Spring Sale: Get 1 Year, Save 58%

Freedom Caucus comes for LGBTQ marriage

Republicans are returning to an anti-LGBTQ platform after the Supreme Court’s decision ending Roe vs. Wade opened the door to rolling back other human rights in America.

On Friday, the far-right House Freedom Caucus came out against the Respect for Marriage Act, which seeks to codify in law the Supreme Court decisions that legalized gay and interracial marriage.

“The radical left has launched an all-out campaign on America’s traditional values and sacred institutions,” the House Freedom Caucus claimed in a statement.

“It has weakened the nuclear family, attacked the norms of masculinity and femininity, and now it wants to further erode the sacred institutions of marriage,” the statement said, even though gay and interracial marriages have long been allowed.

The attacks on marriage equality are part of a trend as far-right Republicans openly campaign on bigotry.

“Since the Supreme Court decision last month overturning Roe v. Wade, anti-gay rhetoric and calls to roll back established L.G.B.T.Q. protections have grown bolder,” The New York Times reported Friday. “And while Republicans in Congress appear deeply divided about same-sex marriage — nearly 50 House Republicans on Tuesday joined Democrats in supporting a bill that would recognize same-sex marriages at the federal level — many Republican officials and candidates across the country have made attacking gay and transgender rights a party norm this midterm season.”

Attorney General Dana Nessel, the first openly gay politician elected statewide in Michigan, warned “the dominoes have started to fall, and they won’t just stop at one.”

“People should see the connection between reproductive rights, L.G.B.T.Q. rights, women’s rights, interracial marriage — these things are all connected legally,” Nessel explained.

The Human Rights Campaign has tracked over 300 anti-LGBTQ bills in 23 states.

“In Texas, Attorney General Ken Paxton said after the Roe reversal that he would be ‘willing and able’ to defend at the Supreme Court any law criminalizing sodomy enacted by the Legislature,” The Times reported. “Before that, the Republican Party of Texas adopted a platform that calls homosexuality ‘an abnormal lifestyle choice.’ In Utah, the Republican president of the State Senate, Stuart Adams, said he would support his state’s joining with others to press the Supreme Court to reverse the right of same-sex couples to wed. In Arizona, Kari Lake, a candidate for governor endorsed by Donald J. Trump, affirmed in a June 29 debate her support for a bill barring children from drag shows — the latest target of supercharged rhetoric on the right.”

Trump calls McConnell a “disloyal sleaze bag”

Former President Donald Trump went on a massive tirade late Thursday after the House select committee investigating the Jan. 6 riot concluded their latest public hearing.

Trump ended his night by trashing Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-KY) as a “disloyal sleaze bag!”

After the committee displayed evidence that Trump did nothing for three hours while watching on TV as rioters stormed the Capitol building, the erstwhile president tried to place blame everywhere but in his own lap.

“Is this the same Mitch McConnell who was losing big in Kentucky, and came to the White House to BEG me for an Endorsement and help?” Trump wrote. “Without me he would have lost in a landslide. A disloyal sleaze bag!” Trump wrote, “I had an election Rigged and Stolen from me, and our Country. The USA is going to Hell. Am I supposed to be happy?”

Before that he wrote, “1. But Crooked Hillary Clinton, Stacey Abrams, and many others, contested their Elections – and for a far longer time than I. 2. How do they know I watched on T.V.? 3. I never said that to Kevin McCarthy, who came to Mar-a-Lago to say ‘hi’ very early on (the Unselects don’t say this). So many lies and misrepresentations by the corrupt and highly partisan Unselect Committee!” adding, “Liz Cheney is a sanctimonious loser. The Great State of Wyoming is wise to her. Why not show the tapes, or interview, those that, with evidence, challenge the election?” and then, “It’s Nancy Pelosi’s fault, she turned down the troops! Perhaps she was disengaged – maybe looking for her husband!”

Trump also appears to have been watching CNN’s coverage because he lashed out at host Jake Tapper, writing, “Fake Tapper of CNN is so biased and pathetic. No wonder CNN’s ratings are at an all time low! P.S. Almost all Trump Endorsed candidates have won, or are winning!”

Ted Cruz says his pronoun is “kiss my ass”

During a speech given at the Turning Point USA Student Action Summit, which kicked off on Friday night in Tampa, Florida, Sen. Ted Cruz (R-TX) told attendees that his pronoun is “kiss my ass.”

The summit, which has the intended purpose of offering leadership training and championing student activism; groups students together with political leaders such as Cruz, former President Donald Trump, Trump Jr., Fox News anchor Laura Ingraham, Rick Scott, Gov. Ron DeSantis, congressman Matt Gaetz, Sen. Josh Hawley and several other notable “right wingers,” as described by Creative Loafing Tampa.

In Creative Loafing’s preview coverage of the summit they mention that a protest organized by Women’s Voices of Southwest Florida, Florida For Change and Tampa Bay Community Action Committee is planned to take place during Saturday’s events, which feature a speech from Marjorie Taylor Greene. The groups are asking people to gather at the Downtown Convention Center in Tampa, where the event is being held, to voice their collected views that the TPUSA is “fascist.” 

Cruz took to the stage during Friday’s event kick-off and began his speech with a lively roar, positioned in the middle of a ring of smoke machines. 

“I’m told that there’s a dangerous bunch of radicals gathered in Florida seeking to peacefully overthrow a Communist government run by imbeciles and nincompoops, and so God bless each of you” he said in his opening. 

“We are gathered at a time of extraordinary challenge,” Cruz continued. “I wanna say two things to you today in a word of encouragement. I’m here today to encourage you, to bring a word of hope. The first thing I wanna say is America is in crisis. This is not normal. We have a president who shakes hands with the empty air. We have a president who talks to the Easter Bunny . . . This is nuts.”


Want a daily wrap-up of all the news and commentary Salon has to offer? Subscribe to our morning newsletter, Crash Course.


 The second of the two words of encouragement from Cruz was that “revival is coming.” 

“All over this country people’s eyes are opening up and they realize, this is a mess,” Cruz said. 

After spending a fair portion of his speech poking fun of COVID-19 safety measures, calling them “garbage,” Cruz launched into a segment on abortion issues and the phrasing, “people with the capacity for pregnancy,” which he seemed to find amusing. 

“Trigger warning, women exist,” Cruz said. 

After touching upon abortion, Cruz explained to the audience what the proper definition of a woman is, and then went into the topic of gender identity.

“I talked to a student recently at one of our woke college campuses who said she’s required in every class to introduce herself and to give her pronouns. Well I’m Ted Cruz and my pronoun is kiss my ass.” 

Watch his full speech below:

Netflix’s “The Gray Man”: Ryan Gosling and Chris Evans go loud in Russos’ propulsive action flick

While “The Gray Man” showcases Ryan Gosling, Chris Evans, and Regé-Jean Page, this globe-hopping action thriller, directed by Anthony and Joe Russo, is more interested in pounding pulses and taking breaths than throbbing hearts. It is a big, noisy, explosive adrenaline rush — a live-action spin on that old “MAD” magazine comic, “Spy vs. Spy” — and about as deep.  

The story is simple. Six (Ryan Gosling) is recruited in prison by Fitzroy (Billy Bob Thornton) to be a “gray man” and work for the CIA killing bad guys as part of the Sierra program, an elite unit. During one mission — to take out Dining Car (Callan Mulvey) — Six goes rogue. However, Dining Car reveals he is “Sierra Four” and Six will be targeted next. Four gives Six a medal that contains an encrypted drive with compromising information that incriminates Denny Carmichael (Regé-Jean Page), Six’s boss, who is high up in Langley.

Denny, who is none too pleased with this unfortunate development, hires independent agent Lloyd Hansen (Chris Evans) to kill Six and get the drive back by any means necessary. For Lloyd, a man who is said to have “zero impulse control,” that does not exclude torture or destroying European cities.

And that’s pretty much it. Dani Miranda (Ana de Armas, underused) shows up from time to time to kick ass, and there is a subplot involving Fitzroy’s niece, Claire (Julia Butters from “Once Upon a Time… in Hollywood“) who has a pacemaker. But mostly, the film is one action set piece after another after another.

The action set pieces are pretty nifty, though. One dizzying sequence has Six fighting his way out of a plane that is pretty much coming apart as it goes down. Another episode involves him McGuyvering his way out of a sticky situation best not to be explained, except to say it is pretty ingenious. Then there is a massive shootout while Six is handcuffed to a bench, and an exciting, extended chase scene on a tramline that may be the film’s pièce de résistance. These scenes are all executed with panache, as well as rapid-fire editing and a roving camera that adds to their propulsive nature. They are all pretty astonishing.

But as exhilarating — or as exhausting — as “The Gray Man” is, the film strains credibility as Six survives everything he encounters. It is all rather two-dimensional. The confident and righteous Six is Road Runner to cocky and badass Lloyd’s Wile E. Coyote. The whole film plays out like a live action Looney Tunes cartoon. The numerous explosive devices from grenades to rocket launchers, might as well be marked “Acme.” 

The Gray ManChris Evans as Lloyd Hansen, Jessica Henwick as Suzanne Brewer in “The Gray Man” (Paul Abell/Netflix)One almost wants to root for Wile, er, Lloyd because at least Chris Evans, in his “white pants and trash ‘stache” seems to be having fun playing an over-the-top baddie. As Six, Gosling is once again in too-cool-for-school “Drive” mode. The film yields some mild pleasure whenever he gets taken down a peg — as when he acknowledges that Dani Miranda keeps saving his ass. (And for those counting, Gosling also gets one shirtless scene where displays his impressive chest; it is the same number of times he is called a “Ken doll.”)

As Carmichael, Regé-Jean Page is as petty as he is pretty. It would have been better for him to be cast as Six, because he could easily deliver on being grace under pressure. Instead, as Carmichael, Page has to sweat out being found out, and that is just not a good look for the “Bridgerton” star. 

Each character experiences a series of reversals of fortune, but “The Gray Man” makes it pretty clear how things are going to play out. Sure, there is a terrific scene involving one of Fitzroy’s contacts, Margaret Cahill (Alfre Woodard) helping out, and it features clever, coded spy exchanges like, “Have you tried aluminum siding?”/ “I prefer fiberglass.” Another enjoyable bit features Laszlo Sosa (a fabulous Wagner Moura, hamming it up) as an operative who helps Six with a passport among other things. 

These episodes are far more interesting than Six’s backstory and what he did to land in jail (cue tired father issues); Lloyd torturing someone for information; or even a flabby sequence where Six “babysits” Claire, so they can bond, and her medical condition can tug at heartstrings. There are also multiple, extended needle drops that should juice things up, but don’t. 

But arguably the biggest flaw is that the film falters when Six and Lloyd finally go mano-a-mano, after a protracted chase through a hedge maze at night, no less. There should be some real electricity seeing Gosling and Evans duke it out in a water fountain, but it is oddly underwhelming — especially after some of the film’s superb actions sequences. 

Ultimately, “The Gray Man” is as mindless as it is thrilling — not unlike the similar Netflix offerings, “Extraction” or “The Old Guard.” That is not a bad thing, but it could have been better. 

“The Gray Man” is now streaming on Netflix.

 

The 7 most shocking Victoria’s Secret revelations from Hulu’s “Angels and Demons” docuseries

Victoria’s Secret, the multi-million dollar business once known for its alluring catalogs and glitzy fashion shows, successfully sold a fantastical dream to women through a collection of push-up bras, lacy thongs and other inviting lingerie. During the early 2000s, the brand pioneered a new era of womanhood, in which embracing the sexual image became a new form of empowerment.    

Underneath such profound messages, however, was a darker tale of exploitation, abuse and powerful predators. At the forefront of it all was the company’s CEO Leslie “Les” Wexner and its CMO Ed Razek. In the background were their closest acquaintances, which included now-convicted sex offenders Ghislaine Maxwell and Jeffrey Epstein.

Hulu’s latest documentary, “Victoria’s Secret: Angels and Demons,” exposes these unsettling connections over the course of three episodes. The feature also spotlights journalists, writers, attorneys, former Victoria’s Secret models and former employees who explore the rise and fall of America’s most prominent lingerie company.

Here are 7 shocking revelations from the series:

01

Les Wexner’s achieves his lingerie dreams acquiring Victoria’s Secret

IVictoria's Secret: Angels and Demons“Victoria’s Secret: Angels and Demons” (Hulu)

Victoria’s Secret was actually founded by Roy and Gaye Raymond, a married couple who sought to help men feel more comfortable while lingerie shopping for their wives. They created a catalog, through which ordering by mail allowed for remote purchases.

 

In 1982, just five years after its inception, Victoria’s Secret was on the brink of bankruptcy and consequently, sold to the brand to Les Wexner for $1 million. Wexner, who had been keen on investing in the lingerie industry, first approached Roy in the early 1980s. At that time, however, the pair was unable to agree on a deal as Roy was quite skeptical of Wexner.

 
“When I met him, it was as if he met the devil,” Wexner recounts.

 

It was never revealed why Roy had his doubts but perhaps, it was because of Wexner’s ongoing obsession with sexy women’s undergarments and his perception of what women want. In an old broadcast clip featured in the docuseries, Wexner gleefully explained his early fascination with the lingerie business:

“The funny story I like telling . . . I was driving to Dayton and I was thinking about what other businesses I could start. And I remember saying, ‘Every woman I know wears underwear, most of the time. All of the women I know would like to wear lingerie all of the time.’ And I’m just driving, driving down the highway, laughing my butt off and thinking what a funny thought that is. And so, I said, ‘I wonder why no one’s done that?'”

02

Victoria’s Secret was based on a fake persona Wexner concocted

IVictoria's Secret: Angels and DemonsLes Wexner in “Victoria’s Secret: Angels and Demons” (Hulu)

Following the procurement, Wexner fully rebranded Victoria’s Secret and concocted a story about its fictitious founder, in hopes of appealing to every woman’s inner desires. The main character of Wexner’s story was named “Victoria” in accordance with the company’s original name.

      
“She was refined, aspirational and English,” said Cindy Fedus-Fields, a former Victoria’s Secret executive. “Victoria” was precisely 36 years old and married to a barrister. She was also a smart and savvy aristocrat with a fiery and seductive side to her.

 

This mythical narrative had a great impact on everyone, from shoppers to Victoria’s Secret employees. In one instance, a young assistant buyer who had joined the company’s corporate team asked her when she would be able to meet “Victoria.”

 
“That’s how real and powerful the story was,” Fedus-Fields said.

03

Jeffrey Epstein exploits Wexner’s trust

Jeffrey Epstein in Cambridge, Mass., in 2004.Jeffrey Epstein in Cambridge, Mass., in 2004. (Rick Friedman Photography/Corbis/Getty Images)

By the mid-1980s, Wexner established himself as a retail tycoon with Victoria’s Secret and a series of women’s clothing stores called The Limited. It was then that he also met Jeffrey Epstein through their mutual acquaintances, insurance executive Robert Meister and his wife. Epstein, who was just 33 years of age, had recently left his job as an options trader at Bear Stearns, a New York-based investment banking company, to start his own financial management firm called J. Epstein & Company.

 

The duo’s relationship progressed fast, with Epstein becoming Wexner’s primary financial adviser the following year. In July 1991, Wexner granted Epstein power of attorney over all his financial and legal matters, a controversial move that would soon invite trouble and scandal.

 

Just two years later, it was learned that Epstein was pretending to be a Victoria’s Secret recruiter and luring young models who were seeking a gig with the nation’s biggest lingerie company. The news first reached Fedus-Fields, who then notified Wexner.

 
Wexner assured her that he would look into the issue and put an end to it. But no action was taken as the abuse continued for many years afterwards.

04

Jean-Luc Brunel’s sinister collaboration with Epstein 

Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine MaxwellJeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell at Cipriani Wall Street on March 15, 2005 in New York City. (JoeSchildhorn/Patrick McMullan via Getty Images)

Jean-Luc Brunel, a French model scout who led the international modeling agency Karin Models, was exposed for being a “super creep” in a 1988 “60 Minutes” report. Brunel was under investigation for sexual harassment, assault and rape after multiple women came forward with abuse claims.

 

“He is acting as a matchmaker,” said one model in an old clip of the broadcast. “He’s got the agency, he’s got the girls, his friends say, ‘You know, I’d like to meet some girls.’ Or, ‘We’re having a party tonight. Can you bring some girls?'”

 

In the 1980s, Brunel fled to New York City, where he met Ghislaine Maxwell who introduced him to Epstein. In 2004, Brunel received “up to a million dollars” from Epstein to help launch MC2 Model Management, a new modeling agency based in Florida with satellite offices in Tel Aviv and New York City. Brunel provided young models, who travelled to the states to kickstart their careers, with work Visas and housed them in Epstein’s East 66th Street apartment. This system allowed the pair to legally bring minors from all over the world under the guise of modelling.

 
Almost 10 years later, MC2 Model Management was accused of being a cover for sex trafficking by Virginia Roberts Giuffre, one of Epstein’s many victims. Shortly after Epstein’s death in August 2019, Brunel went into hiding but was caught by police on December 16, 2020 and arrested on suspicion of trafficking and raping underage girls.

 

On June 29, 2021, Brunel was officially charged with sexual harassment and the rape of minors over 15 years old. On February 19, 2022, he reportedly died by suicide in his prison cell.

05

Model Alicia Arden’s accusations against Epstein

IAlicia ArdenAlicia Arden during Bench Warmer Trading Cards Celebrates 2004 Fall Fantasy Series at Bliss in Los Angeles, California, United States. (Albert L. Ortega/WireImage/Getty Images)

In May 1997, Alicia Arden, a former playboy model and “Baywatch” actress, met up with Epstein at Shutters Hotel in Santa Monica, California, to discuss working as a Victoria’s Secret model. The business meeting took place in Epstein’s private hotel room, where Arden claims he assaulted her.

 
In a crime report filed to the Santa Monica Police Department, Arden wrote that she was “manhandled” by Epstein who also “groped her buttocks.”

 

“Did Victoria’s Secret ever know that a police report was filed by her? Did they ever ask Epstein about that? Did Les Wexner know about that?” attorney Gloria Allred asked in the docuseries. “Why is the denial of a wealthy well-known man of more value than the serious allegation to law enforcement by one woman who happens to be a model?”

 

Still, no action was taken against Epstein following Arden’s accusations. Wexner only continued to praise Epstein, saying in a 2003 Vanity Fair article that he thinks the financier is “very smart with a combination of excellent judgement and high standards.” Wexner also referred to Epstein as “the most loyal friend.”

06

Epstein’s exploitation of Wexner hits home

IVictoria's Secret: Angels and DemonsLes Wexner in “Victoria’s Secret: Angels and Demons” (Hulu)

In addition to the signed letter of attorney, Wexner appointed Epstein as the president of Wexner’s Property and awarded him with generous sums of money. This influx of cash allowed Epstein to purchase vast, international real-estate holdings, including a Manhattan triplex, the apartments on East 66th Street, a Stanley, New Mexico ranch and an Avenue Foch apartment in Paris.

 

Epstein also got access to Wexner’s luxury, private jets. One of these jets, a Boeing 727-200, became the infamous “Lolita Express,” which was allegedly used to fly underage girls to Epstein’s many estates.

 

Shortly afterwards, Epstein gained ownership of the guest house in Wexner’s Ohio-based mansion.

 

“Over a period of many years, the convicted and now-deceased sex offender, Jeffrey Epstein, had a close social and financial relationship with Mr. Wexner and his wife, defendant Abigail S. Wexner,” a 2021 complaint filed on behalf of Wexner outlined.

 

“Upon information and belief, the Wexners let Epstein use their home for liaisons with victims,” the suit continued.

07

Victoria’s Secret and its narrow, unattainable beauty standards

IVictoria's Secret AngelsVictoria’s Secret Angels present creations during the 2016 Victoria’s Secret Fashion Show at the Grand Palais in Paris on November 30, 2016. (MARTIN BUREAU/AFP via Getty Images)

“For me, fantasies are more effective when there’s a diversity to them. And . . . a lot of the models looked the same, not a lot of different body types at the time . . . not racially diverse,” said Lyndsey Scott, a former Victoria’s Secret model. “It became clear to me that Victoria’s Secret wasn’t empowering women. They used such a narrow idea of beauty in their marketing, that it was doing the complete opposite. It was making women feel badly about themselves.”

 

During the early 21st century, Victoria’s Secret touted an unattainable body type that was only achievable through Photoshop, plastic surgery and other extreme enhancements. The brand’s marketing tactics played on women’s insecurities and ultimately, distorted one’s idea of healthy body image. Approximately 60-80% of American women said they wanted to be thinner while 89% of teenage girls said they felt pressured by the fashion industry to lose weight.

 

“Today, people howl about the effects of Instagram on young girls,” said Michael Gross, author of the 1995 novel “Model: The Ugly Business of Beautiful Women.” “At the time, Victoria’s Secret was the analog version of the same thing.”

 

Victoria’s Secret models even lambasted the extreme dieting regimes and weight requirements they had to abide by, especially before the annual fashion show. Dorothea Barth Jörgensen, a former PINK model, said she didn’t eat much during the 10 years she worked as a model for the brand. Tyra Banks, in an old interview, said she was once told to drop 10 pounds. At 5’10 and 123 pounds, she was deemed “too curvy.”

In recent years, Victoria’s Secret has ditched its old-fashioned tactics and emerged as a more size-inclusive and gender-inclusive brand. Per a 2021 Teen Vogue article, the brand is “moving away from telling its customer ‘what’s sexy and how to look’ in favor of supporting consumers ‘throughout every phase of their life.’

 

“It’s a change led by an entirely new board of directors that consists of seven people, six of whom are women.”

The three-part “Victoria’s Secret: Angels and Demons” is streaming on Hulu. Watch a trailer, via YouTube:

 

11 drag slang terms you should know

Drag queen culture is exceptionally rich when it comes to language. In fact, many Gen Z and Millennial slang terms, from shade and tea to slay, actually originated in the queer ball scene decades ago. But for every phrase you do know, there may be one that you’re not yet familiar with. Read on for 11 of our favorites, from dusted to purse first.

1. Dusted

If someone says you look dusted, you should thank them. The term is a high compliment that HomoCulture’s Triston Brewer describes as “looking flawless, polished, and perfect.” It’s sometimes cited as the opposite of busted, which describes someone who looks disheveled, unpolished, or just plain bad.

2. Boots

Tacking boots to the end of a comment emphasizes the sentiment. As Bob the Drag Queen explained it to “Vanity Fair,” “In real life you would say, ‘This outfit is very fierce,’ but in drag you would say, ‘This outfit is fierce boots.'” If you want to add even more emphasis, you could say “boots the house down (or the house down boots).”

3. Bar Queen

If someone calls you a bar queen, they probably don’t expect any sincere thanks. The diss usually implies that you’re only good enough to perform in bars, rather than booking larger and/or more esteemed establishments.

4. Reading

Reading someone is pointing out their flaws. “So it’s almost as if I’m opening up a book and the book has statements about how terrible you are,” Detox explained for “Vanity Fair.” This tradition of trading insults was covered in the classic 1990 documentary “Paris Is Burning” and continues to be considered an art form in today’s drag culture. Someone will often kick off a reading session with the phrase “The library is open.”

5. Garage Doors

Garage doors are eyelids covered in a single color of eyeshadow — so solid that when a queen opens and closes her eyes, it looks like garage doors opening and closing.

6. Eleganza Extravaganza

An eleganza extravaganza (or extravaganza eleganza) is exactly what it sounds like: A gathering where everyone and everything is exceptionally elegant and glamorous. Here’s an example offered by queens Princess Pop, Manila von Teez, and Mary Scary for CapeTownMagazine.com: “The only appropriate way to celebrate the acquisition of my new David Tlale shoes is to throw an extravaganza eleganza.”

7. Cheesecake

Cheesecake or Miss Cheesecake is another term referenced in “Paris Is Burning.” “Some children will ask me what I meant by ‘Miss Cheesecake.’ That means you must not only have a body, but you must be sexy. A lot of people have bodies but are not sexy,” Avis Pendavis explains in the film. “Luscious body, body that moves, body that’s delicious,” Mariah Balenciaga described it.

8. Serving Realness

“Serving realness” means you’re so fully embodying a certain persona that it appears authentic. As Dorian Corey defined realness in “Paris Is Burning,” “It’s not a take-off or a satire. No, it’s actually being able to be this.” “RuPaul’s Drag Race,” for example, has had contestants serve “country realness,” “Meryl Streep realness,” “Soul Train’ realness,” and “fierce jazzercise realness.”

9. No Tea, No Shade

No tea, no shade” essentially means no offense or no disrespect. You’re not trying to be gossipy or insulting — you’re just telling it like it is. 

10. Kiki

kiki is a laid-back gathering at which queer people relax, catch up, and often gossip. According to “WIRED,” the word — meant to mimic the sound of laughter — originated in Black and Latinx queer circles.

11. Purse First

During his first appearance on “RuPaul’s Drag Race,” Bob the Drag Queen finished creating his outfit early and spent the extra time fashioning a purse. He then walked the runway with his arm outstretched, purse in hand, and the catchphrase purse first was born. It doesn’t have a strict definition, but people who walk into a room purse first are typically exhibiting confidence. In 2016, Bob even released a song titled “Purse First.”

Colorado man suspected in disappearance of wife guilty of Trump vote using her ballot

Colorado resident Barry Morphew pleaded guilty on Thursday to one count of felony forgery for using the mail-in ballot of his missing wife, Suzanne Morphew, to vote for Trump in the 2020 election.

Suzanne has been missing for two years and Morphew was initially charged with first-degree murder last year in relation to her disappearance, but the charges were ultimately dropped due to discovery rule violations. Suzanne Morphew is said to have disappeared shortly after leaving her home in Salida, Colorado to go on a bike ride in May 2020. Five months after Suzanne was reported missing, her mail-in ballot arrived at the clerk’s office in Chaffee County, according to The New York Times, and a warrant was later issued for Morphew’s  arrest for that crime only.

Morphew received a sentence of one year of supervised probation for the forgery conviction, in addition to being fined and assessed court costs of $600, according to The Denver Post. Morphew maintains that he has nothing to do with his wife’s disappearance, although prosecutors in that case accused him of killing her after learning that she had been involved in an extramarital affair.  

“I just thought, give him another vote,” Morphew said when questioned by the FBI on why he cast his missing wife’s ballot. “I figured all these other guys are cheating. I know she was going to vote for Trump anyway.”

“He believed that because he could sign legal documents for her, that the ballot, similarly, was under his authority,” says Morphew’s lawyer, Iris Eytan. “So he was following her wishes. He did not sign her name. He signed his name on the witness line. So he didn’t, in any way, intend to deceive the clerk of the court.”


Want a daily wrap-up of all the news and commentary Salon has to offer? Subscribe to our morning newsletter, Crash Course.


 Prior to the disappearance of Suzanne, she’d expressed concerns for her safety, according to her sister Melinda Moorman. According to People, Moorman phoned in to local Colorado radio station Heart of the Rock Radio in 2021 to talk about Suzanne and when the host asked if she’d ever said anything that would indicate her husband’s involvement Moorman said “Yes, Suzanne did. She definitely made implications that she had concerns about her safety. … And the condition of their relationship had, I think, deteriorated quite a bit over the last several years.”

Why does Saturn have rings and Jupiter doesn’t? A computer model may have figured it out

Jupiter, the fifth planet in our solar system and by far most massive, is a treasure trove of scientific discovery. Last year a pair of studies found that the planet’s iconic Great Red Spot is 40 times deeper than the Mariana Trench, the deepest location on Planet Earth. In April authors of a paper in the journal Nature Communications studied a double ridge in Northwest Greenland with the same gravity-scaled geometry as those found on Europa, one of Jupiter’s moons, and concluded that the probability of life on Europa is greater than expected.

Now scholars believe they have cracked another great Jupiter mystery — namely, why it lacks the spectacular rings flaunted by its celestial neighbor, Saturn. As a very massive gas giant with similar composition, the evolution of the two planets is believed to be similar — meaning the reason that one has a prominent ring system and the other doesn’t has always been something of a puzzle.

RELATED: A giant planet may have “escaped” from our solar system, study finds

With results that are currently online and will soon be published in the journal Planetary Science, researchers from the University of California–Riverside used modeling to determine that Jupiter’s enormous moons nip the creation of possible rings right in the bud.

Using a computer simulation that accounted for the orbits of each of Jupiter’s four moons, astrophysicist Stephen Kane and graduate student Zhexing Li realized that those moons’ gravity would alter the orbit of any ice that might come from a comet and ultimately prevent their accumulation in such a way as to form rings, as happened with Saturn. Instead the moons would either fling the ice away from the planet’s orbit or pull the ice toward a collision course with themselves.

This not only explains why Jupiter only has the paltriest of rings at present; it suggests that it likely never had large rings.


Want more health and science stories in your inbox? Subscribe to Salon’s weekly newsletter The Vulgar Scientist.


There is more at stake here than merely understanding why the aesthetics of Jupiter differ from the aesthetics of Saturn. As Kane explained in a statement, a planet’s rings contain many clues about that planet’s history. They can help scientists understand what objects might have collided with a planet in the past, or perhaps the type of event that formed them.

“For us astronomers, they are the blood spatter on the walls of a crime scene. When we look at the rings of giant planets, it’s evidence something catastrophic happened to put that material there,” Kane explained.

The scientists say they do not plan on ending their astronomical investigation at Jupiter; their next stop is Uranus, which also has paltry rings. The researchers speculate that Uranus, which appears to be tipped on its side, may lack rings because of a collision with another celestial body.

Technically, Jupiter does have a ring system, it is just incredibly small and faint. Indeed, Jupiter’s rings are so small that scientists did not even discover them until 1979, when the space probe Voyager passed by the gas giant. There are three faint rings, all of them made of dust particles emitted by the nearby moons — a main flattened ring that is 20 miles thick and 4,000 miles wide, an inner ring shaped like a donut that is more than 12,000 miles thick and a so-called “gossamer” ring that is actually comprised of three much smaller rings comprised of microscopic debris from the nearby moons.

NASA itself has expressed wonderment at the wispy rings that accompany our solar system’s most conspicuous behemoth — in particular, at the size of the particles that comprise them.

“These grains are so tiny, a thousand of them put together are only a millimeter long,” NASA writes. “That makes them as small as the particles in cigarette smoke.”

By contrast, the rings of Saturn are famously beautiful, and some of the particles in those rings are “as large as mountains.” When the space probe Cassini finally got an up-close look at Saturn’s rings, it found “spokes” longer than the diameter of Earth and potentially made of ice — as well as water jets from the Saturnian moon Enceladus, which would provide much of the material in the planet’s E ring.

For more Salon articles about astronomy:

Steve Bannon found guilty of contempt, faces up to 2 years after his defense strategy backfired

Former Trump adviser Steve Bannon was found guilty of contempt of Congress after refusing to cooperate with the Jan. 6 committee’s investigation.

A jury took less than three hours to find Bannon guilty on one count of contempt of Congress for refusing to produce documents and one count of contempt of Congress for refusing to appear for a deposition.

Bannon faces a mandatory minimum of at least 30 days in jail but could face up to one year behind bars for each count. He could also be fined up to $100,000. His sentencing is scheduled for October 21.

Bannon is expected to appeal the verdict, according to NBC News.

Bannon played a key role ahead of the deadly Jan. 6 Capitol riot, participating in secret meetings with fellow Trump allies at the Willard Hotel and vowing ahead of the attack that “all hell is going to break loose.”

“In short, Mr. Bannon appears to have played a multi-faceted role in the events of January 6th, and the American people are entitled to hear his first-hand testimony regarding his actions,” the Jan. 6 committee said in a report.

Fellow former Trump adviser Peter Navarro, who played a key role in stoking Trump’s Big Lie, also faces a contempt trial after he was indicted by a grand jury for failing to cooperate last month. He has pleaded not guilty.

Prosecutors spent little time arguing Bannon’s case, calling just two witnesses.

“This case is not complicated, but it is important,” Assistant U.S. Attorney Molly Gaston said in her closing arguments on Friday. “When it came down to it, he did not want to recognize Congress’s authority or play by the government’s rules.”

Bannon, despite vowing to cause chaos in his trial, did not even mount a defense or take the stand as his lawyers argued there was reasonable doubt concerning his guilt.

“We didn’t feel the need to put on a defense,” Bannon attorney Evan Corcoran told the jury.

Bannon was indicted in November after the House voted to hold him in contempt for failing to cooperate with the Jan. 6 investigation. Bannon’s attorney at the time argued that Trump had asserted executive privilege.

U.S. District Judge Carl Nichols rejected the argument that any assertion of executive privilege excused him from complying with a congressional subpoena.

Bannon’s attorneys accused the judge of “handcuffing” their defense.

“He’s wanted to testify publicly in this case under oath to tell the court, the jury and the public exactly what the true facts of the case are,” David Schoen, another attorney for Bannon, told the court. “However, on the advice of counsel … he has decided not to testify, because he understands that he would be barred from telling the true facts explaining why he did what he did, and why he did not do what he did not do in relation to the committee’s subpoena. He wanted to testify under oath to explain that at all times, he believed he was doing what the law required him to do, based on his lawyer’s advice.”


Want a daily wrap-up of all the news and commentary Salon has to offer? Subscribe to our morning newsletter, Crash Course.


In closing arguments, Corcoran suggested that the dates on the subpoenas were merely “placeholders” and bizarrely questioned whether Bannon’s subpoena was actually signed by Committee Chairman Bennie Thompson, D-Miss., raising questions whether his signature was real. He also raised “serious questions” about a witness’ participation in a book club that also included Gaston, NBC News reported.

“The thing about bias is that sometimes people become blind to it,” Corcoran argued.

Prosecutors rejected the defense’s claims of political bias.

“The only person who is making this case about politics is the defendant and he is doing it to distract and confuse you,” Gaston said. “Don’t let him.”

Bannon days before the trial reversed his position and offered to testify before the committee, which prosecutors dismissed as a “last-ditch attempt to avoid accountability.”

“That is like a child continuing to argue with their parent after they’re told they’re grounded,” Assistant U.S. Attorney Amanda Vaughn said Friday. “That kid knows they’re grounded, they can argue all they want, it doesn’t change the fact that the decision has been made.”

Gaston argued that the case was important because the investigation was focused on a major attack on the Capitol and how to prevent a similar incident in the future.

“Our government only works if people show up. It only works if people play by the rules, and it only works if people are held accountable when they do not,” Gaston said.

Prosecutors used Bannon’s own words against him, citing his quote to the Daily Mail after he was hit with the subpoena.

“I stand with Trump and the Constitution,” Bannon told the outlet.

“His belief that he had a good excuse not to comply does not matter,” Gaston said. “The defendant chose allegiance to Donald Trump over compliance with the law.”

“I stand with Trump”: Prosecutors use Bannon’s words against him in court

Closing arguments in Steve Bannon’s trial for contempt of Congress began this Friday with Assistant U.S. Attorney Molly Gaston pointing out that the case “is not complicated, but it is important.”

“This is a simple case about a man, that man, who didn’t show up,” Gaston said.

Bannon, who led Trump’s successful 2016 presidential election campaign, was among dozens of people called to testify about the storming of Congress by Trump supporters.

Bannon was indicted on two charges of contempt of Congress after refusing to testify to a House of Representatives committee probing the violence.

Gaston argued to the jury that Bannon’s congressional subpoena, which he initially rebuffed, works just like a parking ticket. If a person finds one on their windshield, they have two options — pay it, or try to argue against it. If your argument is rejected, the parking ticket has to be paid.

As NBC News’ Ryan J. Reilly points out, Gaston argued that Bannon made an “intentional” choice not to cooperate, adding that Gaston cited Bannon’s “I stand with Trump and the Constitution” quote to the Daily Mail.

“This is not a mistake,” Gaston told the jury.

“Our government only works if people show up. It only works if people play by the rules. And it only works if people are held accountable when they do not,” she said, according to CNN.

Investigators believe Bannon and other Trump advisors could have information on links between the White House and the rioters.

After refusing to testify for months, Bannon finally agreed to cooperate with the investigation, a move prosecutors said was a “last-ditch attempt to avoid accountability” by stalling his trial for contempt.

Judge Carl Nichols ruled it should go ahead anyway, saying “I see no reason for extending this case any longer.”

If convicted of contempt, Bannon, 68, faces a minimum sentence of 30 days and a maximum of one year in prison on each count.

He was Trump’s strategy chief at the White House before being sacked in 2017.

Bannon was charged with conspiracy to commit wire fraud and money laundering after allegedly defrauding thousands of donors to a campaign to fund Trump’s anti-migrant wall along the southern border.

In Trump’s final hours in office, he pardoned Bannon.

More than 850 people have been arrested in connection with the attack on Congress. The assault left at least five people dead and 140 police officers injured.

Trump was impeached for a historic second time by the House after the riot — he was charged with inciting an insurrection — but was acquitted by the Senate.

Trump’s 2025 plan includes a nightmare list of Cabinet picks — and purge of career officials: report

Former President Donald Trump’s top allies are preparing to purge potentially thousands of career civil servants and install MAGA loyalists in key administration positions if he wins the 2024 presidential election, according to Axios.

Trumpworld is already lining up names of loyalists to fill top jobs if Trump returns to the White House in 2025, including former Justice Department official Jeffrey Clark, who tried to take over the DOJ to help Trump overturn his election loss. Other names for top administration roles include Kash Patel, a former top aide to ex-Rep. Devin Nunes, R-Calif., who helped run interference in the Mueller probe; former adviser Peter Navarro, who played a key role in pushing Trump’s Big Lie about the election; and Stephen Miller, the architect of Trump’s controversial family separation policy.

But Trump’s allies aren’t just thinking about the top jobs — they’re also plotting a purge of career civil servants by radically overhauling labor protections for tens of thousands of career officials. The plan appears similar to one pushed by Ginni Thomas, the wife of Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas, who made detailed lists of disloyal officials to oust during Trump’s tenure.

“The impact could go well beyond typical conservative targets such as the Environmental Protection Agency and the Internal Revenue Service,” Axios’ Jonathan Swan reported. “Trump allies are working on plans that would potentially strip layers at the Justice Department — including the FBI, and reaching into national security, intelligence, the State Department and the Pentagon.”

The key to the Trumpworld plot is an executive order, known as “Schedule F,” which was developed in secret throughout Trump’s presidency as he complained about the so-called “deep state.”

New presidents typically get to replace more than 4,000 political appointees when they take office but more than 2 million career federal employees have strong job protections and typically stay on regardless of which party controls the White House. But Trump’s executive order, which was issued days before the 2020 election and later rescinded by President Joe Biden, reassigned about 50,000 federal workers as “Schedule F,” meaning they would lose their employment protections and could be replaced.

Trump’s allies are plotting to bring back the order and “stack thousands of mid-level staff jobs” with loyalists, according to the report, which noted the preparations are “far more advanced and ambitious than previously reported.”

Trump’s allies told Axios that they will not have to fire 50,000 employees because the order itself could send a chill through the federal government. One source told the outlet that firing a number of “bad apples” in each agency would lead to “behavior change” among the rest of the career civil servants.

Others, however, said they anticipate needing an “alternate labor force of unprecedented scale,” Swan wrote, perhaps as many as 10,000 vetted hires, to replace “obstructionist” government officials.

Former Trump chief of staff Mark Meadows’ group, the Conservative Partnership Institute, is expected to play a key role. The group has already raised nearly $20 million, including $1 million from Trump’s PAC, and has a team working on a database of “vetted staff that could be fed immediately” to Trump’s team, according to the report.

The conservative Heritage Foundation is also involved, planning to spend at least $10 million to build a database of personnel for the next Republican administration.

Miller, too, has been working on a list of lawyers who would be ready to fill key counsel jobs in a second Trump administration. And former Budget Director Russ Vought is working on reforms that would make it easier for personnel to get security clearance if they are blocked by the current system, as many of Trump’s top picks were.

Federal labor unions and Democrats would certainly fight such a move but Trump’s advisers noted that the cases would likely end up in front of friendly conservative judges, many of whom were appointed by Trump.

Rep. Gerry Connolly, D-Va., added an amendment to this year’s defense bill aimed at preventing Trump or another future president from reimposing the Schedule F order. The amendment passed the House but Republicans aim to block it in the Senate.

A number of conservative groups linked to former allies are already feverishly working to lay the groundwork for a more successful second Trump presidency. Meadows, Clark and Vought are likely to see key roles in a second Trump administration, as are Trump loyalists like Dan Scavino, Richard Grenell, John Ratcliffe and Pam Bondi.


Want a daily wrap-up of all the news and commentary Salon has to offer? Subscribe to our morning newsletter, Crash Course.


Trump himself is working with a small team of advisers at Mar-a-Lago and considers Rep. Jim Jordan, R-Ohio, his “closest confidant” on Capitol Hill, according to Axios. He has also stayed close to Nunes, who now runs his Twitter knockoff Truth Social.

Clark, who was paraded from his home in his pajamas and had his devices seized by federal agents, has also “circulated at Mar-a-Lago,” according to the report, holding court about his plans for the Justice Department in a second Trump administration. Trump, Clark predicted, “would never appoint an attorney general who was not completely on board with his agenda,” according to the report, which noted that Clark would be a serious contender for the job.

Patel has also been seen around Mar-a-Lago. Trump unsuccessfully sought to install Patel as deputy director of the CIA or FBI but relented after strong pushback from former CIA Director Gina Haspel and former Attorney General Bill Barr. “Never again would Trump acquiesce to such warnings,” Swan wrote, noting that Patel has only grown closer to Trump and would certainly be in line for a key administration role, perhaps as national security adviser or even CIA or FBI director.

Grenell, one of Trump’s most outspoken defenders who now works at the right-wing network Newsmax, could be in line to be his secretary of state after serving as his acting director of national intelligence.

Patel and others are particularly interested in “cleaning house” in the intelligence community, State Department, Defense Department, and the top layers of the Justice Department and the FBI, according to the report.

Trump is particularly focused on his never-ending election lies, frequently grousing about “ungrateful” and “treasonous” former administration officials that he feels did not do enough to help him steal the election. Many of the people he has surrounded himself with have embraced his constant falsehoods, but it’s unclear that Trump would be able to fill an entire Cabinet with diehard loyalists.

“Even if you’re a true believer, you see what happens to people,” one former Trump adviser told Axios. “Are there any Senate-confirmable individuals who would consider taking a chance on this? You’ll either be saddled with legal fees or have your reputation destroyed.”

Ivanka Trump and Jared Kushner try to “distance” from Trump, don’t want to be linked to his politics

A new report has indicated that former President Donald Trump’s daughter, Ivanka Trump, and his son-in-law, Jared Kushner, have reportedly distanced from Trump and are no longer affiliated with his political endeavors.

Ivanka Trump, her husband, and many other Republicans who were closely connected to Trump during his presidency have also distanced from him, Axios reported.

Speaking to The New York Times, a number of sources have revealed that the couple also did not believe the former president’s claims of widespread voter fraud after losing the 2020 presidential election. Sources also noted other concerns Kushner had.

“To Mr. Kushner, his father-in-law’s decision to turn once again to Mr. Giuliani was a red flag. As far as Mr. Kushner was concerned, Mr. Giuliani was an erratic schemer who had already gotten Mr. Trump impeached once because of his political intriguing in Ukraine, and nothing good would come of the former mayor’s involvement in fighting the election results,” The New York Times reported.

The report added, “But instead of fighting Mr. Giuliani for Mr. Trump’s attention, Mr. Kushner opted out entirely, deciding it was time to focus on his own future, one that would no longer involve the White House.”

In addition to shedding light on the couple’s take on Trump’s “Big Lie,” The Times report also shed light on what Ivanka Trump had been doing as angry Trump supporters stormed the U. S Capitol on January 6.

“Ivanka Trump had spent much of the day trying to keep her father from going too far. She had refused to address the rally on the Ellipse but at the last minute was so concerned by her father’s anger toward Mr. Pence that she decided to accompany him there in hopes of avoiding a worse clash,” The Times reported. “Over the following hours, as rioters rampaged through the Capitol, she ran up and down the stairs in the West Wing from her office to the Oval Office hoping to persuade her father to issue stronger statements calling off the attackers.”

In the aftermath of the Capitol insurrection, Kushner reportedly made efforts to garner peace between Trump and former Vice President Mike Pence as the former president faced scrutiny and accusations about his alleged involvement in what transpired at the Capitol. However, Trump was reportedly set on “waging war on Mr. Biden and the system, insisting he really won.”

However, Kushner made it clear that he refused to be involved with such antics.

Fox News’ desperate distraction circus: Anything to have viewers ignore the January 6 hearings

Expectations for this year’s January 6 committee hearings may have started out low, but by the eighth and final night of summer hearings, both media and viewers had grown accustomed to each hearing being two-plus hours of shocking revelations. Thursday night’s hearing, which covered Donald Trump’s actions the day of the Capitol insurrection, did not disappoint. As Heather “Digby” Parton recounts, the committee painted a vivid picture of Trump spending hours reveling in the violence he had knowingly unleashed on the Capitol, while making threatening calls to Republican senators, demanding the White House. 

Of course, as the months since have shown, he probably didn’t need to use violence. Now that they’re safe again, nearly all of those Republicans who were furious over the riot have come right back around to kissing Trump’s rear. Worse, many of them are helping him plan for the next, more well-organized coup. Some, like Sen. Josh “Running Man” Hawley of Missouri, are in this because they unsubtly long for a fascist state. Others, like Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell and House Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy, seem less enthused about Trump, but clearly feel like keeping their own power means playing nice with Trump, who still has a Svengali-like hold over the GOP base. 

But what if Trump’s power over the Republican base started to wobble, even just a little bit?

The GOP is already an unpopular minority party that only has real power because of the anti-majoritarian tilt of electoral institutions. The party’s ability to hold onto power, much less win (or get it close enough to steal) in 2024 depends all too often on razor-thin margins of victory in swing states and gerrymandered districts. If even 1-2% of reliable Republican voters got cold feet about the authoritarian tilt of the party, it could dramatically alter the GOP’s future. That’s true even if those voters didn’t vote for Democrats, but instead just skipped voting. 

It may seem like an impossible dream, but clearly Fox News is worried about this possibility. 

The best way to keep Trump voters from feeling pangs of conscience over his violent methods is to remind them of why they backed him in the first place

On the last night of the hearings, while other networks piped the broadcast directly to American TVs, Fox instead embraced a distract-and-spin strategy meant to keep their viewers from even feeling tempted to engage with the actual evidence of Trump’s villainy. The network exuded a palpable fear that some of their people might actually listen, learn and change their minds. So network producers pulled out all of the stops to keep that from happening. 


Want more Amanda Marcotte on politics? Subscribe to her newsletter Standing Room Only.


John Whitehouse, the news director of Media Matters, took on the thankless task of tweeting side-by-side comparisons of the Fox News programming and the live hearing. The strategy is as predictable as it is depressing.

Tucker Carlson spent his primetime hour opening a firehose of grievance programming, geared directly at stimulating the sexual jealousies, racism, and intellectual resentments of the Fox News audience. Things kicked off with a “why do those stupid medical scientists think they know more about viruses than me?” tantrum:

Followed by the “Freebird” of right-wing grievance: “How dare those stupid sluts have sex with men who aren’t me” whining. 

Carlson also hit the racism hard, with segments about how the world outside of the Fox News viewer’s suburban lawn is a violent hellhole caused by racial diversity. Whatever it takes to keep the lizard brains activated, drowning out any desire to think critically or engage with real evidence.

Sean Hannity, meanwhile, embraced a different tactic, acknowledging the hearings but trying to discredit them. 

Trump himself got involved, having an extended meltdown on his lame “Truth Social” network, mostly with misogynist vitriol aimed at Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi and former White House aide Sarah Matthews, who testified against him. It was a blended approach: Trying to discredit the hearings, but within a framework of misogynist whining to endear him to his fellow woman-haters. 


Want more Amanda Marcotte on politics? Subscribe to her newsletter Standing Room Only.


This content is, of course, all irrelevant noise built on a foundation of lies. It’s the purpose of it that is so fascinating: To convince viewers to stay as far as possible away from absorbing the information offered by the January 6 committee. Clearly, the Fox News producers are worried that even a small amount of attention paid to the facts will stoke doubts in their viewers and weaken their resolve to keep supporting Trump. 

Should they be worried? From one perspective, the answer is a big, fat no. After all, as the committee demonstrated last night, Republican members of Congress were directly threatened by Trump’s violence, were afraid for their lives, and begged him to stop. If people he nearly killed can handle the cognitive dissonance to stay by his side, certainly voters who are at a physical remove can. 

And certainly, the past six years suggest Trump voters are plenty aware that he’s a sociopathic monster. That’s why they like him. They’re motivated by the same thing that causes Republican politicians to stick by Trump: They want power, no matter what the cost, and think that Trump is the vehicle to get it. They don’t “believe” the Big Lie, so much as embrace it as a way to achieve the overall goal, which is for their tribe to control all the reins of power, democracy be damned. For most Trump voters, Fox News exists mostly as a rationalization-generator more than a source of genuine confusion. They could, after all, change the channel — but they don’t. 

Still, even if most Trump voters are immovable in their faith, as the numbers show, all you need is a couple of percentage points to change their minds and it would dramatically undermine the GOP hold on power.

If Trump and his main propagandists are this worried about losing support, maybe that’s a sign of hope for the rest of the country. 

There are voters like former Metropolitan Police Officer Michael Fanone, who voted for Trump in 2016 but, having endured the violence of January 6, are now outspoken critics. Polling shows that while most Republican voters are steadfast in love with Trump, the hearings really are rattling the consciences of a small percentage. However quietly, some small number of Republicans are wondering if it’s really worth it to keep on the path of fascism, just to retain political power? 


Want more Amanda Marcotte on politics? Subscribe to her newsletter Standing Room Only.


In light of that, it’s interesting to look back at Carlson and Hannity’s different approaches to convincing viewers to bury doubts and stay the course.

Carlson’s projectile vomiting of racism, misogyny, homophobia and general resentment towards intellectuals is classic fascist propaganda, of course. But the context layers on another, implicit argument: Trump’s violence and attempts to destroy democracy may be uncomfortable, but it’s necessary to achieve the right’s political goals of forced childbirth, undermining science, and enforcing strict race and gender hierarchies. 

Hannity, on the other hand, seems more interested in trying to bamboozle his audience, by muddying the waters around the facts of January 6. Or, more cynically, he’s just offering up a bunch of talking points for his audience to repeat so they can justify their predetermined conclusion that they don’t care about January 6. 

Carlson’s always been the smarter one, so I’d bet on his strategy more.

Again, Republican voters have never been particularly confused about who Trump is. As the committee members argued strenuously Thursday night, Trump lacks character. But that’s not news to his voters, so much as a selling point. Trump revels in his villainy and his supporters cheer the most loudly at his rallies when he’s insulting or bullying people. They view his sociopathy as a weapon they can use against their perceived enemies. So the best way to keep them from feeling pangs of conscience over his violent methods is to remind them of why they backed him in the first place: They want him to oppress people they don’t like — even if it means violence. 

It remains to be seen how much impact the January 6 hearings will have. Most Trump voters know Trump did it, they know why he did it, and they approve. The hope is that just enough of them start to feel things have gone too far. I tend to be skeptical about that, but it gives me pause to watch Fox News and Trump spin as hard as they can. If Trump and his main propagandists are this worried about losing support, maybe that’s a sign of hope for the rest of the country. 

Trump just admitted his scheme to overturn his election loss in new statement

As the Jan. 6 select committee presented damning evidence of Donald Trump allowing his violent coup attempt to continue for 187 minutes, Donald Trump basically admitted to seditious conspiracy on his Truth Social website.

In his statement, Trump admitted he wanted Vice President Mike Pence to reject the valid electors in multiple states in violation of the Constitution. 

And then he went on to admit the goal was to overturn the 2020 presidential election, which was won by Joe Biden.

“This may have proven to be an election-changing event,” Trump admitted before attacking Biden.

“What a difference it would have made if state legislatures had another crack at looking at all of the fraud, abuse, and irregularities that have been found,” Trump said, even though all his delusions had been thoroughly debunked and laughed out of court by Jan. 6.

As Trump issued his Truth Social statement, the select committee was hearing testimony about his refusal to issue an adequate statement on Jan. 6.

Hearing reveals Pence Jan. 6 security called families to say goodbye as they feared for their lives

The House Jan. 6 committee on Thursday revealed that former Vice President Mike Pence’s security detail feared for their lives as a mob of Trump supporters stormed the Capitol.

Though some Republicans after the riot described the attack as a “normal tourist visit” and a largely “peaceful protest,” Thursday’s hearing highlighted the fear that lawmakers and security personnel experienced in real time as Trump supporters hunted lawmakers through the halls of Congress.

Audio played by the committee showed that Pence’s Secret Service detail grew increasingly concerned that they would be trapped by the mob as they closed in.

“We need to move now. If we lose any more time, we may … lose the ability to leave. So, if we’re going to leave, we need to do it now,” one Secret Service agent said over the radio.

Trump sent out a tweet attacking Pence for lacking the “courage” to try to steal the election at around 2:24 pm. Around the same time, a White House National Security Council official noted in a chat log that Secret Service at the Capitol “does not sound good right now.”

“There was a lot of yelling. A lot of very personal calls over the radio, so it was disturbing,” the official, whose identity was obscured over fear of retaliation, told the committee. I don’t like talking about it, but there were calls to say goodbye to family members, so on, so forth. For whatever the reason was on the ground, the VP detail thought that this was about to get very ugly.

“I think there were discussions of reinforcements coming, but again, it was just chaos, they were just yelling,” the official explained. “If they’re running out of options and they’re getting nervous — it sounds like we came very close to either Service having to use lethal options or worse. At that point, I don’t know. Is the VP compromised? Is the detail? I don’t know. … If they’re screaming and saying things like, ‘say goodbye to the family,’ like the floor needs to know this is going to a whole ‘nother level soon.”

Less than a minute after Pence was rushed off the Senate floor, a mob chanting “hang Mike Pence” came within feet of Pence’s location.

“Mike Pence didn’t have the courage to do what should have been done,” Trump tweeted. “USA demands truth.”

Witnesses at the hearing and in clips played from past depositions recalled their disappointment that Trump attacked his vice president at a moment when nearly everyone was pleading for him to de-escalate the situation.

“I thought the tweet about the vice president was the last thing that was needed in that moment,” former White House deputy press secretary Sarah Matthews, who resigned hours after the attack, told the panel. “It was essentially him giving the green light to these people — telling them that what they were doing at the steps of the Capitol, and entering the Capitol, was okay, that they were justified in their anger. And he shouldn’t have been doing that. He should have been telling these people to go home and to leave and to condemn the violence that we are seeing.”

Former deputy national security adviser Matthew Pottinger said the tweet prompted him to resign as well. Former White House counsel Pat Cipollone called it a “terrible tweet.” Former White House spokesman Judd Deere said it was extremely unhelpful.”

Lawmakers were struck with fear as well, including Sen. Josh Hawley, R-Mo., who pumped his fist in support of the mob outside the Capitol shortly before surveillance footage played by the committee showed him fleeing through the Senate hallway after the mob broke into the building.

House Republican Leader Kevin McCarthy, R-Calif., who has since repeatedly defended Trump, desperately pleaded for Trump to call off the mob but was rebuffed as the president sat in his dining room watching the chaos on Fox News.

“Leader McCarthy, who was one of the president’s strongest supporters, was scared and begging for help. President Trump turned him down, so he tried to call the president’s children,” Rep. Adam Kinzinger, R-Ill., said at the hearing.


Want a daily wrap-up of all the news and commentary Salon has to offer? Subscribe to our morning newsletter, Crash Course.


Trump son-in-law Jared Kushner testified that McCarthy warned him that “it was getting really ugly over at the Capitol.”

“I don’t recall a specific ask, just anything you could do. Again, I got the sense that they were scared. … That he was scared, yes,” Kushner said.

“Secret Service agents protecting the vice president were exceptionally concerned about his safety and their own,” said Rep. Liz Cheney, R-Wyo., the committee’s vice-chair. “Republican leader Kevin McCarthy was scared, as were others in Congress. Even those who themselves helped to provoke the violence.”

This simple mascarpone cream pie filling is great with any kind of seasonal fruit

This simple filling is great with any kind of seasonal fruit, especially strawberries, blackberries, raspberries, and peaches. — Erin Jeanne McDowell

Watch this recipe

Vanilla-Mascarpone Cream Pie with Honeyed Fruit
Makes
1 9-inch pie

Ingredients

Crust

  • 2 cups sugar cookie crumbs
  • Generous pinch of salt
  • 3 tablespoons unsalted butter, melted

Finished Pie

  • 1 teaspoon gelatin
  • 2 tablespoons cold water
  • 1 1/4 cups heavy cream
  • 1/2 cup vanilla sugar
  • two 8-ounce containers mascarpone cheese
  • 3/4 teaspoon vanilla extract
  • Seasonal fruit, cut into large wedges or trimmed and left whole (I used black plums and black currants)
  • 2 tablespoons wildflower honey

 

Directions

  1. Preheat the oven to 375° F. In a medium bowl, stir the cookie crumbs and salt together to combine. Add the butter and mix just until the mixture clumps together. If it looks dry, add an additional 1 tablespoon melted butter.
  2. Press the cookie mixture into the pie plate evenly. Transfer to the oven and bake until golden brown, 10 to 15 minutes. Cool completely.
  3. In a small bowl, bloom the gelatin in cold water for 5 minutes, then melt it in the microwave until liquid.
  4. In the bowl of an electric mixer, whip the heavy cream on medium-low speed until frothy. Gradually add the vanilla sugar and continue to whip it until it forms soft peaks. 
  5. Add the mascarpone, vanilla extract, and melted gelatin. Mix until the mixture is fully combined and it reaches medium peaks. 
  6. Pour the mascarpone mixture into the cooled cookie crust and spread it evenly. Work quickly, as the mixture will set fast since it is cold. Arrange the fruit on top of the filling. 
  7. In a small pot, warm the honey until very fluid. Gently brush the fruit with the honey. Keep the pie chilled until ready to serve.

Why won’t Republicans investigate white supremacists in uniform? We know why

In the years since the civil rights movement, open white supremacists have largely been stigmatized, marginalized, condemned and all but banished from mainstream American society. That’s especially true for neo-Nazis, who have existed mostly on the extreme outer boundaries of American public life.

That has changed. The Age of Trump has given permission for the worst of human behavior, and those kinds of norms have been twisted, bent or broken. Donald Trump’s regime, the current Republican Party and the larger white right have been willing to amplify such voices, bringing them into the highest levels of government and power and, through “narrative laundering,” into the mainstream of American society and politics. Trumpism and American neofascism are at once a reflection, a cause and a symptom of growing racial authoritarianism and outright white supremacy, both in the United States and around the world.

Note this most recent example: Last week, all 208 Republican members of the House voted against investigating white supremacist and neo-Nazi activity in the military and exploring how to address it. Those 208 Republicans included Rep. Liz Cheney of Wyoming, vice chair of the Jan. 6 committee and hero to the mainstream commentariat and entirely too many liberals. Tess Owen of Vice summarizes the situation, noting that this amendment passed the House on a strict party-line vote:

If the amendment survives Senate scrutiny, it would mandate the chiefs of the FBI, Department of Homeland Security, and Department of Defense to produce a report assessing the extent of white supremacist or neo-Nazi activity in their ranks and how they plan to address it. They’d have 180 days from the enactment of the National Defense Authorization Act to compile that report.

The stark divide between Democrat and Republican support for the amendment is a reminder of how the genuine national security problem of white supremacist infiltration of government agencies has instead been turned into a partisan football. 

“We just voted to combat neo-Nazis in our military and every single Republican voted no,” tweeted New Jersey Democratic Rep. Bill Pascrell Jr. 

In more normal times, voting to investigate Nazis and members of other white supremacist hate groups in uniform would be an easy political win for both Republicans and Democrats. What respectable public figure would want to risk being viewed, correctly or not, as sympathetic to Nazis, Klan members or other far-right racial terrorists?


Want a daily wrap-up of all the news and commentary Salon has to offer? Subscribe to our morning newsletter, Crash Course.


But today’s “conservative” movement has become a big tent of the worst possible type. Many are ready to welcome or embrace white supremacists and other right-wing extremists. Others are content to look the other way, while demonstrating a shared affinity for many of the same fundamental values, beliefs and goals. Republicans in the Age of Trump are not willing to alienate their most enthusiastic supporters, even at risk at being seen as aligned with hate groups.

I asked antiracism activist and author Tim Wise for his reaction:

As usual, the MAGA-fied GOP has shown its true colors: unwilling to openly condemn or investigate white supremacists and nationalists in the military despite warnings that these are becoming significant problems among the enlisted. Why? Because too many of their base endorse those ideologies, or at the very least are comfortable with them. To condemn white racism is to condemn huge swaths of their voter base. It literally puts their electability in question. It would be like a Democrat announcing they were for segregation; only, please note, the difference between Democrats and Republicans is that being for segregation and racism gets you in trouble if you’re a Democrat. Being against Nazism and racism sinks you as a Republican. Fascinating.

Meanwhile, their inaction puts the nation at risk. Racists admit they are targeting such folks for recruitment because they want battle-tested (or at least trained) soldiers for their race war. Neglecting to investigate this issue proves that the GOP cares nothing for national security, and only for their own reactionary base of neofascists.

David Neiwert, one of America’s leading experts on right-wing extremism, highlights the incremental creep of the Republican Party’s inexorable slide toward avowed white supremacy and right-wing extremism:

This vote in the House is really just the latest action cementing the Republican Party’s ardent embrace of the same right-wing extremism that overtook the Capitol on Jan. 6. The GOP now openly and undeniably defends the politics of sedition and insurrection, and has become a fundamentally antidemocratic entity. At some point, Americans who believe in democracy need to awaken to this reality and treat it with the deadly seriousness it deserves. But it’s escaping our notice because it’s happening brick by brick.

The Republican Party’s refusal to support efforts to deradicalize the U.S. military and federal law enforcement is part of a much larger pattern. The right-wing movement is working to end America’s multiracial democracy and replace it with a pseudo-democratic Christian-fascist plutocracy, where a small minority of wealthy white men and their allies will rule over American society without resistance or challenge. In local, national and state elections across the country, various kinds of right-wing extremists are seeking office as Republicans. They understand today’s Republican Party to be their natural home.

A large proportion of Republicans and a majority of Trump voters buy into the most important claims of the “great replacement” conspiracy theory, which holds that white people in the U.S. and other Western nations are being “replaced” in “their own countries” by nonwhite immigrants, as part of a deliberate strategy by “global elites” (which tends to mean Jewish people). That conspiracy theory has repeatedly led to violence, including white supremacist mass shootings in Buffalo, El Paso, Pittsburgh and numerous other places.

Social science researchers have repeatedly shown that white racism and racial animus are determining factors in support for Trump and the Republican Party.

White Republican voters also believe that white people in America are the “real victims” of racism. These delusions and fantasies are central tenets of white supremacist ideology as espoused by neo-Nazis and other hate groups.

Many Republicans also believe that Trump’s coup attempt and the Jan. 6 Capitol attack were at least partly justified, and view the people who attacked the Capitol as “patriots” who are being unfairly persecuted by Democrats and the federal government. 

Members of right-wing extremist and paramilitary groups, most notably the Oath Keepers and the Proud Boys, were integral to Trump’s coup plot and the terrorist attack on the Capitol. In practice, these groups functioned as Trump’s personal stormtroopers on Jan. 6, and hoped to go much further during the reign of terror that might have followed his seizure of power after nullifying the results of the 2020 election.

I asked Jenn Budd, an author and former patrol and intelligence agent with the U.S. Border Patrol, for her perspective on the escalating dangers from the Republican Party and the growing neofascist movement:

On Jan. 6, our democracy was almost overthrown not just by radicalized white Americans but also by many in Congress who are Republican leaders. Democrats are trying to investigate and prevent future acts of terrorism with the very people who took part in the coup. The threat of terrorism is coming not just from white nationalists outside but from within the government itself.

We should not be surprised by any of this. The largest federal police forces are CBP, Border Patrol and ICE. They are literally based in white nationalist ideology, as they are constantly looking for people who “don’t belong” to deport them, i.e., Black and brown bodies. The entire reason political leaders have militarized our borders is to keep “those people” out while opening the door for white migrants like the Ukrainians. The truth is that both sides created these agencies to enforce the laws that ensure white supremacy. It is difficult to address white nationalism and terrorism when our entire system is based on that ideology.

Right-wing extremism, including neo-Nazism and other white supremacist ideologies, is a long-standing problem in the U.S. military and law enforcement. Repeated efforts to confront this security challenge, as we have just seen, are repeatedly resisted by Republicans and the mainstream right. Stephanie Foggett, a resident fellow at the Soufan Center, provided further context, noting that domestic terrorism “has been recognized as a top national security priority by law enforcement,” and that there’s no valid reason why addressing that threat should be a partisan issue:

That lawmakers must address means to combat white supremacist and neo-Nazi infiltration of the armed forces and law enforcement should not come as a surprise: Violent extremist groups highly value having service members and veterans among their ranks. In recent years, current and former service members have been linked to these groups and movements; some participated in the violence at the U.S. Capitol on Jan. 6…. On the one hand, violent extremist groups seek to recruit among this demographic for operational and tactical reasons. They hope to benefit from both the skillset these members would bring, like weapons training, as well as combat and other types of “real-world” experience. On the other hand, individuals with extremist beliefs and affiliations may seek to join the armed forces or law enforcement, so it’s important to have policies for screening new recruits for extremism.

Another concern is among veterans; America’s history already shows a worrying intersection between war and far-right extremism. The reality is that the armed forces and law enforcement are uniquely vulnerable to this threat, from extremist actors looking to recruit among the demographic to extremist actors looking to infiltrate these institutions to the vulnerability of veterans to recruitment following their service. It is a security imperative to root out far-right extremism in the military and police, for the benefit of the institutions themselves as well as for the country they serve to protect.   

The conservative movement’s incremental embrace of white supremacy and racial authoritarianism is part of a much larger global phenomenon. Today’s Republican Party has more in common with right-wing extremist and fascist political parties in Hungary, Poland and Turkey than with mainstream conservative parties in Germany, France or the U.K. 

Leading “conservatives” view Vladimir Putin’s Russia and Viktor Orbán’s Hungary as models for the type of anti-democratic and anti-pluralistic order they want to enforce on America. CPAC held a gathering in Hungary last May that drew far-right figures from all over Europe, and Orbán will be a featured guest at the next CPAC gathering in Dallas later this year. 

I asked James Scaminaci III, a leading expert on right-wing extremism and political violence, for his insights into the Republican Party’s refusal to investigate and monitor white supremacists and other extremists within military and law enforcement:

I served four years in Bosnia-Herzegovina after the genocidal war and covered the war in that country from the start in the late 1980s as a civilian military intelligence analyst. The GOP is balkanizing this country like the ethno-nationalists did in the former Yugoslavia. Under the ethno-nationalists, you could only trust members of your own ethnic-religious group. The GOP is doing its utmost to ensure that social and political polarization goes to the extremes. We are in the gravest of dangers, and while a large majority of the public, both GOP and Democrat, realizes the dangers, we have one political party driving us towards Christian-nationalist fascism. We have no fail-safe measures.

Today’s Republican Party and the larger “conservative” movement and white right are a clear and present danger to American democracy and American society. The Trump cabal’s 2021 coup attempt was no aberration. It was part of a larger pattern of violence and radical extremism with the goal of ending America’s multiracial pluralist democracy and replacing it with right-wing minority rule. The Republican refusal to monitor, deradicalize or purge white supremacists and other right-wing extremists from military and law enforcement is one obvious aspect of that larger strategy.

Too many members of the mainstream news media and larger political class remain committed to the self-soothing fiction that contemporary Republicans and “conservatives” are capable of being responsible partners in government and democracy. They are not, and it’s long past time to abandon that delusion. 

7 soundproofing hacks to drown out your noisy neighbors

There’s a saying among the acoustics junkies, home improvement enthusiasts, and city dwellers of Reddit: Sound is like water — it can find its way into a space through even the smallest opening. In other words, making a room, let alone an entire apartment, completely soundproof can feel like a Sisyphean effort. As hopeless as they may sound, these same Reddit users do their best to, at the very least, reduce the amount of noise that seeps its way into their homes. And, lucky for us, they’re more than willing to share their hacks with the rest of the internet-browsing public.

Whether you’re dealing with a loud neighbor, constant construction, or bumper-to-bumper traffic right outside your window, you can counteract some of the cacophony using some of the tips below:

1. Furnish, furnish, furnish

Here’s the thing: the less you have in your home, the more sound is going to bounce around and drive you absolutely bonkers. This one is the simplest of the bunch: furnish your apartment. This means laying down rugs (the fluffier, the better) wherever there’s a bare wood or tiled floor, filling the room up with soft furnishings like chairs, couches, and blankets, and hanging up curtains.

Think about it: when you moved into your empty apartment, your voice would throw across the room and reverberate in an unsettling way, but once all your possessions were in place, the sound was much better absorbed. This, combined with preservation of flooring, is also why many buildings and landlords will require a certain percentage of the room be covered with rugs. So, get to laying more rugs down!.

2. Make your gallery wall do double duty

Sound reduction doesn’t necessarily have to be a whole new DIY project — you can actually use your pre-existing decor to enhance your home’s resistance. In one Redditor’s case, this meant tacking felt, foam, and other soft, sound-absorbing materials onto the backs of framed pictures. Although the Reddtor’s trick of using panty liners to cushion their hanging art is pretty darn funny (and not to mention inventive, we’d recommend sheets of fiberglass instead.

3. Try out acoustic panels

Listen, we know you don’t live in a recording studio (or maybe you do?), and probably don’t want to hang foam all over your walls to reduce the amount of noise coming in from your rude neighbors, so we present to you: acoustic panels. You can actually order sound-absorbing panels that look just like large canvas art, so as not to totally compromise the integrity of your decorated home. They’re customizable too, so you can send any kind of art you’d like to be printed.

4. Plug up leaky doors

Doors can allow a sneaky amount of noise into your living space, especially if there are sizable gaps between them and their frames. Plus, if your interior doors have hollow cores, even more sound is liable to get through. Replacing any hollow core doors with solid ones will make a dramatic difference, as one Redditor noted, but if that isn’t an option, they also recommended sealing the gaps around your doors with soundproofing adhesive. While this trick will work as well for your front door as for your bathroom door, another Reddit user suggested a hack that’s particularly suited for interior doors: draft blockers. Although their intended use is insulation, draft blockers fit snugly between the bottom of your door and the floor, and thus stop sound from moving from room to room as easily.

5. Expand your home library

If you prefer a grand bookshelf to a gallery wall, you’re in luck. Several Redditors have posted that leaning a large shelf, ideally one laden with heavy books, against a wall will help absorb some of the noise that’s coming through from the other side. Extra credit if you add some of that fiberglass we mentioned earlier between the shelf and the wall — you can even find hangable fiberglass blanketsfor floor-to-ceiling shelves.

6. Browse wall hangings and upgrade your curtains

Who said tapestries were just for college kids? According to one Reddit user, thin walls can get a minor sound absorbency boost from fabric wall hangings — and there are plenty of grownup optionsto be found. Aside from tapestries, another Redditor claims that your windows can get a similar treatment from heavy, blackout curtains, in case street noise is the source of your woes.

7. And, as a last resort: Cover up the noise

As silly as it may seem to walk around wearing earplugs or noise-cancelling headphones in your home, many Reddit users insist that it’s the surest way to get some peace and quiet — especially when you’re trying to sleepWhite noise machinesstreamable background sounds, and even humble box fans are said to work just as well, if you’d rather not physically plug your ears before hitting the hay.

Flailing Trump has extended meltdown on Truth Social over Jan. 6 hearing

Former President Donald Trump lashed out at a cavalcade of critics on Thursday during the eighth televised hearing held by the House select committee investigating the Jan. 6 Capitol riot.

The committee held a nearly three-hour hearing, detailing Trump’s refusal to intervene or call off his angry mob of supporters at the Capitol for 187 minutes as they assaulted police officers and stormed through the halls of Congress seeking to stop the certification of election results, perhaps by kidnapping or murdering Vice President Mike Pence.

“Donald Trump made a purposeful choice to violate his oath of office to ignore the ongoing violence against law enforcement to threaten our constitutional order,” committee Vice-Chair Liz Cheney said in her closing remarks. “There is no way to excuse that behavior. It was indefensible.”

Trump, who is banned from all major social media platforms, took to his Twitter knockoff Truth Social to lash out at Cheney, calling her a “sanctimonious loser” and demanding she instead show evidence challenging the election results. The committee has heard from a parade of witnesses from Trump’s administration that investigated his false election fraud claims and found no evidence to back them up.

Trump also dismissed others at the hearing, claiming “I don’t know” witness Sarah Matthews. Matthews worked for Trump’s 2020 presidential campaign before joining the White House as a deputy press secretary. Matthews and fellow hearing witness Matthew Pottinger, who was Trump’s deputy national security adviser, both resigned after Trump’s actions on Jan. 6. Matthews criticized Trump for attacking Pence on Twitter during the riot, when the then-president accused the veep of lacking the “courage to do what should have been done.”

“I thought that the tweet about the vice president was the last thing that was needed in that moment,” Matthews said. “It was essentially him giving the green light to these people, telling them that what they were doing at the steps of the Capitol and entering the Capitol was okay.”

The House Republican Conference also attacked Matthews as a “liar and pawn” on Twitter despite the fact that she now works for House Republicans. That tweet was quickly deleted.

Trump also falsely claimed that the committee has not asked the Secret Service for “corroboration” of former White House aide Cassidy Hutchinson’s testimony that he lunged at a Secret Service agent while insisting he be taken to the Capitol with his supporters following his speech at the Ellipse. “Kangaroo court!” Trump wrote.

The committee played testimony from multiple witnesses describing Trump’s angry response when he was told he could not go to the Capitol, noting that the incident was widely discussed among agents.

“The president was upset and that he was adamant about going to the Capitol and that there was a heated discussion about that,” D.C. Police Sgt. Mark Robinson, who was assigned to Trump’s motorcade, told the panel. “The president was upset and he was saying there was a heated argument or discussion about going to the Capitol,” he added.

The hearing also focused on Trump’s refusal to call in any law enforcement agencies or the National Guard to help quell the violence in the Capitol. Trump did not deny the evidence but instead faulted House Speaker Nancy Pelosi and Washington, D.C., Mayor Muriel Bowser for failing to have “10,000 to 20,000 troops to stand guard at the Capitol Building.”

“It’s Nancy Pelosi’s fault, she turned down the troops!” he wrote.

The committee detailed frantic efforts by Trump’s family, advisers and Republican lawmakers to get him to call off the mob and send in additional support. House Republican Leader Kevin McCarthy repeatedly called Trump’s allies and the president himself, pleading for him to intervene.

“Well Kevin, I guess they’re just more upset about the election than you are,” Trump told McCarthy, according to Rep. Jaime Herrera Beutler, R-Wash.

“I never said that to Kevin McCarthy,” Trump insisted, accusing the committee of spreading “lies and misrepresentations.” In the same post, he falsely claimed that “Crooked Hillary Clinton” and Georgia gubernatorial candidate Stacey Abrams had “contested their elections” for a “far longer time.” Clinton never contested her defeat, conceding the race within 24 hours after the 2016 election. Abrams refused to concede her defeat to Georgia Gov. Brian Kemp but did not challenge the election the way Trump did. Neither led an angry mob to stop their opponent from taking power.

“I had an election Rigged and Stolen from me, and our Country,” Trump claimed on Truth Social. “The USA is going to Hell. Am I supposed to be happy?”


Want a daily wrap-up of all the news and commentary Salon has to offer? Subscribe to our morning newsletter, Crash Course.


After the riot, Senate Republican Leader Mitch McConnell condemned Trump’s mob. Video played at the hearing showed him asking then-acting Defense Secretary Chris Miller when the chamber could resume the certification of the results.

“We’re not going to let these people keep us from finishing our business,” McConnell said. “So we need you to get the building cleared, give us the OK so we can go back in session and finish up the people’s business as soon as possible.”

Trump lashed out at McConnell, calling him a “disloyal sleaze bag.”

“Is this the same Mitch McConnell who was losing big in Kentucky, and came to the White House to BEG me for an Endorsement and help?” Trump wrote. “Without me he would have lost in a landslide.”

Despite McConnell’s condemnation, the Republican leader later voted against convicting Trump during his second impeachment trial and said he would “absolutely” support him in 2024 if he wins the Republican nomination. McCarthy, who told colleagues that Trump bore responsibility for the attack, has repeatedly defended Trump, helped torpedo a bipartisan investigation into the Capitol riot, and is seeking to ingratiate himself to the former president ahead of a likely bid for the House speaker’s gavel after the midterms.

But despite all this revisionist history, Thursday’s hearing highlighted the very real threat posed to Pence and lawmakers, including Sen. Josh Hawley, R-Mo., who pumped his fist to the angry mob at the Capitol before fleeing through the Senate hallways after they invaded the building.

“Members of the VP detail at this time were starting to fear for their own lives,” an anonymous security official testified. “There were a lot of — there was a lot of yelling, a lot of — I don’t know — a lot of very personal calls over the radio. So — it was disturbing. I don’t like talking about it, but there were calls to say goodbye to family members and so forth. It was getting — for whatever the reason was on the ground, the VP detail thought that this was about to get very ugly.”

24 hours of a coup: Jan. 6 hearings end with damming minute-by-minute account of Trump’s crusade

If Donald Trump knew any history — which he most certainely does not — you might think that he based his January 6 rally and march to the Capitol on the infamous March on Rome, a 1923 coup d’etat orchestrated by Benito Mussolini. That is when Mussolini’s blackshirts staged a dramatic march to the Italian capitol and took over the government. (Like Donald Trump, Mussolini didn’t actually accompany his followers on their march but did have his picture taken with them.) The existing Italian government didn’t put up any resistance and Mussolini easily assumed power the next day without any blood being shed. Everyone had already known the mob violence the blackshirts were capable of, they’d been wreaking havoc on the population for some time.

Of course, Trump knew nothing of this when he called for his mob to assemble in the nation’s Capitol on the day the congress certified the election for Joe Biden. He just has the same fascistic instincts as Benito Mussolini and thought he could use his crowd to intimidate Congress into going along with his crackpot plans to overturn the election with fake electors. If that didn’t work, he even had members of his party, such as Sen. Ted Cruz, R-Tx., prepared to demand that the count be delayed for 10 days so he could continue his pressure on Republican officials.

As it turned out, his crowd staged a violent assault on the Capitol injuring hundreds of police officers. Trump had incited them to not only stop the count but got them to hunt down his allegedly disloyal vice president by tweeting in the middle of the violence, “Mike Pence didn’t have the courage to do what should have been done to protect our Country and our Constitution, giving States a chance to certify a corrected set of facts, not the fraudulent or inaccurate ones which they were asked to previously certify. USA demands truth!”

Like Mussolini, the president may not have been with them in person but he was leading them just the same.


Want a daily wrap-up of all the news and commentary Salon has to offer? Subscribe to our morning newsletter, Crash Course.


Thursday’s primetime hearing, the last in this first summer series, looked at Trump’s behavior during the time he returned to the White House after giving his incendiary speech in which he told the crowd to march to the Capitol up until the morning after the insurrection when he was coerced into giving an insincere speech condemning the rioters. We had learned in earlier hearings and from news reports that Trump sat in the dining room off the Oval Office watching the big TV on the wall, rebuffing everyone’s entreaties to stop the violence.

It is an astonishing 24-hour period in American history, meticulously detailed by the January 6 Committee in all its hideous glory. 

He did manage to call GOP senators, however, to try to get them to go along with his daft plan even as his people were storming the building. He also spoke to his lawyer and co-conspirator Rudy Giuliani a couple of times, although we can only speculate about what they discussed. But after sending that inflammatory tweet targeting Mike Pence, Trump refused to do anything more than belatedly release another tweet saying not to harm the Capitol police. It is then that one rioter is heard on tape laughing and saying, “he didn’t say anything about not hurting the congressmen!”

They got the message: He didn’t say anything about not hurting Mike Pence, either.

The committee revealed some harrowing testimony from an anonymous national security employee who apparently had access to radio traffic from that period and he testified to how very close the Pence came to being confronted by that rabid mob:

“Members of the VP detail at this time were starting to fear for their own lives. There was a lot of yelling, um a lot of — a lot of very personal calls over the radio. So, it was disturbing. I don’t like talking about it. But there were calls to say goodbye to family members, so on and so forth. It was getting — for whatever the reason was on the ground, the VP detail thought that this was about to be very ugly.”

They also played audio of Pence’s Secret Service detail as they decided to evacuate the VP to a safer space and you could hear the frantic concern in their voices.

The committee asked former White House counsel Pat Cipollone to comment on what the people in the White House were thinking and saying as this unfolded:

When asked about the president, Cipollone said he couldn’t reveal communications “but obviously I think you know … yeah.”

Yes, we do.

The committee also showed outtakes from two speeches Trump made, the first on Jan. 6 in which he told the mob to go home and that he loved them, after which he sent his final tweet which said: “These are the things and events that happen when a sacred landslide election victory is so unceremoniously & viciously stripped away from great patriots who have been badly & unfairly treated for so long. Go home with love & in peace. Remember this day forever!”

They also showed the outtakes from a “conciliatory” speech that Trump clearly didn’t want to give the next day. That blooper reel shows just how insincere Trump was — and how angry he remained:

It is an astonishing 24-hour period in American history, meticulously detailed by the January 6 Committee in all its hideous glory.

Most of the TV lawyers opined later that what Trump did that day — incite the rioters with his speech and then lead the insurrection with his inflammatory tweets and verbal silence from the Oval Office — probably doesn’t rise to the level of a criminal violation. (Other aspects of his coup-plotting almost certainly do.) But his behavior on that day is a perfect example of a president violating his oath of office so completely that to even consider allowing him to become president again should be unthinkable. 

Like Mussolini, the president may not have been with them in person but he was leading them just the same.

Yet from Donald Trump’s perspective, his crusade to overturn the election isn’t over yet.

Just this week, we learned that he is still calling up state officials to strong-arm them into “decertifying” the 2020 election. And while many of the punditocracy suggest that his day is done and his voters are getting tired of him, Trump remains the frontrunner for the Republican nomination in 2024.

The committee showed some previously unheard audio and still pictures of the congressional leadership on the evening of Jan. 6 speaking to acting Defense Secretary Chris Miller. Majority Leader Mitch McConnell, R-Ky., and Minority Leader Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y., are heard insisting they want to go back that night to certify the election to prove that the insurrection failed and asking when the building will be cleared for that purpose. We all know that Pence refused to leave the Capitol largely because knew he would be necessary to preside when (if) the violence was controlled. Remarkably, they all did their duty that night.

But before we get too enraptured with the notion that the Republicans rallied to the defense of the Constitution and saved our republic, consider that later that night 139 GOP House members and 8 senators still objected to the certification. The Senate had the chance two weeks later to ensure that Trump could never run again when the House impeached him and they couldn’t even get the 16 Republican senators necessary to do it. After all that Trump had put them and the country through they could not summon the will to do anything about it. Just like Trump on Jan. 6, they are leading the GOP’s authoritarian take-over by the simple act of letting it happen. 

TikTok users went wild over a mysterious $20 “Pink Sauce.” Then questions about its safety emerged

For weeks, my TikTok and Twitter feeds have been filled with videos of a mysterious, viscous pink condiment that looks shockingly like Pepto Bismol. I came to learn that it’s called “Pink Sauce,” and it’s designed to “thrill your taste buds.” 

Pink Sauce is sold by the TikTok creator known as Chef Pii, who has filmed herself pouring it on everything from Popeye’s chicken to Taco Bell hardshell tacos. As Pii hyped the product, she teased that beginning in July, it would be available to purchase for $20 a bottle.

In addition to its color, another mystery surrounding the condiment was its flavor profile. After being asked what it tasted like, Pii responded, “Honestly, it has its own taste. If you wanna taste it, buy it. It goes on sale tonight.” A similarly vague video described the sauce simply as “sweet, savory, seasoned.”

Indeed, orders opened July 1 on Pii’s website — appropriately located at www.thepinksauce.com — and TikTok was abuzz as customers finally began to receive their shipments this week. Then questions about its safety emerged. 

Here’s a breakdown of the viral condiment, the chef who created it and the questions some are asking about food safety

Who is Chef Pii? 

Chef Pii is a self-described entrepreneur, content creator and chef who lives in Miami, according to her Instagram feed. 

“I am NOT your average chef,” Pii wrote in a recent post. “As an expressional artist, I love thinking outside the box. With an innovative style of cooking, I connect with my audience by posting recipes, mouthwatering food videos and mixology illusions.” 


Want more great food writing and recipes? Subscribe to “The Bite,” Salon Food’s newsletter.


Pii said — in a recent interview with NBC News — that she used to run a pop-up restaurant called Flavor Crazy, where she would add Pink Sauce to dishes and her “clients would request it.” Flavor Crazy, which opened in 2021, has since closed, however “that’s a whole other story.” 

According to a now-outdated Postmates menu, Flavor Crazy sold Caribbean-infused soul food dishes, such as “flavor-crazy wings,” macaroni and cheese, “Rasta Pasta,” snapper and seafood rice. The address given for Flavor Crazy indicates that the venture was run out of the Miami Kitchen Incubator, a shared commercial kitchen space dedicated to helping local food businesses grow.

What exactly is in Pink Sauce? 

This question, in particular, has garnered a lot of interest from customers and TikTok rubberneckers, especially now that reviews of Pink Sauce have started to surface. On the aforementioned Flavor Crazy menu, there was a sauce listed for sale called “Pink Ranch.” Ranch, as you may know, is typically a mix of buttermilk, savory spices and mayonnaise. So, for a while, it was reasonable to assume that some of those ingredients might be included. 

Pii also shared a TikTok video featuring child taste-testers, one of whom described her sauce as tasting like “sweet ranch.” Another kid, meanwhile, remarked that it was “spicy.”

When Pii posted the nutritional information for Pink Sauce online ahead of the product launch, the ingredient list answered some questions. According to the website, the condiment contains “water, sunflower seed oil, raw honey, distilled vinegar, garlic, pitaya, pink Himalayan sea salt and less than 2% of dried spices, lemon juice, milk and citric acid.” 

Certain varieties of pitaya, or dragon fruit, have a neon-pink flesh which, when blended with oil, could definitely pop pink like the color advertised on TikTok. Why does the sauce look creamy? It may just be emulsified oil, or perhaps that splash of milk has something to do with it. 

What’s at the center of the Pink Sauce controversy? 

As soon as customers began receiving orders, questions about Pink Sauce’s formulation and production began to emerge. One TikTok user uploaded a video of the sauce she had ordered, which arrived looking pale and coagulated with dark blue or green specks, according to the footage. It allegedly “smelled rotten,” and after measuring how much sauce had actually arrived, the user reported that “no more than” two ounces of sauce were inside. 

Others began to point out concerns and discrepancies on the ingredient list. For instance, the nutrition facts indicated that a typical serving size was one tablespoon, but the label said there were 444 servings in each bottle. Some suggested that the milk included in the formula, if not preserved correctly, may potentially curdle in the mail. 

In a July 20 video uploaded by Chef Pii, the nutritional label indicates that the sauce should be refrigerated, though the same disclaimer did not appear to be listed on the product’s website at the time this article was published. “[O]k but why is there no dry ice in the packaging w[ith] milk being an ingredient?” one commenter asked. Another inquired, “Will you be putting expiration dates on them??” 

A YouTuber who goes by EbbysWorld posted what was supposed to be a review of the sauce, though they ultimately decided not to taste-test it. The reviewer held up a distended bottle and remarked that “something’s in there that’s not supposed to be in there that’s making the bottle expand like this.”

“Disclosure, guys, she did send out a message saying the package may have exploded,” the YouTuber added in the video. 

When the reviewer finally opened the packaging, the condiment, which was warm, reportedly smelled “like ranch.” According to the footage, the color of the sauce in the package didn’t appear to match the bright pink hue portrayed on TikTok. 

In an interview with Yahoo Life, food safety expert Brigette Joseph said that “it is absolutely not safe to buy unregulated food from strangers on a social media platform just because it has gone viral.” 

“In some cases, raw honey can cause botulism — an extreme case of food poisoning — due to natural bacteria that exists in it,” Joseph added. 

Has Chef Pii responded? 

Chef Pii has acknowledged that there were some “issues” with the viral Pink Sauce. “Alright, y’all, time to acknowledge the elephant in the room,” Pii said in a video uploaded on July 20. “I want to start by saying, number one, my apologies. My apologies, my apologies, I’m only human.” 

Pii explained that “things happen” and all labels on future Pink Sauce runs would be replaced. She also clarified that a mix-up had occurred, and there were only 30 servings per container, rather than 444.

“We are following FDA standards,” she said, “but we are currently in lab testing. We are in lab testing currently.” 

Though she acknowledged that ingredients weren’t cheap, Pii revealed that attempts were being made to lower the sauce’s sticker price.

In an interview with NBC, Pii expressed confidence that she would “bounce back from this 100%.” 

“I cannot prevent someone from taking a certain action,” Pii said. “I can only choose how I respond to it due to the fact that I did create something freakin’ amazing. I’m going to stand by that. I love my product. People love my product. I made a few mistakes. We’re coming back from it, and we’re going to grow from there.”

WATCH: Trump’s “blooper reel” reveals what he refused to say after Jan. 6

During Thursday’s primetime hearing, the House Select Committee Investigating the Jan. 6 Attack on the U.S. Capitol played an amazing video of Donald Trump attempting to film a message on the day after the attack.

“I don’t want to say the election is over,” Trump said. “I just want to say Congress has certified the results without saying the election is over, okay?”

CNN’s Kaitlan Collins reports, “multiple people say it took about an hour to record what ended up being a three-minute video.”

“Yesterday is a hard word for me,” the Ivy League graduate said of a three-syllable word.

Trump was quickly mocked after the video was broadcast

HBO prison drama “Oz” actor Terry Kinney, who founded the Steppenwolf Theatre Company with John Malkovich, Laurie Metcalf, Gary Sinise and Jeff Perry, offered his professional opinion of the tapes.

“In the end, the Former Guy was simply this: a very bad, fired actor, trying to change all of his lines, and flubbing them, continuously, in the final episode of his sh*tty, canceled show,” he concluded.

Filmmaker Chip Franklin said the videos were “so sweet.”

“Watching Trump do his impression of Ron Burgundy? F*cking priceless,” he said.

“One way that tyrants fall is when they are made fun of. The Trump outtakes are pretty laugh-out-loud funny,” wrote New Yorker writer Susan Glasser.

Other opinions of the videos were not much kinder, but some attempted to defend Trump, like actor Randy Quaid.

“More Trump footage! I miss him!” Quaid said. “The outtakes show his pure creative genius in real-time. Beautiful to watch.”

Here’s some of what people were saying:

Inspector General launches criminal probe into deletion of Secret Service texts

The Department of Homeland Security Office of Inspector General has opened a criminal investigation into the Secret Service’s destruction of text messages sent the day of and before the January 6, 2021 assault on the U.S. Capitol.

“This is to notify you that the Department of Homeland Security Office of Inspector General has an ongoing investigation into the facts and circumstances surrounding the collection and preservation of evidence by the United States Secret Service as it relates to the events of January 6, 2021,” DHS Deputy Inspector General Gladys Ayala wrote in a letter to Secret Service Director James Murray on Wednesday night.

“To ensure the integrity of our investigation, the USSS must not engage in any further investigative activities regarding the collection and preservation of the evidence referenced above,” the deputy inspector general continued. “This includes immediately refraining from interviewing potential witnesses, collecting devices, or taking any other action that would interfere with an ongoing criminal investigation.”

Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington, which filed a complaint earlier this week asking the U.S. Justice Department to launch “an immediate and full investigation into whether Secret Service employees willfully destroyed federal records,” welcomed news of the inspector general’s criminal probe.

While the Secret Service has claimed that texts from last January 5 and 6 were erased as “part of a device replacement program,” the inspector general has emphasized that the messages were deleted after DHS oversight officials requested them to aid their assessment of the deadly insurrection incited by former President Donald Trump.

The Secret Service acknowledged its receipt of the inspector general’s letter, which comes as the House committee investigating the January 6 attack is attempting to recover the agency’s missing electronic communications—with limited success so far.

“We have informed the January 6th select committee of the inspector general’s request and will conduct a thorough legal review to ensure we are fully cooperative with all oversight efforts and that they do not conflict with each other,” the Secret Service said in a statement.

A Secret Service official said the letter “raises some legal complexities,” NBC News reported Thursday after speaking with two unnamed sources.

While the inspector general has asked the Secret Service to cease all internal inquires amid the watchdog’s criminal probe, the agency also faces a subpoena from the House January 6 committee and a request for information from the National Archives.

According to CNN, which reviewed the letter: “The inspector general wrote that the Secret Service should explain what interviews had already been conducted related to the text messages, along with the ‘scope off the questioning, and what, if any, warnings were given to the witness(es).’ The inspector general told the Secret Service to respond by Monday.”

The results of the inspector general’s probe could be referred to federal prosecutors, the outlet noted. The Justice Department declined to comment on the letter’s reference to an “ongoing criminal investigation.”

The January 6 panel is set to hold a public hearing Thursday at 8:00 pm ET.

“Cry harder”: House GOP ridiculed for deleted “heresy” tweet during Jan. 6 hearing

The House Republican caucus attempted to distract during Thursday’s Jan. 6 select committee primetime hearing — and it did not go well for them.

Republicans have sought to claim the evidence against Trump by former White House officials is “hearsay” or second-hand information.

But after lashing out at former Trump Deputy Press Secretary Sarah Matthews as a “liar and pawn” for testifying, the official @HouseGOP Twitter account claimed it was “heresy” or against religious doctrine.

The Republican caucus was quickly mocked for the tweet, which was deleted.

“The truth hurts. Cry harder,” suggested former prosecutor Katie Phang.

 

Here’s what some people were saying: