Spring Sale: Get 1 Year, Save 58%

Report outs Jim Jordan’s weaponization subcommittee “whistleblowers” as frauds paid by Trump ally

The first three witnesses to testify privately before Rep. Jim Jordan’s, R-Ohio, new committee investigating the “weaponization” of government pushed right-wing conspiracy theories and received financial support from a top Trump ally, according to a report from Democrats on the House Judiciary Committee.

Jordan formed the committee after Republicans took over the House with the aim of exposing bias against conservatives by the federal government. Jordan last month claimed that there were “dozens and dozens of whistleblowers, FBI agents, coming to us talking about what is going on, the political nature of the Justice Department.” But the panel has only transcribed interviews with three purported whistleblowers who appear to not meet the definition of a whistleblower and engaged in partisan conduct that undermines their credibility, according to the 316-page Democratic report.

“Based on interviews of the three witnesses that have been made available to us, we are able to draw a number of striking conclusions about the state of the Republican investigation,” the report says. “First, the three individuals we have met are not, in fact, whistleblowers. These individuals, who put forward a wide range of conspiracy theories, did not present actual evidence of any wrongdoing at the Department of Justice or the Federal Bureau of Investigation.”

The report also highlighted “disturbing outside influence” on the witnesses and “potentially” the Republicans on the committee themselves, citing a network of organizations led by former Trump administration officials Kash Patel and Russ Vought that appears to have “identified these witnesses, provided them with financial compensation, and found them employment after they left the FBI.”

The report did not disclose the substance of the transcribed interviews but said each of the witnesses “endorses an alarming series of conspiracy theories related to the Jan. 6 Capitol attack, the Covid vaccine, and the validity of the 2020 election.”

“One has called repeatedly for the dismantling of the F.B.I,” the report added. “Another suggested that it would be better for Americans to die than to have any kind of domestic intelligence program.”

One of the witnesses, George Hill, a retired FBI intelligence analyst from the Boston field office, claimed on social media that the Capitol riot was a “set up” and part of a “larger #Democrat plan using their enforcement arm, the #FBI,” according to the report. In another tweet, Hill described the FBI as the “Brown Shirt enforcers” of the DNC.

Fellow witness Stephen Friend, a former FBI special agent who worked at the Daytona Beach field office, resigned from the FBI after refusing to take part in a SWAT raid of Jan. 6 Capitol riot suspect Tyler Bensch, an alleged member of the right-wing Three Percenter militia who posted a video of himself outside the Capitol on Jan. 6 carrying an AR-15-style rifle. Friend said the raid constituted “excessive force” and described himself as a “conscientious objector.”

Despite his claim, Friend during questioning “confirmed that ownership of a firearm, even without any additional factors, in fact would be enough of a factor on its own to justify deploying a S.W.A.T. team in an arrest.”

Friend also claimed that he was asked by FBI officials to surveil a person attending a school board meeting amid Republican claims that the federal government is targeting conservative parents. But Friend admitted during the interview that he was asked to track a Three Percenter under a counterterrorism investigation who was later arrested along with Bensch, according to the report.

The report said that Friend also engaged with Russian propaganda outlets while working at the FBI, including appearances on Russia Today and quotes in a Sputnik article about his claims that President Joe Biden had turned federal agencies into an “instrument of intimidation.”

Friend filed a whistleblower complaint to the Justice Department inspector general and the Office of Special Counsel, but his complaint was rejected by both.

Friend is part of a group of former agents who were placed on leave and called themselves the “suspendables” in a letter alleging bias at the bureau against conservative agents.  Friend and another witness, suspended Kansas FBI special agent Garrett O’Boyle, both testified that they received financial support from Patel, a close Trump ally. Friend said that Patel sent him $5,000 after they connected last year and that Patel helped promote his upcoming book on social media. Patel also found Friend a job working as a fellow on domestic intelligence and security services at the Center for Renewing America, which is run by Vought and largely funded by the Conservative Partnership Institute, which is run by former Trump chief of staff Mark Meadows and former Sen. Jim DeMint, R-S.C.

“Based on this evidence, committee Democrats conclude that there is a strong likelihood that Kash Patel is encouraging the witnesses to continue pursuing their meritless claims, and in fact is using them to help propel his vendetta against the F.B.I., Justice Department, and Biden administration on behalf of himself and President Trump,” the report said.


Want a daily wrap-up of all the news and commentary Salon has to offer? Subscribe to our morning newsletter, Crash Course.


Patel did not comment on the alleged financial support but told The New York Times that whistleblowers who “provide credible information exposing government waste, fraud, and abuse serve a critical role for constitutional oversight.”

Democrats said they released the report after learning that Republicans on the committee planned to leak materials from the interviews. Jordan spokesman Russell Dye accused the Democrats of misrepresenting the testimony.

“It is beyond disappointing, but sadly not surprising, that Democrats would leak cherry-picked excerpts of testimony to attack the brave whistle-blowers who risked their careers to speak out on abuses at the Justice Department and F.B.I.,” Dye told The New York Times. “These same Democrats vowed to fight our oversight ‘tooth and nail,’ and they are willing to undermine the work of the Congress to achieve their partisan goals.”

Democrats cited the report to raise questions about the other “dozens” of witnesses Jordan claims have come forward.

“Who knows whether he has dozens. Who are these people? Why haven’t we been given a list? What kind of credibility do they have?” Rep. Gerry Connolly, D-Va., told CNN.

But Rep. Kelly Armstrong, R-N.D., accused Democrats of trying to discredit the purported whistleblowers before hearing them out.

“Discounting whistleblowers before the Democrats know what the witnesses have to offer says a lot more about their agenda than it does about the validity of the whistleblowers,” he told CNN.

Rep. Ted Lieu, D-Calif., who sits on the Judiciary panel, countered that Republicans on the committee “should be ashamed for doing this.”

“What happens when Republicans use purported ‘whistleblowers’ that were paid?” he tweeted. “They make stuff up and say crazy things.”

In a growing petrochemical hub, the East Palestine derailment triggers ‘an uneasy feeling’

Chris Laderer was 34 days into his tenure as chief of the volunteer fire department in Darlington, Pennsylvania, when the station received a call that a train had caught fire in the neighboring town of East Palestine, just over the state border in Ohio. Laderer assumed that an engine had overheated, but as the crew pulled out of the station he saw signs of something far more disastrous.

“We could see the glow and plume of smoke from our station, and we’re 4 miles from the scene,” he recalled. “We realized we’re getting something much bigger than what we anticipated.”

When Laderer’s team arrived, alongside the fire departments from roughly 80 other towns across Pennsylvania, Ohio, and West Virginia, they found 38 cars of a 150-car train splayed along the tracks, with some emitting flames that smelled, as Laderer described it, of burning plastic. They would learn in the days that followed that 11 cars contained hazardous chemicals, including the highly toxic compounds vinyl chloride and butyl acrylate, which are used in the manufacturing of common plastics. 

a red and orange blob covers a large swath of land on a map showing the site of the East Palestine derailment
A map from the Ohio Governor’s Office shows the train derailment’s chemical evacuation area — a roughly one-mile by two-mile area surrounding East Palestine — that includes parts of both Ohio and Pennsylvania. Ohio Office of the Governor

By Monday, three days after the February 3 derailment, the Norfolk Southern railroad company had sent in their own officials and contractors to perform a controlled burn-off of the vinyl chloride. The tactic was meant to prevent, as much as possible, more than 100,000 gallons of vinyl chloride from evaporating into the air and seeping into the soil and creek beds surrounding the train, although an as-yet-unknown quantity of it already had. (“Either we were going to blow it up, or it blows up itself,” Trent Conaway, the mayor of East Palestine, explained at a town hall the next week by way of illustrating a frustrating lack of options.)

But the burn didn’t go quite as planned. A towering, bulbous cloud of black smoke erupted from the train in the explosion and then spread over the surrounding area like a pool of oil, where it hung in the low atmosphere for hours and hours. Experts have attributed the smoke’s stubborn refusal to dissipate to a weather phenomenon called an inversion, where warm air that rises into the atmosphere after a sunny day traps the cold air coming off the ground as night falls. “The smoke that was supposed to stay up started banking down a bit on the area,” Laderer explained.

Jeremy Woods, a mechanic for the Darlington-based trucking company and repair shop Lync, described the scent that permeated the air all of Monday night as that of charred PVC pipe, but with a hint of chlorine that reminded him of the YMCA pool. Trisha Blinkiewicz, whose home sits about 4 miles east of the derailment, went to dinner in nearby Chippewa, Pennsylvania, on that same Monday evening. She found the town buried in a low-lying fog that felt thick on the skin, with a distinct, abrasive smell of burnt plastic.

The train that crashed in East Palestine derailed about 20 miles northeast of its destination of Conway, Pennsylvania, one of the industrial towns and small cities that line the Ohio River as it flows west from its mouth in Pittsburgh. The Upper Ohio River Valley — which stretches, roughly speaking, from that mouth down to where West Virginia meets the tip of Kentucky — has been the site of proliferating petrochemical development over the past decade, as oil and gas companies turn their attention away from fuel and toward a much richer prospect: plastics.

Ethane gas fracked from the Marcellus Shale, which extends across Pennsylvania into the eastern edge of Ohio and northern West Virginia, can be “cracked” into ethylene, a flammable gas critical to the production  of plastics used for packaging, bottles, and electrical insulation, among other products. And all of the infrastructure that is required for every step of plastic production and transport — wells, pipelines, refineries, ports, plants — has spread like a spider’s web over the region.

 

The accelerating petrochemical development is simply the newest incarnation of industrial exploitation for a region that has been plagued by legacy pollution since the dawn of the Industrial Revolution. The pressing question is whether the people who have lived here for generations have hit their breaking point, and whether they feel empowered to demand more from the corporations that threaten their homes and the politicians that enable them.

“Honestly, I never expected this big an incident to happen in my entire life, let alone my first month as fire chief,” said Laderer. “And Norfolk Southern are not telling us a lot, and they’ve got me questioning things.”


The unique Appalachian topography of the greater Ohio Valley tends to fortify the pollution created within it, as if the geology that had endowed the region with such bountiful fossil fuel and mineral reserves also cursed it to suffer more for them. Major industrial facilities and railroad hubs are usually established on the river, for ease of both transportation and waste disposal, and the emissions that they produce get trapped by the steep hillsides that frame the tributaries.

Many houses in the rural community of Enon Valley, Pennsylvania sit just a few feet from the railroad tracks. Grist / Eve Andrews
A sign on Market Street in East Palestine. Grist / Eve Andrews
A decommissioned train sits behind the Greersburg Tavern in Darlington, Pennsylvania. Grist / Eve Andrews

The Shell cracker plant, which began operations in the fall of 2022, is a sprawling behemoth on the edge of the Ohio River in Monaca, Pennsylvania, directly across the river from the derailed train’s destination in Conway. The plant, which is widely considered to be a grim arbiter of future petrochemical development in the region, takes locally fracked gas and breaks it down at a molecular level to manufacture the ethylene “nurdles” — translucent plastic pellets the size of a grain of arborio rice — that make up many household and single-use plastics.

Residents of eastern Beaver County, which is quite rural, say that they have not personally felt the adverse effects of the Shell plant. They do not smell chemicals in the air or see nurdles floating in the creeks near their homes, unlike those who live downstream of the plant. They are more or less protected by the same topography that traps pollution around the facilities that create it, with a buffer of hills and hollers that rise and fall between their communities and the plant itself. But the derailment in East Palestine on February 3 brought the more disastrous consequences of plastic production far closer to home.

The Shell Pennsylvania Petrochemicals Complex, also known as the cracker plant, in Monaca, Pennsylvania. Grist / Eve Andrews

Ron Stidmon moved from New York City to Enon Valley, Pennsylvania, in 2003, seeking stillness and solitude after having lost several friends in the 9/11 attacks. Enon Valley, which sits a few miles northeast of East Palestine on the border between Beaver and Lawrence counties, is secluded and quiet, dotted with both Amish farms and sprawling properties. Stidmon bought a farm, unsuccessfully tried to make a lot of different crops work, and finally cracked the code of profitability with garlic. He has steadfastly committed to organic practices on his land for 20 years, to the extent where he grumbles when a neighbor burns a tire on an adjacent property.

When Norfolk Southern performed the controlled burn-off of vinyl chloride on February 6, Stidmon recalled, “it looked like the end of the world with the smoke coming up.” He’s now watching the wells and ponds on his property daily, with no other option than to simply wait for testing to learn  if carcinogenic chemicals from the derailment have leached into the aquifer. He’s optimistic that his water supply will be spared of contamination, simply because he’s upstream of the crash.

“If we were a mile or so west, it would be completely different. If the winds had been blowing a different direction, it would have been different,” he said. “It’s a matter of luck — has nothing to do with having a plan, or setting up that we’re safe.”

Ron Stidmon, a garlic farmer in Enon Valley, Pennsylvania, expressed concern that his land — which has been farmed organically for 50 years — may now be contaminated with carcinogenic chemicals from the derailment. Grist / Eve Andrews

Stidmon had been anticipating a disaster like this for years. In 2016, he was on the Darlington Township’s Board of Supervisors, where he began to raise the issue of railroad safety. He was concerned by the sheer volume and frequency of trains routed along the track that wraps around Darlington, running north through the village of New Galilee, east across Enon Valley, and over the state border into East Palestine. According to Stidmon, he spent a year trying to get Norfolk Southern to simply provide the number of trains that came through in a day. When months went by and the company never answered, he and a few neighbors got together to stay up for 24-hour shifts, watch the tracks, and count. The figure at which they arrived was 60.

“[Norfolk Southern] won’t do anything to address the people’s concerns, to address legitimate problems. They have such a cavalier attitude: ‘This is our track, our business.’ It’s discomfiting to know that anything can happen, with practically no repercussions,” said Stidmon. “You can live your own life as clean as you want, but these guys can destroy everything you’ve done to keep it clean for yourself.”

Jason Blinkiewicz owns the trucking company and repair shop Lync, which is located a little over a mile from the derailment. He lives in Enon Valley, where the railroad runs right in front of his house. (On the night of February 3, he and his wife, Trisha, found that the engine of the train that had crashed had “cut and boogied” to come sit on the tracks in their front yard.) He, like most of his neighbors and employees, doesn’t trust Norfolk Southern and assurances from the Environmental Protection Agency that the air and water have been safe to breathe and drink. The borough of Enon Valley commissioned independent testing of wells and streams, and the community is awaiting results.

From left to right: Luke Marecec, Bob Vogel, Jeremy Woods, and Jason Blinkiewicz all work for LYNC Trucking, which is less than a mile from the derailment site. Their homes are all within five miles of the derailment. Grist / Eve Andrews

“It’s normalized to some degree because there’s already low air quality in the area,” Blinkiewicz said. “The cracker plant is putting out volatile organic compounds, or what’s the nuclear power plant doing, or how about the coal plant right behind it that they shut down not that long ago? What about the mills in Midland and the steel plant in Koppel?”

But all of those facilities are far enough from Blinkiewicz’s home and workplace that he hasn’t felt their impacts nearly as acutely as those of the derailment. “I think it’s the first time, in my 46 years on this planet, in this area, that it gives you an uneasy feeling about everything,” he said. 

“And as much as it pains me to say, my trust has to lie in our government. Which is hard to do, right? But we have to rely on those government agencies to protect us. That’s what they’re there for.”


On the night of February 15, East Palestine hosted a town hall at the local high school for residents to ask questions of both state and federal EPA officials. (Representatives from Norfolk Southern pulled out hours before the meeting due to “the growing physical threat” to their employees’ safety. Those threats have not been substantiated.) Volunteers with the East Liverpool, Ohio-based community group River Valley Organizing, were standing outside of the high school’s front door passing out flyers for the group’s own town hall to take place the following week.

Amanda Kiger, director of the group, is familiar with the pervasive distrust of government, regardless of political orientation, in the Ohio Valley region. It is hard to have faith in one’s representatives with a centuries-long legacy of politicians whose loyalties have been bought by industry.

Amanda Kiger, director of River Valley Organizing, addresses the crowd at a packed town hall in East Palestine on February 23, 2023. Grist / Eve Andrews

“Historical pollution has been just layered on this region for so long,” Kiger said several days later in an interview. Stoneware potteries, coal mines, and steel mills mostly died off to be replaced by refineries, hazardous waste incinerators, unconventional gas wells, and petrochemical facilities. “And when you look at communities that are environmentally devastated, bad and polluting commerce attracts more bad and polluting commerce. They can go: ‘We didn’t do that, they did that, that’s been there for years.'”

Two days before the town meeting, a week after the black cloud of burning vinyl chloride spread over East Palestine and its neighboring towns, residents around the Shell cracker plant about 20 miles southeast started to post reports of a large flame emitting from it.

The flame was evidence of a “flare,” which is a mechanism meant to regulate malfunctioning of the plant’s machinery by expelling excess hydrocarbons into the air. This flaring, while preventing a more disastrous outcome for the plant and its surroundings, pumps volatile organic compounds (VOCs) into the atmosphere. In just a few short months since being operational, Shell has already exceeded its annual allowance of VOC emissions as permitted under the Clean Air Act and the Pennsylvania Air Pollution Control Act. That’s in spite of the fact that the facility has the second-highest permit for VOC emissions in the state. In fact, the environmental organizations Clean Air Council and Environmental Integrity Project intend to sue Shell for the plant’s early violations.

Due to bureaucratic delays from both Shell (which is required to notify the community of flaring activity) and the Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection, it can sometimes take as long as a month for residents of Monaca and the surrounding towns to learn that a plant malfunction happened. But the resident groups Beaver County Marcellus Awareness Community (BCMAC) and Eyes on Shell have asked local “watchdogs” to post whether they’ve observed a flare or felt changes in the scent or feel of the air around the plant.

Anaïs Peterson, a volunteer with Eyes on Shell, notes that in the months prior to the Shell plant’s official opening in November, the group of concerned citizens that she helped convene would see about 40 attendees at their monthly meetings. By January of this year, several months and multiple flaring events into the plant’s operations, that number had tripled. 

“Sometimes the bad things that happen in the community are the moments you can bring folks together,” said Kiger. “And it takes the community coming together to push back on federal and state legislators.

“But am I really sick and tired that my community is the casualty, and we have to be the message-bringers? Absolutely. It’s getting overwhelming.”

On the evening of February 23, dozens of residents from within several miles’ radius of East Palestine crowded into a small storefront on the town’s commercial thoroughfare for River Valley Organizing’s town hall event, spilling out of the main room into the lobby and kitchen. A panel of independent experts in environmental cleanup and hazardous chemicals answered questions from the community. The atmosphere darkened as those in the room processed new information: that the EPA had not been testing air, water, or soil samples for dioxins, potential toxic byproducts of the vinyl chloride explosion that can persist in land and sediment for decades without proper cleanup.

A sign at an East Palestine Town Hall on February 15, 2023, after Norfolk Southern pulled out of the event. Grist / Eve Andrews

As the evening went on, the questions grew more distressed: When I go home tonight, what is the first thing I can do to make sure the air is clean for my children to breathe? How can I protect my livestock and pets that roam land that might be contaminated with dioxins? Is my home ruined forever? And, above all: How do we make sure Norfolk Southern sees justice for what they’ve done to us?

“You would have tripped over your own shoes without a flashlight, the smoke was so thick — like being in a cave,” said one resident of New Springfield, Ohio, a few miles northwest of the derailment, who expressed concern to the experts assembled that he couldn’t safely grow produce and raise livestock on the land that had been contaminated by that smoke. “We’ve been pretty self-sufficient, and now we’re zero self-sufficient. What do you pay property taxes on 40 acres for if you can’t grow a tomato?”

One of the great, enduring appeals of rural American life is the dream of complete independence. You buy property, build a homestead, grow food, raise your family. Your children play in the creek in the summer and ride sleds down sloping white hills in the winter. But when one powerful corporation’s mishap puts all of that at risk, it becomes clear that a so-called independent existence is only protected through the strength of community.

“I don’t care if you’re red or blue, I don’t care if I beat you up in the bar 10 years ago,” said Jamie Cozza, an organizer for River Valley Organizing and lifelong resident of East Palestine, before urging those gathered to contact every elected official in the region. “We need to come together right now and use our voices, because no one else is going to fight for us.”


This article originally appeared in Grist at https://grist.org/transportation/east-palestine-derailment-has-neighbor-towns-uneasy/.

Grist is a nonprofit, independent media organization dedicated to telling stories of climate solutions and a just future. Learn more at Grist.org

The truth about GOP hypocrisy: Jessa Duggar’s abortion and Bill Lee’s drag are more than “gotchas”

Like many a professional opinion-haver who has been at it a long time, I grow weary of “Republicans are hypocrites” discourse. This has, of course, been a demonstrable truth for a very long time now, yet it never seems to move the needle. The party of “family values” is in the thrall of a thrice-divorced chronic adulterer who bragged about how he likes to “grab them by the pussy.” Clearly, being seen as hypocrites doesn’t bother the vast majority of Republican politicians or voters. If anything, they probably like how their bad faith “triggers” the liberals. 

And yet, I can’t quite blow off two recent stories about the depraved depths of Republican hypocrisy: Right wing reality TV star Jessa Duggar Seewald terminating a pregnancy, and photos surfacing of anti-drag Republican politicians wearing women’s clothes. In both cases, it’s not just that the people involved are massive hypocrites. Republicans love to make noble claims about their intentions as if they care about “protecting life” or “protecting children.” In reality, as these stories show, their main goal is policing people’s personal lives and self-expression based on gender. 

The hypocrisy is annoying. The hate that the hypocrisy reveals, however, is what is truly terrifying. 


Want more Amanda Marcotte on politics? Subscribe to her newsletter Standing Room Only.


On Thursday, Republican Gov. Bill Lee of Tennessee signed a broad law meant to ban drag in public, claiming it’s a threat to children. Critics argue that the law is so broad it could ban even banal drag performances at, say, a Pride parade. Still, the GOP governor signed the ban even though photos were recently published showing that Lee himself has performed in drag, in full view of underage people no less. 

Their drag doesn’t count because they’re straight.

Shortly thereafter, similar footage of Texas state Rep. Nate Schatzline, who has authored another bill criminalizing drag, was released. Again, his drag performance was outside, where children could see it, which is what Republicans say they are trying to prevent. 

In both cases, these Republicans have turned to gaslighting and word games to pretend that their turn in drag is somehow not drag. Lee called his drag performance “lighthearted” and contrasted it with supposedly “sexualized entertainment.” Schatzline complained that he was just “wearing a dress as a joke back in school for a theatre project.”

None of these arguments make a lick of sense. If you’ve ever seen an episode of “RuPaul’s Drag Race” — or seen any drag queen, ever — you would know that “lighthearted” and “theater project” are qualities of most, if not all, drag performances. Moreover, Lee is being dishonest by pretending there’s nothing “sexualized” about his drag performance. The “humor” of cross-dressing pranks only works under the assumption that “real” women are sexy and these dudes in dresses are not. Indeed, the caption on Lee’s yearbook photo is “Hard Luck Woman,” which may be mild in the realms of blue humor, but it doesn’t work without the sexual implications. It’s certainly a much dirtier joke than anything you’ll hear at the Drag Queen Story Hours that Republicans are up in arms about. 

Republicans think drag is okay if it’s misogynist — but if it’s pro-woman and pro-queer, then they’re calling the cops. 

It doesn’t take Columbo to figure out what Lee and Schatzline are implying, even as they won’t come right out and say it: Their drag doesn’t count because they’re straight. The point of Republicans’ anti-trans laws is to create a pretext for law enforcement to harass queer people, not straight men like themselves. 

Digging in a little deeper, even, it’s really about the Republican obsession with policing gender more broadly. The kind of drag that Lee and Schatzline are doing is about mocking women and mocking femininity. The “joke” is that being a woman is a debased position. The kind of drag they’re trying to ban — the queer kind — is about the opposite message: Femininity is awesome. These two men were exaggerating how bad they are at looking like women, using humor to remind everyone of their maleness and therefore superior social status. But queer drag performers want to look good and go to great pains (literally, if you look up “tucking”) to bury themselves in the feminine fantasy. Lee and Schatzline were trying to serve “man in a dress.” Saying a professional drag queen looks like a man in a dress, however, is an insult to her skills. 

Or, to be less academic about it: Republicans think drag is okay if it’s misogynist — but if it’s pro-woman and pro-queer, then they’re calling the cops. 


Want more Amanda Marcotte on politics? Subscribe to her newsletter Standing Room Only.


The Duggar case is similar and has caused quite a stir in pro-choice circles and defensiveness on the right. It’s not just that Seewald’s family, the Duggar clan of the “19 and Counting” franchise of TLC, is famously conservative or that they’re outspoken against abortion rights. The Duggar family found fame by holding themselves out as living proof that women need no access to birth control or abortion, by presenting constant childbearing as “natural” and with no downsides. 

Abortion laws were always meant to be selectively enforced.

Things started when Seewald released a tearful video about having to abort a wanted pregnancy because she was miscarrying and letting the process carry through naturally was too risky for her health. It’s likely she didn’t realize the procedure she’s describing in an abortion, as doctors often avoid using the A-word when terminating pregnancies in these circumstances. But as many people pointed out, medical intervention to terminate a pregnancy is the definition of abortion, which is why we’re seeing so many horror stories of patients in similar situations to Seewald being denied medical care.

Seewald claims her procedure wasn’t an abortion, because her embryo was already dead. That may have made it legal in Arkansas, but it doesn’t mean it wasn’t an abortion. As Jessica Valenti points out: “Abortion is not an ‘intention’, and it certainly doesn’t have a debatable definition: It’s a medical intervention to end pregnancy. That’s it.” Indeed, the medical term for a miscarriage that occurs naturally is “spontaneous abortion.” 

Ultimately, the semantic tug-of-war is about trying to distract from what this is really about: Gender and power.

Republicans don’t like abortion for the same reason they keep trying to cut off access to birth control: Pregnancy, to them, is an offer women have no right to refuse. Abortion and contraception free women to do all sorts of things the right disapproves of, from having career ambitions to being selective about who they marry, or if they marry at all. But Seewald presents herself not just as a member of the right-wing tribe, but as a woman who lives by their strict gender ideals that cast women as vessels for husbands and children instead of full humans who are equal to men. 

As pro-choicers have long pointed out, abortion laws were always meant to be selectively enforced. They’re a pretext to punish women who live outside the strict gender rules that Republicans want to place on women. It’s single women, women of color, perceived feminists, and poorer women who will find themselves suspected of illegal abortion. The law may ban the procedure, but the real purpose is penalizing women who don’t fit the Duggar model of what women should be.

These situations are interesting from a legal perspective, because it shows the limitations of using the law the way Republicans want to, which is to force their narrow cultural prescriptions about gender onto everyone else. But these cases also do a great job in exposing the very intentions conservatives are trying to hide. The concern is never “life” or “children’s innocence.” It’s always about restricting the ability of other people, mostly other adults, who want to make personal choices that Republicans don’t like, from how they dress to how they identify to even when they give birth. Hypocrisy may not matter much to voters. This unwillingness to just leave other people alone, however? The polls show it’s still politically toxic

The media is underestimating Donald Trump — again

The American mainstream news media continues to send expeditions out into the hinterlands of Trumplandia. Along this journey anthropological dispatches are written from bowling alleys, diners, gun ranges, flea markets, swap meets, supermarkets, churches, car shows, baseball games, rallies, trailer parks, and other special sites where the denizens of Trumplandia gather. The American mainstream news media is on a quest of sorts to find some type of Rosetta Stone or Holy Grail that will grant them access to secret knowledge about the ways of the cult of Donald Trump.

The mainstream news media has a problem: They will never be successful in their quest. Why? Because they are asking the wrong questions. Moreover, even if they found the correct answer, they would likely reject it because it is not what they were looking for.

The Washington Post recently sent its reporters on another expedition to Trumplandia. Here is what they “discovered” this time:

“I and a lot of other Republicans who were supportive of President Trump are becoming less and less supportive,” Jaster said. “Not because I’m a ‘Never Trumper.’ I just don’t believe Trump is the best person to move this party forward.”

That distinction is reshaping the Republican base as the 2024 presidential primary kicks off. The MAGA vs. RINO dichotomy that defined the GOP for much of the last eight years is increasingly obsolete. In its place, a new dynamic emerged from interviews with more than 150 Trump supporters across five pivotal electoral states. In between Republicans who remain firmly committed or opposed to the former president, there’s now a broad range of Trump supporters who, however much they still like him, aren’t sure they want him as the party’s next nominee.

The foremost reason is electability. Even Republicans who said they still supported Trump and believed his false claims that the 2020 election was stolen acknowledged doubts on whether he could defeat President Biden or another Democrat in 2024. …

In most interviews, fatigue with Trump was not a break with Trumpist politics. While these voters expressed interest in someone less divisive, they showed little appetite for more moderate policies or messaging — a combination many saw possible with DeSantis.

Echoing the Washington Post, Politico has this new reporting on Trump and his relationship with the Republican Party:

Rep. Thomas Massie was so eager for Donald Trump’s endorsement in a contested primary three years ago that he ran TV ads targeted at the then-president in Florida to win his support.

Today, Massie is all but shunning Trump and his comeback campaign. In fact, the Kentucky Republican attended a retreat last weekend for Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis.

“Ron DeSantis is the best governor there ever was,” he said when asked if he planned to endorse in the 2024 presidential primary.

The Kentucky Republican is far from the only one-time Trump ally who’s staying away from the former president, despite his lead in every major poll so far. Some are looking more seriously at his would-be rivals like DeSantis or Gov. Nikki Haley. Others are intentionally staying on the sidelines but privately hoping he stumbles. That sentiment is deepening throughout the Republican Party — but no segment of the party illustrates the shift as vividly as the House GOP, whose members almost universally backed Trump in both previous races. …

The widespread hesitancy would not be notable in another era — or if a former president was not already in the race. But in this instance, the lack of public support is perhaps the clearest sign yet that members feel Trump’s support is no longer a prerequisite for political survival. Trump’s vengeance is now barely registering as a threat, after years as one of the most dominant forces in politics.

“I’m the last person that would worry about that,” Massie said of possible retribution for not supporting Trump. “It backfires. You can’t attack too many of your own party.”

Of course, the presidential primaries don’t begin for a year, and the field has yet to fully take shape.

In interviews with nearly 20 House Republicans, many cited the uncertainty in the field as reason to keep quiet for now.

The Washington Post and Politico reinforce the conclusions reached by other leading publications, pollsters, and mainstream politics watchers about the current state of Trump and his 2024 prospects. In this consensus narrative, Trump’s base of support is supposedly weakening and there is infighting within the Republican Party about who will be the 2024 presidential candidate and the overall direction of the party and “conservative” movement. Trump fatigue is real.

Trump’s personality and charisma as compared to likely rival Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis is also an important factor. To that point, former Republican consultant Rick Wilson told the Guardian last year:

“I know that the Republicans who right now are acting very bold and the donors who are acting very frisky — as Trump starts winning primaries, they will bend the knee, they will break, they will fall, they will all come back into line. …

“Right now they’re all talking so much shit: ‘I’m not going to get with Trump. I’m going to be with the hot new number, DeSantis.’ When DeSantis gets his ass handed to him, when he gets his clock cleaned in a debate or forum or just by Trump grinding away at him, eating him alive mentally for weeks on end, and suddenly Donald Trump’s numbers start posting up again, all the conservative thinkers who are right now like, ‘We will never vote for Trump again, we have integrity!’ will find themselves some excuse. ‘Well, you know, we don’t like Trump’s tweets, but otherwise it’s pure communism!’

“It’s all bullshit, it’s all a fucking game, and that game is going to play out in a way that does not result in the outcome that the donor class thinks they’re going to get.”

In addition, horserace predictions and attempts to handicap the 2024 presidential election are very premature. Donald Trump has not even begun to focus his attacks on potential rivals or campaign in earnest. Given the potential legal troubles swirling around Trump he may not even be in the race next year, instead preferring to play the spoiler or kingmaker – or better yet a berserker.

One should not overlook, and by doing so underestimate, Trump’s potential popularity and competitiveness in the 2024 presidential race — even after his political crime spree. Trump received more votes in 2020 than he did in 2016. Republican voters are so hostile to Biden and any potential Democratic presidential candidate that they will overwhelmingly support Trump again no matter what.

Donald Trump is not a man, he is an idea.

Trump’s followers are deeply compelled to Trumpism and what he represents, the freedom and permission to break norms, engage in history-breaking revolutionarily destructive projects, and openly hate. They want more of it all, not less.

As seen with the Washington Post’s recent story about Trumplandia, and the mainstream news media more generally, their biggest failing in the quest for truth about Donald Trump and this era is very much a function of training, habit and how that institution and its members conceptualize politics and society. The truth is that Trumpism, with or without Trump,  – the latter is perhaps even more preferable if the poison can be delivered by someone more “appealing” and well-coiffed like a Ron DeSantis.

The American mainstream news media’s approaches to writing and reporting and truth-telling are obsolescent in a time of ascendant fascism and a democracy crisis. Horserace journalism, inside the beltway access journalism, bothsidesism, and “objectivity” and “fairness” are inadequate to the task and at this point, seven years into the Age of Trump, willfully so.

The news media can send as many expeditions out into Trumplandia as they want (or talk to Republican Party insiders) but they will never find the answers they are looking for – or more importantly what the American people really need to know.

Thus, the great incompatibility and incongruence: Fascism, and the battle to defeat it, is first and foremost a struggle over ideas and emotions. Fascism, fake right-wing populism, and other forms of authoritarianism are a force that gives its followers meaning. The tools and techniques of normal politics as practiced by the mainstream news media are insufficient to the challenge.

For example, in his book “On Tyranny”, historian Timothy Snyder says the following about the rise of Nazism and the role of emotions, reason, and the charismatic personality of the demagogue:

One of his former students implored him to “abandon yourself to your feelings, and you must always focus on the Fuhrer’s greatness, rather than on the discomfort you are feeling at present”. Twelve years later, after all the atrocities, and at the end of a war that Germany had clearly lost, an amputated solider told (Victor) Klemperer (a literary scholar of Jewish origins) that Hitler “has never lied yet. I believe in Hitler.” The final mode is misplaced faith. It involves the sort of self-deifying claims the president made when he said, “I alone can solve it” or “I am your voice”. When faith descends from heaven to earth in this way, no room remains for the small truth of our individual discernment and experience.

What terrified Klemperer was the way that this transition seemed permanent. Once truth had become oracular rather than factual evidence was irrelevant”.

In their book “Moving Beyond Fear” Charles Derber and Yale Magrass offer these insights:

Hitler’s success in winning power helps demonstrate one of the Right’s great strengths: its explicit and powerful use of emotion, which has often historically triumphed over the Left’s appeal to rationality. Hitler didn’t entirely reject reason – a few could respond to it – but relied on emotion to win the masses:

I use emotion for the many and reserve reason for the few.

In the introduction to his new book Insurrections, social critic Henry Girioux highlights the role of cultural pathologies in the rise of Trumpism, neofascism, and the larger culture of cruelty:

The destruction of democracy and its institutions will result from the increasing attack on ethical standards, the undermining of truth, and a mass consciousness that supports violence as a central weapon for social change. Accelerating this breakdown of democracy is the disabling of memory, the mass production of ignorance, and the weakening of the collective imagination. …

While the mainstream media have failed to see the signs, authoritarianism’s historical political, racial, and cultural dynamics have become more visible, taking on a seditious and coarsening reality as they have emerged in boldly rhetorical, increasingly violent, and terrifying forms. …

Trump’s attack on the foundations of democratic rule received enormous legitimation from his base and political party, and it was deeply rooted in a culture that normalized violence as a political tool while becoming increasingly cruel, frighteningly intolerant, and unabashedly disdainful of democracy. Even more disturbing is how Trump’s lies, racism, and attacks on his enemies attracted a broad swath of individuals of different ages and occupations, living in different parts of the country.

In the end, the news media can send as many expeditions out into Trumplandia as they want (or talk to Republican Party insiders) and they will never find the answers they are looking for – or more importantly what the American people really need to know.

Trumpism and American neofascism are not new. They were born hundreds of years ago here in America with the genocide of First Nations people and the enslavement of Black people, crimes against humanity committed in the name of “democracy”, “freedom”, and “progress”. That story of deep rot and its present-day poisonous bloom is what the American mainstream news media should be pursuing and amplifying. But such truths are too dangerous, too scary, and will likely not generate enough clicks, ad revenue, and attention to propel the careers of the journalists and reporters who dare to say such things (and their editors as well) to great heights.

Instead, more expeditions to Trumplandia will be launched in earnest.

We asked scientists what they think of the FBI’s assessment that COVID came from a Chinese lab

Almost as soon as the COVID-19 pandemic went global in early 2020, a public debate over its origins erupted. No one doubted then, or doubts now, that the SARS-CoV-2 virus originated in China before spreading all over the world. Yet since the first humans were infected, the mainstream scientific narrative has been that the SARS-CoV-2 virus was passed from an animal to humans at a wet market.

This view has not gone unchallenged: A small group of scientists and other public commentators — some, but not all, with political agendas — theorize that the virus originated in the wild before being captured and experimented upon in a biolab like the nearby Wuhan Institute of Virology, from where it then leaked. Even after an article in Science Magazine last summer seemed to reaffirm the wet market theory, the lab leak notion has held on to its adherents. Major publications — including New York Magazine, the New Yorker and the MIT Technology Review — published stories on it. 

“SARS-CoV-2 is the only one of the more than 200 known SARS related coronaviruses — the only one in its category — that contains a furin cleavage site. This is a feature that is more easily explained by a lab origin.”

Now the so-called lab leak hypothesis has been supercharged by a series of external events: First the Department of Energy shifted its stance on the matter, announcing a “low confidence” level that the virus originated with a lab leak. Then on Tuesday, FBI Director Christopher Wray told Fox News that the pandemic “most likely” began due to a lab leak in Wuhan. Previously this week, the Department of Energy called lab leak the “most likely” origin of the COVID-19 pandemic as well, according to a classified intelligence report.

According to experts who spoke with Salon, these developments certainly mark an important shift in the public discussion about the pandemic.

To a layperson, the lab leak hypothesis has an obvious appeal due to its simplicity: it lays clear who is to blame for the global pandemic that cost millions of lives. Yet a simple narrative is not necessarily a true one, and researchers who work in microbiology, virology or public health remain relatively skeptical of the lab leak hypothesis — with a few notable exceptions. 

Initially, many experts with whom Salon spoke said they had not seen data that would hint at the lab leak hypothesis.

“According to press reports, Director Wray stated ‘there’s not a whole lot of details I can share that aren’t classified,'” Russell Medford, PhD, Chair and CEO, Covanos, Inc. and Immediate Past Chair, Center for Global Health Innovation, told Salon by email. “I cannot comment on his overall assertion as to the likelihood of a lab leak without seeing the underlying data.”

“I do not know the basis for the FDA/[Department of Energy] decision, since there continues to be no data supporting a lab leak except proximity to the [Wuhan Institute of Virology] (and it is not very close — just within the same city),” Stanley Perlman, MD, Ph.D., a professor of microbiology and immunology at the University of Iowa, observed. 


Want more health and science stories in your inbox? Subscribe to Salon’s weekly newsletter The Vulgar Scientist.


Dr. Susan Weiss, a University of Pennsylvania professor who has studied coronaviruses for decades, felt similarly. “My overall thought is that there has been so much hype about lab leak but I have not see any data to support this assertion,” she said. “Scientists need data to be persuaded.”

By contrast, Rutgers University chemistry and chemical biology professor Dr. Richard H. Ebright told Salon that he believes the virus leaked from a lab. Ebright has been outspoken about this assertion: he testified before the Senate to this effect, and issued a long Twitter thread on the subject.

Ebright also elaborated on his reasons during a phone interview. As he pointed out, scientists know for sure that the pandemic was caused by a bat carrying a SARS-related coronavirus, and that it emerged in the Chinese city of Wuhan. Ebright expressed doubt that wild bats carrying SARS-CoV-2-related viruses lived close enough to Wuhan to cause a natural outbreak there, and noted that Wuhan is home to “the world’s largest research program on bat-SARS-related coronaviruses.” Researchers from the Wuhan Institute of Virology previously published numerous papers on these bat coronaviruses, including a 2017 paper published in PLoS Pathogens titled “Discovery of a rich gene pool of bat SARS-related coronaviruses provides new insights into the origin of SARS coronavirus.”

On top of that, Ebright pointed out that as early as 2015, scientists and diplomats voiced concern that the Wuhan lab posed a high risk of a laboratory accident, as the Washington Post previously reported.

“My overall thought is that there has been so much hype about lab leak but I have not see any data to support this assertion. Scientists need data to be persuaded.”

Ebright noted that the Wuhan Institute of Virology had previously worked on SARS-related coronaviruses that could combine the spike gene of one coronavirus with genetic information from a different coronavirus. Intriguingly, that research was actually funded partially by the U.S. National Institutes of Health, which provided a grant to EcoHealth Alliance with a “subaward to the Wuhan Institute of Virology in Wuhan, China.”

“In order to study animal coronaviruses circulating in nature, the investigators replaced the spike protein from a well-characterized bat coronavirus, WIV1-CoV, with the spike protein of animal coronaviruses recently discovered in bats in China,” an NIH website explains.

Ebright elaborated on this study, saying that “the resulting laboratory-generated virus was efficiently infected and replicated in human airway cells, and exhibited 10,000 times enhanced viral growth and four times enhanced lethality in mice engineered to display human receptors on their airway cells.”

Additional research into SARS-related coronaviruses soon followed.

“In 2017 to 2019, the Wuhan Institute of Virology constructed and characterized novel SARS-related coronaviruses using biosafety level two,” Ebright told Salon; this is corroborated by other reports, including from MIT Technology Review.  “That’s a biosafety level that is inadequate for, indeed is recklessly inadequate for, work with enhanced potential pandemic pathogens, and that would be unable to contain a virus that has the transmission properties of SARS-CoV-2.”

Ebright is also persuaded by the fact that the SARS-CoV-2 virus has many of the “exact properties” described in grant proposals from both that institute and from US government agencies like DARPA and NIH.

Such research, in which a virus is made more infectious in the lab, is known as “gain of function” research.

“SARS-CoV-2 is the only one of the more than 200 known SARS related coronaviruses — the only one in its category — that contains a furin cleavage site,” Ebright explained as one example. “This is a feature that is more easily explained by a lab origin.” He concluded by accusing the Wuhan Institute of Virology “and its collaborators at EcoHealth Alliance” of having “withheld information, misrepresented facts, and obstructed investigation.”

The furin cleavage site has become a fixation among both the lab leak believers and detractors. Furin, an enzyme that humans and some animals possess, is implicated in the ability of the virus to replicate efficiently and easily. In a previous interview, Perlman disagreed with Ebright on the importance of the furin cleavage site to the virus’ replication abilities, saying that its presence wasn’t a smoking gun that humans had tampered with the virus’ genetics. 

The interest in manipulating the genetics of coronaviruses is not necessarily a sinister endeavor reserved for bioweapons makers: American and European virologists frequently experiment with dangerous viruses that can infect humans, and have for decades. Often, researchers in the lab attempt to make viruses more infectious with the hopes of understanding how they mutate and thus staving off future pandemics. Such research, in which a virus is made more infectious in the lab, is known as “gain of function” research.

Even if SARS-CoV-2 was tinkered with in the lab in Wuhan, it could just as easily have leaked from a U.S. lab doing comparable work. The National Institutes of Health was engaged in funding gain-of-function research for decades, with a three-year pause in funding from 2014 to 2017. When it was lifted in December 2017, the NIH director gave a statement praising such seemingly dangerous research.

“Today, the National Institutes of Health announced that it is lifting a funding pause dating back to October 2014 on gain-of-function (GOF) experiments involving influenza, SARS, and MERS viruses,” NIH director Francis S. Collins wrote at the time. “GOF research is important in helping us identify, understand, and develop strategies and effective countermeasures against rapidly evolving pathogens that pose a threat to public health.”

For his part, Medford believes that the data on the SARS-CoV-2 virus points in the exact opposite direction: that it started in bats and mutated as it spread through humans, with no stop-over in a lab.

“The sequence of the originally reported SARS-CoV-2 virus that causes COVID-19 is closely related to some bat coronaviruses, and SARS-CoV-2 has since evolved the many mutations that have affected transmissibility, virulence and vaccine responsiveness,” Medford wrote to Salon. “There is no evidence that the virus was genetically engineered. To my knowledge, there is also no evidence that definitively links the current pandemic to a laboratory release of the SARS-CoV-2 virus.”

Perlman was more blunt.

“There is a lack of evidence that the virus was ever present in any laboratory in Wuhan,” Perlman told Salon. “The best data are for an animal source, but even here there are gaps. The virus was never been isolated from an animal in China or elsewhere and it has not been isolated from bats even though bats are the most likely source of the virus,” as the genome of the virus reveals that it gestated in bats for a long while before mutating.

A timeline of HBO’s messy “torture porn” show, involving The Weeknd, Sam Levinson and Rolling Stone

Forget about “The Last of Us” and “Yellowstone” — the latest drama you should be watching is a three-person play, starring R&B superstar The Weeknd, “Euphoria” creator Sam Levinson and Rolling Stone.

Here’s the plot summary: At the center of it all is Levinson and Abel “The Weeknd” Tesfaye’s highly anticipated HBO series “The Idol,” which failed to premiere last fall due to directorial changes, shooting delays, production rewrites and unfinished scripts. The heated hoopla was exposed in a Wednesday Rolling Stone report, in which 13 anonymous sources recounted the show’s toxic work environment and detailed its disturbing, overly explicit themes. 

“The Idol” — which HBO describes is the “sleaziest love story in all of Hollywood” — stars Lily-Rose Depp as Jocelyn, a rising yet troubled pop superstar who falls in love with Tesfaye’s Tedros, a mysterious L.A. nightclub owner who secretly runs a religious sex cult (think NXIVM meets Scientology). Initially helmed by Amy Seimetz, the six-episode series was meant to be “about a troubled starlet falling victim to a predatory industry figure and fighting to reclaim her own agency.” But under Levinson’s direction, the show transformed into a “rape fantasy,” as described by one production member. Others called it “sexual torture porn” and “a distorted and jarring story that lost its overall impact.”

Of course, the recent exposé didn’t go unnoticed by its producer/star. On Wednesday, Tesfaye tweeted a clip from the show, in which his character bashes Rolling Stone as “irrelevant.” It’s accompanied by a caption, asking, “.@RollingStone did we upset you?” In a separate statement, Depp also defended the show and Levinson.

Simply put, the ongoing drama is messy and confusing. Here’s a timeline of what went down when on “The Idol” set, from Seimetz’s departure and Levinson’s arrival, to the show’s chaotic production and HBO’s defense:

June 2021: “The Idol” went into development after being created by Tesfaye, alongside his producing partner Reza Fahim, and Levinson. The trio were named writers in addition to Joe Epstein and Mary Laws of “Succession.” Seimetz — who is best known for starring in “The Girlfriend Experience” and directing, writing and producing “She Dies Tomorrow” — was also announced as director.

According to crew members, Seimetz arrived on set seven weeks before the show started filming and was given “half-finished scripts, a first-time showrunner in Epstein, a tight schedule, and near-impossible expectations from HBO.” She was expected to emulate the extravagant sets seen on “Euphoria,” despite HBO’s budget of around $54 million (in comparison, “Euphoria’s” budget was more than $97 million for its second season, raised from $47 million in its first). Seimetz also wrote while directing because the scripts for the final episodes were incomplete while the finale was completely unwritten.

Per sources, Levinson and Seimetz also disagreed on the show’s creative direction: 

“I went into ‘The Idol’ thinking that this might be an interesting collaboration, but I left it pretty convinced that [Levinson] is not quite collaborative,” one source said. “It’s really frustrating seeing Amy doing her damn best to turn around some kind of product that she can be somewhat proud of to HBO . . . and then [for HBO] to turn around and have Sam get essentially a blank check to turn it into ‘Euphoria Season Three with pop stars’ is extremely, extremely frustrating.”

July 2021: Tesfaye’s availability was limited because he was getting ready to go on a worldwide tour. Levinson was also rarely on set as he was busy filming the second season of “Euphoria.” The only time he was seen on set was a few weeks into production, when Depp filmed her first intimate scene with Tesfaye.

The show’s set soon grew disorganized, with cast and crew members reportedly working long hours with little to no rest.

November 2021: “The Idol” was ordered to series, while filming continued.

April 2022: Filming went on hiatus after Seimetz suddenly left with roughly 80 percent of the show finished. News reports claimed that Seimetz’s departure was because of Tesfaye, who was unhappy with the direction of the show. He said the show portrayed too much of a “female perspective” and placed more focus on Depp’s character instead of his.     

HBO later announced that the show was set “to have a major creative overhaul” and would adjust its cast and crew. Seimetz’s directorial duties were given to Levinson.

May 2022: Production of “The Idol” resumed. Many crew members from the first shoot did not return and little-known actors were removed from the script. However, notable cast members, like singer-songwriter Troye Sivan and Suzanna Son of “Red Rocket,” were asked to stay.

According to crew members who remained on set, the environment continued to be chaotic. What was supposed to be a three-month-long shoot from May to July extended into September. Cast and crew were then called back for more filming in October, despite celebrating with a wrap party in July.

Levinson once again squabbled with higher-ups at HBO and crew members who were part of Seimetz’s shoot. Her original script was scrapped, and Levinson allegedly stopped sending scripts to HBO and certain department heads. 

“It was a show about a woman who was finding herself sexually, turned into a show about a man who gets to abuse this woman, and she loves it,” said one crew member.

July 2022: Production was paused again, just before Tesfaye’s After Hours til Dawn Tour.

August 2022: HBO released the show’s first teaser. The full ensemble cast is also announced. Alongside Tesfaye, Depp, Sivan and Son are Moses Sumney, Jane Adams, Dan Levy, Jennie Ruby Jane, Eli Roth, Rachel Sennott, Hari Nef, Da’Vine Joy Randolph, Mike Dean, Ramsey and Hank Azaria.

September 2022: Tesfaye’s performance at Sofi Stadium in Inglewood, California was filmed for the show. Thousands of his fans in attendance were used as free extras, who didn’t necessarily understand what they were witnessing.

March 1, 2023: Rolling Stone published its exposé. 

In response, Tesfaye slammed Rolling Stone on social media, writing, “@rollingstone did we upset you?” alongside a clip from the show of Tesfaye’s character poking fun of the outlet.

“Yeah, nobody cares about Rolling Stone,” Tesfaye’s character says in the scene. “Rolling Stone has six million followers on Instagram. Half of them, probably bots. And Jocelyn has 78 million followers — all real. I’d assume. So she does a photoshoot, she tags them, they get her followers, more money for Rolling Stone, nothing for Jocelyn.”

Tesfaye’s publicity team also sent this clip out to press on his behalf.

Depp also addressed the report and defended Levinson, who she said is the “best director I had ever worked with.”

“Never have I felt more supported or respected in a creative space, my input and opinions more valued,” Depp continued in a statement to IndieWire. “Working with Sam is a true collaboration in every way — it matters to him, more than anything, not only what his actors think about the work, but how we feel performing it. He hires people whose work he esteems and has always created an environment in which I felt seen, heard, and appreciated.”

A representative for HBO also denied the report. In another statement to IndieWire, HBO claimed that “the creators and producers of ‘The Idol’ have been working hard to create one of HBO’s most exciting and provocative original programs.” 

“Throughout the process, the creative team has been committed to creating a safe, collaborative, and mutually respectful working environment, and last year, the team made creative changes they felt were in the best interest of both the production and the cast and crew,” they added. “We look forward to sharing ‘The Idol’ with audiences soon.”

As for the show’s crew members, many said they are now wary of working again with Levinson.

“This was such a strong example of just how far [Levinson] can really push HBO, and they will continue to cover [him] because he brings in money,” said one member. “He’s able to walk away unscathed and everybody still wants to work with him . . . People ignore the red flags and follow him regardless.

“Anti-free speech”: Trump supporters reportedly banned from DeSantis book signing

Supporters of former President Donald Trump are accusing Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis, R, of being anti-free speech after security at a mall where DeSantis was doing a book signing instructed them to disperse.

DeSantis, who is seen as a potential challenger to Trump for the Republican nomination for president in 2024, signed autographs for his new book at a mall in Leesburg, Florida, on Tuesday. Outside of the mall, pro-Trump protesters led by white nationalist Lara Loomer demonstrated against the Florida governor.

According to footage shared on social media by Loomer, a security guard approached the group and instructed them to leave the premises. After the protesters refused to do so, the guard said he had to call the local police department.

“DeSantis people are in there telling me to come out to tell you guys not to be here while he’s here,” the guard said to the pro-Trump group.

“Governor DeSantis, he always talks about how he’s in favor of free speech,” Loomer said in response. “So do we have a first amendment right to be here, to rally in support of President Trump?”

“Right, you do. But not now,” the guard said.

“As you can hear from the video, DeSantis told the police to kick out anyone in Trump gear,” Loomer said in one of her tweets.

“Ron DeSantis is anti-free speech!” she wrote in another tweet.

Loomer told The Daily Beast that police eventually showed up to tell Trump supporters to leave.

“Police showed up and they told us that we were going to be cited and arrested for trespassing if we didn’t leave because DeSantis didn’t want us inside,” Loomer said. “It shows that he’s a tyrant.”

First Amendment speech rights do not allow individuals to speak without consequence on private property, meaning that malls and stores can indeed ask people to leave their premises on the basis of their political positions or affiliations.

Notably, both Trump and DeSantis have repeatedly sought to limit the speech of people who oppose them and their views.

In 2017, Trump called for the NFL to punish players who protested against police violence by kneeling during the national anthem at the beginning of games. And in the summer of 2020, the U.S. Park Police — which falls under the purview of the president — used tear gas on protesters outside of the White House, appearing to do so to ensure that Trump could walk unimpeded to a photo op at a nearby church.

In his role as governor, DeSantis has championed legislation that aims to restrict teachers in Florida from discussing LGBTQ topics in schools.

DeSantis is widely considered the most viable option to challenge Trump for the GOP nomination for president in 2024. While several polls have shown the two in a neck-and-neck race, a more recent survey from Emerson College shows Trump leading the Florida governor by 25 points among Republican respondents.

The two Republicans fare somewhat equally in hypothetical matchups against President Joe Biden, the likely Democratic nominee in the next presidential election cycle. According to an aggregate of polls about possible matchups in the 2024 election by RealClearPolitics, both Trump and DeSantis are statistically tied with Biden.

“Disgusting hatred”: Iowa Republicans propose amendment that would ban same-sex marriages

Republican lawmakers in Iowa have submitted a proposal for a constitutional amendment in the state that would bar the recognition of marriage rights for same-sex couples.

The amendment, which was submitted this week, would only affect marriage rights in the state of Iowa and would not supersede federal marriage equality protections that have been in place since the Obergefell v. Hodges Supreme Court ruling in 2015. But should that ruling ever be overturned, the amendment, if passed, would grant the state the ability to deny Iowa’s same-sex couples the right to marry or have marriage benefits conferred to them.

Iowa became the third state in the nation to legalize same-sex marriage — and the first in the Midwest — after its state Supreme Court overturned a ban on same-sex marriage in 2009. If passed, the proposed constitutional amendment would negate that ruling.

The proposal reads as follows:

For the amendment to become official, it must pass both houses of the state legislature, be signed by the governor, and pass the legislature again in the next session before being sent to voters.

A separate anti-LGBTQ bill submitted in Iowa on Tuesday seeks to undermine the Respect for Marriage Act, federal legislation that was passed by Congress and signed into law by President Joe Biden last year. (The act stipulates that, even if the U.S. Supreme Court overturns Obergefell, states must recognize same-sex marriages licenses from jurisdictions where marriage equality protections are still in place.) That bill runs afoul of the U.S. Constitution’s “supremacy clause,” and would likely be found unconstitutional.

Iowa voters would likely oppose a measure to ban same-sex marriage in the state. Even if Republican lawmakers are successful in forwarding the amendment to a vote, polling from the Public Religion Research Institute in 2017 shows that a majority of residents in the state (59 percent) support preserving marriage equality.

Still, the proposal for the state constitutional amendment and the bill seeking to delegitimize the Respect for Marriage Act indicate the lengths to which Republicans in Iowa will go to deny the rights of LGBTQ residents.

Democratic lawmakers in the state have vowed to oppose the legislation.

“No, @IowaGOP, we will not be going back to the days when committed, loving same-sex couples don’t have the same right to marriage equality as everyone else,” said state Rep. Sami Scheetz, D. “This kind of disgusting hatred and backwards thinking has no place in Iowa.”

GOP finally offers response to inflation: “Hollow” 3-page bill with a “basic drafting error”

Democrats blasted House Republicans on Wednesday for passing a bill marketed as fighting economic inflation which actually does nothing to actually combat the effects of inflation.

The Reduce Exacerbated Inflation Negatively Impacting the Nation or REIN IN Act requires the president to issue inflation estimates for “major” executive orders that are projected to cause an annual gross budgeting effect of at least $1 billion. That forecasting, however, does not apply to measures related to emergency assistance or national security.

During his weekly press conference, House Democratic Leader Rep. Hakeem Jeffries, D-N.Y., balked at the bill saying the Republicans need to put forward serious proposals, not “silliness.”

“This is their grand plan. It’s three pages,” Jeffries scoffed.

Rep. Elise Stefanik, R-N.Y., who sponsored the bill said during House floor remarks Tuesday that the bill would be a check on what she calls “Bidenflation” and an effort toward more transparency from the White House.

“Joe Biden has fueled this inflation crisis and caused this inflation crisis working with the previous radical, socialist Democrat majority,” said Stefanik, “By passing the REIN IN Act, House Republicans will demand transparency for the American people.”

During debates yesterday, Rep. Cori Bush, D-Mo., called the bill “unbelievable,” saying that while Democrats passed legislation that has been driving down inflation every month, “House Republicans have come up with nothing more than a study.”

“They have circumvented regular order to bring this hollow bill to a vote on the House floor,” said Bush, “Even as people continue to suffer the consequences of inflation and flawed responses that exacerbate unemployment, corporations, especially in the energy industry, have capitalized on this crisis to raise prices for everyday people and for families.”

Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, D-N.Y., questioned why members were voting for a bill that is “not even ready for a vote” and evaded the committee process.

“[I]f they had gone through regular order, they may have caught that this bill does nothing to rein in inflation, in part, because in their haste to put it together, my colleagues on the other side of the aisle committed an incredibly basic drafting error that makes this bill completely unenforceable,” said Ocasio-Cortez.

Ultimately, the bill passed with bipartisan support from 59 Democrats, while four Republicans voted against the measure.

Republicans have long blamed the Biden administration’s American Rescue Plan and provisions of the Inflation Reduction Act for driving up inflation.

While consumer prices jumped by a half-percent in January, overall inflation has decreased from the 9.1 percent reported last summer.

“Take yourself to the ocean”: “Blueback” star Radha Mitchell on how to care about the environment

“Blueback” is a gentle and beautifully filmed ecological-themed drama about a mother, Dora (Radha Mitchell), and her daughter Abby (Ilsa Fogg as a teenager) protecting the waters in Australia where they live.

“You have this charming lead character, who is not any of the humans in the story. He is this beautiful blue groper. He is not an animated fictious Disney character.”

The film, directed by Robert Connelly (“The Dry“), who adapted Tim Winton’s novella, toggles back and forth in time as the adult Abby (Mia Wasikowska) returns home to care for her mother (Elizabeth Alexander), who has recently suffered another stroke. In several extended flashbacks, Abby recalls Dora (Mitchell) teaching her to dive in the bay for abalone but to only take one for every three to prevent overfishing. 

Abby also befriends Blueback – a big-mouthed Australian fish known as a groper that lives in the water – and tries to protect him from danger. Her experiences — along with her activist mother’s fight to stop developers from buying her land and stripping the reef of its fish — influenced Abby to become a marine biologist and save the waters from harm. 

The ecological messages in the film may be obvious (the film is geared to families) but “Blueback” raises awareness of issues about conservation and sustainability as Dora and Abby check in on Macka (Eric Bana), who fishes in the bay. (Bana, who coproduced, is charming in his few scenes.) They also keep tabs on the developers who want to change the local ecosystem to suit their greedy needs.

Connelly and Mitchell spoke with Salon about “Blueback” and its themes. 

Robert, what was the appeal of Tim Winton’s novel that you wanted to make a film version of “Blueback”?

Robert Connelly: Tim described the book as a fable for all ages, and I was looking for something cinematic that had a kind of poem about the ocean. I love “The Old Man in the Sea,” and the elegant nature of that book. The challenge as a filmmaker was how to make a work that has narrative but is not really propelled by narrative. The book tells the story about a life lived. Trying to have a jigsaw puzzle of all those pieces in a compelling way, was engaging for me. I love the politics of saving the ocean.  

What prompted you to change the story to be about a mother and her daughter? Abby was Abel in the novella. 

Connelly: I made a family film, “Paper Planes,” a few years ago about a boy. I have two daughters, who are now 18 and 20, but years ago, when I started developing “Blueback,” one of my daughters gave me a lot of grief, “You have two daughters, and the heroes in all of your films are always boys. What are you doing?” Tim, [Winton, the author of the book] said, “You optioned the book for a long time, why haven’t you made it?” I told him I was getting grief from my daughters, and asked, “How do you feel if I changed the protagonist to a girl?” And he thought that was great because it is a universal story about young people being empowered. It worked well for the film.

Radha, how did you identify with Dora? She’s described as “fearless” by one character, but she is also very stubborn and protective. What observations do you have about her and her as a mother?

Mitchell: I was drawn to the film because it has this subliminal and emotional element. It’s something you feel. To understand Dora, you have to understand the ocean, so I was personally compelled to face some of my own anxiety about the ocean and global warming, and how to confront that creatively. Dora is all about taking it on, on a personal level. She isn’t intellectual about it. It is innate to who she is; she lives it, and she is living in it. 

I had a dream where I was walking along a pier in Melbourne and I was in my 20s, during a time of crisis, and this dolphin invited me to the bottom of the ocean there. I felt I wasn’t ready to go down to depths, and the fish swam away. I felt I missed this opportunity because I am weak and felt wasn’t ready, and the dolphin turned around on the horizon, like Flipper, and goes [Mitchell makes dolphin noises], and it was like an invitation.

Connelly: You just watched “The Big Blue.” [Both laugh; Jean-Marc Barr, who starred in “The Big Blue” costarred with Mitchell in the feature “Big Sur,” and the short “Whoever Was Using This Bed,” based on the Raymond Carver story.]

Mitchell: Dora is a compelling character as a positive demonstration of a mother who is not a perfect woman, but a steward or a role model to her daughter. You don’t always see mothers in that active role. Women are usually stuck in the kitchen. So having an emancipated free spirit was amazing.

Robert, can you talk about the challenges of filming underwater and on boats, and with the gropers, which are some of the best sequences in the film? And Radha, did you get to do any of the diving? 

Mitchell: Yes, yes, yes. That’s why it was a challenge. I was actually afraid because I had a bad experience diving and was actually intimidated by that. Rob said, “Don’t worry, it’s just going to be in a swimming pool.” But none of it, other than a small part, was in a swimming pool. Mostly, we were in the ocean. We did all our own diving.

Connelly: There were no stunt doubles. I wanted the authenticity of shooting the actors in a boat diving and then panning down, watching them without editing so the audience could lose themselves in belief that it was the characters. There were safety people in the water. But it was tricky. A scene where young Abby (Ariel Donoghue) retrieves a wedding ring, we had a shark mitigation drone looking for sharks. They said there were no sharks, then I called “Action,” for her. Technologically, it was an adventure. There were weather issues. Radha had to get a boat license for the film, and she was out there with a dinghy, and a pod of dolphins appeared, and she took off with dolphins. 

Mitchell: I thought it was a good shot!

Connelly: Filmmaking is such an industrial process. You look for the magic. We filmed an oceanic manta ray in one scene, that is rarely filmed, and we weren’t expecting that, but when you are exposed to the natural world, you lose a bit of control. If it’s a stormy day and it was meant to be bright and sunny, you have to work with that. Working with the fish was a whole other story.

Blueback is the name of the groper that is a symbol of the bay’s wildlife that is endangered by predatory developers. He requires significant efforts to protect. You show how Abby — and by extension Dora and Briggs (Pedrea Jackson) — connect with Blueback and that emotional bond inspires their activism. Is it really a simple matter of connecting to animals and marine life that will encourage folks to protect the environment? 

Connelly:  You nailed it. It’s not about saying, “It’s all a disaster, and we have to fix it,” It is the opposite; it’s about making people love it. Jacques Cousteau said, “People protect what they love.” The film shows if you experience it and if you love it, you feel compelled to save it. There’s a big shift in the environmental movement of activism based on optimism. If you tell people the Great Barrier Reef is going to die because of climate change, people are just going to curl up in a ball and do nothing. But if you tell them that scientists have found ways to make coral more resilient with climate change, then people get a twinkle in their eyes. I didn’t want “Blueback” to feel like a political lecture but that it does inspire activism. It’s a finely calibrated journey.

Mitchell: To know you is to love you. I’m talking to the fish. [Laughs] You have this charming lead character, who is not any of the humans in the story. He is this beautiful blue groper. He is not an animated fictious Disney character. He is a real fish. That was inspiring about the story.  

BluebackBlueback (Quiver Distribution)

There are messages on respecting nature, using only what you need. The bay gives, but can also take back. Losing something can also be a way of saving it. These are important points about coral bleaching, stripping the reef and overfishing. Can you talk about raising awareness about these issues?

Connelly: It is interesting that when the novella was [written in 1997], biodiversity was the big issue — if we lose that, the environment is going to start collapsing — so it was all about protecting species of animals. But since writing the book, climate change has become such a big issue, so with Tim Winton’s help, we created the adult Abby story of climate change and its impact on the temperature of the ocean and coral, which was a bigger issue than when the book was written. So how do we mesh the bigger impact of climate change with biodiversity, which says take one of every three abalone. The film could not have not spoken on the impact of climate change and species of coral. It is devastating when you see these bleached sections.

Mitchell: We can’t know, and we don’t really know. We are still figuring it out and still learning. You can see “Seaspiracy,” and might never eat fish again. It opened a big conversation globally. We don’t know the impact because we don’t have enough knowledge and how all these things interplay. The film is drawing focus, and the more we engage the more we know we will make it a priority and will find solutions.

Given the activism on display in the film, what inspires you to stand up and speak out and take risks — even if your efforts might go unrewarded? The film certainly shows that doing nothing is often not an option.

Mitchell: It’s almost philosophical. I stand for love and peace and a consciousness about my behavior and how it impacts others. I try to make personal lifestyle changes that align with changes in how we act collectively. I have solar panels, a water filter. I try not to use plastic bottles or buy lots of things. I could go on. Keep your mind open and keep educating yourself.

Connelly: Economic inequality is so extreme, and it is really doing more destruction at the moment than we can imagine. The economic inequality of the world is disrupting something. I don’t know the solution. Australia, sadly, used to be one of the most egalitarian countries in the world, and we’ve gone down to more of an unequal model. I know there are films like “Triangle of Sadness” and “The Menu” and could be satirical about the uber-wealthy. 

Another area of real interest to me is generational change. How do we empower young people to have a stronger voice? 


Want a daily wrap-up of all the news and commentary Salon has to offer? Subscribe to our morning newsletter, Crash Course.


There is an economic aspect to the story in that greed is driving developers to despoil these areas because they see profit. How do you address this greater issue after the credits roll? Is funding marine sanctuaries sufficient or stopping the practice of overfishing, beach erosion, polluting the oceans. Your film is a call to action. How can people help create change?

Mitchell: That’s’ the question most people want an answer to. It is so personal. We can’t tell everybody what to do. We’re trying to align with organizations that want to align with us and have people work in those frameworks. 

Connelly: What can people do as a product of seeing the film if they feel compelled? A young girl at a screening said she wanted to become a marine biologist. But not everyone is going to do that. 

Mitchell You can get familiar with your natural environment. Don’t go shopping, go hiking. Take yourself to the ocean, and that will take you on a journey. Have a personal, visceral experience. If you take someone into the natural world, you talk about the birds and engaging with things that become part of your consciousness and what you value. 

“Blueback” opens in theaters on wide release March 3.

 

“Star Trek: Picard” challenges us to consider that our icons change, yes even in franchises

Fanaticism is boring. That’s true of religion and genre franchise entertainment, and often the twain meets within the fandoms of heritage brands like “Star Wars,” the Tolkien universe, and, yes, “Star Trek.”

To travel the Trek universe(s) means encountering many tests of legitimacy gauged by any number of determining factors. Were you a fan of the original? Who is the best captain? What are your feelings about J.J. Abrams’ Kelvin Timeline? (There is a wrong answer, in case you’re wondering.)

According to the devoted, woe to those who deigned to enjoy any aspects of “Star Trek: Discovery” and previous seasons of “Star Trek: Picard.” Only “Star Trek: Lower Decks” and “Star Trek: Strange New Worlds” are deemed as acceptable newcomers because they utilize the same quandary-of-the-week format that defined the original “Star Trek.” 

“Discovery” supposedly fails Gene Roddenberry’s original directive by being too dark, aggressive and grim; “Picard,” in its first season, introduces a space elf reminiscent of “Lord of the Rings” hottie Legolas. Each deserves credit for testing the boundaries of what we expect of Starfleet and the characters who define its ideals but to the truest of true believers, those are not truly “Star Trek.” They are violations. Into the airlock with you!

This brings us to Worf (Michael Dorn) and his reintroduction to the franchise in the second episode of this third and final season of “Picard.” The Klingon officer was part of Jean-Luc Picard’s (Patrick Stewart) crew on the USS Enterprise on “Star Trek: The Next Generation” before transferring to work under the command of Benjamin Sisko on “Star Trek: Deep Space Nine.”

He’s served in many capacities and constructed a rich legend throughout his time on these series and the “TNG”-related movies, which made his resurfacing in “Picard” as a one-man, bat’leth-swinging killing machine . . . divisive.

Star Trek: PicardMichael Dorn as Worf in “Star Trek: Picard” (Trae Patton/Paramount+)

This is a simplistic reduction of what occurred. Worf co-stars in a parallel plot with Starfleet intelligence agent Raffi Musiker (Michelle Hurd), whose deep cover efforts failed to stop a deadly terrorist attack on a Starfleet recruitment center. In her anger, and against the orders of her unseen handler, she clumsily tries to shake down a Ferengi gangster only to have him order his goons to slaughter her.

Their hands never make it to their holsters. The last thing a drugged Raffi sees before she passes out is what appears to be a humanoid Cuisinart making swift work of her would-be killers, but the audience witnesses the full coup de grace in which her savior, Worf, beheads said Ferengi crime lord, who was unarmed.

How is that honorable? Worf would never do that. Putting aside the circumstances, in which the guy had just ordered a Starfleet agent’s death after showing off the severed head of another figure, one might ask a very obvious question: How can you be so sure?

When a character asks, “Is there anybody you know who’s still the person you knew?” he might as well be posing that to doubting viewers.

Twenty years have passed since audiences last saw Lieutenant Commander Worf in action, in “Star Trek: Nemesis.” Within that same period, Picard’s Number One, Commander William Riker (Jonathan Frakes) became captain of the USS Titan and settled down with Deanna Troi (Marina Sirtis) only to encounter a rocky patch in their marriage. Data (Brent Spiner) found a way to have twin daughters. The heretofore gentle Dr. Beverly Crusher (Gates McFadden) became a gun-toting smuggler.  

Star Trek: PicardGates McFadden as Dr. Beverly Crusher in “Star Trek: Picard” (Trae Patton/Paramount+)

When a character points out how long it’s been since Picard has caught up with most of his old friends, and asks, “Is there anybody you know who’s still the person you knew?” he might as well be posing that to doubting viewers. Of course, Picard has already grappled with that question in witnessing the progression of Seven of Nine (Jeri Ryan) from Borg to Starfleet crewmember to space pirate and back again. When she greets him this time, she’s the Titan’s second-in-command. Unfortunately, the ship’s abrasive Captain Liam Shaw (Todd Stashwick) lacks the humor and forbearance of Picard or Riker. We also receive some hints that he wasn’t always this prickly, either.

This is one of the broader points “Picard” makes throughout its farewell episodes, six of which were provided for review. Everything and everyone changes, Worf included. He’s always taken pride in his Klingon warrior heritage while building his near-perfect Starfleet record, eventually winning enough trust among his Federation and Klingon peers to become an ambassador.

Dorn pointed out in a recently held Television Critics Association press conference that Worf is on a lifelong journey to figure out who he is. The meeting place of his various identities might look something like, say, a silver-haired martial arts master practicing his forms to a selection from Hector Berlioz’s opera “Les Troyens.”

In a measure of validation for the doubters, Dorn admitted  to having a few reservations about Worf’s initial reveal in “Picard,” but was ultimately satisfied by how his story progressed. Nevertheless: “There were times when I’d look at the script and go, ‘You know, Worf wouldn’t say that. You know?'” Dorn told reporters covering the event. “And Jonathan Frakes, you know, he would say, ‘Shut up, Mike, and do the lines.'”

That may be, but Worf’s way of introducing himself to Raffi in the third episode is flawlessly in character. “I am Worf, son of Mogh. House of Martok. Son of Sergey, House of Rozhenko. Bane to the Duras family. Slayer of Gowron. I have made some chamomile tea. Do you take sugar?”

Picard is not even his old self on a cellular level. Yet he is still very much the Jean-Luc fans venerate.

“Picard” never attempted to be an extension of “The Next Generation” in format or style, eschewing its predecessor’s weekly adventure format in favor of a serialized plot. Season 1 is a mystery reentering the life of the show’s namesake at a point of his extreme disillusionment with the United Federation of Planets, and its emphasis on politics over the sanctity of all life. He proved his willingness to die in defense of that principle in that season’s finale, which most might agree is a very Admiral Picard move.

Leap ahead to the current “Picard” episodes (and we mean that, you can skip the second season and not miss a thing) and Picard is not even his old self on a cellular level. His consciousness was loaded into a synthetic replication of his body at the end of Season 1 when it looked as if an inoperable brain abnormality was going to finish him off.

Star Trek: PicardEd Speelers as Jack in “Disengage” in “Star Trek: Picard” (Trae Patton/Paramount+)

Yet he is still very much the Jean-Luc fans venerate. That makes the current season’s auxiliary theme provocative on a deeper level that it initially seems. “I am not a man who needs a legacy,” Picard magnanimously declares to his doting Romulan housekeeper Laris (Orla Brady) as the premiere starts. 

In the grand plan of it all our desires don’t matter, which the writers prove by the end of the second episode when Picard is make to realize that Beverly’s son, Jack (Ed Speleers), is also his kid, raised without his knowledge on the extralegal side of the galaxy.


Want a daily wrap-up of all the news and commentary Salon has to offer? Subscribe to our morning newsletter, Crash Course.


Why Beverly cut off Jean-Luc and everyone else in this otherwise tight crew is eventually explained, and in doing so the writers invite anyone who places Picard on a pedestal to reexamine that unquestioning regard. At the end of it all, Picard is an institution too. And if the Federation and Starfleet were at times blinded by their dedication to principles over humanity, so was the man said to represent the best of what they stood for.

“Picard,” as previously mentioned, bellyflopped in its second season but it did so by trying something new within a familiar universe. Many of the claims about the new interpretations of the franchise return to the familiar claim of something “not being ‘Star Trek’,” which is the same projectile that was hurled at “The Next Generation” by those who would accept no other captain than James T. Kirk and toward “Deep Space Nine” for daring to de-emphasize one-and-done plots for season-long arcs.

Some refused to accept Zachary Quinto as Spock, or moaned about the franchise’s insistence on recycling Spock through the franchise only to be delighted by Ethan Peck’s jaunty take on the iconic Vulcan in “Strange New Worlds.”

“The Next Generation” crew never received a farewell commensurate to the esteem in which Trekkers hold them, and the last season of “Picard” strives to do that not by returning to the explorers they once were but wiser, more scarred, and battle-hardened.

It is not like “Star Trek: The Next Generation,” in the sense that it mimics a conspiracy thriller as opposed to a philosophically driven space odyssey. But it is “Star Trek,” and a fitting closer for a team that spent seven seasons between 1987 and 1994 reminding viewers that what makes us extraordinary is our adventurous nature.

“He should apologize”: Trump is melting down on Truth Social over Murdoch’s deposition revelations

Former President Donald Trump is not finished with his online tirade against Fox Corp. Chairman Rupert Murdoch after he admitted in a deposition that some of the network’s hosts “endorsed” false claims about his election loss. 

A court filing in Dominion Voting Systems’ $1.6 billion defamation lawsuit against the network revealed that the Fox boss and other pro-Trump Fox hosts privately mocked the very same false election claims they aired. 

Trump’s targeted rant against Murdoch began earlier this week after the Fox executive said in a deposition that he knew there was no truth to Trump’s false claims but chose not to do anything about it as his network continued to air them.

“Rupert Murdoch should apologize to his viewers and readers for his ridiculous defense of the 2020 Presidential Election,” Trump wrote Thursday on Truth Social. “How many forms of cheating and rigging does he have to see? He should also apologize to those anchors who got it right, and fire the ones who got it wrong, or were afraid to speak up (of which there were many!). It’s time to get rid of Fake News, and call it like it is!”

He then turned his anger toward former House Speaker Paul Ryan, R-Wis., who now sits on the Fox Corp.’s board of directors.

“Rumors are flying high that idiot RINO Paul Ryan, who has greatly hurt the ‘credibility’ of Rupert Murdoch with his ridiculous stance that the 2020 Election was all “peaches and cream,” will be fired “like a dog” from the Fox Board,” Trump wrote

“Fox is going in the wrong direction, ratings are heading down, and Murdoch just threw certain very good people, who were correct, under the bus,” the former president continued. “He played right into the enemies camp. Viewers, and MAGA, are not happy!”

“I think that Fox Board Member RINO Paul Ryan, put his boss, Rupert Murdoch, in great legal and monetary jeopardy by convincing him to to go against his news anchors and their belief that the 2020 Presidential Election was Rigged and Stollen [sic],” Trump continued in his another post

“In so doing Murdoch is saying that Fox behaved badly when, in fact, evidence has proven that the Election was rife with Election Fraud and Irregularities,” he added. “Ryan is bad luck for Fox. He should either resign or be fired. Too many incompetent RINOS at FoxNews!”


Want a daily wrap-up of all the news and commentary Salon has to offer? Subscribe to our morning newsletter, Crash Course.


Fox is also under fire from congressional leaders including Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y., and House Democratic Leader Hakeem Jeffries, D-N.Y.

The two lawmakers sent a letter to Murdoch on Wednesday, demanding that he stop the advancement of 2020 election conspiracies on the right-wing channel and that he have the network publicly admit to wrongdoing. 

Fox has repeatedly denied the allegations against them, framing the lawsuit as an attack on the network’s First Amendment rights, and previously stated that Dominion “cherry-picked” evidence in their filing to “smear” the network. Fox Corp. has argued that its executives were not directly involved in the decision to air the false claims.

The Democrats, who also addressed Fox News CEO Suzanne Scott, Fox Corp. CEO Lachlan Murdoch and Fox News Media President Jay Wallace, called out Murdoch for his admission that Fox News hosts knowingly pushed election lies.

“The leadership of your company was aware of the dangers of broadcasting these outlandish claims,” the letter states. “By your own account, Donald Trump’s election lies were ‘damaging’ and ‘really crazy stuff.’ Despite that shocking admission, Fox News hosts have continued to peddle election denialism to the American people. This sets a dangerous precedent that ignores basic journalistic fact-checking principles and public accountability.”

Schumer and Jeffries also used the letter to express their concern that House Speaker Kevin McCarthy allowed Fox News star Tucker Carlson to review the footage from the Jan. 6 Capitol riot despite his constant false narratives about the insurrection on air. 

“We demand that you direct Tucker Carlson and other hosts on your network to stop spreading false election narratives and admit on the air that they were wrong to engage in such negligent behavior,” the letter reads.

“As evidenced by the January 6 insurrection, spreading this false propaganda could not only embolden supporters of the Big Lie to engage in further acts of political violence, but also deeply and broadly weakens faith in our democracy and hurts our country in countless other ways,” it continues.

“Fox News executives and all other hosts on your network have a clear choice,” the congressmen wrote. “You can continue a pattern of lying to your viewers and risking democracy or move beyond this damaging chapter in your company’s history by siding with the truth and reporting the facts. We ask that you make sure Fox News ceases disseminating the Big Lie and other election conspiracy theories on your network.”

“Amazing”: Biden dunks on MTG after she blames him for fentanyl deaths that happened under Trump

Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene, R-Ga., falsely claimed on Tuesday that the Biden administration was responsible for the fentanyl poisonings of two young men who actually died while former President Donald Trump was in the White House. 

Right-wing attorney Rebecca Kiessling — who has branded herself as an anti-abortion activist “conceived in rape” —testified in front of the House Homeland Security Committee on Tuesday about the deaths of her sons Caleb and Kyler on July 29, 2020. The young men died as a result of fentanyl poisoning from pills that Kiessling says they mistakenly believed were safe painkillers.

In her emotional testimony, she requested stronger federal action to prevent fentanyl from being imported across the southern border, accusing lawmakers of “welcoming drug dealers across our border.” However, fentanyl, a deadly synthetic opioid, is actually largely smuggled in by US citizens through legal ports of entry rather than migrants sneaking into the country illegally, according to a fact check from CNN

Greene later tweeted a video of an exchange with Kiessling at the hearing to her more than two million followers, writing: “Listen to this mother, who lost two children to fentanyl poisoning, tell the truth about both of her son’s murders because of the Biden administrations refusal to secure our border and stop the Cartel’s from murdering Americans everyday by Chinese fentanyl.”

Twitter users added a fact-check to her tweet, noting that the “fentanyl overdose deaths Greene refers to occurred in July 2020 during the presidency of Donald Trump. Joe Biden was not in public office when the Kiessling brothers died.” As of Thursday afternoon, the tweet has received more than 8.6 million views. 

In fact, Kiessling explicitly told the committee the exact date of her son’s death, making it clear that it was during the Trump presidency.

When CNN fact-checker Daniel Dale reached out to Greene spokesman Nick Dyer to ask whether the congresswoman plans to delete or correct the tweet, Dyer cursed at him and questioned whether Americans that died from drugs during Biden’s presidency “care about the details” of the specific case his boss cited.

“Do you think they give a f**k about your bullsh*t fact checking?” he asked.

When asked about the tweet, Kiessling told CNN in an email Wednesday morning that the number of fentanyl deaths increased sharply from 2020 to 2021 and argued that “if the border had been secured during the Obama administration when the federal government first knew of this issue, my sons would be alive today.” 

“The whole of our federal government has failed,” she wrote in the email. “Congress included.”

Fentanyl deaths in the U.S. began to spike under the Obama administration in the mid-2010s, and continued to rise under Trump’s presidency. They swiftly rose during the COVID-19 pandemic, early into Biden’s presidency, and while overdose deaths are much higher than they were in 2020 and earlier, there have been preliminary signs of improvement.


Want a daily wrap-up of all the news and commentary Salon has to offer? Subscribe to our morning newsletter, Crash Course.


Biden called out Greene over the false claim at a gathering of Democrats on Wednesday night before addressing the serious allegations. 

“She was very specific — I shouldn’t digress, probably — I read, she was very specific recently saying that a mom, a poor mother who lost two kids to fentanyl, that I killed her sons. Well, the interesting thing is, that fentanyl they took came during the last administration,” Biden said.

Biden added that Greene will likely push more Republicans out of the party.

“And you know, a little bit more Marjorie Taylor Greene and a few more, you’re gonna have a lot of Republicans running our way,” he said as the audience laughed. “Isn’t she amazing? Oof.”

MSNBC political contributor Steve Benen noted in a column on Wednesday that Greene’s claim is part of a “curious recent pattern in GOP politics.”

“Republicans keep forgetting who was president in 2020,” he wrote, calling them “calendar challenged.”

Rep. Ronny Jackson, R-Texas, recently said Biden was responsible for “paying people to stay home” in 2020 — a law that was actually signed by Trump. 

Rep. Lauren Boebert, R-Colo., also blamed Biden for Covid-related school closures in 2020, which likewise happened during Trump’s presidency. 

Former White House press secretary Kayleigh McEnany also accused Biden for not doing enough to prevent crime, pointing to data from 2020 when her former boss was president — and she was still in the White House.

Experts: Murdoch testimony “guts” Fox’s best defense — but he may set up top exec to “take the fall”

Fox Corp. Chairman Rupert Murdoch may have damaged the company’s defense in Dominion Voting Systems’ $1.6 billion defamation lawsuit — but some media analysts believe he is setting up Fox News CEO Suzanne Scott to “take the fall” in the case.

Murdoch’s deposition admitting that some Fox News “endorsed” false claims about the election “guts” the network’s best defense, CNN legal analyst Elie Honig argued on Wednesday. 

“Every day that it’s on the air and continues to push some of the basis of what this defamation lawsuit’s about, they do have legal liability and exposure,” former federal prosecutor Laura Coates said on “The Situation Room.”

Honig agreed that Murdoch’s testimony “really guts what I think is the best potential defense here for Fox.”

“Their defense – they’ve articulated this – is going to be, ‘These were newsworthy comments by the then-president and his top advisers. We were simply reporting them,'” Honig said. “Now, Murdoch has admitted ‘we’ endorsed them, but he tried to draw this distinction between, ‘Well, not we, Fox, but we, our top anchors.’ But who is Fox News, who is any media corporation if not the voices of the top journalists and reporters?” 

Fox News has denied Dominion’s allegations and accused the company of cherry-picking quotes to publicize in its filings. A spokesperson said Dominion has taken an “extreme, unsupported view of defamation law” to “publicly smear FOX for covering and commenting on allegations by a sitting President.

The voting machine company filed a brief last month citing internal communications in which Fox colleagues privately trashed the same debunked election fraud allegations they aired. Fox Corp., the parent company of Fox News, has sought to distance itself from the lawsuit, arguing that its executives were not directly involved in decisions to air the claims. Murdoch in his deposition suggested that the issue was Fox News CEO Suzanne Scott’s responsibility.

Semafor editor-in-chief Ben Smith told CNN on Wednesday that the Murdochs “are certainly setting Suzanne Scott up to take the fall for this.”

David Folkenflik, an NPR media correspondent and Murdoch biographer, added that “they’re leaving a trail of crumbs that lead back to her office.”

However, many media experts have argued that Murdoch is actually in charge of all major network decisions and acknowledged in his deposition that he regularly talks to Scott and likes to be “involved in these things.”

“I’m a journalist at heart,” Murdoch said, according to Dominion’s filing.

This would not be the first time that Murdoch has made sacrificial lambs out of his colleagues. In 2016, Fox News CEO Roger Ailes faced allegations of sexual misconduct, and just one year later, star personality Bill O’Reilly faced his own sexual misconduct scandal. In both cases, Murdoch severed ties with top Fox personnel.

“His pattern has been to throw some money overboard and offer a head or two in the process to make it go away,” one source who worked with Murdoch’s team told CNN on Wednesday. 


Want a daily wrap-up of all the news and commentary Salon has to offer? Subscribe to our morning newsletter, Crash Course.


“Looking back to previous scandals, Murdoch and the companies have tended to try to pay early and quietly to make things go away, or they ignore them thinking they’re so big they can ride things out,” Folkenflik told the outlet. “And then when things really come to a head, they try to cauterize the wound at the lowest level possible.”

“If he threw [Scott] over, he would only do it because he thought he needed to cauterize the wound before it goes higher,” Folkenflik added. “That’s his record. That’s what he does. It can be editors. It can be executives. It can be stars. He’s not throwing himself over the side.”

Former New York Times media columnist Jim Rutenberg, who covered Murdoch, agreed that the media mogul “has a history of sacrificing loyal lieutenants.”

“But he does it only in the most extreme circumstances,” Rutenberg told CNN. “We know that he hates doing it. We know that he tends to try to fight for his loyalists, even for Ailes, certainly for O’Reilly. But when it’s a necessity to overcome a real threat to his business, he’ll do it.”

“If you’re Rupert, you can’t fire Rupert. And you’re not going to fire [Fox CEO] Lachlan [Murdoch] either,” Folkenflik explained. “So who are you going to chop?”

“Everyone who takes a senior executive position under Rupert Murdoch knows that is the case, that is the ultimate fall position,” Folkenflik added. “They understand that’s part of the job. You’re very well paid. It can be a somewhat glamorous life. If you fall out of favor with the sun king, or it is to his benefit, that’s part of the equation.”

New study shows nightmares linked to a higher risk of dementia and Parkinson’s disease

Can children’s dreams foretell events that will happen nearly 40 years into the future? Yes, according to the results of my latest study published in The Lancet’s eClinicalMedicine journal.

More specifically, it showed that children who experience regular bad dreams and nightmares between the ages of seven and 11, may be nearly twice as likely to develop cognitive impairment (the core feature of dementia) by the time they reach age 50. And they may be up to seven times more likely to be diagnosed with Parkinson’s disease by age 50.

For some background to these startling findings, in 2022 I discovered that middle-aged and older adults who experience frequent bad dreams and nightmares could be more than twice as likely to develop dementia or Parkinson’s in the future.

Given that a large proportion of people who experience regular nightmares as adults also report having had regular nightmares when they were children, this made me wonder whether having lots of bad dreams during childhood might predict the development of dementia or Parkinson’s disease later in life.

To find out, I used data from the well-known 1958 British birth cohort study, which follows the lives of all children born in England, Scotland and Wales during the week of March 3–9, 1958.

When the children were aged seven (1965) and 11 (1969), their mothers answered a range of questions about their health, including whether they had experienced bad dreams in the previous three months (yes/no).

I grouped the 6,991 children based on how regularly they experienced bad dreams at ages seven and 11: “never”, “occasional”, or “persistent”. I then used statistical software to determine whether the children with more regular bad dreams were more likely to develop cognitive impairment or be diagnosed with Parkinson’s by the time they turned 50 (2008).

The results were clear. The more regularly the children experienced bad dreams, the more likely they were to develop cognitive impairment or be diagnosed with Parkinson’s disease.

Remarkably, compared with children who never had bad dreams, those who had persistent bad dreams were 76% more likely to develop cognitive impairment and were 640% more likely to develop Parkinson’s. This pattern was similar for both boys and girls.

These results suggest that having regular bad dreams and nightmares during childhood may increase the risk of developing progressive brain diseases like dementia or Parkinson’s disease later in life. They also raise the intriguing possibility that reducing bad dream frequency during early life could be an early opportunity to prevent both conditions.

Further studies will be needed to confirm whether bad dreams and nightmares truly cause these conditions.

The frequency with which we experience nightmares as children is to a large degree determined by our genetics. And one gene known to increase our risk of having regular nightmares (PTPRJ) is also linked to increased risk of developing Alzheimer’s disease in old age. So it’s possible that nightmares and progressive brain diseases are both caused by a shared set of genes.

My hunch is that both theories could be true. That is, nightmares and progressive brain diseases are linked by shared genetics, as well as through nightmares directly causing brain diseases by disrupting the brain-restoring elements of sleep.

Don’t be alarmed

Although these findings sound alarming, put in their proper context, they shouldn’t be. Of the roughly 7,000 children included in my study, only 268 (4%) had persistent bad dreams according to their mothers. Among these children, only 17 had developed cognitive impairment or Parkinson’s disease by age 50 (6%).

So it is likely that the vast majority of people who have persistent bad dreams in childhood are not going to develop early-onset dementia or Parkinson’s.

However, the risk of developing progressive brain diseases increases substantially in old age. Being aware that bad dreams in childhood may signal a higher risk of dementia or Parkinson’s later in life suggests that there could be a window of opportunity to implement simple strategies to lower those risks. And for young people with frequent distressing dreams that persist over time, getting help for nightmares might be one such strategy.

The next step for my research is to use electroencephalography (a technique to measure brainwaves) to look at the biological reasons for bad dreams and nightmares in children.

In the longer term, the aim will be to use this knowledge to develop new treatments for all people troubled by bad dreams and nightmares. The ultimate goal is to improve their sleep quality and mental health and reduce their chance of developing dementia or Parkinson’s disease later in life.


Abidemi Otaiku, NIHR Academic Clinical Fellow in Neurology, University of Birmingham

This article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license. Read the original article.

Why Republicans are spreading the lie that whales are being killed by wind farms

On February 19, 2023, hundreds of protesters filled the boardwalk in Point Pleasant Beach, New Jersey. Their cause — or so it seemed — was protecting the whales: photos from the rally show demonstrators waving signs reading “Save the Whales,” some adorned with images of humpback whales. 

At first glance, this gathering appeared to be a boilerplate environmental protest, one in which activists were demanding environmental protections for whales. Yet curiously, protesters’ signs were also peppered with anti-wind turbine rhetoric — not what one might expect among a conference of environmental activists. One person in the crowd held a sign that read: “Windmills at sea DUMB.” As reported by the local news station WKXW, attendees were chanting “whale lives matter” as they called for an end to wind projects.

“There is no evidence that is linking the wind activities in the mid Atlantic region to these whale strandings.”

Considering the left-leaning tendency of most environmentalists, the list of attendees was curious, and included many prominent local Republican politicians: Seaside Park, N.J. mayor John Peterson Jr., Point Pleasant Beach mayor Paul Kanitra, and U.S. Representative Chris Smith (R-NJ). 

At the rally, Smith announced that he introduced legislation in the House of Representatives that would require an investigation into the environmental review processes for offshore wind projects.

“Today, the whales are sending us a tragic message that demands transparency and accountability — both of which has been sorely missing from Governor Murphy’s plan to use New Jersey’s coast as the prime location for the offshore wind industry in the U.S.,” Smith said at the rally. “Questions and concerns raised by me and many others have gone unanswered concerning the unexplained deaths of at least 10 whales.” Previously, nearly 30 New Jersey mayors called for a moratorium on wind farm construction, citing the need to protect whales.

This narrative — connecting whale deaths and strandings to offshore wind projects — has become a prominent talking point on right-leaning news channels like Fox News, which has been pushing the narrative that whale deaths are linked to offshore wind projects. Fox pundit Tucker Carlson recently remarked that “the government’s offshore wind projects—which are enriching their donors—are killing a huge number of whales, right now.

Meanwhile, at the protest, Congressman Smith said that there was “great concern for the potential serious — even catastrophic — damage to marine ecosystems leading to the destruction of New Jersey’s fishing and tourism businesses if hundreds, and even thousands, of wind turbines are installed off the New Jersey coast.” 

“We want the truth” about wind, Smith continued.

Offshore wind power is a political issue in New Jersey because of the state’s commitment to adding more green energy to its power mix. Indeed, the state plans to transition to 100% renewable electricity by 2050, thanks to a commitment from Democratic Governor Phil Murphy. The state’s plan includes adding more offshore wind energy; currently, one such plant is under construction at the Port of Paulsboro.

Meanwhile, ocean conservationists say that wind turbines are not to blame for the dozens of dead whales that have washed ashore along the East Coast since early December 2022. 

“There is no evidence that is linking the wind activities in the mid Atlantic region to these whale strandings, where there is evidence it is pointing to vessel strikes to entanglement with fishing gear,” Gib Brogan, campaign director at ocean conservation nonprofit Oceana, told Salon. “So this is speculation based on no facts, and it distracts from the underlying problems that are threatening humpback whales and the critically endangered North Atlantic right whales that are being killed by these threats.”

“This is speculation based on no facts, and it distracts from the underlying problems that are threatening humpback whales and the critically endangered North Atlantic right whales.”

Since 2016, both humpback whales and north Atlantic right whales in the Atlantic Ocean have experienced an “unusual mortality event,” or UME, according to the  National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA). Under the Marine Mammal Protection Act, a UME signifies there is a significant die-off of any marine mammal population that requires an immediate response.

According to NOAA, it is often too late to determine a cause of death in many of the strandings because the carcasses are too decomposed. In April 2017, the agency was able to perform half or full necropsies in half of the strandings and concluded that 10 of the deaths occurred due to ship strikes, which was six times greater than the 16-year average. 

“The rate of strandings over the last month or two has been high,” Brogan said, adding that marine mammal scientists are watching what’s happening on the East Coast closely. “But so far there’s no evidence that there’s something new that’s going on.” Brogan emphasized that that these whales’ deaths likely stem from the same things that have killed them for years — boat strike and entanglement in fishing gear. 

Previous studies have found that ship collisions are the leading cause of injury and death for North Atlantic right whales. Whales being caught in fishing gear is a second leading cause of injury and death. This is in part because North Atlantic right whales are difficult to spot in the ocean, since they are dark in color and don’t have a dorsal fin. They are also slow swimmers, averaging around 6 miles per hour; at normal operating vessel speeds, ships can’t easily avoid them since they’re too slow to move out of a ship’s way. 

“The broad concern about these projects in New Jersey and in the mid-Atlantic are misplaced and misguided.”

In late February, NOAA and the Marine Mammal Commission emphasized in a statement that there is no evidence that wind turbines are the cause of these whale deaths. 

Brogan said Oceana is supportive of wind projects that are built responsibly, and there are some concerns around placement off the coast of Nantucket relating to North Atlantic right whales — particularly since there are fewer than 350 left.

“The projects that are south of Nantucket and Martha’s Vineyard — that are core habitat for the whales, their year-round feeding — we have concerns about the presence of these wind projects, and what that’s going to mean for the remaining North Atlantic right whales,” Brogan said. “But the broad concern about these projects in New Jersey and in the mid-Atlantic are misplaced and misguided.” 

So, why are some latching on to misinformation to blame wind turbines for recent whale deaths? As Fast Company recently reported, it could be because some of the groups promoting the anti-wind turbine propaganda are backed by oil-industry interests. It also speaks to the politicized debate on renewable energy. In 2021, Pew Research published a report stating that most Americans support expanding solar panel and wind turbine farms, but Democrats and Republicans were “increasingly divided in views” of the energy sources.

Meanwhile, wind turbines are no strangers to conspiracy theories.

“Conspiracy theories have long circulated about wind turbines, even if this phenomenon has largely evaded academic attention,” researchers wrote in Nature. “For example, despite dozens of academic studies indicating that wind farms pose no threat to human health, conspiracy theories persist that they contribute to congenital abnormalities, fatigue and/or cancer, claims that have been propagated by anti-wind farm lobby groups and echoed by senior politicians including former US President Donald Trump.”

As it pertains to the whales, Brogan said the focus on wind turbines is distracting from a real issue and potential opportunity to truly help the North Atlantic right whales. 

“The Biden administration is considering an important update to the vessel speed rules to slow the boats down to protect the right whales, and this will likely have benefits for the humpback whales as well,” Brogan said. “If we slow the boats down, they’re far safer for the whales; we are hopeful that they’re going to stay on track and put out the final safeguards that are in line with what they proposed last year.”

Editor’s note: A previous version of this article referred to Phil Murphy as the former governor of New Jersey; he is the incumbent governor. 

“Despicable”: White House rips “incredibly ugly and inappropriate” GOP attack on Biden’s dead son

House Oversight Committee Chairman James Comer, R-Ky., on Tuesday questioned why Beau Biden, the late son of President Joe Biden, was never prosecuted in an investigation into illegal contributions to his father’s 2008 presidential campaign.

Comer, who has vowed to lead a congressional investigation into the business dealings of Biden’s other son Hunter, questioned why prosecutors have not charged Hunter Biden during an interview with former Fox Business host Lou Dobbs — and suggested that the Justice Department should have gone after the president’s late son Beau before his death as well.

David Weiss, the Trump-appointed U.S. attorney in Delaware, has been investigating Hunter Biden’s tax affairs since 2018, and prosecutors are close to wrapping up the case according to recent reports. Authorities have also looked into the president’s son for allegedly lying on a gun application form. Comer in the interview questioned why charges had not yet been brought and suggested that Weiss has been too sympathetic to the Biden family. He then brought up Beau Biden, who served as Delaware’s attorney general, before passing away in 2015 due to a brain tumor. President Biden has said that he believes the cancer was caused by burn pits Beau was exposed to while serving in Iraq.

“This U.S. attorney had had an opportunity to go after the Bidens years ago,” Comer complained. “In fact, it was Beau Biden, the president’s other son, that was involved in some campaign donations from a person that got indicted, as well as Joe Biden was involved in some of these campaign donations when he was a senator, and then when he ran for president against Obama.”

“But nothing ever happened,” the Kentucky lawmaker continued. “So I don’t know much about this U.S. attorney other than he’s had an opportunity to investigate the Bidens before and he chose not to. We all know that he’s just been silent for a long time.”

Comer then moved his focus to Hunter Biden, claiming “we know what’s on that laptop” and questioned why Weiss still hasn’t prosecuted him.

“There’s enough to indict Hunter Biden now, there was enough to indict Hunter Biden three or four years ago with what’s on the laptop,” he said. “So for whatever reason, this U.S. attorney hasn’t produced very many results.”

The campaign donation that Comer referenced was from Christopher Tigani, a Delaware liquor executive, who contributed to Joe Biden’s unsuccessful campaign for president in 2008, according to The Daily Beast.

Tigani pled guilty to campaign finance charges in 2011 because of a donation reimbursement scheme, after which Beau Biden recused himself from a state investigation into the donations and brought on special prosecutor E. Norman Veasey to lead the two-year investigation.

The report found that 19 lawmakers unknowingly received straw donations from Tigani, including Joe and Beau Biden, and ultimately no public officials were ever charged or prosecuted.

“Although some witnesses made vague references or speculated to the effect that candidates or their agents knew about or suggested reimbursements, investigators did not find credible evidence to support a charge,” Veasey’s report stated.


Want a daily wrap-up of all the news and commentary Salon has to offer? Subscribe to our morning newsletter, Crash Course.


Comer’s reference to the late Beau Biden on the podcast contradicts his previous statements that he is only interested in investigating President Biden, not his family. Just last week, he told Fox News that “at the end of the day, this is an investigation of Joe Biden.” He also told Newsmax last year that he doesn’t “care” about Hunter Biden’s personal life nor his drug addiction.

During a Wednesday afternoon briefing, White House Press Secretary Karine Jean-Pierre responded to Comer’s appearance on the right-wing podcast, calling his comments “ugly” and “inappropriate.”

“It’s completely inappropriate. It’s ugly, the comments that he made. It says a lot about the chairman, which is not good, by the way,” Jean-Pierre said, answering a question from a Daily Beast reporter. “To make the statement that he did is incredibly ugly and inappropriate.”

“Instead of House Republicans focused on attacking the President and his family, why don’t they focus on what the American people put them in office to do, which is to deliver for them,” she continued from the podium. She also condemned House Republicans for their various “political stunts.”

White House communications director Kate Bedingfield also commented on Comer’s “appalling” comments on a Wednesday morning appearance on MSNBC. “It’s despicable,” she noted. “And frankly, it says quite a lot—none of it good—about Jim Comer.”

“Burn hazards”: Over 2 million air fryers recalled

According to a release from the U.S. Consumer Products Safety Commission, two million COSORI air fryers have been recalled by Atekcity due to fire and burn hazards. “A wire connection in the air fryers can overheat, posing fire and burn hazards,” the release said.

About 2 million units have been sold in the United States, in addition to 250,000 in Canada and 21,000 in Mexico.

The voluntary recall comes after “205 reports of the air fryers catching fire, burning, melting, overheating and smoking,” resulting in “reports of minor, superficial burn injuries and … reports of minor property damage.”

The affected air fryers were sold between June 2018 and December 2022, according to the release. This recall involves over 15 units/model numbers. 

Anyone who’s purchased the product should contact Cosori via email, phone or through their website in order to get more information on the recall and inquire about a replacement; the “remedy” on the release notes that all “consumers should immediately stop using the recalled air fryers.”


Want more great food writing and recipes? Subscribe to Salon Food’s newsletter, The Bite.


COSORI itself released a statement, saying “After a thorough investigation, we determined that in extremely rare circumstances, the closed-end crimp connectors within the recalled air fryers – which are responsible for establishing electrical connections between certain wires – can overheat, posing fire and burn hazards,” 

COSORI’s website also writes: “As one of the leading air fryer brands in the U.S., COSORI puts consumer safety first. In cooperation with the U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission, Health Canada, and Mexico Procuraduría Federal del Consumidor (Profeco), COSORI is voluntarily recalling and replacing certain models of our air fryers. To register for a replacement, please visit www.recall.cosori.com or contact the toll-free recall support hotline at 888-216-5974 Monday – Friday, 8 am – 5 pm EST.”

The recall webpage also states “COSORI is committed to the safety of those who use and love our products, and we sincerely apologize for any inconvenience.”

Critics decry “fascist” GOP bill that would “cancel” Florida Democratic Party

A Republican lawmaker in Florida has proposed a bill that would effectively dismantle the Democratic Party, a move that would disenfranchise millions of voters in the state.

Senate Bill 1248, sponsored by Republican state Senator Blaise Ingoglia, is titled “The Ultimate Cancel Act,” a reference to right-wing grievances about so-called cancel culture.

The bill doesn’t mention the Democratic Party by name, but seeks to “immediately cancel the filings of a political party, to include its registration and approved status as a political party, if the party’s platform has previously advocated for, or been in support of, slavery or involuntary servitude.”

Early in its history, the Democratic Party fought to preserve the institution of slavery and to uphold other vehicles of white supremacy, including Jim Crow laws in the South after the Civil War. Partway through the 20th century, however, the platforms and voting blocs of the two major political parties underwent a dramatic shift; in the years since, Republicans have actively campaigned to disenfranchise Black voters and to suppress any acknowledgment of the ongoing effects of slavery and racism in the U.S.

Indeed, Republicans in Florida, led by Gov. Ron DeSantis, R, recently passed laws to restrict educators from teaching factual accounts of Black history in the U.S. — a move that many scholars and activists say is proto-fascist.

Ingoglia himself has defended preserving racist relics of Florida’s past. In 2016, for example, he was among a handful of Republicans who voted against removing a statue of Edmund Kirby Smith, a Confederate Civil War general whose family enslaved Black people.

If Ingoglia’s bill were to become law, it would effectively end the Democratic Party altogether, preventing millions of Floridians from participating in primary elections. Florida is a closed-primary state, meaning that a person has to declare themselves a member of a political party in order to vote in the primaries. If the bill passes, the status of registered Democrats in Florida would automatically change to unaffiliated, shutting them out of the voting process to select candidates for the general election.

“Presenting a bill that would disenfranchise 5 million voters is both unconstitutional and unserious,” a statement from the Florida Democratic Party said.

Nikki Fried, chair of the state’s Democratic Party, condemned the legislation in a separate statement.

“Shame on the radical Republican party for initiating some type of a piece of legislation of this magnitude,” Fried said. “This is what a dictator does. This is what a fascist does.”

Introducing the first-ever, sort-of-annual Bulls**t Awards: Not just for Republicans!

I woke up to see snow in the mountains north of the San Fernando Valley. I am told it is a rare occurrence.

I don’t know. I was told Donald Trump was a rare occurrence too, and now we’ve got him and Ron DeSantis. They seem to be part of a metastatic cancer. In his last news conference at the White House, Joe Biden said — with a wee bit of a smile on his face — that he looked forward to watching Trump and DeSantis have at each other.

Me? I’ve never liked mud wrestling, but some have the taste for it and others like to watch it.

Speaking of “watching,” those who watch Fox News were reminded again last week that most of its “news” is nothing but fiction. Tucker Carlson and Sean Hannity discussed trying to get Fox White House reporter Jacqui Heinrich fired because she fact-checked Donald Trump. In other words, she did her job. Carlson and Hannity did not. Yet so far, management at Fox has apparently done nothing to reprimand either man for undermining the foundations of our democracy by promoting lies that led to an insurrection.

The fallout from this is ongoing: My former White House comrade Jim Acosta has been trending on social media for calling Fox out as a “bullshit factory.”

Jim is masterful at understatement. Fox is actually more like a cancer on the media landscape.

If you had told me at the beginning of 2016 that in a mere four years you could undo 50 years of social progress, I would have recommended that you put down the crack pipe.

Shows you what I know. In Kentucky they’re talking about banning drag shows. In Florida they’re refusing to teach history while trying to shut down Disney World. In Texas — well, hell, Texas has always been anally retentive when it comes to social issues, so nothing new there. Handguns are cheap and plentiful.

Maybe the next evolution of man, if we don’t blow ourselves up, will include the ability to better detect and isolate bullshit. It is, after all, a survival issue.

In the meantime, you can rest assured that Fox News isn’t the only source for bullshit in the Washington, D.C., area. My father, a very successful car salesman and no stranger to bullshit, used to say, “With all the bullshit in D.C., there’s got to be a loose herd around somewhere.”

Trump and his continued grifting guarantees that the bullshit keeps spreading.

So in recognition of that pervasive bullshit, let me be the first to announce the semi-regular Bullshit Awards. They are given to politicians and other miscreants in the public eye who deserve recognition for their invaluable service to the low art of subtle and blatant bullshit, meaning a dedication to spreading deception while sometimes being the victim of the same. These are high honors for lowbrows. Moos for the cows. But it remains my joyful responsibility to remind everyone just how full of bullshit these folks actually are.


Want a daily wrap-up of all the news and commentary Salon has to offer? Subscribe to our morning newsletter, Crash Course.


So with no further ado, dim the lights, open the curtains and let us begin:

First we have the Clueless Bullshit award, which goes to those who don’t recognize their own bullshit. This is for those who label themselves as “woke” when they are not, the self-proclaimed “alpha males” who are nothing of the sort and those who want to ban books, erase the past, re-edit old novels and movies to remove “offensive” material — and anyone who believes the NFL or Major League Baseball is better with clocks, replays, larger bases or smaller shoulder pads. It’s all bullshit.

Next is the Victim Bullshit award. I’d be remiss in my duties if I didn’t call out Harry and Megan for being so full of bullshit that they’d consider suing “South Park” for satire. Harry called his self-pitying autobiography “Spare.” Big deal. He’s a spare king used to living in privilege and unaware of what it means to fight for survival. The South Park parody of his book, “Waaagh!”, is more accurate. 

Prince Harry, Duke of SussexPrince Harry, Duke of Sussex (Chris Jackson/Getty Images)

And, of course, a Golden Calf Bullshit award goes to those Christians who won’t embrace Jimmy Carter. The former president is in hospice care, facing the end of a long life in public service and putting himself on the line for his fellow human beings. He served on a nuclear submarine, and has spent most of his life in the same home he and his wife owned before he became president.  He spent years building homes for the poor through Habitat for Humanity, saying his Christian beliefs told him to do everything he could for everyone he could with whatever he could for as long as he could. Most American evangelicals embrace Donald Trump. Bullshit. Those folks have earned a Stupid Dumbass Bullshit award.

Speaking of Trump, he remains the flatulent, corpulent aging steer sitting at the top of the bullshit — the apex bullshitter. He continues to proclaim his innocence and his superior intellect, and revises history to suit whatever argument he is making at the time. He receives the coveted Silver Steer award for his bullshit efforts.

A Mini-Me Bullshit award goes to Ron DeSantis, who while proving to be smarter than Trump (at least in some ways) has the charisma of roadkill and the smell of a dead skunk in the middle of the road. (That’s a reference to an obscure song lyric — actually, DeSantis is so far to the right he’s off the road). He mimics Trump’s fascism in every move he makes, but takes it even further as he tries to turn the state of Florida into a Disney version of Germany in 1937. 

Ron DeSantis; Donald TrumpRon DeSantis and Donald Trump (Photo illustration by Salon/Getty Images)

Speaking of Disney, a Dumbo Bullshit award goes out to Marjorie Taylor Greene, who says she was “attacked” recently while dining at a local restaurant. She claims everyone is entitled to a quiet dinner with friends and family without being verbally assaulted. She is right on that one, but she’s full of bullshit because she’s never extended that courtesy to victims of mass shootings, or to the president of the United States while he delivers the State of the Union address. The problem with calling out Greene for this award is that she has ingested and regurgitated so much bullshit that you can’t tell if she is crafting the stuff or has become its human embodiment, actively decaying in real time.

Another Dumbo Bullshit award goes out to George Santos. Poor old George is so full of bullshit his eyes are brown, as my pop used to say. He is so divorced from reality he thinks bullshit is filet mignon. He is Marjorie Taylor Greene on bullshit steroids. 

A final Dumbo Bullshit award goes to Matt Gaetz, who quoted actual Chinese propaganda in a congressional hearing this week. He also earns special acknowledgment as probably being too stupid to realize how stupid he is.

A Holy Shit Bullshit award goes to Kevin McCarthy, who apparently made a deal to turn over 40,000 hours of surveillance video from the Jan. 6 insurrection to Tucker “Bullshit” Carlson. This will also become known as the “Fox in the Henhouse” award for future reference.

Joe Biden; Kevin McCarthyU.S. President Joe Biden delivers the State of the Union address to a joint session of Congress as House Speaker Kevin McCarthy (R-CA) listen on February 7, 2023 in the House Chamber of the U.S. Capitol in Washington, DC. (Jacquelyn Martin-Pool/Getty Images)

A Perennial Bullshit award goes out to the Department of Justice for pursuing Julian Assange. At this writing Donald Trump remains unindicted, while the DOJ spends money trying to extradite Assange from Britain because he published information obtained by Chelsea Manning. The DOJ once again proves it’s more interested in pursuing those who provide factual information about our government’s misdeeds than in punishing those guilty of the misdeeds. Bullshit.

A special “C’mon Man” Bullshit award goes to Joe Biden for saying on the campaign trail that he’d do something about the murder of Jamal Khashoggi — and then doing nothing.

The Rookie of the Year Bullshit award goes to House Oversight Committee Chairman James Comer of Kentucky for his crusade against Hunter Biden while ignoring Trump’s misdeeds. Kurt Bardella, who worked for that committee when Republicans were in the majority during the Obama years, said in an op-ed for MSNBC this week, “This glaring act of hypocrisy once again undermines the legitimacy of the committee’s activities.”

An Epic Bullshit award is granted to the right-wing justices of the U.S. Supreme Court for overturning Roe v. Wade. Let’s give them a hand, folks. It takes a lot of cunning and cowardice to overturn 50 years of established law regarding human health rights because you claim your version of God told you to. 

Neil Gorsuch; Brett Kavanaugh; Amy Coney Barrett; Samuel Alito; Clarence ThomasUS Supreme Court Associate Justices Neil Gorsuch, Brett Kavanaugh, Amy Coney Barrett, Samuel Alito and Clarence Thomas. (Photo illustration by Salon/Erin Schaff-Pool/Getty Images)

A regional Rainbow Bullshit award goes out to every state legislature currently crafting legislation to ban or limit drag shows under the pretense of protecting children, while failing to address the need to ban guns — a much bigger threat to kids than cross-dressing and wearing makeup. Check out a drag show, people. My wife and I have never been to a bad one. 

Of course the same Christians opposed to drag shows are often the same Christians who turn their preteen daughters into sex symbols at youth beauty pageants. Those folks have earned the Double Bullshit award for hypocrisy.

A Possible Bullshit award (is that a bull fart?) goes to Director of National Intelligence Avril Haines, who, according to published reports, has determined that the “Havana Syndrome” is “very unlikely” to have been caused by foreign foes. Instead, she says all those symptoms were probably the result of “pre-existing conditions, conventional illnesses and environmental factors.”

She could actually clear all that up if her office would respond to a FOIA request I filed a year ago. But since the intelligence bureaucracy refuses to be transparent, Haines can say anything she wants and we cannot prove otherwise.

Finally — a drum roll please — it’s time for the Golden Perennial Bullshit award. It was close, folks, but the anticipation is now over. Those who are idly rich among us can rest easy. The top trophy is yours — as it has been for millennia. The award goes to the eager oligarchs and the 0.1 percenters who have sold supply-side economics to the masses for 40 years, destroying pensions, unions, mental health care and prenatal care, while also making sure that the U.S. is at the ass-end of family leave when we do have children.

Man with Cash (Getty/kali9)

Oh, but wait, Hank! We have a special award for the idle rich as well: The rare Double Dumbass award will be presented by William Shatner after he sings his version of Elton John’s “Rocket Man.” Bill, come on down and hand it out to the ultra-rich who continue to make bank while the rest of us fight over issues that ultimately don’t matter. Donald Trump is just the tip of the grift — and we’re all the suckers.

That about covers it from here. Let’s take a short commercial break, where another bullshit artist will try to sell you a product you don’t need but will end up wanting anyway.

We’ll be back with sports and weather, and finish up the broadcast with a funny feature story about a guy with a beard made of honeybees.

And as the anchors say, “Have a pleasant tomorrow.”

“Charges against Trump are coming”: Experts say Kellyanne may be key witness in Manhattan DA probe

Prosecutors at the Manhattan district attorney’s office recently met with Kellyanne Conway, who served as campaign manager and White House adviser to former President Donald Trump.

Prosecutors met with Conway on Wednesday in their probe of Trump’s role in a $130,000 hush money payment to adult film star Stormy Daniels during the 2016 campaign in the latest sign the office is “ramping up” its criminal investigation, according to The New York Times.

Former Trump fixer Michael Cohen, who pleaded guilty to campaign finance violations related to the payment, said he was reimbursed by the former president. Cohen also named Conway as the person he alerted after making the payment in the final days of the 2016 campaign.

“I called Trump to confirm that the transaction was completed, and the documentation all in place, but he didn’t take my call — obviously a very bad sign, in hindsight,” Cohen wrote in his 2020 book. Instead, Conway “called and said she’d pass along the good news,” he added.

Conway is the latest in the parade of witnesses to meet with prosecutors in recent weeks after Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg impaneled a new grand jury in January to hear evidence related to the hush money payment. Other witnesses who have testified include Trump Organization officials Jeffrey McConney and Deborah Tarasoff as well as David Pecker and Dylan Howard — two former leaders of the National Enquirer, which helped arrange the hush money deal. Daniels’ former attorney Keith Davidson has also testified, according to the report.

The questioning of the “central players” in the matter suggests that Bragg is “nearing a decision” on whether to seek an indictment against Trump, according to the Times. But the report added that neither Cohen nor Daniels have testified before the grand jury and Conway may not be the last 2016 campaign official to face questioning.

Trump has denied having an affair with Daniels and rejected any allegations of wrongdoing, accusing prosecutors of a politically-motivated witch hunt.

Prosecutors are looking at whether Trump played a role in falsifying business records related to the hush money payment, which the Trump Organization falsely reported as legal expenses to Cohen. In order to charge Trump with a felony, Bragg would have to show that Trump was involved in the matter to commit or conceal a second crime – in this case a violation of state election laws, a legal theory that has not been tested, according to the report. Trump could face up to four years in prison if convicted.

The case would also rely on testimony from Cohen, who pleaded guilty to an array of federal crimes in 2018 – which Trump’s lawyers would likely try to use to undermine Cohen’s testimony.


Want a daily wrap-up of all the news and commentary Salon has to offer? Subscribe to our morning newsletter, Crash Course.


Conway, who continued to speak with Trump and remains friends with former first lady Melania Trump, according to the Times, has continued to defend the former president in the media but has been willing to publicly acknowledge his shortcomings. Conway in a New York Times op-ed in January warned that Trump’s 2024 presidential bid may not be able to “outrun the mountain of legal woes” he faces.

Conway, who left the White House in 2020, previously testified to the House Jan. 6 committee that she tried to get through to Trump during the Capitol riot and even tried reaching out to Melania Trump because Trump “reserves fear” for her.

Conway in her testimony called Jan. 6 a “terrible day” and in a media interview expressed disappointment that Trump did not act sooner to call off the mob of “marauders and murderers.” Transcripts from her Jan. 6 committee interview also show that she dismissed Trump’s plan to litigate his election loss.

MSNBC legal analyst Lisa Rubin said Conway’s Jan. 6 testimony suggests “she’s been calling it like she sees it.”

“That makes me think that as a witness, she won’t apologize for believing in Trump’s agenda or even in him,” Rubin tweeted. “Don’t expect any 180 in her political philosophy. But I also don’t think she’ll lie or shill for him–and you’d better believe she has a skilled lawyer not paid by Trump.”

Former federal prosecutor Andrew Weissmann, who served on former special counsel Bob Mueller’s team, called the report that prosecutors interviewed Conway an “interesting development.”

“Evidence could tie the payments to election concerns vs solely a concern about personal blowback from Melania,” he wrote on Twitter. “And she can corroborate – or not – Cohen’s account that he spoke to Conway about the payments and she purported to pass on Cohen’s info to Trump.”

Along with the Manhattan DA probe, Trump could also face legal jeopardy in Georgia’s Fulton County, where a special grand jury investigating his efforts to overturn his election loss in the state recently recommended about a dozen indictments, according to the grand jury forewoman. DA Fani Willis will decide whether to present the evidence to a regular grand jury, which could make charging decisions.

“Make no mistake: Charges against Trump are coming from the Manhattan DA for 2016 election wrongdoing to complement those from the Atlanta DA for 2020 election wrongdoing,” predicted Norm Eisen, an attorney who served as the Democratic co-counsel during Trump’s first impeachment. “And soon!”

Kentucky floodwaters are rising again, and activists blame strip mines

Heavy rain has once again brought flash floods to eastern Kentucky, a region still reeling from last summer’s deadly inundations — which social justice advocates say were exacerbated by the environmental destruction wrought by decades of strip mining.  

At least one person died in the latest torrents, which followed a storm that dropped more than 3 inches of rain on some communities beginning Thursday. Rising water stranded motorists, prompted road closures, and led to several rescues. It was an eerie reminder of last summer’s deluges, which caused historically high waters, led to the deaths of dozens of residents, and damaged thousands of homes.

Social justice and environmental groups in Kentucky say those impacts were aggravated by the state’s long history of strip mining and lax oversight of an industry with no regard for the damage they’ve wrought or accountability to the communities dealing with the long-term consequences.

Last week, the social justice organization Kentuckians for the Commonwealth sent a letter to the U.S. Interior Department requesting a review of the effectiveness of regulations governing strip mining that go back nearly 50 years. The group says it has gathered evidence showing a correlation between 36 of the 43 verified drowning deaths and their location downstream from large-scale strip mines at the head of local valleys.

The organization wants the Office of Surface Mining and Reclamation, a branch of the Interior Department, to launch an investigation into how the state’s actions — and inactions — to enforce surface mine regulations contributed to the high death toll. The letter also notest that, according to the American Red Cross, the flooding damaged or destroyed more than 1,600 homes.

Steve Peake lives in the eastern Kentucky town of Fleming-Neon, which sits downstream of several abandoned strip-mining sites. His home was heavily damaged last summer as torrential rains battered the region, causing the creek adjacent to his home to overrun its banks and flood his property beneath nearly two feet of water.

“I’m 70 years old and never seen anything like that,” he told Grist. “In all my years we’ve had floods, I guess five or six floods, but the water never got out of the bank.” It took volunteers from around the country two days to clear the mud and water from his home.   

Eastern Kentucky has a long and complex relationship with the coal industry. While few coal mining companies still operate there, the landscape bears the scars of strip mining, which carved away many of the mountain ridges at the head of populated valleys, leaving thousands of acres of land devoid of trees and healthy topsoil. That allows heavy rain to rush down the slopes toward the communities below. According to Kentuckians for the Commonwealth, many of the towns most heavily impacted by last summer’s floods are located where strip mining activity was most prominent.  

Over a century ago, following the discovery of coal in Kentucky and the broader Appalachian region, speculators traveled through the region with broad form deeds — legal documents that allowed the deed holder to extract mineral resources from beneath a parcel of land — and convinced many residents to sign them. That effectively severed landowners’ relationships to any mineral riches beneath the surface of their property.  

Yet coal mine operators were not legally bound to restore the land, either by replanting trees or replacing the topsoil, nor obligated to compensate landowners for property damage caused by the extraction of coal. In the 1960s, as strip mining technology developed, Kentucky courts further cemented the privileges of mining holders by granting them the right to extract coal through any method they deemed appropriate.

Organizations like Kentuckians for the Commonwealth have for nearly 50 years fought for stronger regulation of the mining industry and its environmental impacts, but have made little headway since 1977, when President Jimmy Carter signed the federal Surface Mine Control and Reclamation Act. The law reiterated the importance of underground coal mining in meeting the nation’s energy needs at the time, but also took steps to regulate and inspect coal mines and acknowledged the inherent hazards they posed to the environment and communities. The law required mining companies to restore land to its approximate original state after extracting the resource.

But enforcement was left to the states. Activists and former regulators say state authorities have been far too lenient in holding mining companies accountable for the environmental damage they’ve wrought and its lingering impacts.

“The mining operators walk away, and years later there’s erosion and it’s nobody’s fault,” Davie Ransdell, a former state mine inspector in Kentucky, told Grist.

Peake put it even more plainly, saying, “They don’t plant trees or anything to hold the soil back.” Those responsible for the damage to his community, and his home, are long gone, leaving him to deal with the mess. He tries not to get too nervous when the forecast calls for storms, even as he monitors the flood warnings issued by local radio stations and worries about his 27-year-old daughter, who has Downs syndrome.

“She’s looking out the window,” he said, “and wondering if it’s going to start raining.”


This article originally appeared in Grist at https://grist.org/article/kentucky-floodwaters-are-rising-again-and-activists-blame-strip-mines/.

Grist is a nonprofit, independent media organization dedicated to telling stories of climate solutions and a just future. Learn more at Grist.org

Stop mocking Marjorie Taylor Greene

Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene wants you to laugh at her. In fact, your laughter and mocking are among the Georgia Republican’s greatest weapons.

Laughter is a type of dismissive behavior. Moreover, many people laugh when they are scared, hysterical or in denial. To laugh at someone is to not take them seriously. Laughter is also a way of gratifying one’s ego and asserting some type of superiority. When one laughs or mocks a person they generally assume that the other person cares or is somehow vulnerable to such acts.

Marjorie Taylor Greene wore a white dress to Biden’s State of the Union address in an attempt to look like “the Chinese spy balloon”. People laughed at her. She heckled President Biden during his State of the Union address. People laughed at and condemned her tacky and crass behavior.

Marjorie Taylor Greene does not care.

Her fans in MAGAland do not care about such laughter and condemnation – in fact, they view such behavior as validation and encouragement. The laughter is kin to the “liberal tears” they love to drink until they soil themselves.

Greene has shown herself to be a white supremacist, a white Christian nationalist, and a white victimologist. She is also an antisemitic conspiracist who believes in “Jewish space lasers”, “globalists” and QAnon (which is just an updated version of blood libel and the Protocols of the Elders of Zion). The laughter and mocking have not dissuaded her from such beliefs and behavior.

Republicans, for their part, have rewarded her antics. With the GOP takeover of the House of Representatives, Greene is now a member of the Committee on Homeland Security and one of the most powerful members of Congress. The laughter did not stop her rise to power.

He who laughs last laughs loudest. The laughter of Marjorie Taylor Greene and the other American fascists will be very deafening indeed.

The laughter did not stop her seditious machinations and coup plotting. Greene is an insurrectionist who supported Jan. 6, and in total is an enemy of democracy who, per the Constitution, should be removed from office.

In an essay at The Atlantic, Seyward Darby warns:

So please, don’t laugh at Greene. Be angry at her choice. Be angry that she encouraged violence against her Democratic colleagues. Be angry that so many Americans agree with her. There is nothing funny about who Greene is, what she stands for, or what she and other conspiracists are capable of. 

Greene is now threatening a second Civil War (what she and other Republicans have euphemistically described as a “national divorce“).

None of this is funny.

Greene is claiming that she was misunderstood and that she is the real “victim”. Such a tactic is textbook stochastic terrorism: the threat is made and then denials are issued after the message is circulated and received by the members of the public who are being radicalized into political violence and terrorism. It follows a much larger pattern of right-wing threats of political violence and a second civil.

As part of her threats of a second Civil War, Greene also threatened to take away the civil rights of people from “blue states” who dare to move to “red state” America, in essence treating them as potential enemies and a fifth column, who should not be allowed to vote for 5 years until they demonstrate their loyalty to the new order.

Destroying the Union and creating a 21st-century Confederacy has long been a fantasy, threat, and goal of white supremacists, neo confederates and other members of the white right and those who are allied with them.

Peter Wehner, also at the Atlantic, sounds this alarm:

[I]f Republicans call Greene out, they will offer only gentle rebukes. Mostly, they’ll want to ignore her comments, change the topic, and try to redirect attention to Democrats. During the past half a dozen years, Republicans have perfected whataboutism.

What the rest of us learned during the Trump era is that a party led by craven men and women—some of them cynical, others true believers, almost all afraid to speak out—will end up normalizing the transgressive, unethical, and moronic.

As Wehner notes, the mainstream pundit class largely rejected and mocked Greene’s threats of a second Civil War. Several “traditional” Republicans even issued their obligatory condemnations. In keeping with the constant (and irresponsible) churn of the 24/7 news cycle, most of the political class and chattering class have moved on from her most recent “controversy.” Collectively, the response to Greene was dismissive. Some observers tried to rebut Greene by showing how the logistics of a second Civil War and secession are unworkable. The lazy mainstream media types defaulted to their usual horserace journalism, polls, and catch-all “culture war” framework. In all, Greene’s civil war threats were treated by the mainstream news media and political class as just another moment, the traffic-generating and clickbait outrage of the day instead of as something far more serious.

To simply move on from Marjorie Taylor Greene’s threats is emblematic of a much larger failure by the mainstream news media – the centrists especially – and the larger political class with their slavish commitment to normal politics and empirical reality to accept and understand that the neofascists and other right-wing authoritarians and fake populists are engaged in a political project that emphasizes ideas, emotions, and dreams in service to a radically destructive revolutionary project to remake American and Western society. Such forces reject the consensus reality that the liberal democratic tradition and its adherents are wedded to. And while liberals and democrats and traditional conservatives appeal to public policy and material reality the neofascists and their forces only care about corrupt power and wield emotions in a battle over culture and identity.

Time is malleable in this vision as well; History is to be broken and rewritten and remade in service to the neofascist dream. In the book Proud Boys and the White Ethnostate, historian Alexandra Minna Stern explains:

If examples of the civil rights and feminist movements of the 1960s are mentioned, it is to reproach them as conjurers of the falsehood that diversity is good and racial equality is an achievable and desirable goal. To upstream a white national future, alt-right writers somehow must downstream the past, one that is not in sync with mainstream, let alone progressive renditions of American history.

Alt-righters employ nonlinear conceptions of time when interpreting political events and the viability of white nationalism going forward…The obsession with time is a crucial dimension of the alt-right imagination. As the temporal horizon closes in and speeds up, white nationalists want to push a primordial past and a techno-utopian future into a present they feel is both slipping out of their hands and perhaps within close reach.

So what is the world that Marjorie Taylor Greene and other Republicans want to (re)create in the 21st century?

The Confederacy.


Want a daily wrap-up of all the news and commentary Salon has to offer? Subscribe to our morning newsletter, Crash Course.


America’s native form of fascism, the Confederacy offered a white supremacist terror and surveillance society where white “Christian” men rule over all others uncontested and ordained by “God’s” will. The 21st-century Confederacy, like the original, would also be a plutocracy where the white rich and monied classes would control society without restrictions or limits. Black people, other non-whites, women, gays and lesbians, and any people deemed the Other and “inferior” to “real Americans” would have their human and civil rights taken away.

The neo-confederate ideology is rooted in a fantasy-lie of what is known as the Lost Cause where the evils of the American slaveocracy and its horrible violence and the South’s traitorous secession to defend that ignoble institution is imagined as something good and noble and whose defenders were heroic instead of as agents of an antihuman white supremacist terror regime.

At its foundation, Greene’s endorsement of a “national divorce” and second Civil War is a threat of white supremacist violence –the first civil war killed some 750,000 Americans – against Black people and others who would be targeted for death, re-enslavement, and misery on a massive scale.

We have just experienced a nightmare here in America (and the world) where what many “centrists” and “mainstream” political thinkers and voices said was impossible came true. If someone in 2015 or 2016 had told you that a professional wrestling heel, fake billionaire, willful ignoramus, white supremacist cult leader and TV host, a man credibly accused of rape many times, a failed casino owner and real estate developer, con artist would become president of the United States, make choices in response to a pandemic that would kill at least a million Americans, bring the country and its democracy to a breaking point, attempt a coup, surrender America’s interests to its enemies such as Russia, commit an endless number of serious crimes while in office, be impeached twice and almost win reelection, and then announce a second presidential candidacy all the while not being held responsible for his crimes many people would – and did — mock any person willing to say such a thing. They labeled it “Trump derangement” syndrome. We all know what happened next.

Public opinion polls and other research show that a majority of Republicans believe in the white supremacist great replacement conspiracy theory. A version of fears about “white extinction” and “Black domination” were common across White America during the antebellum era and were a driving force behind the South’s secession and then the end of Reconstruction and the rise of Jim and Jane Crow.

Other polls show not insignificant levels of support among Republicans for the Confederacy and a belief that secession was justified. Political scientists and other researchers have repeatedly shown that a plurality, if not outright majority of Republican voters, support Trump’s coup attempt on Jan 6 and the terrorist attack on the Capitol. That research also shows that many millions of Trumpists and Republicans and right-wing independents support using political violence to remove President Biden and the Democrats from office in order to restore Trump’s regime.

On Jan. 6 Trump’s shock troops overran the Capitol and they carried the Confederate flag — which is a symbol of white supremacy — while doing so. During the first Civil War, the Confederates never achieved such a thing, but their descendants did so only two years ago.

Marjorie Taylor Greene and the other Republican fascists and the larger white right and their allies are very dangerous. Your laughter does not change that fact. Your laughter will not save you from them or the new American nightmare they are forcing into being. He who laughs last laughs loudest. The laughter of Marjorie Taylor Greene and the other American fascists will be very deafening indeed.

Rupert Murdoch usually settles his many lawsuits — so why is he toughing out the Dominion case?

Rupert Murdoch is no stranger to getting sued. His international media company, News Corp, often finds itself at the center of gruesome scandals stemming from Murdoch’s freewheeling attitude about journalistic and business ethics. A defamation lawsuit from Dominion Voting Systems against Fox News, Murdoch’s biggest American company, is but the latest example on his long history of being on the receiving end of righteous litigation. A little over a decade ago, for instance, Murdoch’s British newspapers were embroiled in a sprawling case of journalistic malfeseance involving hacking the phones of politicians, celebrities and even crime victims in order to publish stolen materials. News Corp ended up settling out of court with hundreds of victims, including actor Hugh Grant and soccer star Wayne Rooney. 

Then there’s the long history of Fox News settling sexual harassment cases out of court, often saddling victims with non-disclosure agreements. All told, the cost of those settlements is believed to have topped a whopping $200 million for Murdoch’s company. The company has also paid staggering settlements in less-sexy but still damning cases involving anti-trust laws and corporate mismanagement. What Murdoch has paid out in lawsuit settlements may top the GDP of many a small nation. 

The court filings have been so bad that it may finally destroy the mainstream media myth that the network deserves to be treated like a journalistic operation. 

“Settlement” is the key word here. What this long history of litigation shows is that Murdoch sees paying off his various victims as the price of doing business. His company is sleazy and he often doesn’t even try to deny it. When it’s accountability time, Murdoch just whips out his checkbook to make the problem go away. He’s one of the richest men in the United States, and can buy his way out of most kinds of trouble, after all. 


Want more Amanda Marcotte on politics? Subscribe to her newsletter Standing Room Only.


All of which is why it’s surprising that he hasn’t yet offered to settle out of court with Dominion. It’s certainly not because Dominion has a weak case against Fox News. As two weeks of court filings show, the ballot machine manufacturer has amassed an impressive amount of evidence that the leadership at Fox News, both its executives and famous hosts, were well aware that they were misleading their audiences by repeatedly suggesting the 2020 election was stolen from Donald Trump by President Joe Biden. They knew Big Lie promoters like Sydney Powell and Rudy Giuliani were talking pure nonsense, but presented them as expert sources anyway. 

Murdoch himself has had to sit for a deposition, in which he came across as a comic book villain. At one point, when asked why he kept platforming conspiracy theorist Mike Lindell, even knowing that Lindell’s election claims were ridiculouslly false, he replied, “It is not red or blue, it is green.” The court filings have been so bad that it may finally destroy the mainstream media myth that the network deserves to be treated like a journalistic operation. 

Yes, Dominion is asking for $1.6 billion, which is a big number by most reasonable standards. Still, that’s likely not why Murdoch seems willing to take his chances in court. He’s settled similarly huge cases before, and often for a fraction of what the plaintiffs were asking. The Murdoch family is worth over $17 billion. Fox News makes about $14 billion in revenue in a year. So it might make a lot of financial sense to try to settle this out of court, especially as there’s a real threat that more court filings will result in more brand-damaging media coverage. 

In light of all this, I suspect the reason Murdoch and Fox News seem determined to stick this out is that they are just that worried about what impact an admission of wrongdoing would have on their reputation with their audience. The possibility of a jury ruling in their favor, which they could spin as a total exoneration of their tactics, is so important to them that they’re willing to take a big risk that the opposite could happen. A settlement, however, would remove all doubt about who was in the wrong. 


Want more Amanda Marcotte on politics? Subscribe to her newsletter Standing Room Only.


That Fox News is very worried about this lawsuit is not hard to surmise. I’ve written critically about the network for years. I rarely, if ever, hear a peep from their communications department. Yet every time I write about the Dominion lawsuit, I now promptly get an email from the network’s press office stressing that this case “would prevent journalists from basic reporting” and is “a blatant violation of the First Amendment.”

Fox News leadership is genuinely worried that their viewers will perceive them as a propaganda outlet, instead of a news organization.

Of course, as the Dominion filings showed, internal machinations at Fox News were precisely about how to prevent journalists from conducting basic reporting. Tucker Carlson demanded the firing of a Fox reporter for reporting the simple fact of the election outcome. The latest filing quotes Murdoch himself suggesting firing a data analyst for correctly reporting that Biden had won the Arizona election. It’s telling that Fox News puts so much pressure on journalists, even when it’s just opinion writing. It suggests they’re incredibly worried that this lawsuit really could damage them in the eyes of the only people they clearly care about: MAGA. 

Trump himself is, in many ways, the typical Fox viewer: Elderly, obsessed with his baseless grievances, and hostile to anything resembling reality-based journalism. His response to all this has been telling. Unsurprisingly, he has a sociopath’s lack of remorse for getting Fox News into this situation in the first place, by making the Big Lie a thing their audience wanted to hear more of. Instead, he’s been raving on Truth Social about “how weak and ineffective Fox News is” and how they should defend themselves instead by doubling down on the lies, but this time in a court setting. 

They’re probably not going to do that, because that’s committing perjury. The company has enough legal headaches already from doing Trump’s bidding. But there may be some wisdom, albeit of the totally cynical sort, in the strategy of being seen by their audience as putting up a fight, rather than settling out of court. That creates the room for Fox to paint themselves as hapless victims and continue the pretense that what they’re doing is “journalism.” As Erik Wemple of the Washington Post notes, it’s “an arduous legal undertaking” to meet the standard of defamation against a media outlet. Dominion has done a remarkable job of it, yet the standard is so high that it may still prove to be an impossible undertaking. If that happens, Fox News can take that victory to viewers and pretend it fully exonerates them of being deliberate purveyors of disinformation. 

Or, to boil it all down: What this all suggests is that Fox News leadership is genuinely worried that their viewers will perceive them as a propaganda outlet, instead of a news organization. Why that bothers them is hard to suss out. As the court filings show, the leadership of Fox News felt pressure from their audience to downplay actual facts and play up conspiracy theories. It feels like theirs is not an audience who cares about facts, or even the illusion of facts. But watching Fox’s machinations around this case, it seems that they believe keeping up the pretense that they are “news” matters to their viewers, even if no one actually believes it.