Spring Sale: Get 1 Year, Save 58%

“Trump fatigue” is hype: The GOP is still firmly in Donald Trump’s grip — and that may haunt them

It appears that the GOP establishment is pursuing one of its typically lame quixotic attempts to see if it might be possible to oust Donald Trump from the leadership of their party. Or, at least, they are working hard to persuade the mainstream media to tell all those suburban swing voters that they’re trying.

We’ve seen multiple articles in recent days making the case that Trump is weakening and that GOP leadership is taking a strong hand to the party in advance of the 2022 election. Some ambitious politicians even took to the Sunday shows to proclaim their independence.

Did I mention they were lame?

Donald Trump may have “dropped” to 50% support from Republicans polled but that would still translate into a primary election landslide. (And I suspect that Larry Hogan is not a serious threat to Donald Trump in today’s GOP in any case.) According to an NBC News poll, just before the 2020 election, 54% of Republicans said they were more a supporter of Donald Trump than the Republican Party and only 38% said they were supporters of the GOP. In January of this year, the numbers are almost reversed with 56% saying they are supporters of the Republican Party and 36% saying they identify as Trump supporters.

Again, the problem is that the third of the party who consider themselves Trump uber allies adds up to a lot of people — and they are the most active and energized. And a majority of Republicans still like Trump and will happily vote for him in a general election anyway. Nonetheless, there are some hairline cracks in the coalition.


Want a daily wrap-up of all the news and commentary Salon has to offer? Subscribe to our morning newsletter, Crash Course.


TIME magazine recently reported that one of the little fractures in the GOP foundation is around vaccines. Apparently, a lot of Trump’s followers are truly offended that he promoted vaccines. They quote one supporter saying, “why lose half your base over a faulty vaccine actively being used to take away rights?” and another saying, “I love Trump but this shit is getting intolerable.”

RELATED: Trump can’t save vaccine-hesitant Republicans: Fox News has turned the GOP into a death cult

We know he wants desperately to be given credit for the vaccines and possibly be given the Nobel Prize or perhaps even granted sainthood for this great personal achievement. Some of his advisers believe it’s a good issue for him going into 2024, as well. But his followers aren’t having it and it appears he’s backed off and has joined the right’s febrile caterwauling about “mandates” to cover for it, prompting one of his supporters to say after one of his recent rallies, “not hearing President Trump pushing the ‘vaccines’ was my favorite part of last night’s speech.”

Perhaps more concerning to Trump, Republican polling firm Echelon Insights released a poll this month that showed Republicans would prefer Trump over Florida Governor Ron DeSantis by 57% to 32% — down from 62% to 22% in October. It’s still a big lead, but it’s not quite the juggernaut it was a year ago. Echelon’s Kirsten Soltis Anderson told the New York Times that many of the people she polled showed “a shocking level of ambivalence” about voting again for Trump. She said they liked his policies (whatever they are) but are finally expressing a bit of what sounds to me like “Trump fatigue” after all this time.

These numbers are inspiring headlines like the Washington Post’s on Sunday which said, “A weakened Trump? As some voters edge away, he battles parts of the Republican Party he once ran.” Reporters Michael Shear and Josh Dawsey write:

The former president’s power within the party and his continued focus on personal grievances is increasingly questioned behind closed doors at Republican gatherings, according to interviews with more than a dozen prominent Republicans in Washington and across the country, including some Trump advisers. Many spoke on the condition of anonymity because there remains significant fear of attracting Trump’s public wrath.

I think we can see the problem with this entire thesis, right there, can’t we? These people who are “questioning” Trump’s power are still terrified of his wrath. It seems to me that’s the very definition of power.

GOP pollster Frank Luntz explains further that the real problem lies with the defection of independents, telling the Post, “He is still God among Republicans, but independents don’t want him to run again. They have had enough.” That’s a problem for Trump. No one of either party can win without independent votes.

The article contends that this is all a matter of diverging priorities: Trump wants to wreak revenge on Republicans he believes have crossed him and put in place sycophants and cronies while Republican leaders want to find “palatable candidates most able to win in November.” I would suggest that those aren’t just diverging priorities. They are completely at odds.

Certainly, Mitch McConnell seems to think so.

On Sunday, the New York Times’ Jonathan Martin reported on the machinations behind the scenes to topple Trump from his perch atop the Republican Party once and for all and it’s not going well. McConnell, the GOP’s leader in the Senate, is having a terrible time recruiting good candidates for the midterm and Trump has been flexing his muscle in a number of Senate races, pushing “goofballs” as McConnell sees them. It’s anyone’s guess how many of those goofballs will succeed in their primaries and how well they will do in a general election.


Want a daily wrap-up of all the news and commentary Salon has to offer? Subscribe to our morning newsletter, Crash Course.


It’s clear that Trump has lost some altitude over the past few months. It’s understandable since he’s no longer in the public eye every day and has lost his connection to his base through social media as well. The mainstream media outlets aren’t covering his rallies live and he is irrelevant to the legislative sausage making that’s consumed much of the political coverage of the past few months.

RELATED: Republicans in chaos: Conflict with Trump endangers GOP Senate prospects

However, this may end up being a silver lining for him if he can allow himself to tone down the obsessive stolen election mantra and concentrate on the “policies” his followers allegedly love so much: degrading their political enemies and demeaning immigrants and people of color.

Being out of the spotlight allows Trump to re-enter the scene and offer up something new for his followers, some fresh insults, some new lies. His tedious rambling about stolen ballots has its place among their list of grievances but they need some new red meat.

I don’t know if he’s capable of pulling himself out of his funk and doing what needs to be done. And frankly, I’m not sure it really matters all that much. For all of this whispering among the establishment good old boys and the faint murmurs among some Republicans and Independent voters, it’s hard to see how he can lose if he decides to run even if half the Party just wishes he would go away, It’s the other half, the half that can’t get enough of him, that’s driving the bus. And they will run right over anyone who stands between them and their Dear Leader. 

Republicans have dropped the mask — they openly support fascism. What do we do about it?

Those of us who have repeatedly sounded the alarm about the Republican Party’s threat to democracy and American society have often been told we were exaggerating or being ridiculous. We were hyperbolic, attention-seeking or just plain wrong — because, after all, the Republican Party’s leaders and voters really do love America.

Last week the Republican National Committee dropped any remaining pretexts of patriotism or love of democracy with its now-infamous statement that those who attacked the U.S. Capitol on Jan. 6, 2021, were “ordinary citizens engaged in legitimate political discourse.” Reports suggest that a draft version of that RNC statement was even bolder in its embrace of right-wing terrorism.

Last Friday’s statement of support for fascism announced that the Republican Party has birthed a monster that will ultimately eat it alive. But looking beyond outrage and disgust, what does this tell us about America in this moment of existential crisis?

In terms of the mainstream news media and America’s political class, it reveals how deep the capacity for denial goes. Many of the same voices who insisted that the Republicans were not fascists and did not pose an existential threat to democracy also downplayed or outright dismissed the obvious evidence that Donald Trump and his cabal were going to attempt a coup to nullify the 2020 presidential election.

RELATED: If America really surrenders to fascism, then what? Painful questions lie ahead

Many of these same gatekeepers and boundary keepers then claimed that the Jan. 6 coup was a one-off, a disorganized and spontaneous “riot,” and that the long-term existential dangers were exaggerated. Why? Because they were invested in the idea that “the institutions” had worked, and that Trump’s coup was doomed to fail from the beginning, thanks to “democratic norms” and the “rule of law.”

Now, more than a year after the attack on the Capitol, there is a mountain of evidence that confirms what was obvious at the time, and even before: Trump’s coup attempt was a highly coordinated nationwide effort, whose ultimate goal was to overthrow multiracial democracy and install Trump as de facto dictator.

Ultimately, the Republican Party’s embrace of fascism as a now-indispensable part of its identity should not be a surprise. This devolution was years in the making. In a recent essay for the New Republic, Michael Tomasky summarizes this: 

The conservative movement that started in Barry Goldwater’s time was once an element within the GOP. Then along came Newt Gingrich, the key figure who intensified the culture war, and in time the conservative movement swallowed the party whole — and moved hard to the right while doing it.

And now, in the Trump era, it has become what it’s been in process of becoming for some time: an extremist, pro-violence party. The Anti-Defamation League recently released a report finding that more than 100 Republican candidates on various ballots in 2022 have explicitly embraced extremism or violence — House candidates boasting about having the backing of white supremacist leaders, at least 45 candidates giving credence to QAnon conspiracy theories.

This is not some aberration that time will correct. It is a storm that will continue to gather strength, because it’s where the action and the money are, and no one in the GOP is opposing it — except the two people who were just essentially read out of the party (Kinzinger is retiring after his current House term).

The Republican Party, like Michael Palin’s parrot, has ceased to be. It has become an appendage of Trump dedicated to doing his will and smiting his enemies.

A week or so after the fact, the mainstream news media has already moved on from the Republican National Committee’s embrace of fascism. If the American mainstream news media was truly the “guardian of democracy,” it would explain how the Republican fascist movement is an indictment of the country’s political culture.


Want a daily wrap-up of all the news and commentary Salon has to offer? Subscribe to our morning newsletter, Crash Course.


The headlines of the month and central narrative of the year should be grappling with the following damning question: How did one of the country’s two main institutional political parties come to embrace fascism and right-wing terrorism? What does this mean for the future of the country? These questions are not being asked in a sustained way. Instead, the media is defaulting to the story of the day: “hot takes,” horserace reporting, Beltway gossip and both-sides-ism, amounting to a refusal to take any moral stand on the country’s democracy crisis and the Republicans’ responsibility for creating it.

More than 50 years ago. Hannah Arendt described the role that today’s Republican Party plays as a front organization for fascism and authoritarianism in her essential work “The Origins of Totalitarianism“:  

The front organizations surround the movements’ membership with a protective wall which separates them from the outside, normal world; at the same time, they form a bridge back into normalcy, without which the members in the prepower stage would feel too sharply the differences between their beliefs and those of normal people, between the lying fictitiousness of their own and the reality of the normal world.

The ingeniousness of this device during the movements’ struggle for power is that the front organizations not only isolate the members but offer them a semblance of outside normalcy which wards off the impact of true reality more effectively than mere indoctrination….

The world at large, on the other side, usually gets its first glimpse of a totalitarian movement through its front organizations. The sympathizers, who are to all appearances still innocuous fellow-citizens in a nontotalitarian society, can hardly be called single-minded fanatics; through them, the movements make their fantastic lies more generally acceptable, can spread their propaganda in milder, more respectable forms, until the whole atmosphere is poisoned with totalitarian elements which are hardly recognizable as such but appear to be normal political reactions or opinions.

As a front organization for American neofascism, the Republican Party’s long-term strategy and goal is to normalize right-wing violence as a means of creating a “state of exception,” in which they can impose their will on others without restraint by usurping civil and human rights, free speech, the rule of law, the Constitution and finally democracy itself.

The Republican Party’s open declaration that it supports terrorism and other political violence offers an opportunity to remind the American people of the power of lists and keeping accurate records and accounts of this crisis. What is fascism, on its most fundamental level? An assault on reality, time, facts and truth. Correctly documenting reality and the facts are a practical way of staying grounded and refusing to be overwhelmed by this tsunami of events.

Americans who support democracy must now accept that elites and other political leaders will not save them. In fact, they must pressure the country’s elites through a range of actions, perhaps including national strikes, boycotts, civil disobedience and other forms of direct action. They should consider joining (or even forming) local organizations and other civil society groups to make possible the grassroots organizing that can resist and then defeat American neofascism. Those who have the material resources to support such efforts must consider how best to use them.

Pro-democracy Americans need to understand that the struggle against American neofascism will be long and difficult. There is no rapid or easy solution to this crisis. Defeating fascism will require personal and collective sacrifice. 

Writing at the Atlantic, Linda Hirshman offers these lessons from American history and the Black Freedom Struggle, which merit being quoted at length:

The fault lines of today’s political chasm go back to the decades that preceded the Civil War. One can see them in our geography — most of the states that will recriminalize abortion, for example, are in the old Confederacy and the rural or deindustrialized regions it influenced — and in our racial division, which continues to render the country into, more or less, two camps. …

Today’s challenges are different — and no offense can be compared with the slavocracy of the antebellum period — but anyone who cares about basic principles of democracy can see that our struggle is much the same. In 2013, the Supreme Court put the Democrats at an enormous disadvantage by gutting the Voting Rights Act and handing back elections to the minority-party-dominated rural-state legislatures. Despite repeated efforts of most of the Democratic senators, Congress has refused to pass a new voting-rights act. In several key states, Republican legislatures have set up new systems that may overturn future election results. Sometime in June, the Supreme Court is likely to rule that American women no longer have a constitutional right to refuse to bear a child, despite the fact that polls regularly show that the overwhelming majority of Americans support some level of abortion rights.

These are dark times, but dark times do not always prevail. Four decades after Black spokesmen told their white so-called friends in the execrable American Colonization Society that they would not be returned to Africa, and just 30-plus years after the Black activist David Walker published an “appeal to the Colored Citizens of the World” promising that “the blacks,” once started, would form a “gang of tigers and lions,” the newborn Republican Party won the presidency on a platform of restricting slavery. Ten years after Garrison torched his copy of the Constitution, Abraham Lincoln signed the Emancipation Proclamation. How did they do it?

The specifics of their fight are not identical to what prodemocracy Americans now face. But the work of the abolitionist movement is comprehensible and replicable. It is the closest thing we have to a blueprint for how to rescue our democracy.

Almost every tactic the mostly white abolitionists used derived from methods that Black organizers tried first. Walker’s appeal, published in 1829, inspired Garrison. There was a Black convention and Lodge movement well before the first white or interracial antislavery society. But one lesson emerges loudly from history: Neither Black nor white Americans could have done it alone.

They made an alliance, and they dug in for the long haul. And they left a playbook.

Americans who believe in democracy must balance optimism and realism, but without succumbing to fatalism. The fight has hardly begun, and too many people are exhausted and have preemptively surrendered. Most important of all, pro-democracy Americans should resist the temptation or urge to compromise with their enemies or appease them. There is no room for “bipartisanship,” compromise or truce with the Republican fascists and their allies. That only normalizes evil and all but guarantees the fascists an eventual victory.

Unfortunately, the leaders of the Democratic Party have not learned this lesson. President Biden recently spoke at the National Prayer Breakfast, one day before the Republican National Committee’s official embrace of the Jan. 6 insurrection. At the breakfast, Biden spoke directly to Senate Republican leader Mitch McConnell, saying, “Mitch, I don’t want to hurt your reputation, but we really are friends. And that is not an epiphany we’re having at the moment. You’re a man of your word, you’re a man of honor. Thank you for being my friend.”

RELATED: Biden pleads for unity — in speech at anti-LGBTQ, faux-bipartisan Prayer Breakfast

In the midst of an existential threat brought on by the Republicans and their followers, the president of the United States told the most powerful Republican legislator, with evident sincerity, that he was a friend. That crystallizes all the ways the Democratic leadership is not reacting with the urgency of now to save American democracy. Biden’s words suggest that he and his party are simply not up to the challenge of defending American democracy from the fascist onslaught.

As so often occurs in moments of great struggle and challenge, the few must save the many. And that salvation, if it comes, will not come from the so-called leaders in Washington. Who will step forward?

Read more on the resurgence of fascism in America:

Biden’s nominees have a clear path to confirmation — that is, if they’re white

A government watchdog group has found that President Biden’s nominees of color have faced tougher confirmations than white nominees — and this report comes as the president prepares to nominate a Supreme Court justice, who has said will be a Black woman.

The White House has repeatedly touted Biden’s diverse appointees but the Senate has confirmed Biden’s white and male nominees at a significantly faster rate than nominees of color, according to a new report from the government watchdog group Accountable.US, which  was shared with Salon ahead of its release.

White and male nominees for a range of positions at the Justice, State, Commerce, Energy, and Interior departments “generally received the fastest track through the Congressional process, having waited less time to go from their official nominations to receiving a Senate hearing, as well as receiving their confirmations quicker than other identity groups,” the report says.

Biden will soon nominate a replacement for retiring Supreme Court Justice Stephen Breyer. The president has repeatedly promised to nominate the first Black woman to the Supreme Court, drawing criticism from Republican lawmakers and conservative pundits. Of the 114 Supreme Court justices in the nation’s history, 107  have been white men.

“The fact that President Biden’s white male nominees across several critical departments were confirmed by the U.S. Senate far more quickly than his nominees of color is deeply concerning, especially as lawmakers prepare to consider his forthcoming nominee for U.S. Supreme Court,” Kyle Herrig, president of Accountable.US, said in a statement to Salon.

RELATED: GOP senator thinks Biden’s “woke” SCOTUS pick won’t know “law book from a J.Crew catalog”

Sen. Alex Padilla, D-Calif., on Thursday called Republicans’ treatment of Biden’s nominees of color “demeaning, offensive, and just plain wrong” during a Senate Judiciary vote on Andre Mathis, one of Biden’s judicial nominees. Sen. Marsha Blackburn, R-Tenn., last month said that Mathis had a “rap sheet with a laundry list of citations,” referring to some traffic tickets the nominee got more than a decade earlier.

“Mr. Mathis, unfortunately, isn’t the only nominee to receive this kind of treatment,” Padilla said. “It’s not lost on me that nominees of color have been treated differently in our hearings, whether it’s insinuations of rap sheets, or hostility about their qualifications or views, or undue scrutiny of their personal religious faith.”

About 45% of Biden’s Justice Department nominees have been people of color and 40% have been women. But white nominees advanced through the confirmation process about 60% faster than nonwhite appointees, according to the report. White nominees went from hearing to confirmation in an average of 21.8 days, compared to 35 days for nonwhite nominees. Of the five Justice Department nominees who faced the longest delays, four were nonwhite and the other was David Chipman, a gun control advocate who withdrew himself from consideration to lead the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives.

Kristen Clarke, the first woman of color to lead the DOJ’s civil rights division, waited 125 days after the nomination to be confirmed amid considerable Republican resistance, which NAACP president Derrick Johnson and other supporters argued was “racially motivated.”

Biden nominated civil rights attorney Vanita Gupta, the first woman of color to serve as associate attorney general, on his first day in office last January. She was not confirmed until 91 days later. The National Women’s Law Center blamed Republican opposition to Gupta on “sexism and racism.”

White male nominees have also advanced faster for State Department roles. White male nominees were confirmed 15.3 days faster than nonwhite women and 7.7 days faster than nonwhite men. Of the five State Department nominees who faced the longest delays, three were nonwhite and the other two were white women.

White Commerce Department nominees also received a confirmation hearing an average of 20 days faster than nonwhite nominees and were confirmed an average of 49 days faster than nonwhite nominees. White male nominees, in particular, received hearings within 72.7 days of their nominations compared to 158 days for nonwhite male nominees, 117 days for nonwhite female nominees, and 103.7 days for white female nominees. Arun Venkataraman, Biden’s nominee to serve as the department’s assistant secretary — who is of Indian descent — is still awaiting confirmation more than 230 days after he was nominated.


Want a daily wrap-up of all the news and commentary Salon has to offer? Subscribe to our morning newsletter, Crash Course.


A similar trend has played out among Biden’s 12 Energy Department nominees. Male nominees received a hearing within 32.5 days of their nominations, compared to 66 days for female nominees. Male nominees were also confirmed in an average of 84.8 days compared to 131 days for female nominees.

Shalanada Baker, who was nominated to head the department’s Office of Minority Economic Impact, and Asmeret Berhe, the nominee to lead the department’s Office of Science, have waited more than 260 days for confirmation since they were nominated last April.

At the Interior Department, male nominees received congressional hearings in an average of 32.3 days after nomination, compared to 64.9 days for female nominees. Deputy Secretary Tommy Beaudreau, the only white male nominee among Biden’s 11 Interior appointments thus far, had the fastest track, receiving a confirmation hearing within 14 days of his nomination. By comparison, nonwhite female candidates waited an average of 59 days and white female candidates waited an average of 67 days. Beaudreau was confirmed within 63 days while nonwhite males waited an average of 112.7 days, nonwhite females waited 96 days and white females waited 111 days. Three nominees for the department who have yet to be confirmed are all women, including assistant secretary pick Cynthia Statchelberg, who has waited more than 260 days, and fellow assistant secretary nominee Laura Daniel-Davis, who has waited more than 200 days.

“These racial and gender disparities should sound alarm bells across Washington for anyone who wants President Biden’s nominee for Supreme Court or any other position to have a fair and timely confirmation hearing,” Herrig said.

While Republican leaders have reportedly urged members to avoid staging a showdown over Biden’s upcoming Supreme Court nominee — which they do not have the votes to block — some Senate Republicans have criticized Biden for vowing to nominate a Black woman, even though former Presidents Ronald Reagan and Donald Trump both promised to nominate women to the high court as well.

Sen. Roger Wicker, R-Miss., suggested that a Black woman on the Supreme Court would be the “beneficiary” of affirmative action. Sen. Ted Cruz, R-Texas, said it was “offensive” to rule out white candidates because Black women only make up “6% of the population,” and suggested it was “actually an insult to Black women.” Right-wing pundits on Fox News have aired similar arguments before Biden has even selected a nominee.

During last Thursday’s Judiciary Committee vote, Democratic senators lashed out the treatment of Biden’s nominees of color.

Sen. Pat Leahy, D-Vt., the Senate president pro tem, suggested he perceived a trend “charges made against some nominees … in some cases, thinly veiled charges, because they’re a woman or a person of color.”

That wasn’t the first time Leahy has used the committee’s hearings to criticize Republicans for their handling of certain nominees. “I have respect for this committee, but I also look at the record of how the votes go on nominees,” he said during a confirmation hearing for Jennifer Sung, another judicial nominee. “I’ve seen, in my years here, which is longer than anybody else’s, a disproportionate number of votes… against women and people of color, especially women of color.”

Read more:

AOC rallies for Texas progressives: New hope for midterms?

Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez of New York spent the weekend in Texas as she headlined rallies with a pair of progressive candidates vying to join her in Washington next year by winning upcoming elections in the Lone Star State.

With Democratic primaries in Texas set for March 1, Ocasio-Cortez appeared at events for both Jessica Cisneros, challenging Democratic incumbent Rep. Henry Cuellar in the 28th congressional district, and Greg Casar, running for an open seat in the state’s newly-created 35th district. Both districts stretch from Austin to areas in and around San Antonio.

Sen. Ted Cruz, a Republican, “could never,” tweeted AOC on Sunday afternoon as she shared a video of herself dancing with constituents following an afternoon rally with Casar in San Antonio:

At a rally on Saturday, Ocasio-Cortez bolstered both candidates by saying that Texas deserves more members in Congress willing to fight for working people and families over corporate interests.

“If we send a Democrat who doesn’t give a damn about people, why would we expect people to vote for that person?” she said. “How can we win when we don’t stand for anything? We have to stand for something in order to bring it home.”


Want a daily wrap-up of all the news and commentary Salon has to offer? Subscribe to our morning newsletter, Crash Course.


Ocasio-Cortez said she was in Texas “to support two incredible game-changing candidates — both, I think, for the Democratic Party, but, frankly, for the country writ large.”

In separate comments, she said she was in town because of the “long game” Democrats must be playing — and not just in safely blue states. “We flip Texas,” she said, “we flip the country.”

“Cisneros has really shown what is possible — not only here in San Antonio but all the way down in South Texas,” said AOC at the Saturday rally. “She’s shown that we don’t have to accept status quo politics before we actually fight for change.”

During a canvas launch party hosted by CWA Local 6143 on Saturday, Ocasio-Cortez and Cisneros were welcomed by union members and the New York Democrat described why deep canvassing in Texas and elsewhere remains one of the most vital tools if progressives want to win:

Sharing a video of Sunday’s rally, Casar said a “better Texas is possible” so long as the people of Texas fight and organize for it.

During the rally, Casar credited Ocasio-Cortez for being an organizer who later “shook the halls of Congress” by running and winning as a bold progressive.

“She reignited in me and so many of us a fire by instead of talking about what can’t get done, what it is possible for us to do,” he said. “She showed us that when the people lead, the politicians must follow — that’s what we’re gonna do.”

Read more:

A Jan. 6 committee investigator goes over the data

Former Rep. Denver Riggleman (R-VA), a top investigator for the House Select Committee on Jan. 6, hinted over the weekend that the American public will be shocked when they see the results of the committee’s investigation.

“Once you see the data, you can’t unsee it,” Riggleman tweeted on Saturday. “And if you understand the data, you want others to see and understand it.”

He suggested that the general public would see the data “when it’s time.”

Riggleman, a former Republican congressman, was hired by the Jan. 6 Committee as a senior staff member in August.

“Doing this might be one of the biggest things I’ve ever done in my life,” Riggleman said after taking the job. “We can’t worry about the color of the jerseys anymore or whether we have an R or a D next to our name. It’s time for us to look in a fact-based way at what happened on January 6 and to see if we can prevent this from ever happening again in the future.”

GOP lawmaker fined for campaign law violations

A Republican congressman in Arizona has been fined by the Federal Election Commission (FEC) for misappropriation of campaign funds, according to new reports.

Business Insider reports that Rep. David Schweikert (R-Ariz.) has agreed to a penalty payment of $125,000. According to campaign finance documents disclosed by the FEC on Friday, February 11, the commission has determined that the Republican lawmaker repeatedly violated campaign finance laws from 2010 to 2017.

A Republican congressman in Arizona has been fined by the Federal Election Commission (FEC) for misappropriation of campaign funds, according to new reports.

Business Insider reports that Rep. David Schweikert (R-Ariz.) has agreed to a penalty payment of $125,000. According to campaign finance documents disclosed by the FEC on Friday, February 11, the commission has determined that the Republican lawmaker repeatedly violated campaign finance laws from 2010 to 2017.

Per Insider:

“Specifically, Schweikert failed to disclose at least $300,000 in loans or loan repayments to his campaign accounts, falsely reported other transactions, and paid $270,000 to a consulting firm operated by his chief of staff, Oliver Schwab, violating ethics rules that restrict outside income for senior congressional aides.”

In a statement to Insider, Schweikert’s spokesperson, Chris Baker, blamed Schwab for the campaign’s repeated violations.

“No one has been more directly harmed by the malfeasance of Congressman Schweikert’s former Chief of Staff than the campaign,” he said in a statement. “While he has had no relationship or involvement with the campaign committee for several years now, we felt it was the right thing to self report his violations and enter into a conciliation agreement with the FEC.”

This $125,000 fine follows Schweikert’s previous $50,000 fine. According to Arizona Central, the lawmaker had a total of 11 ethics violations as a result of a lengthy House Ethics Committee investigation. In the report for that investigation, Schweikert was criticized for making vague and misleading statements to “evade the statute of limitations for the most egregious violations of campaign finance laws.”

“Throughout the course of this investigation, Representative Schweikert made vague or misleading statements to the (investigative subcommittee) and (the Office of Congressional Ethics) that allowed him to evade the statute of limitations for the most egregious violations of campaign finance laws, his document productions were slow or non-responsive to several of the ISC’s requests for information regarding (Federal Election Commission) errors, and he gave self-serving testimony that lacked candor,” the report said.

The statement comes one month after Schweikert and Schwab came to a conciliation agreement with the FEC. The commission has approved the agreement. Schweikert’s campaign committee will pay a $125,000 fine for civil penalties while Schwab will pay a $7,500 fine. The lawmaker’s committee will also amend its reports as part of the agreement.

Want to master Wordle? Here’s the best strategy for your first guess

As Wordle has skyrocketed in popularity, multiple media outlets have published articles that explore the best word to use as your initial guess.

Often the authors of these pieces theorize that the word ought to be one that uses as many vowels as possible, contains letters that frequently appear in English or possesses features that regularly occur in the language.

Well, my finance students and I decided to tackle this question in as definitive a manner as possible by determining the optimal first word to play in Wordle.

Our analysis actually ran through all possible combinations of five-letter words and ran simulations across all possible iterations – over 1 million of them – to figure out the best starting strategy.

A “tried” and true approach

In Wordle, players have six attempts to guess a five-letter word. Each time the player makes a guess, they learn whether each letter is correct and in the right location, appears in the word in another location or isn’t in the word at all.

Players can have different approaches. Some might simply want to solve the word, even if it takes six tries. Others try to do it in as a few guesses as possible.

Based on our analysis, if you’re trying to win in as few guesses as possible, the top three words to go with are “slice,” “tried” and “crane.” Using any of these three words will produce an average number of word attempts of 3.90, 3.92, and 3.92, respectively, if you’re using an optimal strategy to play (more on that later).

If, on the other hand, you’re simply trying to win within the allotted six guesses, the top three words to play are “adept,” “clamp” and “plaid.” Using any of these three words will yield an average success rate in winning the game of 98.79%, 98.75%, and 98.75%, respectively, if you’re playing the optimal strategy.

And herein lies the first interesting distinction between playing to win and playing to win in as few guesses as possible.

If you’re playing to win in the allotted six guesses, it appears best to play a word that has just one vowel and four consonants in it, as six out of the top 10 words have just one vowel. But if you’re playing to win in as few guesses as possible, it’s best to play a word that has two vowels and three consonants: All of the top 10 have two vowels.

Inside the simulations

Other researchers, such as David Sidhu at University College London, have tried to determine the “best first word” from a linguistic perspective. In these efforts, the best selection is decided by how often certain letters appear in the English language, or the frequency of where these letters are located in five-letter words.

While these approaches are noble, our analysis extends beyond them by actually performing simulations across all possible word options to find the best type of word to play first.

To perform this analysis, two of my students, Tao Wei and Kanwal Ahmad, constructed a program that went through all 2,315 official five-letter words in Wordle’s dictionary. The program attempted each possible word as a first guess and ran simulations across all possible end word solutions, checking how long each attempt would take to guess the correct end word – 1,692,265 total simulations.

We then averaged all attempts for each word to see how many guesses one could expect to make to get to the correct end word.

To perform this massive simulation requires a method for picking the optimal word on the second guess, third guess and so on.

To give yourself the best odds on each ensuing guess, it’s important to select letters that are most likely to appear in each position. So the program used the list of 2,315 total words to determine the frequency at which each letter appears.

After receiving the results from the previous guess, the program filtered down the possible words to those that meet the criteria. Say the first guess were “bloke,” and L and E were in the correct position, while B, O and K didn’t appear in the solution. The program would then narrow down the list of possible words to those like “flume” and “slate.”

The program then assigns a score to each word in this list, where the score is the sum of the frequency of its letters. The word “slate,” for example, has a score of 37% because the letter “S” appears 5% of the time in the full list, while the letter appears “A” 8% of the time, and so on. The word with the highest score is then submitted as the next guess.

Running this simulation over all possible first guesses and against all possible solutions yielded the results.

But maybe you don’t want to start with the same word every time you play. In that case – and if you want to win with the fewest guesses – try making sure your first guess has two vowels, with one of them at the end of the word.

If you’re just looking to win within the allotted six guesses, then you may want to consider a word with fewer vowels – and definitely a word that ends in a consonant.

Hopefully our mathematical approach to Wordle hasn’t sucked all the joy out of the game. At the very least, it’ll give you a leg up if you decide to put a friendly wager on tomorrow’s game.

Derek Horstmeyer, Professor of Finance, George Mason University

This article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license. Read the original article.

Jodie Whittaker’s “Doctor Who” regeneration will be slightly different

Every Doctor on “Doctor Who” eventually regenerates, with the old actor making way for a new one to take their place. So it will be with Jodie Whittaker’s Thirteenth Doctor. But while most Doctor’s regenerate in the safety of the TARDIS, Whittaker’s Doctor will do things a bit differently.

“We shot the last-ever scene in the TARDIS, and said goodbye to the TARDIS, and then there were some tears,” director Jamie Magnus Stone told Radio Times. “And then we went out to film, basically, her regeneration.”

And the last shot that we did, I think, will be the last shot in the episode as well. So it was really nice to do things in sequence. And it was mostly Jodie and [Mandip Gill’s] scenes on that last day. So it was just super-emotional.

It’ll be fun to see “Doctor Who” tackle this key moment in a slightly different way when the Doctor regenerates later this year.

For Jodie Whittaker, shooting the regeneration scene was “the most emotional day on set I think I’ve ever had”

According to Stone, Whittaker gave a “wonderful speech” on the last day. “It all worked out really nicely. I think everything we shot that day is going to be absolutely lovely. Yeah, I can’t wait to show you guys.”

Whittaker herself has weighed in on that final day of shooting. “I’ve shot my version of regen[eration], and it was singularly the most emotional day on set I think I’ve ever had,” she told Entertainment Weekly. “It’s a really bizarre feeling, because it’s the best time I’ve ever had on a job, and I made the decision to leave it, so it’s a really strange thing to do to yourself.”

Jodie Whittaker’s final episode as the Doctor will air sometime this year, although we don’t know exactly when. In the meantime, to enjoy one more standalone episode featuring the Doctor and her current companions, “The Legend of the Sea Devils,” before that.

As for who is replacing Whittaker, that’s still an open question. We know that her companions are leaving along with her, and that original showrunner Russell T. Davies is returning for season 14.

Queer wedding planning at the end of the world

August 12, 2021, 9:40 a.m.

Hello Michael & T,

Re: your atypical wedding menu —

  • 1 entree is Indian
  • 1 entree is Chinese
  • 1 side is Korean
  • 1 side is local California farm-to-table 

I suggest something clean and green for the last dish (asparagus???). Might cleanse the palate after all these bold flavors.

Best,
Linda

* * *

September 10, 2021, 3:56 a.m.

Hi sweetie,

See email below from Aunt Maya about Rohingya refugees displaced by hurricanes in Bangladesh. She is doing so much for these abused people (more like traumatized for generations!). Help if you can — I know you and Michael are busy with planning.

Now with climate change we must do our part.

Love you both,
Mom

* * *

September 11, 2021, 12:24 p.m.

Greetings Michael and T,

Attached please find attached the COVID addendum to our contract. The deposit for the venue is non-refundable, but we can reschedule if necessary due to coronavirus or other Acts of God.

Be well,
Alina

* * *

Sep 20, 2021, 7:12 p.m. 

“What the fuck are stone fruits?” I asked and looked around the table. Michael and I sat across from our friends Mei and Jonathan. Our monthly dinners had become a support group for wedding planning. The evening sun turned the kitchen walls a dappled orange. Catering menus and the sticky remains of Chinese takeout were spread out before us. 

“Peaches, I think.” Mei said. She wiped sauce from the corner of a menu and squinted at the text, bringing her other hand to rest on her pregnant belly. “But don’t quote me.”

“That’s right, babe.” Jonathan said, adjusting his glasses and reaching for our plates. “And plums, cherries, raspberries. Probably a few more.”

“Apricots, mangoes, nectarines, lychees.” Michael added. “Queers know their fruits.” He winked at me and rose to help Jonathan clear the table.

“Not immigrant queers,” I said. “Fruits are the worst. Also, vegetables. I can’t remember all the queens from ‘RuPaul’s Drag Race’ and the names of produce in two languages.” 

“Neither can I,” Mei said, shaking her head. “I forget more words as I get older, too. Hopefully that’s an immigrant thing and not early Alzheimer’s.”

“I don’t think that’s how Alzheimer’s works. But,” I said, “test me anyway.” 

Mei thought for a moment. The clink and splash of dishes filled the room. Then she grinned and pointed across the table.

“Watermelon!” she said. “Say ‘watermelon’ in Bengali.”

Time slowed. I sensed Jonathan and Michael pause their washing at the sink. I noticed the tang of soy sauce lingering in the air. I searched my memories, and the silence grew taut.

It’s somewhere between your teeth and your tongue.

“Shit,” I said, finally. “I can almost taste it, but I can’t remember the word.” 

Everyone nodded and the world sped up. Mei patted my arm and stood slowly, one hand supporting her lower back.

“Lucky for you, we have some sliced up in the fridge. Eating dessert might jog your memory.”

* * *

October 2, 2021, 8:30 a.m.

Hey babe,

Drowning at work today. Can you call the caterer about the last side dish? Thinking broccolini since you hate asparagus.

<3
Michael

* * *

October 2, 2021, 5:59 p.m.

Hi T,

Sorry to hear you’ll miss therapy. Will reach out if another appointment opens up this week. Meanwhile, feel better.

Joseph

* * *

October 5, 2021, 7:15 a.m.

Hi Alina,

Contract attached. Quick question: do wildfires/smoke count as Acts of God? Want to make sure our families can breathe lol.

— Michael (and T)

* * *

September 20, 2021, 10:38 p.m.

After dinner, we hugged our friends goodbye and drove home. Michael started running a bath and I walked the dimly lit rooms of our apartment, closing curtains for the night. My head was full of fruit. In the living room, I paused with my hand on a window ledge. I closed my eyes and thought back to dinner with Mei and Jonathan, and my first bite into a slice of cool watermelon. Saliva flooded my taste buds, and my tongue shaped the word.

Tormüj, I thought. 

The soft “toh” like teeth gently parting for the bite. 

The “r” which arches the soft palate open. 

The “müj” like lips and gums crunching into the delicate, pink sponge. 

I tasted the sweet dribble that meandered down my chin. My grandmother’s shawl brushed the corner of my mouth. I was five years old, and we sat at her kitchen table. The evening light shone glorious through the windows, filtered by banana leaves in her courtyard. The bangles on her wrist chimed. She gestured to a fading picture on the wall. It was a photo of her younger brother wearing a marigold wreath at his own wedding’s gaye holud. He’d died before I was born, rescuing civilians in his van near the end of the war, when the military shot him. My grandmother was saying something urgent. With a small start, I realized I could no longer hear the Bengali words she spoke. 

Tormüj, I thought, desperate. 

Tormüj.

Down the hall, I heard the shower running. The rest of the apartment lay quiet as I turned off the lights and walked to the bedroom. I lay down and wiped my eyes. How many other fruits had I forgotten, I wondered? And how incalculable the loss. 

* * *

September 22, 2021, 6:48 a.m.

Good afternoon,

Your leave request was denied as it was not submitted 45 days in advance. Please adjust and resubmit.

Regards,
Jeremiah

* * *

September 28, 2021, 9:25 a.m.

Hey girl hey,

Quick question: I know Rahul’s gotten way into boudoir photography (his IG is fire). Any chance he’d want to photograph our ceremony? 

Zero pressure, but T and I are trying to keep our vendors homo-exclusive 😉

xoxo
Michael

* * *

October 8, 2021, 4:00 p.m.

Hi guys,

The venue offers early access to a separate bridal suite for makeup, hair, etc. (lighting is gorgeous).

Do you need this?

Alina

* * *

October 31, 2021, 10:05 p.m.

Michael decided to stay home from the Halloween party that weekend. We’d had an intense week of discussing flowers, feelings and the merits of a drag queen at the afterparty. So, verging on burnout, I decided a solo adventure suited me just fine. I rummaged through our clothes for anything that resembled a costume.

“This one,” he said, handing me a leather jacket from his side of the closet. “Go party like it’s 1999.”

I ran mousse through my hair, kissed him goodbye and shivered in excitement as I waited outside. A car pulled up to carry me across the Golden Gate Bridge. My boots clicked down Castro Street till I found the address. I tottered up a narrow stairwell to the warmth and noise of the third-floor apartment. 

RELATED: I was one of the lawyers who helped win marriage equality. And yes, the GOP can take it away

I paused at the top to pull off my cloth mask and catch my breath. I spotted the host across the room. Mark tossed the strands of a long, black wig over his shoulder and wound his way through the crowd. A purple bodysuit clung to his hips and rhinestones glittered with each swivel. Reaching me, he leaned over and pouted overdrawn lips.

“Hola, Selena!” I said. We laughed and hugged each other in the middle of the party. 

“You know I had to do it, bitch,” he said. “Who’re you supposed to be?”

“I’m Billy Idol.”

“Who’s she?” He asked. “Actually, tell me later.” Mark’s nails scraped my palm as he pulled me to the kitchen.

“I need to show you the best thing I’ve gotten in the mail all month.” He handed me a sweating glass of champagne and pointed to the refrigerator. There, our Save-the-Date card hung from a magnet. On it, Michael and I mugged for the camera, bowties askew. I cleared my throat.

“You’re coming to the wedding, right?”

“Of course.” Mark said. “Is your family?”

“Some,” I said. I felt briefly dizzy, like the earth had begun to tilt underfoot.

“Good enough.” He pressed his cheek to mine. “Finish your drink, Ms. Billy.” 

I left the kitchen and wandered the crowded apartment, feeling out of sync with the crowd. The boozy, Brownian motion of the party carried me past 30-somethings in superhero leotards and feather boas, cat ears and vampire capes. A fireman stripped to his waist for a small circle of admirers. Two Sailor Moons crooned “Like a Virgin” at the karaoke machine. A co-worker shrieked when she recognized me and leaned in for a shouted conversation. Through it all, I watched Mark’s tentpole figure loom wherever he went, regal and tireless. 

Feeling neither of those things, I sought the relative quiet of a bedroom. The lights were off, but the room glowed with the candles of an ofrenda at one end. I stepped closer to examine the pictures on the wooden altar. Many were familiar — Mark’s mother and father striking movie-star poses in the 1980s. His grandparents smiling in the streets of their small town. The family kneeling at the church before his baptism, serious and radiant before the priest. Colorful tarot cards and drawings of skulls hung from ribbons above the photos. The whole wall glowed in amber chiaroscuro, a monument to traditions that had stretched across continents. I couldn’t help but think about my own family albums, which had gathered dust on our living room shelf for years. 

The fireman found me in the room sometime later. When I kissed him, his arms grew tight across my shoulders. But mostly I felt eyes on my back; the gaze of someone else’s ancestors upon us. 

* * *

November 16, 2021, 8:50 p.m.

Hey cuties,

SO delighted to DJ your wedding! Omg!

I found this Spotify list of Bollywood remixes. Can you listen? I think it’s legit but Jason Derulo is on there?

Love,
Adriana aka DJ Fuck-Around-n-Find-Out 

(I’m working on this too)

* * *

December 5, 2021, 1 a.m.

Hi cuz,

Long time no talk. Saw the news on FBook and wanted to email since you don’t use WhatsApp. Congrats. We are all ok. When I see Grandma she asks about you. These days with corona she is always indoors like all of us. No vaccine here but we are praying you have gotten it.

Love,
Zulkar

* * *

December 9, 2021, 2:20 p.m.

Hi Michael and T,

The food servers wear masks but aren’t all vaccinated. We can try to contract with a company that mandates vaccines. This will depend on your budget of course.

Alina

* * *

December 12, 2021, 4 p.m.

We breathe deep on the drive down the coast. It’s Sunday afternoon, and we’ve left the final walkthrough of our venue. The Pacific Coast Highway is as grand as I remember, and the seaweed scent is familiar from past rides. Only this time we aren’t trying to distract ourselves from wedding stress with rolling vineyards or booming surf. 

This time we’re in it for the zebras.

Michael puts on a podcast about the unlikely tale. We listen to the story of how William Randolph Hearst, at the height of his megalomaniacal wealth, built Hearst Castle in San Simeon, California, over a hundred years ago. How he imported a herd of wild zebras to roam the grounds with a menagerie of other non-native species. After Hearst’s financial collapse, the castle closed, and many animals found themselves relocated around the country. Not so the zebras. These ran free and continue to do so. They gallop and breed on the grassy hills by the Pacific and have even evolved thick coats to better survive the frigid winters. 

At this part of the story, Michael pats my knee in excitement. “Shaggy zebras! I think we’ll see them.”

But we circle the small seaside town for hours to uneventful views. We pass dying palm trees and small, boarded-up stores. We scan browning hillsides with binoculars, hoping for a flash of black and white stripes. We bicker, buy coffee, and raise our binoculars once more. We inquire about the zebras’ whereabouts to a gas station attendant, the cashier at a local Motel 6 and a hipster baker who sells us flaky rolls.

“Haven’t seen them in about five years,” the gas station attendant says.

“At sunset on that hill,” the cashier says. “You can see them best from the second story windows if you want a room.”

“They don’t come anywhere near people or buildings,” the baker laughs. “I guess I wouldn’t either if I didn’t work here.”

Two hours later, we sit in the Motel 6 parking lot eating burgers. I am thinking of saying again how much I enjoyed the drive. Then Michael sits suddenly upright, tosses his wrappers onto the dashboard, and reaches for the binoculars. A beat of silence passes as he scans the countryside, then:

“It’s them. Holy shit.”

“Let me see.”

Through the blurry lenses I watch two animals slowly coalesce in the distance, growing clearer as they crest the hill. Soon we see more ghostly figures emerge from the brushes, some pausing to sniff the air, or to chew at the brush, before continuing towards the coast. Soon we put down the binoculars and see their stripes unaided. We count several times. Nine, we finally agree.

“It’s a mini-herd,” I say.

“A dazzle,” he says. “It’s called a dazzle of zebras. How gay is that?”

I reach for Michael’s hand and interlace our fingers. For long minutes I don’t think about the Bengali words I’ve forgotten and the queer lexicon that seeped in like rain to fill the empty spaces. I don’t fret about smoke in our lungs, or refugees in the storm, or the banal anxieties of a wedding. Instead, I notice the way our rings press against each other. We watch together as the zebras stroll to a hilltop above the crashing waves. They pause their chewing and turn their gazes west, shaggy coats glistening in the last rays of the sun.


Want a daily wrap-up of all the news and commentary Salon has to offer? Subscribe to our morning newsletter, Crash Course.


More personal essays about LGBTQ life: 

Turn last night’s leftovers into a creamy chicken and pesto panini

Last week, Salon Food published a chicken tetrazzini recipe from writer and recipe developer Michael La Corte. As he wrote, it really is the ideal comfort recipe for these dark winter nights. While the origins of tetrazzini are a little murky — a prevailing theory is that it was named after the Italian opera star Luisa Tetrazzini — it has claimed a kind of stronghold on kitchens across America. 

I think this is partially because it is so decadent. You’ve got pillowy noodles enveloped in a rich bechamel sauce, whipped together with chicken (or turkey!) and a few vegetables of your choice. Top the whole thing with breadcrumbs and boom! There’s a hearty casserole bubbling in the oven. 

But in speaking with Michael, he was telling me that he is really passionate about repurposing elements of his different recipes, especially when you’re only cooking for one or two people. But how do you repurpose tetrazzini? 

RELATED: Giant focaccia sandwiches are the new party subs

“I honed in on the classic lunch standby: a sandwich,” he said. “Of course, it’d be a bit challenging to pile a heap of creamy pasta and chicken on some bread and call it a ‘sandwich,’ so I aimed to switch things up a bit, mixing the bechamel sauce with a touch of mayo [and adding] a vibrant pesto to zhush up the flavor profiles — and because I’ve always been astonished by how outrageously delicious pesto-mayo is.”  

From there, Michael recommends adding some sauteed, chopped spinach, a generous heap of grated gruyere and some leftover or reserved chicken from your tetrazzini prep. Pile this all on a toasted roll or crusty ciabatta (or do as I did and panini press the whole thing) and you’ve got an equally comforting lunch for the next afternoon. 

Per Michael: “PSA: pasta salad on the side helps to round out the meal.” 

Check out Michael’s recipe below and be sure to give his tetrazzini a try! — Ashlie Stevens, deputy food editor. 

***

Recipe: Creamy chicken and pesto sandwich

Yields
3-4 servings
Prep Time
5 minutes
Cook Time
10 minutes

Ingredients

1 large baguette or 3-4 smaller rolls

Leftover shredded or chopped chicken in béchamel (read more here)

3 tablespoons mayonnaise

3 tablespoons pesto

4 ounces Gruyere or Fontina, shredded

1.5 cups spinach, sauteed in olive oil with a a little minced shallot and garlic, seasoned with salt and pepper



 

 

Directions

  1. Preheat oven to 375 degrees.
  2. In a small bowl, combine mayonnaise and pesto. Slice baguette — or several smaller rolls — in half and generously spread pesto mayonnaise across one half of the bread.
  3. Assemble sandwich by layering sauced chicken, shredded spinach, and topping with cheese. 
  4. Put sandwich open-faced in oven, letting the cheese melt over spinach and chicken and allowing the pesto-mayo to warm. You can also broil, but if you do, be mindful not to let the bread burn.
  5. Remove from oven, top sandwich with pesto-mayo half of bread, and slice the baguette into 3 to 4 sandwiches. 


     

 

 



 

Here are the 9 best cheeses to add to macaroni and cheese

I’ve been a lifelong lover of cheese, enough so that starting last year I began the process of sitting for cheese mongering certification courses. I think the reason why is that most cheeses begin with the same few elements — milk, salt, water and time — and can end up with wildly different flavors depending on the treatment of those ingredients. 

Visit the cheese counter at your local supermarket or specialty store and there is a kaleidoscopic array of flavors present in that case. But which of those flavors makes the most sense to add to everyone’s favorite cold weather comfort food, macaroni and cheese? After all, they have to both taste good and melt and coat pasta well. After a fair amount of tests of my own this winter, here are nine cheeses you should consider adding to your pot next time. 

***

The Classics

Cheddar 

When I think of “classic” macaroni and cheese — either the creamy stovetop stuff or the casserole dishes my mom would bake during the holidays — cheddar is definitely the predominant flavor. There’s a historic precedent for this. The first modern recipe for macaroni and cheese is attributed to British author Elizabeth Raffald; in her 1769 cookbook “The Experienced English Housekeeper,” Raffald recommends mixing macaroni with a Béchamel sauce that’s been cooked down with cheddar cheese. 

RELATED: The crunchiest, cheesiest macaroni and cheese bakes on a sheet pan

And cheddar definitely has its benefits. It’s cheap, shreddable and easy to melt. Feel free to experiment with different varieties, from sharp to mild to flavored (horseradish cheddar is an unexpectedly good choice in macaroni and cheese, especially served alongside a steak dinner). 

Gruyère

Much like cheddar, gruyère is ideal for melting and is a favorite macaroni and cheese addition. One of Ina Garten’s go-to macaroni and cheese recipes, for instance, uses a combination of cheddar and gruyère  — with gruyère as the dominant cheese in the mix. Young gruyère is creamy and nutty, while older gruyère takes on a really pleasant earthiness that adds some tremendous nuance to the mix. 

Fontina

Giada De Laurentiis’ macaroni and cheese recipe calls for 2 cups of finely grated Fontina cheese. Traditionally made from unpasteurized milk, Fontina is a one-two punch of creaminess and pungency. For a more sophisticated mac, this is a fantastic addition. 

***

The Flavor Enhancers 

Manchego

If I had to pick a favorite cheese, I think manchego would have to be it. It’s a supremely savory and salty Spanish cheese — enough so that its odor even suggests roast meat to some tasters — that also happens to shred really beautifully. Use it as the jumping-off point for a Spanish-inspired macaroni and cheese that incorporates chorizo and some toasty breadcrumbs

Gouda

Much like parmesan, gouda develops crunchy “cheese crystals” as it ages; these are an indicator of real umami flavor, which can help but the fat and enhance the creaminess of a pot of stovetop macaroni and cheese. 

Parmesan

Good Parmesan has a ton of tasting notes: browned butter, toasted almonds, grass and honey, to name a few. However, it’s also a cheese that happens to be really well-known to most home cooks. That mix of intricacy and familiarity when it comes to flavor makes it a stellar add-in to your next batch of macaroni and cheese. 

***

The Wild Cards 

Goat

I love cheese that has a little brininess, but some of my personal favorites, like feta, can take on an almost chalky flavor when melted and incorporated into dishes. That’s where goat cheese comes in. Because of its milk fat content, it melts down and incorporates into a Béchamel flawlessly and adds a little funk and brine to an otherwise standard pot. Note that a little goes a long way. 

Brie

Butteriness is the name of the game when it comes to brie. This cheese has an incredibly luxe texture that shines when heated (hence the popularity of baked brie around the holidays) but a really mild flavor. If you’re looking for a cheese to underscore the flavors already present in your cheese sauce without taking over, brie is one of your best bets. 

Cream

This is such a straightforward add-in, but one I hadn’t considered until I was home for the holidays this year and I noticed that my mother had updated her go-to recipe with a few tablespoons of cream cheese. The result was a casserole dish of macaroni and cheese that had a perfectly oven-baked top with an interior that had the creaminess of stove-top mac. It really helped make this dish, which was the best of both worlds, totally possible. 

A brief list of Barefoot Contessa-approved recipes: 

“Bel-Air” may not be fresh, but it has enough going for it to merit an initial investment

The funny thing about “Bel-Air,” Peacock’s dramatic reimagining of NBC’s ’90s sitcom classic “The Fresh Prince of Bel-Air,” is that the pitch has been spelled out in front of us for more than 30 years. Every line of Will Smith raps in the comedy’s jaunty theme plays out in some fashion in this serious story about good-natured West Philly teenager Will Smith (Jabari Banks), a top-student and basketball star with scholarship offers waiting in the wings.

Will’s life is upended when he runs into “a couple of guys who were up to no good” who “started making trouble in [his] neighborhood.” Only here, the mix-up isn’t slapstick – it lands Will in jail facing a weapons charge and threats scary enough that his mother calls in a favor to her rich brother Phil (Adrian Holmes).

Uncle Phil, a man with political ambitions, pulls some levers to get Will out of lockup and into a first class seat on an L.A.-bound plane, orange juice in his champagne glass and all.

RELATED:  “Fresh Prince of Bel-Air” gets flipped-turned upside down … as a drama

From there you can guess the rest, not because of what the theme song says, but owing to many prime-time soaps and family dramas that came before “Bel-Air,” many of which Morgan Cooper’s 2019 viral trailer no doubt drew inspiration.

Not every viral video deserves to be made into a TV show, regardless of how much sense it makes. “Bel-Air” may prove to be the exception; since it drops on Peacock on Super Bowl Sunday, it’s too early to tell. But regardless of the audience it draws, Cooper – credited as a director, producer and co-writer on the drama – can at least take pride in seeing his fan-generated concept fleshed out into series that actually isn’t bad.

Bel-AirJabari Banks in “Bel-Air” (Peacock)

There’s nothing original about the spin of “Bel Air,” either. This season of TV alone has a range of shows that feel like it, the most expressly similar being The CW’s veteran series “All American.” Fox’s “Our Kind of People” merges class conflict and family drama, and even prestige shows like “Queen Sugar” do this with far more weight and cinematic sweep. Point being, “Bel-Air” is simply the latest version of a show you’re probably already watching.

But none of those show have updated takes on characters we know as comedy figures. Through new versions of Uncle Phil and the rest, the actual Will Smith, who executive produces the show, corrects elements that did not age well over the years.

Geoffrey, for example, is now a house manager (played by Jimmy Akingbola) whose relationship to Phil hints as being closer to what Alfred brought to the Wayne household. Akingbola’s more of a suave confidante than butler, asserting his strength through calm and few words.

Another aspect of the “Fresh Prince” legacy includes Janet Hubert’s sudden replacement on the series by the lighter-skinned Daphne Maxwell Reid, frequently cited as a clear example of colorism in casting. At the show’s 2020 reunion Hubert cites this while recounting the pain she faced as a dark-skinned Black actress in Hollywood who could not find work after she left.

Hubert has since appeared in “The Last O.G,” “Post” and “Love Life”; it’s unknown whether “Bel-Air” will bring her on. If it does, she’ll look like the rest of the Banks family, entirely cast with dark-skinned actors. This matters, even if it’s merely a surface shift. Of greater import is the energy Holmes brings to his muscular version of Phil alongside Cassandra Freeman’s statuesque Aunt Viv.

Coco Jones makes the most of remaking Hilary as an upbeat self-assured culinary influencer instead of a dingbat, while Akira Jolie Akbar channels Ashley’s essential lovability. Olly Sholotan’s Carlton ventures the furthest away from Alfonso Ribeiro’s Tom Jones-loving terrible dancer while maintaining the character’s conservative lean. Will is a basketball star, while Carlton excels at lacrosse.

His clashes with Will and Uncle Phil’s difficulty in connecting with Los Angeles’ Black voters provide the show with ways to grapple with the conflicts that can arise in matters of identity and class disparity. Like the original “Fresh Prince,” “Bel-Air” gets plenty of mileage out of playing up the Banks’ bougieness, while wondering, seriously, why men like Phil Banks are penalized for their success. Both he and Carlton are vehicles for exploring what it means to stay true to one’s roots, with the latter proving to be far more devotedly assimilationist than even his ’90s version is depicted to be.


Want great food writing and recipes? Subscribe to Salon Food’s newsletter, The Bite.


But the main Banks making the series work is Jabari, the newcomer playing the fictional Will Smith. He has a lively swagger that emerges more readily as the series goes on. His character may be the drama’s center, but the playfulness Banks brings to Will preventing “Bel-Air” from slipping too far into dour self-seriousness.

Much as there is to like about “Bel-Air,” including and not limited to its style and a soundtrack mixing ’90s hip-hop classics with modern-day vibes, the three episodes available to review never rise to the level of essential viewing. There’s simply already plenty of established pleasures in the same vein floating around for it to merely register as solid out of the gate.

None of them are on Peacock, a streamer that could use a little more attention and could do a lot worse than dramatic retelling of a widely beloved sitcom classic. Rght now the story of how “Bel-Air” came to be is richer than the show itself, but as the wise investor knows, it may pay to give it time.

The first three episodes of “Bel-Air” debut Sunday, Feb.13 on Peacock. Watch the trailer below, via YouTube.

More stories like this:

 

Rudy Giuliani may testify before Jan. 6 committee — subpoena issued last month

The House select committee investigating the timeline of the Jan. 6 insurrection may be hearing testimony from former New York City mayor, Rudy Giuliani, who was issued a subpoena last month.

Giuliani, who was former President Trump’s lawyer, allegedly plans to take a less confrontational stance to the inquiry than has been the case with others from Trump’s circle, according to The New York Times. It’s further proposed that Giuliani is leaning towards cooperation to avoid a legal fight resulting from the previously mentioned subpoena he received last month. If he does follow through with testifying it will lessen the chances of him being found in contempt of Congress for non-compliance.

Related: Rudy Giuliani revealed to be mastermind behind scheme to install bogus Trump electors: report

Several unnamed sources referenced in The New York Times report are said to have offered insight on Giuliani’s possibilities leading up to his possible testimony. One source says that Giuliani is vacillating between providing an informal interview or a formal deposition. Regardless of which option he chooses, if he does testify it will put him in direct opposition of Trump who he was, at one time, so closely aligned with.


Want a daily wrap-up of all the news and commentary Salon has to offer? Subscribe to our morning newsletter, Crash Course.


Giuliani was scheduled to appear before the panel last week for a deposition, but was allowed to reschedule it, according to a committee aide. The penalty of consequence looms heavily over the former mayor’s decision faced with the fact that Trump’s former chief of staff, Mark Meadows, and former aide, Stephen K. Bannon have both received punishment for not complying with requests to testify themselves. Meadows has been referred to the Justice Department for possible criminal charges, and Bannon was indicted in November for refusing to provide information. 

Read more:

Faxes and snail mail: Will pandemic-era flaws unleash improved health technology?

Jamie Taylor received two letters from the Missouri Department of Social Services Family Support Division that began, “Good news,” before stating that she was denied Medicaid coverage. Her income exceeded the state’s limits for the federal-state public health insurance program for people with low incomes.

Missouri officials now blame the incongruous greeting for the decidedly bad news on a computer programming error, but it was just the beginning of Taylor’s ongoing saga trying to get assistance from Missouri’s safety net. Taylor, now 41, spent hours on the phone, enduring four-hour hold times and dropped calls, and received delayed mailings of time-sensitive documents to her home in Sikeston.

Taylor’s struggles are not uncommon in Missouri or even nationally. Instead, they are part of what the National Association of State Medicaid Directors’ executive director, Matt Salo, called “the next great challenge that government has to solve.” Namely: the extremely outdated technology used by a humongous web of government agencies, from local public health to state-run benefits programs.

Although many people like Taylor struggled with these systems before the pandemic began, covid-19 exposed just how antiquated and ill equipped many of them were to handle unprecedented demand. For example, while private-sector businesses beefed up the ability to stream TV shows, created apps for food deliveries, and moved offices online, public health officials tracked covid outbreaks by fax machine.

In response to the new light shed on these long-standing problems, momentum is building for government tech updates. The pandemic also has created once-in-a-generation pools of money from pandemic relief funding and higher-than-expected tax revenues to fund such projects.

President Joe Biden issued an executive order in December calling on benefits enrollment to be streamlined. State lawmakers are urging the use of unspent covid relief money to address the issue.

That’s critical because outdated information systems can trigger ripple effects throughout the public benefits system, according to Jessica Kahn, who is a partner at the McKinsey & Co. consulting firm and previously led data and systems for Medicaid at the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services. One example: Online benefits applications that are not user-friendly can push more applicants to call phone help lines. That can strain call centers that, like many industries, are having difficulty meeting staffing needs.

Some states are already eyeing improvements:

  • In Wisconsin, Democratic Gov. Tony Evers has directed up to $80 million to replace the state’s dated unemployment infrastructure.
  • Kansas is among the first states working with the U.S. Department of Labor’s newly created Office of Unemployment Insurance Modernization set to manage $2 billion in funds appropriated by the American Rescue Plan Act last year.
  • In Missouri, a bipartisan state Senate committee recommended using surplus covid relief funds for the Department of Social Services to update the benefit computer systems. The department also has proposed using federal pandemic money on artificial intelligence to process some 50,000 documents per week. That work is currently done manually at an average of two minutes per document.

Recent history suggests these fixes may be easier said than done. More than 10 years ago, the Obama administration invested $36 billion to develop and mandate the national use of electronic health records for patients. Despite the billions invested, the digitizing of patients’ records has been plagued with problems. Indeed, to get reimbursed by their insurers for purchases of rapid covid tests, a requirement imposed by the Biden administration, patients have to fax or mail in claims and receipts.

The Affordable Care Act also offered a chance to improve state technology infrastructure, according to Salo. From 2011 through 2018, the federal government offered to cover up to 90% of the funds necessary to replace or update old Medicaid IT systems, many of which were programmed in COBOL, a computer programming language dating to 1959. Those updates could have benefited other parts of the government safety net as well, since state-administered assistance programs frequently share technology and personnel.

But, Salo said, the ACA required these new Medicaid computer systems to communicate directly with the health care exchanges created under the law. States faced varying degrees of trouble. Tennessee applications got lost, leading to a class-action lawsuit. Many states never fully overhauled their benefit systems.

During the pandemic, tech issues have become impossible to ignore. Amid the early lockdowns, hundreds of thousands of people waited months for unemployment help as states such as New Jersey, Kansas, and Wisconsin struggled to program newly created benefits into existing software. Local and state vaccine registration sites were plagued with so many problems they were inaccessible to many, including blind people, a violation of federal disability laws.

Underfunding is nothing new to public health and safety-net programs. Public officials have been reluctant to allocate the money necessary to overhaul dated computer systems — projects that can cost tens of millions of dollars.

Missouri’s safety-net technology woes are well documented. A 2019 McKinsey assessment of the state’s Medicaid program noted the system was made up of about 70 components, partially developed within a mainframe from 1979, that was “not positioned to meet both current and future needs.” In a 2020 report for the state, Department of Social Services staffers called the benefits enrollment process “siloed” and “built on workarounds,” while participants called it “dehumanizing.”

Taylor has experienced that frustration. Eight years ago, a mysterious medical condition forced her out of the workforce, causing her to lose her job-based health insurance. At various times, she’s been diagnosed with ulcerative colitis, Crohn’s disease, gastritis, inflammatory bowel disease, and gastroparesis, but lacking insurance and unable to qualify for Medicaid, she was forced to seek treatment in emergency rooms. She has been hospitalized repeatedly over the years, including for 21 days combined since July. She estimated her medical debt tops $100,000.

When Taylor applied for Medicaid over the phone again in October, she received a rejection letter within days.

At a loss because her family of three’s $1,300 monthly income now falls within state income limits since Missouri’s 2021 expansion of Medicaid, Taylor reached out to state Rep. Sarah Unsicker. The Democratic lawmaker represents a district 145 miles away in St. Louis, but Taylor had seen her championing Medicaid expansion on Twitter. After Unsicker queried the department, she learned that a default application answer had disqualified Taylor from getting Medicaid because it incorrectly listed her as receiving Medicare — the public insurance designed for older Americans that Taylor does not qualify for.

“Within 24 hours, I had a message back from Sarah saying that another letter was on the way and I should be much happier with the answer,” Taylor recalled.

Finally enrolled in Medicaid, Taylor is now struggling to get nutrition assistance, called SNAP, which in Missouri is processed through a separate eligibility system. The programs have similar income requirements, but Taylor was not able to verify her income over the phone for SNAP as she could for Medicaid.

Instead, she received a letter on Nov. 26 requesting her tax returns by Nov. 29. By the time she was able to locate and email those documents on Dec. 1, she had been denied. Every call to sort out the issue has been met with hold times upward of four hours or queues so full that her call gets dropped.

Medicaid and SNAP applications are combined in 31 states, according to a 2019 analysis from the Code for America advocacy group. But not in hers.

“It just doesn’t make sense to me why Medicaid can verify my tax income over the phone, but SNAP needs me to send them a copy of the whole thing,” Taylor said.

Eventually, she gave up and started the whole process over. She’s still waiting.

Do “attachment styles” really matter in relationships?

American singles have no shortage of rubrics they can turn to for determining romantic compatibility. Some of these are more grounded in folk wisdom than others — say, zodiac sign versus Myers-Briggs type — while others are purported to based in psychology, such as enneagram type or love language. Recently, Americans have been obsessed with attachment styles — the idea that there are four “patterns” of attachment, and that these can help determine both the success of a relationship as well as how to communicate with one’s partner.

Unlike the mysticism of zodiac signs, the idea of a person’s attachment style is rooted in psychology theory. Indeed, attachment theory is taught in psychology programs and taken seriously by psychologists and psychoanalysts alike.

It’s all well and good that psychologists think about these things. But how much do they really apply to the average person looking for love? Indeed, are attachment signs really meaningful at all in terms of determining compatibility? Or are they, like love languages, a pop psychology fad that’s more fun than serious?

The theory of attachment has its roots in psychoanalysis. Attachment theory was first developed by a British psychoanalyst named John Bowlby who was attempting to understand what infants experience when they are separated from their parents. Bowlby’s theory suggests that babies come into the world biologically programmed to form an attachment with their caregiver. As such an attachment helps them to survive, Bowlby theorized, any disruption to a secure attachment can have severe consequences. Bowlby further suggests that a baby’s attachment style established with their caregivers essentially becomes a prototype for all future relationships — including romantic ones.

RELATED: Are “love languages” real, or self-help snake oil?

Adding to Bowlby’s research, developmental psychologist Mary Ainsworth introduced the concept of caregivers being the “secure base” for infants, and determined there were four patterns of attachment: secure, anxious-ambivalent, disorganized and avoidant. The theory was popularized by researchers, but the idea of attachment styles really took off as it applied to adult love when the pop psychology book “Attached: The New Science of Adult Attachment, and How It Can Help You Find — and Keep — Love,” was published in 2010. That bestselling book was written by Dr. Amir Levine, a clinical psychiatrist and neuroscience researcher, and psychologist Rachel Heller.

Attachment theory states that if a person has a secure attachment style, they are able to form secure, loving relationships with others. Such people are not afraid of intimacy, and do not feel afraid or panicked when a partner needs space. According to foundational attachment research done by social psychologists Cindy Hazan and Phillip Shaver in the 1980s, 56 percent of people have secure attachment.

But the theory posits other attachment “styles” besides secure, too. Those who have an anxious attachment style supposedly have a deep fear of abandonment. This can manifest when, say, a partner doesn’t text back fast enough. In theory, an anxious attachment’s caregiver was unpredictable with love and affection, perhaps also not present entirely.

Someone with avoidant attachment is said to have a deep fear of intimacy, and therefore has a pattern of distancing themselves from a romantic partner when the relationship becomes too intimate. This person’s caregiver was usually dismissive and distant.

Finally, disorganized attachment is when a person has a combination of both the anxious and avoidant attachment styles. According to the attachment style theory, people with this attachment style may have been neglected or abused as children.

In the psychology world, the theory has something to say about compatibility. Supposedly it is difficult for an avoidant person to have another relationship with another avoidant person; likewise, an anxious person and an avoidant person are likely to have a messy relationship.

Yet differing attachment styles do not necessarily doom relationships. Indeed, couples therapists tell Salon nearly any combination of attachment styles is possible, though there are some caveats. Plus, it is possible for attachment styles to change. 


Want more health and science stories in your inbox? Subscribe to Salon’s weekly newsletter The Vulgar Scientist.


“What’s most valuable about attachment styles is being able to recognize them in ourselves, not necessarily in our partners, and to be conscious of when our attachment style is being activated so that we may be thoughtful and intentional about the choices we make,” said Saba Lurie, a Licensed Marriage and Family Therapist (LMFT) and founder of Take Root Therapy in Los Angeles. “When we aren’t in tune with our attachment styles and something happens to activate or trigger a response from that place, it can be really harmful and disruptive to relationships— as long as we are conscientious and thoughtful there’s room for relationships to develop and for us to become more secure in our attachment styles.”

Indeed, in the aforementioned book “Attached,” the authors note that even if someone possesses an insecure attachment style, it doesn’t mean that they are doomed for love and can’t forge healthy relationships. The idea is that with a conscious effort, a person can become more secure — or go from being secure to anxious.

“We can also do the opposite and start secure, but due to a rupture of trauma in the relationship we may in turn shift towards an anxious attachment,” said Nikki Nolet, LMFT and founder of Relationships Redefined. “This is based mostly on the safety and connective experiences we have with our partners.”

In other words, a person’s attachment style — which is supposedly influenced by a person’s relationship with their caregivers at a young age — isn’t a done deal as an adult. Like personalities, they can evolve throughout a person’s life.

“To change your style to be more secure, seek therapy as well as relationships with others who are capable of a secure attachment,” Nolet siad. “If you have an anxious attachment style, you will feel more stable in a committed relationship with someone who has a secure attachment style.”

Does this mean that attachment styles are irrelevant? Not entirely. But there is a danger to over-identifying with one’s attachment style, experts say.

“People have a tendency to over-identify with just about anything — their attachment styles, their astrological sign, their alma mater; it only becomes problematic when it begins to limit the ways we engage with others and the world around us,” Lurie said. “If you are so fixated on your attachment style and it’s compatibility with someone else’s that it prevents you from being able to have a meaningful relationship with that someone, then it might be time to take a step back and recognize that while our attachment styles are helpful guidelines, they’re just that.”

Lurie emphasized attachment styles don’t “determine who we are as people or even necessarily how we’ll react in every situation.”

“Our attachment styles are plastic, and there’s always room for us to change and develop in our relationships,” Lurie said.

Psychologist Alexander Burgemeeste agreed.

“It is possible that people identify too much with their attachment style in a relationship, but perhaps more awareness of these attachment styles could be beneficial for relationships,” Burgemeeste said. “Identifying your own attachment style can allow you to challenge toxic or negative behavior in order to change the direction of your relationship in a good way.”

However, sometimes, identifying with an attachment style too much can be used as an excuse for why there are “existing issues” and thus ending the relationship, explained Omar A. Ruiz, LMFT and founder of TalkThinkThrive.

“However, if they are unwilling to make any necessary changes, then identifying with their attachment style has no real world value other than a conversational piece,” Ruiz said. “It’s more effective to schedule a session with a couples therapist to discuss how to achieve a secure attachment style within one’s relationship.”

More articles on psychology:

TikTok’s “Marry Me Chicken” is the latest in commitment poultry dishes

While oysters might hold centuries of reputation as an aphrodisiac, nothing seduces people into long-term partnership quite like poultry, at least according to modern legend. The latest in a long line of chicken dishes that supposedly inspire feelings of commitment, Marry Me Chicken, recently took TikTok by storm.

Like so many viral recipes on TikTok, it uses everyday ingredients and an overwhelming amount of dairy to make an easy dinner. A stick of butter, olive oil, chicken breasts, heavy cream, and plenty of Parmesan cheese bring the dish together in about 45 minutes, and — as the name implies — perhaps induce a proposal.

The idea of chicken dishes that can make marriage happen goes back to 1982, when a Glamour magazine editor gave a version of a Marcella Hazan recipe to a coworker — “the most delicious roast chicken she’d ever tasted.” Shortly after the co-worker made it for her boyfriend, he proposed. She passed it onto three more people, and the same thing happened. Eventually the magazine published it as “Engagement Chicken.”

That simple roast chicken recipe — just chicken, lemons, salt, pepper, and herbs — has since been created for dozens more engagements, including that of Howard Stern and possibly even Meghan Markle and Prince Harry. Rumor has it that the royal version came from Ina Garten, who adds way more garlic, some onions, and a little wine, so whether or not it gets a ring, at least you can drink the rest of the wine and have a stinky make-out session. Fellow Food Network stars the Neelys call their version Get Yo’ Man Chicken and switch it to just chicken thighs, add tomatoes, and lemon pepper.

In other words, TikTok’s Marry Me chicken proves itself the epitome of a viral recipe: It takes an age-old, sort of sexist idea, adds a ton of dairy, and gives a flashy new name.

In an age of fascist counterrevolution, our biggest problem may be the death of ethics

We must see now that the evils of racism, economic exploitation and militarism are all tied together … you can’t really get rid of one without getting rid of the others … the whole structure of American life must be changed.

— Martin Luther King Jr.

The brutalizing horrors of a fascist past are with us once again. This is most evident in the growing support for bigotry and white nationalism among Republicans and their base, buttressed by the increased presence of armed militia and an increasingly well-armed populace. Within the current abysmal historical moment, a mix of aggrieved agency, a tsunami of conspiracy theories and an expanding culture of lies fuel a massive political effort to legitimate and normalize white minority rule.

Underlying this authoritarian political project is a massive ideological scaffolding reproducing the lethal workings of repressive power and a formative culture solidifying the identities and agents willing to embrace a political landscape of fascist agitation and violence. This is a pedagogical effort to refute elements of the past as a site of injustice, all the while enabling a machinery of exclusion and disposability wedded to the logic of white supremacy and what Kimberly Williams Crenshaw calls “The Unmattering of Black Lives.”

Talk of civil war has emerged at a time when violence becomes a powerful force for shaping language, addressing social problems and emerging as a central organizing principle of politics. Central to this brutalizing of civic culture and the social imagination is the need to acknowledge that long before violence becomes normalized in society, politics descends into what John Berger once called ethicide — a formative culture composed of “agents [who] kill ethics and therefore any notion of history and justice.”

At work here is a collective disavowal of social responsibility and the removal of political, discursive and economic actions from any sense of the social costs involved. Central to the turn towards ethicide is a Republican Party waging a counterrevolution against the foundations of democratic rule. This is a right-wing political party wedded to a politics of dehumanization, social abandonment and terminal exclusion, which accelerate the death of the unwanted. This amounts to a politics of ethicide in which ethical boundaries disappear, language is emptied of ethical referents, zones of social abandonment become normalized, racial purity is embraced, historical amnesia is celebrated and a culture of cruelty becomes commonplace.

RELATED: Democracy vs. fascism: What do those words mean — and do they describe this moment?

Toni Morrison remarked that the prevailing formative culture of neoliberalism and its underlying fascist politics “is recognizable by its need to purge, [and] its terror of democratic agendas.” It “produces perfect capitalists,” defined largely as consumers, indifferent to ethics and more than willing to criminalize and pathologize the enemy, reward mindlessness, and maintain, at all costs, silence.” Morrison’s insights are all the more relevant in an age when the lines between democracy and authoritarianism are collapsing. Her warning necessitates a heightened critical vigilance at a moment when the culture is shifting, new political formations are emerging and new identities are being produced.

This is particularly true given the regressive formative culture that has been at work in producing the agents involved in the current attacks on democratic institutions, policies and laws. This is a formative culture rooted in hate, bigotry, cruelty, infused with a spirit of vigilante violence. Far removed from democratic values, it has provided the language and political signposts to support the attack on the Capitol, women’s reproductive rights, voting rights and racial justice as part of a broader effort to successfully display its affirmation and merging of politics, white nationalism, imperialism and violence. In addition to these policies, this emerging formative culture has forecasted the “bald political calculus” of a rising unique American authoritarianism.

The coup attempt on Jan. 62021, was a death-dealing expression of mass violence that has a deep resonance with the past that has once again manifested itself as an organizing force of the present. This contemporary expression of violence has a long history grounded in what Achille Mbembe has called necropolitics, or the politics of death — an upgraded species of fascist politics that defines whose lives are worthy of human value, citizenship and occupying the public sphere and, more specifically, who is considered disposable and excess.


Want a daily wrap-up of all the news and commentary Salon has to offer? Subscribe to our morning newsletter, Crash Course.


American legal scholar Laurence Tribe observes that Trump’s Republican Party not only “embraced the violence of 6 January,” they also supported a governing form “that almost always comes wrapped in violence” and is endemic to fascism. How else to explain the threats and “murderous violence” by Trump’s followers aimed at school board members who support pupils wearing masks, medical personnel who support lockdowns, election officials who refuse the lie of fraudulent elections and politicians who dare to disagree with Trump’s policies?

Political scientist Robert A. Pape argues that a new politically violent mass movement has developed to restore the Trump presidency. This includes “21 million adamant supporters of insurrection [who] have the dangerous potential for violent mobilization” and are willing to shed bloodshed for their cause. What are we to make, for that matter, of Republican Gov. Ron DeSantis of Florida signing legislation “that gives legal protections to people who drive their cars into protesters in the street,” and defines individuals as criminal felons if in the midst of the protests they break windows or engages in other alleged illegal activity? These are just a few of the many signposts indicating that the revival of fascist conditions that led to Jan. 6 are not only still with us but are becoming normalized and reinvented every day.

Violence in its spectacularized forms tends to produce a shock value that hides the often “slow violence” of everyday life. This is evident in the border violence waged against undocumented immigrants, the homeless deprived of the most basic social provisions, poor people of color whose culture is equated with criminality and fill America’s prisons. It is also evident in poor housing conditions, people struggling to put food on the table, support payments for the poor that tie them to a politics of mere survival and “bare life.” One element of fascism that has returned with a vengeance is the relationship between fascism and big business. Not only is this evident in the numerous examples of how the financial elite sponsor voter suppression laws, provide millions to push their economic and political interests through lobbying efforts, control the media and attack government policies that enhance the welfare state and extend government  policies that benefit the common good, but also in their hoarding of wealth and power.

Necropolitics finds its most powerful expression not in isolated attacks on the government or in plans to kidnap and kill politicians, however horrible such acts are, but in producing and normalizing forms of massive economic and political inequality that kill. For instance, in a new report by Oxfam, it is estimated that “inequality is contributing to the death of at least 21,000 people a day, or one person every four seconds.” At the same time, “The world’s ten richest men more than doubled their fortunes from $700 billion to $1.5 trillion — at a rate of $15,000 per second or $1.3 billion a day — during the first two years of a pandemic that has seen the incomes of 99 percent of humanity fall and over 160 million more people forced into poverty.” 

Oxfam makes clear that extreme inequality kills, inflicts violence on the vast majority of people on the globe and “has unleashed this economic violence particularly acutely across racialized, marginalized and gendered lines.” Moreover, this greedy financial elite is killing the planet as “the richest 1 percent emit more than twice as much CO2 as the bottom 50 percent of the world, driving climate change [which contributes] to wildfires, floods, tornadoes, crop failures and hunger.” Predatory capitalists such as Elon Musk, Jeff Bezos and Mark Zuckerberg amass huge profits while trafficking in death and misery, all the while paying little in taxes. Oxfam recommends clawing back the tax gains that have been given to the rich and reversing the attack on workers’ rights, unions and the welfare state. These are not insignificant demands, but they say nothing about the relationship between capitalism and fascism, nor do they associate a murderous inequality with a call to end neoliberal capitalism.

It is impossible to separate the breakdown of civic culture, the collapse of language and a rise in insurrectionist violence in the United States from the plague of gangster capitalism. Under a regime of privatized utopias, hyper-individualism and ego-centered values, human beings are reduced to self-sufficient atoms of self-interest, removed from relations of mutual dependency. A neoliberal market-driven society has given rise to a culture of fear, uncertainty and danger that numbs many people just as it wipes out the creative faculties of imagination, memory and critical thought. Rather than live in a historical period that awakens the critical faculties, Americans now occupy a social order that freezes and numbs the capacity for informed judgment. Turning away from the collapse of reason, justice and democracy appears to have become habitual for most Trump supporters.

RELATED: With fascism coming, America responds: LOL who cares? Let’s Netflix and chill

As democracy is increasingly viewed with contempt by large segments of the public, the moral mechanisms of language, meaning and morality collapse. What emerges is a cruel indifference that takes over diverse modes of communication and exchange — a singular register of the rise of a fascist politics with its scorn for democratic values, identities and social relations. Surely this is obvious today as all vestiges of the social contract, social responsibility and modes of solidarity that get people working together give way to a form of social Darwinism with its emphasis on violence, privatization, ruthlessness, cruelty, war, modes of hyper-masculinity and a disdain for those considered weak, dependent, alien or economically unproductive.

While it has become increasingly clear that democracy is under siege, little has been said about something inherent in the unfolding of a savage and ruthless capitalism and its embrace of an updated form of fascist politics. Lost here were the workings of neoliberal machinery with its massive inequalities in wealth and private power, its comfortable alliance with structural racism and a political system driven by money and the concentrated control of the ultra-rich and corrupt financial institutions. This is an economic system with profound malignancies, one that has given rise to pernicious relations of power that have transformed the Republican Party into a force that, as Noam Chomsky states, “is driving organized human society to suicide.” He goes further and argues that however weak democracy is in the U.S., it “is intolerable to the GOP wreckers.” He writes:

Nothing is overlooked in their systematic assault on the fragile structure. Methods extend from “taking hold of the once-overlooked machinery of elections” at the ground level, to passing laws to bar the “wrong people” from voting, to devising a legal framework to establish the principle that Republican legislatures can “legally” determine choice of electors, whatever the irrelevant public many choose.

Narrowing the debate about the attack on democracy to the attack on the Capitol and spectacularized forms of violence creates the conditions for cynicism, despair and a politics that sabotages itself by virtue of its narrow focus. Moreover, by isolating these events, history disappears and with it the ability to learn from the past in ways that allow us to further understand the long-standing forces and patterns that work to dissolve the line between democracy and authoritarianism. Under such circumstances, remembrance no longer functions as an activity of interrogation, criticism and renewal dedicated to the promise of freedom; on the contrary, it now functions as an “organized structure of misrecognition.” What is under attack by conservative forces is what Tony Morrison described in her novel “Beloved” as “rememory” — a way of thinking memory afresh. As Gabrielle Bellot observes, this takes place in spite of the fact that

 the terrors of the past still live in the present. [As can be seen] in an age when Republicans in Texas and Idaho, among other states have approved legislation prescribing how current events are taught in the classroom severely curtailing discussions of Black American history, and when it is all too common for conservatives to dismiss the existence of systemic racism or the relevance of historical acts of anti-Black violence. In an era when it is still all too common to see Black bodies under the heel of white cops.

Memory has become a site of repression. Its underlying project is the creation of a history without an individual and collective democratic subject. Systemic violence, racial injustice and political corruption have now disappeared from history. In part, this whitewashing of history takes place through both increasing acts of censorship in the schools and through the efforts of Republicans in Congress and their allies in right-wing media to rewrite history by invoking the horrors of 1930s fascist regimes to criticize health workers and policymakers trying to save lives in the midst of the pandemic crisis. This type of moral nihilism is displayed by Tucker Carlson, a white supremacist and Fox News host who has compared Biden’s vaccine mandates to Nazi medical practices, and Fox News contributor Lara Logan, who has compared Dr. Anthony Fauci, Joe Biden’s chief medical adviser, to Josef Mengele, the Nazi doctor who was known as the “Angel of Death” for experimenting on Jews in the concentration camps.

These propagandistic efforts to induce a climate of fear along with a moral and political coma are meant to turn reality on its head, all of which is part of the Republican Party’s dangerous efforts to produce a public consciousness trapped in the fog of historical amnesia and unchecked ignorance. The current assortment of Republican zombies are not merely reactionaries for a new age. On the contrary, to paraphrase Raoul Vaneigem, they are people who have a corpse in their mouths.

The violent attack waged by the armed loyalists to Donald Trump on the Capitol on Jan. 6, 2021, constituted a major political and constitutional crisis in the making. But recognition of the seriousness of the attack did not lead to a deeper understanding of its underlying historical, political and economic causes. Largely ignored in the mainstream media was the growing threat of authoritarianism accelerated through the merging of white supremacy ideology and the savage mechanisms of a neoliberal economy, both of which were powerful forces in creating the conditions for the insurrection. The underlying necropolitics driving the surge of right-wing populism and the attack on the Capitol was largely decoupled from neoliberal capitalism and its related institutions of violence: white supremacy, inequality, the prison-industrial complex, unequal humanity, disposability, militarization, colonialism and its propagandistic cultural apparatuses, what C. Wright Mills called “the observation posts, the interpretation centers, the presentation depots.” Underlying this attack was a counterrevolutionary politics whose aim was the elevation of white nationalist rule and a politics of disposability. In this instance, politics turned deadly with the rise of an authoritarian narrative, in which, as Mbembe states in a different context, those who do not matter are relegated to “death worlds … forms of social existence in which vast populations are subjected to conditions of life conferring upon them the status of living dead.”

None of this appears out of the ordinary in the current historical moment, suggesting that, as Coco Das points out, America has a “Nazi problem.” At the same time, it is crucial to stress that I am not suggesting that the former Trump administration was a precise replica of Hitler’s Nazi Germany. Yet as Churchwell and a number of historians, writers and critics have argued, there are important parallels that cannot be ignored. Fascism has deep roots in American history, and its basic elements can crystallize in different forms under unique historical circumstances. Rather than being a precise replica of the past, fascism should be viewed as a series of patterns that emerge out of different conditions that produce what Hannah Arendt called totalitarian forms.

RELATED: Fascism in America: It’s nowhere near as new as you might think

As the late Daniel Guerin, one of the more authoritative experts on fascism, made clear, there is no one single version of fascism, and indeed “there are many fascisms.” Fascism is not interred strictly in a specific history, and its different histories are crucial to understand because it mutates, evolves and often lies dormant, but it never goes away. The potential for fascism exists in every society, and what its histor(ies) teach us is that there is much to lose if we fail to learn its lessons. In the current era, there is no perfect fit between 1930s Germany and Trump and his followers, but there are alarming echoes of history.

The threat of fascism is especially acute under neoliberalism, which exacerbates the worst elements of gangster capitalism. This includes, most emphatically, the widening of the scourge of inequality, a contempt for social responsibility, promotion of racial hatred, the acceleration of a politics of disposability, a corrupt alignment with big business and a belief in the necessity of a heroic leader. Peter Dolack is right to argue that while “militarism, extreme nationalism, the creation of enemies and scapegoats” are basic elements of a fascist politics, “the most critical component is a rabid propaganda that intentionally raises panic and hate while disguising its true nature and intentions under the cover of a phony populism.” He concludes by stating that “As long as capitalism exist, the threat of fascism exists.” This may be an understatement. If anything, the United States may be well beyond the threat.

If a form of mass resistance is to take place to avoid a fascist coup in the future, it is essential to develop a new language for equating freedom and democracy. This necessitates challenging the basic tenets of neoliberal capitalism and connecting the push for civic literacy. The latter is fundamental to creating a mass movement dedicated to the principles of democratic socialism. Real substantive and lasting change will not come without the existence of mass movement in America. Angela Davis has long advocated that mass movements coupled with a radical shift in consciousness about what kind of world we want are the key to radical change. She is worth quoting at length:

… what I am saying is that in order to make real, lasting change, we have to do the work of building movements. It is masses of people who are responsible for historical change. It was because of the movement, the Black freedom movement, the midcentury Black freedom movement, that Black people acquired the right to vote — not because someone decided to pass a Voting Rights Act. And we know now that that victory cannot simply be consolidated as a bill passed, because there are continual efforts to suppress the power of Black voters. And we know that the only way to reverse that is by building movements, by involving masses of people in the process of historical change. And this holds true for the current administration.[38]

Rather than wage war against neoliberal capitalism in the abstract, it is crucial to wage an educational campaign in which activists speak to people in a language they understand, one that makes visible the problems they face and provides them with a moment of recognition capable of altering their commonsense assumptions about how they deal with the problems they experience. This means addressing fundamental concrete problems such as the threat to social security, funding public education, abolishing student debt, providing free child care, implementing universal health care, providing a social wage for everyone, eliminating homelessness, dismantling the prison-industrial complex, curbing gun violence, making neighborhoods safe, massively curbing military budgets in order to expand programs to eliminate poverty, homelessness, food insecurity and decaying infrastructures, among other issues. These deeply rooted issues begin not with abstractions about predatory capitalism but with a language in which people can recognize themselves.

In addition, there is a crucial need to wage a political and educational campaign to defend schools and other institutions that provide the conditions for people to think critically, question authority, learn the tools for making informed judgments and embrace what it means to be moral witnesses and engaged citizens. Making education central to politics demands a new language, a different regime of desires, new forms of identification and a struggle to create new modes of thinking, subjectivity and agency. It is important to stress that direct action, cultural politics and political education are crucial tools to mobilize public attention as part of a broader campaign both to inform a wider public and create the conditions for mass struggle.  

The United States is in the midst of a cultural war infused by a counterrevolutionary movement that is waging a full-scale attack against ideas, truth, rationality, ethics and justice. This is a site of contestation and struggle over minds, emotions and modes of agency; it takes place in diverse cultural apparatuses that must be challenged, redefined and appropriated as sites of resistance. Fascism removes the language of aggrieved identity, pain and rage from the structures of capitalism while undermining the ideals and promises of a socialist democracy. In part, this is done through a cultural politics that produces civic illiteracy, manufactured ignorance, moral decay and historical amnesia, all the while promoting apocalyptic fears that feed off an exaggerated discourse of alleged catastrophe facing white civilization.

Against this regressive educational and cultural project, a new anti-capitalist politics must arise. Such a struggle needs a new vision, one that merges the power of critique in multiple sites with “a positive, forward-looking program for real change.” Only then will a mass movement arise infused with a language of both critique and hope, willing to engage in the long struggle against fascism and the battle for a future in which matters of justice, freedom and equality become foundational in the struggle for a democratic socialist society. Democracy is under siege in America as the result of a counterrevolutionary movement and criminal conspiracy being waged by right-wing extremists at the highest levels of power and government. There is no room for balance, compromise and indifference, only mass resistance.

DNA used to solve 58-year-old cold case of a 9-year-old girl

Pennsylvania state police were able to close the books on the 58-year-old cold case of a 9-year-old girl named Marise Chiverella using DNA evidence pulled from her jacket.

On March 18, 1964 Chiverella left her home to walk to school and later that afternoon her body was discovered in a coal refuse pit, according to CNN. Officers at the scene were able to determine that the young girl had been sexually assaulted, but were unable to narrow down a suspect for her murder. In 2007, with the help of modern technology, they were able to run tests on her belongings, discarded in the pit along with her body, in search of new DNA evidence. Police pulled a fluid sample from Chiverella’s jacket and ran it through their new system in hopes of narrowing down a suspect, but no matches popped up.

“Police checked the database monthly against all other criminals that had DNA in the system,” said Pennsylvania State Police Lieutenant Devon Brutosky.

RelatedWhy serial killers are drawn to politics

On Thursday, the outcome Pennsylvania police had been seeking for nearly 60 years was finally obtained. A mix of DNA and genealogy tracking produced a positive match to a man named James Paul Forte, who died in 1980.

The naming of Chiverella’s killer can be credited to current, as well as retired, state detectives and officials, but a great deal of assistance was also provided by genealogist Eric Schubert who is skilled at using DNA to track down family trees. Schubert was only 18 years old when he reached out to state police and offered to help search for the young girl’s killer, expecting no compensation in return. 


Want a daily wrap-up of all the news and commentary Salon has to offer? Subscribe to our morning newsletter, Crash Course.


“Mr. Schubert began genealogical work on the family tree of our match and very shortly we were provided names of relatives who were scattered throughout the country,” a police statement said. “We were fortunate enough to have most of the related family cooperate and provide us their DNA samples.”

After making the determination that Forte was the main suspect in Chiverella’s murder, police had his body exhumed to verify the match. Forte would have been around 20 years old when he murdered the 9-year-old girl.

“Our family now knows the identity of her murderer,” said Chiverella’s sister, Carmen Marie Radtke. “Justice has been served today.”

Read more:

The making of Eagly, the “Peacemaker” scene-stealing, butt-kicking eagle whose hugs are miracles

Not all heroes wear capes. Some of them are birds and can fly on their own, thank you very much.

That’s the case with Eagly, the breakout star of “Peacemaker,” the action-comedy series spun off from James Gunn’s 2021 film “The Suicide Squad.” John Cena plays the jingoistic Chris Smith, aka Peacemaker, who’s been away in jail for four years. After recovering from a Suicide Squad mission, he visits his father Auggie (Robert Patrick) – not for the chilly and belligerent reception – but to retrieve a new helmet and his pet bald eagle.

Their warm bond is clear. Eagly greets Peacemaker with happy screeches, wing flaps . . . and a hug. 

“I read an article about a vet who saved an eagle with a broken wing, didn’t see the eagle for years, and, when he did, the eagle went crazy with joy and hugged him,”  Gunn explained via email about his inspiration for creating Eagly. “I liked the idea that Peacemaker has a soft spot for one of the more notoriously grumpy birds – who also has a soft spot for him.”

As for the name that one brave soul dared to call “unoriginal,” Gunn said, “I just don’t think Peacemaker would put much thought into naming his pet, and he’d just call him whatever was the first thing that came to mind.”

RELATED: Bald eagles are making a comback

As one might expect, hugging eagles aren’t easily found, so Eagly had to be created from scratch. Weta Digital (VFX) and Proof Inc. conceived of and delivered the visuals, a nearly photo realistic bird.

“[James Gunn] talked about Eagly being as real as possible,” said VFX Supervisor Betsy Paterson over Zoom. “But at the same time, he needs to feel like a pet. It’s obvious that Eagly adores Peacemaker. Their relationship is much more like a dog and pet parent, rather than your typical bird-trainer kind of thing. We wanted to establish that kind of easy familiarity between them and that he was very easily as protective of Peacemaker and loves Peacemaker.”

Veteran voice actor Dee Bradley Baker also helped bring Eagly to life. Having voiced thousands of characters ranging from platypuses and monkeys to aliens and Star Wars clones, Baker first collaborated on Gunn’s “The Suicide Squad” to provide the sounds for Ratcatcher 2’s pet rat, Sebastian.

“They called me to problem solve, and I did Sebastian and really all the rats,” Baker told Salon in a Zoom call. “I was doing rat sounds for a whole day with James Gunn and the group, and they loved it . . . And because of that, I think that that I earned their trust, and they just called me in to do Eagly.”

The hatching of Eagly: design and vocal conception

PeacemakerEagly screaming at Chris on “Peacemaker” (HBO Max)

While the VFX crew studied videos of eagles to get Eagly’s movements and mannerisms, they also went straight to the source to design his body.

“We did bring in a real eagle, scanned him, and did lots of photographs for reference,” said Paterson. “He’s a little bit bigger than a typical eagle, but there certainly are eagles his size.”

Boosting Eagly’s size was done for practical reasons, especially since one of his trademarks is hugging Peacemaker.

“We decided he just needs to be a little bit bigger because John’s such a big guy, that the average eagle looked a bit small next to him,” said Paterson. “We pumped that up about 20%. You need large wings to reach around John Cena.”

RELATED: Hugs are back! But do you really want one?

There were two practical models made to stand in for Eagly as well. One was for actual interactions with Cena. Paterson said, “Anytime you see him pet Eagly or they hug he’s got this bowling pin-shaped gray pillow that he’s hugging so that way he could have something physical to react with.”

PeacemakerEagly giving a hug to Christopher Smith / Peacemaker on “Peacemaker” (HBO Max)

The second Eagly model looked far more realistic and functioned as a stand-in for the actual shoots. 

“We had a taxidermist, a kind of model guy come in,” said Paterson. “It wasn’t an actual dead eagle; it was fake. I guess there’s a big market for people who want something that looks like a dead eagle in their house. But basically, they construct it and use chicken feathers. It looked very real. 

“We took that out and we walked it through every single shot that Eagly so we could see what his presence would be,” said Paterson. And what the light would look like on his feathers for shadows and for the DP to make sure that Eagly has his hero light.”

Eagly does not work quickly. The whole process from start to finish with the visuals took about a year.

“While we were shooting [the series] WETA was building the model and starting to do animation tests,” said Paterson. “So while we were on set, we would start to see the animation tests come in so we could say, ‘Oh, hey look, this  going to work this way.’ It would inspire James. As soon as he saw the the animation, he was like, ‘OK we got to we got to put in as much Eagly as possible because that’s going to be everybody’s favorite character.'”

Once the animated Eagly is added to the show, Baker comes in to add the vocal touches. 

“They had temped in what I think are real eagle or hawk sounds, which sounded pretty good,” said Baker. “But they couldn’t cover all the nuances of the bird’s expression and all the specific behaviors of all of it. For a creature, I don’t think of it as sound effects; it’s acting. Usually the creature, there’s something going on up here. And there’s conversational aspects to the subtext of what the creature is uttering. That’s why they need an actor.”

You can see Eagly in action capping the glorious “Peacemaker” opening credits sequence in which the cast dances in a jerky manner to “Do Ya Wanna Taste It” by Wig Wam. At the very end, Eagly flies in and squawks, isn’t quite in the right spot and has to adjust. Take a look:

“All that James said was, ‘I want him to fly him to the front and do a ta-da, but WETA came up with the little ‘checking his mark and shuffling into place’ thing, which we all loved immediately,” said Paterson. “It’s subtle, but you can definitely see him doing it. We had the title sequence to work with, so we knew that slightly awkward dance, that weird attitude that James was going for. WETA did a great job of coming up with just that little touch that kind of felt like he was part of that whole weird, awkward mood.”

“I watch it every time, I don’t skip it,” said Baker about the main titles. The animated touches to Eagly made it easy for him to match the vocalizations to the picture.

“There’s all these little details that the animators did that are quite beautiful, they’re quite realistic,” he said. “It’s not just a screech; there’s little squawks and little hmm’s and ha’s and hesitations. There’s all these little, details to the expression that are already animated. You’ve got to make sure that to to lip-sync that or beak-sync that just right.”

Fleshing out the fledgling

PeacemakerEagly sitting in a car on “Peacemaker” (HBO Max)Eagly isn’t just an eagle, but a character on “Peacemaker” with his own personality. 

“I’ve worked on a lot of character creature shows, and what happens is, as it develops, they they become a character in their own right,” said Paterson. “You start to respect that character, even though they’re made up and say, ‘Well, Eagly really wouldn’t do that,’ or, ‘This is what Eagly would do in this situation.'” 

Besides giving great hugs, Eagly is also a bird of prey, and thus drops his catches at Peacekeeper’s feet as a gesture of care by providing food. 

“We had a stuffed possum and a stuffed squirrel, and so we would drop the practical things in,” said Paterson. “But most of the time, they would end up getting replaced with a CG version of it that looked exactly like it because as soon as Eagly touches it, it has to be seem to interact with him.”

And while Eagly’s love of Peacekeeper is undeniable, so is his distrust of others. Now that Peacemaker has joined a black ops team known as Project Butterfly that targets aliens known as Butterflies, Eagly encounters many more humans. In one scene, he and team member Economos (Steve Agee) climb into the backseat of a car, and Eagly pecks him persistently.

“He cues off of Peacemaker, and Peacemaker’s always annoyed by Economos,” said Paterson. “And in general, Eagly doesn’t like anyone except for John. He’s always wary and doesn’t want to get too close to anybody except for John.”

Eagly also gives Peacemaker’s team member Leota Adebayo (Danielle Brooks) a peck upon first meeting her. Perhaps she shouldn’t have scoffed at the idea of a hugging eagle, even when Peacemaker had told her, “You don’t want to believe in miracles, that’s on you.”

Check out their meeting in this HBO Max clip:

Eagles aren’t necessarily known for their expressive faces, like dogs have, and pushing the animation to try and create expressions would’ve made Eagly seem less realistic. 

“It’s very subtle. All of us working on it have pets, and all of that goes into it,” said Paterson. “Once the character moves further along you can do a lot just with a head turn and a look. Only once or twice we did very subtle widening or shrinking of his eyelids just to kind of emphasize things. But the animators were fantastic with just the slight attitude adjustments, the head cocks.”

Sometimes, Eagly is animated in such a way that Baker has to wing it, so to speak, when it comes to creating the right vocalizations.

“There’s a scene with Eagly sticking his face out the window of a car and letting us tongue loll,” said Baker. “What do you do with that? Is there a sound? Maybe there is, maybe there’s not, but you’re not going to get that from an eagle library. It’s all to picture, it’s what plays and what feels right with the comedy or the emotion of the scene.”

Although there is not an eagle library, Baker did record a range of vocalizations so that there would be an Eagly library that the production could use to make the character express himself just so.

RELATED: From fat bears to “Nature,” TV displays our complicated feelings about the natural world

“I’ve got a pretty good ear for those kinds of things,” said Baker. “I grew up with a connection to animals and I watched animal documentaries and monster movies to add to my database of sounds. Then I try copying them and messing around with them. 

“After recording to picture, I record a lot more sounds than they need,” he continued. “I’ll hit little beats of moments or behavior like confusion or anger or curiosity. It’s like a little sound bucket for each of these emotional beats. They have the choice to later just assemble the sandwich any way that they wish. It’s got to be a broad enough palette of usable acting moments.”

Eagly takes flight (and in a fight)

PeacemakerEagly on “Peacemaker” (HBO Max)“I wanted to see him hug Peacemaker and kick ass,” Gunn said about scenes on his Eagly wishlist. “And in the show he had ample opportunity to do both.”

In particular, we see Eagly do both in a recent episode. Throughout the series, Peacemaker has been reckoning with a traumatic past and his father Auggie, who is a racist supervillain known as the White Dragon. It all comes to a head when Auggie decides that his son is now expendable. 

When Auggie and his white supremacist followers catch up to Peacemaker and begin to pummel him, Eagly proves that he’s no mere pet by entering the fray. He dives, swoops and attacks the men while also dodging gunfire. 

The scene doesn’t last long, but the entire sequence took at least half a year to put together.


Want a daily wrap-up of all the news and commentary Salon has to offer? Subscribe to our morning newsletter, Crash Course.


“Stunts were rehearsed probably for two weeks or so,” said Paterson. “We had 20 stunt guys, and I would have to say, ‘He’s gonna fly in here, and he’s gonna hit you, and then he’s gonna hit you,’ to get the choreography right with this invisible thing. They all had to really imagine it. It was quite tough to get them all all kind of in sync and reacting properly to the thing that they couldn’t see.”

On top of that, in order to see the fight from the eagle-eyed view, the cameras also had to swoop around. “The cameramen’s got to fly around and follow him through the air. So there was a lot of me standing there saying, ‘No, no, you go like this and like that.’ Shooting it took a couple of days.”

RELATED: The “Only Murders in the Building” stunt double gag isn’t just hilarious, it’s subversive justice

Paterson continued, “Then of course, the animation, and then editing took quite a while to get exactly the right angles to tell the story of what’s going on. We were able to adjust Eagly’s movements so that he hits everybody just at the right time as they fall over. I think it’s really effective and really feels like he is participating and helping out in that fight. So yeah, it was probably six or eight months from beginning to end.”

Eagly is taken out during the fight, however, when he attacks Auggie, who punches him out cold with an armored powered fist. Even on a superhero series that has cartoon-like violence, it’s disturbing to see an animal harmed, even a digitally created one. Seeing Eagly down, Peacemaker breaks free of his assailants and attacks his father . . . and eventually kills him.

“That was definitely the emotional heart of it,” said Paterson. “It’s really what leads Peacemaker to do what he does. He sees his best friend hurt, possibly dead. He doesn’t know at that point. He needed that motivation to cross the line the way that he did.”

PeacemakerEagly and Christopher Smith / Peacemaker on “Peacemaker” (HBO Max)As with any actor, a good scene partner helps to sell a performance, and Baker makes a point to give credit to Cena for helping create the emotional bond with Eagly on screen.

“John Cena plays it beautifully,” said Baker. “He connects with Eagly, and that’s not easy to do, for an actor to connect with this digital creature. That requires really good acting imagination to do that kind of green-screen acting to a puppet or a reference ball.

“If he didn’t, it wouldn’t matter how well I’m performing Eagly because the relationship wouldn’t be there. But happily, it’s already halfway there because of what he’s giving. And so I’m able to give that back on the other side once the digitization of the animation is finished. It’s a very interesting, fraught process and kind of confounding to me how it even gets done to work so beautifully. But I think it certainly does in ‘Peacemaker.'”

After the fight, Peacemaker brings Eagly to a vet’s office for treatment, but even then it’s not clear whether the bird will pull through. It’s an affecting scene when Adebayo witnesses Peacemaker praying for his friend’s recovery and then seeing the two embrace when Eagly wakes. The hug is Adebayo’s proof of miracles.

“It was definitely very emotional for everybody to think, ‘Oh my God, Eagly’s hurt,” said Paterson, ‘which helps sell it even more when he walks out of the vet’s office on his own two legs. It made us all feel better.”

And that’s just one more way Eagly is not like the average eagle. In many scenes, this giant bird of prey decides to walk around instead of flying. 

“Something I had never thought about that much, was how eagles walk, because he does spend quite a bit of time on the ground walking around,” said Paterson. “They have a pretty goofy walk and they have a lot of attitude through their walk, so we  we pushed that up a bit. James really liked him having that kind of gangster attitude in his walk.”

RELATED: Why is walking so good for the brain? 

Perhaps this is why when they leave the vet’s office, Eagly doesn’t fly but walks alongside the Project Butterfly members. It doesn’t seem like the most efficient or elegant way for Eagly to travel, but that’s not the point.

“It was definitely James that wanted the walking,” said Paterson. “The director of that episode Brad Anderson had this idea that well, he’s just been injured, so maybe maybe Peacemaker should carry him. We did shoot a version like that, but it just it wasn’t right. 

“So we went with the one where he’s doing the walk. It was intentional because he’s part of the team at that point. So to just have him swoop through wouldn’t have really sold that. We had a lot of fun. As soon as WETA showed it to us, that was everybody’s favorite shot. ‘That’s going into marketing,’ James said.”

With only one episode left in the season, Eagly is more important than ever. “He is a full-fledged member of the team at that point [in the finale],” said Paterson. “He’s given a very difficult mission. And I won’t tell you whether or not he succeeds.”

Overall, Paterson has been surprised and gratified at the loving reception for Eagly. “I’ve worked in this business a very long time and worked on many things. But this is the first time I’ve got people random people from my past emailing me like, ‘Oh my god, I love Eagly.'”

Baker added, “I’m very proud of Eagly. Long may he fly!”

The “Peacemaker” finale streams Thursday, Feb. 17 on HBO Max.

More stories you might like: 

Diddling while Rome burns: How sex party purveyors survived the pandemic

Rest in peace, vanilla sex. It was a casualty of the COVID-19 pandemic, at least in the hearts and minds of many Americans.

Mind you, sex itself seems to be alive and well. Indeed, according to an early release of data from a survey conducted by psychologist Justin Lehmiller of the University of Indiana’s Kinsey Institute and presented in late 2021 at the National Sexual Health Conference, the average American wants oodles of sex, and now they want the kind that pushes them out of their comfort zones.

In the survey, over half (51%) of respondents said their erotic interests have become “experimental.” More than a third (37%) are newly interested in kink. Almost a quarter (22%) want additional partners.

In a Zoom call, Dr. Lehmiller speculated about why Americans seem eager to up the ante on sexual encounters. “With pandemic boredom and stress, people may need more intense stimulation to amp up desire. Also, all the deaths have made it clear to everyone that time is limited. Given that, some people may be ready to have the sort of sex they’ve feared.”

How, though, can anyone risk experimental, outré, and promiscuous sex during a time of contagion? To find out who’s trying and how, I interviewed three producers of high-kink sex parties (a.k.a. play parties, lifestyle events, and orgies). I was directed to these producers by respected academic researchers in sexuality. To me, all three producers seemed to be good people in a business that, over the past two years, has been tremendously difficult.

RELATED: How the pandemic ruined sex

Talking to the producers, I wanted to know what kinds of people promiscuously seek out carnal connection in a time of risk. I had truly mundane questions, too. For example, how does a sex party even begin to comply with mask mandates?

The three producers told me that minimizing risk at their events is a universal principle. Each producer emphasized to me that they repeatedly remind guests of the importance of clearly communicating to prospective partners their consent (or lack thereof) to specific sexual activities. From my conversations, I also learned that, almost by definition, Covid safety measures at a sex party are imperfect. Indeed, one producer I interviewed explained that his party accidentally became a superspreader event.

Shay, co-proprietor of Playscapes NYC.

Shay (an alias) describes Playscapes NYC as a space for risk-aware, consensual revelry.

Shay’s early business-building technique was to go to regular ol’ Brooklyn get-togethers and ever so casually ask new acquaintances, “Hey, want to come to a sex party?” Then Shay would whip out hot-off-the-press business cards.

Shay (preferred pronouns are “they” and “them”) has light-colored, straight hair and a sweet and perky disposition. It’s completely possible that, when canvassing for people for their bacchanalia, they sounded as wholesome as apple pie with a nipple on top: “Hey, wanna ride on a really cool sex swing?” Shay might innocently ask.

The Sex Swing is one of Playscape NYC’s most popular attractions. Riders sit with feet anchored in stirrups akin to those at any OBGYN’s office. The Swing carries them back and forth into repeated contact with whatever dildo, feather, or nimble finger is on the opposite end of the pendulum ride. It’s a bit like Pin-the-Tail-on-the-Donkey with slightly higher stakes.

Another popular attraction is the Saint Andrew’s Cross. Partygoers are crucified upside down and flogged à la the canonized saint. Playscapes NYC also has spanking benches and wax play. (You drip hot wax on each other’s tenders and rip it off once it’s cooled.) There are sessions of Shibari, a type of rope bondage that originated in ancient Japan.

In a Zoom interview, Shay explained, “There are typically between 80 and 140 people at our parties. One area in our space is just for mingling. So, if this is your first event, you can enter the full-on play slowly. The Playroom itself generally has about ten mattresses and a ton of torture furniture.”

More than just a place for quickies, Playscapes NYC tries to be an intentional community, with a come-for-the-f**ks-and-leave-with-new-friends attitude. Prospective attendees are vetted, beginning with an online questionnaire asking how the applicant defines “consent” and what he, she, or they expect not just from a play party but from an ethical one. Next is an interview. Applicants have to provide personal references. And, of course, guests must produce proof of full vaccination and evidence of a recent negative COVID-19 test.

Lexie, the chef-turned-sex-party host

With lockdown in March 2020, Lexie (also an alias) shuttered her small sex party business. She and her husband sequestered themselves at home.

A few months later, when COVID seemed on the verge of defeat, Lexie threw a few orgies. She closed up shop again when the delta variant surged.

She hasn’t, however, bunkered at home. Most weekends, she and her husband go to sex parties in Palm Springs.

“The ‘lifestyle,'” she told me in a Zoom call, “is just part of who we are.”

Lexie described the typical party. “There are couples, throuples, people having sex alone, people who just watch, people who like to be watched. The variety is awesome. Some people don’t even have or watch sex. They just like the energy or like to be naked or like openness. At some parties, you don’t even have to be naked.”


Want more health and science stories in your inbox? Subscribe to Salon’s weekly newsletter The Vulgar Scientist.


I asked Lexie what she does first thing when she walks into a sex party. For example, are there minutes of awkward conversation?

“Sometimes I still have my bag on my shoulder when someone’s tongue is in my throat,” she spoke loudly and clearly from a hairdresser’s chair about group groping, and she proudly called herself a “slut.”

Clearly, Lexie refuses the idea that fully consensual sex is dishonorable.

“There is power and transcendence in being exactly who you are,” Lexie told me. “When I found the lifestyle, it was the first time I realized there is nothing wrong with me for liking lots of sex with many people and wanting to be naked. There are so many people like me. I am normal. This is normal.”

Lexie is a chef. She told me that the food at most sex parties is airplane-snack quality. Her parties’ food is different. She serves gastronomic delights. However, in serving the food, Lexie noticed that some young women have too much body shame to eat in front of men.

“Women need to get over this shit where they can’t eat in front of a guy,” Lexie told me. “I will not be a party to that. Women would come to my parties where there was all this wonderful food and say, ‘Oh, but I feel so uncomfortable eating in public.’ You’ll do all this other stuff with everyone looking but you won’t eat? I’d think. But then, there was a young woman who’d always refused to have a plate of food in front of men. I worried about her self-concept and her health. Really, I was concerned. I finally figured out that she was going to be fine the night she told me that she had just simultaneously gnawed on a chicken leg and ridden a dick.”

Bob Hannaford, co-proprietor of “Naughty Events”

Naughty Events hosts multi-day sex parties for couples at vacation spots around the world. The largest annual event is Naughty N’awlins. In 2019, over 2600 people attended the festivities, as well as workshops on topics like “How to Have Anal Sex.”

In 2020, because of the pandemic, only 283 people attended. This was good because (spoiler alert) Naughty N’awlins 2020 became a superspreader event. So that other party producers might learn from what happened in New Orleans, Bob Hannaford publicly raked through his decision-making process. As he explained, “I live my life on my sleeve for the whole world to see.”

Bob had wondered in early 2020 whether hosting his regular New Orleans event was going to be possible. After all, vaccines weren’t generally available. He consulted with state police, local health officials, the fire marshal, at least one virologist, and a member of the White House COVID-19 advisory team.

As Bob explained in a Zoom call, “The advice pointed toward ‘don’t cancel.’ One doctor said to me, ‘People are going to come to New Orleans that week looking for sex no matter what you do. You need to create a bubble of protection. You may not be able to keep people altogether safe, but with planning, you may keep them safe-er.'”

And so, Bob and Tess (his wife and co-proprietor) planned. They offered people with compromised immune systems and comorbidities full refunds. They made sure that check-in at the hotel would be touchless and include temperature monitoring, social distancing, and hand sanitizing. Each guest would need to present an antibody test and wear a mask in public places. The regular, elaborately designed Playroom featuring many beds shoved together for big, worm ball-like orgies would be scrapped. The popular Dungeon would be used only for torture demos. At workshops, pairs of chairs would be socially distanced from other pairs of chairs. There wouldn’t be a dance floor.

When I commented to Bob about the irony of social distancing and touchless registration for people about to get naked and squishy together, he (like Shay and Lexie) pointed out the importance of consent. Few people want to share germs willy-nilly. They might have specific kinds of sex, however, with people who have taken precautions.

Alas, the best laid plans of mice and men (pun intended, as is the nod to poet Robert Burns) didn’t work as well as Bob and his advisors had hoped.

Of the only 283 attendees that pre-vaccine year, 41 (14.48%) developed COVID. As Bob explained in our interview, “In the weeks following the event, I learned that most people who’d gotten COVID hadn’t stayed in the safety bubble we’d created. They’d partied out in the Quarter and taken off their masks.”

The next year, 2021, Naughty N’walins was held during the delta surge with much better results. According to Bob, of the 1,200 people who braved attending, only 10 (.83%) got sick.

“Keeping things safe was a lot of work,” Bob told me. “But everyone had a magical experience seeing friends they hadn’t seen in a year and a half. Our events are just as much about camaraderie and friendship as they are about sex. There’s a collective spirit — no less than there is among people who do needlework together or who support the same ball team. We all need to socialize and congregate with people like us.”

For the sake of that community spirit, here’s hoping that omicron will have waned by July for Naughty N’walins 2022. Plus, Bob says the Playroom and Dungeon will be back in action this year.

* * *

I have no doubt that the social scene at lifestyle parties can be marked by caring and friendship. At the same time, sexual appetite appears not to be reliably pro-life, propelling otherwise careful people into taking mortal risks.

Some animals, like humans, are dying to mate. Members of the antechinus genus (a mouse-sized Australian marsupial) have so much seasonal, multi-partner sex that, at the end of several weeks of it, all of the males go blind and then fall from the trees, dead. Male brown widow spiders willingly hurl themselves into the jaws of hungry mates.

As a general rule of nature, female animals evolve to fare well during and after sex that is fatal to males. Likely that is because, once inseminated, they have babies to bear and feed.

I now understand that, for some people, the “lifestyle” is their community. Like members of any supportive group, they want to see each other. However, with Covid, just getting coughed on can be fatal. Why don’t they keep their pants on during this emergency like the rest of us do? Is the fact that people go to orgies during a pandemic evidence that Charles Darwin was right — that, for many animals, the mating urge can overwhelm the tendency towards self-protection? Or was Sigmund Freud right when, for human animals, he linked his hypothetical life instinct (Eros) to a death instinct (Thanatos)?

Was Jung correct when he called sex a power that both beautifies and destroys?

Do people at pandemic orgies risk dying because it’s titillating in a way that I don’t understand to wave life a flashy, fond farewell?

Rhetorical questions, all. I do think, however, that Dr. Lehmiller may have been onto something when he gave a nod to pandemic boredom and stress. Two full years into our acquaintance with the virus known as SARS-CoV-2, I for one seem to have developed a rhino-skinned emotional hide. If that’s common, and if some people need to play with mortality in order to feel something through that hide — well, who can blame them? Perhaps there is something apt about the French idiom for “orgasm,” which translates to “little death.”

Read more on Americans’ sex lives:

Decoding brain diseases, molecule by molecule

My grandmother was in the advanced stages of Alzheimer’s disease when she died in 2007, not long after I graduated from journalism school. As a budding health reporter, I tried to learn everything I could about Alzheimer’s and wrote about new research on preventions and treatments that everyone wanted to believe had potential. It is demoralizing and infuriating to think about how, nearly 15 years later, no breakthrough cure or proven prevention strategy has panned out.

But neurologist Sara Manning Peskin argues in “A Molecule Away from Madness: Tales of the Hijacked Brain” that we could be on the brink of a revolution in confronting diseases like this because scientists have a better handle on how molecules work in the brain. Molecular research has transformed our understanding and treatment of cancer in recent years, and now it is beginning to do the same for brain diseases. In fact, it has already been key to solving several mysteries of why seemingly healthy people appear to suddenly fall into a mental inferno.

While the shadow of Alzheimer’s looms over the book, representing an intractable condition that Peskin routinely confronts in her clinical practice, “A Molecule Away from Madness” is a fascinating tour of different kinds of ways that the brain can lead to the breakdown of mental life. The book is organized according to how different molecules interact with our brains to wreak havoc — Peskin calls them “mutants, rebels, invaders, and evaders.” Some have helped scientists solve longstanding puzzles, while others, like the molecules associated with Alzheimer’s, continue to leave millions of people waiting for a cure.

Peskin delivers sensitive and detailed profiles of patients, doctors who aren’t taken seriously by their peers, and collaborations of researchers who defy skepticism to come up with much-needed answers. The most compelling chapters introduce us to a patient with a mysterious illness, then take us back in time to meet the pioneering scientists and doctors who worked to understand the origins of the relevant disease. “Sometimes outlandish, often criticized, and forever devoted to their art, these scientists and doctors have brought cognitive neurology to where we stand today: on the precipice of a molecular breakthrough,” Peskin writes.

The mutants of the book have to do with DNA sequences gone wrong. In one case, we encounter a young woman Peskin calls Amelia (all patient names in the book have been changed) in a clinic waiting room, about to find out if she is destined to develop Huntington’s disease, a genetic disorder that results in loss of control of movement and impaired intellectual abilities. Before Amelia’s mother died of the condition, she “had become irrational, demented, and exhausted from unintentional movements that made her limbs look like they were infused with a fluctuating electric current,” Peskin writes. By contrast, Amelia throws herself into activities that involve exact body movements, and has become an expert in aerial performance.

But no amount of rigorous physical training can stave off genetic fate. In the Huntington’s gene, the number of DNA nucleotides that spell out CAG are the key indicator. More than 40 repeats signal that the disease will take hold; fewer than 35 repeats signifies safety, and in between is a gray area. Sadly, Amelia learns that she has the Huntington’s mutation — but Peskin ends on a hopeful note: At least one treatment is in development, which may ensure that Amelia does not suffer the same fate as her mother.

The rebels of the book are proteins behaving badly, such as prions — infectious proteins that cause the body to weaponize normal proteins into something dangerous. The discovery of this process came about partly because of a disease called kuru that was found among the Fore people in Papua New Guinea in the 1950s. Kuru is now extinct, but it led to the insight that certain proteins can infect people and lead to neurodegenerative disorders like mad cow disease. Some researchers believe — though this is controversial — that Alzheimer’s and Parkinson’s diseases could also be related to prions.

Then there are the invaders, smaller molecules that are generally toxins and drugs made outside the body but that create destruction within. One riveting account involves the element mercury, which “tricks the nervous system into sabotaging itself.” In antiquity, some believed mercury was, in Peskin’s words, an “antidote to mortality” — as did the first Qin dynasty emperor, whose rule ended in 210 BCE when he died at age 49 of probable mercury toxicity, according to historians.

For millennia afterward, mercury still held its status as a medical wonder — for example, in the 1800s, she writes, “doctors at the time believed mercury purged the body of toxins by inducing voluminous diarrhea.” She recounts a historian’s quest to prove that Abraham Lincoln took mercury-based medication called blue mass — possibly for constipation and depression. Though still ambiguous, some still think that mercury may have caused the president’s “moments of uncontrolled wrath,” and he stopped taking it early in his presidency.

Finally, there are the evaders, and they are our friends — “we depend on having them around and we suffer when they are missing,” Peskin writes. For example, a patient she calls Lisa starts creating false memories, and a litany of scans and other diagnostic tests cannot find the source. When her husband mentions her alcoholism, a doctor realizes the connection between Lisa and a vitamin deficiency identified nearly 150 years earlier in a different context: Dutch troops in Java eating white rice, and chickens fed their leftovers. The magic vitamin they were all missing is thiamine, also known as vitamin B1, which “protects us from dangerous forms of oxygen that would otherwise decimate our brain cells.” Heavy drinking, it turns out, can decrease the gut’s ability to absorb thiamine. But why this causes damage to memory, and only in some people, remains a mystery.

Researchers will go to great lengths to prove that they are right, sometimes even experimenting on themselves. One memorable chapter about another evader takes place in the early 20th century in the American Southeast. Around 3 million people came down with a mysterious illness called pellagra in about a 35-year period, and no one knew why until a doctor, Joseph Goldberger, figured out in the 1910s that dietary changes could eradicate the disease.

Unfortunately, his methods were controversial and the scientific establishment did not believe his initial findings. In order to prove that pellagra was due to diet and not a transmissible disease, he, his wife, and other volunteers ingested or got injected with blood, urine, skin flakes, and other excretions from pellagra patients. None of them developed pellagra, proving that bodily fluids could not infect anyone with the disease. While he did not live to learn the specific molecule responsible, Goldberger’s insight that people were sick because of a vitamin deficiency led to its eventual discovery and fortification in flour. That missing vitamin was nicotinic acid, later known as niacin, and it helps us evade pellagra.

As for Alzheimer’s, Peskin files it under “DNA mutants.” While many cases have not been linked to any particular gene, a highly genetic form of the disease found in the Antioquia region of Colombia is key to some promising cutting-edge research. The research began in 1984 with a doctor named Francisco Lopera, who, as a neurology resident in Medellín, had a patient in his mid-40s who showed symptoms of Alzheimer’s disease. As it turned out, the patient’s father and grandfather also showed memory loss symptoms before age 50 — as did many others in the community. Locals called the malady “la bobera de la familia,” meaning “the idiocy of the family.” Lopera traced the condition back to a couple of European descent born in Medellín in the 1700s, representing the likely ancestors of tens of thousands of people.

With such a strong genetic connection, this community represents a unique opportunity to understand early-onset Alzheimer’s. By studying this group, Lopera, in collaboration with neurologist Kenneth Kosik, has linked la bobera to a single molecule, a DNA mutation in a gene called presenilin 1. This year, Peskin writes, they expect to release the results of a clinical trial in the Colombian community of a drug that “causes plaques to change from an insoluble clump to a soluble form that immune cells can mop up and dispose of.”

It could be many years before any real breakthroughs happen for Alzheimer’s patients and those predisposed to dementia. But Peskin maintains hope: “In 25 years, if all goes well, we will look back on the dark days when dementia still meant an irreversible march toward the erasure of mind. We will tell the story of how we used molecular science to save hundreds of thousands of brains from wilting into nonexistence — and the people we rescued will be there with us, retelling the tale.”


Elizabeth Landau is a science journalist and communicator living in Washington, D.C. She has contributed to The New York Times, The Washington Post, Quanta Magazine, Smithsonian, and Wired, among other publications. Find her on Twitter at @lizlandau.

This article was originally published on Undark. Read the original article.

Why is Joe Burrow so great? Because he’s from Appalachia

You may know Joe Burrow as the 25-year-old quarterback leading his team, the Cincinnati Bengals, to their first Super Bowl in over 30 years. You may know him as the soft-spoken, polite athlete who plays chess and who cried during his Heisman Trophy acceptance speech (which later launched a half a million dollars in donations).

But before that, he was a high school kid in my town taking college classes, like my friend’s English course, where he wrote a paper about his dream to be a football player at The Ohio State University (he accomplished that dream, but when he didn’t play, he transferred to LSU). Before that, he was in middle school with a girl I babysat. He grew up in the county where my son was born and where I lived for much of my life: rural Athens County in southeast, Appalachian Ohio.

There are facts about home: It’s often ranked as the poorest county in Ohio, and one of the poorest communities in the United States. It’s a 90-minute drive, each way, from a major airport. The creeks in the woods are orange-red because of acid mine damage. When the spring floods come — and they always do — they swallow the bike path and parts of roads that are the only way into or out of some of the smaller villages, cutting these places off. 

But as Burrow has risen from the high school star who made the local papers every Friday to Heisman winner, the way those facts are presented continues to be disappointing. The rest of the world likes to talk about rural poverty and the Appalachia where Burrow grew up in a certain way. Mostly: othering and miserable. 

A “dusty old town, a place still wheezing long after the coal miners left,” wrote the Washington Post. (Coal mines are still operational there, and Appalachian Ohio is way too humid and green to be dusty.) 

Burrow came from “humble beginnings” wrote thousands of journalism outlets from Larry Brown Sports to Sports Illustrated. (Burrow is the son of a former football player and university coach, and while being Associate Head Coach at a place like Ohio University in Athens does not pay as much as other institutions, football is certainly in the younger Burrow’s blood).

My sport was dance. I was kicked off the gymnastics team when I grew too tall, and dropped out of swim team due to anxiety. I can’t write with authority about how Burrow plays football. But I know what makes him special. It’s the place where he — and my son — was raised.

Related: Echoes of that “Ted Lasso” Midwest niceness in “Somebody Somewhere”

One morning early in my son’s life, I opened the porch door to find a stranger standing there. She had a restaurant-sized tray of homemade enchiladas and a jar of brownies. She was out of breath and apologized. “I’m sorry I didn’t come sooner. I just found out.”

“Found out what?” I asked.

“Well,” the stranger said. “That you had a baby.”

I had no family close when my son was born. My husband at the time didn’t live with us, and soon would not be my husband. Appalachian Ohio became (and is) my family. The woman was the first of many to show up at the door with food. The chain had been activated, and for months, I would come home to find meals on the porch. After that, came the clothes: baby clothes for my son. Blankets. 

The chain sets in motion in Appalachian Ohio upon births, deaths, illnesses, hardship. Strangers give to strangers. People who have very little give to those who have less. Long before swaths of the country had even heard of mutual aid — where community members help each other cooperatively, something that took off during the pandemic — I experienced it firsthand in southeast Ohio. 

When I asked how much I owed the owner of the repair shop for fixing the tires on my ancient Honda, he looked at the car seat in the back, and said, “You don’t owe me nothing. Just keep that baby safe.”

My son had been born in a rural and remote part of the state where, as Burrow mentioned in his now-legendary Heisman speech, the food insecurity rate is much higher than the national average. But I’ve never been to someone’s house in southeast Ohio — no matter how so-called “humble” — without being offered a meal.

At the chicken restaurant, the fry cook peers out of the order window to see who’s ordering, how many children they have with them, and adjusts the free pieces of chicken she puts in the bag accordingly. 

The Italian restaurant offers free lunches every Tuesday. You don’t have to say anything. You just stand outside and the owner will bring food to you. One summer, the restaurant gave away free seedings. I took an armful, and when the vegetables grew strong in the garden, I put the squash and peppers on my neighbors’ porches.

That’s the way of it. You pass it on. You can’t walk down a street in my son’s hometown — and Burrow’s home county — without seeing plant starters, vegetables, bags of clothes or canned goods out by the curb with a note that reads Free. Please take.

When my son started elementary school, I learned to pack a double lunch in case he met a classmate who was hungry. I left a bowl of food on the dining room table always, in easy reach of small hands, whatever children might come in the house (and my son invited many).

Once someone has helped you, you learn to offer help to others, however you can in Appalachia. 

“I tried to leave a legacy of hard work and preparation, and loyalty, and dedication everywhere I go,” Burrow said in his speech. He was talking about football, but could also be speaking to growing up in Appalachia where my son learned to shovel sidewalks with our neighbor (a retired coach too), and by the time he was in first grade, would clean the walks and porches of elderly folk.

Burrow’s Heisman speech — where he mentioned his family so many times I lost count, but he also mentioned home again and again — triggered a chain of help that has become the largest outpouring Athens County has ever seen. A fellow Athens High School grad watched Burrow’s speech, and set up a donation page for the Athens County Food Pantry. In a week, people had donated half a million dollars, an unprecedented amount, and donations that proved invaluable as southeastern Ohio was hit hard by the pandemic.

Donations keep coming. On Super Bowl Sunday, the church of my former high school teacher, retired now in a city hours from Athens, is passing out 300 boxes to be filled with food and donations meant for southeast Ohio. She told me it’s “motivated by the giving Joe Burrow has done.”

Back in Athens county, restaurants are offering specials like the Burrow Bowl, the Cup of Joe at one of the coffeeshops, the Go Joe shot at Tony’s Tavern, with some proceeds going to the food bank.

Burrow does charity work himself, like the NFL’s “My Cause My Cleats,” where he raffles off cleats with proceeds to go to the Athens County Food Pantry. But beyond the gigantic gift of financial help and motivating others, Burrow’s speaking openly about poverty, about hunger — that’s a gift too.

NBC Sports interviewed a teacher, Sarah Crabtree, who shared a letter written to Burrow by one of her students at Federal Hocking Middle School: “You have inspired me to not be embarrassed by my life story and work hard to achieve my goals . . .” The student signed his name, and under it wrote: “Just a kid from Southeast Ohio.” “

The phrase – a riff on the LeBron James quote, “I’m just a kid from Akron” – has taken off, appearing on signs, mugs, walls painted in support of Burrow in Ohio. On a sweatshirt my son wore to school the Friday before the Super Bowl. His shirt is supporting the Bengals and Burrow, of course — but it’s also supporting him, my son, and kids like him, kids born into poverty in a place people didn’t give much thought to before, forget about putting it on a T-shirt.

Sure, America loves its male athletes. Maybe especially Ohio. When I was a child, the high school boys’ basketball team won the state championship against a better-ranked, much bigger school. The road up to the high school was renamed Championship Drive. And Athens has done some of that, temporarily renaming Burr Oak State Park Burrow Oak State Park, for example, and permanently renaming the high school stadium.

But it’s not just that Burrow plays well, better than anyone from southeast Ohio in recent memory, and that he has gone farther than anyone too. It’s that he openly acknowledges he didn’t get to the Super Bowl or the NFL or even to college alone.

Some notably famous people came from Appalachian Ohio, as famous people come from everywhere. Sometimes, they don’t bring it up in interviews. Sometimes, they lose their accents. Sometimes, they don’t ever visit home, let alone raise money for home, let alone eat carryout from Buffalo Wild Wings while sitting in their parents’ tiny living room — which looks a lot like my parents’ living room — with a slipcovered recliner while being drafted into the NFL live on television. 

Burrow wasn’t even born in Appalachia; he was born in Iowa. But Appalachian Ohio accepted him (as it did me). And it made its mark on him the way only the most special places can. He speaks of it, positively, while still being honest about the poverty and problems. He comes back, throwing footballs to local kids while waiting for the draft pick. He remembers the place where he was raised, and he makes sure the people there are remembered too.

When Burrow won the Heisman he said, “I’m up here for all those kids in Athens and Athens County that go home to not a lot of food on the table, hungry after school. You guys can be up here, too.”


Want a daily wrap-up of all the news and commentary Salon has to offer? Subscribe to our morning newsletter, Crash Course.


My son and I left Appalachia, the first summer of the pandemic. We left home, and moved across the country to Colorado, where my partner has family and where one of my siblings live. We left for work, and we left for my son. Because, like most parents, I want my child to have a better education than I did, a better chance. He takes after-school art classes where we live now. We have a choice of public middle schools where he can take advanced science. Here in the mountains, he’s discovered a love of rocks. He has posters of gems on his walls, and dreams of attending college for geology.

We have a dishwasher now. Last winter, the heat didn’t go out once, and the water never does. For the first time in my son’s life, we are not living below the poverty line. But I don’t know our neighbors. I don’t know how to help. And I dream every day of a way to go home and contribute to the community that saved my life when I was a young mother with nothing. 

National newspapers, people not from there, people who never lived there, will tell you that Burrow is bringing hope to southeast Ohio. But southeast Ohio already has hope. What it doesn’t have is infrastructure and the jobs and educational opportunities of elsewhere, through no fault of the people who live there.

The hope that Burrow brings is really for children, like my kid from southeast Ohio. That you can make something of yourself. You can come from anywhere. Never forget where you came from. And, as is my deepest wish for my son, home will always be there for you. 

More stories like this:

24 Valentine’s Day breakfast ideas cooked by cupid

Surely you’ve heard the phrase, “The way to a man’s heart is through his stomach.” Ignoring the idea that only men want to eat good food, there’s some truth to the statement — you can usually win over loved ones with delicious recipes. On Valentine’s Day, don’t just wait to bring home a dozen red roses just before a dinner out on the town; start with breakfast in bed. Red velvet pancakes (heart-shaped of course) or scones smothered in strawberry butter are perfect for Valentine’s Day morning. But if your sweetheart lacks a sweet tooth, we’ve got plenty of festive savory recipes too, such as eggs Benedict or a roasted tomato omelet.

Our best Valentine’s Day breakfast ideas

1. The BLT Benedict

Eggs Benedict is a bit more of a cooking project than you might expect to tackle on a Monday morning, but if there’s one day to give it a go, it’s Valentine’s Day. Whip up fresh hollandaise sauce in a blender and use it to drizzle over a craggy English muffin, poached egg, juicy tomatoes, and thick-cut bacon.

2. Bell-less, Whistle-less, Damn Good French Toast

The difference between good French toast and French toast worthy of a Valentine’s Day breakfast is the type of bread. Brioche and challah are our go-to loaves because of their sweet, eggy flavor. There’s nothing too fussy about this recipe, which is why our readers call it their favorite French toast recipe.

3. Buttermilk Waffles

For a family-friendly Valentine’s Day breakfast, you can’t go wrong with waffles. Merrill Stubbs recommends using the best-quality buttermilk you can get your hands on for the best-tasting waffles.

4. Creamy Baked Eggs

Looking for something savory for your sweetheart? This luxurious preparation of eggs includes cherry tomatoes, baby spinach, bacon, and Gruyère cheese, and it should hit the spot on the morning of February 14th.

5. Cottage Cheese Pancakes with Strawberry Maple Syrup

These pretty-in-pink pancakes were made to be served on Valentine’s Day. “The cottage cheese not only transforms the texture of the cakes, making them light, fluffy, and soufflé-like, but enhances their taste, as well Think: strawberry cheesecake for breakfast (though certainly not as heavy as that),” writes recipe developer and Food52-er Eric Kim. He recommends eating them with maple-macerated strawberries, which creates a gorgeous pink syrup.

6. Nutella Bread Pudding with Blackberry Coulis

In our eyes, every day is a good day to have dessert for breakfast, but Valentine’s Day is definitely the time to do it. This bread pudding is swirled with everyone’s favorite chocolate-hazelnut spread, a rich custard, and blackberry coulis.

7. Avocado Toast Eggs Benedict

You can have avocado toast any day of the week, so on Valentine’s Day, go all out. This brunch favorite features mashed avocado and a poached egg atop a crunchy English muffin and, of course, the whole thing is topped with homemade hollandaise.

8. Ricotta and Brown Butter Pancakes with Maple-Bourbon Apricots

Need a breakfast in bed recipe? You’ve come to the right place. Show your loved one(s) just how sweet they are with a stack of these fluffy pancakes.

9. Perfectly Pillowy King Arthur Cinnamon Rolls

Cinnamon rolls for Valentine’s Day seem like a good idea until you realize that it takes hours to make the dough and let it rise. King Arthur and Cupid work in tandem for this sweet breakfast treat that you can make in advance; the recipe promises to remain pillowy for days.

10. Lavender-Chocolate Chunk Pancakes with Crème Frâiche

Dried lavender and lemon zest bring the fragrance and flavor of a beautiful bouquet of Valentine’s Day flowers to these fluffy pancakes.

11. Lemon Poppy Seed Pancakes

Inspired by a beloved bakery muffin, these pancakes deliver zesty, almondy flavor in every bite for a delightful Valentine’s Day breakfast.

12. Sweet Potato Cinnamon Rolls with Browned Butter Cream Cheese Glaze

If you want to give your little ones something sweet to snack on before heading out the door, roll up these sweet potato cinnamon buns. The bright orange color is totally eye-catching, but the nutrient-packed veggie will keep them nourished all morning long.

13. Foolproof Cream Scones

Let’s spread the love for Food Editor Emma Laperruque, who discovered that the secret to moist, tasty scones is using all cream and no butter.

14. Chocolate Popovers

In lieu of red roses, I will take a bouquet of one dozen chocolate popovers for breakfast, please and thank you.

15. Caramelized Cream Eggs

Blink and you’ll miss the super short ingredients list for this egg breakfast recipe — all it takes is heavy cream, eggs, and salt. But don’t let minimalism fool you. It’s the most delicious, creamy preparation of fried eggs ever.

16. Naughty Rhubarb Scones

These spring-forward scones are not a cheeky reference for Valentine’s Day, but are rather rule-breaking because the recipe developer tweaked her mother’s original recipe (shh, don’t tell!). Vanilla sugar offsets the tart nature of rhubarb.

17. My Mother’s Strawberry Jam

Serve this fresh strawberry jam with a batch of tart rhubarb scones for a fun take on the classic strawberry-rhubarb pie.

18. Chocolate Chip Banana Streusel Muffins

Talk about a stud muffin! Light, delicate banana muffins with a sweet, crumbly chocolate streusel topping are the perfect Valentine’s Day breakfast.

19. Breakfast Casserole

Your whole family will fall head over heels for this early morning casserole that’s jam-packed with sweet Italian sausage, shredded hash browns, lots of melty cheese, and fresh herbs. Don’t reserve it just for the weekend — serve it for Valentine’s Day too!

20. Bread Pudding with Prosecco-ed Fruits

It’s never too early to start drinking bubbly on Valentine’s Day. A bevy of fruit (think: blueberries, raspberries, oranges, apples, and pears) are soaked in prosecco and folded into a challah-based bread pudding.

21. Kamut Dutch Baby with Strawberries and Thyme

“This huge puffy pancake, resembling a giant popover, makes for show — without much effort,” writes recipe developer MariSpeck. Instead of regular all-purpose flour, use golden kamut flour and fresh strawberries for a Valentine’s Day breakfast that will make your heart soar.

22. Crêpes

The way to win over your loved ones on Valentine’s Day? Give them exactly what they want. In this case, we’re talking plain crepes, which they can then roll up with any sweet or savory fillings that they please.

23. Souffl’omelet with Roasted Tomatoes and Whipped Ricotta

Blistered and juicy, these roasted tomatoes bring a pop of Valentine’s Day red to this otherwise neutral and nutritious breakfast.

24. Basic Yeast Donuts (with Many Variations)

Kick off your Valentine’s Day festivities on a sweet note with homemade donuts. A pinch of nutmeg and cinnamon make the old-fashioned cake flavor just a little 

“Trump will get his comeuppance”: Rep. Jamie Raskin promises consequences for Jan. 6

Rep. Jamie Raskin, a Maryland Democrat, opens his bestselling new book, “Unthinkable: Trauma, Truth, and the Trials of American Democracy” by sharing “two impossible traumas” he suffered in the same week: “the shattering death by suicide” of his 25-year-old son, and the insurrection at the U.S. Capitol.  As Raskin discussed during our recent “Salon Talks” conversation, these two losses obviously are not equivalent — but in linking them on some level, Raskin is also sharing his deep love for America.

I have interviewed Raskin many times for my SiriusXM radio show, and he has always been a thoughtful, measured person when it comes to talking politics of the day. The fact that he’s a former constitutional law professor likely contributes to that professorial nature. That’s also why we should all take heed of his words when he states point blank that today’s Republican Party has launched a “fascist attack against the constitutional order.” In his book, Raskin writes that the GOP is now “the party of Trump, authoritarianism, corruption, and insurrection.”

That has become even more obvious in recent weeks as Donald Trump suggested he would pardon the Capitol attackers if returned to office, and the Republican National Committee approved a resolution describing the Jan. 6 attack as “legitimate political discourse.” Raskin, who is a member of the House select committee investigating the events Jan. 6, shared his belief that the panel’s upcoming public hearings could be the most important in American history, saying they will “certainly up there with the Watergate hearings.” You can watch my “Salon Talks” with Rep. Raskin here, or read our conversation below to hear Raskin discuss the “maddening and frustrating” fact that Trump has yet to be brought to justice.

This conversation has been lightly edited for clarity and length.

Your book “Unthinkable” went straight to No. 1 on the New York Times bestseller list. The book is a love letter to your late son Tommy, who took his own life last December, and on some level a love letter to our democracy and what this nation stands for. But I wanted to start with Tommy. You go into detail about his struggle with depression, writing, “Depression, it entered his life like a thief in the night and became an unremitting beast.” What do you say to families out there where people are struggling with depression? 

Well, I don’t claim any particular medical expertise. But I will just say as a dad who’s gone through this, that it’s obviously important that each person who’s facing a mental health struggle be in a therapeutic relationship with doctors and get whatever medication we have that might work. But also, build a close social network to stay on top of the situation. Obviously I’ve asked myself a thousand questions since all of this happened, but the thing I probably most regret is not talking about the topic of suicide and not confronting it directly. 

I think parents probably have an instinct that talking about it will somehow conjure it into existence or cast some kind of spell that will make it happen. But that’s obviously just superstition, and it really works in the other direction: To not talk about something is the risky thing, it’s to endow it with more power and mystery than it should have. I say that about suicide and I also say that about the word “fascism” in the book. We can’t be afraid to talk about that, like somehow that’s a breach of etiquette or something.

Switching to politics here, right in the beginning of your book, you talk about how in the week between Dec. 31, 2020, and Jan. 6th, 2021, your family suffered two impossible dramas: One was your son’s death by suicide, and the second was the Capitol insurrection. You’re not equating the two things, but I can sense your love for this nation. Is that fair to say that: You have a deep love for this democratic republic and what it’s supposed to stand for, and you feel compelled to defend it?

Well, I think that’s right. It’s kind of you to say that. I certainly feel it. And I have felt that Tommy’s with me, and he is in my heart. He’s in my chest. He was during the impeachment trial in the Senate. And unfortunately we didn’t have enough Republican senators to join us in convicting Trump. I mean, it was the most bipartisan, sweeping impeachment result in a Senate trial in American history, but we still fell 10 votes short. And for that reason, we’re still in the thick of this struggle.

Like I told the impeachment managers before we went out there, the facts are overwhelmingly on our side. The law is overwhelmingly on our side. I want to make sure that people understand that the passion for our country, the patriotism in your hearts is what’s motivating the whole thing. So show your emotion about what just happened to us. They stormed our house.

You write about going into the Capitol on Jan. 6, bringing your daughter Tabitha and your son-in-law Hank with you. So during the siege, you weren’t just worried about yourself, you had to worry about your family. We have the footage of this horrific attack on our Capitol by people dressed in Trump regalia and chanting, “Fight for Trump.” Yet now we know, thanks to the work of your committee, that Donald Trump, for 187 minutes, watched that and did nothing, even when Ivanka Trump came in twice asking him to intervene. What does that say to you about how Trump viewed this event?

The violence was strategic and political, but it was also sadistic too. He had unleashed primitive impulses in this mass demonstration, which became a mob riot. I view the activities of Jan. 6 as being in three rings of sedition, Dean. There was the mob riot, which surrounded the ring of the insurrection. And that was the Proud Boys, the Oath Keepers, the Three Percenters, the Aryan Nation, different white nationalist groups, the Militiamen, the First Amendment Pretorians, there were some religious cults in there. These people had trained for battle and they were the first ones to come and smash out our windows and attack our police officers. They helped convert the demonstration into a mob riot and an attack on the officers. But the scariest ring was the innermost ring, the ring of the coup, which is a strange word to use in American political parlance, because we don’t have a lot of experience with coups.

We think of a coup as something that takes place against a president, but this was a coup orchestrated by the president against the vice president and against the Congress. And the whole purpose was to get Mike Pence to declare lawless, extra-constitutional powers, to exclude and reject and repudiate Electoral College votes coming in from Arizona, Georgia and Pennsylvania to lower Biden’s total from 306 to below 270. That would have triggered, under the 12th Amendment to the Constitution, a contingent presidential election. And you ask: Why would Donald Trump want Speaker Pelosi’s Democratic-controlled House of Representatives to decide who’s president? Well, in a contingent election, we’re not voting one member, one vote. We’re voting one state, one vote.

After the 2020 elections, they had 27 state delegations, we had 22 and one, Pennsylvania, was split down the middle. So even had they lost the at-large representative from Wyoming — my new best friend, Liz Cheney — they still would have had 26 votes to declare Donald Trump president and seize the presidency for another four years. I think they were also prepared at that point to invoke the Insurrection Act and declare martial law, and finally call on the National Guard, that had been held back, to put down the insurrectionary chaos he had unleashed against us.

Are you surprised that we don’t even hear an inkling that Trump is being investigated by the Department of Justice for potential crimes?

Well, yeah. I mean, I’m a little bit softer on Attorney General Merrick Garland than some people are, because he’s my constituent. I still remember, so bitterly, how they prevented him from even getting a hearing when he was nominated by President Obama to the Supreme Court. But look, people were on Garland’s case about the fact that there had been no indictments for seditious conspiracy. And then there was a huge indictment on seditious conspiracy against the Oath Keepers, and presumably more to come. They obviously weren’t the only group there. There were these overlapping circles of conspiracy to knock over the Capitol and take down our government. I mean, that was the interruption of the peaceful transfer of power, for the first time in American history, for four or five hours. And we didn’t know which way it was going to go.

Trump will get his comeuppance. I know how maddening and frustrating it is to people. I share that feeling, having been an impeachment manager. I mean, he’s as guilty as sin. He’s a one-man crime wave, and it’s amazing that his dad’s money and this pack of lawyers he travels with have been able to get him off everything up until now. But I’m with Dr. King that the arc of the moral universe is long, but it tends toward justice. It’s going to catch up with Donald Trump too.

RELATED: Trump’s toilet: Clogged with documents?

You write in the book that we can now say that the Democratic Party, whatever its faults, is the party of democracy and that the Republican Party is the party of authoritarianism, corruption, and insurrection. Can our democratic republic continue if one party is embracing autocracy and fascism and the other party is playing by the rules?

It’s a good question. If you look at it historically, liberal and progressive parties have never on their own been enough to defeat fascist and authoritarian coups. It’s always the liberal and progressive parties, the left and the center-right together. And when they come together, they can reject and defeat a fascist attack against the constitutional order. And that is the importance of Liz Cheney and Adam Kinzinger and Mitt Romney. We had 10 Republicans vote to impeach in the house. We had seven vote to convict in the Senate. So that’s like 14 or 15 percent of the Republican Party. If that block holds and comes our way, and we’re able to build a cross-party coalition with a lot of Independents and Greens and Libertarians and Republicans and Democrats to defend democracy, we can do it.

The Democratic Party can’t do it alone. It’s going to have to be the base of it, but we also need to assemble all the other institutions in American life that are part of democracy, because democracy’s not one thing. I mean, it is the legislative branch, yes, obviously. But it is courts. It is the states. It is the press, the media, the universities, the colleges, the schools, civil society. Everybody needs to stand up and reject authoritarianism at this point. When people ask what they can do: You can do things every single day to stand up for strong democracy in America.

After Watergate, Congress passed reforms to try to rein in a runaway president in Richard Nixon. I know some have been proposed now. Is there any hope of legislation that will curtail another potential Trump or another person cut from that cloth, regardless of party, who really tries to abuse their power?

In a certain sense, this is what we’ve been trying to do with all the voting rights legislation. We’ve been trying to solidify and protect the right to vote and protect the integrity of elections against these outrageous efforts to convert bipartisan or nonpartisan election commissions into partisan election commissions, or to put them directly under the control of GOP legislatures. The problem is that the Republican Party, which is a minority party and a shrinking minority party — remember, Hillary beat Trump by three million votes and Joe Biden beat him by seven and a half million votes. The young people are coming in our direction.

That demography is totally against the GOP, but they’ve got this bag of tricks that include the most anti-democratic instruments in the country. It’s voter suppression statutes. It’s the filibuster. It’s right wing court packing and judicial activism. It’s manipulation of the Electoral College. It’s a race between the will of the majority, trying to defend democratic institutions and liberal democracy, against one-party rule, which is what they want. They are a rule-or-ruin party, and I’ve been calling that them that for a while. I was glad that President Biden picked that up in his democracy speech because they either are going to rule or they’re going to ruin our ability to make any progress as a country.

With the Jan. 6 committee, you’re going to have public hearings coming up at some point this year. I’m not sure if there’s a schedule that we don’t know about. Is there any sense of what we might expect to see, or the types of witnesses that you might bring forward in these hearings?

I’d hoped it would happen in March. I think because of all the obstruction and roadblocks thrown up by the entourage around Donald Trump — Mark Meadows, who’s kind of doing the hokey pokey, one foot in one foot out, Steve Bannon, Roger Stone — that it’s going to be later in the spring, April or May more likely. But I think these could be the most important hearings in American history, certainly up there with the Watergate hearings. I hope we will do them during prime time. I hope we will see them every single day, so we can tell a complete story to the American people about how this took place. It’s obviously enormously complex. But people are following it closely.

The vast majority of Americans who we’ve approached as witnesses have testified. So most people, including people who participated, are cooperating. They understand that they’ve got not just a legal obligation but a civic obligation to help us figure out what happened. It’s only when you get right to that bullseye core around Donald Trump and his innermost confidants that people think they’re somehow above the law and can just give the finger to the U.S. Congress.

The way you envision this, it wouldn’t be like the first hearings we saw with the Capitol Police, which was months ago? This would be more like lining up a bunch of nights in a row, as opposed to one hearing and then coming back three weeks later?

Yeah, it would not be episodic. We want to tell the whole story. I felt very strongly that we’d go to the police officers first. That was my great frustration about the Senate trial, that we weren’t able to have them come and tell the story of what had happened. We wanted to shock the public into remembrance of what this was about. I mean, this was a violent assault on American democracy, a riot surrounding an insurrection surrounding a coup, and it was our officers who stood between us and losing it all. So there were a lot of heroes on that day and we can’t forget who those heroes were.

Newt Gingrich literally said that you and others on your committee are going to jail if Republicans get control of the House. I don’t know what the justification would be, but when you hear that, does that ring bells of fascism to you? The idea of threatening to put political opponents in prison simply because they’re doing their job.

Well, of course that was the direction that Donald Trump took their party in, because the moment he got in, the Department of Justice was treated like a group of lawyers who were supposed to follow his orders in prosecuting his enemies and excusing and protecting his friends. It was like that from the very beginning, and all through the administration. It doesn’t surprise me that Newt Gingrich, who’s an utter chameleon and total moral invertebrate, would just follow Donald Trump down into that cesspool.

You mentioned that 10 Republican House members voted to impeach Donald Trump, and seven Republicans voted to convict in the Senate. We heard Kevin McCarthy go on the floor saying, “The president’s to blame.” But that same Kevin McCarthy now is sucking up. What do you make of this, in terms of that party losing its way? Is it just the pursuit of power at literally any cost?

Of course. I mean, the framers understood this. If you go back and read Federalist No. 1 by Alexander Hamilton, he says that the major threat to the Democratic Republic is going to be politicians who act as demagogues pandering to negative emotions who then come to power and  go from being demagogues to becoming tyrants. So, exploiting negative emotions in people, racism, hatred, stereotyping, scapegoating and then becoming tyrants over the people. So that’s an old story. It’s obviously a different story than Donald Trump was telling, but it’s one we can recognize immediately.

On another point, you have a documentary, “Loving the Constitution,” coming out on MSNBC. It was shot over three years, following you through everything. What can you share about this? 

Madeline Carter was someone who was a college classmate of mine, and she kept bugging me for more than a year that she wanted to make a documentary about me and Trump. The constitutional law professor who gets elected the same night as the would-be authoritarian dictator of America — following his story and mine. Of course history takes us places we never imagined going. But I finally relented, I said, “Fine, if you think there’s something there, you can make the movie about us.” Of course she ended up filming a lot of stuff I wish had never happened, along with some things I’m proud of and some things I regret. But it is what it is. I confess I have lived, as Pablo Neruda said. It is what it is, and I’m curious to see what it’s all about.

When Justice Breyer had his press conference, talking about retiring, he mentioned the Gettysburg Address and talked about the experiment this country is. I went back and read the Gettysburg Address, and the very last line is that the government of the people, by the people and for the people shall not perish from this earth. That was the hope of Lincoln. You get the sense that some of our fellow Americans just believe it won’t perish from the earth and they don’t have to do anything to preserve it.

I mean, I don’t blame those people. Most of us grew up with the sense that there was stability and durability in our democratic institutions and that they would grow stronger over time. But of course there are people who also have much more of a tragic sensibility and understand the ebb and flow of history. There are periods of progressive evolution and change, and then periods of profound reaction and destruction, and we obviously just witnessed one of those with these nihilists who took over and tried to destroy everything that had been built for decades. I mean, they just put the civilizing movements of our time in their crosshairs: the civil rights movement, the women’s movement, the LGBTQ movement, the human rights movement, the environmental movement, the climate movement and so on.

So yeah, I don’t really blame those people. But I think Lincoln was trying to say, if democracy’s going to survive, we all have to fight for it. And there will be a spectrum of sacrifice. Some people will give their lives, like the thousands who were killed in the battle at Gettysburg. But all of us have got to be engaged in this. I mean, that’s what democracy is. It’s something that we take care of together.

Lincoln was posing that as a real question, not as just some kind of rhetorical flourish. I mean, for most of the history of our species, people have lived under despots and tyrants and dictators and bullies and kings and queens and all that. So our American experiment began with some very high ideals. They were compromised from the beginning, with the viciousness of slavery and other kinds of repressive political features. But at least the ideals were there and successive social and political movements have been able to transform the country. And that has left us, even through Donald Trump, the greatest multiracial, multiethnic, multi-religious constitutional democracy that’s ever existed. So that’s our legacy. That’s what we’re fighting for now.

Read more on the aftermath of Jan. 6, 2021: