Spring Sale: Get 1 Year, Save 58%

Remixed “Revolver” to reveal new layers of the Beatles’ extraordinary musical powers

This week, producer Giles Martin held a listening session at New York City’s Republic Studios, where he unveiled his remixed version (prepared with engineer Sam Okell) of the Beatles’ legendary “Revolver” album. As the key feature of an upcoming boxed set, slated for release on October 28, the remixed “Revolver” is a revelation made explicitly possible by recent advances in sonic technology.

The youngest son of celebrated Beatles producer George Martin, Giles acknowledged the sheer weight of responsibility associated with remixing landmark LPs from the likes of the Beatles. During his remarks at Republic Studios, he pointed out that fans of the Fabs imbue a daunting sense of “ownership” when it comes to the band’s output. In recent years, Martin has carried out remixes for “Sgt. Pepper’s Lonely Hearts Club Band,” “The Beatles” (“The White Album“), “Abbey Road” and “Let It Be.” In each case, he has endeavored to ensure that the remixes reflect the spirit and sound of their precursors. Otherwise, he argued, “they would no longer be the Beatles.”

For many listeners, “Revolver” marked a creative peak for the Beatles. Artist and musician Klaus Voormann, the Grammy-winning designer behind the LP’s cover art, isn’t really surprised about the band’s longevity. In a recent interview with me, he vividly recalled the moment when he first heard the Beatles in Hamburg in 1960. “I had never had access to rock ‘n’ roll music. I had only heard a few tracks on the radio. So I went to Hamburg, to the Reeperbahn, and I listened to the music coming out of a basement apartment window. There was a band playing, and I found out later that it actually was the Beatles playing. And I thought it sounded incredible to me. It was fresh. It had nothing to do with classical music or nothing to do with jazz. It was just really raw rock ‘n’ roll music. And I thought it was fantastic.”

As for the LP’s famous cover art, Voormann will never forget the first time he presented his “Revolver” collage for the Beatles and their team’s inspection. As he explained during our interview, “I was very nervous because nobody had ever seen it before. It was black and white, and it was just a drawing. It was just my invention.” He remembered that when he unveiled the cover art, “They were very quiet, then Paul went up to the cover and pointed at a photo of himself sitting on the toilet. Then George Martin came up, and they all got really close to the cover, and they started looking at all the pictures. Then George Martin said, ‘You can’t do that. You got to take it off. Can you exchange it for some other photo?’ To which I replied, ‘Sure you can.’ And then the ice was broken and people started talking about the cover, and smiling and laughing. And then I knew, just by their faces, that they liked it.”  

As with Giles Martin’s previous efforts, the remixed “Revolver” clearly benefited from his interest in breathing new life into the original, highly compressed mixes propounded by his father in the 1960s. Using new technologies, Martin has succeeded in establishing greater separation among the Beatles’ instrumentation. The result is a musical palette that reveals the extraordinary power of the Beatles’ musicianship in all of its attendant beauty.

Martin chalks up much of his capacity for increasing the band’s instrumental separation to the groundbreaking work of director Peter Jackson’s team at Park Road Post Production in New Zealand. In a jaw-dropping demonstration, Martin played the remixed instrumental track for the “Revolver” track “Taxman,” slowly dropping one instrument after another from the mix until we were left with the sound of Ringo Starr’s snare drum. It was really quite something to behold, rendered even more impressive by the instruments’ stunning clarity and utter lack of generational loss.


Love the Beatles? Listen to Ken’s podcast “Everything Fab Four.”


I spoke with Beatles historian Jason Kruppa, the host of the popular “Producing the Beatles” podcast, who attributed to the Park Road team’s technological strides to “deep machine learning — basically teaching the machine to hear the difference between certain instruments and voices.” For Martin’s work on “Revolver,” technology has made a stunning difference in our abilities for remixing highly compressed albums.  

As Kruppa points out, “There are currently several online tools based on a source code library called Spleeter, the algorithms of which have been trained to do the same thing and some, like Dmucs, are very effective, but they don’t allow the user to do any training. If you upload a file, you’re simply using the tool in its current state. At least one difference with Park Road, as I understand it, is that they are teaching their machine the sound of specific instruments, and even the difference between each of the Beatles’ voices. So it’s much more targeted, and they have much more control.”

The express result of all of that machine learning, of course, is the ability to disaggregate and isolate a particular sound pattern as precise as Ringo’s snare drum on a 56-year-old recording. It’s quite a feat — all but unimaginable even a few short years ago. The pristine, shimmering results of Martin and Okell’s “Revolver” remix underscore the technology’s tremendous potential. I, for one, am excited about what the future portends.

Trump threatens DOJ with “big problems” from fans if he’s indicted: “They will not stand for this”

On Thursday, in an interview with right-wing talk radio host Hugh Hewitt, former President Donald Trump appeared to issue a vague threat to the Justice Department against indicting him.

Trump said that “I would have no prohibition against running,” when he asked whether he would still run for office with an indictment.

“I think, if it happened, you’d have problems in this country the likes of which, perhaps, you have ever seen before,” said Trump. “I don’t think the people of the United States would stand for it.”

When Hewitt asked Trump to elaborate, he said, “Big problems.”

“I just don’t think they’d stand for it,” he added. “They will not sit still and stand for this ultimate of hoaxes.”

Additionally, Trump defended some aspects of his allies’ plot to overthrow the results of the 2020 election, one of the key issues under investigation by the Justice Department, by claiming that it is “very common” for states to have a competing slate of “alternate” electors claiming the other candidate won. This is not true.

In addition to the election investigation, which centers on the fake electors, the planning behind the January 6 attack, the financing structures tied to Trump that helped support the plotting, and his phone calls trying to demand “extra” votes from election officials, among other things, the FBI is also investigating boxes of classified documents hoarded at the former President’s Mar-a-Lago estate in Palm Beach, Florida.

That investigation has been temporarily put on hold by a judge Trump appointed, pending a review of the documents by a special master.

It remains unclear whether Trump himself will ever face criminal charges as a result of either investigation, but the efforts could be further complicated by longstanding Justice Department conventions about avoiding investigations of political officials immediately ahead of elections.

Turkish eggs are the most garlicky, buttery way possible to start the day

I can’t figure out the oven thing here. I have tried. I have read the instructions, in confusingly translated English. I have pushed random buttons for days. But while staying temporarily in the Netherlands, I have so far had to accept my limitations and stick to stovetop dinners.

If I could never bake again, this would be a problem. But for a few weeks, I can comfortably subside on boiled things and sautéed things. And so it came to pass that one recent evening, scrounging through my tiny refrigerator for dinner ideas, that I decided it was time to face one of my biggest cooking fears — the poached egg.

Poached eggs are fine when you’re out for brunch, but at home, the possibility of chaos just always seems too great. The whites can feather off into infinity, leaving you with a pan full of streaky, soggy, deeply unappetizing matter. But a recipe from my local supermarket for “Turkish poached eggs with garlic yogurt” contained all the words that make me say, “I want to eat that,” so I reached down deep and started simmering.


Want more great food writing and recipes? Subscribe to Salon Food’s newsletter.


The Turkish eggs dish known as çilbir is one of the most versatile recipes to learn and keep under your belt. Garlicky yogurt gets drizzled in peppery oil and delicate, oozy eggs, a combination that’s somehow incredibly bold and incredibly comforting. And poaching eggs, it turns out, isn’t really that intimidating. Mine still got a little streaky, but simmering them for exactly 3 minutes made made them perfectly runny and delicious, which is the most important thing.

These egg make an ideal dinner, but of course they’re also stunning breakfast. I could happily eat these morning, noon and night never get tired, never even miss turning on the oven.

* * *

Inspired by Albert Heijn and Nigella Lawson

Turkish Eggs (Çilbir)
Yields
 1serving 
Prep Time
 10 minutes
Cook Time
 10 minutes

Ingredients

2 large eggs

1/2  cup of full fat plain Greek yogurt, room temperature

2  finely minced garlic cloves

2 tablespoons of butter

3 tablespoons of  olive oil

1 teaspoon of aleppo pepper or smoked paprika

1/2 lemon

salt and pepper to taste

 

 

 

Directions

  1. Make the yogurt base: In a small bowl stir together the garlic, yogurt and salt and pepper. Set aside.
  2. In a small pan over medium heat, melt the butter until it begins to brown. Stir in the olive oil and pepper. Remove from heat and seat aside.
  3. Fill a deep skillet with at least 2 inches of water and bring it to a simmer over low heat.
  4. Crack one egg into a small bowl.
  5. Stir the water to create a small vortex in the middle, then gently slide your egg into the middle. Simmer for 3 minutes. 
  6. With a slotted spoon, gently remove the egg. Put it on a paper towel or clean towel.
  7. Repeat the process for the second egg.
  8. To a shallow bowl, add the yogurt, a big spoonful of the butter sauce, and finally the eggs. Top with more ground pepper, a big squeeze of lemon and more ground pepper, if you like.

Cook’s Notes

It’s traditional to warm the yogurt, but I think you lose nothing but eating it at room-temperature.

Depending on your desires and appetites, you can of course make this with just one egg, and/or serve with salad or pita bread. 

Salon Food writes about stuff we think you’ll like. While our editorial team independently selected these products, Salon has affiliate partnerships, so making a purchase through our links may earn us a commission.

Trump offered Jordan’s king control of the West Bank — and more bonkers claims in bombshell new book

Former President Donald Trump offered Jordan’s King Abdullah II control of the West Bank, touting it as a “great deal” even though the United States has no claim on the territory, according to a forthcoming book “The Divider: Trump in the White House 2017-2021.”

The new book by New York Times chief White House correspondent Peter Baker and New Yorker staff writer Susan Glasser details behind-the-scenes accounts featuring Trump administration insiders, who share their experiences working for the 45th president. 

The occupied West Bank, which is at the heart of the Israel-Palestine conflict, was never Trump’s to give away. The piece of land sits between Israel and Jordan and was formerly governed as part of Jordan. But Israel seized the West Bank in 1967 and since then, it has been occupied by Israeli forces. Their settlements are considered illegal under international law by much of the world. 

Upon hearing Trump’s offer, Abdullah II thought he was “having a heart attack,” he reportedly told an American friend, the authors wrote in an excerpt published by The Washington Post. “I couldn’t breathe. I was bent doubled-over.”

Trump made the offer just one month after his administration broke with decades of US policy by moving the US embassy from Tel Aviv to Jerusalem. The US government has long pushed for a two-state solution and expressed opposition to settlements despite its close ties with Israel. 

However, Trump repeatedly caused controversies and placed himself in the middle of the decades-long conflict. In 2019, he also announced that the US would no longer view settlements as illegal under international law. 

Trump’s handling of the coronavirus drew criticism from his wife

The book offers a look inside the criticism Trump received from his wife, first lady Melania Trump, for his handling of the pandemic. 

In a phone call with former New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie, Melania Trump sought help convincing her husband to take the coronavirus more seriously, according to an excerpt published by CNN.

“‘You’re blowing this,” she recalled telling her husband, according to the book. “‘This is serious. It’s going to be really bad, and you need to take it more seriously than you’re taking it.’ He had just dismissed her. ‘You worry too much,’ she remembered him saying. ‘Forget it.'”


Want a daily wrap-up of all the news and commentary Salon has to offer? Subscribe to our morning newsletter, Crash Course.


Similar accounts of Trump’s inability to address the severity of the coronavirus pandemic are laid out in books written by staffers who worked under his administration. Former White House adviser Kellyanne Conway reveals in her own memoir that Trump shrugged off her warnings about the virus. She recounted a private moment with Trump in the presidential limousine where she told him she was worried about the coronavirus and he responded with saying:  “I’m not… The doctors told us there is a very low risk for the United States.” 

And in “Silent Invasion,” former covid response coordinator Deborah Birx details that Trump informed her she had misled him about the severity of the virus. He told her: “We will never shut down the country again. Never.”

Trump’s decisions often posed national security concerns 

The book also dives into concerns Trump’s national security team faced, remaining fearful that Trump would ignite a conflict with Iran or withdraw the US from NATO.

An administration official told Trump that if he lost the 2020 election, he should strike Iran’s nuclear program, the authors wrote. “Milley at the time told his staff it was a ‘What the f— are these guys talking about?’ moment,” they write. “Now, it seemed frighteningly possible.”

The former president also feared Iran would try to assassinate him in avenging the death of Qassem Suleimani, an Iranian general killed in a US drone strike ordered by Trump. 

“At a cocktail party, Trump told several of his Florida friends he was afraid Iran would try to assassinate him, so he had to go back to Washington where he would be safer,” the authors write.

Then, there’s insight into the more serious efforts Trump made to withdraw the US from the NATO alliance. Director of National Intelligence Dan Coats was alarmed by Trump during a 2018 summit in Helsinki with Putin.

Trump contradicted his own intelligence agencies by publicly backing Putin, who asserted that Russia did not meddle in the 2016 election. This led Coats to question “What does Putin have on him that causes him to do something that undermines his credibility?” the book said. 

The Divider: Trump in the White House 2017-2021 will be published in the US next week. Among its many revelations, the book makes clear that if Trump announces his run for presidency, it will be without former Vice President Mike Pence who Trump said “committed political suicide” for refusing to interfere in the certification of the 2020 election.

Unfazed Ted Cruz rejects Uvalde parents’ pleas for gun bill — offers them more school cops instead

Sign up for The Brief, our daily newsletter that keeps readers up to speed on the most essential Texas news.

 

The parents of a child who was killed in the Uvalde school shooting met with Republican U.S. Sen. Ted Cruz, R-Texas, on Wednesday and asked him to support a federal ban on semi-automatic weapons.

The senator declined and instead suggested increasing law enforcement presence on school campuses.

Kimberly Mata-Rubio, whose daughter Lexi was killed in the shooting, recounted the meeting to The Texas Tribune and on Twitter on Wednesday afternoon. Felix Rubio, Lexi’s father, presented Cruz a picture of his daughter “in her child-size casket” while asking for a federal semi-automatic weapon ban, Mata-Rubio wrote. A total of 19 students and two teachers were killed in the massacre — the worst school shooting in Texas history.

Mata-Rubio said she didn’t expect Cruz to support gun control legislation before meeting with him and she didn’t think the Texas senator would change his mind.

“We had the meeting because I wanted to hear what he had to say. I wanted him to say it to my face,” Mata-Rubio said.

Mata-Rubio said the meeting with the junior Texas senator couldn’t have lasted more than five minutes, during which Cruz offered his alternative plan to improve school safety: more funding for school resource officers and mental health professionals. But she said her husband, Rubio, explained that more law enforcement officers in schools doesn’t guarantee students will be protected, pointing to the 2018 shooting in Parkland, Florida, where a school resource officer was on the scene when the shooter arrived and killed 17 people.

The police response to the shooting at Uvalde’s Robb Elementary has been heavily criticized. Hundreds of law enforcement officers descended on the school. But responders waited more than an hour to confront the gunman, which contradicts law enforcement doctrine that directs officers to immediately confront active shooters.

The meeting with Cruz was one of several conversations Mata-Rubio and Rubio had with political leaders on Wednesday. They were joined by family members of victims of other school shootings. The meetings were organized by the Newtown Action Alliance Foundation, a gun violence advocacy group. In addition to the meeting with Cruz, Mata-Rubio spoke with representatives of other Republican senators about gun control legislation, including the offices of Sen. Charles E. Grassley, R-Iowa, and Sen. Bill Cassidy, R-La.

“While they obviously, probably don’t support the bill, they just had more questions and were more sympathetic than our meeting with Ted Cruz,” Mata-Rubio said. “That was really disheartening because this is our representative.”

Mata-Rubio and Rubio testified before the House Oversight Committee in June during a hearing on gun violence, where Mata-Rubio called for a ban on semi-automatic rifles, raising the minimum purchasing age, “red flag” laws, stronger background checks and an end to gun manufacturers’ liability immunity.

Mata-Rubio is a journalist for the Uvalde Leader-News, and Rubio is a patrol deputy with the Uvalde County Sheriff’s Office.

Cruz’s initial response to the shooting got immediate blowback, with critics calling his prayers empty without substantive gun legislation to match.

Along with Sen. John Barrasso, R-Wyo., Cruz introduced a bill to increase funding for school resource officers and mental health professionals in schools to secure against shootings, but Democrats blocked the bill from heading to a vote, criticizing legislation that beefs up school security without effective gun control. He also voted against a landmark gun safety law authored by his Texas colleague Sen. John Cornyn in response to the Uvalde shooting.

“Today, Sen. Cruz met with [Rubio and Mata-Rubio] and he saw firsthand the pain and grief that the unspeakable violence at Robb Elementary school caused,” a spokesperson for Cruz wrote. “After meeting with them, Sen. Cruz went to the Senate floor to fight for his school safety legislation. Unfortunately, Senate Democrats blocked it with no explanation of why they don’t support doubling the number of police officers in schools, hiring 15,000 school-based mental health professionals, and increasing the physical security for children in schools.”

In speaking to elected officials in Washington, surrounded by survivors of other mass shootings, Mata-Rubio said she believed there is sufficient momentum to achieve actionable gun control. Cornyn’s gun safety law, passed one month after the shooting at her daughter’s elementary school, was the first major legislation on gun safety since 1994.

“There’s lives at stake. It’s too late for us, but we’re fighting for other families, for other children,” Mata-Rubio said.

 


The Texas Tribune Festival is almost here! From Thursday through Saturday, Sept. 22-24, in downtown Austin, TribFest attendees will enjoy three days full of mind-expanding events, conversations and panels featuring more than 350 big names including Chris Bosh, Pete Buttigieg, Liz Cheney, Annette Gordon-Reed and many others. Join us for Texas’ biggest politics and policy event when you buy your tickets today.

This article originally appeared in The Texas Tribune at https://www.texastribune.org/2022/09/14/uvalde-parents-ted-cruz-gun-control/.

The Texas Tribune is a member-supported, nonpartisan newsroom informing and engaging Texans on state politics and policy. Learn more at texastribune.org.

NY AG rejects Trump’s settlement offer — plans to sue him and at least one of his children: report

New York Attorney General Letitia James has rejected former President Donald Trump’s settlement offer — and is now reportedly has one of Trump’s children in her crosshairs.

The New York Times reports that James’ rejection of Trump’s settlement offer is “setting the stage for a lawsuit that would accuse Mr. Trump of fraud,” and sources tell the publication that James “is also considering suing at least one of Mr. Trump’s adult children” as part of the case.

While it’s not known which Trump child would be the target of the lawsuit, the Times notes that Donald Trump Jr., Eric Trump, and Ivanka Trump have all served as executives at the Trump Organization.

James’ probe is focused on whether the Trump Organization systematically manipulated the value of assets to artificially lower tax bills.

“A lawsuit from Ms. James would supercharge their drawn-out battle, offering her an opportunity to deliver a significant blow to the former president and his business, which she vowed before taking office to ‘vigorously investigate,'” writes the Times. “If the case goes to trial and Mr. Trump loses, a judge could impose financial penalties and restrict the former president’s business operations in New York — all potentially in the midst of a 2024 presidential campaign that he is expected to join.”

Trump himself testified before a grand jury in the probe earlier this year, and he invoked his Fifth Amendment right against self-incrimination hundreds of times.

Tentative deal to avert catastrophic rail strike reportedly includes sick time win for workers

The Biden White House on Thursday announced a tentative agreement between unions and rail carriers that reportedly includes a win for workers on sick leave, an issue central to the dispute that nearly resulted in a nationwide strike.

The Washington Post reported that the deal, which still must be approved by union members, would give rail workers “the ability to take days off for medical care without being subject to discipline.”

The Post‘s Lauren Kaori Gurley noted on Twitter that “workers will receive voluntary assigned days off and a single additional paid day off. (They previously did not receive sick days.)”

“The agreement provides members with the ability to take unpaid days for medical care without being subject to attendance policies,” Gurley added.

In a statement Thursday morning, President Joe Biden said the deal represents “a win for tens of thousands of rail workers who worked tirelessly through the pandemic to ensure that America’s families and communities got deliveries of what have kept us going during these difficult years. “

“These rail workers will get better pay, improved working conditions, and peace of mind around their healthcare costs: all hard-earned,” Biden continued. “The agreement is also a victory for railway companies who will be able to retain and recruit more workers for an industry that will continue to be part of the backbone of the American economy for decades to come.”

Sick leave was the key sticking point in the tense and consequential negotiations between hugely profitable freight rail carriers and their employees, who have been working for three years without a contract as railroads see booming profits. It’s not clear whether the agreed-upon policy changes will be sufficient for union members.

“It’s definitely premature to be hailing Biden as an economy-saving dealmaker,” argued HuffPost labor reporter Dave Jamieson. “Workers haven’t even been walked through the particulars yet, let alone determined whether they’re willing to accept it.”

The major unions that had been preparing to strike did not immediately respond to the tentative deal, which includes a 24% raise for rail workers by 2024 and an immediate 13.5% raise.

statement from the National Carriers’ Conference Committee, which represents the major railroads, contained no mention of attendance policies that unions said have been ruining their members’ lives.

“Our members are being terminated for getting sick or for attending routine medical visits as we crawl our way out of a worldwide pandemic,” the heads of two rail unions said Sunday.

The White House announced the agreement after frenzied talks between administration officials, including Labor Secretary Marty Walsh, and representatives of the unions and rail companies over the past 24 hours—a last-ditch effort aimed at averting a strike with massive implications for the U.S. economy.

The unions, for their part, accused rail carriers of engaging in “corporate extortion” by blocking shipments and shuttering other operations before a single worker had walked off the job, a signal that companies were moving in the direction of a damaging lockout.

The White House has faced significant criticism over its role in the dispute: Last month, an emergency board formed by Biden recommended a compromise deal that excluded sick leave improvements that rail workers had been demanding and fell short in other key areas, including healthcare costs.

On Wednesday, Sen. Bernie Sanders, I-Vt., blocked a GOP effort to force rail workers to accept the emergency board’s recommended agreement.

“Evil and inhumane”: DeSantis trolls Martha’s Vineyard with planes of migrants — but locals step up

Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis on Wednesday claimed credit for sending two planes carrying migrants to Martha’s Vineyard in Massachusetts.

DeSantis, apparently seeking to one-up Texas Gov. Greg Abbott and Arizona Gov. Doug Ducey, who have sent buses carrying migrants to Democrat-led cities that have expressed support for migrant protections regardless of their status, sent two planes carrying undocumented migrants to Massachusetts, which has a Republican governor. A spokesperson for DeSantis said the governor is targeting locations with “sanctuary” policies as part of a $12 million program the state authorized to remove undocumented migrants, according to Fox News, which first reported the stunt.

“States like Massachusetts, New York, and California will better facilitate the care of these individuals who they have invited into our country by incentivizing illegal immigration through their designation as ‘sanctuary states’ and support for the Biden Administration’s open border policies,” DeSantis spokeswoman Taryn Fenske told the outlet.

DeSantis, who is running for re-election and has been widely discussed as a potential 2024 presidential contender, previously threatened to send migrants to Democrat-led states and sued the Biden administration over immigration enforcement.

About 50 migrants from Venezuela and Colombia traveling from San Antonio through Florida arrived at Martha’s Vineyard Airport on Wednesday, according to local news reports.

Massachusetts state Rep. Dylan Fernandes, a Democrat, decried the stunt as “evil and inhumane” but touted local support for the new arrivals.

“Many don’t know where they are. They say they were told they would be given housing and jobs,” he tweeted. “Islanders were given no notice but are coming together as a community to support them.”

A spokesperson for Republican Gov. Charlie Barker told Axios that the governor’s office is “in touch with local officials regarding the arrival of migrants in Martha’s Vineyard.”

“At this time, short-term shelter services are being provided by local officials, and the Administration will continue to support those efforts,” Baker spokesperson Terry MacCormack told the outlet.


Want a daily wrap-up of all the news and commentary Salon has to offer? Subscribe to our morning newsletter, Crash Course.


Fernandes said the migrants were “not met with chaos” but with “compassion.”

“Our island jumped into action putting together 50 beds, giving everyone a good meal, providing a play area for the children, making sure people have the healthcare and support they need,” he wrote. “We are a community that comes together to support immigrants.”

State Sen. Julian Cyr, a Democrat who represents Martha’s Vineyard, told CNN that officials scrambled to set up hurricane-style shelters after receiving no prior notice of the arrivals.

“They set that up in a matter of hours and these families received a meal,” he said. “They were Covid tested and are spending the night in shelters at several churches on the island.”

Rep. Bill Keating, D-Mass., whose district includes the island, tweeted that residents are called DeSantis’ “bluff and rising to meet the challenge because that’s what Americans do.”

“History does not look kindly on leaders who treat human beings like cargo, loading them up and sending them a thousand miles away,” he wrote, blasting DeSantis’ decision to “prioritize cruelty & chaos over human dignity in today’s taxpayer-funded stunt.”

Back home, a coalition of Venezuelan-American groups announced a Thursday press conference to condemn the stunt, accusing DeSantis of a “blatant disregard for human life” and of lying to Cuban and Venezuelan communities earlier this month when he vowed not to send migrants from those countries out of state, according to Florida Today.

“Even for Ron DeSantis, this is a new low,” Florida Democratic Chairman Manny Diaz said in a statement. “There is nothing that DeSantis won’t do, and nobody that he won’t hurt, in order to score political points… Ron DeSantis is playing games with the lives of people who came here in search of freedom and opportunity in order to boost his campaign fundraising and Fox News ratings.”

Former Florida Gov. Charlie Crist, the Democratic nominee facing DeSantis in his re-election battle, condemned his opponent for “spending $12 million to fly innocent migrant children out of our state when that money could be spent on fighting to help Floridians and lower costs.”

“Everything Ron DeSantis does is to score political points and feed red meat to his base in his thinly veiled attempt to run for President – but it’s really Floridians who pay the price,” he tweeted, adding that “this is just another political stunt that hurts our state.”

Uncle Joe believes: Behind the scenes, Democrats clearly now think they can win

The gathering on the South Lawn of the White House Tuesday was billed as a celebration of the Inflation Reduction Act — a bill President Biden signed a month ago.

On the very day of the event, ironically enough, the latest economic numbers make clear that inflation is still with us. Never mind: Biden plunged into the event with gusto. Chuck Schumer, Nancy Pelosi and Vice President Harris spoke before Levette Jacobs, an IBEW apprentice from Boston, took the stage and introduced the president.

It was a mixed-bag event with a variety of messages. Perhaps because of the news that morning, the warm-up acts celebrated organized labor, the president’s accomplishments on infrastructure and his purported bipartisan appeal, and also addressed continuing problems with climate change and the continuing domestic threats against democracy.

At times I had to remind myself why we were there. Certainly watching James Taylor perform “Fire and Rain” was a draw. He was the opening act. Schumer was dull, Pelosi was amusing — even reminding the crowd when to applaud —  Harris gave a predictable stump speech and Jacobs was impressive.

Then a very energetic Joe Biden took the stage. He spoke for nearly 30 minutes in the heat, after taking off his jacket, and then spent another 30 minutes shaking hands and meeting with supporters in the typically hot and humid D.C. weather. While his detractors say he’s lost a step, the only step he actually lost on stage was when he stepped on his own suit jacket and apologized for that — noting that it was a good thing his mother wasn’t around to give him grief for it. None of this will be acknowledged by Biden’s political opponents, of course, who continue to purposely cast his lifelong problem with stuttering as evidence of dementia. Nor will they acknowledge that he can handle himself for an hour with a throng of people on a sticky day, with a dexterity and humor that should make most of them jealous.

I have some real problems with this administration. Those boil down to questions of access and better explanations of what the president is doing. No administration I’ve covered in my career has been as standoffish as Biden’s. The communication department is understaffed. Some members of the administration are arrogant, while others are elitist and ignorant.

That being said, it was obvious throughout the nearly two-hour event on the South Lawn that the president’s people understood that it was a problem to be talking about inflation reduction on a day when the headlines made it obvious that there hasn’t been much reduction. Appearances can certainly be deceiving, but the White House reacted to the news by downplaying the official reason we had been assembled while also cheerleading the rest of the president’s domestic agenda. Republicans, not to be outdone, wanted to pile on with the bad inflation numbers. Instead, we saw the ever wooden-eared Sen. Lindsey Graham announce a bill that would generate a near-total national ban on abortion.

It is hard to understand a political party that cheers against American success, but that, in a nutshell, is today’s Republican Party. “God, we need Trump back,” I heard from a Trump minion Tuesday. I hear that every day, of course, from the handful of Trumplicans who still exist outside mental institutions and the Deep South.

We don’t need Trump anywhere — except behind bars. And there is a world of difference between Biden and Trump on the stump. Biden is a politician with a wealth of experience in serving the country. He is adept at public speaking and knows how to reach people empathically.  When Biden says, as he did on Tuesday, that he really believes the best is yet to come for the United States — stressing each word as he says it — it’s easy to see why his supporters are so optimistic. You believe he means it.

When Trump speaks, on the other hand, his anger and vitriol toward those he despises (which would be anyone who doesn’t emphatically agree with him) is wrapped up in a speech that displays no empathy — only bitterness and hatred. It’s easy to see why his supporters are so pessimistic. You believe he means it when he says he wants to tear it all down. He wants to be a tyrant.

At the end of the day Tuesday, we witnessed a cheerleading event for the Democrats that contained a fair share of facts, along with standard stump speeches from all the politicians. They thanked staffers and members of Congress. Quite a few Democratic social media influencers had also been invited and were also thanked. The press? We stood in the back, sweated a lot and listened in the heat.

Biden made a point of singling out Sen. Joe Manchin thanked him for showing up, while Pelosi and Schumer made sure they thanked residents of California and New York (their respective home states) for attending.


Want a daily wrap-up of all the news and commentary Salon has to offer? Subscribe to our morning newsletter, Crash Course.


Four years ago, in the run-up to the 2018 midterm elections, there was a sense of foreboding inside the Trump White House. The bile spewed by Trump made even his closest advisers fearful of a Democratic takeover of both the Senate and the House, though in public Trump’s toadies put on a brave face about “retaining control” of Congress. 

Today, many Democrats are openly gloomy about their chances in the fall, but more sanguine behind closed doors. The Democrats, and the president’s staff in particular, showed us plainly Tuesday not only that they’re horrible at messaging, but that it is clearly painful for them to be optimistic. Part of that is the political climate in D.C. “The Republicans lose elections and claim they win,” Rep. Rashida Tlaib of Michigan said. “Democrats win and then have to explain why they should win again.” 

Democrats are gloomy about their chances in public, but more sanguine behind closed doors. Lindsey Graham’s proposed national abortion ban — a Democratic campaign ad in waiting — makes clear why.

It’s almost as if the Democrats think they have to apologize for their success. They certainly have a tough time exploiting it. If Trump hadn’t been so terrifyingly inept as a president, the Republicans might well have held onto both houses of Congress four years ago. The fact they are in the running today to take it all back mostly speaks to the Democrats’ ineptitude at putting together a narrative of success — based almost entirely in fact — that would make a Republican victory about as likely as Trump being elected pope.

But never fear: Republicans are now taking a page out of the Democratic playbook. On Tuesday, Graham once again demonstrated why the GOP will have a hard time winning in the fall. He vowed to make a near-total ban on abortion the highest priority should the Republicans take back the House and Senate. He told us we could be “guaranteed” such a bill won’t get a vote if the Democrats win.

You could run that video clip as a Democratic campaign ad, just as it is, and tack on the obligatory “Paid for by the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee.” It would be wildly successful. 

Democrats on the ballot in multiple states no doubt quietly thanked Graham for once again dramatically misreading the American electorate. He may help snatch defeat from the jaws of victory for many Republicans — even if he thinks he’s got the “right issue” at the “right time,” as I was told by one of his staffers.

Tlaib chuckled when I asked her if she thought that were true. “We have to thank Sen. Graham for making our choices this fall so crystal clear. He underestimates us,” she said.

But it is Joe Biden who perhaps best understands the tone-deaf quality of the GOP and people like Graham. Though the press has preempted his speeches, never takes them live, downplays the daily briefings and otherwise gives him short shrift on many occasions, he perseveres — often getting ahead of the press and even his own communications staff (which is not hard to do).

The hodgepodge celebration on the South Lawn jumped all over many themes, from infrastructure to climate change, threats against democracy and the economy. But it really boiled down to one message that many in the crowd, and many reporters apparently missed.

Biden did not.

As the president met with supporters at the end of the event, I looked for an opportunity to shout a question to him — one he could answer and might actually hear over the conversations and the piped-in music. My years of mentorship under Sam Donaldson gave me the confidence to believe I could be sufficiently brief and sufficiently loud.

There was really only one question to ask. Democrats in the Senate and House have danced around their chances in the midterm elections for the last few weeks, as the sweeping nationwide anger from the Supreme Court decision that overturned Roe v. Wade has mounted.

So I asked it: “Mr. President, are you going to hold onto the House?” Ten words. I was happy I got that out succinctly. I knew he heard me over the din of music and glad-handers because he looked up at me standing on the press riser and smiled. Then he proved he was better at being succinct than I was.

“Yes,” he said to a round of applause from his remaining supporters as he strode away and entered the residence.

Whether or not he retains that swagger after the midterms will be decided by American voters.

But there is no doubt that one-word answer told us more clearly than all the speeches and the thousands of people on the South Lawn why we were there: Biden honestly believes his party will hold onto both the House and the Senate.

Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell has quietly acknowledged that Republicans probably won’t get control of the Senate.

Now the president is predicting a seismic shift that, should it come to pass, will mean the final nail in the political coffin of Donald Trump.

In the Great Lakes, the pandemic disrupted sea lamprey control

It’s a gray morning on Lake Ontario when Will Sampson, a sports fishing guide and recreational angler, sees one of the fishing reels on his father’s boat jerk. He reels it in. On the other end of the line is a Chinook salmon that he estimates weighs 22 pounds — a great catch, save for one wriggling detail: Latched into the salmon’s side dangles a two-foot long sea lamprey, suction-cup mouth clinging on, one eye peeking around its host’s fin. In its lifetime, that sea lamprey could kill up to 40 pounds of fish; the hooked Chinook was its latest target.

Here, just off the Toronto harbor front and 27 miles to Niagara Falls, the Sampsons have gotten to know the Great Lakes’ infamous eel-like invasive fish well. Out of every 10 big fish they catch, they say usually at least four will have clear signs of a lamprey bite, some with multiple wounds at different stages of healing. For the father-son duo, the lamprey on the morning’s Chinook is just another sign that this summer, the blood-sucking fish’s population has ballooned.

It’s a scenario that scientists are concerned about, too. During the 1940s and 1950s, when the region’s sea lamprey populations reached their peak, they decimated fisheries, wiping out livelihoods and wreaking havoc on the lakes’ ecosystem. Since then, the species has been the subject of a robust cross-border control program. But that program was disrupted significantly during 2020 and 2021 amid pandemic restrictions.

Now, as control measures return to normal, biologists, conservationists, and fishery scientists worry about how the consequences of this disruption will play out across the Great Lakes, from Lake Ontario to Lake Superior. Though many are cautiously optimistic that the region may only experience a short-term increase to lamprey population levels, the question also lays bare the challenge of predicting how invasive species in general will respond to years of pandemic-fueled gaps in control efforts.

“If you ease up control, even for a short time — like two years in Covid — they’ll take advantage of that,” explained Marc Gaden, communications director of the Great Lakes Fishery Commission, or GLFC. The commission, established by a 1954 treaty between Canada and the United States, oversees the sea lamprey control program across the five Great Lakes from hubs in Michigan and Ontario. In order to protect the Great Lakes’ $7 billion fishery, the two countries spend about $25 million annually on sea lamprey control, according to Gaden, with the U.S. contributing nearly 70 percent of the funding. Though there are over 180 invasive species in the Great Lakes, none are more destructive than the sea lamprey, Gaden said.

The control effort isn’t just expensive, but also labor intensive. To do the job right, aligning treatment times with the lamprey’s growth cycle is essential — a precise schedule that the pandemic threw two years off-target.

“The good news is you can control them, but they’re not going away,” Gaden said. “You’re never going to get that last mating pair.”


At the beginning of its lifecycle, a lamprey can seem harmless. At less than an inch long when hatched, with no eyes or teeth, the larval lamprey feeds on plankton and other detritus in streams. But after four or six years, on average, it goes through a dramatic metamorphosis. The tiny worm-like fish grows eyes and a suction cup mouth with barbed teeth along its tongue. Once the metamorphosis is complete, it begins to travel downstream to hunt. Within one year, these parasitic sea lampreys can grow over two feet long by latching onto fish and feeding on their blood.

The trick to controlling sea lampreys is preventing them from metamorphosing and moving beyond the streams, Gaden said. Each year, the GLFC maps out a selection of the approximately 500 streams in the region that produce most of the larvae and selects some for treatment. Then, from spring until fall, crews from U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and Fisheries and Oceans Canada treat the streams with pesticides selective to lampreys, called lampricides, ultimately killing about 98 percent of them. (The chemical is non-lethal to other species, which are able to detoxify it, though it can sometimes have other harmful effects on the surrounding ecosystem.)

Using this strategy, the program has reduced the sea lamprey population in the Great Lakes by about 95 percent from the historic abundance in the 1940s and 1950s. “It’s a boots-on-the-ground, boats-in-the-water field program,” Gaden said. “By the time you come back to the stream, they’ll have built up again and you can get them.”

But in 2020, the pandemic hit just before spring arrived in the Great Lakes region. That year, crews only treated around 25 percent of the planned streams as pandemic restrictions and concerns prevented control teams from traveling. The following year, in 2021, crews accomplished 75 percent of targeted treatment.

“It would be Pollyannaish to think there’s not going to be any effect,” said Gaden. But what the effect will be on sea lamprey control — how severe, how long lasting, and how the region’s fisheries and other species will fare — is still playing out.


On March 11, 2020 — the day the World Health Organization declared the coronavirus a pandemic — Margaret Docker, professor of biological sciences at the University of Manitoba, was visiting Ann Arbor, Michigan, for a sea lamprey control meeting. By the time Docker returned home two days later, norms had changed across the world. In Winnipeg, Manitoba, she began working from home. At the same time, out in the hundreds of streams around the Great Lakes, larval lampreys prepared to metamorphosize.

The lamprey spawning this spring and summer are the survivors of that 2020 season. Now, scientists are tracking those spawning numbers, working to understand the impact of the pause to control measures. “If you have streams not being treated two years in a row, there’s just no way that you’re going to get them all,” Docker said.

Docker predicts there will be at least a temporary surge to lamprey populations in the lakes. But she is also hopeful that the disruption might serve as a kind of unplanned experiment, helping researchers understand how lampreys react to shifts in their population abundance. She’s curious about how more lampreys in the lakes may impact the species’ birth rate, death rate, and sex breakdown, and how that information could inform control efforts.

“When you get increases in larval density, it often decreases the growth rate,” she said. “Because the number of sea lamprey has been reasonably consistent over the last 50, 60 years, we can’t really study that because we don’t have that variation.”

But predicting what will happen to lamprey populations in the coming years and decades — and what kind of intervention to invest in to keep the worst effects at bay — is a tricky science, said Michael Jones, a quantitative fisheries scientist and professor emeritus at Michigan State University. Jones models lamprey populations in the lakes to understand how variances in temperature, weather, control measures, and more affect lamprey population levels. In this work, decade-to-decade changes are much more significant than year-to-year ones, he explained.

“The actions that we take in any one year affect the situation two years later, they don’t really affect the situation 10 years later,” said Jones. Other factors, like warming waters from climate change, he predicted, could make the Great Lakes a much more favorable habitat for lampreys over the long term, with a potentially far greater benefit to the lamprey survival rate than a year or two of lapsed lampricide treatments.

Jones’s confidence that lamprey levels will remain under control also comes, in part, from the GLFC’s ability to respond with full force in the coming years. Supported by significant investment from both sides of the border, the commission aims to play aggressive catch up with its lampricide treatments.

For other species control programs, though, the situation could be more dire. The invasive carp, for example, also threatens to enter the Great Lakes ecosystem, with no pesticide available to eliminate it. After the pandemic interrupted the construction of carp barriers, the invasive fish entered tributaries even closer to the lakes, said Marc Smith, Great Lakes policy director at the National Wildlife Federation. If carp make it into the lakes, no chemical treatment will be able to control them.

Biologists have expressed similar concerns about pandemic-fueled boons to other invasive species populations, including rats in New Zealand, mice in Hawaii, and some plants in California.

When it comes to invasive species management, “You never want any delays, you never want a lack of focus or lack of pushing things out time-wise,” Smith said. “That’s kind of what Covid did.”


Rebecca Redelmeier is a journalist based in Brooklyn. Her reporting has been published online and in print in the U.S., Canada, and overseas, including by the Committee to Protect Journalists, Globe and Mail, and Daily Maverick.

This article was originally published on Undark. Read the original article.

This year’s hurricane season has been eerily quiet. Will it last?

After months of near-total tranquility, the Atlantic Ocean has finally seen its first two hurricanes of the 2022 season. Hurricanes Danielle and Earl, which both developed hurricane-force winds over the past weekend, are now spinning northward through the ocean, where they are expected to dissolve in cold water before making direct landfall.

Despite this recent flurry of activity, this year’s Atlantic hurricane season is still one of the quietest on record — and it seems likely to stay that way. This summer has seen historic floodsbrutal heat waves, and rampaging wildfires strike the United States. So far, however, there have been no major hurricanes like those that have devastated the U.S. over the past few years. Although meteorologists are tracking a few more storm systems that may develop over the coming weeks, none is expected to present an imminent threat to residents of the Caribbean or American mainland.

Before Danielle and Earl, just three tropical storms had formed in the Atlantic this year, all of them in June. Just one of them, Alex, caused any noticeable effects on land, leading to a day of flash flooding in Miami, Florida. Tropical storm activity overall is just around 10 percent of its average so far this year, and if the trend continues 2022 will end up being the fourth quietest year in the last century. With the traditional peak of hurricane season coming up on September 10, it’s looking more and more probable that the year will finish well below average.

“It’s super weird,” said Phil Klotzbach, a senior research scientist at Colorado State University, one of the leading hurricane forecasting institutions. “If you just showed me, ‘here’s what the winds look like,’ I would have said we should have had a couple of hurricanes, probably at least one major hurricane — conditions are fairly conducive, and yet, nothing is going.”

The dearth of tropical storm formation has come as a surprise to many meteorologists, especially given that every major hurricane model predicted an eventful season this year. Experts are still trying to figure out what’s causing the reprieve. If anything, the symptoms still point toward a busier season: The world is experiencing a La Niña climate pattern, wherein cold Pacific Ocean temperatures reduce wind shear in the Atlantic, which should make it easier for storms to grow. And the Atlantic surface has been fairly hot for most of the year, with temperatures that are more than high enough to fuel storm development. It’s just that very few storms have emerged.

The most likely explanation for the dry spell, said Klotzbach, is a large patch of dry air that has hung to the west of Africa for much of the past month, reducing overall moisture above the oceans. He added that this dry period may have been caused by the historic heat wave in Europe earlier this summer. The high-pressure system that burned Europe also made the tropics cooler, and the temperature differential between the regions allowed dry air to flow into the tropics, stymying the moisture buildup necessary for major storms.

The reprieve may continue in the coming years. Meteorologists project that the current multi-year La Niña may end as soon as this winter, shifting back toward an El Niño pattern that will kick up winds in the Atlantic and suppress many storms. Climate change actually has the potential to make things even quieter: according to recent research, a warming world may reduce the temperature differential between the ocean and the atmosphere above it, thus reducing the hot air movements that lead to tropical cyclones.

But though climate change has the potential to suppress storm activity, resulting in overall quieter hurricane seasons, it also provides more fuel for the storms that do form, because ocean temperatures in general are only getting warmer. Increasingly, once a cyclone hits the extra-warm waters of the Caribbean Sea, it experiences what’s known as “rapid intensification” — ballooning in size, picking up speed, and reaching maximum strength before it hits land. This process often happens too fast for residents in these storms’ paths to prepare.

“By this time of year, the temperatures are warm enough for anything to form. And the warmer and warmer it gets, the more explosive something can be,” said Brian McNoldy, a research associate at the University of Miami who studies hurricanes. “Anytime we have a rapidly intensifying storm on its way to making landfall, we start to realize that evacuations are just impractical. It’s really impossible to get large numbers of people out of harm’s way when you have these short-fuse storms.” 

We’ve seen several examples of this phenomenon in recent years, including 2021’s Hurricane Ida, which grew from a messy tropical formation to a high Category 4 hurricane in the span of about three days. Computer models were adept at predicting the storm’s path, but the cyclone grew so fast as to make it impossible to evacuate coastal Louisiana cities like New Orleans and Baton Rouge in a timely manner. The results were catastrophic: Tens of thousands of New Orleanians were stuck in the city without power for days, and residents of the nearby River Parishes had to wait out dangerous flooding when levees near their homes collapsed.

These dynamics remain constant whether the overall hurricane season is active or relatively quiet, which is why McNoldy likes to say that “all it takes is one.”

“We might have even not as many cyclones, but of the ones that form could become even stronger than they would have before,” he told Grist.

Klotzbach said that the relationship between climate change and tropical storms is still murky: We only have about a hundred years of good data on hurricanes, which makes it hard to identify long-term trends. Even so, the lesson of the past few years is clear. The threat of climate-enhanced hurricanes is not that they’re guaranteed to happen every summer, like wildfires, but that the worst of them can happen at any moment, with little notice.

Lindsey Graham would hate it if America’s abortion laws really were like Europe’s

In their pantheon of transparently absurd excuses for their war on reproductive rights, the GOP somehow managed this week to come up with a whopper of new one — they just want America to be more like Europe.

With the midterms right around the corner — and sensing perhaps that their initiative for forcing children to bear their rapist’s babies or grieving mothers to carry around their dead fetuses may not be so popular with voters after all— Sen. Lindsey Graham, R-S.C., this week floated a new approach. Unveiling the provocatively named “Protecting Pain-Capable Unborn Children from Late-Term Abortions Act” on Tuesday, the senator, perhaps while smoking Gauloises and listening to ABBA, called for a nationwide ban on abortion after 15 weeks gestation. His justification? He claimed the plan “will put the United States abortion policy in line with other developed nations such as France, Germany, Belgium, Denmark, Spain, and other European nations.” Yes, because we all know how much Republicans love the way Europeans do things, with their free university systems and their restrictive gun laws and their socialized medicine.

We could just call this an absolute load of utter codswallop and tosh, but let’s take a minute and really unpack Graham’s sales pitch here.

First, it’s telling that Graham includes Germany on that list. Abortion there is technically illegal — though doctors and patients rarely face prosecution. It is also permissible under medical exceptions. Germany, by the way, is a nation still unwinding its reproductive policies that are rooted in its Nazi era. Just this past June, the country got around to abolishing one of those laws, which had restricted doctors from counseling on abortions.

It’s true that across many European nations, abortion regulations kick in at around 15 or 16 weeks. In France, the limit is 14 weeks — but it is worth noting that the country has in recent years been moving to expand abortion access, not limit it. This summer, on the heels of the Dobbs decision here, French Prime Minister Élisabeth Borne backed a bill to enshrine abortion rights in the country’s constitution. “We must engrave this acquired right in stone,” she said at the time.

Though the U.K. is no longer in the E.U., pregnant individuals in the country can get an abortion at up to 24 weeks, and past that date if medically necessary. In Ireland (which is an E.U. country), where the constitutional ban on abortion was overturned in 2018 — in no small part because enough were sick of the Catholic Church being cool with letting pregnant people die — termination is accessible up to 12 weeks, later if necessary. And this is a nice touch: even in cases where it is not legal, “criminal provisions do not apply to a woman in respect of her own pregnancy.”

In his baffling rationalization that a nationwide limit on abortion would give the U.S. some of that continental je ne sais quoi, Graham has, first and foremost, likely wildly overestimated his base’s interest in taking policy cues from people who call soccer “football” and drink their beer at room temperature. More than that, though, he’s conspicuously excised a great deal of the context around the European approach to reproductive healthcare.

Let me offer an example. While Graham didn’t mention the Netherlands in his statement, I happen to be studying its reproductive health system at a Dutch university right now. And guess what? Abortion is readily available up to 24 weeks, with exemptions for later intervention for nonviable fetuses and emergency situations. The Netherlands also has comprehensive and early sex education, universal healthcare, free birth control if you’re under 21 and low cost contraception for everyone else, and — Lindsey’s not going to like this — one of the lowest abortion rates in the world, and a significantly lower maternal mortality rate than the U.S.

Every healthcare system has its drawbacks, and Europe no different from anywhere else. There is tremendous progress yet to be made there for better abortion care, miscarriage management and prenatal — because you can’t have one without the others.

But when your populace has better access to education and contraception, when early abortion is relatively easy to obtain, safe, and free or low cost, when pregnant people and their doctors are not afraid of going to jail for making difficult medical decisions, when they are not afraid of being murdered, those other limitations don’t line up at all with what Republicans are proposing for the U.S. Not at all. It’s a shameless falsehood. And for a guy who has spent years vowing to “stop the government takeover of healthcare,” it seems a little peculiar now that Lindsey Graham insists he just wants America to be more like Europe, of all places.

There’s a solution to the labor shortage — and it’s the undocumented workers who are already here

The United States is in a transitional economic moment, moving from the shock of the COVID-19 pandemic through a period of recovery to a more traditional economic expansion. Things are trending in the right direction: inflation is slowly coming down, gas prices are decreasing, we have record job creation, consumer spending is high and we are rebuilding supply chains and manufacturing hubs domestically. While the Biden administration’s economic policies have helped fix roads and bridges and foster remarkable small business creation, there is a big opportunity for continued economic expansion; we must find more workers.

Remarkably, there are currently more jobs than workers, which means businesses cannot grow to their full potential because our current labor force cannot meet market demand. The solution is obvious: We must immediately increase the size of our workforce. To bring America to a soft economic landing in which we can keep lowering inflation and strengthening our economy, we must provide a path for immediate legal status to the 11 million undocumented workers who already here — and offer them a path to citizenship.

While the country’s mood is sour, new narrative research shows that some are hungry for a mentality of shared prosperity, a fundamental belief that America possesses a wealth of resources, plenty for all of us. But that isn’t just about money, natural resources, food or housing — it’s about the potential of the American people. In a recent Future Majority poll, 85% of Americans agreed with the statement, “We must invest in America because Americans are worth it. When you invest in Americans, our potential is limitless.”

A mutually beneficial process that benefits both immigrant and U.S.-born workers, and that unlocks and creates shared prosperity, is a powerful antidote to the divisive MAGA narrative.

This notion of a mutually beneficial process that benefits both immigrant and U.S.-born workers, and that unlocks and creates shared prosperity, is a powerful antidote to the divisive MAGA narrative that is tearing our country apart. This idea is much bigger than our labor market; it speaks to what makes our country unique. Our nation is strong because anyone can come here, become American and work to solve big problems that contribute to the innovations that improve everyone’s lives.

Voters in general want an America that’s better for everyone — that’s more free, more harmonious and multiracial, where everybody has an opportunity to thrive. They want to live in a country that can be made distinctly better in ways we haven’t seen before. Gretchen Barton from Worthy Strategy Group notes that on the issue of the economy, voters from moderate to liberal are comfortable with immigration when they view it as mutually beneficial for all involved: 

Voters desperately wish for a world of reconnection, within families and communities or across borders. They long for a world of integration, where everyone can bring the best of themselves to join up, solve problems together and be better. That is the key to meeting this moment, with solutions for creating greater community and integration mutually beneficial to our economic well-being.


Want a daily wrap-up of all the news and commentary Salon has to offer? Subscribe to our morning newsletter, Crash Course.


According to Daniel Costa, director of immigration law and policy research at the Economic Policy Institute, providing a pathway to citizenship for immigrant workers who are already in our labor market would mutually benefit both our economy and the undocumented workers themselves. These workers often face horrific working conditions and exploitation:

Five percent of our labor market right now has no rights because they are working without documentation. They live in fear of reporting labor violations because they and their families can be deported. We have seen with Dreamers that their wages doubled after getting DACA, so why wouldn’t we find a way to provide a pathway to citizenship to increase wages for all workers and bring stability to our economy?

Providing undocumented workers with a pathway to citizenship is not only smart economic policy and the moral thing to do. It’s largely popular across ideological lines. A recent poll from the National Immigration Forum shows that more than 75% of conservatives, moderates and liberals supported the idea of “Republicans and Democrats working together this year on reforms that could help lower food prices by ensuring a legal, reliable workforce.”

Democrats must embrace a mindset of shared prosperity, in which the tremendous gains of our economy can be shared equitably. The U.S. is the wealthiest country in the world. We are at our best when we adopt a growth mindset — one that allows people who are drawn to our country to help grow the economy and pay into the system, and to do so with dignity and the ability to participate fully in American life.

In this transitional economic moment, we have a crucial opportunity to do the right thing: Provide a pathway to citizenship for undocumented immigrants and turbocharge our economy. Now is the time to create greater opportunity for all, rebuild our country and honor and integrate those who are already here, and who have become American in every way but their documentation.  

Read more on the Jan. 6 committee:

Louisiana woman speaks out: She traveled 2,500 miles to NYC for emergency abortion

A Louisiana woman who was denied an abortion despite carrying a fetus with a fatally flawed skull revealed Wednesday that she had traveled nearly 2,500 miles round trip to New York City in order to undergo the procedure.

Nancy Davis, 36, told the Guardian that she traveled from her hometown of Baton Rouge to a Manhattan clinic, where she terminated her wanted pregnancy on Sept. 1.

That’s because Louisiana is one of more than a dozen states with “trigger laws” immediately banning abortion that went into effect after the Supreme Court struck down Roe v. Wade and half a century of federally guaranteed reproductive freedom in June.

“I felt like we made the best decision for our baby as well as ourselves,” Davis said during a Monday appearance on “Dr. Phil.”

“It’s still taken an emotional toll on me. I have problems sleeping at night, I have problems eating; it’s been very emotionally draining,” she added. “It was extremely traumatizing, it was mentally draining in all aspects, it was physically draining.”

When she was about 10 weeks pregnant in late July, Davis underwent an ultrasound at Woman’s Hospital in Baton Rouge that showed her fetus was missing the top of its skull — a fatal condition called acrania. Babies with the rare condition usually die within days, and sometimes minutes, of birth.

While Louisiana’s abortion ban has a broad exception for fetuses that would die outside the womb, acrania is not included on the state’s list of medical conditions that qualify for such an exception. Staff at Woman’s Hospital, therefore, refused to perform an abortion on Davis, apparently worried about potential prosecution, imprisonment, fines and forfeiture of their professional licenses if they did.


Want a daily wrap-up of all the news and commentary Salon has to offer? Subscribe to our morning newsletter, Crash Course.


“Basically, they said I had to carry my baby to bury my baby,” Davis said at an Aug. 26 press conference. “I want you to imagine what it’s been like to continue this pregnancy for another six weeks after this diagnosis. This is not fair to me and it should not happen to any other woman.”

“Basically, they said I had to carry my baby to bury my baby. I want you to imagine what it’s been like to continue this pregnancy for another six weeks after this diagnosis.”

Civil rights attorney Benjamin Crump, who is representing Davis, said during the press conference that Louisiana’s law was causing his client to suffer “unspeakable pain, emotional damage and physical risk.”

He added that the Republicans who implemented the state’s ban “replaced care with confusion, privacy with politics, and options with ideology.”

In the wake of Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization, 14 states have fully banned abortion or implemented six-week bans as of Sept. 9, with a near-total ban looming in West Virginia.

Of those states, pregnant people in Louisiana seeking abortions must travel an average of 1,332 miles round trip for the medical procedure — the longest such trip in the nation, according to the Guttmacher Institute.

National medical groups have warned of the “irreparable harm” such laws will cause, while experts argue that poor and Black patients are disproportionately affected by such bans.

“Even in very obvious cases, cases the anti-abortion movement insists they don’t oppose, these bans result in women being denied access to abortion,” Joshua Stein, a postdoctoral student at Georgetown University in Washington, D.C., tweeted.

“That includes the case of the unnamed 10-year-old girl who was raped, unable to get an abortion in Ohio because of the state’s laws, traveling to Indiana,” he continued. “The state [attorney general] insisted the law didn’t prohibit such cases, but the possible providers weren’t sure and didn’t want to risk liability.”

“It also includes the many, many cases where doctors are forced to adopt the ‘expectant management’ (wait-and-see) approach even when abortion would be the greatest reduction of risk to the patient’s safety, as in the Elise Taft case,” Stein added, referring to a Wisconsin woman who suffered a miscarriage and subsequently required emergency lifesaving surgery that experts say will be denied to people in states with strict bans.

“The implementation of these bans means that people are seeing the real consequences, either when people they know try to access services or when brave women come forward to make their experiences public,” said Stein.

“The GOP wants to change the topic away from that; the anti-abortion [movement] wants to change the topic away from that,” he added. “They want to distract from the real, serious, and obvious consequences of their policies (consequences actual experts knew about for years). They shouldn’t be allowed to.”

Belying conservative claims that the abortion issue should be left up to the states to decide, influential Republican Sen. Lindsey Graham of South Carolina on Tuesday introduced what reproductive rights defenders have long warned is the GOP endgame: a national abortion ban.

Parkland shooter’s trial comes to a quick halt when tensions erupt in courtroom

The trial for Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School shooter Nikolas Cruz took a turn on Wednesday as the judge lambasted the defense attorneys. The uproar came as defense announced they were resting their case without warning, a move that the judge called a waste of time.

Broward Circuit Judge Elizabeth Scherer was visibly frustrated, telling the defense team that they were unprofessional for not telling the court ahead of time.

“We’re not playing chess,” she said. “This is the most uncalled for, unprofessional way to try a case. You all knew about this. Even if you didn’t make your decision until this morning. To have 22 people plus all of the staff and every attorney march into court and be waiting as if it’s some kind of game … I have never experienced a level of unprofessionalism in my career. It’s unbelievable.”

The head defense lawyer, Melisa McNeill, tried to explain, but the judge stopped her.

“Well judge, you’re insulting me on the record in front of my client,” McNeill cut in.

“Well, you’ve been insulting me the entire trial,” Scherer shot back.

Sanders fights for rail workers as strike looms

U.S. Sen. Bernie Sanders on Wednesday afternoon stood up against Republicans’ attempt to force 115,000 railroad workers to accept a contract recommended by a presidential board last month, saying the GOP wants to hinder the workers’ fight “for sick leave and better working conditions.”

Before taking to the Senate floor, Sander (I-Vt.) tweeted that “I will proudly stand up to stop” the legislation proposed by Sens. Roger Wicker (R-Miss.) and Richard Burr (R-N.C.).

The Presidential Emergency Board (PEB), a nonpartisan panel appointed by President Joe Biden last month, recommended that rail carriers and union workers accept a contract with wage increases, but unions expressed outrage that the recommendations did not include a paid sick leave policy or address stringent “points-based” attendance rules which requires engineers and conductors to work many days—and sometimes consecutive weeks or months—with no time off, to make up for taking a weekend off.

Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) on Tuesday said the contract recommended by the PEB should be accepted and called on Biden to push for its adoption, but Democratic leaders have expressed hope that railway carriers and the workers’ unions can come to an agreement before 12:01 am Eastern Time on Friday, when workers can strike.

“Democrats are not going to impose these contracts without dealing with the issue of workers’ working lives,” Larry Cohen, former president of the Communication Workers of America, told The Washington Post. “Republicans are viciously against collective bargaining, but carriers are going to have to respect people’s lives and there’s going to have to be respect for these workers. They’re not getting a settlement without it.”

On the Senate floor Wednesday, Sanders condemned the rail industry for trying to pressure workers into accepting working conditions which he called “absolutely unacceptable” and “almost beyond belief,” noting that rail carriers have “seen huge profits in recent years.”

In 2021, the Vermont Independent senator noted, carriers “made a record-breaking $20 billion in profit” while “the CEOs of many of these rail companies are enjoying huge compensation packages.”

“In the midst of all of those profit increases for the industry, what’s going on for the workers?” he asked, before saying railroad engineers are “entitled to a grand total of zero sick days.”

Unions and carriers are under pressure to reach an agreement, as a strike would temporarily harm supply chains across the nation.

On Wednesday, Amtrak announced it would cancel long-distance trips starting Thursday in anticipation of the strike.

Labor reporter Jonah Furman argued that the current threat to railroad operations is not a potential strike over unfair working conditions, but a “lockout” controlled solely by powerful railroad companies.

“There is not a single worker on strike on the U.S. rails right now,” said Furman. “There are CEOs shutting down rail lines and withholding goods to shock Congress into forcing a deal on 100,000 workers.”

According to Sanders, what Congress should be doing “is telling the CEOs in the rail industry: Treat your workers with dignity and respect, not contempt.”

“Reservation Dogs” and “Echo” star on the “appetite for Native stories” and living up to her name

When she appears onscreen for our recent Zoom interview, Devery Jacobs is the portrait of chill despite admitting, “It’s been a pretty crazy time.”  The “Reservation Dogs” star is just stating facts, not complaining. She connected with Salon from Atlanta where she was on a break from working on the upcoming “Hawkeye” spinoff “Echo,” due out next year.

Being a Marvel joint, Jacobs is contractually barred from saying much about her role beyond expressing her thrill at collaborating again with Navajo director Sydney Freeland, with whom Jacobs has worked in Peacock’s “Rutherford Falls,” along with the FX/Hulu comedy in which she stars.

As of Season 2, Jacobs is also one of the critically acclaimed show’s writers. Like she said, her schedule is full.

But the work she’s doing makes the effort worthwhile. On “Reservation Dogs” Jacobs plays Elora Danan, a young woman torn between wanting to run away from the Oklahoma rez where she was raised, and the mighty pull of her family’s and friends’ love for her. “Mabel,” the fourth episode of the current season, clarifies the ramifications a person’s departure has on a close-knit community like Elora’s. It also represents Jacobs’ first co-writing credit on the series, which she shares with Sterlin Harjo.

The “Reservation Dogs” creator was already familiar with Jacobs’ screenwriting through several of her other projects, including the recently released Canadian feature “This Place.” But she didn’t take that for granted.

“I was just like, ‘I’m going to have to brace myself to battle it out and be like, ‘Here’s why you should have me in the room’ and plead my case,” Jacobs remembered. “And when I was gearing up to do that, Sterlin actually invited me into the room, straight up. I was just like, ‘Wait a minute. You mean I don’t actually have to fight for this?'”

The episode “Mabel” proves the soundness of Harjo’s choice, as Elora joins her friends, family and neighbors gathered to say goodbye to her grandmother Mabel (Geraldine Keams) in one of the season’s most moving storylines. Jacobs, who is Mohawk, wanted to show the audience a tradition that’s central to her own experience while also depicting the lasting impact of someone leaving their community behind, as Elora’s Aunt Teenie did after her mother Cookie died.

Watch our “Salon Talks” here or read a transcript below as we discuss “Mabel” as well as the expanded representation for Indigenous actors, writers and directors in Hollywood.

The following interview has been edited for length and clarity.

On “Reservation Dogs,” you have an all-Native writers room. I know that there have been a number of series that do. I recently talked to Zahn [McClarnon], one of your co-stars on “Reservation Dogs,” for “Dark Winds,” and he was very excited to have an all-Native production, and talking about his role as an executive producer and the star there. What is the representation on “Echo”?

“The Native film industry is just so small, and it’s comprised of people who are just working so hard to try and kick the doors down, and to have our stories be heard.”

The representation is actually a mix of different folks. There’s Indigenous folks who are directing and who are in the writers room, but there’s also deaf folks and there’s also some other experienced writers. But because the series follows Echo, played by Alaqua [Cox], who plays Maya Lopez, there’s definitely a lot of deaf representation in there too. And so that’s been something that’s just such an honor to be a part of and invited into a world of deaf culture that I hadn’t had access to previously.

“Mabel”  is an episode that has a lot of moving parts to it. Obviously you’ve been writing since 2016, so . . . you’re not green at it. Still, I’m someone who’s been writing for decades and if I was handed an episode where I had to handle so many different moving parts, I would find it challenging. What that was like?

Being a part of that room was something that was really special because I’ve either known all of the writers or known of them for years. The Native film industry is just so small, and it’s comprised of people who are just working so hard to try and kick the doors down, and to have our stories be heard. [It’s] also filled with people who have been told by the industry for decades that there’s just not an audience for Native stories. There isn’t an appetite for it.

 . . . But when it came to this episode, I guess I wasn’t going into the room anticipating writing for Elora Danan. I went in genuinely wanting to write and be a part of the creation of the season. And it was actually really focused on all of the other characters. But when it came to that episode, I was especially passionate about the conversations of death with Indigenous people, because I feel like for our communities . . . that death is a really hands on, warm experience.

Obviously there’s exceptions: when people die by suicide, like Daniel in the series, or when people have passed before their time. Those are obviously the exceptions. But for the most part, when somebody’s an elder and somebody passes away and they’re surrounded by community, it’s a celebration. It’s like some of the funnest times I’ve had in my community, where you’re with them all night long telling stories of the stupid stuff they did growing up. And I think that it’s a glimpse into our cultures in a way that hasn’t been explored before.

I couldn’t be more proud of that episode, as a writer or actor. And I just really appreciated how beautifully and with how much care the director, Danis Goulet, had directed that episode.

One of the things that this show does so well, as you’ve said before, is finding the universality in specificity.

The other that this particular episode does is give us deeper knowledge about this community. This is the episode where you find out that the pain that your friends are feeling has been felt by the generation before you, with Elora Danan’s mother, Cookie, passing. How did you decide to incorporate these themes and bring in so many different voices to take these stories and move them forward, and give [Elora] a new perspective on what it means to be home?

I think that’s where audiences are going to be really surprised, pleasantly, by where we go this season. And one of those storylines was how it [Cookie’s passing] impacted and shockwaved through the community, and how that’s kind of happened also with Daniel.

“All of these components were things that have already been baked into the DNA of our series.”

It was already in the story. If we look at last season in Episode 7, the “California Dreaming” episode, Bill Burr’s character, Coach Bobson, talks about how he was impacted when Cookie had passed and what that was like. . . . It just makes sense for the audience, but also for Elora, to see the impact of Teenie leaving, her Aunt Teenie (Tamara Podemski), who didn’t get to be a part of her life because she left once Cookie had passed away, similarly to how all Elora Danan wanted to flee and wants to flee after the passing of Daniel.

And so Elora gets to get a glimpse into her future – should she choose to leave – and the impact of that, while also feeling anger and grief over the loss of this person who could and should have been in her life, and also getting to see someone who is still connected to community, even though they’ve left.

All of these components were things that have already been baked into the DNA of our series. My favorite, being an actor turned filmmaker, is tracking everybody’s emotions throughout the series and making sure that even if it’s in little moments, that we’re checking in with everyone and we know where they’re at about everything, because that’s why we care. That’s why we’re all here.

In this industry, whenever there is a surge in representation for any group, there’s this tendency to be like, “It’s a moment!” which is so infuriating, because a moment is small. One of the things that has been such a boon is to see you and Zahn, and Elva [Guerra] who was in “Dark Winds” with Zahn before then they came back to reprise Jackie on “Reservation Dogs,” and Jana [Schmieding] coming in from “Rutherford Falls.”

Do you feel like this momentum is something that’s here to stay? What is your sense, just in terms of the presence that you as artists and you, Devery, as an artist, have in this industry right now?

Yes, it is a moment, but it’s a moment that is launching the beginning of a greater industry for Indigenous folks, is what I’m feeling and what I’m determined to make sure happens. And even this industry is not the same industry that it was even five years ago, even three years ago. And I think seeing people come up and also talking to different folks who’ve been trailblazing the industry, people like Zahn, people like Tantoo Cardinal, who I’m getting to work with in “Echo,” getting to work with Graham Greene, and people who forged this path for us to follow has been wild.

I was speaking with Tantoo on set the other day, and she said the first film she was in was 1971, when people had a very different idea about Indigenous people in North America. And so to be a part of this, I think, is the first glimpse into the stories that we have to share and is the first time that we are getting to prove that widespread audiences have an appetite for Native stories. And so I think that’s the exciting part.


Want a daily wrap-up of all the news and commentary Salon has to offer? Subscribe to our morning newsletter, Crash Course.


It’s also a little frustrating that it’s taken this long for that to happen. And I’ve spoken before how it feels a little bit like whiplash – where all of the things that specified me too much, that made me sound too much like I was from a rez in Canada and that I wouldn’t be able to work, all of those things that I was told to get rid of because it meant that I would be considered less of an actor – are now things that are being celebrated for in this show, which is absolutely the way it should be.

I’ve always known that Native people are so freaking cool and should be on stages like this. So I think it’s a lot of undoing and unlearning the ways that we were taught to exist as Native people in this industry and to blow past that and to forge a new way forward. And I hope that there are so many creatives coming up, Indigenous creatives coming up, who I have no idea who they are, because that just means that there’s more people and that we’re growing a bigger industry for ourselves and for our communities.

One last question, and I just want to call this out so people notice it: On “Mabel,” you use your full name [in the credits]. Can you talk about the significance of that?

Totally. So that’s my first name legally. I was born and raised as Kawennáhere, and that’s what my family calls me. The name was given to me by  . . . my grandmother. The direct translation means, “Her word is above.” But what that means is what I have to say is important. And so I definitely try to live up to my name, when creating and acting as a filmmaker, whether that’s a writer or director, it definitely comes from a personal place. And it’s not me playing a character. It’s me looking within and sharing some of that information as a creative. So for me having my first name be a part of it, when the writing process was such a personal process and such a personal component where each of us were deriving from our own lives, it just made sense for me to include my full name.

New episodes of “Reservation Dogs” stream Wednesdays on Hulu.

Adnan Syed murder case made famous by “Serial” podcast gets new trial to vacate sentence

Baltimore prosecutors filed a motion on Wednesday for a new trial in the case of Adnan Syed, who was arrested on February 28, 1999 and charged with the first-degree murder of ex-girlfriend Hae Min Lee. In Syed’s initial trial, which was made famous by the “Serial” podcast that launched the true-crime podcast craze, he was found guilty and sentenced to life in prison plus 30 years in February 2000. Now, after a year-long investigation, Baltimore City State’s Attorney Marilyn Mosby says that prosecutors are moving to vacate that sentence after it was determined that information regarding two new suspects was withheld from Syed’s defense attorneys.

“As stewards of the court, we are obligated to uphold confidence in the integrity of convictions and do our part to correct when this standard has been comprised,” Mosby said in a statement obtained from CNN. “We have spoken with the family of Ms. Hae Min Lee and (they) fully understand that the person responsible for this heinous crime must be held accountable.”

According to coverage of the newly filed motion by The Baltimore Sun, prosecutors say that “they do not concede Syed, 42, is innocent, but they no longer have faith in his conviction . . .  and asked a judge to release Syed on his own recognizance pending further developments.”

“The State’s Brady violations robbed the Defendant of information that would have bolstered his investigation and argument that someone else was responsible for the victim’s death…. These concerns are highlighted by the new information regarding alternative suspects, and new evidence regarding the reliability of critical evidence at trial has caused the state to lose faith in the integrity of the convictions,” Becky Feldman, chief of the state’s attorney’s office’s Sentencing Review Unit, wrote in the motion.


Want a daily wrap-up of all the news and commentary Salon has to offer? Subscribe to our morning newsletter, Crash Course.


Syed’s case has gone through several appeals over the years, with no success. This new trial, referred to by close friend Rabia Chaudry as “validating,” seeks to finally bring true justice to the highly publicized case. “It’s what we’ve been saying for decades,” says Chaudry.

“This is a true example of how justice delayed is justice denied,” Maryland Public Defender Natasha Dartigue said in a statement. “An innocent man spends decades wrongly incarcerated, while any information or evidence that could help identify the actual perpetrator becomes increasingly difficult to pursue.”

“Given the stunning lack of reliable evidence implicating Mr. Syed, coupled with increasing evidence pointing to other suspects, this unjust conviction cannot stand,” said Syed’s attorney, Erica Suter, the director of the Innocence Project clinic at the University of Baltimore School of Law. “Mr. Syed is grateful that this information has finally seen the light of day and looks forward to his day in court.”

Are Hawaii’s beach showers in violation of the Clean Water Act?

Ecotoxicologist Craig Downs describes his main work goal as “preventing zombies” — communities of coral or other marine creatures that appear to be thriving, but upon closer inspection, turn out to be composed only of adults lacking the ability to reproduce. These populations are like the “living dead,” a generation away from vanishing, according to scientists who discovered them in dying reefs across the Caribbean in 2016.

Globally, coral reefs are in decline for a number of reasons, including climate change, coastal development, and pollution. Over the years, Downs, executive director of Haereticus Environmental Laboratory in Virginia, has studied sunscreen, microplastics, and most recently, beach showers, in an effort to understand the effects of these human-made substances on some of the world’s most popular vacation destinations. His latest study, published in July, could also breathe new life into an old law.

In April, the Clean Water Act, the keystone U.S. law on water pollution, took what many environmentalists describe as a tough hit. In a controversial shadow docket decision, the Supreme Court voted to remove states’ power to block federally-approved, but environmentally-damaging projects. Commentators decried the attempt to strip states of the right to protect their own waters, one of the core principles enshrined in the Act.

Downs’ study, which suggests that beach showers are leaching pollutants into the sea, concerns another part of the law — section 502, subsection 14, to be precise. He and his colleagues allege that the showers are “point sources,” defined by the Clean Water Act as “single identifiable sources of pollution from which pollutants are discharged.” If Downs and his colleagues are right, attorneys say, this would meaningfully change the current understanding of the 50-year-old statute, potentially allowing citizens to sue many an unsuspecting municipality or resort.

“I wasn’t very surprised to hear about this study,” said Peter Prows, managing partner of the environmental law firm Briscoe Ivester & Bazel in San Francisco. One of his clients, the Republic of Palau, in the western Pacific, banned several sun filters after connecting a crash in its famous golden jellyfish population, in part, to the sunscreen pollution left by tourists.

In Hawaii, nearly a decade ago, a lifeguard by the name of Tamara Paltin — now a Maui politician — asked Downs how much sunscreen was coming from a local beach shower that drained over the pavement and nearby grass. She also wondered about the showers in the rest of the county, which includes Maui and three other islands. Many of the facilities discharge their wastewater straight into the sea.

Although he was researching sunscreen pollution at the time, Downs didn’t think anything of it. Years later, William White, a co-author on the new paper, told Downs about erosion caused by another shower at Waialea Bay on Hawaii Island, and insisted Downs take a look. “He pressed it into my brain,” Downs said. “The people who lived there have always wondered if it was an issue.”

When Downs and his colleagues tested the ground and water around the showers on three Hawaiian islands in 2019, levels of sunscreen chemicals, including oxybenzone, avobenzone, benzophenone-2, octocrylene, and octinoxate, were disturbingly high.

The resulting research paper is punctuated with references to pollution discharge permits and precise statutory definitions of “pollutants” and “point sources.” The first few lines of the discussion section echo the opening paragraphs of the U.S. Supreme Court’s opinion in County of Maui vs Hawaii Wildlife Fund, a case in which a group of local NGOs fought a water-polluting county ⁠— and won.

That this feat was possible hints at the power contained in the Clean Water Act. Enacted in 1972, it had bold aims: to restore and maintain the integrity of the nation’s water, and eliminate water pollution by 1985. To achieve them, lawmakers packed the statute with a variety of tools, among them, “citizen suits,” which allow ordinary Americans to take legal action against polluters — a right exercised by Hawaii Wildlife Fund against Maui County Council.

The county had argued that pollutants seeping from injection wells where it stored wastewater were not a point source discharge, because the wells didn’t discharge directly into the sea; the waste traveled there indirectly, through the groundwater. The Court decided that the Act’s “language, structure, and purpose” would never have left such a large loophole open to polluters.

Any case against beach shower pollution would have to establish that sunscreen is a pollutant. According to Anupa Asokan, senior ocean advocate for the National Resource Defense Council and a board member for the environmental nonprofit Surfrider Foundation, “There’s science to back up the fact that some of the chemicals in sunscreen aren’t great for coral.” Downs himself has published a number of papers on this, including a 2015 study suggesting that oxybenzone and octinoxate could contribute to the bleaching of Hawaiian reefs. These findings led to a statewide ban on the two chemicals.

Yet much remains unknown about the ecological effects of sunscreens. Earlier this month, the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine issued a report, urging the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency to conduct ecological risk assessments for each active ingredient in sunscreens sold in the U.S. The NAS report noted that “Sunscreen is used as a critical tool for the prevention of UV skin damage and skin cancer; however, specific UV filter ingredients may also impact the health of aquatic environments, resident species, or ecosystem services.”

Stefanie Harrington, a spokesperson for the Personal Care Products Council — a trade group representing the cosmetics and personal care products industry — re-emphasized sunscreen’s role in reducing skin cancer. Commenting on Downs’ recent paper, she added that Hawaii’s waste management infrastructure should be upgraded: “All manner of chemical and biological contaminants that have been shown to impact ecosystems and public health are being released to the environment because of poor waste management facilities and practices in Hawaii.”

Any lawsuit would have to convince courts that a shower could really be a point source.

“There is some contention as to what constitutes a point source or not,” said Dietrich Hoefner, an environmental and regulatory lawyer at Lewis Roca in Denver, Colorado. “If you look at the Clean Water Act, it says that a point source is ‘a discernible, confined and discrete conveyance, including, but not limited to any pipe, ditch, channel, tunnel, conduit, well.'” But historically, he said, “Regulators think of point sources as things that come out of pipes.”

When Downs explains why he and his co-authors believe the showers are point sources, he doesn’t mention pipes. He sends images of 15-inch-deep gullies rubbed into the sand by the rivulets that stream from the showers every day.

“Is that rivulet a defined, discrete conveyance?” pondered Prows. “You’d get a lot of lawyers to argue about that. Probably in some circumstances it is.” He and Hoefner both conjure a shower drain that collects the water, releasing it onto the beach, underground or somewhere nearby, away from the shower, where it will inevitably flow to the ocean. “That would be a discrete conveyance and a point source.”

But even if a point source is established, Hoefner spots another hurdle: “Put yourself in the regulator’s shoes. You might look at this and go, these people have already been presumably swimming in the ocean, right?” Some of their sunscreen has already washed off into the water. “So should we really be so concerned that a little bit more is coming off an outdoor shower?”

Downs has heard that argument before. “One swimmer, one shower, does it pose a threat? But 500 swimmers and more than 500 showers?” The difference, he says, is all in the concentrations.

Cláudia Mieiro, a marine biologist at the University of Aveiro in Portugal who was not involved in Downs’ study, remarked on the high concentrations of sunscreen chemicals found in the sand near the showers. The sand, she said, appears to be acting like a sink for these compounds.

This could disrupt the beach ecosystem, said Downs, evoking the place where ghost crabs dig their holes, sea turtles come ashore to nest, and migrating birds feed.

And what’s in the sand ultimately gets into the sea — and coral reefs. That, said Downs, “leads to zombies.”

Downs’ findings have already prompted legislators to act. Although just published in July, much of the research for the paper took place back in 2019. By the end of 2021, two of its authors, Kelly King and Tamara Paltin, both members of Maui County Council — and whom Downs invited to join the research project to build community engagement on the issue — had already spearheaded an ordinance banning all chemical sunscreens.

For Councilmember King, an environmentalist and former deep-sea diver, the fallout from the Hawaii Wildlife Fund case is still fresh. The case is a cautionary tale for polluting municipalities. But those who hope it signals a vivification of the Act might want to temper their optimism.

“I think a lot of attorneys were surprised when the Supreme Court found that the Clean Water Act actually applied to those groundwater discharges a couple years ago,” said Prows. With another big environmental ruling approaching, he said, “I think the safe bet would be to expect that at least the Supreme Court is going to continue to be skeptical about expansive interpretations of the Clean Water Act.”

Hoefner agreed: “With this Supreme Court, we’ve seen a higher level of skepticism of the federal government’s ability to act as an environmental regulator and a sort of narrower reading of the applicable laws than maybe we’ve seen in the past.”

So where does all this leave the beach showers?

“If I were a plaintiff, I’d be looking for the right set of facts to bring a case and try to set precedent,” Prows said. “It wouldn’t surprise me if there’s one out there that meets the test in a more compelling way than others. A judge may well be convinced that under those circumstances, yeah, there’s a discharge of a pollutant from a point source here, and that’s a violation of the Act.”


Jea Morris is a journalist based in London. She writes about beauty and the biosphere and her work has appeared in ELLE, Hakai Magazine, and Smithsonian Magazine.

This article was originally published on Undark. Read the original article.

The true story behind the “doomsday mom” accused of killing her two children in “Sins of Our Mother”

It’s hard to not anticipate the worst while watching “Sins of Our Mother.” The latest true-crime installation from Netflix revisits the 2020 case surrounding Lori Vallow Daybell — nicknamed the “doomsday mom” — who is presently awaiting trial for the deaths of her two children.

Over the course of three episodes, the series explores Lori’s grim descent into religious extremism, which progressed gradually via her devotion to The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints. Under the influence of her fifth husband Chad Guy Daybell — a former gravedigger turned apocalyptic novelist and self-declared prophet — Lori believed her 17-year-old daughter and 7-year-old son were so-called “dark” individuals and followers of Satan.

From the director of “Abducted in Plain Sight” and “Girl in the Picture” comes “Sins of Our Mother,” a docuseries that spotlights Lori’s surviving child, Colby Ryan, along with her parents, her ex-friends and the investigators tackling the ongoing case. The series itself summarizes the Vallow-Daybell murder and refrains from providing new details. But it’s still a grueling watch for newcomers of the case and ardent followers alike.   

Here’s a closer look at the suspects in question, the murder case and recent updates:

Who is Lori Vallow Daybell?

Lori Vallow Daybell was born on June 26, 1973, as Lori Norene Cox and grew up in San Bernardino, California. She and her three siblings — Adam, Alex and Summer — were all raised in the LDS Church.

“All of our kids love ‘The Book of Mormon,’” recounted Lori’s mother, Janis Cox, in the documentary. “And Lori’s always loved the scriptures. She took to it right away.” Her fascination with Mormonism was also fueled by her father, Barry Cox, whom she once hailed as “the spiritual giant.”

At the age of 19, Lori married her high school boyfriend Nelson Yanes, but the marriage was short-lived and ended in divorce. In 1995, at the age of 22, she married William Lagioia and had her first child, Colby Ryan. The pair, however, split just three years later on February 25, 1998.

Lori remarried in 2001 to her third husband, Joseph Anthony Ryan, wo is the biological father of her second child, daughter Tylee Ryan. Joseph allegedly abused Lori and physically and sexually abused Colby, thus prompting Lori to end their marriage with divorce.    

“There’s a turning point in my life that turned me to the Temple. I had been married to someone who was very awful, who raped my children,” Lori said in an old voice recording. “And I was going to murder him; just thought I couldn’t take it anymore. So I went and met my Bishop and I was like, ‘I’m either going to turn my life to the Temple or I’m going to commit murder.'”

In 2006, Lori married her fourth husband, Charles Vallow. Seven years into their marriage, the couple adopted Joshua ‘JJ’ Vallow, who was the grandson of Charles’ sister. JJ had autism but grew close to both Colby and Tylee, who oftentimes referred to JJ as her own child.

Sins of Our MotherCharles Vallow, Colby Ryan and Lori Vallow from “Sins of Our Mother” (Netflix)

Lori and Chad’s relationship

Although Lori had her longest marriage with Charles, she was dissatisfied with her husband and oftentimes told her closest acquaintances that she didn’t see Charles as her “spiritual equal.”

In 2018, Lori met Chad Daybell — her soon-to-be fifth husband — and quickly took a liking to his extreme apocalyptic and catastrophic preachings. Together, they began planning for the end of times and followed a ranking system that categorized people on a scale of “light” to “dark.” Per Chad, “light” individuals were “followers of Jesus Christ” while “dark” individuals (also known as “zombies”) were devotees of Satan.

The following year, Charles filed for divorce as he grew more fearful of Lori’s erratic and inexplicable behavior. On several occasions, Lori threatened to murder her husband and ostracized him from the family in an attempt to cast him as a villain. She also allegedly told Charles that she no longer cared about him or JJ before disappearing with both Tylee and JJ, according to a 2020 KSL TV report.

Unfortunately, only a few months later, Charles was murdered by Lori’s brother, Alex Cox, in the Arizona home she was living in with her children. Alex shot Charles four times in the chest after accusing him of “abusing his sister.” He later told law enforcement that Charles had attacked him first by hitting him in the head with a baseball bat and, thus, he had used the gun in self-defense. Investigators also learned, per the autopsy report, that Alex failed to perform CPR on Charles after a 9-1-1 dispatcher instructed him to do so. The case was subsequently dropped, and Alex was not charged.

In September 2019, Lori and her children left their Arizona residence to live closer to Chad. The quartet lived in an apartment complex in Rexburg, Idaho; Alex also moved into that same complex, just a few doors down from his sister.

The string of deaths

That same year, both JJ and Tylee went missing. Police said the last known photo of Tylee was taken during a Yellowstone National Park trip she attended with Lori, JJ and Alex. In response to inquiries and concerns from family, Lori concocted lies regarding her children’s whereabouts. She told some family and friends that Tylee was visiting relatives, while others heard that she was studying at Brigham Young University’s Idaho campus. Lori also claimed JJ was staying with her close friend, Melanie Gibb, who eventually told authorities that JJ hadn’t been with her. Gibb also said she heard Lori refer to her two children as “zombies.”

In October 2019, Chad’s then-wife, Tammy Daybell, died of natural causes in her sleep. But police grew suspicious of Tammy’s death and suspected foul play, especially after Lori and Chad hastily tied the knot just two weeks later. An autopsy was never performed, per a request from the Daybell children. They were convinced that their mother died of natural causes because she was in poor health prior to her death.

In December 2019, Alex then died of natural causes in Arizona. The Rexburg Police Department also officially declared Tylee and JJ as missing persons and launched a nationwide investigation into their disappearances.

On January 25, 2020, officials located Chad and Lori in Kauai, Hawaii, and served the latter a court order requiring her to produce her children within five days. Lori was unable to fulfill the order and on February 20, 2020, she was arrested. Two weeks later, she was extradited to Idaho.

Despite the arrest, Tylee and JJ’s whereabouts and safety were still a mystery. On June 9, 2020, local authorities searched Chad’s property and found the bodies of both children — JJ had been buried under a tree while Tylee had been buried in the Daybell’s pet cemetery.

Sins of Our MotherPhoto of Tylee Ryan and JJ Vallow from “Sins of Our Mother” (Netflix)

The charges

On May 25, 2021, Chad and Lori were formally charged with first-degree murder for the deaths of JJ and Tylee. Chad was also charged for the death of Tammy. He pleaded not guilty to all the charges.

On June 29, 2021, Lori was also charged with conspiring to murder Charles. However, her case was put on hold after a judge decided she was mentally unfit to stand trial and referred her for treatment.

A few months later, prosecutors announced that they were seeking the death penalty for Chad. He is currently in jail and awaiting trial.

Sins of Our MotherChad Daybell from “Sins of Our Mother” (Netflix)

Present day

On April 11, 2022, Judge Steven Boyce declared that Lori is mentally competent to stand trial. A few days later, Lori refused to enter a plea to murder, thus prompting the judge to put in a plea of “not guilty” for her.

Chad also pleaded not guilty to murder, conspiracy and grand theft charges; The pair’s joint trial is slated to begin in January 2023.

“Sins of Our Mother” is currently available for streaming on Netflix. Watch the trailer below, via YouTube:

 

A virus that causes polio-like symptoms is spreading among children, CDC warns

Public health agencies including the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) are warning the public about a resurgent virus causing severe respiratory illness that sometimes comes with polio-like symptoms.

In August 2022, the agency was alerted about an uptick in pediatric hospitalizations caused by enterovirus D68 (EV-D68), which can cause severe respiratory tract infections, and in rare cases, it can cause limb weakness and progressive paralysis, not unlike polio.

“EV-D68 is back this year and circulating in the U.S.,” Kevin Messacar, a pediatric infectious diseases specialist at Children’s Hospital Colorado, told STAT News. “So we want providers, first-line health care workers, pediatricians, ER docs to be on the lookout for cases of patients presenting with weakness, knowing that this is circulating, so that those cases can be diagnosed quickly and managed appropriately.”

EV-D68 isn’t a new pathogen — it was first identified in 1962 — but it has become far more common in the 21st century. The last major outbreak in the U.S was in 2018, with a record 238 documented cases. Following a dip in cases during the COVID pandemic, the virus has returned in force, generating illness in multiple states.

The most common symptoms of EV-D68 include muscle aches, fever, coughing, sneezing, blisters or rashes. In severe cases, EV-D68 can trigger wheezing or difficulty breathing, which can sometimes require a ventilator. In some cases, the virus can attack the heart or cause lesions on the spinal cord, known as acute flaccid myelitis (AFM), which can produce nerve dysfunctions and paralysis.

According to the CDC, typical signs of AFM include a sudden onset of arm or leg weakness or loss of muscle tone and reflexes. That can include difficulty moving the eyes or drooping eyelids, drooping of the face, difficulty with swallowing or slurred speech. Pain in the arms, legs, neck or back is also sometimes reported.

Less common but extremely risky symptoms include respiratory failure and serious neurologic complications such as body temperature changes and blood pressure instability that could be life threatening.

If you or your child develops any of these symptoms, you should seek medical care immediately.

Children are most at risk, but adults can catch it, too, although the risk of severe illness is far greater in kids. That’s because most adults have developed immunity from previous exposures to enteroviruses. There are no vaccines or antiviral treatments for EV-D68 approved by the Food and Drug Administration. Doctors can give supportive care, but not much else. Severe cases often require hospitalization even as a precaution, because the disease can progress rapidly.

Acute flaccid myelitis cases typically lag behind EV-D68 respiratory illnesses, so monitoring for additional infections in the coming months will be “essential,” the CDC says.

“Children with a history of asthma or reactive airway disease may be more likely to require medical care, though children without a known history of asthma can also present with severe illness,” the CDC warned on September 9th. “Adults may also become infected with EV-D68, but it is thought to be more commonly detected in adults with underlying conditions.”

Some kids will recover from AFM, but others won’t. Some will struggle with neurological complications for the rest of their lives.

So how at-risk are kids? Even though there are more cases of EV-D68 this summer than the last three years during the same period, they are still relatively rare. However, the consequences can be severe.

So far, the CDC says it hasn’t seen an uptick in associated AFM cases yet. That could change, however, as acute flaccid myelitis cases typically lag behind EV-D68 respiratory illnesses, so monitoring for additional infections in the coming months will be “essential,” the CDC says.

The CDC has offered guidance on how to protect yourself from EV-D68: Wash your hands often, avoid touching your eyes, nose, and mouth, and avoid close contact such as kissing or hugging. Don’t share cups or eating utensils with people who are sick.

You should also clean and disinfect frequently touched surfaces, especially if someone is sick and cover your coughs and sneezes with a tissue or your upper shirt sleeve, not your hands. Stay home when you are sick.

It can be difficult to test specifically for EV-D68, which can make monitoring the outbreak cumbersome. There are also over 100 different strains of enteroviruses, including poliovirus, the pathogen famously responsible for polio, a disease notorious for paralyzing its victims.


Want more health and science stories in your inbox? Subscribe to Salon’s weekly newsletter The Vulgar Scientist.


Polio is currently spreading as well in parts of the U.S. Last week, New York Gov. Kathy Hochul declared a state disaster emergency in response to circulating polio cases. And yesterday, September 13th, the CDC announced agreement with the World Health Organization’s assessment that polio is spreading in Rockland County, New York and surrounding areas. The U.S. has now been added to a list of approximately 30 other countries, including Ethiopia, Yemen and Ukraine, where polio outbreaks more regularly occur.

However, unlike EV-D68, there is a vaccine for poliovirus. “Polio vaccination is the safest and best way to fight this debilitating disease and it is imperative that people in these communities who are unvaccinated get up to date on polio vaccination right away,” Dr. José R. Romero, director of CDC’s National Center for Immunization and Respiratory Diseases, said in a statement. “We cannot emphasize enough that polio is a dangerous disease for which there is no cure.”

While vaccines for EV-D68 are in early stages of development, they are still likely years away from becoming available to the general public. In the meantime, health officials will need to continue monitoring the situation while parents will have to hope their kids don’t catch a child-paralyzing disease.

Fishing regulations are so lax that fishing waste has created a large trash island

Naude and Katja Dreyer became emotional as they shared the story of a seal that they attempted to cut free from a mire of painful, dangerous trash. And they had to do so not just once, but twice.

Through their private organization Ocean Conservation Namibia (OCN), Naude and Katja find Cape fur seals that have been entangled in ocean pollution and spring to the rescue. It is a mission that keeps them quite busy: they have posted dozens of videos in which they chase down roly-poly, chubby and fluffy seals, who almost invariably bellow in protest. The resulting content is almost shamefully entertaining because of its slapstick quality. Unsurprisingly, the OCN YouTube channel has garnered 827K subscribers at the time of this writing — in no small part because the OCN mission is quite serious and, for the seals themselves, a matter of life-and-death.

This particular seal stands out — “a big male,” as Naude described him — because his team recognized him from five days earlier. The brawny pinniped sported “a very specific mark, a wound from the previous entanglement where we rescued him before.” On the previous Tuesday, Naude and his team had extricated the hapless animal from a white packaging strip commonly used in bait boxes. By the very next Sunday, they had again “caught the seal, removed a strap, and got him up. We could see it was the exact same seal again.”

“There are beaches in Hawaii where you can literally watch the plastic come in, with every wave on some beaches… And a lot of it is clearly coming from fishing gear.”

Naude repeated himself, seemingly in disbelief: “Within five days he had actually gone and gotten another entanglement, another bait box strap over his neck. Within five days.”

Needless to say, both Naude and Katja seemed saddened but not surprised when they learned of a report earlier this month that the infamous North Pacific garbage patch is comprised mostly of discarded fishing gear. Scientists already knew that the North Pacific garbage patch — an island of garbage more than 610,000 square miles (1.7 million square kilometers) large, or roughly twice the size of Texas — was being largely fueled by plastic pollution. The new study reveals, however, that the bulk of this pollution comes from one specific group of polluters: the fishing industry.

John Hocevar, a marine biologist and director of Greenpeace’s oceans campaign, told Salon that his organization has already noted that the scourge of plastic pollution in the ocean is inextricably linked to under-regulation of the fishing industry.

“I’ve seen firsthand how big a problem discarded fishing and aquaculture debris is in some parts of the ocean,” Hocevar told Salon. “There are beaches in Hawaii where you can literally watch the plastic come in, with every wave on some beaches. You can see the microplastics with your naked eyes in your hand among the grains of sand that you pick up. And a lot of it is clearly coming from fishing gear.”

Hocevar added, “there is not a lot of oversight of fishing vessels at sea.”

There are consequences to this lack of oversight, at least when it comes to pollution in the ocean. Joao Sousa — the Senior Programme Officer and Marine Plastics and Plastics Expert at the International Union for Conservation of Nature — broke down the bleakness of the plastic pollution situation with Salon. Fueling the sheer massive quantity of fishing-related pollution is the fact that the plastics commonly used by the fishing industry are not biodegradable. This means that items made from those plastics which enter the ocean will likely stay there forever. Sousa compared the situation facing the planet to the one facing people who have plaque build up in their cardiovascular systems. They can try to avoid further damage to their body, but much of the build up that exists now will likely be there for the rest of their lifetime.

Even worse, what we are seeing with both the North Pacific garbage patch and all of the rest of the free-floating ocean plastic is simply the icing on a grubby, disgusting cake. After all, that is merely the plastic which floated to the surface — and not every piece of plastic floats.


Want more health and science stories in your inbox? Subscribe to Salon’s weekly newsletter The Vulgar Scientist.


“It’s very difficult to have a full perspective of what goes on if you only account for whatever you catch that is floating,” Sousa explained. “Most people don’t know because most people think that plastic is ‘bottles’ and ‘bottles float,’ which they don’t. Half of the plastic produce is actually a higher density than water, so it actually sinks.”

Buoyancy is determined by many factors, and so while scientists can visually determine whatever is floating in great big garbage patches, “we do not see what is down there [beneath the floating garbage], and it’s absolutely massive.”

This naturally has a devastating impact on ocean wildlife. Reflecting on their work rescuing Cape fur seals, Katja Dreyer estimated that “probably excess of 70% of all our entanglements are directly fishing-related.” Sometimes the fishing line is recreational rather than industrial, but even then Dreyer categorized it as “fishing-related.”

“In Washington’s Puget Sound, which is a vitally important region for wild salmon, over 4,000 derelict fishing nets have been removed from Puget Sound over the past decade at a cost of several million dollars.”

“For example, one of our biggest culprits is plastic packaging straps, these white plastic package bands, and in this area those are most commonly are used on bait boxes,” Dreyer pointed out, referring to Namibia’s slice of the southwest African coastline. “They then get discarded into the ocean, or fall overboard, or are somehow dislodged during use. Sometimes they enter the ocean from non-fishing related purposes, like regular shipping and regular packaging.”

Emma Helverson is the executive director of Wild Fish Conservancy, a nonprofit group in the Pacific Northwest that is, according to its website, “solely dedicated to the protection and and recovery of the northwest’s wild fish.” Addressing the issue of fishing-related pollution from the vantage point of a conservationist, Helverson said that marine species in the Pacific Northwest, including wild salmon, are particularly threatened by “derelict gear or ‘ghost nets’ that are abandoned or lost during commercial fishing.” This equipment, as Ocean Conservation Namibia also pointed out, lingers long after its initial purpose has been fulfilled.

“In Washington’s Puget Sound, which is a vitally important region for wild salmon, over 4,000 derelict fishing nets have been removed from Puget Sound over the past decade at a cost of several million dollars,” Helverson explained. “One concern our staff has is that certifiers do not consider the impact of lost nets as an issue when they are choosing to certify fisheries.”

“We did identify, on two different occasions, multiple seals with rope around their necks.” 

On the other side of the North American continent, Rachel Miller of the Rozalia Project — a non-profit Miller helped found that is dedicated to cleaning up derelict fishing gear, consumer debris, and microplastic in the Gulf of Maine — had similar stories of animal suffering.

“We encounter debris from fishing all over incredibly remote islands in one of the areas where we do our most work, which is the Gulf of Maine, and the Gulf of Maine has an active trap-based fishery because of the lobster industry,” Miller explained. “The buoys, the lines and the traps themselves are vulnerable to a variety of forces that cause them to go from actively fishing to just being trash, and pretty dangerous trash at that.”

On one occasion, Miller’s team pulled up discarded traps “where there were crabs that were effectively tied to the outside of the trap by line, and even like fishing line, which is kind of disconcerting. The crab is still alive, but tied to the outside of a trap.”

Miller added, “We’ve actually seen that twice.” Like Ocean Conservation Namibia, Miller has also seen how fishing gear can harm seals.

“We were doing work to observe and identify the potential for any entangled seals,” Miller recalled, and described how “we did identify, on two different occasions, multiple seals with rope around their necks.” On one occasion it was fishing line; on the other, “more of a strapping band that is likely also related to the fishing industry.”

While it is impossible to remove all of the plastic that is now permanently polluting up the ocean, experts Salon interviewed said one solution is to nibble at the edges of the problem by engaging in clean-up efforts wherever you can. In addition, it is necessary to urge governments to impose hefty fines on companies that dump their non-biodegradable garbage into the environment.

“I think there are a few things that we could do,” Hocevar told Salon. “One would be, at the permitting stage, requiring vessels to bring back all of the fishing gear that they take out, and that isn’t happening almost anywhere.” Hocevar also pointed out that manufacturers of fishing equipment could in theory be required to only use biodegradable material — although that, like insisting on an “audit” of fishing equipment, could only happen if the popular will overcame entrenched resistance from the industries which profit from the status quo.

“We can require fishing gear to have satellite tags on it, making it easier to track and remove gear that is lost,” Hocevar added. “As you know even in some cases, even with the best intentions, some fishing gear is going to get lost. One other point is that in most cases, right now, it costs fishing companies money to bring damaged gear back to shore and dispose of it. So they have to pay to dispose of it. And that is part of what leads them to just dump it over the side. Unless there is real regulation and enforcement, with fines that are high enough to compensate, then we’re going to continue to see people toss nets overboard.”

Want to take a bite of sunshine? These lemony citrus cooler cookies are the answer

Anything that requires me to turn my oven on in the summertime must be worth it. As heat indexes rise into the triple digits, my patience lowers for lots of things — most things really — but particularly for being in a hot kitchen. Whatever I’m doing in there must turn out to be delicious, easy to make and fast to bake. Citrus Coolers are one of my favorites that meets these criteria: a simple drop cookie baked at just 350 degrees for only about ten minutes that can even be prepared in your toaster oven! Brimming with bright citrus flavor, I find most folks have a taste for them all year round, but I especially crave them in the summer. 

Despite being a cookie for all seasons, I make these Citrus Coolers mostly in the summer and fall. In addition to the speed of turning these babies out, the fresh citrus taste really draws me in when it’s hot outside. But here along the coast, lemons and satsumas come in during the fall, so I bake these cookies using satsumas instead of navel oranges once the satsumas are ready to pick.  

If you’ve never had a satsuma, they are a small, sweet, seedless type of mandarin orange that grows very well here. They are absolutely delicious and we have bucketfuls of them every year. Just about everyone in this community has lemon and satsuma trees that are prolific producers each fall, so between us there is plenty of both to go around.

These cookies bake to a beautiful toasty color and are topped with an artful smear of the palest pastel icing that is lightning-fast to whip up. They are the perfect accompaniment to your midday pick-me-up with coffee or tea, and although I don’t know firsthand, I have been told they pair well with a nice glass of Sancerre! Not too sweet and not too tangy, I think they are just right. 

When I tasted these for the first time many years ago, I had never heard of using the entire peel in a baked good. Sure, I had used zest, but using everything but the seeds was something new for me. I was dubious but intrigued. 

These cookies are a go-to for me during these hot months when time is best spent in the water (or anywhere but in the kitchen). Summer is a sociable season where I live, and I like having something homemade to offer when people drop by. These are always a big hit and they keep well. 

School is already starting, or soon to start, for many of our summer families, so little by little we are thinning out along the bay as folks head back home for the school year. Despite that, there is no sign of fall in the air here. That’s for sure. We call these hot, humid days of late July and August “dog days,” which “The Old Farmer’s Almanac” says are the 40 days between July 3 and August 11.

We have a neighbor down the beach, Robert, who has a telescope and can turn a clear evening of stargazing into quite the astronomy lesson. He explained to me how “dog days” gets its name from the “daily dawn rising of Sirius” which begins just after the summer solstice. Sirius, the brightest star in the sky aside from our sun, is one of the stars that make up the constellation Canis Major. Canis Major, as opposed to Canis Minor, translates to “Greater Dog,” so it follows that the star, Sirius, is known as the Dog Star. Dog Star brings about dog days.

Canis Major and Canis Minor are the constellations named for Orion’s two hunting dogs. If you can find Orion’s belt in the sky, you can find Sirius and Canis Major. Just look south from Orion’s belt to find Sirius, the nose of Canis Major. Look farther south to see the triangle of stars that make up the dog’s hindquarters. 

Whether it is due to the now “daily dawn rising of Sirius, the Dog Star,” or the “heat dome” my local weather guy talks of ad nauseam, it is still hot as you- know-what where I live and still very much summer! Going out in this heat to do my regular routine, without anything extra or out of the ordinary, makes me feel I’ve earned a treat by the time I finish my day with washing up the supper dishes. These cookies are just that. A  well-deserved treat for making it through another dog day of summer. 

By the way you don’t need a telescope to find Canis Major and the Dog Star this time of year. All you need is a clear night in a place without a lot of light pollution. As our summer folks return home, their dock lights, house lights, motion detector lights, car lights and evening fireworks are no longer lighting up the place, so our bay community returns to the quieter, darker evenings we are used to having. Stargazing is magical here on a clear night, so as nice as it was to see everyone this summer, it is time for them all to go. I extrapolate the three-day rule for houseguests to the three-month rule for our summer folks. Nice to see you. It’s been fun. Now it’s time to go home.


Want more great food writing and recipes? Subscribe to Salon Food’s newsletter.


You know, maybe I was wrong. Maybe there are signs of fall here. Maybe Robert out looking at the sky through his telescope the other night, our one night this week without rain, was a sign. And now that I think about it, the wasp-like buzz of jet skis is no longer drowning out Robert’s music in the evenings. Robert is also a saxophonist who often plays on his dock just as the sun is going down — dreamy, almost melancholic music that emanates from his dock along the shoreline on a quiet evening. And if I trust “The Farmer’s Almanac,” these dog days should be over in the next few days. I need to check our weather station in the kitchen and see what the heat index is. If it’s below 100, I’ll have faith that cooler, crisper days will be here soon. 

As nice as summer was, I am ready for fall. I think these cookies are just the thing for the transition. I hope you like them as much as we do.

Citrus cooler cookies
Yields
36 small cookies
Prep Time
30 minutes
Cook Time
10-12 minutes

Ingredients

2 sticks of butter, softened (1/2 cup)

1 cup sugar

1 navel orange, cut into pieces, seeds removed

1 small lemon or 1/2 large lemon, cut into pieces, seeds removed

2 cups AP flour

1/2 teaspoon soda

1/2 teaspoon salt

 

Icing

3 Tablespoons butter, softened

2 cups powdered sugar, sifted

2 Tablespoons ground orange and lemon peel/pulp

2 Tablespoons juice from orange and lemon 

 

 

Directions

  1. Preheat oven to 350 degrees.
  2. Squeeze juice from lemon and orange and combine. Press or squeeze all the juice you can from the citrus.
  3. Place the peels and pulp in a food processor and pulse until you have a fine grind. You may also chop it very, very small if you don’t have a food processor.

    ***You will not use all the juice or ground pulp/peel.

  4. Beat butter and sugar until smooth and creamy.

  5. Add a firmly packed 1/2 cup of ground (or finely chopped) orange/lemon to the beaten butter-sugar.

  6. Add the flour, soda, and salt and beat/blend well.

  7. Drop dough by tablespoons onto an ungreased cookie sheet and gently flatten with your fingers or the back of a wet spoon.

  8. Bake 10 to 12 minutes or until golden. Remove from cookie sheet to a rack to cool.

  9. Whip up the icing while the cookies are baking by creaming together the powdered sugar and butter. Add the ground peels and the juice and beat or stir until smooth. Spread the icing onto warm cookies.


     


Cook’s Notes

To gluten or not to gluten             
It is common for me to offer alternative ingredients to reduce or eliminate gluten and sugar, and this recipe can handle these substitutions. If you choose to eliminate gluten, make sure to use a gluten-free baking mix, not simply gluten-free flour, as it must have rising and binding agents added to it in order for it to be a true replacement. 

Sweetener
Regarding sweetener, using Swerve (erythritol), or other measure-for-measure sweetener, also works fine for these cookies, but I would recommend using real powdered sugar in the icing. I repeat: use real powdered sugar for the icing. When I have tried using an alternative powdered sugar, no one has liked the result. 

Lemons & Oranges
Feel free to change the ratio of lemon to orange to your liking as well, using more or less of one or the other to equal the amount of juice, peel, and pulp called for in the recipe. The orange sweetens and mellows the sour from the lemon, but because fresh lemons and oranges vary in taste from fruit to fruit, each batch will be a bit different. I have made these with regular lemons, Meyer lemons, and every sort of orange. They are all good!  Sometimes I keep the lemon and orange juice separated and only use orange juice in the icing. You will try all sorts of variations over time.  

Salon Food writes about stuff we think you’ll like. While our editorial team independently selected these products, Salon has affiliate partnerships, so making a purchase through our links may earn us a commission. 

Trump has a long history of gathering and wielding “compromising” sensitive info to help himself

Ever since the FBI came out of Mar-a-Lago last month with box after box of documents, some of them highly sensitive and classified, questions have wafted over the criminal investigation: Why did former President Donald Trump sneak off with the stash to begin with? Why did he keep it when he was asked to return it? And what, if anything, did he plan to do with it?

It’s true that Trump likes to collect shiny objects, like the framed Time magazine cover that was stowed, according to the U.S. Justice Department, alongside documents marked top secret. It’s true, as The Associated Press reported, that Trump has a “penchant for collecting” items that demonstrate his connection to famous people, like Shaquille O’Neal’s giant shoe, which he kept in his office in New York’s Trump Tower.

But I’ve covered Trump and his business for decades, and there’s something else people around him have told me over and over again: Trump knows the value of hoarding sensitive, secret information and wielding it regularly and precisely for his own ends. The 76-year-old former host of “The Apprentice” came up in the world of New York tabloids, where trading gossip was the coin of the realm. Certainly sometimes he just wanted to show off that he knew things about important people. But he also has used compromising information to pressure elected officials, seek a commercial advantage or blunt accountability and oversight.

A Trump spokesperson did not respond to a request for comment.

Take a little-known episode where Trump tried to pressure former Republican New Jersey Gov. Christine Todd Whitman.

In 1997, Trump, then a major casino owner in Atlantic City, was furious with New Jersey elected officials for supporting a $330 million tunnel project. The tunnel would run from the Atlantic City Expressway almost to the doorstep of a casino run by then-rival Steve Wynn. “Trump didn’t want Wynn in Atlantic City,” Whitman recently told me. Trump “wanted to control the gambling there.”

As a casino owner, Trump wasn’t able to make donations in New Jersey legislative races, contributions being one of his go-to methods of attempting to exert control over government decisions. But Trump could run caustic ads and file lawsuits, which he did. When none of that worked, and the tunnel was in the final stages of approval, Whitman said, Trump called her up.

A few years before the tunnel vote, Whitman’s son, Taylor, who was in high school at the time, had gotten falling-down drunk at a private dance at Trump’s Plaza Hotel off Central Park in New York City and had to be taken to the hospital. This is something that high school students stupidly do, and Whitman said to me she was happy for Taylor to be sick “to teach him a lesson.” But in the call, Trump suddenly brought the episode up. He said it would be “too bad” if the press found out about her son’s drunken antics.

“He made the threat during the deliberations over the tunnel,” Whitman said, and it “blindsided” her because the high school dance was private and Taylor’s behavior had been a family concern. She had no idea how Trump found out about it, she said, but the episode made it clear to her that people collected and delivered sensitive information to Trump about what happened in his properties. She did not buckle to Trump, and he never made good on his threat.

Many people who have found themselves, for better or worse, in Trump’s orbit over the decades — people with far less power than Whitman — told me it was obvious that Trump collected information on people, delighted in it, even. And he was not shy about deploying it. “There was always someone watching,” one former high-level Trump Organization employee told me. “What Donald would do is he would let the person know he knows, in his around-the-corner way. He let the person know he was all-imposing and he knew what was going on.” Like most other former employees, this person did not want to speak on the record for fear that Trump would still come after him all these years later.

It was helpful for Trump that people knew he collected information on others’ less glowing moments as potential ammunition down the road. One top former New Jersey lawmaker told me that he’d been warned to be on his best behavior when he traveled to Atlantic City because Trump kept an eye on important people. Even as a rumor, it furnished Trump with power.

In one infamous case involving a journalist, Trump wielded his knowledge about behavior in the casino town.

In 1990, Neil Barsky, then a Wall Street Journal reporter, came upon a scoop. He was told by a banker that “Donald Trump is driving 100 miles per hour toward a brick wall, and he has no brakes” in Atlantic City. Four large banks had hundreds of millions of dollars of debt on the line. Trump was divorcing his first wife, Ivana, and trying desperately to keep his finances from her and out of the tabloids. Unfortunately for him, Barsky kept writing about Trump’s financial difficulties.

In early 1991, one of Trump’s senior executives offered Barsky comp tickets to a company-sponsored boxing match in Atlantic City. His editor encouraged him to accept a ticket for himself to cultivate Trump Organization sources. In what he later called “an act of bad judgment,” Barsky also accepted tickets for his father and brother. Writing about the episode in 2016, Barsky said he later learned that after the match, Trump called the New York Post, asking, “How would you like to destroy the career of a Wall Street Journal reporter?” The story that ensued conjured a picture of a malevolent Barsky, extorting the tickets in exchange for keeping bad stories out of his paper.

After it appeared, the editors moved Barsky off the beat and Trump no longer had to deal with his tough financial scrutiny.

A decade later, Trump tried the same thing with another journalist, New York Times real estate reporter Charles V. Bagli. For years, Trump had offered Bagli tickets to the U.S. Open. One year, Bagli finally accepted to advance his reporting on a story. Trump had been trying to ingratiate himself with an important beat writer — but now he had a piece of potentially compromising information.

Finally the moment came. After Bagli wrote a story fact-checking the opening credits to “The Apprentice,” writing that Trump “is not the largest developer in New York, nor does he own Trump International Hotel and Tower,” Trump pounced. His lawyer sent a letter to the Times threatening a lawsuit and stating that Bagli had tried to shake Trump down for the tickets and wrote the piece when Trump refused. The accusation was false, and the Times backed its reporter.

If people’s gambling and hotel habits can be valuable, top secret intelligence has the potential to be even more so. As it was back in his casino heyday, just the knowledge that Trump may have compromising secrets, and could use them, confers continued power.

The New Jersey tunnel Trump fought so hard against was ultimately approved, though Wynn, and then Trump, left Atlantic City. But Trump and Whitman never reconciled. In 2016 she declined to support him in the Republican primary for president. Displeased, Trump forwarded a letter to her, Whitman recalled, that again referred to her son’s drunken incident at the school dance. By this time her son, who now works in health care finance, was an adult. As Whitman remembered, on the letter were these words scrawled with a Sharpie: “Too bad you don’t remember the good old days.”