Spring Sale: Get 1 Year, Save 58%

Five people charged in the death of late One Direction star Liam Payne

Five people have been charged in connection with the death of former One Direction star Liam Payne in Argentina, local authorities said in a statement Monday.

The 31-year-old musician died in October after he fell from a hotel balcony in Buenos Aires. 

In the statement, Judge Laura Bruniard said she decided to move forward and prosecute the case. Bruniard listed five people including the Hotel Casa Sur manager, receptionist and one of Payne's friends, Roger Nores, who have been charged with manslaughter. Two other hotel employees have been charged with supplying drugs and have been ordered into custody.

In Argentina, defendants can appeal against the charges; however, if their appeal fails, the trial begins. If convicted, the defendants could face up to five years in prison, BBC reported. However, the sentence for supplying drugs is more severe in the country, facing between four and 15 years in jail.

Last month, Argentinian authorities reported that in a toxicology test, Payne had alcohol, cocaine and a prescription antidepressant in his system before his death.

The funeral service for Payne was held in London, England in late November. The singer's former One Direction bandmates, Harry Styles, Niall Horan, Louis Tomlinson and Zayn Malik were all in attendance.

After Payne's death, Malik posted a tribute to his band member. He said, "Liam, I have found myself talking out loud to you, hoping you can hear me, I can't help but think selfishly that there was so many more conversations for us to have in our lives."

“Just the beginning of my worries”: Retired general warns Elon Musk is a national security threat

A retired army general argued that billionaire Elon Musk poses a threat to national security due to his ties to China in a blistering op-ed published in The New York Times on Sunday.

“Mr. Musk and his rocket company, SpaceX, face federal reviews from the Air Force, the Defense Department’s Office of Inspector General and the under secretary of defense for intelligence and security for failing to provide details of Mr. Musk’s meetings with foreign leaders and other potential violations of national-security rules,” wrote former Lt. General Russel Honoré. 

“These alleged infractions are just the beginning of my worries,” he added.

Honoré pointed to the $1.4 billion Tesla borrowed from the Chinese government to build a factory in Shanghai, which was responsible for more than half of Tesla’s 2024 deliveries. He added that financial lending is rare for the communist government that can legally “demand intelligence” from any company doing business in the country.

“This means Mr. Musk’s business dealings in China could require him to hand over sensitive classified information, learned either through his business interests or his proximity to President-elect Donald Trump," Honoré wrote.

In the last year, Musk's influence over the federal government has expanded past business endeavors. He’s become one of the president-elect’s closest allies and last month was tapped to co-chair Trump’s new Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) with Vivek Ramaswamy. Despite now being colleagues, Ramaswamy once thought Musk was in “China’s pocket,” Honoré points out.

“I have no reason to think Elon won’t jump like a circus monkey when Xi Jinping calls in the hour of need,” Ramaswamy said in 2023. 

Though Ramaswamy has since taken back this statement, Honoré writes that this fear isn’t far-fetched. He points to numerous instances where Musk praised or defended the Chinese government, including his argument that Taiwan should be a “special administrative region.” Musk was also the first foreigner to write for the magazine China Cyberspace, which is run by the state’s internet censorship agency.

“The last thing the United States needs is for China to potentially have an easier way of obtaining classified intelligence and national security information,” Honoré writes. 

But with Musk’s proximity to the White House only growing closer in the coming months, Honoré questioned whether Trump will even consider Musk’s threat.

“The question now is whether the incoming Trump administration will take this risk seriously," he wrote.

Bob Dylan acted out “A Complete Unknown’s” script before he approved it

Move over Timotheé Chalamet, Bob Dylan might have a career in acting . . . 

The legendary folk and rock musician was heavily involved in the filmmaking process of his biopic "A Complete Unknown," which follows a young, musically inclined Dylan (Chalamet) as he slowly rises to fame. As Dylan forges a name for himself as a folk musician, he controversially switches from acoustic to electric guitar, changing his career forever.

While the script was being written, Dylan, an executive producer on the film, would reportedly act out scenes with director James Mangold before officially approving the script.

One of the film's producers Peter Jaysen said on the podcast "The Town," “[Dylan] met with Jim Mangold multiple times.

"At one point they sat there and they read the entire script out loud, with Jim Mangold reading every part and stage direction, and Bob Dylan only reading lines of dialogue for himself," Jaysen said. "Through that process, [Dylan] sat there writing notes on the script. At the end of the last session with Jim Mangold, he signed the script and said, ‘Go with God.'”

Even though Dylan "did not have final cut," Jaysen stated Dylan’s role was significant.

Chalamet, who plays a young Dylan in the biopic, also shared with Rolling Stone that the musician went through the film's screenplay line by line.  

“Jim has an annotated Bob script lying around somewhere,” he said. “I’ll beg him to get my hands on it. He’ll never give it to me.”

Mangold explained, “I felt like Bob just wanted to know what I was up to. ‘Who is this guy? Is he a s**thead? Does he get it?’ — I think the normal questions anyone asks when they’re throwing themselves in league with someone."

Now out in theaters, "A Complete Unknown" is a film adaptation of the book, "Dylan Goes Electric" by Elijah Wald. The film has landed Chalamet another Golden Globe nomination for best actor in a drama.

 

Safety warning issued for QVC oven gloves following dozens of injury reports

If you’ve recently purchased oven gloves from QVC as holiday gifts, you may want to check them carefully.

The U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC) has issued a recall of more than one million pairs of oven gloves sold through QVC’s television and e-commerce channels, citing a potential burn hazard. According to Food & Wine’s Stacey Leasca, the recall was prompted by dozens of injury reports and findings that the gloves may fail to provide adequate heat protection.

The CPSC stated the gloves “can fail to provide sufficient protection from heat, posing a burn hazard to consumers.”

The recalled gloves were sold in a variety of colors and patterns, including blue, yellow, red, floral and summer shell prints. They bear model numbers: K51459, K76398, K47973, K48879, K85322, K96004, K92603, K308719, K309220, K309388 and K309516. They were labeled “Tempt-tations by Tara.”

As of the recall notice, QVC has received 162 reports of gloves failing to provide heat protection, including 92 cases of minor burns. The gloves were sold between August 2018 and August 2024, priced between $4 and $13 per pair or bundled with other kitchen items for $14 to $26 per set.

Consumers who purchased the recalled gloves are advised to stop using them immediately and contact QVC for a refund.

“Bull”: Republican called out over claim that Elon Musk is too “rich” to have conflicts of interest

New Hampshire Gov. Chris Sununu was slammed on social media Sunday after he argued that billionaire Elon Musk is too rich to have conflicts of interest as a member of President-elect Donald Trump’s inner circle. 

“The guy’s worth $450 billion as of today in this month. So I don’t think he’s doing it for the money. He’s doing it for the bigger project and the bigger vision of America. He doesn’t need the dollars, he really doesn’t,” Sununu told CNN Host Dana Bash on Sunday.

“So I like the fact that in a way, he’s so rich, he’s so removed from the potential financial influence of it,” Sununu said.

Musk has been a staunch and vocal Trump supporter in the last year and spent over $250 million to help get the president-elect back into office. Last month, Trump officially brought Musk into the fold and tapped him to lead the new Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE), further solidifying Musk’s lucrative influence in his administration.

Last year, Musk was promised nearly $3 billion across 100 different contracts with 17 federal agencies, The New York Times reported in October. In the last decade, two of Musk’s companies, SpaceX and Tesla, have accounted for at least $15 billion in government contracts.

Critics on social media were quick to point out the absurdity of Sununu’s comments given Musk’s wide-ranging and clear conflicts of interest, namely in government contracts.

We need your help to stay independent

“I couldn’t go through life saying things I didn’t believe. Sure, I’d make more money if I did, and I’d get reelected to office if I did, but I’d be miserable. @ChrisSununu has spent the past few years saying stuff about Trump he doesn’t believe, and now he’s doing the same thing with Elon Musk,” former Rep. Joe Walsh, R-Ill., wrote on X. 

Former White House lawyer Richard Painter responded “Is this the new normal? Billionaires are too rich to have conflicts of interest. Bull.”

“Sununu has learned that once you jettison all honor and integrity by digging a hole of relativism you might as well keep digging,” political analyst Jeff Timmer wrote.

Political podcast host Brian Tyler Cohen called Sununu's comments "embarrassing." 

"I can’t tell if @ChrisSununu is a bigger bootlicker or partisan hack," he wrote on X. 

"According to @GovChrisSununu, if you happen to be the world’s wealthiest biological organism, your motives can no longer be questioned—even if you donated $277 million in campaign contributions to Trump and other GOP pols to secure your seat at the table," wrote New Hampshire State Rep. David Meuse.

Ina Garten reflects on the life-changing “love tap” she received from Oprah Winfrey

In a recent episode of Oprah Winfrey’s eponymous podcast, Ina Garten discussed the title of her memoir, “Be Ready When the Luck Happens,” which was inspired by a particularly memorable interaction with Winfrey that took place in 2010.

“I did remember having a discussion, but I didn't remember slapping you,” Winfrey said while conversing with Garten on Tuesday’s episode.

“Maybe it was a love tap,” Garten said. “You were like, ‘Woah, you make your own luck.’ And I was like, ‘No, I've just been really lucky.’”

“In my mind, you were already an iconic figure and a powerful woman. In your acceptance speech, you mentioned luck and luck and luck,” Winfrey said. “I come from the belief that luck is preparation meeting the moment of opportunity.”

Garten concludes her memoir, recounting the specific incident that took place shortly after she got on stage to receive the Matrix Award for Women in Media.

“I spoke about how lucky I was at each phase of my career because it seemed whatever I was most interested in doing was exactly what the world wanted at the time,” she writes of her acceptance speech. “I was lucky that I was interested in food and cookbooks at a time when the world was interested in food and cookbooks. I was lucky that Food Network was looking for home cooks when they found me, and lucky that they refused to take no for an answer. Lucky.”

Garten wrote that she then sat “right next to Oprah.” Their brief conversation would later have a profound effect on her.

“Immediately, she turned and smacked me on the arm, saying, ‘You weren’t lucky. You make your own luck,’” Garten recalls Winfrey telling her. “‘Actually, I have been lucky,’ I started to say,” she writes. “And then she smacked me again.”

“Did Oprah just smack me in front of a thousand people?” Garten says she asked herself.

Garten adds that Lesley Stahl then got up on stage and referenced Garten’s conversation with Winfrey while introducing the next guest on stage. “Why do successful women always say they’re lucky, and successful men say they got there by the force of their talent?” Stahl said, per Garten.


Want more great food writing and recipes? Subscribe to Salon Food's newsletter, The Bite.


“Wait? Did Lesley Stahl just smack me, too?” she writes.

Weeks later, Garten says the topic of luck came up again when she learned about the time Liza Minelli told a 23-year-old Rob Marshall to “Be ready when the luck happens.” Her memoir, she writes, ultimately tells a story about “hard work and luck.”

Garten says she focuses “on what’s in front of me and work[s] hard because I love what I do, and I have fun doing it.”

“And then I leave the door open, so I’ll be ready when the luck happens,” she concludes her memoir.

CosMc’s and Live Más Café: Are small-format, beverage spinoffs the future of fast food?

Back in 2023, McDonald’s made headlines with its first-ever small-format, beverage-led concept called CosMc. The spinoff chain offers patrons an array of eclectic beverages, including Island Pick-Me-Up Punch, Tropical Spiceade and S’mores Cold Brew. There are also food items from Savory Hash Brown Bites and Pretzel Bites to Caramel Fudge Brownies and a Blueberry Lemon Cookie Sundae.    

CosMc quickly became a hit. The chain’s inaugural location in Bolingbrook, Illinois, saw double the number of visits that a typical McDonald’s saw chainwide last December, according to a report from Placer.ai. CosMc also had triple the amount of traffic per square foot than a traditional McDonald's, the report added.

McDonald’s isn’t the only fast food restaurant opening café spinoffs. Last month, Taco Bell introduced its new drink-focused concept called Live Más Café. The café officially opened its doors on Dec. 9, Nation’s Restaurant News reported.

Live Más Café’s menu items include specialty drinks like Coffee and Churro Chillers, agua frescas, coffees and other cult-favorite foods. Per Taco Bell, its café is a “unique experience where fans can enjoy specialty drinks…This café redefines the Taco Bell experience with an innovative beverage lineup and Bellristas, providing exceptional flavor and hospitality in a cozy, inviting atmosphere, all while maintaining the great value customers love.”

As explained by Nation’s Restaurant News, Taco Bell has been experimenting with its drinks lineup in recent years. That includes testing new flavors and combinations that push the boundaries of what Taco Bell is typically known for serving. The burrito chain began testing its Coffee Chillers and Churro Chillers in late 2023 and its Agua Refrescas in April. Few months later, it introduced multiple flavors of Limonada Freeze (lemonade, strawberry lemonade and vanilla creme).

In 2022, Taco Bell tested cold brew coffee options and earlier in 2024, the chain tested Baja Blast Charged Berry and Mtn Dew Energy Baja Blast.

Live Más Café offers additional drinks like Cinnavanilla Coffee Churro Chiller, Cinnabon Caramel Iced or Hot Coffee, Vanilla Crema Iced or Hot Coffee, Limonada Iced Tea and more, according to promotional material obtained by TODAY. The café also taps into the dirty soda trend with its Dirty Baja Blast.


Want more great food writing and recipes? Subscribe to Salon Food's newsletter, The Bite.


“We’re always looking for new ways to elevate the Taco Bell experience, and the Live Más Café is the perfect example of that,” Taco Bell president Scott Mezvinsky said in a statement. “This innovative pilot concept is all about expanding the boundaries of what Taco Bell can be, creating a dynamic space where guests can experience our bold flavors in new and exciting ways.”

Taco Bell’s latest concept was launched in partnership with Diversified Restaurant Group, one of Taco Bell’s largest franchisees.  

“This isn’t just a menu update message — it’s a movement,” Diversified Restaurant Group CEO, SG Ellison, said in a statement. “The new beverage platform will empower consumers to live bold and live beyond, and Taco Bell has allowed us to help write the book on this exciting new concept.”

Love Oreo cookies? 2025 will be your year as the brand launches a half dozen new products

If you’re an Oreo superfan, 2025 might just be your year.

According to Stacey Leasca of Food & Wine, the brand has announced six new flavor innovations set to hit stores in 2025, including Oreo Frozen Treats.

Starting Dec. 26, Oreo will release its limited-edition Game Day cookies, featuring the signature chocolate cookie embossed with five football-themed designs.

In early January, Oreo will launch several new products, beginning with Oreo Loaded, which features the classic chocolate cookie with Mega Stuf-level creme and bits of real Oreo cookie pieces. Also arriving in January are Golden Oreo Cakesters, a permanent addition to the lineup. These soft-baked snacks include creme filling sandwiched between two pillowy golden snack cakes, offering a twist on the Golden Oreo sandwich cookie.

On Jan. 3, Oreo Irish Creme Thins will debut, featuring Irish cream-flavored creme with notes of chocolate and vanilla. Joining them are Oreo Minis Peanut Butter, filled with peanut butter-flavored creme.

Lastly, Oreo Frozen Treats will make their debut. The lineup includes Oreo Bites—poppable frozen dairy creme-flavored bites coated in Oreo crumbs—and Oreo Mini Bars, which have a creme-flavored base mixed with Oreo cookie pieces.

Oreo is also launching the Dunk Club, a program for fans to stay updated on new product releases, gain access to exclusive pre-sale events, enter sweepstakes, and even help the brand choose future innovations.

McDonald’s faces lawsuit over alleged orange juice surcharge in breakfast combos

You might want to reconsider ordering combos at your favorite eateries.

According to Bernadette Giacomazzo of RetailWire, McDonald’s is facing another class-action lawsuit. This time, plaintiffs claim they were charged an “unnecessary surcharge” for substituting orange juice in breakfast combos. Represented by Top Class Actions of Santa Monica, California, the lawsuit alleges that McDonald’s misleadingly advertises breakfast combos with orange juice at a fixed price but then imposes a hidden surcharge.

The suit argues this practice violates consumer protection laws by introducing unexpected charges and seeks compensation for affected customers, along with reforms to McDonald’s menu displays.

Amber Meyers, one of the plaintiffs, stated she ordered the same breakfast combo for nearly a year before noticing the upcharge. “If I knew there was a surcharge for the orange juice, I wouldn’t have ordered it every time,” she said.

In a related issue, TAB (The Accountability Board) is urging McDonald’s and other restaurant chains to address food waste. TAB’s president and co-founder, Matthew Prescott, emphasized the financial impact of waste: “All waste is financial waste. Strategies that mitigate food waste also save money.”

King Charles III officially ends royal warrants for Unilever and Cadbury chocolatiers

In what’s been described as a “disappointing” decision, King Charles III has dropped royal warrants for Unilever and Cadbury, meaning the consumer goods companies will no longer be recognized as suppliers to the royal family.

CNN reported Monday that Charles announced the second set of warrants of his reign late last week. Warrants are awarded to companies that regularly provide their goods or services to the Royal Household. Those companies can also display the Royal Arms on their packaging.

The latest list does not include Cadbury or Unilever, which owns multiple brands including Dove, Ben & Jerry's, Magnum and Hellmann's and Best Foods. No specific reasons were given for why the two companies were stripped of their warrants.

Cadbury said it was “disappointed” over losing its royal warrant for the first time in 170 years, per a recent statement obtained by Fortune.

The royal warrant removals come after Unilever and Cadbury’s parent company Mondelez (MDLZ) faced criticism from Ukraine’s government for continuing to sell its products and make profits in Russia following the nation’s invasion of Ukraine in 2022. In June, activist group B4Ukraine wrote an open letter to Charles, urging him to get rid of royal warrants for several companies, namely Mondelez and Unilever. They said “the continued presence and financial support of these companies in Russia only serve to prolong the brutal war against Ukraine.”

“Whilst we are disappointed to be one of hundreds of other businesses and brands in the UK to not have a new warrant awarded, we are proud to have previously held one, and we fully respect the decision,” Mondelez said in a statement.

Similarly, Unilever said: “We are very proud of the long history our brands have supplying the royal household and of the warrants they have been awarded during this time, most recently by Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth II.”

According to the royal family’s website, warrants “may not be renewed if the quality or supply for the product or service is insufficient, as far as the relevant Royal Household is concerned.”

“Playing with fire”: Republican warns that ousting Speaker Mike Johnson would backfire on GOP

Rep. Mike Lawler, R-N.Y., is warning against the repercussions of his own party's attempt to oust House Speaker Mike Johnson, R-La., who is facing harsh criticism for the U.S. spending bill that passed last week to avert a government shutdown.

“The fact is that Mike Johnson inherited a disaster when Matt Gaetz and several of my colleagues teamed up with 208 Democrats to remove Kevin McCarthy, which will go down as the single stupidest thing I’ve ever seen in politics,” Rep. Mike Lawler, R-N.Y., said on ABC News on Sunday.

“With that said, removing Mike Johnson would equally be as stupid," he continued. "The fact is that these folks are playing with fire, and if they think they’re somehow going to get a more conservative speaker, they’re kidding themselves.”

Johnson can only afford to lose one Republican vote when Congress votes on its new leader later this week.

A conservative hardliner and staunch supporter of President-elect Donald Trump, Johnson was selected as the House speaker in Oct. 2023 following the removal of former House Speaker Kevin McCarthy, R-Calif. Though the president-elect has previously said he is with Johnson “all the way,” he slammed the Louisiana Republican’s proposed stopgap U.S. spending bill last week for failing to raise the debt ceiling and including “Democrat handouts.”

“The most foolish and inept thing ever done by Congressional Republicans was allowing our country to hit the debt ceiling in 2025. It was a mistake and is now something that must be addressed,” Trump said in a statement, adding that any legislation without his demands is a “betrayal of our country.”

Trump’s comments prompted further GOP infighting. Billionaire Elon Musk, who will head Trump’s "Department of Government Efficiency” (DOGE), repeatedly called the bill “criminal.” DOGE co-chair Vivek Ramaswamy compared the bill's “debt-fueled spending sprees” to giving cocaine to an addict. 

Despite the pushback from Trump and his allies, the stopgap bill that finally passed did not include a debt ceiling increase, which sparked further outrage and dissent among the GOP’s most conservative members. 

Last week, Rep. Thomas Massie, R-Ky., told The Hill that he wouldn’t vote for Johnson in Friday’s speakership vote. Other lawmakers, including Ralph Norman, R-S.C. and Eric Burlison, R-Mo., have also publicly shared their dismay with Johnson. 

“I think that it’s shameful that people that celebrate DOGE coming in, I can’t, and yet we’re going to vote for another billion dollars to be added to the deficit, and so it’s ironic. Personally, I’m disappointed,” Burlison told reporters on Tuesday, The Hill reported.

We need your help to stay independent

But Lawler warned that the GOP is only weakening itself by trying to oust Johnson, who he said was “arguably the most conservative speaker ever.” Finding a more right-wing speaker than Johnson is a futile battle that distracts from Congress’ work “on behalf of the American people," namely certifying Trump’s presidency, Lawler added. 

In November, Lawler won a key congressional race in New York, 57-41, earning him a significant voice in the Republican Party. He’s said the country’s top priority should be a crackdown on illegal immigration.

"We can't get anything done unless we have a speaker, including certifying President Trump's election on January 6th. So, to waste time over a nonsensical intramural food fight is a joke," he said.

Johnson's fate will be decided when the 119th Congress is sworn in on Jan. 3.  

It’s Elon Musk over MAGA: Donald Trump makes his pick

A couple of days after Christmas, Donald Trump posted something very odd, even by his standards. He accidentally posted a personal text to his BFF, Elon Musk, on Truth Social. (Trump staffers confirmed to CNN that the message was intended to remain private.) Sounding downright forlorn, the president-elect wondered when his pal would return to Mar-a-Lago ("the center of the universe") because he misses him and his son, X. He also mentioned that the New Year's Eve party was going to be "AMAZING" and that Bill Gates had asked to come to dinner.

Sometimes you can be lonely even in a room full of people, so perhaps Trump needs the richest man in the world by his side to make him feel loved. But it's also possible that he senses his new best buddy is no longer as interested in him and has instead decided that he's going to play president without him. Where are you?

Trump, for his part, is spending his days down in Mar-a-Lago golfing, holding casting sessions for his administration and wining and dining CEOs who might be able to boost his personal fortune over the next four years. He doesn't appear to be paying very close attention to what's been going on in Washington or among his MAGA faithful. Several times now, he's been late off the mark, belatedly following Musk's lead after all hell broke loose.

It happened just before Christmas when he was busy golfing while Musk blew up the continuing resolution and almost caused a government shutdown. Trump later attempted to appear to have taken control by pretending that he had been the one to decide the deal was untenable due to overspending while at the same time demanding that Congress raise or eliminate the debt ceiling before he took office. The Republican hardliners balked and didn't extend or eliminate the debt ceiling and they ended up passing a watered-down version of the original deal with Democratic votes. Trump looked weak, Musk looked strong and the MAGA/Freedom Caucus appeared to be siding with Musk rather than Dear Leader.

Over the past week, more fault lines appeared in the coalition, with Musk once more right in the middle of it.

While Trump was photographed on the golf course and entertaining his dinner guests with his insufferably weird playlist of "YMCA" and Pavarotti, an online war broke out between the MIA friend Musk and some of Trump's most loyal MAGA activists. The problem began last weekend when Trump named Indian-born Sriram Krishnan, as his senior policy advisor on AI, to work with another Musk associate and fellow South African-born David Sachs, his new AI and "crypto czar." That got the attention of some MAGA loyalists, notably Laura Loomer who was, until recently, a great friend of the president-elect, even traveling with him on his campaign plane. She noticed that Krishnan is a big proponent of the H-1B visa program which allows skilled workers to come into the US to work temporarily, many of them from Asia. The tech sector makes particular use of this program.

Loomer went after the program, saying it was unfair to native-born Americans and began complaining that the loyal MAGA followers were being left out of the administration in favor of these tech-bro interlopers who were betraying the American First cause. Other MAGA followers weighed in making it clear that they did not want any brown foreigners coming into the country. They voted for Trump because he said he was going to get them all out. They don't see any difference between a Guatemalan migrant, a Haitian refugee or a Pakistani engineer.

It was at this point Musk personally joined the conversation, explaining that in order the make America great again they would need to hire lots of foreign engineers and programmers because they're the best and it would help the team. That didn't go over very well. Soon his deputy, Vivek Ramaswamy, joined the fray, posting a long screed about how American mediocrity, bad culture and a compulsion to worship prom queens instead of smart nerds makes it impossible for the country to succeed. It surely made incels everywhere rejoice that they have finally been seen but it enraged the MAGA faithful online even more.

Meanwhile, Loomer and her cadre were going specifically after Musk, suggesting that he was playing Donald Trump for a fool. She wrote at one point, “The elephant in the room is that [Musk], who is not MAGA and never has been, is a total fucking drag on the Trump transition. He’s a stage 5 clinger who overstayed his welcome at Mar a Lago in an effort to become Trump’s side piece and be the point man for all of his accomplices in big Tech to slither in to Mar a Lago."

We need your help to stay independent

Everything went downhill from there, with this post perfectly distilling the argument. (Musk has since deleted his tweet in agreement):

He later called his MAGA critics "contemptible fools" and said to one, "take a big step back and FUCK YOURSELF in the face. I will go to war on this issue the likes of which you cannot possibly comprehend." But at least he didn't call them deplorable. That would be very bad.

It got even uglier at that point with the likes of Steve Bannon, Charlie Kirk and Jack Posobiec getting in on the act as Musk proceeded to suspend the X privileges of a number of his critics, including Loomer.

Everyone had wondered if Trump was ever going to put down his golf clubs and say something. When he finally did it was in an interview with the NY Post in which he declared that he thinks the H-1B visas are just great and he uses them all the time at his properties.


Want a daily wrap-up of all the news and commentary Salon has to offer? Subscribe to our morning newsletter, Crash Course.


Trump was extremely hostile to these visas in the past, as one of his most loyal activists, Jack Posobiec pointed out:

In 2020 he formally signed an order suspending the entry of all H-1B workers:

Once again, it's pretty obvious who wears the presidential pants in this new administration — and it isn't Donald Trump.

Elon Musk won yet another internecine GOP brawl and proved that he has the next president of the United States firmly under his thumb. Trump seems to be dazzled by him and his tech-bro billionaire buds in the same way he's dazzled by Vladimir Putin. Having the richest man in the world be his friend is more meaningful to him than being president again.

I think we've all been thinking that Trump was going to get jealous and kick Musk to the curb sooner rather than later. But that's no sure thing. He's lost more than a step. He's four years older than when he left the White House and he's bored with the details of the presidency. From what we're seeing, he's ready to let his bff do whatever he wants and it's becoming clear to the MAGA activists who've worshipped him that it's not going to be Musk who's kicked to the curb — it's going to be them. 

Climate change is making plants less nutritious

More than one-third of all animals on Earth, from beetles to cows to elephants, depend on plant-based diets. Plants are a low-calorie food source, so it can be challenging for animals to consume enough energy to meet their needs. Now climate change is reducing the nutritional value of some foods that plant eaters rely on.

Human activities are increasing atmospheric carbon dioxide levels and raising global temperatures. As a result, many plants are growing faster across ecosystems worldwide.

Some studies suggest that this “greening of the Earth” could partially offset rising greenhouse gas emissions by storing more carbon in plants. However, there’s a trade-off: These fast-tracked plants can contain fewer nutrients per bite.

I’m an ecologist and work with colleagues to examine how nutrient dilution could affect species across the food web. Our focus is on responses in plant-feeding populations, from tiny grasshoppers to giant pandas.

We believe long-term changes in the nutritional value of plants may be an underappreciated cause of shrinking animal populations. These changes in plants aren’t visually evident, like rising seas. Nor are they sudden and imminent, like hurricanes or heat waves. But they can have important impacts over time.

Plant-eating animals may need more time to find and consume food if their usual meal becomes less nutritious, exposing themselves to greater risks from predators and other stresses in the process. Reduced nutritional values can also make animals less fit, reducing their ability to grow, reproduce and survive.

Rising carbon, falling nutrients

Research has already shown that climate change is causing nutrient dilution in human food crops. Declines in micronutrients, which play important roles in growth and health, are a particular concern: Long-term records of crop nutritional values have revealed declines in copper, magnesium, iron and zinc.

In particular, human deficiencies in iron, zinc and protein are expected to increase in the coming decades because of rising carbon dioxide levels. These declines are expected to have broad impacts on human health and even survival, with the strongest effects among populations that are highly dependent on rice and wheat, such as in East and Central Asia.

Image showing levels of nitrogen, calcium, phosphorus and sodiun in range grass falling with growth.

Grass tissue from a tallgrass prairie in Kansas shows nutrient levels in the plant falling as the plant grows from May through September. Kaspari and Welti, 2024, CC BY-ND

The nutritional value of livestock feed is also declining. Cattle spend a lot of time eating and often have a hard time finding enough protein to meet their needs. Protein concentrations are falling in grasses across rangelands around the world. This trend threatens both livestock and ranchers, reducing animals’ weight gains and costing producers money.

Nutrient dilution affects wild species too. Here are some examples.

Dependent on bamboo

Giant pandas are a threatened species with great cultural value. Because they reproduce at low rates and need large, connected swaths of bamboo as habitat, they are classified as a vulnerable species whose survival is threatened by land conversion for farming and development. Pandas also could become a poster animal for the threat of nutrient dilution.

The giant panda is considered an “umbrella species,” which means that conserving panda habitat benefits many other animals and plants that also live in bamboo groves. Famously, giant pandas are entirely dependent on bamboo and spend large portions of their days eating it. Now, rising temperatures are reducing bamboo’s nutritional value and making it harder for the plant to survive.

Giant pandas spend 10 to 14 hours a day or more eating bamboo, a giant grass species.

Mixed prospects for insects

Insects are essential members of the web of life that pollinate many flowering plants, serve as a food source for birds and animals, and perform other important ecological services. Around the world, many insect species are declining in developed areas, where their habitat has been converted to farms or cities, as well as in natural areas.

In zones that are less affected by human activity, evidence suggests that changes in plant chemistry may play a role in decreasing insect numbers.

Many insects are plant feeders that are likely to be affected by reduced plant nutritional value. Experiments have found that when carbon dioxide levels increase, insect populations decline, at least partly due to lower-quality food supplies.

Not all insect species are declining, however, and not all plant-feeding insects respond in the same way to nutrient dilution. Insects that chew leaves, such as grasshoppers and caterpillars, suffer the most negative effects, including reduced reproduction and smaller body sizes.

In contrast, locusts prefer carbon-rich plants, so rising carbon dioxide levels could cause increases in locust outbreaks. Some insects, including aphids and cicadas, feed on phloem – the living tissue inside plants that carries food made in the leaves to other parts of the plant – and may also benefit from carbon-rich plants.

Uneven impacts

Declines in plant food quality are most likely to affect places where nutrients already are scarce and animals struggle now to meet their nutritional needs. These zones include the ancient soils of Australia, along with tropical areas such as the Amazon and Congo basins. Nutrient dilution is also an issue in the open ocean, where rapidly warming waters are reducing the nutritional content of giant sea kelp.

Certain types of plant-feeding animals are likely to face greater declines because they need higher-quality food. Rodents, rabbits, koalas, horses, rhinoceroses and elephants are all hind-gut fermenters – animals that have simple, single-chambered stomachs and rely on microbes in their intestines to extract nutrients from high-fiber food.

These species need more nutrient-dense food than ruminants – grazers like cattle, sheep, goats and bison, with four-chambered stomachs that digest their food in stages. Smaller animals also typically require more nutrient-dense food than larger ones, because they have faster metabolisms and consume more energy per unit of body mass. Smaller animals also have shorter guts, so they can’t as easily extract all the nutrients from food.

More research is needed to understand what role nutrient dilution may be playing in declines of individual species, including experiments that artificially increase carbon dioxide levels and studies that monitor long-term changes in plant chemistry alongside animals in the field.

Over the longer term, it will be important to understand how nutrient dilution is altering entire food webs, including shifts in plant species and traits, effects on other animal groups such as predators, and changes in species interactions. Changes in plant nutritional value as a result of rising carbon dioxide levels could have far-reaching impacts throughout ecosystems worldwide.The Conversation

Ellen Welti, Research Ecologist, Great Plains Science Program, Smithsonian Institution

This article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license. Read the original article.

“This is Trump’s America now!”: MAGA diehards jumpstart a new year of political violence

Donald Trump isn't in office yet but his fans are already getting excited about hurting and stealing from people of color. Last week, Mother Jones reported on a letter circulating through Lincoln County, Oregon, calling on locals not to wait for Trump officials to start the promised mass deportations, but to take action for themselves. "Sit in your church’s parking lot and write down the license plate of brown folks," the letter instructed. "Schools, as you wait in line to pick up the kiddos or the grandkiddos—if you see brown folks—record the plate. Your neighborhood—you know where the brown folks live in your neighborhood—again record the plate."

The goal, the letter explains, is to gather information to help Trump's incoming appointments for Homeland Security in their quest to deport millions of non-white people, which will necessitate rounding them up in concentration camps. The letter ends with a promise of material rewards for people who participate. "When the brown folks are rounded up, their properties will be confiscated," the letter promises. "So, within a short term, there will be a whole lot of homes on the market for us white folks to purchase and with the inventory so high—the prices will be very low and affordable."


Want more Amanda Marcotte on politics? Subscribe to her newsletter Standing Room Only.


This promise has strong echoes from history. When Jews were kidnapped for the Holocaust during WWII, it was common for their Christian neighbors to ransack their homes, stealing everything and enriching themselves. "They raided Jewish people’s homes, businesses, and offices in search of valuables," reads the Holocaust Museum's online exhibit, which includes pictures of people going through piles of stolen goods and selling off looted valuables. It's unclear if the letter writer knows this history and finds it inspiring, or if they are unconsciously recreating the Nazi past. Either way, the main takeaway is whoever is behind this letter doesn't want to sit back and let the Trump administration do their own dirty work. They believe the MAGA masses can be harnessed to help, in a vigilante fashion. 

There is no way for MAGA to get what it wants — the elimination or serious reduction of the population of people they don't like — without violence.

This brownshirt impulse has always been a part of Trumpism, as we saw with the rise of the Proud Boys, Oath Keepers and other paramilitary gangs during the first Trump administration. It was one of the earliest and strongest indicators that MAGA is a fascist movement, and they later proved instrumental in the attempted coup on Jan. 6, 2021. Since that failed, the organized paramilitary arm of MAGA has died down, though far-right violence against minorities has continued to rise. The lengthy sentences that Proud Boys and Oath Keepers received — especially compared to the much lighter sentences for the unorganized insurrectionists — appear to have had a chilling effect on those who would want to keep paramilitary fascist violence going. 

Unfortunately, Trump won and has been promising widespread pardons for Jan. 6 defendants, even those convicted of violence or seditious conspiracy. This will likely embolden more far-right people to get back into the brownshirt business. That's almost certainly the point. Trump didn't hide his disappointment when his calls for his followers to "rally" at the courthouse to prevent his trials failed. MAGA spaces online showed they understood he was asking for them to storm the proceedings, but were afraid of being arrested like the Jan. 6 defendants. If he can remove that concern, the equation will change. 

Earlier this month, police in Colorado arrested Patrick Thomas Egan, 39, accusing him of assaulting TV reporter Ja’Ronn Alex, who has Pacific Islander heritage. Witnesses say Egan followed Alex in his car for 40 miles, yelling, "Are you even a U.S. citizen? This is Trump’s America now!" When Alex, who had been out reporting, returned to the station, Egan allegedly tackled him and strangled him so hard people on the scene feared he couldn't breathe. 

Trump has also nominated Kash Patel to head the FBI. Patel is extreme even by MAGA standards, parroting wild-eyed conspiracy theories that all point to the same conclusion: that Trump and MAGA are justified in doing whatever they wish to get "revenge" on people who tried to hold them accountable. Patel calls Trump "King Donald" and has showily drawn up enemy lists of people he wants to harass. The result of all this is predictable and likely desired: a strong signal shown to would-be domestic terrorists that they have nothing to worry about from the FBI. 

Most MAGA commentators are smart enough to avoid overt threats of violence after Trump's election, though there are incidents like popular Christian nationalist pastor Terri Copeland Pearsons telling her audience they must "take up the enemy's sword and cut his head off with it." But while sidestepping the inherent violence of their views, MAGA influencers are getting bold in their demands for what Trump's America must look like — which is very white, very Christian, and with no tolerance for people who are different. 

Doug Wilson — who runs the church attended by Trump's defense secretary nominee, Pete Hegseth — has called for a ban on any non-Christian displays in public spaces. Christian nationalist pastor Lance Wallnau has declared that cities and counties that voted for Vice President Kamala Harris are infected with demons, which is an unsubtle way of justifying violence against them. Another pastor at Hegseth's church, Joshua Haymes, insisted that the Founding Fathers "didn't have in view mosques being erected" when they enshrined freedom of religion and that they only meant it for Christian churches. (This is flat-out false, not that any of these guys care about actual history.) 

In that same clip, Haymes declares, "We need 10,000 more Michael Cassidys," referencing a failed Republican congressional candidate who drove from Mississippi to Iowa to destroy a Satanic display in the state capitol. The display was part of a longstanding project of the Satanic Temple to put up shrines wherever Christians put up overtly religious displays on public property to illustrate the absurdity of such monuments on secular government lands. Cassidy avoided a felony hate crime charge by pleading down to criminal mischief. Haymes may think he's being cute by applauding a man who only attacked property and not people, but his implication is not subtle. He wants more white Christians to commit crimes to show their displeasure at having to share the country with people who aren't them. 

We need your help to stay independent

Similar word games were played by the pastors at Right Response Ministries, another popular group of Christian nationalists, in a video last month calling for the persecution of religious minorities. "When you establish a Christian nation and you say no more mosques, no more synagogues," argued Wesley Todd in a video released shortly after Trump's electoral victory. He insisted this wouldn't be "conversion at the point of the sword" or "going into people’s homes, holding a gun to them." In the real world, of course, people will rebel and attempt to hold services. Shutting that down would lead to violence. In general, there is no way for MAGA to get what it wants — the elimination or serious reduction of the population of people they don't like — without violence. 

Earlier this month at the New York Times, researcher Stuart Thompson published the results of watching 47 hours of MAGA content on the Rumble network post-election. "I expected many of the videos to feel triumphant," he said, but "their happiness quickly gave way to a relentless outpouring of anger and frustration, as they fixated on a cast of perceived enemies." What's striking about his report is how much the Rumble content centers on violence. Hosts claimed that the Department of Homeland Security is running a "sex-trafficking operation" and that Republican politicians are being targeted by the left for assassination. Intimations of imminent war were routinely made, with one host asking viewers to secure a "fallout shelter." This rhetoric isn't just dishonest. It keeps viewers in a violent state of mind, convincing them they are victims, so they feel justified in committing violence of their own. 

Trump made a lot of bold promises to get elected, leaving his followers with hopes that the U.S. will soon have the racial and religious homogeneity they crave. With 42% of Americans belonging to a racial minority, however, even Trump's outrageous deportation plans will do little to make the U.S. look as white as MAGA wants. The frustration Thompson clocked is likely MAGA's dawning realization that Trump is not going to make their racist dreams come true. Unfortunately, Trump and his mouthpieces have conveyed a "take measures into your own hands" message to the MAGA faithful. How this will manifest is still unknown, but there's every reason to worry it could get bad. 

Jimmy Carter was ahead of the curve

Jimmy Carter lived longer than any other American president, passing away on Sunday at the age of 100. Given that he devoted much of that life to serving others, it is fitting that Carter was blessed with so many years.

During his extra time on Earth, the 39th president was involved in charities all over the world, from the peacemaking and disease-fighting Carter Center to Habitat for Humanity, which constructs affordable housing. He also remained politically active. During Donald Trump's first term, Carter told Salon that "the government is worse than it has been before." He added that it was the first time during his life that "the truth is ignored, allies are deliberately aggravated, China, Europe, Mexico and Canada are hurt economically and have to hurt us in response, Americans see the future worse than the present, and immigrants are treated cruelly." These words are an accurate encapsulation of his legacy, for in so many ways Carter fought for every single value he saw violated during Trump's administration. Jimmy Carter was the anti-Trump.

"During Donald Trump's first term, Carter told Salon that 'the government is worse than it has been before… the truth is ignored…'"

Born in the small Georgia town of Plains on Oct. 1, 1924, Carter was the son of a successful small business owner and a registered nurse. After serving in the United States Navy, he expanded his family's peanut-growing business by utilizing the latest advances in agricultural science and technology. Carter started his political career in 1962 by being elected to the state senate in a hotly contested election. After serving two legislative terms, he campaigned for governor — first without success in 1966, and then eventually winning in 1970. Shortly after his victory, Carter declared an end to the Jim Crow era in Georgia politics, announcing in his inaugural address that "the time of racial discrimination is over." He later installed portraits of African-American Georgia leaders Martin Luther King Jr., Lucy Craft Laney and Henry McNeal Turner in the state capitol.

Carter quickly developed a reputation as the leader of a so-called New South, a moderate governor who focused on honesty and integrity in a notoriously corrupt region. This image later became crucial to his presidential ambitions in the 1976 election. During the Democratic primaries, Carter pioneered innovative grassroots campaign tactics, overcoming a crowded field despite being an underdog. Once nominated, Carter faced off against the incumbent president, Republican Gerald Ford. Carter entered the campaign with a major advantage: Ford was still politically struggling from his controversial decision to pardon disgraced ex-president Richard Nixon after the Watergate scandal. Famously promising that he would always tell the truth if he won, Carter defeated Ford in a close election in which the Democrat eschewed ideology and instead cultivated an anodyne image as a folksy populist.

We need your help to stay independent

It is at this point that the reality of Carter's life conflicts with the myth. According to the spin promulgated by conservative Republicans after Carter's presidency, he was an ineffective leader who was sent packing by an angry electorate when Ronald Reagan beat him in the 1980 election. While the second half of this statement was true, for Carter was indeed electorally humiliated by Reagan, the Georgia peanut farmer was also an accomplished president in both foreign and domestic policy. His legacy was stymied by his shortcomings as a politician rather than by any serious weaknesses as a policymaker. Journalist Theodore H. White perhaps best captured this dichotomy between Carter's accomplishments and his image in the book, "America in Search of Itself: The Making of the President, 1956-1980."

Jimmy Carter was always a mystery, this man with the straw-colored hair and clear blue eyes, whose enemies came to despise him while those who would be friends could not understand him. Carter fit no mold nor any of those familiar journalistic diagrams by which political writers try to explore the nature of a presidency through the personality of the President. He could not describe himself, as Roosevelt so jauntily did, as having passed from being "Dr. New Deal" to "Dr. Win the War." Nor could he be described, as was Richard Nixon by so many of us, in the twenty years of Nixon's eminence, as being the "Old Nixon" or the "New Nixon," with new Nixons succeeding one another every two or three years in the public print. The personality of Jimmy Carter was the same from the day he decided to run for the presidency until he lost it. And that personality, rather than changing from an "old" to a "new" Carter, had to be examined as a set of layers of faith, of action, even of unpleasantnesses.

To be sure, Carter had more than his share of disappointments — his tax reform agenda, national health insurance plan, labor law proposal, instant voter registration bill, energy mobilization board and many other ambitious ideas never became reality. Yet as White was quick to point out, Carter was hardly a failure. In foreign policy, Carter is perhaps best known for negotiating the longest-enduring Middle Eastern peace agreement of all time — namely, the historic deal struck between Israel and Egypt after Carter's delicate negotiations between Israeli Prime Minister Menachem Begin and Egyptian President Anwar Sadat. This was not his sole geopolitical achievement of historic magnitude: Despite the staunch opposition of conservatives in Congress, Carter unequivocally denounced white supremacist African governments such as those in Rhodesia (now Zimbabwe) and South Africa, unlike previous administrations. In stark contrast to the antisemitic Nixon, Carter prioritized the rights of Soviet Jews facing antisemitism when shaping his Cold War policies. Finally, he defied American jingoistic tendencies and returned the Panama Canal to the people of Panama, despite (once again) the protests of many conservatives. In doing so, he articulated a humanitarian rationalization for all of his foreign policymaking that could not be in starker contrast to the bellicosity and imperialist aspirations of Trumpism.

"'… Americans see the future worse than the present, and immigrants are treated cruelly.'… Carter fought for every single value he saw violated during Trump's administration."

"This agreement with Panama is something we want because we know it is right," Carter explained, after reviewing the history of the Panama Canal in detail. "This is not merely the surest way to protect and save the canal, it's a strong, positive act of a people who are still confident, still creative, still great. This new partnership can become a source of national pride and self-respect in much the same way that building the canal was 75 years ago. It's the spirit in which we act that is so very important."

By contrast, President-elect Donald Trump is talking about trying to reacquire the Panama Canal.

On domestic policy, Carter was also far ahead of the curve. He passed landmark ethics legislation in response to the Watergate scandal and avoided any serious scandals during his own presidency. He also doubled the size of America's national park system, created tax incentives for families to install solar panels (while putting them on the White House) and established a so-called Superfund to clean up contaminated factory and mining sites. Economically Carter endorsed the Federal Reserve's decision to raise interest rates and thereby "squeeze out inflation." (This ultimately worked, but the benefits were not seen until after Carter left office.) When it came to promoting diversity, Carter appointed more women and more Black people to senior positions and to the federal bench than all 38 presidents before him put together.

"The energy security we enjoy today is due to the energy bills he passed," former Carter domestic affairs adviser Stu Eizenstat told Salon in 2018. "The ethics legislation, more important than ever today, all was done during his time. He was the greatest environmental president, doubling the size of the National Park System with the Alaska Lands bill."

Perhaps most importantly, the Carter administration was alarmed by the existential threat posed to humanity by climate change. In an era before the fossil fuels lobby had successfully blanketed Washington with fear at the mere thought of effectively addressing global warming, American government officials recognized the need for reform and had started working on clean energy policies. Before any meaningful policies could be implemented, however, the 1980 election rolled around. Americans' eyes were on Iran, where 52 Americans had been held hostage by radical Islamists since 1979. The military mission attempting to rescue U.S. hostages in Iran was a disastrous failure, albeit through no fault of Carter's own. Meanwhile, the economy struggled with spiking oil prices, causing Carter's approval ratings to further tank. It didn't help matters that he had become a dull and listless speaker, in sharp contrast to both his early homespun style and the sparkling rhetoric and optimism the former actor Reagan regularly supplied.


Want a daily wrap-up of all the news and commentary Salon has to offer? Subscribe to our morning newsletter, Crash Course.


Reagan's subsequent defeat of Carter in the 1980 election proved a watershed moment in not just American history, but world history. Most prominently, it ushered in the so-called "Reagan Revolution," a period in which the Republican Party became staunchly associated with ideological conservatism and dominated the political landscape. On a deeper level, though, it marked the end of a period of hope. After Reagan weakened labor unions, income inequality skyrocketed; when he did the same thing to civil rights legislation, systemic racial barriers were left even harder to surmount. Many promising Carter initiatives, such as orienting foreign policy to prioritize human rights and supporting an Equal Rights Amendment for women, died along with his dreams of re-election. Perhaps most importantly, if there had been a chance that the human species could have reversed the effects of severe environmental pollution — in particular, climate change — and avoided ecological catastrophe, that slender reed broke once Reagan's reactionaries took over.

Rick Perlstein, an American historian and journalist who has penned acclaimed books on the 1960s and 1970s like "Before the Storm," "Nixonland" and "Reaganland," has been critical of Carter, but speaking with Salon last year he acknowledged that Earth as a planet would be better off today if Carter had defeated Reagan in 1980. Although Perlstein argued that Carter's progressive energy programs were motivated more by economic nationalism than environmentalism, they still would have included the essential environmental regulations humanity needs.

"Carter's policies, had they continued, would have been bad," Perlstein told Salon at the time. "But Reagan's were downright cataclysmic. He and his advisors simply despised the notion of using the power of government to regulate environmental harm."

It would be unfair to close a tribute to Carter's life on such a bleak note. When I had the privilege of interviewing him for Salon back in 2018, he offered inspiring words of wisdom. We mostly focused on the administration of then-President Donald Trump — and needless to say, Carter wasn't impressed. Yet we did not only talk about what was wrong with America. We also discussed Carter's role in advancing disability rights by supporting Section 504, a provision of a 1973 civil rights act protecting disabled individuals from discrimination. Because I am autistic and physically disabled, this is why I personally admire Carter, and why I thanked him for his work. Reflecting on his legacy, I asked Carter what advice he had for younger Americans who also look up to him. His response is extremely appropriate to the America we enter as Trump commences his second term. Carter may have lacked Trump's bombast and charisma but made up for that with a sincerity and substance that we are guaranteed to sorely miss in the years ahead. Whereas Trump left his first term without a single notable foreign policy achievement, and only a pair of impeachments (plus an unsuccessful coup attempt) to distinguish him on the domestic front, both during and after his presidency Carter made America and the world a better place. That is why his parting words to me hit so hard:

"Never give up, and follow the advice of my school teacher: 'We must accommodate changing times but cling to principles that do not change.'"

Humanity is failing to meet its climate change goals. Here’s what experts say we can still do

Last month the Copernicus Climate Change Service, an organization run by the European Union to monitor global heating, revealed that Earth was on track to surpass the 1.5º C threshold. This manifested throughout 2024 in so-called “weird weather,” from unusually extreme hurricanes and floods to intense heat waves, parching droughts and unprecedented wildfires. It’s little wonder this year was the hottest in recorded history, breaking the record shattered in 2023

A recent study even found that 2024 experienced 41 days of extra dangerous heat because of human-caused climate change. To make matters worse, recent data suggests that climate change is accelerating even faster than scientists predicted, meaning we’re rapidly entering uncharted territory. International conferences to address environmental issues like climate change (such as COP29) consistently ended in disappointment.

Why are continuing to go backward on this issue? It’s certainly not from a lack of awareness or passion for the environment. Many people understand the stakes: climate change threatens to kill billions of humans and wipe out millions of species, pushing the definition of “habitability” to the brink. Top climate scientists say there’s still reason to hope and time to act, explaining why humanity has failed to meet its climate goals — and what we can do from here.

“The obstacle isn’t technology,” University of Pennsylvania climate scientist Dr. Michael E. Mann told Salon. “We have the technological knowhow and infrastructure to decarbonize our economy on the needed timescale. What we’re currently lacking — globally, and certainly now in the U.S. under the control of Trump and Republicans — is the political will.”

"What we’re currently lacking — globally, and certainly now in the U.S. under the control of Trump and Republicans — is the political will."

Mann said humanity needs to rapidly decarbonize our economy. The overwhelming scientific evidence demonstrates humanity’s overuse of fossil fuels is the primary cause of climate change, as doing so releases greenhouse gases such as carbon dioxide into the atmosphere.

“We need governmental incentives that will massively incentivize renewable energy and phase out fossil fuel energy as soon as possible,” Mann said. “It won’t happen, however, if young people in particular don’t turn out to vote for climate-forward policymakers.” He added that many did not turn out in sufficiently large numbers during the 2024 election, “and too many fell victims to dishonest tactics of the Republicans and even voted for them out of ignorance of their true agenda. As a result, we elected the most pro-fossil fuel, climate-adverse government in modern history.” Going forward, Mann hopes people who prioritize climate change turn out to vote in larger numbers.

Dr. Kevin Trenberth, a distinguished scholar at the National Center for Atmospheric Research, explicitly argued for three specific policy measures: “Cut emissions and use of fossil fuels; promote renewables; prepare for the consequences,” Trenberth said. He also noted that growing trees, carbon capture and storage and direct air capture of carbon dioxide emissions tend not to work.


Want more health and science stories in your inbox? Subscribe to Salon's weekly newsletter Lab Notes.


In general, it appears like humanity has failed to make limiting greenhouse gas emissions a priority, according to Tom Knutson, a senior scientist at the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration's Geophysical Fluid Dynamics Laboratory, said that it appears humanity as a species has not “decided that strongly limiting future emissions of greenhouse gases is a top priority goal that should be pursued and treated as a critical ‘pass or fail goal.’”

Knutson, who has contributed to the scientific efforts behind reports for the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change or the U.S. Fifth National Climate Assessment, views his job as providing relevant scientific information rather than offering policy prescriptions. Regardless of the specific measures that people choose to democratically decarbonize our society, it will be essential that they establish realistic goals and reliably follow through in implementing them.

“Broadly speaking, humanity can decide, based on the above scenario information (with uncertainties) provided by IPCC and other scientific sources, what future emission pathway to set as a goal,” Knutson said. “Then society and policymakers can enact policies in an effort to reach the emission goal that is set. If they decide collectively that scenario X is the goal, and they fail to enact or implement the policies to achieve scenario X, or the policies are not followed as desired by the policymakers, then that would constitute a failure in my view.”

It appears humanity as a species has not "decided that strongly limiting future emissions of greenhouse gases is a top priority goal."

As humanity swims against the tide of rising temperatures, they will also need to solve lingering mysteries regarding these scientific facts. At the time of this writing, Knutson and his colleagues are researching issues such as why current climate models are not able to reproduce the observed pattern of sea surface temperature trends (1980 to 2022) in the tropical Pacific and southern Pacific Ocean. Other scientists are examining why climate change has been accelerating even faster than previous models anticipated. Because climate science includes many variables that humans do not know, experts cannot precisely anticipate or explain every phenomenon that ensues as people continue global heating through greenhouse gas emissions.

Yet Knutson does have his own hypothesis about why climate change seems to be getting worse at an ever more rapid rate.

“I would speculate that natural variability may be creating temporary trends (either ‘hiatus’ periods of little warming or temporary ‘spurts’ of accelerated warming) lasting up to a few decades,” Knutson said. “Maybe that is part of the explanation for the recent changes.”

Citing his 2016 paper for Nature Communications on possible future trajectories for global mean temperature, Knutson said that this “suggests to perhaps just be patient for now to see if the recent acceleration we have seen is just a temporary effect of internal variability or temporary forcing change, or if it really does represent an accelerated long-term warming rate, relative to the trend we've been on since about 1970.” He added that these are his personal views and do not necessarily represent those of NOAA or the U.S. government.

We need your help to stay independent

Mann emphasized that the most recent peer-reviewed scientific research does not find any acceleration of warming itself.

“Some impacts of climate change are proceeding faster than expected,” Mann said. “Examples are ice sheet melt and sea level rise, and the rise in extreme weather events. The longer-term warming itself is steady and is proceeding as predicted by the models.”

Perhaps the bottom line in all of this is that human beings must stop relying on fossil fuels. Dr. Friederike Otto, the lead of World Weather Attribution and an Imperial College climate scientist, put it bluntly when announcing the extra 41-days of extreme heat that occurred in 2024.

"Climate change did play a role, and often a major role in most of the events we studied, making heat, droughts, tropical cyclones and heavy rainfall more likely and more intense across the world, destroying lives and livelihoods of millions and often uncounted numbers of people," Otto said during a media briefing. "As long as the world keeps burning fossil fuels, this will only get worse."

Humans think slower than expected, study finds

Human brains are not computers, in spite of how often such a comparison is made, but a recent study in the journal Neuron reveals our gray matter is quite pokey even when compared to Wi-Fi speeds.

Researchers from the California Institute of Technology calculated the speed at which humans performed tasks that can be quantified as "information processing." For example, they figured out the speed at which people can solve a Rubik’s Cube, memorize numbers, play Tetris and remember random orders in a deck of cards. Reducing this data into “bits,” wherein quantities are measured through a binary code (0s and 1s), the scientists then calculated the overall “speed” at which the brain processes this information.

Ultimately they concluded that the average rate of human thought is roughly 10 bits per second. By contrast, Wi-Fi speeds are usually measured in hundreds of millions of bits per second, while the human eye processes information at 100 million bits per second.

“The brain seems to operate in two distinct modes: the ‘outer’ brain handles fast high-dimensional sensory and motor signals, whereas the ‘inner’ brain processes the reduced few bits needed to control behavior,” the authors write. “Plausible explanations exist for the large neuron numbers in the outer brain, but not for the inner brain, and we propose new research directions to remedy this.”

It may seem counterintuitive to refer to a large number of neurons in the outer brain after learning that humans think so slowly, but in fact the experts believe our speed of thought is more than sufficient for our evolutionary needs. The earliest creatures to develop central nervous systems did so in order to move toward food and away from predators. From there, the brain simply continued to develop using this linear mode of thinking, as a kluge rather than a rationally designed machine. When our brains process abstract concepts, it is engaging in the same basic activity that it employs when navigating. For these purposes, 10 bits per second does the job.

"Our ancestors have chosen an ecological niche where the world is slow enough to make survival possible," the authors write. "In fact, the 10 bits per second are needed only in worst-case situations, and most of the time our environment changes at a much more leisurely pace."

Some college athlete NIL deals make headlines. Most don’t

It’s been almost four years since the NCAA decided that college students could make money from their name, image and likeness (NIL). 

Since then, the NIL market has exploded. Students can ink brand deals as simple as getting free pizza in exchange for an Instagram post, or much larger, like WNBA basketball star Angel Reese scoring an endorsement deal with McDonald’s. 

But the effects of the NIL ruling vary, and it's worth asking whether it has been good for college athletes on the whole.

How much does the average athlete earn?

NIL rules allow students to make money advertising for third-party companies, creating their own products and brands or even receiving money directly from schools.

The first option is the one that most people think about when they imagine NIL money, like a local restaurant paying a college basketball player to shoot a couple of TikTok videos.

Some athletes set up affiliate deals with brands, where they receive a portion of each sale. For example, you may have to use a special promo code for them to receive credit for the deal.

We need your help to stay independent

The third option is the NIL Collective, which is like a booster club for college. In short, it means that schools can crowdfund money from alumni, fans and generous donors to pay athletes directly. 

“It’s what we would have historically called payola,” said NIL professor and lawyer Robert Boland, a former college athlete.

And starting in 2025, some colleges will be able to directly give money to athletes, outside of the school’s collective. Schools will be able to dish out $20 million to athletes.

Just like deals for professional athletes, NIL deals vary significantly. For example, while the average college football player earns about $3,400 a month, a football player at Auburn University earns almost double that — $7,400 per month.

Even though million-dollar deals generate headlines, most college athletes aren’t getting rich off their NIL deal. According to NCAA data, the median total earnings per athlete in 2024 was about $500, while the average total earnings per athlete was about $21,331. In fact, more than half of all NIL deals were worth $100 or less. 

Still, Boland says that "is not insignificant to a college athlete, particularly if they may come from a disadvantaged situation."

"Maybe it means they don’t have to work during the school year. Maybe it helps them develop some skills around selling themselves, “ Boland said.

Does the NIL help athletes?

The NIL is still controversial. Some people say that it’s corrupted the college game and blurred the lines between a student-athlete and a professional athlete. Others say it’s only fair that students get paid when college athletics are a $19 billion industry.

Others say it’s not an equitable process. Students in certain sports, like football and basketball, are more likely to be top earners. 

In a 2024 NIL ranking, only one athlete in the top 10 wasn’t a football or men’s basketball player (LSU gymnast Livvy Dunne). Even though athletes like Reese get headlines for scoring $2 million in NIL deals, men are primarily the beneficiaries of the program. 

"It's not equitable, but it's been beneficial"

However, Boland says he thinks that the NIL deals are making women’s sports more popular with fans. With the rise of stars like Caitlin Clark and Reese, the WNBA is seeing a trickle-down effect that began with the NIL deals. 

“I think it has been very favorable to women’s athletes and women’s sports,” Boland. “It’s not equitable, but it’s been beneficial.”

This also provides more chances for female alumni to choose to donate to a collective for women’s sports, instead of men’s.  

“I can certainly see successful women alumni who want to decicate money to women’s athletics,” said NIL agent Bob Zito.

The NIL market gives athletes potentially more time to develop before going pro. If they can still make decent money in college, they don’t have to sacrifice their degree to make a living. Many athletes felt pressured to sign a rookie contract so they could monetize their skills, even if it meant going pro before they were physically, mentally and emotionally ready.

“It has given athletes some measure of financial independence based on their college play,” Boland said. “It isn’t enough to take the place of turning pro. It isn't going to be life-changing money in most cases, but it does give you some cushion of when to make decisions like when to turn professional or how to value your education.”

"It isn't going to be life-changing money in most cases, but it does give you some cushion"

Even high school athletes can now make money, like AJ Dybantsa, a high school basketball player whose NIL valuation is about $2 million.

Your average college soccer, cross country or golf athlete isn’t likely to see a huge difference in their bank account. But it could be enough to provide some breathing room in their budget, especially since they likely don’t have the time for a part-time job like other students.

What are the downsides of NIL?

Sometimes deals fall through, like in the case of football player Jaden Rashada. He was promised $13 million from the University of Florida, but the deal ultimately collapsed. Rashada ended up suing the school. 

With the proliferation of NIL collective payouts, more stories like this are likely to pop up.  

“It’s now extremely important that players know how schools and coaches are operating in the new environment,” Zito said.

Zito also said some schools are becoming savvy and trying to avoid paying students who enter the transfer portal. For example, they may pay less during the academic year and pay more once the season ends. This penalizes players who enter the transfer portal and leave.

“In the case of basketball, if the player enters the transfer portal, the deal is null and void,” Zito said. “That is another contract that we would never encourage one of our athletes to sign.”

The reverse is also true. If an athlete looks for an agent, they need to vet them carefully since agents advise on the best decisions and can make or break careers.

Overall, it's hard to say how NIL rules will shake out in the end. But for now, the NIL — like sports betting — is here to stay.

“It’s a new world and that last chapter hasn’t been written yet,” Zito said. “There’s going to be lots and lots to go over.”

Former U.S. President Jimmy Carter dies at 100

Former U.S. President Jimmy Carter died Sunday at the age of 100 in his hometown of Plains, Georgia, according to the Carter Center, the nonprofit he and his wife Rosalynn Carter founded.

The longest-lived American president endured recent battles with health issues and treatment for cancer in 2015 before entering home hospice care in February 2023. His death follows the passing of Rosalynn, the former first lady and his wife of more than 77 years, on Nov. 19, 2023, at the age of 96 and shortly after she was diagnosed with dementia.

“Rosalynn was my equal partner in everything I ever accomplished. She gave me wise guidance and encouragement when I needed it,” Carter wrote in a heartfelt tribute to his wife after her death. “As long as Rosalynn was in the world, I always knew somebody loved and supported me.”

Carter’s grandson, Jason, said at the time that his grandfather’s life was “coming to an end.”

“(My grandfather) is doing OK,” he said during a speech honoring his grandmother at the Carter Center. “He has been in hospice, as you know, for almost a year and a half now, and he really is, I think, coming to the end that, as I’ve said before, there’s a part of this faith journey that is so important to him, and there’s a part of that faith journey that you only can live at the very end and I think he has been there in that space.”

Jason Carter added that Rosalynn’s passing was “difficult” for his grandfather. But, he added, the “outpouring of love and support that we, as a family, received from people in this room and from the rest of the world was so remarkable and meaningful to us. And it really turned that whole process into a celebration.”

Carter was a peanut farmer, Navy officer and moderate Democrat who served as the 39th president from 1977 to 1981. He became a global humanitarian after leaving office, and “decided to spend his remaining time at home with his family and receive hospice care instead of additional medical intervention,” the Carter Center said last year. On Sunday, they announced his death in a statement on the social media platform X.

The previous winter, in a moment when Carter was at his sickest and his family feared for his life, the former president was said to have refused hospital care so he could remain by Rosalynn’s side, historian Michael Beschloss told MSNBC following her passing.

“I am told that President Carter said, ‘No, I want to get home, and be in bed with Rosalynn, and just sit holding hands, and that’s the way I’d like to close my life,'” Beschloss said, emphasizing the love the two shared and how their close partnership played a role in Carter’s presidency.

Carter was born on Oct. 1, 1924, in Plains, Georgia. He married Rosalynn Smith in 1946, and they had four children — Jack, James III “Chip”, Donnel and Amy — as well as 12 grandchildren and 14 great-grandchildren. The Carters celebrated their 77th anniversary on July 7, 2023 and held the record for the longest-wed presidential couple, overtaking the late President George H. W. Bush and his wife Barbara.

After returning home from military service in 1953, Carter rose as an activist in the Democratic Party, opposing segregation and supporting the growing civil rights movement.

Carter served as the lesser-known Georgia governor and former state senator who defeated then-President Gerald Ford in the aftermath of the Vietnam War. He connected with many Americans who felt betrayed by former President Richard Nixon and the devastating effects of the war in Southeast Asia.

“If I ever lie to you, if I ever make a misleading statement, don’t vote for me. I would not deserve to be your president,” Carter said frequently during his campaign for president.

On his second day as president, Carter famously pardoned all Vietnam War draft evaders. Throughout the course of his presidency, Carter would have to govern amid Cold War pressures, racial tensions and unpredictable oil markets.

Carter was well known for his work in foreign policy, including brokering the Camp David Accords, a 1978 framework for peace signed by Egyptian President Anwar Sadat and Israeli Prime Minister Menachem Begin that led to the March 1979 treaty between the nations. He also restored the Panama Canal back to Panama and signed the SALT II nuclear arms reduction treaty with Soviet leader Leonid Brezhnev.

He designated millions of acres of land in Alaska as national parks and wildlife reserves. He also appointed a then-record number of women and Americans of color to federal posts and was best known for his promotion of civil rights attorney Ruth Bader Ginsburg to the country’s second-highest court.

Carter was one of the last Democratic presidents to gain widespread support from the South before the rise of his Republican opponent, Ronald Reagan. Carter lost much of his base after the 444-day hostage crisis in Iran culminated in a failed rescue mission in April 1980, resulting in the deaths of eight Americans.

He served one term before losing to Reagan in 1980. In the years after his loss, Carter dealt with a lack of trust from his Democratic colleagues and was treated as a punchline amongst Republicans. However, decades later, he reflected on his presidency with a sense of pride, telling the Associated Press that he did “protect our nation’s security and interests peacefully” and “enhance human rights here and abroad.”

“I’m perfectly at ease with whatever comes,” he said in 2015. “I’ve had an exciting, adventurous and gratifying existence.”

The loss of a second term ultimately brought about Carter’s decades of work in public health and human rights with the Carter Center, whose motto is “wage peace, fight disease, and build hope.”

The Carters opened the center in 1982 and their work was recognized in 2002 with the Nobel Peace Prize. While the former president spent most of his life in Plains, he traveled the world in his 80s and early 90s, including annual trips with Habitat for Humanity to build homes. Last year, the Carter Center celebrated 40 years of promoting democracy worldwide, including monitoring at least 113 elections in Africa, Latin America and Asia since 1989.

The center also worked alongside the World Health Organization to ensure the near-eradication of the tropical disease known as Guinea worm.

The former president was concerned with the health of those who did not have access to safe drinking water and were contracting the disease.

“I would like to see Guinea worm completely eradicated before I die,” he said at a news conference in 2015. “I’d like for the last Guinea worm to die before I do.”

Due to the Carter Center’s work, the end of the destructive parasite is near.

“It’s an audacious and mind-boggling idea,” Emily Staub, the press liaison to health programs for the Carter Center told CNN later. “A whole bunch of people with the Carter Center decided that they were going to eradicate a disease that has no vaccine, no immunity, no medication. It’s thousands of years old and has a one-year incubation. The odds are totally stacked against you. And the people that suffer from it speak thousands of different languages, and some have never had outsiders interact with them.

“President Carter just jumped in with two feet,” she said.

Carter in 2006 delivered the eulogy at the funeral of his close friend Coretta Scott King, the wife of Martin Luther King Jr., and praised her for “breaking down the racial barriers that had separated us one from another for almost two centuries.”

After the news broke that Carter was entering hospice care, Bernice King, the youngest child of Coretta and Martin, said she was joining the nation in praying for him.

“Former President Carter’s love and compassion for all people set him apart as a leader, servant, and simply a great man striving to achieve a Beloved Community,” she wrote. “We are praying that you feel God’s grace, mercy, and love as well as the love of your family, The King Center, and the world that you have so graciously served.”

“I’ve had the good fortune to meet many presidents, kings, Nobel Peace Prize winners and truly impressive people. Few are as truly good as Jimmy Carter, who at age 98 is now entering hospice,” wrote New York Times columnist Nicholas Kristoff. “He leaves this planet so much better than he found it. A great, great, great man.”

Kai Bird, the former president’s biographer, wrote in a guest essay for The Times that Carter “was not what you think.”

“Jimmy Carter was probably the most intelligent, hard-working and decent man to have occupied the Oval Office in the 20th century,” Bird wrote. “A Southern liberal, he knew racism was the nation’s original sin. He was a progressive on the issue of race, declaring in his first address as Georgia’s governor, in 1971, that ‘the time for racial discrimination is over,’ to the extreme discomfort of many Americans, including a good number of his fellow Southerners.”

Bird also reflected on Carter’s post-presidential life, writing, “Some of his controversial decisions, at home and abroad, were just as consequential. He took Egypt off the battlefield for Israel, but he always insisted that Israel was also obligated to suspend building new settlements in the West Bank and allow the Palestinians a measure of self-rule.”

After the release of his 2006 New York Times bestselling book “Palestine: Peace Not Apartheid,” Carter gave a radio interview in which he described apartheid to be the “forced separation of two peoples in the same territory with one of the groups dominating or controlling the other,” and claimed that Israel’s policies resulted in apartheid worse than South Africa’s.

“When Israel does occupy this territory deep within the West Bank, and connects the 200-or-so settlements with each other, with a road, and then prohibits the Palestinians from using that road, or in many cases even crossing the road, this perpetrates even worse instances of apartness, or apartheid, than we witnessed even in South Africa,” Carter said.

While the book and his subsequent interviews generated controversy, including some accusing him of antisemitism, Carter continued to stand up for his beliefs in racial equality. “The hope is that my book will at least stimulate a debate, which has not existed in this country. There’s never been any debate on this issue, of any significance,” he said.

“He was not afraid to warn everyone that Israel was taking a wrong turn on the road to apartheid,” Bird wrote. “In or out of the White House, Mr. Carter devoted his life to solving problems, like an engineer, by paying attention to the minutiae of a complicated world.”

The Carter Center carried on its founder’s voracious criticism of Israel’s treatment of Palestinians in the wake of Israel’s ongoing bombardment of Gaza, citing his Nobel Peace Prize speech in their call for a ceasefire in the city, the return of the hostages seized during Hamas’ deadly attack and the reinstatement of services and resources to the besieged territory.

“In his 2002 Nobel Peace Prize lecture, our founder, former U.S. President Jimmy Carter, said, ‘We will not learn to live together in peace by killing each other’s children,'” the center wrote in a statement. “His words resonate with us today more than ever as the Israel-Hamas conflict enters a new and even more dangerous phase.”

“Carter is widely considered a better man than he was a president,” The Independent noted in 2009 — a sentiment widely shared by many Americans.

Gates Foundation CEO Mark Suzman thanked Carter for his “decades of leadership, service, & wisdom” and wrote, “the future is brighter because of your work.”

Reverend William J. Barber II reflected on Carter’s legacy through a theological lens.

“President Jimmy Carter’s leadership & moral commitment were so strong that some tried to undermine his legacy by calling him weak,” he wrote on Twitter. “The so-called religious right said they wanted a Christian President, but Carter was one, & they stood against him — exposing their hypocrisy. Before Obama, Jimmy Carter broke through the Southern strategy.”

“Carter walked in the halls of power & never lost his humanity. He never let power and money change him,” he added. “As he transitions to life evermore, I pray we forever learn from the model of leadership he showed us as President &, more importantly, as a person.”

After Carter entered hospice care, former President Bill Clinton tweeted a picture of him and Carter with the caption, “On this Presidents’ Day I’m thinking of President Jimmy Carter.”


Want a daily wrap-up of all the news and commentary Salon has to offer? Subscribe to our morning newsletter, Crash Course.

 

Residents of Plains, Georgia remember Carter fondly for his “small-town boy” demeanor. He was known to greet everyone he came in contact with, including in one instance every passenger on a commercial flight he took.

“President Carter’s very unique,” Millard Simmons, a lifelong resident of Plains, told the Augusta Chronicle. “President Carter could have lived anywhere in the world he wanted to live, but he wanted to come back to a place that I think he loves; I know he loves.”

Local pastor Tony Lowden spent time with the former president in his remaining days and told The Atlanta Journal-Constitution that Carter has “given us so much.”

Carter was an integral figure in the local community and was committed to diversity and inclusion within the church. After the Southern Baptist Union announced in 2000 that they would no longer allow women to become pastors, the former president renounced his membership.

“I’m familiar with the verses they have quoted about wives being subjugated to their husbands,” he told the Atlanta Journal-Constitution in 2000. “In my opinion, this is a distortion of the meaning of Scripture. I personally feel the Bible says all people are equal in the eyes of God. I personally feel that women should play an absolutely equal role in service of Christ in the church.”

Lowden said he looked to Carter for guidance in the aftermath of George Floyd’s murder in 2020. “He gave me better advice than anyone could have,” Lowden told the outlet. “He told me not to hold back with my advice, even if it’s tough. Tell the truth. You’re not trying to win an election — you’re trying to save America.”

The two had a rule each time they saw each other for prayer sessions or private conversations: Never say goodbye.

Instead, Lowden told Carter three things: I love you, I’ll see you again — and there’s nothing you can do about it.

The best anime of 2024 also has the best opening credits

Dandadan, Dandadan, Dandadan, Dandadan, Dandadan. Even before it got its anime adaptation, the title of one of this year’s best shows feels like it was destined to be turned into rhythm. Thank god the Japanese band behind the anime’s catchy and propulsive opening had the same idea, one that’s compelled over 32 million views and counting on YouTube alone (and that’s just one of its listings – there’s another on Netflix’s channel). The bouncy, fast-paced backing track already feels perfectly representative of this animated take on the manga by Yukinobu Tatsu, in a goofy, chaotic and idiosyncratic genre mash-up. 

The show itself, directed by Fūga Yamashiro with animation produced by Science Saru, is similarly flexible. A marriage of science fiction and horror, reflections on contemporary urban living and age-old folklore, high school romance and hard-hitting action, there’s a little bit of something for everybody. "Dandadan" is the story of Momo Ayase and Ken “Okarun” Takakura, two seemingly opposite classmates at school who are drawn together by a mutual fascination with the paranormal. Momo insists that ghosts and spirits are real, while Ken (whom Momo later nicknames Okarun) believes in aliens

Neither believe the other at first, before each land themselves into an encounter with those very things. Momo is abducted by aliens, Okarun is possessed by Turbo Granny, a spirit haunting a tunnel (and yes, Turbo Granny is the actual name of a spirit from Japanese urban legend). Both survive the experience, but gain strange new powers as a result, and use those to solve various hauntings and other abductions throughout this 12-episode run (with more to come next year). Not only that, but the two have to begin a search: during his possession by Turbo Granny, Okarun’s balls got stolen. 

DandadanTurbo Granny in "Dandadan" (Yukinobu Tatsu/Shueisha, DANDADAN Production Committee)

As well as the general mayhem that emerges it’s fun seeing how each episode of "Dandadan" highlights its different building blocks: One episode might be more ghostly, the next leaning more into sci-fi, with some surprisingly long stretches dedicated to fleshing out the budding romance between Momo and Okarun. In action-oriented anime, romance is usually an afterthought, but in "Dandadan" it's one of the driving forces of the story – including arcs about communication and anxiety that are surprisingly sincere and generous about these feelings, while giving a lot of space for characters to figure out some tangled emotions.

It’s the balancing act to the rest of the show’s sometimes willfully juvenile humor, which actually never tips into insufferable, just silly (though this is perhaps underselling how deranged the first couple of episodes are). The show has been a standout this year in part because of its sense of unpredictability as well as its sincere investment in its romance, and its eye-catching visual approach, which is perhaps not as experimental as the studio’s other work has been (though one standout episode has an astonishing first person conceit), but it’s consistently beautiful. 

Those "Dandadan" main titles

Directed by Abel Gongora of "Scott Pilgrim Takes Off" fame, the viral opening credits encompass all of these sides to the show. The backing song – performed by a band called Creepy Nuts, oddly appropriate for this – first kicks things off with wild and energetic rapping before settling into a gentler, poppy hook, almost reflective of the tonal swings in the show that follows. It’s also just an earworm, perhaps even surpassing Gongora’s last efforts as director on the opening for Science Saru’s "Keep Your Hands Off Eizouken!!" which also went viral in its day.

All this and having style to spare, it’s also just fun.

The animation itself complements these change-ups beautifully – shifting art styles as it moves from the quickfire montage of detailed, goofy expressions hinting at the main cast’s personalities to the more heavily stylized touches, as the camera zooms out until the person in frame becomes a shape amidst a block color background. Interspersed throughout are some paintings of the various spirits and aliens, silhouetted against the block colors which within the show itself become strongly associated with them: each spiritual or alien encounter leading to the following scenes being taken over by that single block color. It’s not just a hint at the show’s own style, but a reference to its influences; many have noted that much of the opening refers back to that of the original "Ultraman," the monsters from which have inspired a lot of those in "Dandadan." This wild minute-and-a-half eventually settles into a hint at something more tender as the two main characters lean on each other and look at the stars. 

DandadanMomo in "Dandadan" (Yukinobu Tatsu/Shueisha, DANDADAN Production Committee)

All this and having style to spare, it’s also just fun. There’s giant crabs, guys running so fast they turn into a mess of jagged lines, there’s a maneki-neko doll running around, there’s dancing (modeled on moves from a Rihanna video, as pointed out by some eagle-eyed fans).

https://www.instagram.com/p/DBkOMGxRhTN/?utm_source=ig_web_copy_link&igsh=MzRlODBiNWFlZA==

It speaks to something which has felt missing from a lot of television in recent years, as so many opening sequences have gotten tied up in feeling prestigious, leading down the same road of moody and atmospheric music over a montage of animated statues. Even the animated smash hit "Arcane," which is more eclectic than even "Dandadan" in its visual approach, fell into this same trap as it relented to these prestige TV trends.

"Dandadan’s" opening, for all the influences it proudly presents, doesn’t feel so anonymous. It has personality and energy, no anxiety about not being taken seriously. Admittedly, though on average they trend to being more, well, animated than a lot of TV main titles, anime opening and ending credits tend to follow their own medium's tropes. Think images of hands reaching out the sun, the protagonist running . . . somewhere, the cast falling out of the sky. You can get generic versions of these too; there’s no ironclad rule, and Gongora’s work on "Dandadan" (and "Eizouken") feel idiosyncratic within that space too. 

Why not have an opening that encourages you to sing the title?

Still, they’re at the pinnacle of a format which can sometimes feel like an afterthought, as television gets absorbed more and more into an age of “Skip Intro” buttons and streamers attempting to push you through to the next episode as soon as possible. It should be said that there are notable recent exceptions: think "Peacemaker," "Pachinko" (I promise, I’m not just naming intros with dance routines), "Severance" or "Succession" (there you go). These are shows with different priorities, yes, and anime like "Dandadan" is looking toward pop sensibilities rather than HBO’s “it’s not TV” mindset, something many treat as aspirational. But openings like this (and like "Peacemaker") are part of the fun, a chance to capture the show in microcosm, and chasing trends feels like it diminishes that chance. 

Perhaps this is all part of my wider problem with streaming, the expectation to get everything at once, ravenously consume it, and click to the next thing, rather than have fun with the ritual of television, of seeing something on a weekly basis and growing familiar with it. I can’t get "Dandadan" out of my head, so I’ll be coming back. Why not have an opening that encourages you to sing the title?

Norovirus cases surging in parts of U.S.

Some places in the U.S. are seeing an uptick in cases of the stomach bug known as norovirus

The U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention says there were 91 outbreaks reported during the week of Dec. 5, up from 69 cases the last week of November, per The Associated Press. There have been a maximum of 65 outbreaks reported during the first week of December in recent years.

The highly contagious infection is the leading cause of foodborne illness and causes sudden vomiting and diarrhea. Other symptoms include nausea, stomach pain, body ache, headache and fever. There is no medication to treat it. 

According to the CDC, there are between 19 million to 21 million cases of norovirus a year, and an estimated 900 people die from it while 109,000 are hospitalized. It's estimated that one in every 15 people per year are infected. 

Norovirus is often seen on cruise ships, nursing homes, jails, schools and crowded living conditions. Cases are usually highest between November to April in the U.S. 

Experts have said masking doesn't offer much help to prevent norovirus, since it is spread through direct contact with an infected person, surface, or food and water — not through air. 

They recommend handwashing with soap and water, drinking clean water and paying attention to food safety regulations. Infected people usually start feeling better in about one to three days.

How to break your food delivery habit in 2025

During the pandemic, food delivery became more than a convenience — it became a lifeline. For many of us, it’s still a habit that feels hard to shake. But with rising fees, health goals unmet, and local restaurants squeezed by third-party apps, 2025 might be the year to reassess our reliance on takeout.

I know this because I was there. Delivery meals became a near-nightly occurrence in my household, driven by convenience, but costing us a little more than we realized. The financial strain was obvious — delivery fees, service charges and tips added 30% or more to each meal — but the hidden costs were just as significant. My nutritional goals suffered, and I began to feel disconnected from the joy of cooking and the support I wanted to offer local businesses.

Breaking the habit wasn’t easy, but it was transformative. If you’re ready to do the same, this guide is for you.

Start with your “why”

To break any habit, you need a reason. For me, it was threefold: my health, my wallet and my ethics. I wanted to eat more nutritious meals, save money for bigger goals and do better by the restaurants I love. Food delivery apps often take a significant cut from local businesses, leaving them with a fraction of the money you think you’re spending to support them.

Take a moment to identify your own “why.” Is it financial? A desire to cook more? A way to feel more connected to your community? Write it down. Let it guide your next steps.

Find your roadblocks

Once I had my “why,” I had to figure out what was stopping me from cooking at home. Here’s what I learned:

  • I wasn’t meal planning, which led to last-minute delivery orders.
  • My kitchen was often too cluttered to feel inspiring.
  • I didn’t have easy fixes for nights when cooking felt like too much.
  • Delivery had become a default, especially on busy or lazy nights.

From there, I borrowed a strategy from Kendra Adachi, author of “The Lazy Genius Way”: break big problems into small, actionable solutions.

We need your help to stay independent

Small solutions that work

Plan meals ahead

Meal planning doesn’t have to be elaborate. A few simple steps — like theme nights (Taco Tuesday, Soup Sunday) or jotting down meals for the week — can make a huge difference. Knowing what’s for dinner eliminates the temptation to open a delivery app when hunger strikes.

If meal planning feels overwhelming, start small. I found success by planning just three dinners a week and leaving the rest flexible for leftovers or low-effort meals. Over time, I got better at stocking ingredients for meals we genuinely enjoyed, which made cooking less of a chore and more of a pleasure.

Keep the kitchen ready

A dirty kitchen is the enemy of cooking. Inspired by K.C. Davis’s “How to Keep House While Drowning,” I started practicing “closing duties.” Every night before bed, I empty the sink, store (or freeze) leftovers and wipe down the counters. These three small tasks transformed my relationship with cooking.

This routine became one of my favorite parts of the day. I toss on music, use cleaning products I genuinely enjoy (a good-smelling spray can be oddly motivating) and savor the ritual. Waking up to a clean kitchen not only makes mornings smoother, but also removes an easy excuse to order delivery later.

Stock the freezer

Freezer meals became my secret weapon. I had dabbled in meal prep before but mostly for office lunches—and let’s be honest, they weren’t thrilling. This time, I shifted my focus to comforting dinners that could be made in double batches and frozen for later.

Curries, stews, pasta bakes, pot pies, vegetable lasagnas and Swedish meatballs all became staples. Pinterest and Instagram are full of ideas, and I started thinking of freezer cooking as a favor to “future me.” After a long day of interviews in the Chicago slush, knowing that dinner was just a reheating away was often enough to keep me off the apps.

Plan for “lazy” nights

Not every night needs to involve a full recipe. Delivery often felt easiest on nights when I was low on energy, so I started keeping ingredients for mix-and-match meals on hand.

Shredded rotisserie chicken and bagged salads became a go-to. Omsom noodle kits paired with tofu, rotisserie chicken or frozen meatballs were another lifesaver. Trader Joe’s and Whole Foods freezer sections offered plenty of solid options — from stir-fry kits to frozen pizzas — that felt quicker and cheaper than delivery.

Recreate your favorites

One of the most satisfying parts of this process has been recreating some of my delivery staples at home. Cà ri gà — Vietnamese coconut curry with chicken — now simmers on my stove instead of arriving in a takeout container. Sweetgreen-inspired salads have become a lunchtime highlight. Even pad Thai feels less intimidating thanks to Pinterest’s wealth of dupe recipes.

Learning to make these dishes didn’t just save money; it also gave me a sense of accomplishment. And the best part? They taste even better fresh than they do after languishing in a delivery bag. 

The reward

As I reflect on the past year, I’ve noticed changes beyond the numbers in my bank account. I’ve rediscovered the joy of cooking, embraced a sense of agency over my meals and felt more connected to the food I eat. I also support local restaurants by dining in or ordering directly from their websites, skipping the third-party fees.

Breaking a delivery habit doesn’t mean swearing off takeout entirely—it’s about finding balance. Start small, celebrate your wins, and remember your “why.”

“Under the spell of Orlok”: “Nosferatu” director on making vampires scary again post-“Twilight”

Robert Eggers is one of the most distinctive filmmakers working today and his highly anticipated reimagining of “Nosferatu,” a fever dream of a movie, will not disappoint admirers of his previous films, “The Northman,” “The Lighthouse” and “The Witch.” 

Strikingly filmed with eerie shadows and atmospheric lighting, this variation on Bram Stoker’s “Dracula” has Thomas Hutter (Nicholas Hoult) tasked with a trip to Transylvania to meet with Count Orlok (Bill Skarsgård) about a property he wants to buy in Germany. Thomas’ wife Ellen (Lily-Rose Depp) is upset that her new husband will be gone for several weeks, and while staying with Friedrich and Anna Harding (Aaron Taylor-Johnson and Emma Corrin), she starts having episodes where she becomes spellbound and soon requires the care of Dr. Sievers (Ralph Ineson). 

Meanwhile, Thomas is having episodes of his own after encountering Orlok. From bite marks on his chest to strange dreams, Thomas has to undergo an exorcism of sorts to save himself from Orlok’s grip. And with the help of Professor Albin Eberhart von Franz (Willem Dafoe), Thomas hopes to rescue his wife from Orlok’s sinister clutches. 

Eggers maximizes the terror with jump scares, scene of animalistic behavior, copious bloodletting, rats and vivid images such as Orlok killing a pair of children. The filmmaker spoke with Salon about his vision of “Nosferatu.”

What prompted you to take on “Nosferatu” and what did you imagine in your take on the story?

How far back do you want me to go, Gary? Once upon a time, when I was 9 years old, I watched [F.W.] Murnau’s “Nosferatu.”  I had been into vampires, and it was unlike any vampire movie I’d ever seen. Max Schrek’s portrayal of the vampire seemed real, and the atmosphere was very haunting. The VHS tapes that were around back in the day were made from 16mm prints, so the grainy, degraded quality of the image added to the realism and authenticity. It seemed unearthed from the past. 

"I went to the folklore which was written about and by people who actually believed vampires existed."

Then, when I was in high school, I was still enamored of “Nosferatu,” and I did a school play adaptation of “Nosferatu.” This was seen by an artistic director of a local theater company, who invited me and my friends to do a more professional version at his theater. That experience changed my life and cemented the fact that I wanted to be a director. It made “Nosferatu” an important part of my identity as someone who endeavors to make creative work.

About 10 years ago, because of my obsession and passion for this story, I wanted to make a film of it. The way in — the reason for bothering to do this again — was that I took the cue from Murnau and his collaborators who made the female protagonist the heroine in the final act. I thought, if the female protagonist can be the central character from the beginning, and we see the film through her eyes, there is the opportunity for more emotional and psychological depth in this adaptation. 

NosferatuCount Orlok signs his contract in "Nosferatu" (Focus Features)You are very deliberate with your lighting and shadows, and I love all the scenes of Orlok’s hands or his figure in silhouette. Can you talk about crafting the visuals in the film? Scenes plays out like a fever dream — so the characters and viewers don’t always know what is real. What was your intention with (re)telling the story in this way?

The long unbroken takes framed on the z-axis, where things tend to be centrally framed, are meant to draw the viewer into the world and into the story. There are many passages in the film that are intended to have a kind of dream logic, particularly when Thomas is in the castle and under the spell of Orlok. But even in the scenes that aren’t intended to have dream logic, the way we frame things and move the camera is intended to help with the atmospheric quality you are describing.

Orlok is an imposing figure, and his voice is very distinctive. “His shadow covers you in a nightmare.” Can you talk about how you presented him? 

The cinematic vampire has evolved and climaxed with Edward Cullen [from “Twilight”] as a sparkling, heroic and non-threatening vampire. In order to make this scary again, I went to the folklore which was written about and by people who actually believed vampires existed. Those early vampires from the Baltic and Slavic sources were putrefying, maggot-covered corpses, more like a cinematic zombie, which was exciting and new. So, then the obvious question was: What does a dead Transylvanian nobleman look like?

We need your help to stay independent

Do you believe in vampires, or the uncanny?  

Probably not, but I think that astral vampires are more likely to exist than corporeal vampires, that’s for sure.  

What observations do you have about the connection between sex and death in the story? I found the climactic scene to be both agony and ecstasy. 

That’s what vampires are all about: Eros and Thanatos. That’s why they have been interesting from the beginning and why they continue to be compelling. I watched the Tod Browning movie [“Dracula”] with Bela Lugosi last week again — why, who knows? [laughs] Even though that’s a pretty stodgy movie with all these boring drawing room scenes, when Lugosi is leering over his victims, he is erotically charged. He is portraying a living corpse. It’s exciting.

Can you talk about creating the terror in the film, the graphic violence and gory moments? 

You are always trying to modulate by instinct what is tasteful and what is distasteful. One of my favorite horror movies is “The Innocents” by Jack Clayton, which does not have anything explicit visually and even the dialogue is incredibly coded, but it makes your imagination go wild with horror. Even though “Nosferatu” is certainly more explicit than that film, I try to keep things like that in mind. There are one and a half jump scares in “The Witch,” but this is the first time I am attempting to do very traditional jump scares. While there were other horror films before it, Murnau kind of invented horror movies. I am obviously in conversation with horror history in making this movie, so I felt obligated to have jump scares that hopefully are moving the story forward and not just the next stop on the haunted house ride at the amusement park. 

NosferatuWillem Dafoe as Professor Albin Eberhart von Franz and Lily-Rose Depp as Ellen Hutter in "Nosferatu" (Focus Features)

I’m curious about your thoughts on the Van Helsing character, Prof. von Franz, who becomes the most interesting character. He is looking at science more than the uncanny. Can you talk about him? 

He is definitely a man of contemporary science of 1838, the world in which he lives. Yet he is also interested in outdated notions of alchemy, and the occult, and peristalsis and other medieval ideas. He sees the value of all of those things. He sees the beauty in the darkness, not just the light. That makes him a curious person and a compelling character, and also the only character who can see Ellen for who she actually is. 

The film addresses issues of power, faith and love. There is a kind of morality throughout in how the characters behave. What are your thoughts about these themes? 

Von Franz puts it best when he says, “God is beyond our morals.” I think that Ellen is on a different plane of understanding than most human beings, certainly in — it’s not England, but we’ll call it a Victorian society for short. What is the gray in between good and evil?

NosferatuAdéla Hesová stars as Clara Harding and Milena Konstantinova as Louise Harding in "Nosferatu" (Focus Features)

It is very easy with Dracula-themed work to tip into camp or go grisly. You find an appropriate tone in making the film earnest and respectful to the material. Can you talk about how you leaned into the source material but also put your own spin on the legend?

"Archetypal stories, fairy tales, myths, fables and legends always work."

Thank you. My approach was endeavoring to recreate the verisimilitude of the period and how people thought in that era. All the costumes, even if they seem over the top in places, are taken from research and put on the screen. The only “intentionally stylized” aspect is the fairy-tale framing of things. Every object, from a pocket watch to a castle to a petticoat, is drawn from that world. The accumulation of details creates an atmosphere. The accuracy is not so important for the storytelling yet it enables the audience to unconsciously feel that this world is grounded in something real. It is not just invented. I am always trying to find ways to keep it grounded. 

The other thing that is stylized is the music which always acts as subtext to a scene. Hopefully, it’s not clearly describing what you are watching. Rather, it is adding something to the image, and certainly, the sound design stylizes things. But even when we go into the gothic and uncanny and horror and weird with the sound design, I still try to have a few naturalistic elements to tether us to reality. 

What is the appeal of making films like “Nosferatu” for today’s society? 

Not trying to be cagey, but archetypal stories, fairy tales, myths, fables and legends always work. You can always see yourself in them. And these are the stories that get told repeatedly. We tell “Hansel and Gretel” to our children and go to see “Oedipus” and “King Lear” on stage because they always work. You don’t need to bend it and reshape it to talk about now; it becomes now. Obviously, I have added and changed things in “Nosferatu” which haven’t been featured before. I don’t live in a vacuum, so some of the things I have added may speak more directly to the contemporary world, but I am not making work with any kind of specific message. But certainly, Lily-Rose’s character, as a female outsider, and as a victim of 19th century society, seems to be speaking to a lot of contemporary audience members. 

“Nosferatu” is currently in theaters nationwide.

 

Trump asks Supreme Court to delay TikTok ban

President-elect Donald Trump has asked the Supreme Court to delay a ban on TikTok so he can find a way to save the social media app that he once tried to bar from the U.S. 

TikTok faces a ban if its parent company, ByteDance, does not follow a new federal law that requires it to be sold to a non-Chinese company by Jan. 19, the day before Trump is inaugurated. The law received bipartisan support from members of Congress, who said because the app can track and collect data on its 170 million American users, it poses a national security risk.

Trump took the same position in his first term as president, but successfully courted younger voters on TikTok this year and said after his reelection he has "a warm spot in my heart" for the app, where he has 14.7 million followers. 

The Supreme Court is scheduled to hear TikTok's First Amendment challenge to the law on Jan. 10. A brief filed with the court on Friday said Trump "takes no position on the underlying merits of this dispute." It warned about setting "a dangerous global precedent" on government censorship "by exercising the extraordinary power to shut down an entire social-media platform based, in large part, on concerns about disfavored speech on that platform."

The brief says Trump "alone possesses the consummate dealmaking expertise, the electoral mandate, and the political will to negotiate a resolution to save the platform while addressing the national security concerns expressed by the Government," ABC News reported.

Trump's turnaround comes four years after he tried to ban TikTok through an executive order that directed ByteDance to divest its U.S. interests or face broad sanctions, The New York Times reported. The order, issued after Trump criticized China's handling of the coronavirus pandemic, said the app "threatens to allow the Chinese Communist Party access to Americans' personal and proprietary information — potentially allowing China to track the locations of federal employees and contractors, build dossiers of personal information for blackmail and conduct corporate espionage," per The New York Times. A federal judge blocked the ban, saying Trump had overstepped his authority. 

Earlier this year, Trump told CNBC he still considered TikTok a national security threat but that young people "will go crazy without it" and that banning it would empower Facebook, which he said he considers "an enemy of the people."

Media outlets report that his change of mind came around the same time he met with Jeff Yass, a major Republican donor with financial ties to TikTok's parent company. Trump said they didn't discuss the company, per The New York Times, but critics said the connection underscores concerns that donors wield significant influence over policymaking.

Trump met last week with TikTok CEO Shou Chew, The Associated Press reported. TikTok executives also have reached out to Elon Musk, who owns their competitor, X, and who has found success in guiding Trump on other issues, The Wall Street Journal reported.