Spring Sale: Get 1 Year, Save 58%

How do I know if I’m a great father or a terrible father?

With a few fresh baby wipes resting on top of the wipe warmer, I pin my daughter Cross, who needs a diaper change, down with my left elbow, because although I have washed my hands in the thorough style of a Johns Hopkins Hospital neurosurgeon, as my sweet wife has instructed, I then touched my iPhone, the device my sweet wife considers to be the dirtiest item in our home. (I often wonder if she thinks I rub my phone around the rim of a dumpster every night for 20 minutes before I come in for dinner.) While trying not to press onto my daughter’s torso, I reach for the hand sanitizer. I think of rewashing my hands but don’t want to step away while she’s on the changing table — she could take a leap of faith deep into her fuzzy pink throw rug and land both of us in the doghouse. 

Cross squirms and kicks, knocking the wipes off the warmer as I punch a perfect glob of sanitizer into the center of my palm. I am sanitized. I try to pull out another wipe, but it’s stuck, so I tug. Sixty wipes explode out of the box onto the changing table and the floor.  

“You OK up there?” my sweet wife yells from downstairs. “You wash your hands?” 

“Yes,” I reply, followed by a semi-offended, “you know I washed my hands!” 

 “Yeah, OK,” she answered. “I didn’t hear you do it.”  

The entire floor of the house now smells worse than a gas station restroom at the end of the night.

Cross is playing with the wipes, tossing them into the air like confetti. I grab a chunk of the remaining wipes off the table with one hand and undo her diaper with the other. Inside was 15 pounds of waste that somehow came out of my 15-pound baby. No really, how? The entire floor of the house now smells worse than a gas station restroom at the end of the night. I power forward, using the remaining wipes to disappear all evidence of the feces, rolling those soiled wipes into her heavy diaper, then rolling the whole package into a tight ball, sealed on every angle to suppress the funk. I slam-dunk the ball into the Diaper Genie, then quickly apply the regimen of lotions, oils and creams that my sweet wife requires after every change, before fastening on a new pamper. Cross jumps to her feet, still up high on the table, spreading her arms, excited to hug me for completing the task.

RELATED: I love being a Girl Dad

“Dad-yeeeee,” she says. 

“One second, baby,” I tell her.  

I reach for her shorts and catch a whiff of a toxic odor wafting from a place it should not waft, because I just cleaned her and I know I sealed that diaper with CIA-level security. What is that smell? 

I look down at my hands. My index and middle fingers have a thick brown swirl of chocolate stink on them that I have also transferred to Cross’ shorts. Now I have to take the big gamble of flipping myself into the bathroom to thoroughly wash my hands, while peeking out of the door every three seconds to make sure she doesn’t jump off the table, then dry my hands, then check them again, then drench them in enough sanitizer to make my skin burn and peel. I do all of this quickly and efficiently, and then I run a bath to wash Cross as thoroughly as I washed my hands, re-greasing her with the same assortment of lotions, and snap on a new diaper and outfit. Mission accomplished. This is what being a great father feels like.

Cross smiles, showing off all her tiny white teeth. “Hello, Dad-yeeeeee!”

“Hey, Cross,” I smile back. 

My sweet wife walks into the room, looks Cross over, places her back onto the changing table, takes off the diaper, readjusts the tabs, and tells me that I put it on wrong.

“What?” I reply, with a hit of anger. Is my sweet wife trying to snatch away my moment? Can she not see that I’m Dad-yeeeee? 

“It’s not a big deal,” she says, applying all the lotions I have already applied. “You just have to make sure the bottom is secure. We don’t want her leaking out.” 

Cross gleams, giving my sweet wife the hug that was meant for me. The nerve of this toddler. 

RELATED: On Father’s Day, Black dads and the fragility of our fortune

I get upset like a child. I don’t yell or scream or shoot back rebuttals. I am more of an inside-my-head type of guy. Deep, deep into my skull is where I venture, to the section responsible for questions like: What does she mean I didn’t put the diaper on right? Does she know I changed this little girl’s diapers a zillion times? Does she know my fingers were just covered in doo-doo, and I still was able to save our daughter from becoming one with that doo-doo? Could she not smell the 172 lotions I applied in the order she told me to apply them? Does she know that I care just as much as she does? Does she think that I don’t care? Why does she think that I don’t care? 

All my dad had to do, literally, was show up.

I grew up in the ’80s, at the height of the crack era. Many of the dads from my neighborhood were on the wrong side of the drug war: using them, selling them, sitting in a box because of them, or dead because of them. Having a dad was as rare as a four-leaf clover in a sea of concrete; in the event of the miracle of your dad being present, you probably only really saw him on holidays. Present dads lived at work; they made money, came home, fed the family, relaxed with a beer for every bit of two minutes, and then got up and went to work again. They didn’t change diapers, give feedings, or wrap their fingers in stink like me. No dealing with emotional growth and working through the issues that many children face. Dads saw their kids when they saw them. 

RELATED: I grew up surrounded by toxic masculinity, but I evolved: We have to give people a chance to grow

My dad was there. He had his struggles with addiction, like most of the men in my neighborhood did when I was young, but he always kept a job and made sure we had the basics: food, shelter, Nikes. His presence made him a neighborhood hero, but the lack of paternal figures also set expectations extremely low. All my dad had to do, literally, was show up. 

Sometimes I tease him about it. “I swear your generation was terrible,” I laugh. “You guys weren’t responsible for anything past money. You guys didn’t even know your children’s names!” 

Being a great father now means taking your kid to school every day, mastering all kinds of weird TikTok dance routines, making a bunch of money no matter how the economy is doing, dressing cool for an old guy, being a master photographer and social media caption writer, and cooking five-star meals, perfectly plated and photographed, to receive no fewer than 1,000 likes after the first two hours on Instagram. I’m exhausted.


Want a daily wrap-up of all the news and commentary Salon has to offer? Subscribe to our morning newsletter, Crash Course.


My dad often reminds me that his dad — a drunk, philandering salesman and alleged war vet — wasn’t around, so he had no real examples of what a great father would be. 

“You know I try my best?” my dad once asked. “You know I tried to be the father you needed.” 

“And you are great,” I respond. “The best father I could ever ask for.” 

He choked up, his eyes becoming glossy wet slits, as he pulled me in for a hug. That’s also rare, because I don’t really hug, but I obliged him. I was being 1000% honest. As far as dads went, he was the best I ever saw. Of course I count his mistakes, just as my daughter will be able to count mine. But despite his flaws, I still think he is amazing.

What will my daughter think of me? Will I be the best in her eyes? Because times are changing. The era of the absent Black father is over. 

What else am I doing wrong while aimlessly thinking I’m doing a good job?

Not only are statistics showing a rise in the presence of minority fathers in households, but we Black fathers are also working hard at being the people our fathers could not be for us. My friends who are dads are not only spending time with their children, they are getting their nails painted, baking cupcakes, figuring out how to braid hair, and enjoying every minute of it. According to the CDC ,”Black fathers are more likely than their white and Hispanic counterparts to feed, eat with, bathe, diaper, dress, play with, and read to their children daily.” We are being more vulnerable, fighting to be more understanding, and sharing chores with our spouses, while doing the emotional work and trying our best to be as present with our children as mothers have been for generations. But are we doing it right? After all, I thought I did a good job on that diaper, but I put it on wrong. What else am I doing wrong while aimlessly thinking I’m doing a good job? Am I not strapping her tight enough in the car seat? Applying too much cinnamon to the oatmeal?

“Are you a good father?” I asked one of my close friends. “What does your girl think? Better yet, what does your kid think?” 

“I swear bro, I ask myself that all the time,” he responded. “I feel like I am, but you know …” 

I do know. It’s hard to gauge your impact when you are present everyday and the results don’t really come in until you get to see your child’s grade school, collegiate or business accomplishments, the impact they have or the people around them and their community, the way they interact with their own family (if they decide to have to have one) and then the ultimate test: how they reflect on their experiences with you. What will she say about me?

Will my daughter say that I was the most loving and caring guy she ever met, a true gift from God? Or will she say, “This klutz couldn’t even change my diaper without dipping his fingers knuckle-deep in doo-doo! Get this asshole out of here!” 

My sweet wife snaps me out of my Aquarian aloofness, questions my constant day dreaming and pondering. “What are you thinking about?” she asks. 

“Nothing,” I say instead of telling her my inability to change a diaper perfectly, two years in, makes me feel like a failure. I know she’ll respond with something like, “You are beyond amazing! The best father ever!” but isn’t she supposed to say that? I can’t imagine her actually saying, “Our daughter would truly be better off if you spent more time at a work. As a matter of fact, take a job in another city and Zoom in biweekly, because things are better when you aren’t around.” 

I sit with all of these rambling thoughts and ideas — sometimes while holding my daughter, sometimes while the three of us are curled up together on the couch, the two of them fast asleep. In those moments, I can’t help but feel like I did something right. The intimacy allows me to pull away from the emotions that cloud this journey, and I can see that I am not special, and neither is my wife or her comments on how I administer care. Because the truth is there will be times my sweet wife will get it wrong too, and I know she cares more than anything. And if I’m lucky, I will be there to pick up the pieces the same way she fixed the lopsided diaper. This is what family is. 

We are normal people who are sharing a beautiful experience and what is special–– is the way we live, love, try, and talk about that experience for us and for the sake of our child, her life, and wellbeing. We love our union and our child dearly, and will proudly suit-up and go to war over that love with any and everyone–– but that should not mean each other. 

I watched my sweet wife change our daughter a few times after our exchange. Carefully and slowly, I mastered her artful technique, her ability to throw multiple wipes in the air with her left hand and catch them like a Cobra Kai sensei with her right before sanitizing our child. I vowed never to walk away from the changing table until my daughter’s diaper was applied a step beyond perfect, in a manner that exceeds the company’s application guidelines and expectations. My great diaper debacle behind me, I finally felt good enough to earn my sweet wife’s respect.

“Baby, no, no, take that diaper off of her,” my sweet wife said after I finished changing my daughter. “Do you listen? We switched to pull-ups.” 

More personal essays about fathers:

Yes, Donald Trump is an “American monster”: But he wasn’t built by a mad scientist

In a recent New York Times column, Maureen Dowd describes Donald Trump as an “American monster.” This is an entirely reasonable view, but American society is mired in such a state of malignant normality that this monster has tens of millions of followers, who worship his greed, criminality and cruelty. 

Dowd contrasts Trump to the monster in Mary Shelley’s “Frankenstein,” who begins with “elegance of mind and sweetness of temperament, reading Goethe’s ‘The Sorrows of Young Werther’ and gathering firewood for a poor family.” But then his creator, Victor Frankenstein, abandons and rejects him, refusing to make him a mate:

The creature finds no one who does not recoil in fear and disgust from his stitched-together appearance, his yellow skin and eyes, and black lips. Embittered, he seeks revenge on his creator and the world.

“Every where I see bliss, from which I alone am irrevocably excluded,” he laments. “I was benevolent and good; misery made me a fiend.”

Before he disappears into the Arctic at the end of the book, he muses that once he had “high thoughts of honour,” until his “frightful catalogue” of malignant deeds piled up.

Shelley’s monster, unlike ours, has self-awareness, and a reason to wreak havoc. He knows how to feel guilty and when to leave the stage. Our monster’s malignity stems from pure narcissistic psychopathy — and he refuses to leave the stage or cease his vile mendacity.

Dowd surmises that it never occurred to Donald Trump that a president openly plotting a seditious coup “would be a debilitating, corrosive thing for the country. It was just another way for the Emperor of Chaos to burnish his title.” The House Jan. 6 committee’s first prime-time hearing, she writes, played out as “a horror story with predatory Proud Boys and a monster at its center that even Mary Shelley could have appreciated”:

In his dystopian Inaugural speech, Trump promised to end “American carnage.” Instead, he delivered it. Now he needs to be held accountable for his attempted coup — and not just in the court of public opinion.

But who created this American monster? Donald Trump was not built by a deranged scientist in a secret lab. He is not an orphan, and did not emerge out of nowhere. He was the almost inevitable result of a decades-long assault by the “conservative” movement aimed at ending American democracy (especially multiracial democracy) and replacing it with a pseudo-democratic authoritarian state, perhaps organized under the system political theorist Sheldon Wolin described as “inverted totalitarianism.”

RELATED: Cult expert Steven Hassan sees 95% chance of worsening pro-Trump violence

As part of that long-term assault, most or all the historic victories of the civil rights movement, the women’s rights movement, the gay rights movement, the labor and environmental movements and other struggles for human dignity and a more just society are being rolled back. If this project succeeds, America’s already threadbare social safety net will be virtually eliminated. White Christian fascists and corporate plutocrats will forge a ruling coalition with near-total dominion over American life and society. The separation of church and state, along with the guarantee of free speech and most of the Bill of Rights, will disappear.    

There is no longer a “normal” or “traditional” version of the Republican Party for so-called conservatives to return to. Even those conservatives who have disavowed or denounced the Trump movement are implicated in his rise. They are like political Dr. Frankensteins, horrified by what they have created but unable to kill it. Over the course of decades, they painstakingly built the monster and created the blueprint for American fascism.


Want a daily wrap-up of all the news and commentary Salon has to offer? Subscribe to our morning newsletter, Crash Course.


As Wajahat Ali wrote this week in the Daily Beast, some of Trump’s “most prominent enablers” are now trying to distance themselves from the “ongoing, concentrated, right-wing effort to overturn the 2020 election”:

Even though most of these ex-Trumpers will fail up in their careers—as is often the case in Washington, D.C. — it’s important for the rest of us to recognize them as utterly complicit actors who deserve to wear that MAGA hat on their heads until the end of time….

If you believe that there is a “team normal” in the modern GOP, then you’ll also probably believe that fewer doors and arming teachers will reduce mass gun shootings, banning books will save your child from being transgender, and climate change is a hoax created by China.

Either way, you’re not acknowledging that the GOP is now a weaponized cult that no longer produces “rational” Republicans, but instead caters to the festering, fevered paranoid swamp of dangerous conspiracy theories and white supremacist ideologies. This persistent right-wing disinformation has now radicalized its base, in which many members believe violence is necessary to “take back” their country. The reality is that Team Normal and Team Crazy both play for the GOP, wear the same uniforms, and, for now, worship the golden calf known as Trump.

Ultimately, Donald Trump is not some type of monstrous Other or outsider. He was not conjured up in some other dimension ruled by Lovecraftian demons, only to descend on America out of the ether to sow destruction, chaos, misery and death.

Donald Trump and everything he embodies is the product of our society, with its extreme inequality, consumerism and greed, racism, anti-intellectualism and fetish for violence.

 

In reality, Donald Trump — as a man, a symbol and a political leader — and everything he embodies is the product of our society, driven by extreme social inequality, consumerism and greed, unfulfilled dreams, widespread alienation and loneliness, anti-intellectualism, racism and white supremacy, the cult of the spectacle, our fetish for violence and a range of related antisocial and anti-human values and tendencies.

In a recent essay for ScheerPost republished at Salon, Chris Hedges offers a powerful diagnosis of our corrupt and failing American political system, arguing that the House Jan. 6 committee will do nothing to correct it:

The two established wings of the oligarchy, the old Republican Party represented by politicians such as Liz Cheney, one of two Republicans on the committee, and the Bush family, are now united with the Democratic Party elite into one ruling political entity. The ruling parties were already in lockstep for decades on the major issues, including: war, trade deals, austerity, the militarization of police, prisons, government surveillance and assaults on civil liberties. They worked in tandem to pervert and destroy democratic institutions on behalf of the rich and corporations. They desperately work together now to stave off the revolt by enraged and betrayed white working men and women who support Donald Trump and the far right.

There are other systemic failures as well. America’s mainstream news media, through both habit and laziness, have approached Donald Trump, and American politics more generally, as a running narrative of “great men” (and, more recently, “great women”), singular figures who are the main characters in an unfolding drama largely independent of history, culture or economic reality. 

This partly explains the media’s obsession with polling and public opinion, the addiction to horserace coverage and the drive to identify “winners” and “losers” on a daily basis. Of course the mainstream media is also driven by profit, and compelled to shape the news so as not to offend advertisers or alienate the political establishment and other social and cultural elites.

Media practitioners are also trained to avoid moral language when describing domestic politics, although they routinely use such language when discussing foreign affairs, and especially American’s official enemies. The result is that most mainstream American political journalism remains an exercise in stenography and superficial commentary, almost always bending the knee to such totems as “moderation,” “normal politics,” “fairness” and “balance,” concepts that were likely never helpful or transparent and are now totally inadequate to the task of confronting America’s democracy crisis.

Many in the media still refuse to see the Trump movement and the modern Republican Party as destructive revolutionary forces, rather than as traditional political movements with an investment in the existing system. At this point, the media’s willful or compulsive refusal to comprehend the nature of the threat has become a pathology. Journalists at mainstream outlets would benefit greatly from reading The Authoritarian Playbook: A Media Guide,” a new report from the nonpartisan nonprofit group Protect Democracy. It offers the following advice:

To the extent that the authoritarian playbook has a central theme, it is that democratic erosion is a process of power concentration and consolidation. While all political actors seek to accumulate power, authoritarians, uniquely, seek to entrench that power and protect it from external checks. Experts generally agree that democracies don’t tend to die at the hands of individuals alone. Rather, contemporary attacks on democracy only succeed when they are coordinated, systemic, and undertaken by broad parties or movements.

If Donald Trump the American monster is somehow banished from American political life — through criminal prosecution, advancing age or some other force — another such monster will rapidly appear. In fact, Ron DeSantis and other leading Republican-fascists are eagerly waiting for Trump to leave the stage, and could well turn out to be more competent and more effective than him. Trumpism is a hydra-headed movement, no longer dependent on Trump as an individual: Chop off one of its heads and another will grow. The only long-term solution is to drain the swamp that birthed the monster.

Read more on our 45th president and our national hangover:

Bill Barr’s parting gift to Donald Trump: A possible “get out of jail free” card

Former Attorney General William Barr told the House committee investigating the Jan. 6, 2021, insurrection that claims of widespread voter fraud in the 2020 election were bogus. But the phrase that made the headlines was his speculation that the former president was “detached from reality.” Those words may hand Donald Trump a “get out of jail free” card. 

Barr must have known that hinting that his former boss no longer could tell the difference between truth and fiction could make it more difficult for the Department of Justice to prove Trump’s culpability. 

I know that lawyers well versed in these matters are convinced there’s an airtight case to be made against Trump. But I’m not so sure. 

RELATED: Jan. 6 miniseries unfolds plot: Barr calls bulls**t, Rudy was drunk and Trump’s in trouble

As a country, we are pretty good at avoiding reality. The pandemic proved that. There were people who, as they died of COVID, denied they had contracted it. We all have family members who live in their own little worlds, whom we have to tolerate only on Thanksgiving.  

In white-collar cases, former U.S. attorney and MSNBC legal analyst Barbara McQuade told The New Yorker, defense lawyers focus on intent. The defense may contend that all of Trump’s actions were “because he genuinely believed he had won the election and he was the one who was trying to stop fraud. … Maybe he was wrong in the end, but he led from a good place because he believed this was true.” 

But is someone who hears dozens of arguments to the contrary, and still clings to his beliefs, guilty of “willful blindness?” McQuade says a judge can instruct the jury to consider the evidence that should have convinced Trump that he was wrong. That’s another arrow in the prosecution’s quiver. 


Want a daily wrap-up of all the news and commentary Salon has to offer? Subscribe to our morning newsletter, Crash Course.


Still, a verdict will depend on the thinking of those 12 people on the jury, who may wonder what it means when someone is so out of touch that no evidence can shake his convictions. It would only take one juror’s doubts to upend the process. And then, once again, we’d have the former president claiming total exoneration.

Surely Barr knows that. That’s what makes his “detached from reality” comment so potent. He could have called his former boss obdurate, or dead-set in his views about what happened. But he didn’t. He speculated about Trump’s state of mind. 

And Barr has only recently jumped off the Trump train. Remember, he desperately wanted the AG job, writing a long memo that attacked special counsel Robert Mueller’s investigation into the Trump campaign’s dealings with Russia during the 2016 campaign and whether Trump was guilty of obstruction of justice. As attorney general, he skillfully defanged the Mueller report before it saw the light of day. 

He had no problem with Trump’s policies on immigration. And after the George Floyd murder, during peaceful protests against police brutality in Lafayette Square close to the White House, Barr accompanied a Bible-toting Trump as police used tear gas and pepper spray to clear a path through the demonstrators.

Even Barr’s resignation letter was plump with praise. He wrote that he was proud to have played a role in the Trump administration’s “many successes and unprecedented achievements … all the more historic” because they were accomplished “in the face of relentless, implacable resistance.”

No one should think that Bill Barr’s comments before House investigators display any real change of heart. For Trump, Barr is the gift that keeps on giving. 

Read more on Barr, Trump and the Jan. 6 hearings:

Dr. Oz invests up to $715,000 in companies he blames for skyrocketing insulin costs

Dr. Mehmet Oz, the Republican nominee in Pennsylvania’s crucial U.S. Senate race, has repeatedly criticized pharmaceutical companies blamed for the rising cost of insulin — but his recent financial disclosure shows that he has invested up to $715,000 in exactly those companies.

Prior to announcing his Senate bid, Oz repeatedly railed about the rising cost of diabetes treatment, lamenting in a Newsmax op-ed that the cost of insulin had more than tripled over the past decade.

“Globally, three companies dominate the insulin market, and all of them have raised their prices dramatically. In 1996, the original price of Humalog was $21 a vial; it is now $275,” he wrote in a joint op-ed with Dr. Mike Roizen of the Cleveland Clinic Wellness Institute.

RELATED: As Big Pharma jacks up prices, Dems worry their failure will cost seats this fall

The rising cost is “forcing many people to reduce their life-saving use of insulin,” the authors warned, citing a study that found that a quarter of diabetic patients had to ration doses because of the cost. “Interestingly, very few of the patients surveyed were uninsured, but their out-of-pocket costs were still prohibitively high, and so were their blood sugar levels,” they wrote.

Oz hosted a segment on his long-running “Doctor Oz Show” in 2019 in which he sent an undercover reporter to investigate the rise of black-market insulin.

“Insulin prices are soaring and causing desperate families to buy the life-saving drug from strangers,” he tweeted at the time, warning that “black-market diabetes medication could be putting your life at risk.”

Oz, who went so far as to recommend that patients buy their insulin from Canadian pharmacies to access lower prices — a common but quasi-legal practice — also specifically blamed pharmacy benefits managers for the rising cost.


Want a daily wrap-up of all the news and commentary Salon has to offer? Subscribe to our morning newsletter, Crash Course.


“Why have prices gone up so steeply? Experts say it’s a result of inadequately designed insurance coverage in both private insurance and Medicare, and alleged price-fixing by pharmaceutical companies. Another source of trouble: the rebate system. It provides incentives for middlemen — pharmacy benefit managers such as CVS, Express Scripts, and UnitedHealth’s Optum — to accept high-priced drugs and not pass available savings on to consumers,” Oz and Rozien wrote in the Newsmax op-ed.

In a separate syndicated column published in 2019, the two reiterated that “a lot of the blame rests with middle-level distributors, not just Big Pharma.”

But a personal financial disclosure filed by Oz’s campaign in April shows that he stands to profit from investments in the exact companies he blamed for causing the price increases.

The disclosure showed that Oz has invested between $280,000 and $600,000 in UnitedHealth and another $50,000 to $100,000 in CVS Health. He also has between $1,000 and $15,000 in Cigna stock.

The Federal Trade Commission earlier this month launched an investigation into CVS, UnitedHealth and others over their business practices. The FTC is looking into “potentially unfair” business practices, fees and methods as well as “the impact of rebates and fees from drug manufacturers on formulary design and the costs of prescription drugs to payers and patients.”

“Although many people have never heard of pharmacy benefit managers, these powerful middlemen have enormous influence over the U.S. prescription drug system,” FTC Chair Lina Khan said in a statement last week. “This study will shine a light on these companies’ practices and their impact on pharmacies, payers, doctors, and patients.”

Arkansas Attorney General Leslie Rutledge last month filed a lawsuit against CVS, UnitedHealth, Cigna and others, accusing them of inflating prices to pad profits. The lawsuit notes that despite being on the market for decades, insulin had risen in price by more than 1,500% between 1997 and 2018.

At the moment, the drug “ranges between $300 and $700,” Rutledge said in a statement. “While insulin costs hundreds of dollars to buy at the pharmacy, it costs less than $2 to produce.”

“These drug manufacturers and PBMs have inflated the price of insulin and other diabetes-related medication to line their own pockets,” Rutledge said. “They have endangered the lives of thousands of Arkansans and Americans, who simply cannot afford to buy this life-saving medicine. Today we begin the fight to stop this outrageous inflation of insulin pricing.”

Oz’s campaign did not respond to a request for comment.

“Mehmet Oz is a scammer and a fraud who will do anything to help himself,” said Brad Bainum, a spokesperson for the Democratic-aligned PAC American Bridge 21st Century, “including investing in health care corporations that he admits profit from hurting Pennsylvanians by keeping insulin costs high.”

Read more on Dr. Oz, Donald Trump and the 2022 midterms:

Will Merrick Garland be the one to criminally charge Trump?

One of America’s top constitutional experts predicted that his former student, Attorney General Merrick Garland, would criminally charge Donald Trump for his attempted coup.

On Thursday, CNN’s Erin Burnett interviewed Laurence Tribe, professor emeritus at Harvard Law School where he taught for 52 years, teaching the Constitution to some of the most powerful people in America.

Tribe taught Jan. 6 select committee members Jaime Raskin (D-MD) and Adam Schiff (D-CA) and Supreme Court Chief Justice John Roberts.

“With the hearing today that focused so much on Trump causing violence against Pence, do you believe the committee has proven that Trump himself knowingly committed crimes?” Burnett asked.

“Without any doubt,” Tribe said.

“Beyond a reasonable doubt, beyond any doubt, and the crimes are obvious. The most obvious was that he was ordering his vice-president to do what everyone in the room knew would be illegal, namely, exercise power to pick the next president. It would be very convenient if Al Gore could have picked himself as the next president in 2000, very convenient if Richard Nixon could have done it in 1960.”

Tribe has won 35 cases before the U.S. Supreme Court, but was unsuccessful when representing Gore during the 2000 Florida recount.

“Ordering your vice-president to violate the law in order to stay in power is a very serious federal crime, but there are other crimes as well,” Tribe said. “One that occurred to several people today is attempted murder. You know, under the criminal code of the United States, the attempted murder of the vice-president is punishable by life imprisonment.”

“You don’t have to go to law school to know that there’s something seriously criminal about that. There are other crimes that have been proven, those are plenty to start with,” Tribe said.

“Well, I mean, it’s pretty incredible to hear you say that, I mean attempted murder,” Burnett said. “Do you believe, Prof. Tribe, that Attorney General Merrick Garland will bring charges against Trump?”

“I think he will,” Tribe replied.

“I don’t think he will charge attempted murder, I was making that point to show, really, how extreme this was, that we can even talk about that shows how far from normal this all is,” he explained.

“But I do believe, though he’s doing it meticulously and not as quickly as some would like, that Merrick Garland will approve criminal charges against this [Trump],” Tribe predicted.

Watch below:

Criminal defense attorneys say Roe reversal will flood prisons

With the U.S. Supreme Court’s right-wing majority expected to overturn Roe v. Wade any day now, criminal defense attorneys are preparing to defend a flood of clients facing abortion-related charges—and warning about the looming decision’s likely consequences.

That’s according to an NPR report from Thursday, which includes an interview with Lisa Wayne, executive director of the National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers (NACDL), that aired earlier this week.

While the NACDL does not take a political position on abortion, Wayne said that “our legal concern is to make sure that we are sounding an alarm bell about the wave of expansive prosecutions that we are certain will follow any significant curtailment or reversal of Roe v. Wade.”

Referencing recently enacted laws in states like Texas and Oklahoma that target people who aid and abet abortions, and the potential for similar legislation elsewhere in the future, Wayne warned that “we’re talking about the doctors performing them, the friends, the parents, the boyfriends. All of those people will be exposed to criminal penalties, which opens up the floodgates to overcriminalization and mass incarceration.”

In response to that warning, Congresswoman Pramila Jayapal (D-Wash.), who has publicly shared her own abortion story, said that “this is absolutely terrifying—and further underscores that efforts to ban abortion are solely about controlling our bodies.”

The NACDL leader explained that people who have or assist with abortions could face prison time with mandatory minimum—and possibly even life—sentences. As she put it: “We’re not talking about just fines like a traffic ticket. We’re talking about serious consequences in this country.”

Comparing attacks on abortion rights to the U.S. War on Drugs, Wayne told NPR that “people were looking at life sentences and still remain incarcerated to this day. You have to ask yourself, what lessons did we really learn?”

Noting that comparison in a tweet about the NPR report, U.S. Rep. Bonnie Watson Coleman (D-N.J.) said that “abortion isn’t just a reproductive health issue—it’s a civil rights issue and a racial justice issue.”

Wayne also acknowledged how the anticipated surge in demand for attorneys—if or when Roe falls and GOP lawmakers ramp up legislative attacks on reproductive freedom—will disproportionately impact low-income people.

“Whenever you have laws that lead to rampant overcriminalization, you stretch your resources,” she said. “So rich people will always be able to lawyer up. They will always have access to attorneys. They will always be able to have that advice that you should have at the front end.”

“Poor people will be left behind. I don’t get a lawyer if I’m poor until I’m actually charged with a crime in this country in most jurisdictions, so I have to wait to that moment until I get charged,” she continued. “If I have money, if I have access to counsel, I get advice on the front end of being able to perhaps avoid the consequences that I would face if I didn’t have money.”

Wayne’s remarks echoed an August 2021 report from her organization which says that reversing the landmark 1973 high court decision “will lead to rampant overcriminalization through regulatory enforcement and to mass incarceration on an unprecedented scale.”

“If Roe v. Wade is overturned it will result in a near-complete ban on abortion in several states, vastly expanding the potential for criminal charges to be brought against those participating in or performing abortions in those states,” the NACDL report notes.

According to the pro-choice Guttmacher Institute, at least 26 states “are certain or likely to ban abortion without Roe” through existing so-called trigger laws and other measures.

The NACDL document also highlights that “proposed anti-abortion legislation disproportionately impacts poor women, Black women, and other women of color, highlighting the deeply sexist, racist, and classist nature of the recent and proposed new anti-abortion laws, and the manner in which such laws will contribute to the problem of systemic racism and classism within the criminal legal system.”

“The future is clear, should Roe v. Wade be overturned,” the report warns, “states across the nation are prepared to arrest and prosecute women, their friends, their providers, and all those who assist them obtain what is presently a legal medical procedure.”

Since Politico broke the news of a leaked Supreme Court draft opinion that would reverse Roe, demands have mounted for federal action to protect reproductive freedom. However, Sen. Joe Manchin (D-W.Va.) last month partnered with the GOP—yet again—to block the Women’s Health Protection Act, which would affirm the right to abortion nationwide.

The New York Times reported Thursday that U.S. President Joe Biden is considering executive action to protect reproductive rights, including “declaring a national public health emergency, readying the Justice Department to fight any attempt by states to criminalize travel for the purpose of obtaining an abortion, and asserting that Food and Drug Administration regulations granting approval to abortion medications preempt any state bans.”

In a letter to Biden last week, over two dozen senators offered six specific recommendations for executive action and asserted that “the entirety of the federal government must be engaged in the administration’s efforts and must act as swiftly as possible.”

“We got groomed”: 5 horrifying revelations from Hulu’s Boy Scouts abuse documentary “Leave No Trace”

The Boy Scouts of America (BSA), once hailed as “a vital factor in American life,” has long preached the importance of moral behavior, instilling a sense of trust among families that its programs can transform young boys into disciplined, well-rounded men.

Revered as one of the largest scouting organizations and one of the largest youth organizations in the nation, the BSA touts over 1 million participants and an impressive alumni, including Neil Armstrong, President John F. Kennedy and Steven Spielberg. Being a Scout became more than just donning a tan troop uniform complete with a patrol emblem and a merit-badge sash. It was about upholding — and embodying — the institution’s principal promises: 1) Duty to God and country 2) Duty to other people and 3) Duty to self.

RELATED: “I was shocked and appalled”: Ousted gay Boy Scout leader sounds off to Salon

For years, the BSA was successful in maintaining its admirable image. But that image hid a darkness underneath with the revelation that at least 7,800 suspected scouting leaders sexually abused 12,254 Boy Scouts members between 1944 and 2016.

The sex abuse claims and its painful history are now being revisited in Hulu’s latest documentary, “Leave No Trace.” The two-hour-long showcase features interviews with multiple survivors — many of whom are speaking out for the first time — along with the reporters and attorneys working closely on the investigations.

Here are just a few of the horrifying revelations from the documentary:

I wanted to run away”

Humphrey, who served as a Scout from 1972 to 1974, was sexually abused between the ages of 11 and 13 by Thad Alton, his schoolteacher and Scoutmaster.

“I think back at all of the times that I was abused two, three, four times a week . . . at troop meetings, in the car after troop meetings, in the jug-band practice room, on the foam mats in the locker room, on camping trips, winter trips, summer trips,” Humphrey recounted. “I mean, the first time I ever ejaculated was at the hands of this Scoutmaster.”

He continued, “You know, it slowly became clear to me as I got older and a little more mature that something was wrong, that something wasn’t right. I wanted to run away from it as fast and as hard as I could.”

Humphrey revealed that he was abused more than 200 times and as a result, lost all his hair when he was 13 due to stress from the enduring trauma. He kept mum about the abuse for most of his life and broke his silence just five years prior, when he was 55 years old. 

Today, Humphrey works as an IT consultant in Dallas, Texas, and leads the Official Tort Claimants’ Committee (TCC), a group consisting of survivors who are fighting for the justice they deserve.

“We got groomed”

From 2015 to 2017, Yoxall was sexually abused by his Scoutmaster, Douglas Young. During his interview from home, Yoxall said he doesn’t remember much about Young, such as what he looked like or how he acted. But he does remember one, distinct thing:

“I remember his smell and his smell was disgusting. But I don’t really remember a lot of other stuff about him.”

He added that his abuse began immediately during his first night of camp. 

“The first thing that happened is he stuck his hand down behind . . . in my pants,” Yoxall said while his parents sat just a few feet away from in the living room, horrified.

“First thing that was going through my head is, ‘What the f**k,'” he continued. “It just, it got much worse from that. It progressed like really fast. I’d wake up with him doing stuff. I know he used to take pictures, as well.”

Yoxall’s parents explained that their son initially joined the Boy Scouts in hopes of becoming a police officer in the future. “We got manipulated. We got groomed. We got played hard,” his father said sadly. 

The abuse dated back to 1920, but the Boy Scouts of America did nothing

According to Peter Janci, an attorney and advocate for victims of sexual abuse, the leadership of the BSA were well aware that pedophiles were using the Scouting program to abuse dozens of boys in one troop. 

“Starting back in the 1920s, they [BSA] had identified over a thousand men,” Janci explained.

The names of each abuser were included in a list called the “red flag list.” Also known as the “red list,” the list’s misleading name “led people to believe that the institution was trying to root out communists from their ranks” when they were actually identifying child molesters, said Nigel Jaquiss, an investigative reporter who won a Pulitzer Prize for his 2005 exposé on child sex abuse within the government of Oregon. 

The list was only available to a small, select group of Boy Scouts executives who kept the files under lock and key. It wasn’t shared with the public nor was it shared with law enforcement, as the BSA feared the abuse reports would damage its favorable reputation. 

“If I told anyone, then he would kill me”

“Developing my body and my athleticism, it’s another way of protecting myself to make sure that no one is going to harm me,” said Lord, who was involved in Scouting from the ages of 11 to 20. “I get to own that.”

Lord was sexually abused by Scout leader Lonnie Barnes, who also served as an assistant Scoutmaster. Just one week after the start of camp, Barnes was fired and removed from campgrounds.

“And it was, like, one of the best days of my life,” Lord said. “He was rushed out of camp. They said they found a liquor bottle outside of his tent.”

Despite his departure, Barnes was still involved with Scouting and the BSA.

“It did not affect his participation at all in the program,” Lord recounted. “And he was the one who told me that if I told anyone, then he would kill me.”

The first person who learned of Lord’s abuse was his mother. But sadly, upon hearing the news, she experienced a stroke and passed away. 

“My mom died, and the person that I got the courage to tell . . . I couldn’t tell,” he said. “I went back into deeper silence and promised to tell no one. I’m 40 years old before I . . . I tell someone.”

 The Boy Scouts of America hired pedophiles, but excluded gay members

James Dale, who served as an assistant Scoutmaster of a New Jersey troop during the summer of 1990, was excluded from the program after an interview, in which Dale said he was gay, was published.

“Dear Mr. Dale, the ground for your membership revocation are the standards for leadership established by the Boy Scouts of America, which specifically forbid membership to homosexuals,” read his letter of dismissal. 

Dale, who was a Scout from the ages of 8 to 20, described his participation in the BSA as “the singular, most formative part of my youth.” And even though he wasn’t able to vocalize or understand his sexuality at a young age, he credited the BSA with helping him feel more confident about his own identity. 

“I was not out when I was younger. And even in the back of my mind as a gay kid, I had that doubt or fear or, you know, self-hatred, you could even say,” he explained. “The Boy Scouts really helped me not feel so bad about myself as a gay kid, even if I didn’t have the words at the time. I was really caught off guard but it wasn’t something I could also walk away from.”

Dale soon took matters into his own hands and sued the BSA, alleging that it was actively shutting out members simply on the basis of their sexuality. The New Jersey Supreme Court ruled in favor of Dale, which prompted the BSA to challenge the case and appeal to the United States Supreme Court.

On June 28, 2000, the Supreme Court voted in favor of the BSA, ruling that its exclusion of gay Scouts and leaders did not qualify as discrimination.

Watch the official trailer for “Leave No Trace” below, via YouTube:

More stories you might like:

COVID vaccines for kids under five are finally here. Here’s why it took so long

At last, parents of kids under the age of five — many of whom felt left behind during the pandemic — can breathe a sigh of relief.

At last, a COVID-19 vaccine for the youngest children is expected to be recommended for emergency use authorization (EUA) in the coming days. The news comes as an FDA advisory panel voted in favor of recommending authorization of the Pfizer and Moderna vaccines for kids under 5 on Wednesday —  the first step in a multi-step process for full authorization.

While the news has been met with relief, many parents have waited over two years to have the option to protect their little ones. Moreover, in that span, there were multiple points at which rumors circulated that vaccines for children under five were going to be approved imminently; again and again, parents found their hope dashed. In May, mass vaccination sites across the country — including in Chicago and Seattle — were allowing parents to book vaccination appointments for their children, though a delay ensued.

RELATED: Misinfo swirls around kids, and masks

At the end of 2021, health officials in the Biden administration hoped to authorize shots by Pfizer and BioNTech for kids between the ages of six months and five years sometime in early 2022, possibly by February 2022. But when February 2022 rolled around, the possibility of any authorization was pushed to spring; then, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) stated that the agency wanted more data submitted around the possibility of a three-dose Pfizer vaccine amid concerns of the omicron variant affecting the vaccine’s efficacy. (Notably, Moderna’s two-dose vaccine appeared to offer more protection against omicron.)

“It has been rough. We have two school aged kids and never knew when or what they were bringing home. It was like playing Russian roulette,” Griffen Miller, 36, told Today regarding the recent endorsement. “So, honestly, I thought it was about time. We went so long without protection for that age group. It didn’t make sense.”

“The bar is set really high for the safety issue … We know that the vaccines don’t protect as well against omicron, so it’s kind of a moving target in terms of the effectiveness that you’re aiming for.”

So, why did it take so long to get to where we are today? Countries like China, Argentina, Venezuela, Croatia, Germany, Greece, Hungary and Spain have already offered vaccinations for kids under five. The answer has to do with emerging variants; the difficulties of running clinical trials on children; and unsatisfactory results from clinical trials around how much protection the vaccines provide. To be clear, safety and side effects were never a reason for a delay.

“The bar is set really high for the safety issue, [but] it’s difficult to do the effectiveness studies,”  Dean Blumberg, associate professor of pediatrics at the University of California–Davis, previously told Salon. “We know that the vaccines don’t protect as well against omicron, so it’s kind of a moving target in terms of the effectiveness that you’re aiming for.”

One of the principal challenges in vaccine design stems from the fact that children have a different immune system than adults, which makes weighing dosage adjustments and immunity a complicated balancing act. This always made it more difficult for clinical trials to occur for this cohort.

“Children have different, less experienced immune systems, and they also are different sizes compared to adults,” Blumberg said. Essentially, younger children’s immune systems are “less mature,” Blumberg added, and they typically have less body mass than adults. Generally, this means an adjustment in vaccine dosage — either more or less than adults to create a healthy and protective immune response. As a result, Pfizer’ shot for kids is one tenth of the dosage for adults, and Moderna’s is a quarter of what’s administered to adults.

Moreover, since clinical trials were conducted when the omicron variant began to spread, protection with Pfizer’s two-dose vaccine was lower for kids, which affected the calculus of the dosage. Hence, the need for a three-dose vaccine, which is what is expected to be approved now.

According to the most recent data from Pfizer, its three dose vaccine provides 75 percent efficacy against COVID-19 in kids between six months and two-years-old, and is 82 percent effective against omicron in two to four-year-olds.


Want more health and science stories in your inbox? Subscribe to Salon’s weekly newsletter The Vulgar Scientist.


However, during the FDA’s Wednesday meeting, concerns were raised about the logistics of getting three doses in kids’ arms, as the third dose is key to providing real protection. With only two doses, the vaccine is a mere 14 percent effective for kids under age 2, and 33 percent effective for those ages 2 to 4, specifically tested on omicron. Notably, while Pfizer’s second dose is given three weeks after the first; the third is given at least eight weeks after the second.

“I do worry that parents aren’t necessarily going to know that after two doses, they may not be protected at all and will engage the kind of activity that would put their child at risk,” Dr. Paul Offit, an FDA committee member, an FDA committee member, said.

Ultimately, the committee agreed that the benefits outweigh the risk.

Moderna’s two-dose vaccine is estimated to be about 51 percent effective against omicron for six-month-old to 2-years-old, and about 37 percent effective for children ages 2 to 5-years-old.

While Wednesday’s meeting was a promising step forward, nothing is for certain yet. Next, an expert panel that advises the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention will convene to make their recommendation. As soon as that happens, a final recommendation could be made by the FDA which will likely lead to CDC Director Rochelle Walensky formally signing off on the recommendations in the next week. This could mean that kids between the ages of six months old and five could start getting vaccinated as early as next week.

Read more on COVID-19:

Gender transition treatment minimum age lowered to 14-years-old

The World Professional Association for Transgender Health has declared that the minimum age for gender transition treatment can now be lowered to 14, which is two years younger than previously advised. Along with that decrease in the age requirement for hormone treatments, the association has also moved to lower the minimum age for some gender reassignment surgeries to between 15 or 17.

While potential risks are present when administering hormone treatments and performing reassignment surgeries on patients within these age brackets, those risks were weighed against those that could come from withholding treatment from someone in need of it.

RELATED: Trans kids in the U.S. were seeking treatment decades before today’s political battles

In a report from AP News in which they detail information shared with them by the association prior to it being published in a medical journal later this year, it’s explained that input from a pool of “more than 3,000 doctors, social scientists and others involved in transgender health issues” was used in making the decision to lower these minimum age requirements. A key factor in this decision, according to the association’s report, was that lowering these ages would allow for trans youth to go through puberty at the same time as their peers.

Dr. Eli Coleman, chair of the group’s standards of care and director of the University of Minnesota Medical School’s human sexuality program points out in the AP News report that emotional maturity will also factor in to a case-by-case basis when it comes to any gender transition treatment.

“Certainly there are adolescents that do not have the emotional or cognitive maturity to make an informed decision,” Coleman said. “That is why we recommend a careful multidisciplinary assessment.”


Want a daily wrap-up of all the news and commentary Salon has to offer? Subscribe to our morning newsletter, Crash Course.


Under the new guidelines, girls will be able to start puberty blockers between the ages of 8 to 13, and two years later for boys, which allows anyone considering gender reassignment to have an expanse of time to decide for themselves whether they’d like to move forward with the next steps in terms of further treatment.

According to AP News the new guidelines also recommend:

—Sex hormones — estrogen or testosterone — starting at age 14. This is often lifelong treatment. Long-term risks may include infertility and weight gain, along with strokes in trans women and high blood pressure in trans men.

—Breast removal for trans boys at age 15. Previous guidance suggested this could be done at least a year after hormones, around age 17, although a specific minimum age wasn’t listed.

—Most genital surgeries starting at age 17, including womb and testicle removal, a year earlier than previous guidance.

 “Medical intervention in any realm is not a one-size-fits-all option,” Coleen Williams, a psychologist at Boston Children’s Hospital’s Gender Multi-specialty Service said in response to the new guidelines.

Read more:

Jeff Bridges on the Dude, making “The Old Man” and the experience of “dancing with my mortality”

Somehow after many decades in the movies, including an Oscar win for his work in “Crazy Heart,” Jeff Bridges can’t seem to shake his association with one signature role – two, maybe, if you count his messianic programmer Flynn from “Tron.”

As for the other, you know who I’m talking about, right?  That guy might describe the last few years for Bridges as involving “a lotta ins, lotta outs, lotta what-have-yous,” if he were putting it far too lightly. Bridges himself describes it as a “dream” culminating in the FX action thriller “The Old Man,” an adaptation of Thomas Perry’s 2017 novel that marks Bridges’ first leading role in a TV series.

Bridges plays ex-CIA operative Dan Chase, a man who managed to disappear for decades until an assassin shows up at his door. This surprises the cops, to whom Chase appears to be a harmless elderly widower, one who hasn’t seen his daughter in some time. (For a while, we don’t either.) But by that point, the audience has already come to understand how dangerous it is to cross Dan, based on the trepidation with which his one-time government ally Harold Harper (John Lithgow) and Harper’s right-hand Angela Adams (Alia Shawkat) approach hunting him.

“The Old Man” shows the 72-year-old Bridges getting thrown around, slamming against walls and hard floors, and even considering the production’s usage of a stunt double, it’s an incredibly physical portrayal. Bridges credits the stunt coordinators’ expertise for making the combat look so realistic. “It’s like figuring out a dance routine or something,” he told me in a recent episode of “Salon Talks.”

RELATED: How Jeff Bridges built his fascinating body of work: “I tried hard not to develop too strong a persona”

Any knocks Bridges may have sustained are nothing next to the battles he fought and won since the series was first announced in 2019. Production was underway when the pandemic forced it to halt, resuming for a brief time before the actor announced he’d been diagnosed with lymphoma after doctors found a 9-by-12-inch mass in his stomach.

Then he contracted COVID during chemotherapy treatments, a setback that very nearly killed him. To hear him tell it from the other side, Bridges describes it as “dancing with his mortality,” an altogether different type of fight choreography.

During our conversation, Bridges was enthusiastically open to discuss what his experience with near-fatal illness taught him about life and aging, and how he brought that lesson to his work in “The Old Man.” We also asked whether Dan Chase has much in common with the iconic role he’s most associated with,  to which he responded in a very “dude”-like fashion.

Watch our “Salon Talks” with Bridges here or read the interview below.

This transcript has been edited for length and clarity.

“I think there’s an old age adolescence.”

One interesting thing about Dan Chase is his balance of what we think about this time of life for people versus what he can do with it. Specifically, there’s a real element there in terms of questions about . . . what’s going on with him and his body? He wonders if he has memory issues, because he’s lost his wife. He plays with that within the story, too. I’m wondering what it must be like for you, and what do you think this role says about our concept of human frailty.

Yeah, it’s a funny kind of thing. I think one of the themes in the film and certainly into life is that we’re habitual creatures, and when we practice something over and over again, stop it for years, but when that task is called upon us to perform, our muscle memory kicks in and that’s certainly an aspect of us.

Then another thing that I find fascinating in my own life, and I don’t know if he finds it as fascinating . . .  But what I’m talking about is I think there’s an old age adolescence.

We hear so much about adolescence and you coming into your sexuality and you have fear of asking that girl out and have all those challenges, but when you get older, you’ve got these other challenges that are just as fresh that you haven’t ever experienced. This memory thing is one of those things.

I don’t know if it’s because I’ve had COVID or if it’s getting old. My memory is challenged, so you feel sometimes ridiculous when you can’t remember somebody’s name that you’ve known for so many years or have trouble expressing yourself. All kinds of different challenges, but it’s new stuff for us old guys, too. In a way, I still feel young because of that.

You may have answered this just by talking about this, but I noticed that when I said this time of life, you kind of smiled a bit. What made you smile when I said that?

Well, this time of life, the word that comes to mind is a dream. It all feels very dream-ish to me, especially having gone through this illness that I currently had. In the middle of shooting “The Old Man,” we took a two-year break. We had the COVID break and then I got sick and we came back two years later. And I show up on the set with the same cast and the same crew, and it seems like we had a long weekend and I had this bizarre dream. It seemed so unreal.

That child’s song: “Row, row, row your boat gently down the stream/ Merrily, merrily, merrily, life is but a dream.” That comes to mind often.

Regarding the physicality of the role, how much of [filming the fight scenes] occurred before the break versus after? Was there any split? Did you feel like the scenes played out differently for you . . . before production took that break, versus after?

There were physical scenes before and after the break. It’s a funny thing that happens with an actor. Athletes probably have the same thing, too. . . . Again, it’s that muscle memory or that spirit memory. All of a sudden, you’re not thinking about your health or your illness, only who you’re supposed to be in the show.

What made you choose “The Old Man” to make your series lead debut on TV?

Yeah. Well, I resisted getting into doing TV for a long time because my father, Lloyd Bridges, had done several TV show series. And I saw how hard he had to work with that quality because you didn’t have the time to pull off the magic trick that you’d have in the movies. So I was a bit concerned about that, but then over the last, what, 10 years now or so, the movies that are taking place on TV are so high quality of the shows, all of the shows. There’s so much content now, it’s hard to keep track, but the quality is certainly there. I thought, “Oh, I’ll do a little experiment.” This story sounds great, the description. “I’ll meet with the guys.”

. . . I thought, “Oh, these guys, their dream is one that I can dream, too.” So much of it is the teams that you assemble. All these guys were experts at what they were doing, so I was in good company.

You referenced the fact that your father, Lloyd Bridges, worked in TV and you had a couple of appearances on his programs when you were very young.

Oh, yeah.

I’m wondering if any of those experiences had colored that experience of saying, “OK, I see what’s going on behind the scenes. I see what Dad looks like when he comes home at night. I’m going to stick with movies.”

I think so, because I saw how he was frustrated a lot of times with the TV stuff, and I was concerned about it, but my experience in making “The Old Man” was no different than making a film. . . . All the scenes were given appropriate amounts of time, and the quality of the writing and the directing and acting was all top notch. It wasn’t any different, so I’m glad I took that experiment.

” I learned things during . . . illness that I would not have been privy to if I hadn’t gone through that experience.”

I know that you have answered a lot of questions about your health. First of all, I’m very glad to see that you’re in good health and good spirits today.

Thank you.

You’ve been in this profession for a very long time. You’ve been in situations where you’ve had to answer questions over and over again about the roles you’re playing. What is it like for you to answer these questions over and over again about the state of your health?

Ah, it’s funny. Just generally speaking, doing interviews like this for as many years as I’ve been doing them, 60-some-odd years or whatever, you say, “Gee, I’ve told that story, but it’s the story of my life.” You ask me a question and that’s the thing that pops up. Now that I think of it, it’s kind of like playing a part. You want to do it differently somehow or try to find some new nuance in it. With the asking the health questions, man, it was such a profound time in my life that . . . it’s not something that I get tired of talking about, because it’s still pretty fresh.

But you know how you’re told a story when you were a kid and you’ve told the story and you don’t know, am I telling what actually happened? Or am I retelling the story that I was told? It’s kind of a funny thing. And I mentioned the word dream. A lot of that illness feels like a dream to me. I can’t remember accurately quite a bit of it, but I don’t mind talking about any specific questions you want to ask. Please do.

I realize this is going into inside baseball territory: We do have to ask these questions as journalists, but also as human beings, we’re aware that there’s another human being who is answering questions about what is potentially a very traumatic time. Not potentially – it is a very traumatic time in their lives. It strikes me that in this instance, you are somebody who people obviously care about.

On the one hand, I would imagine if I were in your shoes, you’re both reassuring people, but on the other hand, as a human being, I would also be tempted to think, “Hey, everybody, I’m OK. You don’t have to keep asking it.” It seems like it would take a great deal of patience. The reason I’m asking is I’m wondering what it’s like for you to have people keep on inquiring about what is a very personal experience.

Yeah, that’s a good thing. Intimacy. That’s kind of a high in life, isn’t it? My marriage, well, we just celebrated our 45th anniversary. We’ve been intimate with each other a long time.

Congratulations.

Thank you. The more you get into another person and find out what makes them tick, there’s a wonderful feeling of connection with that. That goes along with people curious about mortality, and that’s a subject that we’re all very interested in, I’d say. I certainly am, and I got to experience dancing with my mortality.

That was . . . I mention this word over and over again, a dream and it’s not necessarily a nightmare. I learned things during that illness that I would not have been privy to if I hadn’t gone through that experience. It wasn’t necessarily new stuff, but I found that all of my philosophies about life and ideas of spirituality and different strategies that have worked in my life in the past, all of those were kicked into overdrive.

I got super curious about we’re not alone in this situation. Thousands of years have gone by with people struggling with all the things that we struggle with today.

I found I was curious about reading. One of the books that I got into or philosophies that I got into actually came through “The Old Man” when I talked to . . . this former CIA guy. I said, “What are your philosophies?” And he said, “Well, a lot of military and guys in the CIA, they were into stoicism and Marcus Aurelius,” who was one of the founders of that philosophy. Basically, that’s kind of leaning into your obstacle. The obstacle is the way. What hinders your task, that’s the task.

When I was sick, each little moment, one of my big challenges, it seems funny, it makes me smile, but it was true and painful at the time, was just turning over in bed. Just doing that. When you sleep, I like to say that position is not quite right. Just that little task. I’d have to call the nurse and get oxygen before I turned. And then while I was in turn, I’d have to get more oxygen.

It’d take about 15 minutes just to make that just little turn, and that became the task, and everything was focused on that little thing. You’d feel all the irritation. “Damn it.” And you’d say, “What’s that doing? Oh, that’s not beneficial.” All those little things became clear, and I wouldn’t have gotten into that kind of thing if I hadn’t been in that position.

 That carries over now when I’m healthy. I can catch myself a little bit in irritation and say, “What’s to be done here? Oh, yeah. Relax. This thing that’s giving you the irritation, that’s the class you’ve just enrolled in. This is where your next lesson is.” Sometimes in life, you’re in an algebra class and you haven’t even finished math yet. Sometimes you say, “Oh, I can’t do it.” Sometimes, you get a D or an F in your class, but that’s life.

But to look at it into just a different perspective, that’s something that I got into when I was sick.


Want a daily wrap-up of all the news and commentary Salon has to offer? Subscribe to our morning newsletter, Crash Course.


Sometimes when we think about people like you who are regularly in front of us, it’s in terms of certain roles or taking on different personas. It must be interesting from your perspective to hear how people interpret you through these characters.

The character, I think, that people obviously associate with you, no matter what you do, would be “The Dude” from “The Big Lebowski.” What do you think it is about that character that speaks to people not just now, but throughout the years? He seems to have this intergenerational appeal that’s very comforting.

Well, the character is in a movie that is a classic movie. Man, those Coen Brothers, they know how to do it, man. It looks like they’ve just fallen off a log, but they’re masters, man. Every aspect of that film is so good. God, I don’t watch too many of my shows on TV, but when that one comes on, I’ll say, “Oh, I’m just going to watch it up to. . .” And then I’ll find myself watching all the scenes because they’re so good. The acting is so good and all the parts. I get a kick out of it. I’m so proud to have been in that film.

But I think The Dude, he is who he is. He’s the Dude! It’s funny, people think he’s this too chill, laid-back guy. But as Walter says, “Very un-Dude.” He’s always blowing it. He’s being tested constantly with his coolness.

Is there any bit of The Dude in Dan Chase?

Yeah. In a weird sort of way. He’s certainly who he is too, but very complicated character. I have to think about that. That’s interesting. I guess we all have in common that we’re alive, and there’s a common denominator there, certainly. Yeah. But we’re all unique too, but that’s another similarity, I guess.

“The Old Man” premieres at 10 p.m.Thursday, June 16 on FX and streams on Hulu.

More stories like this:

Henry Winkler bashes Herschel Walker for saying celebrity opinions are America’s biggest issue

Former Fonzie Henry Winkler had a few choice words for Herschel Walker after the former NFL star and current GOP Georgia Senate nominee bashed celebrities.

On Tuesday, neurosurgeon-turned-politician Ben Carson, in a conversation for the American Cornerstone Institute, had asked Walker about the nation’s biggest issue.

“I think some of the biggest problems going on in our country today, we have so many celebrities telling people that they can’t do it,” Walker answered, per The Comeback. “Telling a lot of people, ‘Oh, well, you got to feel bad for yourself, feel sorry for yourself.’ Which is sad to me. They’ve done it, but they’re telling you you can’t do it. And it’s like, you did it, why they can’t do it? I think they tell all the kids they can’t do it, making our kids feel sorry for themselves.”

Winkler, who currently stars in HBO’s comedy-drama “Barry,” wasn’t about to let that comment slide. 

“I need to repeat this again I am an American First with every right to an opinion . . . then I am an actor,” Winkler wrote in a bold tweet. “Got that Mr. Walker . . . Mr famous Athlete.”

RELATED: From valedictorian to “honorary deputy”: 5 times Herschel Walker was caught inflating his resume

Walker‘s quote – which failed to address any other issues such as gun violence, the bipartisan divide, encroaching fascism or dialing back rights for women and other marginalized groups – also ignores his own fame. As a former athlete who’s arguably been elevated into politics based on his past, Walker’s greatest strength could be seen as his celebrity. 

Winkler, who’s best known for playing The Fonz on “Happy Days,” might have been tempted to tell Walker to “sit on it,” but instead tweeted: “Aren’t [you] kind of a celeb, Hersh?” 

Winkler also responded to a separate tweet, in which one user expressed shock over Walker’s recent success in the polls.


Want a daily wrap-up of all the news and commentary Salon has to offer? Subscribe to our morning newsletter, Crash Course.


“My head spins. He’s on the ballot! How crazy has this country become?” the user wrote. “And he’s polling well!!!! I’m trying not to go numb, while at the same time wanting to be numb.”

In a quote tweet, Winkler simply said, “Celebs are AMERICANS first.”

More stories you might like:

“Forever chemicals” linked to high blood pressure, study finds

Millions of Americans have high blood pressure, a condition that can cause heart attack or stroke if left untreated. Generally, this condition is believed to be caused mostly by diet. Yet now, a stranger potential culprit has emerged: a synthetic chemical that is in thousands of consumer products, kitchenware, and even microwave popcorn bags, and which may be contributing to hypertension or high blood pressure. 

These man-made “forever chemicals” — so named because of their ability to break down — are known as per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances, shortened to PFAS. They are used in everything from non-stick cookware and fast food wrappers to furniture and paper packaging. Indeed, PFAS appear to enter our blood in part of their utter ubiquity in industrial civilization.

This is where a new report comes into play. According to research published in Hypertension, a journal of the American Heart Association, middle-aged women specifically were more likely to have high blood pressure if they also had higher blood concentrations of higher blood concentrations of these forever chemicals.

RELATED: “Forever chemicals” in non-stick pans are in your body right now — and may be affecting your liver

To ascertain this, the researchers used data from 1,000 women between the ages of 45 and 56. All of them had normal blood pressure prior to enrollment in the study and had their blood PFAS levels measured in advance. The participants were racially diverse, came from five cities in either California or the northern United States, and included women who identified as white (54.5%), Japanese (16.2%), Black (15.2%) or Chinese (14.1%).

Their conclusion was that “women with higher concentrations of specific PFAS were more likely to develop high blood pressure,” more specifically, “women in the highest one-third concentrations of all seven PFAS examined had a 71% increased risk of developing high blood pressure.”

Experts estimate that 99 percent of Americans have at least some PFAS in their blood. That means that in studying such chemicals, research must focus on the extent of one’s exposure, as it is near-impossible to have a control group with no exposure. This creates some understandable difficulties when attempting to create a controlled experiment assessing how PFAS impact human health.


Want more health and science stories in your inbox? Subscribe to Salon’s weekly newsletter The Vulgar Scientist.


“We cannot know for sure that PFAS are causing hypertension because our study is not an experiment that exposes humans with PFAS and compared with non-exposed controls,” study senior author Sung Kyun Park, Sc.D., M.P.H., an associate professor of epidemiology and environmental health sciences at the University of Michigan School of Public Health told Salon by email. “To prove if environmental chemicals like PFAS cause any health outcomes, we need a number of well-designed and well-conducted studies that show consistent results. Our study is its first step and we need more studies to conclude if PFAS are causally associated with hypertension and cardiovascular disease.”

“The best way to reduce health impacts at this point is to focus on regulation to make sure we aren’t exposed in the first place, and find ways to permanently remove them from our environment.”

Liz Costello, a PhD student at the University of Southern California who was involved in a study linking PFAS to liver disease, praised the new report and noted that while an individual observational study like this one could not possibly prove that PFAS cause hypertension, “prospective studies like this one are the best we have without doing a controlled experiment, and they can confirm for us that there is no reverse causation (where having high blood pressure might somehow affect blood PFAS levels) because the PFAS exposure happened before development of hypertension.”

When asked if there was anything consumers could do to avoid PFAS, Costello was skeptical.

“I think it’s very hard for people to avoid PFAS on their own,” Costello explained. “There are some water filters that can remove them if you have contaminated water, but it’s much harder if PFAS are in your food packaging or household products. Some products might also advertise themselves as being free of PFAS, so if you know what to look for you might be able to avoid some exposure. But there are thousands of PFAS, and you won’t find most of them on product labels.”

She added, “The best way to reduce health impacts at this point is to focus on regulation to make sure we aren’t exposed in the first place, and find ways to permanently remove them from our environment.”

Since it is impossible for individuals to avoid exposure, Park argued that people should focus on improving chemical regulations.

“It’s more important that we regulate PFAS through legislation,” Park explained. “If we have stricter regulations, everyone can benefit. It is very important for our policymakers to do something and act on PFAS exposure. We have a lot of scientific evidence that consistently tells us that reduction in PFAS is really important.”

For more Salon articles on pollution:

Jan. 6 bombshell: Author of plot to have Mike Pence overturn the election sought pardon from Trump

on Wednesday, the House select committee investigating the January 6 Capitol riot presented pre-produced video evidence of former President Donald Trump calling for former Vice President Mike Pence to “come through” and “stand up” for the country on Jan. 6 and berating Pence as a “wimp” and “pussy.” They also showed video of rioters echoing similar sentiments and calling for violence against Pence if he didn’t refuse to certify the 2020 presidential election. But perhaps the most powerful revelation from the third hearing was that a former federal appellate and Supreme Court clerk sought a pardon after pushing a plot to overturn the election. 

Numerous Democrats have cited Pence as being vital to ensuring that the election was not overthrown by Trump. During the electoral vote-count ceremony on January 6, the vice president did not go along with a legally dubious scheme – now known as the “Eastman memo” – laid out by ex-Trump attorney John Eastman, a former law school dean, who sought to have the former vice president reject certified electors in various swing states that Trump had lost. 

RELATED: Jan. 6 hearing bombshell: Pence — not Trump — called in Guard troops as White House tried to stop it

White House lawyer Eric Herschman later advised Eastman to “get a great f— criminal defense lawyer” because “you’re going to need it.” So Eastman appealed to the president for a pardon.  “I’ve decided that I should be on the pardon list, if that is still in the works,” read an email presented by the committee on Thursday. 

“Mike Pence did his job,” House Democratic Caucus Vice Chairman Pete Aguilar, D-Calif., told The Los Angeles Times. “He did his job throughout. He didn’t waver in his reading of the Constitution. Even after all of that, the president of the United States still used every method to call him names, to call him out, and to summon a mob to get him.”

“If the vice president would have succumbed to pressure, or if the vice president would say that he or she was more loyal to the president than the Constitution, we would have had a constitutional crisis that would have threatened the republic,” Aguilar added. 

According to ABC News, Pence and his family were forced to go into hiding on the day of the Capitol riot over fears that he might be harmed for refusing to do Trump’s bidding. Photos obtained by the outlet show Pence and his family squirreled away in the vice president’s ceremonial office, near the Senate floor. The pictures were reportedly taken just after the Capitol complex was breached by rioters, some of whom were chanting slogans like “Hang Mike Pence.”

RELATED: Trump’s “coup memo” lawyer tries to hide 37,000 pages of emails from Jan. 6 investigators

Many lawmakers have argued that Pence was put in grave danger by the remarks made on January 6 by Trump, who that day tweeted in real-time that the former vice president refused to overturn the election. According to NBC News, Trump made the announcement even when he knew that the Capitol had already been stormed. 

“[Trump] knew that there was violence and he still tweeted the vice president didn’t have the courage to do what was necessary,” Aguilar told the outlet. The lawmaker noted that Trump’s tweet pinning the blame on Pence was especially important “because that’s the point at which the president pointed, you know, to the mob and said it’s the vice president’s fault.”

[Luttig hearing developments]

Luttig, a retired judge, was called upon for advice by Pence’s lawyer, Richard Cullen, just a day before the Capitol riot. According to CNN, Luttig reportedly advised Cullen that Pence had no constitutional power to unilaterally reject the certified electors on January 6, despite the plan hatched by Eastman, Luttig’s former clerk.


Want a daily wrap-up of all the news and commentary Salon has to offer? Subscribe to our morning newsletter, Crash Course.


“I instantly understood the significance of the moment,” Luttig said of the call in a February interview with CNN. “I understood that this was a signal moment in history. And that I was to play some role, if for no other reason than by virtue of the fact that my former law clerk was advising the President and vice president that we do not have to accept the Electoral College vote.”

Shortly after the call, Cullen arranged to have Luttig tweet that “the only responsibility and power of the Vice President under the Constitution is to faithfully count the electoral college votes as they have been cast.”

Pence later adduced Luttig’s tweet as part of his reasoning for not attempting to reject the results of the 2020 election. 

RELATED: In latest colossal lie, Trump falsely claims Pence has power to “reject” electors

The ultimate summer salad has a surprisingly “sneaky” secret ingredient

Cottage cheese is like Eugene Levy. For years, it was just a comedic punchline, a lightweight bad guy. Then one day, you turn around and suddenly stop in your tracks. “Hold up,” you wonder. “Are you actually suave as hell?”

I don’t know exactly when we all fell in love with cottage cheese in our household, but I can confirm the obsession was nudged along by the earworm of a particular dairy brand’s jingle. Cottage cheese, you are versatile, super flavorful and cheap as hell. I’d like to apologize for not realizing this when you were a sad sidekick in the ’80s.

RELATED: Cottage cheese isn’t tasteless — you just need to buy the good stuff

With summer now upon us, there’s no better time to enjoy the cottage cheese revival, especially in a salad that flies in the face of all the sad “diet plate” specials you ever watched your mom power through as a kid. Dense with vibrant flavor, Molly Baz’s “sneaky cottage cheese salad” from her incredible “Cook This Book” is exactly the sort of thing you want when you can’t bear turning on the oven but still remember you deserve to be well fed.

Baz calls it “sneaky” because the cottage cheese turns out to be the stealth scene-stealer of the dish. She makes her salad with little gems, but I, a tired person who is currently back in night classes, believe the bagged stuff works just fine. Baz also adds garlic, which I omit to save you one less thing to slice. Toasting the nuts really does amp up the flavor, but if you’re in a hurry, no one will arrest you if you skip that part, too.

RELATED: Molly Baz’s tuna sandwich ruined us for all other tuna sandwiches

Please, however, be generous with the dill, which brightens up the whole works. This is meal so crunchy, so herby, so tart, I could eat it every day for the rest of the summer and be totally content. I bet you could, too.

You can tweak this a hundred different ways, but served with cold smoked fish and some very crisp Riesling or maybe just some local fruit wine, I’d wager to say it’d make a dinner fit for Johnny and Moira themselves.

***

Recipe: The Sneakiest Summer Salad
Inspired by Molly Baz’s “Cook This Book”

Yields
4 servings
Prep Time
10 minutes
Cook Time
10 minutes

Ingredients

  • 1 lemon
  • 2 Persian cucumbers 
  • 1 bag pre-washed romaine 
  • 1 cup fresh dill, roughly chopped
  • 1⁄2 cup full-fat cottage cheese
  • 1⁄2 cup pecans, walnuts or almonds
  • 3 tablespoons extra virgin olive oil
  • Sea salt and freshly ground black pepper

 

Directions

  1. Preheat the oven to 325°F.

  2. Spread the nuts out on a rimmed baking sheet and toast in the oven, about 8-10 minutes. Remove from the oven, flip the nuts over and allow them to cool.

  3. While the nuts are toasting, make the dressing. In a big bowl, zest the peel from about a quarter of the lemon. Cut the lemon in half and squeeze all of the juice into the bowl.

  4. Whisk in the cottage cheese, olive oil, salt and pepper

  5. Cut the cucumber into small rounds or slices. (The choice is yours.)

  6. Open up the big bag of salad and add it to the bowl with the dressing. Toss thoroughly to cover every leaf.

  7. Add the cucumber, dill and nuts before tossing the salad again. Taste a leaf and add more salt and pepper as needed.


Cook’s Notes

You can swap the Persian cucumbers with half an English cucumber. If romaine isn’t your journey, reach for your favorite salad greens instead. 

Had I not finished off my current supply with breakfast earlier in the day, I wouldn’t have hesitated to throw a bunch of pomegranate seeds in there.


Want more great food writing and recipes? Subscribe to “The Bite,” Salon Food’s newsletter.


More of our favorite ways to do salad:

Salon Food writes about stuff we think you’ll like. Salon has affiliate partnerships, so we may get a share of the revenue from your purchase.

What a long COVID diagnosis means when your doctor knows little more than Google

Last December, like millions of Americans, I contracted a decidedly mild case of COVID-19. Months later, when bruise-like lesions developed on my toes, I was baffled. In the media, the condition has been called “COVID toes,” but it took me months to connect the dots. Many long haulers — people with post-COVID conditions — likely have yet to make the connection. 

Medical experts now believe COVID-19 can trigger a variety of conditions colloquially referred to as long COVID. On its website, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) notes fatigue, trouble breathing, difficulty thinking, changes in smell and taste, and muscular pain. However, most conditions associated with long COVID are not unusual enough to be distinct.

“When people have long recovery periods or never really returned to normal, they enter into this mystery diagnosis world where the pattern doesn’t fit something anyone’s ever seen before,” Cardiologist Dr. Harlan Krumholz told Salon in an interview. “And no one knows what to do about it.”

* * *

Loss of smell and COVID toes were peculiar enough to grab headlines, and eventually, led many to realize that their odd symptoms were connected to a previous COVID diagnosis. Therein lies a critically terrifying aspect of long COVID: When it comes to seemingly disconnected conditions like brain fog and COVID toe, many people are unaware that these afflictions are connected to a cough they had weeks or months ago. Now, as society moves away from testing and more cases go unnoticed, the peculiarities of long COVID mean that many are unaware that a grab-bag of conditions they are experiencing are connected to mild COVID cases from long ago — meaning that huge numbers of people may remain undiagnosed.

Many people who described their long COVID symptoms to medical professionals found themselves ignored or dismissed. For others, like myself, the mystery around long COVID leads to anxiety, particularly given how medical experts simply do not have the answers. Could the mechanism that leads to one apparent but relatively minor irritation be causing other damage to my body?

RELATED: COVID-19 is linked to long-term mental health issues in recovered patients

As health officials give in to a populace that wants to move on from the pandemic, we are still largely in the dark about long COVID, and funding from Congress for research has shrunk significantly, according to Dr. Krumholz.

“It’s a moment in time in which people are hopeful that this all just goes away,” he said. “We’re left with a lot of uncertainty about a lot of people who are suffering, and we’re moving far too slowly to try to fill the gaps.”

* * *

When I started to seriously consider I might have scurvy, I went to the internet for help. As it turned out, my fruit consumption habits were probably not a factor in my symptoms. A quick WebMD diagnosis revealed that I had chilblains, a rare condition associated with Raynaud’s syndrome, which is a vascular disorder. Raynaud’s is typically genetic, but it can also be triggered by certain infections, like COVID-19. 

Still, it was bizarre enough that I did get a professional opinion. That opinion turned out to be exactly that: an opinion, meaning confirmation and little else. At the Cleveland Clinic, the doctor who examined me said it was only her third case of long COVID. She was sympathetic but could offer nothing beyond visual confirmation and a recommendation of hydrocortisone to treat the irritation.

Prior to recognition from the medical establishment, frustrated long COVID sufferers banded together to get their attention. One video from a group of survivors called LongCovidSOS, posted on YouTube, apparently struck a chord. The World Health Organization invited the responsible group to a meeting in October 2021, in which advocates made their case for an investigation into a condition that, at the time, was still misunderstood.


Want more health and science stories in your inbox? Subscribe to Salon’s weekly newsletter The Vulgar Scientist.


Meanwhile, some doctors who had observed peculiar symptoms following COVID-19 infections conducted their own studies from largely anecdotal evidence. At Yale, Dr. Krumholz is investigating potential avenues to mitigate negative outcomes of long COVID. Anecdotal evidence suggests that vaccines actually may be one such solution.

Leading the Alberta Health Services COVID-19 Scientific Advisory Group, Dr. Lynora Saxinger, like many medical professionals, worries about the impact COVID-19 infections have down the line. However, for her vast discrepancies in research complicate matters. The most extreme reports suggesting “there’s gonna be an absolute tsunami of devastation in the population”

“If you look at the available information about post-COVID conditions, it is all over the map,” she added.

While some studies minimize personal accounts of long COVID, and other studies conversely hint at extremely high risk, Saxinger asserted that “the truth is generally somewhere in the middle.”

Saxinger suggests that cognitive decline may be more psychosomatic than studies have let on, but further research is needed to determine that.

In part, this discrepancy is a matter of skewed statistics. One recent study in Nature suggested COVID-19 infection increased the risk of heart disease. Mount Sinai rehabilitation expert Dr. David F. Putrino told Medical News Today the findings concerned long COVID could lead to a “mass-disabling event.” The study however, was limited by data, which came from the department of Veterans Affairs. Although experts analyzed a large cohort of subjects, they were mostly white, male veterans.

Sample populations have also often been oversaturated with the most severe cases of COVID-19. Much of the data we have on long COVID comes from hospitals and from long haulers that were infected prior to vaccinations.

For example, National Institutes of Health (NIH) reported that vascular damage could lead to lasting brain damage, but only a small group of deceased hospital patients were analyzed. Saxinger suggests that cognitive decline may be more psychosomatic than studies have let on, but further research is needed to determine that. 

“We actually are all in our own heads and our heads are part of our health,” she told Salon, underscoring the risk of sounding dismissive. “The basis of these conditions might not be all due to the virus.”

Researchers know far less about the long term impact of COVID-19 when symptoms are mild, Saxinger explained. That’s why Dr. Krumholz has also been mounting a study that would analyze a wider swath of the population. Such research may yield not only answers but also potential avenues to alleviate symptoms. 

According to Krumholz, different clusters of symptoms may be the result of entirely different mechanisms of the virus, and findings could actually yield discoveries about the impacts of other viruses as well. Inflammation, vascular damage, and even persistence of the virus itself have been implicated, but it could be years before we have a clear picture of how long COVID works and are able to treat it effectively. 

“The more we start getting large numbers of people to study and treating them like partners in these studies, returning information, working together, holding hands, the faster we can make progress, but we need to really get that done as soon as we can,” he concluded.

Read more on long COVID:

Trump demands news networks airing Jan. 6 hearings give him “equal time” to discuss “voter fraud”

Just hours before the House select committee was to begin its third televised hearing on the Jan. 6 Capitol riot, former president Donald Trump took to his Truth Social account to demand he be given air time on the same networks to lay out what he described as his evidence of “massive Voter Fraud & Dem Security Breach!”

He followed that up moments later with “I DEMAND EQUAL TIME!!!”

On Thursday, viewers are reportedly going to be presented with evidence of Trump’s attempts to bully former vice president Mike Pence into overturning the will of the voters in the 2020 presidential election that one retired federal judge called, “tantamount to a revolution.”

On the precipice of more damaging information coming out about his attempts to steal the election, Trump jumped on Truth Social to rage at the “Fake News Networks.”

“The Fake News Networks are perpetuating lies, falsehoods, and Russia, Russia, Russia type disinformation (same sick people, here we go again!) by allowing the low rated but nevertheless one sided and slanderous Unselect Committee hearings to go endlessly and aimlessly on (and on and on!),” he wrote. “It is a one sided, highly partisan Witch Hunt, the likes of which has never been seen in Congress before. Therefore, I am hereby demanding EQUAL TIME to spell out the massive Voter Fraud & Dem Security Breach!”

He then added, “I DEMAND EQUAL TIME!!!

Liz Cheney, vice chair of the House committee investigating the Capitol riot, said its third June hearing would address Trump’s “relentless effort” on January 6 2021 and in the days beforehand to cajole Mike Pence into rejecting Joe Biden’s victory.

“As a federal judge has indicated, this likely violated two federal criminal statutes. President Trump had no factual basis for what he was doing and he had been told it was illegal,” Cheney said on Twitter.

“Despite this, President Trump plotted with a lawyer named John Eastman and others to overturn the outcome of the election on January 6.”

An aide to the committee said the hearing would look at Eastman’s role in developing a plot for Trump to pressure Pence into subverting the election, backed by a bogus legal theory that represented a “grave danger to American democracy.”

Cheney’s tweet featured a clip of testimony from Trump White House attorney Eric Herschmann who told Eastman the day after the insurrection: “Get a great effing criminal defense lawyer. You’re going to need it.”

White parents chased a Black educator out of town. Then they followed her to the next one

In April of 2021, Cecelia Lewis had just returned to Maryland from a house-hunting trip in Georgia when she received the first red flag about her new job.

The trip itself had gone well. Lewis and her husband had settled on a rental home in Woodstock, a small city with a charming downtown and a regular presence on best places to live lists. It was a short drive to her soon-to-be office at the Cherokee County School District and less than a half hour to her husband’s new corporate assignment. While the north Georgia county was new to the couple, the Atlanta area was not. They’d visited several times in recent years to see their son, who attended Georgia Tech.

Lewis, a middle school principal, initially applied for a position that would bring her closer to the classroom as a coach for teachers. But district leaders were so impressed by her interview that they encouraged her to apply instead for a new opening they’d created: their first administrator focused on diversity, equity and inclusion initiatives.

DEI-focused positions were becoming more common in districts across the country, following the 2020 protests over the killings of George Floyd, Breonna Taylor and Ahmaud Arbery. The purpose of such jobs typically is to provide a more direct path for addressing disparities stemming from race, economics, disabilities and other factors.

At first, the scope of the role gave Lewis pause. In her current district, these responsibilities were split among several people, and she’d never held a position dedicated to anything as specific as that before. But she had served on the District Equity Leadership Team in her Maryland county and felt prepared for this new challenge. She believed the job would allow her, as she put it, to analyze the district’s “systemic and instructional practices” in order to better support “the whole child.”

“We’re so excited to add Cecelia to the CCSD family,” Superintendent Brian Hightower said in the district’s March 2021 announcement about all of its new hires. (The announcement noted that the creation of the DEI administrator role “stems from input from parents, employees and students of color who are serving on Dr. Hightower’s ad hoc committees formed this school year to focus on the topic.”) Hightower acknowledged “both her impressive credentials and enthusiasm for the role” and pointed out that, “In four days, she had a DEI action plan for us.”

During her early visits, Lewis found Cherokee County to be a welcoming place. It reminded her of her community in southern Maryland, where everyone knew one another. But leaving the place where she’d been raised — and where, aside from her undergrad years at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, she’d spent most of her adult life — wasn’t going to be easy. Before her last day as principal of her middle school, her staff created a legacy wall in her honor, plastering a phrase above student lockers that Lewis would say to end the morning messages each day: “If no one’s told you they care about you today, know that I do … and there is absolutely nothing you can do about it!”

Lewis was beginning to prepare for her move South, spending as much time with friends and family as possible, when she got a strange call from an official in her new school district. The person on the line — Lewis won’t say who — asked if she had ever heard of CRT.

Lewis responded, “Yes — culturally responsive teaching.” She was thinking of the philosophy that connects a child’s cultural background to what they learn in school. For Lewis, who’d studied Japanese and Russian in college and more recently traveled to Ghana with the Fulbright-Hays Seminars Abroad program for teachers, language and culture were essential to understanding anyone’s experience.

At that point, she wasn’t even familiar with the other CRT, critical race theory, which maintains that racial bias is embedded in America’s laws and institutions and has caused disproportionate harm to people of color. In a speech the previous fall, then-President Donald Trump condemned CRT as “toxic propaganda” and “ideological poison.”

The caller then told Lewis that a group of people in a wealthy neighborhood in the northern part of the county were upset about what they believed were her intentions to bring CRT to Cherokee County. But don’t worry, the district official said; we just want to keep you updated.

The following month, inside a gabled white clubhouse overlooking the hills of a Cherokee County golf course, dozens of parents from across the county had assembled on a Sunday afternoon for a lesson in an emerging form of warfare. School board meetings would be their battlefield. Their enemy was CRT.

One of several presenters at the meeting was Rhonda Thomas, a frequent guest on conservative podcasts and the founder of the Atlanta-based Truth in Education, a national nonprofit that aims to educate parents and teachers about “radical ideologies being taught in schools.” “So what is critical race theory?” Thomas asked the crowd. “It teaches kids that whites are inherently racist and oppressive, perhaps unconsciously,” and that “all whites are responsible for all historical actions” and “should feel guilty.”

She added: “I cannot be asked for repentance for something my grandparents did or my ancestors did, right?”

Thomas stressed that parents should form their own nonprofit groups and cut ties with their schools’ Parent Teacher Associations. “The PTA supports everything we’re against,” she told them.

Another presenter, a local paralegal named Noelle Kahaian, leads the nonprofit Protect Student Health Georgia, which aims to “educate on harmful indoctrination” including “comprehensive sexuality education” and “gender ideology.”

Kahaian emphasized how to grab attention during upcoming school board meetings. Identify the best speakers in the group, she told them, adding: “It’s OK to be emotional.” Be sure to capture video of them addressing the board — or even consider hiring a professional videographer.

“It’s good in case Tucker Carlson wants to put you on air,” Kahaian said. “It really helps.”

She then briefed them on how to file grievances about school board members’ teaching licenses and on their right to request school board members’ cellphone records.

And she advised them on the benefit of collaborating with “outside forces” to file open records requests to school systems for employee emails and curriculum plans that could provide evidence of inappropriate material being taught in classrooms. Doing so would allow those outsiders to “take some of the heat.”

But there was one agenda item that would inspire the crowd to take more urgent action than any other: They had to figure out what to do about the Cherokee County School District’s decision to hire a woman named Cecelia Lewis.

“And when I got a text message from somebody saying that this person was hired, I immediately was like, ‘Oh, my goodness, where are my people?'” said another speaker, Mandy Heda, a Cherokee County GOP precinct chair who introduced herself as a parent of four students in the district.

Thomas, Kahaian and Heda did not respond to multiple requests for comment or to a list of questions detailing the points they raised at the clubhouse meeting and elsewhere.

After asking the crowd to look at the Maryland district where Lewis was coming from, Heda wondered how Lewis could “leave that at the border” (she didn’t elaborate on what “that” was) and how the longtime educator could come “to Cherokee County and not want to change us.” (Like Cherokee, the district where Lewis was a principal serves a majority-white county that voted for Trump in 2020 — though Heda and others in the clubhouse seemed unaware of this.)

A man interjected, saying he’d contacted the Cherokee County School District to find out “how they arrived at the choice to hire” Lewis. Hadn’t there been any local candidates, he asked.

“You cannot tell me, you know, that you can’t find somebody else qualified,” Heda responded. “And if you’re looking for her to be Black, that’s fine. But that’s not what this is about. This is not about the color of her skin. It’s what she’s going to bring into our district and what she’s going to teach our children.”

Another person in the crowd later asked if the arrival of Lewis was a done deal. Several confirmed that it was.

“We don’t have to accept it, right?” another man asked, the crowd’s energy rising in response with a collective yes. “We can change that, right?”

“In some way, shape or form,” another woman vowed.

The May 2021 clubhouse meeting, a recording of which was provided to ProPublica by a parent who attended, provides a window into the ways in which conservative groups quickly and efficiently train communities to take on school districts in the name of concepts that aren’t even being taught in classrooms.

National groups, often through their local chapters, have provided video lessons and toolkits to parents across the country on how to effectively spread their messaging about so-called school indoctrination. Parents Defending Education has created “indoctrination maps” tracking everything from a district celebrating “Black Lives Matter week” to one that allows students to watch CNN Student News, while the Atlanta-based Education Veritas and Kahaian’s Protect Student Health Georgia provide portals for anonymously reporting educators supposedly sympathetic to CRT, DEI and other so-called controversial learning concepts.

In the wake of 2020’s summer of racial reckoning, as the work of anti-racist authors shot to the top of bestseller lists and corporations expressed renewed commitments to diversity initiatives, conservatives mounted a counteroffensive against what they viewed as an anti-white, anti-American, “woke” liberal agenda. And with that effort came a renewed vilification of CRT, a four-decade-old theory that, contrary to its opponents’ accusations, is rarely if ever taught in K-12 public school systems (it typically is taught in graduate-level college and law school courses). That effort quickly snowballed into complaints about what used to be basic history lessons involving race and slavery, which organized groups began conflating with CRT and campaigning for their removal from curriculums.

Nearly 900 school districts across the country have been targeted by anti-CRT efforts from September 2020 to August 2021, researchers at the University of California, Los Angeles, and the University of California, San Diego, found. Teachers and district equity officers surveyed and interviewed for the report “often described feeling attacked and at risk for discussing issues of race or racism at all, or promoting equity, diversity, and inclusion in any way. Equity officers told us that at times they feared for their personal safety.”

The report also stated: “Only one equity officer described a year free of anti ‘CRT’ conflict.”

“It makes me very sad for my colleagues,” said Cicely Bingener, one of the UCLA researchers and a longtime elementary school educator.

Using local media coverage and lawsuits, ProPublica has identified at least 14 public school employees across the country, six of them Black, who were chased out in part by anti-CRT efforts in 2021. Some of the educators resigned or did not have their contracts renewed, while others were fired by school boards where elections had ushered in more politically extreme members.

Since January 2021, legislatures in more than 40 states have proposed or passed bills and resolutions that would restrict teaching CRT or would limit how teachers can discuss racism and sexism. Four days after the meeting in the golf course clubhouse, Georgia Gov. Brian Kemp released a statement solidifying his stance against CRT and asking the state Board of Education to do the same. “I urge you to take immediate steps to ensure that Critical Race Theory and its dangerous ideology do not take root in our state standards or curriculum,” it read.

On June 3, 2021, the Board of Education did just that, joining Utah’s as the first such groups to pass resolutions of that kind. Georgia’s declared that “the United States of America is not a racist country, and that the state of Georgia is not a racist state.”

In predominantly white Cherokee County, 40 miles north of downtown Atlanta, the fight over CRT has led some residents to question whether they still recognize the community they thought they knew.

“These are our neighbors,” said Leanne Etienne, a Black mother of two Cherokee County students, one of whom served on the superintendent’s ad hoc committee that led to the creation of the DEI position. “These are people who are the parents of the children my kids go to school with. It’s a very uncomfortable feeling. You don’t know who to trust. You don’t feel safe.”

After that April call from the school district official, Lewis was confused but remained optimistic. She read up on CRT and determined it had nothing to do with her role. Then came more calls.

In one, a district official asked Lewis if she has social media accounts. “Only a LinkedIn,” she replied. (Lewis barely has a digital footprint. She has never posted anything on social media nor made any professional statements in regard to CRT or any other controversial topic.) The official explained that some of the people upset about her hiring were complaining that a Twitter user with her name was posting Marxist ideology.

Around that same time, according to Lewis, several emails and handwritten letters were showing up at her school in Maryland, calling her a Black Yankee and saying her liberal thinking is unwanted. She saved only one, with typewriting on the envelope. The return address was just “A Cherokee County Citizen.”

“They ultimately just said, you know, ‘We don’t want you here, and we don’t want you to push us to find out what will happen if you come here,'” Lewis said.

On May 18, 2021, two days after the meeting at the clubhouse, Cherokee County’s schools communications chief and its school board members received the first of approximately 100 form letters that would flood their inboxes over a 48-hour period, demanding that Lewis be fired.

Another parent wrote to a school board member, citing Cherokee County’s recent census statistics: “Did you know that 77.8% of the population is considered ‘whtie [sic] alone’ 7.7% are black and 11.1% hispanic? Are we now in a county that is going to cater to a handful of people?”

Lewis said she was willing and eager, once she arrived in Georgia, to speak to concerned parents. “I just felt as if there was a misunderstanding,” she said, “and as soon as I [would] have an opportunity to get there and really speak on my own behalf, then it was going to be OK.”

She also felt comforted by the fact that school district officials were regularly checking in with her, offering reassurances that they were monitoring the situation and that everything would be OK “once they get to know you.”

Lewis tends not to talk about racism in terms of her professional life. She said that, until she got the Black Yankee email, she had not experienced racial prejudice and was accustomed to learning and working in majority-white spaces. She also recalled being surprised when someone from the district pointed out that a hiring like hers was rare, in that there were not many minority leaders working in the district.

“I did not think that in 2021 that that was really a thing,” Lewis said, noting the district’s proximity to Atlanta, with its high concentration of Black leadership and affluence. “And that was probably just ignorance on my end. And I mean that in the purest form of ignorance, of just not knowing. I didn’t know.”

On May 20, 2021, one of Lewis’ soon-to-be colleagues called to say that the people upset about her hiring were claiming to have spotted her around Cherokee County and were sharing with one another her supposed locations. Lewis, however, was still in Maryland.

That same day — following an increase in social media posts, emails and phone calls complaining about Lewis and CRT — the district installed metal detectors and assigned extra security at the county building where school board meetings are held.

Lewis soon received yet another call. Someone from district leadership asked if she was planning to watch the board meeting that night. She replied that it hadn’t been on her radar.

“You should watch it,” they said.

Well before the Cherokee County School Board meeting’s 7 p.m. start time, people hoping to get inside were being turned away. The room and the overspill viewing area in the lobby were at capacity. Those who were denied entry gathered outside near the parking lot, where they could peek through windows and glimpse the large screens mounted in the boardroom. Others hung around outside, planning to watch the livestream of the meeting on their phones.

At home in Maryland, Lewis and her husband sat in their bedroom, the laptop propped up between them.

Inside, just before the meeting started, mothers in black T-shirts printed with the words “I don’t co-parent with the government” smiled and posed for pictures. A husky man with a deep voice formed the beginning of the large prayer circle that inched toward the dais where district officials, student delegates and Cherokee County’s seven school board members were seated.

The first order of business was introduced by Mike Chapman, a Republican board member who’d held his seat for more than two decades: a resolution against teaching CRT and the 1619 Project, a Pulitzer Prize-winning New York Times series that “aims to reframe the country’s history by placing the consequences of slavery and the contributions of black Americans at the very center of our national narrative.” (Conservatives have railed against it as racially divisive and have often lumped it together with CRT in an attempt to ban both from schools across the country.)

What came next caught Lewis off guard.

Hightower, the superintendent, read from a statement: “While I had initially entertained and publicly spoken to the development of a diversity, equity and inclusivity, DEI plan, I recognize that our intentions have become widely misunderstood in the community and it created division.

“To that end, I have concluded that there will be no separate DEI plan.”

To Lewis, it was as if the “foundations of everything that I was asked to do have just shifted, and I was not a part of the conversation.”

State Rep. Brad Thomas, a Republican, spoke next. He assured the board that, as the father of a Cherokee County student, he’d done his research after fielding complaints about Lewis’ hiring.

He said he now had a plan of his own in the works: He would be drafting legislation to ensure that teaching CRT and the 1619 Project would be illegal statewide. “We’ve pulled language from Tennessee’s bill. We’ve pulled language from Texas’ bill. We’ve pulled language from Oklahoma’s bill. We’ve pulled language from Idaho’s bill,” he said. “And I’ve put some of my own language in there.”

Heda, the Cherokee County GOP precinct officer who’d spoken at the clubhouse meeting four days earlier, also addressed the board. She claimed that the definition of DEI had changed over time and now represents the views held by people with “the same woke political understanding of power dynamics and social positions.”

“We cannot fix racism with institutionalized racism,” she said.

A neighbor of Heda’s approached the lectern next. The woman, who is Black, spoke in favor of the decision to hire Lewis. It was the first time she was mentioned by name.

According to one observer, that’s when the crowd gathered outside began beating against the building’s windows.

“No, no, no!” they screamed in unison, the sound reverberating through the lobby as their fists pounded the glass.

A subsequent speaker, a parent named Lauri Raney, was rewarded with applause when she asked the board, “My question to you is, if you vote to do away with the DEI program, does that mean the new DEI officer has her offer rescinded? Because why do we need to pay $115,000 for somebody who doesn’t have a job to do anymore?”

At that moment, Lewis recalled, her husband said: “That’s it. We’re not doing this. You are not going there.” He left the bedroom in disgust.

Not long after, a volunteer from the campaign of Vernon Jones, a Black Republican who at the time was running for governor (Jones later switched to a run for Congress), read a statement to the school board from the candidate. “Embracing the teaching of critical race theory is a slap in the face of Dr. King’s teachings,” said the volunteer, Stan Fitzgerald. “Taxpayer-funded anti-white racism is still exactly that — racism.”

Upon hearing that, Lewis thought about how Martin Luther King Jr. promoted humanity and love, and she was devastated to hear his words used by strangers to attack her. Everything she had just witnessed felt contrary to his ideals.

Breaking down in tears, Lewis closed her laptop. She could no longer watch.

“That cut me so deeply,” she said. “It hit the core of who I am as a being.”

Lewis missed the part when Miranda Wicker, another parent and member of the county’s Democratic Party, addressed the board. “Those who want this ban are spouting talking points fed to them by an outside special interest group with a deeply political agenda to keep people riled up against an invisible other,” said Wicker, who was interrupted by loud shouts.

“Stop the disrespect!” school board Chair Kyla Cromer yelled at the crowd after banging her gavel. “Stop! Stop!”

Cromer threatened to adjourn the meeting early but ultimately allowed it to continue.

The board voted 4-1 with two abstentions to pass the anti-CRT and anti-1619 Project resolution. But the crowd was still worked up. Cromer moved to take a break. The livestream of the meeting was paused. But the yelling continued. And things spiraled out of control, to the point that Cromer abruptly adjourned the meeting.

One man in the crowd screamed: “I’m furious!”

Another declared: “We’re going to hunt you down!”

The school district’s chief communications officer, Barbara Jacoby, would later say that’s when the students attending the meeting started crying.

“They had to be rushed out of the room,” Jacoby recalled. She went with them and the school board members as security guards ushered the group to a conference room behind the dais. “And then we had to be walked to our cars,” she said. “We had to be followed out of the parking lot onto the highway by police officers.”

In response to questions from ProPublica, the school board provided a statement describing how some members requested school police escorts to their homes, where city and county agencies conducted extra patrols. In response to the other questions, including ones about anti-CRT letters the board received, Jacoby responded on its behalf, stating “the information you note below is correct.” Cromer and Hightower declined to comment.

Jacoby said the scene felt unreal. “It’s certainly not anything anyone who comes to work for a school district expects would ever be part of their job.”

Lewis’ phone kept ringing that night. People from the district were telling her that this is not who they are, that they’re embarrassed by the actions of their neighbors and church members, that they’re sorry she had to witness this.

In a phone call the next morning, Hightower apologized to Lewis. He said he still wanted her to come to Cherokee. Another administrator asked if she would consider a different position.

But by then she’d made up her mind. She told Hightower: It’s just not going to work.

“I can’t say I blame her,” Cherokee County School District chief of staff Mike McGowan said in an interview with ProPublica. “There was so much misinformation about who she was, what she stood for and what was going on politically.”

In response to a detailed list of questions to the district covering all aspects of Lewis’ experience in Cherokee County, Jacoby responded that “we have no further comments to add.”

The following morning, before it was publicly known that Lewis had quit the job she’d never started, a former Cherokee County student who’d attended the school board meeting appeared on “Fox & Friends and warned that the board was still pursuing CRT under the guise of other concepts. “I think that they’re relying on wordplay to try to confuse Cherokee County representatives or constituents that aren’t necessarily completely involved because they’re busy with their day-to-day life,” the guest, Bailey Katzenstein, said. She claimed that CRT initiatives would be carried out by “someone from Maryland” in the form of programs “synonymous” with CRT: DEI and SEL (or social emotional learning). SEL is a decades-old child development concept that emphasizes building self-awareness, teaching kids how to better communicate, fostering relationships and making responsible decisions, according to scholars and researchers.

“I don’t think it’s acceptable,” Katzenstein said of the school board not banning DEI and SEL along with CRT. “They’re hiding behind closed doors, and I think it’s completely full of cowardice.”

The Fox host, ending the segment, said: “If you thought this was an elite, New York City school problem, Bailey Katzenstein just told you the exact opposite. This is spreading. It’s going all over the country, and it’s having real impacts.”

The next day, Cherokee County parents used their private Facebook group to continue to report Lewis “sightings.” (People with access to the group shared screenshots of posts with ProPublica.)

“My husband swears he saw Ms. Lewis at Ace yesterday afternoon!” one woman wrote, adding, “He saw the Maryland plates and the driver looked just like her.”

But Lewis was still in Maryland. She hadn’t returned to Georgia since the house-hunting trip.

In a statement quoted in the Cherokee Tribune & Ledger-News a week and a half later, Lewis wrote: “I wholeheartedly fell in love with Cherokee County when I came to visit and accepted the position, but somehow, I got caught in the crossfire of lies, misinformation, and accusations which have zero basis.”

When Lewis and her husband actually relocated to Georgia later that summer, the Cherokee parents’ private Facebook group lit up.

“Guess where Cecelia Lewis is possibly landing now?” another woman wrote.

They’d figured out her next move.

Five days after Lewis quit her would-be job in Cherokee County, the district’s human resources director forwarded a copy of her resume to the chief academic officer at his former school district, one county over. “Great catching Up!” he wrote. “Talk soon.”

Officials in the Cobb County School District, the second-largest in the state, called Lewis soon after. They wanted to talk to her about an opening they had for a supervisor of social studies, a job title she’d held in another school district earlier in her career.

Lewis did not know it, but the position already had been subjected to scrutiny.

In the summer of 2020, in wake of Floyd’s killing at the hands of Minneapolis police, the Cobb County School District began to more tightly manage the way racial issues are handled in social studies teacher training and more closely vet the materials trainers and educators could use.

According to records obtained by ProPublica, the previous, longtime social studies supervisor had been reprimanded for hosting a district-approved speaker from the state Department of Education. A teacher had complained about the speaker’s presentation, titled “All are Welcome.”

The social studies supervisor’s boss wrote in the letter that most of the presentation was appropriate. There were just a few issues.

The boss wasn’t happy with the “sensitive content and images” and “probing questions” in the presentation. One slide included a photo of Minneapolis police officer Derek Chauvin atop Floyd, his knee pinned to Floyd’s neck, along with two questions that challenged educators in how they approach lessons about such controversies: “What can we share with our black students to help them cope with the bottom?” “What did the man on top miss out on learning that could have made him a better person?”

Additionally, the director’s letter reminded the social studies supervisor that there already had been discussions about references to the 1619 Project, about vetting all presentations, about monitoring social media posts for the “message they send to the greater Cobb County community” and about ensuring that outside organizations the social studies supervisor might partner with would present controversial issues in a manner acceptable to the school district.

In 2021, the social studies supervisor retired. Lewis — who holds a master’s degree in teaching the subject — applied to replace her.

In June, at around the same time that Lewis got the call from Cobb County to come in for an interview, Cobb’s seven-member school board passed its own anti-CRT and anti-1619 Project resolution. Three members — all of them Black Democrats — abstained, noting this was not the first time they were blindsided by the addition of a problematic, last-minute agenda item.

Once a Republican stronghold represented by Newt Gingrich in Congress, Cobb County flipped to blue in 2018 and has remained that way since. By 2020 the county elected its first Black sheriff and county commission chair. Though the school district’s population is 30% Black and 24% Hispanic, the school board majority remains white and conservative.

By mid-July, another metropolitan Atlanta school district was courting Lewis. But by then she was living in Cobb County and decided to follow-up with the district there. It had been weeks since she’d gone through multiple rounds of rigorous interviews, during which Cobb officials complimented her on her credentials, saying she’d be an asset in multiple leadership roles, according to Lewis.

Lewis recalled that a district official finally called her back toward the end of July to apologize for the delayed response and explained that the superintendent had been involved in vetting her hiring, something that typically doesn’t happen for a person who applies for a supervisor role.

The district offered Lewis the job on that call, and she accepted. She was asked to report to work the next day, July 20.

By the end of the week — right around the time when the Cherokee County parent circulated the tip in the private Facebook group that Lewis might now be heading to Cobb — Lewis got a call from a school district leader. It was someone above her boss, Lewis said. According to Lewis, the person requested an immediate, off-site meeting.

It was already after 6 p.m. Lewis had just settled in for a manicure and pedicure. She left her appointment and headed to a nearby Panera Bread, where she and the district official took a seat near the back of the restaurant.

The person explained that complaints about her were “percolating” out of Cherokee into Cobb, according to Lewis, who also remembered the person telling her to be careful; she’s an at-will employee (meaning she can be fired at any time for any reason without notice) and the person might not be able to help her. Lewis also recalled the person telling her that she shouldn’t have to endure in Cobb what she went through in Cherokee.

Lewis was stunned. “I did nothing but showed up to work, signed a contract, agreed to do what I was asked to do in the job description,” she told ProPublica. “And yet again, I’m getting attacked.”

Around the same time, Cobb’s four Republican school board members, its superintendent and another district official, John Floresta, were fielding complaints about the decision to hire Lewis.

“I am appalled that anyone would advocate for the racist, sexist, and Marxist ideology that is Critical Race Theory,” one woman wrote to the group in an email, which ProPublica obtained through an open records request. Her name was redacted. She went on to say, among other things: “I insist that you pass real policy reforms that forbid indoctrinating children with CRT in classrooms,” “Anyone found pushing CRT on CCSD time should be immediately terminated,” and “Make no mistake: press releases and toothless resolutions just won’t cut it.”

“I agree with you 100%,” Cobb County school board member Randy Scamihorn responded. “Thankfully, the majority of the Board did vote on June 10th to ban CRT and 1619 Project from our schools in Cobb County. We then directed Superintendent Ragsdale to implement the enforcement of this decision, which he readily agreed to do.”

“I’m glad to hear you feel that way, but it certainly seems we need to remain vigilant,” the woman replied. “Why has Cecelia Lewis been hired by Cobb? She was hired by Cherokee schools for CRT and was run off because the parents put up such a fight. Now Cobb has quietly hired her. This isn’t a good move for the optics that Cobb has supposedly banned CRT.”

There is no record of an email reply from Scamihorn.

In response to ProPublica’s request for comment on the email exchange, a spokesperson for the district responded on behalf of Scamihorn: “Your assertion that Mr. Scamihorn ‘agreed 100%’ that ‘anyone pushing CRT on CCSD time should be immediately terminated’ is grossly inaccurate and not consistent with the email you are referencing. The Cobb Board did pass a resolution which directs the District to focus on keeping schools, schools, not on political distractions.” When asked to elaborate on what was inaccurate or inconsistent, the spokesperson did not respond.

Floresta responded to a different email complaining about CRT, assuring the sender that it was not allowed to be taught per district policy. The sender then pointed to the hiring in Cobb of “Cecelia Lewis, a well known advocate for CRT and DEI agents who actually resigned from Cherokee County recently because of the push back from the parents.”

“How in the heck did Dr. Cecelia Lewis get hired on?” the email continued. “It is ASTOUNDING to think that anyone would think this was a good idea. We need answers on this, immediately, and an explanation of her role within the County. To list her under Social Studies does not fool any of us.”

On Lewis’ fourth day on the job, she got a message from one of the district secretaries.

“I received a call from a parent wanting to know if you were the same person hired in Cherokee County. I just told her that someone would give her a call back to address her questions.”

Lewis’ boss soon told her to direct all such messages to her office. She also told Lewis to hold off on responding to any emails regarding her hiring, after Lewis replied to a positive note that came in from a supportive parent.

The following week, Lewis was supposed to introduce herself to all the social studies teachers at a districtwide training meeting. She said she’d been asked, before the Panera meeting, to prepare a presentation and share the social studies program vision.

She said she was then asked to shorten the presentation to a simple series of slides. Then, to one slide.

Finally, she learned she wouldn’t even be acknowledged at the meeting as the new supervisor of social studies.

“When the day came, I was told that I had to sit in the back and flip the slides for the presenter,” Lewis recalled. “I was not introduced at all.”

Lewis said she did receive warm welcomes when she individually introduced herself to teachers, some of whom said they’d heard she’d arrived and wondered when they’d meet her.

Not long after the meeting, she recalled, other aspects of her job began to change. Her emails to social studies teachers would need to be vetted before she could hit send (not a single one was approved). And she’d now be on a special project, reviewing thousands of resources that had already been approved and adopted by the district.

“It was pretty much them tucking me away,” Lewis said. “Every meeting was canceled. Every professional learning opportunity that I was supposed to lead with my team, I couldn’t do. Every department meeting with different schools, I was told I can’t go.”

According to Lewis, the only direct communication she was allowed to have without vetting was with other supervisors.

“They were wasting their money,” she said. “I’m just sitting here in this room every day, looking through resources that have already been approved, which makes no sense, and not given much direction as to what I’m looking for — just making sure they’re aligned to standards, which obviously they were.”

At the end of August, Lewis requested a meeting with her supervisor and the district’s chief academic officer. She told them that she would be submitting her two-week notice.

The next day, she got one last email from district leadership.

“As we discussed, it is never our intention, as an organization, for an employee to feel anything other [than] the support and collegiality associated with a positive and professional work environment,” the email said. “Please know your concerns and feedback, as an individual and employee, were heard and valued.”

ProPublica submitted to the Cobb County School District and its school board a list of detailed questions about the hiring of Lewis, the community blowback and the changes to her job. A school district spokesperson responded: “Cecelia Lewis was employed by the Cobb County School District during the summer of 2021, voluntarily submitted her letter of resignation in early fall of 2021, and like every Team member, her contributions and work for students was greatly appreciated.”

Lewis’ departure from not one but two school districts didn’t put an end to the efforts of anti-CRT groups. In fact, the groups used Lewis’ retreat as a rallying call.

In August 2021, Educate Cherokee — a group with a now-defunct website that identifies itself on Facebook as a local chapter of the national conservative nonprofit No Left Turn in Education — announced that it would be holding an event. According to an online notice about the event, it would be led by Heda, who had spoken at the clubhouse and the school board meetings, and Raney, who at the school board meeting had called out Lewis’ salary. In the notice, the group claimed the elimination of “a new DEI administrative position” as one of its accomplishments. “Bring your ideas, energy, and enthusiasm,” the meeting notice said. “We need to convert all of it into an effective election effort to eliminate CRT by replacing all of the current school board members up for re-election with new conservatives committed to our cause.”

In the months to come, four school board candidates — Michael “Cam” Waters, Ray Lynch, Sean Kaufman and Chris Gregory — established themselves as part of a collective effort to gain a majority on the board, in part by ousting board members who’d come under attack following Lewis’ hiring.

The candidates dubbed themselves 4CanDoMore and launched a website, the top of which states: “In May of 2021, Cherokee County was taken by surprise when it was announced that our ‘conservative’ board voted to bring in Cecelia Lewis, as Administrator on Special Assignment, Director of Diversity, Equity and Inclusion (DEI). However, her history was riddled with Critical Race Theory (CRT) ideologies in her previous school district. Why would the current board vote 7-0 to bring in someone to implement programs not in alignment with the family values of our community?”

In March of 2022, the 4CanDoMore candidates got a boost. The 1776 Project PAC, founded last year by author and OANN political correspondent Ryan Girdusky, had been singling out open school board seats across the country and supporting candidates who ran on platforms to ban CRT and the 1619 Project. (The super PAC’s name is a nod to an advisory committee launched in 2020 by Trump partly in response to the 1619 Project. Trump’s 1776 Commission sought to support a “patriotic education” in schools and oppose lessons that teach students to “hate their own country.”)

In 2021, the 1776 Project PAC backed 69 school board candidates in eight states. Fifty-five won their seats, its website claims, including all 15 candidates the PAC endorsed in Texas.

The 4CanDoMore candidates were the 1776 Project PAC’s first endorsements of 2022.

Girdusky did not respond to multiple requests for comment regarding the decision to zero in on Cherokee County candidates.

In May, two of the 4CanDoMore candidates lost their primary bids to incumbents. The other two, Kaufman and Lynch, advanced to a June runoff. Another familiar face in the anti-Lewis effort also made it to the runoff: Kahaian, the paralegal who’d told parents in the clubhouse how to prepare for an appearance on Tucker Carlson’s show. She’s running for a seat in Georgia’s House of Representatives.

Even before any potential shake-up on the school board, some changes have already arrived in the Cherokee County School District. Among them is a ban on the word “equity” from any district initiative.

“We had to stop using the word because the word was redefined by people,” said Jacoby, the Cherokee County Schools communications director. “And so we had to take the word out of the equation, and say, OK, fine, ‘access.’ There’s no way around that access is important.”

After moving back home to Maryland, Lewis continues to work in education, although her role doesn’t primarily focus on DEI. “I may not have the specific acronym tied to my official title, but I am committed to celebrating diversity and promoting equity and inclusion,” Lewis said.

She also noted that, even in the face of increasing attacks, educators should not lose sight of their value and the difference they can make in children’s lives. “No one can take that away from us.”

Today, the metal detectors remain installed at the entrance to the building where Cherokee County School Board meetings are held. A staff member is permanently assigned the task of evacuating students in attendance, should the need ever arise. And an increased number of security officers are strategically placed throughout the meeting room and beyond.

Standing in line outside the building before a recent school board meeting, mothers identified themselves to each other as “a Marjorie” — meaning a proponent of the speaking style of Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene, known for her provocative and unfiltered claims.

A little while later, once the meeting was underway, a man who described himself as a school bus driver and a grandfather stepped to the microphone during the public comment period.

“This is not California or New York. This is Cherokee County, Georgia. We can choose what and how our students learn on a local level,” said the man.

“I was raised in a different era, in the ’50s and ’60s, where we were equipped to survive and succeed.”

Jan. 6 committee finally zeroes in on Ginni Thomas — but will the Supreme Court?

How long will the Beltway establishment be able to ignore what is increasingly obvious? The Supreme Court is an illegitimate and debased institution that is eating away at our democracy.

The conservative majority has gone all-out in investigating the leaked Samuel Alito draft opinion in Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Clinic, the case that the court is using to overturn Roe v. Wade in a few short weeks. Chief Justice John Roberts, in his fervor to find the leaker, has reportedly demanded that the law clerks turn over their cell phones to investigators. Because heaven forbid that the court — which increasingly feels empowered to stomp on any democratically determined policy that offends far-right sensibilities — be subject to any level of transparency or scrutiny as it tears up basic human rights. On the flip side, however, there appears to be no interest at the Supreme Court in investigating the extremely strong possibility that one or more of the sitting justices is part of an ongoing fascist conspiracy to overthrow democracy. 

RELATED: New report shows Ginni Thomas’ effort to overturn election much bigger than previously reported

For months, stories have been leaking out demonstrating that Ginni Thomas, the wife of Justice Clarence Thomas, was an active and eager participant in Donald Trump’s attempted coup that culminated in a violent attack on the Capitol on January 6, 2021. However, it hasn’t been entirely clear how central a role she played in the coup. She certainly spent lots of time blitzing Trump’s chief of staff, Mark Meadows, with text messages in which she spitballed ideas for stealing the 2020 election victory from President Joe Biden and shared wild conspiracy theories she thought could be leveraged as a pretext to do so. 

Late Wednesday, however, we were hit with a one-two punch of stories that suggest that the Ginni Thomas situation is incredibly dire.


Want more Amanda Marcotte on politics? Subscribe to her newsletter Standing Room Only.


First, the Washington Post reported that the House committee investigating January 6 obtained email correspondence between Ginni Thomas and Trump “lawyer John Eastman, who played a key role in efforts to pressure Vice President Mike Pence to block the certification of Joe Biden’s victory.”

The Supreme Court, as it currently stands, is incompatible with democracy.

“The emails show that Thomas’s efforts to overturn the election were more extensive than previously known,” the Post reports, though details are still hazy. 

Shortly after that article came out, the New York Times followed up with a report that Eastman told another pro-Trump lawyer, Kenneth Chesebro, that he had insider knowledge of a “heated fight underway” between Supreme Court justices on whether or not to take up one of Trump’s many frivolous lawsuits demanding that the election be thrown out. Even more disturbingly, Chesebro replied with an email that suggested not just that Trump’s team was planning the Jan. 6 riot, but that they hoped the threat of it could be leveraged as pressure on the Supreme Court to take up the case. He wrote that “odds of action before Jan. 6 will become more favorable if the justices start to fear that there will be ‘wild’ chaos on Jan. 6 unless they rule by then, either way.”

RELATED: Trump lawyers hoped Jan. 6 “chaos” could pressure SCOTUS on election amid Ginni Thomas talks: report

It’s possible, of course, that Eastman was fronting. It’s more likely, considering how close he and Ginni Thomas were and how much they communicated about the coup, that he was not. Either way, it’s exponentially more important to find out the truth of the matter than it is to find out who leaked the Dobbs draft opinion. Not only is there a coup plotter married to a Supreme Court justice, but there’s also reason to fear that she and her husband — and god only knows which of the other justices — were having a secretive debate about how far they were willing to go in order to help Trump’s coup succeed. 

The Supreme Court is too powerful, too unaccountable, and the result is it’s become thoroughly corrupted.

Unfortunately, we’re unlikely to get such an investigation. While the House select committee indicated on Thursday that it plans to request testimony from Ginni Thomas in light of the newly reported Eastman emails, this information is coming from materials subpoenaed by the House, not the court itself. That points to a troubling truth: The justices on the Supreme Court feel wholly unaccountable to the American public.

Yes, it’s clear that there were those on the court who disagreed with the coup and pushed back in this “heated fight.” But, it appears none of them felt the need to alert either the House select committee or the Department of Justice about what they knew about Ginni Thomas’ involvement or what their fellow jurist was saying behind closed doors. 


Want more Amanda Marcotte on politics? Subscribe to her newsletter Standing Room Only.


Sadly, none of this is surprising. Even the liberal justices have become so accustomed to the court’s culture of secrecy and unaccountability that there’s a possibility they knew about this “heated fight” and didn’t stop for a second to think that a line had been crossed from debate to sedition. Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson, who will join the Supreme Court for the fall term, memorably wrote that “presidents are not kings” in a 2019 appellate court decision against Trump. Justices should not be kings, either. Far too many of them, however, seem to think that they are. 

The impact of this extends far beyond the possibility that at least one seditionist sits on the court and remains untouchable. As Justice Sonia Sotomayor memorably noted in a recent dissent, this Republican-heavy court — which has three justices appointed by Trump alone — is “restless.” They are ramming through a wishlist of far-right and authoritarian decisions, and aren’t especially worried about whether the reasoning is logical or legal. Just last week, the court voided the plain letter reading of the Fourth Amendment for over 60% of the country, claiming the right not to be searched without a warrant doesn’t count if you live 100 miles from the border. And that decision has barely made a ripple in news coverage, overshadowed instead by the upcoming abortion ban and what is likely to be a decision destroying the ability of states to pass common sense gun regulations. 

RELATED: Samuel Alito’s leaked anti-abortion decision: Supreme Court doesn’t plan to stop at Roe

The public is increasingly angry about a politicized, unaccountable court, and the response from the Republican justices has been entitled whining, complaining both in public and behind the scenes about how their critics don’t show them enough respect. As Paul Waldman wrote at the Washington Post, no one is a bigger whiner than Clarence Thomas: 

Like many on the right, even in triumph he is consumed with his own victimhood, complaining about the court being “bullied” and warning that we should refrain from “destroying our institutions” when we don’t get “what we want,” even as his wife was wrapped up in the conspiracy to overturn the 2020 election.

But the situation is so dire that even the normal criticisms of the court and proposed solutions — like term limits or expanding the court — are starting to feel inadequate. The Supreme Court is too powerful, too unaccountable, and the result is it’s become thoroughly corrupted. Our democracy is in crisis and, as this week shows, a big part of the reason is that it’s beholden to an unaccountable court. So unaccountable, in fact, that there’s a justice who is married to a woman involved in a conspiracy to overthrow democracy and no one seems to have any power or interest in doing something about it.

The Supreme Court, as it currently stands, is incompatible with democracy. The only real solution is to pull it up by the roots and replace it with a new court geared towards actual accountability. 

Texas Gov. Greg Abbott wants to block records about Uvalde school shooting response from the public

Texas agencies resist releasing public records that could help clarify response to Uvalde school shooting” was first published by The Texas Tribune, a nonprofit, nonpartisan media organization that informs Texans — and engages with them — about public policy, politics, government and statewide issues.

This article is co-published with ProPublica, a nonprofit newsroom that investigates abuses of power. Sign up for ProPublica’s Big Story newsletter to receive stories like this one in your inbox as soon as they are published.

Also, sign up for The Brief, our daily newsletter that keeps readers up to speed on the most essential Texas news.

 

In the past week, Texas Gov. Greg Abbott has joined the growing list of state and local officials fighting the release of records that could help bring clarity to how the emergency response unfolded during last month’s deadly shooting in Uvalde.

The governor’s office strayed from that broader opposition Monday, granting a request under the Texas Public Information Act from a Houston television station that sought the handwritten notes he used when he first spoke publicly about the shooting. The notes appear to support Abbott’s claim that he was misled when he initially praised law enforcement efforts during the mass shooting that resulted in the deaths of 19 children and two educators and left many more injured.

The recent release by Abbott underscores both the tremendous power government officials have to decide what is in the public interest and the unwillingness to release records that could call their agencies’ actions into question.

ProPublica and The Texas Tribune have submitted about 70 public information requests that could help answer larger questions as state and local leaders continue to offer conflicting accounts about why law enforcement did not confront the gunman sooner during the May 24 massacre. Those requests include 911 audio recordings, body and police car camera footage, and communications among local, state and federal agencies. The newsrooms also requested use-of-force documents, death records and ballistic reports.

Three weeks after the shooting, government officials have not provided the news organizations a single record related to the emergency response.

“The public wants immediate transparency,” said Kelley Shannon, executive director of the Freedom of Information Foundation of Texas. “The most enlightened law enforcement agencies understand the importance of being transparent, being open and doing it right away.”

Since the shooting, state police have said Pete Arredondo, the chief of police for the school district, erred in judgment by keeping law enforcement officers from immediately confronting the barricaded gunman despite 911 calls from inside classrooms indicating that children and educators remained in danger.

Arredondo, who leads the district’s six-person police force, defended his actions in an interview last week with the Tribune. He said he never considered himself in charge of directing the law enforcement response and didn’t issue any orders. He also said he didn’t know about the 911 calls because he left his radios behind. He thought they would slow him down and wanted both hands free in the event that he had to use his gun.

Abbott’s office, the Texas Department of Public Safety, the U.S. Marshals Service and the city of Uvalde are asking the state’s attorney general for permission to withhold records that may offer tangible answers to the contradictory accounts. (Under Texas law, agencies seeking to avoid disclosure of public records typically must make their case to the attorney general.) Other government entities have asked the state for extensions as they decide whether to fight such disclosures. News organizations across the country are reporting similar responses.

Among the arguments provided by government entities for withholding such documents is one from DPS stating that releasing records like footage from body cameras would provide criminals with “invaluable information” about its investigative techniques, information sharing and criminal analysis.

In most cases, however, the agencies argue that releasing such information could interfere with ongoing law enforcement investigations by the federal government and the Texas Rangers, an arm of DPS now tasked with investigating its own department. In a statement, Abbott’s office said that, upon completion of the investigations, “we look forward to the full results being shared with the victims’ families and the public, who deserve the full truth of what happened that tragic day.”

But timely disclosure of the records is paramount given the lack of transparency and contradictory accounts from state and local officials, three Texas Public Information Act experts told ProPublica and the Tribune.

Laura Prather, a First Amendment attorney in Texas, said the reason the state allows agencies to withhold information when it is part of an ongoing investigation is to protect someone who was accused of a crime but didn’t ultimately get convicted, “not to protect law enforcement for their actions in circumstances like this, where the shooter is dead.”

“The public has the right to know what happened that day, and right now they can only act on rumors and conflicting information,” said Prather, who is representing ProPublica in an unrelated defamation lawsuit. She said law enforcement must be transparent in order to earn the public’s trust, but agencies are instead using their discretionary powers “to thwart the public from getting information that they are rightly entitled to.”

Because state law allows government officials to withhold information in cases that don’t result in a conviction, it creates a loophole that lets governments deny records in cases where the offender was killed and will not be tried.

That results in a challenge for members of the public seeking records related to Uvalde because “either way, there is a statutory basis for these governmental bodies to seek to withhold information,” said Jim Hemphill, an attorney who serves on the board of the Texas Freedom of Information Foundation.

Texas House Speaker Dade Phelan, a Republican from Beaumont, raised concerns about the “dead suspect loophole” in a tweet this month. He said it would be “unconscionable” for agencies to use the loophole to withhold “information that is so badly needed and deserved right now.”

“This is an area in dire need of reform,” Phelan wrote.

The state’s attorney general has 45 days to consider requests from government and law enforcement officials to withhold records from the public.

In 2019, after a gunman killed 23 people at a Walmart in El Paso, the attorney general issued a ruling that pointed to an ongoing investigation and required the Police Department to release records but allowed it to heavily redact the information.

Families of the 2018 Santa Fe High School shooting victims are still seeking information after the attorney general sided with the district attorney who said he could not release records because of a pending prosecution, according to the Houston Chronicle. The shooter was later declared mentally incompetent to stand trial.

Shaheera Jalil Albasit, whose cousin, Sabika Sheikh, was killed during the Santa Fe shooting, feels an overwhelming sense of helplessness four years later. She and Sheikh’s sister still have biweekly conversations in which they discuss how they could shake loose more details about that horrific day.

Albasit has been following the unfolding of information in Uvalde over the past few weeks and says she imagines the frustrations families must be feeling at not knowing more about whether law enforcement could have saved lives by acting sooner.

“All of these questions, they can whack your mind, especially if you’re a family member,” she said in an interview. “You can’t help thinking about the what ifs.”

State Sen. Roland Gutierrez, a Democrat who represents Uvalde, said families should not have to wait for answers.

“Parents are grieving their children, let’s be clear, but undoubtedly the community is questioning the credibility of law enforcement,” he said. “Can you blame them? People are upset and rightly so.”

Carla Astudillo contributed reporting.


Join us Sept. 22-24 in person in downtown Austin for The Texas Tribune Festival and experience 100+ conversation events featuring big names you know and others you should from the worlds of politics, public policy, the media and tech — all curated by The Texas Tribune’s award-winning journalists. Buy tickets.

This article originally appeared in The Texas Tribune at https://www.texastribune.org/2022/06/15/texas-public-records-uvalde-shooting/.

The Texas Tribune is a member-supported, nonpartisan newsroom informing and engaging Texans on state politics and policy. Learn more at texastribune.org.

Hopped beverages are the no-ABV drink of summer

Hops are one of beer’s most integral ingredients, and beer is one of the world’s oldest beverages. As such, the relationship between hops and beer is a long one: German monks started adding hops to beer for preservation and flavor in the 8th century. It has always seemed an exclusive pairing, but recently, hops have been popping up in other beverages (alcoholic and not), demonstrating why they’re special along the way.

Hopped non-beer alcoholic beverages have appeared in different categories over the years: Charbay’s R5 Hop-Flavored Whiskey gets credit for paving the way in 2013. Now, one can find Wigle’s Hopped WhiskeyCitizen Cider’s The Lake Hopper, and Nashville’s Walker Brothers’ hard kombucha made with Citra hops. More notably, however, is the current wave of non-alcoholic, non-beer options brought to life by hops, often billed as some iteration of ‘hop-infused sparkling water.’

Lagunitas sparked the trend in 2019 with Hoppy Refresher, a zero-alcohol sparkling water with Citra, Equinox, and Centennial Hops, boasting lemon, lime, and tangerine flavors with a bit of piney bitterness. Fellow beer titan Sierra Nevada debuted Hop Splash, a sparkling water with Citra and Amarillo hops in January 2022. Non-alcoholic beer brand Athletic Brewing Company launched their own hopped sparkling water DayPack. Dedicated exclusively to hop-infused sparkling waters, HOP WTR added adaptogens and nootropics (supplements aimed at relaxation) in addition to hops to create “a way to unwind and relax without booze.” HopLark, another hop-centric non-alcoholic beverage brand, sells hop-infused sparkling teas and sparkling water.

What are hops?

Hops are the flowers of the Humulus lupulus plant. Inside their green cones, pods called lupulin are the source of all the flavor, aroma, and bitterness that may come to mind when you think of hops. Hops grow on bines (no, not vines!) that reach skyward, connected by strings helped by strings that connect them to trellises on hop farms. In these beverages, hops work to both bring flavor and novelty, in terms of their unique profiles and of how they strike a familiar chord with beer drinkers. Hops’ flavors and aromas vary depending on where they’re grown. German hops are minty, floral, and spicy; English hops are herbal and woody; hops from Australia and New Zealand are citrusy and tropical; American hops, predominantly grown in the Northwest, are also citrusy-tropical, with notes of resin and pine. Furthermore, every individual hop boasts its own unique scent and flavor profile. This sudden hop-mania beyond the beer world begs the question: what’s the big deal about hops, anyway, and is it worth trying any non-beer beverage that’s made with them?

A confluence of factors, like wellness trends and the COVID-19 pandemic, have inspired many people to reflect on their alcohol consumption: Some have made the choice to cut back. Results from a 2021 Gallup poll found the percentage of U.S. adults who report consuming alcohol was down to 60 percent from 2019’s 65 percent, and the average number of weekly drinks (3.6) is the lowest reported in over 20 years.

Consumers seek breaks from booze, but don’t want to sacrifice flavor, quality, and variety in their beverages. Athletic’s DayPack is an example of how brands are responding. The sparkling waters come in myriad flavors and are permissible for vegan and gluten-free diets. “Consumers are reevaluating their relationship with alcohol and actively seeking beverages that are more flavorful and functional,” said Athletic co-founder and CEO Bill Shufelt. “Hops are a natural antioxidant and contribute tremendous flavor and aroma characteristics to a beverage, which is why you’re starting to see more innovation with them outside of beer.”

DayPack has been on the market for just over a year and is already bigger than 80 percent of U.S. craft breweries, Athletic co-founder and chief product officer John Walker said, noting that DayPack’s 2021 sales place it in the top 1,500 out of 8,764 U.S. craft breweries.

Sierra Nevada has seen similar success with Hop Splash. “We actually sold out of our initial inventory online within about two and a half days,” said Sierra Nevada Communications Manager Ashlee Mooneyhan. The brewery introduced a subscription option to help customers stay stocked; HopLark also offers $35 monthly subscriptions.

“I think the average consumer who’s familiar with hops will first think of some hops’ ability to add citrusy aromas, but there’s really so much more hops can do, and will do in the future,” said Heather McReynolds, Northeast Craft Sales Rep for global hops supplier Hopsteiner, adding that the company is always experimenting and breeding new hops with different aromas for brewers and brands.

Primarily, “hopping a product” immediately signals to beer drinkers that there’s a good chance they’ll like it. Non-alcoholic seltzers and teas provide the complex flavors and aromas of beer while staying drinkable at any time of day.

“Hops are everyone’s favorite beer ingredient,” McReynolds says. “Throw them in a kombucha or a sparkling water and you’ve instantly got that crossover appeal.”

This could imply that those who don’t like the hoppiness in beer may not be drawn to these new infusions, but some experts disagree. “Hopped sparkling waters are a great option for break-taking beer fans, but I think there is a much wider appeal,” said Tessa Shilaty, a sensory and brewing scientist at Yakima Chief Hops. “Many people who don’t like beer actually love the smell of hops. Hops can deliver multifaceted aromas like citrus peel, juicy tropical fruit, creamy vanilla, and much more.”

The trend is growing, but some questions—and perhaps limitations—remain. Beer journalist and author Joshua M. Bernstein points out hopped non-alcoholic beverages don’t have a clear association with a time or venue where someone might want to enjoy them. “Beer has a clear slot: it’s happy hour, watching sports, being with friends,” Bernstein said. “Seltzer is any time; morning, afternoon, dinner, just plain thirsty. But that hop association emotionally transports the beverage into more [alcohol]-related occasions. People don’t think about drinking beer at 10 a.m., so maybe they don’t think about hoppy sparkling water at 10 a.m., either.”

Bernstein added that hopped drinks are coming from craft producers, and sit at a higher price point than many shoppers might prefer to spend on something like seltzer. A six-pack of a hopped seltzer is around $10, compared to a 12-pack of LaCroix for $7.49. For that reason, someone who is used to craft beer’s cost might be more likely to try a hopped seltzer than someone simply looking for an alternative fizzy drink.

If Sierra Nevada and Athletic’s results are any indicator, though, consumers are curious to try these beverages. A hopped sparkling water or tea is prime territory for beer drinkers looking to take a break, and so would make sense to be sold at bars and brewery taprooms, Bernstein notes. As the category grows, too, consumers (both beer fans and avoiders) may increasingly find places where a hopped non-alcoholic beverage fits into their routine. Will hopped drinks eventually be marketed like tea or coffee are today? Consumers may become well acquainted with popular hop varieties to know what flavors to expect, like Citra’s grapefruit, melon, and passion fruit; or Mosaic’s berry and pine. We may start to think of hops like we do fruit flavors, knowing our favorite sparkling water is one with Citra hops the same way we might always choose La Croix Black Razzberry. Hopped drinks may immediately hook beer drinkers, but their flavor potential stands to entice those who never reach for a brew.

Trumper leading Wisconsin election “audit” could lose law license after “full-on meltdown” in court

On Wednesday, writing for Slate, legal reporter Mark Joseph Stern detailed how Michael Gableman, the former Wisconsin Supreme Court Justice tapped by state allies of former President Donald Trump to “audit” Wisconsin’s 2020 election results, is in danger of losing his law license after a furious argument with a state judge last week.

“After undergoing a full-on meltdown in open court, [Gableman] is now at risk of losing his law license,” wrote Stern. “His office faces fines of $2,000 a day. And the records surrounding his conspiracy-fueled 2020 election ‘investigation’ that he has fought so hard to conceal from the public will soon see the light of day.”

“The ex-justice issued sweeping, error-ridden subpoenas demanding mountains of documents, then threatened to arrest his targets. His fishing expedition sought to intimidate civil servants into turning over so much information that he could craft a nonsensical narrative of fraud that might convince unsophisticated, aggrieved, and brainwashed observers,” wrote Stern. “Wisconsin, however, has a robust public records law, and the liberal watchdog American Oversight sought records from the probe that would illustrate its deceptive nature. Gableman refused to turn over key documents, which led to extensive battles in Wisconsin state courts. In short, the courts ordered Gableman, [Assembly Speaker Robin] Vos, and their allies to turn over the relevant records, which they declined to do.”

Gableman was ultimately held in contempt during Friday’s hearing and referred for “appropriate disciplinary action by Wisconsin’s Office of Lawyer Regulation,” up to and including disbarment — a decision not helped, noted Stern, by a furious diatribe at Dane County Circuit Court Judge Frank Remington.

“At Friday’s hearing, Gableman threw a ‘tantrum,’ as Remington described it,” wrote Stern. “Gableman refused to answer questions, instead accusing the judge of acting ‘as an advocate’ for American Oversight. He then gestured toward the bailiff and ‘taunted’ the court by saying: ‘I see you have a jail officer here. You want to put me in jail, Judge Remington? I’m not gonna be railroaded.’ With a ‘raised voice,’ ‘accusatory tone,’ and ‘twisted facial expression,’ Gableman ‘pointed and shook his finger at the judge’ while accusing him of engaging in a ‘fishing expedition.’ (The ex-justice did not, it seems, see the irony in this accusation.)”

Gableman’s investigation, which Stern says is likely moribund after this episode, is one of many Republican-backed efforts to hunt for evidence of Trump’s imagined voter fraud. The most high-profile of these was a lengthy private “audit” of Maricopa County ballots by Florida security firm “Cyber Ninjas,” which was similarly plagued with transparency and press access problems and pursued conspiracy theories, only to conclude that President Joe Biden won the county legitimately.

You can read more here.

“Nobody will say where he is”: Montana Gov. Gianforte slammed for disappearing amid historic floods

On June 14 and 15, flooding was so severe in Yellowstone National Park — which is mostly in northwestern Wyoming but extends into parts of Montana and Idaho — that miles of roads were wiped out. Montana Gov. Greg Gianforte, who declared a statewide disaster, is drawing a great deal of criticism for being out of the country during the flooding.

NBC News, on June 15, reported, “Although he’s used social media for updates and communication, Gianforte has not been seen in person. His office has been tight-lipped on his whereabouts.”

When NBC News contacted the Republican governor’s office about his whereabouts, his office responded, “Before flooding began in South-Central Montana, Gov. Gianforte left the country late last week on a long-scheduled personal trip with the first lady. He is returning early and as quickly as possible. I will provide you with additional information when it is available.”

Gianforte’s office, however, wouldn’t specify where he was.

Journalist/author Kathleen McLaughlin, in a thread posted on Twitter on June 15, slammed Gianforte for being “MIA” during a major crisis:

McLaughlin noted that Gianforte, a former congressman, is the Republican who infamously assaulted a reporter in 2017 for asking him a question about health care that he didn’t like. The reporter was The Guardian’s Ben Jacobs.

Gianforte, who served in the U.S. House of Representatives from 2017 to January 2021, supported overturning the Affordable Care Act of 2010, a.k.a. Obamacare, despite the fact that doing so would have caused millions of Americans to lose their health insurance. Gianforte body slammed Jacobs and pleaded guilty to misdemeanor assault; he was fined and given a six-month deferred sentence and served no jail time.

Gianforte’s history of violence didn’t stop him from being reelected to the U.S. House of Representatives in 2018 and being elected governor in 2020.

Here are some responses to McLaughlin’s thread:

This trick to removing grease stains is also the simplest

Sometimes I feel like I can’t have nice things. Because in a world of nice things, there is also burger grease.

Take, for example, the cautionary tale of my favorite jumpsuit. I loved it, but it was too big for me and had languished, unworn, in my closet for more than a year. One day, inspired to invest in what I had rather than buying new things, I splurged: I took my jumpsuit to an old-school tailor in New York. I watched as he expertly pinned it to fit me just so, paid 50% upfront, and went home to await his call.

A week and a half later, my jumpsuit was ready. I’d never had anything tailored to me before, and it was perfect, from the cross-front neckline to the neat seams to the pant legs, which hit just right at my ankle, not a centimeter off. As a finishing touch, the tailor had steamed the green-grey cotton fabric until it was butter-soft and smooth. I was so pleased, I wore my jumpsuit right out of the tailor’s and straight to a coworker’s farewell party a few blocks away. And I felt great in it for a glorious 15 minutes, imagining all the good times to come.

But then, the sliders came out, and I caught a waft of them as the server dipped the tray beneath my nose.

“Mini slider?” he said.

I can’t turn down a good burger, new jumpsuit or no new jumpsuit, and before he could finish “slider” I was taking my first bite. Which is exactly how the burger grease came into play — all down my front, to be specific.

Fortunately, previous incidents had prepared me for this moment. I beelined to the bar, side-stepping so no one could see my torso, and asked the bartender for some regular old dish soap on a cloth so I could pat the soap onto the stains. When I could duck out, I dashed to the closest convenience store, where I bought a small bottle of the stuff for $1.99 (clear, to be safe), reapplied it generously until I could get home and throw the jumpsuit in the wash.

Dish soap works well as a holdover measure on oily stains because it’s engineered to cut through the fat and food on your plates — and it’s cheap, multipurpose, and convenient. Chances are, you’re within a few paces of a bottle no matter where you are, at home, or at a restaurant or bar. No need to go searching for expensive, speciality laundry potions when time is of the essence.

I’m happy to report that the stains came out, and my jumpsuit has gotten plenty of wear. But now I make sure to stash some dish soap, decanted into a travel-size container, in my bag. Just in case someone comes by with a tray of sliders.

Here’s a step-by-step recap

  1. Before you do anything else, blot the stain with a clean paper towel or cloth napkin to get off as much of the excess grease as you can. Whatever you do, don’t rinse off the stain yet — it’s much easier to work on dry fabric.
  2. Next, as a pre-treatment, apply a few drops of liquid dish soap to the stain and let it soak in, rubbing it gently with your fingers (make sure they’re clean!) or a soft-bristled brush.
  3. Let the soap soak in for 5-10 minutes. Then rinse it out with warm water.
  4. Machine-wash the garment on the hottest cycle available with your normal detergent. Add a color-safe laundry booster, if you’d like to play it safe.
  5. A good tip I learned recently is to air-dry the garment to make sure the stain is completely gone (machine-drying your item might bake the stain in). If the stain remains, repeat the entire process.

There’s also baking soda

Another popular go-to tactic for oily spills on linens, upholstery, and carpets is to sprinkle something absorbent on it — The Spruce suggests cornstarch, talcum powder, or baking soda; Good Housekeeping says you can even use salt or artificial sweetener. These will help prevent an oil stain from setting into the fabric, making it easier to lift when you’re doing laundry later on — just sprinkle on, let sit for a half hour at the minimum, and vacuum up or brush off.

Even better, you can do the absorbent-powder method first, then follow up with the dish soap spot-treatment for a one-two punch. The hot water wash following the two should make the stain entirely disappear. Summer grilling season, we’re ready for you!

Lauren Boebert says she’s suing over accusation that she was a “paid escort” on “sugar daddy” site

Republican Rep. Lauren Boebert of Colorado told Fox News on Wednesday she intended to take legal action against the political action committee widely credited with making Madison Cawthorn the youngest member of Congress to lose a primary.

Following Cawthorn’s defeat in May, the American Muckrakers PAC announced they were targeting Boebert, who is also a first-term Republican.

On Tuesday, the PAC published salacious allegations about Boebert working through a “sugar daddy” website prior to her election to Congress.

The group said “their team and volunteers have uncovered that Lauren Boebert was an unlicensed, paid escort and met clients through SugarDaddyMeet.com. Text messages show she was bankrupt at the time and looking for some ‘side income’ and called her work ‘pay to play.’ She was paid to ‘escort’ with wealthy men,” the group alleged.

“According to our investigation, Boebert was hired by a wealthy male client in Aspen, Colorado, who was a Koch family member. Boebert’s rich client subsequently introduced her to U.S. Senator Ted Cruz (R-TX) in Aspen,” the group alleged. “After meeting with Senator Cruz, Boebert was encouraged by Cruz to run for political office. When Boebert announced her campaign for Congress in December 2019, Senator Cruz donated at least $136,250.00 to the Boebert Campaign and helped her raise large sums of money during trips Boebert made to Texas.”

Boebert is now denying the accusations.

“Boebert’s attorney sent a letter to the American Muckrakers PAC regarding the claims that she was an ‘unlicensed paid escort’ who had ‘two abortions,’ pledging to bring ‘civil defamation’ lawsuits against the PAC,” Fox News reported.

Boebert said she would be undeterred by the “blatantly false and disgusting accusations.”

“I am not going to stand by and pretend this is normal behavior,” she told Fox News.

On Twitter, Boebert threatened criminal legal action.