can take that and bring that to the young people lens. We’re connected in that way. But you with your armchair analysis, and you tweeting, and you’re hashtagging, that’s not helping me. I tell people all the time, “Everything counts.” Do your little part. If that’s all you can do, fine. But then do that and be quiet. You know what I’m saying? If all you need to do is tweet, go ahead and tweet and then leave the criticism alone.

It’s inspired me to dig in deeper on some of the things that I’m working on because you’re brave enough to share some of the darkest elements of your personal story, to talk about what you’ve been through and the years you spent blaming yourself. And without giving too much away, I would like you to talk about how difficult it was to just revisit some things that may not have been easy to revisit.

Yeah. It was hard. And you know what’s interesting? The reason why I was able to write this book, for real for real, is because I have journals that go all the way back to eighth grade. My mother encouraged me to journal when I was younger, and I have journals that’s half written in. Some of them are filled up. 

I had a story — the story of my life is in my head — and if I had to sit down, I could sort of timeline it out. But when I got into some of the really, really harder stories, and then I went back and I read what I was feeling around that time, what I thought around that time, I thought, “Oh my God, I never really unpacked this.” Right? I know the story, I could tell it, I could verbalize it, but I hadn’t really unpacked it. I underestimated what it was going to be like to write it out and unpack it in the moment. It was a difficult process. It was the most difficult creative process I’ve ever gone through. I started in 2019. I put it down for most of 2020. And quite frankly, we have this book because my editor was like, “I mean, do you want to write a book? Because you’re going to need to turn in 70-something pages.” And I got really serious about it end of last year, because got real serious in my therapy, and also had to have a lot of difficult conversations around writing a book.

I went back to talk to people and revisit some old stuff that I had, and people were like, “Why are we talking about this now?” And I’m like, “I’m sorry. I just never . . .” You know, it’s been a while. It was hard, and they keep promoting this as “her first memoir,” and in my mind, I’m like, “I always wanted to write a series of memoirs, like Maya Angelou.” But I’m like, “I don’t know if I can do it again.” It’s hard. It’s definitely hard. 

Was any of it healing? 

Yeah, absolutely. Now that’s the flip side. The thing is, once you unpack it though, it’s unpacked. It’s just like any process. It hurt. It really hurt. A lot of the stuff around my mom was really, really difficult and I just needed to get it out. I think that when you have people in your life and you love them, we find ways to soften the experiences just so we can live with it, right? I know this happened, I know it made me feel this way, but I’m going to, I’m going to let it live in my mind in a particular way, just so that I don’t have to face the reality of it. And what was healing was that I realized I could face the fullness of what happened and I can still love my mom, and we can find a new place in our relationship where both of those things could exist. And that alone was incredibly healing for me, and I think probably for my mom, too.

What would you say to a person who’s going through a similar journey? Somebody who’s trying to understand that healing process, based on what helps you. We talked about therapy, we talked about writing. What about someone who wants to start that journey?
I try not to be prescriptive.

I understand.

It’s so, so different for different people.

I feel you.

I will say that if it sometimes feels . . . the actual thing, the trauma that you feel like, feels like – I think of it like a house sometimes. It feels like your house burned down, right? I mean, it’s such a traumatic thing to even think about. You lose all your worldly possessions and, you know . . . But even when a house burns down, you still have the ground that the house stood on. Regardless of what the brick and mortar that was there, or even the possessions that were inside of the house, you still have ground to build on. And who we are at our core doesn’t really change. It doesn’t have to change. Sometimes the violence that we experienced, the childhood we experienced, feels like it can change our alchemy. But that doesn’t have to be bad.

Without being complicated and all extra cerebral, I try to help people understand. Some people say healing is about how you’re going to be whole again. And you want to try to be whole again, but also know that c That’s been my experience. I got stuck for a long time because I kept thinking I was failing at the healing because I wasn’t feeling a particular way. Where’s the magic? Where’s the thing? Why don’t I feel this? And then it was like, “Oh, this is it. This is what you get. This is who you’re going to be.” It was sort of a journey to accepting this person. This person with the scars, this person with the trauma. It doesn’t go anywhere.

Even the ground you build on, maybe charred from the fire. That may not go anywhere, but you still get to rebuild. And what I’ve done is I control what I rebuild this time, right? It’s up to me. It’s a beautiful process. And particularly for sexual violence, but I think any kind of violence… and I’ve been through all kinds of violence, there’s a way we lose control. Losing control of yourself, of your body, of your functions in any way it’s debilitating. Every decision I make in my life that I have control of is so precious to me. It’s that much more important to me. So, yeah, I just revel in being able to make decisions for my life and that’s healing for me. I don’t know if that’s good advice for people, but I just know it’s a process and it’s a good process. And it ain’t always good, but all of it counts.

“Peace from broken pieces” is the thing I think that we need to talk about. Because we spent so much time looking for magic and waiting for magic, and not even understanding that, the work is something that’s constant. It’s not just a one-time thing.

People don’t realize that healing is the journey. There’s no destination. It’s all in the journey. You have to decide every single day, when you get up, to heal. You have to decide. And then some days decided not to. There’s days when when I’m like, “Yo, I’m f**ked up. I can’t do it. I can’t do it. Today I’m going to cry.” Or I have a girlfriend who I love so much because when I’m going through stuff, she’ll say, “Okay, well, who do you need me to be?” You know? And she was like, “I’m going to give you about 24, 48 hours with this. Do what you need. Cry, rant, whatever, and I’m going to come back and then we’re going to get back on track.” 

I think that’s a beautiful thing, to allow yourself to feel what you need to feel. Give yourself that kind of space. This world of social media, with all those little listicles of “10 ways to heal in your life” that’s not real. It’s not. It’s going to look good sometimes, you’re going to feel great, and then you going to feel terrible sometimes. But you have to know that when you feel terrible, that’s part of it too, and it’s okay.

Something that frustrates me is when we talk about a movement as powerful as Me Too, when we talk about survivors, people who feel like they don’t assault, or they don’t rape, or they didn’t do anything wrong, think that they should be exempt from having the conversation. My question for you is as a man who could potentially come across people who talk like this, what should we be saying to them, to people who feel like they’re above the conversation?

This is such a really important thing. And I think it’s not even for men. It’s for people, right? Because I’ve had sisters, women, who I’ve had to say that If you’re the kind of woman who sees another woman and will be like, “Look at her. Why she got that skirt on?” or “She’s so drunk. Somebody is going to end up.” If you’re that person, you’re part of the problem, too.

I don’t think we’re going to have a shift in sexual violence until we have a shift in rape culture. And all of us contribute to rape culture. And I think that’s the approach we take, not “You could be a perpetrator” or “You probably harmed somebody,” because I think that makes people defensive. But when you can show the breadth of rape culture . . . and it’s so broad. It’s everything from the little jokes we laugh at, the little memes and things that we let slide, you know? And it could be as simple as saying “Man, that’s not funny.” You don’t have to be the guy that’s like “I have a daughter,” and da, da, da, da, da. Or you could be. But to just kind of have boundaries and be clear, “That’s not funny.”

That guy frustrates me too though. The guy who’s like “I would never do that. I have a daughter.” It’s like, even if you don’t have a daughter . . .

Even if you don’t have a daughter. Human to human, you shouldn’t do that to other people. But I’m just saying, let me tell you why I’m not as frustrated with those people anymore. Because at this point, I just want any entry point. If it’s because you got a daughter, all right, let’s take it from there and hopefully I can get you to someplace else, but I hear you. What I need people to do, regardless of how you identify . . . because what happens is that the focus also becomes on men, right? If men could just be different, we wouldn’t have rape. That’s not true because also women cause harm, too. Women also can commit sexual assault. But we don’t talk about trans folks, right? And I’ve seen so many women who uphold rape culture around trans women.

This is a learning curve for all of us. We really have to reshape how we think about sexual violence, how we talk about it, how we normalize it. You got people like the rapper Lil Boosie who was talking about his son. This is the kind of stuff that we normalize. Or the other rappers who are talking about, “I lost my virginity at 11.” That kind of stuff, it’s the normalization. What I try to tell brothers is “Be the difference. Create really hard boundaries and make sure that people around you know. Talk to the young people around you.” It may be too late for some of your peers, but certainly talk to the young people around you because we have to re-socialize our young people, so that by the time they get to teenage years, this stuff is very normal for them. Gender identity, boundaries and respect, all of those things are just normal for them. 

It’s not that they’re rubbing up against the norm. It’s just normal, right? If people all the time in the exercise, replace the rape with murder, so if you were talking in general and the people were like, “Isn’t that guy who they said he raped a girl, didn’t he?” And people would be like, “Maybe, but you know how that is.” If you said, “Didn’t he say he murdered somebody?” That’s going to give you a full pause. “He done like murdered. Did he murder somebody? What?” 

We so normalized rape and we immediately put excuses in our head. What happened? What’s the circumstances? We gotta know extra information. The other last bit I’m going to say about this is we have to move from the idea that sexual violence is an individual issue. So there’s somebody in the community who has that experience of sexual violence, it’s just about them. “Oh, you heard what happened to so-and-so? Oh I hope they getting help. Oh, did she go to the police? Oh did they get counseling?” We start thinking about individual solutions for that person. We don’t think about community solutions. 

When you hear about social justice issues of the day, you hear about gun violence, you hear about police violence. We hear about climate change. You hear about all these different issues that we think of collectively affects us. But we don’t add sexual violence to that because it’s seen as an individual issue. 

I use this to drive this home for people because when you’re in a community and you hear about gun violence, particularly against children, what you see is people rally around that as an issue. “We do not want guns in our community. We want to keep our children safe.” They connect their safety, and the safety of their family, to that particular incident, right? That makes sense to them. They can draw that connection. When you hear about sexual violence in the community, people repel from that. You hear a child is shot, we want to make sure that people are safe. You hear a child is molested, people start whispering. “You don’t know if it’s true or not. I don’t know what happened. What are they going to do? Who is so-and-so?” We don’t feel collectively responsible for the wellbeing of that child or the safety of the community. And that has to change. We have to feel collectively responsible.

At some point, a lot of people tried to tie Me Too to cancel culture. What do you make of that? Or how can we just draw a wedge? Because it’s not the same.

It’s so not the same. I mean, if that was the case, we’d see a whole level of people being canceled, right? It’s not the same. Asking for accountability, or even consent, is not the same as canceling people. And I wish that people would have a little bit of nuance when they think about these things. 

What most people who experience sexual violence are looking for is somebody to be accountable for the pain, to be accountable for the trauma that the person experienced. That accountability can look like a lot of things. Because sexual violence happens on a spectrum, accountability should happen on a spectrum. It doesn’t always mean lose your job, go to jail, blah, blah, blah. But it does mean that somebody has to accounted for it. In a very, very simple way to look at it. 

We have been socialized most of our lives, just because we’re Americans, to think of everything in a crime and punishment framework. Law and order, crime and punishment. This thing happened, these are the set of consequences you have. But at the end of the day, this is about harm and harm reduction. There’s not enough laws to cover the breadth of sexual violence. But right now, if we was face to face and I was to smack you, you may not call the police, right? You’re not going to call the cops necessarily. And you may not even hit me back.

No way.

The next time somebody says, “Do you want to interview Tarana Burke?” You’re going to be like, “No, because she smacked me last time. She didn’t apologize. She didn’t help me out.” I harmed you and I wasn’t accountable for that. And I mean, I’m being flippant a little bit, but the point is whenever anybody is harmed, somebody should answer to that harm. This is not about people being canceled. This is how you get towards wholeness. That healing that we’re talking about, this is a big step in that and everybody deserves healing. It’s not trying to cancel people.

But the other part that I just have to say, and I know people are going to say whatever… There are also some people who sometimes need to be outside of our community, right? That’s just the truth, and I don’t understand why we cape for certain people who cause harm inside of our community, even when they famous. 

This whole thing around R. Kelly and the debate and blah, blah, blah. I’ve had so many Black men, and I wrote about it in a book, who attacked me, or who attacked the new R. Kelly organizers around that, and I’m like, this is a singular man who wrote great songs, but this is a singular man who does not represent Black men.

Absolutely not. 

Absolutely not. I know Black men. I know amazing Black men. In fact, most of the Black men I know are amazing. Even the most trifling of them are amazing, right? Just at their core. Good brothers who would never cause harm, not intentionally in the way this man does. Why is this the hill you want to die on? Sometimes they got to be outside the community and that’s okay.

That man needs to be somewhere getting some help. He’s clearly out of his mind.
 
This is what I’m saying.

I can’t let you go without asking you about the Supreme Court’s decision to not block the Texas abortion ban. This is one of the many things that have just thrown off the month of September.

We’ve watched this happen, right? This is the track that has been happening for several years. This is sort of the culmination of a very carefully calculated plan from the right, from the ultra conservatives, the Christian right wing, whatever you want to call them. It’s kind of a lesson for those of us on the other side. People did not realize how tactical and organized they were. It is horrific, obviously. It is going to be such a monumental setback for reproductive rights. Of course the least of us are going to bear the brunt of it. But I also hope it’s a catalyst for us to double down on our organizing and be as tactical and strategic. 

We really have to raise the bar and sort of meet these people where they are, and even exceed the kind of organizing they’re doing. They have laid the groundwork for this for years and years, and they finally got to this place. It just didn’t happen overnight. It’s not a fluke, and it’s not just because Trump was president. It was going to happen. They found an opportunity with Trump’s presidency to kind of fast track it, and get it in there with the Supreme Court justices. But it’s sad that this is where we are, and I mean, we’re kind of in a really sad time in this country.

Your book is brilliant. Can you please tell everybody where they can check in with you at, and buy the book?
I’m really only on Instagram. I’m sometimes on Twitter. My name is Tarana Janeen on Instagram. And the book is everywhere books are sold, but you should buy it from bookshop.org because that’s where the independents get their money.

Nicki Minaj vows “I’ll never use Twitter again” after backlash over viral COVID vaccine post

Rapper Nicki Minaj went on a wild Instagram Live rant Wednesday night after claiming she was suspended from Twitter for a post in which she said her cousin’s friend in Trinidad and Tobago became impotent and suffered swollen testicles after receiving a COVID-19 vaccine. 

“I have been suspended from Twitter,” she said, over a shot of what appeared to be an apartment ceiling. “Twitter, a place where people say the most horrific things every day.”

The Trinidadian-born artist repeatedly claimed that she did not “give any facts” about the vaccine and that she was simply “asking questions” — though her claims were debunked by the government of Trinidad and Tobago earlier on Wednesday. The country’s health ministry said it could not find any evidence that any patient had reported the symptoms that Minaj described — in Trinidad or elsewhere. 

“As we stand now, there is absolutely no reported side effect or adverse event of testicular swelling in Trinidad,” the country’s health minister, Terrence Deyalsingh, said during a press conference. “And none that we know of anywhere in the world,” he added.


Want a daily wrap-up of all the news and commentary Salon has to offer? Subscribe to our morning newsletter, Crash Course.


Deyalsingh also said he regretted that the agency spent “so much time” fact-checking Minaj, though he maintained that Trinidad and Tobago takes “all of these claims seriously,” especially those that go viral on social media.

“Unfortunately, we wasted so much time yesterday running down this false claim,” he said.

Twitter disputed Minaj’s characterization late Wednesday night, with a spokesperson telling Vulture: “Twitter did not take any enforcement action on the account referenced.”

Minaj also claimed to have received an invitation to the White House Wednesday — though the Biden Administration denied that statement as well, saying it only offered her a phone call with a doctor to explain the benefits of COVID-19 vaccines.

“As we have with others, we offered a call with Nicki Minaj and one of our doctors to answer questions she has about the safety and effectiveness of the vaccine,” a White House official told Bloomberg

The “Super Bass” singer faced hefty backlash for her original Monday tweet, which read:

“My cousin in Trinidad won’t get the vaccine cuz his friend got it & became impotent. His testicles became swollen. His friend was weeks away from getting married, now the girl called off the wedding.”

She also told her more than 22 million followers to “pray on it & make sure you’re comfortable with ur decision, not bullied.”

In an earlier Tweet that kicked off the whole news cycle, Minaj said that she had skipped the 2021 Met Gala because of the event’s vaccination requirement. 

Her vaccine skepticism did earn praise from an unlikely source: right-wing media.

Tucker Carlson, a primetime Fox News host, highlighted Minaj’s tweet during a Monday segment, saying they seemed “sensible.” The channel’s chyron even read: “NICKI MINAJ: COUSIN’S TESTICLES BECAME SWOLLEN” — though the original tweet had claimed her cousin’s friend’s testicles had become swollen. 

During her Instagram Live appearance, Minaj did acknowledge the humor of an entire news cycle dedicated to the size of her cousin’s friend’s genitalia.

“A lot of it has been funny, I’m not going to lie.” 

But later, she compared holding anti-vaccine views in 2021 to being Black in America under segregation, saying, “Are y’all forgetting there was a time not too long ago where [Black Americans] couldn’t even make eye contact with people, and you’re okay with this?”

At one point, Minaj even said she did not plan on returning to the platform that had censored her. 

“I will never use Twitter again,” she said. “This is scary.”

You can watch the whole video below via YouTube:

UPDATE: This story has been updated to include comment from a Twitter spokesperson.

When you drink Chardonnay, the spaetzle get bigger

I was 24 when I lost my job as a financial journalist to the Great Recession and sunk my meager savings into a year-long culinary school program in the hopes of becoming a food writer. Around that time when — to paraphrase the late Nora Ephron — everything in my cooking life was suddenly copy, I grew obsessed with tracking down my late German grandmother’s recipes that endured since my grandparents immigrated from diminutive Heimbuchenthal, Bavaria, to Fairfield, Conn., during World War II. 

My grandmother Louise Buturac — whom we called Oma — died in 1990 when I was only five, meaning I had to glean everything secondhand from my Mom and aunt. I learned delicious tidbits to be sure, such as how she supposedly smuggled mache lettuce seeds in her socks through customs. But her written recipes were scarce — and not just due to the standard granny practice of vague recipe documentation.

As Mom and Aunt Chris gently reminded me, once my grandparents came to the states, Oma lost some enthusiasm for making traditional German dishes night after night. After all, she’d procured her first microwave and made friends with an Italian immigrant at work who shared newfound gems like foolproof eggplant parmesan.

RELATED: The pesky mushroom cookies I bake for Betsy, my late mother-in-law

The handful of recipes my family did inherit included Oma’s stuffed cabbage rolls simmered in tomato sauce, rouladen (thin beef strips wrapped around bacon and a pickle, which we’d refer to by an unsavory, colloquial-German nickname) and spaetzle, a chewy, egg-rich dumpling traditionally served alongside meat with gravy. Spaetzle are gratifying and relatively simple to make — comprising little more than milk, flour and eggs boiled in water. So my sister and I started requesting that Mom make them with us from time to time.

The three of us would crowd into the cluttered little kitchen of my childhood home and pop open a bottle of Chardonnay. We’d always start industriously, divvying up the wet and dry ingredient measurements, then combining and whisking the eggy batter while Mom’s biggest pot of salted water came to a boil. A notorious perfectionist, Oma insisted on using a slotted spoon to funnel the batter into the boiling water, which yielded uniformly tiny dumplings that resembled scrambled egg curds. This of course came with the monotony of hovering over that simmering water for ages fishing out small batches at a time, but Oma bore it without complaint.


Want more great food writing and recipes? Subscribe to Salon Food’s newsletter.


However, the pride with which the three of us retrieved those first few perfect batches was quickly surpassed by exasperation at the quantity of batter left in the bowl. Meanwhile, steam from the pot fogged up the windows dramatically, making us sweat. (Or was that the flush from the wine?) In any case, about midway through our second or third glass, Mom would decisively shift tact and pour the remaining batter into a big measuring cup. She’d tip it over the simmering water, deftly cutting the batter every half second with a butter knife. 

Soon enough, the proportion of shaggy, sausage-sized dumplings overtook the pretty little curds in the buttered bowl. No matter; we’d fry that disorderly assemblage in butter with breadcrumbs per tradition. Only with time has this intergenerational spaetzle become the one I know and cherish most: half impeccable Oma; half the slightly sauced shortcut employed by her impatient descendants — always wholly delicious. 

***

In this slight riff on my Oma’s spaetzle, I’ve added mixed soft herbs, which add interest and color without overpowering the eggy essence of these scruffy homemade noodles. 

Recipe: Herbed Spaetzle

Serves 4 (as a side)

Ingredients:

  • 2 1/4 cups all-purpose flour
  • 1 teaspoon salt
  • 1/2 teaspoon freshly ground black pepper
  • 1/8 teaspoon ground nutmeg
  • 3 large eggs, plus 1 egg yolk
  • 3/4 cup whole milk
  • 3 tablespoons fresh mixed herbs, minced (I used equal parts parsley, dill and chives), divided
  • 2 tablespoons butter, plus more as needed
  • 1 tablespoon olive oil
  • 3/4 cup breadcrumbs 

Method:

1. In a large bowl, mix together the flour, salt, pepper and nutmeg. Whisk together the wet ingredients in a separate bowl. Pour them into the dry ingredients, and mix until well combined. Mix in about 2/3 of the herbs. Let the batter sit for 5-10 minutes. 

2. Bring a large pot of salted water to a boil. Once the water reaches a rolling boil, use a slotted spoon or measuring cup with a spout (depending on the desired size) to funnel the batter into the pot, about 1/2 cup at a time. If using the measuring cup method, use a butter knife or a swipe of your index finger to cut the batter every half second or so. 

3. Cook the spaetzle for 2-3 minutes, or until they float to the top. Remove them using a slotted spoon or spider, and drop them into a colander to allow the excess water to drain for a few minutes. Then move the cooked spaetzle to a large buttered bowl. (You can do this part up to 3 hours ahead of time. Keep the spaetzle in the buttered bowl covered with plastic wrap.)

4. A few minutes before you’re ready to eat, heat a large skillet over medium-high heat. Add the butter, olive oil and breadcrumbs, and cook for a few minutes. Dump in the spaetzle, and toss to coat in the breadcrumb mixture. Cook for about 5 minutes, until browned. You might want to add a bit more butter as you go to keep the spaetzle from drying out. Toss in the rest of the fresh herbs, and serve immediately.

More by this author:

Simone Biles and other gymnasts testify: “I blame an entire system” for enabling Larry Nassar

As Larry Nassar continues to serve his 175-year prison sentence for sexually abusing hundreds of young, female gymnasts, a group of his survivors testified before the U.S. Senate on Wednesday afternoon about the handling of the case. Simone Biles, Aly Raisman, McKayla Maroney, and Maggie Nichols testified once again about their experiences surviving unspeakable sexual trauma at the hands of Nassar — and also rightfully criticized the leaders, systems and institutions that failed them, according to the New York Times

The institutions named in enabling the widespread, systemic sexual abuse includes USA Gymnastics, Michigan State, the Olympic Committee, and of course, the FBI, which received reports from USAG about Nassar’s abuses in 2015 and took no action for almost a year. During the hearings, FBI Director Christopher Wray revealed hat an FBI agent involved in the Nassar investigation had been fired, as if a systemic failure can be neatly pinned on an individual.

“To be clear, I blame Larry Nassar and I also blame an entire system that enabled and perpetrated his abuse,” Biles told the Senate, per reporting from CNN. “USA gymnastics and the United States Olympic and Paralympic committee knew that I was abused by their official team doctor long before I was ever made aware of their knowledge.”

Maroney, a gold medalist at the 2012 London Olympics, slammed the FBI’s mishandling of her reports of Nassar’s abuse. “Let’s be honest, by not taking immediate action from my report, they allowed a child molester to go free for more than a year,” Maroney testified, in a clip published by MSNBC. “And this inaction directly allowed Nassar’s abuse to continue.”

She continued, “What is the point of reporting abuse if our own FBI agents are going to take it upon themselves to bury that report in a drawer? They had legal, legitimate evidence of child abuse, and they did nothing.”

Maroney is specifically referring to the investigation that revealed the FBI’s inaction to help victims of Nassar’s abuse. On Wednesday, Maroney alleged that the FBI didn’t just bury her reports against Nassar. “They falsified my statement, and that was illegal in itself,” she said.

A supervisor at the FBI who was also singled out in the investigation for violating protocol and false statements retired from the agency back in January of 2018, according to CNN.

Raisman, a two-time Olympic champion, pointed out that even today, we still don’t know just how many people were aware of and enabled Nassar’s crimes, according to CNN. “Without knowing who knew what when, we cannot identify all enablers or determine whether they are still in positions of power,” she said. “We just can’t fix a problem we don’t understand, and we can’t understand the problem unless and until we have all of the facts.”


Want a daily wrap-up of all the news and commentary Salon has to offer? Subscribe to our morning newsletter, Crash Course.


The rest of the Senate hearings went as expected, considering how frequently Nassar survivors are forced to come forward, only for almost nothing to change. Director Wray told the survivors who testified that he was “deeply and profoundly sorry,” and U.S. Senators also apologized to the women who testified, and commended their bravery.

We’ve seen some rendition of this before, a handful of times since 2018. The same young women who were victimized by Nassar and failed by adults who should have taken care of them are left to be “brave” and clean up a mess that top officials should have never allowed in the first place. Praising the courage of Nassar victims, as if they had any choice but to be brave in a system that failed them, has become something of an empty platitude from politicians and leaders who could actually be taking tangible actions to help them.

Nassar’s survivors are once again forced to relive their traumas on a national stage in the hopes of some small amount of change — all while, as Raisman points out, so much remains unknown about the systemic corruption and rot at the heart of USAG, the FBI, the Olympic Committee and other institutions.

If anyone should be honored following the latest Nassar hearings, it’s not the FBI, but the gymnasts like Biles who are doing everything they can to protect future generations from harm. “I don’t want another young gymnast, Olympic athlete or any individual to experience the horror that I and hundreds of others have endured before, during and continuing to this day, in the wake — of the Larry Nassar abuse,” Biles said before the Senate.

Capitol Police officer shared secure location where lawmakers were taken on Jan. 6: report

Six Capitol police officers are currently facing disciplinary action over their conduct during the Jan. 6 Capitol riot, including one who reportedly shared information about the secure location that lawmakers were evacuated to during the attempted insurrection. 

That officer was outed when a friend, identified in internal Capitol Police documents obtained by the Miami Herald as “ANONYMOUS,” reported him to the FBI for relaying that information a week after the riot. The friend also told agents that they were concerned about the officer’s parroting of Trump’s election conspiracies.

“I don’t want to report a friend of forty years but he’s says enough concerning statements that I feel like I need to do this… he’s just fallen into this cult and these beliefs,” the friend said in a subsequent interview with Capitol Police, according to the Herald. 

The officer in question apparently disputed that he was sympathetic to the rioters’ cause, but admitted that he may have shared the confidential location where lawmakers were taken after the U.S. Capitol building was breached. 

“I can’t say one hundred percent that I didn’t do what you’re telling me I did,” he told investigators.

Three other officers may be disciplined for “conduct unbecoming” after posing for pictures with rioters, while the others face accusations of making “improper remarks,” failing “to comply with directives,” and “improper dissemination of information,” according to Politico


Want a daily wrap-up of all the news and commentary Salon has to offer? Subscribe to our morning newsletter, Crash Course.


A large number of cases the department investigated did not garner enough evidence for formal charges. However, one officer in particular – dubbed by investigators as the “selfie officer” – may see a significant reprisal.

Back in February, shortly after the Capitol riot unfolded, the FBI sent the Capitol Police Department a photo of at least one of the agency’s officers posing for a selfie with a Capitol rioter, leading some commentators to suspect that the police force deliberately let the rioters inside the building. 

“The arrest warrants are public so I just wanted to give you a heads up that this is happening so you all aren’t blindsided by it,” an FBI investigator told Capitol Police over email, according to the Herald. 

After the media quickly disseminated a flurry of similar images, the Capitol Police Department received “numerous complaints, via telephone and at least 170 emails received in one day, regarding photographs that appeared in news stories and on a live Twitter video of a USCP officer posing with rioters after the Capitol Building was Breached,” per documents related to the investigation. 

The officer in question has maintained that he posed with the rioter to defuse the conflict, and make the offender easily identifiable for a subsequent federal investigation.

“I specifically took the picture so I can refer to that guy,” the officer told investigators, adding: “I can’t help what [the rioters] do. If you want to take a photo, I’m not going to say no because we are always told to interact and keep the situation calm.”

Asked about the photos, the Capitol Police Department told the Miami Herald that it’s “committed to accountability when officers fail to meet the standards governed by USCP policies and the Congressional Community’s expectations.”

“The six sustained cases should not diminish the heroic efforts of the United States Capitol Police officers,” the department added.