Spring Sale: Get 1 Year, Save 58%

The 100 most popular baby names from 100 years ago

While names like Luna and Oliver rule the charts these days (for both new babies and new pets), 1922 looked a little different.

According to data from BabyNames.it, plenty of parents chose timeless classics for their infants that year: John took the top spot for boys, followed by Robert, William, James, and Charles. For girls, Mary was number one; Elizabeth, Anna, and Marie all finished within the top 15. If there’s one thing that hasn’t changed over the last century, it’s the popularity of female names that start with E — Elizabeth, Evelyn, Emma, and Eleanor made 1922’s top 50 and 2021’s top 50.

Though you won’t find Ella, Emily, Elena, or Everly on the former list, you will find Edna, Ethel, Edith, Esther, and many more monikers that we’d now consider “old lady names,” from Mildred to Gertrude. Similarly, male names like Earl, Albert, and Eugene — which we now associate with older men — were deemed perfect for bouncing baby boys.

Some entries reflect naming trends from the past. Virginia, for example, follows the fad of naming babies after states. And Ruby illustrates 20th-century parents’ affinity for choosing jewels or other words that embodied opulence. Others could turn up in Generation Alpha more than you’d expect. Betty, Frank, and Ralph were still popular into the 1950s — an era from which today’s Millennial parents are borrowing names.

See 1922’s top 50 girls’ and top 50 boys’ names below, and find out what just missed the cut-off here.

MOST POPULAR BABY GIRL NAMES FROM 1922

  1. Mary
  2. Dorothy
  3. Helen
  4. Margaret
  5. Ruth
  6. Betty
  7. Virginia
  8. Mildred
  9. Elizabeth
  10. Frances
  11. Doris
  12. Anna
  13. Evelyn
  14. Marie
  15. Alice
  16. Marjorie
  17. Irene
  18. Florence
  19. Lillian
  20. Jean
  21. Martha
  22. Louise
  23. Rose
  24. Catherine
  25. Gladys
  26. Ruby
  27. Eleanor
  28. Josephine
  29. Edna
  30. Annie
  31. Ethel
  32. Thelma
  33. Lucille
  34. Edith
  35. Lois
  36. Pauline
  37. Hazel
  38. Grace
  39. Shirley
  40. Barbara
  41. Bernice
  42. Marion
  43. Beatrice
  44. Esther
  45. June
  46. Norma
  47. Clara
  48. Gertrude
  49. Ann
  50. Emma

MOST POPULAR BABY BOY NAMES FROM 1922

  1. John
  2. Robert
  3. William
  4. James
  5. Charles
  6. George
  7. Joseph
  8. Edward
  9. Richard
  10. Frank
  11. Thomas
  12. Donald
  13. Harold
  14. Paul
  15. Walter
  16. Raymond
  17. Henry
  18. Jack
  19. Arthur
  20. Albert
  21. Kenneth
  22. Harry
  23. Ralph
  24. Eugene
  25. David
  26. Howard
  27. Louis
  28. Willie
  29. Clarence
  30. Carl
  31. Earl
  32. Roy
  33. Fred
  34. Francis
  35. Joe
  36. Lawrence
  37. Ernest
  38. Leonard
  39. Anthony
  40. Herbert
  41. Stanley
  42. Alfred
  43. Samuel
  44. Norman
  45. Warren
  46. Bernard
  47. Daniel
  48. Michael
  49. Russell
  50. Melvin

Many of those stricken with omicron say this supposedly “mild” variant isn’t so mild

Compared to earlier variants of COVID-19, the omicron variant is often referred as “mild.” 

Yet many of those who are stricken with this iteration of the virus have discovered that “mild” is a relative term.

According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), symptoms of the omicron variant include cough, fatigue, congestion and a runny nose. This week, the World Health Organization (WHO) announced that nearly 21 million Covid cases were reported to the WHO over the last week, setting a new global record for weekly cases due to the rapid spread. As more people are getting infected with omicron (vaccinated, boosted, and unvaccinated) due to its increased contagiousness and ability to evade immunity, many of those who are infected are surprised when their symptoms aren’t exactly what they’d consider mild.

Tom Womack, a 54-year-old in Texas, got a breakthrough infection over Christmas. Womack was fully vaccinated (although not boosted, because he recently started a new job and didn’t want to miss work), though most of the people he went to dinner with were both vaccinated and boosted — including his girlfriend. Womack suspects this outing was where he contracted COVID-19. At the restaurant where they dined out, the staff did not wear masks. Within 24 hours of the outing, one of the dinner’s attendees started to feel sick. On Christmas morning, Womack went for a hike with his girlfriend.

“Although we hike often it was really challenging for us that day,” Womack said via email. “We were both really tired and out [of] breath the entire time.”

Later that night, Womack felt unusually tired. His toes and fingers were sore — then the cold chills started.

RELATED: Omicron variant of COVID-19 may be the most contagious virus to ever exist, scientists say

“Bone-crushing cold chills that literally had me shaking, a pounding headache and fever started at the same time,” Womack said. “I wore a jacket to bed under the blankets and comforter and still couldn’t get warm. I woke up a few hours soaked in a cold sweat, still with a pounding headache. The chills had largely faded, but now I was hot.”

Womack said his girlfriend felt fine that night, but had similar— albeit milder — symptoms the next morning.

“The first couple days were the worst for both of us, the cold chills went away after the first night and my fever subsided within 24 to 48 hours,” Womack explained. “After that, it felt like a regular cold with congestion, fatigue and a dry cough.”

Still, Womack had “pounding headaches nearly all day, every day,” which lasted for two weeks.

“Even after we both recovered and felt fine, both Liz and I had long-term fatigue,” Womack said. “Every afternoon for more than two weeks, I literally couldn’t focus or stay awake and would have to take a 20 to 30 minute nap around 2 or 3 pm.”

There is debate as to whether it is a good idea to promote the narrative that the omicron variant yields only “mild” cases. According to a report published by Imperial College London on December 22, 2021, COVID-19 patients with the omicron variant were 20 to 25 percent less likely to be hospitalized compared to those who had delta. Omicron patients also had a 40 to 45 percent reduced risk of a hospital stay that lasted more than one day, compared to delta. These statistics are where the notion that omicron is “mild” is derived from. But some scientists fret over the designation.


Want more health and science stories in your inbox? Subscribe to Salon’s weekly newsletter The Vulgar Scientist.


“I think it’s pretty clear omicron causes less severe disease than the delta variant, but that’s not saying much,” Zoë Hyde, an epidemiologist at the University of Western Australia, told The Scientist. “We know that delta was more than twice as severe as the original strain, and if Imperial College is right to say that omicron is about 40-45% less likely to put people in hospital [than delta was], we’re back to 2020 but with a more contagious strain.”

More recent research shows that omicron appears to spare the lungs, unlike delta. Still, many patients report miserable symptoms. Marcos Martinez, a 36-year-old living in New York City, got COVID-19 over the holidays as omicron started to spread across the city. His case started with an ear infection.

“The ear infection was so bad I couldn’t even fall asleep,” Martinez said. “I’m not sure that the infection was separate or was a one to symptoms, but that definitely wasn’t mild.”

Martinez estimates the ear infection lasted about a week, and the cough lasted about two weeks.

Dr. Amesh Adalja, a senior scholar at the Johns Hopkins Center, told Salon that one’s individual experience with COVID-19 “varies based on their own idiosyncrasies.”

“When a Covid case is referred to as mild, that is still a spectrum of illness. Some people may experience nothing at all or maybe mild nasal congestion whereas others may be confined to the couch for a couple of days,” Adalja said. “However, what is in common among these cases is that these are not going to, generally, be cases that prompt people to visit an emergency department.”

Adalja added that a person infected with COVID-19 should seek immediate medical attention if they’re experiencing “shortness of breath, severe weakness, [or] unremitting fever.”

Indeed, some public health officials, like WHO chief Dr. Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus, have warned against calling omicron “mild.”

“While omicron does appear to be less severe compared to delta, especially in those vaccinated, it does not mean it should be categorized as mild,” Tedros said earlier this month. “Just like previous variants, omicron is hospitalizing people and it is killing people.”

“In fact, the tsunami of cases is so huge and quick, that it is overwhelming health systems around the world,” Tedros continued.

However, there are some who did experience what they consider to be “mild” cases. Donna Gleize, who lives in Toulon, France, said she was relieved that the symptoms she experienced weren’t “fierce.”

“The symptoms were slight fever, feeling cold, heavy headache, sore throat, and body aches,” Gleize wrote in an email to Salon. “Lasted 48 hours for both my husband and I, and we are both vaccinated (x2).”

Read more on the omicron variant:

Too many lemons? 38 recipes to make right now

Bright, tangy lemons might evoke images of poolside cocktails or a kid’s neighborhood business venture, but citrus season comes with the end-of-year chill. Starting in December, lemons hang like ornaments from small, dark green trees, ready to brighten up holiday dishes and treats.

We hardly need to tell you how many ways you can use lemon juice, zest, or rinds. From baked fish to creamy pasta and fluffy meringue, little lemons pack a mighty, refreshing punch. Their sourness stars in sauces and creams, and supports hearty stews and salty dressings. Plus, they add much-needed acid to pastas and poultry. So, if you’re looking for some lemony inspiration, here are 19 recipes to get you started.

Our best lemon recipes

1. Lemon Bars

The secret to our best-ever lemon bars is a brown butter shortbread crust and lots and lots of lemon juice and zest. Don’t forget the dusting of confectioners’ sugar to finish it off!

2. Preserved Lemon Crinkle Cookies from Jesse Szewczyk

These are not your average crinkle cookies, nor are they your average lemon cookie. Here, the preserved lemon peel is used to give the cookies a robust, intensely lemony flavor and salty bite that’s prominent, but not overpowering.

3. Lemon Curd

I can’t get too far into this recipe roundup without talking about lemon curd — and this easy recipe will walk you through exactly how to make one without it turning into lemon scrambled eggs.

4. Grilled Lemon Margarita

Mezcal lovers will adore this three-ingredient margarita and even skeptics will like the subtle smokiness from the grilled lemons.

5. Lemon Buttermilk Cake

“This light, moist, lemony cake is genius for so many reasons: It’s powerfully puckery. It’s got both more fresh lemon juice and zest than you’d expect or normally see in a recipe, and the flavor holds up under heat. It’s given even more flavor because it’s soaked — really soaked — with a lemon and sugar syrup that seeps into the cake slowly and provides moistness, a little more keepability, and a lot more lemon intensity,” writes Maida Heatter.

6. Meyer Lemon Rice with Candied Garlic from Michael W. Twitty

Come for the bars and quick breads, the pies and pancakes, but stay for our savory lemon dishes, like this perfect side dish of long-grain rice cooked in fish stock and aromatic Meyer lemon juice.

7. Lemon Cream Pie

Think of this as the creamier, more pudding-like relative to lemon meringue pie. Omit the usual graham crackers in favor of spiced Biscoff cookies for the crust. As for the topping, this cream pie gets a generous dollop of sweetened whipped cream with lemon zest.

8. Lemony Broccoli and Mozzarella Sandwiches

A whole new way to eat broccoli and I’m definitely not mad about it.

9. Lemoniest Lemon Scones

There are lemon scones and then there are lemon scones. An entire lemon (minus the seeds) is mushed up like applesauce and folded into the scone batter. As for the glaze, it also uses the juice and zest from a whole lemon (the biggest one you can find, please!).

10. Asparagus with Lemon-Pepper Marinade from Bryant Terry

Looking for a new way to make asparagus, well, new again? Blanch it and thengrill it; once the stalks are charred, transfer them to a serving platter and top with a creamy lemon-pepper marinade (it gets its silkiness from the tofu, so it’s totally vegan).

11. Lemoniest Roast Chicken

Lemon chicken, four ways. By that, we mean that the chicken is brined in a dry lemon-zest mixture; and then there’s a lemon zest butter, which is rubbed over the skin of the bird before roasting; oh, there’s lemon halves that are stuffed in the cavity; and finally, there are lemons scattered around the chicken in the skillet, which become deliciously caramelized.

12. Citrus Twist Bread

A trio of citrus zest — lemon, orange, and grapefruit — are mixed with softened butter for a swirly-twirly filling in this sweet bread for brunch.

13. Meyer Lemon Cheesecake with Biscoff Crust

Regular lemons (you know, the kind that are 79 cents in the grocery store) are known as Eureka lemons. Meyers, on the other hand, are smaller, more floral, and not so tart, making them the perfect citrus fruit to use for cheesecake.

14. Spaghetti Pasta with Lemon-Parmigiano Sauce

When you use really good quality ingredients, like true Parmigiano-Reggiano and big, fresh, juicy lemons, you don’t need much else to make a delicious dish like spaghetti.

15. Lemon Drop Martini

For something sweet come 5 o’clock, turn to this citrus cocktail. A combination of simple syrup, good-quality vodka, fresh lemon juice, and orange liqueur is shaken, not stirred, for an extra citrus boost.

16. Smoky Chicken Thighs with Potatoes and Lemony Relish

Dress up crispy chicken thighs with a relish made from the zest and juice of an entire lemon, green olives, garlic, fresh mint, and parsley.

17. Dori Sanders’ No-Churn Fresh Lemon Ice Cream

Ice cream on a hot summer’s day is always a good idea, but creamy lemon ice cream that requires absolutely no churning is a requirement.

18. Lemon Poppy Seed Muffins

Even if you woke up on the wrong side of the bed, these lemony muffins studded with crunchy poppy seeds will turn your morning around.

19. Vegan Pasta al Limone(ish)

The thing about pasta al limone is that it’s so silky and so creamy that you’d think it uses a ton of butter to achieve that consistency. And many recipes do. But this one relies exclusively on soaked cashews puréed with starchy pasta water, nutritional yeast, lemon juice, and olive oil.

20. Lemony Cheese Blintzes

Instead of rolled pancakes, these blintzes are filled with a sweetened lemon cheese mixture and formed into individual square pockets.

21. Lemon Velvet Sheet Cake

Think of this as your best-ever boxed cake mix, which achieves its perfect texture from a combination of cake flour and all-purpose flour and its extra-lemony flavor from the zest and juice of four lemons, which is used in both the cake batter and the glaze on top.

22. Lemon Meringue Pie

Allow me to introduce the lemon recipe of all lemon recipes, the one that you’ve all been waiting for — lemon meringue pie. Hiding beneath a billowing torched meringue is a luscious filling made from more than a tablespoon of zest and 1/2 cup of fresh lemon juice.

23. Vodka Sidecar

Emily Gilmore may not approve of sidecars, but we certainly do (especially when it’s made with a duo of orange liqueur and freshly squeezed lemon juice.

24. Martha Stewart’s Whole-Lemon Pound Cake with Pomegranate Glaze

Leave it to Martha to develop a pound cake recipe that is not only one of our favorite lemon desserts, but also one of the prettiest.

25. Broiled Lemon-Honey Arctic Char with Citrus Sauce

A lovely mix of oranges and lemons makes arctic char an absolutely irresistible winner dinner.

26. Lemon Curd Sponge Cake

Fill this moist sponge cake with a generous layer of lemon curd and then adorn it with even more curd on top, along with piped whipped cream.

27. Lemon and Toasted Almond Risotto

It normally takes a lot of butter and a lot of Parmigiano-Reggiano to make creamy risotto, but this one is totally dairy-free. How? “The chewy, flavorful oat groats create a starchy broth that makes this vegan dish creamy,” says recipe developer AntoniaJames.

28. Lemon-Raspberry Skillet Pudding Cake

Both lemon juice and lemon zest are utilized in this skillet cake studded with fresh raspberries.

29. Sautéed Green Beans with Garlic

For better-than-basic green beans, toss them with a combination of garlic, sea salt, and the zest and juice of a whole lemon.

30.  Ina Garten’s Skillet-Roasted Lemon Chicken

“I can’t tell you how many times I’ve made this! I have the butcher butterfly the chicken so all I do is grind the thyme, fennel seeds, salt, and pepper, mix it with olive oil, and brush it on the chicken. When the lemon slices are roasted and caramelized, you can eat them with the chicken,” said Ina herself.

31. Lazy Mary’s Lemon Tart

Tarts are often fussy and time-consuming but this one is, as the title implies, quite lazy. All of the ingredients — all five of them — are blended together and voilà, there’s your filling.

32. Lemon Raspberry Layer Cake

The acidity of lemons and the sweet-tart duality of raspberries makes them perfect dance partners in any sweet treat, such as this beautiful layer cake that’s worthy of a special occasion.

33. Lemon Curd Rolls

Go beyond cinnamon rolls for breakfast and instead, serve literal sunshine. Homemade lemon curd is spread over Erin Jeanne McDowell’s soft, sweet dough, which is then rolled up and sliced into rolls.

34. Broccoli Rabe in Lemon Cream

Wondering how to make bitter broccoli rabe taste less bitter? A lemony cream sauce, says Food52’s founder Amanda Hesser. “A small squeeze of lemon juice transformed the dish — brightening the mineral flavors in the greens and challenging their bitterness with acidity.

35. Lemon Lavender Gin Rickey

Lemon and lavender is a naturally soothing combination and when paired together for this gin cocktail recipe, you’ll immediately feel the stress of the day melt away.

36. Lemon Poppy Seed Pancakes

A twist on the beloved muffins, these pancakes deliver brightness when you need it the most.

37. Very Lemony Brined Turkey with Lemongrass

Three types of lemon flavorings — whole lemons, lemongrass, and lemon thyme — are used in the wet brine for this turkey recipe. But wait . . . there’s more! The bird is also stuffed with lemons, lemongrass, garlic, and onions for even more flavor.

38. Limoncello e Pepe

“Limoncello is a strong, sunny, lemon-infused Italian liqueur, usually enjoyed as a digestif, or post-dinner drink,” writes recipe developer Emma Laperruque. “Adding black pepper is another way to cut the sweetness and incorporate some subtle spice, which I really love in a digestif.”

“As We See It”: An imperfect step forward for representing autism on screen

At the beginning of the pilot episode of “As We See It,” the recently released series on Amazon Prime about three autistic flatmates, we meet Harrison (Albert Rutecki), being encouraged to go outside and walk a single block by his helper, Mandy (Sosie Bacon). “You got this,” she enthuses encouragingly, as Harrison, who has significant sensory issues, tries to navigate all the noises and interruptions of a typical urban environment.

Sadly, a barking dog proves too much for Harrison, who makes a hasty retreat, despite Mandy’s earnest appeals via her phone for him to keep going. But no matter, because the viewer already has the clear message that “As We See It” is all about the journey.

The other two flatmates, Jack (Rick Glassman) and Violet (Sue Ann Pien) are on journeys of their own. As befits this sort of narrative, they hit multiple bumps and roadblocks along the way. Jack loses his job because he tells his boss he is of inferior intelligence. Violet is demoted from a public-facing role in a burger bar because she asks a customer to be her boyfriend, just before his wife and child loom into view.

Twenty-five-year-old Violet is desperate to have a boyfriend and indeed to have sex, but doesn’t quite know how to go about it. Told by Mandy and her controlling brother Van (Chris Pang) that she must try to find a boyfriend from her drama club, Violet is adamant that she wants to be “normal” and use a dating app, which they forbid.

“As We See It” is billed as an original drama as the three main actors — who play Harrison, Jack and Violet — are all autistic. This may well be a step forward from previous TV and film productions, which have too often cast non-autistic actors and tell stories that can do more harm than help.

https://youtu.be/H_JA2JXM25Y

Autistic representation

The film “Music” follows Zu (Kate Hudson) after she becomes the sole guardian of her half-sister who is autistic. Released in 2021, it caused controversy as it appeared to justify physical restraint. It also portrayed a non-speaking autistic person (played by a non-autistic actor) in an unhelpful and over-simplified way.

In the UK, there was “The A Word” which, although incorporating some actors with disabilities, presented autism as a factor in family breakdown, a myth that some research has challenged.

“As We See It” is in some ways from a different stable, as the ever-smiling Mandy, more of a life coach than a support worker, gently coaxes the flatmates to overcome their challenges. Jack’s blunt honesty and Harrison’s fear of the outdoors are convincingly and authentically portrayed, and Sue Ann Pien, who plays Violet, has stated that the character resonates with her. It is also refreshing to see an Asian autistic person on screen, as autism is still almost universally portrayed as white.

Work still to do

And yet, while “As We See It” takes a few positive steps along the path of more enlightened representations of autism, there are a few wrong turns that risk taking it back to the beginning again.

Mandy and Van both have dramas — and love lives — of their own, suggesting that Harrison, Jack and Violet’s stories aren’t considered enough to hold the attention of the viewer. Mandy, we learn, has been turned down from top medical schools, and while this frustrates her desire to become a neuroscientist, it does show she has other possibilities in her future. She may choose to stay with “the guys,” but unlike them, Mandy has choices.

Van’s busy work life and responsibilities for his sister Violet (their parents are dead) mean he has little time for his girlfriend, as they discuss while in bed together. Van, unlike his lovelorn sister, at least has some physical intimacy in his life, as does Mandy.

https://youtu.be/b0PqgMTRtXc

The problem is that “As We See It” walks a fundamentally normative path in both its narrative structure and portrayal of how to support autistic people. One obvious question is why Harrison isn’t living in a quiet rural setting, where trips outdoors might be a pleasure, rather than an ordeal to be endured.

When Mandy takes Jack to his former workplace in a bid to get his job back, she urges him to make eye contact. This is well-established as an inappropriate and even damaging expectation for at least some autistic people.

Given that autistic people can be subject to higher rates of unemployment than the general population and even other disability groups, Mandy would be better placed reminding Jack’s employers of their responsibilities under disability legislation so that he can be suitably supported and his talents can shine.

There is also an uncomfortable episode when Violet, having defied her carers and set up a date via an app, is manhandled out of a bar by her brother after her date has fled several hours earlier. Although another customer challenges Van and they have a brief machismo exchange, no one stops Van from doing this.

Even if Van’s controlling nature becomes part of his “journey,” in the days of #metoo, this feels like a misstep. It’s also part of a narrative that autistic people need to be “rescued” and that autism is burdensome for family members, like in “Music.”

My favorite moment of the pilot episode was when the three flatmates are gathered around a new robotic vacuum cleaner, which they watch with awe. This simple moment, when viewers are invited to share their pleasure, from their perspective, is very well done. Let’s hope that future episodes of the drama build on this, and in so doing, travel further than the first block of autistic and neurodiversity representation on screen.

Rebecca Wood, Senior Lecturer in Special Education, University of East London

This article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license. Read the original article.

Football hero: How George Visger survived the NFL and traumatic brain injury — barely

Along with 100 million fellow citizen-spectators, give or take, a 63-year-old former NFL defensive lineman named George Visger will be watching the Super Bowl in two weeks. The San Francisco 49ers, his old team, could be playing in it. (That issue will be decided this weekend in their game against the Los Angeles Rams.)

Visger will be at his new home on the pocket bend of the Sacramento River, five miles south of California’s Capitol building. Or maybe he’ll take in the big game from the home of his girlfriend Jennifer, a musician and private music teacher in Oakland. Either way, it will be a glorious day.

During his own playing days, Visger was a journeyman, but today he is basking in victory in litigation — which, as we all know, is America’s second most popular sport. His view of the Super Bowl, with feet comfortably on the divan, will mark a milestone in an improbable movie-script life, albeit for the most painful reasons.

A glorious day — if you ignore the fact that Visger will have to refer to the noodlings in his Rite-in-the-Rain notebook at the start of the third quarter to remind himself which team was leading at halftime (or about pretty much anything else that happened earlier that day). His stash of waterproof notepads is a remnant of his stop-and-start career as a wildlife biologist, which often entailed consulting on the construction and management of wetlands and mitigation banks as part of building projects. In the best times over the course of his struggle to make himself whole again post-football, he had his own company in this field.

Christopher Nolan’s 2000 film “Memento” is a thriller about a man who suffers a traumatic brain injury. Piecing together information about the incident in which his wife was murdered and he was injured, he has to process things backward, sideways, diagonally or in a loop — any way but in linear fashion, since his short-term memory is shot.

RELATED: Everything you wanted to know about “Memento”

Meet George Visger, your real-life “Memento” guy. Don’t try taking away his notepad and expecting him to know where he just parked his truck.

He’s a poster boy — one of tens or hundreds of thousands across the country, professional and amateur alike — for the proposition that football players are the Roman gladiators of late-empire America. This observation is no less accurate for being a cliché. Thanks to the addition of a 17th regular season NFL game, Super Bowl Sunday now rolls within a week of President’s Day weekend, that quaint civics lesson turned department store sale-a-thon, long ago eclipsed as our true national winter holiday by a hyped-to-the-gills sporting spectacle. In the year just concluded, NFL TV ratings surged back to their highest levels since 2015.

Even before the pandemic and the Great Resignation, enough hungover workers have been calling in sick on the Monday morning after the Super Bowl to render the combined pregame, game and postgame a de facto three-day weekend. There is disputed data to suggest an uptick of incidents of domestic violence surrounding this gathering at the national hearth of TV and streaming device screens. Many will have one eye on the action and the other on the real action: universal, legal and suddenly de-stigmatized opportunities to bet on everything from which team covers the “spread” to which pass receiver garners the most “targets.”

As a kid in Stockton, California, and then as a young adult, George Visger was addicted to the cathartic, manly-man thwak of shoulder pad on shoulder pad (or worse). The price he paid was cumulative brain trauma, both concussive and sub-concussive. In 1980 the New York Jets made him their sixth round draft choice and signed him for a $15,000 bonus. After they cut him at the end of training camp, the 49ers picked him up, and he took snaps in several games for a legendary team that the next year would win the first of its five Super Bowl championships.

Visger’s very first regular season game, against the Dallas Cowboys, left immediate cranial handprints. On two different trap plays, the Dallas tight ends — Doug Cosbie on one play, Jay Saldi on the other — blocked for the ball carrier by whacking Visger on the earhole of his helmet. The second shot knocked him out. The trainers administered smelling salts and the head coach, Bill Walsh, sent him right back in; Visger didn’t miss a play. Today he points out that Walsh is regarded in NFL lore as a legend and a genius: “Maybe he was a genius in more ways than one. He stuck me with over $100,000 in medical bills over five years.”

RELATED: Football’s unknown epidemic: When Black players die suddenly, the cover-up begins

Four decades and nine brain surgeries later, Visger has finally won at the game of life. First, in 2016, the NFL came to a federal appellate court settlement of a case known as “In re: National Football League Players Concussion Injury Litigation.” The league continues to fulfill claims on a rolling basis. The total payout to claimants currently stands north of $800 million.

Visger was named plaintiff No. 22 on the list of the more than 120 NFL alums in that mass action. After the attorneys’ cut, his check was fairly modest. He hasn’t told me the amount, but I calculate that the ceiling is in the mid-six figures, a pittance relative to his 38 years of havoc and hell.

The first factor working against Visger in the settlement tiers is straightforward: He hasn’t died. Chronic traumatic encephalopathy (CTE) — the catch-all named condition of brain deterioration, marked by tangled accumulations of tau proteins — is still only detectable postmortem. Nor has Visger been diagnosed with Lou Gehrig’s Disease or Alzheimer’s or Parkinson’s.

For purposes of the NFL lawsuit, therefore, he was classified as “Neuro Cognitive Impairment 2.0,” which pays up to $3 million for those with five years of active service. Visger was credited for one year of service, but not for his second season in the NFL, when he was injured in preseason and underwent three brain surgeries. (The average NFL playing career is 3.2 years. It takes four years to be vested in the Bert Bell/Pete Rozelle NFL Retirement Plan, which is named for the league commissioners who successively presided over its television explosion in the late 1950s and ’60s.)


Want a daily wrap-up of all the news and commentary Salon has to offer? Subscribe to our morning newsletter, Crash Course.


What Neuro Cognitive Impairment 2.0 means, in Visger’s case, is that an image of his brain shows the most grotesque caverns and crevasses.

Much more significant for Visger than the NFL settlement was his ultimate success in tortuous, marathon worker’s comp litigation against Travelers Insurance. Last year, under prodding by a state court judge in Southern California, that case reached a comprehensive settlement. That amount is confidential, too, but is surely many times what he got from the NFL.

Visger got a minority of the funds upfront, with the rest parceled out over time under the guidance of a financial adviser. Several years earlier, he had completed an amicable divorce with his wife, Kristi, whom he met 25 years ago; they would become teaching colleagues at Sacramento’s Hiram Johnson High School. Though he terrified her at times with anger management issues and lack of impulse control, and they haven’t been together for years, there was never an estrangement of the heart. Their daughter Amanda, 24, and son Jack, 22, have new cars and funding for higher education. George, Kristi and their kids are all set up with health care plans, courtesy of the settlement. (More later on Stefani, Kristi’s daughter from a previous relationship, whom George helped raise.)

And there’s that house near the riverbank, in reach of Visger’s favorite fishing and hunting spots.

The insurance company’s end-game legal tactics included trying to slap a lien against Visger for his NFL settlement check. By then, he was well versed in the ways of cutthroat lawyers. He had already been schooled in the ways of cutthroat football. There were iterations of malpractice claims against 49ers team doctors; submissions to the NFL retirement fund that went nowhere, because Visger wasn’t vested; the reality check of statutes of limitations; the imbalance of legal firepower between his modest teams of earnest disability lawyers and the paperwork factories and deep, deep pockets of corporate football.

“My life story,” Visger says, “has been either science fiction or comedy. Take your pick.”

*  *  *

I met Visger in 2012 at the Hyperbaric Oxygen Clinic in Sacramento. The short answer as to what brought us together is that my work writing about the less-scrutinized angles of football harm has put me in touch with many ex-players. Many of their stories were unimaginably dark — filled with heartbreaking anecdotes of interludes of crazy behavior, broken relationships, financial ruin. I came to believe these added up to far more than the wan “What price glory?” tropes of mainstream media. They go down to the very bowels of American culture and the unaccounted, and unacceptable, human costs of the secular religion that is football. 

Among all those damaged men, Visger’s narrative resonated the most in its exotic details. Also, he was the most charismatic of narrators.

RELATED: Troubled waters: USA Swimming’s struggle to cover up its sexual abuse crisis

That day in Sacramento, he was trying to work through solutions found on the fringes of conventional medical advice. In 2010, the psychiatrist and brain disorder specialist Dr. Daniel Amen directed him to the benefits of hyperbaric oxygen therapy (HBOT), which involved immersing himself for 75-minute sessions in a chamber of compressed pure oxygen. These sessions seemed to clear his mind somewhat from the side effects of a cocktail of medications, which included at various times Dilantin, Depacote, Phenobarbital, Kepra and Zonegran (for seizures); Lamictal (for seizures and bipolar disorder); and Aricept, Risperdal and Namenda (for dementia). Visger has had a total of 232 HBOT sessions. At the time of our first contact, they were almost daily.

One of the best parts was that the co-owner and manager of the clinic, Mike Greenhalgh, let Visger sleep on the floor at night and use a side cubicle as his office during the day. This was during Visger’s hardcore near-homeless phase, when he was putting his head down on a pillow at a Motel 6, if he could afford it, or in a trailer on a brother’s property, if he couldn’t. In 2011, George and Kristi had lost their house in Grass Valley, in the gold country on the way to Lake Tahoe.

Even in the face of such adversity, George cut an almost incongruously positive and affable figure in person, whether it was in Sacramento or in my own neck of the woods, the San Francisco Bay Area, when he crashed with an old friend there. For several years I would drive up to see him during the holidays so we could go out to dinner. One year he told me to meet him at the address of an apartment complex rather than Greenhalgh’s clinic. The place turned out to belong to his new girlfriend, a middle manager for a Big Pharma company who had once been married to an NFL running back who one year led the league in rushing yardage. The three of us went out together.

In the words of that 1930s Tin Pan Alley song, “Ya gotta be a football hero/ To get along with the beautiful girls …”

Over dinner, George would tell the same stories over and over, then apologize for forgetting that he’d already told them to me many times before. The one whose repetition I especially didn’t mind was about bonding and falling in love with Kristi while they worked together at Hiram Johnson, one of Sacramento’s toughest inner-city schools.

Kristi was the type of teacher who left the door of her classroom open during lunch: She knew fights would break out on the school grounds, and some kids didn’t feel safe. Up to 20 of them regularly ate lunch in Kristi’s room. Before heading out to school every morning, she had George prepare extra bags for the food-insecure among them.

But what really sealed the deal for George was Kristi’s beautiful two-year-old daughter, Stef. “I fell in love with two girls at once,” he says. At 38, he became an instant stepdad.

Even today, it’s not hard to figure out his way with the ladies. Minus his football weight, the 6’5″ George is rangy and graceful. (OK, there was that one time when he fell while doing work on the roof of the house in Grass Valley, sustaining … a concussion.) He laughs loudly and often. His intense eyes, which maintain contact, are framed by beetle brows. He owes his Mediterranean dark good looks to his beloved mother, the 5’1″ “Big Rita,” who died at age 94 in 2018.

Rita grew up over her Lebanese parents’ corner store in downtown Stockton. The man she married, Jack, had been a 17-year-old gunner on a Navy troop transport vessel in the South Pacific during World War II. Driving a beer truck, he earned enough to buy a three-bedroom house with no air conditioning — quite the challenge for raising three boys and three girls in a Central Valley town where the thermometer can often hit 110 in the summer. George was the fifth of the six kids. Jack died of cancer in 1999, at age 72.

George’s football indoctrination came at age 11 with the local Pop Warner league’s West Stockton Bear Cubs, who made it all the way to the Junior Redwood Bowl in Eureka, more than 300 miles away on the Northern California coast. A less-than-fond memory was the coach’s introduction of a sick drill called “Bull in the Ring,” which was likely the cause of Visger’s earliest concussion and which at least some football people now acknowledge is barbaric. Two other kids from the Bear Cubs would also go on to the NFL: center Jack Cosgrove, an eighth-round draft choice of the Seattle Seahawks, and tight end Pat Bowe, who made the Green Bay Packers as a free agent. Visger also had a Little League baseball teammate, Von Hayes, who became a star with the Philadelphia Phillies.

Visger was All-Northern Californian and a top 100 All-American at the iconically — and ironically — named Amos Alonzo Stagg High School. One of the founding fathers of modern football coaching, mostly from decades at the University of Chicago, Stagg finished his career at College of the Pacific and Stockton Junior College, before his death in 1965.

Heavily recruited by college football programs, Visger chose the University of Colorado, where he majored in fisheries biology. From a young age, he was a Jacques Cousteau wannabe as well as a jock. Visger’s Golden Buffaloes played in the 1977 Orange Bowl. One teammate, Leon White, became Vader, a famous pro wrestler in both the U.S. and Japan.

*  *  *

At the Jets’ spring mini-camp in 1980, Visger bench-pressed 430 pounds and squatted 500-plus. He had a 28-inch vertical jump and ran a 4.9-second 40-yard dash, and his body fat was 18%. But the defensive line coach took him aside and said he needed to bulk up by an additional 25 pounds, to 275. A marginal teammate whom all the players called Dr. D (for dirt) found a way to get them steroid connections. In Visger’s case, the regimen was 20 ml of Dianobol, 15 ml of Deca-Durabolin and 10 ml of Anavar. Visger reported to summer training camp at 275 pounds, with a 32-inch vertical jump and bench-pressing 460. But it wasn’t good enough. To give you an idea, the Jets’ best defensive lineman of that period, Mark Gastineau, weighed 282 pounds, had 9% body fat and ran the 40 in 4.4 seconds.

On the 49ers a year later, Visger found himself besieged with pulsating headaches, marked by projectile vomiting, bright lights in his peripheral vision and intermittent hearing loss. The 49ers’ orthopedic surgeon, Dr. Fred Behling, prescribed medication for high blood pressure. The only palpable effect from that was that, at night, Visger’s right arm curled up to his armpit, as if he were paralyzed or had palsy. 

When Visger confronted Behling at the team facility, the doctor finally agreed that this wasn’t hypertension. His patient’s brain was hemorrhaging. Behling scribbled down the name and number of another doctor, and told Visger to lie down for a while, then drive himself to the doctor.

RELATED: Dead in the water: The tragic human cost of swimming’s abuse scandals

Upon examining Visger, this second doctor booked him promptly for emergency surgery. He had hydrocephalus, “water on the brain.” A ventricular-peritoneal shunt was permanently installed in his brain. A hole was drilled in his skull to allow a perforated catheter to pass into the ventricles in the middle of his brain. The catheter ran to a pressure valve installed in the back of his head; from there, a tube ran into his abdomen to drain excess spinal fluid.

Over a 14-day period before and after his 23rd birthday, Visger was in intensive care at Stanford Hospital. Bill Walsh’s secretary called once to see how he was doing. Walsh’s story to the team was that Visger was recuperating at his parents’ home in Stockton following a “spinal test.” Visger’s apartment roommates, veteran linebacker Terry Tautolo and rookie running back Scott Stauch, visited him at the hospital. Walsh cut them from the squad the same week.

The team’s trainers told Visger they were looking into rigging some kind of customized helmet, which would protect his brain shunt and allow him to continue bonking heads at the line of scrimmage. “I was all in,” Visger says. When he returned to the team facility with 45 staples at the back of his head, none of the other players knew he’d had brain surgery. They thought he’d simply been released.

At the 49ers’ practice facility, then in the San Francisco suburb of Redwood City, Visger picked up where he’d left off: He attended team meetings and continued rehabbing a separate knee injury (for which he has had three other surgeries, the first of them that year). One day, while working out in the weight room, he met general manager John McVay (whose son, Sean, is now head coach of the Los Angeles Rams — who play the 49ers this weekend for a Super Bowl berth), who was there on a tour with business friends and dignitaries. McVay introduced him as a defensive lineman who was on injured reserve following two knee operations. A woman in the tour group asked Visger how that had happened: two procedures on the same knee? He started to explain that there was also a brain operation involved, but McVay shut down the conversation.

In May 1982, four months after the 49ers won Super Bowl XVI, Visger’s brain shunt failed while he was fishing in Mexico with one of his brothers, who had to bring George home in a coma. There followed his second and third brain surgeries, 10 hours apart. Visger was given last rites following each one. When he recovered, he was handed a pile of hospital bills.

In the mid-’80s, Visger successfully managed what may have been the first California worker’s comp claim by an NFL player. The 49ers were required to underwrite vocational rehabilitation. He put in five years completing his studies in wildlife biology at Sacramento State University, while also earning a general contractor’s license. He persisted through four more brain surgeries in 1987 and ’88; after the last one, he left the hospital in 23 hours and was back in organic chemistry class the next day.

What happens when a shunt fails is that Visger lapses into a coma and will die within a day or so, without surgical intervention. The human body’s production of spinal fluid, about a pint per day, flows into ventricles in the middle brain. In Visger’s case, that fluid gets blocked by scar tissue formed through serial concussions.

“My brain starts getting crushed,” he says. “The feeling is like having a beer can crushed in the middle of your brain.”

Visger has worked on one brother’s construction gang, taught classes, conducted protocol surveys on threatened and endangered wildlife and spoken at numerous brain injury conferences. In 2012, the California State Senate honored Visger and his former 49er teammate Dan Bunz during Brain Injury Awareness Month. Bunz was the linebacker who stuffed the Cincinnati Bengals’ huge fullback, Pete Johnson, to cap the goal-line stand that saved San Francisco’s first Super Bowl win.

*  *  *

There’s a cool school of analysis of the nexus between football and America’s rickety public health that’s inclined to resist the conclusion that we are all George Visger. Packers’ quarterback Aaron Rodgers may be an anti-vax jerk, but he was also short-listed for permanent host of “Jeopardy!” Tom Brady has not strangled his supermodel wife, Gisele Bündchen, on the 50-yard line in the middle of the Weeknd’s halftime show.

But intelligent fans are also familiar by now with pieces of the mountains of evidence to the contrary. They are found on police blotters, in TMZ reports and on the back pages of those newspapers that still bother to publish wire-service items about the premature and grisly deaths of former players, whether celebrated or obscure.  

We also realize, somewhere deep in our medulla oblongatas, that no single headline-friendly metric, such as the number of athletes who die young after taking risks to become rich and famous, can capture the full societal cost of football. For starters, our football problem isn’t just about the few hundred men a year who rise to the elite gladiator caste of the NFL. Social pressure on young males from their earliest ages pushes them into the feeder systems of (in descending order) college, high school and pee-wee programs. In 2014, Paul Bright Jr., the 24-year-old son of Kimberly Archie, who has become an anti-football activist and litigation consultant, died in a motorcycle accident after years of irrational behavior. A brain autopsy confirmed that Bright had CTE, even though his football career ended in high school.

Nor is the issue of football’s overall harm only about death. The sport has wormed its way far enough into the bone marrow and psyche of enough men to inflict quality-of-life damage. With careful inspection, like that given to carcinogenic additives to processed foods, that damage can be found in rates of violent crime, substance abuse, domestic abuse, declines in workplace productivity and satisfaction. In all likelihood, given the popularity of the sport and the human capacity for denial, these factors won’t get seriously measured for centuries — perhaps by future or alien archeologists tasked with assessing “the decline and fall of the American empire.”

In the meantime, we hear the stories, at least some of them, even if we aren’t fully prepared to process them.

We hear about Travis Williams, “the Road Runner,” who set kickoff return records for Vince Lombardi’s last championship team before dying, drug-addicted, on the streets of Richmond, California. He was 45.

We hear about David Woodley, quarterback on the losing 1983 Super Bowl Miami Dolphins, who was finished at 30, descended into alcoholism, had a liver transplant at 33 and died at 44.

We hear about another quarterback, Mark Rypien, who was MVP of the 1992 Super Bowl for the Washington football team, whose mental health struggles have encompassed a suicide attempt and a charge of domestic violence.

That’s before we get to the most dramatic examples, such as the suicides by gun of the former defensive superstars Dave Duerson (at age 50, in 2011) and Junior Seau (at age 43, in 2012).

In the last year alone, we have heard about former San Diego Charger and Tampa Bay Buccaneer Vincent Jackson, dead in a Florida hotel room of “chronic alcohol use,” at 38. In the still-active or sort-of-active ranks, we have heard about the recent sagas of star defensive back Richard Sherman and star receiver Antonio Brown. Sherman’s erratic behavior during the last offseason resulted in charges of burglary, domestic violence, resisting arrest and fleeing the scene. After those charges were dismissed, Tampa Bay cheerfully snatched him up to fortify their defensive secondary.

Brown’s one-year-plus employment by the Buccaneers involved multiple accusations of sexual assault and falsified COVID vaccination records, even before he contributed to the history of the Great Resignation by tearing off his jersey, midway through a game, and departing the stadium bare-chested. He paused to wave to the crowd and perform jumping jacks in the end zone, before claiming that his dispute with the coaches was over an ankle injury. Was that evidence of CTE? Or just too much football?

Like so many of the sport’s casualties, George Visger is not ideological about football’s future. But he says to list him among those who are highly skeptical that “reform” is possible.

You want to change the culture, he asks rhetorically? “Fine. Then remove helmets. All helmets do — especially the new and improved ones — is add a false sense of security. From what’s happened to me, I know most of all that a brain injury is like throwing a rock in a pond. The ripple effect, the overall number of people impacted, is huge. It destroys quality of life — not just the immediate victims’, but also those around them. No game or amount of money is worth that kind of price. Yet that is exactly the price that continues to get paid, many times a year, all across our land.”

Bill Maher lists “24 Things You Didn’t Know” about Vladimir Putin

With Russia threatening to invade Ukraine, comedian Bill Maher on Friday mocked former president Donald Trump’s relationship with Vladimir Putin.

“Putin is known to be secretive, but when we interviewed him for this, he was an open book,” Maher said on his HBO Real Time program, introducing a Putin-themed version of the segment “24 Things You Didn’t Know About Me.”

No. 1 on the list was, “I’m selling the pee tape as an NFT.”


Want a daily wrap-up of all the news and commentary Salon has to offer? Subscribe to our morning newsletter, Crash Course.


The list also included, “I own a small hotel chain in the United States called the Trump Organization.”

Watch below:

When Harry met Asta: Syfy’s kooky “Resident Alien” is a love story

When Asta Twelvetrees first sees Harry Vanderspeigle on “Resident Alien,” she thinks he’s someone else. 

She can be forgiven for that as Harry is not really Harry: human doctor on vacation, but an alien with an unpronounceable first name who has crash-landed on Earth, killed one Dr. Vanderspeigle, thrown his body in an icy lake, and taken over his life and physical appearance. All great love affairs have to start somewhere.

It’s not exactly a meet cute. But the Syfy show, now in its second season, has other hallmarks of romance. Asta (Sara Tomko) and Harry (Alan Tudyk) have frosty interactions at first, possibly because Harry is literally another creature. He keeps offending her. She keeps confusing him. They end up working together closely in an office where Asta is a nurse — oh, the potential for office place romance! It never actually happens, at least not yet. But the love affair does. Like the best romances on television right now, “Resident Alien” is a love story between friends.

Related: A charming, meandering “Resident Alien”

“Love means never having to say you’re sorry” went the line in “Love Story,” the 1970 tragic romance film starring Ryan O’Neal and Ali MacGraw, the actor for whom my parents named me. That adage definitely holds true for “Resident Alien.” In the first season, newly in his human form, Harry the alien struggles with how to move through the world, physically and emotionally. In his very first sight of Asta, asleep in a chair, he assumes she’s dead, sniffs her and pokes her face. “What the mother hell?” she yells. “You’re not dead,” he replies.

A classic first exchange.

As Harry becomes the ad hoc town doctor for the small, mountain community of Patience, Colorado, he flounders his way through being alive, calling the mayor “Mayor Snowflake,” imitating the body postures of others without realizing that might be offensive or at the very least, strange. He’s like a large toddler in a parka.

Tudyk should teach a graduate class in line reading. His odd alien inflections turn what could be throwaway lines into meaningful, often hilarious moments. Every line, every time. Harry often does not know where to look, and Tudyk somehow manages to make his face, well, utterly alien with his shifting glances, tight jawline and nearly closed mouth. You can see him thinking in his eyes, and see him coming to the wrong, naïve conclusion most of the time, extolling the brainstorming properties of whisky, for example.

Despite her confusion and annoyance with him, Asta defends Harry from the beginning. “Don’t talk to me” she tells the sheriff (Corey Reynolds) when he tries to banter with her about how strange Harry is. And after a night of drinking (which Harry feels pressure to attend, like every lower-level employee coerced into happy hour, to confirm he’s “stopped being a weirdo”), Harry and Asta slip quickly into helping each other. 

She tries to assist him at first without realizing how much he needs it, coaching him through human conversation. “This is when you’re supposed to ask me about my childhood.” Harry in turn assists Asta, skipping straight to the advanced love level of helping her move. And soon, defending her life from the abusive man she married at 16 after she got pregnant. 

Harry’s bluntness perhaps allows Asta to trust him sooner than she might otherwise. He’s disarmingly direct. He hasn’t developed yet the social niceties of many humans. As a woman of color in a small, overwhelmingly white town, Asta tells him: “I’ve always been an outsider. Maybe that’s why I understand you. You’re just different. I know what that feels like.” In the first episode, sharing a moment with Harry while overlooking a mountain view, she says one of the best lines of the show: “Sometimes just feeling human is alien to me.”

You can be weird with your love. You can be yourself. And the confessions bring them close. But like the best love relationships, they help each other be their better selves too. Harry learns loyalty, devotion and sacrifice from Asta. And from him, she learns patience and compromise. The quick Asta is a good match for Harry, and Tomko and Tudyk play off each other with sparking chemistry.

But Harry the alien is on a mission that he keeps secret even from the woman he’s closest to, the one he loves. He’s been sent to Earth to destroy all humans, and as soon as he finds the pieces of his spaceship and a device, he will do just that.

As in the best romances, he didn’t plan on her. “She’s not your problem,” he tells himself in vain, like any rugged romantic lead, before turning his truck around and going back to rescue Asta.

Asta has a secret too. When she became pregnant as a teen, she gave up her baby for adoption, pressured by her abusive partner. Her daughter still lives in town, a smart, moody teen who is at first unclear about her birth mother’s identity. Asta tells Harry about her child right away, and Harry accidentally spills that and a lot of Asta’s secrets, perhaps not being entirely clear on the concept.

But he keeps his big secret from her until the last episode of the first season. He’s an alien. Like a real friend, like a real love, Asta does not turn away from him after finding out his true, otherworldly identity. She’s surprised and upset, but they work it out. She helps him. The first episode of the second season finds them closer than ever. 


Want a daily wrap-up of all the news and commentary Salon has to offer? Subscribe to our morning newsletter, Crash Course.


More and more, the greatest love affairs on television are between friends: Shauna and JackieMoiraine and Lan. And Harry and Asta. 

Maybe platonic love is harder to find than romantic, finding someone who will stick by you and you by them as you both make mistakes and grow and change. And maybe Harry and Asta’s love will shift into something more in season 2 as Harry will risk not destroying the entire world for her. Or, destroying it all except for her. 

But it’s love that keeps her by Harry’s side, teaching him: “on Earth, you don’t really have to be related to be family . . . Sometimes family is just people in your life that you love, that you’d do anything for.” It’s unconditional love for Asta that causes Harry to insist to her, even as it goes against his alien nature: “We are friends. And I won’t kill everyone.” Maybe love is never killing everyone.

More stories like this:

Janis Ian on songwriting magic, from the Beatles to “Baby Shark”

Two-time Grammy award winner Janis Ian joined host Kenneth Womack to talk about her creative process, Lennon and McCartney, her new album and more on “Everything Fab Four,” a podcast co-produced by me and Womack (a music scholar who also writes about pop music for Salon) and distributed by Salon.

Acclaimed singer-songwriter Ian, whose father played piano, asked for lessons at a young age. She then moved on to the guitar at 10 and was writing songs by 12, though it didn’t occur to her at the time that it could be a career. The next year, as Ian tells Womack, she was attending summer camp when a friend introduced her to the Beatles’ “Please, Please Me.” As she says, “It sounded so fresh. Almost like a folk song that wasn’t a folk song.” That same summer, a group of camp kids piled into a flatbed truck and went into town to see the band’s first feature film, “A Hard Day’s Night,” and Ian “was hooked.”

She was particularly struck by the vocals of Lennon and McCartney, calling them “so riddled with energy. The two of them together was greater than the sum of its parts.” Which, of course, also applies to the duo’s “timeless great writing.” Ian, who teaches songwriting master classes, says “I wouldn’t even use them as an example… I wouldn’t want to be a teacher trying to parse that or analyze that.”

LISTEN:

Subscribe today through SpotifyApple PodcastsGoogle PodcastsStitcherRadioPublicBreakerPlayer.FMPocket Casts or wherever you get your podcasts.

Ian herself has been lauded as one of the finest songwriters of her generation, having penned her 1967 hit “Society’s Child” when she was just 14, and then scoring her biggest hit, “At Seventeen” a few years later. She has continued writing and recording into recent years, garnering 10 total Grammy nominations and just releasing her latest album, “The Light at the End of the Line,” via her own Rude Girl Records label.

RELATED: Nancy Wilson of Heart: “We weren’t looking to marry or date the Beatles. We wanted to be them

Though Ian doesn’t like to speculate on “second acts,” and finds it increasingly difficult to maintain a high level of creativity with the constant distractions of social media, she remains impressed with legacy artists who keep going. And when it comes to the Beatles’ enduring musical and cultural impact, she says: “They took ownership and surpassed their own expectations. You don’t think you’re going to change the world. What must that have been like for the four of them? I can’t even begin to imagine that. There isn’t a person in this century or the last who hasn’t been influenced by them.”

Listen to the entire conversation with Janis Ian, including her affinity for the catchy “Baby Shark” song, on “Everything Fab Four” and subscribe via SpotifyApple PodcastsGoogle or wherever you get your podcasts.

“Everything Fab Four” is distributed by Salon. Host Kenneth Womack is the author of a two-volume biography on Beatles producer George Martin, the bestselling book “Solid State: The Story of Abbey Road and the End of the Beatles” and “John Lennon, 1980: The Last Days in the Life.”


Want a daily wrap-up of all the news and commentary Salon has to offer? Subscribe to our morning newsletter, Crash Course.


More “Everything Fab Four” conversations: 

Why serial killers are drawn to politics

One of the most infamous serial killers of the twentieth century almost followed a very different path in life. His name was Ted Bundy and, during his formative years, he craved a career in politics.

Bundy was living in Seattle and taking classes at the University of Washington when he first considered working in foreign affairs, according to Katharine Ramsland. A professor of forensic psychology at DeSales University, Ramsland has written prolifically about murderers like Bundy. “His goal was to graduate from college, get a diplomatic position with the government and work on improving trade with China,” Ramsland explained, referencing the book “Violent Mind: The 1976 Psychological Assessment of Ted Bundy” by a prison psychologist (Dr. Al Carlisle) who evaluated Bundy after he was accused of attempted kidnapping. In 1976, no one knew if Bundy was even capable of killing; it was unimaginable that one day he would confess to 30 murders, and experts believe he was guilty of dozens more.

Carlisle recalled that “importance, prestige and wealth were his primary goals,” according to Ramsland. Eventually those objectives evolved into wanting to impress his wealthy girlfriend; Bundy would steal fancy clothes and boast about supposed big government connections in order to do so.

Bundy is not the only serial killer to have a nascent interest in politics. Because serial killers are some of the most psychologically analyzed individuals in history, and their psychological profiles and family histories are often public, we know that there are many peculiar connections between politics and aspirations to murder. 

While it may seem comedic to suggest politics and serial killing can be juxtaposed in this way (such as the viral joke comparing Ted Cruz to the Zodiac Killer), stories like Bundy’s illustrate how the two passions — one evil and despised, the other neutral yet socially applauded — are rooted in similar parts of the human psyche. Both require a certain amount of grandiose thinking, and with it, self-involvement. Success in either endeavor depends heavily on being a skilled manipulator, and is rewarded with real power over actual human beings.

Then again, only politicians are capable of wielding that power to help people and make the world into a better place. Even though it is fashionable (and not unjustified) to be cynical about politics, there have been plenty of government officials who have used and continue to use their power for benevolent purposes. If there is a sliding scale that connects those individuals with undeniable monsters like Bundy, it raises troubling questions about what kinds of people gravitate to our political system — or may already be flourishing within it.

The Killer Clown and the First Lady

One serial killer who was interested in politics and did manage to create a political career for himself was John Wayne Gacy, the so-called “Killer Clown.” Gacy is known to have sexually assaulted and murdered at least 33 young men and boys between 1972 and 1978, although there may have been more victims.

If nothing else, Gacy’s party affiliation shows that there is bipartisanship among serial killers: Unlike the Republican Bundy, Gacy was a Democrat.

“It was never specifically said by Gacy, or generally known, why he became a Democrat,” John Borowski told Salon. An independent filmmaker who has studied a number of serial killers (including Gacy), Borowski also wrote the book “John Wayne Gacy Hunting a Predator: The Pursuit, Arrest, and Confession.” He has pored through countless details about the man’s life — and admitted, ruefully, that there is not much to analyze right now in terms of his writing. Gacy would sometimes respond to letters he received while he was incarcerated, Borowski explained, and it is possible one of his correspondents has information about Gacy’s political views that is currently unknown to the public. What we possess right now, however, is pretty thin.

Still, in his research, Borowski did find that Gacy’s psyche was heavily influenced by his father, who by multiple accounts was an extremely abusive man. Like many victims of child abuse, Gacy grew up simultaneously craving his father’s approval and deeply resenting the way he was treated.

Oh, and one more thing: Gacy’s father was a Republican.

RELATED: Why Jack the Ripper and other serial killer narratives endure

“He was attempting to almost be the antithesis of what his father was in every single way,” Borowski pointed out. If that was his mission, Gacy accomplished it. After his father learned about his son’s political views, he denounced him as a “patsy” and inundated him with homophobic slurs.

Yet the same Democratic Party affiliation that Gacy’s father cited as just one more sign of the young man’s worthlessness actually became a vehicle for real achievement. Gacy was active in local politics and community projects, first on a smaller level when he lived in Iowa and then much more so after moving to Illinois. Because he had prospered as a businessman, Gacy offered up his employees to clean the party headquarters free of charge, served on his township’s street lighting committee, became a precinct captain and directed Chicago’s annual Polish Constitution Day Parade. He even was photographed with First Lady Rosalynn Carter, a major Secret Service blunder considering that Gacy had already been convicted of a violent sex crime.

“With any type of politics comes that stature, and that prominence, and Gacy loved attention in any way he could get it,” Borowski explained.

What drew Gacy to politics in the first place? “One, of course, is that feeling of power, to say he is involved with the Democratic Party or he was given the title of Norwood Park Lighting District Commissioner, and he had his own little business card,” Borowski said. It helped Gacy feel better about himself — and reinforced the image of normality that he needed to get away with his crimes. Indeed, Gacy’s status as a respected local politician even played a direct role in putting his victims at ease.

“When you look further in Gacy’s plans, when he would bring his young victims to his home, or even police officers who had come to inquire about some of the victims — which they did during his whole killing spree — he would bring them into his den and he would show them his pictures with the president’s wife and his meeting Mayor [Michael Anthony] Bilandic in Chicago,” Borowski told Salon.

Borowski noted that some of these hypotheses were, of course, informed speculation.


Want more health and science stories in your inbox? Subscribe to Salon’s weekly newsletter The Vulgar Scientist.


The serial killer who campaigned for a Rockefeller

In Bundy’s case, we actually have confirmed evidence about which politicians he admired.

Richard Larsen, a Seattle Times reporter who interviewed Ted Bundy and authored a book called “Bundy: The Deliberate Stranger,” writes that Bundy had worked for local Republican candidates in Washington State before managing a grassroots campaign there during the 1968 election to draft New York Gov. Nelson Rockefeller for the presidency. Bundy even attended the Republican National Convention that year as a Rockefeller delegate. He also served as a driver, bodyguard and overall assistant to lieutenant governor candidate Arthur Fletcher, the first African American to seek statewide electoral office in the western United States. According to Larsen, this gave Bundy a sense of “belonging and accomplishment.”

By 1972, Bundy was a high-ranking volunteer for the reelection campaign of Gov. Daniel Evans, at one point being observed by witnesses impressing Evans with his detailed notes about a speech delivered by rival candidate Albert Rosellini, a Democrat. He was later rewarded for his efforts with a job as an assistant to Ross Davis, chairman of the Washington Republican Party.

It later came out that Bundy had obtained his dirt on Rosellini through methods that would seem like normal political dirty tricks under different circumstances, but take on a potentially ominous cast in this context. Bundy had infiltrated Rosellini’s campaign by pretending to be a college student and not disclosing his connection to the Evans team. Republicans denounced the story as a “distortion” (a 1970s equivalent of crying “fake news”), but Larsen recalls that Bundy was excited to discuss what he had done. When asked if he wanted to run for office, Bundy said that he had “given that some thought” and was planning on becoming a lawyer in keeping with those potential aspirations. In a separate interview with The New York Times, Bundy was pointedly blasé about being caught in an act of deception.

“I’m not the least bit uncomfortable with what went, on,” Bundy told the journal of record. “It was just part of political campaigning. You have to know what your opposition is saying and doing.”

As with Gacy, it is easy to develop leads on the deeper meaning of Bundy’s political predilections, but difficult to arrive at any definite conclusions. Born in 1946, Bundy would have taken an interest in politics around roughly the same period in history as Gacy — the 1960s. The Republican Party had undergone its metamorphosis into a predominantly conservative organization during the 1964 election, yet within that now-avowedly right-wing body Bundy consistently supported the dwindling faction that could still be described as moderate: Rockefeller, Fletcher and Evans were all noted for taking liberal stances on issues like civil rights and the environment.

The serial killer who was both a Democrat and a Republican

While Bundy and Gacy are the most famous serial killers to also enter politics, they are not alone. Randy Kraft, whose crime spree from 1971 to 1983 included the rape and murder of dozens of boys and young men, is actually still alive at the time of this writing. Like Bundy and Gacy, Kraft was born in the 1940s (1945 in his case), and became extremely passionate about politics in his adolescence. Kraft started out as a conservative Republican, stating that his ambition was to become a United States senator. In 1964 he campaigned for Arizona Sen. Barry Goldwater, the presidential candidate who made that year’s election into an ideological turning point for the Republican Party. Kraft was also an outspoken supporter of the Vietnam War and even attended pro-war demonstrations.

Then, one year after he was arrested for lewd conduct for propositioning an undercover police officer, Kraft suddenly became a liberal. Before long he was a Democratic Party organizer and enthusiastic backer of New York Sen. Robert F. Kennedy, who was running for the 1968 Democratic Party presidential nomination as the most left-wing alternative. This radical shift may seem like a possible clue into his pathology — but, as a Kraft biographer pointed out, plenty of people transitioned from being conservative Goldwater supporters to liberal Democrats during the tumultuous 1960s. According to Dennis McDougal, an author and investigative journalist who wrote a book on Kraft called “Angel of Darkness: The True Story of Randy Kraft and the Most Heinous Murder Spree of the Century,” the stress of America’s political situation in the 1960s and 1970s could have exacerbated Kraft’s preexisting pathology simply because everyone suffered due to those political stresses. In Kraft’s case, politics offers not only insights into the mind of monster, but also into the conditions that created one.

In particular with Kraft, McDougal observed, it is telling to look at how he chose his victims.

“Why select Marines?” McDougal asked. “Why go out and trawl for sailors or for any kind of military personnel that he sees as his prey of choice? I think that you can probably draw a pretty distinct line between his Goldwater politics shifting to [Kennedy] politics as being influential with that pathology. He’s out literally exorcising his own sexual demons with people who are in the military doing the bidding of whichever other political party happens to be in power. That just happens to chime in with his sexual identity and whatever pathology drove him to those extremes in the first place.”

For Kraft, the ideologies that he may or may not have sincerely held likely mattered far less than the malicious fantasies he enjoyed reenacting for sexual pleasure. It was the fantasy, not the politics, that seemed to drive him.

Not all psychopaths are serial killers

“Serial killers are driven by fantasy,” Dr. Scott Bonn, criminologist and author of the book “Why We Love Serial Killers,” told Salon. “They are driven by a fantasy need. It’s the reason that they kill. And you happened to pick two serial killers [Gacy and Bundy] that fall into the category of power and control killers. Their fantasy need that was served by killing is the need to dominate and control others.”

Borowski echoed Bonn’s observation.

“It comes down to their lust and desire for tension and power, domination and control,” Borowski said. “That’s what leads the serial killer in their day to day life, and that power, domination and control could bleed into any other profession, whether it’s politics or law enforcement.” He later added that “whether they’re actually killing someone with their hands or killing them with a pen on a mass destruction scale, I think it’s all pretty much the same.”

As Ramsland put it, “That’s what people would get confused about. They think all psychopaths are serial killers and all serial killers are psychopaths. That is not true.”

Does this mean that there are people in politics today who, even if they are not serial killers, pursue that passion for the same reasons that a serial killer might do so?

“I’m sure there are,” Bonn told Salon. He later added: “To have a cold-blooded nature, where you simply don’t care about stepping on others and hurting others, you could see as actually a benefit to someone who wants to succeed in business or politics.”

Yet psychopaths can certainly possess sincere political ideologies, though that sincerity often gets tied back in some way to their pathology. Take Gacy: At a time when the gay rights had not yet been associated with either major party, Gacy’s adamant hostility toward homosexuality was a tragically normal sentiment. In his case, however, that opinion intersected with Gacy being what Bonn described as a “power control killer.”

“It’s important to understand that serial killers are motivated by different things,” Bonn explained. “Some of them are motivated by sex. Some of them are motivated by a mission they might think they have about eliminating the world of gay men.” As Gacy justified his actions by describing his victims as “worthless little queers and punks,” and insisted that as a respectable member of society he was not himself a homosexual, one can reasonably assume a link existed between his views on homosexuality and the horrific murders he perpetrated.

Despite their very different reasons for acting, however, the main thing that connects these serial killers’ political pursuits is that their passions make them more enigmatic rather than less so. All we know for sure is that the same urges which drive people to run for office can motivate them to commit the most heinous crimes imaginable. It is an important piece of the puzzle for anyone who wants a better picture of the face of evil.

It does not, however, complete the puzzle.

Read more on crime and psychology:

Canada’s “Freedom Convoy”: Is this Jan. 6 for the Great White North?

If you choose to believe Fox News and right-wing social media, this weekend a 40-mile long “Freedom Convoy” of 50,000 Canadian truckers, plus millions of their supporters, will converge in Ottawa — our northern neighbor’s capital — for a mass protest that will gridlock the city until all of the country’s vaccine mandates are repealed.  

The anti-vaccination convoy movement has raised some $7 million, and earned the support of Canadian conservative Parliament leader Erin O’Toole, who says he plans to meet with the truckers, as well as prominent American conservatives or libertarians from Donald Trump Jr. and Tucker Carlson to Elon Musk. Videos of the convoy have proliferated online, most depicting lines of tractor-trailers driving across Canada, variously set to dramatic film scores or Twisted Sister, and cheered on by throngs of spectators waving the Maple Leaf flag on highway shoulders and overpasses. Other images and videos have popped up too, showcasing the efforts of convoy supporters, including a sort of women’s auxiliary unit singing “O Canada” while assembling sandwiches for the truckers.

But in the last couple of days, research and reporting has emerged that suggests the convoy, ripe as it is for gags about the polite or earnest nature of Canadians, could spell trouble. On Friday, Ottawa police asked residents of the city to avoid traveling downtown on Saturday. Security officials at Canada’s House of Commons warned that demonstrators have been searching for the home addresses of members of Parliament. Groups that track the far right have warned that the convoy movement is sparking violent rhetoric online, including calls for the demonstration to replicate the U.S. Capitol attack of Jan. 6, 2021, and for drivers to use their trucks to ram into the barricades around the Parliament building. 

RELATED: Tucker Carlson’s Hungarian rhapsody: A far-right manifesto for waging the “demographic war”

Reporters and researchers have also pointed out that the convoy movement is inextricably tied to Canadian far-right groups, including members of radical, neo-Nazi-linked “accelerationist” networks, Holocaust deniers and supporters of the white nationalist Great Replacement theory, “sovereign citizen” types with quixotic plans to dissolve the Canadian government and, of course, QAnon adherents. 

As one leading Canadian research group, the Canadian Anti-Hate Network (CAHN), noted in an article published Thursday, “Since the start of the pandemic, COVID conspiracies have been bringing various fringe and far-right elements together. The close connections between the People’s Party of Canada, the young white supremacists of Canada First, and the Diagolon network is one example. This convoy is another.” 

On the eve of the convoy’s arrival in Ottawa, CAHN’s executive director Evan Balgord spoke with Salon. 

So what’s going on with this convoy? 

I’ll dispel one myth right away. A lot of folks are saying that this was some sort of trucker convoy that was hijacked by the far right. That’s not actually true. Canada was going to have a requirement that cross-border truck drivers get vaccinated. We already have a mandate that some public servants have to be vaccinated, like nurses and doctors, and that’s fairly uncontroversial. But a small number of truckers and some trucking organizations pointed out that, because the average Canadian trucker is alone in their trucks all day, why do they have to get vaccinated when they’re largely self-isolating because of their work? Agree with it or not, that seems like a reasonable thing to have a conversation about. So the trucking organizations were asking the government to talk about this mandate. And the far right spotted this and just stole it — stole the idea and decided to have a convoy about it. 

About two years ago, [the organizers] had another convoy called United We Roll. It was a far-right convoy. It was all the same kind of people that we monitor at CAHN. So they stole this grievance and put together this convoy. We have these organizers on record making Islamophobic statements. One of the loudest, Pat King, has made many racist and antisemitic statements and called for violence in the past. One of the main organizers of the group that’s sort of behind the convoy, Canada Unity, is run in part by a guy named James Bauder, who was involved in our Yellow Vest Canada movement. He’s previously expressed support for a bunch of different hate groups. He said that [Prime Minister Justin] Trudeau needs to be arrested and charged with treason. He and some other people got together to do this convoy, so it’s been a far-right project from day one. 


Want a daily wrap-up of all the news and commentary Salon has to offer? Subscribe to our morning newsletter, Crash Course.


Now their GoFundMe has raised around $7 million, and the actual convoy is about to descend on Ottawa. Of course it’s not 50,000 trucks or whatever ridiculous thing Fox News was saying. It’s probably 100 to 200 actual trucks and then a bunch of other vehicles. But it’s significant. Some people are saying they want it to be Canada’s Jan. 6. So it’s concerning. 

What should people expect to see in Ottawa this weekend?

I’ll make one hard prediction. The irony to me in all this is the truckers actually had a kind of issue. But because the far right stole the issue, and the convoy has come to represent far-right extremism, there’s no way those truckers or the trucking organizations can have an adult conversation with our government now. They’ve been totally fucked by this convoy.  

If you look at the list of demands that Canada Unity put out in this memorandum of understanding, they’re asking that the vaccine passport system and mandates just be done away with across Canada. That’s everything from getting on a plane to eating at a restaurant. There’s just no way that our government is going to do that. Then they’ve added on all these other grievances. Some people want to see a Jan. 6. Some people want Trudeau tried for treason. Some people showing up are “sovereign citizens,” who believe that using some magic combination of words and pseudo-legal paperwork is going to dissolve the government. And of course, there’s the others who are just saying no vaccine mandates whatsoever. None of this is going to happen. So one prediction I’m damn sure of is that they’re not going to achieve anything, public policy-wise. 

But in terms of what actually happens — it’s not like we don’t have people who want to do a Jan. 6 here. We do, and they’re always around. I don’t think something like that is going to happen. Jan. 6 was fairly well planned. Not everybody there was part of that plan, and different groups had different plans, but there was significant planning behind it. I don’t know that that planning is taking place here. Then there’s the fact that all of our lawmakers and our prime minister aren’t actually there right now. And in Ottawa, on Parliament Hill, we have concrete barriers to prevent ramming attacks and a gigantic lawn in front of our Parliament building. All of which, I believe, means it’s a lot harder to storm.

But we are telling people who live in Ottawa to stay away this weekend and try not to go outside if they can avoid it. I feel really awful giving that advice. But, you know, there are people among this big convoy who are racists. There are people in this convoy who want to do violence to others. I’m not saying everybody’s like that. But they’ll be finally reaching their target, the thing they’re maddest at, Ottawa, and there’s a crowd, there’s a mob. So you don’t know how things can go. 

Maybe there’s some violence. Hopefully not. Best-case scenario is just they honk their horns, annoy the hell out of everybody, achieve nothing and then have to go home. A lot of businesses are actually closing up for the day. And there’s no public washrooms in Ottawa. They’re not going to have anywhere to poop. Sorry to be crass about it. But they’re not going to find a warm reception there. 

There are a lot of videos online that claim to show hundreds or thousands of trucks on their way to Ottawa. And there are videos claiming to show sympathy protests in different countries around the world. How accurate are the depictions of this movement on social or right-wing media? 

I have no idea of anything else happening in other countries. I certainly haven’t seen any evidence of that. In terms of people supporting them, for all intents and purposes, this is an anti-vaccine, anti-lockdown crowd. And we’ve got a lot of them, just like the States has a lot of them, just like many countries have a lot of them. They’ve thrown all their support behind this, and it’s not just a few bad apples, either. Every single hate group, far-right group we monitor is involved in this in some way, shape or form, pretty vocally. 

There’s very much two Canadas right now. There’s the Canada that is for health and public science and all of that. And then there’s the far right, which is not. But if anyone’s talking about massive levels of support, I’d point out that 90% of our truckers are vaccinated. A lot of our truckers here are South Asian, and I don’t see them participating in this convoy in numbers that would be representative. So this isn’t about truckers, or the specific issue that truckers had. It’s just a far-right thing. 

Is this America’s fault? Did we do this to you guys?

Not entirely. Canada has had its own unique hate ecosystem forever. What you do in the States does definitely strongly impact us. Of course it does. But it works both ways. I mean, stop me if you’ve heard the names Gavin McInnes, Lauren Southern, Faith Goldy or Stefan Molyneux before. And you know, AltRight.com, the website, was created in a Toronto apartment; Richard Spencer was living in Toronto at the time. Canada has a disproportionate impact on the States and the rest of the world when it comes to putting out thought leaders in these fascist movements as well. So it’s not just the States’ fault. We have to own up to our own racist, genocidal history and the systems of white supremacy that we have here as well. 

But for American readers, describing the people on the overpasses — they’re somewhere between, or an amalgamation of, MAGA and Jan. 6. Meaning, with Jan. 6, there were some people that got really organized and wanted to do what happened, or even worse. And then there were plenty of people who were just there and got swept up and started to participate because somebody lit that match. With the convoy, it’s similar: Not everybody that’s there is a racist who wants to do violence. But there’s elements of that in there. Every single hate group and insurrectionary element that we have in our country is there, or is supporting it from the sidelines. So it does create a volatile situation. I don’t think we’re quite at critical mass. We don’t have all the right ingredients, I think, to make this a Jan. 6. But the point is, there’s people here who want it to be. 

Read more from Kathryn Joyce on North America’s far right:

Yes, there’s a climate change version of Wordle now

In case you need a reminder of how fast pop culture can move these days, consider the case of Wordle, the five-letter word-guessing game that’s taken the internet by storm. Although the browser-based puzzle, in which players have six tries to guess one set word of the day, has only been available to the public since October 2021, it already has nearly 3 million users. It has also spawned a slew of spinoffs, from Absurdle, where the winning word keeps changing on you, to Lewdle, a ruder variant.

One of the latest twists on the popular game brings a new meaning to all those “green” squares you’ve seen shared on social media. In “A Greener Worldle,” the word of the day always has something to do with our burning planet, like adaptcleandrown, or — yesterday’s answer — facts.

The game has the same setup as the original Wordle, with letters you’ve guessed flipping yellow if they are part of the final word but in the incorrect spot, or green if they’re the correct spot. “You want the tiles to turn green, just like the planet,” the rules read.

The spinoff was created by the International Institute for Environment & Development, a policy research organization. “If you love climate solutions and Wordle, you’ll DEFINITELY love A GREENER WORLDLE,” the organization announced enthusiastically on Facebook on Tuesday. The organization says that the word game’s launch is “the latest, if slightly unusual, part of IIED’s work to tackle climate change that dates back 50 years.”

Climate change and word games have been having something of a month. A New York Times crossword clue caused a stir on January 10 when the answer to the clue “greener energy source” turned out to be “clean coal” — a famous misnomer popularized by the fossil fuel industry. The puzzle’s constructor, Lynn Lempel, noted that the Times had edited down her original clue, “dubious term for a greener energy source.” The paper quickly corrected the record, saying that the puzzle “may have implied incorrectly that coal is a viable source of clean energy.” 

After that debacle, “A Greener Worldle” seems almost like a gift — though admittedly a strange one — to climate-conscious word nerds everywhere. Did we actually need it? We did not. But if it’s anything like the original Wordle craze, it might just be here to stay.

The Florida cannabis behemoth leaving Black growers behind

This story is the second in a four-part series about cannabis equity in America. Read part one here.

Cannabis is fully legal — parks, restaurants, hotel rooms, and federally subsidized housing aside — in just 18 states plus Washington, D.C. This state of the states is where America’s 350,000 yearly weed arrests come from.

Even in free jurisdictions, prohibition-based regulations keep weed availability unstable and influence cannabis policy in places where the drug is, on a certain level, legal.

Which returns us to Florida (population: 21.5 million), where slightly more than 600,000 patients can receive medical marijuana — and multiple millions can cop in the street. On the northern Florida panhandle sits Gadsden County, where Trulieve is headquartered.

The company reported revenues of $224.09 million and net income of $18.62 million in the third quarter of 2021. Publicly traded on the Canadian Securities Exchange and on over-the-counter markets in the U.S., Trulieve stock closed at $29.30 as of Jan. 19.


Want a daily wrap-up of all the news and commentary Salon has to offer? Subscribe to our morning newsletter, Crash Course.


Trulieve not only sells half of the Sunshine State-approved Mary Jane, it operates 163 dispensaries nationwide. In October, the company purchased Arizona multistate operator Harvest, copping 22 Florida licenses in the process, to become the nation’s largest cannabis company. Unless Amazon swoops in to own the delivery game between now and publication, this is the biggest deal in the licensed market.

Florida legalization activist and political consultant Ben Pollara told me: “Trulieve is medical marijuana in Florida.”

CEO Kim Rivers is a lawyer whose specialty was mergers and acquisitions. Cannabis insiders have in mind Trulieve when discussing shitty weed as a probable consequence of corporate pot’s looming dominance.

Rivers’ husband J.T. Burnette, a prominent real estate developer, was scheduled to report to prison on Jan. 23. After years of being investigated over his political connections, Burnette was convicted of bribery and sentenced to three years of incarceration.

Trulieve and its top executive are not part of the case that sent Rivers’ husband to federal prison. It does confirm a widely held belief that multistate operators (MSOs) power statehouse and city hall conversations:

With the feds punting on legalization, they largely set state and local policy through intense lobbying and political contributions.

RELATED: Could cannabis prevent COVID? To the authors of a new study, it sure looks like it

Speaking of the legal marijuana market, Bonita Money of the National Diversity & Inclusion Alliance (NDICA) said that MSOs “are trying to control everything. They’re tied in politically, so that they get first dibs on all licenses.

“By the time they do give opportunity to anybody else, whether it be on a social equity level or a general level, it doesn’t matter — those licenses are basically allotted.”

Most of the weed that Orlando tourists and Miami rappers alike smoke comes from Colorado, Oregon and California. Six hundred thousand patients get a pass.

In keeping street weed practically the only kind available, Florida allows cannabis to be lumped in and trafficked with coke, smack, fentanyl and I assume bath salts in one nothing-to-see-here tire fire.

A Brief History of Weed World

It’s reasonable to blame the cannabis chaos on our Washington leadership vacuum. The federal bill called the MORE Act, which would have ended the federal ban on marijuana, keeps threatening to emerge from congressional committee status. In December 2020, it passed the House but stalled in the Senate. A new legislative approach is underway.

As the son of a litigant in Pigford v. Glickman, in which it was established that the USDA had engaged in systemic loan discrimination against Black growers, Howard Gunn, for one, isn’t holding his breath waiting for the feds to do right.

To understand the predicament in which Gunn found himself, it’s important to know his state’s history with the drug. And to comprehend Florida’s relationship to the drug is to begin understanding America’s prohibition history.

In his book Reefer Madness: The History of Marijuana in America, author Larry “Ratso” Sloman writes that in 1933 the Tampa Bay Times called for banning the cannabis plant after 21-year-old Victor Licata murdered his parents with an ax.

Quoting unnamed sources, initial press reports claimed the accused killer was six months into a “marihuana” addiction. Turns out that Licata had a far longer history of mental illness.

Still, the Times called for the prohibition of cannabis. Under the headline “Stop the Murderous Smoke” it asserted that whether “or not the poisonous mind-wrecking weed is mainly accountable for the tragedy its sale should not be and should never have been permitted here or elsewhere.”

For nearly two decades Florida and all of the United States along with it would press cannabis to the margins of society, criminalizing consciousness and countless Black and Brown people who reminded law enforcement of the racist sentiments federal anti-pot czar Harry Anslinger had uttered not so long ago.

But then came the ’60s and the first cannabis revolution. Not wholly unlike our quarantine awakening, the young populace began questioning their relationship to work. To their political leaders and to the war machine.

They did not do these things in private. President Richard Nixon had a response. In 1994, Dan Baum got Nixon aide John Erhlicman to tell him:

“The Nixon campaign in 1968 and the Nixon White House after that had two enemies: the antiwar left and Black people. You know what I’m saying? We knew we couldn’t make it illegal to be against the war or to be Black, but getting the public to associate the hippies with marijuana and Blacks with heroin, and then criminalizing both heavily, we could disrupt those communities.”

The War on Drugs officially began in October 1970 as the Comprehensive Drug Abuse Prevention and Control Act. Later, as heroin was supplanted by crack cocaine, President Ronald Reagan ramped up the war. Cannabis purveyors and consumers were caught up in the drug dragnet by the tens of thousands.

Black street weed dealers were the low hanging fruit in a law enforcement culture.

That’s why the least powerful people in cannabis cannot in good conscience be allowed to remain marginal.

“You would think we learned last summer, but we didn’t,” said Mary Pryor, a New York cannabis activist.

“We deal with a lot of really horrific and problematic circumstances as people of color — in ways that have been detrimental and hurtful,” she said. “Consumerism, utilizing Black and brown, you know, melanated cultures to enhance the marketability of some products.”

Black people in legal cannabis flirt with ubiquity in cannabis adverts, and have high visibility in both dispensary storefronts and delivery missions. Or, like the rappers who act as company faces, they’re fronting for a brand and receiving a licensing fee, not ownership.

The Corporate Weed Grab

The word “cartel” is bandied about among activists in discussing Florida med companies’ business comportment. In the broader context, it seems the wrong crime metaphor.

Tallahassee pols and Trulieve lobbyists are nowhere near alone in collaborating on statutes all but built for abuse and manipulation.

What some Black activists call “sharecropper” statutes are standard in current social equity policy. These rules allow large companies access to lusted-after priority licensing if they agree to support financially or via incubation a social equity entrepreneur.

Here are some examples of how sharecropping undermines the true goals of social equity.

  • Connecticut — a state with only four licensed growers — just passed a statute that offers current medical license holders “equity joint venture” opportunities.That’s early access to its forthcoming market, even before equity applicants are issued licenses. But only if these cultivators pay money into an equity fund and incubate with designated equity entrepreneurs.

“This pay-to-play model will always be vulnerable to manipulation and abuse,” says Dasheeda Dawson, cannabis program supervisor for the city of Portland, Oregon. Dawson is also chair of the Cannabis Regulators of Color coalition.

  • Alexis Bronson, a San Francisco equity license qualifier, put up 40% ownership of his dispensary to go into the partnership with High Times — that’s right, they sell weed now — and learned through reporters’ calls that his company had been sold to a larger company called Harvest.

Yes, the same Harvest that’s now a Trulieve tentpole.

Other statutes are less overtly exclusionary than sharecropper policies.

  • North Carolina is presently trying to pass its Compassionate Care Act for med. If made law, state policy will be to do business only with operators who have five years of out-of-state experience. That’s in addition to a $50,000 application fee.

Shaleen Title, author of Fair and Square: How to Effectively Incorporate Social Equity Into Cannabis Laws and Regulations, messaged me that by “disqualifying anyone who doesn’t have out-of-state cannabis experience, it would go toward ensuring that no local social equity operator could truly be independent and able to control their own company.”

All in all, there’s manipulation, abuse and, more prevalently, a general air of condescension, of a kind. In an era of high taxes and tight profit margins, social equity is in some quarters — legal and illegal — regarded as an albatross or, at best, a chess piece.

Entrepreneur and former New York Knicks forward Al Harrington suggests that the business culture around government Mary Jane and equity has needed examination. “I have meetings I go into with MSOs,” Harrington said during a podcast I co-hosted in 2019, “and the one Black guy who works in the office they’re like, ‘C’mon, c’mon. Come to the meeting!’ And then they just sit in the meeting and don’t say anything.

“It’s very popular,” he said, “to have a token Black guy around.”

This was nearly three years ago, 21 in cannabis years. At minimum, America’s visibly shifted racial climate has made white legal weed traffickers be more slick.

Weed Equity, The Show

Wally Wong is an immigrant son, born of Jamaican and Chinese heritage. Loves him some L.A. And diversity is so much Wong’s jam that he focused on it in Hollywood. From 2016-2018 he was co-chair of the Asian American Writers Committee of the Writers Guild of America. Now he’s founder of the cannabis equity activist coalition Working Group.

As California’s equity licenses were about to go into effect four years ago, Wong saw well-connected entrepreneurs undermine the diversity effort.

“I was actually in a backroom deal in South Central Los Angeles, with a Canadian company coming in, and they were buying equity stakes from an existing license.

“They’d flown in a gentleman from Toronto, with his family — never lived in Los Angeles — to take over this dispensary.

“This is what you see when people make the call to get into this space. They’re trying to make a move. They’re trying to jump the market.”

It can take from five to seven years for a state to go from adopting med to decriminalizing it to full legalization.

“They’re trying to call it right before the recreational framework gets set up, so that they can have a stake in the existing medical,” Wong said.

That’s one way that the intentions of cannabis equity are undermined. Of the sharecropping shenanigans, the most infamous features legendary Seattle Sonics power forward Shawn Kemp. Last October a press release went out claiming Kemp was Washington state’s first Black owner of a cannabis company.

Days later, the company had to acknowledge that Kemp is not the majority owner. In fact, he owns 5% of Shawn Kemp’s Cannabis.

Critics have also taken aim at dodgy, Black-led partnership agreements.

Most of the undermining of cannabis equity, however, never sees the light of print.

Said Howard Gunn: “These hedge fund guys with all of this money, they’re the ones controlling the marijuana business throughout the United States and the other parts of the world.”

Where Weed Is Heading?

The coronavirus transformed prohibitionists into open stoners in the space of a shutdown. So, let’s say it, plain: Overpoliced communities haven’t been missing any meals in the wake of the weed wave that’s sweeping the nation. The game has changed, but unlicensed growers and dealers and brokers are eating better than many, many dispensary owners.

Not like multistate operators, not long term. Not like Canadian market investors, who are aiming to get that NFL-level money.

“In the cannabis industry, as with every kind of industry, there’s an urge to limit competition,” said Daniel Delaney, who’s Black and works as a cannabis lobbyist in Massachusetts. Alone in his class.

Weed activists are the diverse people seen pushing for progressive policies at your city or town level. Lobbyists are those people in suits toggling between cannabis company exec offices and your state legislature.

Delaney sees weed bottom lines and structural, rather than strategic, racism propelling white dominance. Despite this plant’s mainstreaming popularity, the lack of funds finding their way to marginalized entrepreneurs makes sense.

“It’s just the fact that it’s very hard to get off the ground in the super-expensive, sort of novelty industry if you’re getting in at the mom-and-pop level,” Delaney said. And because the friends-and-family fundraising model followed by most cannabis start-ups tends toward malfunction in Black America, multistate operators like Trulieve need to take a larger role.

“There needs to be more active incubator nurturing of the minority-owned companies,” Delaney adds. “The big multistates should be encouraged to do partnering. Mentoring is great, but from what I’ve seen in Massachusetts, they’re already confident business people.

“They need access to capital, to some of the network of expertise.”

Or, as Nishant Reddy, owner of A Golden State dispensaries and co-founder of Satya Capital, a privately held investment firm, asked: “The people who are running this shit — what’s in it for them?”

Reddy’s question is an answer. I asked the financier and CEO of A Golden State — retailers of California’s most expensive bud — if we might achieve meaningful equity, rather than performing theater based on this drug culture’s impulses toward empathy.

“Maybe that’s a little bit of a callous answer, but I don’t think they’re really trying to get granular to understand how you make an actual social impact into these communities. How do you make it just not theater?”

So, I emailed Trulieve’s CEO some questions:

  • I understand that social equity isn’t much of a conversation in Florida. How does that impact the way you interact in Tallahassee over issues you might address differently in other states?
  • Is there a Black/minority/overpoliced ownership agenda within Trulieve?
  • Are you familiar with Howard Gunn and the planned license set-aside for Black farmers? Do you look at the license as Florida’s version of social equity?
  • Can you see a day in Florida when actual Black weed-growing talent is brought into the legal weed mix?
  • The license proposal was initially brought up four years ago. What’s your take on the delay?
  • Though worded somewhat differently, I asked what Trulieve will do when the surging, San Francisco-based multistate operator Cookies comes with its loud-and-proud commitment to social equity?

Kim Rivers declined to respond to interview requests for this story, even after requesting that I turn my phone interview into an email Q&A. Which I agreed to.

Her publicity firm did send this statement:

Trulieve has a national community outreach program centered around our core values of diversity, equity and inclusion. Its purpose is to bring awareness to the power of medical cannabis through education and community enrichment. The Company actively programs and participates in expungement clinics, as well as supports with scholarships and internships at HBCUs. Trulieve also has worked with organizations including Last Prisoner Project, National Hispanic Cannabis Council and Minorities 4 Medical Marijuana, to name a few. Last year through their Freedom Pre-Roll campaign, they raised over $40k for Last Prisoner Project, and donated $35k to Thurgood Marshall [College Fund] for scholarships and internships. 

Not every congregation member at Clearwater Missionary Baptist Church is fully down with Gunn’s big pot campaign. He’s quick to remind that it’s not recreational weed that he’s supporting. Were today a day in, say, 2011, one would not have found a plurality of parishioners.

“There is a stigma there,” Gunn said.

But science and circumstances have changed.

“There are some who can see that anything that can substitute for these opioids, they’re willing to go that route.” In fact some of them were part of a Zoom conference that he arranged with the leaders over at Florida A&M University.

“All plants have a value, if you know how to use them,” according to Gunn.

Whether or not the congregants are in or out, the pastor is in the mix for Florida’s cannabis future. The state will decide which Black operator will be granted a medical marijuana license in March.

Copyright 2022 Capital & Main.

The USC Annenberg Center for Health Journalism‘s 2021 National Fellowship supported reporting for this project.

Fox News panelists cut off Jesse Watters after he says Kamala Harris having “female problem”

Panelists on Fox News’ “The Five” rushed to cut off Jesse Watters on Thursday after he pondered whether Vice President Kamala Harris was having a “typical female problem.”

The remark came during a discussion about Harris claiming that she felt she was in a “bubble” in Washington D.C., which prompted Watters to accuse her of not feeling grateful enough for the position she’s in.

“She has her jet, she has a chef, she can move mountains if she wants to affect policy,” he said. “I like that bubble! It’s a cozy bubble! I wouldn’t try to get out of that bubble.”

Things got more dicey from there, however, as Watters started musing about whether Harris’s sex was playing a role in her dissatisfaction.


Want a daily wrap-up of all the news and commentary Salon has to offer? Subscribe to our morning newsletter, Crash Course.


“I’m sorry to say this, but many people are saying this — I am not saying this, but many are saying! — this sounds like a typical female problem,” he said.

This prompted audible groans of protest from fellow panelists Jeanine Pirro and Dana Perino, who both tried to get Watters to stop talking about “typical female problems.”

“Jesse, stop it!” Pirro pleaded with him, even as he kept saying that Harris was too concerned about her “feelings.”

Watch the video below.

Republicans are barring medical boards from punishing doctors who prescribe ivermectin: report

GOP state lawmakers throughout the nation are backing bills that would bar medical boards from disciplining doctors who promote and prescribe hydroxychloroquine and ivermectin – anti-parasitic drugs that are falsely being touted by far-right pundits as a COVID-19 wonder drug, according to BuzzFeed News

Hydroxychloroquine first started to gain ground as a COVID-19 treatment back in the Spring of 2021, when Donald Trump heaped praise on the drug over repeated pushback from Dr. Anthony Fauci, the director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases. By May, Trump had announced that he was on a steady regimen of Hydroxychloroquine, even though there was no substantial scientific evidence of its efficacy in treating COVID-19. Ivermectin, by contrast, began making headlines shortly after Trump left office, when numerous right-wing advocacy groups – like America’s Frontline Doctors and the Front Line COVID-19 Critical Care Alliance – began hawking it to the public.

The FDA has firmly advised against the use of hydroxychloroquine or ivermectin as treatments for COVID. Nevertheless, hundreds of doctors across the country are being sued for refusing to treat patients for the drug, as Salon reported in October. 

RELATED: The conservative group using the courts to push ivermectin on COVID patients


Want a daily wrap-up of all the news and commentary Salon has to offer? Subscribe to our morning newsletter, Crash Course.


According to BuzzFeed News, at least eleven states have proposed measures that would strip medical licensing boards of their powers to reprimand doctors who write prescriptions for the two drugs. Among them are Colorado, Florida, Idaho, New Hampshire, Pennsylvania, Mississippi, Indiana, Virginia, and West Virginia.

Two states, North Dakota and Tennessee have already signed such bills into law. Republicans control the legislatures in every state named, with the exception of Virginia and Colorado. 

Many of the state bills differ by a matter of degree. Some bills, BuzFeed noted, “limit medical boards’ authority to reprimand a doctor, dentist, or pharmacist publicly discussing COVID treatments,” while others “[allow] doctors to prescribe drugs that aren’t approved by the FDA to treat COVID.”

RELATED: Did this virus come from a lab? Maybe not — but it exposes the threat of a biowarfare arms race

A BuzzFeed News investigation from September found that medical boards have “so far taken few steps to remove the credentials” of doctors who baselessly promote hydroxychloroquine and ivermectin.

Still, some of the measures have been met with significant pushback from medical associations, pharmacies, and other lawmakers throughout various states. Last month, a Maine medical board suspended the license of physician Meryl Nass over her promotion of COVID-10 falsehoods.

Even politicians aren’t immune to the backlash: U.S. Rep. Andy Harris, R-Md., an anesthesiologist by trade, is under investigation for pushing the unproven treatment. A medical board in Kansas is likewise investigating a doctor, Republican state Sen. Mark Steffen, who prescribed ivermectin to treat COVID. 

No amount of wine can make “The Woman in the House” spoof work, despite its charismatic star

Is there such a thing as a “slow burn” satire? Here’s a follow-up question: Is trying to describe “The Woman in the House Across the Street From the Girl in the Window” as such being kinder to it than it deserves?

The answers, in order, are no and yes.

A person can’t be blamed for digging for purpose or reason in a Kristen Bell vehicle, one whose satirical intent is alleged in its preposterously lengthy title. A headline like that beckons the viewer with the promise of brainless “Don’t Be a Menace to Society While Drinking Your Juice in the Hood”-style shenanigans.

You’d be hard pressed to find a better performer than Bell to pull off something on that level. “The Good Place” star proves she is as at home with screwball comedy as she is with drama. Fold that talent into any decent parody of mediocre psychological thrillers, and ideally all we’d have to do is sit back and watch everyone alchemize TV movie tin into gold medal foolishness.

But its writers Rachel Ramras, Hugh Davidson, Larry Dorf never fully exercise their license to spill into the realm of ridiculousness, which is where this belongs. Instead “The Woman in the House,” and that’s as much of the title as I’m going to spell out from this point on, flirts with outright lunacy but never fully somersaults into it, and that’s a mistake.

RELATED: The cosmic joke’s on her

Bell plays it straight in the opening episodes and escalates the lunacy as the plot progresses, trusting the viewer to find the spoofery in details. But when we meet her character Anna (Kristen Bell) there isn’t much to laugh about. Anna drinks heavily to drown a lasting sorrow that’s frozen her in place. It’s been three years since her husband Douglas (Michael Ealy) left her, and her career as a painter has stalled out. She’s also on heavy doses of Clonazepam, causing her to lose track of time and occasionally hallucinate, as one does in movies like this.

When the handsome Neil (Tom Riley) moves in across the street with his young daughter Emma (Samsara Yett), Anna finds a reason to pull herself out of her funk. But the more she finds out about Neil, the less will she has to resume living. That is, until she witnesses a woman bleed out from her neck while standing in front of Neil’s living room window. Then the nosy neighbor transforms into a citizen detective, bringing trouble on her house and his.

Some of you may have noticed this plot liberally borrows . . . no, straight-up lifts the script from Joe Wright’s 2021 Netflix dud “The Woman in the Window,” which earned its star Amy Adams a nomination for the Alliance of Women Film Journalists’ highly prestigious She Deserves a New Agent Award.

One would think this limited series would look at everything that flop did wrong and go nuts all over it, amplifying its flaws into grand slapstick. Instead it makes other errors, some of which kill its comedy potential.

At this point I’m obligated to drop a spoiler, albeit one that’s revealed minutes into the opening episode, because it deflates a sizeable amount of the comedy that follows.

Early in the premiere we find out that Anna’s grief is weighted with the death of her daughter who, like the little girl across the street, would have been around nine years old. The circumstances of the child’s death are eventually established as being bizarre and farcical, and along with a recurring gag involving the epitaph on her little headstone, it’s all supposed to be hilarious.

But Bell is actually too convincing at playing a damaged woman saddled with dialogue that’s only slightly screwier than what we’d encounter in a Lifetime movie. That means that “The Woman in the Blah Blah” is only as funny as one finds the recurring gag of Bell pouring voluminous glasses of red wine to the brim while believably behaving like a bereaved mother with a drinking problem.

The caricature works as far as one can laugh at her destroying Corningware casserole dishes one after another for the silliest reasons and others larks that only make sense if you’ve ever struggled through the fog of despair.


Want a daily wrap-up of all the news and commentary Salon has to offer? Subscribe to our morning newsletter, Crash Course.


Taken as a whole, these fleeting moments lead to the realization that the series’ creators and the cast have conflated satire with absurdity. The former finds hilarity in hackneyed entertainment genres and worn-out tropes. The latter helps a person make sense of overwhelming sadness, like some down-in-the-dumps guy constantly losing his house key on one terrible day and having people return it to him, only for it to break off in the lock as he’s trying to enter into his apartment. (This device was recently used in a critically acclaimed TV show, by the way.)

But straight-faced spoofs blunt the impact of such subtleties, souring what should be jokes into examples of bad form that rely too heavily on the viewer to search for laughs the joke-tellers swear are right in front of us, thus defeating the show’s effectiveness as a work of satire.

There’s the natural compulsion to find something positive in a project that should have been a slam dunk for Bell, an actor most people deeply enjoy. The best that can be said about “The Woman in the House” is that it is equal in heft and worth to your average women-in-peril cable movie. But if you expect more from Bell and everyone else in the cast, its shortcomings just kill it for us.

“The Woman in the House Across the Street From the Girl in the Window” streams on Netflix on Friday, Jan. 28. Watch the trailer for it below, via YouTube.

https://youtu.be/fuUZCoyoHo4

More stories like this:

NRA board member subpoenaed by Jan. 6 committee over role in fake Trump elector scheme

The latest round of subpoenas issued by the Jan. 6 committee targeted 14 people accused of submitting falsified Electoral College paperwork across seven states — part of an ultimately unsuccessful attempt to subvert 2020 election results and have former President Donald Trump declared the victor in states won by current President Joe Biden.

“The select committee is seeking information about attempts in multiple states to overturn the results of the 2020 election, including the planning and coordination of efforts to send false slates of electors to the National Archives,” the committee’s chairman, Rep. Bennie Thompson, D-Miss., said in a statement. “We believe the individuals we have subpoenaed today have information about how these so-called alternate electors met and who was behind that scheme.”

According to The New York Times, the 14 people subpoenaed were: “Nancy Cottle and Loraine B. Pellegrino of Arizona; David Shafer and Shawn Still of Georgia; Kathy Berden and Mayra Rodriguez of Michigan; Jewll Powdrell and Deborah W. Maestas of New Mexico; Michael J. McDonald and James DeGraffenreid of Nevada; Bill Bachenberg and Lisa Patton of Pennsylvania; and Andrew Hitt and Kelly Ruh of Wisconsin.”

One name in particular sticks out from the list — Bill Bachenberg, who has been on the National Rifle Association’s Board of Directors since 2005, according to his LinkedIn page and leaked 2018 election results viewed by Salon. Bachenberg did not immediately return a request for comment.


Want a daily wrap-up of all the news and commentary Salon has to offer? Subscribe to our morning newsletter, Crash Course.


Bachenberg has a documented history with TrumpWorld — he reportedly hosted Trump’s son, Donald Trump Jr., at a skeet shooting range he owns in Pennsylvania, and served as co-chair of an official campaign group called Sportsmen for Trump.

He also went viral during the 2020 presidential campaign for laughing along with audience members while speaking at an official Trump fundraiser as they suggested shooting Texas Democrat Beto O’Rourke, who campaigned for his party’s 2020 nomination with a strong stance on gun control.

The NRA’s unusually large board of directors — according to an investigation from Mother Jones in 2013 there were upwards of 76 members elected via a “hush-hush” process — has come under increasing scrutiny in recent years. One board member, Roscoe “Rocky” Marshall, alleged in a lawsuit last year that the board acted as a “rubber stamp” for longtime NRA leader Wayne LaPierre and resisted calls for independent probes into his misuse of organizational funds.

Another director’s name was found on the leaked membership rolls of right-wing militia group the Oath Keepers, who saw 11 members and its longtime leader, Stewart Rhodes, charged with seditious conspiracy earlier this month for their role in the attempted Jan. 6 insurrection. 

RELATED: National Archives: Trump allies caught using forged documents to overturn 2020 election

Given this history, a representative for prominent gun control group Everytown for Gun Safety said the revelation that an NRA board member may have been involved in efforts to subvert the 2020 election “both deeply concerning and unsurprising.”

“For decades the NRA has peddled the conspiracy theories and lies that fuel the far-right, so it’s both deeply concerning and unsurprising that one of their board members is believed to be connected to efforts to overturn the results of the 2020 election,” Justin Wagner, senior director of investigations for the nonprofit, said. “The kind of fear mongering and lies the gun lobby has spread have been the underpinnings for the resurgence of the far-right in recent years, and the dangerous policies the gun lobby pushes allow extremists to arm themselves.”

At least one former White House aide, Boris Epshteyn, admitted to organizing the fake elector campaign on national TV last week, telling MSNBC, “Yes, I was part of the process to make sure there were alternate electors” — though he insisted that “everything that was done was done legally.”

Multiple reports also suggested that former Trump attorney Rudy Guiliani oversaw the efforts — a revelation that means Trump’s inner circle was at least aware of the potentially illegal effort.

Attorneys General in at least two states have already referred investigations to the Department of Justice for criminal prosecution — an effort that legal experts predict is likely to expand in the coming weeks. 

Michigan Attorney General Dana Nessel, a Democrat who has been especially critical of the plot, has said she believes the people who participated in the plot violated both state and federal laws through their efforts.

Read more stories like this:

6 of our coziest soup recipes to keep you warm

I’m a year-round soup enthusiast, but my desire for endless bowls of all things warm and comforting really kicks into overdrive during the winter months. Thankfully, Salon Food has a rich archive of soup recipes from which to draw inspiration. From small hacks to amp up existing classics to unique combinations of flavors, there is — to bastardize the iconic “Seinfeld” line — a soup for you.


Want more great food writing and recipes? Subscribe to Salon Food’s newsletter.


1 Cheesy, no-tear French onion soup

“Lately, I’ve been craving a little piece of Paris — or at least of midtown Manhattan, anyway — in my own kitchen,” writes Salon’s Mary Elizabeth Williams in her latest Quick & Dirty column. “By cobbling together a frankensoup that relies on the easiest and fastest tips I could find, I wound up with a cozy dish of cheese and onions sans the watery eyes.” 

Come for the immensely comforting soup that’s ready in less than 30 minutes, stay for the unexpected trick that prevents your eyes from watering when chopping the requisite onions. 

2 Chicken stew with schmaltzy croutons

As I wrote, this soup recipe was born out of my enduring pandemic-era fantasy of picking up and moving to a spooky cottage in some potentially haunted forest. I wanted something that was appropriately woodsy and earthy, hence the inclusion of wild mushrooms and anise-flavored tarragon. To top it off, toast up some hunks of bread in schmaltz, or rendered chicken fat. You’ll never go back to saltines again.

3 The herbiest bean soup

While I often love the meditative experience that is a day-long cooking project, sometimes you just want lunch on the table in five minutes. Instead of reaching for wilted lettuce and cold cuts to make a sandwich — which doesn’t exactly scream “cozy” — combine canned beans and good stock with a secret ingredient to make a gorgeous soup packed with flavor and greens.

4 Chicken soup with gnocchi

If chicken soup in its many forms is on repeat in your home this winter — as it is in mine — consider swapping out the noodles or rice for pillowy-soft gnocchi. This recipe keeps much of the classic chicken noodle soup flavors, including a pop of color and sweetness from sliced carrots. However, it upgrades the basic egg noodles to Italian potato dumplings.

5 Tomato basil soup

This recipe for tomato basil soup, which cooks in 25 minutes, comes from Barbara Kuhns, Millersburg, Ohio. It was published in “Super Easy Soups and Stews: 100 Soups, Stews, Broths, Chilis, Chowders, and More!” by Abigail Gehring.

Start by melting an entire stick of salted butter in your soup pot, and don’t forget to freeze an extra batch for a cold day.

6 Flavorful tortilla soup

While “Latin Superfoods” cookbook author Leticia Moreinos Schwartz usually keeps this flavorful tortilla on the simpler side with garnishes like shredded chicken, queso-blanco, cilantro and tortillas, she encourages cooks to “go crazy with all of the extra stuff you can put in the soup: avocados, sour cream, or more cheese.”

“You can serve the side dishes in small bowls and people can add whatever they want to the soup,” she writes. “It’s a fun dish to eat!”

More great stories about soup: 

Salon Food writes about stuff we think you’ll like. Salon has affiliate partnerships, so we may get a share of the revenue from your purchase.

“Clean” star Adrien Brody talks “Succession” & daily injustice: “There is a lot to be angry about”

Adrien Brody has a great hangdog expression and it seen throughout “Clean,” an intense revenge drama that he cowrote. The Oscar-winning actor stars as the title character in this flinty character study about a garbage man who is seeking redemption and salvation. Clean is “working on” being good; his past — which he “can’t wash away” — is revealed over the course of this story. The film takes an interesting turn as Clean’s efforts to protect his teenage neighbor, Diandra (Chandler DuPont), lead him down a violent path. Clean also crosses paths with Michael (Glenn Fleshler), a drug kingpin, whose troubled son Mikey (Richie Merritt) knows Diandra. 

The gritty film is a passion project for the actor, who also produced and even composed the music and score. It is a change of pace from his recent deadpan work as an art dealer in “The French Dispatch,” or as Josh Aaronson, a potential investor in the hit HBO series “Succession.” “Clean” allows Brody to go deep and burrow into a character who can fix an Electrolux vacuum, with the same dexterity he employs to build a powerful shotgun. Brody’s appearance looks as haunted as Clean is, and yet he is extremely protective of Diandra who gets in a series of dangerous situations. 

RELATED: Treated like trash: An immigrant meets a terrible end in the Bronx

The actor spoke with Salon about “Clean” and creating its title character as well as the film’s music.

“Clean” is a passion project for you. How did you develop the character? He has interesting physicality and psychology. 

I have been wanting to make a film of this nature for many, many years. I love the genre, and I love many aspects of that type of filmmaking. I really wanted to incorporate a real flawed human being at the core of that. Personally, as an actor, I find it is challenging to find the two merged together — you can find a wonderful character piece and you can find a great action role — and I wanted to create that connection between the two and give audiences something meaningful and artistic and relevant to all that is wrong in our society that isn’t superficially a revenge story. It is about a man who has failed essentially, and in spite of those failures has persevered and managed to help a younger person, and society as a whole, defend themselves against oppressive forces that bring us all down. It was a wonderful, creative endeavor for me. I’ve been acting for a lifetime and worked with wonderful filmmakers. I have collaborated in writing, but never have I brought something to fruition that stemmed from an idea of mine. It is ultimately an amalgamation of many things in my life and encounters — things I witnessed growing up in Queens, New York, and films that have influenced me, and filmmakers who have influenced me, and actors and people that I admire. Music influences. It’s a remarkable thing to weave them together and share that with people. It’s been a long time coming and I’m excited to share that in a theatrical release amidst this difficult time we’re all facing.

I like that Clean’s kindness is matched by his capacity for violence. He is both hero and antihero, a victim and a vigilante. What can you say about the film’s ideas of his recovery, feeling “stained” and “dirty,” as well as how one character suggests Clean is a “good man”?

No one is all good or all bad. No one. Real heroes are people who in spite of all they that have done wrong, and all of their failures — or feelings of failure or low self-esteem or regret — are able to surmount those feelings and do good and contribute to good in the world. All that Clean is struggling with — he’s in recovery not for past drug use, but to quell this violence within him, He finds purpose with that, and in a way, he is fighting fire with fire.


Want a daily wrap-up of all the news and commentary Salon has to offer? Subscribe to our morning newsletter, Crash Course.


You dedicate “Clean” to your father, and you have previously told me “having a positive father figure is crucial for our development.” Clean is a kindly father figure for Diandra whereas Michael is an imposing father towards his son. I know your father was an inspiration for you. What observations do you have about fatherhood

Well, I wouldn’t be here, and I have the ability to represent all of the things I tried to care for in this world without the thoughtfulness of my own father, and his awareness of the world around him and imparting that sensitivity in me. I did grow up in a rough environment and many of my friends who were wonderful and creative were unable to pursue their calling or their dreams partially because it is just so challenging. Having the support of my mother and my father has given me firm footing. It’s not something I take lightly, and I try to honor that gratitude every day and do my best. Again, it’s about doing what you can and with the means you have. That’s what Clean really became aware of later in life through his failings. He just worked towards being a better man. 

What can you say about your own evolution as a man? Ten years ago, you told me of your efforts to step outside yourself and address pressures, to adapt and accept things “the conflict within us is resistance.” The world has changed considerably since then, with the #MeToo and Black Lives Matter movements. What observations do you have about responsibility and despair? 

I think we are all able to see that there is a new level of despair that has permeated with multiple factors — COVID, and us as a nation witnessing how injustice is still prevalent. Part of the storytelling of this film is to represent injustice and it is something I struggle with daily. There is a lot of inequality in this world and that effects every race and every people. We have to work together to surmount that. 

You just talked about inequality and that makes me want to ask you about “Succession” and if you anticipate a return to that show? Viewers seemed to demand more of you.

Brian Cox, Adrien Brody and Jeremy Strong in “Succession” (Macall B. Polay/ HBO )

[Laughs] Everything that is wrong with America is represented in that show! [Laughs] That was a whole different turn. That’s the beauty of being an actor, you get to explore so much and be able to play people from all walks of life and see different perspectives. I feel blessed to be able to understand that.  

You lean towards playing intense characters. I think of your role as a substitute teacher in “Detachment,” as well as, of course, your work in “The Pianist,” among other films. Clean tamps down his emotions, but we can feel, from your performance, the rage simmering underneath his poker face. Can you talk about why you gravitate toward dark roles?

[Laughs] Most actors are probably pretty complicated people. [Laughs] I’m grateful to have the ability to [act]; I’m drawn to understanding. I strive to understand ambivalence about things and there is a lot to be angry about, and a lot of moments of isolation, and those are common feelings for many of us. Those characters are the most interesting to me, frankly. Someone who is flawed and real. “Detachment” is a similar story in many ways. He’s a guy who deals with great turmoil internally, lots of trauma and things that are keeping him back, and yet in spite of that, he manages to lift up these children and give them a sense of hope and a sense of self-awareness of where they are in society and the importance of education and not let forces further oppress them. They have to have a presence of mind and body and gain self-esteem through the work and become their own leaders. They are going to be our leaders. That’s all meaningful.

What prompted you to create the music for this film? Was that part of creating the film’s vibe? How did that help you flex your creative muscle? 

I didn’t intend to initially. I did a film many years ago before “The Pianist” where I was going to score the film. I have been making music since I was 19. I haven’t done anything with it cohesively. I make beats, I sequence music, and I compose with digital music making equipment and it’s a collage of sounds. What I understand about myself and the music that comes out of me is a similar melancholy longing as some of the characters I gravitate towards. As I was filming, I would come home and as a meditation, I would make music, and that haunted yet driving rhythmic structure is within me and my work. I’m a painter as well. It’s in my artwork. It felt very right emotionally, and it felt like it would enhance the storytelling. So, I came up with a theme for “Clean” and started making moments and feelings and ultimately felt that this was the perfect opportunity for my music.

It was amazing thing to collaborate with an orchestra and have someone playing French horns over a synth horn that I constructed a melody, and have it come to life being mixed and mastered. I created not only this cohesive, elaborate piece of music but also a soundscape that further tells the story of this cacophony of oppressiveness that is everywhere — sirens and the fighting outside your door, and urban life and the pressures of that on people. I grew up in that, so I was able to weave that in in a very authentic manner. I didn’t want to turn that over to someone else. That’s why I handled that. It was very exciting, and it was a real breakthrough for me. I’m very proud of the project as a whole as a creative endeavor and I am excited to share music after all these years.

“Clean” is in theaters and VOD on Friday, Jan. 28. Watch a trailer for it below, via YouTube.

More stories you might like: 

Republicans in TrumpWorld try to draft Kid Rock for Tennessee Congressional run

Conservatives in Tennessee are reportedly encouraging Kid Rock to run for Congress. According to a new report published by Politico, “some MAGA members of Congress” are working to recruit the rapper and country music star to enter Tennessee’s 5th Congressional District.

However, Kid Rock has yet to reveal if he’d even consider such an offer. The latest follows the release of Kid Rock’s politically charged new song, titled “We the People,” which takes aim at President Joe Biden and the nation’s top infectious disease expert, Dr. Anthony Fauci.


Want a daily wrap-up of all the news and commentary Salon has to offer? Subscribe to our morning newsletter, Crash Course.


After the song was released, Kid Rock took to Instagram with details about former President Donald Trump’s reaction to it. With a photo of the cover art for the new single, Kid Rock said, “I just got off the phone with our 45th President (hopefully 47th) and he expressed how proud of me he was over “We The People” being the #1 song on Itunes! Suck on that you trolls, critics and haters! Thank you to all the fans, I can’t wait to see you on tour! Pedal to the fuckin’ metal, LET’S GO!!”

https://www.instagram.com/p/CZNeinpv3Ac/

Despite Kid Rock’s latest political songs, he previously confirmed that he had no intent to run for public office. Speaking to Howard Stern back in 2017, Kid Rock made it abundantly clear that he had no interest in politics.

“Fuck no, I’m not running for Senate, are you kidding me?” Rock told Stern at the time. “Who couldn’t figure that out? I’m releasing a new album. I’m going on tour, too. Are you f***ing s***ting me?”

 

D.C.’s Union Station “covered end to end” with swastikas

One day after Holocaust Remembrance Day, multiple people posted photos to social media showing swastikas scrawled on Washington, DC’s iconic Union Station.

“There are hand-drawn swastikas all over the entrance to Union Station in DC. Almost every column,” reported CBS News White correspondent Bo Erickson.


Want a daily wrap-up of all the news and commentary Salon has to offer? Subscribe to our morning newsletter, Crash Course.


He posted four photos showing swastikas drawn on the building’s stone exterior.

Erickson was not the only person to post photos of swastikas at the station, which is a major transportation hub serving DC’s Metro system, commuter rail, Metrobus, and is the souther terminus of Amtrak’s Acela corridor.

Here are other images of the station posted to Twitter:

Jan. 6 committee says Mark Meadows’ “hokey pokey” has slowed down plan for primetime hearings

The Jan. 6 committee’s plans to hold primetime hearings has been slowed down significantly by stonewalling efforts from former President Donald Trump’s inner circle, Rep. Jamie Raskin, one of the committee’s members, told Salon this week.

In particular, Mark Meadows’ game of “hokey pokey” has vexed the panel, which has subsequently been forced to push back its planned public testimony to April or May.

“Well, you know, I’d hoped it would happen in March,” Raskin said on the video interview series “Salon Talks,” adding that he hopes the hearings will now be held “later in the spring, April or May more likely.”

Meadows initially cooperated with the committee’s requests but then quickly changed his mind, turning over thousands of documents before refusing to sit for a deposition. These included a number of bombshell texts and emails, as well as a 38-page powerpoint titled “Election Fraud, Foreign Interference & Options for 6 JAN” that was reportedly shopped around Capitol Hill in the days before the attempted insurrection.

The plot included plans to declare a national emergency in order to delay the certification of the 2020 election and the outlines of a wild conspiracy that the country of Venezuela had taken over voting machines in a large number of important states, among other debunked and unverifiable allegations.

Raskin lamented “the obstruction and roadblocks thrown up by the entourage right around Donald Trump — Mark Meadows, who’s kind of doing the hokey pokey, one foot in, one foot out — Steve Bannon, Roger Stone.”

“It’s only when you get right to that kind of bullseye core right around Donald Trump and his inner most confidants that people think they’re somehow above the law and can just give the finger to the U.S. Congress.”


Want a daily wrap-up of all the news and commentary Salon has to offer? Subscribe to our morning newsletter, Crash Course.


Still, despite the confounding efforts of Trump’s inner circle, the Maryland Democrat believes “these could be the most important hearings in American history.”

“I mean, certainly up there with the Watergate hearings,” he added. 

The comparison is especially apt given Raskin’s hopes that the committee will format the hearings as an every-day-for-however-long-it-takes phenomenon, similar to the those conducted in the wake of Watergate.

“I hope we will see them every single day so we can tell a complete story to the American people about how this took place,” he said. “It’s obviously enormously complex, but people are following it closely.”

The committee has been ramping up over the past few weeks to take its findings public, hoping to put the finishing touches on its findings by inching its way toward Trump’s inner circle in recent days. The panel has conducted hundreds of interviews — upwards of 300, according to some news reports — and collected tens of thousands of documents, all while traveling extensively to battleground states where TrumpWorld’s efforts to subvert the election were focused.

RELATED: Democrats quietly consider using 14th Amendment to prevent Trump from running for office in 2024

“The full picture is coming to light, despite President Trump’s ongoing efforts to hide the picture,” Rep. Liz Cheney, the committee’s vice chairwoman and one of its two Republican members, told the Associated Press earlier this month.

“I don’t think there’s any area of this broader history in which we aren’t learning new things,” she added.

But there’s one important factor weighing on the panel’s timeline: Republicans will likely disband the effort should they re-take the House this fall.

The panel apparently hopes to have a completed report by this summer — but as with all predictions, that timeline is subject to change. And, given TrumpWorld’s successful effort to push back the committee’s timeline, it also appears that strategy is not likely to change anytime soon. 

Read more stories like this:

Nurses are suffering physical ailments as they fight COVID-19 for the rest of us

The nurse was twisting her hair and pulling it out.

She had three patients, June Brown recalled, and was running back and forth so she could give the best possible care to each one of them. This patient load would have been unimaginable except in the most extreme crises prior to the COVID-19 pandemic; they have become all too common since March 2020.

“She would stop at the desk and would hold her hair and spin it and pull her hair,” Brown, a registered nurse (RN) in the Covid ICU at Osceola Regional Hospital, told Salon. “That’s physical. That’s painful. I would say, ‘Listen, stop, stop. Just sit down, breathe in, breathe out.’ So that she can get her anxiety level down.”

Brown is hardly alone in observing the devastating toll of the COVID-19 pandemic on American healthcare workers. Through many interviews, frontline employees and those who represent them sent the same message to Salon: healthcare professionals are suffering because there are too few personnel and too many patients. Yet because anxiety and work stress often manifest with physical symptoms, theirs is not merely a professional hardship; it is a genuine threat to their personal health.

Zenei Triunfo-Cortez, RN and a president of National Nurses United, described the degree of physically exhaustion: “Day in, day out, you go through your shift not knowing whether you’ll get a bio break, if you’ll be able to get a bio break.”

Traditionally nurses in an intensive care unit (ICU) will have no more than one patient, two if necessary. When you have more patients than that, the quality of care declines — and the workers themselves suffer for it. Falguni Dave, an RN at John H. Stroger, Jr. Hospital of Cook County, elaborate on how nurses accidentally hurt themselves because they are spread too thin with such an overwhelming case load.

“Nurses are ending up being injured because they’re working short,” Dave explained. “When it comes to doing patient care, you have to turn the patient. These patients are most of the time very heavy, obese patients that end up in the ICU intubated, and it takes a team to do their care. When you don’t have that and you work short, you’re risking injuring your joints, your back, whatever, because you’re putting all that weight onto one person, versus maybe two or three that could help you do that.”

RELATED: Eight months into the pandemic, nurses say they still aren’t getting the safety equipment they need

Brown, the Osceola nurse who tried to talk down her colleague down as she pulled out her hair, grappled with an unexpected affliction of her own.

“For me, I broke out in a rash,” Brown told Salon. “I didn’t tell people this because it’s personal, but I don’t care about saying it now because it’s the truth. When my anxiety — and I noticed this from last year — when my anxiety gets bad, because I’m very repressive, I repress my feeling. I got so good at it that it shows up in a rash, breaking out on my skin. So I have to take care of that.”

A midwife in northeastern Pennsylvania, who asked to remain anonymous, spoke of the exhaustion that comes from being expected to put in so many hours. Her social life has become anemic and her body copes with ailment after ailment.

“The additional stress of working in this pandemic has significantly impacted my health,” the midwife told Salon. “My blood pressure and weight have increased due to the increased cortisol produced from chronic stress.”


Want more health and science stories in your inbox? Subscribe to Salon’s weekly newsletter The Vulgar Scientist.


The underlying problem, individuals who spoke to Salon agreed, is that hospital administrators focus on turning a profit rather than providing the best environment for staff and patients. If they can make more money by overworking the nurses and others at the COVID-19 frontline, they will choose to do so — at least, that is the way the nurses Salon spoke to overwhelmingly perceive the situation.

Kate Hanselman is a lead nurse practitioner and psychiatric mental health nurse practitioner at Thriveworks in West Hartford, Connecticut. Speaking to Salon, she described how nurses struggle to address work-related health issues because of the work culture that exists in America’s healthcare system.

“I work with a number of nurses as patients of mine, which is always heartening to me because it’s hard to ask for help, and especially in healthcare that can be very highly stigmatized,” Hanselman told Salon. A big problem is burnout due to structural and environmental issues that preceded the pandemic, but were exacerbated by it. This is “a system that was already stressed with nurses that were already burned out,” Hanselman said. There already was a nursing shortage before the pandemic “took everybody by surprise. The health systems were not prepared for it. Obviously it had a huge impact.”

Worse, nurses are encouraged to shoulder those burdens stoically.

“If burnout is a problem that a nurse has when they hit a threshold, then all of the responsibility and the onus is on that nurse to get better, to take better care of themselves,” Hanselman explained. “In reality, nurses are burning out because health systems are strapped and there are not enough people there, and they’re terrified to go to work.”

Brown admitted to Salon that she had thought of herself as “a very strong person” who did not need help from others in terms of mental health. Last April, however, she decided that she needed to see a counselor because the impact of seeing three or four deaths every day was taking too much of a toll on her overall health.

“It begins to affect your heart,” Brown recalled. “It begins to affect your level of anxiety. I never suffer from anxiety, but when I hear a ‘Code Blue’ overhead, my heart jumped. My body jumped. I’d shake like, ‘My God. I don’t even have a bed to put that patient in. There’s no bed in the ICU before.’ And the next thought is that person may not live because there is no bed to put them in. There is no critical care nurse to care for them.”

Nurses and other health care workers have been vocal in expressing their distress. They held a strike in June at the John H. Stroger, Jr. Hospital in Cook County, where Falguni Dave works, and in the following month a contract was ratified in which the facility agreed to hire 300 more registered nurses over the next 18 months. At the Osceola Regional Medical Center, where June Brown works, nurses participated in the National Nurses United National Day of Action earlier this month to demand safe staffing. There are a great many reforms that need to be made, the professional who spoke to Salon all said, but none were emphasized as much as hiring more people.

“A nurse should have one to two ICU patients because of the level of care you have to give,” Brown reminded Salon. “You’re constantly giving and changing medications. You’re constantly assessing your patients’ response to medications. So this is an ongoing frequent thing that you must do to ensure the patient is responding appropriately and not adversely.”

More on healthcare workers during the COVID-19 pandemic:

The critics were right: “Critical race theory” panic is just a cover for silencing educators

When Republicans across the nation started storming school board meetings, in full-blown hysterics about something called “critical race theory,” the initial reaction of the non-Fox News-watcher was confusion. Very few even know what critical race theory is. It is not being taught to the vast majority of public school children, as it’s a high level academic theory used by legal scholars and sociologists, not 8th graders. But soon it became clear that “critical race theory” was being invoked as a scare term, exploiting this multisyllabic academic jargon as cover for what was, in actuality, an effort to censor any curricula or educational materials that taught kids unpleasant truths about the history of fascism, the struggle for civil rights, or the existence of LGBTQ people. 

Republicans, unsurprisingly, faked umbrage at this claim, insisting repeatedly that they had no intention of removing standard classroom lessons on matters like the Holocaust, Brown vs. the Board of Education, or the March on Washington. Instead, their talking points were a jumbled, bad faith explosion of claims that they were actually against racism and just worried about “divisive” lessons. They kept this patter of nonsense up, even as Virginia’s successful GOP gubernatorial candidate Glenn Youngkin ran ads celebrating a right-wing mother who tried to keep her son from reading “Beloved” by Nobel Prize winner Toni Morrison, a book that was clearly only objectionable because it portrayed slavery in a bad light. 

RELATED: Florida school district cancels real history as anti-CRT censorship spreads

It turns out that liberal critics were right and conservatives were lying. “Critical race theory” was, in fact, just a scare term the right was using as cover for what is an all-out, nationwide war on teaching very basic lessons to kids about important historical events — including the civil rights movement and the Holocaust. 


Want more Amanda Marcotte on politics? Subscribe to her newsletter Standing Room Only.


A national scandal erupted this week when it was discovered that a Tennessee school board pulled the famous graphic novel “Maus,” by Art Spiegelman, from their curriculum. The book is rightly regarded as a classic for its depiction not just of the brutalities of the Holocaust, but the lingering impacts on the survivors and their families. In response to the criticism, right-wing activist Christopher Rufo — who has bragged about inventing the use of “critical race theory” as a scare term for exactly this purpose — tried to deny that the book was being yanked for Holocaust denialism reasons. He insisted they just wanted a “better book” to teach. 

Rufo’s dishonesty should be apparent to anyone who has read “Maus,” as there really is no better book to teach. But reading the minutes of the meeting erases all doubt that the objections to the book were rooted in a belief that the truth of the Holocaust should remain hidden. One board member, Tony Allman, explicitly said educators “don’t need to enable or somewhat promote this stuff,” because it “shows people hanging, it shows them killing kids,” and “it is not wise or healthy.” Another member complained that the book showed a suicide caused by survivor’s guilt, claiming it somehow undermined efforts to teach “ethics to our kids.” 

Needless to say, “Maus” does not “promote” killing kids or suicide. Insofar as it “promotes” anything, it’s an understanding of the dangers of fascism, and the inhumanity that racism breeds. And it’s those truths that clearly rattled the school board members. That’s what they don’t want young people exposed to. 

RELATED: Meet Christopher Rufo — leader of the incoherent right-wing attack on “critical race theory”

The “Maus” scandal is just the tip of the iceberg, of course.

In Florida, the legislature is pushing through a ban of history education that causes “discomfort,” and despite claims to the contrary, there’s simply no way to teach about the history of lynching or slavery or Jim Crow without said discomfort. As Kathryn Joyce reported for Salon, one of the most immediate results was a school district in central Florida canceling a training seminar for teachers on how to teach subjects such as the March on Washington, Brown v. Board of Education, and the Montgomery bus boycott. 

The behavior of Florida’s Republican governor, Ron DeSantis, makes quite clear that the intent here is to make it too fraught for teachers to discuss any history of race in America at all. He’s been pushing for a law that would allow parents to comb over school curricula and sue school districts if they find anything they don’t like. That may sound “empowering” initially, but, as the fight over “Maus” demonstrates, the reality is that there are always people out there who simply don’t think any unpleasant facts about history should be taught. And giving parents this level of veto power would mean erasing any history but the occasional lesson about George Washington and the cherry tree. (Which didn’t actually happen.) 


Want more Amanda Marcotte on politics? Subscribe to her newsletter Standing Room Only.


As Jon Skolnik reports for Salon, a Missouri school district banned “The Bluest Eye” by Toni Morrison, using the usual bad faith claims that the objections were somehow about graphic sex. But, of course, this fits the larger pattern of white parents throwing fits about books and lessons that tell the truth about racism, and especially about books like Morrison’s, which humanize the victims of racism. 

In Williamson County, Tennessee, Moms for Liberty — a laughably false name for this pro-censorship group — tried to ban 31 books. It’s not hard to detect the history they’re trying to erase. Books that were targeted include “Martin Luther King, Jr. and the March on Washington,” “We Are the Ship: The Story of Negro League Baseball,” and “Separate Is Never Equal: Sylvia Mendez and Her Family’s Fight for Desegregation.” A couple of books about Greek mythology were also tossed on the list because heaven forbid kids learn about lost religions and start to ask hard questions about existing ones. Of the challenged books, one was outright banned — Newberry winner “Walk Two Moons,” which clearly offends by humanizing Native Americans. Seven other books are being hobbled with “restrictions” on what parts of the book kids are allowed to read. Targeted for censorship: Admitting that male seahorses nurture their young, a book that says it’s okay to have feelings, a book about the fight to desegregate schools, a book about how it’s okay for boys to like poetry, and a book that features interracial relationships. 

RELATED: Why the panic over “critical race theory” is the perfect right-wing troll

So now the truth is out: Republicans weren’t upset about “critical race theory” or anything like it. It was a fake panic, propped up to cover for what they really want to do: Erase the history of racism from schools. As a side bonus, they also wish to force extremely rigid gender roles on children. It’s not just about attacking LGBTQ kids. This hysteria has reached the point of refusing to admit boys can like poetry or that fathers can care for babies. 

Still, this exposure isn’t slowing Republicans down one bit.

Youngkin, who won by pretending to be a moderate who was opposed to fictional leftist extremism, is already showing his true colors as a Virginia governor. He’s calling on right-wing parents to report teachers for any lessons they deem “divisive.” As these previous reports show, that’s an expansive ask, as many parents clearly think it’s “divisive” to admit segregation happened, slavery was real, or the Holocaust was horrific. Youngkin’s intent is quite clearly to scare teachers into simply not teaching history, at least not in any way that’s truthful or remotely educational. Or to scare teachers into not teaching literature that humanizes people of color or LGBTQ people, or men who like poetry for that matter. As usual, despite their denials, Republicans really are behaving like the deplorables their critics say they are

95-year-old WWII vet says mail ballot application denied twice under new Texas voting law

A Texas World War II veteran has said his mail-in ballot application was rejected twice due to new Republican voting restrictions, according to KPRC-TV in Houston.

Kenneth Thompson, 95, told the outlet that he fears the new Republican voting law, SB 1, could prevent him from voting for the first time in his life.

“I’ve been voting many, many years and I’ve never missed a vote,” Thompson told the station, recalling paying a poll tax to vote in the 1950s.

The new Texas law, which includes numerous restrictions on ballot access, requires voters to submit their driver’s license number or a partial Social Security number, which election clerks then have to match to their voter registration. But more than 100,000 voters in the state do not have either number on file, and more than 700,000 do not have at least one of the numbers on file, according to the Texas secretary of state’s office.

“He registered to vote in the 1940s and they didn’t require that,” Thompson’s daughter, Delinda Holland, told KPRC.

Thompson said his application was denied twice because of the new requirement but Harris County election officials did not notify him of the rejection until he called to inquire both times.

“There’s gonna be a lot of people not gonna vote,” he told the outlet. “If I hadn’t have called in about mine, people wouldn’t have known.”

RELATED: Voter suppression in action: Mail-in ballot rejections many times higher under new Texas law

Holland tried to contact the county and the secretary of state’s office to add the data to his voter registration online only to discover there is no way to do that. Texas is one of about a dozen states that do not offer online voter registration.

“We know it’s a new law, we’re happy to correct it,” Holland told KPRC. “He’s a law-abiding citizen. He doesn’t want to miss voting, and yet, there’s no mechanism to add that driver’s license to your record.”

The report drew condemnation from veterans’ groups and voting rights advocates.

“This is reprehensible and unacceptable,” the progressive veterans’ group Vote Vets said on Twitter. “Texas has prevented a WWII Veteran from casting a ballot in the nation he proudly served.”

Thompson said he may be able to go vote in person in the state’s March primaries but worries that other voters will be denied the ability to vote.

“I can get out and move around and go to a regular polling place, but these people, lots of people just can’t,” he told KPRC.

State Rep. Gene Wu, a Democrat who has accused Republicans of voter suppression, argued that Thompson’s rejection shows that the Texas Republican strategy is “working EXACTLY as designed and intended.”


Want a daily wrap-up of all the news and commentary Salon has to offer? Subscribe to our morning newsletter, Crash Course.


Thompson is one of many Texans facing new challenges just to be able to cast his ballot. Some counties have been forced to reject up to seven times as many mail-in ballot applications as they did previously, as a result of the new requirements.

“In Harris County,” tweeted Harris County Judge Lina Hidalgo, “percentage-wise we’re rejecting 7 times more mail ballot apps than before, because of new TX voter suppression laws that create a maze of technicalities.”

The problems have been compounded by another provision in SB 1 banning election officials from sending unsolicited mail-in ballot applications. As a result, some voters’ requests have been rejected because they used dated forms that do not include new fields required by the law. In other cases, voters simply did not include the information because they were not aware it was necessary.

Many local election workers themselves are still unsure about the new rules, according to the Texas Tribune, and say that the secretary of state’s office has not been helpful.

The secretary of state’s office told the outlet it has been working to backfill its records to include both driver’s license and Social Security numbers and some election officials were unaware that updated data had been added to the state database.

 “There were several large counties that are offline that were not aware that they’d have to go beyond their internal systems, and I’m one of them,” Williamson County elections administrator Chris Davis told the Tribune.

Texas Gov. Greg Abbott’s office this week tried to pin the blame on election officials, accusing them of rejecting “valid” applications because of the miscommunication and accusing election administrators of spreading “misinformation.”

But election officials told the Tribune that the problems were foreseeable long before the public dispute that emerged this month. Voting rights advocates say Texas Republican lawmakers bear “the responsibility to foresee problems in the implementation of a law.”

“They are now reaping what they’ve sown,” James Slattery, a senior staff attorney with the Texas Civil Rights Project, told the Tribune. “Though I should say it’s really the voter reaping what they’ve sown, which is the tragedy of all this. At the moment, it’s the voters that are facing the consequences.”

Read more on the voter-suppression campaign: