Spring Sale: Get 1 Year, Save 58%

Inspired by a classic cocktail, these 3-ingredient chocolate cupcakes are unbelievably easy to make

May I confess something? I was skeptical. I’m a columnist who serves up simplified recipes and shortcuts for exhausted cooks every week, but even I thought the internet-famous “soda cake” sounded questionable.

The concept is simple, and only requires two ingredients are required. You grab a box of cake mix and a can of cola, mix them together and voilà — actual cake! 

But I’ve seen enough Ann Reardon videos to know that most viral food hacks lead to inedible messes. More than that, however, I’m highly skeptical of anything that cuts the fat out of an otherwise-decent food such as cake.

Fat is delicious. Fat conducts flavor. So, when I see a recipe for something like “Diet Coke Cake” that swaps the eggs and oil for zero-calorie cola, I tend to be a hard pass. To paraphrase Nigella, low-fat cake isn’t the answer, whatever the question.

What ultimately swayed me, you ask? Another ingredient that typically doesn’t have a lot of fat: booze.

I’m a low-effort drinker. I like wine and beer, and I pretty much only drink cocktails that contain ampersands. Campari & Soda. Gin & Tonic. Rum & Coke. 

Rum & Coke sometimes gets a bad rap, but when I recently stumbled upon a recipe for soda cake that included a generous spike of rum extract, my attention spiked. 


Want more great food writing and recipes? Subscribe to “The Bite,” Salon Food’s newsletter.


I’m shocked that this actually works. The resulting cake is crumblier — because duh, it doesn’t have the fat! — but it’s good. It tastes like cake is supposed to taste.

With that added whiff of rum and the vaguely spicy undertone of cola, it’s also got something extra that makes it truly stand out.

It’s subtle, unlike the bracing hit you get from a rum cake, but the flavor is there. I still love eggs and oil, but this is so remarkably flavorful and embarrassingly easy that I’d make it again even without the rum.

For an accidentally vegan experience, you can dust the finished cupcakes with powdered sugar. (Don’t forget to double-check the ingredients on the box of cake mix, as well.) I frost mine . . . because I have to draw the line somewhere.

***

Inspired by Betty Crocker and Cupcakes and Cutlery

Rum & Coke Cupcakes

 

Yields
24 servings
Prep Time
 10 minutes
Cook Time
 15-18 minutes

Ingredients

  • 1 box chocolate cake mix
  • 12 ounces cola
  • 2 teaspoons rum extract
  • Frosting of choice (optional)

 

Directions

  1. Preheat the oven to 350 degrees. Meanwhile, line two muffin tins with cupcake liners.
  2. In a large bowl, beat the cake mix, cola and rum extract with an electric hand mixer on low speed for 1 minute, then on medium speed for 2 minutes.

  3. Divide the batter between the muffin tins.

  4. Bake 15 to 18 minutes, checking after 15.

  5. Let cool completely, then frost and serve. 


Cook’s Notes

In terms of frosting, cream cheese is always a hit. Here’s a winning recipe

You can, of course, make this in a regular cake pan. Bake according to the directions on the box.

Salon Food writes about stuff we think you’ll like. Salon has affiliate partnerships, so we may get a share of the revenue from your purchase.

Yes, marijuana can be addictive — but it’s not like other addictive drugs. Here’s why

Nicotine is notoriously addictive, to the extent that the global market for nicotine cessation in 2021 was valued at an estimated $23 billion. Alcoholism is so insidious that those who are severe alcoholics can die if they go cold turkey. 

Yet marijuana — the most popular psychotropic drug after alcohol — does not have the same stigma surrounding addiction. In stoner culture, the idea that marijuana is addictive in the same way as other famously addictive drugs is played for laughs, as seen in the 1998 stoner comedy “Half-Baked.” 

Yet as an increasing number of jurisdictions legalize marijuana for recreational use, some psychologists and treatment centers have begun to question the conventional wisdom surrounding marijuana’s purported non-addictive status. The question resurfaced in July when a new study was published in Lancet Psychiatry suggesting that it is, and that observation of cannabis addiction may be linked to an increased potency in marijuana worldwide.

Unlike alcohol and nicotine, there are also medical uses for marijuana — pain management, help managing a sleep disorder, anxiety, or lessening the tremors in Parkinson’s disease, just to name a few. Indeed, this is part of the driver behind legalizing recreational weed, which 19 states have already done. Then there are the economic benefits; one study predicted that cannabis legalization could result in $128.8 billion in tax revenue, and an estimated 1.6 million new jobs. The shifting political narrative has made marijuana a friendlier, more accessible drug, and perhaps contributed to notions of it as fairly benign. And even if it is addictive, it clearly isn’t addictive in the same way as, say, cocaine or opioids, which are so addictive as to compel those in their thrall to steal, lie, or behave violently to acquire these substances.

In the field of mental health and addiction, Norton said that it is a “very settled question” that marijuana is addictive.

In the aforementioned Lancet study, the study’s authors found a connection between potency and dependency. Specifically, they note that people who use higher concentrations of tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) — the main psychoactive compound in marijuana — are more likely to be addicted to marijuana and have mental health problems. That study drew eyebrow-raising headlines; CNN asked if “Highly potent weed” was “creating marijuana addicts worldwide.” 

Still, much of the controversy around this question lies in defining what one means by “addiction.”

“The word addiction means so many different things to so many people, and that makes it kind of a challenging question in that sense,” Dr. Aaron Norton, a mental health counselor who specializes in addiction, told Salon. Norton said many organizations “concur that marijuana is addictive — specifically, THC.”

In the field of mental health and addiction, Norton said that it is a “very settled question” that marijuana is addictive.

“I think probably part of the confusion is that people, when they think of addiction, they sometimes think of more severe addiction presentations — like what we might see in a lot of people with opioid use disorder or with alcohol use disorder,” Norton said. “They think about cannabis, and when they think about the difference in terms of the impact on society and on people and they think, ‘well, it’s not as bad as those other things.'”

Dr.​​ Adrianne Trogden, a licensed addiction counselor, agreed, but further clarified the complexity of the word “addiction.”

In the U.S., about three in 10 people who use marijuana have cannabis use disorder, the CDC estimates.

“While the word ‘addiction’ is used quite a bit, that’s not actually a clinical diagnosable term — so in the medical world, we wouldn’t diagnose somebody with an addiction, we’d diagnose with a substance use disorder,” Trogden said. Trogden said that in their clinical practice and in the community, there is a “continuum of substance use.”

“So there’s people that have kind of experimented on one end of that continuum, and maybe used recreationally from time to time, all the way up to people that use all the time, every day, can’t get through a day without it,” she explained. 

Indeed, therapists like Norton and Trogden often use the diagnosis of cannabis use disorder (CUD) when a client is struggling with cannabis use in a way that it is interfering with their relationships and everyday life. In the U.S., about three in 10 people who use marijuana have CUD, the CDC estimates.

According to the National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA), 9 percent of people who “abuse” marijuana will “develop an addiction to the drug in time.” For people who start using marijuana during their teen years, that risk increases to 17 percent. One study found that CUD diagnoses have increased from 2.18% to 2.72%, in young people who live in states where recreational cannabis is legal.

“I see it all the time in my clinical practice, and I have clients who know that they’re addicted to cannabis,” Norton said. “So they come voluntarily to get help, because they’re struggling to stop.”

Dr. Carla Marie Manly, a clinical psychologist in California and author of “Joy From Fear,” sees it too.


Want more health and science stories in your inbox? Subscribe to Salon’s weekly newsletter The Vulgar Scientist.


“On a clinical level, I can certainly affirm that those who seek treatment for cannabis addiction often find it extremely difficult to eliminate the habit,” Manly told Salon via email. “As with other self-soothing addictions (e.g., drinking alcohol, smoking cigarettes, etc.), many people find it tremendously challenging to ‘kick the marijuana habit.'”

Biochemically speaking, THC isn’t akin to opiates, opioids, cocaine, or other notoriously addictive drugs. So what precisely makes it “addictive”?

In essence, THC triggers chemical reactions in the brain that are associated with relaxation, euphoria and bliss. The more the brain is exposed to the THC by having receptors in the brain shut down, it will learn to only function at an optimal level when it’s being exposed to THC. This can lead to feelings of restlessness and irritability when a patient isn’t using marijuana.

Dr. Michael Kuhar further explained to Salon that THC attaches to endocannabinoid receptors in the brain, causing a physiological “high.”

“Almost every addicting substance has a molecular site in the brain where it binds and causes some action,” Kuhar said. “And the reason there’s a molecular site in the brain is because there is an endogenous brain system that’s like marijuana — it’s not really marijuana, but THC can hook into that [endocannabinoid receptor] system.”

THC, Kuhar explained, is also “self-administered,” which further strengthens the case that marijuana is addictive. When a substance is self-administering, an animal in a laboratory is shown to voluntarily choose more of the substance instead of the placebo, which is usually saline. 

“The animal presses the lever that has THC, he doesn’t know that he’s getting an injection, but he has a sensation and if he likes the sensation, he will press that lever again and again and again, and that is what we call THC self-administration,” Kuhar said. “S​​o that’s the paradigm of drug self-administering, discovered in the late ’70s, and it is now the gold standard for showing that something is addicting.”

Research also supports the finding that ceasing use of cannabis can result in what is defined in the DSM-5 ( (Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders – Fifth Edition) cannabis withdrawal syndrome. 

Norton said treatment looks different for each client, depending on many factors — such as if they see their use is a problem, and how it’s impacting their life. Notably, there is Marijuana Anonymous, which is a 12-step program to help people maintain abstinence from marijuana.

As marijuana continues to be legalized in more states, mental health clinicians say more discussions around the possible adverse effects need to happen.

“So even though I see some good in medical cannabis, and I support it being legalized, like many things in life, there are awful drawbacks,” Norton said.

Editor’s note: This article was updated to clarify Norton’s quote.

Read more

on cannabis

Ready or not, the wine cooler is ready for a comeback

Long before White Claw ascended the pop culture throne, Bartles and Jaymes (“Thank you for your support“) was the trendy beverage.

In 1991, wine coolers were climbing the same ladder that spiked seltzers would eventually scale decades later. Then Congress effectively killed them off. 

That was the year that legislators voted to raise the federal excise tax on wine to $1.07 per gallon. While that may not sound like much, the previous tax was around 17 cents, meaning the rate nearly quintupled overnight. Producers of wine coolers — which are typically a mix of white wine, fruit flavoring and occasionally additional sweeteners and carbonation — shifted to formulating drinks with malt, which is much cheaper. 

Out with the actual wine, in with Zima

Now, nearly 30 years later, could the wine cooler break back into the market again, albeit with a slightly cooler reputation? Several signs, including the Bartles and Jaymes relaunch in recent years, point to yes. 

“I think when most people think of wine coolers, they think of their romance novel-reading aunt getting buzzed by the pool in the ’80s or trying to get drunk off Smirnoff Ice in a basement in high school,” said Molly Fedick, the founder of Buzzkill Wines, which is set to launch its own canned wine cooler by early 2023. 

“That being said, when I think of the ‘modern’ definition of a wine cooler, it’s not as strict,” she told Salon Food. “I think of it as a carbonated wine-based drink with a lower ABV. You don’t necessarily need to add fruit juice or sugar. Wine coolers haven’t been, well, cool, for a while, so I think the new definition is up for grabs.”

A well-made wine cooler, like the kind Buzzkill has in development, certainly dovetails with several key trends that have dominated the beverage market over the last few years. Perhaps most importantly, wine coolers have traditionally been marketed as lower ABV beverages, which fits into the ethos of a brand like Buzzkill which specializes in non-alcoholic and low ABV offerings. 

Fedick spent much of her time as a 20-something in New York, where she described the drinking culture as “super aggressive — like, dancing on the table-aggressive.” 

“I would drink glasses of rosé and Aperol Spritzes like they were going out of style,” she said. “Eventually, you realize you need to chill out, and that prompted me to take eight months off from drinking. During those eight months, I really missed wine, which is why I created our first product, Buzzkill Sauvignon Blanc. That product has a .5% ABV, which means ‘non-alcoholic.'” 

Eventually, she began thinking about a 2.5% ABV carbonated wine-based product. For reference, most hard seltzers, like White Claw, come in at about 5% ABV.

“I liked that idea that we could do different varietals, that there were many use cases for the product, and most importantly, that it could be a ‘jumping off’ point for people who were maybe thinking about cutting back on alcohol,” Fedick said.

The wine cooler resurgence would also hit at a time when both canned wines and ready-to-drink (RTD) cocktails and mixed drinks are really hitting their stride. According to data compiled NielsenIQ, year-over-year off-premise dollar sales of RTD cocktails increased by 126%. 

Experts attribute that triple-digit growth to several key factors. 

“Canned cocktails are a convenient and quality solution for cocktail lovers,” Earl Kight, the co-founder and chief sales and marketing officer for Cutwater Spirits, told BevAlc Insights for its 2022 RTD cocktail forecast. “No ingredients, no prep or clean-up. They offer controlled ABVs and consistently taste delicious.” 

Canned wine has seen similar growth. According to research in Market Watch, increased numbers of winemakers selling canned wines and available products contributed to the segment’s overall approximate 68% growth to about $200 million in 2020. 

As such, consumers are now more attuned to the idea that pre-mixed, canned drinks can actually be good, as opposed to simply being a way to get buzzed on the beach without being fined for schlepping glass onto the sand. To help their beverages stand out in a crowded market, canned wine and cocktail makers are increasingly relying on using interesting wine and spirits mixed with real ingredients. 

And that’s what you can expect from Buzzkill. According to Fedick, the brand plans to use some “very exciting, sophisticated wines [and] varietals that you are not used to seeing in canned wine products.” 

“In addition to this, the product is low-sugar, low-calorie — probably around 35 calories per can — and the wine will be the star of the show, not some weird, processed fruit juice,” she said. “This is not your mom’s wine cooler. I can say that much.”

Patton Oswalt talks lying, comic books and catfishing in his new cringe comedy “I Love My Dad”

In the discomfiting dysfunctional comedy, “I Love My Dad,” Chuck (Patton Oswalt), a compulsive liar, is estranged from his son Franklin (writer/director James Morosini, who based  the film on his real life) for being a bad dad. Chuck breaks promises. He has lame excuses. He disappoints, repeatedly. Franklin decides to cut him out of his life. When Chuck is blocked by Franklin, it prompts him to try to reconnect with his son — who is fragile having attempted suicide — by creating a fake online identity. Pretending to be Becca (Claudia Sulewski), a young woman who claims to have romantic interests in Franklin, Chuck is able to learn about his son and say things to Franklin he has been unable to express otherwise. 

It’s a foolish, harebrained scheme, right out of “Cyrano” and “Who You Think I Am” — and it is bound to backfire. Except it might just bring estranged father and son closer together (as long as Franklin never learns the truth). And “I Love My Dad” is hilarious, heartfelt, or hateful, depending on one’s tolerance for cringe-comedy.

“That’s when I do the most lying: to myself. You have to be a good liar to put that off, so I’m very proud of myself.”

Oswalt has a field day as Chuck, a desperate man who hopes to repair a relationship he broke but doubles down on his bad behavior in his awkward and wrongheaded attempts to fix things. It is amusing to see Chuck texting Franklin while pretending to be a lovesick woman, but he also has a wild sexual exchange with his colleague/girlfriend Erica (Rachel Dratch) whom he manipulates in one scene to keep up the charade. 

The actor/comedian, talked with Salon about parenting, lying, and making “I Love My Dad.”

Chuck is a compulsive liar. On what occasions do you lie or manipulate things?

I think the most lying that I do is to myself, especially when I’m blowing off a deadline, or when I am justifying some dumb thing that I’m doing — or not doing what I’m supposed to be doing. I’ll justify it as self-care and relaxation when I’m just blowing stuff off. That’s when I do the most lying: to myself. You have to be a good liar to put that off, so I’m very proud of myself.

Chuck is comic or pathetic. I could smell him sweating throughout the film. [Oswalt laughs.] You must inform every scene with a choice on how to play it, how far to push things. Can you talk about that process?

“I really don’t like pranks. I have never understood the appeal . . . People have enough tension in their lives. “

That was mainly up to the script and the scene and the context of the moment. I never really worried about how far I can take this, I just let myself serve the scene and the overall story even if that meant putting myself in very uncomfortable positions — even for an audience to watch. I was just very open to that. 

Can you talk about working with James, who both directed and lived this story? 

He was focused on directing and acting in it, so I was focused on serving the script the best I can. He had enough plate-spinning. I just tried to stay out of his way.

Why is Chuck such a bad dad? He almost always makes a bad move and then tries to overcompensate. What drives him? He is so untrustworthy!

I think that he is afflicted with that thing — with him it is permanent, but I think all of us experience it — that “Don’t I get credit for wanting to be good. Do I have to bother going through with the thing? See how I wanted to do this? Doesn’t that get me any credit?” He can’t believe people are expecting a follow through. He made it a part of his life to be heartfelt and charming with apologies, so he knows, subconsciously, he can get out of doing things, or make up for it later. He has stuck himself in a weird comfort loop, even though it is shredding him psychologically and emotionally. 

Yes, the beauty of your performance is that as a viewer, you are calibrating each scene. I never thought “He’s going to do something right,” it was more, “He’s not going to go too far.” Chuck is not going to “be better,” but “be less.”

Nope! Not Chuck! [Laughs]

There is an amusing three-way “phone sex” scene between Chuck and Franklin and Erica. It was mildly uncomfortable, but there is another scene where you and James just go for broke and kiss passionately. It’s like I wanted it to go there, but then I was almost sorry it did. [Oswalt laughs] 

You have to talk to James about that. It was part of the script, and it was all cut together. What made that scene work is that you realize the levels of love and lust that James had for this character of Rebecca. Now it is being transferred on to his dad, so it had to be that way. 

I Love My DadPatton Oswalt and James Morosini in “I Love My Dad” (Magnolia Pictures)

Chuck at times tries to boost Franklin’s self-esteem. His friend Jimmy (Lil Rel Howery) insists Franklin keep his expectations low. I know you have struggled with trauma in your life. Do you lower your expectations? How do you keep a sunny disposition? 

Not to sound cliché, but I count my blessings when I feel low and angry at myself. I get to do comedy. My daughter is awesome. My friends are amazing. I get to watch them do well. I’m in an industry where I am paid to be creative. You have to do check-ins like that where you remind yourself before you go spiraling off. 

Speaking of being creative, I understand you have a comic book, “Minor Threats” coming out. Can you talk about that project?

Yes! That comes out Wednesday, Aug. 24. I wrote it with Jordan Blum. We are two huge comic book fans, and we decided to make our own universe and do it from the point of view of low-level, blue-collar supervillains who are dealing with the fallout of a massive supervillain taking out a massive hero, and now all the other heroes are cracking down so hard, the street-level supervillains are thinking, “Maybe we should turn this guy in, and get a little credit.” They are fighting to keep their normal, low-level criminal lives going. 

“Watching this film with strangers in the dark is a very memorable, very cringe-y, fun experience.”

Chuck tells Erica that he is a practical joker and likes to play pranks. Can you talk about a prank you pulled that was either epic or an epic failure?

I really don’t like pranks. I have never understood the appeal. I don’t pull pranks on people. It’s not my thing. People have enough tension in their lives. 

Given this is a father/son film, what can you say about your relationship with your father or your relationship with your daughter? How do you see being a child or a parent? 

I didn’t pull from experience with my dad because my dad is pretty awesome, and I have a really good relationship with him. And yes, while my daughter and I have been through some trauma together, I love hanging out with her and still like being a parent. That wasn’t anything I pulled from for the film. 

What observations do you have about parenthood? 

Be excited to be a parent; just show up every day. You don’t need to be awesome in terms of, “Oh, we did this craft and it turned out to be great.” They don’t care about the results of what they are doing. They just want to know that you want to spend time with them, and that you are excited to be with them. Even if what you are trying to do doesn’t work out, that can still be fun.


Want a daily wrap-up of all the news and commentary Salon has to offer? Subscribe to our morning newsletter, Crash Course.


What do you like to do with your daughter?

I’m a big movie buff, so we will watch movies together. She likes trying to build Legos. And she is very much into sports. I’ll watch her play basketball, do trampoline and gymnastics, and encourage her. Then we will try to go and play basketball, even though I’m horrible at it, which she thinks is hilarious. 

What do you think audiences should get from this film? Not to catfish your son?

I don’t want to tell audiences what to get from it. I just hope they have an amazing experience in theater. Watching this film with strangers in the dark is a very memorable, very cringe-y, fun experience. That’s what I hope they get from it.

“I Love My Dad” is currently in theaters and available on demand Friday, Aug. 12. Watch a trailer, via YouTube.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=__FXp-MiY1o
 

 

A mom’s campaign to ban library books divided a Texas town — and her own family

Sign up for The Brief, our daily newsletter that keeps readers up to speed on the most essential Texas news.

This article was produced in partnership with NBC News.

For LGBTQ mental health support, call the Trevor Project’s 24/7 toll-free support line at 866-488-7386. You can also reach a trained crisis counselor through the National Suicide Prevention Lifeline by calling or texting 988, or you can reach the Crisis Text Line by texting “HOME” to 741741.

 

Weston Brown was scrolling through Twitter last month when he came across a video that made his chest tighten. It showed a woman at a school board meeting in North Texas, calling on district leaders to ask for forgiveness.

“Repentance is the word that’s on my heart,” she said near the start of the video.

For months, the woman in the clip had been demanding that the Granbury Independent School District ban from its libraries dozens of books that contained descriptions of sex or LGBTQ themes — books that she believed could be damaging to the hearts and minds of students. Unsatisfied after a district committee that she served on voted to remove only a handful of titles, the woman filed a police report in May accusing school employees of providing pornography to children, triggering a criminal investigation by Hood County.

Now, in the video that Weston found online, she was telling the school board that a local Christian pastor, rather than librarians, should decide which books should be allowed on public school shelves. “He would never steer you wrong,” she said.

The clip ended with the woman striding away from the lectern, and the audience showering her with applause.

Weston, 28, said his heart was racing as he watched and rewatched the video — and not only because he opposes censorship. He’d instantly recognized the speaker.

It was his mother, Monica Brown.

The same woman, he said, who’d removed pages from science books when he was a child to keep him and his siblings from seeing illustrations of male and female anatomy. The woman who’d always warned that reading the wrong books or watching the wrong movies could open the door to sinful temptation. And the one, he said, who’d effectively cut him off from his family four years ago after he came out as gay.

“You are not invited to our house for Thanksgiving or any other meal,” his mother had texted to him in November 2018, eight months after he revealed his sexual orientation to his parents.

Weston Brown shared texts that he’d exchanged with his parents with NBC News, including this one with his mother from November 2018. Credit: Courtesy of Weston Brown

Weston, who lives with his partner in San Diego, had long ago come to terms with the idea that he would never again have a meaningful relationship with his parents. He still loved them and desperately missed his younger siblings, he said, but he was done trying to convince his mom and dad that his sexuality wasn’t a choice or a sin. He was done challenging their religious beliefs and praying for them to change.

Until he saw the video of his mom at a school board meeting.

In recent months, Weston has watched as the same foundational disagreements that tore his family apart have begun to divide whole communities. Fueled by a growing movement to assert conservative Christian values at all levels of government, activists across the country have fought to remove queer-affirming books from schools, repeal the right to same-sex marriage, shut down LGBTQ pride celebrations and pass state laws limiting the ways teachers can discuss gender and sexuality.

Stills from Monica Brown's appearances at Granbury ISD school board meetings on April 25, May 16, June 2, and July 18, in Granbury Texas.

Monica Brown, who served on a school district book review committee in Granbury, has called that process a sham. She filed a police report in May accusing school employees of providing pornography to children. Credit: Screenshots of Granbury ISD video by NBC News

 

Much as the seemingly intractable arguments over America’s pandemic response and conspiracy theories about the 2020 election have led to fractured personal relationships in recent years, these clashes over gender and sexuality have pitted neighbors against neighbors, parents against teachers and — in the case of the Browns — a son against his mother.

“It was one thing when my parents’ beliefs were causing this rift between us and it was just a family matter,” Weston said. “But seeing now that she’s applying those same views to public activism, at a time when so many basic rights are being challenged, I couldn’t stay quiet about that.”

Monica, 51, who has homeschooled all nine of her children and serves as the director of a private Christian education cooperative, declined to be interviewed or answer written questions. In a series of email exchanges with NBC News, she initially invited a reporter to discuss the article over dinner at her home in Granbury, but in a subsequent message, she said her husband would not allow the meeting, adding, “I have been advised to not speak with you at all.” Her husband also declined to be interviewed.

In public, Monica has denied targeting LGBTQ books. At a recent school board meeting, she said her only objective has been to protect children from sexually explicit content — gay or otherwise.

“There’s nothing about LGBTQ involved in this,” she said. “There are LGBTQ books that are sexually explicit, yes. They are wrong, too. If they are between men and men, women and women, cats and women, dogs and women, whatever, that is not appropriate educational content.”

That statement, however, doesn’t square with many of the books that she has flagged for removal at Granbury. Several of the titles on her list feature LGBTQ storylines, but contain no sexually explicit content. That includes “Drama,” by Raina Telgemeier, a graphic novel that depicts gay and bisexual characters navigating the routine awkwardness of middle school crushes.

Of the nearly 80 library books Monica and her supporters want removed, 3 out of 5 feature LGBTQ characters or themes, according to an NBC News analysis of titles posted on GranburyTexasBooks.org, a website where the activists have compiled parent reviews of books they want banned. In addition to sexually explicit content, the site calls for books to be removed for “normalizing lesbianism,” focusing on “sexual orientation” and promoting “alternate gender ideologies.”

Monica has also signaled anti-LGBTQ views in formal library book challenges that she’s sent directly to Granbury school officials, according to copies of the forms obtained through a public records request. In one instance, she criticized a biography of notable women in part because it included the story of Christine Jorgensen, a trans woman who made national headlines in the 1950s for speaking openly about her gender-confirmation surgery. She suggested replacing that book with a Christian biography series about girls and women who used their talents to serve God — “biographies of truly great Americans,” she wrote.

After watching the video of his mom at the school board last month, Weston skimmed through excerpts of the books she wanted pulled. It seemed to him that she and her supporters were pushing public schools to adhere to some of the same strict religious ideologies that he says he suffered under as a child.

He thought about all the students, at Granbury and across the country, who might benefit from reading the types of books that were off-limits to him growing up.

With tears in his eyes, he started to type a tweet on the afternoon of July 3.

“This is my mom,” he wrote, with a link to the school board meeting video. “Seeing her advocate for the erasure of queer representation is crushing. Coming up on the 5 year anniversary of being effectively cut off from my family and siblings after coming out in 2018.”

He hesitated, knowing he would be reopening old wounds for the world to see. He didn’t want to do anything to hurt the woman who’d raised him, he said.

But trying to get librarians arrested?

Weston added one more line to his post — “Much love to those standing up and pushing back for representation” — along with a rainbow flag emoji. And then he hit send.

“The rejection you have chosen”

Weston has many fond memories growing up in the suburbs between Dallas and Fort Worth, about an hour from his parents’ current home in Granbury. He recalled summer days splashing in their backyard swimming pool, family ski vacations to Colorado and hours spent at the public library with his mom, who fostered his love of reading.

“I didn’t really have friends growing up, and going to make new friends via fictional characters was always something I looked forward to,” he said. “It was a beautiful way to leave my world and go somewhere better.”

But in a conservative Christian home, some content was off-limits.

Although the Brown family’s bookshelves were lined with classics, such as books from C.S. Lewis’ “Chronicles of Narnia” series, many popular titles were forbidden, Weston said. That included the Harry Potter series, which he said his mother, like many other conservative Christians, regarded as a satanic depiction of witchcraft.

Weston, the eldest child, said his mother also did her best to shield him and his siblings from words or images that might stir sexual curiosity. He remembered being told to look down at the floor anytime they walked through the women’s underwear section at department stores. Even as a child, he said, he was more intrigued by the marketing photos on display in the men’s section — though he didn’t dare tell anyone.

The lessons on purity didn’t stop after he became an adult.

In 2015, when he was 20 and still living with his parents, he returned home late one evening after seeing “Avengers: Age of Ultron,” a PG-13 superhero movie that his mother disapproved of. When he walked into his kitchen, he said, he found two pans of brownies waiting for him, along with a stack of articles printed off the internet about the corrosive influence of Marvel comics and films.

One pan of brownies was normal. The other had a label that warned it had been baked with a small amount of dog poop mixed in.

“Poo anyone? Just a little?” Monica wrote later, when she posted an image of the brownies on Facebook. “How much yuck is too much?”

The moral of the illustration, which is popular among some evangelical Christians: If you wouldn’t eat brownies that might harm your body, then why would you expose yourself to movies, books or music that might harm your soul?

Her son was disgusted, but he didn’t push back on the lesson.

“She made her point,” he said, “and we never spoke about it again.”

That was the same year that the U.S. Supreme Court legalized same-sex marriage — a tectonic cultural development that disturbed many evangelical Christians. Afterward, Monica posted frequently on social media about the “dangerous” gay agenda that she believed was on the march across mainstream U.S. society. She warned in posts that Disney was secretly pushing LGBTQ lifestyles on children in movies such as “Toy Story 4,” and shared a link to a video alleging that pop star Katy Perry was conspiring with satanic forces to convince teens to embrace homosexuality.

Weston said he didn’t challenge his mom’s views while he lived with her. He’d spent years struggling to reconcile his desires with the religious values his parents had instilled in him — trying to convince himself that the butterflies in his stomach any time he was around one of the boys at church was just something friends felt for each other. It didn’t help, he said, that he’d had no meaningful sex education as a teenager — just a blanket instruction to abstain until marriage — and no understanding of LGBTQ identities or what those letters even meant.

But by 2018, he was 23, living on his own and finally confident enough to tell his parents what he’d always known about himself.

“Dear Mom and Dad, I’m writing this to share something that I’ve wanted to share with you yet have held back for a long time,” he wrote in an email to his parents in February 2018. “It is with great relief, clarity and vulnerability that I share this with you: I am gay.”

He ended the note: “I pray that you receive this with an open mind.”

That prayer, he said, went unanswered.

Over the next year and a half, he said, his parents tried to convince him that he was mistaken. Through a series of emotional lunch meetings, phone calls and text messages, he said, they urged him to see a Christian counselor in the hopes that he could learn to overcome his homosexual urges. They invited Weston to church — the one place where they would allow him to see his younger siblings — and openly wondered about what corrupting influences might have led their son down this sinful path.

For months, his mother sent him links to articles from Christian news sites with headlines like “Evidence shows sexual orientation can change” and “It’s not gay to straight, it’s lost to saved” — links that she was simultaneously posting publicly on Facebook. But after Weston made clear that there was no prayer or summer camp that would change who he is, he said his parents made clear that he was not welcome at their home, even on holidays or birthdays.

“You are not rejected, not at all, and never will be,” his father, James Brown, texted to him in October 2019, more than a year after he came out. “The lifestyle you have chosen goes against God and therefore that is the rejection you have chosen.”

His father added, “Have you ever considered the pain you have put your mother and I through?”

That same day, Monica sent him a message on Facebook to say that she was praying for dark forces to be cast out of him.

“I specifically come against evil that has entered you from the movie ‘It,'” she wrote, referring to the time when Weston, at around age 10, had watched part of the Stephen King mini-series about a murderous clown. “Clown demons have to go in the mighty name of Jesus.”

She ended the message, “I love you, Mom.”

“A raging fire”

Monica Brown’s campaign to rid schools of books that she considers obscene began late last year with a trip to the Granbury Middle School library, which sometimes hosts robotics competitions that her homeschooled children have competed in.

She started flipping through a few books while she was there and was disturbed by what she found, according to a May interview she recorded with The Blue Shark Show, a local far-right internet talk show hosted by a Republican former state legislator.

“What I saw was negative, dark — things nightmares are made of,” Monica said, without sharing more details.

Her sudden interest in library books coincided with a wave of similar book ban attempts across the country last year amid a growing conservative backlash against school programs and lessons dealing with racism, gender and sexuality.

The books that have drawn the most intense scrutiny, both in Granbury and nationally, are largely young adult novels and memoirs that contain passages with explicit descriptions of sex or rape, especially those featuring LGBTQ themes and characters. Defenders of these books argue that any sexual content is presented in the context of broader narratives that help teens understand and process the world around them.

The fight has been particularly heated in Texas, where Republican state officials, including Gov. Greg Abbott, have gone as far as calling for criminal charges against any school staff member who provides children with access to novels, memoirs and sex ed books that some conservatives have labeled as “pornography.”

Monica didn’t say in her talk show interview whether she had reported her concerns to the school district. But in early January, Granbury’s schools superintendent, Jeremy Glenn, called a meeting with district librarians and shared that he’d started to get complaints about library books.

“Let’s call it what it is, and I’m cutting to the chase on a lot of this,” Glenn told the librarians, according to a secret recording of the meeting obtained by NBC News, ProPublica and The Texas Tribune and first reported in March. “It’s the transgender, LGBTQ and the sex — sexuality — in books. That’s what the governor has said that he will prosecute people for, and that’s what we’re pulling out.”

When asked about his comments, Glenn released a statement in March saying the district was committed to supporting students of all backgrounds. And although he said the district’s primary focus is educating students, Glenn said “the values of our community will always be reflected in our schools.”

In the days after the meeting, district employees pulled more than 130 books off of school library shelves and announced the formation of a volunteer committee to review them.

Monica was one of the first residents appointed. From the start, she felt the process was a sham, she said in her Blue Shark interview. The first two meetings were held at times when she couldn’t attend, she said, and by the time she arrived at the third meeting, the committee had already voted to return most of the books to shelves.

“That meeting was completely disrupted in the sense that we didn’t vote at all because I kept asking questions,” she said.

In the end, over objections from her and one other member, the volunteer committee voted to ban only three books: “This Book Is Gay,” a coming-out guide for LGBTQ teens by transgender author Juno Dawson that includes detailed descriptions of sex; “Out of Darkness,” by Ashley Hope Pérez, a young adult novel about a romance between a Mexican American girl and a Black boy that includes a rape scene and other mature content; and “We Are the Ants,” by Shaun David Hutchinson, a coming-of-age novel about a gay teenager that includes explicit sexual language.

The district returned dozens of other titles to shelves. Several of the books had no sexual content, the committee found. For the others, a majority of committee members believed that any descriptions of sex were age-appropriate when read in complete context.

Monica was outraged, she said on the Blue Shark Show in early May.

“I think they’re breaking the law,” she said.

That same week, she put that belief to the test. On May 2, she and another disillusioned member of the book committee filed a police report with Hood County Constable Chad Jordan alleging that the district was making pornography available to students, according to a copy of the incident report. Four days later, Hood County constables visited Granbury High School to investigate the claim.

In a letter sent to NBC News on Wednesday and dated Aug. 1, Jordan said his office could not release additional information about the case because the investigation remained active. In a statement issued in May, Glenn, the Granbury superintendent, said the school district was cooperating with law enforcement.

In the months since, Monica has continued to keep the pressure on, speaking at every school board meeting, filing more than a dozen additional book challenges and, in the process, becoming a prominent and polarizing figure in Granbury.

Her activism has been praised by several leading conservative figures in town, including members of the Hood County Republican Party and Melanie Graft, the school board member who selected Monica to serve on the book review committee. Graft, who rose to local prominence in 2015 while leading a conservative campaign to remove LGBTQ-themed picture books from the children’s section at Granbury’s public library, did not respond to messages requesting an interview.

Monica’s fight has also come at a personal cost. In social media posts and public remarks, she’s said the hours spent reviewing library books have required her to sacrifice time with her family and led to a barrage of personal attacks from residents who oppose her efforts.

In May, Adrienne Martin, a Granbury parent and chair of the Hood County Democratic Party, was recording on her phone as she confronted Monica outside a school board meeting.

“You want to have librarians arrested,” Martin said as Monica walked away. “That’s fascism. You’re a fascist.”

At a board meeting last month, Monica tried to explain why she’s fought so hard to remove books from a school district that her kids do not attend. She’s doing it, she said, for all the other children.

“I feel like it’s a raging fire,” she told the board, “and I’ve got a water pistol.”

“I pray for you”

After Weston’s initial post criticizing his mother, he fired off several more tweets denouncing her efforts in Granbury.

It didn’t take long before the posts had reached his parents. His dad texted him to demand that he apologize to his mother.

“We have not come out against the LGBT Community,” his father wrote, insisting that their efforts at Granbury schools were focused on “pornography” and nothing else. “I know you are hurt by our decisions but we are also hurting and have been ever since you said you were Gay.

“We have not been hateful to you,” his father added.

Weston replied: “All I can say is I pity you and wish you the best.”

Soon, opponents of Monica’s efforts began posting images of her son’s tweets on Granbury community Facebook groups — making a family’s private rift public.

“Call your son and leave ours alone!” a woman wrote in response to one of Monica’s many public posts about obscene library books.

“Your crusade against books won’t bring your son back to you or make him straight,” another Granbury resident wrote. “Go home and look in the mirror, fix your house before you worry about others.”

Monica never publicly addressed her son’s tweets, but in response to a Facebook post about them, she wrote: “You can believe what you want about me. In the meantime, I will carry on doing my best to finish out my life for an audience of One.”

A couple of weeks later, she finally got in touch with her son. Two days after NBC News contacted her to request an interview, she texted him to let him know that she didn’t plan to share “personal family details” with a reporter.

“I did not come out against LGBTQ at all — ever,” she wrote, before adding: “I love you, and I pray for you.”

Weston studied the message, thinking back to all the hours he’d spent pleading with her to accept him for who he is rather than trying to control and change him. It hurt, having the woman who’d given birth to him tell him that his sexual orientation was an abomination.

He didn’t want to revisit that trauma, he said. He just wanted his mom to stop pushing her beliefs on other people’s kids.

Weston re-read her text message one more time. He started to type a reply, then stopped. Instead he closed the message and set his phone aside.

He’d already told his mom everything that needed to be said.

 

Disclosure: Facebook has been a financial supporter of The Texas Tribune, a nonprofit, nonpartisan news organization that is funded in part by donations from members, foundations and corporate sponsors. Financial supporters play no role in the Tribune’s journalism. Find a complete list of them here.


The full program is now LIVE for the 2022 The Texas Tribune Festival, happening Sept. 22-24 in Austin. Explore the schedule of 100+ mind-expanding conversations coming to TribFest, including the inside track on the 2022 elections and the 2023 legislative session, the state of public and higher ed at this stage in the pandemic, why Texas suburbs are booming, why broadband access matters, the legacy of slavery, what really happened in Uvalde and so much more. See the program.

This article originally appeared in The Texas Tribune at https://www.texastribune.org/2022/08/11/texas-library-book-ban-granbury/.

The Texas Tribune is a member-supported, nonpartisan newsroom informing and engaging Texans on state politics and policy. Learn more at texastribune.org.

“Grey’s Anatomy” cast: Is Ellen Pompeo leaving “Grey’s Anatomy”?

There’s quite a few changes coming our way when “Grey’s Anatomy” Season 19 premieres this fall. The medical drama is bringing on a host of new doctors to join our fan-favorites at Grey Sloan Memorial Hospital.

According to TVLine, Adelaide Kane will play Jules Millin who was raised by drug addled artist/hippies and somehow is the only real grown-up in her family. Harry Shum Jr. has also been added to the roster as Daniel “Blue” Kwan, a sharp-witted, impatient, and brilliant resident who is generous but competitive.

Niko Terho takes on the role of Lucas Adams who comes from a line of surgeons and is determined to prove he is just as great. Midori Francis is Mika Yasuda, a middle child with eight siblings who is used to being underestimated, which she uses to her advantage. And finally, there’s Alexis Floyd who will play Simone Griffin, a high-achieving woman who never wanted to work at Grey Sloan because of a painful personal history with the hospital.

Some of these new docs are first-year surgical residents. So is this a hint that the Residency Program will be coming back? With all of these new additions, it makes us think if all these newcomers are making up for a possible Grey’s cast member loss.

The new season is only a couple of months away, but is the leading actress going to be in it?

Is Ellen Pompeo leaving “Grey’s Anatomy”?

In a surprise turn of events, Ellen Pompeo, who we’ve loved as Meredith Grey for almost two decades, will be coming back but in a “limited capacity,” according to TVLine.

The news outlet reports that the head of general surgery will be in Season 19, but will appear in only eight episodes, or less than half of the 20-23 installments. However Pompeo will continue to narrate every episode, and continue with her executive producer duties.

TVLine shared that the actress has scaled down her time on “Grey’s Anatomy” to focus on other projects. One of those is a new Hulu series she will star in and executive produce. The untitled show is similar to the Orphan movies, and is inspired by a true story.

The show will follow a couple who adopted who they thought is an 8-year-old girl with a rare form of dwarfism. But she may not be who she says she is. The couple will deal with a battle that’s fought in the tabloids, the courtroom, and their marriage, according to TVLine.

“Grey’s Anatomy” Season 19 premieres Thursday, Oct. 6 at 9 p.m. ET on ABC.

Whole Foods CEO John Mackey is “deeply concerned” that “socialists are taking over” the country

Whole Foods co-founder and CEO John Mackey lamented that “socialists are taking over” nationwide and warned that the initiative is “just continuing” during Thursday’s episode of a podcast with Reason Magazine.

“My concern is that I feel like socialists are taking over,” Mackey told the magazine’s editor-in-chief Nick Gillespie. “They’re marching through the institutions. They’re…taking over education. It looks like they’ve taken over a lot of the corporations. It looks like they’ve taken over the military. And it’s just continuing.”

“You know, I’m a capitalist at heart, and I believe in liberty and capitalism. Those are my twin values. And I feel like, you know, with the way freedom of speech is today, the movement on gun control, a lot of the liberties that I’ve taken for granted most of my life, I think, are under threat,” he continued.

Mackey, who is stepping down as CEO at the end of August, has remained a vocal critic of socialism throughout the years.

During a November 2020 discussion organized by the American Enterprise Institute, Mackey proclaimed, “Socialism has been tried 42 times in the last 100 years, and 42 failures. It doesn’t work. It’s the wrong way. We have to keep capitalism. I would argue we need conscious capitalism.” He then branded socialism as “trickle-up poverty” and said, “it just impoverishes everything.”

On Thursday, Mackey also criticized the uptick in government unemployment benefits offered amid the pandemic, which he alleged made it difficult to hire more staff members at Whole Foods. He proceeded to make jabs at the nation’s “younger generation,” stating that they “don’t seem to want to work” and echoing Kim Kardashian’s advice for women in business.

“They only wanna work if it’s really purposeful, and [something] they feel aligned to,” Mackey said. “You can’t hope to start with meaningful work. You’re gonna have to earn it over time. Some of the younger generation doesn’t seem to be willing to pay that price, and I don’t know why.”

Like clockwork, Mackey’s statements spurred controversy across social media. On Twitter, many opposed his sentiments while others challenged his political takes.


Want more great food writing and recipes? Subscribe to Salon Food’s newsletter, The Bite.


“How ironic that I would love to live in the world apparently imagined to exist by so many leading capitalists,” wrote Jacobin staff writer Luke Savage.

One user tweeted, “If the ridiculous prices aren’t enough to keep you from shopping at Whole Foods, recent comments from the CEO, John Mackey, should be. He is ‘deeply concerned’ that ‘socialists are taking over’ the country. He clearly doesn’t understand socialism so he should shut up.”

“Damnit, just when I settle on a go-to grocery store that I can bike to easily for things we consume, some asshole, capitalism-drunk, CEO opens his mouth about issues that matter to me,” said another Mackey critic. “I shouldn’t be surprised, honestly…”

Mackey also made it clear during his podcast appearance that he’ll be sharing more hot takes in the future, after he retires from his current position.

“Pretty soon, you’re gonna hear about ‘Crazy John’ who’s no longer muzzled,” he said, laughing. “I’ve got six weeks. I can talk more about politics in six weeks than I can today.”

“I personally approved the decision”: Merrick Garland breaks silence after FBI raid of Mar-a-Lago

With a brief statement on Thursday, Attorney General Merrick Garland broke the Department of Justice’s (DOJ) silence following Monday’s search of former president Donald Trump’s Mar-a-Lago residence in Florida. The nation’s top prosecutor confirmed that he personally signed-off on the decision to send agents from the Federal Bureau of Investigations (FBI) to Trump’s Palm Beach resort. Garland then announced that the Justice Department had applied to unseal the search warrant. 

“The public’s clear and powerful interest in understanding what occurred under these circumstances weighs heavily in favor of unsealing,” the DOJ’s motion reads. 

Acknowledging that he “personally approved the decision to seek a search warrant,” Garland said the department first pursued “less intrusive” means to retrieve the materials. According to NBC News, Trump received a federal grand jury subpoena for documents that Trump’s legal team discussed with the Justice Department months before the FBI searched his Mar-a-Lago home. 

Trump has until August 12 to respond to the government’s motion.

Less than five minutes in length, Garland’s statement set off a barrage of rage from right-wing pundits, many of whom have clamored for the Justice Department to speak and release the search warrant. 

 

“What happened to backing the blue?”: Fox News host calls out GOPer over “defund the FBI” attacks

“Fox & Friends” host Steve Doocy challenged Rep. Steve Scalise, R-La., to justify conservative attacks on the FBI following a search of Donald Trump’s home.

The Louisiana Republican appeared Thursday morning on the Fox News program to discuss the FBI removal of boxes of presidential records from Mar-A-Lago while executing a search warrant, which has prompted Republican outrage and violent threats against law enforcement officials.

“People from the political right talk about how the FBI and the [Department of Justice] have been weaponized against Donald Trump,” Doocy said, “and the way it works is the Department of Justice essentially tells the FBI go in and look for this stuff. The FBI, with 35,000 members, you know, now they apparently are receiving a lot of specific field agents are receiving specific death threats because there are a number of people online and elsewhere who are demonizing the FBI, and some Republicans.”

Doocy pointed to comments from Rep. Paul Gosar, R-Ariz., who called for the FBI’s destruction, and Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene R-Ga., who said the bureau should lose its funding, and asked Scalise to explain their position.

“I’m just curious whatever happened to the Republican Party backing the blue?” Doocy said.

Scalise suggested some bad apples within the FBI had carried out the search at the former president’s private resort.

“We’re very strong supporters of law enforcement,” Scalise said, “and it concerns everybody if you see some agents go rogue and if you see an agency that doesn’t have the right checks and balances at the top. This is coming from the top.”

Doocy pushed back on the lawmaker’s claims.

“Who went rogue?” Doocy said. “They were following a search warrant.”

Scalise said the Department of Justice had a lot of explaining to do.

“We want to find that out,” he said. “That’s why we are asking these questions because, you know, there were reports yesterday that [attorney general] Merrick Garland said he didn’t even know about this raid. I don’t know if anybody believed that, but he should be asked under oath if he knew about the raid prior to it happening. He has to answer that question why hasn’t he held a press conference? Why won’t President [Joe] Biden talk about this with the press? I think that is deafening right now that silence.”

Co-host Brian Kilmeade brought up Rep. Scott Perry’s claim that FBI agents seized his cell phone, and co-host Ainsley Earhardt lamented that the seizure took place on his vacation, and Scalise agreed that was also concerning.

“These are all things that are concerning,” Scalise said, “and then by the way they want to add 87,000 more IRS agents at the same time that they are weaponizing other agencies.”

Doocy pressed on, asking why Republicans could hold off their strongest criticism until more was known about the search and what it turned up.

“Why not wait a week or so until we know more about this search warrant than, you know, immediately rush to judgment and say yeah, the FBI, they are crazy?”

Watch video below or at this link.

NY AG may seek “corporate death penalty” against Trump Organization after he pleads the 5th: report

Former President Donald Trump may lose the “crown jewels” of the heir’s corporate empire if New York Attorney General Letitia James moves to invoke New York’s “corporate death penalty” against the Trump Organization, according to a new report.

On Wednesday, Trump announced he would refuse to answer questions in James’ civil investigation into the company during a deposition that lasted more than five hours.

The investigation focuses on whether the Trump Organization essentially kept two sets of books. He allegedly would low-ball values to avoid taxes, while high-balling values to secure loans.

“In the coming weeks or even days, the AG is expected to file a massive, long-threatened ‘enforcement action’ — essentially a multi-hundred-page lawsuit against the Trumps and his Manhattan-based business,” Business Insider reported Wednesday. “Fines and back taxes, however, may be the least of what Trump’s facing. James has signaled she will also seek the dissolution of the business itself under New York’s so-called corporate death penalty — a law that allows the AG to seek to dissolve businesses that operate ‘in a persistently fraudulent or illegal manner.'”

The publication interviewed Tristan Snell, who successfully shut down Trump University under the state’s corporate death penalty law.

“This cuts right to the crown jewel of his real estate portfolio,” Snell said.

“It’s everything, because at issue is Trump Tower [where the Trump Organization is headquartered in Manhattan], at issue is 40 Wall Street, which is one of his most beloved properties and probably one of the more valuable ones,” Snell explained. “All of his golf courses are also at stake, so it’s a big deal.”

On Twitter, Snell explained why it was so important that Trump took the Fifth Amendment.

“This is a civil case — so the court can draw an inference of liability. This is exactly what the AG was hoping to achieve. The case is now even stronger,” he wrote.

“In a civil case, pleading the Fifth is effectively a confession,” Snell claimed.

Snell added, “It’s worth remembering that the NY AG is 2 for 2 so far in bringing Trump to justice — on Trump University and the Trump Foundation.”

When did vegan cheese get so good?

Nuts were a game-changer for vegan cheese because they provide a lot of fat: 100 grams of cashews have 44 grams of fat, versus 6.4 grams of fat in the same amount of soybeans. This allows for richer flavor and texture that gets closer to imitating animal milk dairy. Soy has also gone out of favor as a base for cheese because of allergy concerns, as well the fact that as of 2018, genetically modified soybeans accounted for 94% of all soy planted in the US. Nuts are not perfect — allergy or sustainability-wise — but they provide a fatty base with neutral flavor that has allowed vegan cheese to reach new heights of complexity.

Since the mid-2010s, there’s been seemingly endless innovation. It’s in the artisanal market established 18 years ago by Dr. Cow that most innovation is occurring, and it coincides with (or is maybe contributing to) interest in vegan cheese as one more variety of cheese you can serve on your cheese board: No longer does one have to be adhering to a vegan diet or lactose intolerant to find something to enjoy; a full vegan cheese board has become not just possible, but diverse and delicious.

As more chefs and cheesemakers realize the possibilities of adding cultures to various nut, seed, and legume milks and allowing those flavors to bloom, the more the vegan cheese market will continue to expand. There are also books and recipes that can help you figure out how to create cheeses or cheese-like foods at home.

Vegan cheese options on the market

Miyoko’s Creamery and Kite Hill’s nut-based, artisanal-style products are not the only ones available widely in the supermarket. Mainstream dairy producers have noticed the boom of interest in vegan cheese and begun to capitalize on it, making plant-based versions of their most popular products, such as Babybel Plant-Based. There are also the big vegan brands that have been around for a long time in supermarkets, such as Daiya, Field Roast Chao and Violife, which make everything from slices to shreds. These are made from oils, like coconut, and starches, such as potato, that are flavored and formed into a cheese-like shape, made for ease and recognizability by those who are incorporating more plant-based foods into their diets.

The range of products and recipes available that aren’t based on soy or nuts is expanding, too, with sunflower seeds, pumpkin seeds and oats becoming more popular as base ingredients.

Beyond the mainstream, regional producers in the US, Canada and abroad are creating aged wheels of cheeses that have more in common with products from small-batch, artisanal cheese producers. These products are aged over weeks and have textures similar to dairy cheeses that are eaten on their own rather than as a complement to a dish. Blue Heron Creamery, based in Vancouver, British Columbia, sells cultured cheeses aged for 21 to 60 days. Rind Cheese, based in New York, makes wheels of cheeses that combine the flavors of Camembert and bleu cheese, soft and spreadable cheeses, as well as new slices for melting. Such cheeses might have rinds of various kinds: a washed rind, produced by the cheesemaker rubbing a brine over the cheese as it ages to encourage mold growth, like Gruyère; or a bloomy rind of edible mold, as one would find on brie.

Making vegan cheese at home

Vegan cheese is also rather easy to make at home, from simple ingredients, instead of relying on store-bought products. There are endless recipes to be found online, via blogs and YouTube. To start, vegan cookbook author Isa Chandra Moskowitz’s cashew queso and food writer Irini Groushevaia’s tofu feta are easy introductions to how to create cheesy flavor with a non-dairy base. As noted above, more and more recipes are emerging that are nut and soy-free, using sunflower seedsoat milk, and pumpkin seeds. The deeper resources for those starting out will be Miyoko Schinner’s “Artisan Vegan Cheese” and Karen McAthy’s “The Art of Plant-Based Cheesemaking,”

Sustainability concerns with vegan cheese

Though it’s often assumed that a vegan product is sustainable, there are many concerns in terms of the main source ingredients for vegan cheeses, such as nuts, coconut and soy. Transparency is key here: Is the company telling customers where they’ve sourced ingredients and which measures they’ve taken to ensure they’re produced not just sustainably, but with fair labor practices? Ask small, local artisan producers about their sourcing and check the websites of the brands at the supermarket — and email if there is no information.

Nuts

As with any nut-based product, water usage is a concern. It takes one gallon of water to grow a single almond, and five gallons for a walnut, and these are often grown in water-stressed areas.

When it comes to cashews, human rights are the issue. More than half of the world’s cashews come from three countries — Vietnam, India and the Ivory Coast — where working conditions are treacherous.

Human Rights Watch in 2011 reported major human rights abuses in Vietnam, where people “beaten with truncheons, given electric shocks, locked in isolation, deprived of food and water, and obliged to work even longer hours.” The anacardic acid present in the shell of the cashew also burns the fingers of those who de-shell them if they’re not provided with proper protection. Only 3% of the world’s cashews are certified fair trade (which includes a ban on child labor and forced labor), so look for vegan cashew cheeses that aretransparent about their sourcing. For example, Miyoko’s Creamery has a video on its website about the conditions of its cashew processing plant.

When making vegan cheese at home, as well, it is best to order your nuts from producers such as Equal Exchange, a democratic worker cooperative that pays partner farms fair prices.

Soy

When buying a cheese with soy as the base, note that 94% of soy grown in the US is genetically modified, and so looking for organic certification will be paramount, since organic certification prohibits the use of GMO crops.

Oil

Coconut oil is also used quite a bit in non-dairy cheese. Looking for labels that say the coconuts used were fair trade and organic, which means the laborers, local people and the growing environment won’t be exposed to harmful pesticides. Fair trade, while not perfect, ensures some price stability for the farmer. This oil is often found in non-dairy cheeses that haven’t been fermented and are made at a high volume.

Palm oil can often be found in processed vegan cheeses and other non-dairy products, despite its very bad track record in terms of deforestationorangutan habitats, and human rights’ violations. Vegan companies are starting to understand there is no sustainable way to use this oil in products, but it’s worth keeping an eye out for it on ingredient lists.

When Miyoko Schinner, of Miyoko’s Creamery, published “The Now and Zen Epicure” in 1991, it would have been hard to imagine that 30 years into the future, her name would be appearing on tubs of vegan cheese, boxes of vegan butter and bottles of “liquid vegan mozzarella” at more than 30,000 stores across the United States, as well as in Canada, South Africa, Hong Kong and Singapore. The book was put out by the publishing arm of The Farm, a commune in Tennessee that was established in 1971 and has championed a vegan diet ever since. This book was as niche as niche could get.

Yet it set the course for a modern approach to vegan dairy that we now can take for granted, like using nuts and coconut as bases for mayonnaise, cream sauce, sour cream, ice cream, and creme fraiche. The initial recipes were rudimentary, but they were also a leap forward. Tofu-based vegan cheeses had existed for centuries in China, and the first soy dairy had been established at the turn of the 20th century in Paris by an anarchist named Li Yu-Ying. But it was the realization that there were usable ingredients beyond soy that galvanized the possibilities of full-scale vegan dairy.

The power of nuts

Schinner doesn’t recall precisely where she got the idea to use cashews for vegan dairy, possibly from raw foodists who had already been seeing the possibilities in transforming nuts and seeds without the application of heat. By 2004, Brooklyn-based company Dr. Cow introduced nut-based wheels of cheese and a tangy cream cheese that brought an artisanal touch that could compare to small-batch dairy cheeses. In 2012, Schinner herself put out the book “Artisan Vegan Cheese,” setting off a new boom of possibility focused on culturing with rejuvelac, a fermented wheat berry beverage that had also come out of the raw food movement. She launched Miyoko’s Creamery in 2014, selling wheels of fermented cashew cheese in a range of flavors. Kite Hill, founded by chef Tal Ronnen, launched in 2015 at Whole Foods Market with almond milk as the base. From this moment on, quality vegan cheese went mainstream, presenting a true challenge to the hyper-processed oil-and-starch “cheeses” that had previously dominated grocery store aisles.

Trump signed law making mishandling of classified info a felony — now it may come back to haunt him

In 2018, then-President Donald Trump signed a bill into law that could now be used to punish him if he’s found to have taken classified information from the White House at the end of his tenure, Business Insider reports.

Speaking to Insider, national-security attorney Bradley P. Moss said that Trump could face five years in prison if he’s found guilty under the national security bill he signed.

The law upgrades the crime of wrongly moving classified material from a misdemeanor to a felony. As Moss points out, Trump signed the bill after spending the 2016 presidential campaign accusing Hillary Clinton of improperly handling classified information.

“Trump certainly has legal exposure to Section 1924 given it was classified documents from his spaces in the White House that were removed to Mar-Lago,” said Moss.

Moss added that “efforts by Trump to declassify records before he left office” were another key issue that could decide whether the measures could be used to prosecute him.

The National Archives said in February it had recovered 15 boxes of documents from Trump’s Florida estate, which the Washington Post reported included highly classified texts, taken with him when he left Washington following his reelection defeat.

The documents and mementos — which also included correspondence from ex-US president Barack Obama — should by law have been turned over at the end of Trump’s presidency but instead ended up at his Mar-a-Lago resort.

The recovery of the boxes raised questions about Trump’s adherence to presidential records laws enacted after the 1970s Watergate scandal that require Oval Office occupants to preserve records related to administration activity.

The Archives had requested then that the Justice Department open a probe into Trump’s practices.

White House staff also regularly discovered wads of paper clogging toilets, leading them to believe Trump was trying to get rid of certain documents, according to a forthcoming book by New York Times reporter Maggie Haberman.

Republican war on books: They don’t just want to control your body — next up, your mind

Once Republicans started to falsely accuse educators and librarians of “grooming” children for sexual abuse, it was just a matter of time before the talk of imprisoning them began. Sure enough, in a clip collected by Tennessee Holler, a recently-elected district attorney in Hamilton County, Tennessee, did just that during a meet-and-greet between her, the pro-censorship group Moms for Liberty (whose name would do George Orwell proud) and the local sheriff. In the video, recorded in May, you can hear an anti-liberty “Mom” ask, “Do you feel like there should be some kind of prosecution for these librarians?”

Coty Wamp, the county’s new DA, offers a throat-clearing “tough one,” before affirming that prosecution is on the table: “There’s going to come a time, in some of these books, where it crosses a criminal line. It’s called contributing to the delinquency of a minor.”

Now that the video has gone viral, Wamp is denying that she intended to say what she said. When contacted by Jezebel, she unleashed a confusing disawowal, claiming she never meant to say she would “prosecute librarians or teachers for the books that are in our schools,” but was only talking about some imaginary scenario in which “an adult was standing on a street corner handing out pamphlets to young children that depict sexual acts.” As the video shows, of course, she was responding to a question about librarians, at an event held by a group whose main political activity is harassing librarians and schoolteachers over books with “woke” content they don’t like. 

Indeed, in that same Jezebel interview, Wamp hedged again, in a way that sounds very much as if she has not ruled out prosecuting librarians and teachers for allowing kids to read book with content that offends the racist or homophobic sensibilities of Republicans: 

For me as a lawyer and somebody that’s prosecuted these cases you also have to determine who at the end of the day is responsible for putting these books in these schools. Is it the librarian? Is it the school administrators? Is it the school board? Because if we’re going to talk about who’s on the hook, whose on the hook for this, who is on the hook? We have to talk about it.


Want more Amanda Marcotte on politics? Subscribe to her newsletter Standing Room Only.


Clearly, the Republican war on reading in just beginning. Ever since GOP hedge-fund zillionaire Glenn Youngkin won the 2021 race for Virginia’s governor with a campaign that celebrated attempts to censor Nobel-winning novelist Toni Morrison, Republicans across the country have been swept up in a book-banning frenzy. Using fake concerns about “the children” as cover, Republicans have waged all-out war on not just books but any form of speech deemed “woke,” usually because it advocates antiracism or humanizes LGBTQ people. Red states have been banning books and terrorizing teachers for anything they deem “critical race theory,” now a shapeless umbrella term used to demonizes everything from teaching Martin Luther King Jr.’s March on Washington to telling kids that the Holocaust was bad. Hoary myths that gay people “recruit” children have been revived by simply updating the terminology — these days, LGBTQ people are accused of “grooming” children, with no evidence required — and used to justify legislation such as Florida’s “don’t say gay” law, effectively forcing queer teachers and students into the closet. The circle of censorship is expanding, as conservatives have started to target drag shows and Pride parades, trying to shut down any public expression of queerness or gender diversity.

But as always happens when reactionaries pull their censorship pants on, the main focus is reading. Spoiler: They hate it. Authoritarians have always been suspicious of reading, because it is such a private act. A reader, after all, is alone with the text and their thoughts. It’s very hard to control what kinds of “dangerous” ideas — such as that people of color and LGBTQ people are full, complex, interesting and often contradictory human beings — might start to form in that space. This is exactly why we so often in history see a reluctance to let oppressed groups of people, such as women or racial minorities, have access to literacy or higher education. And it’s also why Republicans have gone on an anti-reading rampage in the wake of their barely literate leader, Donald Trump, losing the 2020 election. 

They’re even going after math books, for heaven’s sake. 

As Dan Kois at Slate reported on Wednesday, Republicans in Virginia have even launched a campaign to revive the old obscenity laws once leveraged to censor books by Henry Miller and James Joyce. Using “protecting the children” as cover, Virginia state Del. Tim Anderson and some of his GOP colleagues have launched a legal petition to return to the days of declaring books “obscene,” allowing them to be banned from libraries, schools and even bookstores. It’s a direct challenge to decades of Supreme Court case law establishing that the First Amendment very much applies to literature. But after the overturn of Roe v. Wade — and Justice Clarence Thomas’ open invitation to right-wingers to challenge any 20th-century case establishing rights they don’t like — Republican lawyers are eager to explore how far they can go to simply delete an entire century’s worth of progress on human rights and civil rights. 

This particular case probably won’t get that far, especially as the current Supreme Court doesn’t seem to hate free speech as much as it hates reproductive rights or the right to vote. But cases like this are often not about trying to win everything all at once, but rather about resetting the parameters of the debate. Now that some Republicans are outright trying to ban the sale of novels, other efforts — such as removing books from schools or harassing and defunding public libraries — can seem more “moderate” in comparison. 


Want more Amanda Marcotte on politics? Subscribe to her newsletter Standing Room Only.


And make no mistake, the crackdown on reading is shaping up to be a major rallying issue for Republicans in the coming months and years. As Kathryn Joyce reported for Salon, Moms for Liberty sprung up nearly overnight and turned into a powerhouse in GOP politics after receiving a flood of dark money spending. “Today, Moms for Liberty has around 95,000 members in some 200 county chapters across close to 40 states,” she wrote. It’s now become standard for Republicans to pander to the group by promising a crackdown on schools and libraries that allow kids to read books on subjects the Moms hate, which almost always means racial justice or LGBTQ lives. 

One of the most immediate effects has been on libraries in small-town America. In Michigan, one library’s funding was cut as conservative residents rallied to close it down. In Iowa, another library temporarily shut its doors after the staff was harassed over the presence of both LGBTQ books and staff members. Librarians report being fired and harassed — often by being called “pedos” and “groomers” — for stocking books the right deems “woke.” In Texas, a conservative activist called the cops to accuse a school library of distributing pornography. The American Library Association has documented censorship efforts at more than 700 libraries in the past year. 

Fortunately, libraries have robust free speech protections, at least for now, and are often able to fend off these censorship efforts. In the long term, however, the most damage will likely be done to the public school system and to the longstanding principle that all American children should have access to a free education. As the Washington Post reported last week, there’s a catastrophic teacher shortage across the country, as many teachers who are already underpaid and pandemic-stressed simply quit in the face of all this abuse. 

“This shortage is contrived,” Randi Weingarten, president of the American Federation of Teachers, told the Post, blaming the situation on the “political situation in the United States.”

As Weingarten suggests, the teacher shortage is a feature, not a bug, of the current right-wing hysteria over “critical race theory,” alleged sexual “grooming” and other made-up panics. As Joyce has documented in investigative reports for Salon, gutting the very concept of public education has been a cherished long-term goal of the religious right. This political moment, with the GOP base in a full-on freakout over “wokeness,” presents a perfect opportunity to push an otherwise unpopular agenda of undermining, defunding and eventually destroying public education as we know it. 


Want more Amanda Marcotte on politics? Subscribe to her newsletter Standing Room Only.


How far Republicans will get with their censorship campaign is still an open question. On one hand, polling shows that book bans and other forms of censorship are soundly rejected by large majorities of Americans. But that’s also true, for example, of laws that ban or severely restrict abortion access. The Republican solution to that is to go around democracy to a form of minority rule. Through gerrymandering and voter suppression, the GOP has gained a political chokehold on large swaths of rural and suburban America where moderates and liberals have been marginalized or driven away amid a stifling climate of religious-right oppression. As Sen. Josh Hawley, R-Mo., recently admitted out loud, the goal is make life so intolerable in some areas that “red states are going to become more red” and Republicans can exert anti-democratic control by cordoning off the blue majority in a handful of dense metropolitan areas. 

Gaining power by making much of the country so inhospitable that only the angriest and most deluded people want to live there is a big task. It starts by destroying people’s ability to live in peace in their own homes, by attacking their right to have whatever sexual relationships they want, form whatever kinds of families they want and even read whatever books they want. The assault on the right to privacy was never going to stop at controlling what people do with their genitals. The final authoritarian goal has always and forever been to control what you do with your mind. 

“Relentless pace”: Republicans’ bad week gets worse as FBI drops subpoenas on Pennsylvania GOP

The FBI served subpoenas to “several” Pennsylvania Republican lawmakers this week as part of the federal investigation into the pro-Trump fake elector plot, according to PennLive.

While news of the FBI raid on Mar-a-Lago has dominated the news cycle, the FBI this week also seized Rep. Scott Perry’s, R-Pa., cellphone and delivered subpoenas or paid visits to multiple state House and Senate offices on Tuesday and Wednesday, sources told the outlet.

“While we were all occupied punditing about Mar-a-Lago, the FBI was apparently quite busy in Pennsylvania,” tweeted Peter Strzok, a former senior FBI official. “Respect to the relentless pace.”

The FBI is specifically seeking information related to Perry and the effort to deliver a so-called alternate slate of electors as part of former President Donald Trump’s plot to steal the election.

Perry played a key role in Trump’s scheme, backing his false claims of election rigging and connecting Trump with former DOJ official Jeffrey Clark, who effectively tried to stage a coup at the DOJ so he could become attorney general and advance Trump’s Big Lie, DOJ witnesses told the House Jan. 6 committee. The Jan. 6 panel has also turned up evidence showing that Perry was in frequent contact with then-White House chief of staff Mark Meadows as Trump sought to overturn his loss.

Trump ultimately backed off his plan to appoint Clark to lead the DOJ after warnings of mass resignations at the department. Authorities marched Clark out of his home in pajamas in June and raided his house as part of a DOJ investigation.

Former top Meadows aide Cassidy Hutchinson testified to the Jan. 6 panel that Perry discussed Trump coming to the Capitol after his rally at the Ellipse ahead of the Capitol riot, which Perry denied. Perry, the chairman of the far-right House Freedom Caucus, was also present for the group’s Dec. 21, 2020 meeting with Trump to discuss what Congress could do to block President Joe Biden’s win. Former acting Deputy Attorney General Richard Donoghue testified to the committee that Perry also called him on Dec. 27 to push debunked claims about discrepancies in the state’s vote count.

Hutchinson testified that Perry sought a pre-emptive presidential pardon from Trump after the Jan. 6 riot, which Perry also denied.

Perry on Tuesday said he had his phone seized by the FBI at an airport while he was traveling with his family. The Washington Post reported that the phone was seized as part of the FBI’s investigation into the fake elector plot.

Perry on Tuesday called the seizure “banana republic tactics.”

“I’m outraged — though not surprised — that the FBI under the direction of Merrick Garland’s DOJ, would seize the phone of a sitting member of Congress,” he said in a Facebook post.

But the seizure, along with the raid on Trump, would have had to be approved by a federal magistrate judge, meaning that the FBI would have had to show significant evidence that a crime likely occurred.

Perry in a statement to PennLive on Wednesday said that he was told he is not the target of the FBI’s investigation.

“In a discussion with the DOJ (federal Department of Justice), my attorneys were informed that I’m not a target of its investigation,” he said. “I’ve directed them to cooperate with the Justice Department in order to ensure that it gets the information to which it’s entitled, but to protect information to which it’s not – including communications that are protected under the speech and debate clause of the United States Constitution.”


Want a daily wrap-up of all the news and commentary Salon has to offer? Subscribe to our morning newsletter, Crash Course.


Senior Pennsylvania Republicans denied any knowledge of the subpoenas issued on Tuesday and Wednesday.

“Federal subpoenas typically request confidentiality from the witnesses being subpoenaed in order to avoid impediment to the ongoing investigation, so it would be inappropriate to comment on whether members have received subpoenas or not. If subpoenaed as witnesses, our members will certainly comply with requests for documents or information not covered by an applicable privilege,” Jason Thompson, a spokesman for Senate President Pro Temp Jake Corman, told PennLive. “We have no indication that any of our members are targets of any FBI investigation.”

But numerous Pennsylvania Republicans played active roles in the fake elector plot, including GOP gubernatorial candidate Doug Mastriano. Mastriano, a state senator who has vehemently pushed Trump’s election lies, was seen as the “point person” in the state’s effort to deliver an “alternate” slate of electors that would ostensibly subvert the will of the state’s voters, according to The New York Times. An attorney for Mastriano denied the report.

The “alternate” slate of electors included other prominent Republicans, including former Rep. Lou Barletta, R-Pa., Allegheny County GOP Chairman Sam DeMarco, former Trump Pennsylvania campaign chair Bernie Comfort and Andy Reilly, one of the state’s members on the Republican National Committee.

Pennsylvania Attorney General Josh Shapiro announced earlier this year that the fake electors would not face state charges even though the fake elector scheme has come under scrutiny by other federal and local investigators.

“Though their rhetoric and policy were intentionally misleading and purposefully damaging to our democracy, based on our initial review, our office does not believe this meets the legal standards for forgery,” Shapiro said in a statement in January.

Along with Perry and Clark, the FBI previously seized the phone of attorney John Eastman, who was the brains behind Trump’s plot to block the certification of Biden’s win. The DOJ also seized the phone of Nevada GOP Chairman Michael McDonald and subpoenaed Georgia GOP Chairman David Shafer, along with other Trump campaign allies in Georgia, Arizona and New Mexico. Nearly a dozen of Georgia’s fake electors were also subpoenaed in a separate investigation by Fulton County District Attorney Fani Willis, who is probing Trump’s effort to overturn his loss in the state.

Beto O’Rourke rips Uvalde heckler: “It may be funny to you, motherf**ker, but it isn’t funny to me”

In Texas — a state known for its obsession with guns — Democratic gubernatorial nominee Beto O’Rourke has been campaigning on moderate gun control, stressing that while he isn’t anti-2nd Amendment, there is no reason why Texans should have easy access to semiautomatic weapons like the one used in the Uvalde massacre. The former congressman laid out his arguments for stricter control of semiautomatic weapons at a townhall event in Mineral Wells, Texas on Wednesday night, August 10. And when he was interrupted by a laughing heckler, he shut the man down in a hurry.

On May 24, 19 students and two teachers were fatally shot during by a gunman at Robb Elementary School in Uvalde, Texas west of San Antonio — and O’Rourke told the crowd that they were “shot to death with a weapon originally designed for use in combat” that was “legally purchased by an 18-year-old.” Texas’ gun laws, O’Rourke noted, allowed the shooter to easily purchase an AR-15-style “weapon that was originally designed for use on the battlefields in Vietnam to penetrate an enemy soldier’s helmet at 500 feet and knock him down dead.”

When a heckler laughed at O’Rourke, the gubernatorial nominee angrily responded, “It may be funny to you, motherfucker, but it isn’t funny to me, OK?” And O’Rourke’s passionate response got him a big round of applause from his supporters in the crowd.

O’Rourke’s gubernatorial campaign underscores the progress that Democrats have been making in Texas, which still leans Republican but is now light red rather than deep red. The former congressman and El Paso native has been trailing incumbent Republican Gov. Greg Abbott in recent polls, but Abbott doesn’t have the type of huge double-digit leads that Republicans typically enjoyed in statewide races in Texas during the 1990s and 2000s. A University of Houston poll found Abbott leading O’Rourke by 5 percent, and a University of Texas poll from June found Abbott ahead by 6 percent.

When O’Rourke ran against far-right Republican Sen. Ted Cruz in Texas’ 2018 U.S. Senate race, he narrowly lost — and Democratic strategists saw that election as an indication that while statewide races are still an uphill battle for Democrats in Texas, they aren’t a lost cause. In 2020, President Joe Biden lost Texas to Donald Trump by about 6 percent — compared to the 16 percent margin that Republican presidential nominee Mitt Romney had enjoyed in Texas in 2012.

Watch the townhall video below or at this link.

Paranoid Trump worried allies “wearing a wire” after insider told FBI about Mar-a-Lago docs: report

Former President Donald Trump is increasingly paranoid about his inner circle after reports revealed that someone on the inside tipped off investigators about classified documents he kept at Mar-a-Lago.

The FBI on Monday executed a search warrant at Trump’s residence at the Palm Beach resort, removing about a dozen boxes of materials that may include classified documents. Someone “familiar with the stored papers” told investigators there may still be more classified documents at the club two months before the raid, according to The Wall Street Journal, though investigators were already suspicious that Trump did not turn over all classified material when the National Archives retrieved 15 boxes earlier this year. Newsweek reported that the raid was “based largely on information from an FBI confidential human source” who was able to identify what documents Trump was still hiding and where they were.

Even before the reports surfaced, TrumpWorld was gripped with paranoia that someone in Trump’s inner circle may have “flipped,” Axios reported on Wednesday. Trump’s allies have speculated about which aide or aides may have provided information to the FBI, leading to an environment of “mistrust and paranoia,” the outlet reported.

Trump himself is concerned that he may have a “rat” and is wondering whether his “phones are tapped, or even if one of his buddies could be ‘wearing a wire,'” according to Rolling Stone.

“He has asked me and others, ‘Do you think our phones are tapped?’ Given the sheer volume of investigations going on into the [former] president, I do not think he’s assuming anything is outside the realm of possibility,” a source close to Trump told the outlet. “He’s talked about this seriously [in the past few months], but I know of one time when he made a joke that was something like, ‘Be careful what you say on the phone!'”

On “at least a couple occasions” since May, Trump has wondered aloud whether any Republicans visiting his golf clubs may be “wearing a wire,” another source close to Trump told Rolling Stone, amid worries about a potential “mole.”

Some in Trump’s inner circle have stoked his paranoia, warning him not to trust certain individuals and to investigate them for potential contact with investigators, according to the report.

“I’m getting a lot of messages saying [things like], ‘This guy must be the informant,’ and others…calling for the [former] president to start doing phone-checks of his staff,” a Trump adviser told the outlet. “To be honest, a lot of it feels like people trying to screw over the ones they don’t like [in Trumpworld.]”

Ultimately, the raid followed months of discussions between the Justice Department and Trump’s legal team. Investigators had discussed the remaining documents with Trump’s lawyers and in June the Justice Department’s counterintelligence chief traveled to the resort to view the boxes, instructing Trump’s team to install a stronger lock on the basement room where they were held. The FBI was ultimately able to convince a federal magistrate judge that a crime had likely occurred and obtained a warrant to seize the documents.

Aides to Trump told the Wall Street Journal that they had cooperated with the DOJ and responded quickly to the request to secure the room. The Trump Organization also complied with a request to turn over surveillance footage from cameras to Mar-a-Lago in June, according to the report.


Want a daily wrap-up of all the news and commentary Salon has to offer? Subscribe to our morning newsletter, Crash Course.


FBI agents who seized the boxes on Monday prevented Trump attorney Christina Bobb from viewing the search, she said, as is standard in such operations. But Trump, his lawyers and his loyalists have seized on the revelation to peddle a baseless conspiracy theory that the FBI may have “planted” evidence during the search. Multiple insiders told Rolling Stone that Trump and his allies “do not have any evidence” that the FBI planted evidence.

Rolling Stone also reported that since leaving the White House, Trump has had a habit of “flaunting trophies” from his time in the White House and guests at Mar-a-Lago have “at times witnessed the ex-president brandishing certain objects or papers, claiming they were mementos from his stint in the White House as he gave informal tours.”

“It reminded me of how he’d give tours of the bathrooms and the toilets when he lived in the White House,” a source told the outlet. “He likes to show off…even if he isn’t supposed to have those things, evidently.”

Trump’s paranoia is not new and was a constant during his White House tenure, former White House press secretary and communications director Stephanie Grisham told Rolling Stone.

“When I worked for him,” she said, “it was an everyday obsession [about] who was leaking, who was cooperating with what. He’d regularly ask me and others, ‘Do you think I can trust this person?’ or ‘Do you trust this person?’ or tell me to ‘go find the leaker.'”

Grisham, who later fell out of favor with Trump, said she actually feels “bad for the guy today.”

“Trump demands total loyalty, and yet he turns on people at a moment’s notice. And he’s now in this situation where he and his people are wondering who among them could be giving some of his most closely held information to the FBI,” she said. “I mean, who can he trust? It’s just a shitty, sad way to live.”

Old age isn’t a modern phenomenon – many people lived long enough to grow old in the olden days, too

Every year I ask the college students in the course I teach about the 14th-century Black Death to imagine they are farmers or nuns or nobles in the Middle Ages. What would their lives have been like in the face of this terrifying disease that killed millions of people in just a few years?

Setting aside how they envision what it would be like to confront the plague, these undergrads often figure that during the medieval period they would already be considered middle-aged or elderly at the age of 20. Rather than being in the prime of life, they think they’d soon be decrepit and dead.

They’re reflecting a common misperception that long life spans in humans are very recent, and that no one in the past lived much beyond their 30s.

But that’s just not true. I am a bioarchaeologist, which means that I study human skeletons excavated from archaeological sites to understand what life was like in the past. I’m especially interested in demography – mortality (deaths), fertility (births) and migration – and how it was linked with health conditions and diseases such as the Black Death hundreds or thousands of years ago. There’s physical evidence that plenty of people in the past lived long lives – just as long as some people do today.

Bones record the length of a life

One of the first steps in research about demography in the past is to estimate how old people were when they died. Bioarchaeologists do this using information about how your bones and teeth change as you get older.

For example, I look for changes to joints in the pelvis that are common at older ages. Observations of these joints in people today whose ages we know allow us to estimate ages for people from archaeological sites with joints that look similar.

jawbone with teeth, a tooth, and a microscopy view of layers within a tooth's cementum

A researcher can count the layers within a tooth that were added over time to determine how old a person lived to be. Benoitbertrand1974/Wikimedia Commons, CC BY-SA

Another way to estimate age is to use a microscope to count the yearly additions of a mineralized tissue called cementum on teeth. It’s similar to counting a tree’s rings to see how many years it lived. Using approaches like these, many studies have documented the existence of people who lived long lives in the past.

For example, by examining skeletal remains, anthropologist Meggan Bullock and colleagues found that in the city of Cholula, Mexico, between 900 and 1531, most people who made it to adulthood lived past the age of 50.

And of course there are many examples from historical records of people who lived very long lives in the past. For example, the sixth-century Roman Emperor Justinian I reportedly died at the age of 83.

Analysis of the tooth development of an ancient anatomically modern Homo sapiens individual from Morocco suggests that our species has experienced long life spans for at least the past 160,000 years.

Clearing up a math misunderstanding

Given physical and historical evidence that many people did live long lives in the past, why does the misperception that everyone was dead by the age of 30 or 40 persist? It stems from confusion about the difference between individual life spans and life expectancy.

Life expectancy is the average number of years of life remaining for people of a particular age. For example, life expectancy at birth (age 0) is the average length of life for newborns. Life expectancy at age 25 is how much longer people live on average given they’ve survived to age 25.

In medieval England, life expectancy at birth for boys born to families that owned land was a mere 31.3 years. However, life expectancy at age 25 for landowners in medieval England was 25.7. This means that people in that era who celebrated their 25th birthday could expect to live until they were 50.7, on average – 25.7 more years. While 50 might not seem old by today’s standards, remember that this is an average, so many people would have lived much longer, into their 70s, 80s and even older.

Life expectancy is a population-level statistic that reflects the conditions and experiences of a huge variety of people with very different health conditions and behaviors, some who die at very young ages, some who live to be over 100 years old, and lots whose life spans fall somewhere in between. Life expectancy is not a promise (or a threat!) about the life span of any single person.

What some people don’t realize is that low life expectancy at birth for any population usually reflects very high rates of infant mortality. That’s a measure of deaths in the first year of life. Given that life expectancies reflect averages for a population, a high number of deaths at very young ages will skew calculations of life expectancy at birth toward younger ages. But typically, many people in those populations who make it past the vulnerable infant and early childhood years can expect to live relatively long lives.

Advances in modern sanitation – which reduce the spread of diarrheal diseases that are a major killer of infants – and vaccinations can greatly increase life expectancies.

Consider the effect of infant mortality on overall age patterns in two contemporary populations with dramatically different life expectancies at birth.

In Afghanistan, life expectancy at birth is low, at just over 53 years, and infant mortality is high, at almost 105 deaths for every 1,000 children born.

In Singapore, life expectancy at birth is much higher, at over 86 years, and infant mortality is very low – fewer than two infants die for every 1,000 who are born. In both countries, people do survive to very old ages. But in Afghanistan, because so many more people die at very young ages, proportionally fewer people survive to old age.

Living a long life has long been possible

It’s incorrect to view long lives as a remarkable and unique characteristic of the “modern” era.

Knowing that people often did have long lives in the past might help you feel more connected with the past. For example, you can imagine multigenerational households and gatherings, with grandparents in Neolithic China or Medieval England bouncing their grandchildren on their knees and telling them stories about their own childhoods decades before. You might have more in common with people who lived long ago than you had realized.


Sharon DeWitte, Professor of Anthropology, University of South Carolina

This article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license. Read the original article.

No exit: After Mar-a-Lago raid, Trump is trapped — and his fear is palpable

There is no limit to the depths Donald Trump will explore to beg for money.

A day after the FBI executed a search warrant on his home at Mar-a-Lago, the former president sent out emails to his supporters saying the FBI had “raided” his home, “broke into” his safe and possibly planted evidence. Was he upset? Maybe. Was he innocent? Who cares? But he was open about needing money to help battle “the corrupt left,” whatever that means. And so, dear friends and neighbors, the preacher in the big pop-up tent is going to pass around the hat, and if you’d very graciously give everything you have, the billionaire who needs your money would much appreciate it. By the way, would you like a new shirt with Donald’s portrait? He’s got those too.

Few would even have known Trump’s residence in Florida was the subject of a search warrant had he not announced it to the world in order to make some money and stir up the rabble. The FBI has made no public statement about the search warrant and executed it as surreptitiously and professionally as possible. Trump, of course, said his home was under siege and as expected the Trumpers cackled like geese on the pond and threatened violence. Many probably eagerly gave him more money.

Make no mistake, the search of a former president’s home — even though Trump wasn’t there, and had no idea what the FBI did or didn’t do while on site — is unprecedented. Trump was right when he claimed that no president has ever had that happen before — but then again, no president before Donald Trump had ever merited an FBI “raid.”

The search warrant apparently has to do with 15 boxes of material (including some classified material) Trump took with him when he left the White House. Rumors have been heavy about what that information was, and what it would be used for — up to and including sharing it with those who shouldn’t have it. The FBI not only had to provide substantial information that indicated a search was timely and necessary, but an independent judge had to sign off on the search. This is as serious as it gets. 

It is also just the tip of the iceberg when it comes to Donald Trump’s alleged crimes — which includes actions taken prior to, during and after the Jan. 6 insurrection. It also includes election activities in Georgia and God only knows what else.

Stray mentally challenged Trumpers may be dangerous, but those still vaguely aware of reality are less interested in taking up arms for a whiny baby who wishes his generals were like Hitler’s.

Trump, attempting to rally his rabble of disaffected supporters, has played the victim card at every opportunity. He screams “Deep State” and “Witch Hunt” so often, you just know they’ll soon be featured on red MAGA hats that Trump will eagerly sell for just $25. Supplies are limited! Get them now! They’re going fast!

The former president held the world captive while in office with his constant whining and ranting. Like a toddler in a high chair spilling his food while soiling his diaper, Trump has perfected the art of the whine. The far right is screaming “Civil war,” and Trump eats it up.

Let them whine. They’re as full of shit as he is. After five years of threats from Donald Trump, I can tell you one thing — the stray mentally challenged Trumper may be dangerous, but with so many of them facing prison time because of the insurrection, those who are still vaguely aware of reality are no longer so interested in taking up arms for a president who once wished his army generals were more like Hitler’s. 


Want a daily wrap-up of all the news and commentary Salon has to offer? Subscribe to our morning newsletter, Crash Course.


In short, Donald Trump’s time on stage will soon be done. This week it was reported he is shopping for an attorney to defend him in a criminal case. Good luck. Trump doesn’t pay anyone he hires, shoots his mouth off randomly, bullies those who work for him and hasn’t, according to several DOJ sources, had an attorney worth a cup of warm piss since he drove the Trump bus over Michael Cohen at the beginning of his presidency. Maybe he can get the firm of Dewey Cheatum and Howe to defend him. Those three stooges are the best Trump can hope for.

Cohen tweeted out a smiling video cheering the DOJ after the FBI searched Trump’s home, so I doubt Trump has a hope in hell of getting him back. Perhaps Rudy Giuliani will hold another press conference in front of a landscaping company to give us the latest. But then again, Rudy claims he’s too infirm to go to Georgia to testify — so who knows. 

Still, here’s what we know: Not only is Trump coming to the end of the line, but he can no longer rely on his faithful rabble to scare people into leaving him alone. Moreover, it’s doubtful there are enough of his faithful handmaidens left to do the job.

*  *  *

The clouds were thick. The air was hot and sticky.  Nearby stood a tall oak tree. In a limb some 20 feet above the ground I saw a Trump flag, caked with dried mud and wrapped around a branch. There were clothes in another nearby branch and corrugated tin wrapped around the trunk.

Welcome to eastern Kentucky. It’s a bastion of Trump support, inhabited by QAnon supporters, coal miners, climate change deniers and the assorted partially-educated working poor.

For some of those people, everything they owned was wrapped around the surviving trees or strewn across the road after the recently receded floods.

This area of Kentucky is dominated by the Daniel Boone National Forest and littered with small towns and unincorporated areas nestled around churches and small stores. In the late 1980s this same area was the site of “Operation Green Gray Sweep” — a state police effort to eradicate the marijuana crop, which in some places still rivals tobacco in popularity, and is still for some strange reason illegal in this state. It isn’t uncommon for banks to hire private security at the end of the growing season as the local farmers deposit proceeds from their lucrative cash crop.

Yes, it’s an area of conflict, hypocrisy, incongruity and amazing contradictions. While churches are common, Christianity isn’t. Religion in the area is used as both a cloak and a dagger by politicians, moralists and the denizens of the rural countryside.

Joe Biden toured eastern Kentucky on Monday to see the flood damage caused by intense thunderstorms, right on the heels of a congressional vote on landmark legislation to combat climate change — which has hit eastern Kentucky citizens hard, even if many of them completely deny it exists.

Few presidents have ever had to confront so much irrationality and fewer still have successfully done so. You can argue about education, gerrymandering, religion and anything else you want, but sometimes you can’t fix stupid. 

“It’s unfortunate. It’s my second visit to Kentucky for a crisis,” Biden said. “I promise you… as long as it takes, we’re going to be here. We [the federal government] are committed. There’s absolute 100 percent coverage of cost for the next few months.”

Few presidents have confronted as much irrationality as Joe Biden. Fewer still have successfully done so. You can argue about education, gerrymandering and religion, but you can’t fix stupid.

It took a set of balls neither Trump, Josh Hawley nor Mike Pence have ever had for Biden to show up in the middle of Trump country and declare he has empathy for citizens who are suffering, and who mostly hate him. Biden did that, and there were some I spoke with in the small towns throughout the region who appreciated it.

Remember, this is an area of the country that lives and dies on the latest accomplishments of the University of Kentucky Wildcat basketball team. Legendary Wildcat shooting guard Rex Chapman, or “Sexy Rexy,” is a traitor to some of these people because of his progressive stances on social media. Yet as one man told me, “He’s one of our own. We love him to death,” adding, “but I wouldn’t let him in the house any more. He’s part of the Deep State.”

At an airport in rural Kentucky there hung two flags, according to pool reports: One that said “F**k Biden” and another declaring support for Trump in 2024. But the vitriol against Biden is waning here, as is the fealty to Trump. “Trump is just a sore loser liar,” I was told by a shop owner outside Hazard. “I voted for him twice. I love him. But he’s a con man. He’s a liar like every other politician. He lost and he can’t admit it.”

Near Richmond, I spoke with a man who said, “Trump was the best. What happened? I saw the [Jan. 6 committee] hearings. He’s crap.”

The hearings have slowly seeped into the national consciousness and conscience, separating the Trump reality from his fiction. This week’s search at Mar-a-Lago will go further to do so. “They wouldn’t do that search if they didn’t have a reason,” I was told by the same man who claimed he loved Trump.

In Missouri, where Sen. Josh Hawley is now routinely mocked by some of the farmers and rural citizens who voted for him, the infrastructure bill, the Jan. 6 hearings and other signs of normalcy are sinking Trump’s potential political future into a thick morass of meaningless mediocrity. “I’d like Biden to get inflation under control, but it’s been more peaceful with him around. Nobody seems as angry,” I was told. “And there’s nothing wrong with building roads and bridges.”

Biden’s influence may actually be growing outside the Beltway, even as he gets pummeled by critics and members of the D.C. press corps. In a trip across the country during the last week, everywhere I drove there were fewer signs of angry Trump supporters. On I-64 in southern Illinois, just last year I saw enormous Trump flags, flanked by bales of hay and American flags, on at least three separate sites. You couldn’t drive more than a few miles without seeing pickup trucks cruising around with huge Trump flags anchored in the truck bed. I saw none of that over the last few weeks. Trump, when he’s spoken about at all, is usually mentioned dismissively. There are definitely folks who will defend him when you ask, but the energy and vitriol once attached to his name are gone.

Instead, you hear the normal chant of “All politicians lie,” and “I hate the president.”

Trumpism, it appears, is receding like the Kentucky flood waters, just when Trump needs his supporters the most.

*  *  *

Wherever Trump is this morning, the walls are probably painted in ketchup and broken china. His yellow, dilated eyes are evidence of his growing fear. The combination of terror, sweat and expelled body fluids have combined to make his turgid, fetid nest smell like Satan’s outhouse. His fear is palpable and a big part of that fear is that he doesn’t know what the Justice Department knows. That’s why he wants someone, anyone, to tell the world what the FBI is up to.

There are those, particularly Trump and his supporters, who would like to see Attorney General Merrick Garland and the FBI address the search of Mar-a-Lago now, in a news conference. I am not one of those. I am content to let the wheels of justice grind on in their natural course because, having spent four years covering Donald Trump, I know where this will inevitably lead: to his prosecution, conviction and imprisonment. 

Trump demands attention, and demands an explanation, because he wants to get in front of the coming calamity. But he cannot avoid the reckoning he is due, no matter how much he cries. Garland is a meticulous, smart prosecutor who won’t give Trump the fuel he wants to ruin the prosecution. Careful, stealthy and quiet is the perfect way to investigate Trump, who is careless, bombastic, loud and rude.

Remember Trump is a hollow man and we all know how they end: “Not with a bang, but with a whimper.”

Trump is whimpering not just because the world is catching up with him but because his lifelong grift is nearing its end. The world is putting him in its rearview mirror.

He sees it. He knows it. He fears it. And ultimately, he can’t escape it.

He’s done.

QAnon believers have a novel spin on Mar-a-Lago raid: At last the “Storm” is here

On Tuesday afternoon, far-right media outlet Real America’s Voice dedicated a nearly 20-minute segment of its talk show “Water Cooler” to a novel explanation of Monday night’s FBI raid on Mar-a-Lago, Donald Trump’s Palm Beach resort and home. While many Trump allies in the Republican Party and conservative media have competed to voice the most vehement denunciation of the search — Rep. Paul Gosar of Arizona called to “destroy” the “democrat brown shirts known as the FBI,” Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene of Georgia suggested that the raid might portend “civil war” and Florida state Rep. Anthony Sabatini said state leaders should arrest FBI agents “upon sight” — RAV managed to find a bigger villain yet. 

“I’ll just tee it up this way: Jeffrey Epstein. Pedophiles. Trump. Deep State,” said host David Brody, co-author of a biography of Trump, before handing the reins over to his colleague Anna Perez, host of her own RAV show, “Common Sense.” Perez went on to make a lengthy case that the raid was tied to the claims of the repeatedly debunked conspiracy theory QAnon, which argues, against all evidence, that Democratic politicians, Hollywood celebrities and other elites are part of a satanic and cannibalistic child sex abuse ring that only Trump can defeat. 

“This is all a part of the puzzle I’m trying to put together here, which is that the Deep State, ultimately, this past raid of Mar-a-Lago, it’s a threat. It’s a threat because they don’t want [Trump] to expose the pedophiles that he knows about,” said Perez. “That’s what impeachment was about. That’s what the Russia hoax was about. That’s what every single — that’s what Jan. 6 was about before they planted all those people from the FBI there… They’re coming after him and it’s because they don’t want him to expose the pedophiles.” 

Perez based her claims, in part, on a Tuesday Politico story speculating that the judge who signed the FBI’s warrant for the raid is Bruce Reinhart, who, in 2008, also represented former employees of Jeffrey Epstein, the deceased sex offender and financier whose connections to powerful people around the world, including Trump, have long been used to prop up QAnon’s elaborate theories. From that exceptionally flimsy foundation, Perez argued, “We are looking at a man who was behind this warrant to raid Mar-a-Lago who is basically supportive of Jeffrey Epstein.” 

As many other QAnon supporters have done over the movement’s brief but eventful existence, Perez pointed to a handful of statements from Trump as evidence of his covert support for the cause, and for the baffling and counterintuitive conviction that Trump ran for president in 2016 with the primary goal of exposing the supposed cabal. Among them was an exchange during a 2020 election town hall hosted by NBC, in which Trump repeatedly refused to disavow QAnon, telling host Savannah Guthrie that he couldn’t say for sure that Democrats weren’t running a satanic pedophile cult, and neither could she. “I do know they are very much against pedophilia. They fight it very hard,” Trump said. “And I agree with that.” 

“What a dumb woman,” Perez said after playing the clip. “Of course there are satanic cults that are running this. Of course there is child abuse. Of course there’s pedophiles everywhere in government.” 

Sitting beside her, David Brody nodded along. Prior to joining Real America’s Voice, Brody was chief political correspondent for the Christian Broadcasting Network, where he conducted one of Trump’s first post-inauguration sit-down interviews in 2017 and also did multiple interviews with Barack Obama during his 2008 campaign. Brody’s successful efforts to make Trump palatable to evangelicals, in large part through a series of eight interviews with the candidate during his 2016 race, earned him “phenomenal” access to the Trump White House and the chance to co-author a “spiritual biography” of the 45th president, as well as a place alongside Maggie Haberman and Tucker Carlson in AdWeek’s 2017 list of the top 15 “political power players” in the media. 

In 2020, though, Brody joined Real America’s Voice, a far-right media empire built to serve as a home for Steve Bannon’s talk show “War Room” after the former Trump campaign CEO and White House strategist was de-platformed from venues like YouTube and Spotify. As the network expanded, also hiring hosts like disgraced former Missouri Gov. Eric Greitens, its leadership promised to serve as “a platform for patriots all across America who care about traditional values.” But as one former RAV producer told the Washington Post earlier this year, “We were told fairly regularly that we were Trump propaganda…That was the message from the top: ‘We’re a Trump propaganda network.’ That’s where the money was.” 

RAV’s “Water Cooler” show isn’t the only place where QAnon conspiracy theorists have been working overtime to square the news of the Mar-a-Lago raid with their unified theory of the coming “Storm” — in the QAnon-verse, a day of mass judgment when all members of the supposed pedophile cabal will be arrested and brought to justice, generally understood to mean summary trial and execution. 


Want a daily wrap-up of all the news and commentary Salon has to offer? Subscribe to our morning newsletter, Crash Course.


In various internet forums, as Media Matters senior fellow Alex Kaplan noted on Twitter, QAnon influencers made the argument that the FBI search of Trump’s Palm Beach redoubt was somehow part of the larger plan that “Q” — the anonymous figure or figures behind the posts that undergird QAnon lore — had prophesied. 

“Was this part of ‘The Plan’???” one influencer asked on 8chan. “Q told us to ‘Trust Wray,'” another wrote on Telegram. “Who leads the FBI? Q told us ‘How do you get evidence entered legally.’ (FBI raid gets all the info on the record). Q asks ‘Who has all the information?’ DJT does.” 

QAnon influencers have labored to argue that the FBI’s search of Mar-a-Lago was somehow part of “The Plan” prophesied by Q: “Remember that Trump repeatedly told us the best was yet to come.”

Yet another influencer, as Newsweek reported, posted, “It’s important to understand something right now. The storm is definitely coming in and it may get extremely wild and unpredictable…But the end is this: Nothing can stop what is coming. Period. When the chaos closes in, choose to trust God and remember that Trump repeatedly told us the best was yet to come.” 

Trump himself seemed to promote the idea that the raid fit into QAnon’s conspiracist theology in a video he posted on Tuesday to Truth Social, his struggling social media platform. As Kaplan reported on Wednesday, Trump’s video paired video footage of his own speeches with a background song entitled “Wwg1wga” — the abbreviated form of the QAnon slogan “Where we go one, we go all,” which has been widely used as a movement hashtag. The video also incorporated visuals of rain and the sound of thunder, in an unmistakable reference to QAnon’s faith in the salvific coming “storm.” 

On Real America’s Voice, in response to Perez’s wild theories, David Brody nodded along, saying that he “hundred-percent agree[d]” with her argument that Trump had run for president in order to dismantle Democrats’ pedophile network. 

“The devil’s-advocate argument is going to be, ‘OK, great, so these are all pedophiles, where’s the evidence?'” said Brody, who, although long a voice of right-wing media, has also had unusual access to the highest levels of political power. But the complete absence of supporting evidence for any of QAnon’s claims, Brody continued, was proof in itself. “There is nothing wrong with, especially in today’s day and age for sure, questioning authority,” he said. “And questioning everything we know, because really we know nothing based on the fact that they’ve given us no reason to believe anything.” 

Perez readily agreed, asking, “Why wouldn’t the Deep State be protecting pedophiles?” 

David Brody explains: “There is nothing wrong with … questioning everything we know, because really we know nothing, based on the fact that they’ve given us no reason to believe anything.”

All of this might be troubling enough: QAnon conspiracy theories being promoted in straightforward fashion, with no artful coding, on a national media network with the apparent approval of a formerly-somewhat-mainstream journalist who had close access to multiple presidents. But the two then shifted into a broader indictment, claiming that the pedophile network QAnon adherents have long warned about has now been paired with a larger threat from LGBTQ people and teachers. 

“All of this is happening on a very higher-up level, on the elite level,” said Perez. “What’s going on at the lowest ground level possible is you have the normalization of pedophilia in schools. They’re not groomers. They’re outright pedophiles that are teaching some of our kids in these school districts.” 

When Perez argued that “the LGBTQA group, whatever they call themselves now,” was “laying the groundwork for people in just a daily-life setting to accept pedophilia,” as a sort of mass-market corollary to the elite cabal, Brody agreed again. “This is why the left hates that ‘groomer’ term,” he said. “Because it hits a little too close to home.” He went on to tell Perez that her work was “a service to America, really.” 

At the end of the segment, Brody invited Perez to explain what drove her passion for the issue. After nearly 20 minutes of broadcasting dangerous, fact-free claims, the two hosts seemed to accidentally land on a moment of truth, as Perez responded that she’d been activated by stuff she’d seen online. “Things just started popping up in my YouTube feed, even, or just anywhere I looked,” she said. “I couldn’t turn away from these stories.” 

Brody helped her along: “You couldn’t escape. It was all around you.”

CORRECTION: An earlier version of this story incorrectly stated that Real America’s Voice host Anna Perez had previously worked at Newsmax. The story has been updated.

Trump, Mar-a-Lago and the Fifth Amendment: A federal prosecutor’s five big takeaways

Wednesday’s breaking news was that the FBI had an inside informant at Mar-a-Lago, who reportedly told them that Donald Trump was hiding classified documents there. On the same day in New York, Trump invoked his Fifth Amendment rights in state Attorney General Letitia James’ civil investigation of the Trump Organization. These are only two of the multiple investigations that have Trump or his family business in their crosshairs. 

Here are a former federal prosecutor’s takeaways from this week’s investigation-related news so far.

First, for those who cherish the rule of law, it may seem hard to avoid schadenfreude when Trump, after relentlessly assaulting the Constitution, takes full personal advantage of its protection. That’s exactly what he did on Aug. 10 in New York while invoking his right against self-incrimination.

It may be difficult to avoid schadenfreude when Trump, after relentlessly assaulting the Constitution, takes full personal advantage of its protection against self-incrimination.

The ironies are multiple, including this one: Trump learned his take-no-prisoners approach to life and litigation from the virulent Roy Cohn, Sen. Joe McCarthy’s chief inquisitor in his demagogic 1950s Senate hearings on communists in America. Innocent people had to assert their right against self-incrimination for fear of their testimony being used against them in the days of red-baiting paranoia. Now it is Cohn’s student who takes the Fifth.

I can say from experience that the Justice Department reinforces what its prosecutors learned in law school — to revere the right against self-incrimination. The chief lesson of the 16th-century Spanish Inquisition was that before depriving citizens of liberty, the government must be required to prove guilt — and without the help of suspects if they decline to give it.

Even centuries before that, in 1215, the Magna Carta protected English citizens from harm at the hands of monarchs by establishing due process of law, of which the right against self-incrimination is a part. So, six years after Trump attacked Hillary Clinton’s aides for invoking that right in the infamous investigation of her emails, let’s appreciate the opportunity that Trump’s invocation provides for educating the American public, including the twice-impeached ex-president’s most fervent supporters, about the constitutional right to remain silent.

Second, consider the dangerous and hypocritical attacks on law enforcement by Trump defenders who hold elected office. Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene, R-Ga., tweeted “Defund the FBI!” Sen. Marco Rubio, R-Fla., referred to the warrant-based search as sponsored by “Marxists,” quite likely in an attempt to fire up his voter base among anti-communist Cuban Americans as he runs for re-election.

Those attacks are flashing red lights for our society’s stability and security. Endangering them is the inevitable and entirely predictable effect of undermining public trust in law enforcement officials who show no fear, favor or partiality to the powerful. Without such trust, we have neither law nor order. No one is safe in a state of anarchy — or an autocracy. 

As for hypocrisy, there is no principled way to demand that the Justice Department investigate Hunter Biden, as Republicans continue to do, and simultaneously to attack the DOJ’s independently validated search of Trump’s home. To obtain a search warrant for Trump’s premises at Mar-a-Lago, federal prosecutors clearly satisfied a federal magistrate that evidence existed that the former president had committed a crime that justified the intrusion.

Third, those who charge that Attorney General Merrick Garland was acting out of political partisanship must consider two things: These headlines overshadowed President Biden’s victory lap for his big win in Congress on a landmark bill addressing both the climate crisis and health care. He was just as blindsided by Garland’s search as the rest of us, and can’t be happy about seeing his moment of triumph upstaged. The White House clearly meant for Wednesday morning’s news of legislative successes to be a major turning point for Democratic prospects in the midterms.

At the same time, Biden got exactly what he sought when he named Garland his AG: A chief legal officer who would not consult him and who would put his head down and do his job, independent of politics.

In addition, the Mar-a-Lago search, according to Sen. Lindsey Graham and other Republicans, made Trump even more determined to run for the 2024 Republican nomination. They claim that Garland’s historic decision to execute a search warrant against a former president has energized Trump and the Republican base to get out and vote in the midterms.

No one who has been in Washington as long as Garland would have missed the possibility of such reactions — and that had no evident effect on his duty to the Constitution.


Want a daily wrap-up of all the news and commentary Salon has to offer? Subscribe to our morning newsletter, Crash Course.


Fourth, while the search warrant required a showing of probable cause that a crime had been committed, as a practical matter, the federal magistrate judge who issued the warrant, Bruce Reinhart, almost surely applied a far higher standard of proof.

The target here was no ordinary public official, but rather a former president of the United States. Reinhart understood that the validity of the warrant would surely become public at some point and receive microscopic scrutiny in the media. It will also be reviewed by a district court judge, should Trump be indicted and should the prosecution seek to offer evidence from the search at trial.

No magistrate judge wants to be professionally embarrassed in a high-visibility case. Reinhart surely required the FBI’s warrant application to meet the most exacting standards.

Because no magistrate judge wants to be reversed or professionally embarrassed, especially in a high-visibility case, Reinhart would have required the FBI’s warrant application to meet the most exacting standards before he approved it. The Aug. 10 report that the FBI had a source for its warrant inside Mar-a-Lago suggests that this judge, a veteran prosecutor with experience in matters of public corruption and then as a criminal defense lawyer, was on extremely solid ground authorizing the search. 

Fifth, Garland will not want to become the next Jim Comey as he considers whether to respond to Republican pressure to justify publicly the Justice Department’s probe of Trump. Comey came under intense public fire, and justifiably so, for acting contrary to Justice Department norms about not discussing or releasing information about pending investigations during an election season. Comey’s bungled handling of the 2016 investigation of Hilary Clinton’s emails may well have affected the outcome of that year’s presidential election, and the course of American history.

Trump, however, faces no similar constraints about releasing the nonclassified items on the FBI’s requisite inventory of what evidence agents collected in the search, a copy of which was left on the premises. If, as Trump claims, the search was purely politically motivated, making that inventory public would serve the public interest in holding the DOJ and FBI accountable.

The longer Trump fails to do so, the stronger two inferences become. First, that his protests about the Mar-a-Lago search are just one more false cry of victimhood. And second, that his future may well hold another opportunity to exercise his Fifth Amendment rights, this one not coming in a civil case but in a criminal one.   

Launch of “Real Doctors Against Oz” campaign calls GOP candidate into question

Highlighting Dr. Mehmet Oz’s spreading of Covid-19 misinformation and his history of dispensing what one study found to be “baseless” medical advice, several Pennsylvania doctors joined Democratic Senate candidate Lt. Gov. John Fetterman on Wednesday in warning that electing Oz to the U.S. Senate would “endanger Pennsylvanians’ health.”

Drs. Val Arkoosh of the Montgomery County Board of Commissioners, Marcelle Shapiro of Perelman School of Medicine, and Lisa Perriera of the Women’s Centers were joined by Fetterman surrogate state Rep. Malcolm Kenyatta (D-181) at a press conference at City Hall in Philadelphia, launching a statewide “Real Doctors Against Oz” campaign.

Fetterman and the physicians are not claiming that Oz, a retired heart surgeon who is running for Senate as a Republican, is not a “real doctor”—but instead denouncing his “history of peddling debunked supplements, dangerous fad diets, and fake miracle cures,” his financial ties to the pharmaceutical industry, and his support for “Republican efforts to ban abortion in Pennsylvania, endangering the lives of women.”

“Not only has Oz palled around with big pharma and promoted their products on his show, but we also know that he’s invested in some of the same companies that are raking in billions while helping to drive up the cost of medication and force families to ration their insulin doses,” said Arkoosh. “When his pharma buddies make money, Oz makes money. Oz simply doesn’t care about the health of Pennsylvanians.”

The physicians discussed Oz’s long career as a celebrity doctor who hosted a TV show for 13 seasons before pivoting to a political career in 2021.

As a study published in 2014 in The BMJ found, half of the advice Oz gave out on his show was “baseless or wrong,” and researchers at Georgetown University found in 2018 that more than three-quarters of his recommendations “did not align with evidence-based medical guidelines.”

The doctors also condemned Oz’s comparison of vaccine mandates “to forced sterilization and lobotomies” and his claim that vaccines against Covid-19 are not “true” vaccines, as well as his defense of discredited Covid-19 treatments like hydroxychloroquine and ivermectin.

“As physicians, we take a pledge to do no harm, as part of our Hippocratic oath,” said Shapiro. “We absolutely cannot trust him to have the best interests of the health of the people of Pennsylvanians and for our country.”

The Real Doctors Against Oz is led by “members of the Pennsylvania medical community communicating their distrust of Dr. Oz, the threat he poses to Pensylvanians as quack doctor and fraud—not trusted by real medical professionals—who has always and will always put enriching himself above all else even if it means endangering people’s health,” said the group.

In addition to pushing ineffective and hazardous treatments for Covid-19, Oz has spent years promoting the use of diet products such as “green coffee bean extract as a miracle fat-burning pill that works for everyone,” the Federal Trade Commission said in 2014. Such claims led both Republicans and Democrats on a Senate committee to “scold” Oz, Real Doctors Against Oz said.

On social media on Wednesday, Fetterman shared several clips of Oz promoting “magic” products “that let you lose weight without diet or exercise.”

“He has no problem spreading misinformation if it helps him make money,” said Fetterman of Oz’s claim that he intends to “take on” Big Pharma as a senator, despite investing heavily in the industry.

“Oz has ALWAYS put profits above the health and well-being of others,” Fetterman added.

As he frequently has in recent months, the lieutenant governor added a meme poking fun at Oz for owning a home in New Jersey, as well as an image of Vince Offer, who starred in infomercials selling an absorbent cloth called ShamWow.

“ShamWow guy + stethoscope = Dr. Oz,” tweeted Fetterman.

Trump supporters plan to protest outside of FBI headquarters this weekend

Supporters of former President Donald Trump are planning a protest outside the headquarters of the Federal Bureau of Investigation this weekend — but some are already suspicious that they’re being set up.

The Daily Beast’s Zachary Petrizzo reports that the far-right Gateway Pundit website has started promoting a pro-Trump rally directly outside the FBI’s headquarters in Washington D.C. to “protest the out-of-control FBI and its actions against President Trump.”

However, Petrizzo writes that many pro-Trump commenters are expressing skepticism that the rally is a legitimate protest and are instead speculating that it’s an elaborate trap enacted by the Deep State.

“If this Nam [Vietnam] vet needs goes to D.C., it will be with a semi-auto pitchfork!” wrote one pro-Trump commenter.

“Beware of possible FBI agents urging rebellion,” wrote another.

Fox News reported on Wednesday afternoon that FBI agents have seen an uptick in violent threats in the wake of the agency executing a search warrant at Mar-a-Lago earlier this week.

The FBI this week executed a search warrant at Mar-a-Lago reportedly because Department of Justice officials had probable cause to believe Trump was illegally housing classified documents within the resort.

Stephen Colbert compares Mar-a-Lago raid to Christmas

During a segment of “The Late Show with Stephen Colbert” on Tuesday, Colbert celebrated the FBI’s recent raid of Trump’s Mar-a-Lago residence and referred to the event as being as “big as Christmas.” 

The incident that Colbert is referring to took place on Monday when the FBI performed an unannounced search of former President Trump’s Florida home to look for documents that Trump may have illegally taken from the White House at the end of his presidency. The raid was conducted under a search warrant which, as Salon points out in earlier coverage of the raid, had to have been signed by a federal prosecutor after showing probable cause.

Greeting his audience during the show’s opening monologue, Colbert joked that “It may be hot outside, but in here it’s Christmas; because yesterday we got the present we wanted.”

From here the screen flashes to an NPR headline reading “FBI agents raided Mar-a-Lago,” causing the audience to erupt into cheers and applause.


Want a daily wrap-up of all the news and commentary Salon has to offer? Subscribe to our morning newsletter, Crash Course.


“That is the most beautiful sentence America has ever produced,” Colbert said in response to NPR’s headline. “It’s right up there with ‘we put cheese inside the crust.”

Offering a brief run-down of what took place during the raid, Colbert joked that he felt sorry for the agents conducting it; riffing as though one of those agents saying “Sir, I finished searching the empty cabinet full of empty chicken buckets, where should I go next?”

“We know the raid happened, but we still don’t know why the raid happened, because we don’t yet know what was in the search warrant” said Colbert as the segment went further into speculation on the justifiable cause behind the search warrant being issued. “Think about that. We’re talking about the former President of the United States of America. The FBI raids his home and all we can think is ‘hmmm, I wonder which of his crimes they’re investigating.'”

Watch the rest of the segment here:

The importance of “Prey” doing right by the dog, Sarii

First, an essential spoiler: the dog lives.

“Prey,” the Hulu Originals film, has injected life into the “Predator” franchise. A prequel to the four previous films about malicious alien, trophy-seeking hunters, it’s set in 1719 on the Northern Great Plains. It centers a young Comanche hunter and tracker named Naru (Amber Midthunder), determined to become a warrior and protect her tribe, be it from big cats, white men or an invisibility-cloaked threat from space. Importantly, the film has also introduced a cute dog.

Naru’s near-constant companion Sarii (Coco) is a breed known as a carolina dog. Tan-colored with large, perky ears, breeds such as Sarii don’t have the highest “trainability level,” according to the American Kennel Club, and Midthunder would have to agree, describing her canine co-star as “a little bit of a hot mess.”

But she’s our mess. Coco as Sarii is earnest, believable and endearing. We need a female lead like the incredibly engaging Midthunder. We need a dog. And we need the dog to make it.

From the beginning of film, dogs have been there. A dog steals the show in Thomas Edison’s 1894 film “Athlete with Wand,” simply by sleeping and appearing disinterested. A stray dog appears alongside the action in the Lumière brothers’ “Le Faux cul-de-jatte.” The wandering on set of random, stray dogs was apparently not uncommon

But like damsels, even early on dogs are often in distress. In 1904’s “Dog Factory,” dogs become sausages, though we don’t see the terrible act. Fast-forward more than a hundred years, and endangering dogs and cats is still a major plot device. RIP, Mews of “Stranger Things”; we hardly knew you. And that’s the point: often, the death of an animal serves as an easy shorthand to a character’s viciousness. How cruel are they? Cruel enough to kill a dog. 

In 1987’s “Benji the Hunted,” the lovable, strappy Benji is pursued by a heartless hunter. Even dogs that reach a natural death in the movies, like “Marley & Me,” adapted from the 2005 memoir, do so with considerable pathos. Anyone reading this who watched “Old Yeller” as a child was likely at least vaguely traumatized by its rabies plot. So many dog characters die or are killed on screen, the website Does The Dog Die? was created several years ago to provide premature details, steering animal lovers away from distressing media or at least mentally preparing them.

PreyDakota Beavers as Taabe and Amber Midthunder as Naru in “Prey” (David Bukach/20th Century Studios)It’s difficult to concentrate when you know the dog might die and often, do so violently. “I’m out, were my son’s words when a cat dies, viciously, in 2022’s “Firestarter” remake (full disclosure: we were all checked out of that slow film long before). The dog’s death in “They/Them” feels so inexplicable, it’s hard to stay with the story. Worrying about an innocent animal’s fate can take you out of the world of the fiction and make you abruptly question motive. It’s a destabilizing effect.

It’s also easy emotional manipulation of an audience.  

Coco is not a professional dog; she simply plays one on TV.

“Prey” does a good job of reassuring us about the dog, even though it may have been inadvertent. Sarii wasn’t supposed to be as big a part of the film, according to Midthunder and director Dan Trachtenberg. But in early screenings, everybody kept asking about that dog. As Trachtenberg says in an article with The A.V. Club: “Everyone as we were developing it and showing cuts to friends and family, was like, ‘More dog! We love the dog!’ I was like, ‘You don’t understand. We are using every usable frame of this dog.'”

Coco is not a professional dog; she simply plays one on TV. Adopted in order to be in the movie — her breed is believed to be a type of dog used by Indigenous people at the time the film is set — apparently she lacked the long training many showbiz dogs go through. And their discipline. She would wander into action scenes, according to cast and crew. Like the football player I was frequently cast alongside in high school theater, she had difficulty finding her mark.

She was also just happy to be there. 

By including her in most of the film, the dog feels present in most of Naru’s life and the life of her tribe.

As Midthunder said: “So much of Coco being around was her running wild and doing laps and so excited to see everyone all the time. For me, personally, she was a dream. For making a movie, you know.” That excitement comes through the film in the dog’s eyes, which are bright and shining, her big ears alert as old TV antennae. (Frankly, her ears should get their own billing.)

She’s not perfect. Coco apparently messed up on set ,and Sarii does onscreen. She’s by her hunter’s side always, but not when Naru needs the dog for some “The NeverEnding Story”-type assistance. (You were likely traumatized by that scene in the 1984 film too, but this movie won’t hurt you like that.)

PreyDakota Beavers as Taabe and Amber Midthunder as Naru in “Prey” (20th Century Studios)Coco’s comic timing as she spits out a rodent she chased down feels effortless. Not only does she provide company for Naru, holding her own alongside the accomplished actor, she’s company for the audience, the comic for Naru’s straight man, the Hooch for her Turner. And the dog’s occasional haplessness is a nice realistic change from her fearlessness. Sarii goes after a bear, after all. 

Wisely, even if perhaps accidentally, the film doesn’t let us fret about the dog for too long, nor let us forget her. Soon she comes barking back into the scene. If Naru is not worried, we’re not worried.   


Want a daily wrap-up of all the news and commentary Salon has to offer? Subscribe to our morning newsletter, Crash Course.


The four-legged “Prey” character was inspired by the blue-heeler known as Dog in “Mad Max: The Road Warrior,” and Sarii is poised to take her place among the Benjis, Lassies, Rin Tin Tins and Rovers of the screen. By including her in most of the film, the dog feels present in most of Naru’s life and the life of her tribe. And when Sarii is taken, Naru will risk her life for the animal, as Sarii risks life for Naru again and again. That’s just what partners do. It’s not presented in the film as a big deal. It’s just expected.    

No dog left behind. And if Sarii has a say in it, no warrior, either.